e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One) |
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the quarterly period ended March 25, 2006 |
or |
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to |
Commission File Number 1-4455
Dole Food Company, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
99-0035300 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
One Dole Drive
Westlake Village, California 91362
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(818) 879-6600
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated
filer o Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the
issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest
practicable date.
|
|
|
Class |
|
Shares Outstanding at May 5, 2006 |
Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value |
|
1,000 |
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
INDEX
2
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 25, | |
|
March 26, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues, net
|
|
$ |
1,400,006 |
|
|
$ |
1,442,133 |
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
1,269,545 |
|
|
|
1,226,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
130,461 |
|
|
|
215,947 |
|
Selling, marketing and general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
107,466 |
|
|
|
114,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
22,995 |
|
|
|
101,129 |
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(1,086 |
) |
|
|
2,950 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,474 |
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
34,425 |
|
|
|
36,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes, minority interests and equity
earnings
|
|
|
(11,042 |
) |
|
|
69,095 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(4,218 |
) |
|
|
53,421 |
|
Minority interests, net of income taxes
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries, net of income
taxes
|
|
|
(1,522 |
) |
|
|
(1,979 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(5,919 |
) |
|
$ |
17,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
3
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 25, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
53,940 |
|
|
$ |
48,812 |
|
Receivables, net of allowances of $56,239 and $58,585,
respectively
|
|
|
732,066 |
|
|
|
637,636 |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
650,273 |
|
|
|
623,497 |
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
66,877 |
|
|
|
58,864 |
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
37,595 |
|
|
|
34,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,540,751 |
|
|
|
1,403,565 |
|
Investments
|
|
|
77,883 |
|
|
|
76,753 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
of $742,509 and $705,115, respectively
|
|
|
1,498,832 |
|
|
|
1,508,597 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
540,280 |
|
|
|
540,280 |
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
725,671 |
|
|
|
726,700 |
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
153,194 |
|
|
|
153,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
4,536,611 |
|
|
$ |
4,409,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$ |
832,494 |
|
|
$ |
842,488 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
25,001 |
|
|
|
25,020 |
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
51,876 |
|
|
|
1,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
909,371 |
|
|
|
868,902 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
2,056,046 |
|
|
|
2,000,843 |
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
353,484 |
|
|
|
355,647 |
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
551,267 |
|
|
|
546,305 |
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
21,424 |
|
|
|
21,487 |
|
Contingencies (Note 9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $0.001 par value;
1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
468,422 |
|
|
|
440,032 |
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
183,672 |
|
|
|
192,991 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(7,075 |
) |
|
|
(16,480 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
645,019 |
|
|
|
616,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
4,536,611 |
|
|
$ |
4,409,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
4
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 25, | |
|
March 26, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(5,919 |
) |
|
$ |
17,154 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash flow used in
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
32,962 |
|
|
|
33,466 |
|
|
Unrealized foreign currency exchange loss (gain)
|
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
|
(493 |
) |
|
Asset write-offs and gain on sale of assets, net
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
(1,702 |
) |
|
Minority interests and equity earnings, net
|
|
|
(905 |
) |
|
|
(1,480 |
) |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(5,127 |
) |
|
|
12,748 |
|
|
Pension expense
|
|
|
3,374 |
|
|
|
3,883 |
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
1,124 |
|
|
|
1,935 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,314 |
|
|
|
1,554 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
(86,568 |
) |
|
|
(142,330 |
) |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(24,314 |
) |
|
|
(32,008 |
) |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(8,196 |
) |
|
|
(5,506 |
) |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(21,768 |
) |
|
|
69,434 |
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
3,738 |
|
|
|
(1,596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow used in operating activities
|
|
|
(109,118 |
) |
|
|
(44,941 |
) |
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
3,093 |
|
Acquisitions and investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,094 |
) |
Capital additions
|
|
|
(24,206 |
) |
|
|
(15,358 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock in the going-private merger
transaction
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow used in investing activities
|
|
|
(22,976 |
) |
|
|
(59,408 |
) |
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt borrowings
|
|
|
58,666 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
Short-term debt repayments
|
|
|
(725 |
) |
|
|
(10,757 |
) |
Long-term debt borrowings, net of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
262,101 |
|
|
|
299,827 |
|
Long-term debt repayments
|
|
|
(208,292 |
) |
|
|
(198,023 |
) |
Capital contributions
|
|
|
28,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to minority shareholders
|
|
|
(684 |
) |
|
|
(1,777 |
) |
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(3,400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by financing activities
|
|
|
136,056 |
|
|
|
89,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
(2,610 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
5,128 |
|
|
|
(17,367 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
48,812 |
|
|
|
79,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
53,940 |
|
|
$ |
61,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
5
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements of Dole Food
Company, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries
(Dole or the Company) include all
adjustments necessary, which are of a normal recurring nature,
to present fairly the Companys financial position, results
of operations and cash flows. The Company operates under a
52/53-week year. The
quarters ended March 25, 2006 and March 26, 2005 are
twelve weeks in duration. For a summary of significant
accounting policies and additional information relating to the
Companys financial statements, refer to the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
(Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Interim results are subject to seasonal variations and are not
necessarily indicative of the results of operations for a full
year. The Companys operations are sensitive to a number of
factors including weather-related phenomena and their effects on
industry volumes, prices, product quality and costs. Operations
are also sensitive to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates in both sourcing and selling locations as well as economic
crises and security risks in developing countries.
Certain amounts in the prior year financial statements and
related footnotes have been reclassified to conform with the
2006 presentation.
Income tax benefit for the quarter ended March 25, 2006 of
$4.2 million reflects the Companys expected effective
income tax rate of approximately 38.2% for the full fiscal year
ending December 30, 2006. Income tax expense of
$14.8 million for the quarter ended March 26, 2005,
which excludes the $38.6 million impact of the repatriation
of certain foreign earnings, reflects the Companys then
expected effective income tax rate of approximately 21% on
earnings for the full fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
For the periods presented, the Companys effective income
tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate
primarily due to earnings from operations being taxed in foreign
jurisdictions at a net effective rate lower than the
U.S. rate. Other than the taxes provided on the
$570 million of repatriated foreign earnings, no
U.S. taxes have been provided on these earnings because
such earnings are intended to be indefinitely invested outside
the U.S.
Section 965 Repatriation: During October 2004, the
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 was signed into law, adding
Section 965 to the Internal Revenue Code. Section 965
provided a special one-time deduction of 85% of certain foreign
earnings that are repatriated under a domestic reinvestment
plan, as defined therein. The effective federal tax rate on any
qualified foreign earnings repatriated under Section 965
equals 5.25%. Taxpayers could elect to apply this provision to a
qualified earnings repatriation made during calendar year 2005.
During the second fiscal quarter of 2005, the Company
repatriated $570 million of earnings from its foreign
subsidiaries, of which approximately $489 million qualified
for the 85% dividends received deduction under Section 965.
Income Tax Audits: The Company believes its tax positions
comply with the applicable tax laws and that it is adequately
provided for all tax-related matters. The Company is subject to
examination by taxing authorities in the various jurisdictions
in which it files tax returns. Specifically, the Company is
routinely under examination by the Internal Revenue Service. The
current examination includes the years 1995 through 2001.
Matters raised upon audit may involve substantial amounts and
could result in material cash payments if resolved unfavorably;
however, the Company does not believe that any material payments
will be made related
6
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
to these matters within the next twelve months. In addition, the
Company considers it unlikely that the resolution of these
matters will have a material adverse effect on its results of
operations.
Honduran Tax Case: In 2005, the Company received a tax
assessment from Honduras of approximately $137 million
(including the claimed tax, penalty, and interest through the
date of assessment) relating to the disposition of all of the
Companys interest in Cervecería Hondureña, S.A
in 2001. The Company believes the assessment is without merit
and filed an appeal with the Honduran tax authorities, which was
denied. As a result of the denial in the administrative process,
in order to negate the tax assessment, on August 5, 2005,
the Company proceeded to the next stage of the appellate process
by filing a lawsuit against the Honduran government, in the
Honduran Administrative Tax Trial Court. The Honduran government
is seeking dismissal of the lawsuit and attachment of assets,
which the Company is challenging. No reserve has been provided
for this assessment.
The major classes of inventories were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 25, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Finished products
|
|
$ |
319,624 |
|
|
$ |
290,593 |
|
Raw materials and work in progress
|
|
|
149,224 |
|
|
|
145,146 |
|
Crop-growing costs
|
|
|
130,465 |
|
|
|
139,271 |
|
Operating supplies and other
|
|
|
50,960 |
|
|
|
48,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
650,273 |
|
|
$ |
623,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS |
Goodwill has been allocated to the Companys reporting
segments as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh | |
|
Fresh | |
|
Packaged | |
|
Fresh-cut | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fruit | |
|
Vegetables | |
|
Foods | |
|
Flowers | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance as of March 25, 2006 and December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
376,355 |
|
|
$ |
97,868 |
|
|
$ |
66,057 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
540,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Details of the Companys intangible assets were as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 25, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Amortized intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$ |
38,501 |
|
|
$ |
38,501 |
|
|
Other amortized intangible assets
|
|
|
9,076 |
|
|
|
9,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,577 |
|
|
|
47,565 |
|
Accumulated amortization customer relationships
|
|
|
(10,066 |
) |
|
|
(9,219 |
) |
Other accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(6,358 |
) |
|
|
(6,164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization intangible assets
|
|
|
(16,424 |
) |
|
|
(15,383 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
31,153 |
|
|
|
32,182 |
|
Unamortized intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademark, trade names and other related intangibles
|
|
|
694,518 |
|
|
|
694,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets, net
|
|
$ |
725,671 |
|
|
$ |
726,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense of intangible assets for the quarters ended
March 25, 2006 and March 26, 2005 totaled
$1 million and $2.8 million, respectively. As of
March 25, 2006, the estimated remaining amortization
expense associated with the Companys intangible assets for
the remainder of 2006 and in each of the next four fiscal years
is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
2006
|
|
$ |
3,325 |
|
2007
|
|
$ |
3,677 |
|
2008
|
|
$ |
3,677 |
|
2009
|
|
$ |
3,677 |
|
2010
|
|
$ |
3,677 |
|
8
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
|
|
5. |
NOTES PAYABLE AND LONG-TERM DEBT |
Notes payable and long-term debt consisted of the following
amounts (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 25, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Unsecured debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.625% notes due 2009
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
7.25% notes due 2010
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
8.875% notes due 2011
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
8.75% debentures due 2013
|
|
|
155,000 |
|
|
|
155,000 |
|
Secured debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facilities
|
|
|
192,000 |
|
|
|
137,000 |
|
|
Term loan facilities
|
|
|
698,879 |
|
|
|
698,149 |
|
Contracts and notes due 2006 2010, at a
weighted-average interest rate of 6.87% (6.86% in 2005)
|
|
|
5,863 |
|
|
|
5,952 |
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
80,444 |
|
|
|
80,971 |
|
Unamortized debt discount
|
|
|
(1,139 |
) |
|
|
(1,209 |
) |
Notes payable
|
|
|
51,876 |
|
|
|
1,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,132,923 |
|
|
|
2,027,257 |
|
Current maturities
|
|
|
(76,877 |
) |
|
|
(26,414 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,056,046 |
|
|
$ |
2,000,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company amortized deferred debt issuance costs of
$1.1 million and $1.9 million during the quarters
ended March 25, 2006 and March 26, 2005, respectively.
As of March 25, 2006, the term loan facilities consisted of
$306.9 million of Term Loan A and $392 million of
Term Loan B. The weighted average variable interest rates
at March 25, 2006 for Term Loan A and Term Loan B
were 1.6% and 6.3%, respectively. During 2005, the Company
entered into an interest rate swap to fix Term Loan A into
a fixed-rate basis
through the term of the loan. The interest rate swap fixed the
interest rate at 2.05%. The fair value of the swap was
$5.8 million at March 25, 2006.
During January 2006, the Company increased its revolving credit
facilities from $300 million to $360 million. At
March 25, 2006, the Company had $192 million of
outstanding borrowings under the $360 million revolving
credit portion of the senior secured credit facilities. After
taking into account approximately $83.9 million of
outstanding letters of credit and bank guarantees issued against
these facilities, the Company had approximately
$84.1 million available for future borrowings under these
facilities. As of March 25, 2006, the weighted average
variable interest rate on the revolving credit facilities was
6.5%.
During April 2006, the Company completed an amendment and
restatement of its senior secured credit facilities, consisting
of the revolving credit and term loan facilities. Refer to
Note 12 for further information.
Provisions under the recently repaid senior secured credit
facilities and the indentures to the Companys senior notes
and debentures required the Company to comply with certain
covenants. These covenants include financial performance
measures, as well as limitations on, among other things,
indebtedness, investments, loans to subsidiaries, employees and
third parties, the issuance of guarantees and the payment of
dividends. In connection with the refinancing, the Company
obtained a waiver for certain covenants for the first quarter
ended March 25, 2006. The Company was in compliance with
the remaining covenants at March 25, 2006.
9
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
The components of comprehensive income were as follows in each
period (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 25, | |
|
March 26, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(5,919 |
) |
|
$ |
17,154 |
|
Unrealized foreign currency exchange translation gain (loss)
|
|
|
2,278 |
|
|
|
(7,646 |
) |
Reclassification of realized cash flow hedging gains to net
income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,271 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
Unrealized net gain (loss) on cash flow hedging instruments
|
|
|
8,398 |
|
|
|
(646 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
3,486 |
|
|
$ |
8,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Contribution
On March 3, 2006, DHM Holding Company, Inc.
(HoldCo) executed a $150 million senior secured
term loan agreement. In March 2006, HoldCo contributed
$28.4 million to Dole Holding Company, LLC, the
Companys immediate parent, which contributed the funds to
the Company. The Company intends to dividend this entire amount
back to Dole Holding Company, LLC by the end of 2006 for further
dividend to HoldCo.
Dividends
During the quarter ended March 25, 2006, the Company
declared and paid a dividend of $3.4 million to its parent
company, Dole Holding Company, LLC. The Company did not declare
or pay a dividend to its parent company during the quarter ended
March 26, 2005.
As discussed in Note 12, the Company declared a dividend of
$161 million to its immediate parent, Dole Holding Company,
LLC, in April 2006.
The Companys ability to declare future dividends is
limited under the terms of its senior secured credit facilities
and bond indentures.
10
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
|
|
7. |
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS |
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the
Companys U.S. and international pension plans and other
postretirement benefit (OPRB) plans were as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension Plans | |
|
Foreign Pension Plans | |
|
OPRB Plans | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Quarter Ended | |
|
Quarter Ended | |
|
Quarter Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
March 25, | |
|
March 26, | |
|
March 25, | |
|
March 26, | |
|
March 25, | |
|
March 26, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$ |
408 |
|
|
$ |
438 |
|
|
$ |
878 |
|
|
$ |
890 |
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
3,918 |
|
|
|
4,063 |
|
|
|
1,461 |
|
|
|
1,312 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(4,159 |
) |
|
|
(4,171 |
) |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized net loss (gain)
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
Unrecognized net transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
312 |
|
|
$ |
529 |
|
|
$ |
2,334 |
|
|
$ |
2,186 |
|
|
$ |
728 |
|
|
$ |
1,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under the Internal Revenue Service funding requirements, no
contribution will be required for 2006. However, the Company may
make contributions to its U.S. qualified plan in 2006 at
its election. Contributions to the qualified U.S. pension
plan in excess of the minimum funding requirements are voluntary
and may change depending on the Companys operating
performance or at managements discretion. During the first
quarter of 2006, the Company did not make any voluntary pension
contributions to its qualified U.S. pension plan.
The Company has four primary reportable operating segments:
fresh fruit, fresh vegetables, packaged foods and fresh-cut
flowers. These reportable segments are managed separately due to
differences in their products, production processes,
distribution channels and customer bases.
Management evaluates and monitors segment performance primarily
through earnings before interest expense and income taxes
(EBIT). EBIT is calculated by adding income taxes
and interest expense to net income. Management believes that
segment EBIT provides useful information for analyzing the
underlying business results as well as allowing investors a
means to evaluate the financial results of each segment in
relation to the Company as a whole. EBIT is not defined under
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(GAAP) and should not be considered in isolation or
as a substitute for net income measures prepared in accordance
with GAAP or as a measure of the Companys profitability.
Additionally, the Companys computation of EBIT may not be
comparable to other similarly titled measures computed by other
companies, because not all companies calculate EBIT in the same
fashion.
11
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Revenues from external customers and EBIT for the reportable
operating segments and corporate were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 25, | |
|
March 26, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues from external customers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$ |
897,024 |
|
|
$ |
939,527 |
|
|
Fresh vegetables
|
|
|
243,203 |
|
|
|
253,606 |
|
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
195,947 |
|
|
|
190,290 |
|
|
Fresh-cut flowers
|
|
|
58,164 |
|
|
|
52,719 |
|
|
Other operating segments
|
|
|
5,668 |
|
|
|
5,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,400,006 |
|
|
$ |
1,442,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$ |
20,223 |
|
|
$ |
76,509 |
|
|
Fresh vegetables
|
|
|
4,560 |
|
|
|
19,204 |
|
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
14,881 |
|
|
|
17,927 |
|
|
Fresh-cut flowers
|
|
|
(395 |
) |
|
|
4,558 |
|
|
Other operating segments
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating segments
|
|
|
39,419 |
|
|
|
118,273 |
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(15,131 |
) |
|
|
(11,639 |
) |
Interest expense
|
|
|
34,425 |
|
|
|
36,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$ |
(10,137 |
) |
|
$ |
70,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A majority of the Companys equity earnings in
unconsolidated subsidiaries, which have been included in EBIT in
the table above, relate to the fresh fruit operating segment.
Total assets for the reportable operating segments and corporate
were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 25, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Fresh fruit
|
|
$ |
2,379,414 |
|
|
$ |
2,301,090 |
|
Fresh vegetables
|
|
|
455,635 |
|
|
|
451,490 |
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
653,524 |
|
|
|
639,999 |
|
Fresh-cut flowers
|
|
|
157,617 |
|
|
|
153,565 |
|
Other operating segments
|
|
|
16,887 |
|
|
|
12,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating segments
|
|
|
3,663,077 |
|
|
|
3,558,622 |
|
Corporate
|
|
|
873,534 |
|
|
|
851,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,536,611 |
|
|
$ |
4,409,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is a guarantor of indebtedness of some of its key
fruit suppliers and other entities integral to the
Companys operations. At March 25, 2006, guarantees of
$2.5 million consisted primarily of amounts
12
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
advanced under third party bank agreements to independent
growers that supply the Company with product. The Company has
not historically experienced any significant losses associated
with these guarantees.
As part of its normal business activities, the Company and its
subsidiaries also provide guarantees to various regulatory
authorities, primarily in Europe, in order to comply with
foreign regulations when operating businesses overseas. These
guarantees relate to customs duties and the now-eliminated
banana import license fees that were granted to the European
Union member states agricultural authority. These
guarantees are obtained from commercial banks in the form of
letters of credit or bank guarantees. In addition, the Company
issues letters of credit and bonds through major banking
institutions and insurance companies as required by certain
vendor and other operating agreements. As of March 25,
2006, total letters of credit and bonds outstanding were
$110.4 million.
The Company also provides various guarantees, mostly to foreign
banks, in the course of its normal business operations to
support the borrowings, leases and other obligations of its
subsidiaries. The Company guaranteed $140.9 million of its
subsidiaries obligations to their suppliers and other
third parties as of March 25, 2006.
The Company has change of control agreements with certain key
executives, under which severance payments and benefits would
become payable in the event of specified terminations of
employment following a change of control (as defined) of the
Company.
The Company is involved from time to time in claims and legal
actions incidental to its operations, both as plaintiff and
defendant. The Company has established what management currently
believes to be adequate reserves for pending legal matters.
These reserves are established as part of an ongoing worldwide
assessment of claims and legal actions that takes into
consideration such items as changes in the pending case load
(including resolved and new matters), opinions of legal counsel,
individual developments in court proceedings, changes in the
law, changes in business focus, changes in the litigation
environment, changes in opponent strategy and tactics, new
developments as a result of ongoing discovery, and past
experience in defending and settling similar claims. In the
opinion of management, after consultation with outside counsel,
the claims or actions to which the Company is a party are not
expected to have a material adverse effect, individually or in
the aggregate, on the Companys financial condition or
results of operations.
A significant portion of the Companys legal exposure
relates to lawsuits pending in the United States and in several
foreign countries, alleging injury as a result of exposure to
the agricultural chemical DBCP
(1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane).
DBCP was manufactured by several chemical companies including
Dow and Shell and registered by the U.S. government for use
on food crops. The Company and other growers applied DBCP on
banana farms in Latin America and the Philippines and on
pineapple farms in Hawaii. Specific periods of use varied among
the different locations. The Company halted all purchases of
DBCP, including for use in foreign countries, when the
U.S. EPA cancelled the registration of DBCP for use in the
United States in 1979. That cancellation was based in part on a
1977 study by a manufacturer which indicated an apparent link
between male sterility and exposure to DBCP among factory
workers producing the product, as well as early product testing
done by the manufacturers showing testicular effects on animals
exposed to DBCP. To date, there is no reliable evidence
demonstrating that field application of DBCP led to sterility
among farm workers, although that claim is made in the pending
lawsuits. Nor is there any reliable scientific evidence that
DBCP causes any other injuries in humans, although plaintiffs in
the various actions assert claims based on cancer, birth defects
and other general illnesses.
Currently there are 554 lawsuits, in various stages of
proceedings, alleging injury as a result of exposure to DBCP or
seeking enforcement of Nicaraguan judgments. Seventeen of these
lawsuits are currently pending in various jurisdictions in the
United States. One case pending in Los Angeles Superior Court
with 13 Nicaraguan plaintiffs has a trial date of
January 24, 2007. Another case in Galveston, Texas with
1,463 claimants
13
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
from 14 different countries has a trial planned for January
2007. The remaining cases are pending in Latin America and the
Philippines, including 347 labor cases pending in Costa Rica
under that countrys national insurance program. Claimed
damages in DBCP cases worldwide total approximately
$35.2 billion, with the lawsuits in Nicaragua representing
approximately 85% of this amount. In almost all of the non-labor
cases, the Company is a joint defendant with the major DBCP
manufacturers and, typically, other banana growers. Except as
described below, none of these lawsuits has resulted in a
verdict or judgment against the Company.
In Nicaragua, 168 cases are currently filed in various courts
throughout the country, with all but one of the lawsuits brought
pursuant to Law 364, an October 2000 Nicaraguan statute that
contains substantive and procedural provisions that
Nicaraguas Attorney General formally opined are
unconstitutional. In October 2003, the Supreme Court of
Nicaragua issued an advisory opinion, not connected with any
litigation, that Law 364 is constitutional.
Seventeen cases have resulted in judgments in Nicaragua:
$489.4 million (nine cases consolidated with 468 claimants)
on December 11, 2002; $82.9 million (one case with 58
claimants) on February 25, 2004; $15.7 million (one
case with 20 claimants) on May 25, 2004; $4 million
(one case with four claimants) on May 25, 2004;
$56.5 million (one case with 72 claimants) on June 14,
2004; $64.8 million (one case with 86 claimants) on
June 15, 2004; $27.7 million (one case with 39
claimants) on March 17, 2005; $98.5 million (one case
with 150 claimants) on August 8, 2005; and
$46.4 million (one case with 62 claimants) on
August 20, 2005. The Company has appealed all judgments to
the Nicaragua Courts of Appeal, with the Companys appeal
of the August 8, 2005 $98.5 million judgment now
activated by the court.
There are 20 active cases currently pending in civil courts in
Managua (10), Chinandega (8) and Puerto Cabezas (2), all of
which have been brought under Law 364 except for one of the
cases pending in Chinandega. Six of the active cases pending
before the court in Chinandega have been consolidated for trial,
which seeks $3.4 billion on behalf of 1,708 claimants.
Trial in this consolidated case commenced November 25,
2005. In the 19 active cases under Law 364, except for one case
in Chinandega and one in Managua, the Company has sought to have
the cases returned to the United States pursuant to Law 364.
Notwithstanding, the Chinandega court denied the Companys
request in the six consolidated cases pending there; the Managua
court denied the Companys request with respect to one of
the cases pending there; and the court in Puerto Cabezas denied
the Companys request with respect to the two cases there.
The Companys requests as to eight of the cases in Managua
are still pending; and the Company expects to make similar
requests in the remaining two cases at the appropriate time. The
Company has appealed the two decisions of the court in Puerto
Cabezas, the decision of the court in Managua and the six
decisions of the court in Chinandega.
The claimants attempted enforcement of the
December 11, 2002 judgment for $489.4 million in the
United States resulted in a dismissal with prejudice of that
action by the United States District Court for the Central
District of California on October 20, 2003. The claimants
have voluntarily dismissed their appeal of that decision which
was pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Circuit. Defendants motion for sanctions against
Plaintiffs counsel is still pending before the Court of
Appeals in that case.
Claimants have also indicated their intent to seek enforcement
of the Nicaraguan judgments in Colombia, Ecuador, Venezuela and
other countries in Latin America and elsewhere, including the
United States. In Venezuela, the claimants are attempting
to enforce five of the Nicaraguan judgments in that
countrys Supreme Court: $489.4 million
(December 11, 2002); $82.9 million (February 25,
2004); $15.7 million (May 25, 2004);
$56.5 million (June 14, 2004); and $64.8 million
(June 15, 2004). An action recently filed to enforce the
$27.7 million Nicaraguan judgment (March 17, 2005) in
the Colombian Supreme Court was dismissed. In Ecuador, the
claimants attempted to enforce the five Nicaraguan judgments
issued between February 25, 2004 through June 15, 2004
in the Ecuador Supreme Court. The First, Second and Third
Chambers of the Ecuador Supreme Court issued rulings refusing to
consider those enforcement actions on the ground that the
Supreme Court was not a court of competent jurisdiction for
enforcement of a foreign
14
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
judgment. The plaintiffs subsequently refiled those five
enforcement actions in the civil court in Guayaquil, Ecuador.
Two of these subsequently filed enforcement actions have been
dismissed by the 3rd Civil Court
$15.7 million (May 25, 2004) and the
12th Civil Court $56.5 million
(June 14, 2004) in Guayaquil; plaintiffs have
sought reconsideration of those dismissals. The remaining three
enforcement actions are still pending.
The Company believes that none of the Nicaraguan civil trial
courts judgments will be enforceable against any Dole
entity in the U.S. or in any other country, because
Nicaraguas Law 364 is unconstitutional and violates
international principles of due process. Among other things, Law
364 is an improper special law directed at
particular parties; it requires defendants to pay large,
non-refundable deposits in order to even participate in the
litigation; it provides a severely truncated procedural process;
it establishes an irrebuttable presumption of causation that is
contrary to the evidence and scientific data; and it sets
unreasonable minimum damages that must be awarded in every case.
As to all the DBCP matters, the Company has denied liability and
asserted substantial defenses. The Company has also engaged in
efforts to resolve pending litigation and claims in the U.S. and
Latin America. Although no assurance can be given concerning the
outcome of these cases, in the opinion of management, after
consultation with legal counsel and based on past experience
defending and settling DBCP claims, the pending lawsuits are not
expected to have a material adverse effect on the Companys
financial condition or results of operations.
European Union Antitrust Inquiry and
U.S. Class Action Lawsuits: The European
Commission (EC) is investigating alleged violations
of European Union competition (antitrust) laws by banana
and pineapple importers and distributors operating within the
European Economic Area. On June 2 and 3, 2005, the EC
conducted a search of certain of the Companys offices in
Europe. During this same period, the EC also conducted similar
unannounced searches of other companies offices located in
the European Union. The Company is cooperating with the EC and
has responded to the ECs information requests. Although no
assurances can be given concerning the course or outcome of that
EC investigation, the Company believes that it has not violated
the European Union competition laws.
Following the public announcement of the EC searches, a number
of class action lawsuits were filed against the Company and
three competitors in the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of Florida. The lawsuits were filed on behalf
of entities that directly or indirectly purchased bananas from
the defendants and have now been consolidated into two separate
class action lawsuits: one by direct purchasers (customers); and
another by indirect purchasers (those who purchased bananas from
customers). Both consolidated class action lawsuits allege that
the defendants conspired to artificially raise or maintain
prices and control or restrict output of bananas. The Company
believes these lawsuits are without merit.
Honduran Tax Case: In 2005, the Company received a tax
assessment from Honduras of approximately $137 million
(including the claimed tax, penalty, and interest through the
date of assessment) relating to the disposition of all of the
Companys interest in Cervecería Hondureña, S.A
in 2001. The Company believes the assessment is without merit
and filed an appeal with the Honduran tax authorities, which was
denied. As a result of the denial in the administrative process,
in order to negate the tax assessment, on August 5, 2005,
the Company proceeded to the next stage of the appellate process
by filing a lawsuit against the Honduran government, in the
Honduran Administrative Tax Trial Court. The Honduran government
is seeking dismissal of the lawsuit and attachment of assets,
which the Company is challenging. No reserve has been provided
for this assessment.
15
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
|
|
10. |
IMPACT OF HURRICANE KATRINA |
During the third quarter of 2005, the Companys operations
in the Gulf Coast area of the United States were impacted by
Hurricane Katrina. The Companys fresh fruit division
utilizes the Gulfport, Mississippi port facility to receive and
store product from its Latin American operations. The Gulfport
facility, which is leased from the Mississippi Port Authority,
incurred significant damage from Hurricane Katrina. As a result
of the damage sustained at the Gulfport terminal, the Company
diverted shipments to other Dole port facilities including
Freeport, Texas; Port Everglades, Florida; and Wilmington,
Delaware. The Company resumed discharging shipments of fruit and
other cargo in Gulfport at the beginning of the fourth quarter
of 2005. However, the facility has not yet been fully rebuilt.
The financial impact to the Companys fresh fruit
operations includes the loss of cargo and equipment, property
damage and additional costs associated with re-routing product
to other ports in the region. Equipment that was destroyed or
damaged includes refrigerated and dry shipping containers, as
well as chassis and generator-sets used for land transportation
of the shipping containers.
During the first quarter of 2006, the Company incurred direct
incremental expenses of $0.7 million related to Hurricane
Katrina, bringing the total charge to $10.8 million. The
total charge includes direct incremental expenses of
$4.8 million, write-offs of owned assets with a net book
value of $4.1 million and leased assets of
$1.9 million representing amounts due to lessors. The
Company maintains customary insurance for its property,
including shipping containers, as well as for business
interruption. During the first quarter of 2006, the Company
collected $5.1 million from insurance carriers related to
cargo and property damage bringing the total cash collected to
$11.1 million. Subsequent to the first quarter of 2006, the
Company collected an additional $0.4 million. The Company
is continuing to work with its insurers to evaluate the extent
of the costs incurred as a result of the hurricane damage and to
determine the extent of the insurance coverage for that damage.
|
|
11. |
BUSINESS RESTRUCTURING |
In the first quarter of 2006, the commercial relationship
substantially ended between Doles wholly owned subsidiary,
Saba Trading AB (Saba), and Sabas largest
customer. Saba is a leading importer and distributor of fruit,
vegetables and flowers in Scandinavia. Sabas financial
results are included in Doles fresh fruit reporting
segment. Other than the expected charges described below, the
loss of this customers business is not expected to be
material to Doles ongoing earnings. In connection with
this recent event, Dole plans on restructuring certain lines of
Sabas business and expects to incur related costs. Total
costs incurred, consisting primarily of employee-related
severance costs, amounted to approximately $5.3 million
during the quarter ended March 25, 2006. The Company
currently estimates that the total restructuring costs will
approximate $18 million in the aggregate. However, the
timing and exact amount of the charges are yet to be determined,
as well as Doles potential contractual claims against this
customer pending the results of current discussions.
Refinancing and Dividend Transactions: On April 12,
2006, the Company completed an amendment and restatement of its
senior secured credit facilities. The Company obtained
$975 million of term loan facilities and $100 million
in a pre-funded letter of credit facility. The proceeds of the
term loans were used to repay the outstanding term loans under
the Companys existing senior secured credit facilities. In
addition, the Company paid a dividend of $161 million to
its immediate parent, Dole Holding Company, LLC, which proceeds
were used to repay in full its Second Lien Senior Credit
Facility. The terms and covenants under the new senior secured
credit facilities are similar to those under the Companys
existing senior secured credit facilities except that the new
facilities do not contain financial maintenance or maximum
capital expenditure covenants.
16
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Additionally, the Company entered into a new asset-based
revolving credit facility of $350 million. The facility is
secured and is subject to a borrowing base consisting of up to
85% of eligible accounts receivable plus a predetermined
percentage of eligible inventory, as specified in the credit
facility.
The purposes of the refinancing include increasing the size of
the Companys revolving credit and letter of credit
facilities and eliminating certain financial maintenance
covenants, realizing currency gains arising out of the
Companys existing senior secured credit facilities, and
refinancing of the higher-cost bank indebtedness of Dole Holding
Company, LLC, at the lower-cost Dole Food Company, Inc. level.
|
|
13. |
GUARANTOR FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
In connection with the issuance of the 2011 Notes in March 2003
and the 2010 Notes in May 2003, all of the Companys
wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries (Guarantors) have
fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint and several
basis, the Companys obligations under the indentures
related to such Notes and to the Companys 2009 Notes and
2013 Debentures (the Guarantees). Each Guarantee is
subordinated in right of payment to the Guarantors
existing and future senior debt, including obligations under the
senior secured credit facilities, and will rank pari passu with
all senior subordinated indebtedness of the applicable Guarantor.
The accompanying guarantor consolidating financial information
is presented on the equity method of accounting for all periods
presented. Under this method, investments in subsidiaries are
recorded at cost and adjusted for the Companys share in
the subsidiaries cumulative results of operations, capital
contributions and distributions and other changes in equity.
Elimination entries relate primarily to the elimination of
investments in subsidiaries and associated intercompany balances
and transactions.
As of January 1, 2006, Dole Packaged Frozen Foods, Inc. was
converted to a limited liability company. In addition, the
assets and liabilities of the Dole Packaged Foods division were
contributed to Dole Packaged Frozen Foods, Inc., and the
combined entity was renamed Dole Packaged Foods, LLC. Prior to
January 1, 2006, Dole Packaged Foods was included as a
division of Dole Food Company, Inc. for all guarantor financial
statements presented. Subsequent to the change in structure
effective January 1, 2006, Dole Packaged Foods, LLC is
presented as a Guarantor for disclosure purposes in the
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements for the
quarter ended March 25, 2006.
The following are condensed consolidating statements of
operations of the Company for the quarters ended March 25,
2006 and March 26, 2005; condensed consolidating balance
sheets as of March 25, 2006 and December 31, 2005; and
condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the
quarters ended March 25, 2006 and March 26, 2005.
17
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Quarter Ended March 25, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dole Food | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company, Inc. | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues, net
|
|
$ |
11,329 |
|
|
$ |
702,652 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,921 |
|
|
$ |
(314,896 |
) |
|
$ |
1,400,006 |
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
9,696 |
|
|
|
632,178 |
|
|
|
939,428 |
|
|
|
(311,757 |
) |
|
|
1,269,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
1,633 |
|
|
|
70,474 |
|
|
|
61,493 |
|
|
|
(3,139 |
) |
|
|
130,461 |
|
Selling, marketing and general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
15,498 |
|
|
|
45,063 |
|
|
|
50,044 |
|
|
|
(3,139 |
) |
|
|
107,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
(13,865 |
) |
|
|
25,411 |
|
|
|
11,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,995 |
|
Equity in subsidiary income
|
|
|
17,325 |
|
|
|
(4,730 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,595 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,085 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,086 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,474 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
24,118 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
10,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes, minority interests and equity
earnings
|
|
|
(20,473 |
) |
|
|
20,686 |
|
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
(12,595 |
) |
|
|
(11,042 |
) |
Income taxes
|
|
|
(14,590 |
) |
|
|
3,897 |
|
|
|
6,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,218 |
) |
Minority interests, net of income taxes
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
617 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries, net of income
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
(1,072 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,522 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(5,919 |
) |
|
$ |
16,985 |
|
|
$ |
(4,390 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,595 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,919 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarter Ended March 26, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dole Food | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company, Inc. | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues, net
|
|
$ |
127,259 |
|
|
$ |
583,433 |
|
|
$ |
1,036,999 |
|
|
$ |
(305,558 |
) |
|
$ |
1,442,133 |
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
95,496 |
|
|
|
519,636 |
|
|
|
914,156 |
|
|
|
(303,102 |
) |
|
|
1,226,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
31,763 |
|
|
|
63,797 |
|
|
|
122,843 |
|
|
|
(2,456 |
) |
|
|
215,947 |
|
Selling, marketing and general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
32,287 |
|
|
|
27,924 |
|
|
|
57,063 |
|
|
|
(2,456 |
) |
|
|
114,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(524 |
) |
|
|
35,873 |
|
|
|
65,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,129 |
|
Equity in subsidiary income
|
|
|
86,357 |
|
|
|
65,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(151,927 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,950 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
31,945 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
4,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes, minority interests and equity
earnings
|
|
|
53,915 |
|
|
|
101,460 |
|
|
|
65,647 |
|
|
|
(151,927 |
) |
|
|
69,095 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
36,467 |
|
|
|
15,036 |
|
|
|
1,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,421 |
|
Minority interests, net of income taxes
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
499 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries, net of income
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(227 |
) |
|
|
(1,752 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,979 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
17,154 |
|
|
$ |
86,625 |
|
|
$ |
65,302 |
|
|
$ |
(151,927 |
) |
|
$ |
17,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of March 25, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dole Food | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company, Inc. | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
27,537 |
|
|
$ |
(12,381 |
) |
|
$ |
38,784 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
53,940 |
|
|
Receivables, net of allowances
|
|
|
270,399 |
|
|
|
10,953 |
|
|
|
450,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
732,066 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
6,767 |
|
|
|
271,914 |
|
|
|
371,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
650,273 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
4,355 |
|
|
|
12,124 |
|
|
|
50,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,877 |
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
9,185 |
|
|
|
24,778 |
|
|
|
3,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
318,243 |
|
|
|
307,388 |
|
|
|
915,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,540,751 |
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
2,438,826 |
|
|
|
1,720,229 |
|
|
|
75,881 |
|
|
|
(4,157,053 |
) |
|
|
77,883 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
297,847 |
|
|
|
368,506 |
|
|
|
832,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,498,832 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
18,224 |
|
|
|
145,702 |
|
|
|
376,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
540,280 |
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
690,242 |
|
|
|
33,338 |
|
|
|
2,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
725,671 |
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
30,687 |
|
|
|
9,576 |
|
|
|
112,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
3,794,069 |
|
|
$ |
2,584,739 |
|
|
$ |
2,314,856 |
|
|
$ |
(4,157,053 |
) |
|
$ |
4,536,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$ |
77,185 |
|
|
$ |
310,261 |
|
|
$ |
445,048 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
832,494 |
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
24,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,001 |
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,137 |
|
|
|
50,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
76,885 |
|
|
|
312,296 |
|
|
|
520,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
909,371 |
|
|
Intercompany payables (receivables)
|
|
|
1,124,318 |
|
|
|
(247,707 |
) |
|
|
(876,611 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,244,160 |
|
|
|
2,264 |
|
|
|
809,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,056,046 |
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
284,587 |
|
|
|
40,283 |
|
|
|
28,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,484 |
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
419,100 |
|
|
|
40,190 |
|
|
|
91,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
551,267 |
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,842 |
|
|
|
15,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,424 |
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
645,019 |
|
|
|
2,431,571 |
|
|
|
1,725,482 |
|
|
|
(4,157,053 |
) |
|
|
645,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
3,794,069 |
|
|
$ |
2,584,739 |
|
|
$ |
2,314,856 |
|
|
$ |
(4,157,053 |
) |
|
$ |
4,536,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dole Food | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company, Inc. | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
12,698 |
|
|
$ |
(5,453 |
) |
|
$ |
41,567 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
48,812 |
|
|
Receivables, net of allowances
|
|
|
121,316 |
|
|
|
116,226 |
|
|
|
400,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
637,636 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
101,935 |
|
|
|
171,601 |
|
|
|
349,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
623,497 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
5,663 |
|
|
|
10,071 |
|
|
|
43,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,864 |
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
15,946 |
|
|
|
15,282 |
|
|
|
3,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
257,558 |
|
|
|
307,727 |
|
|
|
838,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,403,565 |
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
2,271,031 |
|
|
|
1,708,078 |
|
|
|
75,200 |
|
|
|
(3,977,556 |
) |
|
|
76,753 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
299,100 |
|
|
|
360,886 |
|
|
|
848,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,508,597 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
18,224 |
|
|
|
145,702 |
|
|
|
376,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
540,280 |
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
710,743 |
|
|
|
13,687 |
|
|
|
2,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
726,700 |
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
34,679 |
|
|
|
9,643 |
|
|
|
109,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
3,591,335 |
|
|
$ |
2,545,723 |
|
|
$ |
2,250,225 |
|
|
$ |
(3,977,556 |
) |
|
$ |
4,409,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$ |
(24,493 |
) |
|
$ |
428,142 |
|
|
$ |
438,839 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
842,488 |
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
24,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,020 |
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,119 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
(24,793 |
) |
|
|
430,146 |
|
|
|
463,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
868,902 |
|
|
Intercompany payables (receivables)
|
|
|
1,072,418 |
|
|
|
(229,126 |
) |
|
|
(843,292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,216,090 |
|
|
|
2,451 |
|
|
|
782,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,843 |
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
294,420 |
|
|
|
32,128 |
|
|
|
29,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355,647 |
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
416,657 |
|
|
|
39,684 |
|
|
|
89,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
546,305 |
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,325 |
|
|
|
15,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,487 |
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
616,543 |
|
|
|
2,264,115 |
|
|
|
1,713,441 |
|
|
|
(3,977,556 |
) |
|
|
616,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
3,591,335 |
|
|
$ |
2,545,723 |
|
|
$ |
2,250,225 |
|
|
$ |
(3,977,556 |
) |
|
$ |
4,409,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Quarter Ended March 25, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dole Food | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company, Inc. | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$ |
(37,505 |
) |
|
$ |
(345 |
) |
|
$ |
(71,268 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(109,118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,330 |
|
Capital additions
|
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
(13,472 |
) |
|
|
(10,187 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,206 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock in the going-private merger
transaction
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow used in investing activities
|
|
|
(646 |
) |
|
|
(13,462 |
) |
|
|
(8,868 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,976 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,614 |
|
|
|
51,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,666 |
|
Short-term debt repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(725 |
) |
Long-term debt borrowings
|
|
|
132,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262,101 |
|
Long-term debt repayments
|
|
|
(104,700 |
) |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
(103,420 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(208,292 |
) |
Capital contributions
|
|
|
28,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,390 |
|
Dividends paid to minority shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(436 |
) |
|
|
(248 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(684 |
) |
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(3,400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
52,990 |
|
|
|
6,879 |
|
|
|
76,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
14,839 |
|
|
|
(6,928 |
) |
|
|
(2,783 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,128 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
12,698 |
|
|
|
(5,453 |
) |
|
|
41,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
27,537 |
|
|
$ |
(12,381 |
) |
|
$ |
38,784 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
53,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Quarter Ended March 26, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dole Food | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company, Inc. | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$ |
(71,044 |
) |
|
$ |
7,196 |
|
|
$ |
18,907 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(44,941 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
3,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,093 |
|
Investments and acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,094 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,094 |
) |
Capital additions
|
|
|
(805 |
) |
|
|
(4,348 |
) |
|
|
(10,205 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,358 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock in the going-private merger
transaction
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow used in investing activities
|
|
|
(816 |
) |
|
|
(4,331 |
) |
|
|
(54,261 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322 |
|
Short-term debt repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,757 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,757 |
) |
Long-term debt borrowings
|
|
|
223,900 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
75,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299,827 |
|
Long-term debt repayments
|
|
|
(143,900 |
) |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
(54,002 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(198,023 |
) |
Dividends paid to minority shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,546 |
) |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,777 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
(11,975 |
) |
|
|
21,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,610 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,610 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
8,140 |
|
|
|
(9,110 |
) |
|
|
(16,397 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,367 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
9,236 |
|
|
|
3,279 |
|
|
|
66,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
17,376 |
|
|
$ |
(5,831 |
) |
|
$ |
50,305 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
61,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
In the first quarter of 2006, Dole Food Company, Inc. and its
consolidated subsidiaries (Dole or the
Company) generated revenues of $1.4 billion,
reflecting a 3% decrease compared to the prior year. Lower
revenues were reported by the Companys fresh fruit and
fresh vegetables operating segments. The Company earned
operating income of $23 million compared to
$101.1 million earned in the prior year. Lower operating
income was reported by all four of the Companys primary
operating segments. These results reflect higher production,
shipping and distribution costs and the impact of unfavorable
foreign currency exchange movements. The Company had a net loss
of $5.9 million for the first quarter of 2006 compared to
net income of $17.2 million in the first quarter of 2005.
Results of Operations
Selected results of operations for the quarters ended
March 25, 2006 and March 26, 2005 were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 25, | |
|
March 26, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues, net
|
|
$ |
1,400,006 |
|
|
$ |
1,442,133 |
|
Operating income
|
|
$ |
22,995 |
|
|
$ |
101,129 |
|
Interest income and other income (expense), net
|
|
$ |
388 |
|
|
$ |
4,025 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
$ |
34,425 |
|
|
$ |
36,059 |
|
Minority interests and equity in earnings of unconsolidated
subsidiaries, net of income taxes
|
|
$ |
(905 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,480 |
) |
Income taxes
|
|
$ |
(4,218 |
) |
|
$ |
53,421 |
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(5,919 |
) |
|
$ |
17,154 |
|
Revenues
For the quarter ended March 25, 2006, revenues decreased 3%
to $1.4 billion from $1.44 billion in the quarter
ended March 26, 2005. The decrease is primarily due to
lower sales in the Companys fresh fruit and fresh
vegetables segments. Fresh fruit sales decreased mainly due to
lower sales in Doles European ripening and distribution
operations. In the first quarter of 2006, Dole ended its
commercial relationship with a significant customer of Saba
Trading AB (Saba), which is part of the European
ripening and distribution operations. Fresh fruit sales also
were impacted by lower sales volumes of deciduous fruit in North
America and lower banana pricing in Asia. Lower sales in the
fresh vegetables segment were due to lower pricing in commodity
vegetables and lower volumes of packaged salads. In addition,
unfavorable foreign currency exchange movements in the
Companys foreign selling locations contributed to lower
revenues. If foreign currency exchange rates in the
Companys significant foreign operations during the first
quarter of 2006 had remained unchanged from those experienced in
the first quarter of 2005, the Company estimates that its
revenues would have been higher by approximately
$50 million. These decreases were partially offset by
higher volumes of bananas sold in Europe and North America,
higher sales of packaged food products in North America and
higher pricing and volumes in the fresh-cut flowers operations.
Operating Income
For the quarter ended March 25, 2006, operating income
decreased to $23 million from $101.1 million in the
quarter ended March 26, 2005. The decrease was primarily
attributable to lower operating results in all four of the
Companys operating segments. Higher product, distribution
and shipping costs, which resulted
23
primarily from higher commodity costs (including fuel and
tinplate) continued to affect the Companys operations.
Operating income was also impacted by restructuring costs of
$5.3 million incurred at Saba. Unfavorable foreign currency
exchange movements also contributed to lower operating results.
If foreign currency exchange rates in the Companys
significant foreign operations during the first quarter of 2006
had remained unchanged from those experienced in the first
quarter of 2005, the Company estimates that its operating income
would have been higher by approximately $17 million.
Operating income in the first quarter of 2006 included realized
foreign currency exchange gains of $1.1 million and foreign
currency hedge gains of $0.7 million.
Interest Income and Other Income (Expense), Net
For the quarter ended March 25, 2006, interest income and
other income (expense), net was $0.4 million compared to
$4 million in the prior year. The decrease was due to the
change in unrealized foreign currency exchange losses of
$3.9 million. During the first quarter of 2006, the
Companys Japanese yen denominated term loan and British
pound sterling denominated vessel capital lease obligations
generated foreign currency exchange losses of $0.7 million
and $0.5 million, respectively, compared to a foreign
currency exchange gain on the vessel capital lease obligations
of $2.7 million during the first quarter of 2005.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the quarter ended March 25, 2006 was
$34.4 million compared to $36.1 million in the quarter
ended March 26, 2005. Interest expense decreased primarily
as a result of lower overall effective borrowing rates due to
the Companys second quarter of 2005 refinancing and bond
tender transactions.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax benefit for the quarter ended March 25, 2006 of
$4.2 million reflects the Companys expected effective
income tax rate of approximately 38.2% for the full fiscal year
ending December 30, 2006. Income tax expense of
$14.8 million for the quarter ended March 26, 2005,
which excludes the $38.6 million impact of the repatriation
of certain foreign earnings, reflects the Companys then
expected effective income tax rate of approximately 21% on
earnings for the full fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
The increase in the expected tax rate for the full year of 2006
compared to the expected tax rate for the full year of 2005 is
principally due to earnings from operations decreasing by a
larger relative percentage than the associated taxes required to
be provided on such earnings.
For the periods presented, the Companys effective income
tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate
primarily due to earnings from operations being taxed in foreign
jurisdictions at a net effective rate lower than the
U.S. rate. Other than the taxes provided on the
$570 million of repatriated foreign earnings, no
U.S. taxes have been provided on these earnings because
such earnings are intended to be indefinitely invested outside
the U.S.
Segment Results of Operations
The Company has four primary reportable operating segments:
fresh fruit, fresh vegetables, packaged foods and fresh-cut
flowers. These reportable segments are managed separately due to
differences in their products, production processes,
distribution channels and customer bases.
The Companys management evaluates and monitors segment
performance primarily through earnings before interest expense
and income taxes (EBIT). EBIT is calculated by
adding income taxes and interest expense to net income.
Management believes that segment EBIT provides useful
information for analyzing the underlying business results as
well as allowing investors a means to evaluate the financial
results of each segment in relation to the Company as a whole.
EBIT is not defined under accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and
should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net
income measures prepared in accordance with GAAP or as a measure
of the Companys profitability. Additionally, the
Companys computation of EBIT may not be comparable to
other similarly titled measures computed by other companies,
because not all companies calculate EBIT in the same fashion.
24
Revenues from external customers and EBIT for the reportable
operating segments and corporate were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 25, | |
|
March 26, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$ |
897,024 |
|
|
$ |
939,527 |
|
|
Fresh vegetables
|
|
|
243,203 |
|
|
|
253,606 |
|
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
195,947 |
|
|
|
190,290 |
|
|
Fresh-cut flowers
|
|
|
58,164 |
|
|
|
52,719 |
|
|
Other operating segments
|
|
|
5,668 |
|
|
|
5,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,400,006 |
|
|
$ |
1,442,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 25, | |
|
March 26, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh fruit
|
|
$ |
20,223 |
|
|
$ |
76,509 |
|
|
Fresh vegetables
|
|
|
4,560 |
|
|
|
19,204 |
|
|
Packaged foods
|
|
|
14,881 |
|
|
|
17,927 |
|
|
Fresh-cut flowers
|
|
|
(395 |
) |
|
|
4,558 |
|
|
Other operating segments
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating segments
|
|
|
39,419 |
|
|
|
118,273 |
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(15,131 |
) |
|
|
(11,639 |
) |
Interest expense
|
|
|
34,425 |
|
|
|
36,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$ |
(10,137 |
) |
|
$ |
70,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh Fruit
Fresh fruit revenues in the quarter ended March 25, 2006
decreased 5% to $897 million from $939.5 million in
the quarter ended March 26, 2005. The decrease in fresh
fruit revenues was primarily due to the following: lower sales
in the European ripening and distribution operations, lower
banana pricing in Asia, lower volumes of deciduous fruit sold in
North America and lower volumes of pineapples sold in Asia.
These factors were partially offset by higher volumes of bananas
sold in Europe and North America. The increase in volumes of
European bananas was related to the implementation by the
European Union (EU) of a new tariff only
import fee on bananas effective January 1, 2006 which ended
volume restrictions applicable to Latin American imported
bananas. In addition, unfavorable foreign currency exchange
movements in the Companys foreign selling locations
contributed to lower revenues. If foreign currency exchange
rates in the Companys significant foreign operations
during the first quarter of 2006 had remained unchanged from
those experienced in the first quarter of 2005, the Company
estimates that its fresh fruit revenues would have been higher
by approximately $50 million.
Fresh fruit EBIT in the quarter ended March 25, 2006
decreased to $20.2 million from $76.5 million in the
quarter ended March 26, 2005. EBIT decreased primarily as a
result of higher product costs that impacted worldwide banana
and fresh pineapple operations and deciduous fruit sold in North
America. There were also higher costs in the European banana
business related to the new tariff fees imposed by the EU in
connection with the new import regime. EBIT also decreased due
to higher shipping and distribution costs across all
25
businesses due to significantly higher fuel costs. In addition,
the Company incurred restructuring costs of approximately
$5.3 million at Saba. If foreign currency exchange rates in
the Companys significant fresh fruit foreign operations
during the first quarter of 2006 had remained unchanged from
those experienced in the first quarter of 2005, the Company
estimates that fresh fruit EBIT would have been higher by
approximately $15 million.
Fresh Vegetables
Fresh vegetables revenues for the quarter ended March 25,
2006 decreased 4% to $243.2 million from
$253.6 million in the quarter ended March 26, 2005.
The decrease was due to lower pricing in the commodity
vegetables business, primarily for celery and lettuce, and lower
volumes of packaged salads sold in North America.
Fresh vegetables EBIT for the quarter ended March 25, 2006
decreased to $4.6 million from $19.2 million in the
quarter ended March 26, 2005. The decrease in EBIT was
mainly attributable to the same factors that drove the decrease
in sales as well as higher product and distribution costs in
packaged salads.
Packaged Foods
Packaged foods revenues for the quarter ended March 25,
2006 increased 3% to $195.9 million from
$190.3 million in the quarter ended March 26, 2005.
The increase in revenues was caused by higher pricing of fruit
bowls, higher volumes of fruit parfaits due to its national
retail rollout and higher volumes of pineapple concentrate sold
in North America. These increases were partially offset by lower
volumes of canned solid pineapple in Europe and lower volumes of
pineapple concentrate in Japan.
EBIT in the packaged foods segment for the quarter ended
March 25, 2006 decreased to $14.9 million from
$17.9 million in the quarter ended March 26, 2005.
EBIT for the quarter decreased primarily as a result of higher
product costs. In addition, selling and distribution costs
increased due to higher fuel costs.
Fresh-Cut Flowers
Fresh-cut flowers revenues for the quarter ended March 25,
2006 increased 10% to $58.2 million from $52.7 million
in the quarter ended March 26, 2005. The increase in
revenues was attributable to higher pricing and volumes in the
retail market.
EBIT in the fresh-cut flowers segment for the quarter ended
March 25, 2006 decreased to a loss of $0.4 million
from earnings of $4.6 million in the quarter ended
March 26, 2005. The decrease in EBIT was primarily due to
higher product costs related to outsourcing of production to
meet sales demand, additional third party flower purchases and
higher shipping and distribution costs.
Corporate
Corporate EBIT was a loss of $15.1 million in the quarter
ended March 25, 2006 compared to a loss of
$11.6 million in the quarter ended March 26, 2005. The
change in EBIT for the quarter was primarily due to higher
general and administrative costs, lower foreign currency
exchange gains associated with certain foreign denominated
intercompany notes, which were settled during the first quarter
of 2005, and an unrealized foreign currency exchange loss of
$0.7 million related to the Companys Japanese yen
denominated term loan.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
In the quarter ended March 25, 2006, cash flows used in
operating activities were $109.1 million compared to cash
flows used in operating activities of $44.9 million in the
quarter ended March 26, 2005. Cash flows used in operating
activities were $64.2 million higher, primarily due to
lower net income and lower payables and accrued liabilities,
which resulted from the 2005 accrual of income taxes payable
related to the provision on repatriated foreign earnings, as
well as the timing of payments. These factors were partially
offset primarily by lower receivables associated with lower
sales during the first quarter of 2006 as well as the timing of
payments.
26
Cash flows used in investing activities were approximately
$23 million in the quarter ended March 25, 2006,
compared to cash flows used of $59.4 million in the quarter
ended March 26, 2005. The decrease in cash outflow during
2006 was primarily due to the first quarter 2005 payment of
$47.1 million to Saba shareholders in connection with the
Companys purchase of the remaining 40% minority interest.
This decrease in cash outflow was partially offset by higher
capital expenditures of $8.8 million.
Cash flows provided by financing activities increased to
$136.1 million in the quarter ended March 25, 2006
compared to cash flows provided by financing activities of
$89.6 million in the quarter ended March 26, 2005. The
increase of $46.5 million is due to an equity contribution
of $28.4 million made by Dole Holding Company, LLC in 2006
and higher current year debt borrowings of $20.4 million,
net of repayments. These items were offset by a dividend of
$3.4 million paid to Dole Holding Company, LLC during the
first quarter of 2006.
As of March 25, 2006, the Company had outstanding balances
under its senior secured term loan facilities of approximately
$698.9 million. During January 2006, the Company increased
its revolving credit facilities from $300 million to
$360 million. The Company had $192 million of
outstanding borrowings under the $360 million revolving
credit portion of the senior secured credit facilities, and
after taking into account approximately $83.9 million of
outstanding letters of credit and bank guarantees issued against
these facilities, had approximately $84.1 million available
for future borrowings under these facilities.
On April 12, 2006, the Company completed an amendment and
restatement of its senior secured credit facilities. The Company
obtained $975 million of term loan facilities and
$100 million in a pre-funded letter of credit facility. The
proceeds of the term loans were used to repay the outstanding
term loans under the Companys existing senior secured
credit facilities. In addition, the Company paid a dividend of
$161 million to its immediate parent, Dole Holding Company,
LLC, which proceeds were used to repay in full its Second Lien
Senior Credit Facility. The terms and covenants under the new
senior secured credit facilities are similar to those under the
Companys existing senior secured credit facilities except
that the new facilities do not contain financial maintenance or
maximum capital expenditure covenants.
Additionally, the Company entered into a new asset based
revolving credit facility of $350 million. The facility is
secured and is subject to a borrowing base consisting of up to
85% of eligible accounts receivable plus a predetermined
percentage of eligible inventory, as defined in the credit
facility.
The purposes of the refinancing include increasing the size of
the Companys revolving credit and letter of credit
facilities and eliminating certain financial maintenance
covenants, realizing currency gains arising out of the
Companys existing senior secured credit facilities, and
refinancing of the higher-cost bank indebtedness of Dole Holding
Company, LLC, at the lower-cost Dole Food Company, Inc. level.
Provisions under the recently repaid senior secured credit
facilities and the indentures to the Companys senior notes
and debentures required the Company to comply with certain
financial covenants. These covenants include financial
performance measures, as well as limitations on, among other
things, indebtedness, investments, loans to subsidiaries,
employees and third parties, the issuance of guarantees and the
payment of dividends. The Company obtained a waiver for certain
covenants, with respect to the first quarter ended
March 25, 2006. The Company was in compliance with the
remaining covenants at March 25, 2006.
The Company had a cash balance and available borrowings under
the revolving credit facilities of $53.9 million and
$84.1 million, respectively, at March 25, 2006. As a
result of the April 2006 refinancing transaction, the Company
had available borrowing capacity under the new revolving credit
facility of $208.8 million as of April 21, 2006. The
Company believes that its existing cash balance and available
borrowing capacity under the new revolving credit facility
together with its future cash flow from operations and access to
capital markets will enable it to meet its working capital,
capital expenditure, debt maturity and other commitments and
funding requirements. Factors impacting the Companys cash
flow from operations include such items as commodity prices,
interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, among other
things, as set forth in the Companys
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 and in subsequent SEC
filings.
27
Other Matters
European Union Banana Import Regime: On January 1,
2006, the EU implemented a new tariff only import
regime for bananas. The 2001 EC/ US Understanding on Bananas
required the EU to implement a tariff only banana import system
on or before January 1, 2006, and the EUs banana
regime change was therefore expected by that date.
Banana imports from Latin America are now subject to import
license requirements only and a tariff of 176 euro per metric
ton for entry into the EU market. Under the EUs previous
banana regime, banana imports from Latin America were subject to
a tariff of 75 euro per metric ton and were also subject to both
import license requirements and volume quotas. License
requirements and volume quotas had the effect of limiting access
to the EU banana market.
Although all Latin bananas are now subject to a tariff of 176
euro per metric ton, up to 775,000 metric tons of bananas from
African, Caribbean, and Pacific (ACP) countries may
be imported to the EU duty-free. This preferential treatment of
a zero tariff on up to 775,000 tons of ACP banana imports, as
well as the 176 euro per metric ton tariff applied to Latin
banana imports, is currently being challenged by Panama,
Honduras and Nicaragua at the World Trade Organization
(WTO). The current tariff applied to Latin banana
imports may be lowered and the ACP preference of a zero tariff
may be affected depending on the outcome of these WTO
proceedings, but the WTO proceedings are only in their initial
stage and may take several years to conclude. The Company
encourages efforts to lower the tariff through negotiations with
the EU and is working actively to help achieve this result.
Income Tax Audits: The Company believes its tax positions
comply with the applicable tax laws and that it is adequately
provided for all tax-related matters. The Company is subject to
examination by taxing authorities in the various jurisdictions
in which it files tax returns. Specifically, the Company is
routinely under examination by the Internal Revenue Service. The
current examination includes the years 1995 through 2001.
Matters raised upon audit may involve substantial amounts and
could result in material cash payments if resolved unfavorably;
however, the Company does not believe that any material payments
will be made related to these matters within the next twelve
months. In addition, the Company considers it unlikely that the
resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect
on its results of operations.
Honduran Tax Case: In 2005, the Company received a tax
assessment from Honduras of approximately $137 million
(including the claimed tax, penalty, and interest through the
date of assessment) relating to the disposition of all of the
Companys interest in Cervecería Hondureña, S.A
in 2001. The Company believes the assessment is without merit
and filed an appeal with the Honduran tax authorities, which was
denied. As a result of the denial in the administrative process,
in order to negate the tax assessment, on August 5, 2005,
the Company proceeded to the next stage of the appellate process
by filing a lawsuit against the Honduran government, in the
Honduran Administrative Tax Trial Court. The Honduran government
is seeking dismissal of the lawsuit and attachment of assets,
which the Company is challenging. No reserve has been provided
for this assessment.
Hurricane Katrina: During the third quarter of 2005, the
Companys operations in the Gulf Coast area of the United
States were impacted by Hurricane Katrina. The Companys
fresh fruit division utilizes the Gulfport, Mississippi port
facility to receive and store product from its Latin American
operations. The Gulfport facility, which is leased from the
Mississippi Port Authority, incurred significant damage from
Hurricane Katrina. As a result of the damage sustained at the
Gulfport terminal, the Company diverted shipments to other Dole
port facilities including Freeport, Texas; Port Everglades,
Florida; and Wilmington, Delaware. The Company resumed
discharging shipments of fruit and other cargo in Gulfport at
the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2005. However, the
facility has not yet been fully rebuilt. The financial impact to
the Companys fresh fruit operations includes the loss of
cargo and equipment, property damage and additional costs
associated with re-routing product to other ports in the region.
Equipment that was destroyed or damaged includes refrigerated
and dry shipping containers, as well as chassis and
generator-sets used for land transportation of the shipping
containers.
28
During the first quarter of 2006, the Company incurred direct
incremental expenses of $0.7 million related to Hurricane
Katrina, bringing the total charge to $10.8 million. The
total charge includes direct incremental expenses of
$4.8 million, write-offs of owned assets with a net book
value of $4.1 million and leased assets of
$1.9 million representing amounts due to lessors. The
Company maintains customary insurance for its property,
including shipping containers, as well as for business
interruption. During the first quarter of 2006, the Company
collected $5.1 million from insurance carriers related to
cargo and property damage bringing the total cash collected to
$11.1 million. Subsequent to the first quarter of 2006, the
Company collected an additional $0.4 million. The Company
is continuing to work with its insurers to evaluate the extent
of the costs incurred as a result of the hurricane damage and to
determine the extent of the insurance coverage for that damage.
Business Restructuring: In the first quarter of 2006, the
commercial relationship substantially ended between Doles
wholly-owned subsidiary, Saba, and Sabas largest customer.
Saba is a leading importer and distributor of fruit, vegetables
and flowers in Scandinavia. Sabas financial results are
included in Doles fresh fruit reporting segment. Other
than the expected charges described below, the loss of this
customers business is not expected to be material to
Doles ongoing earnings. In connection with this recent
event, Dole plans on restructuring certain lines of Sabas
business and expects to incur related charges. Total costs
incurred, consisting primarily of employee-related severance
costs, amounted to approximately $5.3 million during the
quarter ended March 25, 2006. The Company currently
estimates that the total restructuring charges will approximate
$18 million in the aggregate. However, the timing and exact
amount of the charges are yet to be determined, as well as
Doles potential contractual claims against this customer
pending the results of current discussions.
Supplemental Financial Information
The following financial information has been presented, as
management believes that it is useful information to some
readers of the Companys condensed consolidated financial
statements (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 25, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total working capital (current assets less current liabilities)
|
|
$ |
631,380 |
|
|
$ |
534,663 |
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
4,536,611 |
|
|
$ |
4,409,727 |
|
Total debt
|
|
$ |
2,132,923 |
|
|
$ |
2,027,257 |
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
645,019 |
|
|
$ |
616,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 25, | |
|
March 26, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(5,919 |
) |
|
$ |
17,154 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
34,425 |
|
|
|
36,059 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(4,218 |
) |
|
|
53,421 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
32,962 |
|
|
|
33,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
57,250 |
|
|
$ |
140,100 |
|
EBITDA margin
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
9.7 |
% |
Capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
22,352 |
|
|
$ |
15,358 |
|
EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest
expense, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization. EBITDA
margin is defined as the ratio of EBITDA, as defined, relative
to net revenues. EBITDA is reconciled to net income in the
condensed consolidated financial statements in the tables above.
EBITDA and EBITDA margin fluctuated primarily due to the same
factors that impacted the changes in operating income and
segment EBIT discussed earlier.
29
The Company presents EBITDA and EBITDA margin because management
believes, similar to EBIT, EBITDA is a useful performance
measure for the Company. In addition, EBITDA is presented
because management believes it is frequently used by securities
analysts, investors and others in the evaluation of companies,
and because certain debt covenants on the Companys Senior
Notes are tied to EBITDA. EBITDA and EBITDA margin should not be
considered in isolation from or as a substitute for net income
and other consolidated income statement data prepared in
accordance with GAAP or as a measure of profitability.
Additionally, the Companys computation of EBITDA and
EBITDA margin may not be comparable to other similarly titled
measures computed by other companies, because all companies do
not calculate EBITDA and EBITDA margin in the same manner.
This Managements Discussion and Analysis contains
forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and
uncertainties. Forward-looking statements, which are based on
managements assumptions and describe the Companys
future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally
identifiable by the use of terms such as anticipate,
will, expect, believe,
should or similar expressions. The potential risks
and uncertainties that could cause the Companys actual
results to differ materially from those expressed or implied
herein are set forth in Item 1A and Item 7A of the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005 and include: weather-related
phenomena; market responses to industry volume pressures;
product and raw materials supplies and pricing; changes in
interest and currency exchange rates; economic crises in
developing countries; quotas, tariffs and other governmental
actions and international conflict.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
During the first quarter of 2006, the Company entered into
additional foreign currency exchange forward contracts to reduce
its risk related to anticipated dollar equivalent foreign
currency cash flows. These hedges have been designated as
effective hedges of cash flows as defined by Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended.
Refer to Note 15 in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005 for a summary of the
Companys derivative financial instruments outstanding at
December 31, 2005.
At March 25, 2006, the outstanding notional amount of the
Companys euro participating forwards, Japanese yen
forwards and participating forwards, Chilean peso participating
forwards, Colombian peso forwards and Thai baht forwards totaled
$149.8 million, $49.3 million, $18.6 million,
$51.6 million and $40.9 million, respectively. The
average strike prices of the Companys euro participating
forwards, Japanese yen forwards and participating forwards,
Chilean peso participating forwards, Colombian peso forwards and
Thai baht forwards were
1.20, ¥112.6, CLP 522, COP 2,282.3 and THB 41.4,
respectively.
For the quarter ended March 25, 2006, there have been no
material changes in the market risk disclosure presented in the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005, other than the transactions
described above.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
An evaluation was carried out as of March 25, 2006 under
the supervision and with the participation of Doles
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as defined in
Rule 15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act (Act). Based upon this
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer have concluded that Doles disclosure controls and
procedures are effective to ensure that information required to
be disclosed by us in reports we file under the Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported by management of Dole on a
timely basis in order to comply with Doles disclosure
obligations under the Act and the SEC rules thereunder.
30
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in Doles internal control over
financial reporting during the quarter ended March 25, 2006
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, Doles internal control over financial
reporting.
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
|
|
Item 1. |
Legal Proceedings |
Dole is involved from time to time in claims and legal actions
incidental to its operations, both as plaintiff and defendant.
The Company has established what management currently believes
to be adequate reserves for pending legal matters. These
reserves are established as part of an ongoing worldwide
assessment of claims and legal actions that takes into
consideration such items as changes in the pending case load
(including resolved and new matters), opinions of legal counsel,
individual developments in court proceedings, changes in the
law, changes in business focus, changes in the litigation
environment, changes in opponent strategy and tactics, new
developments as a result of ongoing discovery, and past
experience in defending and settling similar claims. In the
opinion of management, after consultation with outside counsel,
the claims or actions to which the Company is a party are not
expected to have a material adverse effect, individually or in
the aggregate, on the Companys financial condition or
results of operations.
A significant portion of the Companys legal exposure
relates to lawsuits pending in the United States and in several
foreign countries, alleging injury as a result of exposure to
the agricultural chemical DBCP
(1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane).
DBCP was manufactured by several chemical companies including
Dow and Shell and registered by the U.S. government for use
on food crops. The Company and other growers applied DBCP on
banana farms in Latin America and the Philippines and on
pineapple farms in Hawaii. Specific periods of use varied among
the different locations. The Company halted all purchases of
DBCP, including for use in foreign countries, when the
U.S. EPA cancelled the registration of DBCP for use in the
United States in 1979. That cancellation was based in part on a
1977 study by a manufacturer which indicated an apparent link
between male sterility and exposure to DBCP among factory
workers producing the product, as well as early product testing
done by the manufacturers showing testicular effects on animals
exposed to DBCP. To date, there is no reliable evidence
demonstrating that field application of DBCP led to sterility
among farm workers, although that claim is made in the pending
lawsuits. Nor is there any reliable scientific evidence that
DBCP causes any other injuries in humans, although plaintiffs in
the various actions assert claims based on cancer, birth defects
and other general illnesses.
Currently there are 554 lawsuits, in various stages of
proceedings, alleging injury as a result of exposure to DBCP or
seeking enforcement of Nicaraguan judgments. Seventeen of these
lawsuits are currently pending in various jurisdictions in the
United States. One case pending in Los Angeles Superior Court
with 13 Nicaraguan plaintiffs has a trial date of
January 24, 2007. Another case in Galveston, Texas with
1,463 claimants from 14 different countries has a trial
planned for January 2007. The remaining cases are pending in
Latin America and the Philippines, including 347 labor cases
pending in Costa Rica under that countrys national
insurance program. Claimed damages in DBCP cases worldwide total
approximately $35.2 billion, with the lawsuits in Nicaragua
representing approximately 85% of this amount. In almost all of
the non-labor cases, the Company is a joint defendant with the
major DBCP manufacturers and, typically, other banana growers.
Except as described below, none of these lawsuits has resulted
in a verdict or judgment against the Company.
In Nicaragua, 168 cases are currently filed in various courts
throughout the country, with all but one of the lawsuits brought
pursuant to Law 364, an October 2000 Nicaraguan statute that
contains substantive and procedural provisions that
Nicaraguas Attorney General formally opined are
unconstitutional. In October 2003, the Supreme Court of
Nicaragua issued an advisory opinion, not connected with any
litigation, that Law 364 is constitutional.
31
Seventeen cases have resulted in judgments in Nicaragua:
$489.4 million (nine cases consolidated with 468 claimants)
on December 11, 2002; $82.9 million (one case with 58
claimants) on February 25, 2004; $15.7 million (one
case with 20 claimants) on May 25, 2004; $4 million
(one case with four claimants) on May 25, 2004;
$56.5 million (one case with 72 claimants) on June 14,
2004; $64.8 million (one case with 86 claimants) on
June 15, 2004; $27.7 million (one case with 39
claimants) on March 17, 2005; $98.5 million (one case
with 150 claimants) on August 8, 2005; and
$46.4 million (one case with 62 claimants) on
August 20, 2005. The Company has appealed all judgments to
the Nicaragua Courts of Appeal, with the Companys appeal
of the August 8, 2005 $98.5 million judgment now
activated by the court.
There are 20 active cases currently pending in civil courts in
Managua (10), Chinandega (8) and Puerto Cabezas (2), all of
which have been brought under Law 364 except for one of the
cases pending in Chinandega. Six of the active cases pending
before the court in Chinandega have been consolidated for trial,
which seeks $3.4 billion on behalf of 1,708 claimants.
Trial in this consolidated case commenced November 25,
2005. In the 19 active cases under Law 364, except for one case
in Chinandega and one in Managua, the Company has sought to have
the cases returned to the United States pursuant to Law 364.
Notwithstanding, the Chinandega court denied the Companys
request in the six consolidated cases pending there; the Managua
court denied the Companys request with respect to one of
the cases pending there; and the court in Puerto Cabezas denied
the Companys request with respect to the two cases there.
The Companys requests as to eight of the cases in Managua
are still pending; and the Company expects to make similar
requests in the remaining two cases at the appropriate time. The
Company has appealed the two decisions of the court in Puerto
Cabezas, the decision of the court in Managua and the six
decisions of the court in Chinandega.
The claimants attempted enforcement of the
December 11, 2002 judgment for $489.4 million in the
United States resulted in a dismissal with prejudice of that
action by the United States District Court for the Central
District of California on October 20, 2003. The claimants
have voluntarily dismissed their appeal of that decision which
was pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Circuit. Defendants motion for sanctions against
Plaintiffs counsel is still pending before the Court of
Appeals in that case.
Claimants have also indicated their intent to seek enforcement
of the Nicaraguan judgments in Colombia, Ecuador, Venezuela and
other countries in Latin America and elsewhere, including the
United States. In Venezuela, the claimants are attempting
to enforce five of the Nicaraguan judgments in that
countrys Supreme Court: $489.4 million
(December 11, 2002); $82.9 million (February 25,
2004); $15.7 million (May 25, 2004);
$56.5 million (June 14, 2004); and $64.8 million
(June 15, 2004). An action recently filed to enforce the
$27.7 million Nicaraguan judgment (March 17, 2005) in
the Colombian Supreme Court was dismissed. In Ecuador, the
claimants attempted to enforce the five Nicaraguan judgments
issued between February 25, 2004 through June 15, 2004
in the Ecuador Supreme Court. The First, Second and Third
Chambers of the Ecuador Supreme Court issued rulings refusing to
consider those enforcement actions on the ground that the
Supreme Court was not a court of competent jurisdiction for
enforcement of a foreign judgment. The plaintiffs subsequently
refiled those five enforcement actions in the civil court in
Guayaquil, Ecuador. Two of these subsequently filed enforcement
actions have been dismissed by the 3rd Civil
Court $15.7 million (May 25,
2004) and the 12th Civil Court
$56.5 million (June 14, 2004) in
Guayaquil; plaintiffs have sought reconsideration of those
dismissals. The remaining three enforcement actions are still
pending.
The Company believes that none of the Nicaraguan civil trial
courts judgments will be enforceable against any Dole
entity in the U.S. or in any other country, because
Nicaraguas Law 364 is unconstitutional and violates
international principles of due process. Among other things, Law
364 is an improper special law directed at
particular parties; it requires defendants to pay large,
non-refundable deposits in order to even participate in the
litigation; it provides a severely truncated procedural process;
it establishes an irrebuttable presumption of causation that is
contrary to the evidence and scientific data; and it sets
unreasonable minimum damages that must be awarded in every case.
As to all the DBCP matters, the Company has denied liability and
asserted substantial defenses. The Company has also engaged in
efforts to resolve pending litigation and claims in the U.S. and
Latin America. Although no assurance can be given concerning the
outcome of these cases, in the opinion of management,
32
after consultation with legal counsel and based on past
experience defending and settling DBCP claims, the pending
lawsuits are not expected to have a material adverse effect on
the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
European Union Antitrust Inquiry and
U.S. Class Action Lawsuits: The European
Commission (EC) is investigating alleged violations
of European Union competition (antitrust) laws by banana
and pineapple importers and distributors operating within the
European Economic Area. On June 2 and 3, 2005, the EC
conducted a search of certain of the Companys offices in
Europe. During this same period, the EC also conducted similar
unannounced searches of other companies offices located in
the European Union. The Company is cooperating with the EC and
has responded to the ECs information requests. Although no
assurances can be given concerning the course or outcome of that
EC investigation, the Company believes that it has not violated
the European Union competition laws.
Following the public announcement of the EC searches, a number
of class action lawsuits were filed against the Company and
three competitors in the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of Florida. The lawsuits were filed on behalf
of entities that directly or indirectly purchased bananas from
the defendants and have now been consolidated into two separate
class action lawsuits: one by direct purchasers (customers); and
another by indirect purchasers (those who purchased bananas from
customers). Both consolidated class action lawsuits allege that
the defendants conspired to artificially raise or maintain
prices and control or restrict output of bananas. The Company
believes these lawsuits are without merit.
Honduran Tax Case: In 2005, the Company received a tax
assessment from Honduras of approximately $137 million
(including the claimed tax, penalty, and interest through the
date of assessment) relating to the disposition of all of the
Companys interest in Cervecería Hondureña, S.A
in 2001. The Company believes the assessment is without merit
and filed an appeal with the Honduran tax authorities, which was
denied. As a result of the denial in the administrative process,
in order to negate the tax assessment, on August 5, 2005,
the Company proceeded to the next stage of the appellate process
by filing a lawsuit against the Honduran government, in the
Honduran Administrative Tax Trial Court. The Honduran government
is seeking dismissal of the lawsuit and attachment of assets,
which the Company is challenging. No reserve has been provided
for this assessment.
|
|
Item 6. |
Exhibits and Reports on
Form 8-K |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1* |
|
|
Certification by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
|
|
31.2* |
|
|
Certification by the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification by the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
On March 23, 2006, Dole Food Company, Inc. filed a Current
Report on Form 8-K
which presented selected financial information released to
lenders and potential lenders for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005.
33
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
May 8, 2006
|
|
|
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC. |
|
REGISTRANT |
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Joseph S. Tesoriero
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph S. Tesoriero |
|
Vice President and |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Yoon J. Hugh |
|
Vice President, Controller and |
|
Chief Accounting Officer |
|
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
34
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1* |
|
|
Certification by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
|
|
31.2* |
|
|
Certification by the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification by the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
35