Table of Contents
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
| þ | Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
Or
| o | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-19467
Enpath Medical, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Minnesota | 41-1533300 | |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
2300 Berkshire Lane North, Plymouth, Minnesota 55441
(Address of principal executive office, including zip code)
(Address of principal executive office, including zip code)
(763) 951-8181
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common Stock, $.01 Par Value
Common Stock, $.01 Par Value
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act.
Yes
o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes
o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes
o No þ
The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the issuer as of June 30,
2006, the last day of the second quarter of the past fiscal year, was approximately $67,769,000.
Shares of Common Stock outstanding at March 14, 2007: 6,369,117 shares
Documents incorporated by reference:
Portions of the issuer’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders scheduled for May
3, 2007 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.
Table of Contents
2
Table of Contents
PART I
Item 1 Business
Overview
We are a medical products company engaged in designing, developing, manufacturing and
marketing single use medical device products for the cardiac rhythm management (“CRM”),
neuromodulation and interventional radiology markets. We also manufacture medical devices and
components for medical product companies on a contract basis.
We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Minnesota on August 24, 1981 under the name
“MNM Enterprises, Inc.” In March 1988, we changed our name to Medamicus, Inc. and operated under
that name until February 2004 when we changed our name to Enpath Medical, Inc. which better
reflected our mission to create pathways that enable the delivery of essential
medical therapies. This name change was done in conjunction with our acquisition of the operating
assets of BIOMEC Cardiovascular, Inc. (“BCI”) in October 2003.
Our main product lines consist of the following:
| • | Venous vessel introducers and valved introducers that enable physicians to create a conduit through which they can insert infusion catheters, implantable ports and pacemaker leads into a blood vessel. | |
| • | Advanced delivery catheters that have a “fixed curve” or articulating distal tip section that can be manipulated to enable the health care professional to access parts of the patient’s anatomy that cannot be reached by traditional introducers. | |
| • | Implantable stimulation leads, adaptors and delivery systems for the cardiac and neuromodulation markets. |
Products
Introducer Product Line
We manufacture and market a family of percutaneous venous vessel introducers with proprietary
features, including our own proprietary valved introducer. Venous introducers enable physicians to
create a conduit through which they can insert infusion catheters, implantable ports, pacemaker
leads and other therapeutic devices into a blood vessel.
In order to introduce a catheter or pacemaker lead into a vein, a hypodermic needle is first used
to access the vein. A guide wire is then inserted through the hypodermic needle and the needle is
removed. A vessel introducer, consisting of a hollow sheath and a dilator, is then inserted over
the guide wire to expand the opening. The guide wire and dilator are then removed, leaving only
the hollow sheath through which the catheter or pacemaker lead is introduced. Once the catheter or
pacemaker lead is in place, the vessel introducer sheath is removed. This process is typically
done by “peeling” the introducer in half or “slitting” it off in the case of our proprietary
introducer.
We manufacture and market both peelable introducers and our own patented slitter introducer in a
variety of sizes. We market these products in a kit that contains the disposable devices necessary
to perform catheter or lead implant procedures, and also in bulk for packaging by the customer with
its own devices. A majority of the introducers we sell incorporate proprietary technologies.
These proprietary technologies provide an entry barrier for new competitors, and further limit
existing competitors from duplicating our products. In addition to these proprietary technologies,
our proprietary “know-how” in the manufacture of these introducers further provides barriers to our
competition.
Advanced Delivery Catheter Product Line
We also design, manufacture and market guiding and articulating or “steerable” catheters. These
“advanced delivery catheters” are used by our customers to deliver therapeutic devices to specific
sites in the body. We are currently providing steerable catheters using our proprietary technology
to several different OEM customers for use with their therapeutic or diagnostic devices. Under the terms of our existing development agreements with these customers,
if the customer is successful in commercializing its therapy, we will become the manufacturer of
the delivery catheter.
3
Table of Contents
In 2005, we signed an exclusive multi-year distribution agreement with Bard Electrophysiology
(“Bard EP”), a Division of C. R. Bard, Inc., to distribute our steerable catheter into the
world-wide electrophysiology market. Under the terms of the agreement, Bard EP has certain
specified minimums to maintain exclusivity. Bard EP will also utilize the technology to deliver
its atrial fibrillation ablation catheter which is currently under development.
Lead Technologies Product Line
Our primary product line is our permanent, sutureless, ventricular epicardial (MyoPore®) pacing
leads, both bipolar and unipolar, which are used in open-heart surgery in bradycardia and
tachyarrhythmia patients, as well as in cardiac resynchronization therapy (“CRT”) procedures for
heart failure. The MyoPore lead has been on the market since 1989 and has been used in
approximately 25,000 implants worldwide. The CRT procedure for congestive heart failure is a
relatively new procedure in which one of the stimulation leads needs to be positioned in a small
vein surrounding the left side of the heart, through the coronary sinus. In approximately 10% of
these cases, the lead cannot be effectively placed, in which case the patient may be taken to a
surgical suite where a lead is placed on the epicardial surface of the heart. We manufacture one
of two leads most often used when a sutureless epicardial lead is prescribed.
We also developed a new steroid, sutureless, bipolar epicardial lead (MyoPore Rx™) designed to
reduce cardiac stimulation thresholds and improve the energy efficiency of the pacing system. The
MyoPore Rx lead uses the mechanical structure of the bipolar MyoPore lead and incorporates a
steroid plug that is provided by one of our major CRM customers in order to reduce the inflammatory
response of the cardiac tissue at implant. The MyoPore Rx lead, in cooperation with one CRM
company, has received European regulatory approval and was released in Europe in March 2005. This
CRM customer has continued selling the MyoPore Rx lead in Europe with good success and results.
Unfortunately, we were not able to gain FDA approval for selling the MyoPore Rx in the United
States and we subsequently withdrew our submission from the FDA.
Based on feedback from cardiac surgeons, we developed a new epicardial implant tool called the
FasTac Flex™. The FasTac Flex tool is designed to facilitate less invasive placement of epicardial
leads on the ventricles of the heart and offers more surgery-friendly features such as remote tip
deflection, rotation, and lead release. The FasTac Flex tool is a Class I device and did not
require formal FDA marketing clearance. Approval to market the product in Europe was received in
2005 and the same partner that is marketing the MyoPore Rx lead in Europe is also selling the
FasTac Flex tool through its European sales force. We anticipate that the FasTac Flex tool will be
launched in the United States in the first quarter of 2007 by that same customer.
Adaptors are necessary when a connector on a pacing lead wire from one generation of pacemaker
needs to be connected to a pacemaker from a newer generation. Although pacing leads are intended
to stay in the body indefinitely, pacemakers need to be exchanged every five to ten years as
batteries expire. Due to the advent of multi-polar lead technology and multi-chamber pacing and
defibrillation, a new international standard for connectors has been established in order to
accommodate this new connector technology. We anticipate the new IS-4 connector standard to be
implemented in 2007. We also currently produce five models of IS-1 implantable adaptors. We
intend to supply the IS-4 adaptor to one of the major CRM manufacturers.
Finally, we perform contract manufacturing and development services in which we design and
manufacture products at our facilities to third party customer specifications. Our contract
development and manufacturing activities include stimulation lead projects for both start-up and
mature neurostimulation and cardiac rhythm management companies. In the event of a successful
launch of a device, we would become the manufacturer of these leads.
Markets and Marketing
Each year we estimate that there are nearly five million central venous and peripheral access
procedures performed worldwide that use venous vessel introducers. Because the majority of vessel
introducers are sold in combination with the sale of infusion catheters, implantable ports or
4
Table of Contents
pacing leads, we market our vessel introducer with the catheters, implantable ports or pacing leads
of other medical device manufacturers. Accordingly, we have entered into an agreement with
Medtronic, Inc. for the inclusion of our introducers in their kits sold in the pacing lead market.
We also have agreements with a number of other companies in the pacing lead, dialysis catheter and
central venous catheter markets.
We believe Medtronic has the largest worldwide market share of CRM leads. Medtronic is currently
purchasing our sterilized introducer kits, which include a syringe, hypodermic needle and guide
wire, as well as the vessel introducer, which we produce in Medtronic-designed packaging.
Medtronic markets our vessel introducer with the slitting device worldwide under the
SOLO-TRAKTM trade name. We also manufacture and package a peelable introducer in
similar kits for Medtronic.
In October 2002, we entered into a five-year supply agreement with Medtronic that superseded all
previous supply agreements between the two companies. This agreement named us as exclusive
supplier of all of its standard right-side pacing procedure kits. There are no minimum purchase
obligations associated with the agreement, but Medtronic is obligated to purchase all of its
requirements for certain introducer procedure kits from us. This agreement will expire in October
of this year. We are currently in the process of negotiating an extension to this agreement.
We recently entered into a new development and supply agreement with a large, well-established
blue-chip medical device company to produce a new introducer design and sterile kit for an
application in the arterial access market. We estimate our development efforts will take
approximately eleven months. Although the agreement does not have guaranteed minimums, we
anticipate annual revenues of at least several million dollars per year for at least three years,
beginning in 2008, upon our successful development and commercialization of this introducer. In
the past, all of our introducer revenue has been derived from venous applications, which we
estimate to be a $50 to $60 million world-wide annual market and in which we have roughly 50%
market share today. The arterial introducer market is a much larger market than the venous
introducer market and we have made great strides securing our first customer in this market which
represents an important growth opportunity for us.
Our steerable delivery catheters are intended to be utilized with other OEM customer therapeutic or
diagnostic devices. In addition to our relationship with Bard EP, we currently have development
and supply agreements with two other companies that are employing our delivery catheter for
specific therapeutic or diagnostic clinical applications. We are developing our technology for
other applications and therapies in which we have not yet chosen a partner. We also are developing
delivery systems that can be utilized in the delivery of an epicardial lead or a neurostimulation
lead. This strategy will create more value for our products by bringing to market the lead and the
associated delivery system to precisely place the leads in the most optimal location.
We estimate that approximately 150,000 CRT procedures were conducted in 2006, and in about 10% of
those cases an epicardial lead placement was necessary to complete this procedure. We estimate
that CRT procedures will grow more than three-fold over the next five years. Two of the three
major pacing companies offer our epicardial lead when marketing their products for these
procedures.
Our primary customers for our leads, delivery systems and adaptors include the three major CRM
companies: Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Inc. and St. Jude Medical, Inc. We also package accessory
products for one of the CRM companies and perform packaging and contract manufacturing for a number
of other companies. We sell adaptors to all three major pacing companies and we are poised to
capitalize on the opportunities presented by the adoption of the new IS-4 connector standard. Our
products are sold to our OEM customers by our own sales force.
For the years ending December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, Medtronic accounted for approximately 30%,
27% and 41% of our revenues respectively. Two other customers accounted for approximately 17%, 16%
and 16% and 12%, 14% and 11% of our revenues respectively.
5
Table of Contents
Competition
Introducer Product Line
Our vessel introducers compete with peel-away vessel introducers manufactured by other OEM
manufacturers. We believe that the three major competitors in the venous introducer market are
Pressure Products, Inc.; TFX Medical, a subsidiary of Teleflex Incorporated; and Galt Medical
Corporation, a subsidiary of Theragenics Corporation. All three of these competitors market their
vessel introducers, primarily using the same strategy that we use, by establishing distribution
arrangements with existing companies in the medical field. Some of these competitors are
significantly larger and have significantly greater financial, research, and marketing resources
than we have.
Advanced Delivery Catheter Product Line
Several CRM companies, as well as other medical device companies, have proprietary steerable
delivery catheters that they utilize with their own therapeutic devices. We are not aware of any
other companies that offer finished, deflectable, FDA and CE approved catheters on an OEM basis.
Several companies, including TFX Medical, a subsidiary of Teleflex Incorporated, and Medventure
Technology, among others, do offer deflectable shafts on a contract development and manufacturing
basis.
Lead Technologies Product Line
Our primary competitors in providing stimulation leads and adaptors to OEM customers in the CRM
market are Oscor Inc. and Osypka GMBH. Oscor has a facility in Florida and Osypka GMBH is located
in Germany. Both have lines of pacing leads, adaptors and other electrophysiology devices that
they sell to major CRM companies and also to end-users through their own distributors worldwide.
Research and Development
Although our research and development activities are carried out primarily by our employees,
we have utilized outside consultants and specialists on a contract basis and expect to continue to
do so. During the past year, we continued our product development activities on a number of
projects. We have been working on broadening our venous vessel introducer product offering through
the development of a second-generation valved introducer to minimize blood loss and reduce the
possibility of an air embolism and a number of other extensions and improvements to our existing
non-valved introducer product line. We have spent a large portion of our research and development
dollars over the past two years in creating a proprietary platform around steerable catheters, and
modifying that basic platform to meet the specific needs of our customers. We intend to
aggressively pursue this strategy of developing a patented product platform that we can market to
customers for a variety of applications for the foreseeable future. The benefit of having a
proprietary platform is the ability to command better margins, keep our relationship with our
customer for a longer period of time and improve “speed-to-market” for our customers. Our Lead
Technologies group is engaged in several projects related to new CRM and neurostimulation leads,
adaptors, and delivery systems. We developed the FasTac Flex, a proprietary articulating delivery
tool specifically designed for surgical placement of our epicardial leads in heart-failure patients
undergoing CRT. We are also developing IS-4 adaptors that will adapt current style IS-1 leads and
IPG/ICD systems (pacemakers and defibrillators) to new IS-4 compatible leads and IPG/ICD systems.
The IS-4 standard has been agreed to by the major CRM manufacturers.
For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, we expensed $5.4 million, $5.4 million and
$4.7 million respectively on research and development activities. We currently have 19 employees
dedicated to research and development. We expect research and development spending in 2007 will be
comparable to the amount spent in 2006 as we continue to work on these projects and initiate new
development projects. Our research and development expenses, on a year-to-year basis, are subject
to slight fluctuations due to the nature of products being developed and whether or not we will be
able to recoup some of these costs as a portion of our non-recurring engineering billings.
6
Table of Contents
Contract Manufacturing
We perform contract manufacturing services for a variety of medical device companies in the
United States. We continue to focus our sales and development efforts on increasing our portfolio
of unique proprietary products and only actively market ourselves to the medical device industry as
a contract manufacturer if there is a significant financial opportunity or if the product is
synergistic with our current development and manufacturing capabilities. Over the past two years
we have discontinued several small contract projects. For 2006, 2005 and 2004, our contract
manufacturing sales were 13%, 18% and 17%, respectively, of total sales.
Suppliers
We currently purchase, and will continue to do so in the future, components and raw materials
from outside vendors. Although we have identified alternative suppliers for key components and raw
materials, at the present time we generally use one source of supply for each component and raw
material. Suppliers of raw materials for the vessel introducers sold to Medtronic are subject to
the approval of Medtronic, and future customers may have a right of approval as well. At present,
Medtronic has approved all of the applicable suppliers. If a key supplier is unwilling or unable
to supply a component or raw material in a timely manner, or if approval of a proposed supplier is
delayed, withheld or withdrawn, we could experience delays in obtaining alternative suppliers,
which may adversely affect our business.
Government Regulation
The medical devices we manufacture and market are subject to regulation by the FDA and, in
some instances, by state and foreign authorities. Pursuant to the Medical Device Amendments of
1976 to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and related regulations, medical devices intended
for human use are classified into three categories (Classes I, II and III), depending upon the
degree of regulatory control to which they will be subject. In the U.S. our introducer and
delivery catheter products are considered Class II devices. Our stimulation leads are considered
Class III devices.
If a Class II device is substantially equivalent to an existing (predicate) device that has been
continuously marketed since the effective date of the 1976 Amendments, FDA requirements may be
satisfied through a Pre-market Notification Submission or 510(k) under which the applicant provides
product information supporting its claim of substantial equivalence. In a 510(k) Submission, the
FDA may also require that we provide clinical test results demonstrating the safety and efficacy of
the device. Generally, Class III devices are typically life-sustaining, life supporting, or
implantable devices that must receive Pre-Market Approval (PMA) by the FDA to ensure their safety
and effectiveness. A PMA is a more rigorous approval process typically requiring human clinical
studies. The stimulation leads that we manufacture and market are typically Class III devices.
In August 2004, we submitted a “Paper PMA” (a less burdensome approach that does not require
prospective human clinical data) to gain marketing clearance for our epicardial steroid lead,
based on an indication from the FDA that a Paper PMA would be considered. Upon submission of our
data, the FDA advised us that our application did not have a “robust clinical argument” without
human clinical data. Our marketing partner for the steroid lead in Europe cooperated with us in
an effort to gather retrospective human clinical data that we could use for resubmission to the
FDA. Unfortunately, we were unable to accumulate enough statistical data as requested by the FDA
in Europe within the Pre-Market Approval timeline and we subsequently withdrew our submission from
the FDA.
As a manufacturer of medical devices, we are also subject to certain other FDA regulations and our
manufacturing processes and facilities are subject to on-going review by the FDA in order to ensure
compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practices. We believe that our manufacturing and
quality control procedures substantially conform to the requirements of FDA regulations. Our sales
and marketing practices are subject to regulation by the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services pursuant to federal anti-kickback laws, and are also subject to similar state laws.
7
Table of Contents
Our devices may also be subject to regulation in foreign countries in order to conduct business in
the European Union. Medtronic, Bard Access, St. Jude Medical, Boston Scientific and any other
entity with whom we would develop a distribution relationship are typically responsible for
obtaining approval from the foreign countries in which they desire to sell the vessel introducers
manufactured by us. In the past year, however, we have taken a greater role in obtaining European
and other country approvals. Our facilities are ISO 13485-certified and we received approval for
placement of the CE Mark on products for sale in Europe. If we elect to use independent
distributors in countries outside the European Union, we will be responsible for obtaining European
Notified Body approval to sell in those countries.
Intellectual Property
We have made, and continue to make when appropriate, efforts to obtain patents on new products
and improvements to existing products. We have 11 U.S. patents on various aspects of introducers
and advanced steerable catheters and 10 U.S. and foreign patents on various aspects of stimulation
leads and implant tools. We also have approximately 23 additional patent application disclosures
pending or in process. We also have several invention disclosures in process.
Due to the rapid technological changes experienced in the medical device industry, we believe that
the improvement of existing products, reliance upon trade secrets and unpatented proprietary
know-how are generally as important as patent protection in establishing and maintaining a
competitive advantage.
We also have twelve registered trademarks in the U.S. and Europe related to our MyoPore leads,
FasTac, other endocardial leads and pending trademarks for introducers and business marketing
services.
Employees
As of March 14, 2007, we had 260 full time employees. Of these employees, 205 were in
manufacturing activities, 6 were in sales and marketing activities, 19 were in research and
development activities, 14 were in regulatory and quality assurance activities and 16 were in
general and administrative functions. We have never had a work stoppage and none of our employees
are covered by collective bargaining agreements. We believe our employee relations are good.
Available Information
We maintain a website at www.enpathmedical.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly
reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available on our website as soon as reasonably
practicable after these documents are filed with the SEC. To obtain copies of these reports, go to
“Investor Relations” at www.enpathmedical.com and select “SEC Filings.” A copy of any report filed
by the Company with the SEC will also be furnished without charge to any shareholder who requests
it in writing from Michael D. Erdmann, Secretary, Enpath Medical, Inc., 2300 Berkshire Lane North,
Plymouth, MN 55441.
Any materials filed with the SEC can also be found at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth
Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549 or by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site
(http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information
regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.
Item 1A Risk Factors
The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing us. Additional risks
and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair
our business operations. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition or
results of operations could be seriously harmed.
8
Table of Contents
We have three major customers and depend on these customers for a significant portion of our
revenues.
Medtronic accounted for approximately 30%, 27% and 41% of sales from operations over 2006, 2005 and
2004 respectively, while two other customers accounted for approximately 17%, 16% and 16%; and 12%,
14% and 11%, respectively. We anticipate that our expected near-term future growth in sales will
be tied in part to these customers’ sales of their existing products, as well as other new products
incorporating our components. We cannot ensure that we will be successful in making sales to new
customers, reducing our reliance on thee principal customers or developing and marketing new
products. To the extent that we do not expand our customer base and product offerings, sales to
Medtronic and our other key customers will continue to account for a major portion of our revenues,
making us vulnerable to the risks described below. We anticipate that our concentration of
business with Medtronic will approximate 34% in 2007 with two other customers making up
approximately 15% and 10%, respectively.
On October 11, 2002, we entered into an exclusive supply agreement with Medtronic that requires
Medtronic to purchase all of its requirements for introducer kits from us for a period of five
years. There are no minimum purchase obligations under the supply agreement. However, there could
be a material adverse impact on sales of our products and, consequently, our financial results if
Medtronic:
| • | sales of products that incorporate our products as components decrease | ||
| • | does not develop new products incorporating our products as components | ||
| • | discontinues any of its products that incorporate our products | ||
| • | redesigns or changes the technical requirements for its products so that our products would not meet those requirements | ||
| • | limits or discontinues its purchases from us. |
In addition, under the Medtronic supply agreement, if we fail to supply certain products Medtronic
may manufacture and sell these products or have these products manufactured by another party. Our
failure to supply these products would result in a loss of sales to Medtronic and would have a
material adverse impact on our revenues. Moreover, the supply agreement establishes the pricing
Medtronic receives with respect to each product and provides that if we extend more favorable
pricing to any other customer, that same pricing will also be extended to Medtronic. A reduction
in our pricing with Medtronic could result in a decline in our overall revenue.
The current supply agreement with Medtronic will expire on October 11, 2007. We are in the process
of negotiating an extension to the supply agreement. While Medtronic may continue to purchase some
or all of it introducer requirements from Enpath after the supply agreement has expired, if an
agreeable extension to the supply agreement cannot be reached, Medtronic could pursue alternative
suppliers for their introducer requirements, which could have a material adverse impact on sales of
our products and, consequently, our financial results.
We need to successfully integrate our operations into our new facility in 2007.
We are in the process of consolidating our two existing facilities into one new facility by the
middle of April 2007. We have increased inventory levels for customers prior to the move and we
believe that the consolidation will not cause any disruption to customer shipments. However,
because of the risks associated with moving a medical products manufacturing facility, there can be
no assurance that we will not encounter issues during the move. These risks include delays in
re-qualifying manufacturing equipment and processes and customer approvals of the qualification
process, which could lead to disrupted shipments to customers affecting both current period
revenues and customer satisfaction.
In addition, we will experience increased costs as part of moving into a new larger facility and it
will be necessary for us to find cost savings and efficiencies once the consolidation is complete.
If we are not able to find these cost savings and efficiencies, our gross margins may decrease and
our operating costs may increase which could have a material adverse impact on our financial
results.
9
Table of Contents
We face intellectual property claims which could prevent us from manufacturing and selling our
products or result in our incurring substantial costs and liabilities.
We rely on patents, trade secrets, trademarks, copyrights, know-how, license agreements and
contractual provisions to establish and protect our intellectual property rights. These legal
means afford us only limited protection and may not adequately protect our rights or remedies to
gain or keep any advantages we may have over our competitors. Costly litigation may be necessary
to enforce patents issued to us, to protect trade secrets or “know-how” we own, to defend us
against claimed infringement of the rights of others or to determine the ownership, scope, or
validity of our proprietary rights and the rights of others.
In 2006, we were named as defendant in a patent infringement action filed by Pressure Products
Medical Supplies, Inc, and venued in the United States District Court in the Eastern District of
Texas. We have filed an answer denying liability and have filed counterclaims against the
plaintiff alleging anti-trust violations and patent misuse. See Item 3, Legal Proceedings.
Although we believe the plaintiff’s claims are without merit and we intend to pursue our defenses
vigorously, the existence of the lawsuit may affect our ability to successfully introduce our new
second-generation valved introducer (ViaSeal™ Valved Peelable Introducer).
Any claim of infringement against us may involve significant liabilities to third parties, could
require us to seek licenses from third parties, and could prevent us from manufacturing, selling,
or using our products. The occurrence of litigation or the effect of an adverse determination in
any of this type of litigation could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
We depend on patents and proprietary technology
Our success may depend on our ability to obtain patent protection for our products and processes,
to preserve our trade secrets and to operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of third
parties. We have 21 U.S. and foreign patents issued related to various aspects of vessel
introducers, catheters, stimulation leads and implant tools. There can be no assurance that any
future patent protection will be granted, that the scope of any patent protection will exclude
competitors or that any of our patents will be held valid if subsequently challenged. The validity
and breadth of claims covered in medical technology patents involve complex legal and factual
questions and therefore may be highly uncertain. We also rely upon unpatented trade secrets, and
cannot ensure that others will not independently develop or otherwise acquire substantially
equivalent trade secrets or otherwise gain access to our proprietary technology.
Our products are subject to regulatory oversight.
The medical products that we sell and propose to sell are subject to regulation by the FDA and by
comparable agencies in certain states and foreign countries. The process of complying with
requirements of the FDA and other agencies can be costly and time consuming. We have received
clearance from the FDA to market our vessel introducer products, safety needle, steerable catheter,
and epicardial lead and implant tool. There is no assurance that any future additional clearance
can be obtained. In addition, once obtained, these clearances are subject to review and later
discovery of problems may result in restrictions on the marketing of a product or withdrawal of the
product from the market. We are also subject to certain FDA regulations governing manufacturing
practices, packaging and labeling. Non-compliance with these regulations can result in product
recalls or other sanctions which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial
condition. In 2006, we voluntarily initiated Class 2 recalls of a limited number of units of our
steerable sheath catheters and a pacemaker lead adaptor, based on deficiencies we discovered in our
manufacturing process. We followed FDA guidelines for notification of customers and return of the
products, and have received no reports of injuries. We believe that we now have appropriate
quality assurance procedures in place and that we have completed all applicable procedures.
Although these recalls required time and attention from management and our regulatory personnel and
could have an effect on customer relationships, the recalls did not have a material effect on our
business.
We risk product liability claims and product recalls.
The manufacture and sale of medical products entails significant risk of product liability claims
or product recalls. Our existing insurance coverage limits may not be adequate to protect us from
any liabilities we may incur in connection with clinical trials or the sales of our products. We
may require increased product liability coverage as our products are commercialized. Insurance is
expensive and may not be
10
Table of Contents
available on acceptable terms, or at all. A successful product liability
claim or series of claims brought against us in excess of our insurance coverage, or a recall of
our products, could have a significant negative effect on our business and financial condition.
Even unsuccessful claims could result in the expenditure of funds for legal fees and require
management time and could have a negative impact on our business.
Our research and development projects may not reach technological feasibility.
We are planning on spending approximately the same amount in 2007 as we did in 2006 to continue the
development of several new products. These products include a number of leads on a contract
development basis for a variety of neurostimulation clinical applications, the new IS-4 adaptors,
modified steerable delivery catheters for other applications and a second generation valved
introducer for the pacing and central venous catheter markets. While we believe that these
products will reach technological feasibility, because of the risks associated with the commercial
viability of these products, there can be no assurance that these projects will actually achieve
commercialization. These risks include the delay or failure to obtain the necessary regulatory
approvals or the failure to achieve market acceptance.
We face competition and rapid technological change.
We are faced with competition and rapid technological and industry change and if our competitors’
existing products or new products are more effective or superior to our products, the commercial
opportunity for our products could be reduced or eliminated. We face competition from other device
manufacturers, many of whom are significantly larger and have greater financial, technical,
research, marketing, sales, distribution and other resources than we do. We believe there will be
competitive pricing for products developed in our markets. Our competitors may develop or market
technologies and products that are more effective or commercially attractive than any we are
developing or marketing. Our competitors may succeed in obtaining regulatory approval and
introducing or commercializing products before we do. These developments could have a significant
negative effect on our financial condition. Even if we are able to compete successfully, we may
not be able to do so in a profitable manner. The medical device industry is generally
characterized by rapid technological change, changing customer needs, and frequent new product
introductions. Our products may be rendered obsolete as a result of future innovations.
We have limited sources of supply for our products.
We currently purchase, and will continue to purchase, components and raw materials from outside
vendors. Although we have identified alternative suppliers for key components and raw materials,
at the present time we generally use one source of supply for each component and raw material. If
a key supplier becomes unwilling or unable to supply any such component or raw material in a timely
manner, or if approval of a proposed supplier is delayed, withheld or withdrawn, we could
experience delays in obtaining alternative suppliers which may adversely affect our business.
We may need additional capital in the future.
In October 2003, we entered into a financing arrangement with our principal bank that included a
five-year term loan of $5 million to finance a portion of the acquisition of BIOMEC Cardiovascular
Inc., and a $3 million line of credit. The bank has increased the line of credit limit to $4
million and extended the expiration date to April 30, 2007. The borrowings are secured by
substantially all of our assets and also contain financial covenants that must be met on a
quarterly basis. The agreement also prohibits the payment of dividends without the consent of the
lender. Payments on the term loan consist of monthly principal payments of $83,334 plus interest
at LIBOR plus 2.5%. These payments commenced in November 2003. The line of credit bears interest
at LIBOR plus 2.25% with no minimum interest due and expires on April 30, 2007, if not renewed.
Our availability under the line is subject to borrowing base requirements, and advances are at the discretion of the lender. There
were no borrowings under the line of credit at December 31, 2006, and the entire $4 million was
available for use.
In August 2006, we entered into a second financing arrangement with this bank that included a
seven-year term loan of up to $4 million which will be used to finance the build-out of our new
facility. The borrowings will be secured by substantially all of our assets and the new leasehold
improvements. This financing arrangement was amended in January 2007 to allow for a term loan of
up to $5 million. Payments on the new
11
Table of Contents
term loan
will consist of interest payments only on the amount borrowed at LIBOR plus 2.5% until the end of March 2007. Beginning April 2007, the term
loan amount will become fixed based on the amount borrowed and payments will commence at a fixed
rate plus interest at LIBOR plus 2.5% for the remaining term of the loan. As of December 31, 2006,
we had no outstanding borrowings on this term loan. We anticipate that we will utilize
approximately $4.5 million of this credit facility to complete the consolidation of our facilities.
While we believe that we have sufficient resources with our current cash and the two credit
facilities to meet our long-term debt obligations and fund our planned operations for fiscal 2007,
there is no assurance that we will not need additional capital in the future. Sources of
additional capital may include additional debt financing or the sale of debt or equity securities.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully obtain additional capital on
favorable terms.
We depend on our key personnel.
Failure to attract and retain skilled personnel could hinder our research and development and
manufacturing efforts. Our future success depends to a significant degree upon the continued
services of key technical and senior management personnel. Our future success also depends on our
continuing ability to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified managerial and technical
personnel. Our inability to retain or attract qualified personnel could have a significant
negative effect upon our efforts and thereby materially harm our business and financial condition.
We have a limited public market for our common stock.
As of March 14, 2007, we had 6,369,117 shares of common stock outstanding. The average daily
trading volume in our Common Stock approximated 14,000 shares in 2004, 11,000 shares in 2005 and
15,000 shares in 2006. There can be no assurance that an active market will exist for our common
stock, or that any significant volume of our common stock could be sold without a significant
negative impact on the publicly quoted price per share.
Our future operating results are difficult to predict and may vary significantly from quarter to
quarter, which may adversely affect the price of our common stock.
If our revenue declines in a quarter compared to the revenue in the previous quarter, our earnings
will likely decline as well because many of our expenses are relatively fixed. In particular,
research and development, sales and marketing and general and administrative expenses are not
affected directly by variations in revenue. In some future quarter or quarters, due to a decrease
or shortfall in revenue or for some other reason, our operating results likely will be below the
expectations of securities analysts or investors. In this event, the market price of our common
stock may fall abruptly and significantly.
Item 1B Unresolved Staff Comments
None
Item 2 Properties
We are in the final stages of consolidating our two existing facilities into one new corporate
facility. Our new facility is located at 2300 Berkshire Lane, Plymouth, MN 55441 and we anticipate
completing the consolidation by the middle of April 2007. At this facility, we will occupy 95,691
square feet of space under a ten year lease
agreement that began January 1, 2007. The lease also provides for one five-year extension that is
automatic if we do not give a twelve-month notice of evacuation.
Our existing Plymouth facility, located at 15301 Highway 55 West, Plymouth, Minnesota 55447, houses
our introducer and advanced delivery catheter product manufacturing, as well as all of our
corporate and administrative functions. Our lease at this facility expires on June 30, 2007. Under
this lease, we occupy 38,337 square feet of space.
12
Table of Contents
Our existing Bloomington facility, located at 7452 West 78th Street, Bloomington,
Minnesota 55439, houses our lead product manufacturing. Our lease at this facility expires on
December 31, 2008. Under this lease, we occupy 24,928 square feet of space.
Due to the fact that there are only three months remaining on our existing Plymouth facility as of
our filing date, we estimate that we will incur charges of approximately $120,000 in the second
quarter for remaining rent, common area maintenance, taxes and other miscellaneous charges. We are
attempting to sublet the Bloomington facility and while we have some interested parties, we do not
yet have any signed agreements. If the Bloomington facility cannot be sublet, we may have to take
a charge for some portion of the remaining rent, common area maintenance and real estate taxes in
the second quarter of 2007. The total amount due from April 2007 to December 2008 for rent, common
area maintenance and taxes on the Bloomington facility is approximately $475,000.
Item 3 Legal Proceedings
On June 12, 2006, Enpath was named as defendant in a patent infringement action filed by
Pressure Products Medical Supplies, Inc, and venued in the United States District Court in the
Eastern District of Texas. On October 2, 2006, Enpath was officially served. Enpath has filed an
answer denying liability and has filed counterclaims against the plaintiff alleging anti-trust
violations and patent misuse.
The plaintiff has alleged that the Company’s FlowGuard™ valved introducer, which has been on the
market for more than three years, infringes claims in the plaintiff’s patents and is seeking
damages and injunctive relief. Enpath believes that the plaintiff’s claims are without merit and
intends to pursue its defenses vigorously. Revenues from products sold that include the FlowGuard
valved introducer were approximately 5% of Enpath’s total revenue for years ended December 31, 2006
and 2005.
The lawsuit is currently in the discovery stage. Enpath anticipates that the Court will hold a
Markman Hearing to construe the claims of the plaintiff’s patents in August 2007.
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the quarter ended December 31,
2006.
13
Table of Contents
PART II
| Item 5 | Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
Our Common Stock is traded on The Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol NPTH. The table below
shows the high and low closing sales prices for the quarters indicated.
| 2006 | High | Low | ||||||
Q4 |
$ | 14.55 | $ | 9.07 | ||||
Q3 |
$ | 14.55 | $ | 9.14 | ||||
Q2 |
$ | 14.55 | $ | 9.75 | ||||
Q1 |
$ | 14.55 | $ | 8.45 | ||||
| 2005 | High | Low | ||||||
Q4 |
$ | 8.65 | $ | 6.96 | ||||
Q3 |
$ | 8.09 | $ | 5.45 | ||||
Q2 |
$ | 8.60 | $ | 5.44 | ||||
Q1 |
$ | 10.75 | $ | 7.49 | ||||
Holders and Dividends
As of March 8, 2007, we had 284 record holders and approximately 1,550
beneficial holders of our Common Stock. We have not paid cash dividends in the past and do not
expect to do so in the foreseeable future. Under the terms of our bank credit facilities, we are
prohibited from paying any dividends without the consent of the bank.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Equity Securities
The Company had no unregistered sales of equity securities during the quarter ended December 31,
2006.
Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities
We did not repurchase any of our equity securities during the quarter ended December 31, 2006.
Other Information Regarding Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth information regarding our equity compensation plans in effect as of
December 31, 2006. Each of our equity compensation plans is an “employee benefit plan” as defined
by Rule 405 of Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
| Number of shares of | Number of shares of | |||||||||||
| common stock to be | common stock | |||||||||||
| issued upon exercise | Weighted-average | remaining available | ||||||||||
| of outstanding | exercise price of | for future issuance | ||||||||||
| options, warrants and | outstanding options, | under equity | ||||||||||
| Plan Category | rights | warrants and rights | compensation plans | |||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by
shareholders: |
||||||||||||
1999 Stock Option Incentive Plan |
629,300 | $ | 10.13 | 247,950 | ||||||||
1999 Non-Employee Director and
Medical Advisory Board Stock
Option Plan |
160,000 | $ | 8.97 | 176,500 | ||||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved
by shareholders: |
||||||||||||
1991 Non-statutory Plan |
7,500 | $ | 3.63 | 0 | ||||||||
2003 Warrants issued in
connection with acquisition of
assets of BCI |
10,000 | $ | 8.36 | 0 | ||||||||
Totals |
806,800 | $ | 9.82 | 424,450 | ||||||||
14
Table of Contents
Comparative Stock Performance
The SEC requires that the Company include in this Form 10-K a line graph presentation comparing
cumulative, five-year shareholder returns on an indexed basis with a broad market index and either
a nationally-recognized industry standard or an index of peer companies selected by the Company.
The Company has chosen to use the Nasdaq Stock Market (U.S. Companies) Index as its broad market
index and the Nasdaq Non-Financial Stock Index as its peer group index. The table below compares
the cumulative total return as of the end of each of the Company’s last five fiscal years on $100
invested as of December 31, 2001 in the common stock of the Company, the Nasdaq Stock Market Index
and the Nasdaq Non-Financial Stock Index, assuming the reinvestment of all dividends:
| 12/31/01 | 12/31/02 | 12/31/03 | 12/31/04 | 12/30/05 | 12/29/06 | |||||||||||||||||||
Enpath Medical, Inc. |
$ | 100.00 | $ | 54.31 | $ | 84.51 | $ | 69.41 | $ | 54.63 | $ | 93.51 | ||||||||||||
Nasdaq Stock Market (U.S.) |
$ | 100.00 | $ | 64.47 | $ | 96.70 | $ | 105.01 | $ | 106.46 | $ | 117.03 | ||||||||||||
Nasdaq Non-Financial Stocks |
$ | 100.00 | $ | 65.33 | $ | 100.01 | $ | 107.85 | $ | 110.30 | $ | 120.97 | ||||||||||||
Since the
Company’s fiscal year ends on the last day of December each year, data in the above
table reflects market values for the Company’s stock and Nasdaq indices as of the close of trading
on the last trading day of each year presented.
15
Table of Contents
Item 6 Selected Financial Data
The following selected financial data as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for the three years
ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 are derived from, and should be read together with, our
financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The following selected financial data
as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002
are derived from financial statements not included herein. The information set forth below should
be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations,” the Financial Statements and Notes thereto and other financial information
included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||
Statements of Operations Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 36,840 | $ | 29,368 | $ | 29,489 | $ | 19,603 | $ | 17,879 | ||||||||||
Cost of sales |
23,233 | 18,711 | 18,319 | 11,627 | 9,504 | |||||||||||||||
Gross Profit |
13,607 | 10,657 | 11,170 | 7,976 | 8,375 | |||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
5,404 | 5,393 | 4,730 | 1,987 | 1,661 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
6,218 | 5,278 | 5,415 | 3,082 | 2,272 | |||||||||||||||
Impairment charge on safety needle investment |
0 | 0 | 2,809 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Purchased in-process research and development |
0 | 0 | 0 | 2,650 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
11,622 | 10,671 | 12,954 | 7,719 | 3,933 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
1,985 | (14 | ) | (1,784 | ) | 257 | 4,442 | |||||||||||||
Other income (expense)
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
income |
13 | 0 | 2 | 40 | 78 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(182 | ) | (254 | ) | (206 | ) | (52 | ) | (23 | ) | ||||||||||
Other income (expense) |
(40 | ) | 78 | (7 | ) | (9 | ) | (4 | ) | |||||||||||
Total other income (expense) |
(209 | ) | (176 | ) | (211 | ) | (21 | ) | 51 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
1,776 | (190 | ) | (1,995 | ) | 236 | 4,493 | |||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
277 | (523 | ) | (699 | ) | (73 | ) | 1,634 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 1,499 | $ | 333 | $ | (1,296 | ) | $ | 309 | $ | 2,859 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) per common share — Basic |
$ | 0.24 | $ | 0.06 | $ | (0.22 | ) | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.61 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) per common share — Diluted |
0.24 | 0.05 | (0.22 | ) | 0.06 | 0.57 | ||||||||||||||
Weighted average common and common
equivalent shares outstanding |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
6,201 | 5,961 | 5,843 | 4,918 | 4,712 | |||||||||||||||
Diluted |
6,322 | 6,075 | 5,843 | 5,169 | 4,974 | |||||||||||||||
| As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 523 | $ | — | $ | 363 | $ | 1,068 | $ | 7,304 | ||||||||||
Working capital |
7,537 | 5,994 | 5,220 | 4,558 | 8,858 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
33,393 | 30,051 | 31,168 | 33,561 | 18,571 | |||||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
4,477 | 2,967 | 4,162 | 4,842 | 2,843 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
5,204 | 5,025 | 7,393 | 10,571 | 3,143 | |||||||||||||||
Shareholders’ equity |
28,189 | 25,026 | 23,775 | 22,990 | 15,428 | |||||||||||||||
16
Table of Contents
| Item 7 | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Overview
We are a medical products company engaged in designing, developing, manufacturing and marketing
single use medical device products for the cardiac rhythm management (“CRM”), neuromodulation and
interventional radiology markets. We also manufacture medical devices and components for medical
product companies on a contract basis.
We manufacture and market a family of percutaneous venous vessel introducers with proprietary
features, as well as our own proprietary valved introducer. Vessel introducers enable physicians
to create a conduit through which they can insert infusion catheters, implantable ports and
pacemaker leads into a blood vessel. These products make up our Introducer product line. We also
develop and manufacture advanced delivery catheters that have a “fixed curve” or an articulating
distal tip section that can be manipulated to enable the health care professional to access parts
of the patient’s anatomy (such as the left ventricle of the heart) that cannot be reached by
traditional introducers. These sophisticated advanced delivery catheters are designed and
manufactured to meet the unique needs of each procedure being performed. These products make up
our Advanced Delivery Catheter product line. We also develop and manufacture proprietary and
custom designed implantable stimulation leads, adaptors and delivery systems for the cardiac and
neuromodulation markets. These products make up our Lead Technologies product line.
Recent Events
| • | On December 21, 2006, we received 510(k) clearance from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to commercialize one model of the Enpath Medical ViaSeal Valved Peelable Introducer. The ViaSeal is designed to provide an atraumatic method for introducing devices such as catheters and pacemaker leads into the venous system while providing hemostatic sealing to venous pressures. The ViaSeal has a “peel-away” feature which allows the user to remove the introducer without removing the inserted therapeutic device. The ViaSeal is offered in sizes from 7 French to 10.5 French. The ViaSeal is Enpath’s first Peelable Introducer product to provide hemostatic sealing. | |
| • | We are in the final stages of consolidating our two existing facilities into one new corporate facility. Our new facility is located at 2300 Berkshire Lane, Plymouth, MN 55441 and we anticipate completing the consolidation by March 31, 2007. We will occupy approximately 95,691 square feet of space under a ten year lease agreement that begins January 1, 2007. The lease also provides for one five-year extension that is automatic if we do not give a twelve-month notice of evacuation. | |
| • | We recently entered into a new development and supply agreement with a large, well-established blue-chip medical device company to produce a new introducer design and sterile kit for an application in the arterial access market. We estimate our development efforts will take approximately eleven months. Although the agreement does not have guaranteed minimums, we anticipate annual revenues of at least several million dollars per year for at least three years beginning in 2008 upon our successful development and commercialization of this introducer. |
Results of Operations
Through December 31, 2005, we combined the sales and gross profits of the Introducer product line
and the Advanced Delivery Catheter product line under the heading Delivery Systems and we listed
the sales and gross profits of the Lead Technologies product line under the heading Lead
Technologies. Some of our product sales that were classified as Delivery Systems in past periods
have been segregated into the Introducer product line and the Advanced Delivery Catheter product
line. We have reclassified the product line sales categories from 2005 and 2004 in order to give a
better product line comparison. Overall, the business is aggregated into one reportable
segment: the manufacture and sale of single use medical devices. Our products have similar
customers, economic characteristics and regulatory requirements. We support all sales activities
with one sales and marketing department and our general and administrative function has
responsibility for the entire company.
17
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain items from our statements of
operations expressed as a percentage of net sales:
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
Net sales |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||
Cost of sales |
63.1 | % | 63.7 | % | 62.1 | % | ||||||
Gross Profit |
36.9 | % | 36.3 | % | 37.9 | % | ||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||
Research and development |
14.6 | % | 18.3 | % | 16.1 | % | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
16.9 | % | 18.0 | % | 18.4 | % | ||||||
Impairment charge on safety needle investment |
— | — | 9.5 | % | ||||||||
Total operating expenses |
31.5 | % | 36.3 | % | 44.0 | % | ||||||
Operating income (loss) |
5.4 | % | — | (6.1 | %) | |||||||
Other expense |
(0.6 | %) | (0.6 | %) | (0.7 | %) | ||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
4.8 | % | (0.6 | %) | (6.8 | %) | ||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
0.7 | % | (1.7 | %) | (2.4 | %) | ||||||
Net income (loss) |
4.1 | % | 1.1 | % | (4.4 | %) | ||||||
Our primary products are categorized into three product lines. The following table sets
forth, for the periods indicated, net revenue by product line along with the percentage change from
the previous year:
| For Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Percent | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net Sales | Change | Net Sales | Change | Net Sales | ||||||||||||||||
Introducers |
$ | 25,346,000 | 35.4 | % | $ | 18,713,000 | 3.1 | % | $ | 18,151,000 | ||||||||||
Advanced Delivery Catheters |
2,645,000 | 50.2 | % | 1,761,000 | -36.9 | % | 2,790,000 | |||||||||||||
Lead Technologies |
8,849,000 | -0.5 | % | 8,895,000 | 4.1 | % | 8,548,000 | |||||||||||||
Total Net Sales |
$ | 36,840,000 | 25.4 | % | $ | 29,369,000 | -0.4 | % | $ | 29,489,000 | ||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2006 compared to year ended December 31, 2005
For the year ended December 31, 2006, sales of $36.8 million increased 25.4% when compared to $29.4
million in 2005. Sales of our introducer products increased to $25.3 million, up 35.4% or $6.6
million, when compared to the $18.7 million reported for 2005 due primarily to increased sales to
both existing and new customers, including significant orders from a European cardiac rhythm
management customer. In 2006, advanced delivery catheter revenue of $2.6 million was up 50.0%, or
nearly $900,000, when compared to the $1.8 million reported in 2005. As anticipated, our advanced
delivery catheter revenues increased dramatically late in 2005 and early in 2006 as our partners
built inventory, generated market awareness and launched the products. Since the first half of
2006, sales have declined as those customers are in the relatively early stages of their marketing
efforts. Sales of our lead technologies products decreased slightly in 2006 when compared to the
$8.9 million reported in 2005 due primarily to decreased sales of our contract manufacturing
accessory products. This decrease was mostly off-set by increased sales of leads to both our
largest OEM customer as well as other OEM customers. Our largest leads customer is currently
selling
our steroid epicardial lead in Europe and also commenced selling the FasTac Flex® delivery tool in
Europe late in 2005. This customer also has plans to launch the FasTac Flex in the United States
in 2007. In 2006, approximately 8% of our sales were generated outside of the United States as
compared to 6% for 2005.
We continue to attract new partners due to our ability to quickly adapt our base introducer product
line to each partner’s specific needs and we expect introducer revenues to remain strong in 2007,
but not at the growth rates we experienced in 2006. We expect advanced delivery system revenue in
2007 to be comparable to 2006 and we will continue to invest in catheter development and partner
with a number of customers that pay for development activities related to additional new products.
We expect to see an increase in sales of our lead technologies products in 2007 over 2006.
18
Table of Contents
Gross profit increased to 36.9% in 2006 from 36.3% in 2005 due primarily to higher introducer sales
and production efficiencies. During 2006, the improved efficiencies from higher volume in our
introducer product line were offset by the margin challenges in our catheter product line. The
most significant factor was our on-going investment to correct the yield issues in our steerable
catheter product line. Throughout the year, we continued the effort to reduce catheter production
yield losses and improve efficiencies and we achieved our yield target by mid-fourth quarter of
2006. This will improve our overall margin picture for 2007. We expect our gross margins to
improve to the 40-42% range during 2007.
Research and development expenses from 2005 to 2006 remained relatively flat at $5.4 million,
primarily due to continued work on developing product platforms to grow the business that was
started in 2005. As a percentage of revenues, R & D spending decreased in 2006 to 14.7% of
revenues as compared to 18.4% for 2005. We expect research and development spending in 2007 will
be comparable to the amount spent in 2006 as we continue to work on these projects and initiate new
development projects. Our research and development expenses, on a year-to-year basis, are subject
to slight fluctuations due to the nature of products being developed and whether or not we will be
able to recoup some of these costs as a portion of our non-recurring engineering billings.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2006 were $6.2 million or 16.9% of revenues, as
compared to $5.3 million or 18% of revenues in 2005. In 2006, the Company incurred expenses
related to the implementation of stock-based compensation accounting (FAS123R) which the Company
adopted effective January 1, 2006, additional personnel and related costs, Sarbanes-Oxley
compliance activities, legal costs associated with our patent infringement lawsuit and we absorbed
the cost of additional rent expense on our new facility starting in July 2006. The Company will
incur duplicate rent expense until the existing properties in both Bloomington and Plymouth have
been sublet or the lease term expires, the earlier of which is June of this year and the latest
being the end of 2008. In 2007, we also anticipate additional legal costs associated with our
patent infringement lawsuit, an increase in Sarbanes-Oxley compliance work as well as the continued
effects of stock-based compensation, all of which could likely result in an increase in our
selling, general and administrative expenses in both absolute dollars and as a percent of revenue.
Interest expense decreased primarily due to lower balances on the note payable as well as having no
outstanding borrowings on the line of credit in 2006. Other expenses for 2006 were primarily due
to writing off of the remaining value of an unused patent while other income for 2005 was primarily
due to the sale of a piece of equipment.
Year ended December 31, 2005 compared to year ended December 31, 2004
For the year ended December 31, 2005, sales of $29.4 million decreased slightly from the $29.5
million recorded in 2004. Sales of our introducer products increased slightly from 2004 to 2005
primarily due to sales patterns stabilizing after the FlowGuard™ valved introducer launch in 2004.
Sales of our advanced delivery products decreased from 2004 to 2005, primarily due to continued
declining component and kit sales to Medtronic for their Left Ventricle Lead Delivery System
(“LVLDS”) as Medtronic continued to integrate this product line into its own facility. Sales of
our lead technologies products increased slightly in 2005 compared to 2004, primarily due to
increased accessory sales and non-recurring engineering service billings, off-set by lower sales of
leads and adaptors. We had hoped to launch our new MyoPore Rx™ steroid epicardial lead at the
beginning of 2005, but because of the FDA’s decision to require human clinical data in order to receive approval for this
product, our partners slowed their purchasing of MyoPore epicardial leads until there was some
final resolution to the situation. In 2005 and 2004, approximately 6% of our sales were generated
outside of the United States
Gross profit decreased to 36.3% in 2005 from 37.9% in 2004 due primarily to the lower sales of
high margin components and kits to Medtronic for its LVLDS product line which was included in the
advanced delivery catheter sales numbers. We also incurred start-up costs as we increased
production capabilities for our advanced steerable catheter manufacturing.
19
Table of Contents
Research and development expenses increased in 2005 to $5.4 million, or 18.4% of revenue, from
$4.7 million, or 16.0% of revenue in 2004. The increase is primarily due to the strategic
decision to expand our product line by developing a proprietary platform around advanced steerable
catheters. The development work on this platform increased during 2005 as we began to incorporate
this technology into therapeutic devices for various companies. In addition, in 2004 we began the
process of preparing the information and conducting tests to be able to file our submission with
the FDA to gain marketing clearance for our steroid lead. When the FDA determined that it was
going to require human clinical data in order to grant clearance, we appealed that decision which
resulted in substantial legal and consulting costs in 2005.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased in 2005 to $5.3 million or 18.0% of revenue
as compared to $5.4 million or 18.4% of revenue, in 2004, primarily due to lower salaries and
advertising costs. We also spent more on advertising in 2004 as we introduced our new Enpath
corporate name and brand identity to the marketplace.
Income Taxes
In 2006, we included the benefit related to current year R&D tax credits due to the extension of
the tax law during the fourth quarter. In addition, we reversed previously recorded tax reserves
that were determined no longer needed due to the closing of the statute of limitations. As a
result, we were able to record a tax benefit of approximately $270,000 for current year R&D credits
during 2006 as compared with tax credits of approximately $340,000 in the fourth quarter of 2005.
We also recorded a benefit of approximately $140,000 during 2006 related to the reversal of
previously recorded reserves.
As a result of these benefits and other permanent differences and adjustments, our effective tax
rate for 2006 was approximately 16%. We expect that our overall state and federal tax
rate for 2007 will approximate 22% due to additional extraterritorial income exclusion resulting
from sales outside the United States and R&D credit benefits related to prior tax years.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2006 we had cash and cash equivalents of $523,483 compared to $0 as of December
31, 2005. Net cash provided by operating activities during 2006 was $3.5 million, consisting
primarily of net income of $1.5 million, adjusted for non-cash items of depreciation and
amortization of $2.6 million, stock based compensation of $448,000, intangible asset impairment
charges of $121,000 and a net change in our deferred tax benefit of $190,000. These increases were
offset in part by the net change in operating assets and liabilities of $1.3 million.
Net cash used in investing activities during 2006 was approximately $3.0 million, consisting
primarily of the purchase of property and equipment totaling $2.9 million and additions to
intangible assets totaling $255,000, offset by proceeds on a note receivable of $90,000.
Approximately $1.5 million of the $2.9 million property and equipment additions were related to
leasehold improvements on the new facility.
Net cash provided by financing activities during 2006 totaled approximately $12,000. We had
proceeds from the exercise of stock options of $1.0 million and a tax benefit from options
exercised of $176,000. This was partially offset by payments made on our long-term debt and
capital lease obligations of $1.2 million.
In October 2003, we entered into a financing arrangement with our principal bank that included a
five-year term loan of $5 million, to finance a portion of the acquisition of BIOMEC Cardiovascular
Inc., and a $3 million line of credit. The bank has increased the line of credit limit to $4
million and extended the expiration date to April 30, 2007. The borrowings are secured by
substantially all of our assets and also contain financial covenants that must be met on a
quarterly basis. The agreement also prohibits the payment of dividends without the consent of the
lender. Payments on the term loan consist of monthly principal payments of $83,334 plus interest
at LIBOR plus 2.5%. These payments commenced in November 2003. The line of credit bears interest
at LIBOR plus 2.25% with no minimum interest due and expires on April 30, 2007, if not renewed.
Our availability under the line is subject to borrowing base requirements, and advances are at the
discretion of the lender. There were no borrowings under the line of credit at December 31, 2006,
and the entire $4 million was available for use.
20
Table of Contents
In August 2006, we entered into a second financing arrangement with our principal bank that
included a seven-year term loan of up to $4 million which will be used to finance the build-out of
our new facility. The borrowings will be secured by substantially all of our assets and the new
leasehold improvements. This financing arrangement was amended in January 2007 to allow for a term
loan of up to $5 million. Payments on the new term loan will consist of interest payments only on
the amount borrowed at LIBOR plus 2.5% until the end of March 2007. Beginning April 2007, the term
loan amount will become fixed based on the amount borrowed and payments will commence in April 2007
at a fixed rate plus interest at LIBOR plus 2.5% for the remaining term of the loan. As of
December 31, 2006, we had no outstanding borrowings on this term loan. We anticipate that we will
utilize approximately $4.5 million of this credit facility to complete the consolidation of our
facilities.
As of December 31, 2006, our working capital was $7.5 million, or a current ratio of 2.7 to 1,
compared to working capital of $6.0 million or a current ratio of 3.0 to 1 as of December 31, 2005.
Accounts receivable increased $102,000 primarily due to increased sales levels. Our overall
collections have remained constant at approximately 42-45 days during both 2006 and 2005.
Inventory increased $2.7 million primarily due to higher sales levels, as well as a bridge
inventory buildup in advance of our move into our new facility during the first quarter of 2007.
This increase was partially offset by $1.0 million of additional accounts payable balance.
A summary of our contractual cash obligations at December 31, 2006 is as follows:
| Long-term debt | Operating | Total | ||||||||||
| Year | including interest | Leases | Obligations | |||||||||
2007 |
$ | 1,095,000 | $ | 728,000 | $ | 1,823,000 | ||||||
2008 |
851,000 | 603,000 | 1,454,000 | |||||||||
2009 |
— | 428,000 | 428,000 | |||||||||
2010 |
— | 427,000 | 427,000 | |||||||||
2011 |
— | 427,000 | 427,000 | |||||||||
Thereafter |
— | 2,017,000 | 2,017,000 | |||||||||
Totals |
$ | 1,946,000 | $ | 4,630,000 | $ | 6,576,000 | ||||||
We also have a commercial commitment as described below:
| Total Amount | Outstanding at | Date of | ||||||||||
| Other Commercial Commitment | Committed | 12/31/06 | Expiration | |||||||||
Working capital line of credit |
$ | 4,000,000 | $ | — | 4/30/2007 | |||||||
Construction line of credit |
5,000,000 | — | 3/31/2013 | |||||||||
While we believe that we have sufficient resources with our current cash and two credit
facilities to meet our long-term debt obligations and fund our planned operations for fiscal 2007,
there is no assurance that we will not need additional capital in the future. Sources of
additional capital may include additional debt financing or the sale of debt or equity securities.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully obtain additional capital on
favorable terms. We may also apply cash to acquisitions in future periods.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations addresses our
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. The preparation of our financial statements requires that we make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period. On an on-going basis, we evaluate these estimates and judgments. We base
our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed
to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments
about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
21
Table of Contents
Our accounting policies are described in Note 2 to the financial statements. We set forth below
those material accounting policies that we believe are the most critical to an investor’s
understanding of our financial results and condition, and require complex management judgment.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin 104, Revenue Recognition in
Financial Statements, when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the selling price is
fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company has two active stock-based compensation plans under which there are awards still
available for grant. These plans are administered by the compensation committee of the Board of
Directors, which selects persons to receive awards and determines the number of shares subject to
each award and the terms, conditions, performance measures and other provisions of the award.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R),
which requires companies to measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based payments
at fair value. SFAS is being applied on the modified prospective basis. Prior to the adoption of
SFAS 123R, the Company accounted for its stock-based compensation plans under the recognition and
measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees, and related interpretations, and accordingly, recognized no compensation
expense related to the stock-based plans. We recorded $447,938 of Stock-Based Compensation expense
for the year ended December 31, 2006. Refer to Notes 2 and 8 for additional information related to
these stock-based compensation plans.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We establish estimates of the uncollectability of accounts receivable. Our management analyzes
accounts receivable, historical write-offs as bad debts, customer concentrations, customer
credit-worthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment terms when evaluating
the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. We maintain an allowance for doubtful
accounts at an amount that we estimate to be sufficient to provide adequate protection against
losses resulting from collecting less than full payment on receivables. A considerable amount of
judgment is required when assessing the realizability of receivables, including assessing the
probability of collection and the current credit-worthiness of each customer. If the financial
condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make
payments, an additional provision for doubtful accounts may be required. We have not experienced
significant bad debt expense and our reserve for doubtful accounts of $56,000 should be adequate
for any exposure to loss in our December 31, 2006 accounts receivable.
Allowance for Excess and Slow-Moving Inventory
Inventories, which are composed of purchased parts and subassemblies, work in process and finished
goods, are valued at the lower of cost or market with cost being determined by the first-in,
first-out method. On a periodic basis, we analyze the level of inventory on hand, its cost in
relation to market value and estimated customer requirements to determine whether write-downs for
excess or slow-moving inventory are required. Actual customer requirements in any future periods are inherently uncertain and thus may differ from estimates. If
actual or expected requirements were significantly greater or lower than the established reserves,
a reduction or increase to the obsolescence allowance would be recorded in the period in which such
a determination was made. We have established a reserve for excess and slow-moving inventories and
believe the reserve of $161,000 at December 31, 2006 is adequate.
22
Table of Contents
Valuation of Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets including Intangible Assets with Finite Lives
As a matter of policy, we review our major assets for impairment at least annually, and whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The
test for impairment of finite life assets requires us to make estimates of the fair value of our
long-lived assets, primarily based on projected future cash flows using discount rates determined
by management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in the current business model or another
valuation technique. For goodwill, we determine whether the carrying amount of the net assets
exceeds the estimated fair value of the Company. If we determine that the carrying value of these
assets may not be recoverable, we will reduce the valuation of these assets on our financial
statements. In 2006, we incurred charges of approximately $121,000 to reflect impairment on patents
and non-compete agreements acquired in 2003 as part of the BCI acquisition.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
FIN 48 - Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN 48 requires us to assess the probability
of tax positions and record only those that are more likely than not to be upheld upon IRS
examination. If a company takes a position in its tax return that does not meet the more likely
than not threshold, it must book a liability for the amount in excess of the maximum amount to be
realized. This liability is outside of deferred taxes and related valuation reserves. FIN 48 will
be effective for us as of January 1, 2007, and we believe the adoption of FIN 48 will not have a
material impact on our financial statements.
FAS 151 — Inventory Costs. This Statement amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory
Pricing” to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling
costs, and wasted material (spoilage). Paragraph 5 of ARB 43, Chapter 4, previously stated that
"...under some circumstances, items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight
and re-handling costs may be so abnormal as to require treatment as current period charges....” This
Statement requires that those items be recognized as current-period expense regardless of whether
they meet the criterion of “so abnormal.” In addition, this Statement requires that allocation of
fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the
production facilities. The provisions of this Statement are effective for inventory costs we
incurred during 2006. The adoption of FAS 151 had no impact on our financial statements.
SAB 108 — Quantifying Misstatements in Financial Statements. On September 16, 2006, the SEC staff
outlined the approach it believes companies should use to quantify the misstatement of current year
financial statements that results from misstatements of prior year financial statements. The staff
communicated its views in Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 108, which was effective in the
fourth quarter of 2006. The adoption of SAB 108 resulted in us recording additional pre-tax income
of approximately $102,000 in 2006.
Forward Looking Statements
Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in the letter to shareholders, in our
quarterly reports, in filings by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in our press
releases, and oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer that are
not historical or current facts are “forward-looking statements” made pursuant to the safe harbor
provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Certain important factors
could cause results to differ materially from those anticipated by some of these statements.
Investors are cautioned that all forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. A
number of factors that could cause results to differ materially are those discussed in Item 1A,
“Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Among the factors that could cause results to
differ materially are the following: Enpath’s dependence upon a limited number of key customers for
its revenue; Enpath’s ability to successfully protect its intellectual property against misappropriation or claims of infringement by third parties including
its ability to successfully resolve, or defend itself in, pending litigation; Enpath’s ability to
successfully integrate its operations into its new facility in the first quarter of 2007; the
ability of Enpath’s customers to successfully develop and market therapies that utilize the
Company’s advanced delivery systems; Enpath’s ability to effectively manufacture its products,
specifically steerable catheters, in anticipated required quantities; Enpath’s ability to develop
or acquire new products to increase its revenues; Enpath’s ability to attract and retain key
personnel; introduction of competitive products; government regulatory matters; economic
conditions; and Enpath’s ability to raise capital. All forward-looking statements of Enpath,
whether written or oral, and whether made by or on behalf of Enpath, are expressly qualified by
these cautionary statements. In addition, Enpath disclaims any obligation to update
forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof.
23
Table of Contents
Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily as a result of our borrowing activities
used to maintain liquidity. Our earnings have not been materially affected by changes in interest
rates on our floating interest rate debt (less than $25,000 for 2006) because interest rates
remained fairly stable during the year and we did not utilize our line of credit. Based on our
current borrowings and anticipated line of credit requirements in 2007, an increase of 100 basis
points in prevailing interest rates would increase our annual interest expense by approximately
$75,000.
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Quarterly Financial Data
The statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2006, and the related balance sheets of the Company as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, together with the related notes thereto and the report of independent
registered public accounting firm appear on pages 25 through 41 hereof.
The following tabulation presents the Company’s unaudited quarterly results of operations for 2006
and 2005 (amounts in thousands except net income (loss) per common share):
| 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 9,423 | $ | 9,530 | $ | 9,324 | $ | 8,563 | $ | 36,840 | ||||||||||
Gross profit |
3,713 | 3,974 | 3,101 | 2,819 | 13,607 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income |
1,051 | 600 | 289 | 44 | 1,984 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 653 | $ | 360 | $ | 371 | $ | 115 | $ | 1,499 | ||||||||||
Basic net income per common share |
$ | 0.11 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.24 | ||||||||||
Diluted net income per common share |
0.11 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.24 | |||||||||||||||
| 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 6,617 | $ | 7,194 | $ | 7,669 | $ | 7,889 | $ | 29,369 | ||||||||||
Gross profit |
2,367 | 2,780 | 2,823 | 2,687 | 10,657 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(468 | ) | (278 | ) | 446 | 286 | (14 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (350 | ) | $ | (225 | ) | $ | 237 | $ | 670 | $ | 332 | ||||||||
Basic net income (loss) per common share |
$ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.11 | $ | 0.06 | ||||||||
Diluted net income (loss) per common share |
(0.06 | ) | (0.04 | ) | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.05 | |||||||||||||
24
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Enpath Medical, Inc.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Enpath Medical, Inc.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Enpath Medical, Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and
2005, and the related statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of
the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2006. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Enpath Medical, Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended
December 31, 2006 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, on January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment.
| /s/ McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP | ||||
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 16, 2007
March 16, 2007
25
Table of Contents
Enpath Medical, Inc.
Balance Sheets
Balance Sheets
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 523,483 | $ | — | ||||
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $56,000
and $57,000, respectively |
3,760,672 | 3,862,199 | ||||||
Inventories, less allowance for slow-moving inventory of $161,000 and
$258,000, respectively (Note 3) |
7,201,118 | 4,539,265 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
215,396 | 164,790 | ||||||
Income taxes receivable |
78,635 | 69,887 | ||||||
Notes receivable |
45,000 | 90,000 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes (Note 5) |
190,051 | 234,315 | ||||||
Total current assets |
12,014,355 | 8,960,456 | ||||||
Property and equipment: |
||||||||
Equipment |
8,334,622 | 6,978,553 | ||||||
Office furniture, fixtures and computers |
1,935,093 | 1,870,422 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements |
3,248,942 | 1,708,254 | ||||||
| 13,518,657 | 10,557,229 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(7,618,542 | ) | (5,871,108 | ) | ||||
Net property and equipment |
5,900,115 | 4,686,121 | ||||||
Non-current assets: |
||||||||
Goodwill (Note 2) |
9,487,975 | 9,487,975 | ||||||
Intangible assets with finite lives, net (Notes 2 and 4) |
4,587,364 | 5,322,666 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes (Note 5) |
1,403,102 | 1,548,740 | ||||||
Notes receivable |
— | 45,000 | ||||||
Total non-current assets |
15,478,441 | 16,404,381 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 33,392,911 | $ | 30,050,958 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 2,048,718 | $ | 928,807 | ||||
Current maturities of note payable to bank (Note 6) |
1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | ||||||
Current installments of capital lease obligations |
— | 4,714 | ||||||
Bank line of credit payable |
— | — | ||||||
Accrued compensation |
1,145,460 | 713,903 | ||||||
Other accruals |
226,770 | 263,259 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
56,250 | 56,250 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
4,477,198 | 2,966,933 | ||||||
Long-term liabilities: |
||||||||
Notes payable to bank, less current maturities (Note 6) |
633,308 | 1,833,316 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
93,750 | 225,000 | ||||||
Total long-term liabilities |
727,058 | 2,058,316 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
5,204,256 | 5,025,249 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
|
||||||||
Shareholders’ equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock-undesignated, authorized 1,000,000 shares |
— | — | ||||||
Common stock-$.01 par value, authorized 20,000,000 shares; issued and
outstanding 6,290,637 and 6,035,380 shares, respectively |
62,906 | 60,353 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
23,862,156 | 22,200,269 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
4,263,593 | 2,765,087 | ||||||
Total shareholders’ equity |
28,188,655 | 25,025,709 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
$ | 33,392,911 | $ | 30,050,958 | ||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements
26
Table of Contents
Enpath Medical, Inc.
Statements of Operations
Statements of Operations
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 36,840,014 | $ | 29,368,519 | $ | 29,489,034 | ||||||
Cost of sales |
23,232,831 | 18,711,334 | 18,318,793 | |||||||||
Gross profit |
13,607,183 | 10,657,185 | 11,170,241 | |||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||
Research and development |
5,404,392 | 5,393,277 | 4,730,013 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
6,218,493 | 5,277,849 | 5,415,287 | |||||||||
Impairment charge on safety needle investment |
— | — | 2,809,199 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses |
11,622,885 | 10,671,126 | 12,954,499 | |||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
1,984,298 | (13,941 | ) | (1,784,258 | ) | |||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(181,875 | ) | (253,516 | ) | (205,636 | ) | ||||||
Interest income |
13,675 | — | 1,613 | |||||||||
Other, net |
(40,258 | ) | 77,685 | (6,907 | ) | |||||||
Total other income (expense) |
(208,458 | ) | (175,831 | ) | (210,930 | ) | ||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
1,775,840 | (189,772 | ) | (1,995,188 | ) | |||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) (Note 5) |
277,334 | (522,557 | ) | (698,822 | ) | |||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 1,498,506 | $ | 332,785 | $ | (1,296,366 | ) | |||||
Earnings (loss) per common share: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.24 | $ | 0.06 | $ | (0.22 | ) | |||||
Diluted |
0.24 | 0.05 | (0.22 | ) | ||||||||
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares
outstanding: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
6,201,070 | 5,961,111 | 5,843,103 | |||||||||
Diluted |
6,322,039 | 6,074,780 | 5,843,103 | |||||||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements
27
Table of Contents
Enpath Medical, Inc.
Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
| Additional | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Common Stock | Paid-In | Retained | ||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | Capital | Earnings | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2003 |
5,703,526 | $ | 57,035 | $ | 19,204,591 | $ | 3,728,668 | $ | 22,990,294 | |||||||||||
Options exercised (Note 8) |
50,815 | 508 | 154,944 | — | 155,452 | |||||||||||||||
Common stock issued in connection with acquisition |
133,588 | 1,336 | 1,818,137 | — | 1,819,473 | |||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from options exercised |
— | — | 99,504 | — | 99,504 | |||||||||||||||
Options issued to consultant for services |
— | — | 6,500 | — | 6,500 | |||||||||||||||
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2004 |
— | — | — | (1,296,366 | ) | (1,296,366 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2004 |
5,887,929 | $ | 58,879 | $ | 21,283,676 | $ | 2,432,302 | $ | 23,774,857 | |||||||||||
Options exercised (Note 8) |
113,620 | 1,136 | 236,439 | — | 237,575 | |||||||||||||||
Common stock issued for contingent payment |
33,831 | 338 | 390,747 | — | 391,085 | |||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
— | — | 28,000 | — | 28,000 | |||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from options exercised |
— | — | 255,311 | — | 255,311 | |||||||||||||||
Options issued to consultant for services |
— | — | 6,096 | — | 6,096 | |||||||||||||||
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2005 |
— | — | — | 332,785 | 332,785 | |||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2005 |
6,035,380 | $ | 60,353 | $ | 22,200,269 | $ | 2,765,087 | $ | 25,025,709 | |||||||||||
Options exercised (Note 8) |
217,957 | 2,180 | 1,038,688 | — | 1,040,868 | |||||||||||||||
Restricted stock grants |
37,300 | 373 | 35,455 | — | 35,828 | |||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
— | — | 412,110 | — | 412,110 | |||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from options exercised |
— | — | 175,634 | — | 175,634 | |||||||||||||||
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2006 |
— | — | — | 1,498,506 | 1,498,506 | |||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2006 |
6,290,637 | $ | 62,906 | $ | 23,862,156 | $ | 4,263,593 | $ | 28,188,655 | |||||||||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements
28
Table of Contents
Enpath Medical, Inc.
Statements of Cash Flows
Statements of Cash Flows
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 1,498,506 | $ | 332,785 | $ | (1,296,366 | ) | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating
activities: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation |
1,747,434 | 1,626,571 | 1,538,341 | |||||||||
Amortization |
869,216 | 846,147 | 883,550 | |||||||||
Non-cash consulting services |
— | 6,096 | 6,500 | |||||||||
Non-cash stock-based compensation |
447,938 | 28,000 | — | |||||||||
Impairment charge on finite-lived intagibles |
121,362 | — | — | |||||||||
Impairment charge on safety needle investment |
— | — | 2,809,199 | |||||||||
Gain loss on disposal of equipment |
— | (96,004 | ) | — | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
189,902 | (434,091 | ) | (596,964 | ) | |||||||
Equity increase from tax benefit from stock option exercises |
— | 255,311 | 99,504 | |||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
101,527 | (202,150 | ) | 462,521 | ||||||||
Inventories |
(2,661,853 | ) | 84,918 | (885,330 | ) | |||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
(50,606 | ) | 65,653 | (15,066 | ) | |||||||
Income taxes receivable |
(8,748 | ) | 240,796 | (210,752 | ) | |||||||
Accounts payable |
1,022,168 | 1,611 | 195,806 | |||||||||
Accrued liabilities |
395,068 | (93,800 | ) | 141,324 | ||||||||
Deferred revenue |
(131,250 | ) | 281,250 | — | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
3,540,665 | 2,943,093 | 3,132,267 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment |
(2,863,686 | ) | (1,275,592 | ) | (1,397,598 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment |
— | 100,000 | — | |||||||||
Additions to intangible assets |
(255,276 | ) | (322,091 | ) | (411,201 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from notes receivable |
90,000 | — | — | |||||||||
Net cash paid for acquisition |
— | (97,771 | ) | (1,990,476 | ) | |||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(3,028,961 | ) | (1,595,454 | ) | (3,799,275 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||
Principal payments on capital lease obligations |
(4,714 | ) | (66,179 | ) | (75,398 | ) | ||||||
Principal payments on long-term debt |
(1,200,008 | ) | (1,000,008 | ) | (1,000,008 | ) | ||||||
Net borrowings from (payments on) line of credit |
— | (881,652 | ) | 881,652 | ||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants |
1,040,868 | 237,575 | 155,452 | |||||||||
Tax benefit from options exercised |
175,634 | — | — | |||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
11,780 | (1,710,264 | ) | (38,302 | ) | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
523,483 | (362,625 | ) | (705,310 | ) | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
— | 362,625 | 1,067,935 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
$ | 523,483 | $ | — | $ | 362,625 | ||||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
||||||||||||
Cash paid during the period for interest |
$ | 181,875 | $ | 253,516 | $ | 204,984 | ||||||
Net cash paid (refunds received) during the period for income taxes |
$ | (185,704 | ) | $ | (584,572 | ) | $ | 9,500 | ||||
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities: |
||||||||||||
Common stock issued in payment of contingent purchase price |
$ | — | $ | 391,085 | $ | 1,819,473 | ||||||
Accrued acquisition payments not yet paid |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | 488,856 | ||||||
Reduction of goodwill due to adjustment to final contingent payment |
$ | — | $ | 120,000 | $ | — | ||||||
Note receivable for sale of property and equipment |
$ | — | $ | 135,000 | $ | — | ||||||
Property and equipment additions included in accounts payable |
$ | 97,743 | $ | 135,000 | $ | — | ||||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements
29
Table of Contents
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
We are a medical products company engaged in designing, developing, manufacturing and marketing
single use medical device products for cardiac rhythm management (“CRM”), neuromodulation and
interventional radiology markets. We also manufacture medical devices and components for medical
product companies on a contract basis.
We manufacture and market a family of percutaneous venous vessel introducers with proprietary
features, as well as our own proprietary valved introducer. Vessel introducers enable physicians
to create a conduit through which they can insert infusion catheters, implantable ports and
pacemaker leads into a blood vessel. These products make up our Introducer product line. We also
develop and manufacture advanced delivery catheters that have a “fixed curve” or an articulating
distal tip section that can be manipulated to enable the health care professional to access parts
of the patient’s anatomy (such as the left ventricle of the heart) that cannot be reached by
traditional introducers. These sophisticated advanced delivery catheters are designed and
manufactured to meet the unique needs of each procedure being performed. These products make up
our Advanced Delivery Catheter product line. We also develop and manufacture proprietary and
custom designed implantable stimulation leads, adaptors and delivery systems for the cardiac and
neuromodulation markets. These products make up our Lead Technologies product line.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The financial statements through December 31, 2004 include the accounts of Enpath Medical, Inc. and
its wholly-owned subsidiary Enpath Lead Technologies, Inc. after elimination of material
inter-company accounts and transactions. On March 15, 2005, the wholly-owned Lead Technologies
subsidiary was merged into Enpath Medical, Inc.
Segment Reporting
We believe that we have three major product lines operating in one business segment.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments, primarily United States money market
securities, with an original maturity of three months or less. The Company maintains its cash in
bank accounts, which, at times, exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced
any losses in such accounts.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are carried at original invoice amount less an estimate made for doubtful
receivables based on a review of all outstanding amounts on a monthly basis. Management determines
the allowance for doubtful accounts after reviewing individual customer accounts as well as
considering both historical and expected credit loss experience. Accounts receivable are written
off when deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of accounts receivable previously written off are
recorded when received.
Inventories
Inventories, which are composed of purchased parts and subassemblies, work in process and finished
goods, are valued at the lower of cost or market with cost being determined by the first-in,
first-out method. On a periodic basis, the Company reviews the level of inventory on hand, its
cost in relation to market value and estimated customer requirements to determine whether
write-downs for excess or slow-moving inventory are required. If actual or expected requirements
were significantly greater or lower than the established reserves, a reduction or increase to the
obsolescence allowance would be recorded in the period in which such a determination was made.
30
Table of Contents
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated or amortized on a straight-line basis
over a period of three to seven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the remaining
term of the related lease or their remaining useful lives, whichever is shorter. Repair and
maintenance costs are charged to operations as incurred.
Goodwill and Finite-Lived Intangible Assets
Goodwill is tested for impairment annually in the fourth quarter or more frequently if changes in
circumstances or the occurrence of events suggest impairment exists. An impairment loss would
generally be recognized when the carrying amounts of the Company’s net assets exceeds the estimated
fair value of the Company. The Company has concluded that no impairment of goodwill exists as of
December 31, 2006.
The Company also periodically reviews long-lived assets to determine any potential impairment. The
asset carrying values are compared with the expected future cash flows resulting from their use.
The expected future cash flows include cash flows resulting from the asset’s disposition. The
Company recognizes an impairment loss when an
asset’s carrying value exceeded its expected future cash flow. The Company, with assistance from
an external valuation expert, determined that several of its identifiable intangible assets were
impaired at December 31, 2006 and reduced the value of these assets by approximately $121,000. In
2004, management also recorded an impairment charge of approximately $2.8 million related to its
investment in the safety needle.
Other finite-lived intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated
useful lives or contractual lives, whichever are shorter (see Note 4).
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue upon shipment of products to its customers, FOB shipping point.
Shipping and handling charges billed to customers are included in net sales, and shipping and
handling costs incurred by the Company are included in cost of sales.
Research and Development Costs
All research and development costs are charged to operations as incurred.
Warranty Costs
The Company provides a limited warranty for the replacement of defective products. The Company has
not incurred any significant costs associated with this warranty and therefore has not provided any
estimated liability for these warranties.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company has two active stock-based compensation plans under which there are awards still
available for grant. These plans are administered by the compensation committee of the Board of
Directors, which selects persons to receive awards and determines the number of shares subject to
each award and the terms, conditions, performance measures and other provisions of the award.
Refer to Note 8 for additional information related to these stock-based compensation plans.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R),
which requires companies to measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based payments
at fair value. SFAS 123R is being applied on the modified prospective basis. Prior to the
adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company accounted for its stock-based compensation plans under the
recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations, and accordingly, recognized
no compensation expense related to the stock-based plans.
31
Table of Contents
Under the modified prospective approach, SFAS 123R applies to new awards and to awards that were
outstanding on January 1, 2006 that are subsequently modified, repurchased, cancelled or vested.
Compensation cost recognized in 2006 includes compensation cost for all share-based payments
granted prior to, but not yet vested on, January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value
estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R, and compensation cost for all
shared-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value
estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R. Prior periods were not restated to
reflect the impact of adopting the new standard. Also see Note 8 for accelerated vesting of
options in April 2005.
As a result of adopting SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006, the net income and net income per share for
the year ended December 31, 2006, were $377,983 and $0.06 lower, respectively, than if the Company
had continued to account for stock-based compensation under APB Opinion No. 25 as reflected in the
following table:
| Pro Forma | ||||||||
| As Reported | Under APB 25 | |||||||
Income before taxes |
$ | 1,775,840 | $ | 1,775,840 | ||||
Add back compensation expense |
0 | 447,938 | ||||||
Adjusted income before taxes |
1,775,840 | 2,223,778 | ||||||
Income tax expense |
277,334 | 347,289 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,498,506 | $ | 1,876,489 | ||||
Net income per common share |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.24 | $ | 0.30 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.24 | $ | 0.30 | ||||
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding |
||||||||
Basic |
6,201,070 | 6,201,070 | ||||||
Diluted |
6,322,039 | 6,322,039 | ||||||
The following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share had the Company
accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS 123 for the years ended December 31,
2005 and 2004:
| 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Net income (loss) — as reported |
$ | 332,785 | $ | (1,296,366 | ) | |||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation (expense
determined under the fair value based method for all awards) |
(1,979,624 | ) | (624,686 | ) | ||||
Pro forma net loss |
$ | (1,646,839 | ) | $ | (1,921,052 | ) | ||
Net income (loss) per common share: |
||||||||
Basic net income (loss) per share — as reported |
$ | 0.06 | $ | (0.22 | ) | |||
Basic net income (loss) per share — pro forma |
$ | (0.28 | ) | $ | (0.33 | ) | ||
Diluted net income (loss) per share — as reported |
$ | 0.05 | $ | (0.22 | ) | |||
Diluted net income (loss) per share — pro forma |
$ | (0.28 | ) | $ | (0.33 | ) | ||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
||||||||
Basic-as reported and pro forma |
5,961,111 | 5,843,103 | ||||||
Diluted-as reported |
6,074,780 | 5,843,103 | ||||||
Diluted-pro forma |
5,961,111 | 5,843,103 | ||||||
The above pro forma effects on net income (loss) and net income (loss) per common share are
not likely to be representative of the effects on reported net income (loss) for future years
because options vest over several years and additional awards generally are made each year. The
effects of future periods would also be affected by the accelerated vesting of options that took
place in April 2005 (see Note 8).
32
Table of Contents
Income Taxes
Deferred taxes are provided on an asset and liability method under which deferred tax assets are
recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards
and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary
differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their
tax basis. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of
management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not
be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax
laws and rates on the date of enactment.
Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share
Basic per-share amounts are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding. Diluted per-share amounts are computed similar to basic per-share
amounts except that the weighted average shares outstanding are increased to include additional
shares for the assumed exercise of stock options and warrants, if dilutive. The number of
additional shares is calculated by assuming that outstanding stock options and warrants were
exercised and that the proceeds from such exercises were used to acquire shares of common stock at
the average market price during the year. The dilutive effect of these additional shares for the
years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 was to increase the weighted average shares outstanding by
120,969 and 113,669 shares, respectively. Because the Company had a loss in 2004, diluted shares
were the same as basic shares since the effect of options and warrants would have been
anti-dilutive. Options and warrants totaling 541,200, 527,446 and 834,227 shares were excluded
from the calculation of diluted shares for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
Reclassification
Certain 2005 and 2004 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2006 presentation. These
reclassifications had no impact on gross margins, operating income or net income.
Recent Pronouncements
FIN 48 – Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN 48 requires companies to assess the
probability of tax positions and record only those that are more likely than not to be upheld upon
IRS examination. If companies take a position in their tax return that does not meet the more
likely than not threshold, they must book a liability for the amount in excess of the maximum
amount to be realized. This liability is outside of deferred taxes and related valuation reserves.
FIN 48 will be effective for the Company as of January 1, 2007, and we believe the adoption of FIN
48 will not have a material impact on our financial statements.
FAS 151 – Inventory Costs. This Statement amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory
Pricing” to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling
costs, and wasted material (spoilage). Paragraph 5 of ARB 43, Chapter 4, previously stated that
"...under some circumstances, items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight
and re-handling costs may be so abnormal as to require treatment as current period charges....” This
Statement requires that those items be recognized as current-period expense regardless of whether
they meet the criterion of “so abnormal.” In addition, this Statement requires that allocation of
fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the
production facilities. The provisions of this Statement shall be effective for inventory costs we
incurred during 2006. The adoption of FAS 151 had no impact on our financial statements.
SAB 108 – Quantifying Misstatements in Financial Statements. On September 16, 2006, the SEC staff
outlined the approach it believes companies should use to quantify the misstatement of current year
financial statements that results from misstatements of prior year financial statements. The staff
communicated its views in Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 108 which was effective in the fourth
quarter of 2006. The adoption of SAB 108 resulted in us recording additional pre-tax income of
approximately $102,000 in 2006.
33
Table of Contents
3. INVENTORIES
Inventories consisted of the following at December 31:
| 2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Purchased parts and subassemblies |
$ | 4,994,241 | $ | 3,176,993 | ||||
Work in process |
1,344,082 | 850,124 | ||||||
Finished goods |
862,795 | 512,148 | ||||||
Total Inventories |
$ | 7,201,118 | $ | 4,539,265 | ||||
4. INTANGIBLE ASSETS WITH FINITE LIVES
Finite life intangible assets consist of the following at December 31:
| December 31, 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
| Estimated | Gross | Accumulated | ||||||||||||||
| Lives (Years) | Carrying Amount | Amortization | Net Value | |||||||||||||
Licensed technology |
2 | $ | 115,000 | $ | 115,000 | $ | — | |||||||||
Core technology |
12 | 2,650,000 | 699,314 | 1,950,686 | ||||||||||||
Developed technology |
8 | 1,500,000 | 593,750 | 906,250 | ||||||||||||
Customer relationships |
6 | 615,000 | 324,596 | 290,404 | ||||||||||||
Patents and inventions |
5 to 9 | 1,813,700 | 907,622 | 906,078 | ||||||||||||
Trade name |
30 | 545,000 | 57,532 | 487,468 | ||||||||||||
Other |
5 to 10 | 108,187 | 61,709 | 46,478 | ||||||||||||
Totals |
$ | 7,346,887 | $ | 2,759,523 | $ | 4,587,364 | ||||||||||
| December 31, 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
| Estimated | Gross | Accumulated | ||||||||||||||
| Lives (Years) | Carrying Amount | Amortization | Net Value | |||||||||||||
Licensed technology |
2 | $ | 115,000 | $ | 86,250 | $ | 28,750 | |||||||||
Core technology |
12 | 2,650,000 | 478,478 | 2,171,522 | ||||||||||||
Developed technology |
8 | 1,500,000 | 406,250 | 1,093,750 | ||||||||||||
Customer relationships |
6 | 615,000 | 222,092 | 392,908 | ||||||||||||
Patents and inventions |
5 to 9 | 1,650,968 | 581,020 | 1,069,948 | ||||||||||||
Trade name |
30 | 545,000 | 39,364 | 505,636 | ||||||||||||
Other |
5 to 10 | 96,571 | 36,419 | 60,152 | ||||||||||||
Totals |
$ | 7,172,539 | $ | 1,849,873 | $ | 5,322,666 | ||||||||||
Amortization expense related to these assets was as follows:
| Year ended December 31, | Amount | |||
2006 |
$ | 869,216 | ||
2005 |
846,147 | |||
2004 |
883,550 | |||
Estimated annual amortization expense for these assets over the next five years is as follows:
| Year | Amount | |||
2007 |
$ | 897,000 | ||
2008 |
835,000 | |||
2009 |
739,000 | |||
2010 |
478,000 | |||
2011 |
441,000 | |||
34
Table of Contents
5. INCOME TAXES
Significant components of the income tax expense (benefit) are as follows:
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
Current |
$ | 68,000 | $ | (89,000 | ) | $ | (102,000 | ) | ||||
Deferred |
209,000 | (434,000 | ) | (597,000 | ) | |||||||
Totals |
$ | 277,000 | $ | (523,000 | ) | $ | (699,000 | ) | ||||
The appropriate deferred tax effect of each type of temporary difference and carry-forward is:
| Deferred tax assets | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||
Intangible assets |
$ | 457,000 | $ | 732,000 | ||||
Vacation accrual |
118,000 | 129,000 | ||||||
Inventory |
85,000 | 98,000 | ||||||
Credits |
558,000 | 390,000 | ||||||
Tax/book depreciation |
184,000 | 297,000 | ||||||
Other |
46,000 | 137,000 | ||||||
Deferred Revenue |
84,000 | — | ||||||
Non-Qualified Options - 123R |
95,000 | — | ||||||
| 1,627,000 | 1,783,000 | |||||||
Deferred tax liabilities |
||||||||
Prepaid Expenses |
(34,000 | ) | — | |||||
Net deferred tax assets |
$ | 1,593,000 | $ | 1,783,000 | ||||
The components giving rise to the net deferred income tax assets described above have been
included in the accompanying balance sheets as follows:
| 2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Current assets |
$ | 190,000 | $ | 234,000 | ||||
Long-term
assets |
1,403,000 | 1,549,000 | ||||||
Net deferred tax assets |
$ | 1,593,000 | $ | 1,783,000 | ||||
The total tax expense (benefit) differs from the expected tax expense (benefit), computed by
applying the federal statutory rate to the Company’s net income (loss) before income taxes, as
follows:
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
Expected income tax expense (benefit) |
$ | 604,000 | $ | (66,000 | ) | $ | (678,000 | ) | ||||
State tax (benefit), net of federal effect |
119,000 | (6,000 | ) | (65,000 | ) | |||||||
R&D tax credits |
(273,000 | ) | (502,000 | ) | (40,000 | ) | ||||||
123R ISO deduction |
54,000 | — | — | |||||||||
Reversal of tax reserves |
(243,000 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Other, including non-deductible expenses |
16,000 | 51,000 | 84,000 | |||||||||
Net tax expense (benefit) |
$ | 277,000 | $ | (523,000 | ) | $ | (699,000 | ) | ||||
6. FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
On October 23, 2003, the Company entered into two credit facilities with a bank that included a
five-year term loan of $5 million, which was used to finance a portion of the BCI acquisition, and
a $3 million operating line of credit that was subsequently increased to $4 million. The
borrowings are secured by substantially all Company assets and also contain financial covenants
that must be met on a quarterly basis. The agreement also prohibits the payment of dividends
without the consent of the lender. The Company paid $1.2 million and $1.0 million in principal
payments on the term loan during 2006 and 2005, respectively.
35
Table of Contents
Outstanding borrowings under the term loan are summarized as follows:
| 2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Term loan payable to bank in monthly installments of $83,334 plus interest at Libor plus 2.5% (7.85% and 6.81% at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.), with balance due October 2008 |
$ | 1,633,308 | $ | 2,833,316 | ||||
Less current maturities |
(1,000,000 | ) | (1,000,000 | ) | ||||
| $ | 633,308 | $ | 1,833,316 | |||||
Approximate maturities of long-term debt at December 31, 2006, are as follows:
| Years ending December 31, | Amount | |||
2007 |
$ | 1,000,000 | ||
2008 |
633,308 | |||
Total |
$ | 1,633,308 | ||
The current operating line of credit bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.25% with no minimum
interest due and expires on April 30, 2007. The Company paid interest on the operating line of
credit borrowings of $0 and $45,433 in 2006 and 2005, respectively. The availability under the
line is subject to borrowing base requirements, and advances are at the discretion of the lender.
There were no outstanding borrowings under the operating line of credit as of December 31, 2006 and
2005.
In August 2006, we entered into a second financing arrangement with our principal bank that
included a seven-year term loan of up to $4 million which will be used to finance the build-out of
our new facility. This financing arrangement was amended in January 2007 to allow for a term loan
of up to $5 million. The borrowings will be secured by substantially all of our assets and the new
leasehold improvements and also contain financial covenants that must be met on a quarterly basis.
The agreement also prohibits the payment of dividends without the consent of the lender. We
anticipate the total cost of our facility consolidation to total approximately $5.8 million and
will be completed during the first quarter of 2007. Through December 31, 2006 we spent
approximately $1.5 million on the new facility and funded it with our existing cash on hand.
Payments on the new term loan will consist of interest only payments on the amount borrowed at
LIBOR plus 2.5% until the end of March 2007. Beginning April 2007, the term loan amount will
become fixed based on the amount borrowed and payments will commence at a fixed rate plus interest
at LIBOR plus 2.5% for the remaining term of the loan. As of December 31, 2006, there were no
outstanding borrowings on this term loan. We anticipate that we will utilize approximately $4.5
million of this credit facility to complete the consolidation of our facilities.
7. LEASES
The Company does not currently have any obligations under capital lease.
The Company has separate operating leases related to its three facilities. The new combined
corporate facility is under an operating lease that begins January 1, 2007 and expires December 31,
2016. The lease is for 95,661 square feet with a base rent of $33,624 per month for 2007. The
existing Plymouth, MN corporate facility is under an operating lease that expires June 30, 2007,
related to 38,337 square feet with base rent of $19,952 per month. The existing Bloomington, MN
facility is under an operating lease that expires December 31, 2008, related to 27,000 square feet
with a monthly base rent of $14,189. This rent expense is being recognized on a straight-line
basis over the term of the lease.
We estimate that we will incur charges of approximately $120,000 through June 30, 2007 for
remaining rent, common area maintenance, real estate taxes and miscellaneous charges. We are in the
process of trying to sublet the Bloomington facility and while we have some interested parties, we
do not yet have any signed agreements. If the Bloomington facility cannot be sublet, we will have
to take a charge for some portion of the remaining rent, common area maintenance and real estate
taxes in the second quarter of 2007. The total amount due from April 2007 to December 2008 is
approximately $475,000.
36
Table of Contents
Approximate future minimum payments under operating leases are as follows:
| Years ending December 31, | Amount | |||
2007 |
$ | 728,000 | ||
2008 |
603,000 | |||
2009 |
428,000 | |||
2010 |
427,000 | |||
2011 |
427,000 | |||
Thereafter |
2,017,000 | |||
Total minimum lease payments |
$ | 4,630,000 | ||
Total rent expense, including operating expenses and real estate taxes, was approximately
$847,000, $624,000 and $589,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
8. STOCK OPTIONS, RESTRICTED STOCK GRANTS AND WARRANTS
Stock Options
The Company has two active stock-based compensations plans under which there are awards still
available for grant: The 1999 Incentive Stock Option Plan and the 1999 Non-Employee Director and
Medical Advisory Board Stock Option Plan. The Company also has two other plans that are no longer
active but had stock option activity during the year, including the exercise of stock options and
forfeitures. Summary information related to all plans is shown below.
| Available | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Plan | Reserved | Granted | Forfeited | Excercised | Outstanding | To Grant | ||||||||||||||||||
1989 Incentive Plan |
400,000 | 581,925 | (342,325 | ) | (239,600 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
1991 Non-Qualified Plan |
280,000 | 299,500 | (19,500 | ) | (272,500 | ) | 7,500 | — | ||||||||||||||||
1999 Incentive Plan (Option Grants) |
1,100,000 | 1,195,500 | (380,750 | ) | (222,750 | ) | 592,000 | 247,950 | ||||||||||||||||
1999 Non-Employee Director Plan |
400,000 | 248,500 | (25,000 | ) | (63,500 | ) | 160,000 | 176,500 | ||||||||||||||||
Option Grant Totals |
2,180,000 | 2,325,425 | (767,575 | ) | (798,350 | ) | 759,500 | 424,450 | ||||||||||||||||
1999 Incentive Plan (Restricted Stock Grants) |
— | 40,910 | (3,610 | ) | — | 37,300 | — | |||||||||||||||||
Grand Totals |
2,180,000 | 2,366,335 | (771,185 | ) | (798,350 | ) | 796,800 | 424,450 | ||||||||||||||||
The options were designated for grant at prices not less than 85% of fair market value at date
of grant if a non-qualified option, or 100% if an incentive option as defined under the Internal
Revenue Code. The options issued to the Company’s officers vest over a five-year period while the
options issued to directors vest after eleven months. The options expire over periods ranging from
six to fifteen years after the date of grant.
37
Table of Contents
Option activity is summarized as follows:
| Weighted | ||||||||||||
| Average | Aggregate | |||||||||||
| Exercise | Intrinsic | |||||||||||
| # Shares | Price | Value | ||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2003 |
802,700 | $ | 7.07 | |||||||||
Granted |
178,100 | 12.25 | ||||||||||
Exercised |
(52,273 | ) | 3.31 | |||||||||
Forfeited |
(94,300 | ) | 11.04 | |||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2004 |
834,227 | 7.96 | ||||||||||
Granted |
226,300 | 8.27 | ||||||||||
Exercised |
(113,620 | ) | 2.09 | |||||||||
Forfeited |
(118,500 | ) | 10.06 | |||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
828,407 | 8.55 | ||||||||||
Granted |
228,000 | 10.16 | ||||||||||
Exercised |
(217,957 | ) | 4.78 | |||||||||
Forfeited |
(78,950 | ) | 11.36 | |||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
759,500 | $ | 9.83 | $ | 3,597,724 | |||||||
Exercisable on December 31, 2006 |
537,732 | $ | 9.73 | $ | 2,612,132 | |||||||
The weighted average fair value of stock options granted with an exercise price equal to the
deemed stock price on the date of grant during 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $6.29, $4.15 and $3.95,
respectively. The weighted average fair value of stock options vested during 2006, 2005 and 2004
was $6.28, $4.30 and $4.27, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during
the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $1,186,411, $670,844 and $510,486,
respectively.
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2006:
| Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted Avg | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Number | Remaining | Number | ||||||||||||||||||
| Range of | Outstanding | Contractual Life | Weighed Avg | Exercisable at | Weighed Avg | |||||||||||||||
| Exercise Prices | at 12/31/06 | Years | Exercise Price | 12/31/06 | Exercise Price | |||||||||||||||
$2.00 to $7.33
|
151,000 | 2.22 | $ | 5.74 | 147,400 | $ | 5.74 | |||||||||||||
$7.34 to $8.52
|
149,700 | 4.29 | 8.21 | 119,533 | 8.34 | |||||||||||||||
$8.53 to $10.50
|
132,400 | 4.69 | 9.25 | 49,399 | 9.63 | |||||||||||||||
$10.51 to $11.61
|
134,500 | 4.90 | 11.19 | 54,500 | 11.00 | |||||||||||||||
$11.62 to $14.79
|
175,300 | 2.71 | 13.64 | 150,300 | 13.74 | |||||||||||||||
$14.80 to $18.65
|
16,600 | 3.70 | 15.00 | 16,600 | 15.00 | |||||||||||||||
$2.00 to $18.65
|
759,500 | 3.68 | $ | 9.83 | 537,732 | $ | 9.73 | |||||||||||||
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate fair value of stock-based
awards with the following weighted average assumptions:
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
Expected dividend yield |
0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||||
Expected stock price volatility |
71.95 | % | 77.40 | % | 26.70 | % | ||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
4.51 | % | 3.80 | % | 3.30 | % | ||||||
Expected life of options (years) |
6 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||
The Company calculates expected volatility for stock options using its historical volatility
as the Company believes the expected volatility will approximate historical volatility. The
Company estimated the forfeiture rate for stock options to be 4% in 2006 based on historical
forfeitures
38
Table of Contents
and
estimated the forfeiture rate for stock awards to be 10% in 2006 based on
historical employee turnover rates. The risk-free rates for the expected terms of the stock
options are based on the five year U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect the month prior to the
grant. The expected life of the options is based on the historical life of previously granted
options which are generally held to maturity.
During 2006, the Company recorded compensation expense of $412,110 related to stock options in our
expenses and cost of sales in the accompanying statement of operations. At December 31, 2006,
there was approximately $957,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to option-based payments
that we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of 3.6 years.
Cash received from option exercise under all share-based payment arrangements for the year ended
December 31, 2006 was $1,040,868. SFAS 123R also requires that the tax benefit from the exercise
of options be reflected in the statement of cash flows as a cash inflow from financing activities.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, these tax benefits have been reflected as a cash inflow from
operations. The actual tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from the option exercise of the
share-based payment arrangements totaled $175,634 for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Restricted Stock Grants
At the April 28, 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the shareholders approved amendments to both
the 1999 Incentive Stock Option Plan and the 1999 Non-Employee Director and Medical Advisory Board
Stock Option Plan allowing for restricted stock grants. This change was made primarily in response
to FAS 123R and dealing with the stock-based compensation expense that the Company was required to
record beginning in 2006. The Company has ceased issuing stock option grants to all hourly and
salaried employees as of December 31, 2005. The Company intends to make all future employee
stock-based compensation grants in the form of restricted stock grants except for Officers and
Non-Employee Directors who will still receive option grants. The Company modified several existing
non-employee director grants in anticipation of moving to a new non-employee director compensation
program in 2006 and recorded $28,000 of compensation expense in 2005 as a result of these
modifications.
Both plans allow for the issuance of restricted stock awards that may not be sold or otherwise
transferred until certain restrictions have lapsed. The unearned stock-based compensation related
to these awards is being amortized to compensation expense over the period the restrictions lapse
(generally five years). The share based expense for these awards was determined based on the
market price of our stock on the date of grant applied to the total number of shares that were
anticipated to fully vest and then amortized over the vesting period. At December 31, 2006 and
2005, none of these shares had fully vested.
The following table presents the restricted shares that were granted and outstanding as of December
31, 2006 and December 31, 2005:
| Weighted-Average | ||||||||
| Grant Date | ||||||||
| Restricted Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2004 |
— | $ | — | |||||
Granted |
4,215 | 7.72 | ||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
4,215 | 7.72 | ||||||
Granted |
36,695 | 9.99 | ||||||
Forfeited |
(3,610 | ) | 9.34 | |||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
37,300 | $ | 9.80 | |||||
These restricted shares were issued from the 1999 Incentive Stock Option Plan with prices
ranging from $8.62 to $11.94 per share and vest over five years. Compensation expense of
approximately $275,000, determined to be the fair market value of the related common stock on the
date of grant less estimated forfeitures, will be recognized over the requisite service period of
the grants. Compensation expense that was included in our expenses and cost of sales in the
accompanying statements of operations related to these restricted stock grants was $35,828 in 2006.
As of December 31, 2006, we have unearned stock-based compensation of approximately $238,000
associated with these awards.
39
Table of Contents
Warrants
In connection with the acquisition of the operating assets of BCI, the Company issued warrants to
an agent to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $8.36 per share that
expire on October 23, 2008. The fair value of those warrants, estimated using the Black-Scholes
Model, of approximately $52,000 was treated as a cost directly related to the acquisition.
Accelerated Vesting
On April 28, 2005, our Board of Directors took action to accelerate vesting of all outstanding
employee stock options. As of that date, we had a total of 670,400 employee options outstanding, of
which 214,000 were vested and 456,400 were unvested. The Board accelerated the vesting schedule of
the 456,400 unvested employee options, of which 439,800 were underwater and 16,600 were in the
money. Unvested options that were granted to Board members were not subject to the accelerated
vesting.
Summary information related to these options is shown below:
| Total | Vested | Unvested | ||||||||||
Underwater Options |
561,900 | 122,100 | 439,800 | |||||||||
In The Money Options |
108,500 | 91,900 | 16,600 | |||||||||
Total Options |
670,400 | 214,000 | 456,400 | |||||||||
This action was taken to eliminate approximately $1.3 million in compensation expense that we
would otherwise have incurred over four years beginning in 2006, upon the adoption of FAS 123R. We
also determined that no compensation expense needed to be booked for the 16,600 in the money
options that were unvested due to the high likelihood of continued employment of the individuals
involved, as well as the short remaining period (less than one year) to full vesting.
9. SALES INFORMATION AND SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS
Sales information for the three product lines over the past three years is shown in the table
below:
| For Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Percent | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net Sales | Change | Net Sales | Change | Net Sales | ||||||||||||||||
Introducers |
$ | 25,346,000 | 35.4 | % | $ | 18,713,000 | 3.1 | % | $ | 18,151,000 | ||||||||||
Advanced Delivery Catheters |
2,645,000 | 50.2 | % | 1,761,000 | -36.9 | % | 2,790,000 | |||||||||||||
Lead Technologies |
8,849,000 | -0.5 | % | 8,895,000 | 4.1 | % | 8,548,000 | |||||||||||||
Total Net Sales |
$ | 36,840,000 | 25.4 | % | $ | 29,369,000 | -0.4 | % | $ | 29,489,000 | ||||||||||
Sales by geographic destination as a percentage of total net sales were as follows for the
years ended December 31:
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
Domestic |
92 | % | 94 | % | 94 | % | ||||||
Foreign |
8 | % | 6 | % | 6 | % | ||||||
40
Table of Contents
The Company currently has three major customers that account for more than 10 percent of net
sales. The information below includes the customers’ percent of sales for the years ended December
31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 and the related percent of accounts receivable at December 31, 2006, 2005
and 2004.
| December 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | December 31, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Customer | % Sales | % A/R | % Sales | % A/R | % Sales | % A/R | ||||||||||||||||||
A |
30 | % | 30 | % | 27 | % | 25 | % | 41 | % | 35 | % | ||||||||||||
B |
17 | % | 17 | % | 16 | % | 9 | % | 16 | % | 15 | % | ||||||||||||
C |
12 | % | 13 | % | 14 | % | 14 | % | 11 | % | 7 | % | ||||||||||||
10. RETIREMENT PLAN
The Company has a profit-sharing plan (the “Plan”) classified as a defined contribution plan under
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Plan allows employees to defer a portion of their
annual compensation through pre-tax contributions to the Plan. The Company matches 25% of an
employee’s contribution, up to a maximum of 5% of the employee’s compensation. Matching
contributions for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $126,807, $90,271 and
$84,844, respectively. The Company’s Board of Directors may approve discretionary contributions to
the Plan. No discretionary contribution has been made since the Plan’s inception.
11. CONTINGENCIES
On June 12, 2006, Enpath was named as defendant in a patent infringement action filed by Pressure
Products Medical Supplies, Inc, and venued in the United States District Court in the Eastern
District of Texas. On October 2, 2006, Enpath was officially served. Enpath has filed an answer
denying liability and has filed counterclaims against the plaintiff alleging anti-trust violations
and patent misuse.
The plaintiff has alleged that the Company’s FlowGuard™ valved introducer, which has been on the
market for more than three years, infringes claims in the plaintiff’s patents and is seeking
damages and injunctive relief. Enpath believes that the plaintiff’s claims are without merit and
intends to pursue its defenses vigorously. Revenues from products sold that include the FlowGuard
valved introducer were approximately 5% of Enpath’s total revenue for years ended December 31, 2006
and 2005.
The lawsuit is currently in the discovery stage. Enpath anticipates that the Court will hold a
Hearing to construe the claims of the plaintiff’s patents in August 2007. It is not possible to
predict the timing or outcome of this litigation, including whether it will affect the Company’s
ability to sell its FlowGuard products, or to estimate the amount or range of potential loss.
Item 9 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure
None
Item 9A Controls and Procedures
The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness
of the design and operation of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in
the Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon
that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the Company’s most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
41
Table of Contents
Item 9B Other Information
None
PART III
Item 10 Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by Item 10 concerning the executive officers and directors of the
Company is incorporated herein by reference to the following sections of the Company’s definitive
Proxy Statement for its 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 3, 2007 (the “2007
Proxy Statement”), which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to
Regulation 14A within 120 days after the close of the fiscal year for which this report is filed:
| • | Ownership of Voting Securities by Principal Holders and Management | ||
| • | Proposal one– Election of Directors | ||
| • | Nominees for Election to Board of Directors | ||
| • | Audit Committee | ||
| • | Executive Officers of the Company | ||
| • | Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance | ||
| • | Corporate Governance and Board Matters – Code of Ethics and Business Conduct. |
A copy of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is available by writing to our Investor Relations
Department at:
| Enpath Medical, Inc. | |||
| Investor Relations Department | |||
| 2300 Berkshire Lane | |||
| Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 | |||
| investorrelations@enpathmed.com |
Item 11 Executive Compensation
The information required by Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to the section of the
Company’s 2007 Proxy Statement titled “Executive Compensation and Other Information,” except that
information under the subsections titled “Compensation Committee Report,” “Comparative Stock
Performance” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation in Compensation
Decisions” is not incorporated by reference.
Item 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to the section of the
Company’s 2007 Proxy Statement titled “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management – Summary Ownership Table.”
Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to the section of the
Company’s 2007 Proxy Statement titled “Committees of the Board of Directors.”
42
Table of Contents
Item 14 Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information required by Item 14 is incorporated by reference to the section of the
Company’s 2007 Proxy Statement titled “Principal Accountant Fees and Services.”
PART IV
Item 15 Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) Documents Filed as Part of This Report
| 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. See Item 8 above. | ||
| 2. | FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES: Opinion on financial statement schedules Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |
||
| 3. | EXHIBITS. See “Exhibit Index” on page following signatures. |
43
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized:
| Enpath Medical, Inc. |
||||
| Date: March 13, 2007 | By: | /s/ John C. Hertig | ||
| Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates
indicated:
| Name | Title | Date | ||
/s/ John C. Hertig
|
Chief Executive Officer | March 13, 2007 | ||
/s/ James D. Hartman
|
Chairman | March 14, 2007 | ||
/s/ Scott P. Youngstrom
|
Chief Financial Officer | March 14, 2007 | ||
/s/ Thomas L. Auth
|
Director | March 13, 2007 | ||
/s/ Michael D. Dale
|
Director | March 14, 2007 | ||
/s/ Albert Emola
|
Director | March 12, 2007 | ||
/s/ Richard F. Sauter
|
Director | March 14, 2007 | ||
/s/ Richard T. Schwarz
|
Director | March 10, 2007 |
44
Table of Contents
Exhibit Index
| Exhibit # | Description | |
3.1 |
Articles of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the | |
| Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.) | ||
3.2 |
By-laws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Form 10-K for the | |
| year ended December 31, 2003). | ||
*10.1 |
Letter agreement dated November 21, 2005 between the Company and John C. Hertig | |
| (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 10-K for the year ended December | ||
| 31, 2005). | ||
*10.2 |
Employment agreement dated December 12, 2006 between the Company and John C. | |
| Hertig.(incorporated by reference to Item 5.02 to the Form 8-K filed by the Company on | ||
| December 17, 2006). | ||
*10.3 |
Employment agreement dated December 12, 2006 between the Company and Scott P. | |
| Youngstrom.(incorporated by reference to Item 5.02 to the Form 8-K filed by the Company on | ||
| December 17, 2006). | ||
*10.4 |
Employment agreement dated December 12, 2006 between the Company and Steven D. | |
| Mogensen.(incorporated by reference to Item 5.02 to the Form 8-K filed by the Company on | ||
| December 17, 2006). | ||
*10.5 |
Employment agreement dated December 12, 2006 between the Company and Michael P. | |
| Winegar.(incorporated by reference to Item 5.02 to the Form 8-K filed by the Company on | ||
| December 17, 2006). | ||
*10.6 |
Employment agreement dated December 12, 2006 between the Company and Michael D. | |
| Erdmann.(incorporated by reference to Item 5.02 to the Form 8-K filed by the Company on | ||
| December 17, 2006). | ||
*10.7 |
Enpath Medical, Inc. 1991 Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to | |
| Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333 57944)). | ||
*10.8 |
Enpath Medical, Inc. 1999 Incentive Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to | |
| Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333 133740). | ||
*10.9 |
Enpath Medical, Inc. 1999 Non-Employee Director and Medical Advisory Board Stock Option | |
| Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on | ||
| Form S-8 (File No. 333 62560)). | ||
*10.10 |
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to | |
| Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.) | ||
*10.11 |
Form of Non-Employee Director Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to | |
| Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. | ||
**10.12 |
Supply Agreement, dated October 11, 2002, between the Company and Medtronic, Inc. | |
| (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended | ||
| September 30, 2002). | ||
10.13 |
Lease Agreement, dated January 31, 2004, between the Company and Jagodzinski Properties | |
| for premises at 15301 Highway 55 West, Plymouth, Minnesota, incorporated by reference to | ||
| Exhibit 10.8 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. | ||
10.14 |
Lease agreement for premises at 7452 West 78th Street, Bloomington, Minnesota | |
| as amended and assigned thought October 23, 2003, incorporated by reference to Exhibit | ||
| 10.9 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. | ||
10.15 |
Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement dated October 17, 2003 between the Company and | |
| M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Form 10-Q for | ||
| the quarter ended September 30, 2003). | ||
10.15.1 |
Letter Amendment No. 1 dated March 18, 2004, to the Revolving Credit and Term Loan | |
| Agreement dated as of October 17, 2003 between the Company and Marshall & Ilsley Bank | ||
| (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Form 10-K for the year ended December | ||
| 31, 2003). | ||
10.15.2 |
Letter Amendment No. 2 dated July 19, 2004, to the Revolving Credit and Term Loan | |
| Agreement dated as of October 17, 2003 between the Company and Marshall & Ilsley Bank | ||
| (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, | ||
| 2004). |
45
Table of Contents
| Exhibit # | Description | |
10.15.3 |
Letter Amendment No. 3 dated October 13, 2004, to the Revolving Credit and Term Loan | |
| Agreement dated as of October 17, 2003 between the Company and Marshall & Ilsley Bank | ||
| (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended | ||
| September 30, 2004). | ||
10.15.4 |
Letter Amendment No. 4 dated February 9, 2005, to the Revolving Credit and Term Loan | |
| Agreement dated as of October 17, 2003 between the Company and Marshall & Ilsley | ||
| Bank.(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12.4 to the Form 10-K for the year ended | ||
| December 31, 2004). | ||
10.15.5 |
Letter Amendment No. 5 dated August 22, 2006, to the Revolving Credit and Term Loan | |
| Agreement dated as of October 17, 2003 between the Company and Marshall & Ilsley | ||
| Bank.(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended | ||
| September 30, 2006. | ||
10.15.6 |
Letter Amendment No. 6 dated January 3, 2007, to the Revolving Credit and Term Loan | |
| Agreement dated as of October 17, 2003 between the Company and Marshall & Ilsley Bank. | ||
10.16 |
Term Promissory Note dated October 17, 2003 in favor of Marshall & Ilsley Bank | |
| (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended | ||
| September 30, 2003). | ||
10.17 |
Term Promissory Note B dated August 22, 2006 in favor of Marshall & Ilsley (incorporated | |
| by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006). | ||
10.17.1 |
Amended Term Promissory Note B dated January 3, 2007 in favor of Marshall & Ilsley Bank. | |
10.18 |
Revolving Promissory Note dated October 17, 2003 in favor of Marshall & Ilsley Bank | |
| (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended | ||
| September 30, 2003). | ||
10.19 |
Security Agreement dated October 17, 2003 between the Company and Marshall & Ilsley Bank | |
| (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended | ||
| September 30, 2003). | ||
10.20 |
Third Party Security Agreement dated October 17, 2003 between the Company’s wholly owned | |
| subsidiary and M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to | ||
| the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003). | ||
10.21 |
Lease Agreement dated May 26, 2006, between Enpath Medical, Inc. as Tenant and Plymouth | |
| 2200, LLP, a Minnesota limited liability partnership, as Landlord with respect to premises | ||
| located at 2300 Berkshire Lane North, Plymouth, Minnesota (incorporated by reference to | ||
| Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006). | ||
10.22 |
Salaried employee bonus plan for fiscal year 2007. | |
21.1 |
The Company has no subsidiaries. | |
23.1 |
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | |
31.1 |
Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley | |
| Act of 2002 (Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). | ||
31.2 |
Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley | |
| Act of 2002 (Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). | ||
32 |
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350). |
| * | Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
|
| ** | Certain portions of this Exhibit have been deleted and filed separately with the Commission pursuant to a request for confidential treatment under Rule 24b-2. Spaces corresponding to the deleted portions are represented by brackets with asterisks. |
46
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Enpath Medical, Inc.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Enpath Medical, Inc.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements of
Enpath Medical, Inc. taken as a whole. The supplemental schedule II is presented for purposes of
complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and is not a part of the basic
financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in our
audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material
respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
| /s/ McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP | ||||
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 16, 2007
March 16, 2007
47
Table of Contents
Enpath Medical, Inc.
Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
| Additions | ||||||||||||||||
| Balance at | Charged to | Balance at | ||||||||||||||
| Beginning | Costs and | Less | End of | |||||||||||||
| Description | of Period | Expenses | Deductions | Period | ||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2006: |
||||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
$ | 57,341 | $ | 0 | $ | 1,723 | $ | 55,618 | ||||||||
Allowance for slow-moving inventory |
$ | 257,538 | $ | 0 | $ | 96,821 | $ | 160,717 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 314,879 | $ | 0 | $ | 98,544 | $ | 216,335 | ||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2005: |
||||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
$ | 68,606 | $ | 0 | $ | 11,265 | $ | 57,341 | ||||||||
Allowance for slow-moving inventory |
$ | 123,982 | $ | 273,451 | $ | 139,895 | $ | 257,538 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 192,588 | $ | 273,451 | $ | 151,160 | $ | 314,879 | ||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2004: |
||||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
$ | 69,990 | $ | 0 | $ | 1,384 | $ | 68,606 | ||||||||
Allowance for slow-moving inventory |
$ | 155,395 | $ | 0 | $ | 31,413 | $ | 123,982 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 225,385 | $ | 0 | $ | 32,797 | $ | 192,588 | ||||||||
48