10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-4879
Diebold, Incorporated
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
34-0183970 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
|
|
|
5995 Mayfair Road, PO Box 3077, North Canton, Ohio
|
|
44720-8077 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (330) 490-4000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date. Common Stock, $1.25 Par Value 66,100,607 shares as of October 31, 2008
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
212,784 |
|
|
$ |
206,334 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
117,467 |
|
|
|
104,976 |
|
Trade receivables, less allowances of doubtful accounts of $27,330 and $33,707, respectively |
|
|
591,162 |
|
|
|
544,501 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
571,684 |
|
|
|
533,619 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
79,606 |
|
|
|
80,443 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
49,846 |
|
|
|
46,347 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
144,328 |
|
|
|
114,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,766,877 |
|
|
|
1,630,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities and other investments |
|
|
80,618 |
|
|
|
75,227 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
584,010 |
|
|
|
575,796 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
378,199 |
|
|
|
355,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
205,811 |
|
|
|
220,056 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
449,596 |
|
|
|
465,484 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
235,936 |
|
|
|
239,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,738,838 |
|
|
$ |
2,631,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
$ |
12,743 |
|
|
$ |
14,807 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
197,008 |
|
|
|
170,632 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
238,295 |
|
|
|
301,248 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
327,537 |
|
|
|
263,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
775,583 |
|
|
|
750,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable long term |
|
|
683,959 |
|
|
|
609,264 |
|
Pensions and other benefits |
|
|
37,013 |
|
|
|
36,708 |
|
Postretirement and other benefits |
|
|
35,402 |
|
|
|
29,417 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
36,846 |
|
|
|
39,393 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
29,764 |
|
|
|
37,115 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
20,659 |
|
|
|
13,757 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares, no par value, authorized 1,000,000 shares, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, $1.25 par value per share, authorized 125,000,000 shares,
issued 75,792,982 and 75,579,237, shares, respectively, outstanding
66,100,607 and 65,965,749 shares, respectively |
|
|
94,741 |
|
|
|
94,474 |
|
Additional capital |
|
|
276,856 |
|
|
|
261,364 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,070,462 |
|
|
|
1,036,824 |
|
Treasury shares, at cost (9,692,375 and 9,613,488 shares, respectively) |
|
|
(408,358 |
) |
|
|
(406,182 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
85,911 |
|
|
|
128,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
1,119,612 |
|
|
|
1,114,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
2,738,838 |
|
|
$ |
2,631,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
473,251 |
|
|
$ |
359,972 |
|
|
$ |
1,136,868 |
|
|
$ |
978,629 |
|
Services |
|
|
417,039 |
|
|
|
380,881 |
|
|
|
1,222,619 |
|
|
|
1,103,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
890,290 |
|
|
|
740,853 |
|
|
|
2,359,487 |
|
|
|
2,082,324 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
341,306 |
|
|
|
264,494 |
|
|
|
821,261 |
|
|
|
732,982 |
|
Services |
|
|
315,343 |
|
|
|
299,300 |
|
|
|
937,069 |
|
|
|
878,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
656,649 |
|
|
|
563,794 |
|
|
|
1,758,330 |
|
|
|
1,611,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
233,641 |
|
|
|
177,059 |
|
|
|
601,157 |
|
|
|
470,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
|
147,774 |
|
|
|
117,532 |
|
|
|
405,774 |
|
|
|
342,568 |
|
Research, development and engineering
expense |
|
|
20,364 |
|
|
|
18,894 |
|
|
|
58,275 |
|
|
|
53,115 |
|
Impairment of asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of assets, net |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(6,407 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,110 |
|
|
|
136,440 |
|
|
|
468,393 |
|
|
|
389,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
65,531 |
|
|
|
40,619 |
|
|
|
132,764 |
|
|
|
81,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income |
|
|
6,575 |
|
|
|
6,221 |
|
|
|
19,541 |
|
|
|
16,875 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(11,241 |
) |
|
|
(10,045 |
) |
|
|
(32,375 |
) |
|
|
(29,329 |
) |
Miscellaneous, net |
|
|
(1,564 |
) |
|
|
(1,227 |
) |
|
|
(644 |
) |
|
|
6,850 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(3,003 |
) |
|
|
(1,172 |
) |
|
|
(6,800 |
) |
|
|
(5,579 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
56,298 |
|
|
|
34,396 |
|
|
|
112,486 |
|
|
|
70,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes on income |
|
|
9,782 |
|
|
|
6,247 |
|
|
|
24,961 |
|
|
|
20,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
46,516 |
|
|
$ |
28,149 |
|
|
$ |
87,525 |
|
|
$ |
49,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
66,101 |
|
|
|
65,926 |
|
|
|
66,073 |
|
|
|
65,798 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
66,758 |
|
|
|
66,985 |
|
|
|
66,459 |
|
|
|
66,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash flow from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
87,525 |
|
|
$ |
49,601 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority share of income |
|
|
6,800 |
|
|
|
5,579 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
61,211 |
|
|
|
53,366 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
9,166 |
|
|
|
10,945 |
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(867 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
14,892 |
|
Impairment of assets |
|
|
4,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of assets, net |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(6,407 |
) |
Cash provided (used) by changes in certain assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
(67,311 |
) |
|
|
92,589 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(53,161 |
) |
|
|
(48,164 |
) |
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
(6,297 |
) |
|
|
(12,686 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
(24,403 |
) |
|
|
(11,134 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
29,748 |
|
|
|
18,085 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(61,057 |
) |
|
|
(51,500 |
) |
Certain other assets and liabilities |
|
|
74,671 |
|
|
|
(76,451 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
61,846 |
|
|
|
37,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(3,733 |
) |
|
|
(10,028 |
) |
Proceeds from maturities of investments |
|
|
314,185 |
|
|
|
54,788 |
|
Payments for purchases of investments |
|
|
(345,059 |
) |
|
|
(31,867 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
7,594 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(32,637 |
) |
|
|
(34,323 |
) |
Increase in certain other assets |
|
|
(17,035 |
) |
|
|
(22,725 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(84,250 |
) |
|
|
(36,561 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(49,917 |
) |
|
|
(46,820 |
) |
Notes payable borrowings |
|
|
588,628 |
|
|
|
556,480 |
|
Notes payable repayments |
|
|
(514,106 |
) |
|
|
(629,774 |
) |
Distribution of affiliates earnings to minority interest holder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,440 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
867 |
|
Issuance of common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities |
|
|
24,605 |
|
|
|
(126,364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
4,249 |
|
|
|
12,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
6,450 |
|
|
|
(112,218 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period |
|
|
206,334 |
|
|
|
253,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period |
|
$ |
212,784 |
|
|
$ |
141,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2008
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 1: CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Diebold, Incorporated and
its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) have been prepared in accordance with the instructions
to Form 10-Q and therefore do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair
presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP); however, such information reflects all adjustments
(consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments), which are, in the opinion of management,
necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods.
The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and Notes thereto together with managements discussion and analysis of
financial condition and results of operations contained in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007. In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered
necessary to fairly state the financial position of the Company at September 30, 2008 and December
31, 2007, the results of its operations for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30,
2008 and September 30, 2007 and its cash flows for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008
and September 30, 2007.
In addition, some of the Companys statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q may be
considered forward-looking and involve risks and uncertainties that could significantly impact
expected results. The results of operations for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 are
not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year.
On December 21, 2007, the Company announced that, in consultation with outside advisors, it was
conducting an internal review into certain accounting and financial reporting matters, including
but not limited to, the review of various balance sheet accounts such as prepaid expenses, accrued
liabilities, capitalized assets, deferred revenue and reserves within both the Companys North
America and International businesses. On January 15, 2008, the Company announced that it had
concluded its discussion with the Office of the Chief Accountant (OCA) of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) with regard to the Companys practice of recognizing certain revenue on a
bill and hold basis in its North America business segment and, as a result of those discussions,
the Company determined that its previous long-standing method of accounting for bill and hold
transactions was in error, representing a misapplication of GAAP. Management of the Company
determined that the corrected method of recognizing revenue would be adopted retroactively after an
in-depth analysis and review with its outside auditors, KPMG LLP (KPMG), an independent registered
public accounting firm, the Audit Committee of the Companys Board of Directors, and the OCA.
Accordingly, management concluded that the previously issued financial statements for the fiscal
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003; the quarterly data in each of the quarters for
the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005; and the quarter ended March 31, 2007, must be restated
and should no longer be relied upon. As a result, the Company restated its previously issued
financial statements for those periods. Restated financial information is presented in our annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provision of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
Postretirement Plans an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R), that requires
entities to measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of the date of the employers
statement of financial position. The adoption of SFAS No. 158 had a cumulative effect reduction to
beginning retained earnings of $1,387 as of January 1, 2008.
On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 06-10,
Accounting for Collateral Assignment Split Dollar Life Insurance, which applies to entities that
participate in collateral assignment split-dollar life insurance arrangement that extend into an
employees retirement period (often referred to as key person life insurance.) The pronouncement
requires employers to recognize a liability for the postretirement obligation associated with a
collateral assignment arrangement if, based on an agreement with an employee, the employer has
agreed to maintain a life insurance policy during the postretirement period or to provide a death
benefit. The adoption of this EITF had a cumulative effect reduction to beginning retained earnings
of $2,583 as of January 1, 2008.
6
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2008
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 2: EARNINGS PER SHARE
The basic and diluted earnings per share computations in the condensed consolidated statements of
income are based on the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during each period reported.
The following table shows the amounts used in computing earnings per share and the effect on the
weighted-average number of shares of potentially dilutive common shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
46,516 |
|
|
$ |
28,149 |
|
|
$ |
87,525 |
|
|
$ |
49,601 |
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average shares |
|
|
66,101 |
|
|
|
65,926 |
|
|
|
66,073 |
|
|
|
65,798 |
|
Effect of dilutive shares |
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average shares |
|
|
66,758 |
|
|
|
66,985 |
|
|
|
66,459 |
|
|
|
66,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive shares not used
in calculating diluted
weighted-average shares |
|
|
1,409 |
|
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
2,253 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
NOTE 3: OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Items considered to be other comprehensive income include adjustments made for foreign currency
translation (under SFAS No. 52), pensions (under SFAS No. 87 and SFAS No. 158), and hedging
activities (under SFAS No. 133). Components of comprehensive income consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
87,525 |
|
|
$ |
49,601 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation adjustment |
|
|
42,197 |
|
|
|
58,302 |
|
Realized and unrealized (loss) gain on hedges |
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
(245 |
) |
Pension adjustment |
|
|
(829 |
) |
|
|
3,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
129,968 |
|
|
$ |
111,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income is reported separately from retained earnings and additional
capital in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Components of accumulated other comprehensive
income consist of the following for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and the year ended
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
Translation adjustment |
|
$ |
95,811 |
|
|
$ |
138,008 |
|
Realized and unrealized gain on hedges |
|
|
958 |
|
|
|
2,033 |
|
Pension adjustment |
|
|
(10,858 |
) |
|
|
(11,687 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive
income |
|
$ |
85,911 |
|
|
$ |
128,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2008
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 4: SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
The Companys share-based compensation policy is consistent with the requirements of SFAS No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123(R)), which requires that all share-based payments to
employees be recognized in the statement of income based on their grant-date fair values during the
period in which the employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award.
Share-based compensation was recognized as a component of selling, general and administrative
expenses. Total share-based compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008 was $3,145 and $9,166, respectively. Total share-based compensation expense for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $3,828 and $10,945, respectively.
Options outstanding and exercisable under the Companys 1991 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan
as of September 30, 2008 and changes during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Contractual Term |
|
|
Value (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(per share) |
|
|
(in years) |
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
2,884 |
|
|
$ |
41.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
25.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired or forfeited |
|
|
(284 |
) |
|
|
44.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30,
2008 |
|
|
2,936 |
|
|
$ |
39.42 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
8,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30,
2008 |
|
|
2,161 |
|
|
$ |
40.61 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
4,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic
value (the difference between the closing price of the Companys
common shares on the last trading day of the third quarter of 2008 and
the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money
options) that would have been received by the option holders had all
option holders exercised their options on September 30, 2008. The
amount of aggregate intrinsic value will change based on the fair
market value of the Companys common shares. |
The following tables summarize information on unvested restricted stock units and performance
shares outstanding for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted-Average Grant- |
|
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs): |
|
Shares |
|
|
Date Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(per share) |
|
Unvested at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
325 |
|
|
$ |
45.14 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
42.07 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
55.20 |
|
Granted |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
28.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
397 |
|
|
$ |
38.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted-Average Grant- |
|
Performance Shares: |
|
Shares |
|
|
Date Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(per share) |
|
Unvested at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
519 |
|
|
$ |
54.49 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
55.89 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
57.08 |
|
Granted |
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
28.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
605 |
|
|
$ |
44.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2008
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Unvested performance shares are based on a maximum potential payout. Actual shares granted at the
end of the performance period may be less than the maximum potential payout level depending on
achievement of performance share objectives.
NOTE 5: INCOME TAXES
The effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was 17.4 percent compared to
18.2 percent for the same period in 2007. The decrease in 2008 resulted from a larger China
technology rate reduction credit and a more favorable mix of income.
The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was 22.2 percent compared to
29.6 percent for the same period in 2007. In addition to the China benefit referenced above, a
significant portion of the decrease is due to higher earnings in international jurisdictions where
the Company benefits from lower effective tax rates. The income shift from the U.S. to lower-taxed
foreign jurisdictions was exacerbated in 2008 by non-routine expenses
incurred in the United States.
NOTE 6: INVENTORIES
The Company primarily values inventories at the lower of cost or market applied on a first-in,
first-out (FIFO) basis. At each reporting
period, the Company identifies and writes down its excess or obsolete inventory to its net
realizable value based on forecasted usage, orders and inventory aging. With the development of new
products, the Company also rationalizes its product offerings and will write down discontinued
product to the lower of cost or net realizable value.
Major classes of inventories are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
Finished goods |
|
$ |
285,209 |
|
|
$ |
252,729 |
|
Service parts |
|
|
151,718 |
|
|
|
152,039 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
57,843 |
|
|
|
64,414 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
76,914 |
|
|
|
64,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
571,684 |
|
|
$ |
533,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 7: BENEFIT PLANS
The Company has several pension plans covering substantially all U.S. employees. Plans covering
salaried employees provide pension benefits that are based on the employees compensation during
the 10 years before retirement. The Companys funding policy for salaried plans is to contribute
annually, if required, at an actuarially determined rate. Plans covering hourly employees and union
members generally provide benefits of stated amounts for each year of service. The Companys
funding policy for hourly plans is to make at least the minimum annual contributions required by
applicable regulations. Employees of the Companys operations in countries outside of the United
States participate to varying degrees in local pension plans, which in the aggregate are not
significant.
In addition to providing pension benefits, the Company provides healthcare benefits (referred to as
Other Benefits) for certain retired employees. Eligible employees may be entitled to these benefits
based upon years of service with the Company, age at retirement and collective bargaining
agreements. Currently, the Company has made no commitments to increase these benefits for existing
retirees or for employees who may become eligible for these benefits in the future. Currently,
there are no plan assets and the Company funds the benefits as the claims are paid.
9
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2008
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Other Benefits |
|
Components of Net Periodic Benefit
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
2,460 |
|
|
$ |
2,865 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
7,012 |
|
|
|
6,403 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(8,936 |
) |
|
|
(8,252 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss (gain) |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension benefit cost |
|
$ |
932 |
|
|
$ |
2,182 |
|
|
$ |
365 |
|
|
$ |
396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Other Benefits |
|
Components of Net Periodic Benefit
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
7,380 |
|
|
$ |
8,596 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
21,035 |
|
|
|
19,209 |
|
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
1,019 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(26,810 |
) |
|
|
(24,756 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
(387 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss (gain) |
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
2,966 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension benefit cost |
|
$ |
2,498 |
|
|
$ |
6,477 |
|
|
$ |
853 |
|
|
$ |
1,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows
Previously, the Company disclosed expected payments related to the 2008 plan year of $2,776 to its
qualified and non-qualified pension plans and $2,262 to its other postretirement benefit plan. In
the third quarter of 2008, the Company changed its expectation for the total contributions to the
qualified plan and non-qualified pension plans to $6,776. The Companys expectation for
contributions to its other postretirement benefit plans has not changed. As of September 30, 2008
and 2007, contributions of $2,122 and $10,593 were made to the qualified and non-qualified pension
plans, respectively.
NOTE 8: GUARANTEES AND PRODUCT WARRANTIES
The Company has applied the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, including
Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, to its agreements that contain guarantees or
indemnification clauses. These disclosure requirements expand those required by SFAS No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies, by requiring a guarantor to disclose certain types of guarantees,
even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantors performance is remote. The following is a
description of arrangements in effect as of September 30, 2008 in which the Company is the
guarantor.
In connection with the construction of certain manufacturing facilities, the Company guaranteed
repayment of principal and interest on variable rate industrial development revenue bonds by
obtaining letters of credit. The bonds were issued with a 20-year original term and are scheduled
to mature in 2017. At September 30, 2008, the carrying value of the liability was $11,900.
The Company provides its global operations guarantees and standby letters of credit through various
financial institutions to suppliers, regulatory agencies and insurance providers. If the Company is
not able to make payment, the suppliers, regulatory agencies and insurance providers may draw on
the pertinent bank. At September 30, 2008, the maximum future payment obligations related to these
various guarantees totaled $74,251 of which $25,728 represented standby letters of credit to
insurance providers. At September 30, 2007, the maximum future payment obligations relative to
these various guarantees totaled $62,105, of which $22,663 represented standby letters of credit to
insurance providers. There was no associated liability recorded for any guarantees as of September
30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
10
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2008
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
The Company provides its customers a standard manufacturers warranty and records, at the time of
the sale, a corresponding estimated liability for potential warranty costs. Estimated future
obligations due to warranty claims are based upon historical factors such as labor rates, average
repair time, travel time, number of service calls per machine and cost of replacement parts.
Changes in the Companys warranty liability balance are illustrated in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty Liability |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
$ |
26,494 |
|
|
$ |
22,511 |
|
Current period accruals |
|
|
39,157 |
|
|
|
20,446 |
|
Current period settlements |
|
|
(24,290 |
) |
|
|
(21,064 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30 |
|
$ |
41,361 |
|
|
$ |
21,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 9: ACQUISITIONS
The following mergers and acquisitions were accounted for as purchase business combinations and,
accordingly, the purchase price has been or will be allocated to identifiable tangible and
intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based upon their respective fair values, with
the excess allocated to goodwill. Results of operations from the date of acquisition of these
companies are included in the condensed consolidated statements of operations of the Company.
In February 2008, the Company formed a partnership, D&G Centroamerica, S. de R.L. (D&G), based in
the Republic of Panama with an initial investment of approximately $6,423. The Company owns 51 percent of the partnership.
The minority partner of D&G was previously used by the Company as a distributor in Central America.
Goodwill and other intangibles, net of amortization, resulting from the acquisition amounted to
approximately $731 and $5,761, respectively, as of September 30, 2008. D&G is included as part of
the Companys Diebold International (DI) segment.
In January 2007, the Company acquired Brixlogic, Inc. (Brixlogic) based in San Mateo, California
for approximately $8,349. Brixlogic is a software development firm previously used by the Company
for various software development projects. Other intangibles, net of amortization, resulting from
the acquisition amounted to approximately $6,998 as of September 30, 2008. Brixlogic is included as
part of the Companys DNA segment.
NOTE 10: DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The Company uses derivatives to mitigate the negative economic consequences associated with the
fluctuations in currencies and interest rates. SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, requires that all derivative instruments be recorded on the balance sheet
at fair value and that the changes in the fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless
specific hedge accounting criteria are met. Special accounting for qualifying hedges allows
derivative gains and losses to be reflected in the income statement together with the hedged
exposure, and requires that a company formally document, designate and assess the effectiveness of
transactions that receive hedge accounting treatment. The Company does not enter into any
speculative positions with regard to derivative instruments.
NOTE
11: RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER CHARGES
The following table summarizes the Companys restructuring charges by plan for the three- and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
11
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2008
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
DCM Plan |
|
$ |
1,243 |
|
|
$ |
734 |
|
|
$ |
2,761 |
|
|
$ |
18,552 |
|
Germany Plan |
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
6,673 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
RIF Plan |
|
|
5,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
Newark Plan |
|
|
7,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
14,457 |
|
|
$ |
1,219 |
|
|
$ |
29,534 |
|
|
$ |
19,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the first quarter of 2006, the Company announced a plan (DCM Plan) to close its production
facility in Cassis, France in an effort to optimize its global manufacturing operations. During the
first quarter of 2007, the Company notified one hundred twenty-five Cassis employees to be
terminated. Actual termination dates varied based upon each individual employees circumstances.
For the quarter ended September 30, 2007, the Company incurred $734 in expense through product cost
of sales. Total restructuring charges incurred as of September 30, 2007 under the DCM Plan were
$18,552.
For the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the DCM Plan restructuring charges were $1,243 of DI product cost of sales which included $1,085 of severance costs and $158 of other
costs. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the DCM Plan restructuring charges were
$1,875 of DI product cost of sales and $886 of Diebold North America (DNA) product cost of
sales. The DCM plan costs incurred of $2,761 included $1,577 of severance costs and $1,184 of other costs. The company expects remaining expenses
in relation to the DCM plan to be immaterial. As of September 30, 2008, the DCM accrual balance
was not material to the Company.
During the third quarter of 2007, the Company notified seventeen employees of termination as a
result of its plans to downsize its operations in Germany (Germany Plan) in an effort to remove
excess capacity. During the first quarter of 2008, the Germany Plan was modified to initiate a
closure of its operations in light of further declines in sales opportunities resulting from a
fully mature market. Total Germany Plan restructuring expenses incurred for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 were $6,673, $6,207 incurred in DI and $466
incurred in DNA. Restructuring charges in the DI
segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 included $1,361 of product cost of sales,
$3,501 of service cost of sales, $1,372 of operating expense and the remaining in other income and
expense. Restructuring charges in the DNA segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
included $466 of product cost of sales. As of and for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the
Germany Plan accrual balance, remaining expenses and actual restructuring charges were not
material. The Company expects the Germany Plan, including all terminations, to be substantially
complete by the end of fiscal year 2008.
During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company announced a plan to reduce its global workforce (RIF
Plan) in an effort to optimize overall operational performance. As of September 30, 2008, the
Company anticipates total remaining costs to be incurred of approximately $2,500. Total
restructuring charges for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 were $5,403 and
$11,716, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, total DNA RIF Plan
restructuring charges incurred were $847 through product cost of sales, $673 through service cost
of sales and $1,556 through operating expense. Total DI RIF Plan restructuring charges incurred
were $157 through product cost of sales, $2,537 through service cost of sales and $5,308 through
operating expense. Total Election Systems (ES) & Other RIF Plan restructuring charges incurred were $46 through
product cost of sales and $592 through operating expense.
For the
quarter ended September 30, 2008, total DNA RIF Plan
restructuring charges of $51 were incurred through product cost of sales, service cost of sales, and operating
expense. Total DI RIF Plan restructuring charges incurred were $22 through product cost of sales,
$2,104 through service cost of sales, and $3,226 through operating expense. During the third
quarter, the Company notified seventy eight employees of termination. The Company expects the RIF
Plan, including all terminations, to be substantially complete by the end of fiscal
year 2008. As of September 30, 2008, the RIF Plan accrual balance was not material to the Company.
During the second quarter of 2008, the Company announced plans to close its manufacturing facility
in Newark, Ohio (the Newark Plan) as part of its continued focus on its strategic global
manufacturing realignment plan. The company gave notice to its one
hundred employees and the collective
bargaining unit representing its Newark, Ohio manufacturing facility of its plans to close this
operation. As of September 30, 2008 the Company anticipates total remaining costs incurred to be
approximately $3,700. Total restructuring
12
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2008
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
charges
for the Newark Plan were $7,063 and $7,130 for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and were
recognized through product cost of
sales in
the DNA segment. The Company anticipates the closure of this facility to be
substantially complete by the end of the first quarter of 2009. As of September 30, 2008, the
Newark Plan accrual balance was approximately $6,800.
The
Company incurred legal, consultation, audit and financial advisory
fees (collectively referred to as non-routine expenses) of $24,665
and $41,839 for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008, respectively, related to the filing of the restated financial
statements and the unsolicited takeover bid from United Technologies
Corp. Financial advisory fees of $13,500 were recorded in the third
quarter 2008 related to the withdrawal of the unsolicited takeover
bid from United Technologies Corp. As of September 30, 2008, the
accrual balance for these non-routine expenses was approximately
$18,000.
NOTE 12: FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157),
for its financial assets and liabilities, as required. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff
Position No. 157-2, which deferred the effective date of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and
liabilities except for those recognized or disclosed on a recurring basis. SFAS 157 establishes a
common definition for fair value to be applied to GAAP guidance requiring the use of fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure requirements about such
fair value measurements. The standard does not require any new fair value measurements, but rather
applies to all other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.
The Company adopted SFAS 157 on January 1, 2008 with respect to financial assets and financial
liabilities that are measured at fair value within the condensed consolidated financial statements
and deferred the adoption for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities until January 1,
2009. Accordingly, the provisions of SFAS 157 were not applied to long-lived assets and goodwill
and other intangible assets measured for impairment testing purposes.
The hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value is
divided into three levels:
|
§ |
|
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities. |
|
|
§ |
|
Level 2 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities,
unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are
not active or inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable
either directly or indirectly. |
|
|
§ |
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data. |
The Company measures its financial assets and liabilities using one or more of the following three
valuation techniques outlined in SFAS 157:
|
§ |
|
Market approach Prices and other relevant information generated by market
transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. |
|
|
§ |
|
Cost approach Amount that would be required to replace the service capacity of an
asset (replacement cost). |
|
|
§ |
|
Income approach Techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount based
upon market expectations. |
The Company has no financial assets or liabilities for which fair value was measured using Level 3
inputs. Assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurement are as follows:
13
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2008
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting Date Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Fair Value as of |
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
$ |
117,467 |
|
|
$ |
117,467 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Deferred Compensation |
|
|
9,876 |
|
|
|
9,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forward Exchange
Forward Contracts |
|
|
11,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
138,880 |
|
|
$ |
127,343 |
|
|
$ |
11,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
$ |
1,679 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,679 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Investments The Company has investments in certificates of deposit that are recorded at
cost, which approximates fair value due to their short term nature and lack of volatility.
Deferred Compensation Plan The fair value of the Companys deferred compensation plan is derived
from investments in a mix of money market, fixed income and equity funds managed by Vanguard.
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts A substantial portion of the Companys operations and revenues
are international. As a result, changes in foreign exchange rates can create substantial foreign
exchange gains and losses from the revaluation of non-functional currency monetary assets and
liabilities. The foreign exchange contracts are valued using the market approach based on
observable market transactions of forward rates.
Interest Rate Swaps The Company has variable rate debt and is subject to fluctuations in interest
related cash flows due to changes in market interest rates. The Companys policy allows it to
periodically enter into derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges to fix some portion
of future variable rate based interest expense. The Company has executed two pay-fixed
receive-variable plain vanilla interest rate swaps to hedge against changes in the London Interbank
Offered Rate (LIBOR) benchmark interest rate on a portion of the Companys LIBOR- based credit
facility. The fair value of the swap is determined using the income approach and is calculated
based on LIBOR rates at the reporting date.
NOTE 13: SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Companys segments are comprised of its three main sales channels: DNA, DI and ES & Other. These sales channels are evaluated based on revenue from customers and operating
profit contribution to the total corporation. The reconciliation between segment information and
the condensed consolidated financial statements is disclosed. Revenue summaries by geographic
segment and product and service solutions are also disclosed. All income and expense items below
operating profit are not allocated to the segments and are not disclosed.
The DNA segment sells and services financial and retail systems in the United States and Canada.
The DI segment sells and services financial and retail systems over the remainder of the globe. The
ES & Other segment includes the operating results of Premier Election Solutions, Inc. and the
voting and lottery related business in Brazil. Each of the sales channels buys the goods it sells
from the Companys manufacturing plants or through external suppliers. Intercompany sales between
legal entities are eliminated in consolidation and intersegment revenue is not significant. Each
year, intercompany pricing is agreed upon which drives sales channel operating profit contribution.
As permitted under SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information, certain information not routinely used in the management of these segments,
information not allocated back to the segments or information that is impractical to report is not
shown. Items not allocated are as follows: interest income, interest expense, equity in the net
income of investees accounted for by the equity method and income tax expense or benefit.
14
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2008
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
The following table presents Diebolds revenue by reportable segment for the three- and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DNA |
|
DI |
|
ES & Other |
|
Total |
For the quarter ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer revenue |
|
$ |
386,989 |
|
|
$ |
426,521 |
|
|
$ |
76,780 |
|
|
$ |
890,290 |
|
Operating profit |
|
|
19,929 |
|
|
|
30,064 |
|
|
|
15,538 |
|
|
|
65,531 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
5,163 |
|
|
|
7,424 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
12,859 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
10,621 |
|
|
|
5,716 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
17,064 |
|
For the quarter ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer revenue |
|
$ |
388,912 |
|
|
$ |
343,274 |
|
|
$ |
8,667 |
|
|
$ |
740,853 |
|
Operating profit (loss) |
|
|
31,860 |
|
|
|
11,377 |
|
|
|
(2,618 |
) |
|
|
40,619 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
2,196 |
|
|
|
7,887 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
10,295 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
8,565 |
|
|
|
3,214 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
11,979 |
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer revenue |
|
$ |
1,134,603 |
|
|
$ |
1,102,990 |
|
|
$ |
121,894 |
|
|
$ |
2,359,487 |
|
Operating profit |
|
|
67,061 |
|
|
|
50,340 |
|
|
|
15,363 |
|
|
|
132,764 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
12,646 |
|
|
|
19,558 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
32,637 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
21,123 |
|
|
|
18,175 |
|
|
|
2,414 |
|
|
|
41,712 |
|
Property, plant and
equipment, at cost |
|
|
423,362 |
|
|
|
147,555 |
|
|
|
13,093 |
|
|
|
584,010 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
445,081 |
|
|
|
2,181,947 |
|
|
|
111,810 |
|
|
|
2,738,838 |
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer revenue |
|
$ |
1,115,007 |
|
|
$ |
928,124 |
|
|
$ |
39,193 |
|
|
$ |
2,082,324 |
|
Operating profit (loss) |
|
|
81,405 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
(1,647 |
) |
|
|
81,658 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
14,849 |
|
|
|
18,431 |
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
34,323 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
21,169 |
|
|
|
13,250 |
|
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
35,017 |
|
Property, plant and
equipment, at cost |
|
|
412,446 |
|
|
|
140,621 |
|
|
|
6,080 |
|
|
|
559,147 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
584,809 |
|
|
|
1,887,784 |
|
|
|
153,651 |
|
|
|
2,626,244 |
|
The following table presents Diebolds revenue by geographic region for the three- and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
The Americas |
|
$ |
642,990 |
|
|
$ |
525,600 |
|
|
$ |
1,692,514 |
|
|
$ |
1,503,814 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
123,442 |
|
|
|
79,899 |
|
|
|
316,923 |
|
|
|
220,465 |
|
Europe, Middle East, and
Africa |
|
|
123,858 |
|
|
|
135,354 |
|
|
|
350,050 |
|
|
|
358,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from customers |
|
$ |
890,290 |
|
|
$ |
740,853 |
|
|
$ |
2,359,487 |
|
|
$ |
2,082,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents Diebolds revenue by Product and Service Solution for the three- and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
15
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2008
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Financial self-service: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
324,414 |
|
|
$ |
270,509 |
|
|
$ |
812,732 |
|
|
$ |
720,823 |
|
Services |
|
|
290,225 |
|
|
|
249,227 |
|
|
|
844,769 |
|
|
|
733,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial self-service |
|
|
614,639 |
|
|
|
519,736 |
|
|
|
1,657,501 |
|
|
|
1,454,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
78,755 |
|
|
|
86,509 |
|
|
|
227,890 |
|
|
|
238,158 |
|
Services |
|
|
120,116 |
|
|
|
125,941 |
|
|
|
352,202 |
|
|
|
350,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total security |
|
|
198,871 |
|
|
|
212,450 |
|
|
|
580,092 |
|
|
|
588,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial self-service & security |
|
|
813,510 |
|
|
|
732,186 |
|
|
|
2,237,593 |
|
|
|
2,043,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Election systems: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
69,326 |
|
|
|
2,954 |
|
|
|
92,199 |
|
|
|
19,648 |
|
Services |
|
|
6,698 |
|
|
|
5,713 |
|
|
|
25,648 |
|
|
|
19,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total election systems |
|
|
76,024 |
|
|
|
8,667 |
|
|
|
117,847 |
|
|
|
39,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lottery systems |
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from customers |
|
$ |
890,290 |
|
|
$ |
740,853 |
|
|
$ |
2,359,487 |
|
|
$ |
2,082,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of September 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
ITEM 2: MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
Diebold is on the verge of its 150th year in business, providing self-service delivery
and security innovations and solutions to the financial, retail, commercial and government markets.
Drawing from its history as the premier manufacturer of safes and vaults in the United States,
Diebold today is transforming itself into a leading provider of integrated services for the
industries in which it operates.
During the third quarter of 2008, Diebold filed all of its late reports with the SEC on September
30, meeting the filing schedule previously announced by the company.
Diebold filed its annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for
the quarters ended June 30, 2007, September 30, 2007, March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008. The
completion of these filings also marks the conclusion of the previously disclosed internal review
of other accounting items.
In
connection with the Companys filing of the restated financial
statements, the Company incurred significant legal, audit and
consultation fees during 2007 and 2008. In addition, the Company
incurred financial advisory fees in 2008 as a result of the
withdrawal of the unsolicited takeover bid from United Technologies
Corp.
In addition, Diebold raised its expectations for full-year 2008 earnings per share. The upward
revision is a result of earlier-than-expected progress from the Smart Business 200 a series of
additional cost-reduction actions to eliminate another $100,000 in costs, with $70,000 expected to
be recognized by the middle of 2010, improved profitability from the Brazilian voting and lottery
businesses, continued demand for the companys solutions in the global financial markets and a
lower anticipated effective tax rate.
In regard to Smart Business 200 cost savings initiatives, actions include additional strategic
global manufacturing realignment; further consolidation of the Companys supply chain and
distribution network; and initiating a product rationalization and simplification program to
improve margins, reduce the cash conversion cycle and improve inventory turnover.
Work has
continued on the Companys strategic global manufacturing realignment plan. The Companys
plans are moving forward, and it has given notice during the third quarter 2008 to approximately
one hundred associates at the Newark, Ohio-area manufacturing facility that the Company intends to
close this operation and move all of its production to Diebolds plant in Lexington, North Carolina
by the end of the first quarter of 2009. Most of Lexingtons Opteva ATM production lines will be
moved to existing plants in China and Hungary.
Diebold has continued to work with Menlo Worldwide Logistics to rationalize and optimize its
warehouse network in the United States. Diebold reduced its U.S. warehouse infrastructure from 89
facilities to three strategically located regional distribution and final customization facilities.
The goal is to reduce customer lead times while simultaneously reducing required inventory levels.
The Company also continued to incur restructuring charges in the third
quarter 2008 related to severance and reorganization costs from the
previously announced reduction in the Companys global workforce.
During the third quarter of 2008, The United States Postal Service (USPS) chose Diebold to
implement a multi-site, technologically-advanced, video security program. With more than 40,000
sites across the country, the USPS has selected Diebold Security to manage this nationwide
implementation under a three-year agreement. The contract has the potential to span more than 12
years.
Also during the third quarter of 2008, Diebold announced it was chosen to provide on-site service
and support for Catalina Marketings network of point-of-sale printers in more than 25,000 grocery
and drug stores, mass merchandisers and pharmacies throughout the United States.
In Brazil, Banco do Brasil chose Diebold to provide more than 5,400 ATMs and check dispensers,
enabling the financial institution to expand its reach to new and existing customers at its
branches in all Brazilian states, as well as through new retail locations.
For the Companys Premier Election Solutions subsidiary, the performance and near-term market
expectations for this business remain unchanged from prior expectations. While Diebold fully
supports its elections subsidiary, the Company also continues to pursue strategic alternatives to
ownership of this company.
The Company intends the discussion of its financial condition and results of operations that
follows to provide information that will assist in understanding the financial statements, the
changes in certain key items in those financial statements from year to year and the primary
factors that accounted for those changes, as well as how certain accounting principles, policies
and estimates affect the financial statements.
17
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of September 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table summarizes the results of our operations for the three- and nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
Dollars |
|
Net Sales |
|
Dollars |
|
Net Sales |
|
Dollars |
|
Net Sales |
|
Dollars |
|
Net Sales |
Net sales |
|
$ |
890,290 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
740,853 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
2,359,487 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
2,082,324 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
|
233,641 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
% |
|
|
177,059 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
% |
|
|
601,157 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
% |
|
|
470,934 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
% |
Operating expenses |
|
|
168,110 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
% |
|
|
136,440 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
468,393 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
|
389,276 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
% |
Operating profit |
|
|
65,531 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
40,619 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
132,764 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
81,658 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
Net income |
|
|
46,516 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
28,149 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
87,525 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
49,601 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Third Quarter 2008 Comparisons with Third Quarter 2007
Net Sales
The following table represents information regarding our net sales for the three-month periods
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
% Change |
Net sales |
|
$ |
890,290 |
|
|
$ |
740,853 |
|
|
$ |
149,437 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
% |
Net sales for the third quarter of 2008 increased 20.2 percent from the comparable period in 2007.
The increase in net sales included a net positive currency impact of approximately $21,630.
Financial self-service revenue increased by $94,903 or 18.3 percent over the same period in 2007.
The increase resulted from higher revenue in the Americas of $63,325 and strong revenue growth in
Asia Pacific of $42,275. The increase in the Americas was due to strong revenue growth in Brazil from several large orders
as well as positive growth in both Latin America and domestic revenues. The Asia Pacific increase was due to higher
volume in China of $32,541, which included a large order expected to be recognized as revenue during the fourth quarter but
occurred during the third quarter due to customer acceptance occurring sooner than planned. There
was a partially offsetting decrease of $10,697 in Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA). Security
solutions revenue decreased by $13,579 or 6.4 percent from the third quarter of 2007 as new bank
branch construction and retail store openings remained weak in the United States. Election systems
revenue increased $67,357 or 777.2 percent over the third quarter of 2007 of which the Brazilian
election systems business, historically occurring every other year, accounted for more than 85 percent of the increase. There was $756 of
lottery systems revenue in the third quarter of 2008 in comparison with none for the same period of
2007.
Gross Profit
The following table represents information regarding our gross profit for the three-month periods
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
% Change |
Gross profit |
|
$ |
233,641 |
|
|
$ |
177,059 |
|
|
$ |
56,582 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
% |
Gross profit margin |
|
|
26.2 |
% |
|
|
23.9 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit margin for the third quarter of 2008 increased by 2.3 percentage points compared to
third quarter of 2007 due to higher gross profit margins in product and service. Product gross
margin was 27.9 percent compared to 26.5 percent in the comparable
18
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of September 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
period of 2007. The increase in
product gross margin was the result of gross profit associated with the Brazil voting business of
$25,348 and a higher mix of revenue from China. This favorable impact was partially offset by
higher restructuring charges, unfavorable security product revenue mix, and lower overall volume in
the security business of $7,754. Additionally, the Companys ongoing cost reduction efforts more
than offset the year-over-year increase in commodity prices. Restructuring charges of $8,434 or
1.8 percent of net sales were included in product costs of sales
for the third quarter of 2008, while restructuring charges of $838 were recorded in the third quarter of 2007. Restructuring
charges in the third quarter of 2008 related primarily to severance costs from the previously
announced ongoing reduction in the Companys global workforce, which is on track to be completed by
the end of 2008. Service gross margin was 24.4 percent compared to 21.4 percent in the third
quarter of 2007. The increase in service margin was the result of productivity and efficiency
gains achieved in part due to improved product quality, which resulted in improved service margins
domestically and internationally. Service margins were adversely impacted by restructuring charges
of $2,265 or 0.5 percent of net sales in the third quarter of 2008 compared to restructuring
charges of $181 in the third quarter of 2007.
Operating Expenses
The following table represents information regarding our operating expenses for the three-month
periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
$ |
147,774 |
|
|
$ |
117,532 |
|
|
$ |
30,242 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
% |
Research, development and engineering
expense |
|
|
20,364 |
|
|
|
18,894 |
|
|
|
1,470 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
% |
(Gain) loss on sale of assets, net |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
-300.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
168,110 |
|
|
$ |
136,440 |
|
|
$ |
31,670 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of net sales |
|
|
18.9 |
% |
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense for the third quarter of 2008 as a percent of net sales was 16.6
percent compared to 15.9 percent for the same period in 2007. The increase in selling, general and
administrative expense as a percent of sales between years resulted in part due to higher
non-routine expenses and restructuring charges in the third quarter of 2008 as compared to the
third quarter of 2007. Non-routine expenses of $24,665 or 2.8 percent of net sales impacted the
third quarter of 2008 compared to $3,323 of non-routine expenses in the third quarter of 2007. The
non-routine expenses were mainly from legal, audit and consultation fees related to the internal
review of other accounting items, restatement of financial statements and the ongoing SEC and U.S.
Department of Justice (DOJ) investigations and other advisory fees. Included in the non-routine expenses
for the third quarter of 2008 was a $13,500 fee owed to financial advisor Goldman Sachs as a result
of the withdrawal of the unsolicited takeover bid from United Technologies Corp. Additionally,
restructuring charges of $2,111 or 0.2 percent of net sales were included in selling, general and
administrative expense for the third quarter of 2008. The restructuring charges were primarily
related to severance costs from the previously announced ongoing reduction in the Companys global
workforce, which is on track to be completed by the end of 2008. There were restructuring charges
of $200 included in selling, general and administrative expense for the third quarter of 2007. Research,
development, and engineering expense for 2008 was 2.3 percent of net sales as compared to 2.6
percent in 2007. Research, development and engineering expense increased on a dollar basis due to
restructuring charges and was down slightly as a percent of net sales due to higher sales volume.
Restructuring charges of
$1,673 were included in research, development and engineering expense for the third quarter of 2008
as compared to no charges in the same period of 2007.
Operating Profit
The following table represents information regarding our operating profit for the three-month
periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
% Change |
Operating profit |
|
$ |
65,531 |
|
|
$ |
40,619 |
|
|
$ |
24,912 |
|
|
|
61.3 |
% |
Operating profit margin |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
19
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of September 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Operating profit margin for the third quarter of 2008 was 7.4 percent compared to 5.5 percent for
the same period in 2007. The increase in operating profit margin between years was due to the
Brazilian voting business, the Companys ongoing cost reduction efforts, higher mix of revenue from
China, and improved service gross profit, reduced by higher non-routine expenses and restructuring
charges. Operating profit in the third quarter of 2008 included non-routine expenses of $24,665 or
2.8 percent of net sales compared to $3,323 or 0.4 percent of net sales of non-routine expenses for
the comparable period in 2007. In addition, restructuring charges of $14,483 or 1.6 percent of net
sales adversely affected the operating profit in the third quarter of 2008 compared to $1,219 or
0.2 percent of net sales for the comparable period in 2007.
Other Income (Expense) and Minority Interest
The following table represents information regarding our other income (expenses) and minority
interest for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Investment income |
|
$ |
6,575 |
|
|
$ |
6,221 |
|
|
$ |
354 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(11,241 |
) |
|
|
(10,045 |
) |
|
|
(1,196 |
) |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
Miscellaneous, net |
|
|
(1,564 |
) |
|
|
(1,227 |
) |
|
|
(337 |
) |
|
|
27.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
$ |
(6,230 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,051 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,179 |
) |
|
|
23.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Net Sales |
|
|
-0.7 |
% |
|
|
-0.7 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
$ |
(3,003 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,172 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,831 |
) |
|
|
156.2 |
% |
Interest expense for the third quarter of 2008 increased $1,196 or 11.9 percent from the comparable
period in 2007. Higher interest expense was related to foreign exchange hedging activity. Minority
interest was higher in the third quarter of 2008 by $1,831 due to higher profitability in China.
Net Income
The following table represents information regarding our net income for the three-month periods
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
% Change |
Net income |
|
$ |
46,516 |
|
|
$ |
28,149 |
|
|
$ |
18,367 |
|
|
|
65.2 |
% |
Percent of net sales |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
17.4 |
% |
|
|
18.2 |
% |
|
|
-0.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Net income for the third quarter of 2008 increased $18,367 or 65.2 percent compared to the third
quarter of 2007. The increase was due to higher gross profits and a
lower effective tax rate,
partially offset by higher operating expense levels resulting from increased non-routine expenses
and restructuring charges. The 2008 effective tax rate was positively
affected by a $3,740 discrete
benefit related to China technology tax credit.
Segment Analysis and Operating Profit Summary
Diebold North America (DNA) third quarter of 2008 net sales decreased slightly by $1,923 or 0.5
percent compared to the same period in 2007 as lower security solutions revenue was partially
offset by higher financial self-service revenue. Third quarter of 2008 net sales for Diebold
International (DI) increased $83,247 or 24.3 percent over the comparable period in 2007. The
increase in DI net sales was attributable to strong revenue growth in Brazil from several large
orders and Asia Pacific due to higher China volume. Election Systems (ES) & Other third quarter of
2008 net sales increased $68,113 compared to third quarter of 2007, of which Brazilian election
systems revenue, historically occuring every other year, accounted for $58,581 of the increase.
DNA third quarter of 2008 operating profit decreased $11,931 or 37.5 percent compared to the third
quarter of 2007. Operating profit in the third quarter of 2008 was negatively impacted by
workforce optimization restructuring charges, higher non-routine expenses and unfavorable
financial self-service and security solutions revenue mix. DI operating profit for the third
quarter of 2008 increased $18,687 or 164.2 percent compared to the same period in 2007. The DI
operating profit for the third quarter of 2008 was favorably affected by higher financial
self-service revenue and profitability in Asia Pacific and Brazil, partially offset by higher
restructuring charges and non-routine expenses. ES & Other third quarter of 2008 operating profit
was $18,156 higher than the third quarter of 2007 due to increased volume in the Brazilian election
systems business.
20
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of September 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Refer to Note 13 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for details of segment revenue
and operating profit.
Nine Months ended September 30, 2008 Comparisons with Nine Months ended September 30, 2007
Net Sales
The following table represents information regarding our net sales for the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
% Change |
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,359,487 |
|
|
$ |
2,082,324 |
|
|
$ |
277,163 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
% |
Net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were 13.3 percent higher than net sales for
the comparable period in 2007. The increase in net sales included a net positive currency impact
of $89,641. Financial self-service revenue for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 increased by $203,317 or 14.0 percent compared to the same period in 2007. The increase
resulted from higher revenue in the Americas of $108,852 and strong revenue growth in Asia Pacific
of $99,751. The increase in the Americas was due to strong revenue
growth in Brazil from several large orders as well as positive growth
in both Latin America and domestic revenues. The Asia Pacific increase resulted from higher volume in China of $77,825. The
typical revenue seasonality in China was affected by the 2008 Summer
Olympics, which resulted in purchases
occurring earlier in 2008, rather than being concentrated in the fourth quarter. In addition, a
large order expected to be recognized as revenue during the fourth
quarter was instead recognized as
revenue during the third quarter due to customer acceptance occurring sooner than planned. There
was a partially offsetting decrease of $5,286 in EMEA. Security solutions revenue for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 decreased $8,855 or 1.5 percent versus the comparable period in
2007 due to lower revenue in all market segments. Election systems revenue increased by 200.7
percent compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
Brazilian election systems revenue, which historically occurs every
other year, accounted for 78.1 percent of the increase. There was $4,047 of lottery systems revenue in the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 in comparison with none for the same period of 2007.
Gross Profit
The following table represents information regarding our gross profit for the nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
% Change |
Gross profit |
|
$ |
601,157 |
|
|
$ |
470,934 |
|
|
$ |
130,223 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
% |
Gross profit margin |
|
|
25.5 |
% |
|
|
22.6 |
% |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased by 2.9 percentage points
compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Product gross margin was 27.8 percent
compared to 25.1 percent in the comparable period of 2007. The increase in product gross margin
was the result of gross profit associated with the Brazil voting business of $26,391, a higher mix
of
revenue from China, and lower restructuring charges. Additionally, the Companys ongoing cost
reduction efforts more than offset the year-over-year increase in commodity prices. Restructuring
charges of $13,255 or 1.2 percent of net sales were included in product costs of sales for the
first nine months of 2008 while restructuring charges of $25,094 or 2.6 percent of net sales were
included for the same period in 2007. Restructuring charges in the third quarter of 2008 related
primarily to severance costs from the previously announced ongoing reduction in the Companys
global workforce, which is on track to be completed by the end of 2008. Service gross margin was
23.4 percent compared to 20.4 percent in the first nine months of 2007. The increase in service
gross margin was the result of productivity and efficiency gains achieved in part due to improved
product quality, which resulted in improved service gross margins domestically and internationally.
Service gross margins were adversely impacted by restructuring charges of $6,995 or 0.6 percent of
net sales in the first nine months of 2008 compared to restructuring charges of $181 in the
comparable period of 2007.
21
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of September 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Operating Expenses
The following table represents information regarding our operating expenses for the nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
$ |
405,774 |
|
|
$ |
342,568 |
|
|
$ |
63,206 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
% |
Research, development and engineering
expense |
|
|
58,275 |
|
|
|
53,115 |
|
|
|
5,160 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
Impairment of asset |
|
|
4,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,376 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
(Gain) loss on sale of assets, net |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(6,407 |
) |
|
|
6,375 |
|
|
|
-99.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
468,393 |
|
|
$ |
389,276 |
|
|
$ |
79,117 |
|
|
|
20.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of net sales |
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was 17.2
percent of net sales as compared to 16.5 percent of net sales for the first nine months of 2007.
The increase in selling, general and administrative expense as a percent of sales between years resulted in
part due to higher non-routine expenses and restructuring charges, increased sales volume and a
weakening of the U.S. dollar. Selling, general and administrative expense was impacted by non-routine
expenses of $41,839 or 1.8 percent of net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
compared to $4,212 of non-routine expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The
non-routine expenses consisted primarily of legal, audit and consultation fees related to the
internal review of other accounting items, restatement of financial
statements and the ongoing SEC and DOJ investigations and other advisory fees. Included in the non-routine expenses for the first nine
months of 2008 was a $13,500 fee owed to financial advisor Goldman Sachs as a result of the
withdrawal of the unsolicited takeover bid from United Technologies Corp. In addition,
restructuring charges of $7,037 or 0.3 percent of net sales were included in the first nine months
of 2008 compared to restructuring charges of $200 for the comparable period in 2007. Research,
development and engineering expense for the first nine months of 2008 was 2.5 percent of net sales
as compared to 2.6 percent in 2007. Research, development and engineering expense increased on
the dollar basis due to restructuring charges and was down slightly as a percent of net sales due
to higher sales volume. The Company incurred a charge of $4,376 for the impairment of asset in the
first quarter of 2008 related to the write down of intangible assets from the 2004 acquisition of
TFE Technology Holdings, a maintenance provider of network and hardware service solutions to
federal and state government agencies and commercial firms. The gain on sale of assets in 2007
resulted from the gain on the sale of the Companys manufacturing plant in Cassis, France of $6,438
associated with the Companys restructuring initiatives, and was offset by other immaterial gains
and losses.
Operating Profit
The following table represents information regarding our operating profit for the nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
% Change |
Operating profit |
|
$ |
132,764 |
|
|
$ |
81,658 |
|
|
$ |
51,106 |
|
|
|
62.6 |
% |
Operating profit margin |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Operating profit margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was 1.7 percent higher than
the comparable period of 2007. The increase in operating profit margin between years resulted in
part due to the Brazilian voting business, the Companys ongoing cost reduction efforts, higher mix
of revenue from China and improved service gross profit, partially offset by higher non-routine
expenses and restructuring charges. Operating profit in the first nine months of 2008 included
non-routine expenses of $41,839 or 1.8 percent of net sales compared to $4,212 of non-routine
expenses for the comparable period in 2007. In addition, restructuring charges of $29,561 or 1.3
percent of net sales adversely affected the operating profit in the first nine months of 2008
compared to $19,037 or 0.9 percent of net sales for the comparable period in 2007.
22
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of September 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Other Income (Expense) and Minority Interest
The following table represents information regarding our other income (expense) and minority
interest for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Investment income |
|
$ |
19,541 |
|
|
$ |
16,875 |
|
|
$ |
2,666 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(32,375 |
) |
|
|
(29,329 |
) |
|
|
(3,046 |
) |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
Miscellaneous, net |
|
|
(644 |
) |
|
|
6,850 |
|
|
|
(7,494 |
) |
|
|
-109.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
$ |
(13,478 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,604 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,874 |
) |
|
|
140.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Net Sales |
|
|
-0.6 |
% |
|
|
-0.3 |
% |
|
|
-0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
$ |
(6,800 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,579 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,221 |
) |
|
|
21.9 |
% |
Investment income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $2,666 or 15.8 percent
compared to the same period in 2007 due to a higher volume of investments at more favorable
interest rates within the Brazilian operation. Interest expense for the first nine months of 2008
was higher by 10.4 percent versus the comparable period in 2007.
Higher interest expense was related
to foreign exchange hedging activity. The unfavorable variance in miscellaneous, net was
attributable to foreign exchange gain/(loss) movement between years. The increase in minority
interest related to higher profitability in China and Latin America.
Net Income
The following table represents information regarding our net income for the nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
% Change |
Net income |
|
$ |
87,525 |
|
|
$ |
49,601 |
|
|
$ |
37,924 |
|
|
|
76.5 |
% |
Percent of net sales |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
22.2 |
% |
|
|
29.6 |
% |
|
|
-7.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased $37,924 or 76.5 percent over net
income for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007. The increase was a result of higher gross profits and a lower effective
tax rate, partially offset by higher operating expense levels resulting from increased non-routine
expenses and restructuring charges.
Segment Analysis and Operating Profit Summary
DNA first nine months of 2008 net sales increased slightly by $19,596 or
1.8 percent compared to the same period in 2007 due to higher financial self-service revenue. The
first nine months of net sales for DI increased $174,866 or 18.8 percent
over the comparable period in 2007. The increase in DI net sales was attributable to strong revenue
growth in Brazil from several large orders, Asia Pacific due to
higher China volume, and strong revenue growth in the remainder of Latin America. ES & Other third quarter of 2008 net sales
increased $82,701 compared to third quarter of 2007, of which
Brazilian election systems revenue, historically occurring every other
year,
accounted for $61,424 of the increase.
DNA first nine months of 2008 operating profit decreased $14,344 or 17.6 percent compared to the
same period in 2007. Operating profit in the first nine months of 2008 was unfavorably affected by
higher non-routine expenses, workforce optimization restructuring charges, and increased commodity
costs, partially offset by higher service profitability. DI operating profit for the first nine
months of 2008 increased $48,440 compared to the same period in 2007. The 2008 DI operating profit
was higher financial self-service revenue and profitability, partially offset by higher non-routine
expenses. ES & Other first nine months of 2008 operating profit was $17,010 higher than the same
period of 2007 due to increased volume in the Brazilian election
systems business.
Refer to Note 13 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for details of segment revenue
and operating profit.
23
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of September 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Capital resources are obtained from income retained in the business, senior notes, committed and
uncommitted credit facilities, long-term industrial revenue bonds, and operating and capital
leasing arrangements. Management expects that cash provided from the Companys capital resources
will be sufficient to finance planned working capital needs, investments in facilities or
equipment, and the purchase of the Companys common shares for at least the next twelve months.
Part of the Companys growth strategy is to pursue strategic acquisitions. The Company has made
acquisitions in the past and intends to make acquisitions in the future. The Company intends to
finance any future acquisitions with either cash provided from operations, borrowings under
available credit facilities, proceeds from debt or equity offerings and/or the issuance of common
shares.
The following table summarizes the results of our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net cash flow provided (used) by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
61,846 |
|
|
$ |
37,848 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(84,250 |
) |
|
|
(36,561 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
24,605 |
|
|
|
(126,364 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and
cash equivalents |
|
|
4,249 |
|
|
|
12,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
6,450 |
|
|
$ |
(112,218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities was $61,846 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
and increased by $23,998 compared to the same period in 2007. Cash flows from operating activities
are generated mainly from net income and controlling the components of working capital. The
primary reasons for the increase were the $37,924 increase in net income and a net increase in
certain other assets and liabilities, partially offset by an increase in trade receivables. The
change in certain other assets and liabilities was $151,122, moving from ($76,451) for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 to $74,671 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was due to
approximately $30,200 collection of refundable income taxes, $16,000 increase in accruals for
legal, audit and consultation fees, $14,200 increase in warranty reserves, $10,100 increase in VAT
taxes as a result of increased product revenue and foreign currency translation impact on certain
other assets and liabilities. The change in trade receivables was
$159,900, moving from a cash source of $92,589 for
the nine months ended September 30, 2007 to a cash use of $67,311 for the comparable period in 2008. This
increase in cash used by changes in receivables was due to
significantly higher revenues for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and receivable balances at September 30,
2008
compared to 2007. Days sales outstanding was 52 days at September 30, 2008
compared to 61 days at September 30, 2007.
Net cash used for investing activities was $84,250 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, an
increase of $47,689 from the same period in 2007. Net payments for purchases of investments were
$30,874 during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to net maturities of investments
of $22,921 during the same period in 2007, increasing net cash used for investing activities by
$53,795.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $24,605 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008,
an increase of $150,969 compared with net cash used by financing activities of $126,364 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase was largely attributable to an increase in net
note payable borrowings of $147,816.
The
Company has a credit facility with J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
with borrowing limits of $300,000 and
150,000. Under the
terms of the credit facility agreement, the Company has the ability
to increase the borrowing limits an additional $150,000. This
facility expires on April 27, 2010.
At September 30, 2008, the Company had U.S. dollar denominated private placement debt outstanding
of $300,000, U.S. dollar denominated outstanding bank credit lines approximating $275,348, euro
denominated outstanding bank credit lines approximating 80,725 (translated at $113,959) and Indian
rupee denominated outstanding bank credit lines approximating 347,422 (translated at $7,395). An
additional $127,795 was available under committed credit line agreements, and $56,679 was available
under uncommitted lines of credit. All contractual cash obligations with initial and remaining
terms in excess of one year and contingent liabilities remained generally unchanged at September
30, 2008 compared to December 31, 2007.
The Companys financing agreements contain various restrictive covenants,
including net debt to capitalization and interest coverage ratios. As of September 30, 2008
the Company was in compliance with all of its debt covenants.
24
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of September 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Managements discussion and analysis of the Companys financial condition and results of operations
is based upon the Companys consolidated financial statements. The preparation of these financial
statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, sales and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. The Company bases these estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form
the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not
readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Management believes there have been no significant changes during the quarter ended September 30,
2008 to the items that the Company disclosed as its critical accounting policies and estimates in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the
Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 03-6-1 In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) issued Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position (FSP) Emerging Task
Force (EITF) No. 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment
Transactions Are Participating Securities. Under the FSP, unvested share-based payment
awards that contain rights to receive nonforfeitable dividends (whether paid or unpaid) are
participating securities, and should be included in the two-class method of computing
earnings per share. The FSP is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008, and interim periods within those years. The adoption of FSP EITF No. 03-6-1 will not
have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 162 In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 162 (SFAS 162), The Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles. SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principals
used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are
presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (the GAAP hierarchy).
SFAS No. 162 will become effective November 15, 2008. The Company does not expect the
adoption of SFAS No. 162 to have a material effect on the Companys financial position,
results of operations or liquidity.
Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position No. 142-3 In April 2008, the FASB issued
FSP No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets, which amends the list
of factors an entity should consider in developing renewal or extension assumptions used in
determining the useful life of recognized intangible assets under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets. The position applies to intangible assets that are acquired
individually or with a group of other assets and both
intangible assets acquired in business combinations and asset acquisitions. FSP 142-3 is
effective for financial statements issued for the fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is in the process of
determining the effect that adoption of FSP No. 142-3 will have on its consolidated
financial statements.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No.
161 (SFAS 161), Disclosures about Derivatives Instruments and Hedging Activities an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS 161 applies to all entities and requires
specified disclosures for derivative instruments and related hedged items accounted for
under SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS 133). SFAS 161 amends and expands SFAS 133s existing disclosure requirements to provide
financial statement users with a better understanding of how and why an entity uses
derivatives, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under
SFAS 133, and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys
financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for fiscal
years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 161 is
not expected to have a material impact on the Companys financial position, results of
operations or liquidity.
Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160 In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160
(SFAS 160), Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an Amendment of ARB
51. SFAS 160 applies to all entities that have an outstanding non-controlling interest in one or
more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. Under SFAS 160, non-controlling interests in
a subsidiary that are currently recorded within mezzanine (or temporary) equity or as a liability
will be included in the equity section of the balance sheet. In addition, this statement requires
expanded disclosures in the financial statements that clearly identify and distinguish between the
interests of the parents owners and the interest of the non-controlling owners of the subsidiary.
25
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of September 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on
or after December 15, 2008. Application of SFAS 160s disclosure requirements is retroactive. The
Company is in the process of determining the effects that adoption of SFAS 160 will have on its
consolidated financial statements.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141(R) In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS
141 (revised 2007) (SFAS 141(R)), Business Combinations, which amends the accounting and reporting requirements
for business combinations. SFAS 141(R) places greater reliance on fair value information,
requiring more acquired assets and liabilities to be measured at fair value as of the acquisition
date. The pronouncement also requires acquisition-related transaction and restructuring costs to
be expensed rather than treated as a capitalized cost of acquisition. SFAS 141(R) is effective for
fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and the Company will implement its
requirements in future business combinations. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS
141(R) to have a material impact on the Companys historical financial position, results of
operations or liquidity.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT DISCLOSURE
In this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, statements that are not reported financial results or other
historical information are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements give current expectations or
forecasts of future events and are not guarantees of future performance. These forward-looking
statements relate to, among other things, the Companys future operating performance, the Companys
share of new and existing markets, the Companys short- and long-term revenue and earnings growth
rates, and the Companys implementation of cost-reduction initiatives and measures to improve
pricing, including the optimization of the Companys manufacturing capacity. The use of the words
will, believes, anticipates, expects, intends and similar expressions is intended to
identify forward-looking statements that have been made and may in the future be made by or on
behalf of the Company.
Although the Company believes that these forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable
assumptions regarding, among other things, the economy, its knowledge of its business, and on key
performance indicators that impact the Company, these forward-looking statements involve risks,
uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those
expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements. The Company is not obligated to update
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak
only as of the date hereof. Some of the risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking
statements include, but are not limited to:
|
|
results of the SEC and DOJ investigations; |
|
|
|
competitive pressures, including pricing pressures and technological developments; |
|
|
|
changes in the Companys relationships with customers, suppliers, distributors and/or partners in its business ventures; |
|
|
|
changes in political, economic or other factors such as currency exchange rates, inflation rates, recessionary or
expansive trends, taxes and regulations and laws affecting the worldwide business in each of the Companys operations,
including Brazil, where a significant portion of the Companys revenue is derived; |
|
|
|
the effects of the sub-prime mortgage crisis and the disruptions in the financial markets, including the bankruptcies,
restructurings or consolidations of financial institutions, which could reduce our customer base and/or adversely
effect our customers ability to make capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
acceptance of the Companys product and technology introductions in the marketplace; |
|
|
|
the amount of cash and non-cash charges in connection with the planned closure of the Companys Newark, Ohio facility; |
|
|
|
unanticipated litigation, claims or assessments; |
26
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of September 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
variations in consumer demand for financial self-service technologies, products and services; |
|
|
|
challenges raised about reliability and security of the Companys election systems products, including the risk that
such products will not be certified for use or will be decertified; |
|
|
|
changes in laws regarding the Companys election systems products and services; |
|
|
|
potential security violations to the Companys information technology systems; |
|
|
|
the Companys ability to successfully execute its strategy related to the elections systems business; and |
|
|
|
the Companys ability to achieve benefits from its cost-reduction initiatives and other strategic changes. |
27
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2008
(In thousands)
ITEM 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk inherent in its international
operations denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. A hypothetical 10 percent
unfavorable movement in the applicable foreign exchange rates would have resulted in a decrease in
2008 year-to-date operating profit of approximately $10,785. The sensitivity model assumes an
instantaneous, parallel shift in the foreign currency exchange rates. Exchange rates rarely move in
the same direction. The assumption that exchange rates change in an instantaneous or parallel
fashion may overstate the impact of changing exchange rates on amounts denominated in a foreign
currency.
The Companys risk-management strategy uses derivative financial instruments such as forwards to
hedge certain foreign currency exposures. The intent is to offset gains and losses that occur on
the underlying exposures, with gains and losses on the derivative contracts hedging these
exposures. The Company does not enter into derivatives for trading purposes. The Companys primary
exposures to foreign exchange risk are movements in the dollar/euro, dollar/yuan, dollar/forint,
and dollar/real rates. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, there were no significant
changes in the Companys foreign exchange risks compared with the prior period.
The Company manages interest rate risk with the use of variable rate borrowings under its committed
and uncommitted credit facilities, fixed rate borrowings under its private placement agreement and
interest rate swaps. Variable rate borrowings totaled $395,859 at September 30, 2008, of which
$50,000 was effectively converted to a fixed rate using interest rate swaps. A one percentage point
increase or decrease in interest rates would have resulted in an increase or decrease in interest
expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 of approximately $858 and $2,303,
respectively, on the variable debt including the impact of the swap agreements. The Companys
primary exposure to interest rate risk is movement in the three-month LIBOR rate. The Company
hedged $200,000 of the fixed rate borrowings under its private placement agreement, which was
treated as a cash flow hedge. This reduced the effective interest rate by 14 basis points from 5.50
to 5.36 percent.
ITEM 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
This
quarterly report includes the certifications of our chief executive
officer (CEO) and chief financial officer (CFO) required by Rule 13a-14 of the
Exchange Act. See Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2. This Item 4 includes information concerning the controls
and control evaluations referred to in those certifications.
Background of Restatement
As previously disclosed under Part II Item 9A Controls and Procedures in our annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, management has concluded that our internal control
over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2007.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated
under the Exchange Act) are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the
reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
In connection with the preparation of this quarterly report, Diebolds management, under the
supervision and with the participation of the CEO and CFO, conducted an evaluation of
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based
on that evaluation, including restatement of previously issued financial statements and the
identification of certain material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting,
discussed in detail below, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2008, and through the filing of this
quarterly report. Certain material weaknesses described below have not been remediated.
Nevertheless, based on a number of factors, including the completion of the Companys internal
review, internal procedures that identified revisions to previously issued financial statements
and the performance of additional procedures by management designed to ensure the reliability
of financial reporting, the Companys management believes that the consolidated financial
statements fairly present, in all material respects, the Companys financial position, results
of operations and cash flows as of the dates, and for the periods, presented, in conformity
with GAAP.
28
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2008
(In thousands)
Management identified the following control deficiencies that constituted material weaknesses as of December 31, 2007:
Description
of Material Weaknesses
Control Environment: The Companys control environment was not effective at
establishing sufficient control consciousness or the appropriate culture to promote the
consistent application of accounting policies and procedures, adherence to GAAP, and the
importance of effective internal control over financial reporting. This material weakness
contributed to the material weaknesses noted below.
Selection, Application and Communication of Accounting Policies: The Companys
policies and procedures for the selection of accounting policies and the communication of those
accounting policies to the Companys personnel for consistent application were ineffective.
This material weakness results from insufficient accounting and finance personnel with skills,
knowledge, and training in GAAP in light of the Companys geographic dispersion of the
Companys operations, decentralization of accounting functions, and disparity in accounting
systems. This material weakness resulted in additional material weaknesses in the accounting
for certain revenue transactions under SAB 104 and inventory valuation that arise from policies
and procedures that do not effectively apply GAAP in the Companys financial statements. These
material weaknesses resulted in material errors in the preparation of the Companys financial
statements.
Monitoring: The Company did not maintain monitoring activities that were effective at
ensuring that breakdowns in the operation of controls at the individual business units are
detected and corrected on a timely basis. This material weakness led to the failure to detect
deficiencies in the compliance with the Companys policies and procedures on a timely basis,
including balance sheet account review controls operated by business unit personnel.
Specifically, certain asset and accrual accounts were recorded and reconciled by numerous
individual business units without a review or reconciliation at a higher level on a total
account basis. This material weakness resulted in material errors in the preparation of the
Companys financial statements.
Manual Journal Entries: The Company did not maintain effective policies and procedures
over non-recurring manual journal entries. Specifically, effective policies and procedures
were not in place to ensure that non-recurring manual journal entries were accompanied by
sufficient supporting documentation, that supporting documentation was properly retained, and
that these journal entries were adequately reviewed and approved. This material weakness
resulted in material errors in the Companys financial statements.
Contractual Agreements: The Company did not have appropriate policies and procedures
to ensure that non-routine contractual agreements or supporting information with financial
reporting implications are received completely or in a timely manner by accounting personnel.
This material weakness resulted in material errors in the presentation and disclosure of
certain acquisitions, divestitures, sales arrangements and legal matters.
Account Reconciliations: The Companys policies and procedures did not adequately address
the steps necessary for an adequate reconciliation, the supporting documentation that should be
maintained, the timing of the performance or their review and approval. This resulted in material
weaknesses in the Companys policies and procedures with respect to account reconciliations for
accounts receivable, inventory, other assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses, deferred revenue,
and intercompany accounts.
These deficiencies give rise to a reasonable possibility of a material error occurring in each of
these accounts and not being prevented or detected on a timely basis and resulted in material
errors in the Companys financial statements.
These material weaknesses resulted in material errors and in the restatement of Diebolds
historical financial statements and resulted in errors in the Companys preliminary 2007
financial statements.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, management continued the process of implementing
certain of the remediation measures described below, including (a) development and execution of
portions of a specific and targeted communication plan involving the executive leadership and
the Board of Directors, (b) certain personnel actions, (c) implementation of the revised
revenue recognition policy, (d) the establishment of more rigorous financial reporting
policies, procedures and processes involving the review and approval of account
reconciliations, journal entries, and corresponding supporting documentation, (e) the design
and implementation of training programs, (f) an increased emphasis by the corporate accounting,
internal audit and financial controls compliance groups on reviewing key accounting controls
and processes, including documentation requirements,
29
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2008
(In thousands)
and (g) engaging expert accounting consultants to assist management with the implementation and
optimization of controls, the documentation of complex accounting transactions and the
reconciliation of deferred revenue accounts.
Diebolds management believes the remediation measures described below will remediate the
identified control deficiencies and strengthen the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. As management continues to evaluate and work to improve its internal control over
financial reporting, it may be determined that additional measures must be taken to address
control deficiencies or it may be determined that the Company needs to modify, or in
appropriate circumstances not to complete, certain of the remediation measures described below.
Remediation Steps to Address Material Weaknesses
In response to the material weaknesses identified above, management, along with the CEO and
CFO, proposed and began the implementation of several key initiatives and remediation efforts
to address the material weaknesses, as well as other areas of identified risk. These
remediation efforts, outlined below, are intended both to address the identified material
weaknesses and to enhance the Companys overall financial control environment.
Control Environment: Commencing in 2006, major efforts have been made by current
senior executives to communicate and establish an effective culture and tone necessary to
support the Companys control environment. Substantial progress has been made in addressing
the remediation of this weakness at all levels within the Company, but ongoing efforts were
still in process as of date of the filing of this quarterly report. In order to reinforce an
environment of strong consciousness and the appropriate culture within the Company to ensure
the consistent application of accounting policies, adherence with GAAP, and the importance of
internal control over financial reporting, management has developed and executed portions of a
specific and targeted communication plan involving the executive leadership and the Board of
Directors. These communications are focused on setting the tone and highlighting the
requirements and expectations for all employees related to financial reporting controls
compliance, personnel responsibilities, processes and avenues for reporting suspected
violations of the Companys Code of Conduct, and mechanisms to answer questions and address
potential concerns. In addition, the Companys executives will be required to attend
educational courses that will focus on executive fiduciary responsibilities and duties relating
to financial reporting and controls.
Selection, Application and Communication of Accounting Policies: Management has made
some personnel changes in the accounting and financial reporting functions. Actions have been
taken, related to appropriate remedial actions with respect to certain employees, including
terminations, reassignments, reprimands, increased supervision, and the imposition of financial
penalties in the form of compensation adjustments. In addition, management will continue to
enhance its accounting and finance organization personnel to better align individuals with job
responsibilities commensurate with skills sets, experience, and capabilities. The Company is
also evaluating the structure of the finance department, to further align and segregate, where
necessary, the responsibilities within the accounting, financial reporting, planning and
forecasting responsibilities. In addition, the Company is continuing to recruit additional
qualified senior accounting personnel for the accounting and finance departments, including
certified public accountants with public accounting firm experience, and designing and
implementing retention programs to ensure that personnel with this background and experience
can be retained. Management also is implementing training programs that are designed to ensure
that the Companys personnel have knowledge, experience and training in the application of GAAP
commensurate with the Companys financial reporting requirements.
In 2007, management began expansion of its existing accounting policies and procedures manual,
and issued several new policies. To date, these policies and procedures address account
reconciliations, manual journal entries, fixed assets, non-routine contractual agreements, and
access to financial information systems. Management will expand, strengthen and distribute a
financial and accounting policies and procedures manual that will specifically address revenue
recognition, recording of expenses, recording and valuation of assets, accruals and reserves
and other accounting matters. In addition, in 2007, management increased the focus and
expanded testing by internal audit and the financial controls compliance group on the review
and monitoring of key accounting processes, including journal entries, account reconciliations
and their corresponding supporting documentation and the review of complex accounting areas,
including revenue recognition. Management will continue this increased focus and expanded
testing of controls compliance related to these key accounting processes in 2008.
Starting in August 2007, management conducted training courses for numerous accounting and
finance personnel regarding accounting policies, account reconciliations and revenue
recognition. Management will continue to identify, develop and deliver targeted training, as
necessary, to global accounting and finance personnel on current financial accounting issues
and policies,
30
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2008
(In thousands)
internal controls and GAAP compliance, including specific revenue recognition training. This
training will cover proper capitalization of assets, including inventory and accrual of costs.
Finally, the training will also include the fundamentals of accounting and financial reporting
matters, including accounting policies, financial reporting requirements, account
reconciliations, documentation requirements, and other specific areas of financial reporting.
In January 2008, management formed a multi-discipline project team that has implemented
procedures and proper financial controls related to compliance with the revised revenue
recognition policy to ensure revenue is properly recognized.
Monitoring: Management continues to enhance its accounting and finance processes and
structure to facilitate completion of detailed analytical reviews of the consolidated balance
sheet at a financial statement line item level. This process will include an additional review
separate from the account owner or business unit personnel at a level of precision that is
designed to detect a breakdown in controls which could lead to errors that could be material.
The process includes a review to identify inconsistencies in application of GAAP, reporting
misclassifications of balances, and/or validates that variances in balance sheet accounts are
consistent with fluctuations in related income statement accounts.
Manual Journal Entries: In October 2007, management established a global journal entry
accounting policy governing requirements for support, review and approval of non-recurring
manual journal entries. This policy was established to ensure accuracy and completeness of
non-recurring manual journal entries on a global basis, and implemented authorization levels
for the approval of non-recurring manual journal entries that includes the review of certain
material non-recurring manual journal entries by the Vice President Corporate Controller
and/or CFO. Compliance with this policy will be tested on a regular basis by the financial
controls compliance group. In addition, management is reviewing the utilization of the
systematic application control of journal entry approvals within its ERP system.
Contractual Agreements: Management continues to evaluate and enhance controls to
develop a more formalized process for monitoring, updating, and disseminating non-routine
contractual agreements to facilitate a complete and timely review by accounting personnel.
Additional controls include the implementation of a global contractual agreement database
related to existence, completeness, approval, and retention of global contractual agreements
amongst the various departments.
Account Reconciliations: In 2006, 2007 and 2008, management engaged expert accounting
consultants to assist management with the implementation and optimization of financial controls
in various areas including the administration of existing controls and procedures, the
documentation of complex accounting transactions and the reconciliation of deferred revenue
accounts. In August 2007, management established a global account reconciliation policy
governing account reconciliation content, format, and review and approval procedures.
Compliance with this policy will be tested on a regular basis by the financial controls
compliance group. In December 2007, management began implementing a global account
reconciliation compliance monitoring tool related to existence, completeness, accuracy and
retention of account reconciliations. To date, approximately 80% of the total balance sheet
account reconciliations prepared in the United States are monitored utilizing this tool.
Global deployment of this tool is contemplated by the end of 2009. In the meantime, management
utilizes manual monitoring processes to ensure that reconciliations are completed, reviewed and
approved in a timely fashion.
The material weaknesses identified by management and discussed above are not fully remediated
as of the date of the filing of this quarterly report. Substantive procedures have been
performed by the Company in consultation with external accounting advisors to ensure the
underlying transactions within this quarterly report are supported and the financial statements
are fairly stated as of the date of the filing of this quarterly report. The Audit Committee
has directed management to develop a detailed plan and timetable for the implementation of the
above-referenced remedial measures, to the extent not already complete, and will monitor their
implementation. In addition, under the direction of the Audit Committee, management will
continue to review and make necessary changes to the overall design of the internal control
environment, as well as policies and procedures to improve the overall effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting.
31
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2008
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
At September 30, 2008, the Company was a party to several lawsuits that were incurred in the normal
course of business, none of which individually or in the aggregate is considered material by
management in relation to the Companys financial position or results of operations. In
managements opinion, the Companys consolidated financial statements would not be materially
affected by the outcome of any present legal proceedings, commitments, or asserted claims.
In addition to the routine legal proceedings noted above, the Company has been served with various
lawsuits, filed against it and certain current and former officers and directors, by shareholders
and participants in the Companys 401(k) savings plan, alleging violations of the federal
securities laws and breaches of fiduciary duties with respect to the 401(k) plan. These complaints
seek compensatory damages in an unspecific amount, fees and expenses related to such lawsuits and
the granting of extraordinary equitable and/or injunctive relief. For each of these lawsuits, the
date each complaint was filed, the name of the plaintiff and the federal court in which such
lawsuit is pending are as follows:
|
|
|
Konkol v. Diebold Inc., et al., No. 5:05CV2873 (N.D. Ohio, filed December 13, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
Ziolkowski v. Diebold Inc., et al., No. 5:05CV2912 (N.D. Ohio, filed December 16, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
New Jersey Carpenters Pension Fund v. Diebold, Inc., No. 5:06CV40 (N.D. Ohio, filed
January 6, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
Rein v. Diebold, Inc., et al., No. 5:06CV296 (N.D. Ohio, filed February 9, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
Graham v. Diebold, Inc., et al., No.5:05CV2997 (N.D. Ohio, filed December 30, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
McDermott v. Diebold, Inc., et al., No. 5:06CV170 (N.D. Ohio, filed January 24, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
Barnett v. Diebold, Inc., et al., No. 5:06CV361 (N.D. Ohio, filed February 15, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
Farrell v. Diebold, Inc., et al., No. 5:06CV307 (N.D. Ohio, filed February 8, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
Forbes v. Diebold, Inc., et al., No. 5:06CV324 (N.D. Ohio, filed February 10, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
Gromek v. Diebold, Inc., et al., No. 5:06CV579 (N.D. Ohio, filed March 14, 2006). |
The Konkol, Ziolkowski, New Jersey Carpenters Pension Fund, Rein and Graham cases, which allege
violations of the federal securities laws, have been consolidated into a single proceeding. The
McDermott, Barnett, Farrell, Forbes and Gromek cases, which allege breaches of fiduciary duties
under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 with respect to the 401(k) plan, likewise
have been consolidated into a single proceeding. The Company and the individual defendants deny the
allegations made against them, regard them as without merit, and intend to defend themselves
vigorously. On August 22, 2008, the court dismissed the consolidated amended complaint in the
consolidated securities litigation and entered a judgment in favor of the defendants. On September
16, 2008, the plaintiffs in the consolidated securities litigation filed a notice of appeal with
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
The Company filed a lawsuit on May 30, 2008 (Premier Election Solutions, Inc., et al. v. Board
of Elections of Cuyahoga County, et al., Case No. 08-CV-05-7841, (Franklin Cty. Ct Common
Pleas)) against the Board of Elections of Cuyahoga County, Ohio, the Board of County Commissioners
of Cuyahoga County, Ohio, Cuyahoga County, Ohio (collectively, the County), and Ohio Secretary of
State Jennifer Brunner (Secretary) regarding several Ohio contracts under which the Company
provided electronic voting systems and related services to the State of Ohio and a number of its
counties. The lawsuit was precipitated by the Countys threats
to sue the company for unspecified
damages. The complaint seeks a declaration that the Company met its contractual obligations. In
response, on July 15, 2008, the County filed an answer and counterclaim alleging that the voting
system was defective and seeking declaratory
32
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2008
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
relief and unspecified damages under several theories of recovery. The Secretary has also filed an
answer and counterclaim seeking declaratory relief and unspecified damages under a number of
theories of recovery.
Management is unable to determine the financial statement impact, if any, of the federal securities
class action, the 401(k) class action and the electronic voting systems action.
The Company was informed during the first quarter of 2006 that the staff of the SEC had begun an
informal inquiry relating to the Companys revenue recognition policy. In the second quarter of
2006, the Company was informed that the SECs inquiry had been converted to a formal, non-public
investigation. In the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company also learned that the DOJ had begun a
parallel investigation. The Company is continuing to cooperate with the government in connection
with these investigations. The Company cannot predict the length, scope or results of the
investigations, or the impact, if any, on its results of operations.
33
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2008
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 2: UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Information concerning the Companys share repurchases made during the third quarter of 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
that May Yet Be |
|
|
Shares |
|
Average Price |
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
Purchased Under |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
Paid Per Share |
|
Announced Plans |
|
the Plans (1) |
July |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,926,500 |
|
August |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,926,500 |
|
September |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,926,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,926,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The total number of shares repurchased as part of the publicly
announced share repurchase plan was 9,073,500 as of September 30,
2008. The plan was approved by the Board of Directors in April 1997
and authorized the repurchase of up to two million shares. The plan
was amended in June 2004 to authorize the repurchase of an additional
two million shares, and was further amended in August and
December 2005 to authorize the repurchase of an additional six million
shares. On February 14, 2007, the Board of Directors approved an
increase in the Companys share repurchase program by authorizing the
repurchase of up to an additional two million of the Companys
outstanding common shares. The plan has no expiration date. |
ITEM 6: EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
(i)
|
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of
Diebold, Incorporated incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.1(i) of Registrants Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994
(Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
(ii)
|
|
Amended and Restated Code of Regulations of
Diebold, Inc. incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 (ii) to Registrants Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007
(Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment by Shareholders to
Amended Articles of Incorporation of Diebold,
Incorporated incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to Registrants Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 1996 (Commission File
No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Amended Articles of
Incorporation of Diebold, Incorporated
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to
Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1998 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
Rights Agreement dated as of February 11, 1999
between Diebold, Incorporated and The Bank of New
York incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1
to Registrants Registration Statement on
Form 8-A dated February 2, 1999 (Commission File
No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.1
|
|
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement as amended and
restated as of September 13, 1990 incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1990 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
34
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2008
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
*10.2
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Certain Officers who are Parties to
Employment Agreements incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrants Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005 (Commission File
No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.5
|
|
(i)
|
|
Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan I as
amended and restated July 1, 2002 incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.5 (i) of Registrants
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2002 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.5
|
|
(ii)
|
|
Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan II as
amended and restated July 1, 2002 incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.5 (ii) of Registrants
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2002 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.7
|
|
(i)
|
|
1985 Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of
Diebold, Incorporated incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.7 to Registrants Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1992 (Commission File
No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.7
|
|
(ii)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated 1985
Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of
Diebold, Incorporated incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.7 (ii) to Registrants Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 1998 (Commission
File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.7
|
|
(iii)
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated 1985
Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of
Diebold, Incorporated incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.7 (ii) to Registrants Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (Commission
File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.7
|
|
(iv)
|
|
2005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of
Diebold, Incorporated, effective as of January 1,
2005 incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7(iv) to Registrants Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2005 (Commission File
No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.8
|
|
(i)
|
|
1991 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan as
Amended and Restated as of February 7, 2001 -
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) to Form
S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-60578 |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.8
|
|
(ii)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the 1991 Equity and
Performance Incentive Plan as Amended and
Restated as of February 7, 2001 incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8 (ii) to Registrants
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004
(Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.8
|
|
(iii)
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the 1991 Equity and
Performance Incentive Plan as Amended and
Restated as of February 7, 2001 incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8 (iii) to Registrants
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004
(Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
*10.8
|
|
(iv)
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to the 1991 Equity and
Performance Incentive Plan as Amended and
Restated as of February 7, 2001 incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8 (iv) to Registrants
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004
(Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.9
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Executive Incentive Plan incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of Registrants
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1993 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.10
|
|
(i)
|
|
Amended and Restated 1992 Deferred Incentive
Compensation Plan incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.10 (i) of Registrants Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (Commission
File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.10
|
|
(ii)
|
|
2005 Deferred Incentive Compensation Plan,
effective as of January 1, 2005 incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10(ii) to Registrants
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005
(Commission File No. 1-4879) |
35
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2008
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
*10.11
|
|
|
|
Annual Incentive Plan incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.11 to Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000
(Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.13
|
|
(i)
|
|
Forms of Deferred Compensation Agreement and
Amendment No. 1 to Deferred Compensation
Agreement incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.13 to Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996
(Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.13
|
|
(ii)
|
|
Section 162(m) Deferred Compensation Agreement
(as amended and restated January 29, 1998)
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 (ii)
to Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 1998 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.14
|
|
|
|
Deferral of Stock Option Gains Plan
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of
Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1998 (Commission File
No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
(i)
|
|
Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated as of
April 30, 2003 among Diebold, Incorporated, the
Subsidiary Borrowers, the Lenders and Bank One,
N.A. incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17
to Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2003 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
(ii)
|
|
First amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of
April 28, 2004 among Diebold, Incorporated, the
Subsidiary Borrowers, the Lenders and Bank One,
N.A. incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.17(ii) to Registrants Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2004 (Commission File
No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
(iii)
|
|
Second amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of
April 27, 2005 among Diebold, Incorporated, the
Subsidiary Borrowers, the Lenders and JP Morgan
Chase Bank, N.A. (successor by merger to Bank
One, N.A.) incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 on Registrants Form 8-K filed on
May 3, 2005 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
(iv)
|
|
Third amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of
November 16, 2005 among Diebold, Incorporated,
the Subsidiary Borrowers, the Lenders and JP
Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (successor by merger to
Bank One, N.A.) incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed on November 22,
2005 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
(v)
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated
November 27, 2006 among Diebold, Incorporated,
the Subsidiary Borrowers, the Lenders and
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. (successor by merger to
Bank One, N.A.)- incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.17(v) to Registrants Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2006 (Commission File
No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.18
|
|
(i)
|
|
Retirement and Consulting Agreement with Robert
W. Mahoney incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.18 of Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000
(Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.18
|
|
(ii)
|
|
Extension of Retirement and Consulting Agreement
with Robert W. Mahoney incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.18 (ii) of Registrants
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2002. (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.18
|
|
(iii)
|
|
Extension of Retirement and Consulting Agreement
with Robert W. Mahoney incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.18 (iii) to Registrants
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003
(Commission File No. 14879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.18
|
|
(iv)
|
|
Extension of Retirement and Consulting Agreement
with Robert W. Mahoney incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.18 (iv) to Registrants
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004
(Commission File No. 1-4879) |
36
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2008
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
*10.18
|
|
(v)
|
|
Extension of Retirement and Consulting Agreement
with Robert W. Mahoney incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.18 (v) to Registrants
Form 10 -Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005
(Commission File N0. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.18
|
|
(vi)
|
|
Extension of Retirement and Consulting Agreement
with Robert W. Mahoney dated March 7, 2006
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
(i)
|
|
Transfer and Administration Agreement, dated as
of March 31, 2001 by and among DCC Funding LLC,
Diebold Credit Corporation, Diebold,
Incorporated, Receivables Capital Corporation and
Bank of America, National Association and
Financial institution from time to time parties
thereto incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.20 (i) on Registrants Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2001 (Commission File
No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
(ii)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Transfer and
Administration Agreement, dated as of May 2001,
by and among DCC Funding LLC, Diebold Credit
Corporation, Diebold, Incorporated, Receivables
Capital Corporation and Bank of America, National
Association incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.20 (ii) on Registrants Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2001 (Commission File
No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.22
|
|
|
|
Form of Non-qualified Stock Option Agreement -
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to
Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2007 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.23
|
|
|
|
Form of Restricted Share Agreement incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 on Registrants
Form 8-K filed on February 16, 2005 (Commission
File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.24
|
|
|
|
Form of RSU Agreement incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.24 to Registrants Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (Commission File
No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.25
|
|
|
|
Form of Performance Share Agreement -
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to
Registrants ort on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2007 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.26
|
|
|
|
Diebold, Incorporated Annual Cash Bonus Plan -
incorporated by reference to Exhibit A of
Registrants Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A
filed on March 16, 2005 (Commission File No.
1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
|
|
Form of Note Purchase Agreement incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Form
8-K filed on March 8, 2006 (Commission File No.
1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.28
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement between Diebold,
Incorporated and Thomas W. Swidarski -
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on
Registrants Form 8-K filed on May 1, 2006
(Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
*10.29
|
|
|
|
Employment [Change in Control] Agreement between
Diebold, Incorporated and Thomas W. Swidarski -
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 on
Registrants current report on Form 8-K filed on
May 1, 2006 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
10.32
|
|
|
|
Letter Agreement (including Term Note) dated as of November 27, 2006, between Diebold, Incorporated and
PNC Bank, N.A. incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
37
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2008
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Reflects management contract or other compensatory arrangement. |
38
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2008
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED
|
|
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: November 10, 2008 |
By: |
/s/ Thomas W. Swidarski
|
|
|
|
Thomas W. Swidarski |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
Date : November 10, 2008 |
By: |
/s/ Kevin J. Krakora
|
|
|
|
Kevin J. Krakora |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
39
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2008
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
EXHIBIT NO. |
|
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
40