AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON AUGUST 30, 2002

                                                      REGISTRATION NO. 333-83292

                UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
                                   FORM S-4/A

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 4

             REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

                                   ----------

                         AMERICAN REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
             (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

                                                                  
          NEVADA                                 6510                                 75-2847135
(State or other jurisdiction of        (Primary Standard Industrial     (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)         Classification Code Number)


               1800 VALLEY VIEW LANE, SUITE 300, DALLAS, TX 75234
    (ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE,
                  OF REGISTRANT'S PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICE)

                                   ----------

                                ROBERT A. WALDMAN
                        1800 VALLEY VIEW LANE, SUITE 300
                               DALLAS, TEXAS 75234
                                 (469) 522-4200
                              (469) 522-4360 (FAX)
     NAME, ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA
                          CODE, OF AGENT FOR SERVICE)

                                   ----------

                                 WITH COPIES TO:

         STEVEN C. METZGER, ESQ.                     JEFFREY M. SONE, ESQ.
     PRAGER METZGER & KROEMER, PLLC                  JACKSON WALKER L.L.P.
       2626 COLE AVENUE, SUITE 900                901 MAIN STREET, SUITE 6000
           DALLAS, TEXAS 75204                        DALLAS, TEXAS 75202
             (214) 969-7600                              (214) 953-6000
          (214) 523-3838 (FAX)                        (214) 953-5822(FAX)

                                   ----------

         Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale of the securities to
the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration
Statement.


         If the securities being registered on this Form are being offered in
connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with
General Instruction G, check the following box. .............................[ ]

         If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering
pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and
list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same offering. ...............................[ ]

         If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule
462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities
Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration
statement for the same offering. ............................................[ ]


                         CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                       PROPOSED MAXIMUM     PROPOSED MAXIMUM
    TITLE OF EACH CLASS OF SECURITIES               AMOUNT TO BE        OFFERING PRICE     AGGREGATE OFFERING       AMOUNT OF
             TO BE REGISTERED                        REGISTERED            PER UNIT              PRICE          REGISTRATION FEE
================================================================================================================================
                                                                                                    
10% Series G Cumulative Redeemable Convertible       4,025,344(1)        Not applicable    $128,174,675.67(2)     $ 11,792.07(3)
preferred stock, par value $2.00 per share

Common stock, par value $0.01 per share             10,070,618(4)        Not applicable    $             0(5)     $         0(6)

10% Series H Cumulative Redeemable Convertible
preferred stock, par value $2.00 per share             683,282(7)        Not applicable    $ 24,821,801.25(8)     $  2,283.61(9)

Common stock, par value $0.01 per share              1,538,734(10)       Not applicable    $             0(5)     $         0(6)

         Total:                                                                            $152,996,476.92        $ 14,075.68


THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR DATES
AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL FILE
A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT
SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(a) OF THE
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE COMMISSION ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(a),
MAY DETERMINE.





----------

(1) Represents the maximum number of shares of Series G redeemable convertible
preferred stock of American Realty Investors, Inc. ("ARL") estimated to be
issued in connection with the merger of Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.
("TCI") described herein at the exchange ratio of one share of Series G
redeemable convertible preferred stock for each share of TCI's common stock
outstanding (other than shares owned by ARL and its subsidiaries).

(2) Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee.
Pursuant to Rules 457(f)(1) and 457(c) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(the "Securities Act"), the registration fee is based on the product of (i)
$15.93, the average of the high and low sales price of TCI common stock on
February 15, 2002, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange, and (ii) the
maximum number of shares of TCI common stock estimated to be converted or
cancelled pursuant to the merger.

(3) Computed in accordance with Rule 457(f) under the Securities Act to be
$11,792.07, which is equal to 0.000092 multiplied by the proposed maximum
offering price of $128,174,675.67. $11,786.96 has been previously paid.

(4) Represents the maximum number of shares of common stock of ARL estimated to
be issued upon conversion of the shares of Series G redeemable convertible
preferred stock, assuming each record holder receives one share of ARL common
stock in lieu of a fractional share. Pursuant to Rule 416, there are also
registered hereunder an indeterminate number of additional shares of ARL common
stock as may be issuable as a result of stock splits, stock dividends and other
provisions of the Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock.

(5) No additional consideration will be received in connection with the
conversion of the shares of preferred stock.

(6) Pursuant to Rule 457(i), no filing fee is due.

(7) Represents the maximum number of shares of Series H redeemable convertible
preferred stock of ARL estimated to be issued in connection with the merger of
Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. ("IOT") described herein at the
exchange ratio of one share of Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock
for each share of IOT's common stock outstanding (other than shares owned by ARL
and its subsidiaries and TCI).

(8) Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee.
Pursuant to Rules 457(f)(1) and 457(c) of the Securities Act, the registration
fee is based on the product of (i) $17.25, the average of the high and low sales
price of IOT common stock on February 15, 2002, as reported by the American
Stock Exchange, and (ii) the maximum number of shares of IOT common stock
estimated to be converted or cancelled pursuant to the merger.

(9) Previously paid.

(10) Represents the maximum number of shares of common stock of ARL estimated to
be issued upon conversion of the shares of Series H redeemable convertible
preferred stock, assuming each record holder receives one share of ARL common
stock in lieu of a fractional share. Pursuant to Rule 416, there are also
registered hereunder an indeterminate number of additional shares of ARL common
stock as may be issuable as a result of stock splits, stock dividends and other
provisions of the Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock.




The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may
not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer
to sell these securities, and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these
securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.


Subject to Completion, Dated August 30, 2002.


AMERICAN REALTY          TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY        INCOME OPPORTUNITY
INVESTORS, INC.          INVESTORS, INC.                REALTY INVESTORS, INC.

         To the stockholders of American Realty Investors, Inc.,
Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. and Income Opportunity Realty Investors,
Inc.:


         As the result of a court approved settlement of litigation involving,
among others, a subsidiary of American Realty Investors, Inc. ("ARL"),
Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. ("TCI") and Income Opportunity Realty
Investors, Inc. ("IOT"), ARL has agreed to acquire all of the outstanding common
stock of TCI and IOT through the merger of TCI and IOT with two subsidiaries of
ARL, with TCI and IOT being the surviving corporations (the mergers and related
transactions are collectively referred to as the business combination). ARL does
not currently have enough cash to pay the cash consideration that will be due to
stockholders of TCI and IOT as a result of the mergers. The mergers will not be
consummated until ARL and TCI or IOT, as the case may be, have obtained
sufficient funds to pay the cash consideration that will be due in the mergers.
In order to complete the business combination, we must, among other things,
obtain the required approval of the ARL, TCI and IOT stockholders. In addition,
since ARL does not have enough cash to pay the cash merger consideration, ARL,
or TCI and IOT, will have to sell a sufficient number of properties or otherwise
raise a sufficient amount of cash to pay the merger consideration, before ARL
will consummate the mergers.

         When the mergers are completed, holders of TCI's and IOT's common stock
(other than ARL and its affiliates) will receive $17.50 and $19.00,
respectively, in cash less any dividends declared and paid on the TCI common
stock after January 2, 2002 or, if they affirmatively elect, one share of newly
issued ARL Series G or Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock for each
share of TCI or IOT common stock they currently own, respectively. Each share of
TCI and IOT common stock held by certain affiliates of ARL will be converted
into one share of the Series G or Series H redeemable convertible preferred
stock, respectively, and shares held by ARL and its subsidiaries will be
cancelled. The cash prices to be received by TCI and IOT stockholders are less
than the calculated book values per common share at June 30, 2002, which were
$26.41 and $27.38, respectively. See "Comparative per Share Information."


         During a 75 day period commencing on the 15th day after ARL publicly
files its first Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission following
the consummation of the TCI merger and/or the IOT merger, the Series G and the
Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock may be converted at the option
of the holder into 2.5 and 2.25 shares of ARL common stock, respectively.
Beginning 45 days after ARL files its first Form 10-Q following the consummation
of the TCI and/or IOT mergers, ARL may provide notice of and thereafter redeem
the Series G and Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock upon payment of
the liquidation value of $20.00 and $21.50 per share, respectively. By electing
to receive Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock, stockholders of IOT
will no longer be stockholders in a Real Estate Investment Trust, or REIT, but
will become stockholders in a taxable corporation and, therefore, will not
receive 95% of ARL's income in the form of dividends as they did for IOT.


         At March 31, 2002, the total value of TCI assets and liabilities was
$785,093,000 and $567,046,000, respectively. No goodwill is acquired or
generated through the business combination. Likewise, the total value of IOT
assets and liabilities was $95,693,000 and $56,287,000, respectively, and no
goodwill is acquired or generated through the business combination. The
unaudited pro forma net earnings per share of the ARL common stock at December
31, 2001 was $1.12, which is less than the historical net earnings per share of
$2.32 of the TCI common stock and more than the loss per share of ($2.32) of the
IOT common stock. This differential in pro forma net income per share was not
considered by the TCI and IOT board of directors, nor was it available at the
time the boards were considering the business combination.


         The Series G and H redeemable convertible preferred stock have limited
voting rights and, except as otherwise provided by law, may vote (i) only with
respect to an amendment to ARL's restated articles of incorporation or bylaws
that would materially alter the existing terms of such class of preferred stock
and (ii) at any time or times for the election of two directors when all or any
portion of the dividends on such class for any six quarterly dividends, whether
or not consecutive, shall be in arrears and unpaid.

         1,165,699 shares of the Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock
and 106,802 shares of the Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock will
be issued to affiliates of ARL. In the event that each stockholder of TCI and
IOT, other than persons or entities affiliated with ARL, elects to receive
shares of the Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock or the Series H
redeemable convertible preferred stock, respectively, persons not affiliated
with ARL will hold approximately 2,859,645 shares of Series G redeemable
convertible preferred stock and 576,480 shares of Series H redeemable
convertible preferred stock, representing approximately 71% and 84.4% of all
issued and outstanding shares of the Series G redeemable convertible preferred
stock and the Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock, respectively. In
the event all stockholders of TCI and IOT elect to receive cash in exchange for
their shares of TCI and IOT common stock (other than affiliates of ARL who must
take preferred stock) the maximum cash consideration payable in the aggregate to
the TCI and IOT stockholders would be $50,043,787 and $10,953,120, respectively.

         The shares of common stock of ARL and TCI are traded on the New York
Stock Exchange under the symbols "ARL" and "TCI", respectively. The shares of
common stock of IOT are traded on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol
"IOT". On _____, 2002, the average of the high and low price for the common
stock of ARL, TCI and IOT was $____, $_____ and $____, respectively.

SEE THE SECTION ENTITLED "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 35 FOR A DISCUSSION OF
CERTAIN FACTORS YOU SHOULD CONSIDER WHEN DECIDING HOW TO VOTE.

NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES
COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED THE PREFERRED STOCK OR COMMON STOCK TO BE
ISSUED UNDER THIS JOINT PROXY STATEMENT AND PROSPECTUS; HAS APPROVED OR
DISAPPROVED OF THE TRANSACTIONS UNDER THIS JOINT PROXY STATEMENT AND PROSPECTUS;
PASSED UPON THE MERITS OR FAIRNESS OF THE TRANSACTION; DETERMINED IF THIS JOINT
PROXY STATEMENT AND PROSPECTUS IS TRUTHFUL OR INCOMPLETE; OR PASSED UPON THE
ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THE DISCLOSURE IN THIS JOINT PROXY STATEMENT AND
PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

This joint proxy statement and prospectus is dated ___________, 2002, and is
first being mailed to stockholders on or about _____________, 2002.





                  NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF
                         AMERICAN REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
                    TO BE HELD __________, 2002 AT 2:00 P.M.

To Our Stockholders:

         You are invited to attend the special meeting of stockholders of
American Realty Investors, Inc. ("ARL"). The meeting will be held at 1800 Valley
View Lane, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas 75234 on ________, 2002 at 2:00 p.m. local
time. At the special meeting, ARL's stockholders will be asked to consider and
vote upon:

         o        A PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE TCI MERGER WHEREBY ARL WILL ACQUIRE
                  ALL OF THE OUTSTANDING COMMON STOCK OF TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY
                  INVESTORS, INC. ("TCI") THROUGH THE MERGER OF A RECENTLY
                  FORMED WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF ARL WITH AND INTO TCI;

         o        A PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE IOT MERGER WHEREBY ARL WILL ACQUIRE
                  ALL OF THE OUTSTANDING COMMON STOCK OF INCOME OPPORTUNITY
                  REALTY INVESTORS, INC. ("IOT") THROUGH THE MERGER OF A
                  RECENTLY FORMED WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF ARL WITH AND INTO
                  IOT; AND

         o        ANY OTHER MATTERS THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE SPECIAL
                  MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENTS THEREOF.

         THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT ITS STOCKHOLDERS
VOTE FOR THE MERGERS DESCRIBED ABOVE.

         Only holders of record of ARL's common stock at the close of business
on June 4, 2002, the record date, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the
special meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof. None of the
stockholders are entitled to dissenters' or appraisal rights in connection with
the mergers.

         Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the special
meeting, please complete, sign and date the accompanying proxy card and return
it in the enclosed prepaid envelope. You may also submit a proxy by telephone by
calling 1-800-PROXIES or over the Internet by accessing www.voteproxy.com. For
stockholders who wish to vote telephonically, after entering your control
number, you will hear the name of the company and will be offered the option to
vote for all of the recommendations or to vote on each proposal individually.
Proposals are referred to by proposal number (as shown on the proxy card). For
stockholders who vote via the Internet, after entering your control number, you
will be offered the option to vote for all of the recommendations or to vote on
each proposal individually. The text of each proposal is displayed exactly as it
appears on the proxy card. After the voting process is completed, you will be
shown how you have voted and given the opportunity to change your vote. Prior to
ending the session, you will be asked if you wish to vote on another proxy. If
yes, the process will be repeated for the next control number entered.

         If you attend the special meeting, you may revoke your proxy and vote
in person if you wish to do so. However, if you hold your shares in a brokerage
account, you cannot vote in person at the special meeting. If you have
instructed your broker to vote your shares, you must follow your broker's
instructions regarding how to change your vote.

                                     By Order of the Board of Directors
                                     of AMERICAN REALTY INVESTORS, INC.

                                     /s/ Robert A. Waldman
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     Robert A. Waldman, Senior Vice President,
                                     General Counsel and Secretary
                                     American Realty Investors, Inc.


Dallas, Texas
__________, 2002






                  NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF
                     TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
                   TO BE HELD ____________, 2002 AT 3:00 P.M.

To Our Stockholders:

         You are invited to attend the special meeting of stockholders of
Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. ("TCI"). The meeting will be held at
1800 Valley View Lane, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas 75234 on ____________, 2002 at
3:00 p.m. local time. At the special meeting, TCI's stockholders will be asked
to consider and vote upon:

         o        A PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE TCI MERGER WHEREBY AMERICAN REALTY
                  INVESTORS, INC., ("ARL") WILL ACQUIRE ALL OF THE OUTSTANDING
                  COMMON STOCK OF TCI THROUGH THE MERGER OF A RECENTLY FORMED
                  WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF ARL WITH AND INTO TCI; AND

         o        ANY OTHER MATTERS THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE SPECIAL
                  MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENTS THEREOF.

         After careful consideration, the board of directors of TCI have
determined that the terms of the proposed TCI merger are fair to and in the best
interests of TCI's stockholders.

         THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT ITS STOCKHOLDERS
VOTE FOR THE MERGER AND OTHER MATTERS DESCRIBED ABOVE.

         Only holders of record of TCI's common stock at the close of business
on June 4, 2002, the record date, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the
special meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof. None of the
stockholders are entitled to dissenters' or appraisal rights in connection with
the merger.

         Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the special
meeting, please complete, sign and date the accompanying proxy card and return
it in the enclosed prepaid envelope. You may also submit a proxy by telephone by
calling 1-800-PROXIES or over the Internet by accessing www.voteproxy.com. For
stockholders who wish to vote telephonically, after entering your control
number, you will hear the name of the company and will be offered the option to
vote for all of the recommendations or to vote on each proposal individually.
Proposals are referred to by proposal number (as shown on the proxy card). For
stockholders who vote via the Internet, after entering your control number, you
will be offered the option to vote for all of the recommendations or to vote on
each proposal individually. The text of each proposal is displayed exactly as it
appears on the proxy card. After the voting process is completed, you will be
shown how you have voted and given the opportunity to change your vote. Prior to
ending the session, you will be asked if you wish to vote on another proxy. If
yes, the process will be repeated for the next control number entered.

         If you attend the special meeting, you may revoke your proxy and vote
in person if you wish to do so. However, if you hold your shares in a brokerage
account, you cannot vote in person at the special meeting. If you have
instructed your broker to vote your shares, you must follow your broker's
instructions regarding how to change your vote.

                                  By Order of the Board of Directors of
                                  TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.


                                  /s/ Robert A. Waldman
                                  ---------------------------------------------
                                  Robert A. Waldman, Senior Vice President,
                                  General Counsel and Secretary
                                  Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.

Dallas, Texas
____________, 2002






                  NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF
                    INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
                   TO BE HELD _____________, 2002 AT 4:00 P.M.

To Our Stockholders:

         You are invited to attend the special meeting of stockholders of Income
Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. ("IOT"). The meeting will be held at 1800
Valley View Lane, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas 75234 on _____________, 2002 at 4:00
p.m. local time. At the special meeting, IOT's stockholders will be asked to
consider and vote upon:

         o        A PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE IOT MERGER WHEREBY AMERICAN REALTY
                  INVESTORS, INC. ("ARL"), WILL ACQUIRE ALL OF THE OUTSTANDING
                  COMMON STOCK OF IOT THROUGH THE MERGER OF A RECENTLY FORMED
                  WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF ARL WITH AND INTO IOT; AND

         o        ANY OTHER MATTERS THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE SPECIAL
                  MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENTS THEREOF.

         After careful consideration, the board of directors of IOT have
determined that the terms of the proposed IOT merger are fair to and in the best
interests of IOT's stockholders.

         THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT ITS STOCKHOLDERS
VOTE FOR THE MERGER AND OTHER MATTERS DESCRIBED ABOVE.

         Only holders of record of IOT's common stock at the close of business
on June 4, 2002, the record date, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the
special meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof. None of the
stockholders are entitled to dissenters' or appraisal rights in connection with
the merger.

         Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the special
meeting, please complete, sign and date the accompanying proxy card and return
it in the enclosed prepaid envelope. You may also submit a proxy by telephone by
calling 1-800-PROXIES or over the Internet by accessing www.voteproxy.com. For
stockholders who wish to vote telephonically, after entering your control
number, you will hear the name of the company and will be offered the option to
vote for all of the recommendations or to vote on each proposal individually.
Proposals are referred to by proposal number (as shown on the proxy card). For
stockholders who vote via the Internet, after entering your control number, you
will be offered the option to vote for all of the recommendations or to vote on
each proposal individually. The text of each proposal is displayed exactly as it
appears on the proxy card. After the voting process is completed, you will be
shown how you have voted and given the opportunity to change your vote. Prior to
ending the session, you will be asked if you wish to vote on another proxy. If
yes, the process will be repeated for the next control number entered.

         If you attend the special meeting, you may revoke your proxy and vote
in person if you wish to do so. However, if you hold your shares in a brokerage
account, you cannot vote in person at the special meeting. If you have
instructed your broker to vote your shares, you must follow your broker's
instructions regarding how to change your vote.

                                   By Order of the Board of Directors of
                                   INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.

                                   /s/ Robert A. Waldman
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   Robert A. Waldman, Senior Vice President,
                                   General Counsel and Secretary
                                   Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.


Dallas, Texas
_____________, 2002






                                TABLE OF CONTENTS




                                                                                                                    PAGE
                                                                                                                 
Summary...............................................................................................................1
Forward Looking Statements...........................................................................................34
Risk Factors.........................................................................................................35
The Special Meetings.................................................................................................46
Special Factors......................................................................................................51
Interests of Directors and Officers of ARL, TCI and IOT in the Business Combination..................................94
The Plans of Merger..................................................................................................96
Comparison of Ownership of Shares...................................................................................101
The Advisor - BCM...................................................................................................115
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions of BCM, ARL, TCI and IOT.............................................124
Certain Information Regarding TCI Common Stock and IOT Common Stock.................................................135
Information About ARL...............................................................................................139
   Business of ARL..................................................................................................139
   Properties of ARL................................................................................................145
   Legal Proceedings................................................................................................162
   Selected Financial Data of ARL...................................................................................163
   Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of ARL.....................165
   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks of ARL...............................................189
   Management of ARL................................................................................................191
   Directors and Executive Officers.................................................................................191
   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management of ARL............................................194
   Description of the Capital Stock of ARL..........................................................................197
Information About TCI...............................................................................................213
   Business of TCI..................................................................................................213
   Properties of TCI................................................................................................217
   Legal Proceedings................................................................................................233
   Selected Financial Data of TCI...................................................................................235
   Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of TCI.....................236
   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Market Risk of TCI............................................245
   Management of TCI................................................................................................247
   Directors and Executive Officers of TCI..........................................................................247
   Executive Compensation of TCI....................................................................................249
   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management of TCI............................................251
Information About IOT...............................................................................................256
   Business of IOT..................................................................................................256
   Properties of IOT................................................................................................260
   Legal Proceedings of IOT.........................................................................................267
   Selected Financial Data of IOT...................................................................................269
   Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of IOT.....................270
   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Market Risk of IOT............................................277





                                       i



                                                                                                        
   Management of IOT................................................................................................279
   Directors and Executive Officers.................................................................................279
   Executive Compensation...........................................................................................281
   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management of IOT............................................282
Securityholder Proposals............................................................................................286
Legal Matters.......................................................................................................286
Experts.............................................................................................................286
Where You Can Find More Information.................................................................................286
Glossary of Terms...................................................................................................288

Pro Forma Financial Statements......................................................................................P-1
Financial Statements:...............................................................................................F-1
Appendices:
Agreement and Plan of Merger (TCI Merger)....................................................................Appendix A
Agreement and Plan of Merger (IOT Merger)....................................................................Appendix B
Certificate of Designation of the Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock ...........................Appendix C
Certificate of Designation of the Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock ...........................Appendix D
Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin Financial Advisors, Inc. Fairness Opinion
     Concerning TCI..........................................................................................Appendix E
Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin Financial Advisors, Inc. Fairness Opinion
     Concerning IOT..........................................................................................Appendix F





                                       ii






                      JOINT PROXY STATEMENT AND PROSPECTUS

         This joint proxy statement and prospectus is being used to solicit
votes with respect to stockholder meetings for each of American Realty
Investors, Inc., Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. and Income Opportunity
Realty Investors, Inc. called to approve a proposed business combination of
those companies. This joint proxy statement and prospectus is also being used to
register the shares of ARL Series G and H redeemable convertible preferred stock
and the ARL common stock underlying those shares. "We", "us" and "our" as used
in this joint proxy statement and prospectus means American Realty Investors,
Inc., Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. and Income Opportunity Realty
Investors, Inc. as the context requires.

                                     SUMMARY

         This summary highlights material information from this joint proxy
statement and prospectus and may not contain all information that is important
to you. You should read carefully this entire joint proxy statement and
prospectus and the documents to which we have referred you. The following
summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the detailed information
appearing elsewhere in this joint proxy statement and prospectus.

                                    OVERVIEW

         As part of this joint proxy statement and prospectus, three public
companies, American Realty Investors, Inc. ("ARL"), Transcontinental Realty
Investors, Inc. ("TCI") and Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. ("IOT"),
are seeking stockholder approval of two proposed mergers whereby TCI and IOT
will become subsidiaries of ARL. Together, these mergers are often referred to
as the "business combination." The business combination is the result of a court
approved settlement that is described below under "The Olive Settlement."

THE PARTIES

         The material parties that are discussed throughout this joint proxy
statement and prospectus statement include the following:

      AMERICAN REALTY INVESTORS, INC. ("ARL") is a publicly traded Nevada
      corporation engaged primarily in the business of owning and operating a
      portfolio of real estate and financing real estate and real estate
      activities through investments in mortgage loans. ARL holds a diverse
      portfolio of equity real estate located across the United States,
      including office buildings, apartments, hotels, shopping centers and
      developed and undeveloped land. The day-to-day operations of ARL are
      managed by Basic Capital Management, Inc. ("BCM"), a contractual advisor,
      under the supervision of ARL's board of directors.

      TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC. ("TCI") is a publicly traded
      Nevada corporation engaged primarily in the business of owning and
      operating a portfolio of real estate and financing real estate and real
      estate activities through investments in mortgage loans similar to ARL.
      The day-to-day operations of TCI are performed by BCM, a contractual
      advisor, under the supervision of TCI's board of directors. As of the
      third quarter of 2000, TCI no longer met the requirements for tax
      treatment as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, and cannot qualify
      for REIT status for at least five years.



                                       1



      INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC. ("IOT") is a publicly traded
      Nevada corporation primarily engaged in the business of owning and
      operating a portfolio of real estate and financing real estate and real
      estate activities through investments in mortgage loans. IOT is a REIT.
      The day-to-day operations of IOT are performed by BCM, a contractual
      advisor, under the supervision of IOT's board of directors.


      BASIC CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. ("BCM") is a contractual advisor that is
      responsible for managing the affairs of ARL, TCI and IOT and for advising
      the respective boards on setting the policies which guide ARL, TCI and
      IOT. The day-to-day operations of ARL, TCI and IOT are performed by BCM
      under the supervision of each respective board. Among other things, BCM
      locates, investigates, evaluates and recommends real estate and mortgage
      loan investments and sales opportunities, as well as financing and
      refinancing sources. BCM also serves as a consultant to ARL's, TCI's and
      IOT's boards of directors in connection with the business plan and
      investment policy decisions made by each board. BCM is indirectly owned by
      a trust for the benefit of the children of Gene E. Phillips. Mr. Phillips
      is not an officer or director of BCM, but serves as a representative of
      the trust, is involved in daily consultation with the officers of BCM and
      has significant influence over the conduct of BCM's business, including
      the rendering of its advisory services and the making of investment
      decisions for itself and for ARL, TCI and IOT.

      GENE E. PHILLIPS ("MR. PHILLIPS") a resident of Dallas, Texas, is a
      business man with substantial experience in the real estate development
      industry. A trust for Mr. Phillips's children indirectly owns BCM. For
      more than the last five years, Mr. Phillips has served as a representative
      of the trust that indirectly owns BCM. As a representative of the trust,
      Mr. Phillips is actively involved in consultation with the officers of
      BCM, and thus the officers of ARL, TCI and IOT, on a daily basis. As a
      result, although Mr. Phillips does not own any stock of BCM, ARL, TCI or
      IOT, he has significant influence over the conduct of their respective
      business affairs and is involved in substantially all of their respective
      material business decisions. In August 2002, Mr. Phillips and five
      corporations, including BCM, affiliated with Mr. Phillips or the trust for
      his children that indirectly owns BCM, agreed in negotiations with the
      staff of the SEC to enter into an Order Instituting Proceedings Pursuant
      to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, in an
      administrative proceeding brought by the Securities and Exchange
      Commission and pay a substantial civil penalty in connection therewith.
      Although the Order has been agreed to by Mr. Phillips, the five
      corporations affiliated with Mr. Phillips or the trust and the staff of
      the SEC, it has not yet been formally approved by the SEC. The Order in
      its current form finds, among other things, that Mr. Phillips and each of
      the five corporations, including BCM, had violated Section 13(d) and 10(b)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rules 10b-5, 13d-1
      and 13d-2 promulgated thereunder, by failing to file reports required
      under Section 13(d) with respect to the securities of Greenbriar
      Corporation. The Order further determines that Mr. Phillips had
      substantial contact with the management of BCM and had a significant
      influence on its advisory services and investment decisions as well as the
      investment decisions of the five other entities that are the subject of
      the Order. The Order also determines that Mr. Phillips exercised the same
      influence over the management and investment decisions of American Realty
      Trust, Inc., currently a subsidiary of ARL. The Order requires Mr.
      Phillips and the five corporations, including BCM, to cease and desist
      from committing or causing any violation of Sections 10(b) and 13(d) of
      the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5, 13d-1 and 13d-2 promulgated thereunder.



                                       2



         ARL, TCI, IOT and BCM have substantially the same management and have
ownership affiliations as seen in the chart below.



                  ARL                                       TCI                                        IOT
                                                                              
Out of 11,375,127 shares of ARL common   Out of 8,072,594 shares of TCI common      Out of 1,438,945 shares of IOT common
stock outstanding as of July 16, 2002:   stock outstanding as of July 16, 2002:     stock outstanding as of July 16, 2002:

    o    BCM owns 6,629,744 (58.3%)          o    ARL indirectly owns 3,994,300         o    ARL indirectly owns 409,935
    o    TCI owns 746,972 (6.6%)                  (49.5%)                                    (28.5%)
    o    Non-affiliates own 2,299,150        o    BCM owns 1,166,947 (14.5%)            o    BCM owns 106,802 (7.4%)
         (20.2%)                             o    Non-affiliates own 2,859,645          o    TCI owns 345,728 (24.0%)
                                                  (35.4%)                               o    Non-affiliates own 576,480
                                                                                             (40.06%)


         The principal operating offices of each of ARL, TCI, IOT and BCM are
located at 1800 Valley View Lane, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas 75234. The telephone
number for each corporation is 469-522-4200.

                              THE OLIVE SETTLEMENT

         The business combination being proposed results from a court approved
settlement of a lawsuit styled Jack Olive, et. al. v. National Income Realty
Trust, et al, Case No. C89 4331 MHP pending in the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California (the "Olive Litigation"). The claims in
the Olive Litigation related to the operation and management of TCI and IOT.
Defendants in the lawsuit included, among others, American Realty Trust, Inc. (a
subsidiary of ARL, "ART"), TCI, IOT, BCM and Mr. Phillips.

         TCI and IOT are parties to a 1990 settlement of litigation known as the
Olive Settlement. The Olive Settlement is a settlement of a federal class and
derivative action lawsuit commenced in 1989. The action alleged that the boards
of directors of TCI and IOT had breached the governing documents of the
companies in 1989 by appointing a new advisor for the companies. It also alleged
a breach of trust and a breach of fiduciary duty owed by the board members to
each company by retaining BCM as the advisor to each company without stockholder
approval. The lawsuit sought the removal of the board members and the
appointment of an interim receiver pending the election of a new board. A
Stipulation of Settlement was entered into in February 1990. The 1990
Stipulation of Settlement required (i) cash distributions to be made to
stockholders over the next twelve months, (ii) the addition of three new
independent board members to the board of each company; and (iii) the
establishment of special board committees to review certain related party
transactions. The original settlement was modified in 1995 and the modification
was amended in 1997. Periodically, since 1990, designated Settlement Counsel,
George Donaldson, has challenged the compliance of the parties under the Olive
Settlement, the modification and the amendment and has unsuccessfully sought to
remove BCM from its advisory position to TCI, IOT and other entities. Settlement
Counsel also sought to, from time to time, remove some or all of the directors
of TCI, IOT and other entities.

         The most recent disputes arise from Settlement Counsel's allegations
that the boards of TCI and IOT had breached the modification to the Stipulation
of Settlement. In 1999, Settlement Counsel alleged that the boards had failed to
comply with the requirement that a



                                       3



management/compensation consultant be engaged to review the contracts with BCM
and its affiliates. In July 2000, Settlement Counsel alleged that the board of
TCI had breached a settlement provision by authorizing TCI to make a $3 million
loan to BCM and a $9 million loan to ART. In October 2000, Settlement Counsel
alleged that the board of IOT had breached a settlement provision by authorizing
IOT to enter into a stock option agreement to purchase shares of TCI from a
third party. Settlement Counsel requested that the TCI and IOT advisory
contracts with BCM be terminated, that the board members be removed and that a
receiver be appointed to operate TCI and IOT.

         The boards of directors of TCI and IOT denied the allegations and
believe there has been no breach of any of the settlement provisions. Although
there have been several status conferences concerning these matters, there has
been no court order or action resolving or affirming the allegations of breaches
of the settlement.

         The parties to the Olive Litigation acknowledged that further and
substantial expense and time would be necessary to litigate the matters raised
by the pending requests made by Settlement Counsel that the court exercise its
retained jurisdiction over the parties' prior settlement agreements. Thus, in
order to finally put an end to the Olive Litigation and to avoid the anticipated
expense, inconvenience, distraction, and risk of further legal proceedings, the
parties concluded that it was desirable to compromise, settle and discharge all
claims arising from such matters while at the same time devising a mechanism to
enable all stockholders of TCI and IOT to convert their common stock in TCI or
IOT into cash or, if they affirmatively elected, preferred stock of ARL.

         To that end, after arm's length negotiations, TCI, IOT and ARL, as the
parent corporation of ART, entered into the Second Amendment to the Modification
of Stipulation of Settlement (the "Settlement Agreement"), dated October 17,
2001. Following notice to all stockholders of TCI and IOT, the Settlement
Agreement obtained final approval of the Court on February 12, 2002. The
Settlement Agreement provides that if the stockholders so approve, TCI and IOT
will become subsidiaries of ARL through the mechanism of freeze-out mergers. As
part of the mergers, stockholders (other than Mr. Phillips, BCM, ARL and ART
(collectively the "Affiliated Entities") or their affiliates) are to receive $19
per share in cash for IOT common stock or $17.50 per share in cash for TCI
common stock, which amounts shall be reduced by any dividends paid after January
2, 2002 on the TCI or IOT common stock, respectively. In the mergers, the
stockholders of TCI and IOT not affiliated with the Affiliated Entities have the
opportunity (but no obligation) to affirmatively elect to receive shares of
preferred stock of ARL having a liquidation value of $21.50 per share in
exchange for IOT common stock or $20 per share in exchange for TCI common stock,
which amounts shall be reduced by any dividends paid after January 2, 2002 on
the TCI or IOT common stock, respectively. In the mergers, the Affiliated
Entities will receive shares of the ARL preferred stock for the shares of common
stock of TCI and IOT held by them, provided, however, that shares of TCI and IOT
common stock held by ARL and its subsidiaries will be cancelled. The purchase
prices and liquidation values have been established under the Settlement
Agreement.


         ARL does not currently have sufficient cash resources to pay the cash
merger consideration that will be due to unaffiliated TCI and IOT stockholders
as a result of the merger. As a result, the ARL board has determined that ARL
will not enter into the TCI and IOT mergers




                                       4




until, in each case, sufficient cash is available to ARL, either from its own
resources or from TCI or IOT immediately after the mergers, to pay the cash
consideration that will be due the unaffiliated stockholders of TCI and IOT. No
merger agreements have been signed between ARL, TCI or IOT. Consistent with the
ARL board's determination not to enter into the mergers until sufficient cash is
available to pay the cash merger consideration due upon consummation of the
mergers, ARL will refrain from executing a merger agreement with TCI or IOT
until it has available to it the required cash consideration to consummate the
contemplated merger. Originally, the parties to the Settlement Agreement
contemplated that the filing of proxy materials necessary to solicit the
required consent of the ARL, TCI and IOT stockholders to the proposed mergers,
and any Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") review thereof, would be
consummated not later than March 31, 2002. That process was not completed until
the date of this joint proxy statement and prospectus. During the period between
March 31, 2002 and the date hereof, Settlement Counsel refrained from asserting
that the Affiliated Entities were in default under the Settlement Agreement.

         If the Affiliated Entities default on their obligations under the
Settlement Agreement and that default is not waived by Settlement Counsel, they
will become liable for liquidated damages equal to $5 for each share of TCI and
IOT common stock held by unaffiliated stockholders. The $5.00 per share
liquidated damages would be paid in lieu of any merger consideration and the
mergers would not take place. To date Settlement Counsel has not sought to
enforce the liquidated damages provision under the Settlement Agreement. The
Affiliated Entities do not anticipate that Settlement Counsel will provide any
such waiver after September 30, 2002. In addition, the Affiliated Entities may
cure a default under the Settlement Agreement and avoid paying the $5.00 per
share liquidated damages by commencing a tender offer for all of the shares of
TCI and IOT stock held by nonaffiliated stockholders, with respect to the cash
option, at a cash price equal to or better than the amount specified under the
mergers ($17.50 per share of TCI stock and $19.00 per share of IOT stock). If
the tender offers are substantially completed within 120 days following the
commencement thereof, the Affiliated Entities will be deemed to have fully
complied with the Settlement Agreement.

         Under the Settlement Agreement, the cash consideration to be paid to
the unaffiliated TCI and IOT stockholders is to be guaranteed by and becomes an
obligation of the Affiliated Entities. Notwithstanding this obligation of the
Affiliated Entities, the board of directors of ARL has determined that it will
not enter into the TCI or IOT mergers until, in each case, sufficient cash is
available to ARL, either from its own resources or from TCI or IOT immediately
after the mergers, to pay the cash merger consideration due as a result of the
mergers. As a result of the ARL board's decision not to proceed with the mergers
until sufficient cash is available to ARL to pay the cash consideration
immediately thereafter, it is unlikely that the Affiliated Entities will be
called upon to perform the guaranty provided for in the Settlement Agreement.
Although the Affiliated Entities will be obligated to guarantee the payment of
the cash merger consideration to the unaffiliated stockholders of TCI and IOT,
there can be no assurance that any combination of the Affiliated Entities will
have the necessary financial resources to perform that obligation. ARL does not
currently believe that the Affiliated Entities have the financial resources to
pay the cash consideration that would be due the unaffiliated stockholders of
TCI and IOT as a result of the mergers, and does not anticipate that they will
have such resources in the foreseeable future.



                                       5



         Under the Settlement Agreement, except to the extent necessary to
obtain the requisite quorum of any vote of stockholders in connection with the
mergers, the Affiliated Entities and TCI and IOT will not engage in any
solicitation activity directed at the nonaffiliated stockholders in any manner
which would have the effect of causing a nonaffiliated stockholder to accept
preferred stock rather than cash.



                                       6




              QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE BUSINESS COMBINATION


1.Q: WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED? (SEE PAGE 46)


         A: Two separate mergers are being proposed as the result of the
Settlement Agreement. In each merger, a newly formed subsidiary of ARL would be
merged with and into TCI or IOT, as the case may be, and TCI and IOT would
become a subsidiary of ARL. The two mergers are not dependent upon each other,
and if the stockholders of one company do not approve their merger, only the
approved merger may be consummated.


2.Q: WHAT WILL I RECEIVE IN THE MERGER? (SEE PAGES 51, 60-61 and 97-98)


         A: Each share of TCI and IOT common stock will be converted into $17.50
and $19.00 in cash, respectively, (less the amount of any dividends paid after
January 2, 2002) or, at the affirmative election of the TCI or IOT stockholder,
one share of ARL 10% Series G cumulative convertible preferred stock (the
"Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock") or one share of the ARL 10%
Series H cumulative convertible preferred stock (the "Series H redeemable
convertible preferred stock"), respectively. Outstanding shares of TCI and IOT
common stock held by ARL or its subsidiaries will be cancelled and shares of TCI
and IOT common stock held by BCM and other affiliates of ARL will be exchanged
for shares of Series G and Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock,
respectively. If all of the holders of the TCI and IOT common stock other than
BCM and other affiliates of ARL elect to convert their shares of TCI common
stock to Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock, they will own
approximately 71% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Series G
redeemable convertible preferred stock. BCM and other affiliates of ARL would
own the remaining shares of Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock. If
all of the holders of IOT common stock other than BCM and other affiliates of
ARL elect to convert their shares to Series H redeemable convertible preferred
stock, they would own approximately 84.4% of the issued and outstanding shares
of the Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock. BCM and other affiliates
of ARL would own the remaining shares of Series H redeemable convertible
preferred stock.

         ARL will apply to list the Series G and Series H redeemable convertible
preferred stock, and the shares of ARL common stock issuable upon conversion of
the Series G and Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock on the New York
Stock Exchange ("NYSE"), however, the NYSE may not accept the shares for
listing.

         The cash price per share to be paid by ARL was determined in connection
with the settlement of a derivative lawsuit, the Olive Litigation, which has
been approved by a federal court. The cash prices were negotiated between and
agreed to by ARL and by George Donaldson, the Settlement Counsel representing
the interests of the nonaffiliated stockholders of TCI and IOT. In the course of
considering and negotiating the terms of settlement, Settlement Counsel
considered the net asset values of TCI and IOT, the book value of TCI and IOT on
a per share basis and the historical trading prices of the common stock of TCI
and IOT. The cash prices to be received by TCI and IOT stockholders are less
than the calculated book value per common share at March 31, 2002, which were
$26.78 and $28.00, respectively. See "Comparative per Share Information." The
exchange ratio of one share of ARL preferred stock for each one share of TCI or
IOT common stock was determined in connection with the



                                       7




settlement of the Olive Litigation. The liquidation value for each series of ARL
preferred stock also was determined in the litigation settlement. The
liquidation value of each series of ARL preferred stock was set at an amount
higher than the respective cash prices being offered for each TCI or IOT share
which will provide a stockholder with a higher cash return upon redemption of
the ARL preferred stock.

         The conversion ratio for converting the Series G and Series H
redeemable convertible preferred stock into ARL common stock was determined by
and between ARL and Houlihan Lokey, the independent investment advisor to TCI
and IOT, who has opined that the proposed transaction is fair from a financial
point of view to the nonaffiliated stockholders of TCI and IOT.


3.Q: WHAT ARE THE MATERIAL TERMS OF THE TCI MERGER AND THE IOT MERGER? (SEE
PAGES 97-101)


         A: Copies of the forms of agreements and plans of merger that have been
approved by each board of directors as applicable are attached as APPENDIX A and
APPENDIX B to this joint proxy statement and prospectus.

         Although the ARL, TCI and IOT boards of directors have approved the
terms of the merger agreements, the merger agreements will not be executed until
after the stockholders approve the mergers and other conditions precedent
thereto are met. Additionally, ARL has determined not to enter into the merger
agreements unless it has sufficient cash available to it to pay the cash merger
consideration.

         CONDITIONS OF THE MERGERS. Completion of the mergers is dependent upon
the fulfillment of a number of conditions, including the following material
conditions:

         o        all necessary consents from third parties having been obtained

         o        no restraining order, injunction, order or decree of any court
                  having been issued

         o        the filing by the parties of all documents and instruments
                  required to be filed with governmental entities

         o        no action having been taken by any state or federal government
                  or agency which would prevent the merger or impose material
                  conditions on the merger

         o        although not part of the merger agreements, ARL has determined
                  not to enter into the merger agreements unless it has
                  sufficient cash available to it, either from its own resources
                  or from TCI or IOT immediately after the mergers, to pay the
                  cash merger consideration

         The merger agreements may be terminated by one or more parties at any
time prior to the effective time of the mergers if the following events occur:

         o        mutual written consent

         o        the merger is prohibited by law or a court order

         o        the other party materially breaches any representation,
                  covenant or agreement in the merger agreement and the breach
                  has not been remedied within twenty days after written notice



                                       8



         o        by the other party if the other board of directors withdraws
                  or modifies its approval or recommendation of the merger
                  agreement in any manner materially adverse to the other party


4.Q: WHAT ARE THE TERMS OF THE SERIES G AND SERIES H REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE
PREFERRED STOCK? (SEE PAGES 102-115)


         A: The Series G and Series H preferred shares are both convertible and
redeemable. During a 75 day period commencing on the 15th day after ARL publicly
files its first Form 10-Q with the SEC following the consummation of the TCI
merger and the IOT merger, the Series G and Series H redeemable convertible
preferred stock may be converted at the option of the holder into 2.5 and 2.25
shares of ARL common stock, respectively. Beginning 45 days after ARL files its
first Form 10-Q following the consummation of the TCI and/or IOT mergers, ARL
may provide notice of and thereafter redeem the Series G and Series H redeemable
convertible preferred stock upon payment of the liquidation value of $20.00 and
$21.50 per share, respectively. ARL may redeem any or all of the Series G and
Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock upon payment of the liquidation
value plus all accrued and unpaid dividends by giving the holder thereof not
less than 45 days nor more than 60 days notice thereof prior to the date on
which ARL desires such shares redeemed. The Series G and Series H redeemable
convertible preferred stock receive a liquidation preference of $20.00 and
$21.50, respectively, less dividends declared and paid after January 2, 2002
upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of ARL before any distribution
or payment to the ARL common stock holders. No such preference is available for
the TCI or IOT common stock.

         The holders of Series G and Series H redeemable convertible preferred
stock do not vote for the election of directors or on any matter except: (i) as
otherwise provided by law, (ii) with respect to an amendment to ARL's articles
of incorporation or bylaws that would materially alter or change the existing
terms of the Series G and Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock,
respectively, (iii) as to the Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock,
at any time or times for the election of two directors when all or any portion
of the dividends on the Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock for any
six quarterly dividends, whether or not consecutive, shall be in arrears and
unpaid; and (iv) as to the Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock, at
any time or times for the election of two directors when all or any portion of
the dividends on the Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock for any six
quarterly dividends, whether or not consecutive, shall be in arrears and unpaid.
In the event of (iii) above, the number of directors constituting the board of
directors of ARL shall be increased by two and the holders of Series G
redeemable convertible preferred stock, voting separately as a class, shall be
entitled to elect two directors to fill the newly created directorships with
each holder being entitled to one vote in the election for each share of Series
G redeemable convertible preferred stock held. In the event of (iv) above, the
number of directors constituting the board of directors of ARL shall be
increased by two and the holders of Series H redeemable convertible preferred
stock, voting separately as a class, shall be entitled to elect two directors to
fill the newly created directorships with each holder being entitled to one vote
in the election for each share of Series H redeemable convertible preferred
stock held.

         In addition to the conversion and redemption features and the voting
rights set forth above, there are other differences between the Series G and H
redeemable convertible preferred



                                       9



stock and the TCI common stock and IOT common stock, respectively. For a
description of additional differences see "Comparison of Ownership of Shares."

         Each share of Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock has a
cumulative dividend per share of 10.00% per annum of the $20.00 liquidation
preference, payable quarterly in equal installments of $0.5, if and when
declared by the board and to the extent permitted under the Nevada Revised
Statutes. Dividends on the Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock are
in preference to and with priority over dividends upon the ARL common stock. The
Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock ranks on a parity as to
dividends and upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up with all other shares
of ARL preferred stock.

         Each share of Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock has a
cumulative dividend per share of 10.00% per annum of the $21.50 liquidation
preference, payable quarterly in equal installments of $0.5375, if and when
declared by the board and to the extent permitted under the Nevada Revised
Statutes. Dividends on the Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock are
in preference to and with priority over dividends upon the ARL common stock. The
Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock ranks on a parity as to
dividends and upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up with all other shares
of ARL preferred stock.

         The full text of the description of the Series G and Series H
redeemable convertible preferred stock is set forth in Appendix C and D,
respectively.


5.Q: WHAT IS THE INTENDED ACCOUNTING TREATMENT OF THE TCI MERGER AND IOT MERGER?
(SEE PAGE 100)



         A: ARL will account for the mergers under the purchase method of
accounting. At June 30, 2002, the total value of TCI assets and liabilities was
$785,093,000 and $567,046,000, respectively. No goodwill is acquired or
generated through the business combination. Likewise, the total value of IOT
assets and liabilities was $95,693,000 and $56,287,000, respectively and no
goodwill is acquired or generated through the business combination.



6.Q: WILL I RECOGNIZE INCOME TAX GAIN OR LOSS IN THE TCI MERGER OR IOT MERGER?
(SEE PAGES 92-94)


         A: The mergers involve numerous federal income tax consequences to you,
depending in part on whether you are a common stockholder of TCI or IOT.

         Each merger will be a taxable event for United States federal income
tax purposes. The TCI and IOT stockholders who do not affirmatively elect to
receive preferred stock in the mergers will recognize gain or loss equal to the
difference between (i) the amount of cash they receive in connection with the
merger and (ii) their tax basis in their stock of TCI common stock or IOT common
stock, as the case may be. The TCI and IOT stockholders who affirmatively elect
to receive preferred stock in connection with the mergers will recognize gain or
loss equal to the difference between (i) the fair market value of the shares of
preferred stock received in the merger and (ii) their tax basis in their shares
of TCI common stock or IOT common stock, as the case may be. The mergers will
not be a taxable event to the ARL stockholders. Each stockholder receiving
preferred stock in the mergers will be responsible for reporting the fair market
value of the shares on its tax return. Assuming that the preferred stock is not
listed on the



                                       10




NYSE or another exchange at the date of the closing of the mergers, it is
unlikely that a stockholder receiving preferred stock could establish that the
fair market value of the shares was less than the cash that the stockholder
could have received. We will not obtain an opinion as to the fair market value
of the shares at the date of closing.

         We urge you to carefully read the complete explanation of the tax
consequences of the mergers beginning on page 88.

         TAX MATTERS ARE VERY COMPLICATED, AND THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE
MERGERS TO STOCKHOLDERS WILL DEPEND UPON THE FACTS OF EACH INDIVIDUAL'S
SITUATION. WE URGE YOU TO CONSULT YOUR TAX ADVISOR FOR A FULL UNDERSTANDING OF
THE MERGER'S TAX CONSEQUENCES TO YOU.


7.Q: ARE THERE RISKS INVOLVED IN THE MERGERS? (SEE PAGES 35-45)


         A: Yes. In considering whether or not to vote in favor of your merger,
ARL, TCI and IOT stockholders should carefully consider all of the information
set forth in this joint proxy statement and prospectus and, in particular,
should evaluate the factors set forth under the caption "Risk Factors" herein.
These factors include, among other things:

                          RISKS RELATED TO THE MERGERS

         o        Substantial amounts of cash are required for the mergers. If
                  ARL, TCI and IOT are not able to raise the cash anticipated
                  through the sale of real estate, obtaining new loans or other
                  forms of financing, the mergers may be delayed or abandoned
                  and the ongoing combined business of ARL, TCI and IOT may be
                  adversely affected.

         o        Substantial property sales or loans are necessary to complete
                  the mergers. ARL, TCI and IOT may not receive the best
                  possible prices for their properties and may have to incur
                  higher expenses than would otherwise be incurred. Real estate
                  assets are not readily saleable. The consummation of the sales
                  anticipated by ARL, TCI and IOT will be subject to a number of
                  contingencies outside of their control.

         o        Lender consents may be necessary to complete the mergers. To
                  the extent that ARL, TCI and IOT are unable to get any
                  necessary lender consents, or to the extent that they have
                  disagreements with their lenders regarding the mergers, the
                  businesses of ARL, TCI and IOT may be adversely affected and
                  the mergers may be delayed or abandoned.

         o        The mergers are separate transactions. If one of these
                  companies does not approve the merger, ARL may be adversely
                  affected and may not have sufficient cash to consummate the
                  other merger. If the stockholders of either TCI or IOT do not
                  approve the merger, but the stockholders of the other do, the
                  merger of ARL and the other company may be delayed or
                  abandoned.

         o        In the Settlement Agreement, it was agreed that if the
                  stockholders of TCI or IOT did not approve the mergers, ARL
                  can make a tender offer for the shares of the common stock of
                  the company or companies that did not approve the merger.
                  Making a tender offer for the shares of TCI or IOT would be
                  expensive for ARL, and there can be no assurance that it would
                  be able to arrange the necessary financing to make and
                  consummate such a transaction.



                                       11



                    RISKS RELATED TO THE ARL PREFERRED STOCK

         o        The value of the ARL preferred stock is uncertain. There can
                  be no assurance that an active trading market will exist and
                  holders of ARL preferred stock may not be able to sell those
                  shares when and in the amounts they want; even if there is an
                  active trading market there is no assurance the value of the
                  ARL preferred stock will rise; and ARL may not have sufficient
                  cash to pay the dividend contemplated on the ARL preferred
                  stock and those dividends do not bear interest.

         o        The Series G and Series H redeemable convertible preferred
                  stock have very limited voting rights and do not vote for the
                  election of directors or any other matters except as otherwise
                  provided by law and in other limited circumstances when the
                  holders' rights would be materially altered or under certain
                  conditions when dividends are in arrears.

         o        Affiliates of ARL may hold a majority of the Series G and
                  Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock after the
                  mergers are completed and may be able to control any vote of
                  holders of the Series G and H redeemable convertible preferred
                  stock, including any vote to amend the terms of the Series G
                  and H redeemable convertible preferred stock and amend the
                  rights of the holders of the Series G and H redeemable
                  convertible preferred stock.

                     RISKS RELATED TO THE COMBINED BUSINESS

         o        ARL will need to sell property and borrow money to meet its
                  liquidity needs. There can be no assurance that the combined
                  business will be able to make the required property sales for
                  favorable prices or at all, or that it will be able to borrow
                  additional funds on favorable terms or at all.

         o        ARL will have substantial debt after the mergers and the
                  combined business of ARL, TCI and IOT will be highly
                  leveraged. This high level of indebtedness will subject the
                  combined business to risk, including, the combined businesses
                  may be limited in their ability to grow by a lack of cash or
                  the availability of loans for new acquisitions; may be forced
                  to sell properties on disadvantageous terms if they are unable
                  to refinance maturing debt obligations; and the interest
                  expense could increase if general interest rates increase the
                  substantial leverage will increase their vulnerability to
                  economic downturns; high levels of debt could limit the
                  ability to react to changing conditions in the real estate
                  industry or the economy generally; and failure to comply with
                  financial and other restrictive covenants in loan agreements,
                  or failure to make debt service payments could result in
                  events of default that could harm the business or result in
                  the bankruptcy of one or more subsidiaries of ARL, TCI or IOT
                  or of the combined business as a whole.

         o        BCM and its affiliates own or control more than a majority of
                  the voting securities of each of ARL, TCI and IOT, and will
                  own more than a majority of the voting securities of ARL after
                  the mergers. The interest of BCM may be different from those
                  of other stockholders of ARL, TCI and IOT, and may be
                  different from those of other holders of the ARL preferred
                  stock. BCM's position may have a number of effects on the
                  combined business of ARL, TCI and IOT which may affect the
                  value of the ARL common and preferred stock, including, BCM
                  and its affiliates can control



                                       12



                  the election of all members of the board of directors of ARL;
                  BCM and its affiliates are able to prevent any transaction
                  that would result in a change of control of ARL; dealings
                  between ARL and BCM after the mergers may not be at arms
                  length; and BCM as the contractual advisor and BCM's officers
                  and directors are entitled to indemnification from ARL from
                  any action or claims with respect to liability for debts or
                  obligations of ARL and TCI and IOT.

         o        Management of ARL, TCI and IOT are subject to conflicts of
                  interest because most members of management of BCM and ARL are
                  also members of management of TCI and IOT.

         o        Real estate investments are subject to varying degrees of
                  risks and are relatively illiquid, which could adversely
                  effect ARL's ability to pay dividends.

         o        Developing and managing real estate assets is a highly
                  competitive business. The combined business will compete for
                  tenants and customers with other developed real estate owned
                  by third parties many of which are considerably larger, have
                  greater financial resources and may have management personnel
                  with more experience than the officers of the combined
                  business.

         o        A substantial portion of assets of the combined business of
                  ARL, TCI and IOT will consist of real estate and mortgage
                  notes receivable secured by income producing real estate
                  located in the Midwest, Northeast and Southwest regions of the
                  United States. Specific geographic regions of the United
                  States from time to time will experience weaker regional
                  economic conditions and housing markets, and, consequently,
                  will experience higher rates of loss and delinquency on
                  mortgage loans. Any concentration of assets in a region may
                  present risks in addition to those generally present for
                  similar real estate assets or mortgage-backed or asset-backed
                  securities without this concentration.

         o        The real estate assets of the combined business of ARL, TCI
                  and IOT will be subject to industry-specific operating risks,
                  any or all of which may adversely affect the results of the
                  operations of the combined business.


8.Q: ARE THERE ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OR NEGATIVE FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH THE
MERGERS? (SEE PAGE 63 - 64 AND 66-67)


         A: Yes. In addition to the risks involved in the mergers discussed
above, the mergers involve other adverse consequences and negative factors,
including the following:

         o        Following the mergers, the nonaffiliated stockholders of IOT
                  and TCI who receive cash for their shares will cease to
                  participate in any future earnings and growth of either IOT or
                  TCI.

         o        The mergers will result in a taxable transaction for the
                  stockholders of IOT and TCI.



         o        The December 31, 2001 book value per share of TCI common stock
                  ($29.95) and IOT common stock ($24.48) exceeds the per share
                  cash consideration offered to the nonaffiliated stockholders
                  of TCI ($17.50 per share) and IOT ($19.00 per share),
                  respectively, pursuant to the mergers.

         o        As a result of the IOT merger, stockholders of IOT electing to
                  receive shares of the preferred stock of ARL will no longer be
                  holders of an equity interest in a REIT,



                                       13




                  which is required to distribute 95% of its net income in the
                  form of dividends each year.


9.Q: HOW WILL THE BUSINESS COMBINATION BE FINANCED? (SEE PAGES 72 -75)



         A: The estimated cash requirements to pay the amounts to the
nonaffiliated TCI and IOT stockholders if all elect to take the cash merger
consideration and to pay all expenses (including prepayments of indebtedness) of
the transactions is approximately $60,996,907 (TCI-$50,043,787 and
IOT-$10,953,120). The actual amount required to purchase the TCI common stock
and IOT common stock will depend on the number of stockholders who affirmatively
elect to receive Series G and Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock.
Consequently, the greater number of stockholders who affirmatively elect to
receive Series G and Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock the less
funds will be required to pay the cash merger consideration. ARL and TCI have
entered into contracts to sell a number of real property assets to realize at
least $60,000,000, based upon ARL's current estimate of the sales price of the
properties minus the sum of the debt, prepayment penalties, closing costs and
fees payable to BCM. ARL has contracts to sell 18 properties. IOT expects to
sell 1 property and TCI has contracts to sell 14 properties consisting of land,
apartments and office buildings.



10.Q: WILL I HAVE DISSENTERS' OR APPRAISAL RIGHTS IN THE MERGER? (SEE PAGE 49)


         A: No.


11.Q: HAVE TCI AND IOT RECEIVED A FAVORABLE OPINION FROM THEIR FINANCIAL
ADVISORS CONCERNING THE TCI MERGER AND IOT MERGER AS APPLICABLE? (SEE PAGES 75 -
83)


         A: Yes. Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin Financial Advisors, Inc.
("Houlihan Lokey"), has delivered its opinion to the board of TCI that, based
upon the assumptions and analyses contained in its letter dated February 1,
2002, after allowing for the factors and assumptions stated in its opinion and
as of that date, the consideration being offered to the TCI stockholders, other
than ARL and its affiliates, in the merger is fair from a financial point of
view.

         Houlihan Lokey has delivered its opinion to the board of IOT that,
based upon the assumptions and analyses contained in its letter dated February
1, 2002, after allowing for the factors and assumptions stated in its opinion
and as of that date, the consideration being offered to the IOT stockholders,
other than ARL and its affiliates in the merger, is fair from a financial point
of view.

         These opinions are attached as APPENDICES E and F. We encourage you to
read these opinions.



                                       14




12.Q: DO PERSONS INVOLVED IN THE MERGERS HAVE INTERESTS THAT DIFFER FROM MINE?
(SEE PAGES 95-96)


         A: Yes. In considering your board's recommendation that you vote for
the merger, you should be aware that the determination of the boards of ARL, TCI
and IOT to participate in the mergers may have been affected by conflicts of
interest. In particular:


         The boards of directors of TCI and IOT are identical. Additionally, the
executive officers of ARL, TCI, IOT and BCM are essentially the same persons.
Each of the individuals, as a result of their multiple positions, owe fiduciary
duties to the stockholders of all three of ARL, TCI and IOT. At times, they may
be confronted by issues, including the mergers, that present them with
potentially conflicting interests and obligations. Furthermore, in accordance
with the advisory agreements that each of ARL, TCI and IOT have with BCM (as
discussed under the heading "The Advisor"), BCM will receive a fee upon the
sale, if any, of the properties that may be sold to fund the payment of the cash
merger consideration. For the properties available for sale as of April 15,
2002, the amount of the fee is estimated to be $3,837,000. See "Special Factors
- Financing the Business Combination."


         It is currently expected that the officers and directors of ARL, TCI
and IOT will remain the same after the business combination with the exception
that the TCI and IOT board members shall become members of the ARL board. As a
result of these business relationships, the directors and officers of ARL, TCI
and IOT could be more likely to support or recommend the business combination,
the agreements and plans of merger and related matters than might otherwise be
the case. You should consider whether these interests may have influenced these
directors and officers to support or recommend the business combination. The
directors of ARL, TCI and IOT were aware of these interests and considered them
in approving the mergers.

         None of the individual officers and directors of ARL, TCI, IOT and BCM
will receive individual compensation, shares, forgiveness of debt, options,
severance benefits, earn outs or other amounts that could be considered
compensation related to the successful consummation of the business combination.
Certain officers and directors of ARL, TCI and IOT that own shares of ARL common
stock will be treated as affiliates and will receive shares of the ARL preferred
stock in return for their TCI and IOT common stock.


13.Q: WHAT PERCENTAGE OF OUTSTANDING SHARES OF ARL, TCI AND IOT ARE HELD BY
OFFICERS, DIRECTORS AND THEIR AFFILIATES? (SEE PAGES 48-49)


         A: The directors, executive officers and the affiliates of the
directors and executive officers of ARL beneficially own 65.1% of the
outstanding shares of ARL voting with respect to the TCI and IOT mergers. After
completion of the TCI and IOT mergers, the directors, executive officers and the
affiliates of the directors and executive officers of ARL will beneficially own
72.6% of the outstanding shares of ARL, assuming the conversion of all shares of
Series G and Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock, if any, received
in the mergers.

         The directors, executive officers and the affiliates of the directors
and executive officers of TCI (including ARL and its affiliates) own 65.1% of
the outstanding shares of TCI voting with respect to the TCI merger. All
outstanding shares of TCI common stock will be cancelled



                                       15



or exchanged upon completion of the TCI merger. The directors, executive
officers and the affiliates of the directors and executive officers of TCI will,
indirectly and directly, beneficially own 67.3% of the outstanding common stock
of ARL after completion of the TCI mergers, assuming conversion of all shares of
Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock received in the merger.

         The directors, executive officers and the affiliates of the directors
and executive officers of IOT (including ARL, TCI and their affiliates) own
59.9% of the outstanding shares of IOT voting with respect to the IOT merger.
All outstanding shares of IOT common stock will be cancelled or exchanged upon
completion of the IOT merger. The directors and executive officers and
affiliates of the directors and executive officers of IOT will, indirectly and
directly, beneficially own 67.3% of the outstanding common stock of ARL after
the completion of the IOT merger, assuming conversion of all shares of Series H
redeemable convertible preferred stock received in the merger.

         BCM will own 66.9% of the outstanding common stock of ARL after
completion of the TCI and IOT mergers, assuming conversion of all shares of
Series G and Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock received in the
mergers.


14.Q: WHAT VOTE IS REQUIRED TO APPROVE MY MERGER? (SEE PAGE 48-49)


         A:  Approval of the TCI merger requires:

         o        The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the
                  TCI meeting.

         o        The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the
                  holders of shares of TCI common stock voting at the TCI
                  meeting not held by Mr. Phillips, BCM or ARL and their
                  affiliates.

         o        The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in favor
                  of the TCI merger at the ARL meeting.

         Approval of the IOT merger requires:

         o        The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the
                  IOT meeting.

         o        The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the
                  holders of shares of IOT common stock voting at the IOT
                  meeting not held by Mr. Phillips, BCM or ARL and their
                  affiliates.

         o        The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in favor
                  of the IOT merger at the ARL meeting.

         In the event the stockholders of either TCI or IOT approve their merger
but the stockholders of the other company do not, the approved merger may be
consummated, but the other one will not.

         ARL and its affiliates currently own 5,212,949 shares of TCI common
stock representing approximately 64.6% of the outstanding TCI shares and 862,465
shares of IOT common stock representing approximately 59.9% of the outstanding
IOT shares. Although ARL and its



                                       16



affiliates and TCI and IOT intend to vote their shares in favor of the mergers,
the affirmative vote of a majority of the nonaffiliated shares is needed to
authorize the merger.


15.Q: IF THE MERGERS ARE APPROVED AND I AFFIRMATIVELY ELECT TO RECEIVE SHARES OF
THE ARL PREFERRED STOCK WILL THESE SHARES BE LISTED FOR TRADING? (SEE PAGE 32)


         A: ARL will apply to list the Series G and Series H redeemable
convertible preferred stock, and the shares of ARL common stock issuable upon
conversion of the Series G and Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock,
on the NYSE. There can be, however, no assurance that the shares will be listed.
The listing of the preferred and underlying common shares for trading on the
NYSE is not a condition to the respective obligations of TCI and IOT to
consummate the mergers.


16.Q: WHAT FACTORS (POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE) WERE CONSIDERED BY THE ARL, TCI AND
IOT BOARDS? DO THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF ARL, TCI AND IOT RECOMMEND VOTING IN
FAVOR OF THE TCI MERGER AND IOT MERGER AS APPLICABLE? (SEE PAGES 61-71)


         A: ARL. The ARL board of directors has approved the TCI merger
agreement and the IOT merger agreement and unanimously recommends that its
stockholders vote "for" the mergers. In reaching its decision to approve and
recommend the mergers, the ARL board of directors considered, among other
factors, the following, which includes the benefits and detriments considered by
the ARL board:

         o        The ARL board reviewed current and historical market prices of
                  the TCI and IOT common stock relative to the historical market
                  prices of the ARL common stock and relative to the merger
                  consideration. In doing so, the board noted that the proposed
                  merger consideration represented a premium over the average
                  closing price of the TCI common stock and the IOT common
                  stock. As a general matter, paying a premium to the market
                  price for shares of the common stock of TCI and IOT can be
                  seen as negative to the interests of ARL.

         o        The history of the negotiations leading to establishment of
                  the merger consideration and the structure of the proposed
                  transactions.

         o        The advice of TCI's and IOT's financial advisor that the
                  consideration to be offered to the nonaffiliated public
                  stockholders of TCI and IOT was fair from a financial point of
                  view. The fact that the proposed transactions were negotiated
                  at arms length over an extended period of time and the fact
                  that TCI's and IOT's financial advisor considered the
                  structure of the proposed transactions and the merger
                  consideration to be paid to be fair to the nonaffiliated
                  stockholders of TCI and IOT can be seen as a favorable aspect
                  of the proposed transactions from ARL's point of view.

         o        The fact that the cash merger consideration offered for the
                  TCI common stock and the IOT common stock was less than the
                  respective current book value of such stock. The fact that as
                  a result of the transactions, ARL will acquire TCI and IOT by
                  paying less than the book value per share of those businesses
                  can be seen as favorable to ARL's interests.

         o        The view of the ARL board of directors that an increase in the
                  size and diversity of ARL's portfolio would increase the
                  development opportunities available to ARL.



                                       17




                  The ARL board felt that this increase in the size and
                  diversity of ARL's portfolio was a favorable aspect of the
                  proposed transactions from ARL's point of view.

         o        The view of the ARL board of directors that an increase in the
                  size of ARL's business and real estate portfolio would
                  increase ARL's financial flexibility. The increase in
                  financial flexibility that may occur as a result of the
                  proposed transactions was seen as favorable to ARL's interests
                  by ARL's board.

         o        The expectation of the ARL board of directors that the cash to
                  be paid as merger consideration could be raised in large part
                  from sales or refinancing of real estate held by TCI and IOT.
                  The ability to finance the proposed transactions in large part
                  by selling or refinancing the assets of TCI and IOT can be
                  seen as a favorable aspect of the proposed transactions from
                  ARL's point of view. However, the increased indebtedness that
                  may result from refinancing the assets of the combined
                  business will increase the risk associated with the business
                  and can be seen as a potentially negative factor.

         o        The expectation of the ARL board of directors that the TCI and
                  IOT mergers would not be consummated unless, in each case,
                  sufficient cash was available to ARL to pay the cash merger
                  consideration due as a result of the mergers. The ARL board
                  did not believe that agreeing to consummate either of the
                  proposed transactions before, in either case, sufficient cash
                  was available to do so would be in ARL's best interests.

         o        The terms of the merger agreements, including that there is no
                  financing condition and each can be terminated without penalty
                  by either party; which can be seen as favorable to ARL. In
                  addition, the ARL board noted the merger agreements would not
                  be entered into until after the requisite stockholder approval
                  had been obtained; and the possibility that a third party may
                  seek to acquire TCI or IOT before such approval could be
                  obtained making it unlikely that a merger with that entity
                  would occur. Since it is possible that another person might
                  acquire TCI or IOT after ARL has expended a great deal of
                  money and effort on the proposed transactions, this provision
                  of the merger agreements can be seen as negative to ARL's
                  interests.

         o        The fact that stockholders of TCI and IOT affiliated with ARL
                  will accept preferred stock of ARL in lieu of cash as merger
                  consideration. The reduction in the cash necessary to
                  consummate the proposed transactions made possible by
                  delivering preferred stock to the ARL affiliates in lieu of
                  cash can be seen a favorable to ARL's interests.

         o        The fact that the TCI and IOT mergers are not conditioned upon
                  one another. ARL's ability to close one, but not the other
                  transaction, can be seen as favorable to ARL's interests.

         o        The fact that if either of the mergers was not consummated,
                  ARL may be required to pay a penalty of $5.00 per outstanding
                  share of the common stock of the entity not being acquired
                  unless it commenced a tender offer for such shares for at
                  least the same cash consideration offered in the failed
                  merger, and that the consummation of either merger may not
                  occur due to reasons outside of ARL's control. ARL's ability
                  to avoid the penalty by initiating a tender offer can be seen
                  as favorable to ARL's interests, although the existence of the
                  penalty provisions can be seen as negative.

         o        The time and management resources necessary to solicit
                  stockholder approval and consummate the mergers. The risk that
                  consummating the proposed transactions will



                                       18



                  divert ARL's management resources from its existing businesses
                  is a negative aspect of the proposed transactions from ARL's
                  point of view.

         o        The ARL board of directors' understanding that any regulatory
                  approvals necessary to consummate the TCI and IOT mergers
                  could be obtained.

         o        The various risks and uncertainties involved in the mergers,
                  including the risks described under the heading "Risk
                  Factors".

         TCI. The TCI board of directors has determined that the terms of the
proposed TCI merger are fair to and in the best interests of the nonaffiliated
TCI stockholders, approved the TCI merger agreement and unanimously recommends
that its stockholders vote "for" the TCI merger. In reaching its decision to
approve and recommend the TCI merger, the TCI board of directors considered,
among other factors, the following, which includes the potentially positive and
potentially negative factors considered by the IOT board:

Potentially Positive Factors Considered by the TCI Board:

         o        The current and historical market prices of TCI common stock
                  relative to the merger consideration and the fact that the
                  $17.50 per share merger consideration represented a 44.6%
                  premium over the average closing price of TCI common stock
                  over the thirty trading days prior to October 23, 2001.

         o        The fact that the merger consideration is all cash.

         o        The fact that holders of TCI common stock have the opportunity
                  to affirmatively elect to receive ARL preferred stock instead
                  of cash.

         o        The view of the TCI board of directors that the trading value
                  for shares of TCI common stock was not likely to exceed the
                  merger price in the near term if TCI remained independent.

         o        The potential stockholder value that could be expected to be
                  generated from other strategic options available to TCI.

         o        The financial presentation of Houlihan Lokey and the opinion
                  to the effect that the consideration to be offered to the
                  nonaffiliated TCI stockholders pursuant to the TCI merger
                  agreement was fair from a financial point of view to those
                  holders.

         o        The terms of the TCI merger agreement, as reviewed by the TCI
                  board of directors with TCI legal advisors.

         o        The TCI board of directors' determination, based on the fact
                  that no other offers to acquire TCI common stock have been
                  made at a level equal to or better than the merger
                  consideration of $17.50 per share before or after initial
                  press reports on and after October 23, 2001, that ARL had
                  agreed to acquire the nonaffiliated stockholder interest in
                  TCI and after discussing with TCI's advisors the potential
                  risks, costs and benefits of contacting other third parties,
                  that there was insufficient reason to justify the risk of
                  delay in proceeding with the favorable transaction with ARL.

         o        The view of the TCI board of directors that the regulatory
                  approvals necessary to consummate the TCI merger could be
                  obtained.

         o        The fact that TCI will no longer exist as an independent
                  company and its stockholders will no longer participate in the
                  growth of TCI.

         o        The fact that gains from an all cash transaction would be
                  taxable to TCI stockholders for U.S. federal income tax
                  purposes.



                                       19



Potentially Negative Factors Considered by the TCI Board:

         Although all of the factors were simply viewed as a whole and the
individual members of the TCI Board did not rank or list any as positive or
negative, the following potentially negative factors were considered by the TCI
Board:

         o        Calculated book value per share of TCI common stock ($26.95 at
                  December 31, 2001) exceeds the offered cash value per share
                  ($17.50), but the market price per share of TCI common Stock
                  has historically been less than the book value per share of
                  TCI common stock calculated from a financial standpoint.

         o        Based upon the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial
                  statements, the mergers may result in earnings per share of
                  ARL that are less than the historical earnings per share of
                  TCI ($2.32 per share at December 31, 2001).

         o        The risk exists that ARL will have to raise capital from
                  another source, refinance indebtedness or sell assets
                  (including assets of TCI and IOT) to produce proceeds
                  sufficient to finance the cash payments to the TCI holders of
                  common stock not affiliated with ARL. A substantial increase
                  in leverage may be a result of the merger of TCI into ARL,
                  which increase in leverage is not presently quantifiable.

         o        There may not be sufficient ARL cash to pay dividends on ARL
                  preferred stock as a result of the substantial indebtedness
                  which may be required to be incurred pursuant to the mergers.

         o        The likelihood that some significant divestitures will be
                  required and the risk that the circumstances of any such
                  divestitures may not fully maximize the value received for the
                  divested assets.

         o        The risk of diverting management focus and corporate resources
                  from other strategic opportunities and operational matters for
                  an extended period of time.

         o        Gains from an all cash transaction would be taxable to TCI
                  stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes even though
                  some TCI stockholders may elect to receive Series G redeemable
                  convertible preferred stock.

         o        Based upon unaudited pro forma consolidated financial
                  statements giving effect to the merger of TCI into ARL,
                  resulting earnings per share would be less than the historical
                  earnings per share of TCI ($2.32 per share at December 31,
                  2001).

         o        See also "Information About ARL -- Security Ownership of
                  Certain Beneficial Owners and Management of ARL".

         IOT. The IOT board of directors has determined that the terms of the
proposed IOT merger are fair to and in the best interests of the nonaffiliated
IOT stockholders, approved the IOT merger agreement and unanimously recommends
that its stockholders vote "for" the IOT merger. In reaching its decision to
approve and recommend the IOT merger, the IOT board of directors considered,
among other factors, the following which includes the potentially positive and
potentially negative factors considered by the IOT board:

Potentially Positive Factors Considered by the IOT Board:

         o        The current and historical market prices of IOT common stock
                  relative to the merger consideration and the fact that the
                  $19.00 per share merger consideration represented



                                       20



                  a 28.7% premium over the average closing price of IOT common
                  stock over the thirty trading days prior to October 23, 2001.

         o        The fact that the merger consideration is all cash.

         o        The fact that holders of IOT stock have the opportunity to
                  affirmatively elect to receive ARL preferred stock instead of
                  cash.

         o        The view of the IOT board of directors that the trading value
                  for shares of IOT common stock was not likely to exceed the
                  merger price in the near term if IOT remained independent.

         o        The potential stockholder value that can be expected to be
                  generated from other strategic options available to IOT.

         o        The financial presentation of Houlihan Lokey and the opinion
                  to the effect that the consideration to be offered to the
                  nonaffiliated IOT stockholders pursuant to the IOT merger
                  agreement was fair from a financial point of view to those
                  holders.

         o        The terms of the IOT merger agreement, as reviewed by the IOT
                  board of directors with IOT legal advisors.

         o        The IOT board of directors' determination, based on the fact
                  that no other offers to acquire IOT common stock have been
                  made at a level equal to or better than the merger
                  consideration of $19 per share before or after initial press
                  reports on and after October 23, 2001, that ARL had agreed to
                  acquire the nonaffiliated stockholder interest in IOT and
                  after discussing with IOT's advisors the potential risks,
                  costs and benefits of contacting other third parties, that
                  there was insufficient reason to justify the risk of delay in
                  proceeding with the favorable transaction with ARL.

         o        The view of the IOT board of directors, the regulatory
                  approvals necessary to consummate the IOT merger could be
                  obtained.

         o        IOT will no longer exist as an independent company and its
                  stockholders will no longer participate in the growth of IOT.

         o        The fact that gains from an all cash transaction would be
                  taxable to IOT stockholders for U.S. federal income tax
                  purposes.

Potentially Negative Factors Considered by the IOT Board:

         Although all of the factors were simply viewed as a whole and the
individual members of the IOT Board did not rank or list any as positive or
negative, the following potentially negative factors were considered by the IOT
Board:

         o        Book value per share of IOT common stock exceeds the offered
                  cash value per share, but the market price per share of IOT
                  common stock has historically been less than the book value
                  per share of IOT common stock calculated from a financial
                  standpoint.

         o        Based upon the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial
                  statements, the merger may result in earnings per share of ARL
                  that are less than the historical earnings per share of IOT
                  and TCI.

         o        The risk exists that ARL will have to raise capital from
                  another source, refinance indebtedness or sell assets
                  (including assets of IOT and TCI) to produce proceeds
                  sufficient to finance the cash payments to the IOT holders of
                  common stock not affiliated with ARL. A substantial increase
                  in leverage may be a result of the merger of IOT into ARL,
                  which increase in leverage is not presently quantifiable.



                                       21



         o        There may not be sufficient ARL cash to pay dividends on ARL
                  preferred stock as a result of the substantial indebtedness
                  which may be required to be incurred pursuant to the
                  transactions.

         o        The likelihood that some significant divestitures will be
                  required and the risk that the circumstances of any such
                  divestitures may not fully maximize the value received for the
                  divested assets.

         o        The risk of diverting management focus and corporate resources
                  from other strategic opportunities and operational matters for
                  an extended period of time.

         o        Gains from an all cash transaction would be taxable to IOT
                  stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes even though
                  some IOT stockholders may elect to receive Series G redeemable
                  convertible preferred stock.

         o        As a result of the merger, IOT stockholders will no longer be
                  holders of an equity interest in a REIT and therefore, will
                  not receive 95% of REIT net income in the form of dividends
                  each year. See "Comparative Per Share Information" for the
                  amount of IOT distributions during the last two years. During
                  the year ended December 31, 2000, IOT paid dividends equal to
                  $0.45 per share of IOT common stock and paid no dividends in
                  2001.

         o        See also "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
                  Management of ARL".


17.Q: HAVE ARL, BCM AND GENE PHILLIPS MADE A FAIRNESS DETERMINATION PERTAINING
TO TCI AND IOT MERGERS WITH RESPECT TO THE NONAFFILIATED STOCKHOLDERS OF EACH
TCI AND IOT? (SEE PAGES 84-87)


         A: ARL. The ARL directors have unanimously determined that each of the
TCI and IOT mergers are procedurally and substantively fair to the nonaffiliated
TCI and IOT stockholders, respectively.

         In connection with its determination of the procedural and substantive
fairness of the TCI merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,
ARL relied upon the determinations of the board of TCI as having been taken in
good faith following the receipt of advice from legal and financial advisors.
The ARL board adopted the conclusions as to the fairness of the TCI merger set
forth under the "Recommendation and Determination of the TCI Board of Directors"
and "TCI's Purpose and Reasons for the TCI Merger", and the analyses underlying
such conclusions of TCI's board, based on ARL's reliance upon the determinations
of the TCI board and its own views as to its reasonableness of such analyses. In
view of the variety of factors considered in reaching its decision, ARL's board
did not quantify or otherwise assign relative weights to the various factors
considered in reaching its belief as to the fairness of the TCI merger.

         In connection with its determination of the procedural and substantive
fairness of the IOT merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,
ARL relied upon the determinations of the board of IOT as having been taken in
good faith following the receipt of advice from legal and financial advisors.
The ARL board adopted the conclusions as to the fairness of the IOT merger set
forth under the "Recommendation and Determination of the IOT Board of Directors"
and "IOT's Purpose and Reasons for the IOT Merger", and the analyses underlying
such conclusions of IOT's board, based on ARL's reliance upon the determinations



                                       22



of the IOT board and its own views as to its reasonableness of such analyses. In
view of the variety of factors considered in reaching its decision, ARL's board
did not quantify or otherwise assign relative weights to the various factors
considered in reaching its belief as to the fairness of the IOT merger.


         BCM AND GENE PHILLIPS. BCM and Gene Phillips have each determined that
each of the TCI and IOT mergers are procedurally and substantively fair to the
nonaffiliated TCI and IOT stockholders, respectively.

         In connection with their respective determination of the procedural and
substantive fairness of the TCI merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, BCM and Mr. Phillips relied upon the determinations of the
board of TCI as having been taken in good faith following the receipt of advice
from legal and financial advisors. BCM adopted the conclusions as to the
fairness of the TCI merger set forth under the "Recommendation and Determination
of the TCI Board of Directors" and "TCI's Purpose and Reasons for the TCI
Merger", and the analyses underlying such conclusions of TCI's board, based on
their reliance upon the determinations of the TCI board and their own views as
to the reasonableness of such analyses. In view of the variety of factors
considered in reaching their decisions, neither BCM or Mr. Phillips quantified
or otherwise assigned relative weights to the various factors considered in
reaching its belief as to the fairness of the TCI merger.

         In connection with their determination of the procedural and
substantive fairness of the IOT merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, BCM and Mr. Phillips relied upon the determinations of the
board of IOT as having been taken in good faith following the receipt of advice
from legal and financial advisors. BCM and Mr. Phillips each adopted the
conclusions as to the fairness of the IOT merger set forth under the
"Recommendation and Determination of the IOT Board of Directors" and "IOT's
Purpose and Reasons for the IOT Merger", and the analyses underlying such
conclusions of IOT's board, based on their reliance upon the determinations of
the IOT board and their own views as to the reasonableness of such analyses. In
view of the variety of factors considered in reaching their decisions, neither
BCM nor Mr. Phillips quantified or otherwise assigned relative weights to the
various factors considered in reaching the belief as to the fairness of the IOT
merger.



18.Q: WHEN DO THE COMPANIES EXPECT TO COMPLETE THE MERGERS? (SEE PAGE 97)


         A: Assuming the mergers receive the required stockholder approval from
the stockholders of ARL, TCI and IOT, the mergers will occur at the time ARL
determines it has sufficient cash available to it, either from its own resources
or from TCI or IOT, immediately after the mergers, to pay the cash merger
consideration due as a result of the mergers.

19.Q: WHEN DO I ELECT WHETHER TO RECEIVE ARL PREFERRED STOCK OR CASH? (SEE PAGE
99-100)

         A: At the time you send in the letter of transmittal mentioned below
you will elect whether to receive ARL preferred stock or cash.



                                       23




20.Q: WHERE AND AT WHAT TIME WILL THE MEETINGS BE HELD? (SEE PAGE 46)


         A: The ARL special meeting will be held on ________________, 2002, at
the offices of ARL at 1800 Valley View Lane, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas, at 2:00
p.m., Central Time.

         The TCI special meeting will be held on________________, 2002, at the
offices of TCI at 1800 Valley View Lane, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas, at 3:00 p.m.,
Central Time.

         The IOT special meeting will be held on________________, 2002, at the
offices of IOT at 1800 Valley View Lane, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas, at 4:00 p.m.,
Central Time.


21.Q: WHAT DO I NEED TO DO NOW? (SEE PAGE 46-48)


         A: Please mail your signed proxy card in the enclosed return envelope
as soon as possible so that your shares of stock may be represented at the
appropriate meeting.


22.Q: IF MY SHARES ARE HELD BY MY BROKER, WILL MY BROKER VOTE MY SHARES FOR ME?
(SEE PAGES 46-48)


         A: Your broker may vote shares on the merger only if you instruct your
broker how to vote. You should follow the directions provided by your broker
regarding how to instruct your broker to vote your shares. If you do not tell
your broker how to vote, your shares will not be voted on the merger. If you
hold your shares in a brokerage account, you cannot vote in person at your
meeting.


23.Q: CAN I CHANGE MY VOTE AFTER I HAVE MAILED MY SIGNED PROXY CARD? (SEE PAGE
46-48)


         A: Yes. You may change your vote at any time before your proxy is voted
at your meeting. You may do this by sending a written notice stating that you
would like to revoke your proxy or by completing and submitting a new proxy card
bearing a later date than the proxy relating to the same shares to our transfer
agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, 6201 15th Avenue, Brooklyn, New
York 11219, attention Joe Alicia. You may also attend your meeting and vote in
person. Simply attending the meeting, however, will not revoke your proxy. If
you hold your shares in a brokerage account and you have instructed your broker
to vote, you must follow your broker's instructions regarding how to change your
vote.


24.Q: SHOULD I SEND IN MY CERTIFICATES NOW? (SEE PAGE 99-100)


         A: No. After the mergers are approved and the business combination is
consummated, you will receive a letter of transmittal with instructions for
exchanging shares in TCI and IOT for cash or, at your affirmative election,
shares of either Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock or Series H
redeemable convertible preferred stock, respectively.


25.Q: I'VE LOST MY CERTIFICATE. WHAT SHOULD I DO? (SEE PAGES 99-100)


         A: The letter of transmittal mentioned above will contain complete
instructions for a lost certificate.



                                       24




26.Q: WHO CAN I CONTACT FOR MORE INFORMATION? (SEE PAGE 48)


         A: ARL, TCI and IOT stockholders who have questions about the mergers
may call Investor Relations at 1-800-400-6407.



                                       25





                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

         The following table summarizes the ratio of ARL's earnings to fixed
charges and preferred stock dividends at the dates set forth below:




                                                  Six Months                   Years Ended December 31,
                                                    Ended            ----------------------------------------------
                                                June 30, 2002        2001       2000       1999      1998      1997
                                                -------------        ----       ----       ----      ----      ----
                                                                                             

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and
preferred stock dividends                             **             1.16       1.00       1.09       **        **




**Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
by $14,107,000, $23,982,000, $2,634,000 and $5,667,000 in 2002, 1998 and 1997,
respectively.


         The following table summarizes the ratio of IOT's earnings to fixed
charges and preferred stock dividends at the dates set forth below:




                                                                                         Years Ended December 31,
                                                           Six Months Ended              ------------------------
                                                             June 30, 2002               2001                2000
                                                           ----------------              ----                ----
                                                                                                    
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred
stock dividends                                                  2.79                     **                 4.31



**Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
by $3,460,000 in 2001.

         The following table summarizes the ratio of TCI's earnings to fixed
charges and preferred stock dividends at the dates set forth below:



                                                                                         Years Ended December 31,
                                                           Six Months Ended              ------------------------
                                                            June 30, 2002                2001                2000
                                                           ----------------              ----                ----
                                                                                                    
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred
stock dividends                                                   **                     1.48              1.62



**Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
by $3,279,000 in 2002.




                                       26




                          SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA OF ARL

         The following is a summary of financial data incorporated by reference
in this joint proxy statement and prospectus. You should read the following data
in conjunction with the more detailed information contained in "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of ARL"
and the ARL consolidated financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this joint proxy statement and prospectus.




                              FOR THE SIX MONTHS
                                 ENDED JUNE 30,                           FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                          ---------------------------   --------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              2002           2001           2001           2000           1999           1998          1997
                          ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------
                                  (unaudited)                          (dollars in thousands, except per share)
                                                                                               

      EARNINGS DATA
      Revenue ..........  $     78,399   $     83,832   $    166,018   $    172,750   $    193,980   $     87,086   $     57,031
      Expense ..........       111,618        125,593        243,166        272,045        324,789        165,111         90,252
                          ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------

      (Loss) from
      operations .......       (33,219)       (41,761)       (77,148)       (99,295)      (130,809)       (78,025)       (33,221)
      Equity in
      income (loss)
      of investees .....        (1,484)         5,705          8,803          5,246         11,847         37,966         10,497
      Gain on sale of
      real estate ......        21,796         46,979         83,414         96,728        129,260         17,254         20,296
                          ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------

      Net income
      (loss) ...........       (12,907)        10,923         15,069          2,679         10,298        (22,805)        (2,428)
      Preferred
      dividend
      requirement ......        (1,200)        (1,248)        (2,485)        (2,327)        (2,281)        (1,177)          (206)
                          ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------
      Income (loss)
      applicable to
      Common shares ....  $    (14,107)         9,675   $     12,584   $        352   $      8,017   $    (23,982)  $     (2,634)
                          ============   ============   ============   ============   ============   ============   ============

      PER SHARE DATA

      Net income
      (loss)
      applicable to
      Common shares ....  $      (1.24)  $        .96   $       1.07   $        .03   $        .75   $      (2.24)  $       (.22)
                          ============   ============   ============   ============   ============   ============   ============
      Dividends per
      Common share .....  $         --   $         --   $         --   $         --   $        .05   $        .20   $        .20
      Weighted
      average shares
      outstanding ......    11,375,127     10,116,196     11,714,374     10,399,890     10,759,416     10,695,388     11,710,013






                             FOR THE SIX
                             MONTHS ENDED
                               JUNE 30,                FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                             ------------  ----------------------------------------------------------
                                 2002        2001        2000        1999        1998        1997
                             ------------  ----------   ---------  ----------  ----------  ----------
                              (unaudited)
                                                                        

      BALANCE SHEET DATA
      Real estate, net .....  $  536,518  $  588,203     653,744  $  771,630  $  734,907  $  302,453
      Notes and
      interest
      receivable, net ......      33,145      30,382      13,831      38,604      52,053      25,526
      Total assets .........     713,331     758,763     787,015     919,546     918,605     433,799
      Notes and
      interest payable .....     532,557     564,298     616,331     706,196     768,272     261,986
      Margin borrowings ....      26,005      28,040      13,485      33,264      35,773      53,376
      Stockholders'
      equity ...............      74,489      85,884      73,402      46,266      38,272      63,453
      Book value per
      share ................  $     6.55  $     7.33        7.06  $     4.30  $     3.58  $     5.42




                                       27



                          SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA OF TCI

         The following is a summary of financial data incorporated by reference
in this joint proxy statement and prospectus. You should read the following data
in conjunction with the more detailed information contained in "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of TCI"
and the TCI consolidated financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this joint proxy statement and prospectus.




                                FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                          JUNE 30,                          FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                -------------------------   -------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   2002          2001          2001          2000           1999          1998          1997
                                -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
                                        (unaudited)
                                                                                               

      EARNINGS DATA
      Rents ..................  $    58,476   $    54,502   $   134,911   $   139,357   $    82,039   $    69,829   $    54,462
      Property expense .......       36,276        30,371        80,562        78,061        44,497        38,282        32,424
                                -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
      Operating income .......       22,200        24,131        54,349        61,296        37,542        31,547        22,038
      Other income ...........          484        (1,084)       (3,002)        1,814           555           739         2,311
      Other expense ..........       38,570        37,149        85,806        83,878        48,395        38,320        33,154
      Gain on sale of real
      estate .................       12,697        28,749        54,270        50,550        40,517        12,940        21,404
                                -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
      Net income (loss) ......       (3,189)       14,647        19,811        29,782        30,219         6,906        12,599
      Preferred dividend
      requirement ............          (90)          (15)         (172)          (22)          (30)           (1)           --
                                -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
      Net income (loss)
      applicable to Common
      shares .................  $    (3,279)       14,632   $    19,639   $    29,760   $    30,189   $     6,905   $    12,599
                                ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========
      Basic and Diluted
          Earnings Per
          Share Net income
          (loss) applicable
          to Common shares ...  $     (0.41)         1.68   $      2.32   $      3.45   $      7.05   $      1.78   $      3.22
                                ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========
      Dividends per Common
      share ..................           --            --            --   $       .54   $       .60   $       .60   $       .28*
      Weighted average
      Common shares
      outstanding ............    8,042,594     8,734,514     8,478,377     8,631,621     4,283,574     3,876,797     3,907,221






                                    FOR THE SIX
                                    MONTHS ENDED
                                      JUNE 30,             FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                    ------------  -----------------------------------------------------
                                        2002        2001       2000       1999       1998       1997
                                    ------------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
                                    (unaudited)
                                                                            

      BALANCE SHEET DATA
      Real estate held for
      investment, net .............  $ 675,559    $ 622,171  $ 639,040  $ 599,746  $ 347,389  $ 269,845
      Real estate held for sale,
      net
           Foreclosed .............         --          516      1,824      1,790      1,356      1,356
           Other ..................     29,143           --         --         --         --      3,630
      Notes and interest
      receivable, net .............     34,546       22,049      8,172     11,530      1,493      3,947
      Total assets ................    785,093      709,152    731,885    714,195    382,203    319,135
      Notes and interest payable ..    524,272      461,037    501,734    503,406    282,688    222,029
      Stockholders' equity ........    212,438      216,768    200,560    179,112     91,132     86,133
      Book value per share ........  $   26.41    $   26.95  $   23.22  $   20.76  $   23.35  $   22.15




                                       28


                          SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA OF IOT

         The following is a summary of financial data incorporated by reference
in this joint proxy statement and prospectus. You should read the following data
in conjunction with the more detailed information contained in "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of IOT"
and the IOT consolidated financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this joint proxy statement and prospectus.




                               FOR THE SIX MONTHS
                                  ENDED JUNE 30,                               FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                           ---------------------------     -------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              2002            2001            2001            2000            1999           1998           1997
                           -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------    -----------    -----------
                                   (unaudited)                             (dollars in thousands, except per share)
                                                                                                    

EARNINGS DATA
Rents .................    $     5,202           5,425     $    13,001     $    13,731     $    15,968    $    14,326    $    12,221
Property expense ......          2,725           2,649           6,591           6,969           6,768          6,462          5,900
                           -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------    -----------    -----------
Operating income ......          2,477           2,776           6,410           6,762           9,200          7,864          6,321

Interest income .......            378             137             194             319              29            172            266
Income (loss) from
equity partnerships ...          5,776           4,362              (9)            (61)            148            113             52
                           -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------    -----------    -----------
Gain on sale of real
estate ................          7,105               0              --          20,878           1,525            180          3,953
                           -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------    -----------    -----------
                                 4,184          (1,449)            185          21,136           1,702            465          4,271

Other expense .........              0               0          10,057          11,104           9,580          9,008          7,275
                           -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------    -----------    -----------
Net income (loss) .....          4,184          (1,449)         (3,462)    $    16,794     $     1,322    $      (679)   $     3,317
                           ===========     ===========     ===========     ===========     ===========    ===========    ===========

PER SHARE DATA
Net income (loss) .....    $      2.90           (0.95)          (2.32)    $     11.03     $       .87    $      (.44)   $      2.18
                           ===========     ===========     ===========     ===========     ===========    ===========    ===========
Dividends per share ...    $        --              --              --     $       .45     $       .60    $       .60    $       .40

Weighted average
Common shares
outstanding ...........      1,438,945       1,514,045       1,493,675       1,522,510       1,527,386      1,521,832      1,519,888






                                            FOR THE SIX
                                           MONTHS ENDED
                                              JUNE 30,                       FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                           ------------   ------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               2002          2001          2000          1999          1998          1997
                                            ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------
                                           (unaudited)
                                                                                                
BALANCE SHEET DATA
Real estate held for investment, net ...    $   79,179    $   87,315    $   86,277    $   86,542    $   83,691    $   81,914
Real estate held for sale, net .........            --            --            --            --            --            --
     Foreclosed ........................            --
     Other .............................            --
Notes and interest receivable, net .....         6,530           505         1,500            --            --         2,010
Total assets ...........................        95,693        91,833        96,519        91,185        88,695        90,309
Notes and interest payable .............        54,448        54,426        54,206        62,852        60,786        61,323
Stockholders' equity ...................         39,40        35,222        39,998        23,991        23,560        25,131
Book value per share ...................    $    27.39    $    24.48    $    26.42    $    15.69    $    15.44    $    16.53





                                       29


                        COMPARATIVE PER SHARE INFORMATION

         The following tables set forth per share data of the shares of TCI and
IOT common stock on a historical and pro forma combined and equivalent basis
under three scenarios: (i) all nonaffiliated stockholders of TCI and IOT common
stock take all cash for their shares of TCI and IOT common stock, respectively,
(ii) all nonaffiliated stockholders of TCI and IOT take all Series G and H
redeemable convertible preferred stock for their shares of TCI and IOT common
stock, respectively, and (iii) 50% of the nonaffiliated stockholders of TCI and
IOT accept cash and 50% of the nonaffiliated stockholders of TCI and IOT accept
Series G and H redeemable convertible preferred stock for their shares of TCI
and IOT common stock. In each of these scenarios, the affiliated stockholders of
TCI and IOT receive Series G and Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock
for their shares, respectively. Pro forma equivalent information for TCI and IOT
was calculated by multiplying the pro forma per share amounts for ARL by the
exchange ratio of 2.50 for TCI and 2.25 for IOT common stock. These tables
should be read in conjunction with the historical financial statements and notes
thereto and the unaudited pro forma combined financial information included
elsewhere in this joint proxy statement and prospectus.

                        COMPARATIVE PER SHARE INFORMATION
             (ALL CASH TO NONAFFILIATED STOCKHOLDERS OF TCI AND IOT)



                                             ARL COMMON STOCK                TCI COMMON STOCK               IOT COMMON STOCK
                                        ---------------------------    ---------------------------    ---------------------------
                                                         PROFORMA                       PROFORMA                       PROFORMA
                                                         COMBINED                       COMBINED                       COMBINED
                                                            AND                            AND                            AND
                                        HISTORICAL      EQUIVALENT     HISTORICAL      EQUIVALENT     HISTORICAL      EQUIVALENT
                                        -----------     -----------    -----------     -----------    -----------     -----------
                                                                                                    
Income (loss) per common share,
diluted
Six months ended June 30, 2002 .....    $     (1.24)    $      3.82    $     (0.41)    $      3.68    $      2.90     $      1.39
Year ended December 31, 2001 .......    $      0.04     $      5.19    $      3.45     $      5.38    $     (2.32)    $      2.76

Cash dividend per common share
Six months ended June 30, 2002 .....             --              --             --              --             --              --
Year ended December 31, 2001 .......             --              --             --              --             --              --

Book value per common share
Six months ended June 30, 2002 .....    $      6.55     $     13.17    $     26.41     $     12.86    $     27.38     $      9.54
Year ended December 31, 2001 .......    $      6.45     $      8.23    $     26.95     $      8.21    $     24.48     $      7.71





                                       30


                        COMPARATIVE PER SHARE INFORMATION
      (ALL SERIES G AND SERIES H REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK TO
                   NONAFFILIATED STOCKHOLDERS OF TCI AND IOT)




                                             ARL COMMON STOCK                TCI COMMON STOCK               IOT COMMON STOCK
                                        ---------------------------    ---------------------------    ---------------------------
                                                         PROFORMA                       PROFORMA                       PROFORMA
                                                         COMBINED                       COMBINED                       COMBINED
                                                            AND                            AND                            AND
                                        HISTORICAL      EQUIVALENT     HISTORICAL      EQUIVALENT     HISTORICAL      EQUIVALENT
                                        -----------     -----------    -----------     -----------    -----------     -----------
                                                                                                    
Income (loss) per common
share, diluted
Six months ended June 30, 2002 .....    $     (1.24)    $      3.56    $     (0.41)    $      3.46    $      2.90     $      1.34
Year ended December 31, 2001 .......    $      0.04     $      3.22    $      3.45     $      3.57    $     (2.32)    $      2.47

Cash dividend per common share
Six months ended June 30, 2002 .....    $        --     $        --    $        --     $        --    $        --     $        --
Year ended December 31, 2001 .......    $        --     $        --    $        --     $        --    $        --     $        --

Book value per common share
Six months ended June 30, 2002 .....    $      6.55     $     11.29    $     26.41     $     11.18    $     27.38     $      9.54
Year ended December 31, 2001 .......    $      6.45     $      8.43    $     26.95     $      8.34    $     24.48     $      7.89




                        COMPARATIVE PER SHARE INFORMATION
 (50% CASH AND 50% SERIES G AND H REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK TO THE
                   NONAFFILIATED STOCKHOLDERS OF TCI AND IOT)



                                             ARL COMMON STOCK                TCI COMMON STOCK               IOT COMMON STOCK
                                        ---------------------------    ---------------------------    ---------------------------
                                                         PROFORMA                       PROFORMA                       PROFORMA
                                                         COMBINED                       COMBINED                       COMBINED
                                                            AND                            AND                            AND
                                        HISTORICAL      EQUIVALENT     HISTORICAL      EQUIVALENT     HISTORICAL      EQUIVALENT
                                        -----------     -----------    -----------     -----------    -----------     -----------
                                                                                                    
Income (loss) per common
share, diluted
Six months ended June 30, 2002 .....    $     (1.24)    $      3.73    $     (0.41)    $      3.69    $      2.90     $      1.34
Year ended December 31, 2001 .......    $      0.04     $      3.99    $      3.45     $      4.29    $     (2.32)    $      2.61

Cash dividend per common share
Six months ended June 30, 2002 .....    $        --     $        --    $        --     $        --    $        --     $        --
Year ended December 31, 2001 .......    $        --     $        --    $        --     $        --    $        --     $        --

Book value per common share
Six months ended June 30, 2002 .....    $      6.55     $     12.01    $     26.41     $     11.84    $     27.38     $      9.54
Year ended December 31, 2001 .......    $      6.45     $      8.48    $     26.95     $      8.39    $     24.48     $      7.81





                                       31

                     MARKET PRICES AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION

         As of October 22, 2001, the last full trading day prior to the public
announcement of the mergers, the table below sets forth the closing prices per
share of the common stock of ARL, TCI and IOT:



                                                                             Closing Price
                                                                             -------------
                                                                          
                  ARL Common Stock..........................................     $11.62
                  TCI Common Stock..........................................     $12.00
                  IOT Common Stock..........................................     $14.76


         The shares of ARL common stock and the shares of TCI common stock are
traded on the NYSE under the symbols "ARL" and "TCI," respectively. The shares
of IOT common stock are traded on the American Stock Exchange ("AMEX") under the
symbol "IOT." As of the record date, there were 5,415 record holders of ARL
common stock, 7,258 record holders of TCI common stock and 1,351 record holders
of IOT common stock. As of the record date, there were no restrictions on TCI's
or IOT's ability to pay dividends. The following table sets forth the quarterly
high and low reported sales prices of ARL, TCI and IOT common stock, as well as
the quarterly distributions, declared per share, as applicable, for the periods
indicated below.



                                     ARL                                  TCI                                  IOT
                               COMMON STOCK(1)                        COMMON STOCK                         COMMON STOCK
                   -------------------------------------  ------------------------------------  ------------------------------------
                     HIGH          LOW      DIVIDENDS(2)     HIGH        LOW      DIVIDENDS(3)    HIGH         LOW      DIVIDENDS(3)
                   ---------    ---------   ------------  ---------   ---------   ------------  ---------    ---------  -----------
                                                                                             
1999:

First Quarter       $     --      $    --         $ --     $ 16 3/8   $  11 5/8    $     .15    $       8      $ 6 3/8   $     .15
Second Quarter            --           --           --       12 1/2      11 3/8          .15        7 3/4        5 5/8         .15
Third Quarter             --           --           --      13 7/16      10 7/8          .15        7 1/8        5 1/8         .15
Fourth Quarter            --           --           --       13 1/8      11 1/4          .15        5 7/8        4 3/4         .15

2000:

First Quarter             --           --           --           13    10 13/16          .18        7 1/2        5 1/4         .15
Second Quarter            --           --           --       13 1/2       2 7/8          .18        7 1/2            2         .15
Third Quarter             17            7           --           16      11 1/2          .18       10 1/4        6 3/4         .15
Fourth Quarter        17 1/4      13 7/16           --           16       8 7/8           --        9 1/4            8          --

2001:

First Quarter         14 1/2       12 1/2           --      12 9/16      8 3/16           --        9 1/8        7 5/8          --
Second Quarter      12 10/16        9 3/4           --           16     8 15/16           --       8 3/16      6 15/16          --
Third Quarter             12       10 1/8           --       14 3/4    11 11/16           --       13 1/2       9 1/16          --
Fourth Quarter            13        9 3/4           --       16 3/8      11 5/8           --       23 1/2       12 3/4          --

2002:

First Quarter           9.93         6.48           --        16.82       15.70           --        18.30        17.30          --
Second Quarter         11.27          6.7           --        20.55       16.27           --         18.4        17.95          --


         Although ARL will apply to have the Series G and Series H redeemable
convertible preferred stock, and the shares of ARL common stock issuable upon
conversion of the Series G and Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock,
listed on the NYSE, there is no assurance the NYSE will list the shares. The
listing of the preferred and common shares for trading on the


----------

(1) Trading of ARL common stock on the NYSE commenced on August 3, 2000.


(2) It is the policy of ARL to determine annually whether to pay dividends. In
accordance with that policy, ARL did not pay any dividends in 2000 or 2001.

(3) During the fourth quarter of 2000, IOT and TCI discontinued the payment of
dividends.



                                       32


NYSE is not a condition to the respective obligations of TCI and IOT to
consummate the mergers.





                                       33


                           FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

         The SEC encourages companies to disclose forward-looking information so
that investors can better understand a company's future prospects and make
informed investment decisions. These statements may be made directly in this
joint proxy statement and prospectus referring to ARL, TCI or IOT, and they may
also be made a part of this joint proxy statement and prospectus by reference to
other documents filed by us with the SEC, which is known as "incorporation by
reference."

         Words such as "anticipate," "estimate," "expect," "project," "intend,"
"plan," "believe," "target," "objective," "strategy," "goal" and words and terms
of similar substance used in connection with any discussion of future operating
or financial performance, or the acquisition by ARL of TCI and/or IOT, identify
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on management's
current views about future events and are subject to a number of factors and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
described in the forward-looking statements. The following risks could cause or
contribute to actual results differing materially from those described in the
forward-looking statements:

         o        inability to obtain, or to meet conditions imposed for,
                  regulatory approval of pending acquisitions and divestitures

         o        availability, terms and development of capital

         o        business abilities and judgment of personnel

         o        changes in, or the failure to comply with, governmental
                  regulations, particularly those affecting the environment and
                  water quality

         o        competition

         o        success of operating initiatives, advertising and promotional
                  efforts

         o        existence of adverse publicity or litigation

         o        changes in business strategy or plans

         o        quality of management

         o        general economic, business and financial market conditions

         o        the ability to satisfy the conditions to closing set forth in
                  the merger agreements

         o        other factors described in our filings with the SEC

         We caution you not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date of this joint proxy statement and
prospectus or the date of the documents incorporated by reference in this joint
proxy statement and prospectus. Except as required by law, we are under no
obligation, and expressly disclaim any obligation, to update or alter any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.

         For additional information about factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking
statements, please see the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and the annual reports
on Form 10-K as well as current reports on Form 8-K that ARL, TCI and IOT have
filed with the SEC as described under "Where You Can Find More Information."

         All forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting
on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary
statements contained or referred to in this section.



                                       34


                                  RISK FACTORS

         You should carefully consider the risks described below and other
information in this joint proxy statement and prospectus before you decide how
to vote on the mergers of TCI and IOT with ARL. If the mergers are approved,
stockholders of TCI and IOT should also consider these risk factors again before
they decide to exercise their right to affirmatively elect to receive preferred
stock of ARL instead of cash for their shares of the common stock of TCI or IOT.

         The plan to merge ARL, TCI and IOT involves risk. Some of those risks
relate to the proposed transactions themselves. Other risks relate to the
preferred stock of ARL being offered or to the businesses of ARL, TCI and IOT
themselves. The risk factors described below are the material risk factors faced
by ARL, TCI and IOT and their stockholders.

                          RISKS RELATED TO THE MERGERS

         SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNTS OF CASH ARE REQUIRED FOR THE MERGERS. A substantial
amount of cash is necessary to fund the cash payments to the stockholders of TCI
and IOT required in the mergers and to pay expenses associated with the mergers.
Also, the combined business of ARL, TCI and IOT have substantial indebtedness
due in the next twelve months that must be repaid or refinanced.

         o        Nonaffiliated TCI and IOT stockholders will be entitled to
                  receive up to an aggregate of $60,996,907 in cash for their
                  shares of the common stock of TCI and IOT if none
                  affirmatively elect to receive the preferred stock of ARL

         o        ARL, TCI and IOT expect to incur approximately $27,149,311 in
                  costs in connection with the mergers, including prepayment of
                  indebtedness and fees and commissions associated with property
                  sales necessary to raise cash to fund payments to the
                  stockholders of TCI and IOT


         o        as of June 30, 2002, ARL, TCI and IOT have approximately
                  $385,159,557 in loans coming due in the next twelve months
                  that must be repaid or refinanced

Approximately $95,148,907 must be raised in order to fund all of the obligations
related to the mergers, and an additional $385,659,557 in the next twelve months
to repay or refinance maturing indebtedness. ARL does not currently have this
much cash presently available. Although ARL, TCI and IOT expect to be able to
raise the cash necessary to fund the transactions required in connection with
the mergers and their continuing combined business by selling real estate or
obtaining new loans, there can be no assurance that sales will be made or that
loans will be obtained, or that they will be made or obtained on terms favorable
to the combined business of ARL, TCI and IOT. ARL may also consider selling
securities such as shares of preferred stock in privately negotiated
transactions to raise some or all of the cash it will require in connection with
the mergers and its operations. Any preferred stock issued in the future might
have rights to dividends and other rights ranking prior to those of the series G
and Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock being offered in connection
with the mergers. The ARL board of directors has determined that the TCI and IOT
mergers would not be consummated unless, in each case, sufficient cash was
available to ARL, either from its own resources or from TCI or IOT immediately
after the mergers, to pay the cash merger consideration due as a result of the
mergers. If ARL, TCI and IOT are not able to raise the cash




                                       35



anticipated through the sale of real estate, the mergers may be delayed or
abandoned and the ongoing combined business of ARL, TCI and IOT may be adversely
affected.

         SUBSTANTIAL PROPERTY SALES OR LOANS ARE NECESSARY. ARL, TCI and IOT
will raise the cash necessary to fund all of the obligations related to the
mergers from the sale of real estate and loans. Because ARL, TCI and IOT need to
sell assets before the mergers, they may not receive the best possible prices
for their properties and may have to incur higher expenses than would otherwise
be incurred. Real estate assets are not readily saleable. The consummation of
the sales anticipated by ARL, TCI and IOT will be subject to a number of
contingencies outside of their control, including:

         o        the buyers' ability to obtain any necessary financing

         o        the satisfactory completion of any due diligence review made
                  by the buyers and the buyers' lenders

         o        satisfactory completion of any environmental review and other
                  review of the subject properties' legal compliance

         Similarly, the consummation of any potential loans to ARL, TCI or IOT
will be subject to contingencies outside of their control.


         ARL MAY OBTAIN LOANS OR ISSUE SECURITIES. ARL may seek to raise some or
all of the cash necessary to fund its obligations related to the mergers by
obtaining new loans or issuing securities, such as shares of preferred stock, in
privately negotiated transactions. There can be no assurance that ARL will be
able to find a lender to make new loans or a buyer for its securities, or if it
does, on what terms such a loan or sale would be consummated. It is possible
that any securities issued to raise money to fund ARL's obligations related to
the mergers would have rights to dividends and other rights superior to the
Series G and Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock being offered in
connection with the mergers.


         LENDER CONSENT MAY BE NECESSARY. ARL, TCI and IOT have each borrowed
substantial amounts of money to buy and develop real estate. Some of ARL, TCI or
IOT's loan agreements may contain provisions limiting their ability to do the
mergers or requiring advance consent for the mergers by lenders. In some cases,
ARL, TCI and IOT may disagree with their lenders about the interpretation of
these provisions. To the extent that ARL, TCI and IOT are unable to get any
necessary lender consents, or to the extent that they have disagreements with
their lenders regarding the mergers, the businesses of ARL, TCI and IOT may be
adversely affected and the mergers may be delayed or abandoned

         THE MERGERS ARE SEPARATE TRANSACTIONS. TCI and IOT are separate
companies. TCI and IOT will each enter into a separate merger agreement with ARL
and their stockholders will receive different compensation as a result of the
merger. It is possible that the stockholders of TCI or IOT will vote to approve
a merger with ARL and that the stockholders of the other will not. If one of
these companies does not approve the merger, ARL may be adversely affected and
may not have sufficient cash to consummate the other merger. If the stockholders
of either TCI or IOT do not approve the merger, but the stockholders of the
other do, the merger of ARL and the other company may be delayed or abandoned.



                                       36



         A TENDER OFFER MAY BE MADE IN ORDER TO AVOID A PENALTY. In connection
with the Settlement Agreement, ARL agreed to propose the mergers to the
stockholders of TCI and IOT. It was also agreed that if the stockholders of TCI
or IOT did not approve the mergers, ARL and certain of its affiliates can make a
tender offer for the shares of the common stock of the company or companies that
did not approve the merger. Making a tender offer for the shares of TCI or IOT
would be expensive for ARL, and there can be no assurance that it would be able
to arrange the necessary financing to make and consummate such a transaction. If
ARL does not make the tender offer allowed by the Settlement Agreement it could
be liable for damages of approximately $14,265,400 (or $5.00 for each share of
TCI stock it does not acquire) and/or $2,882,400 (or $5.00 for each share of IOT
stock it does not acquire.)


                    RISKS RELATED TO THE ARL PREFERRED STOCK

         If the mergers are consummated, stockholders of TCI and IOT will
receive cash for their shares of TCI and IOT common stock unless they elect to
receive shares of ARL preferred stock instead. The opportunity to receive shares
of ARL preferred stock instead of cash will be given to stockholders of TCI and
IOT after the mergers are completed, if they are completed. Electing to receive
shares of ARL preferred stock is a decision to invest in the stock of ARL and is
subject to the risks of investing in the combined business of ARL, TCI and IOT.
Investing in the preferred stock of ARL is also subject to risks related to the
terms and nature of the Series G and Series H redeemable convertible preferred
stock. TCI and IOT stockholders should carefully review the risks described
below before electing to take ARL preferred stock instead of cash.

         VALUE OF THE ARL PREFERRED STOCK IS UNCERTAIN. There can be no
assurance regarding the value of the ARL preferred stock. Along with the risks
associated with owning securities generally, stockholders of TCI and IOT should
consider the following specific risks associated with the ARL preferred stock:

         o        although ARL will apply to list the preferred stock to be
                  offered to TCI and IOT stockholders on the NYSE, the exchange
                  may not accept them for listing. Even if the shares of ARL
                  preferred stock are listed on an exchange, an active trading
                  market for them may not develop

         o        there can be no assurance that an active trading market for
                  the ARL preferred stock will develop, even if those shares are
                  listed on the NYSE. As a result, holders of the ARL preferred
                  stock may not be able to sell those shares for cash when they
                  wish to or may be limited in the number of shares that they
                  are able to sell at any one time

         o        stockholders of TCI and IOT who affirmatively elect to receive
                  ARL preferred stock instead of cash for their shares of TCI or
                  IOT will be investing in the combined business of ARL. If
                  there is a trading market for the ARL preferred stock after
                  the mergers, the value of those shares will rise and fall
                  based upon many factors, including the results of ARL's
                  business operations and its financial condition. There can be
                  no assurance that the ARL preferred stock will rise in value

         o        the preferred stock to be offered to stockholders of TCI and
                  IOT will have a annual dividend which will be payable
                  quarterly. Although the preferred stock has a dividend, ARL is
                  only obligated to pay the dividend when it is declared and
                  when it has sufficient funds to do so. Unpaid dividends will
                  accumulate until paid, but will not bear interest. Because ARL
                  will need to pay substantial amounts to consummate



                                       37


                  the mergers and to repay or refinance indebtedness in the next
                  twelve months, there can be no assurance that ARL will have
                  sufficient cash to pay the dividend contemplated on the shares
                  of ARL preferred stock to be offered to stockholders of TCI
                  and IOT

         o        even if it is able to fund its near term cash needs, ARL's
                  ability to declare and pay dividends on its preferred stock
                  will depend upon the results of its business operations, the
                  terms of loan agreements it may have and the amount of cash it
                  has available from time to time. Dividends on ARL's preferred
                  stock will only be payable when its board of directors
                  determines it has sufficient cash available and that it is
                  otherwise appropriate to do so. Unpaid dividends on the ARL
                  preferred stock will not bear interest

         o        ARL has other shares of preferred stock outstanding that are
                  entitled to dividends. ARL can only pay dividends on its
                  preferred stock if it pays dividends on all of the shares of
                  preferred stock entitled to dividends at the same time. As of
                  July 16, 2002, ARL has 3,374,910 shares of its Series A and E
                  preferred stock outstanding. Those shares require the payment
                  of a total of approximately $613,727 in dividends quarterly.
                  If all of the stockholders of TCI and IOT elect to receive
                  preferred stock instead of cash, ARL will add approximately
                  4,731,576 shares of preferred stock outstanding with a
                  dividend requirement of approximately $2,391,000 quarterly

         o        stockholders of TCI and IOT who affirmatively elect to receive
                  shares of ARL preferred stock instead of cash will each
                  receive one share of preferred stock for each share of TCI or
                  IOT common stock that they hold. No adjustment in this
                  exchange ratio will be made to reflect changes in the market
                  prices of the shares of ARL, TCI or IOT. Shares of the ARL
                  preferred stock to be issued to TCI and IOT stockholders who
                  elect to receive them instead of cash will be convertible into
                  shares of ARL common stock in the future. The number of shares
                  of ARL common stock you will receive if you convert a share of
                  ARL preferred stock has already been set and will not be
                  adjusted if the market value of ARL's common stock declines in
                  the future

         THE ARL PREFERRED STOCK HAS LIMITED VOTING RIGHTS. The ARL shares of
Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock and Series H redeemable
convertible preferred stock have very limited voting rights. The holders of
Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock and Series H redeemable
convertible preferred stock are not voting for the election of directors or on
any matter except: (i) as otherwise provided by law, (ii) with respect to an
amendment to ARL's articles of incorporation or bylaws that would materially
alter or change the existing terms of such series of preferred stock, and (iii)
at any time or times for the election of two directors when all or any portion
of the dividends on such series of preferred stock for any six quarterly
dividends, whether or not consecutive, shall be in arrears and unpaid. In the
latter event, the number of directors constituting the board of directors of ARL
shall be increased by two and the holders of such Series G redeemable
convertible preferred stock or Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock,
as applicable, voting separately as a class, shall be entitled to elect two
directors to fill the newly created directorships with each holder being
entitled to one vote in the election for each share of such preferred stock held
by such stockholder.

         AFFILIATES OF ARL MAY HOLD A MAJORITY OF THE ARL PREFERRED STOCK.
Affiliates of ARL own a substantial number of shares of the common stock of TCI
and IOT. If the mergers occur,



                                       38


shares of TCI and IOT held by ARL's affiliates will be converted into preferred
stock of ARL. Thus, a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of the ARL
preferred stock to be issued as a result of the mergers may by held by
affiliates of ARL. Affiliates of ARL may be able to control any vote of holders
of the Series G and H redeemable convertible preferred stock, including any vote
to amend the terms of the Series G and H redeemable convertible preferred stock
and the rights of the holders of the Series G and H redeemable convertible
preferred stock.

                     RISKS RELATED TO THE COMBINED BUSINESS

         The combined businesses of ARL, TCI and IOT will be subject to risks.
If the mergers are consummated, stockholders of TCI and IOT will receive cash
for their shares of TCI and IOT common stock unless they affirmatively elect to
receive shares of ARL preferred stock instead. The opportunity to receive shares
of ARL preferred stock instead of cash will be given to stockholders of TCI and
IOT after the mergers are completed, if they are completed. Electing to receive
shares of ARL preferred stock is a decision to invest in the stock of ARL and is
subject to the risks of investing in the combined businesses of ARL, TCI and
IOT. TCI and IOT stockholders should carefully review the risks described below
before affirmatively electing to take ARL preferred stock instead of cash.

         ARL WILL NEED TO SELL PROPERTY AND BORROW MONEY TO MEET ITS LIQUIDITY
NEEDS. The combined business of ARL, TCI and IOT will need to sell properties or
borrow additional amounts to repay maturing debt and to fund their ongoing
business operations. There can be no assurance that the combined business will
be able to make the required property sales for favorable prices or at all, or
that it will be able to borrow additional funds on favorable terms or at all. In
connection with considering an investment in the ARL preferred stock,
stockholders of TCI and IOT should consider the following risks related to the
indebtedness and liquidity needs of the combined business of ARL, TCI and IOT.
The pro forma dollar amounts set forth below are based upon the assumption that
all nonaffiliated stockholders receive cash for their shares of TCI or IOT
common stock if the mergers are consummated and that ARL will borrow
approximately $61.0 million in addition to any amounts that may be borrowed to
fund the cash required for the mergers.


         o        in addition to the substantial amounts of cash that will be
                  needed to fund the cash payments to the nonaffiliated
                  stockholders, the combined business of ARL, TCI and IOT will
                  need to raise approximately $385,659,557 to repay or refinance
                  debts maturing in the next twelve months. The combined
                  business of ARL, TCI and IOT will have approximately
                  $385,659,557 of indebtedness coming due in the next twelve
                  months out of a total debt of $992,709,000.

         o        ARL, TCI and IOT have significant debt service obligations
                  when compared to their available cash flow. As of June 30,
                  2001, after giving effect to the mergers and related
                  transactions on a pro forma basis, the combination of ARL, TCI
                  and IOT would have had total debt of approximately
                  $992,709,000 and total stockholders equity of approximately
                  $182,425,000, if no stockholders of TCI and IOT elect to
                  receive ARL preferred stock instead of cash. For the twelve
                  months ended December 31, 2001, after giving effect to the
                  mergers and assuming that no TCI or IOT stockholder elects to
                  receive ARL preferred stock instead of cash, the interest
                  expense



                                       39



                  for the combined business of ARL, TCI and IOT would have been
                  $102,685,000 as compared to net available cash flow of
                  approximately $111,419,413.

         o        the ongoing business operations of the combined business of
                  ARL, TCI and IOT will require substantial amounts of cash from
                  property sales, new borrowings or sales of securities. A large
                  portion of the assets of ARL, TCI and IOT consist of
                  undeveloped real estate that produces little or no income. In
                  addition, ARL, TCI and IOT have made substantial commitments
                  in connection with the development of property. For the period
                  ended December 31, 2001, the combined business operations of
                  ARL, TCI and IOT, on a pro forma basis, would have had
                  revenues of approximately $442,113,000 and expenses, exclusive
                  of debt service and non-cash expenses such as depreciation and
                  amortization of approximately $337,939,000. Based upon the
                  anticipated sales of properties set forth under "Special
                  Factors -- Financing of the Business Combination" management
                  anticipates that the combined business of ARL, TCI and IOT
                  will generate an additional $8,923,557 during the next twelve
                  months after paying the costs and expenses related to the
                  mergers assuming all nonaffiliated stockholders receive cash
                  for the shares of TCI and IOT common stock, which was derived
                  by subtracting the total amount of funds related to the
                  mergers (assuming all nonaffiliated stockholders receive cash)
                  from the total amount of funds that are expected to be
                  generated from the sale of properties identified under
                  "Special Factors - Financing the Business Combination." ARL
                  expects to sell enough properties to meet the cash
                  requirements needed to pay the nonaffiliated stockholders that
                  do not elect to receive preferred stock and to meet the
                  working capital requirements of the combined company.


         ARL WILL HAVE SUBSTANTIAL DEBT. ARL, TCI and IOT each have substantial
indebtedness and the combined business of ARL, TCI and IOT will be highly
leveraged. This high level of indebtedness will subject the combined business to
risk. Among those risks are the following:

         o        the combined businesses of ARL, TCI and IOT may be limited in
                  their ability to grow by a lack of cash or the availability of
                  loans for new acquisitions

         o        the combined business of ARL, TCI and IOT may be forced to
                  sell properties on disadvantageous terms if it is unable to
                  refinance maturing debt obligations

         o        the interest expense of the combined business of ARL, TCI and
                  IOT could increase if general interest rates increase, because
                  30.7% of their loans are floating rate loans and another 58.7%
                  come due and must be refinanced within the next three years

         o        the substantial leverage of the combined business of ARL, TCI
                  and IOT will increase their vulnerability to economic
                  downturns and could place them at a competitive disadvantage
                  to competitors having lower levels of debt

         o        high levels of debt could limit the ability of the combined
                  businesses of ARL, TCI and IOT to react to changing conditions
                  in the real estate industry or the economy generally

         o        failure by the combined business to comply with financial and
                  other restrictive covenants in loan agreements, or failure to
                  make debt service payments could result in events of default
                  under those and other loan agreements that, if not cured or
                  waived, could harm the business or could result in the
                  bankruptcy of one or more subsidiaries of ARL, TCI or IOT or
                  of the combined business as a whole



                                       40


CONTROL BY BCM AND RELATED CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. ARL, TCI and IOT are each
managed and controlled by BCM. The combined business of ARL, TCI and IOT will
continue to be managed by BCM as well. ARL, TCI and IOT have no employees.
Instead, pursuant to a written advisory agreement, BCM provides services for
specific compensation. This arrangement will continue after the mergers and ARL
does not expect to employ any full-time personnel. ARL expects to continue to
rely upon BCM and the facilities, personnel and resources of BCM to conduct
ARL's operations, including the sale of ARL property and the borrowing required
to meet ARL's liquidity needs. Also, BCM and its affiliates own or control more
than a majority of the voting securities of each of ARL, TCI and IOT, and will
own more than a majority of the voting securities of ARL after the merger. It is
estimated that pursuant to its advisory agreements with ARL, TCI and IOT, BCM
will receive $/\3,837,000 in incentive fees and finance fees earned from gains
resulting from property sales and when finance or refinance transactions are
consummated with respect to the potential sale of properties to finance the
expenses of the business combination. The interest of BCM may be different from
those of other stockholders of ARL, TCI and IOT, and may be different from those
of other holders of the ARL preferred stock. BCM's position may have a number of
effects on the combined business of ARL, TCI and IOT which may affect the value
of the ARL common and preferred stock, including:

         o   BCM and its affiliates can control the election of all members of
             the board of directors of ARL at the present time, and will
             continue to have that control after the mergers

         o   BCM and its affiliates are able, and will be able after the
             mergers, to prevent any transaction that would result in a change
             of control of ARL

         o   dealings between ARL and BCM after the mergers may not be at arms
             length

         o   BCM as the contractual advisor and BCM's officers and directors are
             entitled to indemnification from ARL from any action or claims with
             respect to liability for debts or obligations of ARL and TCI and
             IOT

         The executive officers of each of ARL, TCI and IOT may have conflicts
of interest because the executive officers of BCM and ARL are also the executive
officers of TCI and IOT. These potential conflicts may arise because:

         o   BCM's personnel and other resources must be allocated among ARL,
             TCI and IOT

         o   BCM will be subject to conflicts between its obligations as an
             advisor to each of TCI and IOT, on the one hand, and its interests
             as an affiliate and advisor of ARL on the other

         o   decisions may have to be made with respect to the extension,
             modification, or termination of the advisory agreements with each
             of ARL, TCI and IOT

         Allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, conflicts of interest and
mismanagement were made against affiliates of BCM and Mr. Phillips in the Olive
Litigation and its predecessor lawsuits. In addition, in August 2002, Mr.
Phillips and five corporations, including BCM, affiliated with Mr. Phillips or
the trust for his children that indirectly owns BCM, agreed in negotiations with
the staff of the SEC to enter into an Order Instituting Proceedings Pursuant to
Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, in an
administrative proceeding brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission and
pay a substantial civil penalty in connection therewith. Although the Order has
been agreed to by Mr. Phillips, the five




                                       41



corporations associated with Mr. Phillips or the trust and the staff of the SEC,
it has not been formally approved by the SEC. The Order in its current form
finds, among other things, that Mr. Phillips and each of the five corporations,
including BCM, had violated Section 13(d) and 10(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and Rules 10b-5, 13d-1 and 13d-2 promulgated
thereunder, by failing to file reports required under Section 13(d) with respect
to the securities of Greenbriar Corporation. The Order further determines that
Mr. Phillips had substantial contact with the management of BCM and had a
significant influence on its advisory services and investment decisions as well
as the investment decisions of the five other entities that are the subject of
the Order. The Order also determines that Mr. Phillips exercised the same
influence over the management and investment decisions of American Realty Trust,
Inc., currently a subsidiary of ARL. The Order requires Mr. Phillips and the
five corporations, including BCM, to cease and desist from committing or causing
any violation of Sections 10(b) and 13(d) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5,
13d-1 and 13d-2 promulgated thereunder.

         DEPENDENCE ON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS. ARL, TCI and IOT each invest
primarily in real estate. Real estate investments are subject to varying degrees
of risk and are relatively illiquid. The performance of real estate assets and
ARL's resulting ability to pay dividends to its stockholders may be adversely
affected by a number of factors, including:

         o   the general economic climate and local real estate conditions (such
             as oversupply of or reduced demand for space and changes in market
             rental rates)

         o   the perceptions of prospective tenants of the safety, convenience
             and attractiveness of the properties

         o   the ability of the owner of the properties to provide adequate
             management, maintenance and insurance

         o   the ability to collect on a timely basis all rent from tenants and
             interest from borrowers

         o   the expense of periodically renovating, repairing and reletting
             spaces

         o   increasing operating costs (including real estate taxes and
             utilities) which may not be passed through to tenants. Certain
             significant expenditures associated with investments in real estate
             (such as mortgage payments, real estate taxes, insurance and
             maintenance costs) are generally not reduced when circumstances
             cause a reduction in rental revenues from the investment

         o   governmental regulations, local rent control or stabilization
             ordinances

         ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS. Under various federal, state and local
environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, an owner of real estate may be
liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic
substances on the property. These laws often impose environmental liability
without regard to whether the owner knew of, or was responsible for, the
presence of hazardous or toxic substances. The presence of hazardous substances,
or the failure to remediate them properly, may adversely affect the owner's
ability to sell or rent the property or to borrow money using the property as
collateral. Persons who arrange for the disposal or




                                       42


containing materials into the air and third parties may seek recovery from
owners or operators of real properties for personal injury associated with
asbestos-containing materials. In connection with the ownership (directly or
indirectly), operation, management and development of real properties, the
combined business of ARL, TCI and IOT may be considered an owner or operator of
these properties or as having arranged for the disposal or treatment of
hazardous or toxic substances and, therefore, potentially liable for removal or
remediation costs, as well as for other related costs, including governmental
fines and injuries to persons and property.

         COMPETITION. Developing and managing real estate assets is a highly
competitive business. The combined business of ARL, TCI and IOT will compete
with many public and private real estate investment entities, including
financial institutions (such as mortgage banks, pension funds and real estate
investment trusts), other institutional investors and individuals for property
to purchase. In addition, developed real estate owned by the combined business
of ARL, TCI and IOT will compete for tenants and customers with other developed
real estate owned by third parties. Many of the competitors in the business of
purchasing, developing and managing real estate are considerably larger, have
greater financial resources and may have management personnel with more
experience than the officers of the combined business of ARL, TCI and IOT will
have.

         GEOGRAPHIC CONCENTRATION. A substantial portion of assets of the
combined business of ARL, TCI and IOT will consist of real estate and mortgage
notes receivable secured by income producing real estate such as apartment
complexes, office buildings, shopping centers and partnership interests located
in the Midwest, Northeast and Southwest regions of the United States. Specific
geographic regions of the United States from time to time will experience weaker
regional economic conditions and housing markets, and, consequently, will
experience higher rates of loss and delinquency on mortgage loans. Any
concentration of assets in a region may present risks in addition to those
generally present for similar real estate assets or mortgage-backed or
asset-backed securities without this concentration.

         REAL ESTATE OPERATING RISKS. The real estate assets of the combined
business of ARL, TCI and IOT will be subject to industry-specific operating
risks, any or all of which may adversely affect the results of the operations of
the combined business. All properties are subject to increases in operating
expenses, including: cleaning, electricity, heating, ventilation and
air-conditioning, elevator repair and maintenance, insurance and administrative
costs, and other general costs associated with security, landscaping, repairs,
regulatory compliance and maintenance. While commercial tenants are often
obligated to pay a portion of these escalating costs, there can be no assurance
that they will agree to pay these costs in the absence of a contractual duty or
that their payments will fully cover these costs. If operating expenses
increase, the local rental market, governmental regulations or the lease may
limit the extent to which rents may be increased to meet expenses without
decreasing occupancy rates. To the extent rents cannot be increased or costs
controlled, the cash flow and financial condition of the combined business of
ARL, TCI and IOT will be adversely affected. Industry specific risks related to
the asset of the combined business of ARL, TCI and IOT include the following:

         o        APARTMENT PROPERTIES. Market values of apartments can be
                  affected significantly by the supply and demand in the
                  geographic market for the properties and, therefore, may be
                  subject to adverse economic conditions. Market values of
                  apartments may



                                       43


                  vary as a result of economic events or governmental
                  regulations outside the control of the borrower or lender.
                  Governmental regulations such as rent control laws may impact
                  the future cash flow of the apartments.

         o        UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY. Undeveloped real estate (raw land)
                  generates little or no income. To the extent that undeveloped
                  real estate is purchased with the proceeds of debt, as a
                  result, the costs of holding it will greatly exceed any income
                  it may generate. In addition, the market value of undeveloped
                  real estate tends to fluctuate greatly, depending upon many
                  factors, including local and national economic conditions,
                  interest rates, local development conditions, local land use
                  regulations, the nature and quality of surrounding developed
                  real estate.

         o        HOTEL PROPERTIES. Like any income producing property, the
                  income generated by a hotel property is subject to local,
                  regional and national economic conditions and competition.
                  However, because the income is primarily generated by
                  short-term occupancies, the level of income responds more
                  quickly to market conditions. Sensitivity to competition may
                  require more frequent improvements and renovations than other
                  properties. To the extent a hotel is affiliated with a
                  regional, national or international chain, changes in the
                  public perception of the affiliated chain may have an impact
                  on the income generated by the hotel. In addition, since the
                  hotel industry is generally seasonal, income generated by a
                  hotel property will fluctuate in accordance with the
                  particular demand characteristics of the market in which it is
                  located.

         o        OFFICE AND RETAIL PROPERTIES. The market value of office
                  buildings and shopping centers is affected by the risk that a
                  lease may not be renewed, that the space may not be released
                  and that the terms of renewal or release (including the cost
                  of required renovations or concessions to tenants) may be less
                  favorable than current lease terms.

         o        INVESTMENTS IN NON-RECOURSE MORTGAGE LOANS. Mortgage loans may
                  or may not be recourse obligations of the borrower and
                  generally will not be insured or guaranteed by governmental
                  agencies or otherwise. In the event of a default under this
                  type of a loan, ARL may have to foreclose the mortgage or
                  protect its investment by acquiring title to the property.
                  Taking title to a property may require investing in
                  substantial improvements or repairs in order to maximize the
                  property's investment potential. Borrowers may contest
                  enforcement of foreclosure or other remedies, seek bankruptcy
                  protection against foreclosure and/or bring claims for lender
                  liability in response to actions to enforce mortgage
                  obligations. Because of relatively high "loan-to-value" ratios
                  and declines in the value of the mortgaged property, the
                  amount received in foreclosure may be less than the amount
                  outstanding under the mortgage loan.

         o        PARTICIPATION IN LOANS MADE BY OTHERS. The combined business
                  of ARL, TCI and IOT may participate in loans originated by
                  other real estate lenders or investors such as financial
                  institutions. A participant in a loan or investment originated
                  by another entity may not have the sole authority, or any
                  authority, to declare a default under the mortgage or to
                  control the management or disposition of the financed property
                  or any related foreclosure proceedings.

         o        SUBORDINATED INTERESTS. The combined business of ARL, TCI and
                  IOT may make loans that are subordinated to other obligations
                  of the debtor. Any investments in



                                       44


                  subordinated mortgage loans involve additional risks,
                  including the lack of control over collateral and related
                  foreclosure proceedings.

         o        INVESTMENTS IN PARTNERSHIPS OR JOINT VENTURES. The combined
                  business of ARL, TCI and IOT will have investments in one or
                  more partnerships, joint ventures or similar entities where
                  responsibility for the conduct of the business of the
                  investment is shared with a third party. As a result, the
                  success of such an investment will be subject to risks that
                  the third party may become bankrupt or fail to perform its
                  obligations, have different economic goals than the combined
                  business, take actions which are contrary to the interests of
                  the combined business or be unable to agree upon the proper
                  conduct of the investment's business.

         o        RISK OF TERRORISM. Office buildings, hotels and other
                  properties are subject to the risk that terrorists or other
                  persons may damage or destroy them, or that their value may be
                  damaged or destroyed as a result of damage to or destruction
                  of neighboring properties. In addition, to the extent that
                  added security measures made necessary by changing political
                  conditions increases the cost of operating real property
                  investments, operating income from and value of such
                  properties may be reduced.

         o        AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. Under the Americans with
                  Disabilities Act ("ADA"), places of public accommodation and
                  commercial facilities are required to meet requirements
                  related to access and use by disabled persons. Compliance with
                  ADA requirements could require both structural and
                  non-structural changes to the properties in which the combined
                  business of ARL, TCI and IOT invests. Noncompliance could
                  result in fines imposed by the federal government or an award
                  of damages to private litigants. The combined business of ARL,
                  TCI and IOT may be required to incur additional and unexpected
                  costs to ensure compliance with the ADA in the future. A
                  number of additional federal, state and local laws exist which
                  impose additional burdens or restrictions on owners with
                  respect to access by disabled persons. Those laws may require
                  modifications or restrict renovations to properties owned by
                  the combined business of ARL, TCI and IOT. The ultimate amount
                  of the cost of compliance with the ADA or other related laws
                  is not currently ascertainable. Any substantial unexpected
                  costs of compliance with the ADA and similar statutes could
                  adversely affect the results of operations of the combined
                  business of ARL, TCI and IOT.




                                       45


                              THE SPECIAL MEETINGS

INTRODUCTION

         This joint proxy statement and prospectus is being furnished in
connection with the solicitation of proxies by the ARL, TCI and IOT boards of
directors for use in connection with the special meeting to be held by each
entity and any adjournments or postponements of the meetings.

ARL SPECIAL MEETING

         The special meeting of holders of ARL common stock will be held on
_________, 2002 at 2:00 p.m., Dallas time at 1800 Valley View Lane, Suite 300,
Dallas, Texas. The purpose of the ARL meeting is to consider and vote upon the
proposal to approve the TCI merger and the IOT merger and the corresponding
agreements and plans of merger.

TCI SPECIAL MEETING

         The special meeting of holders of TCI common stock will be held on
________, 2002 at 3:00 p.m., Dallas time at 1800 Valley View Lane, Suite 300,
Dallas, Texas. The purpose of the TCI meeting is to consider and vote upon the
proposal to approve the TCI merger and the TCI agreement and plan of merger.

IOT SPECIAL MEETING

         The special meeting of holders of IOT common stock will be held on
___________, 2002 at 4:00 p.m., Dallas time at 1800 Valley View Lane, Suite 300,
Dallas, Texas. The purpose of the IOT meeting is to consider and vote upon the
proposal to approve the IOT merger and the IOT agreement and plan of merger.

VOTING INSTRUCTIONS

         VOTING BY WRITTEN PROXY CARD. To vote by written proxy card, sign and
date each proxy card you receive and return it in the prepaid envelope. If a
stockholder is a corporation or partnership, the accompanying proxy card must be
signed in the full corporate or partnership name by a duly authorized person. If
the proxy card is signed pursuant to a power of attorney or by an executor,
administrator, trustee or guardian, the signer's full title must be given and a
certificate or other evidence of appointment must be furnished. If shares are
owned jointly, each joint owner must sign the proxy card.

         VOTING BY TELEPHONE OR THE INTERNET. Instructions for a stockholder of
record to vote by telephone or the Internet are set forth on the enclosed proxy
card. To vote by telephone, call toll-free 1-800-PROXIES and follow the
instructions using the control number provided to you on the proxy card. To vote
by Internet, access the web page at www.voteproxy.com and follow the
instructions using the control number provided to you on the proxy card. The
telephone and Internet voting procedures are designed to authenticate votes cast
by use of a personal identification number. The procedures, which comply with
Nevada law, allow stockholders to appoint a proxy to vote their shares and to
confirm that their instructions have been properly



                                       46


recorded. For stockholders who wish to vote telephonically, after entering your
control number, you will hear the name of the company and will be offered the
option to vote for all of the recommendations or to vote on each proposal
individually. Proposals are referred to by proposal number (as shown on the
proxy card). After voting on each proposal, you will be asked to confirm the
vote. Prior to ending the call, you will be asked if you wish to vote on another
proxy. If yes, the process will be repeated for the next control number entered.

         For stockholders who vote via the Internet, after entering your control
number, you will be offered the option to vote for all of the recommendations or
to vote on each proposal individually. The text of each proposal is displayed
exactly as it appears on the proxy card. After the voting process is completed,
you will be shown how you have voted and given the opportunity to change your
vote. You are also given the option of receiving confirmation of the vote via
e-mail. In the future, your e-mail address may be used to distribute material
via the Internet. Prior to ending the session, you will be asked if you wish to
vote on another proxy. If yes, the process will be repeated for the next control
number entered.

         Any ARL, TCI or IOT stockholder signing and delivering a proxy (other
than for those shares held in a brokerage account, which are described below)
has the power to revoke the proxy at any time prior to its use by:

         a. filing with the corporate secretary of ARL, TCI or IOT, as
applicable, a written revocation of the proxy or a duly executed proxy;

         b. submitting another proper proxy bearing a later date than that of
the proxy first given by:

                  o        signing and returning a proxy card to either the
                           corporate secretary of ARL, TCI or IOT, as
                           applicable;

                  o        following the telephone voting instructions to change
                           your vote by calling toll-free 1-800-PROXIES and
                           using the control number provided on the proxy card;

                  o        following the Internet voting instructions to change
                           your vote by accessing the web page at
                           www.voteproxy.com and using the control number
                           provided on the proxy card; or

         c. attending and voting in person at the meeting.

         Shares represented by a properly executed proxy, and all properly
completed proxies voted by telephone or the Internet, which are delivered
pursuant to this solicitation (and not later revoked) will be voted in
accordance with the instructions indicated on the proxy, and at the discretion
of the proxy holders on all other matters properly addressed at the meeting. If
an ARL, TCI or IOT stockholder executes a proxy without instructions, the votes
represented by the proxy will be submitted in favor of the proposals.

         Your broker may vote shares on the merger only if you instruct your
broker how to vote. A "broker non-vote" occurs when a broker or nominee holding
shares for a beneficial owner does not vote because the broker or nominee lacks
the authority to vote on a particular proposal



                                       47


and has not received any voting instructions from the beneficial owner. Broker
non-votes will be treated as shares that are present for purposes of determining
the presence of a quorum; however, for purposes of determining the outcome of
any matter in which brokers or nominees have no discretionary power to vote,
broker non-votes will be treated as not present and not entitled to vote with
respect to that matter. You should follow the directions provided by your broker
regarding how to instruct your broker to vote your shares. If you do not tell
your broker how to vote, your shares will not be voted on the merger. If you
hold your shares in a brokerage account, you cannot vote in person at your
meeting. If you hold your shares in a brokerage account and you have instructed
your broker to vote, you must follow your broker's instructions regarding how to
change your vote.

         If the stockholders have any questions regarding the business
combination, they should contact Investor Relations at 1-800-400-6407.

RECORD DATE; VOTES REQUIRED

         ARL. Only holders of shares of ARL common stock of record at the close
of business on the record date, June 4, 2002, will be entitled to notice of and
to vote at the ARL special meeting. The mergers and merger agreements will be
approved by ARL if the mergers receive the affirmative vote, in person or by
proxy, of a majority of the votes cast at the ARL meeting. The holders of a
majority of the outstanding stock entitled to vote, present in person or by
proxy, will constitute a quorum for purposes of the ARL meeting. As of the
record date for the ARL special meeting, there were 11,375,127 shares of ARL
common stock outstanding. BCM, TCI and the members of the board of directors and
executive officers of ARL and its affiliates beneficially owned, as of the
record date, 7,026,516 shares, which represent approximately 61.7% of the
outstanding shares. After completion of the TCI and IOT mergers, the directors,
executive officers and affiliates of ARL will beneficially own 72.6% of the
outstanding shares of ARL, assuming that none of the TCI and IOT stockholders
take Series G and Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock in the mergers
and the conversion of all shares of Series G and Series H redeemable convertible
preferred stock received in the mergers. The directors, executive officers and
the affiliates of the directors and executive officers of TCI and IOT will,
indirectly and directly, beneficially own 67.3% of the outstanding common stock
of ARL after completion of the TCI and IOT mergers, assuming that none of the
TCI and IOT stockholders take Series G and Series H redeemable convertible
preferred stock in the mergers and the conversion of all shares of Series G and
Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock received in the mergers. BCM
will own 66.9% of the outstanding common stock of ARL after completion of the
TCI and IOT mergers, assuming that none of the TCI and IOT stockholders take
Series G and Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock in the mergers and
the conversion of all shares of Series G and Series H redeemable convertible
preferred stock received in the mergers. Each share of ARL common stock entitles
its holder to cast one vote on matters as to which voting is permitted or
required by Nevada law. BCM, TCI and, to the knowledge of ARL, the members of
the board of directors and executive officers of ARL and their affiliates intend
to vote their shares in favor of the mergers, however, a majority of the
nonaffiliated shares is needed to approve the mergers. Since the ARL bylaws
require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the meeting,
abstentions and broker non-votes will be excluded when calculating the number of
votes required for approval of the proposals.



                                       48


         TCI. Only holders of shares of TCI common stock of record at the close
of business on the record date, June 4, 2002, will be entitled to notice of and
to vote at the TCI special meeting. The TCI merger and the TCI merger agreement
will be approved by TCI if the TCI merger receives the affirmative vote, in
person or by proxy, of (1) a majority of the votes cast at the TCI meeting and
(2) a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares of TCI common stock
not held by Mr. Phillips, BCM or ARL, voting at the TCI meeting, whether in
person or by proxy. The holders of a majority of the shares of voting stock,
present in person or by proxy, will constitute a quorum for purposes of the TCI
meeting. As of the record date for the TCI special meeting, there were 8,042,594
shares of TCI common stock outstanding. Each share of TCI common stock entitles
its holder to cast one vote on matters as to which voting is permitted or
required by Nevada law. ARL (indirectly), BCM (directly and indirectly) and the
members of the board of directors and executive officers of TCI and its
affiliates beneficially owned, as of the record date for the TCI special
meeting, 5,217,722 shares, which represent approximately 64.6% of the
outstanding shares. ARL, BCM and, to the knowledge of TCI, the members of the
board of directors and the executive officers of TCI and its affiliates intend
to vote their shares in favor of the TCI merger. Since the TCI bylaws require
the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the meeting, abstentions
and broker non-votes will be excluded when calculating the number of votes
required for approval of the proposals.

         IOT. Only holders of shares of IOT common stock record at the close of
business on the record date, June 4, 2002, will be entitled to notice of and to
vote at the IOT special meeting. The IOT merger and merger agreement will be
approved by IOT if the merger receives the affirmative vote, in person or by
proxy, of (1) a majority of the votes cast at the IOT meeting and (2) a majority
of the votes cast by the holders of shares of IOT common stock not held by Mr.
Phillips, BCM or ARL, voting at the IOT meeting, whether in person or by proxy.
The holders of a majority of the shares of voting stock, present in person or by
proxy, will constitute a quorum for purposes of the IOT meeting. As of the
record date for the IOT special meeting, there were 1,438,945 shares of IOT
common stock outstanding. Each share of IOT common stock entitles its holder to
cast one vote on matters as to which voting is permitted or required by Nevada
law. ARL (indirectly), BCM and the members of the board of directors and
executive officers of IOT and its affiliates beneficially owned, as of the
record date for the IOT special meeting, 862,465 shares, which represent
approximately 59.9% of the outstanding shares. ARL, TCI, BCM and, to the
knowledge of IOT, the members of the board of directors and the executive
officers of IOT and its affiliates intend to vote their shares in favor of the
IOT merger. Since the IOT bylaws require the affirmative vote of a majority of
the votes cast at the meeting, abstentions and broker non-votes will be excluded
when calculating the number of votes required for approval of the proposals.

APPRAISAL RIGHTS

         None of the ARL, TCI or IOT stockholders will be entitled to dissenters
or appraisal rights as a result of or in connection with the mergers.

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

         The boards of directors of ARL, TCI and IOT are soliciting proxies for
use in connection with the special meetings to be held by each entity and any
adjournments or postponements of



                                       49


either meeting. ARL, TCI and IOT will bear equally the expense of the proxy
solicitation. The costs of the proxy solicitation are estimated to be $7,000.
Georgeson Stockholder Communications, Inc. has been retained to act as proxy
solicitor in connection with the special meetings. The proxy solicitor may
contact ARL, TCI and IOT stockholders by mail, telephone, telex, telegraph and
personal interviews and may request brokers, dealers and other nominee
stockholders to forward the proxy materials to beneficial owners of ARL, TCI or
IOT shares. The proxy solicitor will receive a fee estimated not to exceed
$30,000 for these services, plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. ARL,
TCI and IOT will indemnify the proxy solicitor against certain liabilities and
expenses in connection with the mergers, including liabilities under federal
securities laws. The telephone number of the proxy solicitor is 212-805-7000.

OTHER MATTERS FOR ACTION AT THE SPECIAL MEETINGS

         The ARL, TCI and IOT boards of directors are not aware of any matters
to be presented for action at any of the special meetings other than those
described in this joint proxy statement and prospectus. If other matters should
properly come before any special meeting, it is intended that the holders of
proxies solicited by this joint proxy statement and prospectus will vote on
those matters in their discretion.




                                       50



                                 SPECIAL FACTORS

GENERAL

         The following is a description of all material matters concerning the
business combination. Pursuant to the business combination, wholly-owned
subsidiaries of ARL will be merged with and into TCI and IOT and TCI and IOT
will become subsidiaries of ARL. If the TCI stockholders approve their merger
and the merger is consummated, each share of outstanding TCI common stock will
be converted into $17.50 in cash (less the amount of any dividend declared and
paid after January 2, 2002 by TCI on the TCI common stock) unless the TCI
stockholder affirmatively elects to receive one share of Series G redeemable
convertible preferred stock in exchange for each share of outstanding TCI common
stock. Outstanding shares of TCI common stock held by ARL, its subsidiaries or
TCI will be cancelled and shares of TCI common stock held by BCM and other
affiliates of ARL will be exchanged for shares of Series G redeemable
convertible preferred stock. Similarly, if the IOT stockholders approve their
merger, each share of outstanding IOT common stock will be converted into $19.00
in cash (less the amount of any dividends declared and paid after January 2,
2002 by IOT on the IOT common stock) unless the IOT stockholder affirmatively
elects to receive one share of Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock.
Outstanding shares of IOT held by ARL, its subsidiaries, TCI or IOT will be
cancelled and each share of IOT common stock held by BCM and other affiliates of
ARL will be exchanged for shares of Series H redeemable convertible preferred
stock. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the ARL board of directors has determined
that ARL would not enter into the merger agreements unless, in each case,
sufficient cash was available to ARL, either from its own resources or from TCI
or IOT immediately after the mergers, to pay the cash merger consideration due
as a result of the mergers.

THE COMPANIES

         AMERICAN REALTY INVESTORS, INC. ("ARL"). A publicly traded (NYSE)
Nevada corporation engaged primarily in the business of owning and operating a
portfolio of real estate and financing real estate and real estate activities
through investments in mortgage loans.

         TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC. ("TCI"). A publicly traded
(NYSE) Nevada corporation engaged primarily in the business of owning and
operating a portfolio of real estate and financing real estate and real estate
activities through investments in mortgage loans.

         INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC. ("IOT"). A publicly traded
(AMEX) Nevada corporation engaged primarily in the business of owning and
operating a portfolio of real estate and financing real estate and real estate
activities through investments in mortgage loans. IOT is a real estate
investment trust.

         TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY ACQUISITION CORPORATION. A Nevada corporation
recently formed as a wholly-owned subsidiary of ARL that will merge with and
into TCI.

         INCOME OPPORTUNITY ACQUISITION CORPORATION. A Nevada corporation
recently formed as a wholly-owned subsidiary of ARL that will merge with and
into IOT.





                                       51


         The principal operating offices of each of ARL, TCI, IOT, Income
Opportunity Acquisition Corporation and Transcontinental Realty Acquisition
Corporation are located at 1800 Valley View Lane, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas
75234. The telephone number for each corporation is 469-522-4200.

BACKGROUND OF THE BUSINESS COMBINATION

         TCI and IOT are parties to a 1990 settlement of litigation known as the
Olive Settlement. The original settlement has been modified and the modification
has been the subject of an amendment. Periodically, since 1990, designated
Settlement Counsel, George Donaldson, has challenged the compliance of the
parties under the Olive Settlement, the modification and the amendment and has
unsuccessfully sought to remove BCM from its advisory position to TCI, IOT and
other entities. Settlement Counsel also sought to, from time to time, remove
some or all of the directors of TCI, IOT and other entities.

         On June 14, 2000, Mr. Phillips and A. Cal Rossi, Jr. were indicted* by
a Grand Jury in the Southern District of New York, charged with conspiracy to
commit securities fraud and kickback and wire fraud schemes. Mr. Phillips is a
representative of a trust for the benefit of his children that indirectly owns
BCM. As a representative of the trust, Mr. Phillips has substantial contact
with, and influence over, the management of BCM and input with respect to BCM's
performance of advisory services for ARL, TCI and IOT. Mr. Rossi serves as an
officer of BCM, ARL, TCI and IOT. Following the announcement of the indictments
the market values of TCI and IOT common stock declined precipitously, thereby
exposing certain owners of the securities to margin calls. Sales under margin
calls were averted in almost all instances, but one brokerage firm sold a large
block of stock in TCI to an investment fund. On October 3, 2001, ARL entered
into an option to purchase the TCI common stock from the investment fund at a
price of $16.50 per share. Mr. Donaldson, Settlement Counsel under the Olive
Settlement, read about the purchase option agreement and inquired as to whether
or not there was interest in a transaction whereby all of the shares owned by
nonaffiliate stockholders in IOT and TCI might be purchased by ARL for cash.

         In early July 2000, Henry W. Simon, Jr. and the Fort Worth, Texas law
firm of Simon, Warner & Doby, were employed to represent BCM, Mr. Phillips, ART
and ARL. On October 12, 2000, Mr. Simon attended a hearing in San Francisco in
the Olive Litigation. After the hearing there was a brief conversation between
Messrs. Simon and Donaldson in which the possibility of finally settling the
disputes in the Olive Settlement by offering cash to nonaffiliated TCI and IOT
stockholders was discussed.

         On October 31, 2000, Mr. Simon met with his clients and others about
the status and possibilities of the proposed purchase of stock and settlement.
These parties contacted Settlement Counsel by telephone, informing him that
there was some willingness to consider attempts to determine cash prices which
would be agreeable to all parties and acceptable to Judge Marilyn H. Patel,
Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of
California. Judge Patel would have to make a finding that each price offered was
fair pursuant to



----------
* On February 13, 2002, following a lengthy trial, Messrs. Phillips and Rossi
were acquitted of all charges in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of
New York.



                                       52


the class action provisions which govern the derivative litigation. Later the
same day, Mr. Simon attended a meeting with Ted P. Stokely, Chairman of the
board of TCI and IOT, and Robert A. Waldman, General Counsel to ARL, TCI and
IOT, to discuss the mechanics leading toward a possible settlement. On November
3, 2000, Settlement Counsel, Mr. Phillips and Mr. Simon met to negotiate a
possible pricing structure. Mr. Phillips indicated that he might consider
recommending that ARL acquire the shares of common stock held by nonaffiliated
TCI stockholders for $16 per share and nonaffiliated IOT stockholders for $14
per share.

         On November 15, 2000, Mr. Waldman contacted representatives of Houlihan
Lokey in Los Angeles, California to discuss Houlihan Lokey's interest in
providing a fairness opinion which would be necessary in the event the parties
reached an agreement on prices. Houlihan Lokey indicated that they would be
pleased to work in furtherance of the transaction. Houlihan Lokey prepared a
draft retainer agreement among IOT, TCI and Houlihan Lokey, and sent it to Mr.
Waldman.

         On November 17, 2000, at meetings of the boards of directors of TCI and
IOT, the members were advised that Settlement Counsel had expressed an initial
interest in a buy out by ARL of all nonaffiliated stockholders at $16 per TCI
share and $14 per IOT share, subject to further information and negotiation as
to price. In attendance at the meetings were directors R. Douglas Leonhard*,
Martin L. White, Edward G. Zampa* and Ted P. Stokely. Also attending the
meetings were Mark W. Branigan, then a director of ARL and Chief Financial
Officer of ARL, TCI and IOT, Karl L. Blaha, then a director of ARL and President
of ARL, TCI and IOT, and Robert A. Waldman, Senior Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary of ARL, TCI and IOT.

         On November 20, 2000, Settlement Counsel, Mr. Waldman, Mr. Phillips and
Mr. Simon met in Dallas to discuss the proposals made and responses received
between the parties. At that time Settlement Counsel indicated that he would not
consider any price less than $16.50 per share for the TCI shares, which was the
option price agreed to between ARL and the investment fund. Settlement Counsel
took the position, that under no circumstances would he agree to any settlement
in which the cash price per share to be paid to the nonaffiliated TCI
stockholders was less than the amount ARL would have to pay by April 2001 to
exercise its options for the TCI shares purchased from a private investment
fund. Accordingly, the price of $16.50 cash per share became Settlement
Counsel's absolute floor for the purchase price for the TCI shares.
Additionally, Settlement Counsel advised that in order to go forward he wished
to engage Green Street Advisors, Inc. to review asset values of TCI and IOT.
Settlement Counsel was unwilling to commit to support any specific price until
Green Street completed its review of the value of TCI and IOT. Settlement
Counsel also advised that whatever price might be agreed upon would be based
upon a current appraisal and evaluation of the underlying assets of the subject
companies. Green Street Advisors, Inc. is a Newport Beach based independent
research and




----------
* Messrs. Leonhard and Zampa resigned as directors of TCI and IOT on December
14, 2001. Messrs. Leonhard and Zampa were directors of both TCI and IOT, but
held no other position in any of TCI, IOT or ARL. Mr. Leonhard did not provide
any reason for his resignation; Mr. Zampa advised that his workload had
increased and time no longer permitted him to continue; neither individual
advised of any disagreement with any policies or practices or operations of
either TCI or IOT, nor did either individual furnish TCI or IOT with any letter
describing any disagreement and requesting that the matter be disclosed. See
also Current Report on Form 8-K for event occurring December 14, 2001 of TCI and
IOT.



                                       53


consulting firm concentrating on publicly-traded real estate securities,
principally real estate investment trusts ("REITs") and other publicly-traded
real estate companies. Green Street's stated mission is to provide exceptional
research products and consulting services that lead to superior investment
performance and insight for its clients. Green Street was selected by Settlement
Counsel without any input or concurrence by any representative of ARL or its
counsel. Except where Green Street provided information to Settlement Counsel
based upon information obtained from ARL, TCI or IOT and their affiliates, no
material relationship exists between Green Street and ARL, TCI or IOT nor has
any existed during the past two years. To the best knowledge of the
representatives of ARL, Green Street did not provide any opinion or appraisal or
recommendation relating to the fairness of the consideration in either merger
transaction. Green Street apparently provided to Settlement Counsel information
with respect to TCI's and IOT's separate net asset values in the aggregate and
on a per share basis, implied cap rate, multi-family property net operating
income, or NOI, office property NOI, industrial property NOI, retail property
NOI, and hotel property NOI. Net operating income, or NOI, means rental revenues
less property operating expenses and replacements before debt service. Such
information was prepared for and available to Settlement Counsel, but does not
include any specific recommendations, procedures followed, basis for or methods
of arriving at any findings or recommendations. Green Street did not receive any
instructions from ARL, TCI or IOT, nor did ARL, TCI or IOT impose any
limitations upon Green Street in the scope of its investigation or the
information it provided to Settlement Counsel.


         The Green Street information does not provide a summary of the
procedures followed but does make a number of assumptions and fails to take into
account minority interests in properties and rights of preferred shareholders.
Such analysis does provide certain evaluations with respect to each of TCI and
IOT, although the analysis is stamped "draft" and was not corrected following
discussions with representatives of ARL and representatives of Green Street and
Settlement Counsel. During those discussions, a number of items of clarification
and/or correction to the information obtained by Green Street were noted, and in
each instance of any clarification or correction, Adam Markman of Green Street
concurred with the clarification or correction; however, apparently no revision
of the Green Street information was made in written form. Therefore, the
information which was never completed was used for negotiations only by
Settlement Counsel and because it was not changed to reflect the corrections,
the results indicated may only be viewed as preliminary in nature which does not
correctly reflect actual results. Such information was reviewed by Houlihan,
Lokey in the preparation of its opinions to the TCI and IOT Boards of Directors.

         As to TCI, the Green Street information preliminarily suggested an
estimated net asset value per share as of March 30, 2001 of $38.40 per share
based upon an estimated number of shares outstanding of 8,971,000 shares. It
also estimated implied net asset values based upon estimated 2001 net operating
income of $77,179,000 and three different levels of implied cap rates ranging
from 16.5% to 10.5% from a low of $89,706,000 to a high of $358,822,000 (or a
low of $10 per share to a high of $40 per share).

         With respect to IOT, the Green Street information preliminarily
provided an estimated net asset value as of March 30, 2001 of $29.71 per share
based on an estimated number of shares outstanding of 1,514,000 shares and an
overall net asset value of $44,981,000. The implied capitalization rate analysis
for IOT prepared by Green Street ranged from rates at 20.73% to






                                       54


11.03% based on estimated 2001 net operating income of $8,024,000, yielding
implied net asset values of $11,355,000 to a high of $45,421,000 and resulting
estimated net asset values per share from a low of $7.50 per share to a high of
$30 per share.

         Green Street argued that the capitalization rates were dropping on
apartments and that previously apartments might have been fairly priced at an
11% capitalization rate but were then selling (or reports of sales) at 8.5% to
9% capitalization rates because interest rates were dropping and the values were
not substantially discounted by alternative uses of money. A fairly complicated
analysis involving interest rates adjusting upward or downward may have an
overall effect upon apartment occupancy such that if interest rates remain low
for an extended period of time, a number of tenants in apartment complexes will
move to single-family housing, which will also make it less expensive to build
new apartments because the cost of interim financing is less; the cost of
permanent financing is less; and newer apartments will be available which are
competitive in price to older apartments. Similarly, the Green Street
information for property acquisition was the subject of significant discussion
about errors in net interest of the entity involved, huge amounts of
differential in value and the failure to recognize minority interest or rights
of preferred stockholders with respect to certain properties. The parameters for
various kinds of properties including raw land, commercial property, residential
property and those in development are the subject of ranges of estimation based
upon assumptions later admitted to be incorrect. Thus, while the Green Street
information is available and was reviewed by Houlihan Lokey, no recommendation
by Green Street was made to ARL, TCI or IOT, or their respective Boards of
Directors.


         The ARL board of directors met on November 22, 2000, to consider the
possible acquisition of the shares of nonaffiliated stockholders at TCI and IOT.
Present at that meeting were ARL directors Richard D. Morgan**, Karl L.
Blaha***, Collene C. Currie, Roy E. Bode****, Joseph Mizrachi and Mr. Branigan
and Mr. Waldman. The ARL board determined that management should proceed with
negotiations on this matter.

         During the month of December 2000, Mr. Simon discussed with Settlement
Counsel the appropriate procedure to advise Judge Patel that the parties were
considering settlement. On December 21, 2000, Mr. Simon approved a form of
Statement of the Case to be submitted by Settlement Counsel, which would
formally advise Judge Patel that the parties were discussing a settlement.
During January 2001, Messrs. Simon and Waldman prepared at the request of
Settlement Counsel certain historical summaries of the trading values of stocks
involved and facilitated the exchange of information between BCM and Green
Street in order to expedite the analysis of the underlying values of TCI and
IOT. On February 14, 2001, Mr. Simon discussed with Settlement Counsel certain
discounts and other assumptions which ARL felt were





----------
** Richard D. Morgan resigned as a director of ARL on October 25, 2001. Mr.
Morgan did not provide any reason for his resignation and did not advise of any
disagreement with any policies or practices or operations of ARL nor did he
furnish ARL with any letter describing any disagreement and requesting that the
matter be disclosed.

*** Karl L. Blaha resigned as a director of ARL and from his positions as
President of ARL, TCI and IOT on February 5, 2002. Mr. Blaha did not provide any
reason for his resignation and did not advise of any disagreement with any
policies or practices or operations of either ARL, TCI or IOT, nor did he
furnish ARL, TCI or IOT with any letter describing any disagreement and
requesting that the matter be disclosed. See also Current Report on Form 8-K for
event occurring December 14, 2001 of TCI and IOT.

**** Roy E. Bode did not stand for re-election at ARL's Annual Meeting on July
10, 2001 and therefore ceased to be a director of ARL on that date.


                                       55


appropriate in reaching final values. These discussions continued with telephone
conversations on February 22, 23, and 28, 2001. On March 7, 2001, Settlement
Counsel and Adam Markman of Green Street met with Messrs. Simon and Waldman in
Dallas to review additional information regarding certain assets. Following that
meeting and several other conversations but prior to April 12, 2001, Messrs.
Simon and Phillips and Settlement Counsel reached a tentative agreement to
propose final cash prices of $16.50 for each of the TCI shares and $19 for each
of the IOT shares.

         On or about February 1, 2001, Settlement Counsel forwarded to Mr. Simon
and Mr. Phillips an initial report from Green Street which, while not a complete
economic analysis, reflected some of the methodology to be used by Green Street.
Issues arose with Mr. Phillips and Mr. Blaha over the assumptions contained
within the methodology, as follows:

         o        Mr. Phillips and his advisors disputed the appropriate cap
                  rate for many of the apartment properties which would depend,
                  to a great extent, on whether those particular properties
                  might be classified as "B" or "C" apartment projects. And, as
                  a function of the cap Mr. Phillips and Mr. Branigan analyzed
                  the capital budgets, both past and projected for these
                  properties

         o        With reference to raw land Mr. Phillips and his advisors
                  debated the effect on probable value of the sale of parcels
                  out of a large tract. The questions raised were how indicative
                  a single or even several separate parcel sales might be toward
                  fixing the value of a tract of 100 plus acres

         o        Additionally, issues were raised as to the economic
                  significance of pending, unclosed contracts

         o        Mr. Phillips and his advisors debated the proper criteria to
                  utilize in attempting to determine the economic values to be
                  obtained if a large number of the properties, particularly
                  those grouped in the same markets, were to be placed on the
                  market within a six to twelve month period


         On February 14, 2001, Mr. Simon discussed with Settlement Counsel
certain discounts and other assumptions which ARL felt were inappropriate in
reaching final values. The discounts and other assumptions described in the
preceding paragraph were the primary topics of the discussion. For example:

         o        The question of the validity of the sale of a pad site out of
                  a commercial site, or ten acres out of one hundred acres
                  cannot simply be averaged over the whole to determine value.
                  If a sale is made at $3 per foot for ten acres but 120 acres
                  are left, it is unclear whether that $3 per foot was the
                  "plum" leaving the value of the rest of the property at
                  substantially less (such as $1 per foot), or whether the $3
                  per foot sale was the least expensive piece of the tract. It
                  is not possible to just take the price paid per square foot
                  for a small portion of land to determine the overall value of
                  the whole.

         o        Appropriate capitalization rates depend upon one's belief in
                  the fluctuation of interest rates. If interest rates are to
                  rise significantly, cap rates will be at one level. If
                  interest rates stay low for an extended period of time, that
                  will result in tenants moving from apartments into
                  single-family housing because the cost is similar (which is
                  proved to be true), but that also makes it less expensive to
                  build new apartments because the cost of interim financing is
                  less and the cost of permanent financing is






                                       56



                  less. As new apartments come on stream which are competitive
                  in price with older properties, the capitalization rates may
                  well shift based upon the age of the property.

These discussions continued with telephone conversations on February 22, 23 and
28, 2001.


         These conversations were critical to the final result. The prospect of
lowered interest rates, as the result of a national recession and possible
action by the Federal Reserve Board, would produce higher values for older
properties because such rates facilitated both sales and refinancing. However,
Mr. Phillips and his advisors disputed the lasting effect of such a monetary
policy. Mr. Phillips pointed out that lowered rates increased new construction,
which, while it generated economic activity, also increased competition. And,
the recession, arguably, affected the collectibility of rent. Generally, it was
Phillips' view that immediate conditions should be seen in a longer context,
leading generally to lower value for these older units. Settlement Counsel
disputed the discounting of current conditions.

         On March 7, 2001, Settlement Counsel and Adam Markman of Green Street
met with Messrs. Simon and Waldman in Dallas, Texas to review additional
information regarding certain assets. Following that meeting and several other
conversations but prior to April 12, 2001, Settlement Counsel and Messrs. Simon
and Phillips reached a tentative agreement to propose final cash prices of
$16.50 for each of the TCI common stock and $19 for each of the IOT common
stock. Other criteria and assumptions commonly utilized in the evaluation of
real estate were likewise raised and debated through these discussions.

         On March 20, 26, 27, and 30, 2001, Mr. Simon held telephone
conversations with Settlement Counsel to complete the data base from which the
final agreed prices might be determined. On April 10, 2001, Mr. Phillips and Mr.
Simon met with Settlement Counsel in California and reached an initial agreement
that Settlement Counsel was authorized to communicate to Judge Patel. In May
2001, Settlement Counsel delivered a letter to Judge Patel concerning the
proposed settlement of the litigation which included the proposed purchase
prices of $16.50 per TCI share and $19.00 per IOT share. On May 8, 2001, Mr.
Simon appeared before Judge Patel in a conference format and discussed with the
Court the nature of the proposed settlement, the steps necessary to achieve both
a resolution of all open issues between the parties and the subsequent judicial
and regulatory approvals which would be needed to implement the transaction.

         In June and July 2001, Settlement Counsel, aided by the Green Street
evaluation team, continued to review data in order to reach an agreement on the
share prices. On July 26, 2001, Mr. Simon met with Mr. Phillips in his Dallas
office to review the summary pages of the Green Street report for TCI. On July
30, 2001, Mr. Simon met with Settlement Counsel in the offices of BCM in Dallas,
Texas to discuss the initial evaluations submitted by Green Street. On the
following day, July 31, 2001, Mr. Markman of Green Street joined the meetings
with Settlement Counsel, Mr. Phillips, certain asset managers of BCM, and others
in the Dallas offices of BCM. Mr. Markman also viewed some of the more
significant TCI properties located in the Dallas area.

         Negotiations regarding comparative values and their effect upon
proposed price per share provisions of a joint settlement continued during the
month of August 2001. ARL desired that





                                       57


there be an alternative election offered to TCI and IOT stockholders whereby a
stockholder could (if a clear affirmative election to do so is made) accept
preferred stock in ARL in lieu of the cash amounts of $16.50 per TCI share and
$19 per IOT share. Settlement Counsel negotiated for a penalty if the
transaction is not completed by ARL and urged that the TCI data warranted an
increase in the cash price to be paid to TCI stockholders. Just prior to August
30, 2001, Settlement Counsel, Mr. Phillips, and the other participants from BCM
agreed upon (a) an increase in the price to be offered TCI stockholders from
$16.50 per share to $17.50 per share; (b) a preferred stock election as to each
offeree; (c) a $5.00 per share penalty for failure to complete the transaction;
and (d) a tender offer procedure, providing the same considerations, in the
event that the regulatory process with the SEC could not be completed
satisfactorily or expeditiously.

         On August 30, 2001, the TCI and IOT directors held special meetings at
which time they approved the terms of the proposed settlement subject to
completion of due diligence and negotiation of a final agreement. In attendance
at the meetings were directors Messrs. Leonhard, White, Zampa and Stokely. Also
attending the meetings were Messrs. Blaha, Corna and Waldman. Mr. Waldman
reviewed the terms of the proposed settlement which had been negotiated between
the parties. They discussed the need to obtain approval from the Court and from
the nonaffiliated stockholders of TCI and IOT. The Settlement Agreement was
drafted by Messrs. Donaldson and Simon in September 2001. Mr. Simon discussed
the proposed joint settlement with Settlement Counsel on a daily basis during
September and the early part of October. Mr. Simon met with Settlement Counsel
in San Francisco on October 3 and 4, 2001 to continue discussions of the
Settlement Agreement. Commencing on October 12, 2001, Mr. Simon broadened his
activities to discuss all aspects of the then "draft" form of the Settlement
Agreement, along with ancillary documents to be filed therewith, with Jessica
Pers and David Goldstein of the Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe law firm,
special counsel to the boards of directors of TCI and IOT in the Olive
Litigation.

         On October 15, 2001, Mr. Simon discussed certain new concerns with
Messrs. Donaldson and Waldman, Eric Redwine, an attorney for BCM, and again with
Ms. Pers. Ms. Pers, by letter, and in telephone conferences raised a concern
regarding whether or not the language embodied in the draft agreement might be
read to indicate that an appeal, then pending, was being abandoned by the
appellants. It was agreed that a part of the Settlement Agreement would be a
voluntary abatement, assuming the consent of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals,
in the pending appeal over issues of jurisdiction which arose from an earlier
order from Judge Patel in which the Court declared that it had jurisdiction to
continue consideration of certain activities of the TCI and IOT directors and of
BCM and its officers.

         On October 18, 2001, the written Settlement Agreement was filed with
Judge Patel. Ms. Pers suggested new language which would make it clear that the
appeal, if abated, was not being abandoned or resolved by agreement and would
revive in the event the contemplated settlement failed to come to fruition. On
October 23, 2001, a press release was issued on behalf of ARL, TCI and IOT
announcing the preliminary agreement with Settlement Counsel providing for ARL
to acquire all of the outstanding common stock of TCI and IOT. On October 25,
2001, the boards of directors of TCI and IOT held special meetings with the
representatives of Houlihan Lokey. The directors reviewed the settlement
proposal and discussed with Houlihan Lokey the procedures that Houlihan Lokey
would apply in analyzing the fairness of the proposed





                                       58

transaction. It was noted that Houlihan Lokey would render an opinion as to the
fairness from a financial point of view of the consideration to be received by
the TCI and IOT nonaffiliated public stockholders.

         On the morning of December 10, 2001, counsel reported to Judge Patel on
their progress and received the Court's comments. That afternoon and evening the
parties worked through the Court's comments, as well as certain comments relayed
to the parties from Stephen Taylor, the Special Master. On December 11, 2001,
Messrs. Simon and Donaldson had extensive telephone conversations with all
participants in the negotiation process which resulted in certain changes being
made to the documents and, upon accomplishment of such changes, the documents
then believed to be in final form were filed with Judge Patel. The Court signed
the order preliminarily approving the Settlement Agreement on December 18, 2001.
The Court also approved a proposed Notice of Proposed Settlement of Derivative
Action which was then mailed to all stockholders of TCI and IOT. The Notice
described the proposed settlement and advised that a Settlement Hearing would be
held on February 4, 2002.


         On February 1 and 4, 2002, the TCI and IOT boards of directors (which
consist of the same persons) met by telephone conference to review a draft of a
board presentations prepared by Houlihan Lokey, which contained proposed
revisions to the timing of the conversion period of the preferred stock
available by affirmative election by the TCI and IOT stockholders, respectively.
During that meeting, discussions ensued concerning the probable timing based
upon potential filings by ARL depending upon the consummation of the TCI and IOT
mergers. The TCI and IOT boards of directors concluded that the recommended
change in timing of conversion periods would be beneficial to those TCI and IOT
stockholders, respectively, who affirmatively elect to receive preferred stock.
Following these discussions, the TCI and IOT directors reaffirmed their February
1, 2002, determinations that the terms of the Settlement Agreement and
contemplated mergers are procedurally and substantively fair to the
nonaffiliated TCI and IOT stockholders, respectively, as previously described.
Each member of the TCI and IOT boards of directors is a member of the board of
directors of the other. Although when acting as a TCI or IOT director, each
person was acting only as such and not as a member of the other board they were
obviously cognizant of their actions as members of the other board. Thus,
although neither the TCI board nor the IOT board made a determination regarding
the fairness of the terms of the Settlement Agreement or the proposed mergers to
the stockholders of the other corporation, they may be deemed to have done so by
virtue of the fact that the same persons, acting for both corporations
determined that the terms of the Settlement Agreement and the mergers were fair
to both the unaffiliated stockholders of TCI and those of IOT.





         On February 4, 2002, the board of directors of ARL had a telephonic
board meeting to begin consideration of the proposed acquisitions of TCI and IOT
by ARL in the manner contemplated by the Settlement Agreement. Present at the
meeting were Ms. Currie and Messrs. Cecil, Humphrey and Mizrachi. Also attending
the meeting were Ronald E. Kimbrough, Mr. Waldman, Jeffrey Sone and Tiffany
Marchesoni. Following a discussion of the proposed transaction, the ARL board
adjourned until the following afternoon to permit members of the board to
consider information provided by management and to receive additional
information requested by members of the board. The meeting of the ARL board
reconvened on February 5, 2002. In attendance were directors Ms. Currie and
Messrs. Cecil and Humphrey. Also attending






                                       59


the meeting were Messrs. Kimbrough, Waldman, Sone and Tiffany Marchesoni. The
board received presentations from management regarding the proposed transaction,
including detailed presentations regarding ARL's proposed plan for raising the
funds necessary to pay for shares of TCI and IOT common stock to be purchased
from stockholders not affiliated with ARL or BCM. In addition, the ARL board
received representations from legal counsel to ARL and discussed with management
of ARL and ARL's legal counsel matters relating to the proposed transactions.
Mr. Cecil, Ms. Currie and Mr. Humphrey were present, in person, at the meeting
of the ARL board on February 5. Messrs. Blaha and Mizrachi were not present.
Following an extended discussion regarding the proposed transactions among ARL,
TCI and IOT and other matters related to the current and proposed business
operations of ARL, the board again adjourned its meeting until the following
afternoon. Subsequent to the adjournment of the ARL board's meeting on February
5, Mr. Blaha tendered his resignation as a member of the ARL board and as an
officer of ARL, TCI and IOT. Mr. Blaha did not communicate the reasons for his
resignation to the ARL board or to the boards of TCI or IOT.

         On February 6, 2002, the ARL board reconvened telephonically. Present
for the entire meeting were Ms. Currie and Messrs. Humphrey and Mizrachi. Mr.
Cecil joined the meeting after it was in progress. Also attending the meeting
were Messrs. Kimbrough, Waldman, and Sone and Ms. Marchesoni. Following a
discussion of the proposed transaction, the board unanimously approved the
proposed business combination between ARL and each of TCI and IOT and determined
to recommend that stockholders of ARL approve the transactions. Following these
actions, the board adjourned its meeting.

         On February 12, 2002 the Court signed the order finally approving the
Settlement Agreement.

         Because the business combination arose out of a negotiated settlement
of the Olive litigation, the boards of TCI and IOT were presented with the
settlement terms to either approve or not approve and continue with the Olive
litigation. This was not a typical merger or acquisition situation where the
board of directors had alternatives to consider. Continuation as a going concern
not considered because it would not have settled the litigation. However, the
TCI and IOT stockholders may continue to participate in the future of the
combined companies by opting to receive Series G or H convertible preferred
stock. Liquidation was considered only in the evaluation of the assets of each
company with a discount for the cost of liquidation and the uncertainty of
realizing the asset values over the time required to liquidate.

DETERMINATION OF MERGER CONSIDERATION

         The merger consideration was determined through negotiations by and
between representatives of ARL and Settlement Counsel in the Olive Litigation.
The parties desired to reach a settlement which would allow the nonaffiliated
TCI and IOT stockholders to obtain a fair price for their common stock and
resolve the ongoing litigation. Settlement Counsel sought to obtain the highest
cash price possible for the shares. Green Street reviewed the assets of both
companies and advised Settlement Counsel on the underlying net asset values. The
agreed upon cash prices per share were greater than the current or historical
trading prices and less than the estimated net asset value per share.





                                       60


         ARL desired to provide the stockholders with an opportunity to continue
to participate in the ongoing business combination through stock ownership.
Therefore, the proposal to allow stockholders to affirmatively elect to receive
one share of ARL preferred stock for each one share of TCI or IOT common stock
was set forth. Each series of the preferred stock was set with a liquidation
value per share at a premium above the cash price per share. ARL set the annual
dividend on the preferred stock at 10%. The conversion ratio was not determined
by the board of directors of ARL until after Houlihan Lokey completed their
evaluation and calculated a range of conversion ratios based on such evaluation.
Initially, Houlihan Lokey's engagement was limited to rendering an opinion as to
the fairness from a financial point of view of the consideration to be received
by the IOT and TCI nonaffiliated public stockholders. The scope of the
engagement was subsequently expanded and Houlihan Lokey was requested to conduct
negotiations on behalf of the TCI and IOT boards of directors with
representatives of ARL with respect to the terms of the proposed transaction,
including the conversion ratios for each series of preferred stock and the
timing of ARL's right to redeem the preferred stock.


         Houlihan Lokey advised the TCI and IOT boards (which consist of the
same individuals) that the conversion ratios should be such that the
stockholders would receive a number of shares of ARL common stock with a range
of underlying net asset values that approximates the range of the underlying net
asset values of the shares of TCI or IOT common stock they had exchanged for one
share of ARL preferred stock. They also suggested that the ARL preferred shares
should not be redeemable until the nonaffiliated stockholders had an opportunity
to evaluate the resulting business combination and convert to ARL common stock.


TCI'S PURPOSE AND REASONS FOR THE TCI MERGER

         Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, TCI received an offer to its
stockholders at $17.50 cash per share. That offer (in the form of the merger of
TCI into ARL) was at a significant premium over the average closing price of TCI
common stock over the thirty trading days prior to October 23, 2001. The TCI
board of directors received a suggestion of the concept of a cash offer through
advice initially in November 2000 and continued with periodic updates, through
mid-October 2001. Although the actual amount of the offer was not finalized
until October 23, 2001, the concept of the offer at a range reflecting a
significant premium over the then market price was known. Once actually
received, the TCI board of directors began the analysis process by employment of
Houlihan Lokey as an independent financial advisor and reviewing information to
determine the potential fairness of the offer to the TCI stockholders.

         In reaching its decision to approve the TCI merger agreement and to
recommend that TCI stockholders approve the TCI merger agreement, the TCI board
of directors consulted with management and its legal and financial advisors. The
TCI board of directors reviewed various information available to it and provided
by management, financial advisors and counsel and considered a number of
factors, including those described below. During its review, the TCI board of
directors did not address whether any of the various factors, information or
advice should be considered as a positive or negative factor affecting their
respective determinations. In certain instances, one or more of the factors
might be considered to be both positive and negative depending upon the
importance to the reviewer. The factors were simply viewed as a whole, and the
individual members of the TCI board of directors did not find it necessary to
make any list of






                                       61


so-called positive factors or so-called negative factors. The TCI board of
directors considered a number of factors including, without limitation, the
following potentially positive factors:

         o        The current and historical market prices of TCI common stock
                  relative to the merger consideration and the fact that the
                  $17.50 per share merger consideration represented a 44.6%
                  premium over the average closing price of TCI common stock
                  over the thirty trading days prior to October 23, 2001.

         o        The fact that the merger consideration is all cash, which
                  provides certainty of value to nonaffiliated TCI stockholders
                  compared to a transaction in which stockholders would only
                  receive stock.

         o        The fact that nonaffiliated TCI stockholders have the
                  opportunity to affirmatively elect to receive ARL preferred
                  stock instead of cash.

         o        It is the view of the TCI board of directors that the trading
                  value for shares of TCI common stock was not likely to exceed
                  the merger price in the near term if TCI remained independent.

         o        The potential stockholder value that could be expected to be
                  generated from other strategic options available to TCI,
                  including (a) remaining independent and continuing to
                  implement its growth strategy, or (b) pursuing other strategic
                  alternatives, as well as the risks and uncertainties
                  associated with those alternatives.

         o        The financial presentation of Houlihan Lokey and the opinion
                  of that firm delivered on February 1, 2002 to the TCI board of
                  directors to the effect that, based upon and subject to the
                  matters set forth in that opinion, as of February 1, 2002, the
                  consideration to be offered to the nonaffiliated TCI public
                  stockholders pursuant to the TCI merger agreement was fair
                  from a financial point of view to those holders.

         o        The terms of the TCI merger agreement, as reviewed by the TCI
                  board of directors with TCI legal advisors including:

                  o        the absence of any financing condition

                  o        no termination fee if the TCI merger agreement is
                           terminated

                  o        consummation of the TCI merger agreement resolving
                           expensive, inconvenient and distracting litigation

         o        The TCI board of directors' determination, based on the fact
                  that no other offers to acquire TCI common stock have been
                  made at a level equal to or better than the merger
                  consideration of $17.50 per share before or after initial
                  press reports on and after October 23, 2001, that ARL had
                  agreed to acquire the nonaffiliated stockholder interest in
                  TCI and after discussing with TCI's advisors the potential
                  risks, costs and benefits of contacting other third parties,
                  that there was insufficient reason to justify the risk of
                  delay in proceeding with the favorable transaction with ARL.

         o        In the view of the TCI board of directors, based upon the
                  advice of management after consultation with its legal
                  counsel, the regulatory approvals necessary to consummate the
                  TCI merger could be obtained.

         o        TCI will no longer exist as an independent company, and its
                  stockholders will no longer participate in the growth of TCI
                  or the pursuit of its standalone business plan and other
                  factors set forth in the TCI certificate of incorporation.





                                       62


         o        Under the terms of the TCI merger agreement, the fact that
                  gains from an all cash transaction would be taxable to TCI
                  stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

         Although the various factors were simply viewed as a whole, and the
individual members of the TCI board did not make any list of positive or
negative factors, the following potentially negative factors were considered by
the board in its deliberations concerning the merger in relation to both the ARL
and TCI businesses, but the board was not able to quantify any of the following:

         o        Although the $17.50 per share merger consideration represents
                  a significant premium over the average closing price of TCI
                  common stock over the thirty trading days prior to October 23,
                  2001, the $17.50 per share merger consideration is less than
                  the calculated book value per share from a financial
                  standpoint (at December 31, 2001, it was $26.95 per share).


         o        Based upon unaudited pro forma consolidated financial
                  statements giving effect to the merger of TCI into ARL,
                  resulting earnings per share from continuing operations would
                  also be less than the historical earnings per share of TCI
                  ($2.32 per share at December 31, 2001).


         o        ARL will have to raise capital from other sources, refinance
                  indebtedness, or sell assets (likely including assets owned by
                  TCI) to produce proceeds sufficient to finance the cash
                  payments in the merger to TCI stockholders, all of which is
                  likely to result in a substantial increase in the amount of
                  leverage as a result of the merger.

         o        By virtue of a number of factors, it is possible that there
                  may not be sufficient ARL cash to allow the payment of
                  dividends on the Series G redeemable convertible preferred
                  stock as a result of the substantial debt to be incurred and
                  increase of leverage by ARL.

         o        The likelihood that some significant divestitures will be
                  required and the risk that the circumstances of any such
                  divestitures may not fully maximize the value received for the
                  divested assets.

         o        The risk of diverting management focus and corporate resources
                  from other strategic opportunities and operational matters for
                  an extended period of time.

         o        Gains from an all cash transaction would be taxable to TCI
                  stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes even though
                  some TCI stockholders may elect to receive Series G redeemable
                  convertible preferred stock.

         The TCI board of directors has an awareness of all of the possible
adverse consequences described above, including that the book value per share of
TCI common stock from a financial standpoint exceeds the cash offered of $17.50
per share. Historically, the market value per share of TCI common stock (at
least for the last several years) has been less than the calculated book value
per share from a financial standpoint (at December 31, 2001, $26.95 per share).
The Board of Directors of TCI is also well aware that ARL will have to raise
capital from other sources, which will likely include sales of assets owned by
TCI, to produce proceeds sufficient to finance the cash payments in the merger
to TCI stockholders, all of which is likely to result in a substantial increase
in the amount of leverage as a result of the merger.





                                       63


         During its consideration of the transaction with ARL, the TCI board of
directors were also aware that certain directors and executive officers of TCI
may have interests in the merger that are different from or in addition to those
of nonaffiliated TCI stockholders generally, as described under "Interests of
Directors and Officers in the Business Combination." Specifically, the executive
officers of BCM, ARL, TCI and IOT are the same. TCI and IOT have the same
directors and Mr. Earl Cecil is a director of ARL, TCI and IOT. The multiple
positions held by these individuals causes them to owe fiduciary duties to more
than one company in the business combination.

         The discussion of the information and factors considered and given and
weighed by the TCI board of directors is not intended to be exhaustive, but it
is believed to address the material information and factors considered by the
TCI board of directors. In view of the number and variety of these factors, the
TCI board of directors did not find it practicable to make specific assessments
of or otherwise assign relative weights to, the specific factors and analyses
considered in reaching its determination. The determination to approve and
recommend the TCI merger agreement was made after consideration of all of the
factors and analyses as a whole. In addition, individual members of the TCI
board of directors may have given different weights to different factors.

IOT'S PURPOSE AND REASONS FOR THE IOT MERGER

         Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, IOT received an offer to its
stockholders at $19 cash per share. That offer (in the form of the merger of IOT
into ARL) was at a significant premium over the average closing price of IOT
common stock over the thirty trading days prior to October 23, 2001. The IOT
board of directors received a suggestion of the concept of a cash offer through
advice initially in November 2000 and continued with periodic updates, through
mid-October 2001. Although the actual amount of the offer was not finalized
until October 23, 2001, the concept of the offer at a range reflecting a
significant premium over the then market price was known. Once actually
received, the IOT board of directors began the analysis process by employment of
Houlihan Lokey as an independent financial advisor and reviewing information to
determine the potential fairness of the offer to the IOT stockholders.

         In reaching its decision to approve the IOT merger agreement and to
recommend that IOT stockholders approve the IOT merger agreement, the IOT board
of directors consulted with management and its legal and financial advisors. The
IOT board of directors reviewed various information available to it and provided
by management, financial advisors and counsel and considered a number of
factors, including those described below. During its review, the IOT board of
directors did not address whether any of the various factors, information or
advice should be considered as a positive or negative factor affecting their
respective determinations. In certain instances, one or more of the factors
might be considered to be both positive and negative depending upon the
importance to the reviewer. The factors were simply viewed as a whole, and the
individual members of the IOT board of directors did not find it necessary to
make any list of so-called positive factors or so-called negative factors. The
IOT board of directors considered a number of factors including, without
limitation, the following potentially positive factors:

         o        The current and historical market prices of IOT common stock
                  relative to the merger consideration, and the fact that the
                  $19 per share merger consideration represented a




                                       64


                  28.7% premium over the average closing price of IOT common
                  stock over the thirty trading days prior to October 23, 2001.

         o        The fact that the merger consideration is all cash, which
                  provides certainty of value to nonaffiliated IOT stockholders
                  compared to a transaction in which stockholders would only
                  receive stock.

         o        The fact that nonaffiliated IOT stockholders have the
                  opportunity to affirmatively elect to receive ARL preferred
                  stock instead of cash.

         o        It is the view of the IOT board of directors that the trading
                  value for shares of IOT common stock was not likely to exceed
                  the merger price in the near term if IOT remained independent.

         o        The potential stockholder value that can be expected to be
                  generated from other strategic options available to IOT,
                  including (a) remaining independent and continuing to
                  implement its growth strategy, or (b) pursuing other strategic
                  alternatives, as well as the risk and uncertainties associated
                  with those alternatives.

         o        The financial presentation of Houlihan Lokey and the opinion
                  of that firm delivered on February 1, 2002 to the IOT board of
                  directors to the effect that, based upon and subject to the
                  matters set forth in that opinion, as of February 1, 2002, the
                  consideration to be offered to the nonaffiliated IOT public
                  stockholders pursuant to the IOT merger agreement was fair
                  from a financial point of view to those holders.

         o        The terms of the IOT merger agreement, as reviewed by the IOT
                  board of directors with IOT legal advisors including:

                  o        the absence of any financing condition

                  o        no termination fee if the IOT merger agreement is
                           terminated

                  o        consummation of the IOT merger agreement finally
                           putting to end an expensive, inconvenient,
                           distracting litigation

         o        The IOT board of directors' determination, based on the fact
                  that no other offers to acquire IOT common stock have been
                  made at a level equal to or better than the merger
                  consideration of $19 per share before or after initial press
                  reports on and after October 23, 2001, that ARL had agreed to
                  acquire the nonaffiliated stockholder interest in IOT and
                  after discussing with IOT's advisors the potential risks,
                  costs and benefits of contacting other third parties, that
                  there was insufficient reason to justify the risk of delay in
                  proceeding with the favorable transaction with ARL.

         o        In the view of the IOT board of directors, based upon the
                  advice of management after consultation with its legal
                  counsel, the regulatory approvals necessary to consummate the
                  IOT merger could be obtained.

         o        IOT will no longer exist as an independent company, and its
                  stockholders will no longer participate in the growth of IOT
                  or the pursuit of its standalone business plan and other
                  factors set forth in the IOT certificate of incorporation.

         o        Under the terms of the IOT merger agreement, the fact that
                  gains from an all cash transaction would be taxable to IOT
                  stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

         Although the various factors were simply viewed as a whole, and the
individual members of the IOT board did not make any list of positive or
negative factors, the board did consider the





                                       65


following potentially negative factors in its deliberations concerning the
merger in relation to both the ARL and IOT businesses, but the board was not
able to quantify any of the following:

         o        Although the $19.00 per share merger consideration represents
                  a significant premium over the average closing price of IOT
                  common stock over the thirty trading days prior to October 23,
                  2001, the $19 per share merger consolidation is less than the
                  calculated book value per share from a financial standpoint
                  (at December 31, 2001, it was $24.48 per share).

         o        Based upon the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial
                  statements, the merger may result in earnings per share of ARL
                  that are less than the historical earnings per share of IOT
                  and TCI.

         o        ARL may have to raise capital from other sources, refinance
                  indebtedness, or sell assets (likely including assets owned by
                  IOT) to produce proceeds sufficient to finance the cash
                  payments in the merger to IOT stockholders, all of which is
                  likely to result in a substantial increase in the amount of
                  leverage as a result of the merger.

         o        By virtue of a number of factors, it is possible that there
                  may not be sufficient ARL cash to allow the payment of
                  dividends on the Series G redeemable convertible preferred
                  stock as a result of the substantial debt to be incurred and
                  increase of leverage by ARL.

         o        The likelihood that some significant divestitures will be
                  required and the risk that the circumstances of any such
                  divestitures may not fully maximize the value received for the
                  divested assets.

         o        The risk of diverting management focus and corporate resources
                  from other strategic opportunities and operational matters for
                  an extended period of time.

         o        Gains from an all cash transaction would be taxable to IOT
                  stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes even though
                  some IOT stockholders may elect to receive Series G redeemable
                  convertible preferred stock.

         o        As a result of the merger, IOT stockholders will no longer be
                  holders of an equity interest in a REIT and therefore, will
                  not receive 95% of REIT net income in the form of dividends
                  each year. See "Comparative Per Share Information" for the
                  amount of IOT distributions during the last two years. During
                  the year ended December 31, 2000, IOT paid dividends equal to
                  $0.45 per share of IOT common stock and paid no dividends in
                  2001.

         o        See also "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
                  Management of ARL".

         The IOT Board of Directors has an awareness of all of the possible
adverse consequences described above, including that the book value per share of
IOT common stock from a financial standpoint exceeds the cash offered of $19.00
per share. Historically, the market value per share of IOT common stock (at
least for the last several years) has been less than the calculated book value
per share from a financial standpoint (at December 31, 2001, $24.48 per share).
The board of directors of IOT is well aware that ARL will have to raise capital
from other sources, which will likely include sales of assets owned by IOT, to
produce proceeds sufficient to finance the cash payments in the merger to IOT
stockholders, all of which is likely to result in a substantial increase in the
amount of leverage as a result of the merger.





                                       66


         During its consideration of the transaction with ARL, the IOT board of
directors were also aware that certain directors and executive officers of IOT
may have interests in the merger that are different from or in addition to those
of nonaffiliated IOT stockholders generally, as described under "Interests of
Directors and Officers in the Business Combination." Specifically, the executive
officers of BCM, ARL, TCI and IOT are the same. TCI and IOT have the same
directors and Mr. Earl Cecil is a director of ARL, TCI and IOT. The multiple
positions held by these individuals causes them to owe fiduciary duties to more
than one company in the business combination.

         The discussion of the information and factors considered and given and
weighted by the IOT board of directors is not intended to be exhaustive, but it
is believed to address the material information and factors considered by the
IOT board of directors. In view of the number and variety of these factors, the
IOT board of directors did not find it practicable to make specific assessments
of or otherwise assign relative weights to, the specific factors and analyses
considered in reaching its determination. The determination to approve and
recommend the IOT merger agreement was made after consideration of all of the
factors and analyses as a whole. In addition, individual members of the IOT
board of directors may have given different weights to different factors.

ARL'S PURPOSE AND REASONS FOR THE MERGER

         ARL's purpose in pursuing the merger is to acquire the businesses of
TCI and IOT at what ARL believes to be an attractive price and on what it
believes to be attractive terms. In addition, ARL believes that by combining and
integrating under ARL the businesses and operations of ARL, IOT and TCI, ARL
will be able to enjoy greater financial and operational flexibility, and may
enjoy better access to capital. ARL's opportunity to acquire TCI and IOT arose,
in part, from the court approved settlement of certain litigation against TCI,
IOT and certain of their affiliates known as Jack Olive, et. al. v. National
Income Realty Trust, et. al., Case No. C89 4331 MHP pending in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California (the "Olive Litigation").
The claims in the Olive Litigation related to the operation and management of
TCI and IOT. As described elsewhere in this joint proxy statement and prospectus
under "Summary - The Olive Settlement" the parties to the litigation have
entered into a settlement, after arms length negotiation, providing that if the
stockholders of TCI and IOT so approve, TCI and IOT will become subsidiaries of
ARL through the mechanism of the proposed mergers. As a result of the mergers,
if consummated, stockholders of TCI and IOT (other than Mr. Phillips, BCM, ARL
and ART) will receive $17.50 and $19.00 in cash for each of their shares of the
common stock of TCI or IOT, respectively. Stockholders of TCI and IOT who are
entitled to receive cash for their shares of the common stock of TCI or IOT will
also, under the proposed settlement, have the opportunity to affirmatively elect
to receive shares of the preferred stock of ARL in lieu of cash. BCM and
affiliates of BCM, ART, ARL and Mr. Phillips have agreed to receive shares of
the ARL preferred stock offered hereby for their shares of the common stock of
TCI and IOT, thus reducing the amount of cash necessary to consummate the
proposed transactions. The proposed transactions were negotiated by ARL's
management and presented to the ARL board of directors for approval. After
consideration of the proposals, the ARL board unanimously approved the
transactions and recommended that the stockholders of ARL approve the TCI and
IOT merger agreements.





                                       67


         In reaching its decision to approve and recommend to the ARL
stockholders the TCI merger agreement and the IOT merger agreement, the ARL
board of directors consulted with management, reviewed materials provided to it
by management as part of management's presentation to the board and pursuant to
requests from the board, consulted with its legal advisors and discussed the
proposed transactions among its members. The ARL board of directors considered a
great deal of information, advice and a number of factors in reaching its
decision, including those described below. Some of this information and advice
and some of these factors are favorable with respect to ARL's interests and some
are not. Although individual members of the board may have considered some
information, factors or advice more or less important than others, and some may
have seen particular information, factors or advice as reflecting more or less
favorably or negatively upon the proposed transactions, in view of the number
and variety of this information, factors and advice, the ARL board did not find
it practicable or useful, as a board, to make specific assessments of or to
otherwise assign relative weights to the factors, information and advice
considered in reaching its decisions. Instead, the determination to approve and
recommend the TCI and IOT merger agreements was made after consideration of all
of the factors, information and advice as a whole, whether negative or
favorable, and after discussion thereof by the board. In its discussion, the ARL
board did not specifically address whether any of various factors, information
or advice considered positively or negatively affected their determination.
Among the information, factors and advice considered by the ARL board were the
following:

         o        The ARL board reviewed information concerning the historical
                  market prices for the TCI, IOT and ARL common stock. In doing
                  so, the board noted that the proposed merger consideration
                  represented a 44.6% premium over the average closing price of
                  the TCI common stock over the thirty trading days prior to
                  October 23, 2001 and a 28.7% premium over the average closing
                  price for the IOT common stock for the same period. The board
                  also compared the historical relationship between the prices
                  for shares of ARL's common stock and shares of TCI's and IOT's
                  common stock. As a general matter, paying a premium to the
                  market price for shares of the common stock of TCI and IOT can
                  be seen as negative to the interests of ARL.

         o        In considering the merger consideration to be offered for the
                  shares of TCI and IOT common stock, the ARL board was advised
                  by management of ARL of the history of negotiations among
                  representatives of ARL, TCI and IOT with respect to the merger
                  consideration and the structure of the proposed transactions.
                  In addition, the board was advised of the advice rendered to
                  the boards of TCI and IOT by their financial advisor to the
                  effect that based upon and subject to certain matters to be
                  reflected in an opinion, as of February 1, 2002, the
                  consideration to be offered to the nonaffiliated public
                  stockholders of TCI and IOT was fair from a financial point of
                  view to those stockholders. The ARL board was not provided
                  with a copy of TCI and IOT's financial advisors opinion or
                  board presentation at the time it approved the proposed
                  transactions. The fact that the proposed transactions were
                  negotiated at arms length over an extended period of time and
                  the fact that TCI's and IOT's financial advisor considered the
                  structure of the proposed transactions and the merger
                  consideration to be paid to be fair to the nonaffiliated
                  stockholders of TCI and IOT can be seen as a favorable aspect
                  of the proposed transactions from ARL's point of view.




                                       68


         o        In considering the cash merger consideration to be offered for
                  the TCI common stock and IOT common stock, the ARL board noted
                  that in each case, the cash consideration was less than the
                  current book value per share of the common stock of TCI and
                  IOT. In the case of TCI, the cash merger consideration to be
                  offered is $17.50 per share, while the book value of the TCI
                  common stock at December 31, 2001 was $26.95 per share. In the
                  case of IOT, the cash merger consideration to be offered is
                  $19.00 per share, while the book value of the IOT common stock
                  at December 31, 2001 was $24.48 per share. The fact that as a
                  result of the transactions, ARL will acquire TCI and IOT by
                  paying less than the book value per share of those businesses
                  can be seen as favorable to ARL's interests.

         o        The ARL board reviewed the real estate portfolios of ARL, TCI
                  and IOT and expressed the view that the proposed combination
                  of those portfolios would benefit ARL by increasing the size
                  and diversity of its portfolio and increasing the number of
                  development opportunities available to it. The board noted, in
                  coming to this conclusion, that TCI and IOT have the largest
                  number of their properties in the Southwest region of the
                  United States, while ARL has its greatest concentration of
                  properties in the Southeast. The ARL board felt that this
                  increase in the size and diversity of ARL's portfolio was a
                  favorable aspect of the proposed transactions from ARL's point
                  of view.

         o        The ARL board expected that an increase in the size of the
                  portfolio of real estate properties under ARL's control, and
                  an increase in the size of its business generally, would also
                  increase ARL's financial flexibility. Among other things, the
                  board felt that an larger portfolio would increase that
                  likelihood that properties would be available for sale or
                  mortgage when ARL or its subsidiaries required cash for
                  development activities. In addition, the board felt that a
                  larger entity would be more attractive as a borrower to
                  capital sources. The increase in financial flexibility that
                  may occur as a result of the proposed transactions was seen as
                  favorable to ARL's interests by ARL's board.

         o        The ARL board carefully reviewed with ARL's management the
                  anticipated cash requirements of ARL's business in the future
                  if the TCI and IOT mergers, or either of them, were
                  consummated, and management's expectations regarding steps
                  necessary to assure that sufficient cash was available to meet
                  ARL's obligations to pay the cash portion of the merger
                  consideration. The ARL board understood that the cash to be
                  paid as merger consideration could be raised in large part
                  from the sales or refinancing of real estate held by TCI and
                  IOT. The ability to finance the proposed transactions in large
                  part by selling or refinancing the assets of TCI and IOT can
                  be seen as a favorable aspect of the proposed transactions
                  from ARL's point of view. However, the increased indebtedness
                  that may result from refinancing the assets of the combined
                  business will increase the risk associated with the business
                  and can be seen as a potentially negative factor.

         o        The ARL board expects that the consummation of each of the TCI
                  and IOT mergers will be dependent upon the availability of
                  sufficient cash to consummate those transactions, and that ARL
                  will not consummate the TCI merger or the IOT merger,
                  respectively, unless management believes such cash is
                  available at the time of the merger. The ARL board did not
                  believe that agreeing to consummate either of the






                                       69


                  proposed transactions before, in either case, sufficient cash
                  was available to do so would be in ARL's best interests.

         o        The ARL board carefully reviewed the terms of the proposed
                  merger agreements with TCI and IOT with management and its
                  legal counsel and noted that neither of the merger agreements
                  were expected to be entered into until after the stockholders
                  of ARL and TCI or IOT, as the case may be, had approved the
                  proposed merger. In connection with its review, the ARL board
                  noted that the proposed merger agreements did not contain a
                  financing condition and could be terminated without penalty by
                  either party. These provisions can be seen as favorable to
                  ARL. In addition, the ARL board noted that because the merger
                  agreements would not be executed until stockholder approval is
                  obtained, it is possible that a third party might seek to
                  acquire either TCI or IOT before such approval could be
                  obtained, making it unlikely that a merger with that entity
                  would occur. Since it is possible that another person might
                  acquire TCI or IOT after ARL has expended a great deal of
                  money and effort on the proposed transactions, this provision
                  of the merger agreements can be seen as negative to ARL's
                  interests.

         o        The ARL board noted that ARL affiliates hold approximately
                  14.9% and 7.4% of the issued and outstanding common stock of
                  TCI and IOT, respectively, and that those stockholders will
                  accept preferred stock of ARL in lieu of cash as merger
                  consideration. The reduction in the cash necessary to
                  consummate the proposed transactions made possible by
                  delivering preferred stock to the ARL affiliates in lieu of
                  cash can be seen a favorable to ARL's interests.

         o        The ARL board noted that the TCI and IOT mergers are not
                  conditioned upon one another, meaning that, subject to
                  stockholder approval and the availability of necessary cash,
                  either of the mergers could be consummated, even if the other
                  was not. ARL's ability to close one, but not the other
                  transaction, can be seen as favorable to ARL's interests.

         o        The ARL board noted that if ARL were unable or unwilling to
                  consummate either of the proposed mergers, it would become
                  obligated to pay a penalty of $5.00 per outstanding share of
                  the common stock of the entity not being acquired unless it
                  initiated a tender offer for such shares for at least the same
                  consideration proposed in the mergers with respect to the cash
                  consideration. The ARL board further noted that consummation
                  of the mergers might not occur for a number of reasons outside
                  of ARL's control, including failure to obtain the necessary
                  stockholder approvals of TCI or IOT or the lack of sufficient
                  cash available to ARL, TCI or IOT, as the case may be, to pay
                  the cash portion of the merger consideration. ARL's ability to
                  avoid the penalty by initiating a tender offer can be seen as
                  favorable to ARL's interests, although the existence of the
                  penalty provisions can be seen as negative.

         o        The ARL board considered, based upon the advice of management
                  and after consultation with legal counsel, the time and
                  management resources necessary to solicit the requisite
                  stockholder approval of the mergers and to consummate the
                  mergers. The risk that consummating the proposed transactions
                  will divert ARL's management resources from its existing
                  businesses is a negative aspect of the proposed transactions
                  from ARL's point of view.

         o        The ARL board considered the steps necessary to consummate the
                  mergers, in addition to those required to solicit stockholder
                  approval, and based upon the advice



                                       70


                  of management and after consultation with legal counsel, was
                  of the view that such steps, including the obtaining of
                  necessary regulatory and other approvals, could be obtained.

         During its consideration of the proposed transactions with TCI and IOT,
the ARL board was aware that certain executive officers and directors of ARL may
have interests in the proposed transactions that are different from or in
addition to those of ARL's nonaffiliated stockholders generally, all as
described under "Interests of Directors and Officers in the Business
Combination." Specifically, the executive officers of BCM, ARL, TCI and IOT are
the same. TCI and IOT have the same directors and Mr. Earl Cecil is a director
of ARL, TCI and IOT. The multiple positions held by these individuals causes
them to owe fiduciary duties to more than one company in the business
combination.

         The foregoing discussion of the information, factors and advice
considered by the ARL board of directors is not intended to be exhaustive, but
is believed to address the material information, factors and advice considered
by the ARL board of directors in reaching its determination to approve and
recommend the TCI and IOT merger agreements.

FINANCING OF THE BUSINESS COMBINATION


         ARL estimates that approximately $60,996,907 (TCI-$50,043,787 and IOT
$10,953,120) will be required if all nonaffiliated TCI and IOT stockholders take
cash in exchange for their shares of TCI common stock and IOT common stock, and
to pay the related fees and expenses of the transactions. The actual amount
required to purchase such shares and pay the related expenses will depend on the
number of stockholders who affirmatively elect to receive Series G and Series H
redeemable convertible preferred stock. Consequently, the greater number of
stockholders who affirmatively elect to receive Series G and Series H redeemable
convertible preferred stock the less funds will be required to pay the cash
merger consideration and certain of the related expenses. ARL expects to fund
the actual TCI and IOT stock purchase through sales of properties currently
under contract. In addition, ARL and TCI will obtain new loans and refinance
certain current loans to finance other cash requirements. The following table
contains an itemized list of funds applicable to the individual mergers as well
as funds that apply to both mergers. This table assumes that all nonaffiliated
TCI and IOT stockholders take the cash merger consideration.




             APPLICATION OF FUNDS SPECIFIC                  AMOUNT OF
                     TO TCI MERGER                            FUNDS                    SOURCE OF FUNDS
                                                                    
Purchase of 2,853,080 shares of TCI common stock at                       Cash from the sources set forth in the
         $17.50 per share from all nonaffiliated TCI                      Source of Funds table below
         stockholders................................     $50,043,787

Sunset Management loan secured by 2,601,798 shares of                     ARL intends to renegotiate the loan,
         TCI common stock............................     $20,000,000     substituting all of the common stock of
                                                                          TCI after the merger for the TCI common
                                                                          stock now used as collateral. ARL may also
                                                                          increase this loan. If this loan is not
                                                                          renegotiated, it must be repaid.

Dynamic Finance loan secured by 843,311 shares of TCI                     ARL intends to satisfy the loan by
         common stock................................     $4,000,000      substituting ARL stock owned by BCM as
                                                                          collateral for the TCI common stock now
                                                                          used as collateral, otherwise ARL must
                                                                          pay off this loan






                                       71


                                                                    
Preferred Bank loan secured by 249,191 shares of TCI                      ARL intends to satisfy the loan by
         common stock................................     $250,000        substituting ARL stock owned by BCM as
                                                                          collateral for the TCI common stock now
                                                                          used as collateral, otherwise ARL must
                                                                          pay off this loan

     Subtotal........................................     $74,293,787
     



             APPLICATION OF FUNDS SPECIFIC                  AMOUNT OF
                     TO IOT MERGER                            FUNDS                    SOURCE OF FUNDS
                                                                    
Purchase of 576,480 shares of IOT common stock at                         Cash from the sources set forth in the
         $19.00 per share from nonaffiliated IOT                          Source of Funds table below
         stockholders................................     $10,953,120

Beal Bank loan secured by 250,000 shares of IOT common                    ARL intends to satisfy the loan by
         stock.......................................     $3,000,000      substituting ARL stock owned by BCM as
                                                                          collateral for the IOT common stock now
                                                                          used as collateral, otherwise ARL must
                                                                          pay off this loan

     Subtotal........................................     $13,953,120





APPLICATION OF FUNDS APPLICABLE TO BOTH THE TCI AND IOT     AMOUNT OF
                        MERGERS                               FUNDS                     TYPE OF FUNDS
                                                                    
Payment to George Donaldson, Settlement Counsel,                          Cash from the sources set forth in the
         pursuant to the Olive Settlement                 $875,000        Source of Funds table below

Professional fees....................................     $590,000        Cash from the sources set forth in the
                                                                          Source of Funds table below

Advisory fees on property sales......................     $3,837,000      Cash from the sources set forth in the
                                                                          Source of Funds table below


                                                                          ARL will satisfy the margin loan by
                                                                          substituting stock of ARL owned by BCM
                                                                          as collateral for the TCI and IOT common
                                                                          stock now used as collateral, otherwise
                                                                          ARL must pay off this loan

Payment of a margin loan with a brokerage firm
         secured by 300,000 shares of TCI common
         stock and 150,000 shares of IOT common stock     $1,600,000

     Subtotal........................................     $6,902,000

     TOTAL...........................................     $95,148,907




         ARL expects the amount of funds needed to complete the business
combination, approximately $60,996,907 (TCI - $50,043,787 and IOT - $10,953,120)
to be funded through sales of properties currently under contract. Additionally,
ARL and TCI expect to have cash available through new borrowings and refinancing
of current properties and may sell securities in privately negotiated
transactions. The amount of funds needed to purchase the stock of nonaffilate
TCI and IOT shareholders will depend on the number of stockholders who accept
cash rather than affirmatively elect to receive Series G and Series H redeemable
convertible preferred stock. The more stockholders who elect to receive Series G
and Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock will reduce the amount of
cash needed to pay the cash merger consideration and in turn will affect the
assets needed to be sold. At the date of this joint proxy statement and
prospectus, ARL, TCI and IOT have property sales currently under contract
sufficient to fund the $60,996,907 (TCI - $50,043,787 and IOT - $10,953,120).
With regard to obtaining new loans or refinancing of current loans, no formal
written commitment has been issued by any lenders.








                                       72


Similarly, no stated or effective interest rates or other material terms of any
financing arrangement have been agreed. The table set forth below summarizes the
properties currently under contract to sell as well as expected loans that ARL
may use to fund the business combination. Some or all of the property sales and
loans may not be required depending on the amount of cash needed. The properties
listed below are more fully described under "Information about ARL -- Properties
of ARL," "Information about TCI -- Properties of TCI" and "Information about IOT
-- Properties of IOT," as applicable. In the event the cash from loans and any
sales of assets is greater than needed to satisfy the cash merger consideration
requirements, ARL and its subsidiaries will use the excess for working capital
purposes.





                                       73





                                                                                        Amount of Net Cash
                        SOURCE OF FUNDS                                              Expected to be Generated

                                                                                  
ARL expects to enter into new loans that total in the aggregate
    $20,000,000 that will be secured by approximately 4,000,000
    shares of ARL stock with a market value of $36,000,000                                $  20,000,000

ARL expects to obtain new loans that are secured by the following properties
                                                                                              7,821,926
    Arlington Place Apts               Pasadena, TX
    Quail Point Apts                   Huntsville, AL
    Regency Apts                       Lincoln, NB
    Sunset Apts                        Odessa, TX
    Northside Villas Apts              Tallahassee, FL
    Rolling Hills Apts                 Tallahassee, FL
    Melrose Business Park              Oklahoma City, OK
    Westwood S.C. Apts                 Mary Ester, FL

TCI expects to obtain new loans that are secured by the following properties
                                                                                             18,234,538
    Grove Park Apts                    Plano, TX
    Terrace Hill Apts                  El Paso, TX
    Mountain Plaza Apts                El Paso, TX
    Plantation Apts                    Tulsa, OK
    Quail Creek Apts                   Lawrence, KS
    Brandies Building                  Omaha, NB
    Encon Warehouse                    Fort Worth, TX
    Institute Place                    Chicago, IL
    Lexington Center Office            Colorado Springs, CO
    McLeod Commercial Building         Orlando, FL
    Ogden Industrial                   Ogden, UT

ARL has contracts to sell the following properties                                           16,711,000

    Confederate Point                  Jacksonville, FL
    Phesant Ridge                      Belleview, NE
    Conradi House                      Tallahassee, FL
    Morning Star Apts                  Tallahassee, FL
    Westwood Parc Apts                 Tallahassee, FL
    Valley Hi Apts                     Tallahassee, FL
    Beaumont Land                      Beaumont, TX
    Deluce Apts                        Tallahassee, FL
    Elm Fork Land                      Denton County, TX
    Stonegate Apts                     Tallahassee, FL
    Georgetown Land                    Panama City, FL



                                       74




                                                                                       
    Katrina Land                       Palm Desert, CA
    Mason Goodrich                     Houston, TX
    Vista Ridge                        Lewisville, TX
    Messick Land                       Palm Desert, CA
    Nashville Land                     Nashville, TN
    Varner Land                        Riverside, CA
    Eldorado Pkwy                      Collin County, TX

TCI has contracts to sell the following properties                                           41,305,000

    4242 Cedar Springs                 Dallas, TX
    Bonita Plaza                       Bonita, CA
    Country Club Villas                Largo, FL
    Country Crossing                   Tampa, FL
    Gladstell                          Houston, TX
    Grove Park                         Plano,TX
    Heritage on the River              Jacksonville, FL
    Plaza Tower                        St. Petersburg, FL
    Summerefield                       Orlando, FL
    Durham Center                      Durham, TX
    Red Cross Land                     Dallas, TX
    K Mart Ctr                         Cary, NC
    Trails of Windfern                 Houston, TX
    Washington Mutual                  Houston, TX
    Palm Desert Land                   Palm Desert, CA

Total                                                                                     $ 104,072,464



OPINION OF FINANCIAL ADVISOR

     The board of directors of each of TCI and IOT retained Houlihan Lokey,
pursuant to engagement letters dated October 4, 2001 (the "Engagement Letters"),
to render fairness opinions, from a financial point of view, to public TCI
common stockholders and public IOT common stockholders, in each case excluding
those stockholders affiliated with ARL, of the consideration to be received by
the nonaffiliated TCI stockholders and the nonaffiliated IOT stockholders in the
merger of TCI and IOT with two subsidiaries of ARL pursuant to which (a)
nonaffiliated TCI stockholders will receive: (i) $17.50 in cash or (ii) if they
affirmatively elect, one share of newly issued ARL Series G redeemable
convertible preferred stock for each share of TCI common stock that they
currently own and (b) nonaffiliated IOT stockholders will receive: (i) $19.00 in
cash or (ii) if they affirmatively elect, one share of newly issued ARL Series H
redeemable convertible preferred stock. Both the Series G redeemable convertible
preferred stock and Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock are
convertible into ARL common stock based upon the terms, conditions and exchange
ratios set forth herein. Houlihan Lokey and the board of directors of each of
TCI and IOT amended the Engagement Letters on February 1, 2002, to provide for
Houlihan Lokey's performance of certain additional financial advisory services
on behalf of the board of directors of each of TCI and IOT, specifically,
conducting negotiations with ARL regarding the mergers. Houlihan Lokey did not
set the cash offering price in the mergers of $17.50 per share for TCI
stockholders or $19 per share for IOT

                                       75


stockholders. These amounts were determined by negotiation between Settlement
Counsel and representatives of ARL. Houlihan Lokey advised the TCI and IOT
boards of directors as to the range of exchange ratios for the conversion
factors of ARL Series G and H Preferred Stock implied by the financial analysis
conducted by Houlihan Lokey and assisted the boards of directors in negotiating
such exchange ratios. See "Special Factors -- Background of the Business
Combination and -- Determination of Merger Consideration."

     Houlihan Lokey is a nationally recognized investment banking firm that
provides financial advisory services in connection with mergers and
acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, business valuations for a variety of regulatory
and planning purposes, recapitalizations, financial restructurings, and private
placements of debt and equity securities. In November of 1999, Houlihan Lokey
acted as financial advisor to an affiliate of ARL, TCI and IOT, National Realty,
L. P. ("NRLP"), and rendered a fairness opinion with respect to the
consideration to be received by unitholders of NRLP in connection with a
business combination. The board of directors of each of TCI and IOT selected
Houlihan Lokey to provide the financial advisory services described herein upon
a referral from NRLP and because of Houlihan Lokey's reputation as a nationally
recognized valuation and financial consulting firm that has substantial
experience providing valuation and consulting services. TCI agreed to pay
Houlihan Lokey a fee of $340,000 and IOT agreed to pay Houlihan Lokey a fee of
$60,000, in each case for its preparation and delivery of a fairness opinion
plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses that may be incurred by Houlihan Lokey in
connection herewith, plus a refundable indemnification deposit of $42,500 from
TCI and a refundable indemnification deposit of $7,500 from IOT. In accordance
with the Settlement Agreement in the Olive Litigation, Mr. Phillips, BCM and ARL
are required to reimburse TCI and IOT for such expenses. Pursuant to the
amendment to the Engagement Letters, TCI and IOT agreed to jointly pay Houlihan
Lokey an additional fee of $100,000 for the additional services described below.
No portion of Houlihan Lokey's fee is contingent upon the successful completion
of the mergers or any other related transaction. Houlihan Lokey has been
retained by TCI and IOT to deliver fairness opinions to the board of directors
of TCI and IOT and provide certain additional financial advisory services on
behalf of the board of directors of each of TCI and IOT, specifically, to
conduct negotiations with ARL regarding the terms of the Series G redeemable
convertible preferred and the Series H redeemable convertible preferred. With
respect to the negotiations with ARL, Houlihan Lokey advised the TCI and IOT
boards of directors with respect to the range of exchange ratios implied by
Houlihan Lokey's financial analysis and recommended that the boards of directors
ensure that the stockholders that received the ARL preferred stock would have an
adequate opportunity to evaluate the ARL combined business operation and to
convert the Series G and Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock into
ARL common stock. Houlihan Lokey also negotiated with representatives of ARL at
the direction of the boards of directors of IOT and TCI regarding the timing of
redeeming the preferred stock and converting the preferred stock. The exchange
ratio was determined by the boards of directors of ARL, IOT and TCI following
negotiations conducted by Houlihan Lokey and representatives of ARL. The
limitations on voting rights of the preferred stock were determined by ARL. TCI
and IOT agreed to indemnify Houlihan Lokey and its affiliates against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under federal securities laws that arise out
of the engagement of Houlihan Lokey.


     At joint meetings of the TCI and IOT boards of directors (which consist of
the same individuals) on February 1, 2002, Houlihan Lokey rendered its oral
opinion regarding the consideration to be received by the stockholders of


                                       76


TCI and IOT in connection with the mergers. Thereafter, Houlihan Lokey assisted
the TCI and IOT boards of directors with respect to certain negotiations
regarding modifications to the terms of the Series G redeemable convertible
preferred stock and Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock. On February
4, 2002, Houlihan Lokey confirmed in writing, that as of February 1, 2002, and
subject to and based upon the various qualifications and assumptions set forth
in its written opinions, the consideration to be received by the stockholders of
TCI and IOT in connection with the mergers was fair, from a financial point of
view, to the nonaffiliated TCI stockholders and the nonaffiliated IOT
stockholders. There were no material limitations to the fairness opinions. The
full text of Houlihan Lokey's opinions, which set forth the assumptions made,
general procedures followed, factors considered and limitations on the review
undertaken by Houlihan Lokey in rendering its opinions are attached hereto as
APPENDIX E and APPENDIX F and are incorporated herein by reference. The
discussion of the opinions below is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the opinions. You are urged to read Houlihan Lokey's opinions in their entirety
carefully for a description of the procedures followed, the factors considered
and the assumptions made by Houlihan Lokey.

     Houlihan Lokey's opinions to the TCI and IOT boards of directors address
only the fairness from a financial point of view of the consideration to be
received in the mergers. Houlihan Lokey's opinions do not constitute a
recommendation as to how any person should vote with respect to the mergers or a
recommendation as to the form and amount of consideration that any person should
elect in connection with the mergers. Houlihan Lokey is not rendering any
opinion on the current or prospective public share prices of any of TCI, IOT or
ARL (collectively, the "Subject Companies"). Houlihan Lokey's opinions also do
not address TCI's or IOT's underlying business decision to effect the mergers,
the tax consequences of the mergers, the fair market value of any of the Subject
Companies' assets either individually or collectively, or the reasonableness of
any aspect of the mergers not expressly addressed in its fairness opinions.
Houlihan Lokey has not been requested to, is not obligated to and does not
intend to update, revise or reaffirm its fairness opinion in connection with the
mergers. Events that could affect the fairness of the mergers, from a financial
point of view, include adverse changes in industry performance or market
conditions and changes to the business, financial condition and results of
operations of the Subject Companies.

     In arriving at its fairness opinions, among other things, Houlihan Lokey
assumed that: (i) each Series G share will have a liquidation preference of
$20.00 per share and will pay a cash dividend of 10 percent per annum; (ii) each
Series H share will have a liquidation preference of $21.50 per share and will
pay a cash dividend of 10 percent per annum; (iii) at the holders' option, each
Series G share is convertible into 2.5 shares of ARL common stock during a 75
day period commencing on the fifteenth day after the public issuance of ARL's
form 10-Q (the "10-Q Issuance Date") to the public following the close date of
the mergers; (iv) at the holders' option, each Series H share is convertible
into 2.25 shares of ARL common stock during a seventy-five day period commencing
on the fifteenth day after the 10-Q Issuance Date following the close date of
the mergers; and (v) the Series G and Series H shares will be redeemable by ARL
90 days after the 10-Q Issuance Date following the close date of the mergers at
the liquidation preference plus any accrued and unpaid dividends thereon.

                                       77


     In arriving at its fairness opinions, among other things, Houlihan Lokey:

     1.   met with certain members of the senior management of the Subject
          Companies and their advisor, BCM, to discuss the operations, financial
          condition, future prospects and projected operations and performance
          of the Subject Companies;

     2.   visited certain facilities and business offices of the Subject
          Companies;

     3.   reviewed the Subject Companies' annual reports to stockholders and on
          Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2000 and quarterly
          reports on Form 10-Q for the three quarters ended September 30, 2001,
          which Subject Companies' management have identified as being the most
          current financial statements available;

     4.   reviewed forecasts and projections prepared by the Subject Companies
          management with respect to the Subject Companies' apartment, retail,
          industrial, hotel and office building assets for the years ended
          December, 2002 through 2006;

     5.   requested the latest appraisals on the Subject Companies' income
          producing properties and any and all appraisals for the Subject
          Companies' land assets, and reviewed such appraisals as were provided
          by management;

     6.   reviewed ARL's Land Portfolio Book dated September 2001;

     7.   reviewed certain estimated valuations of TCI and IOT prepared in
          connection with the Settlement Agreement;

     8.   reviewed the historical market prices and trading volume for the
          Subject Companies' publicly traded securities;

     9.   reviewed certain other publicly available financial data for certain
          companies that Houlihan Lokey deems comparable to the Subject
          Companies; and

     10.  conducted such other studies, analyses and inquiries as Houlihan Lokey
          deemed appropriate.

ANALYSES

     In order to determine the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the
consideration to be received by the nonaffiliated IOT stockholders and the
nonaffiliated TCI stockholders in the mergers, Houlihan Lokey determined an
indicated range per share of equity net asset values for ARL, IOT and TCI and
compared such per share concluded equity net asset values to each other and to
the ARL per share public trading price. This analysis was premised upon a
valuation of each of the Subject Companies' income and non-income producing
properties and other assets and considered their respective liabilities.

     In determining the value of the Subject Companies' income producing
properties, Houlihan Lokey conducted several analyses, including the following:
(1) a "Net Asset Value" approach whereby Houlihan Lokey (a) applied
capitalization rates to historical and projected

                                       78


adjusted net operating income for each of the income producing properties held
by the Subject Companies (the "Income Producing Properties") and (b) estimated
the present value of the projected future cash flows to be generated from the
Income Producing Properties by applying a discount rate to the projected future
cash flow, (2) a "Portfolio" approach whereby Houlihan Lokey determined a level
of earnings considered to be representative of future performance of the Subject
Companies, and capitalized such figure with a risk-adjusted rate, and (3)
various other analyses. Houlihan Lokey used the following valuation
methodologies to determine the value of the land assets: historical sales price
per square foot, outstanding offers and letters of intent, management estimates
and book value. In addition, certain assets, such as Pizza World, Signature
Athletic Club and parking lots, were valued by employing the market multiple
approach and other assets, including notes receivable and oil and gas
operations, were valued at book value.

NET ASSET VALUE APPROACH - INCOME PRODUCING PROPERTY

DIRECT CAPITALIZATION

     In conducting the direct capitalization net asset value approach, Houlihan
Lokey applied (x) rates from publicly available capitalization rates estimated
in the Second Quarter 2001 Market Monitor and the Fall 2001 Real Estate Outlook
by Cushman & Wakefield, Inc. and The Appraisal Institute to (y) each of the
Income Producing Properties (i) adjusted net operating income for the twelve
months ended September 30, 2001 and (ii) projected adjusted net operating income
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002. The capitalization rates used in
the direct capitalization approach ranged from 8.9% to 15.9% for the
twelve-month period ended September 30, 2001 and from 9.3% to 16.4% for the
twelve month period ended December 31, 2002. Capitalization rates applied in
individual property valuations were determined with reference to the type of
property being evaluated and adjusted based on historical and/or projected
occupancy rates for such property, as applicable.

DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW

     In conducting the discounted cash flow net asset value approach, Houlihan
Lokey applied a discount rate to the projected future cash flows of each Income
Producing Property to arrive at present value of such Income Producing Property.
The applicable Subject Company provided Houlihan Lokey with the property level
historical and projected financial information used to determine the net
operating income of each property. The discount rates used in the discounted
cash flow approach ranged from 11.3% to 18.3% and were intended to reflect risks
of ownership of the relevant Income Producing Property and the associated risks
of realizing the stream of projected future cash flows. The discount rates
applied by Houlihan Lokey in its analysis were based on discount rates for
office, industrial and retail properties published by Cushman & Wakefield, Inc.
Discount rates applied in individual property valuations were determined with
reference to the types of property being evaluated and adjusted based on
historical and/or projected occupancy rates for such property, as applicable.
Houlihan Lokey's ability to use the discounted cash flow method of valuation was
limited by the lack of availability of necessary forecasts for certain Income
Producing Properties resulting from changes in tenant occupancy or other factors
that effect projected performance for certain Income Producing Properties.
Accordingly, Houlihan Lokey utilized the discount cash flow method only for
those assets with

                                       79


forecasts considered relevant. Additionally, based upon Houlihan Lokey's
discussions with management, due diligence and analysis of projections, in some
instances the discount rate was adjusted to reflect additional uncertainty and
risk associated with the projections.

SELECTED ASSET VALUES

     Based upon the valuation indications of both the direct capitalization and
discounted cash flow analyses, Houlihan Lokey selected a range of values for
each asset. Following the determination of the individual income producing
property asset values, each property's value was allocated to the Subject
Companies based on respective ownership of the assets.

PORTFOLIO (MARKET) APPROACH - INCOME PRODUCING PROPERTY

     The Subject Companies own various real estate assets that were combined,
based on asset types, into portfolios. Property level financial data was
provided by the applicable Subject Company based on internally prepared property
operating statements. The market approach consists of determining a level of
earnings and capitalizing this figure by an appropriate risk-adjusted rate. This
approach provides an indication of value for the security, which corresponds
with the particular earnings figure being capitalized. For purposes of
determining the value of the Income Producing Properties owned by the Subject
Companies, net operating income was utilized as a representative level of
earnings for the office, hotel, apartment, retail and industrial assets.

     In using the portfolio (market) approach, Houlihan Lokey applied debt-free
market capitalization rates to net operating income of the various categories of
Income Producing Properties of the Subject Companies, in each case to arrive at
the values of the Income Producing Properties.

     Houlihan Lokey utilized the Subject Companies' internal financial
statements to determine consolidated net operating income for the twelve months
ended September 30, 2001 and management projections for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2002. In performing the portfolio (market) analysis, Houlihan Lokey
applied capitalization rates ranging from 9.5% to 15.0% to the net operating
income for the twelve months ended September 30, 2001.

ARL VALUATION

     Because of the nature of ARL's assets and the diversity in type of
property, age, rental history and other factors, no single valuation methodology
was likely to produce an accurate indication of the value of ARL. As a result,
Houlihan Lokey engaged in a valuation of each ARL asset individually by applying
one or more valuation methodologies that were most likely to yield a meaningful
indication of value. Houlihan Lokey then aggregated the range of indicated
values for each property to determine the range of concluded enterprise values
and concluded equity net asset values for ARL taken as a whole. Based on the
portfolio (market) analysis conducted by Houlihan Lokey, Houlihan Lokey
estimated a range of asset value for ARL's income producing property as follows:
(1) $230.5 million to $254.7 million for the ARL apartment portfolio, (2) $50.7
million to $55.8 million for the ARL office portfolio, (3) $70.7 million to
$77.1 million for the ARL shopping center portfolio and (4) $68.8 million to
$80.3 million for ARL's hotel portfolio. In utilizing the "Net Asset Value"
approach, Houlihan Lokey

                                       80


estimated a range of asset value for ARL's income producing property as follows:
(1) $237.6 million to $248.8 million for apartment assets, (2) $59.4 million to
$65.0 million for hotel assets, (3) $120.9 million to $133.0 million for office
assets and (4) $84.4 million to $90.6 million for retail assets. Houlihan Lokey
estimated a range of asset values for ARL's land assets of $290.0 million to
$400.0 million. The estimate asset value for other assets such as investments in
joint ventures, Pizza World, oil & gas operations, notes receivable, accounts
receivable, escrows and earnest money, net other liabilities such as accounts
payable, property taxes and accrued expenses, was $27.6 million to $35.1
million. Houlihan Lokey estimated a range of value for ARL's investment in real
estate securities of $7.8 million to $10.5 million for ARL's 28.3 percent
ownership interest in IOT and $86.9 million to $123.6 million for ARL's 49.7
percent ownership interest in TCI. These estimated values were calculated based
upon ARL's percentage ownership in TCI and IOT multiplied by Houlihan Lokey's
concluded equity net asset values for TCI and IOT.

     Based on the approaches discussed above, Houlihan Lokey estimated a range
of concluded enterprise values for ARL of $873.7 million to $1,071.8 million, a
range of concluded equity net asset values for ARL of $126.3 million to $262.8
million and a range of per share concluded equity net asset values of $11.10 to
$23.10.

IOT VALUATION

     Because of the nature of IOT's assets and the diversity in type of
property, age, rental history and other factors, no single valuation methodology
was likely to produce an accurate indication of the value of IOT. As a result,
Houlihan Lokey engaged in a valuation of each IOT asset individually by applying
one or more valuation methodologies that were most likely to yield a meaningful
indication of value. Houlihan Lokey then aggregated the range of indicated
values for each property to determine the range of concluded enterprise values
and concluded equity net asset values for IOT taken as a whole. Based on the
portfolio (market) analysis conducted by Houlihan Lokey, Houlihan Lokey
estimated a range of asset value for IOT's income producing property as follows:
(1) $23.8 million to $26.3 million for the IOT apartment portfolio and (2) $38.1
million to $41.9 million for the IOT office portfolio. In utilizing the "Net
Asset Value" approach, Houlihan Lokey estimated a range of asset value for IOT's
income producing property as follows: (1) $21.5 million to $22.8 million for
apartment assets and (2) $41.3 million to $50.2 million for office assets. The
estimated asset value for IOT's land assets was $24.6 million to $31.6 million.
The estimated asset value for other assets such as investments in joint
ventures, notes receivable, accounts receivable and escrow deposits, net other
liabilities such as accounts payable, property taxes and security deposits was
-$0.6 million to $0.5 million.

     Based on the approaches discussed above, Houlihan Lokey estimated a range
of concluded enterprise values for IOT of $86.3 million to $102.7 million, a
range of concluded equity net asset values for IOT of $27.4 million to $37.0
million and a range of per share concluded equity net asset values of $19.04 to
$25.71.

                                       81


TCI VALUATION

     Because of the nature of TCI's assets and the diversity in type of
property, age, rental history and other factors, no single valuation methodology
produced an accurate indication of the value of TCI. As a result, Houlihan Lokey
engaged in a valuation of each TCI asset individually by applying one or more
valuation methodologies that were most likely to yield a meaningful indication
of value. Houlihan Lokey then aggregated the range of indicated values for each
property to determine the range of concluded enterprise values and concluded
equity net asset values for TCI taken as a whole. Based on the portfolio
(market) analysis conducted by Houlihan Lokey, Houlihan Lokey estimated a range
of asset value for TCI's income producing property as follows: (1) $221.0
million to $244.3 million for the TCI apartment portfolio, (2) $200.6 million to
$220.7 million for the TCI office portfolio, (3) $25.6 million to $28.0 million
for the TCI shopping center portfolio, (4) $49.7 million to $54.7 million for
the TCI industrial portfolio and (5) $13.1 million to $15.1 million for TCI's
hotel portfolio. In utilizing the "Net Asset Value" approach, Houlihan Lokey
estimated a range of asset value for TCI's income producing property as follows:
(1) $270.4 million to $296.0 million for apartment assets (2) $17.6 million to
$18.6 million for hotel assets, (3) $51.7 million to $60.7 million for
industrial/warehouse assets, (4) $225.9 million to $261.8 million for office
assets and (5) $28.0 million to $32.5 million for retail assets. Houlihan Lokey
estimated a range of asset values for TCI's land assets from $68.0 million to
$97.0 million. The estimated asset value for other assets such as investments in
joint ventures, the Signature Athletic Club, Alamo and West End parking lots,
notes receivable, advances to affiliates, accounts receivable, pending purchases
and escrow deposits, net other liabilities such as accounts payable, property
taxes and security deposits was $10.9 million to $15.1 million. Houlihan Lokey
estimated a range of asset value for TCI's investment in real estate securities
of $6.6 million to $8.9 million for TCI's 24 percent ownership interest in IOT
and $8.0 million to $16.6 million for TCI's 6.3 percent ownership interest in
ARL. These estimated values were calculated based upon TCI's percentage
ownership in ARL and IOT multiplied by Houlihan Lokey's concluded equity net
asset values for ARL and IOT.

     Based on the approaches discussed above, Houlihan Lokey estimated a range
of concluded enterprise values for TCI of $645.3 million to $754.1 million, a
range of concluded equity net asset values for TCI of $173.7 million to $247.2
million and a range of per share concluded equity net asset values of $20.70 to
$29.45.

EXCHANGE RATIO ANALYSIS

     Based on the foregoing valuation estimates, Houlihan Lokey notes that the
indicated exchange ratios based on net asset values of IOT and TCI and the
lowest estimated net asset value of ARL was 1.71 to 2.32 for IOT and 1.86 to
2.65 for TCI on an after tax basis and 1.24 to 1.81 for IOT and 1.42 to 2.10 on
a before tax basis.

     In conclusion, Houlihan Lokey's analyses indicated that the consideration
being offered to the nonaffiliated TCI stockholders and the nonaffiliated IOT
stockholders in connection with the mergers is fair from a financial point of
view. Houlihan Lokey's analysis did not disclose any specific factors that did
not support Houlihan Lokey's opinion.

                                       82


     Houlihan Lokey's opinions are based on the business, economic, market and
other conditions as they existed as of February 1, 2002, and on the projected
financial information provided to Houlihan Lokey as of that date. In rendering
its opinions, Houlihan Lokey has relied upon and assumed, without independent
verification, that the historical and projected financial information (including
the future value and estimated sale dates of the land held for sale) provided to
Houlihan Lokey by the Subject Companies has been reasonably and accurately
prepared based upon the best current available estimates of the financial
results and condition of the Subject Companies. Houlihan Lokey did not
independently verify the accuracy or completeness of the information supplied to
it with respect to the Subject Companies and does not assume responsibility with
respect to it. Except as set forth above, Houlihan Lokey did not make any
independent appraisal of the specific properties or assets of the Subject
Companies.

     The summary set forth above describes the material points of more detailed
analyses performed by Houlihan Lokey in arriving at its fairness opinions. The
preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex analytical process involving
various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of
financial analysis and application of those methods to the particular
circumstances and is therefore not readily susceptible to summary description.
In arriving at its opinions, Houlihan Lokey made qualitative judgments as to the
significance and relevance of each analysis and factor. Accordingly, Houlihan
Lokey believes that its analyses and summary set forth herein must be considered
as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses, without considering all
analyses and factors, or portions of this summary, could create an incomplete
view of the processes underlying the analyses set forth in Houlihan Lokey's
fairness opinions. In its analysis, Houlihan Lokey made numerous assumptions
with respect to the Subject Companies, industry performance, general business,
economic, market and financial conditions and other matters, many of which are
beyond the control of the respective entities. The estimates contained in the
analyses are not necessarily indicative of actual values or predictive of future
results or values, which may be more or less favorable than suggested by the
analyses. However, there were no specific factors reviewed by Houlihan Lokey
that did not support its opinions. Additionally, analyses relating to the value
of businesses or securities are not appraisals. Accordingly, the analyses and
estimates are inherently subject to substantial uncertainty.

DETERMINATION AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE TCI BOARD OF DIRECTORS

     On February 1, 2002, the TCI board of directors met by telephone conference
to consider the recommendation of the TCI merger, to approve the filing of
documents with the SEC and to authorize the executive officers to finalize this
joint proxy statement and prospectus and the related filings. At that meeting,
counsel for TCI reviewed and compared the terms of the TCI merger agreement to
the requirements under the Settlement Agreement. At that meeting, Houlihan Lokey
made a presentation to the TCI board of directors on the financial analyses
performed by Houlihan Lokey in connection with its fairness analysis. Houlihan
Lokey also made a presentation concerning the fairness of the consideration to
be offered to the nonaffiliated TCI stockholders in the merger and delivered
their opinion that the amount of the consideration to be offered in the TCI
merger was fair from a financial point of view to those nonaffiliated TCI
stockholders. Following the presentations, all of the TCI directors determined
that the terms of the Settlement Agreement and contemplated merger were
procedurally and substantively fair to the nonaffiliated TCI stockholders and
approved the terms of the merger and the TCI merger

                                       83


agreement. The TCI board of directors believe that the following helped insure
the procedural fairness of the proposed TCI merger to the nonaffiliated TCI
stockholders, all as required by the Settlement Agreement:

     o    That the TCI board of directors obtain an opinion from Houlihan Lokey
          that the consideration to be offered to the nonaffiliated TCI
          stockholders in the merger is fair to them from a financial point of
          view.

     o    The procedural mechanism for approval of the TCI merger agreement
          requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by
          nonaffiliated TCI stockholders.

     o    The TCI board of directors was aware that all affiliated TCI
          stockholders will receive ARL preferred stock in the merger rather
          than cash.

     o    The terms of the proposed TCI merger were dictated principally from
          the Settlement Agreement from arms length negotiations between
          Settlement Counsel and counsel for ARL.

     o    The TCI merger will afford nonaffiliated TCI stockholders with the
          opportunity (but no obligation) to make an affirmative election to
          receive securities rather than cash.

     o    The terms of the proposed TCI merger were not determined at a time
          when market prices were unusually depressed by virtue of the
          occurrence of any extraordinary or unique event.

     On February 1 and 4, 2002, the TCI board of directors again met by
telephone conference to review a revised form of opinion from Houlihan Lokey,
which contained proposed revisions to the timing of the conversion period of the
preferred stock available by affirmative election by the TCI stockholders.
During that meeting, discussions ensued concerning the probable timing based
upon potential filings by ARL depending upon the consummation of the TCI merger.
The TCI board of directors concluded that the recommended change in timing of
conversion periods would be beneficial to those TCI stockholders who
affirmatively elect to receive preferred stock. Following these discussions, the
TCI directors reaffirmed their February 1, 2002 determination that the terms of
the Settlement Agreement and contemplated merger are procedurally and
substantively fair to the nonaffiliated TCI stockholders as previously
described.

     The Houlihan Lokey opinion was rendered to the TCI board of directors for
its consideration in determining whether to approve the TCI merger agreement and
does not constitute a recommendation to any TCI stockholder as to how such
stockholder should vote.

     Based upon all of the information available to the TCI board of directors,
the TCI board of directors unanimously concluded that the terms and provisions
of the TCI merger and TCI merger agreement were fair to and in the best
interests of the nonaffiliated TCI stockholders, approved the TCI merger
agreement and recommended that the TCI stockholders approve the TCI merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. None of the members of the
TCI board of directors are employees of TCI.

DETERMINATION AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE IOT BOARD OF DIRECTORS

     On February 1, 2002, the IOT board of directors met by telephone conference
to consider the recommendation of the IOT merger, to approve the filing of
documents with the SEC and to authorize the executive officers to finalize this
joint proxy statement and prospectus and the

                                       84


related filings. At that meeting, counsel for IOT reviewed and compared the
terms of the IOT merger agreement to the requirements under the Settlement
Agreement. At that meeting, Houlihan Lokey made a presentation to the IOT board
of directors on the financial analyses performed by Houlihan Lokey in connection
with its fairness analysis. Houlihan Lokey also made a presentation concerning
the fairness of the consideration to be offered to the nonaffiliated IOT public
stockholders in the IOT merger and delivered their opinion that the amount of
the consideration to be offered in the IOT merger, was fair from a financial
point of view to those nonaffiliated IOT stockholders. Following the
presentations, all of the IOT directors determined that the terms of the
Settlement Agreement and contemplated IOT merger were procedurally and
substantively fair to the nonaffiliated IOT stockholders and approved the terms
of the IOT merger and the IOT merger agreement. The IOT board of directors
believe that the following helped insure the procedural fairness of the proposed
IOT merger to the nonaffiliated IOT stockholders, all as required by the
Settlement Agreement:

     o    That the IOT board of directors obtain an opinion from Houlihan Lokey
          that the consideration to be offered to the nonaffiliated IOT public
          stockholders in the merger is fair to them from a financial point of
          view.

     o    The procedural mechanism for approval of the IOT merger agreement
          requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by
          nonaffiliated IOT stockholders.

     o    The IOT board of directors was aware that all affiliated IOT
          stockholders will receive ARL preferred stock in the merger rather
          than cash.

     o    The terms of the proposed IOT merger were dictated principally from
          the Settlement Agreement from arms length negotiations between
          Settlement Counsel and counsel for ARL.

     o    The IOT merger will afford nonaffiliated IOT stockholders with the
          opportunity (but no obligation) to make an affirmative election to
          receive securities rather than cash.

     o    The terms of the proposed IOT merger were not determined at a time
          when market prices were unusually depressed by virtue of the
          occurrence of any extraordinary or unique event.

     On February 1 and 4, 2002, the IOT board of directors again met by
telephone conference to review a revised form of opinion from Houlihan Lokey,
which contained proposed revisions to the timing of the conversion period of the
preferred stock available by affirmative election by the IOT stockholders.
During that meeting, discussions ensued concerning the probable timing based
upon potential filings by ARL depending upon the consummation of the IOT merger.
The IOT board of directors concluded that the recommended change in timing of
conversion periods would be beneficial to those IOT stockholders who
affirmatively elect to receive preferred stock. Following these discussions, the
IOT directors reaffirmed their February 1, 2002 determination that the terms of
the Settlement Agreement and contemplated merger are procedurally and
substantively fair to the nonaffiliated IOT stockholders as previously
described.

     The Houlihan Lokey opinion was rendered to the IOT board of directors for
its consideration in determining whether to approve the IOT merger agreement and
does not constitute a recommendation to any IOT stockholder as to how such
stockholder should vote.

     Based upon all of the information available to the IOT board of directors,
the IOT board of directors unanimously concluded that the terms and provisions
of the IOT merger and IOT

                                       85

merger agreement were fair to and in the best interests of the nonaffiliated IOT
stockholders, approved the IOT merger agreement and recommended that the
stockholders approve the IOT merger agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby. None of the members of the IOT board of directors are employees of IOT.

Fairness Determination of the ARL Board of Directors

     On July 18, 2002, the ARL board of directors met by telephone conference to
consider the fairness of each of the TCI and IOT mergers to the nonaffiliated
stockholders of each TCI and IOT, respectively. At the meeting, counsel for ARL
described to members of the board certain legal requirements associated with the
solicitation of proxies from stockholders of TCI and IOT, and members of the
board discussed information to be provided by ARL in connection with the board's
deliberations. Thereafter, the meeting was adjourned until July 23, 2002 to give
members of the board time to receive and review such information.

     On July 23, 2002, the ARL board reconvened its meeting telephonically. At
that time, counsel for ARL reviewed the terms of each of the TCI and IOT merger
agreements, the terms of Settlement Agreement, the events leading up to the
proposed mergers, the circumstances of the approvals of the TCI and IOT merger
agreements and the recommendations by the respective boards of directors of TCI
and IOT. In addition, counsel for ARL reviewed certain legal requirements
associated with the consummation of the TCI and IOT mergers, the solicitation of
proxies and the terms of the settlement from the stockholders of TCI and IOT.
Following the presentation, the ARL directors unanimously determined that each
of the TCI and IOT mergers are procedurally and substantively fair to the
nonaffiliated TCI and IOT stockholders, respectively.

     The ARL board bases its belief with respect to the procedural fairness of
each of the TCI and IOT mergers on the following:

     o    Each of the TCI and IOT merger agreements are intended to implement,
          if properly approved by the stockholders of TCI and IOT, a court
          approved settlement to the Olive Litigation.

     o    The terms of each of the TCI and IOT merger agreements were approved
          by all of the members of the TCI and IOT boards, none of whom are
          employed by TCI and IOT, respectively.

     o    The TCI and IOT board of directors obtained an opinion from Houlihan
          Lokey that the consideration to be offered to the nonaffiliated TCI
          and IOT public stockholders in the mergers is fair to them from a
          financial point of view, respectively.

     o    The procedural mechanism for approval of each of the TCI and IOT
          merger agreements requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the
          votes cast by nonaffiliated TCI and IOT stockholders, respectively.

     o    Each of the TCI and IOT board of directors was aware that all
          affiliated TCI and IOT stockholders will receive ARL preferred stock
          in the merger rather than cash.

     o    The terms of each of the proposed TCI and IOT mergers were dictated
          principally from the Settlement Agreement which itself resulted from
          arms length negotiations between Settlement Counsel and counsel for
          affiliates of BCM and ARL.

                                       86


     o    The TCI and IOT mergers will each afford nonaffiliated TCI and IOT
          stockholders with the opportunity (but not the obligation) to make an
          affirmative election to receive securities rather than cash.

     o    The terms of the proposed TCI and IOT mergers were not determined at a
          time when market prices were unusually depressed by virtue of the
          occurrence of any extraordinary or unique event.

     In connection with its determination of the procedural and substantive
fairness of the TCI merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,
ARL relied upon the determinations of the board of TCI as having been taken in
good faith following the receipt of advice from legal and financial advisors.
The ARL board adopted the conclusions as to the fairness of the TCI merger set
forth under the "Recommendation and Determination of the TCI Board of Directors"
and "TCI's Purpose and Reasons for the TCI Merger", and the analyses underlying
such conclusions of TCI's board, based on ARL's reliance upon the determinations
of the TCI board and its own views as to its reasonableness of such analyses. In
view of the variety of factors considered in reaching its decision, ARL's board
did not quantify or otherwise assign relative weights to the various factors
considered in reaching its belief as to the fairness of the TCI merger.

     In connection with its determination of the procedural and substantive
fairness of the IOT merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,
ARL relied upon the determinations of the board of IOT as having been taken in
good faith following the receipt of advice from legal and financial advisors.
The ARL board adopted the conclusions as to the fairness of the IOT merger set
forth under the "Recommendation and Determination of the IOT Board of Directors"
and "IOT's Purpose and Reasons for the IOT Merger", and the analyses underlying
such conclusions of IOT's board, based on ARL's reliance upon the determinations
of the IOT board and its own views as to its reasonableness of such analyses. In
view of the variety of factors considered in reaching its decision, ARL's board
did not quantify or otherwise assign relative weights to the various factors
considered in reaching its belief as to the fairness of the IOT merger.


Fairness Determination of BCM and Mr. Phillips

     BCM and Mr. Phillips have determined that each of the TCI and IOT mergers
are procedurally and substantively fair to the nonaffiliated TCI and IOT
stockholders, respectively.

     BCM and Mr. Phillips base their belief with respect to the procedural
fairness of each of the TCI and IOT mergers on the following:


     o    Each of the TCI and IOT merger agreements are intended to implement,
          if properly approved by the stockholders of TCI and IOT, a court
          approved settlement to the Olive Litigation.

     o    The terms of each of the TCI and IOT merger agreements were approved
          by all of the members of the TCI and IOT boards, none of whom are
          employed by TCI and IOT, respectively.

                                       87


     o    The TCI and IOT board of directors obtained an opinion from Houlihan
          Lokey that the consideration to be offered to the nonaffiliated TCI
          and IOT public stockholders in the mergers is fair to them from a
          financial point of view, respectively.

     o    The procedural mechanism for approval of each of the TCI and IOT
          merger agreements requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the
          votes cast by nonaffiliated TCI and IOT stockholders, respectively.

     o    Each of the TCI and IOT board of directors was aware that all
          affiliated TCI and IOT stockholders will receive ARL preferred stock
          in the merger rather than cash.

     o    The terms of each of the proposed TCI and IOT mergers were dictated
          principally from the Settlement Agreement which itself resulted from
          arms length negotiations between Settlement Counsel and counsel for
          affiliates of BCM and ARL.

     o    The TCI and IOT mergers will each afford nonaffiliated TCI and IOT
          stockholders with the opportunity (but not the obligation) to make an
          affirmative election to receive securities rather than cash.

     o    The terms of the proposed TCI and IOT mergers were not determined at a
          time when market prices were unusually depressed by virtue of the
          occurrence of any extraordinary or unique event.


     In connection with its determination of the procedural and substantive
fairness of the TCI merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,
BCM and Mr. Phillips have relied upon the determinations of the board of TCI as
having been taken in good faith following the receipt of advice from legal and
financial advisors. BCM and Mr. Phillips have adopted the conclusions as to the
fairness of the TCI merger set forth under the "Recommendation and Determination
of the TCI Board of Directors" and "TCI's Purpose and Reasons for the TCI
Merger", and the analyses underlying such conclusions of TCI's board, based on
BCM's and Mr. Phillips' reliance upon the determinations of the TCI board and
their own respective views as to the reasonableness of such analyses. In view of
the variety of factors considered in reaching its decision, Neither BCM nor Mr.
Phillips sought to quantify or otherwise assign relative weights to the various
factors considered in reaching their belief as to the fairness of the TCI
merger.

     In connection with their determination of the procedural and substantive
fairness of the IOT merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,
BCM and Mr. Phillips have relied upon the determinations of the board of IOT as
having been taken in good faith following the receipt of advice from legal and
financial advisors. BCM and Mr. Phillips have adopted the conclusions as to the
fairness of the IOT merger set forth under the "Recommendation and Determination
of the IOT Board of Directors" and "IOT's Purpose and Reasons for the IOT
Merger", and the analyses underlying such conclusions of IOT's board, based on
BCM's reliance upon the determinations of the IOT board and their own respective
views as to the reasonableness of such analyses. In view of the variety of
factors considered in reaching the decision, neither BCM nor Mr. Phillips sought
to quantify or otherwise assign relative weights to the various factors
considered in reaching their belief as to the fairness of the IOT merger.


Intent to Vote in Merger Transactions

     The approval of the TCI merger requires the affirmative vote of a majority
of the votes cast at the TCI meeting, the affirmative vote of the votes cast in
favor by the holders of shares of TCI common stock voting at the TCI meeting not
held by Mr. Phillips, BCM or ARL and their

                                       88


affiliates, and the affirmative vote of a majority vote of the votes cast in
favor of the TCI merger at the ARL meeting. The approval of the IOT merger
requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the IOT
meeting, the affirmative vote of the votes cast in favor by the holders of
shares of IOT common stock voting at the IOT meeting not held by Mr. Phillips,
BCM or ARL and their affiliates, and the affirmative vote of a majority vote of
the votes cast in favor of the IOT merger at the ARL meeting.


     ARL, BCM and each of their affiliates has indicated that they intend to
vote in favor of the TCI transaction in accordance with the recommendation of
each of their respective boards of directors. Mr. Phillips does not own any
shares of TCI or IOT, but supports the intention of ARL, BCM and each of their
affiliates to vote in favor of the transaction. Ted P. Stokely, a director of
TCI and IOT and holder of 9,000 shares of TCI common stock has indicated that he
intends to vote his shares in favor of the TCI merger based on his personal
preference. Martin L. White, a director of TCI and IOT and holder of 14,400
shares of TCI common stock has also indicated that he intends to vote his shares
in favor of the TCI merger based on his personal preference. Except with respect
to the recommendation of Messrs. Stokely and White as members of the board of
directors of each of TCI and IOT, Messrs, Stokely and White have not made any
other recommendation in support of or in opposition to the TCI and IOT merger
transactions.

     ARL, BCM, TCI and each of their affiliates has indicated that they intend
to vote in favor of the IOT merger transaction in accordance with the
recommendation of each of their respective boards of directors. Mr. Phillips
supports the intention expressed by ARL, BCM, TCI and each of their affiliates
to vote in favor of the IOT transaction.


EFFECTS OF THE MERGERS; ARL AFTER THE MERGERS

     ARL, TCI and IOT have substantially the same management, and affiliated
ownership. While the three companies operate as a group of related companies,
each is a separate and distinct entity and as such, each has separate SEC
reporting obligations, each files separate tax returns with the Internal Revenue
Service and state tax authorities, and each entity has its own board of
directors, including one or more independent directors. Each entity presently
has the same contractual advisor, BCM, and each entity attempts to operate
efficiently given this three entity structure by, among other things, having the
same contractual advisor which results in a consolidation of the general and
administrative functions of the three companies at the BCM level, and in common
offices located in Dallas, Texas. However, the three entity structure does
necessarily result in certain inefficiencies and higher costs. Among the
detriments of the current structure to each of the three entities and their
respective nonaffiliated stockholders are the following:

     o    the need for and costs of three separate outside audits

     o    the need for and costs of filing separate SEC reports and separate tax
          returns for each of the three entities

     o    the need for and costs of maintaining three separate boards of
          directors, each with at least one or more separate independent
          directors, and of holding separate board meetings and annual
          stockholder meetings for each of the three entities

                                       89


     o    inefficiencies resulting from the need to maintain separate books and
          records for three public companies, and to institute and maintain
          procedural safeguards to protect the interests of the separate
          minority interests in each of the three entities

     o    a limited number of shares in the hands of the public available which
          results in illiquidity of the common equity of the three entities,
          when compared to the enhanced liquidity that should exist if
          substantially all of the common equity of the three entities were
          traded as a single common security

     o    difficulties in explaining to the capital markets the business plan
          and strategy on a company-by-company basis, as opposed to a
          consolidated basis and the interrelations between the ownership,
          businesses and management of the three entities

     o    the difficulty of matching the available assets with the available
          opportunities of the three companies on a company-by-company basis, as
          opposed to a consolidated basis

     If the mergers are consummated, TCI and IOT will each become subsidiaries
of ARL. If both mergers are consummated, the current nonaffiliated TCI and IOT
stockholders will no longer own their shares of stock. Therefore, they will not
benefit from any future earnings or growth of TCI or IOT or benefit from any
increase of the value of TCI or IOT and will no longer bear the risk of any
decrease in value of TCI or IOT. Instead, former stockholders will have the
right to receive at consummation of the merger, $17.50 in cash for each share of
TCI common stock held, and $19.00 in cash for each share of IOT common stock
held. The benefit to the holders of the TCI common stock and the IOT common
stock of the transaction is the payment of a premium, in cash, above the
respective market values for such stock prior to the announcement of the merger
agreements. This cash payment assures that all nonaffiliated TCI and IOT
stockholders will receive a specific cash amount for their respective shares
rather than taking the risks associated with attempting to sell their shares in
the open market. The detriment to such holders (if any) is their inability to
participate as a continuing stockholder in the possible future growth of either
TCI or IOT.

     TCI's and IOT's common stock are each currently registered under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). As a result of
the mergers, the TCI common stock will be delisted from the NYSE, the IOT common
stock will be delisted from the AMEX, the registration of the TCI common stock
and IOT common stock under the Exchange Act will be terminated, and TCI and IOT
will each be relieved of the obligation to comply with the proxy rules of
Regulation 14a under Section 14 of the Exchange Act. Further, TCI and IOT will
no longer be subject to periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and
will cease filing information with the SEC. There will be cost savings
attributable to TCI and IOT no longer being public companies, including legal
and other fees and administrative expenses of personnel relating to the filing
of public documents, and maintenance of boards of directors and committees
required under the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations of the
NYSE and the AMEX.

     After consummation of the mergers, ARL will be the only remaining public
entity of the three. The directors of ARL immediately prior to the effectiveness
of the mergers will be the directors of ARL immediately after the mergers, and
the three directors of TCI and IOT will join the board of directors of ARL
following the mergers. The directors of TCI and IOT will not continue to be the
directors of TCI and IOT after the mergers. The officers of ARL, TCI and IOT
immediately prior to the effective time of the mergers will be the officers of
the entities

                                       90


immediately after the mergers. Similarly, no change in the certificate of
incorporation or bylaws of any of the entities is contemplated prior to the
effective time of the mergers or after the consummation of the mergers.

     ARL expects that the business and operations of all three entities will be
continued substantially as they are currently conducted (except that TCI and IOT
will be operated as subsidiaries of ARL) but some adjustments will be
necessitated by the financing of the consideration to be paid to the
nonaffiliated TCI stockholders and nonaffiliated IOT stockholders in connection
with the mergers. Except as stated in this joint proxy statement and prospectus,
management of ARL does not currently intend to dispose of any specific assets or
operations of ARL, TCI or IOT other than in the ordinary course of their
respective businesses. Management will, from time to time, continue to evaluate
and review the businesses, operations and properties of all of the entities and
make such changes as are deemed appropriate.

     Other than by virtue of the mergers (and any possible tender offers
described elsewhere in this joint proxy statement and prospectus), ARL, TCI, IOT
and BCM have no current plans or proposals which relate to or would result in an
extraordinary corporate transaction involving TCI or IOT or any of their
subsidiaries, such a merger, reorganization or liquidation, or a sale or
transfer of a material amount of assets involving TCI or IOT or any of their
subsidiaries, or any material change in the present dividend rate or policy, or
capitalization or indebtedness (except as contemplated by the financing
arrangements described in this joint proxy statement and prospectus) involving
TCI or IOT or any of their subsidiaries, or any change in the present board or
management of TCI or IOT, or any other material change in ARL's or TCI's or
IOT's corporate structure or business. However, management of ARL will review
proposals or may propose the acquisition or disposition of assets or other
changes in ARL and its subsidiaries' business, corporate structure,
capitalization, management or dividend policy that they consider to be in the
best interests of ARL and its stockholders. Neither ARL nor its management has
formulated any specific plans regarding repayment of indebtedness incurred in
connection with the mergers, but it is anticipated that such indebtedness will
be repaid primarily with or by means of cash from operations of the businesses
of ARL and its subsidiaries.

CONDUCT OF THE BUSINESS OF EITHER OR BOTH OF TCI OR IOT IF EITHER MERGER IS NOT
CONSUMMATED

     If either of the mergers is not consummated, the board of directors of TCI
or IOT or both and current management will continue to operate each entity's
business substantially as presently operated.

FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS

     This section summarizes material U.S. federal income tax considerations
relevant to the stockholders of TCI and IOT participating in the mergers. This
discussion is based upon the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the "Code"), applicable Treasury Regulations, judicial decisions and
current administrative rulings and pronouncements, all as of the date of this
document and any of which may be changed at any time with retroactive effect.
There can be no assurance that future legislation, regulations, administrative
rulings or court decisions would not alter the tax consequences set forth below.
The discussion does not address

                                       91


all aspects of federal income taxation that may be important to particular
stockholders in light of their personal investment circumstances or to
stockholders subject to special treatment under the federal income tax laws
(such as dealers in securities, life insurance companies, foreign persons,
broker-dealers, regulated investment companies, tax-exempt entities, financial
institutions, taxpayers subject to the alternative minimum tax, taxpayers who
acquired their TCI or IOT stock as compensation and persons holding their stock
as part of a "straddle," "hedge" or other integrated investment) and does not
address any aspect of state, local or foreign taxation. For purposes of this
discussion, it is assumed that the TCI and IOT stock are held by the TCI and IOT
stockholders respectively, as capital assets at the time of the consummation of
the mergers, within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code. THEREFORE,
STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS AS TO THE SPECIFIC TAX
CONSEQUENCES TO THEM OF THE MERGERS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, INCLUDING
APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND FOREIGN TAX CONSEQUENCES.

     No ruling has been or will be obtained from the Internal Revenue Service in
connection with the mergers. TCI and IOT stockholders should be aware that an
opinion of counsel is not binding on the Internal Revenue Service or the courts,
and no assurance can be given that the Internal Revenue Service will not
challenge the tax treatment of the mergers.

     The following are the material United States federal income tax
consequences of the mergers. The following discussion is based on and subject to
the Code, the regulations promulgated thereunder, existing administrative
interpretations and court decisions and any related laws, all of which are
subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect. This discussion does not
address all aspects of United States federal income taxation that may be
important to you in light of your particular circumstances or if you are subject
to special rules, such as rules relating to:

     o    stockholders who are not citizens or residents of the United States

     o    financial institutions

     o    tax exempt organizations

     o    insurance companies

     o    dealers in securities

     Each stockholder receiving preferred stock in the mergers will be
responsible for reporting the fair market value of the shares on its tax return.
Assuming that the preferred stock is not listed on the NYSE or another exchange
at the date of the closing of the mergers, it is unlikely that a stockholder
receiving preferred stock could establish that the fair market value of the
shares was less than the cash that the stockholder could have received. We will
not obtain an opinion as to the fair market value of the shares at the date of
closing.

     Jackson Walker L.L.P. has concluded that the mergers will not qualify as
tax-free reorganizations and accordingly they will be taxable transactions. The
mergers will have the following federal income tax consequences upon the TCI,
IOT and ARL stockholders:

     1.   The TCI stockholders who receive cash in the TCI merger will recognize
          gain or loss equal to the difference between (i) the cash received by
          them; and (ii) their tax basis of their shares of TCI.

                                       92


     2.   The TCI stockholders who receive preferred stock in the TCI merger
          will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between (i) the
          fair market value of the preferred stock received by them; and (ii)
          their tax basis of their shares of TCI.

     3.   The IOT stockholders who receive cash in the IOT merger will recognize
          gain or loss equal to the difference between (i) the cash received by
          them; and (ii) their tax basis of their shares of IOT.

     4.   The IOT stockholders who receive preferred stock in the IOT mergers
          will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between (i) the
          fair market value of the preferred stock received by them; and (ii)
          their tax basis of their shares of IOT.

     5.   The tax basis of the preferred stock received by TCI and IOT
          stockholders in the merger will equal the fair market value of the
          preferred shares at the date the TCI and IOT stockholders own the
          shares of preferred stock.

     6.   The holding period for the shares of our preferred stock received by
          TCI and IOT stockholders will not include the holding period of their
          TCI or IOT shares.

     7.   ARL stockholders will not recognize gain or loss as a result of the
          mergers.

     The foregoing discussion is not based upon an advance ruling by the United
States Treasury Department but upon an opinion of Jackson Walker L.L.P., counsel
to ARL. The foregoing discussion is not intended to be a complete analysis or
description of all potential United States federal income tax consequences or
any other consequences of the mergers. In addition, the discussion does not
address tax consequences which may vary with, or are contingent on, your
individual circumstances. Moreover, this discussion does not address any
non-income tax or any foreign, state or local tax consequences of the mergers.
Accordingly, we strongly urge you to consult with your tax adviser to determine
the particular United States federal, state, local or foreign income or other
tax consequences to you of the mergers.

     The above discussion addresses only the federal income tax considerations
of the proposed transactions to a TCI or an IOT stockholder generally. The
federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences of the proposed transactions
and the ownership and disposition of stock in ARL are complex and, in some
cases, uncertain. These consequences also may vary based upon the individual
circumstances of each stockholder. Accordingly, TCI and IOT stockholders are
urged to consult, and must rely upon, their own tax advisors as to the tax
consequences to them of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of stock in
ARL, including the applicability of any state, local or foreign tax laws and any
pending or proposed legislation.

REGULATORY APPROVALS

     At any time before or after the completion of the merger, the Antitrust
Division of the Justice Department, the Federal Trade Commission or another
third party could seek to enjoin or rescind the mergers on antitrust grounds.

                                       93


             INTERESTS OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OF ARL, TCI AND IOT
                           IN THE BUSINESS COMBINATION

     Some of the directors and officers of ARL have interests in the business
combination that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of ARL
stockholders generally, and that may present actual or potential conflicts of
interest. Likewise, some of the directors and officers of TCI and IOT have
interests that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of TCI and
IOT stockholders generally. These interests, to the extent material, are
described below. The ARL, TCI and IOT boards of directors were aware of these
interests and considered them, among other matters, in approving the respective
agreements and plans of merger and the business combination.

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


     Messrs. Branigan, Corna, Kimbrough and Starowicz, who serve as executive
officers of ARL, also serve as executive officers of TCI, IOT and BCM. BCM
itself is owned, indirectly, by a trust for the benefit of the children of Mr.
Phillips. Mr. Phillips is not an officer or director of BCM, ARL, TCI or IOT,
but serves as a representative of the trust, is involved in daily consultation
with the officers of each of those entities and has significant influence over
the conduct of their respective businesses. Each of the individuals, as a result
of their position with ARL, owe fiduciary duties to the stockholders of ARL in
addition to the fiduciary duties owed to the stockholders of TCI and IOT. Mr.
Earl Cecil is a director of each of ARL, TCI and IOT. Additionally, TCI and IOT
have the same officers and directors and, therefore, the directors owe fiduciary
duties to both TCI and IOT. At times, each of these individuals, including Mr.
Phillips, may be confronted by issues, including the business combination, that
present them with potentially conflicting interests and obligations.
Furthermore, in accordance with the advisory agreements that each of ARL, TCI
and IOT have with BCM (as discussed under the heading "The Advisor"), BCM will
receive a fee upon the sale, if any, of the properties that may be sold to fund
the payment of the cash merger consideration. Finally, Triad and Regis,
companies affiliated with Mr. Phillips, provide certain management and other
services to ARL, TCI and IOT. For the properties available for sale as of April
1, 2002, the amount of the fee is estimated to be $3,837,000. See "Special
Factors - Financing the Business Combination."


     None of the individual officers and directors of ARL, TCI, IOT or BCM will
receive individual compensation, shares, forgiveness of debt, options, or
severance benefits, or earn outs or any other amounts that could be considered
compensation related to the successful consummation of either the TCI or IOT
merger.

     It is currently expected that the directors and officers of ARL, TCI and
IOT will remain the same after the business combination except that the three
directors of TCI and IOT will become directors of ARL. As a result of these
interests as well as those set forth below, the directors and officers of ARL,
TCI and IOT could be more likely to vote to approve the business combination,
the agreements and plans of merger and related matters than if they did not hold
these interests. You should consider whether these interests may have influenced
these directors and officers to support or recommend the business combination.

INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE

     ARL has agreed to cause TCI and IOT to maintain, for a period of three
years after the completion of the business combination, the current provisions
and policies regarding

                                       94


indemnification of officers and directors, provided that TCI or IOT may
substitute policies having at least the same coverage and containing terms that
are no less advantageous to the insured.

                                       95


                               THE PLANS OF MERGER

     Provided ARL has sufficient funds available to it, either from its own
resources or from TCI and IOT immediately after the mergers, to pay the cash
merger consideration, ARL and each of TCI and IOT will execute and deliver an
agreement and plan of merger following approval of the mergers by ARL's
stockholders and, in the case of TCI and IOT, approval by their respective
stockholders of the mergers. The mergers will be consummated contemporaneously
with or promptly following the execution and delivery of the agreements and
plans of merger. The following is a discussion of the material provisions of
each agreement and plan of merger. The full text of each agreement and plan of
merger is attached as Appendix A and Appendix B to this joint proxy statement
and prospectus and are incorporated herein by reference. We encourage you to
read the applicable agreement and plan of merger in its entirety.

THE MERGER

     According to the terms of each agreement and plan of merger, at the
effective time of each merger, two separate recently formed wholly-owned
subsidiaries of ARL will merge with TCI and IOT, respectively. The acquisitions
of TCI and IOT are not dependent upon each other. If the stockholders of one
company do not approve their respective merger, only the approved merger may be
consummated. TCI and IOT will survive the merger.

EFFECTIVE TIME OF THE MERGER

     The closing of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreements will
take place contemporaneously with or as soon as practicable following the
execution and delivery of each merger agreement. The closing cannot take place
until after the stockholders of TCI or IOT approve their respective mergers.
Additionally, the ARL board of directors has determined that the TCI and IOT
mergers would not be consummated unless, in each case, sufficient cash was
available to ARL, either from its own resources or from TCI or IOT immediately
after the mergers, to pay the cash merger consideration due as a result of the
mergers.

     As soon as practicable after the closings, the articles of mergers in
connection with each respective merger will be filed with the Secretary of State
of the State of Nevada, as provided in the Nevada Mergers and Exchanges of
Interest Act. The times at which the articles of merger are filed in Nevada and
the Secretary of State issues a certificate of merger is referred to as the
"effective time" of each respective merger.

CONVERSION OF SHARES - EXCHANGE RATIO

     If the TCI stockholders approve their merger, each share of outstanding TCI
common stock will be converted into $17.50 in cash or upon the affirmative
election of the stockholder, one share of Series G redeemable convertible
preferred stock. The cash consideration shall be reduced by any dividend TCI
pays on the TCI common stock after January 2, 2002. Each share of outstanding
TCI common stock held by BCM and other affiliates of ARL will be converted into
one share of Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock and each
outstanding share held by TCI, ARL or its subsidiaries will be cancelled.

                                       96

     If the IOT stockholders approve their merger, each share of outstanding IOT
common stock will be converted into $19.00 in cash or, upon the affirmative
election of the stockholder, one share of ARL Series H redeemable convertible
preferred stock. The cash consideration shall be reduced by any dividend IOT
pays on the IOT common stock after January 2, 2002. Each share of outstanding
IOT common stock held by BCM and other affiliates of ARL will be converted into
one share of Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock and each
outstanding share held by IOT, TCI, ARL or its subsidiaries will be cancelled.

CLOSING

     Contemporaneously with the execution and delivery of the merger agreements,
or promptly thereafter, a closing will take place at the offices of Jackson
Walker L.L.P., 901 Main Street, Suite 6000, Dallas, Texas or at such other place
as ARL, TCI, IOT and the two newly formed subsidiaries mutually agree upon.

REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

     The merger agreements contain representations and warranties by ARL and its
two recently formed subsidiaries relating to:

     o    organization and qualification

     o    capitalization

     o    authority

     o    the absence of a breach or any violation of ARL's and its two recently
          formed subsidiaries' articles of incorporation, bylaws, or similar
          governing documents

     o    statutory approvals

     o    compliance with laws

     o    accuracy of information in the documents filed with the SEC

     o    accuracy of information in financial statements contained in the
          documents filed with the SEC

     o    absence of certain changes or events

     o    absence of litigation

     o    absence of undisclosed liabilities

     o    accuracy of information in the joint proxy statement and prospectus

     o    vote required to approve the merger

     o    accuracy of representations, warranties, and statements contained in
          any certificate or schedule

     o    stock option plans

     o    affiliate agreements

     o    taxes

     o    brokers and finders

                                       97


     The respective merger agreements contain representations and warranties by
TCI and IOT relating to:

     o    organization and qualification

     o    capitalization

     o    authority

     o    the absence of a breach or a violation of TCI's or IOT's articles of
          incorporation, bylaws, or similar governing documents

     o    consents and approvals

     o    statutory approvals

     o    compliance with laws

     o    accuracy of information in documents filed with the SEC

     o    accuracy of information in financial statements contained in documents
          filed with the SEC

     o    absence of certain changes or events

     o    absence of litigation

     o    absence of undisclosed liabilities

     o    accuracy of information in the joint proxy statement and prospectus

     o    vote required to approve the merger agreement

     o    accuracy of representations, warranties, and statements contained in
          any certificate or schedule

     o    stock option plans

     o    affiliate agreements

     o    taxes

     o    brokers and finders

INDEMNIFICATION

     The surviving corporations have agreed to maintain the current provisions
regarding indemnification of officers and directors contained in the charter and
bylaws of TCI and/or IOT and each of their respective subsidiaries and any
directors, officers or employees indemnification agreements of TCI and/or IOT or
their respective subsidiaries.

EXCHANGE OF CERTIFICATES

     At the effective time of the mergers, all shares of TCI and IOT common
stock will cease to be outstanding and will automatically be cancelled and
retired. Each certificate formerly representing TCI and IOT common stock other
than those held by ARL and its subsidiaries, TCI or IOT will represent ownership
of the right to receive either cash or ARL preferred stock, as applicable,
issuable in the mergers until those certificates are surrendered to the exchange
agent. The exchange agent for the merger is American Stock Transfer and Trust
Company.

     As soon as possible after the completion of the mergers, the exchange agent
will mail you a form of letter of transmittal and instructions for your use in
making your election and exchanging your common stock certificates for cash or
ARL preferred stock certificates. When

                                       98


you surrender your certificates, together with a signed letter of transmittal,
you will receive in exchange either cash or certificate(s) representing whole
shares of ARL preferred stock to which you are entitled.

     YOU SHOULD NOT SEND YOUR CERTIFICATES TO THE EXCHANGE AGENT UNTIL YOU
RECEIVE A LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL.

ACCOUNTING TREATMENT

     The mergers will be accounted for under the purchase method of accounting.
Accordingly, ARL will record the assets and liabilities of TCI and IOT and the
consideration paid.

CONSEQUENCES UNDER FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS; RESALE OF ARL STOCK

     The sale of shares of Series G and Series H redeemable convertible
preferred stock issuable in connection with the mergers has been registered
under the Securities Act. Accordingly, there will be no federal securities law
restrictions upon the resale or transfer of the shares by stockholders, except
for those stockholders who are considered affiliates of ARL, TCI or IOT, as that
term is defined in Rule 144 and Rule 145 adopted under the Securities Act.

     Series G and Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock received by
those stockholders who are considered to be affiliates of ARL, TCI or IOT may be
resold without registration only as provided for by Rule 145 or as otherwise
permitted under the Securities Act. Persons who may be considered to be
affiliates of ARL, TCI or IOT generally include individuals or entities that
control, are controlled by or are under common control with, ARL, TCI or IOT,
and may include the executive officers and directors of ARL, TCI and IOT.

MANAGEMENT AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS AFTER THE MERGERS

     Following the completion of the business combination, the board of
directors of ARL will consist of the combined boards of all three entities and
will be seven in number. No other changes in the directors, executive officers
or management of ARL, TCI or IOT are anticipated.

     During the past five years, none of ARL, TCI, IOT, BCM, Transcontinental
Realty Acquisition Corporation, Income Opportunity Acquisition Corporation or
any of their respective executive officers or directors was (i) convicted in a
criminal proceeding during the past five years (excluding traffic violations or
other minor offenses, if any), or (ii) a party to any judicial or administrative
proceeding during the past five years (except for matters that were dismissed
without sanction or settlement, if any) that resulted in a judgment, decree or
final order enjoining the person from future violations of, or prohibiting
activities subject to, federal or state securities laws, or a finding of any
violation of federal or state securities laws.

EXPENSES OF THE MERGERS

     If the mergers are consummated, all fees and expenses incurred in
connection with the mergers will be paid by the party incurring those fees and
expenses, except for the fees and expenses for the fairness opinions, which ARL
is required to pay pursuant to the Settlement

                                       99


Agreement. Estimated fees and expenses incurred or to be incurred in connection
with the business combination are approximately as follows:




                            DESCRIPTION                                          AMOUNT

                                                                           
Legal fees and expenses ...............................................       $  500,000
Accounting fees and expenses ..........................................           64,751
    Houlihan Lokey ....................................................          500,000
    Fees to BCM relating to property expected to be sold and loans
    to be obtained to finance the business combination ................        3,837,000
Printing, mailing and distribution expenses ...........................           30,000
Paying agent fees and expenses ........................................           10,000
SEC filing fees .......................................................           14,130
Miscellaneous fees and expenses .......................................           10,000
          Total .......................................................       $4,965,881




     The fees to BCM ($3,837,000) relate to incentive fees and finance fees
earned when gains result from property sales and finance or refinance
transactions are consummated. These fees will be expensed by ARL, TCI and IOT in
the period when earned by BCM.


                                      100

                           COMPARISON OF OWNERSHIP OF SHARES

         After the effective time of the mergers, IOT and TCI stockholders will
be offered the opportunity to affirmatively elect to become stockholders of ARL.
The following is a comparison of the rights of holders of the TCI common stock
and IOT common stock, on the one hand, and the Series G and Series H redeemable
convertible preferred stock they will be offered the opportunity to acquire, on
the other. No holder of TCI or IOT common stock will be required to acquire
Series G or Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock. Instead, following
the mergers, if they occur, holders of the TCI and IOT common stock will be
offered the opportunity to affirmatively elect to receive Series G or Series H
redeemable convertible preferred stock in lieu of the cash they would otherwise
receive.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                            SERIES G REDEEMABLE
                                                                                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
                                                                                            AND SERIES H REDEEMABLE
TCI COMMON STOCK                                IOT COMMON STOCK                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
                                                                                      
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          MANAGEMENT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the Nevada Revised                        IOT is subject to the same NRS              The holders of Series G
Statutes (the "NRS"), the                       provisions.                                 redeemable convertible preferred
business and affairs of a Nevada                                                            stock and Series H redeemable
corporation are managed by or                   Each share of IOT common                    convertible preferred stock are
under the directors of its board of             stock entitles its holder to cast           not voting for the election of
directors, whose members are                    one vote on matters as to which             directors except when all or any
generally elected by a majority                 voting is permitted or required by          portion of the dividends on such
vote.                                           Nevada law, including the                   class of preferred stock for any
                                                election of directors.                      six quarterly dividends, whether
Each share of TCI common                                                                    or not consecutive, shall be in
stock entitles its holder to cast               The IOT Articles of                         arrears and unpaid, as the case
one vote on matters as to which                 Incorporation require a board               may be. During the period such
voting is permitted or required by              consisting of not fewer than 3 nor          dividends are in arrears, and only
Nevada law, including the                       more than 12 directors, the exact           during such period, the number
election of directors.                          number to be determined by the              of directors constituting the
                                                board.                                      board of directors of ARL shall
The TCI Articles of                                                                         be increased by two and the
Incorporation require a minimum                 Pursuant to IOT's Articles of               holders of Series G redeemable
of 3 directors and a maximum of                 Incorporation, any director of              convertible preferred stock or
12 directors on its board.                      IOT may be removed from office              Series H redeemable convertible
                                                at any time, with or without                preferred stock, as the case may
The Articles of Incorporation and               cause, by the affirmative vote of           be, voting separately as a class,
Bylaws of TCI provide that any                  the holders of not less than two-           shall be entitled to elect two
director of TCI may be removed                  thirds (2/3) of the outstanding             directors to fill the newly created
from office at any time, for                    stock of IOT voting thereon.                directorships with each holder
cause, by the affirmative vote of                                                           being entitled to one vote in the
the holders of not less than 80%                                                            election for each share of such
of the outstanding stock of TCI                                                             class of preferred stock held.
voting thereon.
                                                                                            ARL's Restated Articles of
                                                                                            Incorporation provide that it shall
                                                                                            be managed by a board
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                      101





----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                            SERIES G REDEEMABLE
                                                                                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
                                                                                            AND SERIES H REDEEMABLE
TCI COMMON STOCK                                IOT COMMON STOCK                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                      
                                                                                            consisting of not fewer than 3 nor
                                                                                            more than 12 directors, the exact
                                                                                            number to be determined by the board.

                                                                                            According to ARL's Restated Articles
                                                                                            of Incorporation, any director of ARL
                                                                                            may be removed from office at any
                                                                                            time, with or without cause, by the
                                                                                            affirmative vote of the holders of not
                                                                                            less than two-thirds (2/3) of the
                                                                                            outstanding stock of ARL voting
                                                                                            thereon; provided that any director
                                                                                            elected by a particular class or
                                                                                            series of shares pursuant to ARL's
                                                                                            Restated Articles of Incorporation
                                                                                            may be removed only by the applicable
                                                                                            vote of the holders of such class or
                                                                                            series.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                FIDUCIARY DUTIES
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under Nevada law, directors are                 IOT is subject to the same NRS              ARL is subject to the same NRS
charged with the duty to exercise               provisions.                                 provisions.
their powers in good faith with a
view to the interests of the
corporation. Directors must use
reasonable due diligence to
protect corporate property.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                VOTING RIGHTS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Each share of TCI common stock                  Each share of IOT common stock              The holders of Series G preferred
entitles its holder to cast one vote            entitles its holder to cast one vote        and Series H redeemable
on matters as to which voting is                on matters as to which voting is            convertible preferred stock are
permitted or required by Nevada                 permitted or required by Nevada             not voting for the election of
law, including the election of                  law, including the election of              directors or on any matter except:
directors, amendments to TCI's                  directors, amendments to IOT's              (i) as otherwise provided by law,
Articles of Incorporation,                      articles of incorporation, mergers          (ii) with respect to an amendment
mergers and other extraordinary                 and other extraordinary                     to ARL's Restated Articles of
transactions.                                   transactions.                               Incorporation or Bylaws that
                                                                                            would materially alter or change the
                                                                                            existing terms of such class of
                                                                                            preferred stock, as the case may be,
                                                                                            and (iii) at any time or times for
                                                                                            the election of two directors when all
                                                                                            or any portion of the dividends on
                                                                                            such class of
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                      102






----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                            SERIES G REDEEMABLE
                                                                                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
                                                                                            AND SERIES H REDEEMABLE
TCI COMMON STOCK                                IOT COMMON STOCK                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                      
                                                                                            preferred stock for any six quarterly
                                                                                            dividends, whether or not consecutive,
                                                                                            shall be in arrears and unpaid. In the
                                                                                            latter event, and only during such
                                                                                            period that such dividends are in
                                                                                            arrears, the number of directors
                                                                                            constituting the board of directors of
                                                                                            ARL shall be increased by two and the
                                                                                            holders of such class of Series G
                                                                                            redeemable convertible preferred stock
                                                                                            or Series H redeemable convertible
                                                                                            preferred stock, as the case may be,
                                                                                            voting separately as a class, shall be
                                                                                            entitled to elect two directors to fill
                                                                                            the newly created directorships with
                                                                                            each holder being entitled to one vote
                                                                                            in the election for each share of such
                                                                                            class of preferred stock held.

                                                                                            In the event that the Series G
                                                                                            redeemable convertible preferred stock
                                                                                            or Series H redeemable convertible
                                                                                            preferred stock are required to vote on
                                                                                            a matter as provided by law, the
                                                                                            approval shall be deemed to have been
                                                                                            obtained only upon the affirmative vote
                                                                                            of the holders of a majority of the
                                                                                            shares of such class of preferred stock
                                                                                            outstanding.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      VOTING PROCEDURES
                                                   ANNUAL/SPECIAL MEETINGS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NRS provides that a                         IOT is subject to the same NRS              The holders of Series G
corporation is entitled to make                 provisions. In addition, IOT's              redeemable convertible preferred
bylaws pertaining to the calling                Bylaws provide that the annual              stock and H redeemable
and holding of meetings of its                  meeting of stockholders for the             convertible preferred stock are
stockholders. The TCI Bylaws                    election of directors shall be held         not voting for the election of
provide that the annual meeting                 within the first eight months of            directors except when all or any
of stockholders for the election of             each calendar year, or as soon as           portion of the dividends on such
directors and for such other                    practicable thereafter. Each                class of preferred stock for any
business as may be stated in the                meeting of the stockholders shall           six quarterly dividends, whether
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                      103





----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                            SERIES G REDEEMABLE
                                                                                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
                                                                                            AND SERIES H REDEEMABLE
TCI COMMON STOCK                                IOT COMMON STOCK                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                      
notice of the meeting, shall be                 be held at such place within the            or not consecutive, shall be in
held at such place, either within               United States and at such time              arrears and unpaid. During the
or without the state of Nevada,                 and date as the board of directors          period such dividends are in
and within the first eight months               shall determine. The IOT Articles           arrears, and only during such
of each calendar year as                        of Incorporation and Bylaws                 period, the number of directors
determined by the board of                      provide that special meetings of            constituting the board of
directors. The TCI Articles of                  the stockholders may only be                directors of ARL shall be
Incorporation and Bylaws                        called by the president, secretary          increased by two and the holders
provide that special meetings of                or by resolution of the board of            of Series G redeemable
the stockholders may only be                    directors.                                  convertible preferred stock or
called by the president, secretary                                                          Series H redeemable convertible
or by resolution of the board of                No action may be taken by                   preferred stock, as the case may
directors.                                      written consent except upon the             be, voting separately as a class,
                                                written consent in writing by all           shall be entitled to elect two
                                                of the stockholders of IOT voting           directors to fill the newly created
                                                thereon.                                    directorships with each holder
                                                                                            being entitled to one vote in the
                                                                                            election for each share of such class
                                                                                            of preferred stock held.

                                                                                            Such special meeting for the election
                                                                                            of directors may be called by the
                                                                                            holders of 10% of such class of Series
                                                                                            G redeemable convertible preferred
                                                                                            stock or Series H redeemable
                                                                                            convertible preferred stock issued and
                                                                                            outstanding.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                AMENDMENTS TO CHARTER
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NRS requires the approval of                IOT is subject to the same NRS              The ARL Restated Articles of
the holders of a majority of all                provisions.                                 Incorporation contain a
outstanding shares voting to                                                                provision which requires the
approve proposed amendments to                  In addition, IOT's Articles of              approval of the holders of a
a corporation's charter. The                    Incorporation provide that the              majority of all outstanding shares
holders of the outstanding shares               affirmative vote of at least 75%            voting to approve proposed
of a particular class are voting as             of the votes cast by such holders           amendments to a corporation's
a class on a proposed amendment                 of stock voting thereon shall be            charter. The holders of Series G
if the amendment would alter or                 required to alter, amend or repeal          redeemable convertible preferred
change the power, preferences or                the provisions of IOT's Articles            stock and Series H redeemable
special rights of one or more                   of Incorporation pertaining to (i)          convertible preferred stock are
series of any class so to affect                the size of the board of directors,         not voting on amendments to
them adversely.                                 (ii) the procedures for amending            ARL's Restated Articles of
                                                the corporation's bylaws, (iii) the         Incorporation or on any matter
TCI's Articles of Incorporation                 provisions for obtaining written            except as otherwise provided by
provide that the affirmative vote               consents of the stockholders and            law or with respect to an
of at least 75% of the votes cast               the procedures for calling a                amendment to ARL's Restated
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                      104





----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                            SERIES G REDEEMABLE
                                                                                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
                                                                                            AND SERIES H REDEEMABLE
TCI COMMON STOCK                                IOT COMMON STOCK                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                      
by such holders of stock voting                 special meeting of the                      Articles of Incorporation would
thereon shall be required to alter,             stockholders, (iv) IOT's election           materially alter or change the
amend or repeal the provisions of               not to be governed by the statutes          existing terms of such class of
TCI's Articles of Incorporation                 contained in NRS 78.411 to                  preferred stock.
pertaining to (i) the size of the               78.444 "Combinations with
board of directors, (ii) the                    Interested stockholders" and the
procedures for amending the                     statutes contained in NRS 78.378
corporation's bylaws, (iii) the                 to 78.3793 "Acquisition of
provisions for obtaining written                Controlling Interest" or (v) IOT's
consents of the stockholders and                requirement to obtain the
the procedures for calling a                    approval of two-thirds (2/3) of
special meeting of the                          the holders of the voting stock to
stockholders, (iv) TCI's election               approve certain mergers or
not to be governed by the statutes              business combinations, or to
contained in NRS 78.411 to                      adopt any provision inconsistent
78.444 "Combinations with                       therewith; provided, however,
Interested stockholders" and the                that the requirement for such a
statutes contained in NRS 78.378                75% vote shall not be required
to 78.3793 "Acquisition of                      for any alteration, amendment,
Controlling Interest", (v) TCI's                repeal or adoption of such
requirement to obtain the                       provision recommended by more
approval of two-thirds (2/3) of                 than 50% of the entire board of
the holders of the voting stock                 directors.
for certain mergers or business
combinations, (vi) the procedures
governing the removal of
directors, or (vii) the procedures
governing the board's
consideration of certain mergers,
acquisitions or business
combinations, or to adopt any
provision inconsistent therewith;
provided, however, that the
requirement for such a 75% vote
shall not be required for any
alteration, amendment, repeal or
adoption of such provision
recommended by more than 50%
of the entire board of directors.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                AMENDMENTS TO BYLAWS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NRS provides that subject to                IOT is subject to the same NRS              ARL's Restated Articles of
the restrictions set forth in a                 provisions. The IOT Articles of             Incorporation and Bylaws
corporation's bylaws, the                       Incorporation provide that the              provide that the Bylaws may be
directors may make the bylaws of                Bylaws may be amended by the                amended by the board of
the corporation. The TCI                        board of directors or the approval          directors or a majority of the
Articles of Incorporation provide               of no less than 75% of the                  outstanding stock of ARL voting
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                      105





----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                            SERIES G REDEEMABLE
                                                                                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
                                                                                            AND SERIES H REDEEMABLE
TCI COMMON STOCK                                IOT COMMON STOCK                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                      
that the Bylaws may be amended                  holders of the voting stock of              thereon. The holders of Series G
by a majority of the directors or               IOT voting thereon.                         redeemable convertible preferred
by the affirmative vote of the                                                              stock and Series H redeemable
holders of not less than 75% of                                                             convertible preferred stock are
the outstanding stock of TCI                                                                not voting for amendments to
voting thereon.                                                                             ARL's Bylaws or on any matter
                                                                                            except as otherwise provided by law
                                                                                            or if such amendment to ARL's Bylaws
                                                                                            would materially alter or change the
                                                                                            existing terms of such class of
                                                                                            preferred stock.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to the NRS,                            IOT is subject to the same NRS              Each share of Series G
distributions may be made to                    provisions.                                 redeemable convertible preferred
stockholders (i) unless TCI                                                                 stock has a cumulative dividend
would not be able to pay its debts                                                          per share of 10.00% per annum
as they become due in the usual                                                             of the $20.00 liquidation
course of business, or (ii) except                                                          preference, payable quarterly in
as otherwise specifically allowed                                                           equal installments of $0.5, if and
by TCI's Articles of                                                                        when declared by the board and
Incorporation, its total assets                                                             to the extent permitted under the
would be less than the sum of its                                                           NRS. Dividends on the Series G
total liabilities plus the amount                                                           redeemable convertible preferred
that would be needed, if the                                                                stock are in preference to and
corporation were to be dissolved                                                            with priority over dividends upon
at the time of distribution, to                                                             the ARL common stock. The
satisfy the preferential rights                                                             Series G redeemable convertible
upon dissolution of stockholders                                                            preferred stock ranks on a parity
whose preferential rights are                                                               as to dividends and upon
superior to those receiving the                                                             liquidation, dissolution or
distribution.                                                                               winding up with all other shares
                                                                                            of ARL preferred stock.

                                                                                            Each share of Series H redeemable
                                                                                            convertible preferred stock has a
                                                                                            cumulative dividend per share of
                                                                                            10.00% per annum of the $21.50
                                                                                            liquidation preference, payable
                                                                                            quarterly in equal installments of
                                                                                            $0.5375, if and when declared by the
                                                                                            board and to the extent permitted
                                                                                            under the NRS. Dividends on the
                                                                                            Series H redeemable convertible
                                                                                            preferred stock are in preference to
                                                                                            and with priority over
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                      106





----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                            SERIES G REDEEMABLE
                                                                                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
                                                                                            AND SERIES H REDEEMABLE
TCI COMMON STOCK                                IOT COMMON STOCK                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                      
                                                                                            dividends upon the ARL common stock.
                                                                                            The Series H redeemable convertible
                                                                                            preferred stock ranks on a parity as
                                                                                            to dividends and upon liquidation,
                                                                                            dissolution or winding up with all
                                                                                            other shares of ARL preferred stock.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                CONVERSION RIGHTS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
None.                                           None.                                       During a 75 day period commencing on
                                                                                            the 15th day after ARL publicly files
                                                                                            its first Form 10-Q with the SEC
                                                                                            following the consummation of the TCI
                                                                                            merger, the Series G redeemable
                                                                                            convertible preferred stock may be
                                                                                            converted at the option of the holder
                                                                                            of Series G redeemable convertible
                                                                                            preferred stock into 2.5 shares of ARL
                                                                                            common stock for each share of Series
                                                                                            G redeemable convertible preferred
                                                                                            stock.

                                                                                            During a 75 day period commencing on
                                                                                            the 15th day after ARL publicly files
                                                                                            its first Form 10-Q with the SEC
                                                                                            following the consummation of the IOT
                                                                                            merger, the Series H redeemable
                                                                                            convertible preferred stock may be
                                                                                            converted at the option of the holder
                                                                                            of Series H redeemable convertible
                                                                                            preferred stock into 2.25 shares of
                                                                                            ARL common stock for each share of
                                                                                            Series H redeemable convertible
                                                                                            preferred stock.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                REDEMPTION RIGHTS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
None.                                           None.                                       ARL may provide notice of its
                                                                                            intention to redeem the Series G
                                                                                            redeemable convertible preferred stock
                                                                                            no earlier than 45 days after ARL
                                                                                            publicly files its first Form 10-Q
                                                                                            with the SEC
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                      107




----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                            SERIES G REDEEMABLE
                                                                                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
                                                                                            AND SERIES H REDEEMABLE
TCI COMMON STOCK                                IOT COMMON STOCK                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                      
                                                                                            following the consummation of the TCI
                                                                                            merger. After that time, ARL may
                                                                                            redeem any or all of the Series G
                                                                                            redeemable convertible preferred stock
                                                                                            upon payment of the liquidation value
                                                                                            of $20.00 per share plus all accrued
                                                                                            and unpaid dividends by giving the
                                                                                            holder thereof not less than 45 days
                                                                                            nor more than 60 days notice thereof
                                                                                            prior to the date on which ARL desires
                                                                                            such shares redeemed.

                                                                                            ARL may provide notice of its
                                                                                            intention to redeem the Series H
                                                                                            redeemable convertible preferred stock
                                                                                            no earlier than 45 days after ARL
                                                                                            publicly files its first Form 10-Q
                                                                                            with the SEC following the
                                                                                            consummation of the IOT merger. After
                                                                                            that time, ARL may redeem any or all
                                                                                            of the Series H redeemable convertible
                                                                                            preferred stock upon payment of the
                                                                                            liquidation value of $21.50 per share
                                                                                            plus all accrued and unpaid dividends
                                                                                            than 45 days nor more than 60 days
                                                                                            notice thereof prior to the date on
                                                                                            which the Corporation desires such
                                                                                            shares redeemed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                LIQUIDATION/DISSOLUTION
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the NRS, a dissolution                    IOT is subject to the same NRS              The holders of Series G
must be initiated by the board of               provisions. Upon a liquidation,             redeemable convertible preferred
directors and approved by the                   dissolution or winding up of IOT,           stock and Series H redeemable
holders of a majority of the                    IOT will distribute the remaining           convertible preferred stock are
outstanding voting shares of the                assets, if any, to the holders of           not voting on any liquidation or
corporation.                                    IOT common stock after paying               distribution except as otherwise
                                                or adequately providing for the             provided by law, respectively.
Upon a liquidation, dissolution or              payment of all of its liabilities
winding up of TCI, TCI will                     and obligations.                            Upon any liquidation, dissolution
distribute the remaining assets, if                                                         or winding up of ARL, and after
any, to the holders of TCI                                                                  paying and providing for the
common stock after paying or                                                                payment of all creditors of ARL,
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                      108





----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                            SERIES G REDEEMABLE
                                                                                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
                                                                                            AND SERIES H REDEEMABLE
TCI COMMON STOCK                                IOT COMMON STOCK                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                      
adequately providing for the                                                                the holders of Series G
payment of all of its liabilities                                                           redeemable convertible preferred
and obligations.                                                                            stock shall be entitled, before any
                                                                                            distribution or payment is made to the
                                                                                            ARL common stock, to receive a
                                                                                            liquidation preference in an amount in
                                                                                            cash equal to $20.00 per share less
                                                                                            any dividend declared and paid after
                                                                                            January 2, 2002 and prior to the
                                                                                            issuance of shares of Series G
                                                                                            redeemable convertible preferred stock
                                                                                            with respect to shares of TCI common
                                                                                            stock plus an amount equal to accrued
                                                                                            and unpaid dividends and distributions
                                                                                            thereon, whether or not declared, to
                                                                                            the date of such payment. Holders of
                                                                                            Series G redeemable convertible
                                                                                            preferred stock are not entitled to
                                                                                            any further distributions.

                                                                                            Upon any liquidation, dissolution or
                                                                                            winding up of ARL, and after paying
                                                                                            and providing for the payment of all
                                                                                            creditors of ARL, the holders of
                                                                                            Series H redeemable convertible
                                                                                            preferred stock shall be entitled,
                                                                                            before any distribution or payment is
                                                                                            made to the ARL common stock, to
                                                                                            receive a liquidation preference in an
                                                                                            amount in cash equal to $21.50 per
                                                                                            share less any dividend declared and
                                                                                            paid after January 2, 2002 and prior
                                                                                            to the issuance of shares of Series H
                                                                                            redeemable convertible preferred stock
                                                                                            with respect to IOT common stock plus
                                                                                            an amount equal to accrued and unpaid
                                                                                            dividends and distributions thereon,
                                                                                            whether or not declared, to the date
                                                                                            of such payment. Holders of Series H
                                                                                            redeemable
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                      109






----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                            SERIES G REDEEMABLE
                                                                                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
                                                                                            AND SERIES H REDEEMABLE
TCI COMMON STOCK                                IOT COMMON STOCK                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                      
                                                                                            convertible preferred stock are
                                                                                            not entitled to any further
                                                                                            distributions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                PREEMPTIVE RIGHTS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the NRS, the stockholders                 IOT is subject to the same NRS              No holder of Series G
of a corporation organized after                provisions. The IOT Articles of             redeemable convertible preferred
October 1, 1991 do not have a                   Incorporation do not contain a              stock or H redeemable
preemptive right to acquire                     provision granting the holders of           convertible preferred stock shall
unissued shares, treasury shares                IOT common stock preemptive                 have preemptive rights to acquire
or securities convertible into such             rights.                                     any securities issued or sold by
shares unless the corporation's                                                             ARL because of his ownership of
articles of incorporation provide                                                           such class of preferred stock.
otherwise. The TCI Articles of
Incorporation do not contain a
provision granting the holders of
TCI common stock preemptive
rights.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                TRANSFERABILITY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shares of TCI common stock are                  Shares of IOT common stock are              Shares of Series G redeemable
freely transferable except for                  freely transferable except for              convertible preferred stock and
shares issued to affiliates of TCI.             shares issued to affiliates of IOT.         Series H redeemable convertible
Transfers of shares of stock held               Transfers of shares of stock held           preferred stock will be freely
by affiliates are restricted by                 by affiliates are restricted by             transferable, except for shares
federal and state securities laws.              federal and state securities laws.          issued to affiliates of ARL.
The shares are listed on the                    The shares are listed on the                Transfers of shares of stock held
NYSE under the symbol "TCI".                    AMEX under the symbol "IOT".                by affiliates are restricted by
                                                                                            federal and state securities laws.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                INSPECTION RIGHT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NRS provides that any                       IOT is subject to the same NRS              In addition to the foregoing
person who has been a                           provisions. IOT's Bylaws                    provisions of the NRS, ARL's
stockholder of record of a                      provide that any stockholder of             Bylaws provide that any person
corporation for at least 6 months               IOT may inspect and copy during             who has been a stockholder of
immediately preceding his                       usual business hours the Bylaws,            record of any corporation and
demand, or any person holding,                  minutes of the proceedings of               owns or has been authorized by
or thereunto authorized in writing              meetings of stockholders, annual            the holders of at least 15% of all
by the holders of, at least 5% of               statements of its affairs and               of its outstanding shares, is
all of its outstanding shares, upon             voting trust agreements on file at          entitled to inspect and copy the
at least 5 days' written demand is              IOT's principal office.                     corporate financial records upon
entitled to inspect in person or by                                                         at least 5 days' written notice.
agent or attorney, during usual
business hours, a copy certified
by the secretary of state of the
corporation's articles of
incorporation, as amended, a
copy certified by an officer of the
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                      110





----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                            SERIES G REDEEMABLE
                                                                                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
                                                                                            AND SERIES H REDEEMABLE
TCI COMMON STOCK                                IOT COMMON STOCK                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                      
corporation of its bylaws, as
amended, and the corporation's
stock ledger and make copies
therefrom.

The TCI Bylaws provide that any
stockholder may inspect and copy the
bylaws, stockholder minutes, annual
statements of its affairs and any
voting trust agreements.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                BUSINESS COMBINATIONS/MERGERS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the NRS, stockholders                     IOT is subject to the same NRS              The ARL Restated Articles of
have the right, subject to certain              provisions. In addition, IOT's              Incorporation do not contain any
exceptions, to vote on all mergers              Articles of Incorporation requires          provision requiring a
to which the corporation is a                   the affirmative vote of not less            supermajority vote with respect
party. In certain circumstances,                than two-thirds (2/3) of the                to mergers. The holders of Series
different classes of securities                 outstanding stock of IOT voting             G redeemable convertible
may be voting separately as a                   thereon on certain mergers or               preferred stock or Series H
class with respect to mergers.                  business combinations with, or              redeemable convertible preferred
Under the NRS, unless the                       proposed on behalf of any                   stock are not voting on mergers
articles of incorporation, the                  affiliate of any interested                 to which the corporation is a
board of directors or the merger                stockholder, excluding the stock            party except (i) as otherwise
statutes require a greater vote, a              held by such interested                     provided by law and (ii) with
plan of merger must be approved                 stockholder. The requirement is             respect to an amendment to
by a majority of the voting power               not be applicable in any merger             ARL's Restated Articles of
of the stockholders voting                      or business combination if the              Incorporation or Bylaws in
thereon.                                        transaction is approved by a                connection with such merger that
                                                majority of the board.                      would materially alter or change
TCI's Articles of Incorporation                                                             the existing terms of such class
requires the affirmative vote of                                                            of preferred stock, respectively.
not less than two-thirds (2/3) of
the outstanding stock of TCI
voting thereon on certain mergers
or business combinations with, or
proposed on behalf of any
affiliate of any interested
stockholder, excluding the stock
held by such interested
stockholder. The requirement is
not be applicable in any merger
or business combination if the
transaction is approved by a
majority of the board.

The approval of the surviving
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                      111





----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                            SERIES G REDEEMABLE
                                                                                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
                                                                                            AND SERIES H REDEEMABLE
TCI COMMON STOCK                                IOT COMMON STOCK                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                      
corporation in a merger is not
required under the NRS if: (i) the
articles of incorporation of the
surviving domestic corporation will
not differ from its articles before
the merger, (ii) each stockholder
holds the same number of shares in the
surviving corporation immediately
after the merger as prior thereto, and
such shares have identical
designations, preferences, limitations
and relative rights, (iii) the number
of voting shares in the surviving
corporation immediately after the
merger, plus the voting power of the
shares issued in the merger, does not
exceed the voting power of the shares
prior to the merger by more than 20%,
and (iv) the number of shares entitled
to participate without limitations in
distributions immediately after the
merger, plus the number of shares
entitled to participate without
limitations in distributions shares
issued in the merger, does not exceed
the number of shares entitled to
participate without limitations in
distributions prior to the merger by
more than 20%.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                DISSENTERS' OR APPRAISAL RIGHTS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the NRS, dissenting                       IOT is subject to the same NRS              ARL is subject to the same NRS
stockholders of a corporation                   provisions.                                 provisions.
engaged in certain major
corporate transactions are entitled
to appraisal rights. Appraisal
rights permit a stockholder to
receive cash equal to the fair
market value of the stockholders'
shares (as determined by
agreement by the parties or by a
court), in lieu of the
consideration such stockholder
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                      112




----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                            SERIES G REDEEMABLE
                                                                                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
                                                                                            AND SERIES H REDEEMABLE
TCI COMMON STOCK                                IOT COMMON STOCK                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                      
would otherwise receive in any
such transaction.

Under the NRS, a stockholder is
entitled to dissent from, and obtain
payment for the fair value of his
shares in the event of consummation
of, a plan of merger or plan of
exchange in which the corporation is a
party and any corporate action taken
pursuant to a vote of the stockholders
to the extent that the articles of
incorporation, bylaws or a resolution
of the board of directors provides
that voting or nonvoting stockholders
are entitled to dissent and obtain
payment for their shares.

Notwithstanding, the NRS provides that
stockholders do not have dissenters'
rights of appraisal in connection with
a merger or plan of exchange if their
shares are securities listed on a
national securities exchange or if
they are designated as a national
market system security on an
interdealer quotation system by the
National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc. or are securities held
by 2,000 stockholders of record,
unless (1) the articles of
incorporation provide otherwise or (2)
the stockholders voting thereon are
required to accept anything except (a)
cash or owners' interest in (i) the
surviving corporation or (ii) an
entity whose securities were listed on
a national securities exchange,
included on the national market system
by the National Association of
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                      113





----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                            SERIES G REDEEMABLE
                                                                                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
                                                                                            AND SERIES H REDEEMABLE
TCI COMMON STOCK                                IOT COMMON STOCK                            CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                      
Securities Dealers, Inc., or held of
record by at least 2,000 holders or
(b) a combination thereof.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                LIMITATION OF LIABILITY OF MANAGEMENT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the NRS, a corporation,                   IOT's Articles of Incorporation             The ARL Restated Articles of
through its articles of                         contain such a provision                    Incorporation contain such a
incorporation, may limit or                     eliminating the personal liability          provision eliminating the
eliminate the personal liability of             of directors to the corporation             personal liability of directors to
directors to the corporation and                and its stockholders for damages            the corporation and its
its stockholders for damages for                for breach of fiduciary duty to             stockholders for damages for
breach of fiduciary duty.                       the fullest extent permitted under          breach of fiduciary duty to the
However, this provision excludes                the NRS.                                    fullest extent permitted under the
any limitation on liability for (i)                                                         NRS.
acts or omissions which involve
intentional misconduct, fraud or a
knowing violation of law or (ii)
the payment of distributions in
violation of NRS Section 78.300.
The TCI Articles of Incorporation
contain such a provision eliminating
the personal liability of directors to
the corporation and its stockholders
for damages for breach of fiduciary
duty to the fullest extent permitted
under the NRS.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                      114


                               THE ADVISOR - BCM

          Although the boards of directors are directly responsible for managing
the affairs of ARL, TCI and IOT and for setting the policies which guide each,
the day-to-day operations of each entity are performed by BCM, a contractual
advisor, under the supervision of each board. The duties of BCM include, among
other things, locating, investigating, evaluating and recommending real estate
and mortgage loan investment and sales opportunities as well as financing and
refinancing sources. BCM also serves as consultant to each entity's board of
directors in connection with the business plan and investment policy decisions
made by each board.

          BCM, an affiliate, has served as advisor to ARL since its organization
in July 2000 (and to ART since February 6, 1989) and to TCI and IOT since March
1989 pursuant to separate Advisory Agreements. The Advisory Agreements are
similar with the exception of the compensation provisions, which are discussed
separately below. The business address of BCM is 1800 Valley View Lane, Suite
300, Dallas, Texas 75234; the telephone number of BCM is 469-522-4200.


          BCM is a company of which Messrs. Branigan, Corna, Kimbrough and
Starowicz serve as executive officers. BCM is indirectly owned by a trust for
the benefit of the children of Gene E. Phillips. Mr. Phillips is not an officer
or director of BCM, but serves as a representative of the trust, is involved in
daily consultation with the officers of BCM and has significant influence over
the conduct of BCM's business, including the rendering of its advisory services
and the making of investment decisions for itself and for ARL, TCI and IOT. In
August 2002, Mr. Phillips and five corporations, including BCM, affiliated
with Mr. Phillips or the trust for his children that indirectly owns BCM,
agreed in negotiations with the staff of the SEC to enter into an Order
Instituting Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, in an administrative proceeding brought by the Securities
and Exchange Commission and pay a substantial civil penalty in connection
therewith. Although the Order has been agreed to by Mr. Phillips, the five
corporations associated with Mr. Phillips or the trust and the staff of the SEC,
it has not been formally approved by the SEC. The Order in its current form
finds, among other things, that Mr. Phillips and each of the five corporations,
including BCM, had violated Section 13(d) and 10(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and Rules 10b-5, 13d-1 and 13d-2 promulgated
thereunder, by failing to file reports required under Section 13(d) with respect
to the securities of Greenbriar Corporation. The Order further determines that
Mr. Phillips had substantial contact with the management of BCM and had a
significant influence on its advisory services and investment decisions as well
as the investment decisions of the five other entities that are the subject of
the Order. The Order also determines that Mr. Phillips exercised the same
influence over the management and investment decisions of American Realty Trust,
Inc., currently a subsidiary of ARL. The Order requires Mr. Phillips and the
five corporations, including BCM, to cease and desist from committing or causing
any violation of Sections 10(b) and 13(d) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5,
13d-1 and 13d-2 promulgated thereunder.


          As of July 16, 2002, BCM owned 6,629,744 shares of ARL's common stock,
or approximately 58.3% of the shares outstanding; 1,166,947 shares of TCI's
common stock, or approximately 14.5% of the shares outstanding; and 106,802
shares of IOT's common stock or approximately 7.4% of the shares outstanding.


                                      115




ARL COMPENSATION TO BCM

          The ARL Advisory Agreement provides for BCM to receive monthly base
compensation at the rate of 0.0625% per month (0.75% on an annualized basis) of
Average Invested Assets. As of December 31, 2001, the compensation paid to BCM
in 2001 under the ARL Advisory Agreement was $6,714,671.

          In addition to base compensation, BCM, an affiliate of BCM, or a
related party receives the following forms of additional compensation:

          o    an acquisition fee for locating, leasing or purchasing real
               estate for ARL in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the amount
               of compensation customarily charged in similar arms length
               transactions or (ii) up to 6% of the costs of acquisition,
               inclusive of commissions, if any, paid to nonaffiliated brokers

          o    a disposition fee for the sale of each equity investment in real
               estate in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the amount of
               compensation customarily charged in similar arms length
               transactions or (ii) 3% of the sales price of each property,
               exclusive of fees, if any, paid to nonaffiliated brokers

          o    a loan arrangement fee in an amount equal to 1% of the principal
               amount of any loan made to ARL arranged by BCM

          o    an incentive fee equal to 10% of net income for the year in
               excess of a 10% return on stockholders' equity, and 10% of the
               excess of net capital gains over net capital losses, if any,
               realized from sales of assets

          o    a mortgage placement fee, on mortgage loans originated or
               purchased, equal to 50%, measured on a cumulative basis, of the
               total amount of mortgage origination and placement fees on
               mortgage loans advanced by ARL for the fiscal year

     The ARL Advisory Agreement further provides that BCM shall bear the cost of
certain expenses of its employees, excluding fees paid to ARL's directors; rent
and other office expenses of both BCM and ARL (unless ARL maintains office space
separate from that of BCM); costs not directly identifiable to ARL's assets,
liabilities, operations, business or financial affairs; and miscellaneous
administrative expenses relating to the performance by BCM of its duties under
the ARL Advisory Agreement.

     During the year ended December 31, 2001, ARL paid BCM $11.9 million in
compensation under the ARL Advisory Agreement.

     ARL contracts with affiliates of BCM for property management services.
Currently, Triad, an affiliate, and Carmel Realty, Inc. ("Carmel"), provide such
property management services. The general partner of Triad is BCM. The limited
partner of Triad is GS Realty Services, Inc. ("GS Realty"), a related party,
which is not affiliated with BCM. Triad and Carmel subcontract the
property-level management of 13 of ARL's commercial properties (office
buildings, shopping centers and a merchandise mart) and eight of its hotels to
Regis, a related party, which is a company owned by GS Realty. Regis also
provides real estate brokerage services to ARL and receives brokerage
commissions in accordance with the advisory agreement between ARL and BCM.
Carmel is a company owned by First Equity Properties, Inc., which is


                                      116




a company affiliated with BCM. During 2001, ARL paid Triad, Carmel and Regis
$9.8 million in commissions and fees.

          If and to the extent that ARL shall request BCM, or any director,
officer, partner or employee of BCM, to render services to ARL other than those
required to be rendered by BCM under the ARL Advisory Agreement, such additional
services, if performed, will be compensated separately on terms agreed upon
between such party and ARL from time to time.

          The ARL Advisory Agreement may be terminated by BCM for any reason
without penalty upon sixty (60) days' written notice to ARL. Additionally, the
directors or the holders of a majority in interest of the then outstanding
shares of ARL may terminate the ARL Advisory Agreement for any reason without
penalty upon sixty (60) days' written notice to BCM. ARL may also terminate the
ARL Advisory Agreement in the event of an assignment by BCM, except in the event
of an assignment to a corporation, association, trust, or other successor
organization which may take over the property and carry on the affairs of BCM.

          The ARL Advisory Agreement may be terminated immediately at the sole
option of the directors of ARL upon written notice of termination provided to
BCM, if BCM (i) violates any provision of the ARL Advisory Agreement, and fails
to cure such default within thirty (30) days after notice of such violation,
(ii) is adjudged a bankrupt or insolvent by a court of competent jurisdiction,
or an order is made by a court of competent jurisdiction for the appointment of
a receiver, liquidator or trustee for BCM or for all or substantially all of its
property by reason of the foregoing, or approving any petition filed against the
BCM for its reorganization and such adjudication or order shall remain in full
force for a period of thirty (30) days and (ii) institutes proceedings for
voluntary bankruptcy or files a petition seeking reorganization under the
Federal bankruptcy laws, or for relief under any law for the relief of debtors,
or consents to the appointment of a receiver for itself or for all or
substantially all of its properties, or makes a general assignment for the
benefit of its creditors, or admits in writing its inability to pay its debts
generally as they become due. BCM must give written notice to the directors of
ARL within seven (7) days after the occurrence of any of the events specified in
(ii) and (iii) above.

          The ARL Advisory Agreement automatically renews from year to year
unless terminated in accordance with its terms. ARL's management believes that
the terms of the ARL Advisory Agreement are at least as fair as could be
obtained from nonaffiliated third parties.

          Situations may develop in which the interests of ARL are in conflict
with those of one or more directors or officers in their individual capacities
or of BCM, or of their respective affiliates. In addition to services performed
for ARL, as described above, BCM actively provides similar services as agent
for, and advisor to, other real estate enterprises, including persons and
entities involved in real estate development and financing, including IOT and
TCI. The ARL Advisory Agreement provides that BCM may also serve as advisor to
other entities.

          As advisor, BCM is a fiduciary of ARL's public investors. In
determining to which entity a particular investment opportunity will be
allocated, BCM will consider the respective investment objectives of each entity
and the appropriateness of a particular investment in light of each such
entity's existing mortgage note and real estate portfolios and business plan. To
the extent any particular investment opportunity is appropriate to more than one
such entity, such


                                      117




investment opportunity will be allocated to the entity that has had funds
available for investment for the longest period of time, or, if appropriate, the
investment may be shared among various entities. See "Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions of ARL, TCI and IOT--Certain Business Relationships."

TCI AND IOT COMPENSATION TO BCM

          If the TCI and IOT mergers are approved and consummated, it is
contemplated that the Advisory Agreements with TCI and IOT will be terminated.
The Advisory Agreements with each of TCI and IOT provide for BCM to receive an
advisory fee comprised of a gross asset fee of .0625% per month (0.75% per
annum) of the average of the gross asset value (total assets less allowance for
amortization, depreciation or depletion and valuation reserves) and an annual
net income fee equal to 7.5% of either TCI's or IOT's net income.

          Under the Advisory Agreements with TCI and IOT, BCM is required to
annually formulate and submit for board approval a budget and business plan
containing a twelve-month forecast of operations and cash flow, a general plan
for asset sales and purchases, borrowing activity, and other investments. BCM is
required to report quarterly to the board on IOT's performance against the
business plan. In addition, all transactions require prior board approval,
unless they are explicitly provided for in the approved business plan or are
made pursuant to authority expressly delegated to BCM by the Board.

          The Advisory Agreements with TCI and IOT also require prior approval
of the board for the retention of all consultants and third party professionals,
other than legal counsel. The Advisory Agreements with TCI and IOT provide that
BCM shall be deemed to be in a fiduciary relationship to the stockholders;
contains a broad standard governing BCM's liability for losses by TCI and IOT;
and contain guidelines for BCM's allocation of investment opportunities as among
itself, TCI and IOT and other entities it advises.

          The Advisory Agreements also provide for BCM to receive an annual
incentive sales fee equal to 10% of the amount, if any, by which the aggregate
sales consideration for all real estate sold by either TCI or IOT during the
fiscal year exceeds the sum of: (1) the cost of each such property as originally
recorded in TCI's or IOT's books for tax purposes (without deduction for
depreciation, amortization or reserve for losses), (2) capital improvements made
to such assets during the period owned by either TCI or IOT and (3) all closing
costs, (including real estate commissions) incurred in the sale of such real
estate. However, no incentive fee shall be paid unless (a) such real estate sold
in such fiscal year, in the aggregate, has produced an 8% simple annual return
on the net investment including capital improvements, calculated over the
holding period before depreciation and inclusive of operating income and sales
consideration and (b) the aggregate net operating income from all real estate
owned for each of the prior and current fiscal years shall be at least 5% higher
in the current fiscal year than in the prior fiscal year.

          Additionally, pursuant to the TCI and IOT Advisory Agreements, BCM or
an affiliate of BCM is to receive an acquisition commission for supervising the
acquisition, purchase or long-term lease of real estate equal to the lesser of
(1) up to 1% of the cost of acquisition, inclusive of commissions, if any, paid
to nonaffiliated brokers or (2) the compensation customarily charged in arms
length transactions by others rendering similar property acquisition services as
an


                                     118




ongoing public activity in the same geographical location and for comparable
property; provided that the aggregate purchase price of each property (including
acquisition fees and real estate brokerage commissions) may not exceed such
property's appraised value at acquisition.

          The TCI and IOT Advisory Agreements require BCM or any affiliate of
BCM to pay TCI and IOT one-half of any compensation received from third parties
with respect to the origination, placement or brokerage of any loan made by TCI
or IOT; provided, however, that the compensation retained by BCM or any
affiliate of BCM shall not exceed the lesser of (1) 2% of the amount of the loan
commitment or (2) a loan brokerage and commitment fee which is reasonable and
fair under the circumstances.

          The TCI and IOT Advisory Agreements also provide that BCM or an
affiliate of BCM is to receive a mortgage or loan acquisition fee with respect
to the purchase of any existing mortgage loan by TCI or IOT equal to the lesser
of (1) 1% of the amount of the loan purchased or (2) a brokerage or commitment
fee which is reasonable and fair under the circumstances. Such fee will not be
paid in connection with the origination or funding of any mortgage loan by TCI
or IOT.

          Under the TCI and IOT Advisory Agreements, BCM or an affiliate of BCM
also is to receive a mortgage brokerage and equity refinancing fee for obtaining
loans or refinancing on properties equal to the lesser of (1) 1% of the amount
of the loan or the amount refinanced or (2) a brokerage or refinancing fee which
is reasonable and fair under the circumstances. However, no such fee shall be
paid on loans from BCM or an affiliate of BCM without the approval of the TCI or
IOT board of directors, as the case may be. No fee shall be paid on loan
extensions.

          Under the TCI and IOT Advisory Agreements, BCM is to receive
reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by it in the performance of advisory
services. Under the Advisory Agreements, all or a portion of the annual advisory
fee must be refunded by BCM if the operating expenses of TCI or IOT (as defined
in the TCI and IOT Advisory Agreements) exceed certain limits specified in the
Advisory Agreement, based on the book value, net asset value and net income of
TCI or IOT during the fiscal year. BCM was required to refund to IOT $265,000 of
the 2001 advisory fee under this provision.

          During the year ended December 31, 2001, TCI paid BCM $22.9 million
under the TCI Advisory Agreement and IOT paid BCM $1.7 million under the IOT
Advisory Agreement.

          Additionally, if management were to request that BCM render services
to TCI or IOT other than those required by the TCI and IOT Advisory Agreements,
BCM or an affiliate of BCM is separately compensated for such additional
services on terms to be agreed upon from time to time. TCI and IOT have hired
Triad Realty Services, Ltd. ("Triad"), an affiliate of BCM, to perform property
management for TCI's and IOT's properties. Triad provides such property
management services for a fee of 5% or less of the monthly gross rents collected
on residential properties and 3% or less of the monthly gross rents collected on
commercial properties under its management. TCI paid Triad $2,622,000 during
2001 and $544,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2002. IOT paid Triad
$268,000 during 2001 and $56,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2002.
Also, TCI and IOT have engaged, on a non-exclusive basis, Regis Realty, Inc.
("Regis"), a related party, to perform brokerage services for TCI and IOT.


                                      119




Regis is entitled to receive a real estate commission for property purchases and
sales in accordance with the following sliding scale of total fees to be paid:
(1) maximum fee of 4.5% on the first $2.0 million of any purchase or sale
transaction of which no more than 3.5% would be paid to Regis or affiliates; (2)
maximum fee of 3.5% on transaction amounts between $2.0 million-$5.0 million of
which no more than 3% would be paid to Regis or affiliates; (3) maximum fee of
2.5% on transaction amounts between $5.0 million-$10.0 million of which no more
than 2% would be paid to Regis or affiliates; and (4) maximum fee of 2% on
transaction amounts in excess of $10.0 million of which no more than 1.5% would
be paid to Regis or affiliates. TCI paid Regis $8,027,000 during 2001 and
$1,216,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2002. IOT paid Regis $312,000
during 2001 and $326,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2002. BCM may
only assign the TCI and IOT Advisory Agreements with the prior consent of TCI
and IOT.

          The TCI and IOT Advisory Agreements may be terminated by BCM for any
reason without penalty upon one hundred twenty (120) days' written notice to TCI
or IOT. Additionally, a majority of the directors who are not Affiliates of BCM
or the holders of a majority in interest of the then outstanding shares of TCI
or IOT may terminate the TCI or IOT Advisory Agreement for any reason without
penalty upon sixty (60) days' written notice to BCM. Notwithstanding, TCI or IOT
may terminate the TCI or IOT Advisory Agreement without penalty and without
notice to BCM in the event of any material change in the ownership, control or
management of BCM. TCI or IOT may also terminate the TCI or IOT Advisory
Agreement in the event of an assignment by BCM without the prior consent of TCI
or IOT.

          The TCI and IOT Advisory Agreements may be terminated immediately at
the sole option of the directors of TCI or IOT upon written notice of
termination provided to BCM, if BCM (i) violates any provision of the TCI or IOT
Advisory Agreement, and fails to cure such default within thirty (30) days after
notice of such violation, (ii) is adjudged bankrupt or insolvent by a court of
competent jurisdiction, or an order is made by a court of competent jurisdiction
for the appointment of a receiver, liquidator or trustee for BCM or for all or
substantially all of its property by reason of the foregoing, or approving any
petition filed against the BCM for its reorganization and such adjudication or
order shall remain in full force for a period of thirty (30) days and (iii)
institutes proceedings for voluntary bankruptcy or files a petition seeking
reorganization under the Federal bankruptcy laws, or for relief under any law
for the relief of debtors, or consents to the appointment of a receiver for
itself or for all or substantially all of its properties, or makes a general
assignment for the benefit of its creditors, or admits in writing its inability
to pay its debts generally as they become due. BCM must give written notice to
the directors of TCI or IOT within seven (7) days after the occurrence of any of
the events specified in (ii) and (iii) above.


                                      120





DIRECTORS AND PRINCIPAL OFFICERS OF THE ADVISOR


          The directors and principal officers of BCM are set forth below as of
July 23, 2002:

Name                      Position
----                      --------
Mickey N. Phillips.....   Director*
Ryan T. Phillips.......   Director*
Mark W. Branigan.......   Executive Vice President - Residential
Louis J. Corna.........   Executive Vice President - Tax
Ronald E. Kimbrough....   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
David W. Starowicz.....   Executive Vice President - Commercial Asset Management
Robert A. Waldman......   Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary




MICKEY N. PHILLIPS: Age 53, Director (for more than the last five years).
President, Ned Phillips Construction Company (for more than the last five
years).


RYAN T. PHILLIPS: Age 32, Director (for more than the last five years).
President, Signature Asset Management, Inc. (since January 1992); President,
Cascade Properties Company, Inc. (since October 1995); President, 1330 Riverbend
Investment Corp. (since April 1997); President, Signature Capital Funding, Inc.
(since July 1998).

MARK W. BRANIGAN: Age 48, Executive Vice President - Residential (since June
2001), Director (September 2000 to June 2001), and Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer (August 2000 to June 2001) of ARL. Executive Vice
President - Residential (since June 2001), Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer (August 2000 to June 2001), Vice President - Director of
Construction (August 1999 to August 2000) and Executive Vice President -
Residential Management (January 1992 to October 1997) of BCM, TCI and IOT; Vice
President - Director of Construction (August 1999 to August 2000) and Executive
Vice President - Residential Asset Management (January 1992 to October 1997) of
ART; and real estate consultant (November 1997 to July 1999).

LOUIS J. CORNA: Age 54, Executive Vice President - Tax (since October 2001),
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (June 2001 to October
2001), and Senior Vice President - Tax (December 2000 to June 2001) of ARL.
Executive Vice President - Tax (since October 2001), Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer (June 2001 to October 2001) and Senior Vice
President - Tax (December 2000 to June 2001) of BCM, TCI and IOT; Private
Attorney (January 2000 to December 2000); Vice President - Taxes and Assistant
Treasurer (March 1998 to January 2000) of IMC Global, Inc.; and Vice President -
Taxes (July 1991 to February 1998) of Whitman Corporation.


----------

* Mickey N. Phillips is the brother of Gene E. Phillips and Ryan T. Phillips is
  the son of Gene E. Phillips. Gene E. Phillips serves as a representative of
  the trust, established for the benefit of his children, which indirectly owns
  BCM and, in such capacity, has substantial contact with the management of BCM
  and input with respect to its performance of advisory services for ARL, TCI
  and IOT.


                                      121




RONALD E. KIMBROUGH: Age 49, Acting Principal Executive Officer (since February
2002) and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (since January
2002) of ARL. Acting Principal Executive Officer (since March 2002) and
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (since January 2002) of
BCM, TCI and IOT; Controller (September 2000 to January 2002) of BCM; Director,
Vice President and Treasurer (since February 2002) of First Equity Properties,
Inc.; Vice President and Treasurer (January 1998 to September 2000) of Syntek
West, Inc. and One Realco Corporation; and Consultant (1997).




DAVID W. STAROWICZ: Age 46, Executive Vice President - Commercial Asset
Management (since April 2002), Executive Vice President - Acquisitions, Sales
and Construction (March 2001 to April 2002) and Executive Vice President -
Commercial Asset Management (August 2000 to March 2001) of ARL. Executive Vice
President - Commercial Asset Management (since April 2002), Executive Vice
President - Acquisitions, Sales and Construction (March 2001 to April 2002),
Executive Vice President - Commercial Asset Management (September 1999 to March
2001), Vice President (May 1992 to September 1999) and Asset Manager (November
1990 to May 1992) of BCM, TCI and IOT; and Executive Vice President - Commercial
Asset Management (September 1999 to August 2000), Vice President (May 1992 to
September 1999) and Asset Manager (November 1990 to May 1992) of ART.

ROBERT A. WALDMAN: Age 50, Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel
(since August 2000) of ARL. Senior Vice President and General Counsel (since
January 1995), Vice President (December 1990 to January 1995) and Secretary
(December 1993 to February 1997 and since June 1999) of IOT and TCI; Senior Vice
President and General Counsel (since November 1994), Vice President and
Corporate Counsel (November 1989 to November 1994) and Secretary (since November
1989) of BCM; and Senior Vice President and General Counsel (since January
1995), Vice President (January 1993 to January 1995) and Secretary (since
December 1989) of ART.

          The business address of each director and executive officer is 1800
Valley View Lane, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas 75234. The business telephone number
of each person is 469-522-4200. Each director and executive officer is a citizen
of the United States.


GENE E. PHILLIPS: Age 65, serves as a representative of a trust for the benefit
of his children that indirectly owns BCM. As the trust's representative, Mr.
Phillips is involved in daily consultation with the officers of BCM and has
significant influence over the conduct of BCM's business, including the
rendering of its advisory services and the making of investment decisions for
itself and for ARL, TCI and IOT. Mr. Phillips has been an advisor to BCM since
its inception in July 2000 and before that to American Realty Trust, Inc.,
currently a subsidiary of ARL, since February 6, 1989. In addition, Mr. Phillips
has been actively involved in advising entities affiliated with the trust for
more than the last five years. In August 2002, Mr. Phillips and five
corporations, including BCM, affiliated with Mr. Phillips or the trust for his
children that indirectly owns BCM, agreed in negotiations with the staff of the
SEC to enter into an Order Instituting Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, in an administrative proceeding
brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission and pay a substantial civil
penalty in connection therewith. Although the Order has been agreed to by Mr.
Phillips, the five corporations associated with Mr. Phillips or the trust and
the staff of the SEC, it has not been formally approved by the SEC. The Order
in its current form finds, among other things, that Mr. Phillips and



                                      122



each of the five corporations, including BCM, had violated Section 13(d) and
10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rules 10b-5, 13d-1
and 13d-2 promulgated thereunder, by failing to file reports required under
Section 13(d) with respect to the securities of Greenbriar Corporation. The
Order further determines that Mr. Phillips had substantial contact with the
management of BCM and had a significant influence on its advisory services and
investment decisions as well as the investment decisions of the five other
entities that are the subject of the Order. The Order also determines that Mr.
Phillips exercised the same influence over the management and investment
decisions of American Realty Trust, Inc., currently a subsidiary of ARL. The
Order requires Mr. Phillips and the five corporations, including BCM, to cease
and desist from committing or causing any violation of Sections 10(b) and 13(d)
of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5, 13d-1 and 13d-2 promulgated thereunder. Mr.
Phillip's business address is 1800 Valley View Lane, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas
75234. Mr. Phillips business telephone number is 469-522-4200. Mr. Phillips is a
citizen of the United States.



                                      123




                 CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
                            OF BCM, ARL, TCI AND IOT

CERTAIN BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS


          BCM, ARL's, TCI's and IOT's contractual advisor, is a company of which
Messrs. Branigan, Corna, Kimbrough and Starowicz serve as executive officers.
BCM is a company indirectly owned by a trust for the benefit of the children of
Gene E. Phillips. Although Mr. Phillips is not an officer or director of BCM,
but serves as a representative of the trust, he is involved in daily
consultation with the officers of BCM and has significant influence over the
conduct of BCM's business, including the rendering of its advisory services and
the making of investment decisions for itself and for ARL, TCI and IOT.


          ARL, TCI and IOT contract with affiliates of BCM for property
management services. Currently, Triad, an affiliate, and Carmel Realty, Inc.,
provide such property management services. The general partner of Triad is BCM.
The limited partner of Triad is GS Realty Services, Inc., a related party, which
is not affiliated with BCM. Triad and Carmel subcontract the property-level
management of 13 of ARL's commercial properties (office buildings, shopping
centers and a merchandise mart) and eight of its hotels to Regis, a related
party, which is a company owned by GS Realty. Regis also provides real estate
brokerage services to ARL and receives brokerage commissions in accordance with
the advisory agreement between ARL and BCM. Carmel is a company owned by First
Equity Properties, Inc., which is a company affiliated with BCM.

          ARL owns an equity interest in each of IOT and TCI. See "Properties of
ARL - Investments in Real Estate Companies and Real Estate Partnerships."

          With respect to TCI, Triad also subcontracts the property-level
management and leasing of 51 of TCI's commercial properties, its four hotels and
the commercial properties owned by a real estate partnership in which TCI and
IOT are partners to Regis. Regis also provides real estate brokerage services
for TCI, on a non-exclusive basis, and receives brokerage commissions in
accordance with the brokerage agreement.

          Regarding IOT, Triad also subcontracts the property-level management
and leasing of IOT's seven office buildings and two commercial properties owned
by real estate partnerships in which IOT and TCI are partners to Regis. Prior to
May 1, 2000, affiliates of BCM provided brokerage services for IOT, on a
non-exclusive basis, and received brokerage commissions in accordance with a
brokerage agreement. Currently, Regis performs such brokerage services for IOT.

          At July 16, 2002, ARL indirectly owned approximately 49.5% of TCI's
outstanding common stock. At July 16, 2002, TCI owned 345,728 shares of IOT's
common stock, an approximate 24% interest and 746,972 shares of ARL common
stock, an approximate 6.6% interest which were primarily purchased in open
market transactions in 1990 and 1991 at a total cost of $1.6 million.

          The executive officers of TCI and IOT also serve as officers of ARL,
and owe fiduciary duties to each of those entities as well as BCM under
applicable law. The directors and officers


                                      124




of IOT also serve as directors and officers of TCI. Mr. Earl Cecil is a director
of ARL, TCI and IOT. The directors owe fiduciary duties to TCI as well as to IOT
under applicable law. IOT and TCI have the same relationship with BCM as does
ARL.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

          Historically, ARL, TCI and IOT have each engaged in and may continue
to engage in business transactions, including real estate partnerships, with
related parties. Management believes that all of the related party transactions
represented the best investments available at the time and were at least as
advantageous to ARL, TCI and IOT as could have been obtained from unrelated
third parties.

          OPERATING RELATIONSHIPS

          In October 1997, ARL entered into leases with BCM and Regis, for space
to house BCM's staff at the One Hickory Centre Office Building, construction of
which was completed in December 1998. The BCM leases, effective upon ARL
obtaining permanent financing of the building, were for 75,852 sq. ft.
(approximately 75% of the building), had terms of ten and fifteen years and
provided for annual base rent of $19.25 per sq. ft. for the first year. In
January 2001, both leases were terminated, and ARL entered into a new lease with
BCM, effective October 1, 2000. The new lease is for 59,463 sq. ft.
(approximately 62% of the building), has a term of three years, and provides for
annual base rent of $1.3 million or $21.50 per sq. ft. Effective March 1, 2002,
the lease was amended to 57,879 sq. ft. (approximately 59% of the building),
with an annual base rent of $1.2 million, or $21.50 per sq. ft.

          TCI is a 63.7% limited partner and IOT is a 36.3% general partner in
the Tri-City Limited Partnership ("Tri-City") which owns the Chelsea Square
Shopping Center. In February 2000, the Chelsea Square Shopping Center was
financed in the amount of $2.1 million. Tri-City received net cash of $2.0
million after the payment of various closing costs. The mortgage bore interest
at a fixed rate of 10.24% per annum until February 2001, and a variable rate
thereafter, currently 10% per annum, requires monthly payments of principal and
interest of $20,601 and matures in February 2005. TCI received a distribution of
$1.3 million of the net financing proceeds. IOT received a distribution of
$739,000 of the net financing proceeds. The business purpose of the transaction
was to draw equity from the Chelsea Square Shopping Center.

          In 2001, TCI received $120,000 in rent from BCM for BCM's lease at
Addison Hanger. BCM owns a corporate jet that is housed at the hanger and TCI
had available space at the hanger.

          In 2001, ARL paid BCM, Triad, Carmel and Regis $6.7 million in
advisory fees, $166,000 in net income fees, $3.8 million in incentive fees, $1.2
million in mortgage brokerage and equity refinancing fees, $92,000 in property
acquisition fees, $5.9 million in real estate brokerage commissions and $3.9
million in property and construction management fees and leasing commissions,
net of property management fees paid to subcontractors, other than Regis. In
addition, as provided in the ARL Advisory Agreement, BCM received cost
reimbursements of $2.8 million. BCM manages ARL's day-to-day operations pursuant
to the ARL Advisory Agreement. ARL contracts with Triad and Carmel for property
management services. BCM is the general partner of Triad. Carmel, which is owned
by First Equity Properties, Inc., a company


                                      125




affiliated with BCM, subcontracts property management construction services and
brokerage services to Regis. Regis is a company owned by GS Realty, the limited
partner of Triad.

          In 2001, IOT paid BCM Triad and Regis $817,000 in advisory fees and
$312,000 in property and construction management fees and leasing commissions,
net of property management fees paid to subcontractors other than Regis. In
addition, from time-to-time, IOT has made advances to BCM, which generally have
not had specific repayment terms and have been reflected in IOT's financial
statements as other assets or other liabilities from affiliates. At December 31,
2001, BCM advanced IOT $593,000. As of March 2002, IOT has repaid that amount to
BCM. BCM manages IOT's day-to-day operations pursuant to the IOT Advisory
Agreement. IOT contracts with Triad for property management services.

          In 2001, TCI paid BCM, Triad and Regis $10.8 million in advisory
incentive and net income fees, $45,000 in mortgage brokerage and equity
refinancing fees, $2.4 million in property acquisition fees, $3.8 million in
real estate brokerage commissions and $2.6 million in property and construction
management fees and leasing commissions, net of property management fees paid to
subcontractors, other than Regis. In addition, as provided in the TCI Advisory
Agreement, BCM received cost reimbursements of $2.6 million. BCM manages TCI's
day-to-day operations pursuant to the TCI Advisory Agreement. TCI contracts with
Triad for property management services.

          ADVANCES AND LOANS

          From time-to-time, ARL and its affiliates have made advances to each
other, which generally have not had specific repayment terms and have been
reflected in ARL's financial statements as other assets or other liabilities.
These affiliate borrowings are used to fund operating shortfalls or
investment/acquisition cash requirements. Similarly, as properties are sold and
operating cash flow is generated, those advances/borrowings may be repaid. Also,
incentive fees and net income fees payable to BCM for 2001 are accrued
throughout the year and are due by March 31, 2002. At December 31, 2001, ARL
owed $10.1 million ($4.0 million for fees owed for 2001), $980,000 and $257,000
to BCM, TCI and GS Realty, respectively. In January 2002, ARL paid the $257,000
due to GS Realty. At December 31, 2001, TCI had receivables of $11.6 million,
$1.9 million and $608,000 from BCM, GS Realty, and ARL, respectively. Also at
December 31, 2001, TCI owed $1.0 million and $39,000 to GS Realty and BCM,
respectively. In January 2002, TCI paid the $1.0 million due to GS Realty and in
March 2002, TCI paid the $39,000 to BCM. At December 31, 2001, BCM advanced IOT
$593,000. As of March 2002, IOT has repaid that amount to BCM.

          In October 1999, ARL funded a $4.7 million loan to Realty Advisors,
Inc., the parent company of BCM. The loan, to provide funds for acquisitions or
working capital needs, was secured by all of the outstanding shares of common
stock of American Reserve Life Insurance Company. The loan bore interest at
10.25% per annum, and matured in November 2001. In January 2000, $100,000 was
collected. In November 2001, the maturity date was extended to November 2004.
The collateral was changed to a subordinate pledge of 850,000 shares of ARL
common stock owned by BCM. The shares are also pledged to a lender on ARL's
behalf. The interest rate was changed to 2% over the prime rate, currently 6.75%
per annum, and the accrued


                                      126




but unpaid interest of $984,000 was added to the principal. The new principal
balance is $5.6 million. All principal and accrued interest are due at maturity.

          In March 2000, a loan due to ARL with a principal balance of $2.5
million due from Lordstown, L.P., matured. The loan, to provide funds to
purchase for resale various parcels of land, is secured by a second lien on land
in Ohio and Florida, by 100% of the general and limited partner interest in
Partners Capital, Ltd., the limited partner of Lordstown, L.P., and a profits
interest in subsequent land sales. At June 2002, the loan, and $900,000 of
accrued interest, remained unpaid. At July 2002, settlement terms are being
negotiated. Tara Group, Inc., a corporation controlled by Richard D. Morgan, is
the general partner of Lordstown, L.P. Mr. Morgan served as a director of ARL
until October 2001.

          In December 2000, an unsecured loan due to ARL with a principal
balance of $1.7 million due from Warwick of Summit, Inc. ("Warwick") matured.
The loan was made to provide funds to purchase and renovate and expand a
shopping center property in Warwick, Rhode Island. All principal and interest
were due at maturity. In February 2002, $275,000 of interest was received. In
May 2002, $33,000 of principal and $267,000 of interest was collected. At June
2002, the loan, with a current principal balance of $1.7 million and $12,000 of
accrued interest, remained unpaid. At July 2002, settlement terms are being
negotiated. Richard D. Morgan, a Warwick stockholder, served as a director of
ARL until October 2001.

          In December 2000, a loan due to ARL with a principal balance of $1.6
million due from Bordeaux Investments Two, L.L.C. ("Bordeaux"), matured. The
loan, to provide funds to purchase and renovate a shopping center property in
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, is secured by (1) a 100% interest in Bordeaux, which
owns a shopping center in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; (2) 100% of the stock of
Bordeaux Investments One, Inc., which owns 6.5 acres of undeveloped land in
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; and (3) the personal guarantees of the Bordeaux
members. At June 2002, the loan, and $576,000 of accrued interest, remained
unpaid. At July 2002, settlement terms are being negotiated. Richard D. Morgan,
a Bordeaux member, served as a director of ARL until October 2001.

          In March 2001, ARL funded $13.6 million of a $15.0 million unsecured
line of credit to One Realco Corporation ("One Realco"), which owns
approximately 14.8% of the outstanding shares of ARL's common stock. One Realco
periodically borrows money to meet its cash obligations. The line of credit
bears interest at 12.0% per annum. All principal and interest were due at
maturity in February 2002. The line of credit is guaranteed by BCM. In June
2001, $394,000 in principal and $416,000 in interest was collected. In December
2001, $21,000 in principal and $804,000 in interest was collected. In February
2002, the line of credit was increased to $1.8 million, accrued but unpaid
interest of $217,000 was added to the principal, and the maturity date was
extended to February 2004. In March 2002, ARL funded an additional $1.8 million,
increasing the outstanding principal balance to $15 million. All principal and
interest are due at maturity. Ronald E. Kimbrough, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of ARL, is a 10% stockholder of One Realco. During 2001,
Mr. Kimbrough did not participate in day-to-day operations or management of One
Realco.


          In June 2002, ARL converted $4.5 million of its receivable from BCM, a
related party, to a recourse note receivable. This transaction was to provide
ARL with additional security over that provided by an unsecured receivable. The
note bears interest at 10.0% per annum, matures in March 2004 and requires
quarterly payments of principal and accrued interest. The first payment is due
in December 2002.


                                      127




          PARTNERSHIP TRANSACTIONS

          BCM has entered into put agreements with certain holders of the Class
A limited partner units of Ocean Beach Partners, L.P., to increase ARL's
investment in the partnership. From June 1, 1997 through May 31, 2006, the Class
A units are convertible, at the option of the unitholders, into Series D
Cumulative preferred stock of ARL. At any time from June 1, 2001 through May 31,
2006, the Series D shareholders have the option to sell any or all Series D
shares held by them to BCM at the put price. The put price for the Series D
preferred stock is $20 per share, plus all accumulated but unpaid dividends. ARL
subsidiaries own 100% of the general partner and limited partner beneficial
interests in Ocean Beach Partners, L.P.

          BCM has entered into put agreements with the holders of the Class A
limited partner units of Valley Ranch L.P., to increase ARL's investment in the
partnership. Such Class A units are convertible into Series B Cumulative
Convertible preferred stock of ARL which is further convertible into common
stock of ARL. The put price for the Class A units is $1.00 per unit and the put
price for either the Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock or ARL's
common stock is 80% of the average daily closing price of ARL's common stock for
the prior 20 trading days. In March 1999, ARL reached agreement with the Class A
unitholders of Valley Ranch, L.P. to acquire their eight million Class A units
for $1.00 per unit. In 1999, three million units were purchased, an additional
one million units were purchased in January 2000, and two million units in May
2001. One million units were purchased in May 2002. ARL has committed to
purchase the remaining one million units in June 2002. ARL subsidiaries own 100%
of the general partner and Class B limited partner beneficial interests in
Valley Ranch, L.P.

          BCM has entered into put agreements with the holders of the Class A
units of ART Palm, L.P., to increase ARL's investment in the partnership. Such
Class A units are convertible into Series C Cumulative Convertible preferred
stock of ARL. The put price for the Class A units is $1.00 per unit and the put
price for either the Series C preferred stock or ARL's common stock is 90% of
the average daily closing price of ARL's common stock for the prior 20 trading
days. Through December 31, 2001, ARL has repurchased 9,736,250 Class A units.
The put agreement calls for ARL to repurchase the remaining Class A units as
follows: June 30, 2002, 1,625,000 units; June 30, 2003, 1,625,000 units;
December 31, 2005, 1,625,000 units; and December 31, 2006, 8,563,750 units. ARL
subsidiaries own 100% of the general partner and Class B limited partner
beneficial interest in ART Palm, L.P. One Realco, which owns approximately 14.8%
of the outstanding shares of ARL common stock, owns the Class C limited partner
interest.

          PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS

          In May 2001, ARL exchanged with TCI two parcels of land, a 10.5 acre
tract of Vista Ridge land and an 8.88 acre tract of Hollywood Casino land, for
the 168 unit Glenwood Apartments. The cost of the Vista Ridge land, the
Hollywood Casino land and the Glenwood Apartments was $1.1 million, $2.1
million, and $3.7 million, respectively. The purchase prices were determined
based on the market values of the properties exchanged, using a market rate
multiple of net operating income. The business purpose of the transaction was
for TCI to construct apartments on the Vista Ridge land and office buildings on
the Hollywood Casino land. No consideration was paid on the transaction.
However, ARL received net cash of $3.2 million on the subsequent sale of the
Glenwood Apartments.


                                      128




          In December 2001, TCI, purchased 100% of the outstanding common shares
of National Melrose, Inc. ("NM"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of ARL, for $2.0
million. The purchase price was determined based upon the market value of the
property exchanged, using a market rate multiple of net operating income. NM
owns the Executive Court Office Building. ARL has guaranteed that the asset will
produce at least a 12% annual return on the purchase price for a period of three
years from the purchase date. If the asset fails to produce the annual return,
ARL will pay TCI any shortfall. In addition, if the asset fails to produce the
12% return for a calendar year, TCI may require ARL to repurchase the shares of
NM for the purchase price. The business purpose of the transaction was for TCI
to make an equity investment in NM anticipating a profitable return and ARL to
receive cash for its equity investment. Management has classified this related
party transaction as a note payable to TCI. The consideration paid for the
outstanding shares was $2.0 million.

          In January 2002, IOT purchased 100% of the outstanding common shares
of Rosedale Corporation ("Rosedale"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of ARL, for $5.1
million. The purchase price was determined based upon the market value of the
property exchanged, using a market rate multiple of net operating income.
Rosedale owns the Rosedale Towers Office Building. ARL has guaranteed that the
asset will produce at least a 12% annual return on the purchase price for a
period of three years from the purchase date. If the asset fails to produce the
12% return, ARL will pay IOT any shortfall. In addition, if the asset fails to
produce the 12% return for a calendar year, IOT may require ARL to repurchase
the shares of Rosedale for the purchase price. The business purpose of the
transaction was for IOT to make an equity investment in Rosedale anticipating a
profitable return and ARL to receive cash for its equity investment. Management
has classified this related party transaction as a note payable to IOT. The
consideration paid for the outstanding shares was $5.1 million.

          In January 2002, TCI purchased 100% of the outstanding common shares
of ART Two Hickory Corporation ("Two Hickory"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of
ARL, for $4.4 million. The purchase price was determined based upon the market
value of the property exchanged, using a market rate multiple of net operating
income. Two Hickory owns the Two Hickory Centre Office Building. ARL has
guaranteed that the asset will produce at least a 12% annual return on the
purchase price for a period of three years from the purchase date. If the asset
fails to produce the 12% return, ARL will pay TCI any shortfall. In addition, if
the asset fails to produce the 12% return for a calendar year, TCI may require
ARL to repurchase the shares of Two Hickory for the purchase price. The business
purpose of the transaction was for TCI to make an equity investment in Two
Hickory anticipating a profitable return and ARL to receive cash for its equity
investment. Management has classified this related party transaction as a note
payable to TCI. The consideration paid for the outstanding shares was $4.4
million. In June 2002, the first lien on the property was refinanced. TCI
received $1.3 million of the proceeds as a principal reduction on its loan to
ARL.

          In February 2002, TCI sold a $2.0 million senior participation
interest in a loan to IOT. The board of directors of IOT and TCI determined that
the 16% interest rate was a good return for IOT's investment and TCI could
benefit from the increase in cash and decrease its notes receivable outstanding
portfolio. TCI received consideration of $2.0 million. In February 2002, the
loan was extended until April 2002. In April 2002, IOT extended the loan until
July 2002, receiving $8,500 as an extension fee. IOT and TCI will receive 57%
and 43%, respectively, on


                                      129




the remaining principal and interest payments. In July 2002, the note was
extended until August 2002. IOT and TCI will receive 57% and 43% respectively,
on the remaining principal and interest payments.

          In March 2002, ARL received consideration of $600,000 and exchanged
with TCI two parcels of land, a 24.5 acre tract of Rasor land, a 16.89 acre
tract of Lakeshore Villas land, and the 45,623 sq. ft. Oaktree Village Shopping
Center for the 80,278 sq. ft. Plaza on Bachman Creek Shopping Center. The cost
of the Rasor land, the Lakeshore Villas land, the Oaktree Shopping Center, and
the Plaza on Bachman Shopping Center was $1.0 million, $1.3 million, $1.6
million, and $4.1 million, respectively. The purchase prices were determined
based on the market values of the properties exchanged, using a market rate
multiple of net operating income. The business purpose of the transaction was
for TCI to construct apartments on the Rasor and Lakeshore Villas land and to
give ample value for the property TCI is exchanging, the Oaktree Shopping center
was added to the transaction. The Plaza on Bachman Creek Shopping Center was
subsequently financed with ARL receiving net cash of $4.4 million.

          In April 2002, TCI purchased all of the general and limited
partnership interests in Garden Confederate Point, L.P. ("Confederate Point")
from ARL for $1.9 million. The purchase price was determined based on the market
value of the property exchanged using a market rate multiple of net operating
income. Confederate Point owns the Confederate Point Apartments. ARL has
guaranteed that the asset will produce at least a 12% annual return on the
purchase price for a period of three years from the purchase date. If the asset
fails to produce the 12% return, ARL will pay TCI any shortfall. In addition, if
the asset fails to produce the 12% return for a calendar year, TCI may require
ARL to repurchase the interests in Confederate Point for the purchase price. The
business purpose of the transaction was for TCI to make an equity investment in
Confederate Point anticipating a profitable return and ARL is to receive cash
for its equity investment. Management has classified this related party
transaction as a note payable to TCI.

          In April 2002, TCI purchased all of the general and limited
partnership interests in Garden Foxwood, L.P. ("Foxwood") from ARL for $1.1
million. The purchase price was determined based on the market values of the
property exchanged, using a market rate multiple of net operating income.
Foxwood owns the Foxwood Apartments. ARL has guaranteed that the asset will
produce at least a 12% annual return on the purchase price for a period of three
years from the purchase date. If the asset fails to produce the 12% return, ARL
will pay TCI any shortfall. In addition, if the asset fails to produce the 12%
return for a calendar year, TCI may require ARL to repurchase the interests in
Foxwood for the purchase price. The business purpose of the transaction was for
TCI to make an equity investment in Foxwood anticipating a profitable return and
ARL to receive cash for its equity investment. Management has classified this
related party transaction as a note payable to TCI.

          In April 2002, TCI purchased all of the general and limited
partnership interests in Garden Woodsong, L.P. ("Woodsong") from ARL for $2.5
million. The purchase price was determined based on the market values of the
property exchanged, using a market rate multiple of net operating income.
Woodsong owns the Woodsong Apartments. ARL has guaranteed that the asset will
produce at least a 12% annual return on the purchase price for a period of three
years from the purchase date. If the asset fails to produce the 12% return, ARL
will pay TCI any


                                      130




shortfall. In addition, if the asset fails to produce the 12% return for a
calendar year, TCI may require ARL to repurchase the interests in Woodsong for
the purchase price. The business purpose of the transaction was for TCI to make
an equity investment in Woodsong anticipating a profitable return and ARL to
receive cash for its equity investment. Management has classified this related
party transaction as a note payable to TCI. In July 2002, the Woodsong
Apartments was sold for $9.1 million. TCI received $2.6 million from the
proceeds of $2.8 million as payment of principal and accrued but unpaid interest
on the loan.

          In April 2002, TCI, a related party, purchased 100% of the common
shares of ART One Hickory Corporation ("One Hickory"), a wholly-owned subsidiary
of ARL, for $4.5 million. The purchase price was determined based on the market
values of the property exchanged, using a market rate multiple of net operating
income. One Hickory owns the One Hickory Centre Office Building. ARL has
guaranteed that the asset will produce at least a 12% annual return on the
purchase price for a period of three years from the purchase date. If the asset
fails to produce the 12% return, ARL will pay TCI any shortfall. In addition, if
the asset fails to produce the 12% return for a calendar year, TCI may require
ARL to repurchase the shares in One Hickory for the purchase price. The business
purpose of the transaction was for TCI to make an equity investment in One
Hickory anticipating a profitable return and ARL to receive cash for its equity
investment. Management has classified this related party transaction as a note
payable to TCI.


          In April 2002, ARL sold nine residential properties to partnerships
controlled by Metra Capital, LLC ("Metra"), for a total sales price of $34.2
million. These properties include: the 12 unit Bay Anchor Apartments in Panama
City, Florida; the 168 unit Governor Square Apartments in Tallahassee, Florida;
the 54 unit Grand Lagoon Cove Apartments in Panama City, Florida; the 92 unit
Oak Hill Apartments in Tallahassee, Florida; the 121 unit Park Avenue Villas
Apartments in Tallahassee, Florida; the 62 unit Seville Apartments in
Tallahassee, Florida; the 120 unit Westwood Apartments in Mary Ester, Florida;
the 64 unit Windsor Tower Apartments in Ocala, Florida and the 546 unit
Woodhollow Apartments in San Antonio, Texas. Innovo Realty, Inc., a subsidiary
of Innovo Group, Inc. ("Innovo") is a limited partner in the partnerships that
purchased the properties. Joseph Mizrachi, a director of ARL, controls
approximately 11.67% of the outstanding common stock of Innovo. Management has
determined to treat this sale as a refinancing transaction. ARL will continue to
report the assets and the new debt incurred by Metra on its financial
statements. ARL received net cash of $8.3 million after paying off the existing
debt of $19.3 million and various closing costs. Of the total new debt of $29.2
million, $8.8 million bears interest at 5.00% per annum and matures in May 2003,
$17.0 million bears interest at 7.12% per annum and matures in May 2007 and $3.4
million bears interest at 7.57% per annum and matures in May 2012. ARL also
received $6.3 million of 8% non-recourse, non-convertible Series A preferred
stock of Innovo. The dividend on the Innovo preferred shares will be funded
entirely and solely through member distributions from cash flows generated by
the operation and subsequent sale of the sold properties. In the event the cash
flows for the properties are insufficient to cover the 8% annual dividend,
Innovo will have no obligation to cover any shortfall. The Innovo preferred
shares have a mandatory redemption feature, and are redeemable from the cash
proceeds received by Innovo from the operation and sale of the properties. All
member distributions that are in excess of current and accrued 8% dividends must
be used by Innovo to redeem the Innovo preferred shares.



                                      131



         In April 2002, TCI sold 12 residential properties to partnerships
controlled by Metra. These properties include: the 75 unit Apple Lane Apartments
in Lawrence, Kansas, the 195 unit Arbor Point Apartments in Odessa, Texas, the
264 unit Fairway View Estates Apartments in El Paso, Texas, the 152 unit
Fairways Apartments in Longview, Texas, the 166 unit Fountain Lake Apartments in
Texas City, Texas, the 172 unit Fountains of Waterford Apartments in Midland,
Texas, the 122 unit Harper's Ferry Apartments in Lafayette, Louisiana, the 108
unit Oak Park IV Apartments in Clute, Texas, the 131 unit Quail Oaks Apartments
in Balch Springs, Texas, the 300 unit Sunchase Apartments in Odessa, Texas, the
180 unit Timbers Apartments in Tyler, Texas, and the 112 unit Willow Creek
Apartments in El Paso, Texas. Innovo is a limited partner in the partnerships
that purchased the properties. Joseph Mizrachi, a director of ARL, controls
approximately 11.67% of the outstanding common stock of Innovo. Management has
determined to treat this sale as a refinancing transaction. TCI will continue to
report the assets and the new debt incurred by Metra on its financial
statements. The sales price for the properties totaled $37.6 million. TCI
received net cash of $10.5 million after paying off the existing debt of $18.0
million and various closing costs. The new debt of $30.3 million bears interest
at 7.57% per annum, requires monthly interest only payments of $212,000 and
matures in May 2012. TCI also received $5.7 million of 8% non-recourse,
non-convertible Series A preferred stock of Innovo. The Innovo preferred shares
have the terms described above in the paragraph setting forth ARL's sale of
residential properties to Metra.

         In April 2002, IOT sold all of its residential properties to
partnerships controlled by Metra. These properties include: the 60 unit Brighton
Court, the 92 unit Del Mar, the 68 unit Enclave, the 280 unit Meridian, the 57
unit Signature, the 114 unit Sinclair, located in Midland, Texas, and the 106
unit Treehouse, located in San Antonio, Texas. Innovo is a limited partner in
the partnerships that purchased the properties. Joseph Mizrachi, a director of
ARL, controls approximately 11.67% of the outstanding common stock of Innovo.
The sale constituted 23.39% of the total assets of IOT as of December 31, 2001.
The sales price for the properties totaled $26.2 million. IOT received $5.4
million in cash after the payoff of $16.1 million in debt and various closing
costs. Management has determined to treat this sale as a refinancing
transaction. The new debt, funded by Bank of America, on the properties totals
$21.4 million, bears interest at 7.57% per annum, requires monthly interest only
payments of $135,000 and matures in May 2012. IOT also received $2.9 million of
8% non-recourse, non-convertible Series A preferred stock of Innovo. The Innovo
preferred shares have the terms described above in the paragraph setting forth
ARL's sale of residential properties to Metra.



         In June 2002, TCI purchased 42.6 acres of Hollywood Casino land from
ARL for $17.0 million. The purchase price was determined based on the market
value of the property. The business purpose of this transaction was to reduce
the affiliate payable.

         In June 2002, ARL purchased all the general and limited partnership
interests in Chalet North, L.P. ("Chalet North") from BCM for $3.0 million. The
purchase price was determined based on the market value of the property
exchanged, using a market rate multiple of net operating income. Chalet North
owns the Pinecrest Apartments. The business purpose of this transaction was to
reduce the affiliate payable owed by BCM to ARL.

         In June 2002, ARL purchased the Tiberon Trails Apartments from BCM for
$12.0 million. The purchase price was determined based on the market value of
the property exchanged, using a market rate multiple of net operating income.
The business purpose of this transaction was to reduce the affiliate payable
owed by BCM to ARL.

         In June 2002, ARL purchased the Alta Mesa Shopping Center from BCM for
$4.0 million. The purchase price was determined based on the market value of the
property exchanged, using a market rate multiple of net operating income. The
business purpose of this transaction was to reduce the affiliate payable owed by
BCM to ARL.

         In June 2002, ARL purchased BCM's investment in Realty Advisors-Korea
for $6.0 million. The business purpose of this transaction was to reduce the
affiliate payable owed by BCM to ARL.


         STOCK-RELATED ITEMS

         The directors and officers of TCI also serve as directors and officers
of IOT. The directors owe fiduciary duties to IOT as well as to TCI under
applicable law. IOT has the same relationship with BCM as TCI. At July 16, 2002,
TCI owned 746,972 shares of ARL common stock which were primarily purchased in
open market transactions in 1990 and 1991 at a total cost of $1.6 million. The
officers of TCI and IOT also serve as officers of ARL. BCM also serves as
advisor to ARL and at July 16, 2002, ARL owned approximately 49.5% of TCI's
outstanding common stock. At July 24, 2002, the market value of the ARL common
shares was approximately $6.3 million.


                                      132





         TCI established on April 13, 2000, the Director Stock Option Plan (the
"TCI Director Plan") which became effective upon subsequent approval of the
stockholders of TCI at an Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on October 10,
2000. Under the terms of the TCI Director Plan, successive options covering
5,000 shares of TCI common stock each were automatically granted to each
director on the date of effectiveness of the TCI Director Plan, and on each
January 1 of each subsequent year in which the individual served as a director
of TCI. Pursuant to the TCI Director Plan, two former directors of TCI, Edward
G. Zampa and R. Douglas Leonhard, each held options covering 5,000 shares at an
exercise price of $8.975 per share, and an additional 5,000 shares at an
exercise price of $14.875 per share. On January 30, 2002, TCI entered into
separate agreements with Messrs. Leonhard and Zampa pursuant to which TCI
repurchased all options held by each at a price based upon a $16 per share sale
price of common stock, less the aggregate amount of the exercise price under
each option. As a result of the Purchase Agreements, each of Messrs. Leonhard
and Zampa received an aggregate of $41,225 in settlement, and the outstanding
options previously held by each under the TCI Director Plan have been cancelled.

INDEBTEDNESS OF MANAGEMENT

         As of the record date, no director or executive officer of ARL, TCI or
IOT has any indebtedness to ARL, TCI or IOT.

POLICIES WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN ACTIVITIES

         ARL. Article ELEVENTH of ARL's Articles of Incorporation provides that
ARL shall not, directly or indirectly, contract or engage in any transaction
with (1) any director, officer or employee of ARL, (2) any director, officer or
employee of the advisor, (3) the advisor or (4) any affiliate or associate (as
such terms are defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended) of any of the aforementioned persons, unless (a) the material facts
as to the relationship among or financial interest of the relevant individuals
or persons and as to the contract or transaction are disclosed to or are known
by ARL's board of directors or the appropriate committee thereof and (b) ARL's
board of directors or committee thereof determines that such contract or
transaction is fair to ARL and simultaneously authorizes or ratifies such
contract or transaction by the affirmative vote of a majority of independent
directors of ARL entitled to vote thereon.

         Article ELEVENTH defines an "independent director" as one who is
neither an officer or employee of ARL, nor a director, officer or employee of
ARL's advisor.

         ARL's policy is to have such contracts or transactions approved or
ratified by a majority of the disinterested directors with full knowledge of the
character of such transactions, as being fair and reasonable to the stockholders
at the time of such approval or ratification under the circumstances then
prevailing. Such directors also consider the fairness of such transactions to
ARL. Management believes that, to date, such transactions have represented the
best investments available at the time and that they were at least as
advantageous to ARL as other investments that could have been obtained.




                                      133



         ARL expects to enter into future transactions with entities the
officers, directors or stockholders of which are also officers, directors or
stockholders of ARL, if such transactions would be beneficial to the operations
of ARL and consistent with ARL's then-current investment objectives and
policies, subject to approval by a majority of disinterested directors as
discussed above.

         ARL does not prohibit its officers, directors, stockholders or related
parties from engaging in business activities of the types conducted by ARL.

         TCI. Article FOURTEENTH of TCI's Articles of Incorporation provides
that TCI shall not, directly or indirectly, contract or engage in any
transaction with (1) any director, officer or employee of TCI, (2) any director,
officer or employee of the advisor, (3) the advisor or (4) any affiliate or
associate (as such terms are defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended) of any of the aforementioned persons, unless (a) the
material facts as to the relationship among or financial interest of the
relevant individuals or persons and as to the contract or transaction are
disclosed to or are known by the board of directors or the appropriate committee
thereof and (b) the board of directors or committee thereof determines that such
contract or transaction is fair to TCI and simultaneously authorizes or ratifies
such contract or transaction by the affirmative vote of a majority of
independent directors of TCI entitled to vote thereon.

         Article FOURTEENTH defines an "independent director" as one who is
neither an officer or employee of TCI nor a director, officer or employee of
TCI's advisor.

         IOT. Article FOURTEENTH of IOT's Articles of Incorporation provides
that IOT shall not, directly or indirectly, contract or engage in any
transaction with (1) any director, officer or employee of IOT, (2) any director,
officer or employee of the advisor, (3) the advisor or (4) any affiliate or
associate (as such terms are defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended) of any of the aforementioned persons, unless (a) the
material facts as to the relationship among or financial interest of the
relevant individuals or persons and as to the contract or transaction are
disclosed to or are known by IOT's board of directors or the appropriate
committee thereof and (b) IOT's board of directors or committee thereof
determines that such contract or transaction is fair to IOT and simultaneously
authorizes or ratifies such contract or transaction by the affirmative vote of a
majority of independent directors of IOT entitled to vote thereon.

         Article FOURTEENTH defines an "independent director" as one who is
neither an officer or employee of IOT, nor a director, officer or employee of
IOT's advisor.




                                      134

                          CERTAIN INFORMATION REGARDING
                      TCI COMMON STOCK AND IOT COMMON STOCK

PURCHASES OF TCI COMMON STOCK

         The following table sets forth for each quarter during 2000: (a) the
amount of TCI common stock purchased by BCM and ART, (b) the range of prices
paid by BCM and ART, and (c) the average purchase price paid by BCM and ART,
based on documents filed with the SEC.



                                                NUMBER OF                  RANGE OF                  AVERAGE
       ENTITY              QUARTER           SHARES PURCHASED            PRICES PAID              PURCHASE PRICE
       ------              -------           ----------------            -----------              --------------
                                                                                      
        BCM                2000 Q1                  None                      --                          --
                           2000 Q2                15,500               $11.38 to $11.63               $11.62
                           2000 Q3               431,200                $6.13 to $14.25                $9.18
                           2000 Q4                   900               $16.00 to $16.30               $16.14

        ART                2000 Q1                  None                      --                          --
                           2000 Q2                  None                      --                          --
                           2000 Q3                14,400              $11.00 to $11.875               $11.37
                           2000 Q4                12,400               $10.75 to $11.00                10.88


         On October 3, 2000, pursuant to a Stock Option Agreement dated October
3, 2000, Gotham Partners, LP and Gotham Partners III, LP (both New York limited
partnerships) and Gotham Partners International, Ltd., a Canadian Island company
(all collectively "Gotham") granted to ARL and IOT, jointly, an option to
purchase 1,858,900 shares of TCI common stock (the "Option") at an exercise
price of $12 per share (a total price of $22,306,800). Such Option became
exercisable on January 1, 2001 through 5:00 p.m., central standard time, on
April 4, 2001 (the "Option Period") and was only to be exercised as to the whole
of such Option (not in part). As a fee for the Option, ARL and IOT paid to
Gotham an initial option fee of $5,576,700 ($3 per share) at the time of
execution of the Option and were obligated to pay Gotham on or before December
15, 2000, the remaining portion of the option fee of $2,788,350 ($1.50 per
share), which was not paid but became an obligation payable at the time of
exercise of such Option. On October 19, 2000, IOT assigned all of its right,
title and interest in and to the Option to ARL. On April 4, 2001, ARL gave
notice of exercise of the Option in accordance with the terms of the Option and
paid to Gotham in cash the balance of the option fee of $2,788,350; within three
business days thereafter, Gotham delivered the 1,858,900 shares of TCI common
stock to a brokerage account of EQK Holdings, Inc. ("EQK Holdings") and ARL paid
the full exercise price of $22,306,800 into the brokerage account of EQK
Holdings which was then paid to Gotham. These 1,858,900 shares of TCI common
stock are currently owned by EQK Holdings, an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary
of ARL.


         The following table describes all transactions of TCI common stock
effected by Gene E. Phillips, ARL, BCM, TCI, IOT, and any associate or majority
owned subsidiary thereof, any executive officer, director or any affiliate
thereof, and any pension, profit-sharing or similar plan of TCI or IOT or any
affiliate thereof within the past 60 days:





                                      135



                                           AMOUNT OF SECURITIES
          NAME                 DATE              INVOLVED               TYPE OF TRANSACTION            PRICE PER SHARE
          ----                 ----        --------------------         -------------------            ---------------
                                                                                           
Ted P. Stokely,
TCI & IOT Director            7/5/2002         5,000 Shares        Purchase - Exercise of Option             $8.75
                              7/9/2002         5,000 Shares        Purchase - Exercise of Option            $14.88
                              7/9/2002         5,000 Shares        Purchase - Exercise of Option            $16.05
                             7/12/2002           300 Shares               Open Market Sale                  $19,56
                             7/12/2002         1,700 Shares               Open Market Sale                  $19.40
                             7/15/2002           500 Shares               Open Market Sale                  $19.26
                             7/12/2002         3,500 Shares               Open Market Sale             $19.23 - $19.42

Martin L. White,
TCI & IOT Director            7/3/2002         5,000 Shares        Purchase - Exercise of Option             $8.75
                              7/3/2002         5,000 Shares        Purchase - Exercise of Option            $14.88
                              7/3/2002         5,000 Shares        Purchase - Exercise of Option            $16.05
                             7/13/2002           600 Shares               Open Market Sale                  $20.02



         Except as set forth above, there were no other purchases of TCI common
stock by Gene E. Phillips, ARL, IOT, TCI, BCM or any executive officer, director
or any affiliate thereof, during the past two years that were reported in
documents filed with the SEC.


PURCHASES OF IOT COMMON STOCK

         The following table sets forth for each quarter during 2000: (a) the
amount of IOT common stock purchased by BCM and ART, (b) the range of prices
paid by BCM and ART, and (c) the average purchase price paid by BCM and ART,
based on documents filed with the SEC.



                                                NUMBER OF                  RANGE OF                  AVERAGE
       ENTITY              QUARTER           SHARES PURCHASED            PRICES PAID              PURCHASE PRICE
       ------              -------           ----------------            -----------              --------------
                                                                                       
        BCM                2000 Q1                 None                       --                        --
                           2000 Q2                6,700                 $6.50 to $6.63                $6.58
                           2000 Q3                 None                       --                        --
                           2000 Q4                 None                       --                        --

        ART                2000 Q1                 None                       --                        --
                           2000 Q2                 None                       --                        --
                           2000 Q3                  400                 $7.13 to $6.75                 6.83
                           2000 Q4                 None                       --                        --



         Except as set forth above, there were no other purchases of IOT common
stock by Gene E. Phillips, ARL, IOT, TCI, BCM or any executive officer, director
or any affiliate thereof, during the past two years that were reported in
documents filed with the SEC.


ARRANGEMENTS RELATING TO TCI COMMON STOCK AND IOT COMMON STOCK

         Pursuant to the Option discussed above, Gotham agreed to a "standstill"
for a period of two years from the date of the Option and agreed not to purchase
directly or indirectly any security issued by ARL, TCI or IOT, provided,
however, the standstill was to terminate if the additional option fee was not
made or paid on or before December 15, 2000, or if the Option was




                                      136



not exercised prior to April 4, 2001. Such Option was exercised prior to April
4, 2001, and the additional option fee was paid. Gotham had also executed a
proxy covering the shares of TCI common stock that was subject to the Option (a
total of 1,858,900 shares) in favor of ARL to attend to the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of TCI on October 10, 2000, to represent, vote, execute consents
and otherwise act for Gotham only in approving the four proposals set forth in
TCI's Proxy Statement for such Annual Meeting dated December 11, 2000.

         BCM has pledged 920,507 shares of TCI common stock to Sunset
Management, LLC pursuant to a loan agreement with such lender. BCM has also
pledged 36,689 shares of TCI common stock to Dynamic Finance Corporation as
collateral for a guaranty of indebtedness of an affiliate of BCM under a loan
agreement with such lender. The remaining 209,751 shares of TCI common stock
directly owned by BCM may be deemed to be "collateral" for borrowings pursuant
to margin or other account arrangements with bankers and brokerage firms
relating to accounts of BCM. Such arrangements are standard arrangements
involving margin securities of up to a specified percentage of the market value
of the shares and bear interest at varying rates and contain only standard
default and similar provisions, the operation of any of which should not give
any other person immediate voting power or investment power over such
securities. Such arrangements exist with the shares of TCI common stock and
other securities held in such accounts, and it is impracticable at any given
time to determine the amounts, if any, with respect to the shares of TCI common
stock and interest costs under such arrangements vary with applicable costs and
account balances.

         EQK Holdings has pledged 2,601,798 shares of TCI common stock to Sunset
Management, LLC pursuant to a loan agreement with such lender. EQK Holdings has
also pledged 843,111 shares of TCI common stock to Dynamic Finance Corporation
as collateral for indebtedness under a loan agreement with such lender. EQK
Holdings has also pledged 249,191 shares of TCI common stock to Preferred Bank
as collateral for a guaranty of indebtedness of ART under a loan agreement with
such lender. The remaining 300,000 shares of TCI common stock owned directly by
EQK Holdings may be deemed to be "collateral" for borrowings pursuant to margin
or other account arrangements with bankers and brokerage firms relating to
accounts of EQK Holdings. Such arrangements are standard arrangements involving
margin securities of up to a specified percentage of market value of the shares
and bear interest at varying rates and contain only standard default and similar
provisions, the operation of any of which should not give any other person
immediate voting power or investment power over such securities. Such
arrangements exist with the shares of TCI common stock and other securities held
in such accounts, and it is impracticable at any given time to determine the
amounts, if any, with respect to the shares of TCI common stock and interest
costs under such arrangements may vary with applicable costs and account
balances.

         EQK Holdings has pledged 250,000 shares of IOT common stock to Beal
Bank as additional collateral. An additional 153,400 shares of IOT common stock
owned by EQK Holdings and 106,802 shares of IOT common stock owned by BCM may be
deemed to be "collateral" for borrowings pursuant to margin or other account
arrangements with bankers and brokerage firms relating to accounts of EQK
Holdings and BCM, respectively. Such arrangements are standard arrangements
involving margin securities of up to a specified percentage of the market value
of the shares and bear interest at varying rates and contain only standard
default and similar provisions, the operation of any of which should not give
any person




                                      137



immediate voting power or investment power over such securities. Such
arrangements exist with the shares of IOT common stock and other securities held
in such accounts and it is impracticable at any time to determine the amounts,
if any, with respect to these shares of IOT common stock and interest costs
under such arrangements vary with applicable costs and account balances.

         All 345,728 shares of IOT common stock owned by TCI are located at a
brokerage firm in a cash account (not margin account), and do not serve as
"collateral" for any borrowings pursuant to any margin account arrangement or
otherwise.




                                      138



                              INFORMATION ABOUT ARL

                                 BUSINESS OF ARL

         ARL, a Nevada corporation, is the successor through merger to American
Realty Trust, Inc. ("ART"), a Georgia corporation and National Realty, L.P.
("NRLP"), a Delaware partnership.

         ARL files annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and
other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any document filed by ARL
at the SEC's public reference room in Washington, D.C. The public reference room
at the SEC's office in Washington, D.C. is located at 450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public
reference rooms. ARL's SEC filings are also available to the public from
commercial document retrieval services and at the web site maintained by the SEC
at "http:\\www.sec.gov." In addition, because the common stock of ARL is listed
on the NYSE, reports and other information concerning ARL (symbol: "ARL") can
also be inspected at the office of the NYSE, Inc., 20 Broad Street, New York,
New York 10005.

         On November 3, 1999, ART and NRLP jointly announced the agreement of
their respective boards to combine, in a tax-free exchange, under a new company,
ARL. Prior to December 31, 1998, ART accounted for its investment in NRLP under
the equity method. As of December 31, 1998, upon the election of a wholly-owned
subsidiary of ART as general partner of NRLP, ART began consolidation of NRLP's
accounts at that date and consolidation of its operations subsequent to that
date.

         The merger transaction was closed on August 2, 2000. NRLP unitholders,
except for ART, received one share of ARL common stock for each unit of NRLP
held. ART stockholders received .91 shares of ARL common stock for each share of
ART common stock held. Each share of ART preferred stock was converted into one
share of preferred stock of ARL, having substantially the same rights as ART's
preferred stock. The ART shares of common stock ceased trading on the New York
Stock Exchange on August 2, 2000. ARL common stock commenced trading on the New
York Stock Exchange on August 3, 2000. For financial reporting purposes, the
merger is treated as the purchase of NRLP by ART; accordingly, the historical
information presented for ARL is that of ART.

         On October 23, 2001, ARL, TCI, and IOT jointly announced a preliminary
agreement with Settlement Counsel of the derivative action entitled Olive et al.
v. National Income Realty Trust, et al. for complete settlement of all disputes
in the lawsuit. In February 2002, the court granted final approval of the
proposed settlement. Under the proposal, ARL would acquire all of the
outstanding shares of IOT and TCI not currently owned by ARL for a cash payment
or shares of ARL preferred stock. ARL will pay $17.50 cash per TCI share and
$19.00 cash per IOT share for the stock held by nonaffiliated stockholders. ARL
will issue one share of Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock with a
liquidation value of $20.00 per share for each share of TCI common stock for
stockholders who affirmatively elect to receive ARL Preferred Stock in lieu of
cash. ARL will issue one share of Series H redeemable convertible preferred
stock with a liquidation value of $21.50 per share for each share of IOT common
stock for stockholders who affirmatively elect to receive ARL preferred stock in
lieu of cash. All





                                      139



affiliated stockholders will receive ARL preferred stock. Each share of Series G
redeemable convertible preferred stock will be convertible into 2.5 shares of
ARL common stock, and each share of Series H redeemable convertible preferred
stock will be convertible into 2.25 shares of ARL common stock during a 75-day
period that commences fifteen days after the date of the first ARL Form 10-Q
filing that occurs after the closing of the merger transaction. Upon the
acquisition of IOT and TCI shares, TCI and IOT would become wholly-owned
subsidiaries of ARL. The transaction is subject to the execution of a definitive
merger agreement and a vote of the stockholders of all three entities. ARL has
the same advisor as TCI and IOT, and TCI and IOT have the same board of
directors.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

         On April 26, 2002, ARL sent a letter to the board of trustees of Prime
Group Realty Trust ("Prime Group") proposing that ARL and Prime Group explore a
business combination. On May 1, 2002, Prime Group issued a press release
indicating that it had referred ARL's letter to its board of trustees and to its
financial advisors for consideration. Thereafter, on May 14, 2002, ARL received
a letter from Prime Group declining the proposal to explore a business
combination with ARL.

BUSINESS PLAN AND INVESTMENT POLICY

         ARL's primary business is investing in equity interests in real estate
(including equity securities of real estate-related entities), leases, joint
venture development projects and partnerships and, to a lesser extent, financing
real estate and real estate activities through investments in mortgage loans,
including first, wraparound and junior mortgage loans. Information regarding the
real estate and mortgage notes receivable portfolios of ARL is set forth in
"Properties" and in Schedules III and IV to the ARL consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement and prospectus.

         ARL, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Pizza World Supreme, Inc.
("PWSI"), operates and franchises pizza parlors featuring pizza delivery,
carry-out and dine-in under the trademarks "Me-N-Ed's," "Slices" and "Angelo &
Vito's" in California and Texas. The first Me-N-Ed's pizza parlor opened in
1962. At December 31, 2001, there were 59 pizza parlors in operation, consisting
of 47 owned and 12 franchised pizza parlors. One of the owned pizza parlors was
in Texas and the remainder were in California.

         ARL's businesses are not seasonal. With regard to real estate
investments, ARL is seeking both current income and capital appreciation. ARL's
plan of operation is to continue, to the extent its liquidity permits, to make
equity investments in income producing real estate such as hotels, apartments or
commercial properties or equity securities of real estate-related entities. ARL
also intends to continue to pursue higher risk, higher reward investments, such
as improved and unimproved land where it can obtain financing of substantially
all of a property's purchase price. ARL intends to seek selected dispositions of
certain of its assets, in particular, selected income producing properties in
stabilized markets and certain of its land holdings where the prices obtainable
for such assets justify their disposition. ARL has determined that it will no
longer actively seek to fund or purchase mortgage loans. However, it may, in
selected instances, originate mortgage loans or it may provide purchase money
financing in conjunction with a





                                      140

property sale. See "--Properties of ARL" and Schedules III and IV to the ARL
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement and prospectus.

         ARL's board of directors has broad authority under ARL's governing
documents to make all types of investments, and may devote available assets to
particular investments or types of investments, without restriction on the
amount or percentage of assets that may be allocated to a single investment or
to any particular type of investment, and without limit on the percentage of
securities of any one issuer that may be acquired. Investment objectives and
policies may be changed at any time by the board without stockholder approval.

         The specific composition of ARL's real estate portfolio will depend
largely on the judgment of management as to changing investment opportunities
and the level of risk associated with specific investments or types of
investments. Management intends to attempt to maintain a real estate portfolio
diversified by location and type of property.

         In addition to its equity investments in real estate, ARL has also
invested in private and open market purchases of the equity securities of IOT
and TCI, both affiliates of ARL. See "--Properties of ARL--Investments in Real
Estate Companies and Real Estate Partnerships."

MANAGEMENT OF THE COMPANY


         Although the board of directors is directly responsible for managing
the affairs of ARL and for setting the policies which guide it, its day-to-day
operations are performed by BCM, a contractual advisor under the supervision of
the board. The duties of BCM include, among other things, locating,
investigating, evaluating and recommending real estate and mortgage note
investment and sales opportunities, as well as financing and refinancing
sources. BCM also serves as a consultant in connection with ARL's business plan
and investment policy decisions made by the board. BCM is a company indirectly
owned by a trust for the benefit of the children of Gene E. Phillips. Although
Mr. Phillips is not an officer or director of BCM, but serves as a
representative of the trust, he is involved in daily consultation with the
officers of BCM and has significant influence over the conduct of BCM's
business, including the rendering of its advisory services and the making of
investment decisions for ARL. As of July 16, 2002, BCM owned 6,629,744 shares of
ARL's common stock, approximately 58.3% of the shares then outstanding. BCM is
more fully described in "The Advisor -- BCM." BCM has been providing advisory
services to ARL since February 6, 1989. BCM also serves as advisor to IOT and
TCI. The officers of ARL are also officers of IOT, TCI and BCM.


         Affiliates of BCM have provided property management services to ARL.
Currently, Triad Realty Services, Ltd. ("Triad"), an affiliate, and Carmel
Realty, Inc. ("Carmel") provide such property management services. Triad and
Carmel subcontract with other entities for property-level management services.
The general partner of Triad is BCM. The limited partner of Triad is also a
related party. Triad subcontracts the property-level management and leasing of
13 of ARL's commercial properties (shopping centers, office buildings and a
merchandise mart) and eight of its hotels to Regis Realty, Inc. ("Regis"), also
a related party. Regis is entitled to receive property and construction
management fees and leasing commissions in accordance with the terms of its
property-level management agreement with Triad. Carmel is a company owned by
First Equity Properties, Inc., which is a company affiliated with BCM.





                                      141



         Regis is also entitled to receive real estate brokerage commissions in
accordance with the terms of the Advisory Agreement as discussed in "The Advisor
-- BCM."

         ARL has no employees itself, but PWSI has 921 employees. Employees of
BCM render services to ARL. See "The Advisor -- BCM."

COMPETITION

         REAL ESTATE. The real estate business is highly competitive, and ARL
competes with numerous entities engaged in real estate activities (including
certain entities described in "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions of
ARL, TCI and IOT--Related Party Transactions"), some of which have greater
financial resources than ARL. Management believes that success against such
competition is dependent upon the geographic location of the property, the
performance of property-level managers in areas such as marketing, collections
and control of operating expenses, the amount of new construction in the area
and the maintenance and appearance of the property. Additional competitive
factors with respect to commercial properties are the ease of access to the
property, the adequacy of related facilities, such as parking, and sensitivity
to market conditions in setting rent levels. With respect to apartments,
competition is also based upon the design and mix of the units and the ability
to provide a community atmosphere for the tenants. With respect to hotels,
competition is also based upon the market served, i.e., transient, commercial or
group users. Management believes that beyond general economic circumstances and
trends, the rate at which properties are renovated or the rate new properties
are developed in the vicinity of each of ARL's properties, in particular its
improved and unimproved land, are also competitive factors.

         To the extent that ARL seeks to sell any of its properties, the sales
prices for the properties may be affected by competition from other real estate
entities and financial institutions, also attempting to sell properties in areas
where ARL's properties are located, as well as aggressive buyers attempting to
dominate or penetrate a particular market.

         As described above and in "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions of ARL, TCI and IOT -- Related Party Transactions," the officers of
ARL also serve as officers of IOT and TCI, both of which are also advised by
BCM, and both of which have business objectives similar to ARL's. ARL's officers
and advisor owe fiduciary duties to both IOT and TCI as well as to ARL under
applicable law. In determining whether a particular investment opportunity will
be allocated to ARL, IOT or TCI, management and BCM consider the respective
investment objectives of each and the appropriateness of a particular investment
in light of the existing real estate and mortgage notes receivable portfolios of
each. To the extent that any particular investment opportunity is appropriate to
more than one of the entities, the investment opportunity will be allocated to
the entity which has had funds available for investment for the longest period
of time or, if appropriate, the investment may be shared among all or some of
the entities.

         In addition, also as described in "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions of ARL, TCI and IOT -- Related Party Transactions," ARL also
competes with entities which are affiliates of BCM having similar investment
objectives in the purchasing, selling, leasing and financing of real estate and
real estate-related investments. In resolving any potential conflicts of
interest which may arise, BCM has informed ARL that it intends to continue to
exercise its best





                                      142



judgment as to what is fair and reasonable under the circumstances in accordance
with applicable law.

         ARL is subject to all the risks incident to ownership and financing of
real estate and interests therein, many of which relate to the general
illiquidity of real estate investments. These risks include, but are not limited
to, changes in general or local economic conditions, changes in interest rates
and availability of permanent mortgage financing which may render the purchase,
sale or refinancing of a property difficult or unattractive and which may make
debt service burdensome, changes in real estate and zoning laws, increases in
real estate taxes, federal or local economic or rent controls, floods,
earthquakes, hurricanes and other acts of God and other factors beyond the
control of management or BCM. The illiquidity of real estate investments may
also impair the ability of management to respond promptly to changing
circumstances. Management believes that such risks are partially mitigated by
the diversification by geographic region and property type of ARL's real estate
and mortgage notes receivable portfolios. However, to the extent that property
sales, new property investments, in particular improved and unimproved land, or
mortgage lending are concentrated in any particular region the advantages of
geographic diversification are mitigated.

         Virtually all of ARL's real estate, equity security holdings in IOT and
TCI and its trading portfolio of equity securities are held subject to secured
indebtedness. Such borrowings increase the risk of loss because they represent a
prior claim on ARL's assets and require fixed payments regardless of
profitability. In the event of default, the lender may foreclose on the assets
securing such indebtedness, and ARL could lose its investment in the pledged
assets.

         PIZZA PARLORS. The pizza parlor business is highly competitive and is
affected by changes in consumer tastes and eating habits, as well as national,
regional and local economic conditions, and demographic trends. The performance
of an individual pizza parlor can be affected by changes in traffic patterns,
demographics, and the type, number and location of competing restaurants.

         The quick-service restaurant industry is extremely competitive with
respect to price, service, location and food quality. PWSI and its franchisees
compete with a variety of other restaurants in the quick-service restaurant
industry, including those that offer dine-in, carry-out and delivery services.
These competitors include national and regional chains, franchisees of other
restaurant chains and local owner-operated restaurants. Some of these
competitors have been in existence longer and have an established market
presence in certain geographic regions, and some have substantially greater
financial, marketing and other resources than PWSI and its franchisees. PWSI
competes for qualified franchisees with many other restaurant concepts,
including national and regional restaurant chains.

         PWSI's success is largely dependent upon the efforts of its management
and other key personnel. The loss of the service of one or more members of
management could have an adverse effect on PWSI's operations. Significant
transitions in management involve important risks, including potential loss of
key personnel, difficulties in implementing changes to operational strategies
and maintaining relationships with franchisees.




                                      143



         The typical PWSI franchise agreement establishes the rights and
relationship between the franchisor and franchisee, and outlines the standards,
specifications and operating procedures that franchisees are expected to follow.
The term of the franchise agreement is typically limited; however, the typical
franchise agreement provides that the agreement can be renewed at the option of
the franchisee. Assignment or transfer of a franchise agreement is generally
permitted only in limited circumstances.

         Franchisees enjoy protected territories under typical franchise
agreements, in which no other related pizza franchise can be maintained by the
franchisor. The typical franchise agreement also contains non-competition
clauses, or covenants not to compete, which prevent a franchisee or its owners
from owning or operating a similar business within a specific geographical area
of the pizza parlor. A franchisee who wishes to sell a pizza parlor, or its
interest in a pizza parlor, must, under the typical franchise agreement, give
the franchisor the right of first refusal.

         The typical franchise agreement terminates at the sole discretion of
the franchisor if, for example, the franchisee fails to obtain an on-sale beer
and wine license for the pizza parlor, the franchisee fails to open the pizza
parlor within a specified period of time, or the franchisee fails to complete or
achieve a passing grade in the customary training course concerning operation of
a pizza parlor. The franchisor also has the right to terminate the typical
franchise agreement and the franchise, effective upon delivery of notice of
termination to the franchisee, in certain circumstances. Such circumstances
include, but are not limited to (i) making material misrepresentations or untrue
or inaccurate representations of information, (ii) the bankruptcy or insolvency
of the franchisee or any of its owners, (iii) felony conviction or other crime
or misconduct by the franchisee or any of its owners, which substantially
impairs the goodwill associated with the proprietary nature of the franchisor's
business and (iv) generally, the failure of the franchisee to comply with the
provisions of the franchise agreement.

         The typical franchise agreement provides for the payment of certain
fees and expenses by a franchisee to the franchisor, including, but not limited
to (i) an initial franchise fee for opening a new pizza parlor, payable upon the
execution of the franchise agreement, (ii) an initial advertising fee, payable
upon execution of the franchise agreement, (iii) royalty fees consisting of a
percentage of the adjusted gross sales generated monthly by the pizza parlor,
(iv) periodic advertising fees consisting of a percentage of the adjusted gross
sales generated monthly by the pizza parlor, (v) expenses incurred by the
franchisor in connection with the renewal of the franchise agreement, and (vi)
charges incurred by late payment of any fees, expenses or charges owed by the
franchisee to the franchisor.

         At December 31, 2001, PWSI owned and operated 47 and franchised 12
pizza parlors. The results achieved by PWSI's relatively small pizza parlor base
may not be indicative of the results of a larger number of pizza parlors in a
more geographically dispersed area. Because of PWSI's relatively small pizza
parlor base, an unsuccessful pizza parlor has a more significant effect on
PWSI's results of operations than would be the case in a company owning more
pizza parlors.

         PWSI's existing pizza parlors, both owned and franchised, are located
in California or Texas. At December 31, 2001, there were 54 pizza parlors in
California and five in Texas.




                                      144



Accordingly, PWSI's results of operations may be affected by economic or other
conditions in those regions. Also, given PWSI's present geographic
concentration, publicity relating to PWSI's pizza parlors could have a more
pronounced effect on PWSI's overall sales than might be the case if PWSI's pizza
parlors were geographically dispersed.

         All of PWSI's owned pizza parlors are operated on premises leased from
third parties. Most of the pizza parlor leases provide for a minimum annual rent
and additional rental payments if sales volumes exceed specified amounts. There
can be no assurance that PWSI will be able to renew leases upon expiration or
that the lease terms upon renewal will be as favorable as the current lease
terms. In 2001, PWSI added three new company-owned stores and sold two
company-owned stores to franchisees. In 2002, PWSI plans to construct and open
four new company-owned stores.

         No franchise fee income was recorded in 2001.

                                PROPERTIES OF ARL

         ARL's principal offices are located at 1800 Valley View Lane, Suite
300, Dallas, Texas 75234 and are, in the opinion of management, suitable and
adequate for ARL's present operations.

         Details of ARL's real estate and mortgage notes receivable portfolios
at December 31, 2001, are set forth in Schedules III and IV, respectively, to
the ARL consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement and prospectus. The discussions set forth below under the headings "--
Real Estate" and "-- Mortgage Loans" provide certain summary information
concerning ARL's real estate and mortgage notes receivable portfolios.

         At December 31, 2001, no single asset accounted for 10% or more of
total assets. At December 31, 2001, 78% of ARL's assets consisted of real
estate, 4% consisted of notes and interest receivable, 10% consisted of
investments in equity investees, including IOT and TCI, and 3% consisted of
pizza parlor equipment and related goodwill. The remaining 5% of ARL's assets
were leasehold interests in oil and gas properties, cash, cash equivalents,
marketable equity securities and other assets. The percentage of assets invested
in any one category is subject to change and no assurance can be given that the
composition of ARL's assets in the future will approximate the percentages
listed above.

         ARL's real estate is geographically diverse. At December 31, 2001,
ARL's real estate was located in all geographic regions of the continental
United States, other than the Northeast region, as shown more specifically in
the table under "-- Real Estate" below. ARL also holds mortgage notes receivable
secured by real estate located in the Southeast, Southwest, Pacific and Midwest
regions of the continental United States. See Schedule IV to the ARL
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement and prospectus for a detailed description of ARL's notes receivable
portfolio.




                                      145



GEOGRAPHIC REGIONS

         Northeast region comprised of the states of Connecticut, Delaware,
Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania,
Rhode Island and Vermont, and the District of Columbia. ARL has no properties in
this region.

         Southeast region comprised of the states of Alabama, Florida, Georgia,
Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia. ARL has 34
apartments, 3 commercial properties and 2 hotels in this region.

         Southwest region comprised of the states of Arizona, Arkansas,
Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Texas. ARL has 11 apartments and 8
commercial properties in this region.

         Midwest region comprised of the states of Illinois, Indiana, Iowa,
Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio,
South Dakota, West Virginia and Wisconsin. ARL has 7 apartments, 2 commercial
properties and 1 hotel in this region.

         Mountain region comprised of the states of Colorado, Idaho, Montana,
Nevada, Utah and Wyoming. ARL has 2 commercial properties and 1 hotel in this
region.

         Pacific region comprised of the states of Alaska, California, Hawaii,
Oregon and Washington. ARL has 2 commercial properties and 4 hotels in this
region.

         Excluded from the above are 54 parcels of improved and unimproved land,
a hotel in Sofia, Bulgaria and a single family residence, as described below.

REAL ESTATE

         At December 31, 2001, 88% of ARL's assets were invested in real estate
and the equity securities of IOT and TCI. ARL invests in real estate located
throughout the continental United States, either on a leveraged or nonleveraged
basis. ARL's real estate portfolio consists of properties held for investment,
investments in partnerships, properties held for sale and investments in equity
securities of IOT and TCI.

         TYPES OF REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS. ARL's real estate consists of
apartments, commercial properties (office buildings, shopping centers and a
merchandise mart), hotels and improved and unimproved land. In selecting real
estate for investment, the location, age and type of property, gross rents,
lease terms, financial and business standing of tenants, operating expenses,
fixed charges, land values and physical condition are among the factors
considered. Properties may be purchased subject to debt, or existing debt may be
assumed and properties may be mortgaged, pledged or otherwise collateralized to
obtain financing. The board of directors may alter the types of and criteria for
selecting new real estate investments and for obtaining financing without a vote
of stockholders.

         Although ARL has typically invested in developed real estate, it may
also invest in new construction or development either directly or in partnership
with nonaffiliated parties or affiliates (subject to approval by the board of
directors). To the extent that it invests in construction and development
projects, such as Four Hickory Centre described below, ARL is




                                      146



subject to business risks, such as cost overruns and construction delays,
associated with such higher risk projects. Also at December 31, 2001, ARL had
under construction Oaks of Vista Ridge, a 288 unit apartment complex in
Lewisville, Texas and Vista Lago, a 206 unit apartment complex in Farmers
Branch, Texas.

         In the opinion of management, the properties owned by ARL are
adequately covered by insurance.

         The following table sets forth the percentages, by property type and
geographic region, of owned real estate (excluding 54 parcels of improved and
unimproved land, a hotel in Sofia, Bulgaria and a single family residence,
described below) at December 31, 2001.



                                                                                     Commercial
Region                                                               Apartments      Properties       Hotels
------                                                               ----------      ----------       ------
                                                                                                
Midwest..........................................................      17%                16%             14%
Mountain.........................................................      --                 30              11
Pacific..........................................................      --                  8              46
Southeast........................................................      53                 11              29
Southwest........................................................      30                 35              --
                                                                      ---                ---             ---
                                                                      100%               100%            100%
                                                                      ===                ===             ===


         The foregoing table is based solely on the number of apartment units,
amount of commercial square footage and number of hotel rooms owned and does not
reflect the value of ARL's investment in each region. See Schedule III to the
ARL consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement and prospectus for a detailed description of owned real estate.

         Excluded from the table above are a 136 room hotel in Sofia, Bulgaria,
a single family residence in Dallas, Texas and 54 parcels of improved and
unimproved land consisting of: a 44.4 acre land parcel in Las Colinas, Texas;
six parcels of land in Dallas County, Texas, totaling 391.8 acres; four parcels
of land in Irving, Texas, totaling 278.5 acres; an 82.4 acre land parcel in
Oceanside, California; four parcels of land in Tarrant County, Texas, totaling
129.8 acres; a 130.6 acre land parcel in Harris County, Texas; four parcels of
land in Collin County, Texas, totaling 42.1 acres; 12 parcels of land in Farmers
Branch, Texas, totaling 136.4 acres; two parcels of land in Plano, Texas,
totaling 40.7 acres; a 1,070.9 acre land parcel in Austin, Texas; three parcels
of land in Palm Desert, California, totaling 775.8 acres; a 63.3 acre land
parcel in Travis County, Texas; a 171.7 acre parcel of land in Houston, Texas; a
54.2 acre land parcel in Fort Worth, Texas; a 99.1 acre land parcel in
Lewisville, Texas; a 7.6 acre land parcel in Carrollton, Texas; a 131.3 acre
land parcel in Nashville, Tennessee; three parcels of land in Riverside,
California, totaling 1,677.8 acres; a 150.8 acre parcel of land in Denton
County, Texas; and five additional land parcels totaling approximately 84.0
acres. See Schedule III to the ARL consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this joint proxy statement and prospectus for a detailed
description of ARL's real estate portfolio.




                                      147



         A summary of the activity in the owned real estate portfolio during
2001 is as follows:


                                                                                    
                  Owned properties at January 1, 2001...............................    152
                  Property obtained in exchange for land............................      1
                  Properties under construction.....................................      3
                  Properties sold (excluding partial sales).........................    (23)
                                                                                        ---
                  Owned properties at December 31, 2001.............................    133
                                                                                        ===


         PROPERTIES HELD FOR INVESTMENT. Set forth below are the properties held
for investment and the monthly rental rate for apartments and the average annual
rental rate for commercial properties and the average daily room rate and room
revenue divided by total available rooms for hotels and occupancy at December
31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 for apartments and commercial properties and average
occupancy during 2001, 2000 and 1999 for hotels:



                                                                           RENT PER SQUARE FOOT         OCCUPANCY %
                                                                          -----------------------    ------------------
PROPERTY                LOCATION               UNITS/SQUARE FOOTAGE       2001      2000     1999    2001    2000  1999
--------                --------               --------------------       ----      ----     ----    ----    ----  ----
                                                                                           
APARTMENTS
Arlington Place         Pasadena, TX           230 Units/205,476 Sq. Ft.  $ .73    $ .68    $ .65      97     93     98
Bay Anchor              Panama City, FL        12 Units/10,700 Sq. Ft.      .55      .53      .50     100    100     97
Bridgestone             Friendswood, TX        76 Units/65,519 Sq. Ft.      .71      .68      .68      93     99     91
Chateau                 Bellevue, NE           115 Units/99,220 Sq. Ft.     .71      .68      .69      94     97     96
Chateau Bayou           Ocean Springs, MS      122 Units/105,536 Sq. Ft.    .67      .65      .64      97     89     99
Confederate Point       Jacksonville, FL       206 Units/277,860 Sq. Ft.    .61      .59      .58      98     96     94
Conradi House           Tallahassee, FL        98 Units/49,900 Sq. Ft.      .79      .71      .67     100     98     96
Daluce                  Tallahassee, FL        112 Units/95,432 Sq. Ft.     .63      .61      .59      95     96     93
Falcon House            Ft. Walton, FL         82 Units/71,220 Sq. Ft.      .64      .63      .62     100     95     92
Foxwood                 Memphis, TN            220 Units/212,000 Sq.        .58      .55      .55      91     90     81
Georgetown              Panama City, FL        44 Units/36,160 Sq. Ft.      .65      .62      .60      93    100     94
Governor Square         Tallahassee, FL        168 Units/146,550 Sq. Ft.    .65      .63      .61      95     95     95
Grand Lagoon            Panama City, FL        54 Units/47,460 Sq. Ft.      .76      .74      .71      96     93     94
Greenbriar              Tallahassee, FL        50 Units/36,600 Sq. Ft.      .77      .74      .71      90     98    100
La Mirada               Jacksonville, FL       320 Units/341,400 Sq. Ft.    .56      .54      .54      87     88     94
Lake Chateau            Thomasville, GA        98 Units/65,800 Sq. Ft.      .59      .57      .55      81     95     95
Lake Shore Villas       Harris County, TX      312 Units/259,176 Sq. Ft.    .89      .89        *      96      *      *
Landings/Marina         Pensacola, FL          52 Units/34,464 Sq. Ft.      .72      .69      .68      94     92     96
Lee Hills               Tallahassee, FL        16 Units/14,720 Sq. Ft.      .57      .56      .52      81     94     92
Mallard Lake            Greensboro, NC         336 Units/295,560 Sq. Ft.    .65      .63      .62      90     97     93
Mediterranean Villas    San Antonio, TX        140 Units/158,960 Sq. Ft.    .55      .50      .50      89     96     96
Morning Star            Tallahassee, FL        82 Units/41,000 Sq. Ft.      .85      .81      .77     100     99     95
Northside Villas        Tallahassee, FL        81 Units/134,000 Sq. Ft.     .63      .61      .58      93     97     94
Oak Hill                Tallahassee, FL        92 Units/81,240 Sq. Ft.      .64      .62      .60      98     95     96
Oak Tree                Grandview, MO          189 Units/160,591 Sq. Ft.    .65      .62      .59      91     89     95
Oaks of Vista Ridge     Lewisville, TX         288 Units/238,176 Sq. Ft.     **       **       **      **     **     **
Park Avenue             Tallahassee, FL        121 Units/78,979 Sq. Ft.     .87      .83      .81      94     98     97
Pheasant Ridge          Bellevue, NE           264 Units/243,960 Sq. Ft.    .67      .61      .60      90     94     94
Pinecrest               Tallahassee, FL        48 Units/46,400 Sq. Ft.      .61      .59      .57     100    100     94
Quail Point             Huntsville, AL         184 Units/202,602 Sq. Ft.    .47      .46      .45      89     90     90
Regency                 Lincoln, NE            106 Units/111,700 Sq. Ft.    .63      .62      .64      96     93     88
Regency                 Tampa, FL              78 Units/55,810 Sq. Ft.      .91      .87      .82      89     97     97
Rolling Hills           Tallahassee, FL        134 Units/115,730 Sq. Ft.    .66      .63      .61      97     96     99
Seville                 Tallahassee, FL        62 Units/63,360 Sq. Ft.      .59      .57      .56      95     97    100
Stonebridge             Florissant, MO         100 Units/140,576 Sq. Ft.    .50      .47      .46      99     97     94
Stonegate               Tallahassee, FL        83 Units/34,900 Sq. Ft.      .83      .80      .77     100     99     95
Sun Hollow              El Paso, TX            216 Units/156,000 Sq. Ft.    .71      .65      .65      84     97     94
Sunset                  Odessa, TX             240 Units/160,400 Sq. Ft.    .45      .41      .42      88     85     96
Valley Hi               Tallahassee, FL        54 Units/27,800 Sq. Ft.      .82      .80      .76      98     98     92
Villa Del Mar           Wichita, KS            162 Units/128,004 Sq. Ft.    .62      .56      .59      91     91     85
Villager                Ft. Walton, FL         33 Units/22,840 Sq. Ft.      .76      .73      .70      94     91     94
Villas                  Plano, TX              208 Units/156,632 Sq. Ft.    .91      .85      .81      94     94     96
Vista Lago              Farmers Branch, TX     206 Units/175,100 Sq. Ft.     **       **       **      **     **     **
Waters Edge III         Gulfport, MS           238 Units/212,216 Sq. Ft.    .63      .62      .61      90     92     97
Westwood                Mary Ester, FL         120 Units/93,000 Sq. Ft.     .71      .63      .67      88     93     94




                                      148



                                                                            RENT PER SQUARE FOOT         OCCUPANCY %
                                                                           -----------------------    ------------------
PROPERTY                LOCATION               UNITS/SQUARE FOOTAGE        2001      2000     1999    2001    2000  1999
--------                --------               --------------------        ----      ----     ----    ----    ----  ----
                                                                                            
Westwood Parc           Tallahassee, FL        94 Units/55,950 Sq. Ft.        .77       .74      .70     93     99     99
White Pines             Tallahassee, FL        85 Units/17,000 Sq. Ft.        .54       .53      .74     90     93     95
Whispering Pines        Topeka, KS             320 Units/299,264 Sq. Ft.      .83       .79      .52     94     97     94
Windsor Tower           Ocala, FL              64 Units/66,000 Sq. Ft.        .54       .50      .46     94     98    100
Woodhollow              San Antonio, TX        546 Units/348,692 Sq. Ft.      .67       .65      .64     96     89     76
Woodlake                Carrollton, TX         256 Units/210,208 Sq. Ft.      .84       .78      .77     94     99     96
Woodsong II             Smyrna, GA             190 Units/207,460 Sq. Ft.      .64       .60      .57     93     97     96

OFFICE BUILDINGS
56 Expressway           Oklahoma City, OK      54,649 Sq. Ft.               11.47     11.23     7.92     66     77     23
Centura                 Farmers Branch, TX     410,901 Sq. Ft.              24.91     25.01        *     48     31      *
Cooley Building         Farmers Branch, TX     27,000 Sq. Ft.               11.69      9.25     9.00     69    100    100
Encino Executive Plaza  Encino, CA             177,211 Sq. Ft.              26.98     25.17    16.85     65     78     90
Executive Court         Memphis, TN            41,840 Sq. Ft.               11.06     11.04    13.22     73    100    100
Four Hickory Centre     Farmers Branch, TX     221,000 Sq. Ft.                 **        **       **     **     **     **
Melrose Business Park   Oklahoma City, OK      124,200 Sq. Ft.               3.57      3.22     2.73     78     74     86
One Hickory Centre      Farmers Branch, TX     102,615 Sq. Ft.              18.95     19.90        *     99     72      *
Rosedale Towers         Minneapolis, MN        84,798 Sq. Ft.               17.37     16.84    18.89     95     86     92
Two Hickory Centre      Farmers Branch, TX     96,127 Sq. Ft.               20.89     21.07    18.71     75     33     25
University Square       Anchorage, AK          22,260 Sq. Ft.               14.73     14.07    13.26    100     97     97

SHOPPING CENTERS
Collection              Denver, CO             267,812 Sq. Ft.              10.43      9.83    11.19     88     96     99
Cross County Mall       Mattoon, IL            304,575 Sq. Ft.               5.24      5.10     6.05     93     94     93
Cullman                 Cullman, AL            92,466 Sq. Ft.                3.38      3.27     3.98     98     98     98
Oaktree Village         Lubbock, TX            45,623 Sq. Ft.                9.23      6.64     9.29     89     79     76
Westwood                Tallahassee, FL        149,855 Sq. Ft.               6.87      6.74     6.68     97     93    100

MERCHANDISE MART
Denver Mart             Denver, CO             509,008 Sq. Ft.              11.20     10.98    10.34     92     90     92

SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
Tavel Circle            Dallas, TX             2,271 Sq. Ft.                   --        --       --     --     --     --





                                                                                                      TOTAL ROOM REVENUE
                                                                                                          DIVIDED BY
PROPERTY                 LOCATION          ROOMS         AVERAGE ROOM RATE         OCCUPANCY %       TOTAL AVAILABLE ROOMS
--------                 --------          -----       ---------------------   --------------------  ---------------------
                                                        2001     2000   1999   2001    2000    1999   2001    2000   1999
                                                       -----     ----   ----   ----    ----    ----   ----    ----   ----
                                                                                    
HOTELS
Best Western            Virginia Beach, VA 110 Rooms  $108.20  $103.94  $94.15   53      60      62  $57.83  $62.29 $57.96
Grand Hotel Sofia       Sofia, Bulgaria    136 Rooms   106.97        *       *   60       *       *   60.85       *      *
Holiday Inn             Kansas City, MO    196 Rooms    73.58    70.67   64.09   65      72      81   48.01   51.18  52.02
Piccadilly Airport      Fresno, CA         185 Rooms    70.87    70.22   69.52   59      61      59   42.04   42.87  41.02
Piccadilly Chateau      Fresno, CA         78 Rooms     57.29    56.38   57.09   59      58      56   34.07   32.64  32.17
Piccadilly Shaw         Fresno, CA         194 Rooms    73.12    70.96   71.80   70      69      63   50.84   49.07  45.36
Piccadilly University   Fresno, CA         190 Rooms    65.18    67.11   68.90   62      55      49   40.38   36.83  34.02
Quality Inn             Denver, CO         161 Rooms    53.75    52.83   55.01   67      69      63   35.75   36.30  34.45
Williamsburg
Hospitality House       Williamsburg, VA   296 Rooms     99.04    93.28  88.76   52      60      58   51.88   55.71  51.58


*        Property was purchased or constructed in 2000 or 2001.
**       Property was under construction in 2001.

         Occupancy presented above and throughout this Section is without
reference to whether leases in effect are at, below or above market rates.

         In 2001, ARL purchased the following property:




                                              PURCHASE   NET CASH      DEBT        INTEREST    MATURITY
PROPERTY          LOCATION        UNITS        PRICE      PAID       INCURRED       RATE         DATE
--------          --------        -----        -----      ----       --------       ----         ----
                                                                           
APARTMENTS
Glenwood          Addison, TX    168 Units    $ 6,246    $-- (1)    $ 2,549 (2)     9.25%        10/04


(1)      8.88 acres of Hollywood Casino land and 10.5 acres of Vista Ridge land
         given as consideration. Exchanged with TCI, a related party.

(2)      Assumed debt of seller. Exchanged with TCI, a related party.





                                      149



         In 2001, ARL sold the following properties:



                                             UNITS/SQ.FT.           SALES        NET CASH       DEBT        GAIN/(LOSS)
PROPERTY                LOCATION                /ACRES              PRICE        RECEIVED    DISCHARGED       ON SALE
--------                --------             ------------           -----        --------    ----------     -----------
                                                                                          
APARTMENTS
Ashford                 Tampa, FL             56 Units             $ 2,145      $   593      $  1,182       $    (985)
Bent Tree               Addison, TX           292 Units             12,050        2,480         8,867            7,081
Blackhawk               Ft. Wayne, IN         209 Units              7,100          904         4,030            5,110
Carriage Park           Tampa, FL             46 Units               2,005          757         1,069              663
Chalet I                Topeka, KS            162 Units              5,650        1,288         4,109(1)         3,952
Chalet II               Topeka, KS            72 Units               2,100          485         1,550(1)           434
Club Mar                Sarasota, FL          248 Units              8,500        1,905         6,199(1)         2,328
Covered Bridge          Gainesville, FL       176 Units              7,900        2,463         4,339            6,042
Crossing at Church      Tampa, FL             52 Units               1,880          750           948              623
Glenwood                Addison, TX           168 Units              6,650        3,166         2,549             (581)
Kimberly Woods          Tucson, AZ            279 Units              8,450        1,667         6,191(1)         6,053
Nora Pines              Indianapolis, IN      254 Units              9,850        2,548         5,574            6,957
Place One               Tulsa, OK             407 Units             12,935        3,310         7,539            8,623
Rockborough             Denver, CO            345 Units             16,675        3,654        12,215(1)        13,471
Shadowood               Addison, TX           184 Units              7,125        1,980         4,320            4,644
Timbercreek             Omaha, NE             180 Units              7,500        1,871         4,517            5,219
Woodstock               Dallas, TX            320 Units              9,600        3,877         4,542            5,951

SHOPPING CENTER
Regency Pointe          Jacksonville, FL      67,410 Sq.Ft.          7,350        5,126         1,500            2,232

LAND
Chase Oaks              Plano, TX             22.3 Acres             2,875          663         2,027              871
Chase Oaks              Plano, TX             4.9 Acres              1,973        1,832            --            1,416
Elm Fork                Denton County, TX     10.0 Acres             1,002          (30)          958              283
Elm Fork                Denton County, TX     107.0 Acres            5,600         (168)        5,316           (1,616)
Frisco Bridges          Collin County, TX     27.8 Acres             4,500        4,130            --               25
Katrina                 Palm Desert, CA       20.0 Acres             2,831         (124)          596               -- (2)
Katrina                 Palm Desert, CA       20.0 Acres             2,940           78            --              616
Katrina                 Palm Desert, CA       6.1 Acres              1,196        1,108            --              570
Katrina                 Palm Desert, CA       2.2 Acres                800          (24)          737              514
Katrina                 Palm Desert, CA       1.4 Acres                284           (9)          253               93
Las Colinas             Las Colinas, TX       1.7 Acres                825          233           400              539
Mason/Goodrich          Houston, TX           22.1 Acres             4,168          (34)        3,750            2,896
Nashville               Nashville, TN         2.0 Acres                 26           (1)           24              (82)
Nashville               Nashville, TN         1.2 Acres                  8           --             4              (59)
Nashville               Nashville, TN         4.2 Acres                600          (53)          561              302
Plano Parkway           Plano, TX             11.3 Acres             1,445          312           950               --
Plano Parkway           Plano, TX             12.0 Acres               740          672            --             (991)
Rasor                   Plano, TX             6.6 Acres                350          267            --               34
Santa Clarita           Santa Clarita, CA     12.7 Acres             2,100        1,791            --              952
Santa Clarita           Santa Clarita, CA     6.7 Acres                500          608            --             (501)
Scoggins                Tarrant County, TX    232.8 Acres            2,913          892         1,800              181
Scout                   Tarrant County, TX    408.0 Acres            5,087        1,586         3,200            2,969
Tree Farm               Dallas County, TX     10.4 Acres             2,888          (87)        2,644               75
Vista Ridge             Denton County, TX     27.4 Acres               871          (26)          812           (1,993)
Watersedge              Gulfport, MS          .4 Acres                  80           78            --               -- (3)
Yorktown                Harris County, TX     120.4 Acres            5,239         (160)        4,991           (1,497)


(1)      Debt assumed by purchaser.

(2)      Gain of $830 deferred until ARL-provided financing is collected.

(3)      Sold to TCI. Gain of $65 deferred until sale to unrelated party.



                                      150

         In 2001, ARL financed/refinanced or obtained second mortgage financing
on the following:



                                               UNITS/SQ.FT.        DEBT           DEBT       NET CASH     INTEREST     MATURITY
PROPERTY                 LOCATION              ROOMS/ACRES       INCURRED      DISCHARGED    RECEIVED       RATE         DATE
--------                 --------              -----------       --------      ----------    --------       ----         ----
                                                                                                   
APARTMENTS
Sun Hollow               El Paso, TX            216 Units         $    --(1)    $    --       $    --          --          --
Waters Edge III          Gulfport, MS           238 Units              --(1)         --            --          --          --
Woodlake                 Carrollton, TX         256 Units              --(1)         --            --          --          --

OFFICE BUILDING
Centura Tower            Farmers Branch, TX     410,910 Sq.Ft.     28,739        28,384          (526)        10.50%      07/02
Executive Court          Memphis, TN            41,840 Sq.Ft.       1,970            --         1,598         12.00       12/04 (9)
Four Hickory Centre      Farmers Branch, TX     221,000 Sq.Ft.      5,000            --         5,000          6.75 (5)   10/02
Rosedale Towers          Minneapolis, MN        84,798 Sq.Ft.       7,500(1)         --         7,500          5.00       07/02





                                               UNITS/SQ.FT.        DEBT          DEBT       NET CASH      INTEREST     MATURITY
PROPERTY                 LOCATION              ROOMS/ACRES       INCURRED      DISCHARGED    RECEIVED       RATE         DATE
--------                 --------              -----------       --------      ----------    --------       ----         ----
                                                                                                   
SHOPPING CENTER
Cross County             Mattoon, IL            307,174 Sq.Ft.        3,200        700         2,436         15.00      06/02
Cullman                  Cullman, AL            92,486 Sq.Ft.            --(2)     129            --            --         --
Sesame Square            Anchorage, AK          27,651 Sq.Ft.           800         --           777         15.00      06/02
Westwood                 Tallahassee, FL        149,244 Sq.Ft.        3,000        700         2,221         15.00      06/02

HOTEL
Williamsburg Hospitality
House                    Williamsburg, VA(3)    296 Rooms            10,309         --         9,851         36.00      01/02 (6)

LAND
Chase Oaks               Plano, TX              6.9 Acres             1,633      1,000           425         13.00      03/03
Hollywood Casino         Farmers Branch, TX     51.7 Acres            2,500(4)      --         1,916          9.00      04/03
Jeffries Ranch           Oceanside, CA          82.4 Acres            5,250(2)     750         3,944         14.50      06/02
Katrina                  Palm Desert, CA        300.5 Acres          22,000     15,584         4,417         12.50 (5)  10/02
Marine Creek             Fort Worth, TX         54.2 Acres            1,500        750           701          9.00      01/03
Mason/Goodrich           Houston, TX            235.0 Acres           6,750         --         6,302         14.00      01/02 (7)
Mercer Crossing          Carrollton, TX         31.3 Acres            2,937      1,986            16         13.00      03/03
Pioneer Crossing         Austin, TX             350.1 Acres           7,000         --         6,855         16.90      03/05
Pioneer Crossing         Austin, TX             14.5 Acres            2,500         --         2,350         14.50      01/02 (8)
Valwood                  Dallas County, TX      19.4 Acres               --(4)      --            --            --         --
Varner Road              Riverside, CA          127.8 Acres           2,450         --         2,333          9.00      10/02
Vista Ridge LI           Lewisville, TX         90.3 Acres            9,085      9,119         (101)         13.00      03/03
Vista Ridge MF           Lewisville, TX         23.0 Acres            1,345      1,000           228         13.00      03/03
Willow Springs           Riverside, CA          1,485.7 Acres            --(2)      --            --            --         --


(1)      Single note, with all properties as collateral.
(2)      Single note, with all properties as collateral.
(3)      Also secured by 1,846,000 shares of TCI Common Stock.
(4)      Single note, with all properties as collateral.
(5)      Variable interest rate.
(6)      Paid off in September 2001.
(7)      Extended to April 2003.
(8)      Extended to July 2002.
(9)      In December 2001, TCI, purchased 100% of the outstanding common shares
         of NM, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ARL, for $2.0 million. The purchase
         price was determined based upon the market value of the property
         exchanged, using a market rate multiple of net operating income. NM
         owns the Executive Court Office Building. ARL has guaranteed that the
         asset will produce at least a 12% annual return on the purchase price
         for a period of three years from the purchase date. If the asset fails
         to produce the annual



                                      151



         return, ARL will pay TCI any shortfall. In addition, if the asset fails
         to produce the 12% return for a calendar year, TCI may require ARL to
         repurchase the shares of NM for the purchase price. The business
         purpose of the transaction was for TCI to make an equity investment in
         NM anticipating a profitable return and ARL to receive cash for its
         equity investment. Management has classified this related party
         transaction as a note payable to TCI. The consideration paid for the
         outstanding shares was $2.0 million.

         PROPERTIES HELD FOR SALE. Set forth below are the properties held for
sale, consisting of improved and unimproved land:



PROPERTY                                LOCATION                                     ACRES
--------                                --------                                     -----
                                                                              
Bonneau                                 Dallas County, TX                              8.4
Centura Holdings                        Farmers Branch, TX                             6.4
Chase Oaks                              Plano, TX                                     11.8
Clark                                   Farmers Branch, TX                             3.3
Croslin                                 Dallas County, TX                               .8
Dalho                                   Farmers Branch, TX                             3.4
Desert Wells                            Palm Desert, CA                              420.0
Eldorado Parkway                        Collin County, TX                              8.5
Elm Fork                                Denton County, TX                            150.8
Frisco Bridges                          Collin County, TX                             12.2
FRWM Cummings                           Farmers Branch, TX                             6.5
Hollywood Casino                        Farmers Branch, TX                            42.8
HSM                                     Farmers Branch, TX                             6.2
Jeffries Ranch                          Oceanside, CA                                 82.4
JHL Connell                             Carrollton, TX                                 7.6
Katrina                                 Palm Desert, CA                              283.8
Katy Road                               Harris County, TX                            130.6
Keller                                  Tarrant County, TX                            30.9
Kelly                                   Collin County, TX                               .8
Lacy Longhorn                           Farmers Branch, TX                            17.1
Las Colinas I                           Las Colinas, TX                               44.4
Leone                                   Irving, TX                                     8.2
Marine Creek                            Fort Worth, TX                                54.2
Mason/Goodrich                          Houston, TX                                  171.7
McKinney Corners II                     Collin County, TX                             20.6
Mendoza                                 Dallas County, TX                               .4
Messick                                 Palm Desert, CA                               72.0
Monterrey                               Riverside, CA                                 65.0
Nashville                               Nashville, TN                                131.3
Pioneer Crossing                        Austin, TX                                 1,070.9
Rasor                                   Plano, TX                                     28.9
Scout                                   Tarrant County, TX                            64.5
Sladek                                  Travis County, TX                             63.3
Stagliano                               Farmers Branch, TX                             3.2
Thompson                                Farmers Branch, TX                             4.0
Thompson II                             Dallas County, TX                              3.5
Tomlin                                  Farmers Branch, TX                             9.2
Valley Ranch                            Irving, TX                                   245.4
Valley Ranch III                        Irving, TX                                    12.5
Valley Ranch IV                         Irving, TX                                    12.4
Valley View 34                          Farmers Branch, TX                            33.9
Valwood                                 Dallas County, TX                            246.1
Varner Road                             Riverside, CA                                127.8
Vineyards                               Tarrant County, TX                            15.8
Vineyards II                            Tarrant County, TX                            18.6
Vista Ridge                             Lewisville, TX                                99.1
Walker                                  Dallas County, TX                            132.6
Willow Springs                          Riverside, CA                              1,485.0
Woolley                                 Farmers Branch, TX                              .4
Other (5 properties)                    Various                                       84.0






                                      152

ARL FEDERAL TAX BASIS OF DEPRECIABLE PROPERTY AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001

         For each ARL property upon which depreciation is taken, the table set
forth below includes (i) the Federal tax basis; (ii) rate, (iii) method and (iv)
life claimed as of December 31, 2001.



                                GROSS
                             FEDERAL TAX     ACCUMULATED TAX     NET FEDERAL
        PROPERTY                BASIS         DEPRECIATION        TAX BASIS       RATE      METHOD(1)         LIFE
        --------             -----------     ---------------     -----------      ----      ---------         ----
                                                                                       
APARTMENTS
Arlington Place           $     5,136,331  $          865,067 $     4,271,264      100  %          ADS    12-40 years
Bay Anchor                        117,306              15,808         101,498      100           MACRS     27.5 years
Bridgestone                     1,970,565             331,652       1,638,913      100             ADS       40 years
Chateau                         2,844,370             337,786       2,506,584      100             ADS    20-40 years
Chateau Bayou                   2,364,187             229,042       2,135,145      100             ADS       40 years
Confederate Point               6,697,547           1,086,080       5,611,467      100             ADS    12-40 years
Conradi House                   1,151,649             155,230         996,419      100           MACRS     27.5 years
Daluce                          2,622,734             353,506       2,269,228      100           MACRS     27.5 years
Falcon House                    1,967,301             259,304       1,707,997      100           MACRS     27.5 years
Foxwood                         4,950,375             853,921       4,096,454      100             ADS    12-40 years
Georgetown                      1,025,485             156,543         868,942      100           MACRS     27.5 years
Governor Square                   830,752             147,295         683,457      100             ADS       40 years
Grand Lagoon                      659,190              99,141         560,049      100             ADS       40 years
Greenbriar                        923,602             206,950         716,652      100             ADS       40 years
La Mirada                       8,857,528           1,576,027       7,281,501      100             ADS    12-40 years
Lake Chateau                    1,379,424             200,620       1,178,804      100           MACRS     27.5 years
Lakeshore Villas               14,129,956             619,488      13,510,468      100             ADS    12-40 years
Landings/Marina                 1,255,751             185,117       1,070,634      100           MACRS   7-27.5 years
Lee Hills                         236,046              31,813         204,233      100           MACRS     27.5 years
Mallard Lake                   13,485,915           2,133,760      11,352,155      100             ADS    12-40 years
Med Villas                      2,847,706             275,886       2,571,820      100             ADS       40 years
Morning Star                    1,348,597             177,692       1,170,905      100           MACRS     27.5 years
Northside Villas                3,758,551             506,795       3,251,756      100           MACRS     27.5 years
Oak Hill                        2,107,213             283,890       1,823,323      100           MACRS     27.5 years
Oak Tree                        4,490,117             760,612       3,729,505      100             ADS    12-40 years
Oaks at Vista Ridge**                  --                  --              --      100             ADS       40 years
Park Avenue                       774,877             169,779         605,098      100             ADS       40 years
Pheasant Ridge                  7,525,733           1,217,629       6,308,104      100             ADS    12-40 years
Pinecrest West                    891,750             120,195         771,555      100           MACRS     27.5 years
Quail Point                     4,304,220             819,277       3,484,943      100             ADS    12-40 years
Regency - NE                    2,885,626             427,367       2,458,259      100             ADS    12-40 years
Regency - FL                    1,784,436             496,641       1,287,795      100             ADS       40 years
Rolling Hills                   3,057,516             493,268       2,564,248      100           MACRS   5-27.5 years
Seville                         1,686,356             277,678       1,408,678      100           MACRS   5-27.5 years
Stonebridge                     3,277,158             573,381       2,703,777      100             ADS    12-40 years
Stonegate                       1,663,558             241,364       1,422,194      100           MACRS     27.5 years
Sun Hollow                      5,152,743             997,072       4,155,671      100             ADS       40 years
Sunset                          1,381,980             133,886       1,248,094      100             ADS       40 years
Valley Hi                         833,613             138,976         694,637      100           MACRS   5-27.5 years
Villa Del Mar                   3,225,142             533,725       2,691,417      100             ADS    12-40 years




                                      153




                                GROSS
                             FEDERAL TAX       ACCUMULATED TAX     NET FEDERAL
        PROPERTY                BASIS           DEPRECIATION        TAX BASIS       RATE      METHOD(1)         LIFE
        --------             -----------       ---------------     -----------      ----      ---------         ----
                                                                                         
Villager                       1,106,359               160,353         946,006       100          MACRS    5-27.5 years
Villas                         6,278,546             1,036,042       5,242,504       100            ADS     12-40 years
Vista Lago**                          --                    --              --       100            ADS        40 years
Waters Edge III                1,323,967               114,470       1,209,497       100            ADS        40 years
Westwood                       1,897,454               253,362       1,644,092       100            ADS        40 years
Westwood Parc                  1,483,208               195,500       1,287,708       100          MACRS      27.5 years
Whispering Pines               7,382,519             1,195,969       6,186,550       100            ADS     12-40 years
White Pines                      673,341                90,723         582,618       100          MACRS      27.5 years
Windsor Tower                  2,014,279               280,623       1,733,656       100          MACRS      27.5 years
Wood Hollow                    8,632,523             1,999,434       6,633,089       100            ADS     12-40 years
Woodlake                       8,935,473             1,633,781       7,301,692       100            ADS     12-40 years
Woodsong II                    5,553,747               781,852       4,771,895       100            ADS     12-40 years

OFFICE BUILDINGS
56 Expressway                  3,560,831             1,025,583       2,535,248       100            ADS     12-40 years
Centura Tower                 56,326,747             2,847,642      53,479,105       100          MACRS      5-39 years
Cooley Building                4,435,200               218,164       4,217,036       100            ADS        40 years
Encino                        31,520,000             2,320,000      29,200,000       100          MACRS      5-39 years
Executive Court*                      --                    --              --       100            ADS        40 years
Melrose Business Park          2,680,791               565,449       2,115,342       100            ADS     12-40 years
One Hickory Center            11,199,591               562,341      10,637,250       100            ADS      6-40 years
Two Hickory Center             9,041,244               216,628       8,824,616       100            ADS        40 years
Four Hickory Center**                 --                    --              --       100            ADS        40 years
Rosedale Towers                5,159,244             1,673,231       3,486,013       100            ADS     10-40 years
University Square              2,733,833               785,430       1,948,403       100            ADS     12-40 years
SHOPPING CENTERS
Collection                    13,724,776             1,265,832      12,458,944       100          MACRS        39 years
Cross County Mall             14,627,929             2,733,606      11,894,323       100            ADS     12-40 years
Cullman                        2,473,588               351,922       2,121,666       100            ADS     12-40 years
Oaktree Shopping Village       1,608,873               222,414       1,386,459       100            ADS        40 years
Westwood                       8,570,701             1,770,918       6,799,783       100            ADS     12-40 years

MERCHANDISE MART
Denver Mart                   22,653,797             3,823,165      18,830,632       100          MACRS      5-39 years

HOTELS
Best Western Hotel             5,233,153             4,156,553       1,076,600       100          MACRS      5-39 years
AKC Holiday Inn                7,303,484             1,995,685       5,307,799       100          MACRS      5-39 years
Piccadilly Airport             8,324,191               979,546       7,344,645       100            ADS      6-40 years
Piccadilly Chateau             3,946,863               446,984       3,499,879       100            ADS     10-40 years
Piccadilly Shaw               10,525,142             1,246,662       9,278,480       100            ADS     10-40 years
Piccadilly University         12,145,188             1,360,137      10,785,051       100            ADS      6-40 years
Quality Inn                      964,516               313,206         651,310       100            ADS     10-40 years
Grand Hotel, Sofia            14,566,761               500,612      14,066,149       100            ADS     10-40 years
Williamsburg Hospitality      18,184,618             2,578,840      15,605,778       100            ADS      6-40 years
House

SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
Tavel Circle                     213,576                30,035         183,541       100            ADS        40 years
                             -----------       ---------------     -----------



                                      154



                                GROSS
                             FEDERAL TAX      ACCUMULATED TAX      NET FEDERAL
        PROPERTY                BASIS          DEPRECIATION         TAX BASIS        RATE      METHOD(1)      LIFE
        --------           --------------     ---------------      -----------       ----      ---------      ----
                                                                                            
     Total                    442,608,959          60,221,957      382,387,002
                           ==============     ===============      ===========



*Sold to TCI, treated as financing transaction for book, sale for tax.

**Property under construction, no depreciable assets in service.

(1) ADS = Alternative Depreciation System
    MACRS = Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System

MORTGAGE LOANS

         In addition to real estate, a portion of ARL's assets are invested in
mortgage notes receivable, secured by income-producing real estate, unimproved
land and partnership interests. Management expects that the percentage of ARL's
assets invested in mortgage loans will decline, as ARL will no longer seek to
fund or acquire new mortgage loans. However, ARL may, in selected instances,
originate mortgage loans or it may provide purchase money financing in
conjunction with a property sale. Management intends to service and hold for
investment the mortgage notes currently in the portfolio. Mortgage notes
receivable consist of first mortgage loans.

         TYPES OF PROPERTIES SUBJECT TO MORTGAGES. The types of properties
securing mortgage notes receivable at December 31, 2001, consisted of
apartments, a commercial building, unimproved land and partnership interests.
The type of properties subject to mortgages in which ARL invests may be altered
without a vote of stockholders.

         As of December 31, 2001, the obligors on $25.9 million or 79% of the
mortgage notes receivable portfolio were affiliates of ARL. Also at that date,
$10.3 million or 31% of the mortgage notes receivable portfolio was
nonperforming.

         The following table sets forth the percentages (based on the
outstanding mortgage loan balance at December 31, 2001), by geographic region,
of the commercial properties that serve as collateral for ARL's mortgage notes
receivable. Excluded are $26.1 million of mortgage notes secured by unimproved
land and other security. See Schedule IV to the ARL consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement and prospectus for
additional details of ARL's mortgage notes receivable portfolio.



             REGION                           COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES
             ------                           ---------------------
                                                  
             Southwest                               100.0%
                                                     =====







                                      155



A summary of the activity in the mortgage notes receivable portfolio during 2001
is as follows:


                                                                                     
         Mortgage notes receivable at January 1, 2001                                      11
         Loans funded                                                                       5
         Loans collected in full                                                          (6)
         Loans sold                                                                        --
                                                                                        -----
         Mortgage notes receivable at December 31, 2001                                    10
                                                                                        =====


During 2001, $1.8 million in interest and $5.0 million in principal were
collected on mortgage notes receivable.

         FIRST MORTGAGE LOANS. These loans generally provide for level periodic
payments of principal and interest sufficient to substantially repay the loan at
or prior to maturity, but may involve interest-only payments or moderate or
negative amortization of principal or all interest and a "balloon" principal
payment at maturity. With respect to first mortgage loans, it is ARL's general
policy to require that the borrower provide a title policy or an acceptable
legal opinion of title as to the validity and the priority of ARL's mortgage
lien over all other obligations, except liens arising from unpaid property taxes
and other exceptions normally allowed by first mortgage lenders.

         The following discussion briefly describes first mortgage loans funded
in 2001, as well as events that affected previously funded first mortgage loans
during 2001.

         In July 2000, ARL sold a 749.1 acre tract of its Keller land parcel for
$10.0 million, receiving $8.7 million in cash and providing purchase money
financing of the remaining $1.3 million of the sales price. The loan bore
interest at 12.0% per annum. A payment of $500,000 principal and interest was
collected in September 2000 and all remaining principal and interest was due
July 31, 2001. The loan was secured by 100% of the shares of DM Development,
Inc. and an assignment of land sales proceeds. In March 2001, $850,000 in
principal and interest was collected. In June 2001, the loan was collected in
full, including accrued but unpaid interest.

         In August 2000, ARL sold a 20.5 acre tract of its Mason Goodrich land
parcel for $3.6 million, receiving $2.1 million in cash and providing purchase
money financing of the remaining $1.5 million of the sales price. The loan bore
interest at 13.5% per annum, and matured in December 2000. All principal and
interest were due at maturity. In February 2001, the loan was collected in full,
including accrued but unpaid interest.

         In March 2001, ARL sold a 20.0 acre tract of its Katrina land parcel
for $2.8 million, receiving $700,000 in cash and providing purchase money
financing of the remaining $2.1 million of the sales price. The loan bears
interest at 12.0% per annum and matured in July 2001. All principal and interest
were due at maturity. In January 2002, $274,000 in principal and $226,000 in
interest was collected. In March 2002, the note was collected in full, including
accrued but unpaid interest.

         In April 2001, ARL sold a 20.0 acre tract of its Katrina land parcel
for $2.9 million, receiving $700,000 in cash and providing purchase money
financing of the remaining $2.2 million of the sales price. The loan bore
interest at 10.0% per annum and matured in June 2001.




                                      156



In May 2001, ARL sold an 80% senior interest in the note to a financial
institution. In June 2001, the interest rate was increased to 12.0% and the
maturity date was extended to August 2001. All principal and accrued but unpaid
interest were due at maturity. In July 2001, the note was collected in full,
including accrued but unpaid interest.

         In November 2001, ARL sold a 12.71 acre tract of its Santa Clarita
parcel for $1.9 million, receiving $1.5 million in cash and providing purchase
money financing of the remaining $437,000 of the sales price. The loan bears
interest at 8.0% per annum and matures in November 2002. All principal and
accrued but unpaid interest are due at maturity.

         Also in November 2001, ARL sold the Blackhawk Apartments for $7.1
million, receiving $1.5 million in cash after the assumption of $4.0 million of
mortgage debt and providing purchase money financing of the remaining $1.6
million of the sales price. The loan bears interest at 10.0% per annum and
matured in May 2002. Monthly principal and interest payments were required. In
April 2002, the note was collected in full, including accrued but unpaid
interest.

         OTHER. In September 1999, in conjunction with the sale of two
apartments in Austin, Texas, $2.1 million in purchase money financing was
provided, secured by limited partnership interests in two limited partnerships
owned by the buyer. The financing bore interest at 16.0% per annum, required
monthly payments of interest only at 6.0%, beginning in February 2000 and
required a $200,000 principal paydown in December 1999, which was not received,
and matured in August 2000. ARL had the option of obtaining the buyer's general
and limited partnership interests in the collateral partnerships in full
satisfaction of the financing. In March 2000, ARL agreed to forbear foreclosing
on the collateral securing the note and released one of the partnership
interests, in exchange for a payment of $250,000 and executed deeds of trusts on
certain properties owned by the buyer. In March 2000, the borrower made a $1.1
million payment, upon receipt of which ARL returned the deeds of trust. The
borrower executed a replacement promissory note for the remaining note balance
of $1.0 million, which is unsecured, non-interest bearing and matures in April
2003. In April 2000, ARL funded a $100,000 loan to the borrower. The loan was
secured by five second lien deeds of trust, was non-interest bearing and matured
in September 2001. Payment was not received at maturity, and ARL began to accrue
default interest. In December 2001, the $100,000 loan was collected in full,
including accrued but unpaid interest.

         In December 1999, a note with a principal balance of $1.2 million,
secured by a pledge of a partnership interest in a partnership which owns real
estate in Addison, Texas, matured. The maturity date was extended to April 2000
in exchange for an increase in the interest rate to 14.0% per annum. All other
terms remained the same. In February 2001, the loan amount was increased to $1.6
million and the maturity date was extended to June 2001. In February 2002, $1.5
million in principal and $87,000 in interest were collected. ARL has demanded
payment of the remaining $84,000 in principal plus accrued but unpaid interest.

         In August 1998, a $635,000 loan was funded to La Quinta Partners, LLC.
The loan was secured by interest bearing accounts prior to their being used as
escrow deposits toward the purchase of 956 acres of land in La Quinta,
California, and the personal guarantee of the manager of the borrower. The loan
had an extended maturity date of November 1999. All




                                      157



principal and interest were due at maturity. In November and December 1998,
$250,000 in principal paydowns were received. In the second quarter of 1999, the
loan was modified, increasing the interest rate to 15.0% per annum and extending
the maturity to November 1999. Accrued but unpaid interest was added to the
principal balance, increasing it by $42,000 to $402,000. In the fourth quarter
of 1999, an additional $2,000 was funded increasing the loan balance to
$404,000. In March 2000, $25,000 in interest was collected and the loan's
maturity was extended to April 2000. The borrower did not repay the loan at
maturity. In March 2001, a settlement was reached, whereby ARL collected
$410,000 in full satisfaction of the note.

         RELATED PARTY. Periodically, ARL has made secured and unsecured loans
to parties deemed to be related parties. ARL makes these loans for investment
and high return income purposes. See the specific loans below.

         In October 1999, ARL funded a $4.7 million loan to Realty Advisors,
Inc., the parent company of BCM. The loan, to provide funds for acquisitions or
working capital needs, was secured by all of the outstanding shares of common
stock of American Reserve Life Insurance Company. The loan bore interest at
10.25% per annum, and matured in November 2001. In January 2000, $100,000 was
collected. In November 2001, the maturity date was extended to November 2004.
The collateral was changed to a subordinate pledge of 850,000 shares of ARL
common stock owned by BCM. The shares are also pledged to a lender on ARL's
behalf. The interest rate was changed to 2% over the prime rate, currently 6.75%
per annum, and the accrued but unpaid interest of $984,000 was added to the
principal. The new principal balance is $5.6 million. All principal and accrued
interest are due at maturity.

         In March 2000, a loan due to ARL with a principal balance of $2.5
million due from Lordstown, L.P., matured. The loan, to provide funds to
purchase for resale various parcels of land, is secured by a second lien on land
in Ohio and Florida, by 100% of the general and limited partner interest in
Partners Capital, Ltd., the limited partner of Lordstown, L.P., and a profits
interest in subsequent land sales. At June 2002, the loan, and $900,000 of
accrued interest, remained unpaid. At July 2002, settlement terms are being
negotiated. Tara Group, Inc., a corporation controlled by Richard D. Morgan, is
the general partner of Lordstown, L.P. Mr. Morgan served as a director of ARL
until October 2001.

         In December 2000, an unsecured loan due to ARL with a principal balance
of $1.7 million due from Warwick matured. The loan was made to provide funds to
purchase and renovate and expand a shopping center property in Warwick, Rhode
Island. All principal and interest were due at maturity. In February 2002,
$275,000 of interest was received. In May 2002, $33,000 of principal and
$267,000 of interest was collected. At June 2002, the loan, with a current
principal balance of $1.7 million and $12,000 of accrued interest, remained
unpaid. At July 2002, settlement terms are being negotiated. Richard D. Morgan,
a Warwick stockholder, served as a director of ARL until October 2001.

         In December 2000, a loan due to ARL with a principal balance of $1.6
million due from Bordeaux, matured. The loan, to provide funds to purchase and
renovate a shopping center property in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, is secured by
(1) a 100% interest in Bordeaux, which owns a shopping center in Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma; (2) 100% of the stock of Bordeaux Investments One, Inc., which owns
6.5 acres of undeveloped land in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma;




                                      158



and (3) the personal guarantees of the Bordeaux members. At June 2002, the loan,
and $576,000 of accrued interest, remained unpaid. At July 2002, settlement
terms are being negotiated. Richard D. Morgan, a Bordeaux member, served as a
director of ARL until October 2001.

         In March 2001, ARL funded $13.6 million of a $15.0 million unsecured
line of credit to One Realco, which owns approximately 14.8% of the outstanding
shares of ARL's common stock. One Realco periodically borrows money to meet its
cash obligations. The line of credit bears interest at 12.0% per annum. All
principal and interest were due at maturity in February 2002. The line of credit
is guaranteed by BCM. In June 2001, $394,000 in principal and $416,000 in
interest was collected. In December 2001, $21,000 in principal and $804,000 in
interest was collected. In February 2002, the line of credit was increased to
$1.8 million, accrued but unpaid interest of $217,000 was added to the
principal, and the maturity date was extended to February 2004. In March 2002,
ARL funded an additional $1.8 million, increasing the outstanding principal
balance to $15 million. All principal and interest are due at maturity. Ronald
E. Kimbrough, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of ARL, is a
10% stockholder of One Realco. During 2001, Mr. Kimbrough did not participate in
day-to-day operations or management of One Realco.

INVESTMENTS IN REAL ESTATE COMPANIES AND REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIPS

         REAL ESTATE ENTITIES. ARL's investment in real estate entities includes
the equity securities of two publicly traded real estate companies, IOT and TCI,
and interests in real estate joint venture partnerships. BCM, ARL's advisor,
also serves as advisor to IOT and TCI.

         Since acquiring its initial investments in IOT and TCI in 1989, ARL has
made additional investments in the equity securities of both entities through
private and open market purchases. The cost with respect to shares of IOT and
TCI at December 31, 2001 totaled $64.1 million. The aggregate carrying value
(cost plus or minus equity in income or losses and less distributions received)
of the equity securities of IOT and TCI was $75.3 million at December 31, 2001
and the aggregate market value was $71.9 million. The aggregate investee book
value of IOT and TCI based upon the December 31, 2001 financial statements of
each entity was $118.4 million. See "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions of ARL, TCI and IOT - Related Party Transactions."

         The board of directors has authorized the expenditure of up to an
aggregate of $50.0 million to acquire, in open market purchases, shares of IOT
and TCI, excluding private purchase transactions which are separately
authorized. As of December 31, 2001, ARL had expended an aggregate of $8.6
million to acquire shares of IOT and TCI, in open market purchases, in
accordance with these authorizations. ARL expects to make additional investments
in the equity securities of IOT and TCI to the extent its liquidity permits.

         On October 3, 2000, ARL and IOT entered into an agreement which
provided IOT and ARL with an option to purchase 1,858,900 shares of common stock
of TCI from a third party. On October 19, 2000, IOT assigned all of its rights
to purchase such shares to ARL. The total cost to purchase the TCI shares was
$30.8 million. In October 2000, ARL paid $5.6 million of the option price. In
April 2001, the remainder of the option price was paid, and ARL acquired




                                      159



the TCI shares. See "Business of ARL" for discussion of the proposed acquisition
of TCI and IOT by ARL.

         Pertinent information regarding ARL's investment in the equity
securities of the IOT and TCI at December 31, 2001, is summarized below (dollars
in thousands):



                   PERCENTAGE OF ARL'S     CARRYING VALUE OF    EQUIVALENT INVESTEE BOOK     MARKET VALUE OF
                       OWNERSHIP AT          INVESTMENT AT              VALUE AT              INVESTMENT AT
     INVESTEE       DECEMBER 31, 2001      DECEMBER 31, 2001        DECEMBER 31, 2001       DECEMBER 31, 2001
     --------      -------------------     -----------------    ------------------------    -----------------
                                                                                
      IOT               27.44%                 $ 6,789                 $ 10,034                  $ 7,379
      TCI               49.99                   68,498                  108,369                   64,533


         IOT and TCI each own a considerable amount of real estate, much of
which they have held for many years. Because of depreciation, these entities may
earn substantial amounts in periods in which they sell real estate and will
probably incur losses in periods in which they do not. ARL's reported income or
loss attributable to these entities will differ materially from its cash flow
attributable to them.

         ARL does not have a controlling equity interest in either IOT or TCI;
therefore, it cannot, acting by itself, determine either the individual
investments or the overall investment policies of either of them. However, due
to ARL's equity investments in, and the existence of common officers with, each
of IOT and TCI and that IOT and TCI have the same advisor as ARL, ARL may be
considered to have the ability to exercise significant influence over the
operating and investing policies of IOT and TCI. ARL accounts for its investment
in IOT and TCI using the equity method. Under the equity method, ARL recognizes
its proportionate share of the income or loss from the operations of IOT and TCI
currently, rather than when realized through dividends or on sale. The carrying
value of ARL's investment in IOT and TCI, as set forth in the table above, is
the original cost of investment in each adjusted for ARL's proportionate share
of IOT's and TCI's income or loss and distributions received.

         The following summary description of IOT and TCI is based upon
information publicly reported by each entity.

         IOT. IOT is a Nevada corporation which was originally organized on
December 14, 1984, as a California business trust and commenced operations on
April 10, 1985. IOT's business is investing in real estate through direct equity
investments and partnerships. IOT holds equity investments in apartments and
commercial properties (office buildings) in the Pacific, Southeast and Southwest
regions of the continental United States with a concentration in the Southwest
region. At December 31, 2001, IOT owned 16 income producing properties located
in three states. These properties consisted of seven apartments comprising 777
units and seven office buildings with an aggregate of 459,549 sq. ft. In
addition, IOT owned two parcels of unimproved land, totaling 205 acres.

         IOT reported a net loss of $(3.5) million in 2001 as compared to net
income of $16.8 million in 2000. IOT's net income in 2000 included gains on sale
of real estate of $20.9 million. IOT's cash flow from property operations was
$6.0 million in 2001. At December 31, 2001, IOT had total assets of $91.8
million, which consisted of $87.3 million in real estate held for




                                      160



investment, $4.5 million in investments in partnerships and other assets and
$66,000 in cash and cash equivalents.

         ARL received no dividends from IOT in 2001.

         TCI. TCI is a Nevada corporation which was originally organized on
September 6, 1983, as a California business trust, and commenced operations on
January 31, 1984. On November 30, 1999, TCI acquired, through merger,
Continental Mortgage and Equity Trust ("CMET"), both of which, at the time, were
equity investees of ARL. Pursuant to the merger agreement, TCI acquired all of
the outstanding CMET shares of beneficial interest in a tax-free exchange of
shares, issuing 1.181 shares of its common stock for each outstanding CMET
share.

         TCI has investment policies similar to those of IOT. TCI holds equity
investments in apartments, commercial properties (office buildings, industrial
warehouses and shopping centers) and hotels throughout the continental United
States with a concentration in the Southeast and Southwest regions. At December
31, 2001, TCI owned 112 income producing properties located in 19 states. These
properties consisted of 57 apartments comprising 10,714 units, 31 office
buildings with an aggregate of 4.1 million sq. ft., 13 industrial warehouses
with an aggregate of 2.0 million sq. ft., six shopping centers with an aggregate
of 622,661 sq. ft., a fitness club with 56,532 sq. ft. and four hotels with a
total of 209 rooms. In addition, TCI owned 26 parcels of unimproved land,
totaling 840 acres. TCI also holds mortgage notes receivable secured by real
estate located in the Midwest, Southeast and Southwest regions of the
continental United States.

         TCI reported net income of $19.8 million in 2001 and $29.8 million in
2000. TCI's net income in 2001 included gains from the sale of real estate of
$54.3 million, whereas its net income in 2000 included gains from the sale of
real estate of $50.6 million. TCI's cash flow from property operations was $56.0
million in 2001. At December 31, 2001, TCI had total assets of $709.2 million,
which consisted of $622.2 million in real estate held for investment, $516,000
in real estate held for sale, $14.2 million in investments in real estate
entities, $22.1 million in notes and interest receivable, $39.9 million in other
assets and $10.3 million in cash and cash equivalents. At December 31, 2001, TCI
owned 345,728 shares of IOT's common stock, approximately 24.0% of the shares
then outstanding.

         In 2001, ARL received a total of $53,000 from TCI in accumulated
dividends on shares of CMET that should have been exchanged for TCI common stock
in 1999.

         ELM FORK RANCH, L.P. In June 2000, ARL sold its partnership interests
for $2.0 million in cash, retaining an option to repurchase its interests. In
January 2001, ARL purchased 100% of the partnership interests for $9.2 million,
including financing of $9.0 million.

         ART FLORIDA PORTFOLIO II, LTD. In January 2002, Investors Choice
Florida Public Funds II, in which ART Florida Portfolio II, Ltd. owned an
interest, sold Villas Continental Apartments. ARL received $1.0 million in cash
from the sale. ARL's share of the loss incurred on the sale was $531,000, which
will be included in equity in income of investees in the Consolidated Statement
of Operations.




                                      161



DOUBLE TAXATION OF CORPORATIONS

         ARL is taxed as a regular corporation under the Code. Corporations are
subject to complex federal income tax rules that cause the corporation to be
taxed on its income and distributions, generally, to be taxable to recipients.
As a general rule, a corporation is not entitled to a deduction for dividends
paid to its shareholders. Corporations are subject to an additional tax on
certain undistributed accumulated earnings. Currently, corporations are taxed on
net capital gains at the regular corporate tax rates. Corporations are subject
to the alterative minimum tax.

         Cash distributions from a corporation to a shareholder depend upon
whether the distribution is from the corporation's "earnings and profits." If
the distribution is from the corporation's earnings and profits it is a dividend
and is includable in the distributee shareholder's gross income. Cash
distributions which are not dividends are treated as a return of the
shareholder's investment in its stock. The distributions first reduce the tax
basis of the shareholder in its stock. When the shareholder has recovered its
basis in its stock, further distributions are treated as gain from the sale or
exchange of property.

         Generally a corporate shareholder will receive a "dividends received
deduction" for dividends received. The percentage of the dividend which can be
excluded through the dividends received deductions depends upon the percentage
ownership of the distributee shareholder in the distributor corporation. A 100%
deduction is available for dividends received by a member of the same affiliated
group of corporations. If the distributee owns 20% or more of the distributor
corporation, the distributee corporation is entitled to an 80% deduction for
dividends received. A 70% dividends received deduction is available for most
other dividends.

         The above is intended only as a general summary of the "double
taxation" of corporations and the tax treatment of cash distribution. It is not
intended to be a thorough discussion of the numerous complex tax issues that
affect corporations and their shareholders including accumulated earnings tax,
alternative minimum tax, distributions of appreciated property, liquidations,
reorganizations, issues pertaining to controlled groups of corporations and
issues related to consolidated returns. Similarly, this summary should not be
considered as a discussion of material federal income tax aspects or
considerations for ARL. The above pertains only to "C" corporations under the
Code and does not address state, local, or foreign tax issues. It is not
applicable to regulated investment companies, real estate investment trusts,
banks, insurance companies and other forms of entities for which special
treatment is provided under the Code.

                                LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

         ARL is involved in various lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of
business. Other than the Olive Settlement, in the opinion of ARL's management
the outcome of these lawsuits will not have a material impact on ARL's financial
condition, results of operations or liquidity.


                                      162

                         SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA OF ARL

         The following is a summary of financial data incorporated by reference
in this joint proxy statement and prospectus. You should read the following data
in conjunction with the more detailed information contained in "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of ARL"
and the ARL consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing
elsewhere in this joint proxy statement and prospectus.




                                FOR THE SIX MONTHS
                                  ENDED JUNE 30,                               FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                            --------------------------    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                2002           2001           2001           2000           1999          1998            1997
                            -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------    ------------    -----------
                                   (unaudited)                           (dollars in thousands, except per share)
                                                                                                  
EARNINGS DATA
Revenue .................   $    78,399    $    83,832    $   166,018    $   172,750    $   193,980    $     87,086    $    57,031
Expense .................       111,618        125,593        243,166        272,045        324,789         165,111         90,252
                            -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------    ------------    -----------
(Loss) from operations ..       (33,219)       (41,761)       (77,148)       (99,295)      (130,809)        (78,025)       (33,221)
Equity in income
(loss) of investees .....        (1,484)         5,705          8,803          5,246         11,847          37,966         10,497
Gain on sale of real
estate ..................        21,796         46,979         83,414         96,728        129,260          17,254         20,296
                            -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------    ------------    -----------
Net income (loss) ......        (12,907)        10,923         15,069          2,679         10,298         (22,805)        (2,428)
Preferred dividend
requirement ............         (1,200)        (1,248)        (2,485)        (2,327)        (2,281)         (1,177)          (206)
                            -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------    ------------    -----------
Income (loss)
  applicable to
  common shares ........    $   (14,107)         9,675    $    12,584    $       352    $     8,017    $    (23,982)   $    (2,634)
                            ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========    ============    ===========
PER SHARE DATA
Net income (loss)
  applicable to
  common shares ........    $     (1.24)   $       .96    $      1.07    $       .03    $       .75    $      (2.24)   $      (.22)
                            ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========    ============    ===========
Dividends per common
share ..................    $        --    $        --    $        --    $        --    $       .05    $        .20    $       .20
Weighted average
shares outstanding .....     11,375,127     10,116,196     11,714,374     10,399,890     10,759,416      10,695,388     11,710,013






                                      163




                                      FOR THE
                                     SIX MONTHS
                                       ENDED                      FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                      JUNE 30,   -----------------------------------------------------------------
                                        2002        2001       2000           1999          1998           1997
                                    -----------  ----------   -------     ----------     ----------     ----------
                                    (unaudited)                 (dollars in thousands, except per share)
                                                                                      
BALANCE SHEET DATA
Real estate, net .............       $  536,518  $  588,203   653,744     $  771,630     $  734,907     $  302,453
Notes and interest
receivable, net ..............           33,145      30,382    13,831         38,604         52,053         25,526
Total assets .................          713,331     758,763   787,015        919,546        918,605        433,799
Notes and interest payable....          532,557     564,298   616,331        706,196        768,272        261,986
Margin borrowings ............           26,005      28,040    13,485         33,264         35,773         53,376
Stockholders' equity .........           74,489      85,884    73,402         46,266         38,272         63,453
Book value per share .........       $     6.55  $     7.33      7.06     $     4.30     $     3.58     $     5.42






                                      164


           MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
                        AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF ARL

INTRODUCTION

         ARL is the successor through merger to ART and NRLP. ART was organized
in 1961 to provide investors with a professionally managed, diversified
portfolio of real estate and mortgage loan investments selected to provide
opportunities for capital appreciation as well as current income. ART owns a
portfolio of real estate and mortgage loan investments. NRLP was organized in
1987, and subsequently acquired all of the assets and assumed all of the
liabilities of 35 public and private limited partnerships. NRLP owns a portfolio
of real estate and mortgage loan investments.

         Effective December 18, 1998, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ART was
elected general partner of NRLP. Prior to December 31, 1998, ART accounted for
its investment in NRLP under the equity method. As of December 31, 1998, upon
the election of its wholly-owned subsidiary as general partner of NRLP, ART
began consolidation of NRLP's accounts and has consolidated its operations
subsequent to that date.


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

         Critical accounting policies are those that are both important to the
presentation of ARL's financial condition and results of operations and require
management's most difficult, complex or subjective judgments. ARL's critical
accounting policies relate to the evaluation of impairment of long-lived assets
and the evaluation of the collectibility of accounts and notes receivable.

         If events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value
of a rental property to be held and used or land held for development may be
impaired, management performs a recoverability analysis based on estimated
undiscounted cash flows to be generated from the property in the future. If the
analysis indicates that the carrying value is not recoverable from future cash
flows the property is written down to estimated fair value and an impairment
loss is recognized. If management decides to sell rental properties or land held
for development, management evaluates the recoverability of the carrying amounts
of the assets. If the evaluation indicates that the carrying value is not
recoverable from estimated net sales proceeds, the property is written down to
estimated fair value less costs to sell and an impairment loss is recognized
within income from continuing operations. ARL's estimates of cash flow and fair
values of the properties are based on current market conditions and consider
matters such as rental rates and occupancies for comparable properties, recent
sales data for comparable properties and, where applicable, contracts or the
results of negotiations with purchasers or prospective purchasers. ARL's
estimates are subject to revision as market conditions and ARL's assessments of
them change.

         ARL's allowance for doubtful accounts receivable and notes receivable
is established based on analysis of the risk of loss on specific accounts. The
analysis places particular emphasis on past due accounts. Management considers
the information such as the nature and age of the receivable, the payment
history of the tenant or other debtor, the financial condition of



                                      165



the tenant or other debtor, and ARL's assessment of its ability to meet its
lease or interest obligations. ARL's estimate of the required allowance, which
is reviewed on a quarterly basis, is subject to revision as these factors change
and is sensitive to the effects of economic and market conditions.


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES


         General. Cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2002, totaled $2.6
million, compared with $709,000 at December 31, 2001. Although ARL anticipates
that during the remainder of 2002 it will generate cash from operations, as
discussed below, such excess cash is not sufficient to discharge all of ARL's
debt obligations as they mature. ARL will therefore again rely on externally
generated funds, including aggressive land sales, selected sales of income
producing properties, borrowings against its investments in various real estate
entities, refinancing of properties, and, to the extent necessary, borrowings to
meet its debt service obligations, pay taxes, interest and other non-property
related expenses.

         At December 31, 2001, notes payable totaling $267.5 million had either
scheduled maturities or required principal reduction payments during 2002.
During the first six months of 2002, ARL either extended, refinanced, paid down,
paid off or received commitments from lenders to extend or refinance $89.0
million of the debt scheduled to mature in 2002.

         Net cash used in operating activities decreased to $21.2 million in the
six months ended June 30, 2002, from $31.0 million in the six months ended June
30, 2001. Fluctuations in the components of cash flow from operations are
discussed in the following paragraphs.

         Net cash from property operations (rents collected less payments for
expenses applicable to rental income) increased to $18.6 million in the six
months ended June 30, 2002 from $9.1 million in 2001. The increase is primarily
attributable to a decline in the payments for operating expenses in 2002 from an
elevated level in 2001, when there was a significant paydown of accounts
payable. ARL expects a decrease in cash flow from property operations during the
remainder of 2002. Such decrease is expected to result from the continued
selective sale of income producing properties.

         Net cash from pizza operations (sales less cost of sales) increased to
$3.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2002, from $2.9 million in the six
months ended June 30, 2001. The increase is primarily attributable to the
opening of three new stores in 2001.

         Interest collected increased to $966,000 in the six months ended June
30, 2002, from $300,000 in 2001. The increase was primarily attributable to the
collection of $542,000 in past due interest.

         Interest paid of $30.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2002,
approximated the $31.2 million in 2001.

         Advisory fees paid of $3.3 million in the six months ended June 30,
2002, approximated the $3.5 million in 2001.



                                      166



         General and administrative expenses paid increased to $6.5 million in
the six months ended June 30, 2002 from $4.5 million in 2001. The increase is
primarily attributable to an increase in legal fees and cost reimbursements paid
to the advisor.

         ARL's cash flow from its investments in IORI and TCI is dependent on
the ability of each of the entities to make distributions. In the fourth quarter
of 2000, IORI and TCI suspended distributions. Accordingly, ARL received no
current distributions in the first six months of 2002 and 2001. However, in May
2001, ARL received $53,000 in accumulated dividends on shares of Continental
Mortgage and Equity Trust that should have been exchanged for TCI Common Stock
in 1999.

         Other cash used in operating activities of $2.4 million in the six
months ended June 30, 2002, approximated the use of $2.5 million in 2001.

         In the first six months of 2002, ARL received a total of $5.3 million
on the collection of two mortgage notes receivable and partial paydown of four
mortgage notes receivable.


         In 2002, ARL purchased the following property:




                                          Units/Sq.Ft./        Purchase      Net Cash        Debt         Interest    Maturity
      Property              Location          Acres              Price         Paid        Incurred         Rate        Date
      --------              --------      -------------        --------      --------      --------       --------    --------
                                                                                                 
FIRST QUARTER
Shopping Center:
Plaza on Bachman     Dallas, TX            80,278 Sq.Ft.       $ 3,103        $   --         $   --             --         --
Creek(1)

SECOND QUARTER
Apartments:
Pinecrest(2)         North Augusta, SC     120 Units           $ 2,986        $   --         $1,423           8.75%     03/03
Tiberon Trails(2)    Merrillville, IN      376 Units           $12,000        $   --         $6,417           9.00%     07/06

Shopping Center:
Alta Mesa(2)         Ft. Worth, TX         59,933 Sq.Ft.       $ 4,000        $   --         $1,804          10.43%     10/04

Land:
Pioneer Crossing     Austin, TX            79.4 Acres          $ 1,165        $1,213         $   --             --%        --
Willow Springs       Beaumont, CA          20.7 Acres          $   140        $  146         $   --             --%        --




(1)     Exchanged with TCI, a related party, for the Oaktree Village Shopping
        Center, Rasor land parcel and Lakeshore Villas land parcel.


(2)     Property received from BCM, a related party, for forgiveness of debt.





                                      167

In 2002, ARL sold the following properties:




                                                Units/Acres/                         Net Cash         Debt       Gain/(Loss)
        Property                Location            Sq.Ft.          Sales Price      Received      Discharged      on Sale
        --------                --------        ------------        -----------      --------      ----------    -----------
                                                                                              
FIRST QUARTER
Apartments:
Mallard Lake(1)          Greensboro, NC         336 Units              $14,400        $   --         $ 7,362       $ 10,669
Villas                   Plano, TX              208 Units              $ 8,525        $3,701         $ 4,023       $  5,615

Land:
Katrina                  Palm Desert, CA        2.1 Acres              $ 1,323        $  (40)        $ 1,237        $   978
Lakeshore Villas(2)      Harris County, TX      16.9 Acres             $ 1,499        $  215              --             --
Rasor(2)                 Plano, TX              24.5 Acres             $ 1,211        $  174              --             --
Thompson II              Dallas County, TX      .2 Acres               $    21        $   20              --        $   (11)
Vista Ridge              Lewisville, TX         10.0 Acres             $ 1,525        $  130         $ 1,220        $   401

Shopping Center:
Oaktree Village(2)       Lubbock, TX            45,623 Sq.Ft.          $ 2,302        $  131         $ 1,389 (3)    $    --

SECOND QUARTER
Apartments:
Oak Hill                 Tallahassee, FL        92 Units               $ 3,200        $  156 (4)     $ 2,550        $   527
Regency                  Tampa, FL              78 Units               $ 3,200        $  851         $ 1,710        $(1,458)
Stonebridge              Florissant, MO         100 Units              $ 4,340        $1,272         $ 2,893        $ 3,081

Office Building:
Centura                  Dallas, TX             410,901 Sq.Ft.         $50,000        $   --         $43,739 (3)    $    -- (5)

Land:
Hollywood Casino         Farmers Branch, TX     42.8 Acres             $16,987        $   --         $ 6,222 (3)    $    -- (5)
Marine Creek             Ft. Worth, TX          54.2 Acres             $ 3,700        $   --         $ 1,500 (3)    $    -- (5)
Mason Goodrich           Houston, TX            7.9 Acres              $   672        $   46         $   554        $   268
Mason Goodrich           Houston, TX            10.3 Acres             $ 1,444        $   93         $ 1,225        $   895
Mason Goodrich           Houston, TX            18.0 Acres             $ 2,790        $   --         $ 2,690 (3)    $    -- (5)
Monterrey                Riverside, CA          61.0 Acres             $ 4,625        $   --              --        $    -- (5)
Nashville                Nashville, TN          16.6 Acres             $ 1,890        $   --         $   955 (3)    $    -- (5)

THIRD QUARTER
Apartments:
Valley Hi                Tallahassee, FL        54 Units               $ 1,452        $   75         $ 1,159        $   435
White Pines              Tallahassee, FL        85 Units               $   764        $   10         $   593        $   (51)
Woodsong                 Smyrna, GA             190 Units              $ 9,200        $  (45)        $ 8,196        $ 7,028




(1)      Exchanged for outstanding partnership units in ART Florida Portfolio I,
         Ltd., ART Florida Portfolio II, Ltd. and ART Florida Portfolio III,
         Ltd.

                                      168



(2)      Exchanged with TCI, a related party, for the Plaza on Bachman Creek
         Shopping Center.


(3)      Debt assumed by purchaser.


(4)      Represents dividends on and redemption of Innovo Preferred Stock. See
         Note 7 to the ARL Consolidated Financial Statements "Notes Payable."
(5)      Sold to TCI, a related party. Gain deferred until sale to unrelated
         party.


In 2002, ARL financed/refinanced or obtained second mortgage financing on the
following:




                                             Units/Acres/        Debt             Debt         Net Cash     Interest      Maturity
        Property            Location            Sq.Ft.         Incurred        Discharged      Received       Rate          Date
        --------            --------         ------------      --------        ----------      --------     --------      --------
                                                                                                       
FIRST QUARTER
Land:
Walker                   Dallas County, TX   90.6 Acres        $ 8,500          $8,500         $(1,411)      11.250%(1)     01/03

Shopping Center:
Plaza on Bachman Creek   Dallas, TX          80,278 Sq.Ft.     $ 5,000          $   --         $ 4,444        6.625%(1)     04/04

SECOND QUARTER
Apartments:
Lee Hills                Tallahassee, FL     16 Units          $ 1,750(2)       $  117         $   590        6.625%(1)     06/05
Valley Hi                Tallahassee, FL     54 Units          $    --(2)       $  878         $    --           --%           --
White Pines              Tallahassee, FL     85 Units          $    --(2)       $   --         $    --           --%           --
Office Buildings:
Four Hickory Centre      Farmers Branch, TX  221,000 Sq.Ft.    $12,500(3)       $   --         $ 3,399       13.000%        05/03





Related Party Transactions. In each of the following transactions,
except those footnoted as (6), a related party has purchased an entity, which
owns the listed property asset, from ARL. ARL has guaranteed that the asset will
produce at least a 12% return on the purchase price for a period of three years
from the purchase date. If the asset fails to produce the 12% return, ARL will
pay the purchaser any shortfall. In addition, if the asset fails to produce the
12% return for a calendar year, the purchaser may require ARL to repurchase the
entity for the purchase price. Management has classified these related party
transactions as notes payable.





                                             Units/Acres/       Debt           Debt        Net Cash       Interest     Maturity
        Property            Location             Sq.Ft.       Incurred       Discharged    Received         Rate         Date
        --------            --------         ------------     ---------      ----------    ---------      --------     --------
                                                                                                   
FIRST QUARTER
Office Building:
Rosedale Towers         Minneapolis, MN     84,798 Sq.Ft.     $5,109           $ --        $5,109          12.000%      01/05(4)
Two Hickory Centre      Farmers Branch, TX  96,127 Sq.Ft.     $4,448           $ --        $4,448          12.000%      01/05(5)

SECOND QUARTER
Apartments:
Bay Anchor              Panama City, FL     12 Units          $  255           $ --        $  203           5.000%      05/03(6)




                                      169





                                             Units/Acres/       Debt           Debt        Net Cash       Interest      Maturity
        Property            Location             Sq.Ft.       Incurred       Discharged    Received         Rate          Date
        --------            --------         ------------     ---------      ----------    ---------      --------      --------
                                                                                                   
Confederate Point       Jacksonville, FL     206 Units         $1,929         $   --        $   --         12.000%      04/05(7)
Foxwood                 Memphis, TN          220 Units         $1,093         $   --        $   --         12.000%      04/05(8)
Governor Square         Tallahassee, FL      168 Units         $4,480         $3,196        $  611          7.120%      05/07(6)
Grand Lagoon            Panama City, FL      54 Units          $2,083         $1,209        $  655          5.000%      05/03(6)
Oak Hill                Tallahassee, FL      92 Units          $2,550         $1,875        $  478          5.000%      05/03(6)(10)
Park Avenue             Tallahassee, FL      121 Units         $4,400         $2,756        $1,341          7.120%      05/07(6)
Seville                 Tallahassee, FL      62 Units          $1,955         $1,263        $  473          5.000%      05/03(6)
Westwood                Mary Ester, FL       120 Units         $3,382         $2,327        $1,023          7.570%      05/12(6)
Windsor Tower           Ocala, FL            64 Units          $1,989         $1,128        $  702          5.000%      05/03(6)
Woodhollow              San Antonio, TX      546 Units         $8,160         $5,349        $2,775          7.120%      05/07(6)
Woodsong                Smyrna, GA           190 Units         $2,544         $   --        $   --         12.000%      04/05(9)

Office Building:
One Hickory Centre      Farmers Branch, TX  102,615 Sq.Ft.    $4,468          $   --        $   --         12.000%      04/05(11)




(1)      Variable interest rate.
(2)      Single note with all properties as collateral.
(3)      $5.5 million funded at June 30, 2002.
(4)      In January 2002, IOT purchased 100% of the outstanding common shares of
         Rosedale, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ARL, for $5.1 million. The
         purchase price was determined based upon the market value of the
         property exchanged, using a market rate multiple of net operating
         income. Rosedale owns the Rosedale Towers Office Building. ARL has
         guaranteed that the asset will produce at least a 12% annual return on
         the purchase price for a period of three years from the purchase date.
         If the asset fails to produce the 12% return, ARL will pay IOT any
         shortfall. In addition, if the asset fails to produce the 12% return
         for a calendar year, IOT may require ARL to repurchase the shares of
         Rosedale for the purchase price. The business purpose of the
         transaction was for IOT to make an equity investment in Rosedale
         anticipating a profitable return and ARL to receive cash for its equity
         investment. Management has classified this related party transaction as
         a note payable to IOT. The consideration paid for the outstanding
         shares was $5.1 million.
(5)      In January 2002, TCI purchased 100% of the outstanding common shares of
         Two Hickory, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ARL, for $4.4 million. The
         purchase price was determined based upon the market value of the
         property exchanged, using a market rate multiple of net operating
         income. Two Hickory owns the Two Hickory Centre Office Building. ARL
         has guaranteed that the asset will produce at least a 12% annual return
         on the purchase price for a period of three years from the purchase
         date. If the asset fails to produce the 12% return, ARL will pay TCI
         any shortfall. In addition, if the asset fails to produce the 12%
         return for a calendar year, TCI may require ARL to repurchase the
         shares of Two Hickory for the purchase price. The business purpose of
         the transaction was for TCI to make an equity investment in Two Hickory
         anticipating a profitable return and ARL to receive cash for its equity
         investment. Management has classified this related party transaction as
         a note payable to TCI. The consideration paid for the outstanding
         shares was $4.4 million. In June 2002, the first lien on the property
         was refinanced. TCI received $1.3 million of the proceeds as a
         principal reduction on its loan to ARL.


                                      170


         Innovo Realty, Inc., a subsidiary of Innovo is a limited partner in the
         partnerships that purchased the properties. Joseph Mizrachi, a director
         of ARL, controls approximately 11.67% of the outstanding common stock
         of Innovo. Management has determined to treat this sale as a
         refinancing transaction. ARL will continue to report the assets and the
         new debt incurred by Metra on its financial statements. ARL received
         net cash of $8.3 million after paying off the existing debt of $19.3
         million and various closing costs. Of the total new debt of $29.2
         million, $8.8 million bears interest at 5.00% per annum and matures in
         May 2003, $17.0 million bears interest at 7.12% per annum and matures
         in May 2007 and $3.4 million bears interest at 7.57% per annum and
         matures in May 2012. ARL also received $6.3 million of 8% non-recourse,
         non-convertible Series A preferred stock of Innovo. The dividend on the
         Innovo preferred shares will be funded entirely and solely through
         member distributions from cash flows generated by the operation and
         subsequent sale of the sold properties. In the event the cash flows for
         the properties are insufficient to cover the 8% annual dividend, Innovo
         will have no obligation to cover any shortfall. The Innovo preferred
         shares have a mandatory redemption feature, and are redeemable from the
         cash proceeds received by Innovo from the operation and sale of the
         properties. All member distributions that are in excess of current and
         accrued 8% dividends must be used by Innovo to redeem the Innovo
         preferred shares.
(6)      In April 2002, TCI purchased all of the general and limited partnership
         interests in Confederate Point from ARL for $1.9 million. The purchase
         price was determined based on the market value of the property
         exchanged using a market rate multiple of net operating income.
         Confederate Point owns the Confederate Point Apartments. ARL has
         guaranteed that the asset will produce at least a 12% annual return on
         the purchase price for a period of three years from the purchase date.
         If the asset fails to produce the 12% return, ARL will pay TCI any
         shortfall. In addition, if the asset fails to produce the 12% return
         for a calendar year, TCI may require ARL to repurchase the interests in
         Confederate Point for the purchase price. The business purpose of the
         transaction was for TCI to make an equity investment in Confederate
         Point anticipating a profitable return and ARL is to receive cash for
         its equity investment. Management has classified this related party
         transaction as a note payable to TCI.
(7)      In April 2002, TCI purchased all of the general and limited partnership
         interests in Foxwood from ARL for $1.1 million. The purchase price was
         determined based on the market values of the property exchanged, using
         a market rate multiple of net operating income. Foxwood owns the
         Foxwood Apartments. ARL has guaranteed that the asset will produce at
         least a 12% annual return on the purchase price for a period of three
         years from the purchase date. If the asset fails to produce the 12%
         return, ARL will pay TCI any shortfall. In addition, if the asset fails
         to produce the 12% return for a calendar year, TCI may require ARL to
         repurchase the interests in Foxwood for the purchase price. The
         business purpose of the transaction was for TCI to make an equity
         investment in Foxwood anticipating a profitable return and ARL to
         receive cash for its equity investment. Management has classified this
         related party transaction as a note payable to TCI.
(8)      In April 2002, TCI purchased all of the general and limited partnership
         interests in Woodsong from ARL for $2.5 million. The purchase price was
         determined based on the market values of the property exchanged, using
         a market rate multiple of net operating income. Woodsong owns the
         Woodsong Apartments. ARL has guaranteed that the asset



                                      171


         will produce at least a 12% annual return on the purchase price for a
         period of three years from the purchase date. If the asset fails to
         produce the 12% return, ARL will pay TCI any shortfall. In addition, if
         the asset fails to produce the 12% return for a calendar year, TCI may
         require ARL to repurchase the interests in Woodsong for the purchase
         price. The business purpose of the transaction was for TCI to make an
         equity investment in Woodsong anticipating a profitable return and ARL
         to receive cash for its equity investment. Management has classified
         this related party transaction as a note payable to TCI. In July 2002,
         the Woodsong Apartments was sold for $9.1 million. TCI received $2.6
         million from the proceeds of $2.8 million as payment of principal and
         accrued but unpaid interest on the loan.

(9)      Sold to unrelated buyer in June 2002.
(10)     In April 2002, TCI, a related party, purchased 100% of the common
         shares of ART One Hickory Corporation ("One Hickory"), a wholly-owned
         subsidiary of ARL, for $4.5 million. The purchase price was determined
         based on the market values of the property exchanged, using a market
         rate multiple of net operating income. One Hickory owns the One Hickory
         Centre Office Building. ARL has guaranteed that the asset will produce
         at least a 12% annual return on the purchase price for a period of
         three years from the purchase date. If the asset fails to produce the
         12% return, ARL will pay TCI any shortfall. In addition, if the asset
         fails to produce the 12% return for a calendar year, TCI may require
         ARL to repurchase the shares in One Hickory for the purchase price. The
         business purpose of the transaction was for TCI to make an equity
         investment in One Hickory anticipating a profitable return and ARL to
         receive cash for its equity investment. Management has classified this
         related party transaction as a note payable to TCI.

         ARL has margin arrangements with various financial institutions and
brokerage firms which provide for borrowing up to 50% of the market value of
ARL's marketable equity securities. The borrowings under such margin
arrangements are secured by equity securities of IORI and TCI and ARL's trading
portfolio and bear interest rates ranging from 5.75% to 24.0%. Margin borrowing
totaled $26.0 million at June 30, 2002.


         Management expects that it will be necessary for ARL to sell $102.0
million, $34.1 million and $1.2 million of its land holdings during each of the
next three years to satisfy the debt on such land as it matures. If ARL is
unable to sell at least the minimum amount of land to satisfy the debt
obligations on such land as it matures, or, if it was not able to extend such
debt, ARL would either sell other of its assets to pay such debt or transfer the
property to the lender.

         Management reviews the carrying values of ARL's properties and mortgage
notes receivable at least annually and whenever events or a change in
circumstances indicate that impairment may exist. Impairment is considered to
exist if, in the case of a property, the future cash flow from the property
(undiscounted and without interest) is less than the carrying amount of the
property. For notes receivable, impairment is considered to exist if it is
probable that all amounts due under the terms of the note will not be collected.
If impairment is found to exist, a provision for loss is recorded by a charge
against earnings to the extent that the investment in the note exceeds
management's estimate of the fair value of the collateral property securing each
note. The mortgage note receivable review includes an evaluation of the
collateral property securing such note. The property review generally includes:
(1) selective property


                                      172


inspections; (2) a review of the property's current rents compared to market
rents; (3) a review of the property's expenses; (4) a review of maintenance
requirements; (5) a review of the property's cash flow; (6) discussions with the
manager of the property; and (7) a review of properties in the surrounding area.


COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

         In October 1997, ARL entered into leases with BCM and Regis, for space
to house BCM's staff at the One Hickory Centre Office Building, construction of
which was completed in December 1998. The BCM leases, effective upon ARL
obtaining permanent financing of the building, were for 75,852 sq. ft.
(approximately 75% of the building), had terms of ten and fifteen years and
provided for annual base rent of $19.25 per sq. ft. for the first year. In
January 2001, both leases were terminated, and ARL entered into a new lease with
BCM, effective October 1, 2000. The new lease is for 59,463 sq. ft.
(approximately 62% of the building), has a term of three years, and provides for
annual base rent of $1.3 million or $21.50 per sq. ft. Effective March 1, 2002,
the lease was amended to 57,879 sq. ft. (approximately 59% of the building),
with an annual base rent of $1.2 million, or $21.50 per sq. ft.

         TCI is a 63.7% limited partner and IOT is a 36.3% general partner in
the Tri-City which owns the Chelsea Square Shopping Center. In February 2000,
the Chelsea Square Shopping Center was financed in the amount of $2.1 million.
Tri-City received net cash of $2.0 million after the payment of various closing
costs. The mortgage bore interest at a fixed rate of 10.24% per annum until
February 2001, and a variable rate thereafter, currently 10% per annum, requires
monthly payments of principal and interest of $20,601 and matures in February
2005. TCI received a distribution of $1.3 million of the net financing proceeds.
IOT received a distribution of $739,000 of the net financing proceeds. The
business purpose of the transaction was to draw equity from the Chelsea Square
Shopping Center.

         In 2001, TCI received $120,000 in rent from BCM for BCM's lease at
Addison Hanger. BCM owns a corporate jet that is housed at the hanger and TCI
had available space at the hanger.

         In 2001, ARL paid BCM, Triad, Carmel and Regis $6.7 million in advisory
fees, $166,000 in net income fees, $3.8 million in incentive fees, $1.2 million
in mortgage brokerage and equity refinancing fees, $92,000 in property
acquisition fees, $5.9 million in real estate brokerage commissions and $3.9
million in property and construction management fees and leasing commissions,
net of property management fees paid to subcontractors, other than Regis. In
addition, as provided in the ARL Advisory Agreement, BCM received cost
reimbursements of $2.8 million. BCM manages ARL's day-to-day operations pursuant
to the ARL Advisory Agreement. ARL contracts with Triad and Carmel for property
management services. BCM is the general partner of Triad. Carmel, which is owned
by First Equity Properties, Inc., a company affiliated with BCM, subcontracts
property management construction services and brokerage services to Regis. Regis
is a company owned by GS Realty, the limited partner of Triad.

         In 2001, IOT paid BCM Triad and Regis $817,000 in advisory fees and
$312,000 in property and construction management fees and leasing commissions,
net of property management fees paid to subcontractors other than Regis. In
addition, from time-to-time, IOT has made advances to BCM, which generally have
not had specific repayment terms and have been reflected in IOT's financial
statements as other assets or other liabilities from affiliates. At


                                      173


December 31, 2001, BCM advanced IOT $593,000. As of March 2002, IOT has repaid
that amount to BCM. BCM manages IOT's day-to-day operations pursuant to the IOT
Advisory Agreement. IOT contracts with Triad for property management services.

         In 2001, TCI paid BCM, Triad and Regis $10.8 million in advisory
incentive and net income fees, $45,000 in mortgage brokerage and equity
refinancing fees, $2.4 million in property acquisition fees, $3.8 million in
real estate brokerage commissions and $2.6 million in property and construction
management fees and leasing commissions, net of property management fees paid to
subcontractors, other than Regis. In addition, as provided in the TCI Advisory
Agreement, BCM received cost reimbursements of $2.6 million. BCM manages TCI's
day-to-day operations pursuant to the TCI Advisory Agreement. TCI contracts with
Triad for property management services.

         ADVANCES AND LOANS

         From time-to-time, ARL and its affiliates have made advances to each
other, which generally have not had specific repayment terms and have been
reflected in ARL's financial statements as other assets or other liabilities.
These affiliate borrowings are used to fund operating shortfalls or
investment/acquisition cash requirements. Similarly, as properties are sold and
operating cash flow is generated, those advances/borrowings may be repaid. Also,
incentive fees and net income fees payable to BCM for 2001 are accrued
throughout the year and are due by March 31, 2002. At December 31, 2001, ARL
owed $10.1 million ($4.0 million for fees owed for 2001), $980,000 and $257,000
to BCM, TCI and GS Realty, respectively. In January 2002, ARL paid the $257,000
due to GS Realty. At December 31, 2001, TCI had receivables of $11.6 million,
$1.9 million and $608,000 from BCM, GS Realty, and ARL, respectively. Also at
December 31, 2001, TCI owed $1.0 million and $39,000 to GS Realty and BCM,
respectively. In January 2002, TCI paid the $1.0 million due to GS Realty and in
March 2002, TCI paid the $39,000 to BCM. At December 31, 2001, BCM advanced IOT
$593,000. As of March 2002, IOT has repaid that amount to BCM.

         In October 1999, ARL funded a $4.7 million loan to Realty Advisors,
Inc., the parent company of BCM. The loan, to provide funds for acquisitions or
working capital needs, was secured by all of the outstanding shares of common
stock of American Reserve Life Insurance Company. The loan bore interest at
10.25% per annum, and matured in November 2001. In January 2000, $100,000 was
collected. In November 2001, the maturity date was extended to November 2004.
The collateral was changed to a subordinate pledge of 850,000 shares of ARL
common stock owned by BCM. The shares are also pledged to a lender on ARL's
behalf. The interest rate was changed to 2% over the prime rate, currently 6.75%
per annum, and the accrued but unpaid interest of $984,000 was added to the
principal. The new principal balance is $5.6 million. All principal and accrued
interest are due at maturity.

         In March 2000, a loan due to ARL with a principal balance of $2.5
million due from Lordstown, L.P., matured. The loan, to provide funds to
purchase for resale various parcels of land, is secured by a second lien on land
in Ohio and Florida, by 100% of the general and limited partner interest in
Partners Capital, Ltd., the limited partner of Lordstown, L.P., and a profits
interest in subsequent land sales. At June 2002, the loan, and $900,000 of
accrued interest, remained unpaid. At July 2002, settlement terms are being
negotiated. Tara Group, Inc., a


                                      174


corporation controlled by Richard D. Morgan, is the general partner of
Lordstown, L.P. Mr. Morgan served as a director of ARL until October 2001.

         In December 2000, an unsecured loan due to ARL with a principal balance
of $1.7 million due from Warwick matured. The loan was made to provide funds to
purchase and renovate and expand a shopping center property in Warwick, Rhode
Island. All principal and interest were due at maturity. In February 2002,
$275,000 of interest was received. In May 2002, $33,000 of principal and
$267,000 of interest was collected. At June 2002, the loan, with a current
principal balance of $1.7 million and $12,000 of accrued interest, remained
unpaid. At July 2002, settlement terms are being negotiated. Richard D. Morgan,
a Warwick stockholder, served as a director of ARL until October 2001.

         In December 2000, a loan due to ARL with a principal balance of $1.6
million due from Bordeaux, matured. The loan, to provide funds to purchase and
renovate a shopping center property in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, is secured by
(1) a 100% interest in Bordeaux, which owns a shopping center in Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma; (2) 100% of the stock of Bordeaux Investments One, Inc., which owns
6.5 acres of undeveloped land in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; and (3) the personal
guarantees of the Bordeaux members. At June 2002, the loan, and $576,000 of
accrued interest, remained unpaid. At July 2002, settlement terms are being
negotiated. Richard D. Morgan, a Bordeaux member, served as a director of ARL
until October 2001.

         In March 2001, ARL funded $13.6 million of a $15.0 million unsecured
line of credit to One Realco, which owns approximately 14.8% of the outstanding
shares of ARL's common stock. One Realco periodically borrows money to meet its
cash obligations. The line of credit bears interest at 12.0% per annum. All
principal and interest were due at maturity in February 2002. The line of credit
is guaranteed by BCM. In June 2001, $394,000 in principal and $416,000 in
interest was collected. In December 2001, $21,000 in principal and $804,000 in
interest was collected. In February 2002, the line of credit was increased to
$1.8 million, accrued but unpaid interest of $217,000 was added to the
principal, and the maturity date was extended to February 2004. In March 2002,
ARL funded an additional $1.8 million, increasing the outstanding principal
balance to $15 million. All principal and interest are due at maturity. Ronald
E. Kimbrough, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of ARL, is a
10% stockholder of One Realco. During 2001, Mr. Kimbrough did not participate in
day-to-day operations or management of One Realco.


         In June 2002, ARL converted $4.5 million of its receivable from BCM, a
related party, to a recourse note receivable. This transaction was to provide
ARL with additional security over that provided by an unsecured receivable. The
note bears interest at 10.0% per annum, matures in March 2004 and requires
quarterly payments of principal and accrued interest. The first payment is due
in December 2002.


         PARTNERSHIP TRANSACTIONS

         BCM has entered into put agreements with certain holders of the Class A
limited partner units of Ocean Beach Partners, L.P., to increase ARL's
investment in the partnership. From June 1, 1997 through May 31, 2006, the Class
A units are convertible, at the option of the unitholders, into Series D
Cumulative preferred stock of ARL. At any time from June 1, 2001 through May 31,
2006, the Series D shareholders have the option to sell any or all Series D
shares held by them to BCM at the put price. The put price for the Series D
preferred stock is $20 per share, plus all accumulated but unpaid dividends. ARL
subsidiaries own 100% of the general partner and limited partner beneficial
interests in Ocean Beach Partners, L.P.



                                      175


         BCM has entered into put agreements with the holders of the Class A
limited partner units of Valley Ranch L.P., to increase ARL's investment in the
partnership. Such Class A units are convertible into Series B Cumulative
Convertible preferred stock of ARL which is further convertible into common
stock of ARL. The put price for the Class A units is $1.00 per unit and the put
price for either the Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock or ARL's
common stock is 80% of the average daily closing price of ARL's common stock for
the prior 20 trading days. In March 1999, ARL reached agreement with the Class A
unitholders of Valley Ranch, L.P. to acquire their eight million Class A units
for $1.00 per unit. In 1999, three million units were purchased, an additional
one million units were purchased in January 2000, and two million units in May
2001. One million units were purchased in May 2002. ARL has committed to
purchase the remaining one million units in June 2002. ARL subsidiaries own 100%
of the general partner and Class B limited partner beneficial interests in
Valley Ranch, L.P.

         BCM has entered into put agreements with the holders of the Class A
units of ART Palm, L.P., to increase ARL's investment in the partnership. Such
Class A units are convertible into Series C Cumulative Convertible preferred
stock of ARL. The put price for the Class A units is $1.00 per unit and the put
price for either the Series C preferred stock or ARL's common stock is 90% of
the average daily closing price of ARL's common stock for the prior 20 trading
days. Through December 31, 2001, ARL has repurchased 9,736,250 Class A units.
The put agreement calls for ARL to repurchase the remaining Class A units as
follows: June 30, 2002, 1,625,000 units; June 30, 2003, 1,625,000 units;
December 31, 2005, 1,625,000 units; and December 31, 2006, 8,563,750 units. ARL
subsidiaries own 100% of the general partner and Class B limited partner
beneficial interest in ART Palm, L.P. One Realco, which owns approximately 14.8%
of the outstanding shares of ARL common stock, owns the Class C limited partner
interest.

         PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS

         In May 2001, ARL exchanged with TCI two parcels of land, a 10.5 acre
tract of Vista Ridge land and an 8.88 acre tract of Hollywood Casino land, for
the 168 unit Glenwood Apartments. The cost of the Vista Ridge land, the
Hollywood Casino land and the Glenwood Apartments was $1.1 million, $2.1
million, and $3.7 million, respectively. The purchase prices were determined
based on the market values of the properties exchanged, using a market rate
multiple of net operating income. The business purpose of the transaction was
for TCI to construct apartments on the Vista Ridge land and office buildings on
the Hollywood Casino land. No consideration was paid on the transaction.
However, ARL received net cash of $3.2 million on the subsequent sale of the
Glenwood Apartments.

         In December 2001, TCI, purchased 100% of the outstanding common shares
of NM, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ARL, for $2.0 million. The purchase price
was determined based upon the market value of the property exchanged, using a
market rate multiple of net operating income. NM owns the Executive Court Office
Building. ARL has guaranteed that the asset will produce at least a 12% annual
return on the purchase price for a period of three years from the purchase date.
If the asset fails to produce the annual return, ARL will pay TCI any shortfall.
In addition, if the asset fails to produce the 12% return for a calendar year,
TCI may require ARL to repurchase the shares of NM for the purchase price. The
business purpose of the transaction was for TCI to make an equity investment in
NM anticipating a profitable return and ARL to receive


                                      176


cash for its equity investment. Management has classified this related party
transaction as a note payable to TCI. The consideration paid for the outstanding
shares was $2.0 million.

         In January 2002, IOT purchased 100% of the outstanding common shares of
Rosedale, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ARL, for $5.1 million. The purchase price
was determined based upon the market value of the property exchanged, using a
market rate multiple of net operating income. Rosedale owns the Rosedale Towers
Office Building. ARL has guaranteed that the asset will produce at least a 12%
annual return on the purchase price for a period of three years from the
purchase date. If the asset fails to produce the 12% return, ARL will pay IOT
any shortfall. In addition, if the asset fails to produce the 12% return for a
calendar year, IOT may require ARL to repurchase the shares of Rosedale for the
purchase price. The business purpose of the transaction was for IOT to make an
equity investment in Rosedale anticipating a profitable return and ARL to
receive cash for its equity investment. Management has classified this related
party transaction as a note payable to IOT. The consideration paid for the
outstanding shares was $5.1 million.

         In January 2002, TCI purchased 100% of the outstanding common shares of
Two Hickory, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ARL, for $4.4 million. The purchase
price was determined based upon the market value of the property exchanged,
using a market rate multiple of net operating income. Two Hickory owns the Two
Hickory Centre Office Building. ARL has guaranteed that the asset will produce
at least a 12% annual return on the purchase price for a period of three years
from the purchase date. If the asset fails to produce the 12% return, ARL will
pay TCI any shortfall. In addition, if the asset fails to produce the 12% return
for a calendar year, TCI may require ARL to repurchase the shares of Two Hickory
for the purchase price. The business purpose of the transaction was for TCI to
make an equity investment in Two Hickory anticipating a profitable return and
ARL to receive cash for its equity investment. Management has classified this
related party transaction as a note payable to TCI. The consideration paid for
the outstanding shares was $4.4 million. In June 2002, the first lien on the
property was refinanced. TCI received $1.3 million of the proceeds as a
principal reduction on its loan to ARL.

         In February 2002, TCI sold a $2.0 million senior participation interest
in a loan to IOT. The board of directors of IOT and TCI determined that the 16%
interest rate was a good return for IOT's investment and TCI could benefit from
the increase in cash and decrease its notes receivable outstanding portfolio.
TCI received consideration of $2.0 million. In February 2002, the loan was
extended until April 2002. In April 2002, IOT extended the loan until July 2002,
receiving $8,500 as an extension fee. IOT and TCI will receive 57% and 43%,
respectively, on the remaining principal and interest payments. In July 2002,
the note was extended until August 2002. IOT and TCI will receive 57% and 43%
respectively, on the remaining principal and interest payments.

         In March 2002, ARL received consideration of $600,000 and exchanged
with TCI two parcels of land, a 24.5 acre tract of Rasor land, a 16.89 acre
tract of Lakeshore Villas land, and the 45,623 sq. ft. Oaktree Village Shopping
Center for the 80,278 sq. ft. Plaza on Bachman Creek Shopping Center. The cost
of the Rasor land, the Lakeshore Villas land, the Oaktree Shopping Center, and
the Plaza on Bachman Shopping Center was $1.0 million, $1.3 million, $1.6
million, and $4.1 million, respectively. The purchase prices were determined
based on the


                                      177


market values of the properties exchanged, using a market rate multiple of net
operating income. The business purpose of the transaction was for TCI to
construct apartments on the Rasor and Lakeshore Villas land and to give ample
value for the property TCI is exchanging, the Oaktree Shopping center was added
to the transaction. The Plaza on Bachman Creek Shopping Center was subsequently
financed with ARL receiving net cash of $4.4 million.

         In April 2002, TCI purchased all of the general and limited partnership
interests in Confederate Point from ARL for $1.9 million. The purchase price was
determined based on the market value of the property exchanged using a market
rate multiple of net operating income. Confederate Point owns the Confederate
Point Apartments. ARL has guaranteed that the asset will produce at least a 12%
annual return on the purchase price for a period of three years from the
purchase date. If the asset fails to produce the 12% return, ARL will pay TCI
any shortfall. In addition, if the asset fails to produce the 12% return for a
calendar year, TCI may require ARL to repurchase the interests in Confederate
Point for the purchase price. The business purpose of the transaction was for
TCI to make an equity investment in Confederate Point anticipating a profitable
return and ARL is to receive cash for its equity investment. Management has
classified this related party transaction as a note payable to TCI.

         In April 2002, TCI purchased all of the general and limited partnership
interests in Foxwood from ARL for $1.1 million. The purchase price was
determined based on the market values of the property exchanged, using a market
rate multiple of net operating income. Foxwood owns the Foxwood Apartments. ARL
has guaranteed that the asset will produce at least a 12% annual return on the
purchase price for a period of three years from the purchase date. If the asset
fails to produce the 12% return, ARL will pay TCI any shortfall. In addition, if
the asset fails to produce the 12% return for a calendar year, TCI may require
ARL to repurchase the interests in Foxwood for the purchase price. The business
purpose of the transaction was for TCI to make an equity investment in Foxwood
anticipating a profitable return and ARL to receive cash for its equity
investment. Management has classified this related party transaction as a note
payable to TCI.

         In April 2002, TCI purchased all of the general and limited partnership
interests in Woodsong from ARL for $2.5 million. The purchase price was
determined based on the market values of the property exchanged, using a market
rate multiple of net operating income. Woodsong owns the Woodsong Apartments.
ARL has guaranteed that the asset will produce at least a 12% annual return on
the purchase price for a period of three years from the purchase date. If the
asset fails to produce the 12% return, ARL will pay TCI any shortfall. In
addition, if the asset fails to produce the 12% return for a calendar year, TCI
may require ARL to repurchase the interests in Woodsong for the purchase price.
The business purpose of the transaction was for TCI to make an equity investment
in Woodsong anticipating a profitable return and ARL to receive cash for its
equity investment. Management has classified this related party transaction as a
note payable to TCI. In July 2002, the Woodsong Apartments was sold for $9.1
million. TCI received $2.6 million from the proceeds of $2.8 million as payment
of principal and accrued but unpaid interest on the loan.

         In April 2002, TCI, a related party, purchased 100% of the common
shares of ART One Hickory Corporation ("One Hickory"), a wholly-owned subsidiary
of ARL, for $4.5 million. The purchase price was determined based on the market
values of the property exchanged, using


                                      178


a market rate multiple of net operating income. One Hickory owns the One Hickory
Centre Office Building. ARL has guaranteed that the asset will produce at least
a 12% annual return on the purchase price for a period of three years from the
purchase date. If the asset fails to produce the 12% return, ARL will pay TCI
any shortfall. In addition, if the asset fails to produce the 12% return for a
calendar year, TCI may require ARL to repurchase the shares in One Hickory for
the purchase price. The business purpose of the transaction was for TCI to make
an equity investment in One Hickory anticipating a profitable return and ARL to
receive cash for its equity investment. Management has classified this related
party transaction as a note payable to TCI.


         In April 2002, ARL sold nine residential properties to partnerships
controlled by Metra, for a total sales price of $34.2 million. These properties
include: the 12 unit Bay Anchor Apartments in Panama City, Florida; the 168 unit
Governor Square Apartments in Tallahassee, Florida; the 54 unit Grand Lagoon
Cove Apartments in Panama City, Florida; the 92 unit Oak Hill Apartments in
Tallahassee, Florida; the 121 unit Park Avenue Villas Apartments in Tallahassee,
Florida; the 62 unit Seville Apartments in Tallahassee, Florida; the 120 unit
Westwood Apartments in Mary Ester, Florida; the 64 unit Windsor Tower Apartments
in Ocala, Florida and the 546 unit Woodhollow Apartments in San Antonio, Texas.
Innovo Realty, Inc., a subsidiary of Innovo is a limited partner in the
partnerships that purchased the properties. Joseph Mizrachi, a director of ARL,
controls approximately 11.67% of the outstanding common stock of Innovo. ARL's
relationship with Mr. Mizrachi, management has determined to treat this sale as
a refinancing transaction. ARL will continue to report the assets and the new
debt incurred by Metra on its financial statements. ARL received net cash of
$8.3 million after paying off the existing debt of $19.3 million and various
closing costs. Of the total new debt of $29.2 million, $8.8 million bears
interest at 5.00% per annum and matures in May 2003, $17.0 million bears
interest at 7.12% per annum and matures in May 2007 and $3.4 million bears
interest at 7.57% per annum and matures in May 2012. ARL also received $6.3
million of 8% non-recourse, non-convertible Series A preferred stock of Innovo.
The dividend on the Innovo preferred shares will be funded entirely and solely
through member distributions from cash flows generated by the operation and
subsequent sale of the sold properties. In the event the cash flows for the
properties are insufficient to cover the 8% annual dividend, Innovo will have no
obligation to cover any shortfall. The Innovo preferred shares have a mandatory
redemption feature, and are redeemable from the cash proceeds received by Innovo
from the operation and sale of the properties. All member distributions that are
in excess of current and accrued 8% dividends must be used by Innovo to redeem
the Innovo preferred shares.



         In April 2002, TCI sold 12 residential properties to partnerships
controlled by Metra. These properties include: the 75 unit Apple Lane Apartments
in Lawrence, Kansas, the 195 unit Arbor Point Apartments in Odessa, Texas, the
264 unit Fairway View Estates Apartments in El Paso, Texas, the 152 unit
Fairways Apartments in Longview, Texas, the 166 unit Fountain Lake Apartments in
Texas City, Texas, the 172 unit Fountains of Waterford Apartments in Midland,
Texas, the 122 unit Harper's Ferry Apartments in Lafayette, Louisiana, the 108
unit Oak Park IV Apartments in Clute, Texas, the 131 unit Quail Oaks Apartments
in Balch Springs, Texas, the 300 unit Sunchase Apartments in Odessa, Texas, the
180 unit Timbers Apartments in Tyler, Texas, and the 112 unit Willow Creek
Apartments in El Paso, Texas. Innovo is a limited partner in the partnerships
that purchased the properties. Joseph Mizrachi, a director of ARL, controls
approximately 11.67% of the outstanding common stock of Innovo. Management has
determined to treat this sale as a refinancing transaction. TCI will continue to
report the assets and the new debt incurred by



                                      179


Metra on its financial statements. The sales price for the properties totaled
$37.6 million. TCI received net cash of $10.5 million after paying off the
existing debt of $18.0 million and various closing costs. The new debt of $30.3
million bears interest at 7.57% per annum, requires monthly interest only
payments of $212,000 and matures in May 2012. TCI also received $5.7 million of
8% non-recourse, non-convertible Series A preferred stock of Innovo. The Innovo
preferred shares have the terms described above in the paragraph setting forth
ARL's sale of residential properties to Metra.



         In April 2002, IOT sold all of its residential properties to
partnerships controlled by Metra. These properties include: the 60 unit Brighton
Court, the 92 unit Del Mar, the 68 unit Enclave, the 280 unit Meridian, the 57
unit Signature, the 114 unit Sinclair, located in Midland, Texas, and the 106
unit Treehouse, located in San Antonio, Texas. Innovo is a limited partner in
the partnerships that purchased the properties. Joseph Mizrachi, a director of
ARL, controls approximately 11.67% of the outstanding common stock of Innovo.
The sale constituted 23.39% of the total assets of IOT as of December 31, 2001.
The sales price for the properties totaled $26.2 million. IOT received $5.4
million in cash after the payoff of $16.1 million in debt and various closing
costs. Management has determined to treat this sale as a refinancing
transaction. The new debt, funded by Bank of America, on the properties totals
$21.4 million, bears interest at 7.57% per annum, requires monthly interest only
payments of $135,000 and matures in May 2012. IOT also received $2.9 million of
8% non-recourse, non-convertible Series A preferred stock of Innovo. The Innovo
preferred shares have the terms described above in the paragraph setting forth
ARL's sale of residential properties to Metra.



         In June 2002, TCI purchased 42.6 acres of Hollywood Casino land from
ARL for $17.0 million. The purchase price was determined based on the market
value of the property. The business purpose of this transaction was to reduce
the affiliate payable.

         In June 2002, ARL purchased all the general and limited partnership
interests in Chalet North, L.P. ("Chalet North") from BCM for $3.0 million. The
purchase price was determined based on the market value of the property
exchanged, using a market rate multiple of net operating income. Chalet North
owns the Pinecrest Apartments. The business purpose of this transaction was to
reduce the affiliate payable owed by BCM to ARL.

         In June 2002, ARL purchased the Tiberon Trails Apartments from BCM for
$12.0 million. The purchase price was determined based on the market value of
the property exchanged, using a market rate multiple of net operating income.
The business purpose of this transaction was to reduce the affiliate payable
owed by BCM to ARL.

         In June 2002, ARL purchased the Alta Mesa Shopping Center from BCM for
$4.0 million. The purchase price was determined based on the market value of
the property exchanged, using a market rate multiple of net operating income.
The business purpose of this transaction was to reduce the affiliate payable
owed by BCM to ARL.

         In June 2002, ARL purchased BCM's investment in Realty Advisors-Korea
for $6.0 million. The business purpose of this transaction was to reduce the
affiliate payable owed by BCM to ARL.


         Scheduled principal payments on notes payable are due as follows:



                                                                     
         2002......................................................     $267,526
         2003......................................................       40,866
         2004......................................................        8,153
         2005......................................................       57,001
         2006......................................................       15,714
         Thereafter................................................      172,021
                                                                        $561,281



         Stated interest rates on notes payable ranged from 5.0% to 16.9% per
annum at December 31, 2001, and matured in varying installments between 2002 and
2019. At December 31, 2001, notes payable were collateralized by deeds of trust
on real estate with a net carrying value of $569.7 million.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


         THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 COMPARED TO JUNE 30, 2001. For
the six months ended June 30, 2002, ARL reported a net loss of $12.9 million,
compared to net income of $10.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001.
The primary factors contributing to ARL's net loss are discussed in the
following paragraphs.

         Rents increased to $28.7 million and $56.8 million in the three and six
months ended June 30, 2002, from $27.3 million and $53.8 million in 2001. Rents
from commercial properties



                                      180


increased to $19.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002, from $16.3
million in 2001, rent from hotels increased to $18.2 million in the six months
ended June 30, 2002, from $17.7 million in 2001 and rent from apartments of
$19.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2002 approximated the $19.4
million in 2001. The increase in commercial property rents was primarily
attributable to increased occupancy, and the increase in hotel property rents
was primarily attributable to the opening of the Hotel Sofia in 2001. Rental
income is expected to decrease in the remainder of 2002 as a result of continued
property sales.

         Property operations expense decreased to $20.5 million and $39.8
million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, from $23.5 million and
$42.5 million in 2001. Property operations expense for commercial properties
increased to $11.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2002, from $10.1
million in 2001. For hotels, property operations expense decreased to $12.7
million in the six months ended June 30, 2002, from $15.9 million in 2001. For
land, property operations expense of $4.1 million in the six months ended June
30, 2002 approximated the $4.5 million in 2001. For apartments, property
operations expense of $11.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2002,
approximated the $11.9 million in 2001. The increase in commercial property
operations expense was primarily attributable to the acquisition of Plaza on
Bachman Creek in 2002. The decrease in hotel property operations expense was
primarily due to the over estimation of expenses at Hotel Sofia in 2001.
Property operations expense is expected to decrease in the remainder of 2002 as
a result of continued property sales.

         Pizza parlor sales and cost of sales increased to $9.7 million and $7.8
million, respectively, in the three months ended June 30, 2002 and $18.3 million
and $14.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 from $8.7 million and
$7.1 million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and $16.6
million and $13.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001. The increase
was primarily attributable to the opening of three new stores in 2001, plus an
increase of 10.4% in same-store sales.

         Interest income from notes receivable of $785,000 and $1.4 million in
the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 approximated the $776,000 and $1.2
million in 2001.

         Other income increased to $142,000 and $326,000 in the three and six
months ended June 30, 2002 from $44,000 and $77,000 in the three and six months
ended June 30, 2001. The increase was primarily due to service fee income and
dividends on and redemption of Innovo Preferred Stock. See Note 2. "Real Estate"
and Note 7. "Notes Payable" to the ARL Consolidated Financial Statements.

         Interest expense increased to $18.0 million and $36.2 million in the
three and six months ended June 30, 2002 from $16.1 million and $31.5 million in
2001. The increase was primarily attributable to higher balances payable on
stock loans, at higher interest rates.

         Depreciation and amortization expense of $4.5 million and $7.9 million
in the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, approximated the $4.2 million
and $7.8 million in 2001.

         General and administrative expenses increased to $3.2 million and $6.5
million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, from $1.6 million and
$4.5 million in 2001. The



                                      181



increase is primarily attributable to increased legal fees and increased cost
reimbursements paid to the advisor.

         Advisory fees decreased to $1.5 million and $3.3 million in the three
and six months ended June 30, 2002 from $2.3 million and $3.5 million in 2001.
The decrease is due to the reduction in the total assets of ARL, which is the
basis for the fee.

         Net income fee to affiliate decreased to $(152,000) in the three months
ended June 30, 2002 from $1.8 million in 2001. There was no net income fee to
affiliate for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and $1.8 million in 2001. The
income fee payable to ARL's advisor is 10% of the annualized net income for the
year, in excess of a 10% return on shareholders' equity. At June 30, 2002, ARL's
annualized net income is below the 10% return threshold.

         Incentive fee to affiliate decreased to $(374,000) in the three months
ended June 30, 2002 from $4.3 million in 2001. There was no incentive fee to
affiliate for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and $5.8 million in 2001. The
incentive fee is only due if ARL is also subject to the net income fee. At June
2002, the net income fee requirements are not met; therefore, no incentive fee
is due. This fee represents 10% of the excess of net capital gains over net
capital losses from sales of operating properties. The amount of this fee for
the remainder of 2002 will be dependent on the number of operating properties
sold, the net capital gains realized and whether the net income fee is due.

         Minority interest increased to $773,000 and $1.6 million in the three
and six months ended June 30, 2002, from $(95,000) and $1.5 million in 2001. The
three month increase is due to corrections made in the second quarter of 2001
that effectively eliminated the expense for the quarter.

         Equity in loss of investees decreased to $(5.2) million and $(9.2)
million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, from $(3.8) million and
$(5.3) million in 2001. The decrease was primarily attributable to increased net
losses for TCI and IORI in 2002.

         Loss on the sale of investments in equity investees increased to
$531,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 from $387,000 in the three and
six months ended June 30, 2001. See Note 5 to the ARL Consolidated Financial
Statements "Investments in Equity Investees."

         Equity in gain on sale of real estate by equity investees decreased to
$4.1 million and $8.3 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2002,
from $9.9 million and $11.4 million in 2001. The decrease is primarily
attributable to reduced profit margin on property sales by TCI and IORI.




         2001 COMPARED TO 2000. ARL reported net income of $13.3 million in 2001
compared to $2.7 million in 2000. ARL's net income in 2001 included gains on the
sale of real estate of $83.4 million compared to gains on the sale of real
estate of $96.7 million in 2000. The primary factors contributing to ARL's net
income are discussed in the following paragraphs.

         Rents decreased to $129.3 million in 2001 from $138.2 million in 2000.
Rent from commercial properties increased to $34.0 million in 2001 from $31.5
million in 2000, rent from hotels increased to $36.1 million in 2001 from $33.1
million in 2000 and rent from apartments


                                      182


decreased to $58.3 million in 2001 from $69.8 million in 2000. The increase in
rent from commercial properties was primarily attributable to completion of the
Centura and Hickory Centre office buildings during 2000. The increase in rent
from hotels is attributable to the opening of the Grand Hotel Sofia in 2001.
Apartment rents decreased in 2001 as a result of the sale of nine apartments in
2000 and 17 apartments in 2001. Rents are expected to decrease in 2002 as a
result of the apartment sales in 2001 and expected apartment and commercial
property sales in 2002.

         Property operations expense decreased to $93.2 million in 2001 from
$94.1 million in 2000. Property operations expense for commercial properties of
$20.2 million in 2001 approximated the $19.8 million expense in 2000, hotel
expense increased to $28.3 million in 2001 from $24.1 million in 2000, land
expense decreased to $8.6 million in 2001 from $9.7 million expense in 2000 and
apartment expense decreased to $35.5 million in 2001 from $40.4 million in 2000.
The increase in hotel operations expense was primarily due to the opening of the
Grand Hotel Sofia in 2001. The decrease in land operations expense was primarily
due to the sale of 26 land parcels in 2000 and 34 land parcels in 2001. The
decrease in apartment property operations expense was primarily due to the sale
of nine apartments in 2000 and 17 apartments in 2001. Property operations
expense is expected to decrease in 2002 as a result of the apartment sales in
2001 and anticipated apartment and commercial property sales in 2002.

         Pizza parlor sales and cost of sales were $34.2 million and $27.9
million in 2001 and $32.6 million and $26.8 million, in 2000. Pizza parlor
operations gross margin in 2001 increased over the gross margin in 2000
primarily due to reduced interest costs after refinancing debt in 2001 and
reduced occupancy costs. Pizza parlor gross margin in 2002 is expected to
approximate 2001, unless cheese prices change significantly.

         Interest income of $2.8 million in 2001 approximated the $3.0 million
income in 2000. Interest income is expected to decrease in 2002 as a result of
the notes collected in early 2002, and as no new loans are expected to be funded
in 2002.

         Oil and gas sales in 2001 were $59,000 representing start-up production
from six wells. Oil and gas operating expenses were $269,000. Operating expenses
include lifting costs and repairs and maintenance. See Note 5. "Oil and Gas
Operations" to the ARL consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in
this joint proxy statement and prospectus.

         Equity in income of investees increased to $8.8 million in 2001 from
$5.2 million in 2000. The increase in equity income was primarily due to
increased ownership by ARL in TCI in 2001, due to purchases of TCI common stock.
Equity investees reported gains on the sale of real estate in 2001 totaling
$54.3 million of which ARL's equity share was $22.5 million. These gains were
offset by operating losses totaling $37.9 million, of which ARL's equity share
was $13.6 million. See Note 6. "Investments In Equity Investees" to the ARL
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement and prospectus.

         Other income improved to a loss of $369,000 in 2001 from a loss of
$926,000 in 2000. The increase was primarily due to a reduction in losses on the
sale of marketable securities.



                                      183


         Interest expense of $77.0 million in 2001 approximated the $76.7
million expense in 2000.

         Advisory fees increased to $6.7 million in 2001 from $5.9 million in
2000. The increase was attributable to the inclusion of NRLP assets in ARL's
gross assets, the basis for such fee. Advisory fees are expected to decrease in
2002, as ARL's gross asset base is expected to decrease through property sales.

         Net income fee to affiliate in 2001 was $166,000. The income fee
payable to ARL's advisor is 10% of the net income for the year, in excess of a
10% return on stockholders' equity. No net income fee was paid in 2000.

         Incentive fees increased to $3.8 million in 2001 from $1.6 million in
2000. The increase was attributable to 18 eligible sales in 2001 compared to
four eligible sales in 2000. This fee represents 10% of the excess of net
capital gains over net capital losses from sales of operating properties. The
amount of this fee, if any, in 2002 will be dependent on the number of operating
properties sold and net capital gains realized.

         General and administrative expenses decreased to $12.7 million in 2001
from $17.1 million in 2000. The decrease was primarily attributable to a
decrease in cost reimbursements to ARL's advisor. General and administrative
expenses in 2002 are expected to approximate 2001.

         Depreciation, depletion and amortization increased to $17.7 million in
2001 from $16.9 million in 2000. The increase was primarily attributable to the
completion of the Hickory Centre office buildings in 2000 and the Grand Hotel
Sofia in 2001. Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense should decrease
in 2002 as a result of continued property sales.

         Provision for loss increased to $2.5 million in 2001 from $2.2 million
in 2000. In 2001, the impairment of the Grand Hotel Sofia was recognized, after
comparing the carrying value of the property to an estimate of the market value
calculated by dividing the forecast 2002 net operating income, or NOI, by the
market capitalization rate. In 2000, a litigation reserve, related to a breach
of contract dispute, was established, and the carrying value of an 11.3 acre
tract of land in Plano, Texas, sold in the first quarter of 2001, was reduced to
its net realizable value.

         Minority interest decreased to $972,000 in 2001 from $30.7 million in
2000. Minority interest is the earnings attributable to limited partners, other
than ARL, of certain controlled limited partnerships. Minority interest in 2001
and 2000 was attributable, in part, to the preferred return limited partner
units of Ocean Beach Partners, L.P., Valley Ranch, L.P., Grapevine American,
L.P., Edina Park Plaza Associates, L.P. and Hawthorne Lakes Associations, L.P.,
ART Florida Portfolio III and ART Palm, L.L.C. In 2000, minority interest
includes, in addition to the preferred returns discussed above, $29.8 million of
earnings attributable to the limited partners in NRLP prior to the merger.
Minority interest in 2001 declined due to the 2000 merger of NRLP into ARL.

         Gains on sale of real estate decreased to $83.4 million in 2001 from
$96.7 million in 2000. In 2001, gains of $73.5 million were recognized on the
sale of 15 apartments: Rockborough, Carriage Park, Kimberly Woods, Place One,
Shadowood, Bent Tree, Club Mar, Covered Bridge, Crossing at Church, Chalet I,
Chalet II, Nora Pines, Timbercreek, Blackhawk,


                                      184


and Woodstock; $2.2 million on the sale of Regency Pointe Shopping Center; and
$16.0 million on the sale of land: two tracts totaling 27.2 acres of Chase Oaks
land, 10.0 acres of Elm Fork land, 27.8 acres of Frisco Bridges land, 1.7 acres
of Las Colinas land, 22.1 acres of Mason Goodrich land, 4.2 acres of Nashville
land, 5 tracts totaling 49.7 acres of Katrina land, 6.6 acres of Rasor land,
12.7 acres of Santa Clarita land, 232.8 acres of Scoggins land, 408.0 acres of
Scout land, 10.4 acres of Tree Farm land, and .4 acres of Waters Edge Apartment
land. In 2001, losses of $8.3 million were recognized on the sale of Glenwood
Apartments, 12.0 acres of Plano Parkway land, 120.4 acres of Yorktown land, two
tracts totaling 3.2 acres of Nashville land, Ashford Apartments, 6.7 acres of
Santa Clarita land, 107.0 acres of Elm Fork land, and 27.4 acres of Vista Ridge
land.

         In 2000, gains of $45.9 million were recognized on the sale of nine
apartments: Summerwind, Windtree, The Pines, Whispering Pines, Four Seasons,
Sherwood Glen, Fair Oaks, Hidden Valley and Candlelight Square; $21.9 million on
the sale of commercial properties: Katella Plaza, Marina Playa, Harbor Plaza and
Preston Center; and $30.6 million on the sale of land: 420 acres of Duchesne
land, three tracts totaling 166.7 acres of Frisco Bridges land, 749.1 acres of
Keller land, 0.02 acres of Katy land, four tracts totaling 41.2 acres of
Mason/Goodrich land, 157.9 acres of Mastenbrook land, 82.0 acres of McKinney
Corners I, II, III, IV and V land, 20.67 acres of Monterey land, four tracts
totaling 8.69 acres of Nashville land, 182.5 acres of Pantex land, two tracts
totaling 329.4 acres of Parkfield land, three tracts totaling 89.51 acres of
Rasor land, 80.4 acres of Rowlett Creek land, 3.0 acres of Salmon River land,
126.6 acres of Vann Cattle land, 5.4 acres of Vista Business Park land, and 70.3
acres of Wakefield land. In 2000, losses of $1.6 million were recognized on the
sale of 14.6 acres of McKinney Corners II land, 377.15 acres of Pioneer Crossing
land, 4.79 acres of Plano Parkway land, 22.4 acres of Valley Ranch land, and
36.43 acres of Vista Business Park land.

         2000 COMPARED TO 1999. ARL reported net income of $2.7 million in 2000
compared to $10.3 million in 1999. ARL's net income in 2000 included gains on
the sale of real estate of $96.7 million compared to gains on the sale of real
estate of $129.3 million in 1999. The primary factors contributing to ARL's net
income are discussed in the following paragraphs.

         Rents decreased to $138.2 million in 2000 from $157.6 million in 1999.
Rent from commercial properties increased to $31.5 million in 2000 from $30.2
million in 1999, rent from hotels increased to $33.1 million in 2000 from $31.6
million in 1999 and rent from apartments decreased to $69.8 million in 2000 from
$93.9 million in 1999. The increase in rent from commercial properties was
primarily attributable to completion of the Centura and Hickory Centre office
buildings in 2000. The increase in rent from hotels is attributable to increased
occupancy rates. Apartment rents decreased in 2000 as a result of 15 apartments
being sold in 1999 and nine apartments sold in 2000.

         Property operations expense decreased to $94.1 million in 2000 from
$106.6 million in 1999. Property operations expense for commercial properties
increased to $19.8 million in 2000 from $16.5 million in 1999, for hotels such
expense of $24.1 million in 2000 approximated the $24.2 million expense in 1999,
for land the expense of $9.7 million in 2000 approximated the $9.0 million
expense in 1999 and apartments decreased to $40.4 million in 2000 from $56.4
million in 1999. The increase in commercial property operations expense was
primarily due to the completion of the Centura and Hickory Centre office
buildings in 2000. The decrease in


                                      185


apartment property operations expense was primarily due to 15 apartments being
sold in 1999 and nine apartment sales in 2000.

         Pizza parlor sales and cost of sales were $32.6 million and $26.8
million in 2000 and $30.8 million and $26.3 million, in 1999. Pizza parlor
operations experienced higher profit margins in 2000 due to lower pizza
ingredient costs (primarily cheese), a price increase in October 2000, and the
closing of underperforming locations.

         Interest income decreased to $3.0 million in 2000 from $6.4 million in
1999. The decrease was attributable to the collection of $39.9 million in notes
in 2000, while originating and funding loans of $14.7 million.

         Equity in income of investees decreased to $5.2 million in 2000 from
$11.8 million in 1999. The decrease in equity income was primarily due to
reduced ownership by ARL in TCI in 2000, due to sales of ARL-owned securities by
margin debt holders. Equity investees reported gains on the sale of real estate
in 2000 totaling $71.4 million of which ARL's equity share was $18.6 million.
These gains were offset by operating losses totaling $23.8 million, of which
ARL's equity share was $5.3 million. Also, sales of stock of equity investees by
margin debt holders of ARL resulted in losses of $7.9 million. See Note 6.
"Investments in Equity Investees" to the ARL consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement and prospectus.

         Other income was a loss of $926,000 in 2000 approximating the loss of
$846,000 in 1999.

         Interest expense decreased to $76.7 million in 2000 from $91.7 million
in 1999. This decrease is due to 36 land and nine apartment sales in 2000.

         Advisory fees increased to $5.9 million in 2000 from $5.5 million in
1999. The increase was attributable to the addition of NRLP assets to ARL's
gross assets, the basis for such fee.

         Incentive fees in 2000 were $1.6 million. This fee represents 10% of
the excess of net capital gains over net capital losses from sales of operating
properties.

         General and administrative expenses of $17.1 million in 2000
approximated the $17.1 million expense in 1999.

         Depreciation and amortization decreased to $16.9 million in 2000 from
$17.4 million in 1999. The reduction is due to the sale of nine apartments in
2000.

         In the fourth quarter of 2000, a provision for loss of $2.2 million was
recognized. Such loss relates to the reduction of the carrying value of an 11.3
acre tract of land in Plano, Texas, sold in the first quarter of 2001, to its
net realizable value and a litigation reserve related to a breach of contract
dispute. In the third and fourth quarter of 1999, provisions for loss of $2.1
million and $1.0 million were recognized, respectively. Such loss relates to the
relinquishment by ARL of its general and Class B limited partner interests in a
controlled partnership that owned two apartments in Indianapolis, Indiana.



                                      186


         In December 1998, upon the election of a wholly-owned subsidiary of ARL
as general partner of NRLP, the subsidiary assumed liability for certain legal
settlement payments. Such obligation is included in litigation expense in the
accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations.

         Minority interest decreased to $30.7 million in 2000 from $56.7 million
in 1999. Minority interest is the earnings attributable to limited partners,
other than ARL, of certain controlled limited partnerships. Minority interest in
2000 and 1999 was attributable, in part, to the preferred return limited partner
units of Ocean Beach Partners, L.P.; Valley Ranch, L.P.; Grapevine American,
L.P.; Edina Park Plaza Associates, L.P.; Hawthorne Lakes Associations, L.P.; ART
Florida Portfolio III and ART Palm, L.L.C. In 2000, minority interest includes,
in addition to the preferred returns discussed above, $29.8 million of earnings
attributable to the limited partners in NRLP prior to the merger, compared to
$55.7 million in 1999.

         Gains on sale of real estate decreased to $96.7 million in 2000 from
$129.3 million in 1999. In 2000, gains of $45.9 million were recognized on the
sale of nine apartments: Summerwind, Windtree, The Pines, Whispering Pines, Four
Seasons, Sherwood Glen, Fair Oaks, Hidden Valley and Candlelight Square; $21.9
million on the sale of commercial properties: Katella Plaza, Marina Playa,
Harbor Plaza and Preston Center; and $30.6 million on the sale of land: 420
acres of Duchesne land, three tracts totaling 166.7 acres of Frisco Bridges
land, 749.1 acres of Keller land, 0.02 acres of Katy land, four tracts totaling
41.2 acres of Mason/Goodrich land, 157.9 acres of Mastenbrook land, 82.0 acres
of McKinney Corners I, II, III, IV and V land, 20.67 acres of Monterey land,
four tracts totaling 8.69 acres of Nashville land, 182.5 acres of Pantex land,
two tracts totaling 329.4 acres of Parkfield land, three tracts totaling 89.51
acres of Rasor land, 80.4 acres of Rowlett Creek land, 3.0 acres of Salmon River
land, 126.6 acres of Vann Cattle land, 5.4 acres of Vista Business Park land,
and 70.3 acres of Wakefield land. In 2000, losses of $1.6 million were
recognized on the sale of 14.6 acres of McKinney Corners II land, 377.15 acres
of Pioneer Crossing land, 4.79 acres of Plano Parkway land, 22.4 acres of Valley
Ranch land, and 36.43 acres of Vista Business Park land.

         In 1999, gains of $96.5 million were recognized on the sale of 15
apartments: Olde Town, Sante Fe, Mesa Ridge, Horizon East, Lantern Ridge,
Barcelona, Country Place, Lake Nora, Fox Club, Oak Hollow, Windridge,
Tanglewood, Edgewater Garden, Bavarian Woods, and Manchester Commons; $9.2
million on the sale of the Continental Hotel and Casino; and $24.1 million on
the sale of land: seven tracts totaling 46.9 acres of Plano Parkway land, 9.9
acres of Mason/Goodrich land, four tracts totaling 302.4 acres of McKinney
Corners II, McKinney Corners IV and Dowdy land, 13.0 acres of Rasor land, three
tracts totaling 23.0 acres of Vista Ridge land, four tracts totaling 103.6 acres
of Frisco Bridges land, .13 acres of JHL Connell land, 1.4 acres of Valley Ranch
land, Sun City lots, 121.2 acres of Katrina land, five tracts totaling 187.7
acres of Keller, Scout and Scoggins land, and 205.4 acres of Yorktown land. In
1999, losses of $545,000 were recognized on the sale of Stone Meadows land and
6.2 acres of Plano Parkway land.

ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

         Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances
and regulations, ARL may be potentially liable for removal or remediation costs,
as well as certain other potential


                                      187


costs relating to hazardous or toxic substances (including governmental fines
and injuries to persons and property) where property-level managers have
arranged for the removal, disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic
substances. In addition, certain environmental laws impose liability for release
of asbestos-containing materials into the air, and third parties may seek
recovery for personal injury associated with such materials.

         Management is not aware of any environmental liability relating to the
above matters that would have a material adverse effect on ARL's business,
assets or results of operations.

INFLATION

         The effects of inflation on ARL's operations are not quantifiable.
Revenues from property operations tend to fluctuate proportionately with
inflationary increases and decreases in housing costs. Fluctuations in the rate
of inflation also affect the sales values of properties and the ultimate gains
to be realized from property sales. To the extent that inflation affects
interest rates, earnings from short-term investments and the cost of new
financings as well as the cost of variable interest rate debt will be affected.


                                      188

                    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES
                            ABOUT MARKET RISKS OF ARL

      ARL's future operations, cash flow and fair values of financial
instruments are partially dependent upon the then existing market interest rates
and market equity prices. Market risk is the changes in the market rates and
prices and the affect of the changes on the future operations. Market risk is
managed by matching a property's anticipated net operating income to an
appropriate financing.

      ARL is exposed to interest rate risk associated with variable rate notes
payable and maturing debt that has to be refinanced. ARL does not hold financial
instruments for trading or other speculative purposes, but rather issues these
financial instruments to finance its portfolio of real estate assets. ARL's
interest rate sensitivity position is managed by ARL's finance department.
Interest rate sensitivity is the relationship between changes in market interest
rates and the fair value of market-rate-sensitive assets and liabilities. ARL's
earnings are affected as changes in short-term interest rates impact its cost of
variable rate debt and maturing fixed rate debt. A large portion of ARL's market
risk is exposure to short-term interest rates from variable rate borrowings. The
impact on ARL's financial statements of refinancing fixed rate debt that matured
in 2001 was not material. As permitted, management intends to convert a
significant portion of those borrowings from variable rates to fixed rates in
2002. If market interest rates for variable rate debt average 100 basis points
more in 2002 than they did in 2001, ARL's interest expense would increase, and
net income would decrease, by $1.3 million. This amount is determined by
considering the impact of hypothetical rates on ARL's borrowing cost. This
analysis did not consider the effects of the reduced level of overall economic
activity that would exist in such an environment. Further, in the event of a
change of such magnitude, management would likely take actions to further
mitigate its exposure to the change. However, due to the uncertainty of the
specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, the sensitivity
analysis assumes no change in ARL's financial structure.

      The following table contains only those exposures that existed at December
31, 2001. Anticipation of exposures of risk on positions that could possibly
arise was not considered. ARL's ultimate interest rate risk and its effect on
operations will depend on future capital market exposures, which cannot be
anticipated with a probable assurance level. Dollars in thousands.


                                                                                                                   
            ASSETS
Trading Instruments--Equity
Price Risk

Marketable securities at
market value .......................                                                                                  $    96

Notes receivable
Variable interest rate-fair value ..                                                                                  $ 4,352




                                         2002           2003          2004         2005        2006     THEREAFTER       TOTAL
                                        ------         ------       -------       ------      ------    ----------     --------
                                                                                                  
Instrument's maturities ............    $   --         $   --       $ 5,633       $   --      $   --      $   --       $  5,633
Instrument's amortization ..........        --             --            --           --          --          --             --
Interest ...........................       380            380           318           --          --          --          1,078
Average rate .......................       6.8%           6.8%         11.3%          --          --          --

Fixed interest rate-fair value .....                                                                                   $ 25,431



                                      189




                                              2002           2003           2004         2005      2006   THEREAFTER     TOTAL
                                            --------       --------       --------       ----      ----   ----------   --------
                                                                                                  
Instrument's maturities ..............      $ 11,563       $  1,017       $ 13,200       $ --      $ --      $ --      $ 25,780
Instrument's amortization ............            --             --             --         --        --        --            --
Interest .............................         2,095          1,562            213         --        --        --         3,870
Average rate .........................          10.5%          11.4%           3.2%        --        --        --
Liabilities
Notes payable
Variable interest rate-fair value ....                                                                                 $130,017




                                     2002          2003          2004          2005          2006        THEREAFTER        TOTAL
                                   --------      --------      --------      --------      --------      ----------      --------
                                                                                                    
Instrument's maturities ........   $117,654      $     --      $     --      $     --      $     --       $  1,234       $118,888
Instrument's amortization ......      1,413         1,297         1,305         1,508           124          2,688          8,335
Interest .......................      9,110           749           619           481           379          3,807         15,145
Average rate ...................       13.5%         10.0%         10.0%         10.0%          9.5%           9.0%

Fixed interest rate-fair
value ..........................                                                                                         $439,703




                                     2002          2003          2004          2005          2006        THEREAFTER        TOTAL
                                   --------      --------      --------      --------      --------      ----------      --------
                                                                                                    
Instrument's maturities ........   $143,362      $ 34,785      $  1,898      $ 50,475      $ 10,962       $144,293       $385,775
Instrument's amortization ......      5,097         4,784         4,950         5,018         4,628         23,806         48,283
Interest .......................     32,504        21,473        20,105        16,877        13,729         38,027        142,715
Average rate ...................        9.0%          8.1%          8.3%          8.0%          7.8%           7.5%


      At June 30, 2002, ARL's exposure to a change in interest rates on its debt
is as follows:




                                                                           Weighted            Effect of 1%
                                                                            Average          Increase In Base
                                                      Balance            Interest Rate            Rates
                                                      -------            -------------       ----------------
                                                                                    
Notes payable:
Variable rate ..................................      $81,124               10.715%              $   811
                                                      =======                                    =======

Total decrease in ARL's annual net income ......                                                 $   811
                                                                                                 =======

Per share ......................................                                                 $   .07
                                                                                                 =======



                                      190


                                MANAGEMENT OF ARL

                        DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

        The following table sets forth certain information as of July 23, 2002
regarding ARL's executive officers and directors:




Name                                        Age          Position
----                                        ---          --------
                                                   
Mark W. Branigan*...................        48           Executive Vice President -- Residential
Louis J. Corna*.....................        54           Executive Vice President -- Tax
Earl D. Cecil.......................        73           Director
Collene C. Currie...................        53           Director
Richard W. Humphrey.................        54           Director
Ronald E. Kimbrough*................        49           Acting Principal Executive Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief
                                                         Financial Officer
Joseph Mizrachi.....................        57           Director
David W. Starowicz*.................        46           Executive Vice President -- Commercial Asset Management



      EARL D. CECIL: Director (Independent) (since November 2001) of ARL.
Financial and business consultant (since January 1994); Division Vice President
(February 1987 to December 1993) of James Mitchell & Company, a financial
services marketing organization; and director (since March 2002) of IOT and TCI.

      COLLENE C. CURRIE: Director (Independent) (since August 2000) of ARL. CEO
(since January 2002) of Acorn Capital Company; CEO (since January 2001) of c3
Solutions; Associate Director (June 2000 to December 2001) of Cambridge
Technology Partners; CFO (since June 1998) of Energy Partners Alliance; Vice
President and Senior Relationship Manager (February 1996 to March 2000) of Bank
of America Private Bank, (formerly NationsBank Private Client Group of Dallas);
Director (April 1998 to August 2000) of NRLP Management Corp. ("NMC"), the
former general partner of National Realty, L.P.; Director of Marketing and
Communications (October 1993 to January 1999) of the Dallas Opera; and Director
of ART (February 1999 to August 2000).

      RICHARD W. HUMPHREY: Director (Affiliated) (since November 2001) of ARL.
Real estate broker (since December 1999) of Regis Realty, Inc. and (June 1992 to
November 1999) of Carmel Realty, Inc.

      JOSEPH MIZRACHI: Director (Independent) (since August 2000) of ARL
Registered Investment Advisor and Principal and President (since 1980) of PAZ
Securities, Inc.; Chairman of the board (since 1980) of Midwest Properties
Management, Inc.; Director (since June 2001) of Tarrant Apparel Group; and
Director of ART (June 2000 to August 2000).


----------
* See "The Advisor - BCM - Directors and Principal Officers of Advisor" for
background and business experience information.


                                      191



      GENE E. PHILLIPS: Age 65, serves as a representative of a trust for the
benefit of his children that indirectly owns BCM. As the trust's representative,
Mr. Phillips is involved in daily consultation with the officers of BCM and has
significant influence over the conduct of BCM's business, including the
rendering of its advisory services and the making of investment decisions for
itself and for ARL, TCI and IOT. Mr. Phillips has been an advisor to BCM since
its inception in July 2000 and before that to American Realty Trust, Inc.,
currently a subsidiary of ARL, since February 6, 1989. In addition, Mr. Phillips
has been actively involved in advising entities affiliated with the trust for
more than the last five years. In August 2002, Mr. Phillips and five
corporations, including BCM, affiliated with Mr. Phillips or the trust for his
children that indirectly owns BCM, agreed in negotiations with the staff of the
SEC to enter into an Order Instituting Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, in an administrative proceeding
brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission and pay a substantial civil
penalty in connection therewith. Although the Order has been agreed to by Mr.
Phillips, the five entities affiliated with Mr. Phillips or the trust and the
staff of the SEC, it has not been formally approved by the SEC. The Order in its
current form finds, among other things, that Mr. Phillips and each of the five
corporations, including BCM, had violated Section 13(d) and 10(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rules 10b-5, 13d-1 and 13d-2
promulgated thereunder, by failing to file reports required under Section 13(d)
with respect to the securities of Greenbriar Corporation. The Order further
determines that Mr. Phillips had substantial contact with the management of BCM
and had a significant influence on its advisory services and investment
decisions as well as the investment decisions of the five other entities that
are the subject of the Order. The Order also determines that Mr. Phillips
exercised the same influence over the management and investment decisions of
American Realty Trust, Inc., currently a subsidiary of ARL. The Order requires
Mr. Phillips and the five corporations, including BCM, to cease and desist from
committing or causing any violation of Sections 10(b) and 13(d) of the Exchange
Act and Rules 10b-5, 13d-1 and 13d-2 promulgated thereunder. Mr. Phillip's
business address is 1800 Valley View Lane, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas 75234. Mr.
Phillips business telephone number is 469-522-4200. Mr. Phillips is a citizen of
the United States.


      The business address of each director and executive officer is 1800 Valley
View Lane, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas 75234. The business telephone number of each
person is 469-522-4200. Each director and executive officer is a citizen of the
United States.

                          EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION OF ARL

      ARL has no employees, payroll or benefit plans and pays no compensation to
its executive officers. The directors and executive officers of ARL who are also
officers or employees of BCM are compensated by BCM. Such affiliated directors
and executive officers perform a variety of services for BCM and the amount of
their compensation is determined solely by BCM. BCM does not allocate the cash
compensation of its officers among the various entities for which it serves as
advisor. See "The Advisor" for a more detailed discussion of compensation
payable to BCM by ARL.

      The only direct remuneration paid by ARL is to those directors who are not
officers or employees of BCM or its affiliated companies. Until December 31,
2000, each independent director was compensated at the rate of $20,000 per year,
plus $300 per Audit Committee meeting attended and the Chairman of the Audit
Committee received an annual fee of $500. Effective January 1, 2001, the annual
fee was increased from $20,000 to $45,000. In addition, each independent
director receives an additional fee of $1,000 per day for any special services


                                      192


rendered outside of their ordinary duties as director, plus reimbursement of
expenses. During 2001, $302,318 was paid to independent directors in total
directors' fees for all services including the annual fee for service during the
period January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001, and 2001 special service fees
as follows: Roy E. Bode, $59,873; Earl D. Cecil, $7,003; Collene C. Currie,
$79,743; Cliff Harris, $70,333; Joseph Mizrachi, $50,716; and Richard D. Morgan,
$34,650.

      In January 1999, stockholders approved the Director's Stock Option Plan
(the "Director's Plan") which provides for options to purchase up to 40,000
shares of common stock. Options granted pursuant to the Director's Plan are
immediately exercisable and expire on the earlier of the first anniversary of
the date on which a director ceases to be a director or ten years from the date
of grant. Each independent director was granted an option to purchase 1,000
Common shares at an exercise price of $17.71 per share on January 11, 1999, the
date stockholders approved the plan. On January 1, 2000 and 2001, each
independent director was granted an option to purchase 1,000 common shares at an
exercise price of $18.53 and $13.625 per common share, respectively. Each
independent director will be awarded an option to purchase an additional 1,000
shares on January 1 of each year. At December 31, 2001, 2,000 options were
exercisable at $17.71 per common share, 3,000 options were exercisable at $18.53
per share and 5,000 options were exercisable at $13.625 per share.

      In January 1998, stockholders approved the 1997 Stock Option Plan (the
"Option Plan") which provides for options to purchase up to 300,000 shares of
common stock. At December 31, 2001, there were 173,750 options outstanding under
the Option Plan. No options were granted under the Option Plan in 2001.


                                      193

                    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
                          OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT OF ARL

      The following table sets forth the ownership of ARL's common stock both
beneficially and of record, both individually and in the aggregate, for those
persons or entities known by ARL to be the owner of more than 5% of the shares
of ARL's common stock as of the close of business on July 16, 2002.



                                                                  Assuming Conversion of all Shares of Series G and Series H
                                                          Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, if any, Received in the Mergers
                                                        ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         Shares of                 Shares of                Shares of
                                                            ARL                       ARL                      ARL
                                                          Common                     Common                   Common
                                                           Stock                     Stock                    Stock
                                Amount and              Beneficially              Beneficially             Beneficially
                                Nature of    Percent    Owned After               Owned After              Owned After
     Name and Address of        Beneficial     of         the TCI     Percentage     the IOT    Percentage  the TCI and  Percentage
      Beneficial Owner          Ownership    Class(1)      Merger      of Class      Merger      of Class   IOT Merger    of Class
     -------------------        ----------   --------   ------------  ----------  ------------  ----------  ----------- ------------
                                                                                                
Basic Capital Management,
  Inc.(2) ..................... 6,629,744     58.3%      9,480,924      66.3%      6,870,049       59.1%     9,721,229     66.9%
One Realco Corporation(3) ..... 1,671,659     14.7%      1,671,659      11.7%      1,671,659       14.4%     1,671,659     11.5%
Transcontinental Realty
  Investors, Inc.(4) ..........   746,972      6.6%        746,972       5.2%        746,972        6.4%       746,972      5.1%
Ryan T. Phillips(2)(5) ........ 6,650,526     58.5%      9,485,491      66.5%      6,897,650       59.4%     9,753,398     67.1%


----------

(1)   Percentages are based upon 11,375,127 shares outstanding as of July 16,
      2002.

(2)   Includes 6,625,944 shares owned by BCM over which each of the directors of
      BCM, Ryan T. Phillips and Mickey Ned Phillips, may be deemed to be
      beneficial owners by virtue of their positions as directors of BCM. The
      directors of BCM disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares. Based upon
      1,140,472 shares of Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock and
      106,802 shares of Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock to be
      received in the mergers. The business address of BCM is 1800 Valley View
      Lane, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas 75234.

(3)   Includes 1,521,659 shares owned by One Realco and 150,000 shares owned by
      New Starr Corp., which is a company owned by One Realco. Each of the
      directors of One Realco, Ronald F. Akin and F. Terry Shumate, may be
      deemed to be the beneficial owners by virtue of their positions as
      directors of One Realco. Messrs. Akin and Shumate disclaim beneficial
      ownership of such shares. The business address of One Realco is 555
      Republic Drive, Suite 490, Plano, Texas 75074.

(4)   Each of the directors of TCI, Henry A. Butler, Earl D. Cecil, Ted P.
      Stokely and Martin L. White, may be deemed to be the beneficial owners by
      virtue of their positions as directors of TCI. The directors of TCI
      disclaim such beneficial ownership. The business address of TCI is 1800
      Valley View Lane, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas 75234.

(5)   Includes 27,602 shares owned by the Gene E. Phillips' Children's Trust.
      Ryan T. Phillips is a beneficiary of such trust. Based upon 1,827 shares
      of Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock to be received in the
      TCI merger.


                                      194


      SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT. The following table sets forth the
ownership of shares of ARL's common stock, both beneficially and of record, both
individually and in the aggregate, for the directors and executive officers of
ARL, as of the close of business on July 16, 2002.




                                                                   Assuming Conversion of all Shares of Series G and Series H
                                                           Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, if any, Received in the Mergers
                                                           ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Shares of               Shares of                Shares of
                                                               ARL                     ARL                      ARL
                                                             Common                   Common                  Common
                                        Amount                Stock                   Stock                    Stock
                                      and Nature           Beneficially            Beneficially            Beneficially
                                         of       Percent   Owned After            Owned After              Owned After
                                      Beneficial    of        the TCI   Percentage   the IOT    Percentage  the TCI and  Percentage
      Name of Beneficial Owner        Ownership   Class(1)    merger     of Class     merger     of Class    IOT merger   of Class
      ------------------------        ----------  -------- ------------ ---------- ------------ ---------- ------------  ----------
                                                                                                 
Mark W. Branigan(3)(4) .............  7,376,716    64.8%    10,294,083     72.0%    7,617,020      65.6%     10,534,387     72.5%
Earl D. Cecil(2) ...................      1,000       *          1,000        *         1,000         *           1,000        *
Louis J. Corna(3)(4) ...............  7,376,716    64.8%    10,294,083     72.0%    7,617,020      65.6%     10,534,387     72.5%
Collene C. Currie(2) ...............      3,000       *          3,000        *         3,000         *           3,000        *
Richard W. Humphrey(2) .............      1,200       *          1,200        *         1,200         *           1,200        *
Ronald E. Kimbrough(3)(4) ..........  7,376,716    64.8%    10,294,083     72.0%    7,617,020      65.6%     10,534,387     72.5%
Joseph Mizrachi(2) .................      2,000       *          2,000        *         2,000         *           2,000        *
David W. Starowicz(2)(3)(4)(5) .....  7,379,716    64.9%    10,297,083     72.0%    7,620,020      65.6%     10,537,387     72.5%
All Directors and Executive
 Officers as a group (8
 persons)(2)(3)(4)(5) ..............  7,386,916    64.9%    10,304,283     72.1%    7,623,421      65.7%     10,544,587     72.6%




----------

*less than one percent

(1)   Percentage is based upon 11,375,127 shares outstanding at July 16, 2002.

(2)   Each of Ms. Currie and Messrs. Cecil, Humphrey, Mizrachi and Starowicz
      have options to purchase shares of ARL common stock which are exercisable
      within 60 days of July 16, 2002.

(3)   Includes 746,972 shares owned by TCI of which the executive officers of
      ARL may be deemed to be the beneficial owners by virtue of their positions
      as executive officers of TCI. The executive officers of ARL disclaim
      beneficial ownership of such shares.

(4)   Includes 6,629,744 shares owned by BCM of which the executive officers of
      ARL may be deemed to beneficially own by virtue of their positions as
      executive officers of BCM. The executive officers of ARL disclaim
      beneficial ownership of such shares.

(5)   Mr. Starowicz has options to acquire 3,000 shares of ARL common stock
      pursuant to the 1997 Stock Option Plan which are exercisable within 60
      days of July 16, 2002.

                   RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED ARL SECURITIES

      Each issuance set forth below was made in reliance upon the exemptions
from registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
contained in Section 4(2) on the basis that such transactions did not involve a
public offering. When appropriate, ARL determined that the purchasers of
securities described below were sophisticated investors who had the financial
ability to assume the risk of their investment in ARL's securities and acquired
such securities for their own account and not with a view to any distribution
thereof to the public.

      In 2000, ARL issued 50,000 shares of Series E 6% cumulative preferred
stock to a private investor in exchange for a $500,000 note receivable.


                                      195


      Also in 2000, ARL issued 121,332 shares of ARL Series A cumulative
convertible preferred stock to unsecured creditors of EQK Realty Investors I.
These shares were issued in ARL's acquisition of a 100% interest in EQK Realty
Investors I for $1.1 million in cash and $1.21 million in Series A convertible
preferred stock. At the date of the acquisition, EQK's assets consisted of $2.0
million in cash.

      In 2001, ARL issued 3,968.75 shares of Series F redeemable preferred stock
in connection with the purchase of lease hold interests in 37 oil and gas
mineral development properties. The Series F shares paid $3,968,750 of the $4.7
million purchase price.

      In 2002, ARL issued 600,000 shares of Series A cumulative convertible
preferred stock to ART Hotel Equities, Inc., a subsidiary of ARL. The shares
were pledged as security for an ARL guarantee of a loan.


                                      196


                            PERFORMANCE GRAPH OF ARL

      The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on
ARL's shares (ART's shares prior to August 2000) of common stock with the Dow
Jones Equity Market Index ("DJ Equity Index") and the Dow Jones Real Estate
Investment Index ("DJ Real Estate Index"). The comparison assumes that $100 was
invested on December 31, 1996 in shares of common stock and in each of the
indices and further assumes the reinvestment of all dividends. Past performance
is not necessarily an indicator of future performance.








                               [PERFORMANCE GRAPH]










                                      12/31/1996   12/31/1997   12/31/1998   12/31/1999   12/31/2000   12/31/2001
                                      ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
                                                                                     
American Realty Investors, Inc.          100          223          259          270          213          157

Dow Jones US Realty Index                100          118           93           88          112          126

Dow Jones US Total Market Index          100          132          165          202          183          161


                     DESCRIPTION OF THE CAPITAL STOCK OF ARL

      The description of ARL's capital stock set forth below is only a summary
and is not intended to be complete. For a complete description of ARL's capital
stock, we urge you to read ARL's articles of incorporation and bylaws and as
appropriate the certificate of designation of the Series G or Series H
redeemable convertible preferred stock, which are filed as an exhibit to the
joint proxy statement and prospectus of which this document forms a part.

DESCRIPTION OF COMMON STOCK

      There are currently 100,000,000 shares of ARL common stock authorized and
11,375,127 shares outstanding. Assuming conversion of all of the shares of
Series G and Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock issuable in
connection with the business combination and none of the TCI and IOT
stockholders elect to receive Series G and Series H preferred stock in
connection with the mergers, there will be 14,529,679 shares of ARL common stock
outstanding.


                                      197


      VOTING RIGHTS. Holders of ARL common stock will be entitled to one vote
per share on all matters voted on by stockholders, including the election of
directors. The ARL charter does not provide for cumulative voting in the
election of directors of ARL.

      DIVIDENDS. After giving effect to any preferential rights of any series of
preferred stock outstanding, including the ARL preferred stock to be issued in
the TCI merger, the holders of ARL common stock are entitled to participate in
dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by the ARL board of
directors and, upon liquidation, are entitled to receive a pro-rata share of all
the assets of ARL that are available for distribution to these holders. All of
the ARL common stock will, when issued, be fully paid and nonassessable. Holders
of ARL common stock will have no preemptive rights with respect to future
issuances of ARL capital stock.

DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED STOCK

      The board of directors is authorized to issue up to 50,000,000 shares of
preferred stock from time to time, in one or more series, without stockholder
approval, and to fix the designation, preferences, conversion or other rights,
voting powers, restriction, limitations as to dividends, qualifications and
terms and conditions of redemption of any series that may be established by the
ARL board. As a result, without stockholder approval, the ARL board could
authorize the issuance of preferred stock with voting, conversion and other
rights that could dilute the voting power and other rights of the holders of ARL
common stock. In addition, shares issued after the business combination may have
the effect, under some circumstances, alone or in combination with other
provisions of the ARL charter of rendering more difficult or discouraging an
acquisition of ARL considered undesirable by the ARL board of directors.

      SERIES A PREFERRED STOCK. There are authorized a total of 15,000,000
shares of Series A cumulative convertible preferred stock with a par value of
$2.00 per share and an adjusted liquidation value of $10.00 per share plus
payment of accrued and unpaid dividends. The Series A cumulative convertible
preferred stock is non-voting except:

      (1)   as provided by law,

      (2)   with respect to an amendment to ARL's articles of incorporation or
            bylaws that would materially alter or change the existing terms of
            the Series A cumulative convertible preferred stock, and

      (3)   at any time or times for the election of two directors when all or
            any portion of the dividends on the Series A cumulative convertible
            preferred stock for any six quarterly dividends, whether or not
            consecutive, shall be in arrears and unpaid.

      In the latter event, the number of directors constituting the board of
directors of ARL shall be increased by two and the holders of Series A
cumulative convertible preferred stock, voting separately as a class, shall be
entitled to elect two directors to fill the newly created directorships with
each holder being entitled to one vote in the election for each share of Series
A cumulative convertible preferred stock held. ARL is not obligated to maintain
a sinking fund with respect to the Series A cumulative convertible preferred
stock.


                                      198


      The Series A cumulative convertible preferred stock is convertible, at the
option of the holder, into shares of ARL common stock at any time and from time
to time, in whole or in part, after the earliest to occur of

      (1)   August 15, 2003;

      (2)   the first business day, if any, occurring after a quarterly dividend
            payment date, on which an amount equal to or in excess of 5% of the
            $10.00 liquidation value (i.e., $.50 per share of Series A
            cumulative convertible preferred stock) is accrued and unpaid, or

      (3)   when ARL becomes obligated to mail a statement, signed by an officer
            of ARL, to the holders of record of each of the shares of Series A
            cumulative convertible preferred stock because of a proposal by ARL
            at any time before all of the shares of Series A cumulative
            convertible preferred stock have been redeemed by or converted into
            common stock, to merge or consolidate with or into any other
            corporation (unless ARL is the surviving entity and holders of
            common stock continue to hold the shares of common stock without
            modification and without receipt of any additional consideration),
            or to sell, lease, or convey all or substantially all its property
            or business, or to liquidate, dissolve or wind up.

      The Series A cumulative convertible preferred stock is convertible into
that number of shares of ARL common stock obtained by multiplying the number of
shares being converted by $10.00, then adding all accrued and unpaid dividends,
then dividing those sums by the conversion price, which is 90% of the simple
average of the trading price of the common stock for 20 business days ending on
the last calendar day of the week preceding the conversion date. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, ARL, at its option, may elect to redeem any shares of Series A
cumulative convertible preferred stock sought to be so converted by paying the
holder of the Series A cumulative convertible preferred stock cash in an amount
equal to the conversion price for each share of Series A cumulative convertible
preferred stock redeemed.

      The Series A cumulative convertible preferred stock bears a cumulative
compounded dividend per share equal to 10% per annum of the adjusted liquidation
value, payable on each quarterly dividend payment date. The dividend accrues
from the date of issuance to and including the date on which the redemption
price of the shares is paid, whether or not those dividends have been declared
and whether or not there are profits, surplus or other funds of ARL legally
available for the payment of those dividends. Dividends on the Series A
cumulative convertible preferred stock are in preference to and with priority
over dividends payable on the common stock. Except as provided in the following
sentence, the Series A cumulative convertible preferred stock ranks on a parity
as to dividends and upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up with all other
preferred stock issued by ARL. ARL will not issue any shares of preferred stock
of any series which are superior to the Series A cumulative convertible
preferred stock as to dividends or rights upon liquidation, dissolution or
winding up of ARL as long as any shares of Series A cumulative convertible
preferred stock are issued and outstanding, without the prior written consent of
the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the shares of the Series A cumulative
convertible preferred stock then outstanding voting separately as a class.


                                      199


      In addition to ARL's redemption rights described above upon a conversion
of Series A cumulative convertible preferred stock, ARL may redeem any or all of
the Series A cumulative convertible preferred stock at any time and from time to
time, at its option, for cash upon no less than 20 days nor more than 30 days
prior notice thereof The redemption price of the Series A cumulative convertible
preferred stock shall be an amount per share equal to 103% of the adjusted
liquidation value.

      There were 3,324,910 shares of Series A cumulative convertible preferred
stock outstanding at July 16, 2002. There are reserved 1,998,797 shares of
Series A cumulative convertible preferred stock for issuance as future
consideration in various business transactions of ARL.

      SERIES B REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK. There are designated
80,000 shares of Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock with a par
value of $2.00 per share and a preference on liquidation of $100 per share plus
payment of all accrued and unpaid dividends. The Series B redeemable convertible
preferred stock is non-voting except as required by law. ARL is not required to
maintain a sinking fund for the stock.

      Each share of Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock is
convertible into that number of shares of ARL common stock obtained by
multiplying the number of shares being converted by $100, then adding all
accrued and unpaid dividends on the shares, then dividing the sum by (in most
instances) 80% of the average trading price of the ARL common stock for the 20
business days ending on the last business day of the calendar week immediately
preceding the date of conversion.

      The Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock bears a cumulative
dividend per share equal to $11.00 per annum ($2.75 per quarter). Dividends on
the Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock are in preference to and
with priority over dividends upon the ARL common shares. The Series B redeemable
convertible preferred stock ranks on a parity as to dividends and upon
liquidation, dissolution or winding up with all other shares of preferred stock.

      ARL may redeem any or all of the shares of Series B redeemable convertible
preferred stock from time to time upon payment of $100.00 per share plus all
accrued and unpaid dividends. There is no restriction on the repurchase or
redemption of the Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock by ARL while
there is any arrearage in payment of dividends except that at the time of the
repurchase or redemption ARL must pay all accrued and unpaid dividends on the
shares being redeemed.

      There were no shares of Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock
outstanding at July 16, 2002.

      SERIES C REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK. There are designated
231,750 shares of Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock with a par
value of $2.00 per share and a preference on liquidation of $100.00 per share
plus all accrued and unpaid dividends. The Series C redeemable convertible
preferred stock is non-voting except as required by the law. ARL is not required
to maintain a sinking fund for the stock.


                                      200


      Each share of Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock is
convertible at the option of the holders thereof in the following amounts at any
time on or after the respective dates:

      (1)   25,000 shares on or after December 31, 2000;

      (2)   25,000 shares on or after September 30, 2002;

      (3)   25,000 shares on or after September 30, 2003;

      (4)   25,000 shares on or after December 31, 2005; and

      (5)   all remaining outstanding shares on or after December 31, 2006.

      These shares are convertible into that number of shares of ARL common
stock obtained by multiplying the number of shares of Series C redeemable
convertible preferred stock being converted by $100 and then dividing the sum by
(in most instances) 90% of the average of the daily closing price of the ARL
common shares for the 20 trading days ending on the last trading day of the
calendar week immediately preceding the conversion on the market where the ARL
common stock is then regularly traded. The right of conversion terminates upon
receipt of the notice of redemption from ARL and on the earlier of (1) the
commencement of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of ARL or (2) the
adoption of any resolution authorizing the commencement thereof. ARL may elect
to redeem the shares of Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock sought
to be converted instead of issuing shares of ARL common stock.

      The Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock bears a cumulative
quarterly dividend per share in an amount equal to:

      (1)   8% per annum during the period from July 1, 1999 to September 30,
            2000;

      (2)   9% per annum during the period from July 1, 2000 to September 30,
            2001; and

      (3)   10% per annum from July 1, 2001 and thereafter.

      In each case, the dividend per share is calculated on the basis of the
adjusted liquidation value of the Series C redeemable convertible preferred
stock, payable in arrears in cash on each quarterly dividend payment date. The
dividend accrues from the date of issuance to and including the date on which
the redemption price of the shares is paid. Dividends on the Series C redeemable
convertible preferred stock are in preference to and with priority over
dividends upon the ARL common shares. The Series C redeemable convertible
preferred stock ranks on a parity as to dividends and upon liquidation,
dissolution or winding up with all other shares of ARL preferred stock.

      ARL may redeem all or a portion of the shares of the Series C redeemable
convertible preferred stock issued and outstanding at any time and from time to
time, at its option, for cash upon no less than 20 days nor more than 30 days
prior notice thereof. The redemption price of the shares of the Series C
redeemable convertible preferred stock shall be an amount per share equal to the
sum of (1):


                                      201


            (1)   104% of liquidation value during the period from January 1,
                  2000 through December 31, 2000;

            (2)   103% of liquidation value during the period from January 1,
                  2001 through December 31, 2001;

            (3)   102% of liquidation value during the period from January 1,
                  2002 through December 31, 2002;

            (4)   101% of liquidation value during the period from January 1,
                  2003 through December 31, 2003; and

            (5)   100% of liquidation value from January 1, 2004 and thereafter,

and (2) all accrued and unpaid dividends on the shares through the redemption
date. The right of ARL to redeem shares of Series C redeemable convertible
preferred stock remains effective notwithstanding prior receipt by ARL of notice
by any holder of Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock of the holder's
intent to convert shares of Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock into
shares of ARL common stock. There were no shares of Series C redeemable
convertible preferred stock issued or outstanding at July 16, 2002.

      SERIES D PREFERRED STOCK. There are 91,000 shares of Series D 9.50%
cumulative preferred stock designated with a par value of $2.00 per share and a
preference on liquidation of $20.00 per share plus payment of accrued and unpaid
dividends. The Series D preferred stock is non-voting except as required by law
and is not convertible. ARL is not required to maintain a sinking fund for the
stock.

      Each share of Series D preferred stock has a cumulative dividend per share
of 9.50% per annum of the $20.00 liquidation preference, payable quarterly in
equal installments of $0.475. Dividends on the Series D preferred stock are in
preference to and with priority over dividends upon the shares of ARL common
stock. The Series D preferred stock ranks on a parity as to dividends and upon
liquidation, dissolution or winding up with all other shares of ARL preferred
stock.

      ARL may from time to time after June 1, 2001 redeem any or all of the
Series D preferred stock upon payment of the liquidation value of $20.00 per
share plus all accrued and unpaid dividends. There is no restriction on the
repurchase or redemption of the Series D preferred stock by ARL while there is
any arrearage in payment of dividends except that at the time of the repurchase
or redemption ARL must pay all accrued and unpaid dividends on the shares being
redeemed. As of July 16, 2002, there were no shares of Series D preferred stock
issued or outstanding.

      SERIES E PREFERRED STOCK. There are 500,000 shares of Series E cumulative
preferred stock designated with a par value of $2.00 per share and a preference
on liquidation of $10.00 per share plus payment of accrued and unpaid dividends.
The Series E preferred stock is non-voting except as required by law and is not
convertible. ARL is not required to maintain a sinking fund for the stock.

      Each share of Series E preferred stock has a cumulative dividend per share
of 6.0% per annum of the $10.00 liquidation preference, payable quarterly.
Dividends on the Series E preferred stock are in preference to and with priority
over dividends upon the ARL common


                                      202


stock. The Series E preferred stock ranks on a parity as to dividends and upon
liquidation, dissolution or winding up with all other shares of preferred stock.

      ARL may at any time and from time to time redeem any or all of the Series
E preferred stock upon payment of the liquidation value of $10.00 per share plus
all accrued and unpaid dividends. There is no restriction on the repurchase or
redemption of the Series E preferred stock by ARL while there is any arrearage
in payment of dividends except that at the time of the repurchase or redemption
ARL must pay all accrued and unpaid dividends on the shares being redeemed. As
of July 16, 2002, there were 50,000 shares of Series E preferred stock issued
and outstanding.

      SERIES F REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK. There are 4,961 shares of Series F
redeemable preferred stock designated with a par value of $2.00 per share and a
preference on liquidation of $1,000.00 per share. The Series F redeemable
preferred stock is non-voting except as required by law. ARL is not required to
maintain a sinking fund for the stock.

      The holders of Series F redeemable preferred stock are not entitled to
receive any dividends or distributions. The Series F redeemable preferred stock
ranks on a parity upon a liquidation, dissolution or winding up with all other
shares of preferred stock.

      ARL may redeem at anytime, any or all of the Series F redeemable preferred
stock upon payment of the liquidation value of $1,000.00 per share by giving the
holder thereof not less than 20 days nor more than 30 days notice thereof prior
to the date on which ARL desires such shares redeemed. There is no restriction
on the repurchase or redemption of the Series F redeemable preferred stock by
ARL while there is any arrearage in payment of dividends, if any.

      From and after January 1, 2002, within 10 calendar days of the filing of
ARL's report on Form 10-Q or Form 10-K, ARL shall call for redemption that
number of shares of the Series F redeemable preferred stock having an aggregate
liquidation value equal to 20% of the net cash flow generated by the assets
acquired from MJR Oil & Gas 2001, LLC during the preceding fiscal quarter after
the payment of any current payment due under the two promissory notes which ARL
issued to MJR Oil & Gas 2001, LLC in connection with the acquisition of such
assets. Such shares of Series F redeemable preferred stock shall be redeemed at
the liquidation value of $1,000.00 per share.

      In the event that ARL engages in a transfer of more than 10% the assets
acquired from MJR Oil & Gas 2001, LLC, whether by sale, merger, consolidation or
other similar transaction, ARL shall prior to such transaction call for
redemption each outstanding shares of Series F redeemable preferred stock at a
price per share equal to the liquidation price of $1,000.00.

      As of July 16, 2002 there were no shares of Series F redeemable preferred
stock issued and outstanding.

      10% SERIES G CUMULATIVE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK. There are 4,050,000
shares of the Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock designated with a
par value of $2.00 per share and a preference on liquidation of $20.00 per share
plus payment of accrued and unpaid dividends. There are currently no shares of
Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock outstanding. The Series G
redeemable convertible preferred stock is non-voting except:


                                      203


      (1)   as provided by law,

      (2)   with respect to an amendment to ARL's articles of incorporation or
            bylaws that would materially alter or change the existing terms of
            the Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock, and

      (3)   at any time or times for the election of two directors when all or
            any portion of the dividends on the Series G redeemable convertible
            preferred stock for any six quarterly dividends, whether or not
            consecutive, shall be in arrears and unpaid.

      In the latter event, the number of directors constituting the board of
directors of ARL shall be increased by two and the holders of Series G
redeemable convertible preferred stock, voting separately as a class, shall be
entitled to elect two directors to fill the newly created directorships with
each holder being entitled to one vote in the election for each share of Series
G redeemable convertible preferred stock held. ARL is not required to maintain a
sinking fund for the stock.

      Each share of Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock has a
cumulative dividend per share of 10.00% per annum of the $20.00 liquidation
preference, payable quarterly in equal installments of $0.5. Dividends on the
Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock are in preference to and with
priority over dividends upon the ARL common stock. The Series G redeemable
convertible preferred stock ranks on a parity as to dividends and upon
liquidation, dissolution or winding up with all other shares of preferred stock.

      During a 75 day period commencing on the 15th day after ARL publicly files
its first Form 10-Q with the SEC following the consummation of the TCI merger,
the Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock may be converted at the
option of the holder of Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock into 2.5
shares of ARL common stock for each share of Series G redeemable convertible
preferred stock.

      ARL may provide notice of its intention to redeem the Series G redeemable
convertible preferred stock no earlier than 45 days after ARL publicly files its
first Form 10-Q with the SEC following the consummation of the TCI merger. After
that time, ARL may redeem any or all of the Series G redeemable convertible
preferred stock upon payment of the liquidation value of $20.00 per share plus
all accrued and unpaid dividends by giving the holder thereof not less than 45
days nor more than 60 days notice thereof prior to the date on which ARL desires
such shares redeemed.

      ARL will make an application with the NYSE to list the Series G redeemable
convertible preferred stock provided that there are an adequate number of Series
G redeemable convertible preferred stock stockholders and shares of Series G
redeemable convertible preferred stock outstanding to list the Series G
redeemable convertible preferred stock on the NYSE.

      10% SERIES H REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK. There are 1,030,000
shares of the Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock designated with a
par value of $2.00 per share and a preference on liquidation of $21.50 per share
plus payment of accrued and unpaid dividends. There are currently no shares of
Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock outstanding. The Series H
redeemable convertible preferred stock is non-voting except:


                                      204


      (1)   as provided by law,

      (2)   with respect to an amendment to ARL's articles of incorporation or
            bylaws that would materially alter or change the existing terms of
            the Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock, and

      (3)   at any time or times for the election of two directors when all or
            any portion of the dividends on the Series H redeemable convertible
            preferred stock for any six quarterly dividends, whether or not
            consecutive, shall be in arrears and unpaid.

      In the latter event, the number of directors constituting the board of
directors of ARL shall be increased by two and the holders of Series H
redeemable convertible preferred stock, voting separately as a class, shall be
entitled to elect two directors to fill the newly created directorships with
each holder being entitled to one vote in the election for each share of Series
H redeemable convertible preferred stock held. ARL is not required to maintain a
sinking fund for the stock.

      Each share of Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock has a
cumulative dividend per share of 10.00% per annum of the $21.50 liquidation
preference, payable quarterly in equal installments of $0.5375. Dividends on the
Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock are in preference to and with
priority over dividends upon the ARL common stock. The Series H redeemable
convertible preferred stock ranks on a parity as to dividends and upon
liquidation, dissolution or winding up with all other shares of preferred stock.

      During a 75 day period commencing on the 15th day after ARL publicly files
its first Form 10-Q with the SEC following the consummation of the IOT merger,
the Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock may be converted at the
option of the holder of Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock into
2.25 shares of ARL common stock for each share of Series H redeemable
convertible preferred stock.

      ARL may provide notice of its intention to redeem the Series H redeemable
convertible preferred stock no earlier than 45 days after ARL publicly files its
first Form 10-Q with the SEC following the consummation of the IOT merger. After
that time, ARL may redeem any or all of the Series H redeemable convertible
preferred stock upon payment of the liquidation value of $21.50 per share plus
all accrued and unpaid dividends by giving the holder thereof not less than 45
days nor more than 60 days notice thereof prior to the date on which ARL desires
such shares redeemed.

      ARL will make an application with the NYSE to list the Series H redeemable
convertible preferred stock provided that there are an adequate number of Series
H redeemable convertible preferred stock stockholders and shares of Series H
redeemable convertible preferred stock outstanding to list the Series H
redeemable convertible preferred stock on the NYSE. ARL will also make an
application with the NYSE to list the shares of ARL common stock issuable upon
conversion of the Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock.

      The description of the foregoing provisions of each series of the
preferred stock does not purport to be complete and is subject to and qualified
in its entirety by reference to the provisions of ARL's articles of
incorporation relating to the series of preferred stock.


                                      205


                            CHARTER AND BYLAWS OF ARL

      The following is a summary of the terms of ARL's articles of incorporation
and bylaws. The summary contains all material terms, but does not set forth all
the provisions of the articles of incorporation or bylaws.

AUTHORIZED STOCK

      ARL's charter authorizes it to issue 150,000,000 shares of capital stock,
consisting of 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, and
50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $2.00 per share. Shares of
preferred stock may be issued from time to time, in one or more series, each
having specific voting powers, designations, preferences and restrictions as
approved by the ARL board.

DIRECTORS

      The bylaws provide that the number of directors serving on ARL's board
will be not less than three nor more than twelve. The exact number of directors
will be fixed by the board from time to time. The bylaws provide that, unless
otherwise provided by law or the charter, a quorum consists of a majority of the
entire board. The act of a majority of the directors present at any meeting at
which there is a quorum shall be the act of the board. Cumulative voting is not
authorized in the election of directors to the board. Vacancies and any
newly-created directorships resulting from an increase in the authorized number
of directors may be filled by a majority of the directors then in office, even
if less than a quorum.

STOCKHOLDER MEETINGS AND SPECIAL VOTING REQUIREMENTS

      The annual meetings of stockholders are held on a date established by the
board. Special meetings of stockholders may be called by the chairman of the
board, by the president, by a resolution adopted by a majority of the board of
directors or by the holders of 25% or more of the ARL common stock. In general,
the presence of a majority of stockholders in person or by proxy voting
constitutes a quorum at any stockholders' meeting. Amendments to the charter or
the bylaws must be approved by stockholders holding a majority of the shares
outstanding and entitled to be cast thereon.

      Directors may be removed with or without cause and by the affirmative vote
of the holders of not less than two-thirds of the outstanding stock of ARL
voting for the election of the director.

AMENDMENT OF THE CHARTER AND BYLAWS

      The charter provides that approval of 51% of the stockholders voting is
required to amend the articles. A bylaw may be amended or repealed, or a new
bylaw adopted, by the affirmative vote of 51% of the stock voting or by a
majority of the board.


                                      206


TRANSACTIONS WITH INTERESTED OFFICERS OR DIRECTORS

      The charter provides that ARL shall not, directly or indirectly, contract
or engage in any transaction with any advisor of ARL, any director, officer or
employee of ARL or any advisor or any affiliate or associate of any director,
officer or employee of ARL or any advisor, unless:

      -     the material facts as to the relationship or interest are disclosed
            or are known to the board and the board authorizes the contract or
            transaction in good faith; the contract or transaction is deemed
            fair by the board; and

      -     the board simultaneously authorizes or ratifies the transaction by
            the affirmative vote of a majority of independent directors voting
            on the matter.

ANTI-TAKEOVER EFFECT OF AUTHORIZED BUT UNDESIGNATED PREFERRED STOCK

      The board is authorized to provide for the issuance of shares of preferred
stock, in one or more series, and fix the terms and conditions of each series.
Management believes that the availability of preferred stock will provide ARL
with increased flexibility in structuring financings and acquisitions and in
meeting other corporate needs. Authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock
and common stock will be available for issuance without further action by
stockholders, unless required by applicable law or the rules of any stock
exchange or automated quotation system.

      Although the board has no present intention of doing so, it will be able
to issue a series of preferred stock that could either impede or facilitate the
completion of a merger, tender offer or other takeover attempt. For instance,
these new shares might impede a business combination by including class voting
rights which would enable the holder to block the transaction. The board will
make any determination to issue these shares based on its judgment as to the
best interests of ARL and its stockholders. The board will be able to issue
preferred stock having terms which would discourage an acquisition attempt or
other transaction that a majority of the stockholders might believe to be in
their best interests or in which stockholders might receive a premium for their
stock.

LIABILITY FOR MONETARY DAMAGES

      No director will be personally liable to ARL or its stockholders for
monetary damages arising out of a breach of fiduciary duty as a director. A
director's liability, however, is not limited (1) for acts or omissions which
involve intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of law, or (2) for
the payment of dividends in violation of Nevada law. If Nevada law is amended to
permit additional limitation or elimination of a director's personal liability,
the liability of a director will be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent
permitted by the amended Nevada law. Any repeal or modification of the existing
Nevada law provisions will not increase the personal liability of any director
for any act or occurrence taking place prior to the repeal or modification, or
otherwise adversely affect any right or protection of a director existing at the
time of the repeal or modification.


                                      207


INDEMNIFICATION AND ADVANCEMENT OF EXPENSES

      Present and former directors and officers of ARL and persons serving as
directors, officers, employees or agents of another corporation or entity at the
request of ARL are indemnified to the fullest extent permitted by Nevada law.
The ARL charter and the bylaws specifically indemnify these persons for
expenses, including attorneys' fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in
settlement actually and reasonably incurred by them (1) in connection with a
threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil,
criminal, administrative or investigative by reason of the fact that he is or
was a director or officer of ARL or is or was serving as a director, officer,
employee or agent of another corporation or entity at the request of ARL, or (2)
in connection with the defense or settlement of a threatened, pending or
completed action or suit by or in the right of ARL, provided that the party is
adjudged to be liable to ARL. To be indemnified a person must have acted in good
faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best
interests of ARL and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, must
have had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful.

      Indemnification is only available if the applicable standard of conduct
has been met by the indemnified party. Indemnification is mandatory where a
director or officer is successful in the defense of an action, suit or
proceeding or any claim or matter asserted against the person. A determination
of the availability of indemnification may be made by the majority vote of a
quorum of directors not a party to the suit, action or proceeding, by a written
opinion of independent legal counsel or by the stockholders.

      In the event that a determination is made that a director or officer is
not entitled to indemnification, the director or officer may seek a judicial
determination of his right to indemnification. If successful, a director or
officer is entitled to indemnification for all expenses, including attorney's
fees, incurred in any proceeding seeking to collect an indemnity claim under the
indemnification provisions. Other than proceedings to enforce rights to
indemnification, ARL is not obligated to indemnify any person in connection with
a proceeding initiated by that person.

      ARL will pay expenses incurred by a director or officer of ARL, or a
former director or officer, in advance of the final disposition of an action,
suit or proceeding, if he undertakes to repay amounts advanced in the event it
is ultimately determined that indemnification is not available.

      The indemnification provisions and provisions for advancing expenses in
the ARL charter and bylaws are not exclusive of any other similar rights
pursuant to any agreement, vote of the stockholders or disinterested directors
or pursuant to judicial direction.

      Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities
Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling the
registrants pursuant to the foregoing provisions, the registrant has been
informed that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in the Act and is therefore unenforceable.


                                      208


      Section 78.7502 of the Nevada Law permits a corporation to indemnify any
of its directors, officers, employees and agents against costs and expenses
arising from claims, suits and proceedings if such persons acted in good faith
and in a manner reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best
interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or
proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no indemnification may be made in respect of any
claim, issue or matter, as to which such person is adjudged to be liable to the
corporation unless and only to the extent that a court of competent jurisdiction
determines that in view of all the circumstances of the case, the person is
fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses as the court deems
proper.

                         ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS OF THE
                         ORGANIZATIONAL DOCUMENTS OF ARL

      The ARL articles of incorporation and bylaws contain a number of
provisions that may inhibit or impede the acquisition or attempted acquisition
of control of ARL by means of a tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise. These
provisions are expected to discourage coercive takeover practices and inadequate
takeover bids and to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of ARL to
negotiate first with the ARL board. These provisions may increase the likelihood
that proposals initially will be on more attractive terms than would be the case
in their absence and increase the likelihood of negotiations. This might
outweigh the potential disadvantages of discouraging these proposals because,
among other things, negotiation of the proposals might result in an improvement
of their terms. The discussion below highlights some of these anti-takeover
provisions in the ARL charter documents. Because it is a summary, it may not
contain all of the information that might be important to you. We urge you to
read the ARL articles of incorporation and bylaws, as well as the Nevada General
Corporation Law for a complete description of these anti-takeover provisions.

NUMBER OF DIRECTORS; REMOVAL; FILLING VACANCIES

      After giving preference to any rights of holders of preferred shares of
ARL to elect additional directors under specified circumstances, the ARL
articles of incorporation and bylaws provide that the number of directors must
not be less than three nor more than 12. In addition, the ARL bylaws provide
that, after giving preference to rights of holders of preferred stock, any
vacancies will be filled by majority of the remaining directors, even though
less than a quorum, or by a sole director, and any vacancies created by an
increase in the total number of directors may be filled only by the ARL board.
Accordingly, the ARL board could temporarily prevent any stockholder from
enlarging the ARL board and then filling the new positions with the
stockholder's own nominees.

      The ARL articles of incorporation and bylaws also provide that, after
giving preference to any rights of holders of preferred shares, directors may be
removed only for cause, and only upon the affirmative vote of holders of eighty
percent 80% of the then outstanding shares voting in the election of directors.


                                      209


ADVANCE NOTICE PROVISIONS FOR DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS AND STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

      The ARL bylaws provide for an advance notice procedure for stockholders to
make nominations of candidates for director or to bring other business before
the annual meeting of stockholders. According to this procedure (1) only persons
who are nominated by, or at the direction of, the ARL board, or by a stockholder
who has given timely written notice containing specified information to the
secretary of ARL prior to the meeting at which directors are to be elected, will
be eligible to nominate candidates for directors of ARL, and (2) at an annual
meeting, only that business may be conducted as has been brought before the
meeting by, or at the direction of, the ARL board or by a stockholder who has
given timely written notice to the secretary of ARL of his intention to bring
the business before the meeting. In general, for notice of stockholder
nominations or proposed business to be conducted at an annual meeting to be
timely, the notice must be received by ARL not less than 60 days nor more than
90 days prior to the scheduled date of the meeting.

      The purpose of requiring stockholders to give advance notice of
nominations and other business is to afford the ARL board a meaningful
opportunity to consider the qualifications of the proposed nominees or the
advisability of the other proposed business. To the extent necessary or
considered desirable by the ARL board, the advance notice provision will allow
the ARL board to inform stockholders and make recommendations about the nominees
or business, as well as to ensure an orderly procedure for conducting meetings
of stockholders. Although the ARL bylaws do not give the ARL board power to
block stockholder nominations for the election of directors or proposals for
action, the advance notice procedure may have the effect of discouraging a
stockholder from proposing nominees or business, precluding a contest for the
election of directors or the consideration of stockholder proposals if
procedural requirements are not met. This might also deter third parties from
soliciting proxies for a non-management proposal or slate of directors, without
regard to the merits of the proposal or slate.

      Any action required or permitted to be taken by the ARL stockholders must
be taken at a properly called annual or special meeting of the ARL stockholders
and may not be taken by written consent. Special meetings of the ARL
stockholders may be called at any time, but only by the chairman of the board,
the president, or by a majority of the directors then in office.

BUSINESS COMBINATIONS UNDER NEVADA LAW

      ARL's articles expressly elect not to be governed by the Nevada "Corporate
Combinations Law" contained in Sections 78.411 to 78.444, inclusive, of the NRS
and the Nevada "Control Shares Statute" contained in the NRS Sections 78.378 to
78.3792.

                 ARL POLICIES WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN ACTIVITIES

      The following is a discussion of the current policies of ARL with respect
to investments, financing, affiliate transactions and other activities. These
policies may be amended or waived from time to time at the discretion of the ARL
board without a vote of the ARL stockholders. No assurance can be given that
these investment objectives will be attained or that the value of ARL will not
decrease.


                                      210


      ARL intends to purchase or lease properties for long-term investment,
develop or redevelop its properties or sell these properties, in whole or in
part, when circumstances warrant. ARL may participate with other entities in
property ownership, through joint ventures or other types of co-ownership.
Equity investments may be subject to existing mortgage financing and other
indebtedness that have priority over ARL's equity interest.

      ARL may repurchase or otherwise reacquire shares of ARL common stock, or
other ARL securities and may also invest in securities of other entities
including those engaged in real estate. ARL may invest in the securities of
other issuers in connection with acquisitions of indirect interests in real
estate, consisting generally of general or limited partnership interests in
special purpose partnerships owning one or more properties. ARL may acquire all
or substantially all of the securities or assets of real estate investment
trusts, management companies or similar entities where these investments would
be consistent with its investment policies. ARL may also invest in securities of
other issuers from time to time for the purpose of exercising control. It is not
intended that ARL's investments in securities will require it to register as an
"investment company" under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and
it is intended that ARL would divest securities before any registration would be
required.

      The ARL board may devote available assets to particular investments or
types of investments, without restriction. ARL's investment objectives and
policies may be changed at any time by the ARL board without the approval of
ARL's stockholders.

      Additional capital may be raised through additional equity offerings, debt
financing or retention of cash flow, or a combination of these methods. If the
ARL board determines to raise additional equity capital, it may, without
stockholder approval, issue additional shares of common stock or preferred stock
up to the amount of its authorized capital in any mariner and on whatever terms
and for whatever consideration as it deems appropriate, including in exchange
for property. These securities may be senior to the outstanding ARL common stock
and may include additional series of preferred stock which may be convertible
into ARL common stock. Existing stockholders of ARL will have no preemptive
right to purchase ARL shares in any subsequent securities offering by ARL, and
any offering of this type could cause a dilution of a stockholder's investment
in ARL.

      To the extent that the ARL board determines to obtain additional debt
financing, ARL intends to do so generally by mortgaging its existing properties.
These mortgages may be recourse, non-recourse or cross-collateralized. Although
ARL does not have a policy limiting the number or amount of mortgages that may
be placed on any particular property, mortgage financing instruments typically
limit additional indebtedness on these properties. ARL may also borrow funds
through bank borrowings, publicly and privately placed debt instruments or
purchase money obligations, any of which indebtedness may be secured by ARL's
assets or the assets of any entity in which ARL holds an interest.


                                      211


      ARL may seek to obtain unsecured or secured lines of credit or may
determine to issue debt securities, which may be convertible into common stock
or preferred stock or be accompanied by warrants to purchase stock, or to sell
or securitize its receivables. The proceeds from any borrowings may be used for
the following purposes:

      -     to finance acquisitions

      -     to develop or redevelop properties

      -     to refinance existing indebtedness for working capital or capital
            improvements

      -     the payment of distributions

      -     to refinance existing indebtedness

      ARL may make loans to joint ventures or other entities in which it
participates. ARL does not intend to engage in (1) trading, underwriting or
agency distribution or sale of securities of other issuers or (2) the active
trade of loans and investments.

      The specific composition of ARL's real estate and mortgage notes
receivable portfolios following the merger will depend largely on the judgment
of ARL's management as to changing investment opportunities and the level of
risk associated with specific investments. ARL's management intends to maintain
real estate and mortgage notes receivable portfolios diversified by location and
type of property.


                                      212


                              INFORMATION ABOUT TCI

                                 BUSINESS OF TCI

      TCI, a Nevada corporation, is the successor by merger on March 24, 1992 of
a corporation by the same name, which was the successor to a California business
trust named Transcontinental Realty Investors Trust which was formerly named
Johnstown/Consolidated Realty Trust that was organized on September 6, 1983 and
commenced operations on January 31, 1984. On November 30, 1999, TCI acquired all
of the outstanding shares of beneficial interest of Continental Mortgage and
Equity Trust ("CMET"), a real estate company, in a tax-free exchange of shares,
issuing 1.181 shares of its common stock for each outstanding CMET share.

      TCI files annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and
other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any document filed by TCI
at the SEC's public reference room in Washington, D.C. The public reference room
at the SEC's office in Washington, D.C. is located at 450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public
reference rooms. The company's SEC filings are also available to the public from
commercial document retrieval services and at the web site maintained by the SEC
at "http:\\www.sec.gov." In addition, because the common stock of TCI is listed
on the NYSE, reports and other information concerning TCI (symbol: "TCI") can
also be inspected at the office of the NYSE, Inc., 20 Broad Street, New York,
New York 10005.

      Prior to January 1, 2000, TCI elected to be treated as a Real Estate
Investment Trust ("REIT") under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). Section 856(a)(6) of the Code provides
that a corporation or other entity wishing to qualify for treatment as a REIT
must not be "closely held," as that term is defined in the REIT provisions. A
corporation or other entity will be considered closely held for this purpose if
it meets the stock ownership test for a personal holding company under Section
542(a)(2) of the Code. This test is met if more than 50% in value of the
outstanding shares or certificates of beneficial interest is held directly or
indirectly by or for five or fewer individuals at any time during the last half
of the tax year. For purposes of determining whether or not a REIT is closely
held, an individual also will be attributed ownership of stock that is owned by
a family member pursuant to Section 544(a)(2) of the Code. In addition, an
individual is deemed to own the proportionate share of the equity interests
owned by a corporation, partnership, estate, or trust in which the individual
has an interest pursuant to Section 544(a)(1) of the Code. During the third
quarter of 2000, it was determined that the top five individual holders, for
purposes of the 50% test, held an aggregate ownership interest of 51.5232%.
Accordingly, TCI deviated from the REIT requirement by 1.5232% the equivalent of
131,457 shares. Under the Code, TCI cannot re-qualify for REIT tax status for at
least five years.

      TCI's real estate at December 31, 2001, consisted of 136 properties held
for investment, three partnership properties and three properties held for sale
that were primarily obtained through foreclosure. In 2001, TCI purchased 17
properties held for investment. TCI's mortgage notes receivable portfolio at
December 31, 2001, consisted of ten mortgage loans. In addition, TCI has an
interest in a partnership that holds a wraparound mortgage note receivable.
TCI's real estate and mortgage notes receivable portfolios are more fully
discussed in "Properties of TCI."


                                      213


      On October 23, 2001, TCI, IOT and ARL jointly announced a preliminary
agreement with the plaintiff's legal counsel of the derivative action entitled
Olive et al. V. National Income Realty Trust, et al. for complete settlement of
all disputes in the lawsuit. In February 2002, the court granted final approval
of the proposed settlement. Under the proposal, ARL would acquire all of the
outstanding shares of IOT and TCI not currently owned by ARL for a cash payment
or shares of ARL Preferred Stock. ARL will pay $17.50 cash per TCI share and
$19.00 cash per IOT share for the stock held by nonaffiliated stockholders. ARL
would issue one share of Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock with a
liquidation value of $20.00 per share for each share of TCI common stock for
stockholders who elect to receive ARL preferred stock in lieu of cash. ARL would
issue one share of Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock with a
liquidation value of $21.50 per share for each share of IOT common stock for
stockholders who elect to receive ARL preferred stock in lieu of cash. Each
share of Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock will be convertible
into 2.5 shares of ARL common stock during a 75-day period that commences
fifteen days after the date of the first ARL Form 10-Q filing that occurs after
the closing of the merger transaction. Upon the acquisition of IOT and TCI
shares, TCI and IOT would become wholly-owned subsidiaries of ARL. The
transaction is subject to the negotiation of a definitive merger agreement and a
vote of the stockholders of all three entities. TCI has the same board as IOT
and the same advisor as IOT and ARL.

BUSINESS PLAN AND INVESTMENT POLICY

      TCI's business is investing in real estate through direct equity ownership
and partnerships and financing real estate and real estate related activities
through investments in mortgage loans, including first, wraparound and junior
mortgage loans. TCI's real estate is located throughout the continental United
States and one property is located in Poland. Information regarding TCI's real
estate and mortgage notes receivable portfolios is set forth in "-- Properties
of TCI", and in Schedules III and IV to the TCI consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement and prospectus.

      TCI's business is not seasonal. Management has determined to continue to
pursue a balanced investment policy, seeking both current income and capital
appreciation. With respect to new real estate investments, management's plan of
operation is to consider all types of real estate with an emphasis on properties
generating current cash flow. Management expects to invest in and improve these
properties to maximize both their immediate and long-term value. Management will
also consider the development of apartment properties in selected markets
primarily in Texas.

      Management also expects to consider property sales opportunities for
properties in stabilized real estate markets where TCI's properties have reached
their potential. Management also expects to be an opportunistic seller of
properties in markets that have become overheated, i.e. an abundance of buyers.

      Management's operating strategy with regard to TCI's properties is to
maximize each property's operating income by aggressive property management
through closely monitoring expenses while at the same time making property
renovations and/or improvements where appropriate. While such expenditures
increase the amount of revenue required to cover operating


                                      214


expenses, management believes that such expenditures are necessary to maintain
or enhance the value of the properties.

      Management does not expect that TCI will seek to fund or acquire new
mortgage loans in 2002. However, TCI may originate mortgage loans in conjunction
with providing purchase money financing of a property sale. Management intends
to service and hold for investment the mortgage notes in TCI's portfolio.
However, TCI may borrow against its mortgage notes, using the proceeds from such
borrowings for property acquisitions or for general working capital needs.
Management also intends to pursue TCI's rights vigorously with respect to
mortgage notes that are in default. TCI's Articles of Incorporation impose no
limitations on its investment policy with respect to mortgage loans and does not
prohibit it from investing more than a specified percentage of its assets in any
one mortgage loan.

MANAGEMENT OF THE COMPANY

      Although the board of directors is directly responsible for managing the
affairs of TCI and for setting the policies which guide it, its day-to-day
operations are performed by BCM, a contractual advisor under the supervision of
the Board. The duties of BCM include, among other things, locating,
investigating, evaluating and recommending real estate and mortgage note
investment and sales opportunities, as well as financing and refinancing
sources. BCM also serves as a consultant in connection with TCI's business plan
and investment decisions made by the Board.


      BCM is indirectly owned by a trust for the children of Gene E. Phillips.
Mr. Phillips is not an officer or director of BCM, but serves as a
representative of the trust, is involved in daily consultation with the officers
of BCM and has significant influence over the conduct of BCM's business,
including the rendering of its advisory services and the making of investment
decisions for itself and for TCI.


      BCM has been providing advisory services to TCI since March 28, 1989. BCM
also serves as advisor to IOT and ARL. The directors of TCI are also directors
of IOT. The officers of TCI also serve as officers of ARL, IOT, and BCM. As of
July 16, 2002, TCI owned approximately 24.0% of IOT's outstanding shares of
common stock and ARL indirectly owned approximately 28.5% and BCM owned
approximately 14.5% of the outstanding shares of TCI's common stock.

      Since February 1, 1990, affiliates of BCM have provided property
management services to TCI. Currently, Triad Realty Services, Ltd. ("Triad")
provides such property management services. Triad subcontracts with other
entities for the provision of property-level management services to TCI. The
general partner of Triad is BCM. The limited partner of Triad is GS Realty
Services, Inc. ("GS Realty"), a related party. Triad subcontracts the
property-level management and leasing of 51 of TCI's commercial properties and
the two commercial properties owned by real estate partnerships in which TCI and
IOT are partners to Regis Realty, Inc. ("Regis"), a related party, which is a
company owned by GS Realty. Regis is entitled to receive property and
construction management fees and leasing commissions in accordance with the
terms of its property-level management agreement with Triad. Regis also is
entitled to receive real estate


                                      215


brokerage commissions in accordance with the terms of a non-exclusive brokerage
agreement. Regis Hotel Corporation, a related party, manages TCI's five hotels.
See "The Advisor."

      TCI has no employees. Employees of BCM render services to TCI.

COMPETITION

      The real estate business is highly competitive and TCI competes with
numerous entities engaged in real estate activities (including certain entities
described in "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions of ARL, TCI and
IOT--Related Party Transactions"), some of which have greater financial
resources than those of TCI. Management believes that success against such
competition is dependent upon the geographic location of the property, the
performance of property-level managers in areas such as marketing, collections
and control of operating expenses, the amount of new construction in the area
and the maintenance and appearance of the property. Additional competitive
factors with respect to commercial properties are the ease of access to the
property, the adequacy of related facilities, such as parking, and sensitivity
to market conditions in setting rent levels. With respect to apartments,
competition is also based upon the design and mix of units and the ability to
provide a community atmosphere for the tenants. Management believes that beyond
general economic circumstances and trends, the rate at which properties are
renovated or the rate new properties are developed in the vicinity of each of
TCI's properties also are competitive factors.

      To the extent that TCI seeks to sell any of its properties, the sales
prices for such properties may be affected by competition from other real estate
entities and financial institutions also attempting to sell their properties
located in areas in which TCI's properties are located, as well as by aggressive
buyers attempting to penetrate or dominate a particular market.

      As described above and in "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
of ARL, TCI and IOT -- Related Party Transactions," the officers and directors
of TCI also serve as officers or directors of certain other entities, also
advised by BCM, and which have business objectives similar to those of TCI.
TCI's directors, officers and advisor owe fiduciary duties to such other
entities as well as to TCI under applicable law. In determining to which entity
a particular investment opportunity will be allocated, the officers, directors
and advisor consider the respective investment objectives of each such entity
and the appropriateness of a particular investment in light of each such
entity's existing real estate portfolio. To the extent that any particular
investment opportunity is appropriate to more than one of the entities, the
investment opportunity will be allocated to the entity which has had funds
available for investment for the longest period of time or, if appropriate, the
investment may be shared among all or some of the entities.

      In addition, as also described in "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions of ARL, TCI and IOT -- Certain Business Relationships," TCI also
competes with other entities which are affiliates of BCM and which have
investment objectives similar to TCI's and that may compete with it in
purchasing, selling, leasing and financing of real estate and real estate
related investments. In resolving any potential conflicts of interest which may
arise, BCM has informed management that it intends to continue to exercise its
best judgment as to what is fair and reasonable under the circumstances in
accordance with applicable law.


                                      216


CERTAIN FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH REAL ESTATE AND RELATED INVESTMENTS

      TCI is subject to all the risks incident to ownership and financing of
real estate and interests therein, many of which relate to the general
illiquidity of real estate investments. These risks include, but are not limited
to, changes in general or local economic conditions, changes in interest rates
and the availability of permanent mortgage financing which may render the
purchase, sale or refinancing of a property difficult or unattractive and which
may make debt service burdensome, changes in real estate and zoning laws,
increases in real estate taxes, federal or local economic or rent controls,
floods, earthquakes, hurricanes and other acts of God and other factors beyond
the control of management or BCM. The illiquidity of real estate investments may
also impair the ability of management to respond promptly to changing
circumstances. Management believes that such risks are partially mitigated by
the diversification by geographic region and property type of TCI's real estate
and mortgage notes receivable portfolios. However, to the extent new property
investments or mortgage lending is concentrated in any particular region or
property type, the advantages of diversification may be mitigated.

                                PROPERTIES OF TCI

      TCI's principal offices are located at 1800 Valley View Lane, Suite 300,
Dallas, Texas 75234 and are, in the opinion of management, suitable and adequate
for TCI's present operations.

      Details of TCI's real estate and mortgage notes receivable portfolios at
December 31, 2001, are set forth in Schedules III and IV to the TCI consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement and
prospectus. The discussions set forth below under the headings "Real Estate" and
"Mortgage Loans" provide certain summary information concerning TCI's real
estate and mortgage notes receivable portfolios.

      TCI's real estate portfolio consists of properties held for investment,
properties held for sale, which were primarily obtained through foreclosure of
the collateral securing mortgage notes receivable, and investments in
partnerships. The discussion set forth below under the heading "Real Estate"
provides certain summary information concerning TCI's real estate and further
summary information with respect to its properties held for investment,
properties held for sale and its investment in partnerships.

      At December 31, 2001, none of TCI's properties, mortgage notes receivable
or investment in partnerships exceeded 10% of total assets. At December 31,
2001, 88% of TCI's assets consisted of properties held for investment, less than
1% consisted of properties held for sale, 3% consisted of mortgage notes and
interest receivable and 2% consisted of investments in partnerships. The
remaining 7% of TCI's assets were invested in cash, cash equivalents and other
assets. The percentage of TCI's assets invested in any one category is subject
to change and no assurance can be given that the composition of TCI's assets in
the future will approximate the percentages listed above.

      TCI's real estate is geographically diverse. At December 31, 2001, TCI
held investments in apartments and commercial properties in each of the
geographic regions of the continental United States, although its apartments and
commercial properties were concentrated in the


                                      217


Southeast and Southwest regions, as shown more specifically in the table under
"Real Estate" below. At December 31, 2001, TCI held mortgage notes receivable
secured by apartments and commercial properties in the Southwest and Midwest
regions of the continental United States, as shown more specifically in the
table under "Mortgage Loans" below.

GEOGRAPHIC REGIONS

      TCI has divided the continental United States into the following
geographic regions.

      Northeast region comprised of the states of Connecticut, Delaware,
Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania,
Rhode Island and Vermont, and the District of Columbia. TCI owns a commercial
property in this region.

      Southeast region comprised of the states of Alabama, Florida, Georgia,
Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia. TCI owns 8
apartments and 19 commercial properties in this region.

      Southwest region comprised of the states of Arizona, Arkansas, Louisiana,
New Mexico, Oklahoma and Texas. TCI owns 45 apartments and 22 commercial
properties in this region.

      Midwest region comprised of the states of Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas,
Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South
Dakota, West Virginia and Wisconsin. TCI owns 2 apartments, 4 commercial
properties and 3 hotels in this region.

      Mountain region comprised of the states of Colorado, Idaho, Montana,
Nevada, Utah and Wyoming. TCI owns 3 commercial properties in this region.

      Pacific region comprised of the states of California, Oregon and
Washington. TCI owns 2 apartments, a hotel and 2 commercial properties in this
region.

      Excluded from the above are 26 parcels of unimproved land and one hotel in
Wroclaw, Poland, as described below.

REAL ESTATE

      At December 31, 2001, approximately 93% of TCI's assets were invested in
real estate. TCI invests primarily in real estate located throughout the
continental United States, either on a leveraged or nonleveraged basis. TCI's
real estate portfolio consists of properties held for investment, investments in
partnerships and properties held for sale (which were primarily obtained through
foreclosure of the collateral securing mortgage notes receivable).

      Excluded from the above are 26 parcels of unimproved land and one hotel in
Wroclaw, Poland, as described below.

      TYPES OF REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS. TCI's real estate consists of commercial
properties (office buildings, industrial warehouses and shopping centers),
hotels and apartments having established income-producing capabilities. In
selecting real estate for investment, the location, age and type of property,
gross rents, lease terms, financial and business standing of tenants,


                                      218


operating expenses, fixed charges, land values and physical condition are among
the factors considered. TCI may acquire properties subject to or assume existing
debt and may mortgage, pledge or otherwise obtain financing for its properties.
The board of directors may alter the types of and criteria for selecting new
real estate investments and for obtaining financing without a vote of
stockholders.

      TCI typically invests in developed real estate. However, TCI has recently
invested in apartment development and construction. To the extent that TCI
continues to invest in development and construction projects, it will be subject
to business risks, such as cost overruns and construction delays, associated
with such higher risk projects.

      At December 31, 2001, TCI had the following properties under construction:



                                                                                           ADDITIONAL
                                                                            AMOUNT           AMOUNT              CONSTRUCTION
PROPERTY                       LOCATION            UNITS/ROOMS             EXPENDED         TO EXPEND            LOAN FUNDING
--------                       --------            -----------             --------        ----------            ------------
                                                                                                  
APARTMENTS
Falcon Lakes                Arlington, TX           284 Units              $  1,688         $  14,057             $  13,469
Limestone Ranch             Lewisville, TX          252 Units                 8,225             6,396                13,000
River Oaks                  Wiley, TX               180 Units                 2,228             9,763                10,023
Sendero Ridge               San Antonio, TX         384 Units                 6,561            22,100                24,420
Tivoli                      Dallas, TX              190 Units                 4,299             9,135                11,000
Verandas at City View       Fort Worth, TX          314 Units                 2,570            20,380                19,000
Waters Edge IV              Gulfport, MS            80 Units                  1,979             2,104                    --

HOTEL
Akademia                    Wroclaw, Poland         165 Rooms                11,761             6,974                14,240


      In the opinion of management, the properties owned by TCI are adequately
covered by insurance.

      The following table sets forth the percentages, by property type and
geographic region, of TCI's real estate (other than four hotels in the Pacific
and Midwest regions, one hotel in Poland and 26 parcels of unimproved land, as
described below) at December 31, 2001.



REGION                APARTMENTS             COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES
------                ----------             ---------------------
                                       
Pacific                    2%                          1%
Midwest                    2                          11
Northeast                 --                           1
Southwest                 83                          51
Southeast                 13                          31
Mountain                  --                           5
                        ----                        ----
                         100%                        100%
                        ====                        ====


      The foregoing table is based solely on the number of apartment units and
amount of commercial square footage and does not reflect the value of TCI's
investment in each region. TCI owns 26 parcels of unimproved land, 1 parcel of
4.66 acres in the Southeast region and 25 parcels of .67 acres, .68 acres, 14.39
acres, 2.89 acres, 2.14 acres, 4.7 acres, 6.8 acres, 18.99 acres, 34.58 acres,
36.38 acres, 97.97 acres, 55.8 acres, 160.38 acres, 97.0 acres, 101.94 acres,
16.16 acres, 18 acres, 17.07 acres, 9.96 acres, 108.9 acres, 6.07 acres, 10.5
acres, 5.36 acres, 7.11


                                      219


acres, and 18,000 sq. ft. in the Southwest region. See Schedule III to the TCI
consolidated financial statements to the ARL consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement and prospectus for a detailed
description of TCI's real estate portfolio.

      A summary of activity in TCI's owned real estate portfolio during 2001 is
as follows:



                                                       
          Owned properties at January 1, 2001             144
          Properties purchased                             17
          Properties sold                                 (22)
                                                          ---
          Owned properties at December 31, 2001           139
                                                          ===




                                      220


      PROPERTIES HELD FOR INVESTMENT. Set forth below are TCI's properties held
for investment and the monthly rental rate for apartments, the average annual
rental rate for commercial properties and the average daily room rate and room
revenue divided by total available rooms for hotels and occupancy at December
31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, for apartments and commercial properties and average
occupancy during 2001, 2000 and 1999 for hotels:



                                                                                RENT PER SQUARE FOOT             OCCUPANCY %
                                                 UNITS/                     ---------------------------      -------------------
PROPERTY                    LOCATION             SQUARE FOOTAGE              2001       2000      1999       2001    2000   1999
--------                    --------             --------------             ------     ------    ------      ----    ----   ----
                                                                                                    
APARTMENTS
4242 Cedar Springs          Dallas, TX           76 Units/60,600 Sq. Ft.      $.89     $  .87    $  .84       90      92     99
4400                        Midland, TX          92 Units/94,472 Sq. Ft.       .49        .49       .49       95      91     85
Apple Lane                  Lawrence, KS         75 Units/30,000 Sq. Ft.      1.04       1.00         *       99      97      *
Arbor Point                 Odessa, TX           195 Units/178,920 Sq. Ft.     .41        .39       .37       91      95     95
Ashton Way                  Midland, TX          178 Units/138,964 Sq. Ft.     .43        .41       .41       89      95     78
Autumn Chase                Midland, TX          64 Units/58,652 Sq. Ft.       .53        .52         *       94      97      *
Bay Walk                    Galveston, TX        192 Units/153,120 Sq. Ft.     .74          *         *       92       *      *
By the Sea                  Corpus Christi, TX   153 Units/123,945 Sq. Ft.     .83          *         *       93       *      *
Camelot                     Largo, FL            120 Units/141,024 Sq. Ft.     .56        .54       .53       92      99     92
Cliffs of Eldorado          McKinney, TX         208 Units/182,288 Sq. Ft.     .84        .84       .84       94      95     91
Country Crossing            Tampa, FL            227 Units/199,952 Sq. Ft.     .61        .58       .56       93      94     95
Courtyard                   Midland, TX          133 Units/111,576 Sq. Ft.     .43          *         *       89       *      *
Coventry                    Midland, TX          120 Units/105,608 Sq. Ft.     .43        .42       .42       77      98     78
El Chapparal                San Antonio, TX      190 Units/174,220 Sq. Ft.     .72        .69       .67       92      93     99
Fairway View Estates        El Paso, TX          264 Units/204,000 Sq. Ft.     .62        .61       .57       86      83     76
Fairways                    Longview, TX         152 Units/134,176 Sq. Ft.     .54        .53       .53       93      95     78
Falcon Lakes                Arlington, TX        284 Units/207,960 Sq. Ft.      **          *         *       **       *      *
Fountain Lake               Texas City, TX       166 Units/161,220 Sq. Ft.     .59        .56       .55       96      86     85
Fountains of Waterford      Midland, TX          172 Units/129,200 Sq. Ft.     .53        .53       .53       94      88     52
Gladstell Forest            Conroe, TX           168 Units/121,536 Sq. Ft.     .72        .72       .72       95      90     90
Grove Park                  Plano, TX            188 Units/143,556 Sq. Ft.     .86        .81       .77       94      95     95
Harper's Ferry              Lafayette, LA        122 Units/112,500 Sq. Ft.     .58        .58       .57       91      94     75
Heritage on the River       Jacksonville, FL     301 Units/289,490 Sq. Ft.     .65        .63       .63       97      98     92
Hunters Glen                Midland, TX          212 Units/174,180 Sq. Ft.     .38        .37       .37       91      91     86
In the Pines                Gainesville, FL      242 Units/294,860 Sq. Ft.     .54        .54       .52       96      97     98
Island Bay                  Galveston, TX        458 Units/374,784 Sq. Ft.     .81          *         *       87       *      *
Limestone Canyon            Austin, TX           260 Units/216,000 Sq. Ft.    1.06       1.00       .97       91      96     83
Limestone Ranch             Lewisville, TX       252 Units/219,600 Sq. Ft.      **          *         *       **       *      *
Marina Landing              Galveston, TX        256 Units/205,504 Sq. Ft.     .87          *         *       90       *      *
Mountain Plaza              El Paso, TX          188 Units/220,710 Sq. Ft.     .49        .49       .48       95      94     94
Oak Park IV                 Clute, TX            108 Units/78,708 Sq. Ft.      .54        .52       .51       94      88     84
Paramount Terrace           Amarillo, TX         181 Units/123,840 Sq. Ft.     .57        .55         *       94      94      *
Plantation                  Tulsa, OK            138 Units/103,500 Sq. Ft.     .59        .56       .54       93      95     91
Primrose                    Bakersfield, CA      162 Units/144,836 Sq. Ft.     .59        .56         *       97      93      *
Quail Creek                 Lawrence, KS         95 Units/113,416 Sq. Ft.      .57        .55         *       98      97      *
Quail Oaks                  Balch Springs, TX    131 Units/72,848 Sq. Ft.      .81        .77       .73       93      97     96
River Oaks                  Wiley, TX            180 Units/164,604 Sq. Ft.      **          *         *       **       *      *
Sandstone                   Mesa, AZ             238 Units/146,320 Sq. Ft.     .90        .90       .88       88      91     93
Sendero Ridge               San Antonio, TX      384 Units/340,880 Sq. Ft.      **          *         *       **       *      *
Somerset                    Texas City, TX       200 Units/163,368 Sq. Ft.     .66        .64       .63       91      91     85
Southgate                   Odessa, TX           180 Units/151,656 Sq. Ft.     .42        .41       .41       95      96     86
Southgreen                  Bakersfield, CA      80 Units/66,000 Sq. Ft.       .80        .77       .70       96      95     92
Stone Oak                   San Antonio, TX      252 Units/187,686 Sq. Ft.     .68        .65       .63       91      94     85
Summerfield                 Orlando, FL          224 Units/204,116 Sq. Ft.     .75        .70       .67       93      95     86
Sunchase                    Odessa, TX           300 Units/223,048 Sq. Ft.     .44        .43       .43       96      95     87



                                      221




                                                                                RENT PER SQUARE FOOT             OCCUPANCY %
                                                 UNITS/                     ---------------------------      -------------------
PROPERTY                    LOCATION             SQUARE FOOTAGE              2001       2000      1999       2001    2000   1999
--------                    --------             --------------             ------     ------    ------      ----    ----   ----
                                                                                                    
Terrace Hills               El Paso, TX          310 Units/233,192 Sq. Ft.    $.67       $.66      $.63       91      93     94
Tivoli                      Dallas, TX           190 Units/168,862 Sq. Ft.      **          *         *       **       *      *
Timbers                     Tyler, TX            180 Units/101,666 Sq. Ft.     .57        .55       .54       92      98     93
Trails at Windfern          Houston, TX          240 Units/173,376 Sq. Ft.     .73        .71       .68       96      97     96
Treehouse                   Irving, TX           160 Units/153,072 Sq. Ft.     .78        .75       .71       94      94     93
Verandas at City View       Fort Worth, TX       314 Units/295,170 Sq. Ft.      **          *         *       **       *      *
Waters Edge IV              Gulfport, MS         80 Units/76,400 Sq. Ft.        **          *         *       **       *      *
Westwood                    Odessa, TX           79 Units/49,001 Sq. Ft.       .48        .43       .41       92     100     91
Willow Creek                El Paso, TX          112 Units/103,140 Sq. Ft.     .54        .50       .49       94      97     77
Willo-Wick Gardens          Pensacola, FL        152 Units/153,360 Sq. Ft.     .54        .56       .53       91      89     80
Willow Wick                 North Augusta, SC    104 Units/94,128 Sq. Ft.      .56        .56       .55       97      91     96
Woodview                    Odessa, TX           232 Units/165,840 Sq. Ft.     .48        .46       .45       95      96     91
                                                                                                              **
OFFICE BUILDINGS
1010 Common                 New Orleans, LA      494,579 Sq. Ft.             11.28      10.83     10.45       36      32     21
225 Baronne                 New Orleans, LA      416,834 Sq. Ft.              9.77       9.61      9.32       75      76     77
4135 Beltline Road          Addison, TX          90,000 Sq. Ft.              10.33      10.17     10.00       --      33      *
9033 Wilshire               Los Angeles, CA      44,253 Sq. Ft.              27.67      26.08         *       88      90      *
Ambulatory Surgery Center   Sterling, VA         33,832 Sq. Ft.              20.37      34.26         *      100     100      *
Amoco                       New Orleans, LA      378,244 Sq. Ft.             12.07      11.54     11.23       79      80     78
Atrium                      Palm Beach, FL       74,603 Sq. Ft.              12.69      11.55     11.31       82      84     96
Bay Plaza                   Tampa, FL            75,780 Sq. Ft.              15.96      15.60     15.14       99      95     85
Bay Plaza II                Tampa, FL            78,882 Sq. Ft.              13.03      12.80         *       91      93      *
Bonita Plaza                Bonita, CA           47,777 Sq. Ft.              19.50      18.66     18.78       93      92     88
Brandeis                    Omaha, NE            319,234 Sq. Ft.             10.88      15.87         *       89     100      *
Corporate Pointe            Chantilly, VA        65,918 Sq. Ft.              19.72      18.31     16.85      100     100    100
Countryside Retail Center   Sterling, VA         133,422 Sq. Ft.             16.02      18.02         *       89      89      0
Durham Center               Durham, NC           207,171 Sq. Ft.             17.65      17.79     17.93       94      95     78
Eton Square                 Tulsa, OK            222,654 Sq. Ft.             11.27      10.52      9.78       63      60     86
Forum                       Richmond, VA         79,791 Sq. Ft.              15.99      15.65     15.34       70      84     88
Harmon                      Sterling, VA         72,062 Sq. Ft.              19.72      19.50         *       70      85      *
Hartford*                   Dallas, TX           174,513 Sq. Ft.             11.08      10.78     10.68       47      50     57
Institute Place             Chicago, IL          144,915 Sq. Ft.             16.23      14.99     14.47       95     100     95
Jefferson                   Washington, DC       71,877 Sq. Ft.              31.65      31.94     30.94       91      89    100
Lexington Center            Colorado Springs, CO 74,603 Sq. Ft.              12.88      12.26     11.71       83      54     97
Mimado                      Sterling, VA         35,127 Sq. Ft.              19.97      19.55         *       73      89      *
NASA                        Clear Lake, TX       78,159 Sq. Ft.              11.86      11.74     11.44       68      66     66
One Steeplechase            Sterling, VA         103,376 Sq. Ft.             17.19      16.64     16.26      100     100    100
Parkway North               Dallas, TX           71,041 Sq. Ft.              17.00      14.77      7.82       73      76     85
Plaza Towers                St. Petersburg, FL   186,281 Sq. Ft.             15.54      14.54     14.03       97      95     95
Remington Tower             Tulsa, OK            90,009 Sq. Ft.              11.61      11.34     10.89       88      86     76
Savings of America          Houston, TX          68,634 Sq. Ft.              12.63      11.68     11.28       85      79     71
Venture Center              Atlanta, GA          38,272 Sq. Ft.              17.85      17.16     16.62      100     100    100
Westgrove Air Plaza         Addison, TX          78,326 Sq. Ft.              13.54      12.91     12.69       81      90     89
Windsor Plaza               Windcrest, TX        80,522 Sq. Ft.              13.72      13.70     13.43       66      63     62

INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSES
5360 Tulane                 Atlanta, GA          30,000 Sq. Ft.               2.75       2.60      2.55      100     100    100



----------

* In March 2002, TCI sold the 174, 513 sq. ft. Hartford Office Building in
Dallas, Texas for $4.0 million and provided the $4.0 million purchase price as
seller financing and an additional $1.4 million line of credit for leasehold
improvements in the form of a mortgage note. The note bears interest at a
variable interest rate, currently 6.0% per annum, requires monthly interest only
payments of $14,667 and matures in March 2007.


                                      222



                                                                                RENT PER SQUARE FOOT             OCCUPANCY %
                                                 UNITS/                     ---------------------------      -------------------
PROPERTY                    LOCATION             SQUARE FOOTAGE              2001       2000      1999       2001    2000   1999
--------                    --------             --------------             ------     ------    ------      ----    ----   ----
                                                                                                    
5700 Tulane                 Atlanta, GA          67,850 Sq. Ft.             $ 2.93     $ 2.83    $ 2.63        7      77      9
Addison Hanger              Addison, TX          23,650 Sq. Ft.              10.07      11.08     11.29       86      51     50
Addison Hanger II           Addison, TX          29,000 Sq. Ft.               7.21       *         *          12       *      *
Central Storage             Dallas, TX           216,035 Sq. Ft.              2.40       1.48      1.48      100     100    100
Encon                       Fort Worth, TX       256,410 Sq. Ft.              3.08       2.00      2.00      100     100    100
Kelly                       Dallas, TX           294,899 Sq. Ft.              3.61       3.85      3.74       94     100     98
McLeod                      Orlando, FL          110,914 Sq. Ft.              8.01       7.86      7.62       92      88     91
Ogden Industrial            Ogden, UT            107,112 Sq. Ft.              2.94       3.32      3.79      100      86    100
Space Center                San Antonio, TX      101,500 Sq. Ft.              3.18       3.09      2.97       89     100     83
Texstar                     Arlington, TX        97,846 Sq. Ft.               2.11       2.11      2.11      100     100    100
Tricon                      Atlanta, GA          570,877 Sq. Ft.              3.87       3.75      3.21       93      91     96

SHOPPING CENTERS
Dunes Plaza                 Michigan City, IN    223,869 Sq. Ft.              5.81       5.61      5.54       62      63     64
K-Mart                      Cary, NC             92,033 Sq. Ft.               3.28       3.28      3.28      100     100    100
Parkway Center              Dallas, TX           28,374 Sq. Ft.              15.08      14.67     13.60       86     100    100
Plaza on Bachman Creek      Dallas, TX           80,278 Sq. Ft.              12.11      11.13     11.70       88      79     65
Promenade                   Highland Ranch, CO   133,558 Sq. Ft.             13.06      10.57     10.34       75      73     93
Sadler Square               Amelia Island, FL    70,295 Sq. Ft.               7.21       7.15      6.99       93      95     96
Sheboygan                   Sheboygan, WI        74,532 Sq. Ft.               2.36       1.99      1.99      100     100    100

OTHER
Signature Athletic Club     Dallas, TX           56,532 Sq. Ft.




                                                                                               TOTAL ROOM REVENUES
                                                                                                 DIVIDED BY TOTAL
                                                  AVERAGE ROOM RATE           OCCUPANCY %        AVAILABLE ROOMS
                                             ---------------------------  -----------------   ---------------------
PROPERTY      LOCATION           ROOMS         2001     2000       1999   2001   2000  1999   2001    2000     1999
--------      --------           -----       -------   -------   -------  ----   ----  ----   -----  ------   ------
                                                                             
HOTELS
Willows       Chicago, IL         52 Rooms   $130.37   $131.78   $115.12    53    52    60    69.65  $69.10   $79.24
City Suites   Chicago, IL         45 Rooms    131.16    125.32    111.45    61    74    71    81.13   92.40    69.23
Majestic Inn  San Francisco, CA   57 Rooms    174.85    170.08    162.58    41    79    79    79.10  133.65   128.76
The Majestic  Chicago, IL         55 Rooms    129.63    120.67    105.27    55    65    63    71.52   77.89    66.62
Akademia      Wroclaw, Poland    165 Rooms        **         *         *   ***     *             **       *        *




                                                              SQUARE
PROPERTY                        LOCATION                   FOOTAGE/ACRES
--------                        --------                   -------------
                                                     
LAND
1013 Common                     New Orleans, LA            18,000 Sq. Ft.
Alamo Springs                   Dallas, TX                 .678 Acres
Dominion                        Dallas, TX                 14.39 Acres
Eagle Crest                     Farmers Branch, TX         18.99 Acres
Folsom                          Dallas, TX                 36.38 Acres
Lamar/Parmer                    Austin, TX                 17.07 Acres
Las Colinas                     Las Colinas, TX            4.7 Acres
Lemmon Carlisle                 Dallas, TX                 2.14 Acres
Limestone Canyon II             Austin, TX                 9.96 Acres
Manhattan                       Farmers Branch, TX         108.9 Acres
McKinney 36                     Collin County, TX          34.58 Acres



                                      223



                                                                            SQUARE
PROPERTY                          LOCATION                               FOOTAGE/ACRES
--------                          --------                               -------------
                                                                   
Mira Lago                         Farmers Branch, TX                      8.88 Acres
Pac Trust                         Farmers Branch, TX                      7.11 Acres
Red Cross                         Dallas, TX                              2.89 Acres
Sandison                          Collin County, TX                       97.97 Acres
Seminary West                     Fort Worth, TX                          5.36 Acres
Solco - Allen                     Collin County, TX                       55.8 Acres
Solco - Valley Ranch              Dallas, TX                              6.07 Acres
Stacy Road                        Allen, TX                               160.38 Acres
State Highway 121                 Collin County, TX                       101.94 Acres
Watters Road                      Collin County, TX                       97.00 Acres
West End                          Dallas, TX                              6.8 Acres
Whisenant                         Collin County, TX                       16.16 Acres


*       Property was either purchased or under construction in 2000 or 2001.

**      Property was under construction in 2001.

        Occupancy presented here and throughout this Section is without
reference to whether leases in effect are at, below or above market rates.

In 2001, TCI purchased the following properties:



                                                   UNITS/          PURCHASE       NET CASH       DEBT      INTEREST     MATURITY
PROPERTY                    LOCATION               ROOMS/ACRES       PRICE          PAID       INCURRED      RATE         DATE
--------                    --------               -----------     --------       --------     --------    --------     --------
                                                                                                   
APARTMENTS
Baywalk                     Galveston, TX          192 Units       $ 6,590         $  390      $ 5,856        7.45%        02/11
By the Sea                  Corpus Christi, TX     153 Units         6,175            862        5,538        7.07         05/09
Courtyard                   Midland, TX            133 Units         1,425            425        1,051        9.25         04/06
Falcon Lakes(1)             Arlington, TX          284 Units         1,435          1,437           --          --            --
Island Bay                  Galveston, TX          458 Units        20,360          3,225       16,232        7.40         07/11
Limestone Ranch(1)          Lewisville, TX         252 Units           505             --           --          --            -- (2)
Marina Landing              Galveston, TX          256 Units        12,050            518       10,912        5.30         01/02
River Oaks(1)               Wiley, TX              180 Units           531            578           --          --            --
Sendero Ridge(1)            San Antonio, TX        384 Units         1,850          2,635           --          --            --
Tivoli(1)                   Dallas, TX             190 Units         3,000          2,475        1,000       12.00         12/02
Verandas at City View(1)    Fort Worth, TX         314 Units       $ 2,544         $  276      $ 2,197        4.75%        03/02
Waters Edge IV(1)           Gulfport, MS           80 Units            441            441           --          --            --

HOTEL
Akademia(3)                 Wroclaw, Poland        165 Rooms         2,184          2,669           --          --            --

LAND
Mira Lago                   Farmers Branch, TX     8.88 Acres          541             --           --          --            -- (2)
Pac Trust                   Farmers Branch, TX     7.11 Acres        1,175          1,231           --          --            --
Seminary West               Fort Worth, TX         5.36 Acres          222            232           --          --            --
Solco-Valley Ranch          Dallas, TX             6.07 Acres        1,454          1,525           --          --            --



(1)     Land purchased for apartment construction.

(2)     Land was received from ARL in exchange for the Glenwood Apartments.

(3)     Land purchased for hotel construction.




                                      224


In 2001, TCI sold the following properties:




                                                   UNITS/SQ.FT./         SALES        NET CASH         DEBT             GAIN/(LOSS)
PROPERTY                    LOCATION               ACRES                 PRICE        RECEIVED      DISCHARGED            ON SALE
--------                    --------               ------------          ------       --------      ----------          -----------
                                                                                                      
APARTMENTS

Bent Tree Gardens           Addison, TX            204 Units             $9,000         $2,669       $ 6,065 (1)          $  601
Carseka                     Los Angeles, CA        54 Units               4,000          2,138         1,466               1,352
Fontenelle Hills            Bellevue, NE           338 Units             16,500          3,680        12,454 (1)           4,565
Forest Ridge                Denton, TX             56 Units               2,000            682         1,151               1,014
Glenwood                    Addison, TX            168 Units              3,659             --         2,537 (1)              -- (2)
Heritage                    Tulsa, OK              136 Units              2,286            206         1,948               1,575
Madison at Bear Creek       Houston, TX            180 Units              5,400            828         3,442 (1)           1,162 (4)
McCallum Glen               Dallas, TX             275 Units              8,450          2,633         5,004 (1)           1,375 (3)
McCallum Crossing           Dallas, TX             322 Units             11,500          1,841         8,101 (1)           4,486
Oak Run                     Pasadena, TX           160 Units              5,800          1,203         4,364               2,227
Park Lane                   Dallas, TX             97 Units               2,750          1,526         1,103               1,827
Park at Colonade            San Antonio, TX        211 Units              5,800            927         4,066               1,592
South Cochran               Los Angeles, CA        64 Units               4,650          1,897         1,873               1,660
Summerstone                 Houston, TX            242 Units              7,225          1,780         5,180 (1)           1,884
Sunset Lakes                Waukegan, IL           414 Units             15,000          6,089         7,243               7,316

OFFICE BUILDINGS

Chesapeake Center           San Diego, CA          57,493 Sq.Ft.          6,575          3,111         2,844                204
Daley                       San Diego, CA          64,425 Sq.Ft.          6,211          2,412         3,346                836
Valley Rim                  San Diego, CA          54,194 Sq.Ft.          5,500          1,367         3,516               (138)
Viewridge                   San Diego, CA          25,062 Sq.Ft.          2,010            701         1,272                  4
Waterstreet                 Boulder, CO            106,257 Sq.Ft.        22,250          7,126        12,949              9,154

INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE

Technology Trading          Sterling, VA           197,659 Sq.Ft.        10,775          4,120         6,214              4,163
Zodiac                      Dallas, TX             35,435 Sq.Ft.            762            183           564                167

LAND

Eagle Crest                 Farmers Branch, TX     4.41 Acres               300            291            --               (215)
McKinney 36                 McKinney, TX           1.822 Acres              476            476            --                355
Moss Creek                  Greensboro, NC         4.79 Acres                15             13            --                (71)
Round Mountain              Austin, TX             110.0 Acres            2,560          2,455            --              1,047



(1)     Debt assumed by purchaser.

(2)     The Glenwood Apartments were exchanged with ARL for two parcels of land;
        the 10.5 acre Limestone Ranch and the 8.88 acre Mira Lago.

(3)     Excludes $1.5 million deferred gain from seller financing. See Note 4.
        "Notes and Interest Receivable."

(4)     Excludes $608,000 deferred gain from seller financing. See Note 4.
        "Notes and Interest Receivable."



                                      225

In 2001, TCI financed/refinanced the following property:



                                                       DEBT               DEBT           NET CASH        INTEREST       MATURITY
PROPERTY        LOCATION          ACRES              INCURRED           DISCHARGED       RECEIVED          RATE           DATE
--------        --------          -----              --------           ----------       --------        --------       --------
                                                                (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
                                                                                                   
LAND

Red Cross       Dallas, TX        2.89 Acres         $ 4,500               $ --           $ 4,328          12.5%          10/02


        PROPERTIES HELD FOR SALE. Set forth below are TCI's properties held for
sale, primarily obtained through foreclosure.



        PROPERTY                        LOCATION                            ACRES
        --------                        --------                            -----
                                                                    
        LAND

        Fiesta                          San Angelo, TX                   .6657 Acres
        Fruitland                       Fruitland Park, FL                4.66 Acres
        Round Mountain                  Austin, TX                          18 Acres


      PARTNERSHIP PROPERTIES. TCI accounts for partnership properties using the
equity method. Set forth below are the properties owned by partnerships, the
monthly rental rate for apartments, the average annual rental rate for
commercial properties, and occupancy rates at December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999:



                                                                                 RENT PER SQUARE FOOT            OCCUPANCY %
                                                                               -------------------------     ---------------------
PROPERTY              LOCATION               UNITS/SQUARE FOOTAGE               2001     2000      1999      2001      2000   1999
--------              --------               --------------------               ----     ----      ----      ----      ----   ----
                                                                                                      
APARTMENT

Lincoln Court         Dallas, TX             55 Units/40,063 Sq. Ft.          $ 1.20    $ 1.16    $ 1.14       98      94       92

OFFICE BUILDING

Prospect Park #29     Rancho Cordova, CA     40,807 Sq. Ft.                    19.52     20.42     16.56       72     100      100

SHOPPING CENTER

Chelsea Square        Houston, TX            70,275 Sq. Ft.                     9.63      9.31      8.95       79      77       85


      TCI owns a noncontrolling combined 55% limited and general partnership
interest in Jor-Trans Investors Limited Partnership ("Jor-Trans") which owns the
Lincoln Court Apartments.

      TCI is a 30% general partner in Sacramento Nine ("SAC 9"), which owns the
Prospect Park #29 Office Building. In 2001, TCI received no operating
distributions from SAC 9.

      TCI is a 63.7% limited partner and IOT is a 36.3% general partner in the
Tri-City which owns the Chelsea Square Shopping Center. In February 2000, the
Chelsea Square Shopping Center was financed in the amount of $2.1 million.
Tri-City received net cash of $2.0 million after the payment of various closing
costs. The mortgage bore interest at a fixed rate of 10.24% per annum until
February 2001, and a variable rate thereafter, currently 10% per annum, requires
monthly payments of principal and interest of $20,601 and matures in February
2005. TCI received a distribution of $1.3 million of the net financing proceeds.
IOT received a distribution of $739,000 of the net financing proceeds. The
business purpose of the transaction was to draw equity from the Chelsea Square
Shopping Center.



                                      226

TCI FEDERAL TAX BASIS OF DEPRECIABLE PROPERTY AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001


      For each TCI property upon which depreciation is taken, the table set
forth below includes (i) the Federal tax basis; (ii) rate, (iii) method and (iv)
life claimed as of December 31, 2001.



                                      GROSS FEDERAL        ACCUMULATED         NET FEDERAL
   PROPERTY                             TAX BASIS        TAX DEPRECIATION       TAX BASIS        RATE      METHOD(1)       LIFE
   --------                           -------------      ----------------      -----------       ----      ---------       ----
                                                                                                      
APARTMENTS

4242 Cedar Springs                     $ 1,168,040          $ 272,570          $   895,470        100%        ADS       20-40 years
4400 Apartments                          1,396,277            126,545            1,269,732        100         ADS       20-40 years
Apple Lane Apts.                         1,510,302             73,944            1,436,358        100         ADS        40 years
Arbor Pointe                             1,811,108            242,725            1,568,383        100         ADS       20-40 years
Ashton Way                               1,587,686            143,109            1,444,577        100         ADS        40 years
Autumn Chase Apts                        1,265,253             54,039            1,211,214        100         ADS        40 years
Baywalk                                  6,106,000             64,761            6,041,239        100        MACRS      27.5 years
By The Sea                               5,797,000             79,050            5,717,950        100        MACRS      27.5 years
Camelot                                  3,106,206            628,012            2,478,194        100         ADS       20-40 years
Cliffs Of Eldorado                      10,588,583            849,310            9,739,273        100         ADS        40 years
Country Crossing                         2,642,414            564,034            2,078,380        100         ADS       20-40 years
Courtyard                                1,359,231             21,245            1,337,986        100         ADS        40 years
Coventry Pointe                            553,563             75,692              477,871        100         ADS       20-40 years
El Chapparal                             5,504,184          1,994,711            3,509,473        100         ADS       10-40 years
Fairway                                  1,651,674            359,685            1,291,989        100         ADS       20-40 years
Fairway View Estates                     5,195,432            359,800            4,835,632        100         ADS        40 years
Falcon Lakes**                                  --                 --                   --        100         ADS        40 years
Fountain Lake                            2,604,472            511,118            2,093,354        100         ADS       20-40 years
Ftns Of Waterford(Em Terr)               2,781,248            222,778            2,558,470        100         ADS        40 years
Gladstell Apts                           2,205,407            350,118            1,855,289        100         ADS       20-40 years
Grove Park                               3,820,977            526,619            3,294,358        100         ADS        40 years
Harpers Ferry                            1,476,759            345,984            1,130,775        100         ADS       20-40 years
Heritage On The River                    6,540,795            974,873            5,565,922        100         ADS       20-40 years
Hunters Glen (Junction)                  2,396,095            232,543            2,163,552        100         ADS        40 years
In The Pines                             5,588,935            968,001            4,620,934        100         ADS       20-40 years
Island Bay                              18,852,000            199,945           18,652,055        100        MACRS      27.5 years
Limestone Canyon                        14,142,354            921,355           13,220,999        100         ADS        40 years
Limestone Ranch                          6,604,934             89,431            6,515,503        100         ADS        40 years
Marina Landing                          11,161,000            118,374           11,042,626        100        MACRS      27.5 years
Mountain Plaza                           3,462,395            339,733            3,122,662        100         ADS        40 years
Oak Park Iv                                700,442            131,411              569,031        100         ADS       20-40 years
Paramount Terrace                        3,061,449            124,387            2,937,062        100         ADS        40 years
Plantation Apartments                    3,095,890            158,014            2,937,876        100         ADS        40 years
Primrose Apts                            3,851,850            164,513            3,687,337        100         ADS        40 years
Quail Creek Apts.                        3,090,274            151,300            2,938,974        100         ADS        40 years
Quail Oaks                               3,852,818          1,438,590            2,414,228        100         ADS       10-40 years
Sandstone                                6,719,582            705,072            6,014,510        100         ADS        40 years
Sendero Ridge**                                 --                 --                   --        100         ADS        40 years
Somerset Place                           2,968,407            582,912            2,385,495        100         ADS       20-40 years
Southgate Apartments                     1,656,485            222,474            1,434,011        100         ADS       20-40 years
Southgreen                               3,020,439            229,674            2,790,765        100         ADS        40 years
Stone Oak Place                          2,859,845            867,331            1,992,514        100         ADS       10-40 years
Summerfield Apts                         4,866,452            863,037            4,003,415        100         ADS       20-40 years
Sunchase                                 3,414,060            354,237            3,059,823        100         ADS        40 years
Terrace Hills                            5,287,372            633,346            4,654,026        100         ADS        40 years
Timbers Apartments                       1,992,030            254,861            1,737,169        100         ADS        40 years
Tivoli**                                        --                 --                   --        100         ADS        40 years
Trails At Windfern                       3,542,832            409,524            3,133,308        100         ADS        40 years
Treehouse Apartments                     3,124,523            363,439            2,761,084        100         ADS        40 years
Verandas At City View**                         --                 --                   --        100         ADS        40 years
Waters Edge Iv                           1,536,402              4,809            1,531,593        100         ADS        40 years
Westwood Square                            448,708             61,131              387,577        100         ADS       20-40 years
Wiley Cascades**                                --                 --                   --        100         ADS        40 years
Willocreek                               1,907,582            356,268            1,551,314        100         ADS       20-40 years
WILLOW WICK Sc                           1,342,139            204,096            1,138,043        100         ADS       20-40 years
WILL-O-WICK  Florida                     3,163,742            514,715            2,649,027        100         ADS       20-40 years
Woodview                                 2,966,298            268,148            2,698,150        100         ADS        40 years




                                      227



                                      GROSS FEDERAL        ACCUMULATED         NET FEDERAL
   PROPERTY                             TAX BASIS        TAX DEPRECIATION       TAX BASIS        RATE      METHOD(1)       LIFE
   --------                           -------------      ----------------      -----------       ----      ---------       ----
                                                                                                      
OFFICE BUILDINGS

1010 Common St                        $ 30,773,646        $ 1,711,139         $ 29,062,507        100%        ADS       6-40 years
225 Baronne St                          16,643,612          1,275,283           15,368,329        100         ADS       6-40 years
4135 Beltline Rd O B                     4,280,248            271,967            4,008,281        100         ADS        40 years
9033 Wilshire Blvd                       8,751,868            369,607            8,382,261        100         ADS        40 years
Amoco Building                           9,542,988          1,091,243            8,451,745        100         ADS       6-40 years
Atrium O B                               4,755,800            416,478            4,339,322        100         ADS       6-40 years
Bay Plaza Office Center                  4,028,570            424,397            3,604,173        100         ADS        40 years
Bay Plaza Office Center Ii               4,639,254            176,570            4,462,684        100         ADS        40 years
Bonita Plaza                             5,559,059            565,212            4,993,847        100         ADS        40 years
Brandeis                                13,174,868            368,880           12,805,988        100         ADS        40 years
Corporate Point                          3,831,854            665,507            3,166,347        100         ADS       20-40 years
Countryside Retail                      18,800,998            606,930           18,194,068        100         ADS        40 years
Durham Centre                           18,427,807          1,969,344           16,458,463        100         ADS        40 years
Eton Square                             13,636,733            767,592           12,869,141        100         ADS        40 years
Executive Court O/B*                     1,772,683              1,844            1,770,839        100         ADS        40 years
Forum O B                                6,439,382          1,384,412            5,054,970        100         ADS       20-40 years
Harmon                                   9,506,890            306,604            9,200,286        100         ADS        40 years
Hartford O B                             3,380,275            534,004            2,846,271        100         ADS       6-40 years
Institute Place                          3,615,315            738,650            2,876,665        100         ADS       20-40 years
Jefferson                               12,192,152          1,436,524           10,755,628        100         ADS        40 years
Lexington Center                         2,916,370            349,780            2,566,590        100         ADS       10-40 years
Mimado                                   5,294,166            169,863            5,124,303        100         ADS        40 years
Nasa Office Building                     6,060,256          2,023,899            4,036,357        100         ADS       10-40 years
One Steeplechase O B                     8,398,913          1,859,007            6,539,906        100         ADS       20-40 years
Parkway North                            5,586,783            494,713            5,092,070        100         ADS        40 years
Plaza                                   19,643,316         12,464,715            7,178,601        100         ADS       10-40 years
Remington Tower                          4,565,655            255,132            4,310,523        100         ADS        40 years
Savings Of America                       1,414,953            140,713            1,274,240        100         ADS        40 years
Signature Athletic Club                  3,811,004            418,417            3,392,587        100         ADS        40 years
Surgery Center                           8,170,414            263,823            7,906,591        100         ADS        40 years
Venture Center                           3,848,791          1,129,098            2,719,693        100         ADS       20-40 years
Westgrove Air Plaza                      5,153,891            134,216            5,019,675        100         ADS        40 years
Windsor Executive Plaza                  6,090,651          1,939,151            4,151,500        100         ADS       10-40 years

INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSES

5360 Tulane                                761,529            317,675              443,854        100        MACRS      7-39 years
5700 Tulane                                663,795             59,592              604,203        100        MACRS       39 years
Addison Hangar                             827,261             43,418              783,843        100         ADS       6-40 years
Addison Hangar Ii                        1,378,823             47,410            1,331,413        100         ADS        40 years
Central Freight Whse                     2,294,105            309,469            1,984,636        100         ADS       20-40 years
Encon Warehouse                          4,001,033            414,877            3,586,156        100         ADS        40 years
Kelly Warehouses (5)                     4,594,743            751,562            3,843,181        100         ADS       20-40 years
Mcleod Commerce Center                   3,219,771            537,276            2,682,495        100         ADS       20-40 years
Ogden Industrial                         1,853,095            662,886            1,190,209        100         ADS       10-40 years
Space Center                             1,342,882            643,168              699,714        100        MACRS      7-39 years
Texstar Building                         1,547,017            292,576            1,254,441        100         ADS        40 years
Tricon Warehouses (8)                    8,244,347          1,566,120            6,678,227        100         ADS       20-40 years

SHOPPING CENTERS

Dunes Plaza                              7,031,829          1,493,277            5,538,552        100         ADS       20-40 years
Kmart Cary                               1,319,278            111,321            1,207,957        100         ADS        40 years
Parkway Center                           2,112,085            501,769            1,610,316        100         ADS       20-40 years
Plaza On Bachman Creek                   4,106,090            331,690            3,774,400        100         ADS        40 years
Promenade S C                            7,400,300            992,889            6,407,411        100         ADS       20-40 years
Sadler Square                            2,849,497            564,607            2,284,890        100         ADS        40 years
Sheboygan S C                            1,415,949            331,584            1,084,365        100         ADS       20-40 years

HOTELS

Brompton Hotel                           3,836,832            300,828            3,536,004        100         ADS       10-40 years
City Suites Hotel                        4,939,235            477,054            4,462,181        100         ADS       10-40 years
Majestic Inn                             6,038,695          1,556,605            4,482,090        100         ADS       10-40 years
Surf Hotel                               5,244,496            498,774            4,745,722        100         ADS       10-40 years
Akademia**                                      --                 --                   --        100         ADS        40 years
                                      ------------        -----------         ------------
         TOTAL                         553,081,797         70,304,534          482,777,263
                                      ============        ===========         ============




                                      228

----------

*       Purchased from ARL, treated as financing transaction for book, sale for
        tax.

**      Property under construction, no depreciable assets in service.

(1)     ADS = Alternative Depreciation System
        MACRS = Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System

MORTGAGE LOANS

      In addition to investments in real estate, a portion of TCI's assets are
invested in mortgage notes receivable, principally secured by real estate. TCI
may originate mortgage loans in conjunction with providing purchase money
financing of property sales. Management intends to service and hold for
investment the mortgage notes in TCI's portfolio. TCI's mortgage notes
receivable consist of first, wraparound and junior mortgage loans.

      TYPES OF MORTGAGE ACTIVITY. TCI has originated its own mortgage loans, as
well as acquired existing mortgage notes either directly from builders,
developers or property owners, or through mortgage banking firms, commercial
banks or other qualified brokers. BCM, in its capacity as a mortgage servicer,
services TCI's mortgage notes. TCI's investment policy is described in "Business
of TCI--Business Plan and Investment Policy."

      TYPES OF PROPERTIES SECURING MORTGAGE NOTES. The properties securing TCI's
mortgage notes receivable portfolio at December 31, 2001, consisted of three
apartments, five office buildings, a shopping center, and a mobile home park and
unimproved land. The board of directors may alter the types of properties
securing or collateralizing mortgage loans in which TCI invests without a vote
of stockholders. TCI's Articles of Incorporation impose certain restrictions on
transactions with related parties, as discussed in "Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions of ARL, TCI and IOT-Related Party Transactions."

      At December 31, 2001, TCI's mortgage notes receivable portfolio included
nine mortgage loans with an aggregate principal balance of $17.4 million secured
by income-producing real estate located in the Midwest, Southeast and Southwest
regions of the continental United States, and two non-performing loans with an
aggregate principal balance of $5.2 million secured by unimproved land. At
December 31, 2001, 3% of TCI's assets were invested in notes and interest
receivable.



                                      229

      The following table sets forth the percentages (based on the mortgage note
principal balance) by property type and geographic region, of the income
producing properties that serve as collateral for TCI's mortgage notes
receivable at December 31, 2001. See Schedule IV to the TCI consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement and
prospectus for further details of TCI's mortgage notes receivable portfolio.



                                                          COMMERCIAL
            REGION              APARTMENTS                PROPERTIES            TOTAL
            ------              ----------                ----------            -----
                                                                       
          Southwest               19.9%                      45.0%               64.9%
          Southeast                 --                       11.3                11.3
          Midwest                   --                       23.8                23.8
                                  ----                       ----               -----
                                  19.9%                      80.1%              100.0%
                                  ====                       ====               =====


A summary of the activity in TCI's mortgage notes receivable portfolio during
2001 is as follows:


                                                                       
                     Mortgage notes receivable at January 1, 2001           6
                     Loans paid off                                        (2)
                     Loans funded                                           8
                                                                          ---
                     Mortgage notes receivable at December 31, 2001        12
                                                                          ===


      During 2001, $3.7 million was collected in full payment of two mortgage
notes and $2.3 million in principal payments were received on other mortgage
notes. At December 31, 2001, less than 1% of TCI's assets were invested in
mortgage notes secured by non-income producing real estate, comprised of a first
lien mortgage note secured by 44.6 acres of unimproved land in Fort Worth,
Texas, and a second lien mortgage note secured by 1,714.6 acres of unimproved
land in Tarrant County, Texas.

      FIRST MORTGAGE LOANS. TCI invests in first mortgage notes with short,
medium or long-term maturities. First mortgage loans generally provide for level
periodic payments of principal and interest sufficient to substantially repay
the loan prior to maturity, but may involve interest-only payments or moderate
amortization of principal and a "balloon" principal payment at maturity. With
respect to first mortgage loans, the borrower is required to provide a
mortgagee's title policy or an acceptable legal title opinion as to the validity
and the priority of the mortgage lien over all other obligations, except liens
arising from unpaid property taxes and other exceptions normally allowed by
first mortgage lenders in the relevant area. TCI may grant participations in
first mortgage loans that it originates to other lenders.

      In July 2001, TCI funded a $1.7 million mortgage loan secured by a first
lien on 44.6 acres of unimproved land in Fort Worth, Texas, and a 100% interest
in a partnership. The note receivable bears interest at 16.0% per annum,
requires monthly interest only payments and matures in June 2002.

      The following discussion briefly describes events that affected previously
funded first mortgage loans during 2001.

      In December 1999, TCI provided $1.2 million of purchase money financing in
conjunction with the sale of the Town and Country Office Building in Houston,
Texas. The note



                                      230

receivable bore interest at 8.5% per annum, required monthly payments of
interest only, matured in 2001 and was secured by a first lien on the property
sold. In December 2001, the note was paid in full and a previously deferred gain
on the sale of $819,000 was recognized.

      JUNIOR MORTGAGE LOANS. TCI may invest in junior mortgage loans, which are
secured by mortgages that are subordinate to one or more prior liens either on
the fee or a leasehold interest in real estate. Recourse on such loans
ordinarily includes the real estate on which the loan is made, other collateral
and personal guarantees by the borrower. The board of directors restricts
investment in junior mortgage loans, excluding wraparound mortgage loans, to not
more than 10% of TCI's assets. At December 31, 2001, 3% of TCI's assets were
invested in junior and wraparound mortgage loans.

      The following discussion briefly describes the junior mortgage loans that
TCI originated as well as events that affected previously funded junior mortgage
loans during 2001.

      In March 2001, TCI funded a $3.5 million mortgage loan secured by a second
lien on a retail center in Montgomery County, Texas. In June 2001, an additional
$1.5 million was funded. The note receivable bears interest at 16.0% per annum,
requires monthly interest only payments of $67,000 and matured in September
2001. In October 2001, TCI extended the loan until February 2002, receiving
$100,000 as an extension fee. In December 2001, TCI received a $1.5 million
principal payment. In February 2002, TCI sold a $2.0 million senior
participation interest in the loan to IOT, a related party. TCI and IOT will
receive 43% and 57%, respectively, of the remaining principal and interest
payments. Also in February 2002, TCI extended the loan until April 2002,
receiving $23,000 as an extension fee.

      In June 2001, in conjunction with the sale of 275 unit McCallum Glen
Apartments in Dallas, Texas, TCI funded a $1.5 million mortgage loan secured by
a second lien on the apartments. The note receivable bears interest at 10% per
annum, requires monthly interest only payments and matures in June 2003.

      In July 2001, TCI agreed to fund a $4.4 million line of credit secured by
a second lien on 1,714.16 acres of unimproved land in Tarrant County, Texas. The
note receivable bears interest at 15% per annum, requires monthly interest only
payments beginning in September 2001 and matures in July 2003. As of March 2002,
TCI has funded $3.8 million of the line of credit.

      In August 2001, TCI agreed to fund up to $5.6 million secured by an office
building in Dallas, Texas. The note receivable bears interest at a variable
rate, currently 9.0% per annum, requires monthly interest only payments and
matures in January 2003. As of March 2002, TCI has funded a total of $2.3
million.

      In December 2001, TCI, purchased 100% of the outstanding common shares of
NM, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ARL, for $2.0 million. The purchase price was
determined based upon the market value of the property exchanged, using a market
rate multiple of net operating income. NM owns the Executive Court Office
Building. ARL has guaranteed that the asset will produce at least a 12% annual
return on the purchase price for a period of three years from the purchase date.
If the asset fails to produce the annual return, ARL will pay TCI any shortfall.
In addition, if the asset fails to produce the 12% return for a calendar year,
TCI may require ARL to



                                      231

repurchase the shares of NM for the purchase price. The business purpose of the
transaction was for TCI to make an equity investment in NM anticipating a
profitable return and ARL to receive cash for its equity investment. Management
has classified this related party transaction as a note payable to TCI. The
consideration paid for the outstanding shares was $2.0 million.

      In December 2000, TCI funded a $2.5 million mortgage loan secured by a
second lien on unimproved land: 442 acres in Tarrant County, Texas, 1,130 acres
in Denton County, Texas, and 26 acres in Collin County, Texas. The note
receivable bore interest at 18.0% per annum, required monthly interest only
payments of $37,500 and matured in June 2001. In June 2001, the loan and all
accrued but unpaid interest was paid off.

      Also in December 2000, TCI funded a $3.0 million mortgage loan secured by
a second lien on four office buildings in San Antonio, Texas. The note
receivable bore interest at 16.0% per annum, required monthly interest only
payments of $40,000 and matured in June 2001. The note was extended until
November 2001 with a $750,000 loan principal paydown. With this paydown, the
note was renegotiated to replace the existing collateral with new collateral
consisting of a 120,000 sq. ft. office building and industrial warehouse in
Carrollton, Texas. The note bears interest at 16.0% per annum, requires monthly
payments of interest only and was extended June 30, 2002.

      In October 2001, TCI funded a $4.0 million loan secured by a 375,152
sq.ft. office building in St. Louis, Missouri. The note receivable bears
interest at 9.0% per annum, requires monthly interest only payments of $30,000
and matured in February 2002. In February 2002, TCI extended the loan maturity
to February 2003.

      PARTNERSHIP MORTGAGE LOANS. TCI owns a 60% general partner interest and
IOT owns a 40% general partner interest in Nakash Income Associates ("NIA"),
which owns a wraparound mortgage note receivable secured by a building occupied
by a Wal-Mart in Maulden, Missouri. TCI advanced $33,000 to the partnership.

DOUBLE TAXATION OF CORPORATIONS

      TCI is taxed as a regular corporation under the Code. Corporations are
subject to complex federal income tax rules that cause the corporation to be
taxed on its income and distributions, generally, to be taxable to recipients.
As a general rule, a corporation is not entitled to a deduction for dividends
paid to its shareholders. Corporations are subject to an additional tax on
certain undistributed accumulated earnings. Currently, corporations are taxed on
net capital gains at the regular corporate tax rates. Corporations are subject
to the alterative minimum tax.

      Cash distributions from a corporation to a shareholder depend upon whether
the distribution is from the corporation's "earnings and profits." If the
distribution is from the corporation's earnings and profits it is a dividend and
is includable in the distributee shareholder's gross income. Cash distributions
which are not dividends are treated as a return of the shareholder's investment
in its stock. The distributions first reduce the tax basis of the shareholder in
its stock. When the shareholder has recovered its basis in its stock, further
distributions are treated as gain from the sale or exchange of property.



                                      232

      Generally a corporate shareholder will receive a "dividends received
deduction" for dividends received. The percentage of the dividend which can be
excluded through the dividends received deductions depends upon the percentage
ownership of the distributee shareholder in the distributor corporation. A 100%
deduction is available for dividends received by a member of the same affiliated
group of corporations. If the distributee owns 20% or more of the distributor
corporation, the distributee corporation is entitled to an 80% deduction for
dividends received. A 70% dividends received deduction is available for most
other dividends.

      The above is intended only as a general summary of the "double taxation"
of corporations and the tax treatment of cash distribution. It is not intended
to be a thorough discussion of the numerous complex tax issues that affect
corporations and their shareholders including accumulated earnings tax,
alternative minimum tax, distributions of appreciated property, liquidations,
reorganizations, issues pertaining to controlled groups of corporations and
issues related to consolidated returns. Similarly, this summary should not be
considered as a discussion of material federal income tax aspects or
considerations for TCI. The above pertains only to "C" corporations under the
Code and does not address state, local, or foreign tax issues. It is not
applicable to regulated investment companies, real estate investment trusts,
banks, insurance companies and other forms of entities for which special
treatment is provided under the Code.

                                LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

OLIVE LITIGATION

      In February 1990, TCI, together with National Income Realty Trust, CMET
and IOT three real estate entities which, at the time, had the same officers,
directors or trustees and advisor as TCI, entered into the Olive Settlement of a
class and derivative action entitled Olive et al. v. National Income Realty
Trust et al., relating to the operation and management of each of the entities.
On April 23, 1990, the Court granted final approval of the terms of the
Settlement. The Settlement was modified in 1994 (the "Modification").

      On January 27, 1997, the parties entered into an Amendment to the
Modification effective January 9, 1997 (the "Olive Amendment"). The Olive
Amendment provided for the settlement of additional matters raised by
plaintiffs' counsel in 1996. The Court issued an order approving the Olive
Amendment on July 3, 1997.

      The Olive Amendment provided that TCI's board retain a
management/compensation consultant or consultants to evaluate the fairness of
the BCM advisory contract and any contract of its affiliates with TCI, CMET and
IOT, including, but not limited to, the fairness to TCI, CMET and IOT of such
contracts relative to other means of administration. In 1998, the board engaged
a management/compensation consultant to perform the evaluation which was
completed in September 1998.

      In 1999, plaintiffs' counsel asserted that the board did not comply with
the provision requiring such engagement and requested that the Court exercise
its retained jurisdiction to determine whether there was a breach of this
provision of the Olive Amendment. In January 2000, the board engaged another
management compensation consultant to perform the required evaluation again. The
evaluation was completed in April 2000 and was provided to plaintiffs'



                                      233

counsel. The board believes that any alleged breach of the Olive Amendment has
been fully remedied by the Board's engagement of this second consultant.
Although several status conferences on this matter were held, there has been no
court order resolving whether there was any breach of the Olive Amendment.

      In June 2000, plaintiffs' counsel asserted that loans made by TCI to BCM
and American Realty Trust, Inc. breached the provision of the Modification. The
board believes that the provisions of the Settlement, Modification and the Olive
Amendment terminated on April 28, 1999. However, the Court has ruled that
certain provisions continue to be effective after the termination date. This
ruling was appealed by TCI and IOT.

      On October 23, 2001, TCI, IOT and ARL jointly announced a preliminary
agreement with the plaintiffs' counsel for complete settlement of all disputes
in the lawsuit. In February 2002, the court granted final approval of the
proposed settlement. Under the proposal, the appeal has been dismissed and ARL
will acquire all of the outstanding shares of IOT and TCI not currently owned by
ARL for a cash payment or shares of ARL Preferred Stock. ARL will pay $17.50
cash per TCI share and $19.00 cash per IOT share for the stock held by
nonaffiliated stockholders. ARL would issue one share of Series G redeemable
convertible preferred stock with a liquidation value of $20.00 per share for
each share of TCI common stock for stockholders who elect to receive ARL
preferred stock in lieu of cash. ARL would issue one share of Series H
redeemable convertible preferred stock with a liquidation value of $21.50 per
share for each share of IOT common stock for stockholders who elect to receive
ARL preferred stock in lieu of cash. Each share of Series G redeemable
convertible preferred stock will be convertible into 2.5 shares of ARL common
stock during a 75-day period that commences fifteen days after the date of the
first ARL Form 10-Q filing that occurs after the closing of the merger
transaction. Upon the acquisition of IOT and TCI shares, TCI and IOT would
become wholly-owned subsidiaries of ARL. The transaction is subject to the
execution of a definitive merger agreement and a vote of the stockholders of all
three entities. TCI has the same board as IOT and the same advisor as IOT and
ARL.



                                      234

                         SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA OF TCI

      The following is a summary of financial data incorporated by reference in
this joint proxy statement and prospectus. You should read the following data in
conjunction with the more detailed information contained in "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of TCI"
and the TCI consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing
elsewhere in this joint proxy statement and prospectus.




                                     FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                             JUNE 30,                             FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                    -------------------------   -------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       2002          2001          2001          2000          1999           1998          1997
                                    ----------    -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------    -----------   ----------
                                           (unaudited)
                                                                                                   
EARNINGS DATA
Rents ...........................   $   58,476    $    54,502   $   134,911   $   139,357   $    82,039    $    69,829   $   54,462
Property expense ................       36,276         30,371        80,562        78,061        44,497         38,282       32,424
                                    ----------    -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------    -----------   ----------
Operating income ................       22,200         24,131        54,349        61,296        37,542         31,547       22,038
Other income ....................          484         (1,084)       (3,002)        1,814           555            739        2,311
Other expense ...................       38,570         37,149        85,806        83,878        48,395         38,320       33,154
Gain on sale of real estate .....       12,697         28,749        54,270        50,550        40,517         12,940       21,404
                                    ----------    -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------    -----------   ----------
Net income (loss) ...............       (3,189)        14,647        19,811        29,782        30,219          6,906       12,599
Preferred dividend requirement ..          (90)           (15)         (172)          (22)          (30)            (1)          --
                                    ----------    -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------    -----------   ----------
Net income (loss) applicable to
  Common shares .................   $   (3,279)        14,632   $    19,639   $    29,760   $    30,189    $     6,905   $   12,599
                                    ==========    ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========    ===========   ==========
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per
  Share Net income (loss)
  applicable to Common shares....   $    (0.41)          1.68   $      2.32   $      3.45   $      7.05    $      1.78   $     3.22
                                    ==========    ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========    ===========   ==========
Dividends per Common share ......           --             --            --   $       .54   $       .60    $       .60   $      .28*
Weighted average
Common shares outstanding .......    8,042,594      8,734,514     8,478,377     8,631,621     4,283,574      3,876,797    3,907,221







                                          FOR THE SIX MONTHS                FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                            ENDED JUNE 30,    -------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 2002           2001         2000         1999         1998          1997
                                          ------------------  --------     --------     --------     --------      --------
                                             (unaudited)
                                                                                                 
BALANCE SHEET DATA

Real estate held for investment, net ...       $675,559       $622,171     $639,040     $599,746     $347,389      $269,845
Real estate held for sale, net
         Foreclosed ....................             --            516        1,824        1,790        1,356         1,356
         Other .........................         29,143             --           --           --           --         3,630
Notes and interest receivable, net .....         34,546         22,049        8,172       11,530        1,493         3,947
Total assets ...........................        785,093        709,152      731,885      714,195      382,203       319,135
Notes and interest payable .............        524,272        461,037      501,734      503,406      282,688       222,029
Stockholders' equity ...................        212,438        216,768      200,560      179,112       91,132        86,133
Book value per share ...................       $  26.41       $  26.95     $  23.22     $  20.76     $  23.35      $  22.15





                                      235


           MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
                        AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF TCI

INTRODUCTION

      TCI invests in real estate through acquisitions, leases and partnerships
and in mortgage loans on real estate, including first, wraparound and junior
mortgage loans. TCI is the successor to a California business trust organized on
September 6, 1983, which commenced operations on January 31, 1984. On November
30, 1999, TCI acquired all of the outstanding shares of beneficial interest of
CMET, a real estate company, in a tax-free exchange of shares, issuing 1.181
shares of its common stock for each outstanding CMET share. TCI accounted for
the merger as a purchase.

      Prior to January 1, 2000, TCI elected to be treated as a REIT under
Sections 856 through 860 of the Code. During the third quarter of 2000, TCI no
longer met the requirement for tax treatment as a REIT due to a concentration of
ownership.


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

      Critical accounting policies are those that are both important to the
presentation of TCI's financial condition and results of operations and require
management's most difficult, complex or subjective judgments. TCI's critical
accounting policies relate to the evaluation of impairment of long-lived assets
and the evaluation of the collectibility of accounts and notes receivable.

      If events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of
a rental property to be held and used or land held for development may be
impaired, management performs a recoverability analysis based on estimated
undiscounted cash flows to be generated from the property in the future. If the
analysis indicates that the carrying value is not recoverable from future cash
flows the property is written down to estimated fair value and an impairment
loss is recognized. If management decides to sell rental properties or land held
for development, management evaluates the recoverability of the carrying amounts
of the assets. If the evaluation indicates that the carrying value is not
recoverable from estimated net sales proceeds, the property is written down to
estimated fair value less costs to sell and an impairment loss is recognized
within income from continuing operations. TCI's estimates of cash flow and fair
values of the properties are based on current market conditions and consider
matters such as rental rates and occupancies for comparable properties, recent
sales data for comparable properties and, where applicable, contracts or the
results of negotiations with purchasers or prospective purchasers. TCI's
estimates are subject to revision as market conditions and TCI's assessments of
them change. In the second quarter of 2002, TCI recognized $1.9 million as
impairment losses.

      TCI's allowance for doubtful accounts receivable and notes receivable is
established based on analysis of the risk of loss on specific accounts. The
analysis places particular emphasis on past due accounts. Management considers
such information as the nature and age of the receivable, the payment history of
the tenant or other debtor, the financial condition of the tenant or other
debtor and TCI's assessment of its ability to meet its lease or interest
obligations. TCI's estimate of the required allowance, which is reviewed on a
quarterly basis is subject to




                                      236



revision as these factors change and is sensitive to the effects of economic and
market conditions.


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES


      Cash and cash equivalents totaled $1.4 million at June 30, 2002, compared
with $10.3 million at December 31, 2001. TCI's principal sources of cash have
been and will continue to be from property operations, proceeds from property
sales, the collection of mortgage notes receivable and borrowings. Management
anticipates that TCI's cash on hand, as well as cash generated from property
operations, the sale of properties and the refinancing of certain of TCI's
mortgage debt will be sufficient to meet TCI's cash requirements, including debt
service obligations and expenditures for property maintenance and improvements.

      Net cash used in operating activities was $1.2 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2002, compared to $1.4 million for the six months ended June 30,
2001. The primary factors affecting TCI's cash from operations are discussed in
the following paragraphs.

      Cash from property operations (rents collected less payments for expenses
applicable to rental income) was $25.2 million in the six months ended June 30,
2002, compared to $29.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001.

      Rents collected decreased by $5.4 million in the six months ended June 30,
2002 from 2001. Of this decrease, $9.5 million and $3.3 million was due to the
sale of 19 apartments and 13 commercial properties, respectively, in 2002 and
2001. Increases in rents collected of $4.4 million were due to the purchase of
six properties in 2002 and 2001, and the completion of the Limestone Ranch
Apartments and Hotel Akademia in 2002. Rents collected also increased by
$435,000 due to overall increased rents and stable occupancies at TCI's
apartments and by $2.5 million due to lease buy outs and collections of
outstanding receivables at TCI's commercial properties.

      Payments for property operations decreased to $39.2 million in the six
months ended June 30, 2002, compared to $40.8 million in 2001. Of this decrease,
$5.5 million and $1.6 million was due to the sale of 19 apartments and 13
commercial properties, respectively, in 2002 and 2001 and $457,000 was due to
decreased operations at the U.S. hotels. This increase was offset by increases
of $455,000 and $687,000 due to the completion of the Limestone Ranch Apartments
and Hotel

      Akademia, respectively, in the second quarter of 2002. Increases of $2.7
million were due to the purchase of five existing apartments in 2001 and $88,000
was due to the purchase of one shopping center in 2002. Payments for property
operations also increased by $1.1 million, $637,000 and $300,000 at TCI's
apartments, commercial and land properties, respectively. These increases were
mainly from increased taxes and insurance payments.

      Interest collected increased to $1.6 million in the six months ended June
30, 2002, from $700,000 in 2001. The increase was primarily due TCI funding of
seven loans in 2001 and seven loans in 2002.



                                      237


      Interest paid decreased to $19.6 million in the six months ended June 30,
2002, from $20.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2001. Of the decrease,
$4.3 million was from the sale of 27 properties in 2002 and 2001 subject to
debt, and $100,000 was from loan payoffs and principal paydowns in 2002 and
2001. These decreases were offset by increases of $1.6 million from the purchase
of seven properties in 2002 and 2001 subject to debt, and $1.6 million was due
to the refinancing of 14 properties in 2002 and one property in 2001.

      Advisory, incentive and net income fees paid decreased to $2.7 million in
the six months ended June 30, 2002, from $5.1 million in the six months ended
June 30, 2001. The decrease was primarily due to no incentive or net income fees
paid in 2002. The incentive fee is equal to 10% of the amount by which the
aggregate sales consideration for all TCI's properties sold during the year
exceeds the total cost of the property plus a simple 8% annual return to TCI's
net investment in such property.

      General and administrative expenses paid decreased to $5.6 million in the
six months ended June 30, 2002, from $5.9 million in the six months ended June
30, 2001. This decrease was mainly due to a decrease in legal fees and cost
reimbursements to the advisor.

      In the first six months of 2002, TCI sold two apartments, one warehouse,
one shopping center and four office buildings for a total of $44.7 million,
receiving net cash of $16.9 million after the payoff of existing debt and the
payment of various closing costs.

      Also in the first six months of 2002, TCI financed an industrial warehouse
and 14 apartments for a total of $38.5 million, receiving $9.0 million in cash
after the payment of various closing costs.

      Further in the first six months of 2002, TCI purchased five parcels of
unimproved land for apartment construction, one shopping center, one office
building and six parcels of unimproved land for a total of $88.5 million. TCI
paid $5.0 million in cash, including various closing costs, assumed existing
mortgage debt of $56.4 million and acquired new debt of $2.5 million for the
purchases. TCI also expended $28.5 million on property construction, of which
$21.2 million was funded by debt. For the remainder of 2002 and the first
quarter of 2003, TCI expects to expend an additional $121.3 million on property
construction projects, of which $113.5 million will be funded by debt.

      Also in the first six months of 2002, TCI advanced funds to affiliated
parties, including its advisor, for a total of $38.7 million. For this funding,
TCI received 12% return guarantees for $14.4 million, and real estate valued at
$79.3 million and assumed the existing debt of $55.0 million.

      In the third quarter of 2002, TCI sold three apartments for a total of
$16.9 million, receiving net cash of $4.4 million after the payoff of existing
debt and the payment of various closing costs, and received $4.8 million on the
payment of two mortgage loans.


      Management reviews the carrying values of TCI's properties and mortgage
notes receivable at least annually and whenever events or a change in
circumstances indicate that impairment may exist. Impairment is considered to
exist if, in the case of a property, the future cash flow from the property
(undiscounted and without interest) is less than the carrying amount



                                      238

of the property. For notes receivable, impairment is considered to exist if it
is probable that all amounts due under the terms of the note will not be
collected. If impairment is found to exist, a provision for loss is recorded by
a charge against earnings. The mortgage note receivable review includes an
evaluation of the collateral property securing each note. The property review
generally includes: (1) selective property inspections; (2) a review of the
property's current rents compared to market rents; (3) a review of the
property's expenses; (4) a review of maintenance requirements; (5) a review of
the property's cash flow; (6) discussions with the manager of the property; and
(7) a review of properties in the surrounding area.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 COMPARED TO JUNE 30, 2001. TCI had net
losses of $1.9 million and $3.2 million in the three and six months ended June
30, 2002, including gains on sale of real estate totaling $7.2 million and $12.7
million, compared to net income of $14.3 million and $14.6 million in the
corresponding periods in 2001, including gains on sale of real estate totaling
$22.3 million and $28.7 million. Fluctuations in this and other components of
revenues and expense between the 2002 and 2001 periods are discussed below.

      Rents in the three months ended June 30, 2002, increased to $30.0 million
compared to $28.4 million in 2001. Of this increase, $1.8 million and $140,000
was due to the purchase of five existing apartments and one shopping center,
respectively, in 2002 and 2001, and $378,000 and $181,000 was due to the
completion of the Limestone Ranch Apartments and Hotel Akademia, respectively,
in the second quarter of 2002. Rents also increased by $42,000 due to increased
rents and stable occupancies at TCI's apartments. These increases were offset by
decreases of $463,000 and $478,000 due to decreases in occupancies at TCI's
commercial properties and four U.S. hotels, respectively. Occupancies decreased
to 79% in the second quarter of 2002 compared to 86% in the second quarter of
2001 from commercial properties located in Texas, Georgia, Florida and Virginia.
These properties represented approximately 43% of the revenues in TCI's
commercial portfolio.

      Rents in the six months ended June 30, 2002, increased to $58.5 million
compared to $54.5 million in 2001. Of this increase, $4.5 million was due to the
purchase of six properties in 2002 and 2001, and the completion of the Limestone
Ranch Apartments and Hotel Akademia in 2002. Rents also increased by $363,000
due to overall increased rents and stable occupancies at TCI's apartments. These
increases were offset by decreases of $923,000 due to decreases in occupancies
at TCI's four U.S. hotels. Overall occupancies for the commercial portfolio
remained constant for the six months ended June 30, 2002. However, occupancies
decreased to 80% from 86% in the six months ended June 30, 2002, from commercial
properties located in Texas, Georgia, Florida and Virginia. These properties
represented approximately 44% of the revenues in TCI's commercial portfolio.
Rents are expected to remain constant or decrease in the remaining quarters of
2002 as commercial occupancies continue to decrease.

      Property operations expense increased to $18.9 million and $36.3 million
in the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to $15.0 million and
$30.4 million in 2001. Of these three and six month increases, $455,000 and
$487,000 was due to the completion of the Limestone Ranch Apartments and Hotel
Akademia, respectively, in the second quarter of 2002. Increases of $1.2 million
and $2.7 million for the quarter and six months, were due to the




                                      239


purchase of five existing apartments in 2001 and $74,000 and $88,000 was due to
the purchase of one shopping center in 2002. Property operations expenses for
TCI's apartments increased by $881,000 and $1.1 million in the three and six
months ended June 30, 2002. These increases include $301,000 and $550,000 from
taxes and insurance, $247,000 and $293,000 from replacements and $137,000 and
$264,000 from personnel expenses. Property operations expenses for TCI's
commercial properties increased by $559,000 and $1.2 million in the three and
six months ended June 30, 2002. These increases include $314,000 and $473,000
from taxes and insurance, $155,000 and $405,000 from repairs and $171,000 and
$318,000 from personnel expenses. Property operations expenses for TCI's land
properties increased by $299,000 and $330,000 in the three and six months ended
June 30, 2002, due to increased taxes. These increases were offset by decreases
of $106,000 and $459,000 due to decreases in occupancies from the U.S. hotels.
Property operations expenses for the remaining quarters of 2002 are expected to
increase as TCI continues to upgrade its apartments and improve its commercial
leasing potential.

      Interest and other income increased to $984,000 and $2.1 million in the
three and six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to $670,000 and $1.3 million
in 2001. The increase was primarily due to TCI funding seven loans in 2001 and
seven loans in 2002. Interest income for the remaining quarters of 2002 are
expected to increase from the additional loans funded in 2002.

      Equity in losses of investees decreased to $291,000 and $1.6 million in
the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 from $1.0 million and $2.4 million
in the three and six months ended June 30, 2001. The decrease in losses from
equity investees is primarily attributed to decreased operating losses at ARI.

      Interest expense increased to $9.6 million in the three months ended June
30, 2002, from $8.1 million in 2001. Of this increase, $796,000 was due to
prepayment fees related to the refinancing of 14 properties in 2002, $947,000
was due to the purchase of eight properties subject to debt in 2002 and 2001,
$40,000 was due to the refinancing of one commercial property in 2002, and
$192,000 was due to the refinancing of 13 apartments in 2002. The increases were
offset by decreases of $90,000 and $365,000 due to lower variable rates and
principal paydowns at TCI's apartments and commercial properties, respectively.

      Interest expense increased to $18.0 million in the six months ended June
30, 2002, compared to $16.6 million in 2001. Of this increase, $796,000 was due
to prepayment fees related to the refinancing of 14 properties in 2002, $1.8
million was due to the purchase of eight properties subject to debt in 2002 and
2001, $40,000 was due to the refinancing of one commercial property in 2002, and
an increase of $192,000 was due to the refinancing of 12 apartment properties in
2002. These increases were offset by decreases of $357,000 and $970,000 due to
lower variable interest rates and principal paydowns at TCI's apartments and
commercial properties, respectively.

      Depreciation expense increased to $4.9 million and $9.8 million in the
three and six months ended June 30, 2002, from $4.1 million and $8.1 million in
2001. Of these increases, $281,000 and $558,000 were due to the purchase of five
apartments in 2002 and 2001 and $103,000 and $168,000 were due to the completion
of the Limestone Ranch Apartments and Hotel Akademia in 2002. Increases of
$353,000 and $892,000 were due to building and tenant




                                      240



improvements at TCI's commercial properties, and increases of $31,000 and
$81,000 were due improvements at TCI's hotels. Depreciation expense for the
remaining quarters of 2002 is expected to increase as TCI completes its
apartment construction projects.

        For the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, TCI recorded a $1.9
million provision for asset impairment representing the write down of shares at
an exercise price of $8.875 and $16.05, respectively, per common share. In
February 2002, TCI purchased 20,000 options outstanding from retired directors
R. Douglas Leonhard and Edward Zampa for $82,000. In July 2002, Ted Stokely and
Martin White exercised their options for 15,000 shares. As of July 31, 2002, no
options were outstanding.

        In the three and six months of 2002, gains on sale of real estate
totaling $7.1 million and $9.6 million were recognized, $659,000 on the sale of
the Primrose Apartments, $1.2 million on the sale of the Central Storage
Warehouse, a $608,000 deferred gain on the sale of the Madison at Bear Creek
Apartments, $1.3 million on the sale of the NASA Office Building, a $1.5 million
deferred gain on the sale of McCallum Glen Apartments, $3.4 million on the sale
of Jefferson Office Building, $895,000 on the sale of Windsor Office Building
and a $72,000 loss on the sale of South Green Apartments.

        In the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, gains on sale of real
estate totaling $20.6 million and $25.8 million were recognized. The gains
included $1.6 million on the sale of the Heritage Apartments, $167,000 on the
sale of Zodiac Warehouse, $355,000 on the sale of a tract of the McKinney 36
land parcel, $1.0 million on the sale of Forest Ridge Apartments, $1.0 million
on the sale of Park at Colonade Apartments, $1.0 million on the sale of a tract
of the Round Mountain land parcel, $4.6 million on the sale of Fontenelle
Apartments, $601,000 on the sale of Bent Tree Gardens Apartments, $9.1 million
on the sale of Waterstreet Office Building, $4.2 million on the sale of
Technology Trading Center, $1.4 million on the sale of McCallum Glen Apartments,
$836,000 on the sale of Daley Office Plaza, and a loss of $71,000 on the Moss
Creek land parcel.




        2000 COMPARED TO 1999. TCI had net income of $29.8 million in 2000, as
compared to $30.2 million in 1999. Net income for 2000 included gains on the
sale of real estate of $50.6 million. Net income for 1999 included gains on the
sale of real estate of $40.5 million. Fluctuations in the components of revenue
and expense between 2000 and 1999 are discussed below.

        Rents increased to $139.7 million in 2000 from $82.1 million in 1999. Of
the increase, $2.5 million was due to the completion of the Limestone Canyon
Apartments in December 1999; $8.5 million was due to properties purchased or
obtained through foreclosure in 2000 and 1999; $57.4 million was due to the
properties obtained in the acquisition of CMET and the remaining $2.1 million
was primarily due to increased apartment and commercial property occupancy and
rental rates. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $10.6
million due to properties sold in 2000 and 1999, and a decrease of $2.5 million
from the four hotels.

        Property operating expenses increased to $78.2 million in 2000 from
$44.5 million in 1999. Of the increase, $4.3 million was due to properties
purchased in 2000 and 1999 and $32.8



                                      241


million was due to the properties obtained in the acquisition of CMET. These
increases were partially offset by a decrease of $3.8 million due to properties
sold in 2000 and 1999.

        Interest and other income increased to $2.4 million in 2000 from
$453,000 in 1999. The increase in interest income was due to the funding of
notes receivable in 2000. See Note 4. "Notes and Interest Receivable" to the TCI
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement and prospectus.

        Interest expense increased to $48.1 million in 2000 from $27.7 million
in 1999. Of this increase, $4.5 million was due to properties purchased in 2000
and 1999, $17.5 million was due to the properties obtained in the acquisition of
CMET and $843,000 was due to property financings and refinancings during 2000
and 1999. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $3.3 million
due to properties sold and mortgages paid off in 2000 and 1999.

        Depreciation expense increased to $19.7 million in 2000 from $11.7
million in 1999. Of the increase, $1.6 million was due to properties purchased
in 2000 and 1999, $7.4 million was due to properties obtained in the acquisition
of CMET and the remainder from property additions and tenant improvements. These
increases were partially offset by a decrease of $1.7 million due to properties
sold in 2000 and 1999.

        Advisory and net income fees increased to $7.7 million in 2000 from $5.7
million in 1999. The increase was due to an increase in the advisory fee from an
increase in gross assets, the basis for the fee. The increase in gross assets
was due in part to the assets obtained in the acquisition of CMET. Net income
fees of $2.4 million in 2000 approximated $2.5 million in 1999. See Note 13.
"Advisory Agreement" to the TCI consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this joint proxy statement and prospectus.

        General and administrative expenses increased to $8.5 million in 2000
from $3.3 million in 1999. The increase was primarily due to legal fees incurred
on litigation related matters, taxes and an increase in advisor cost
reimbursements.

        Equity losses from investees were $556,000 in 2000 compared to income of
$102,000 in 1999. The decrease was primarily due to increased operating expenses
of IOT, an equity investee. See Note 7. "Investment in Equity Method Real Estate
Entities" to the TCI consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in
this joint proxy statement and prospectus.

        In 2000, gains on sale of real estate totaling $50.6 million were
realized; $572,000 on the sale of Hunters Bend Apartments, a $4.8 million
previously deferred gain on the sale of McKinney land, TCI's share of gains
recognized by an equity affiliate of $4.6 million, $3.6 million on the sale of
Westgate of Laurel Apartments, $3.2 million on the sale of Apple Creek
Apartments, $1.2 million on the sale of Villas at Fair Park Apartments, $633,000
on the sale of Chateau Charles Hotel, $1.5 million on the sale of Brookfield
Warehouses, $1.5 million on the sale of Villas at Countryside Apartments,
$706,000 on the sale of Ashley Crest Apartments, $206,000 on the sale of Shady
Trail Warehouse, $1.0 million on the sale of Eagle Rock Apartments, $184,000 on
the sale of a portion of the Allen land parcel, $3.8 million on the sale of
Woodbridge Apartments, $2.1 million on the sale of the McKinney land, $3.1
million on the



                                      242


sale of a portion of the Watters Road/Highway 121 land parcel, $5.4 million on
the sale of Shadow Run Apartments, $3.0 million on the sale of Parkwood Knoll
Apartments, $2.6 million on the sale of Villa Piedra Apartments, $1.1 million on
the sale of Country Bend Apartments, $5.1 million on the sale of Fountain
Village Apartments, and $793,000 on the sale of Crescent Place Apartments. See
Note 3. "Real Estate" to the TCI consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this joint proxy statement and prospectus.

        In 1999, gains on sale of real estate totaling $40.5 million were
realized; $1.9 million on the sale of Mariner's Pointe Apartments, $8.3 million
on the sale of 74 New Montgomery Office Building, $675,000 on the sale of
Republic land, $5.2 million on the sale of Parke Long Industrial Warehouse,
$153,000 on the sale of a portion of the Moss Creek land parcel, $5.3 million on
the sale of Corporate Center Industrial Warehouse, $747,000 on the sale of Laws
land, $4.4 million on the sale of Sullyfield Industrial Warehouse, $5.6 million
on the sale of Spa Cove Apartments, $4.7 million on the sale of Woods Edge
Apartments and $3.6 million, TCI's share of the gains realized by three equity
investees on the sale of two shopping centers and two office buildings. See Note
3. "Real Estate" and Note 7. "Investment in Equity Method Real Estate Entities"
to the TCI consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this joint
proxy statement and prospectus.

ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

        Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances
and regulations, TCI may be potentially liable for removal or remediation costs,
as well as certain other potential costs, relating to hazardous or toxic
substances (including governmental fines and injuries to persons and property)
where property-level managers have arranged for the removal, disposal or
treatment of hazardous or toxic substances. In addition, certain environmental
laws impose liability for release of asbestos-containing materials into the air,
and third parties may seek recovery for personal injury associated with such
materials.

        Management is not aware of any environmental liability relating to the
above matters that would have a material adverse effect on TCI's business,
assets or results of operations.

INFLATION

        The effects of inflation on TCI's operations are not quantifiable.
Revenues from property operations tend to fluctuate proportionately with
inflationary increases and decreases in housing costs. Fluctuations in the rate
of inflation also affect sales values of properties and the ultimate gain to be
realized from property sales. To the extent that inflation affects interest
rates, TCI's earnings from short-term investments, the cost of new financings as
well as the cost of variable interest rate debt will be affected.

TAX MATTERS

        For the year 1999, TCI elected and in the opinion of management,
qualified to be taxed as a REIT as defined under Sections 856 through 860 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. During the third quarter of 2000, due
to a concentration in ownership, TCI no longer met the requirements for tax
treatment as a REIT under the Code. Under the Code, TCI is prohibited from
re-qualifying for REIT tax status for at least five years.



                                      243


        Financial statement income varies from taxable income principally due to
the accounting for income and losses of investees, gains and losses from asset
sales, depreciation on owned properties, amortization of discounts on notes
receivable and payable and the difference in the allowance for estimated losses.
TCI had a loss for federal income tax purposes in the first quarter of 2002 and
2001; therefore, it recorded no provision for income taxes.



                                      244

               QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES REGARDING
                               MARKET RISK OF TCI

        TCI's future operations, cash flow and fair values of financial
instruments are partially dependent upon the then existing market interest rates
and market equity prices. Market risk is the change in the market rates and
prices, and the effect of the changes on future operations. Market risk is
managed by matching a property's anticipated net operating income to an
appropriate financing.

        TCI is exposed to interest rate risk associated with variable rate notes
payable and maturing debt that has to be refinanced. TCI does not hold financial
instruments for trading or other speculative purposes, but rather issues these
financial instruments to finance its portfolio of real estate assets. TCI's
interest rate sensitivity position is managed by the Company's finance
department. Interest rate sensitivity is the relationship between changes in
market interest rates and the fair value of market rate sensitive assets and
liabilities. TCI's earnings are affected as changes in short-term interest rates
impact its cost of variable rate debt and maturing fixed rate debt. A large
portion of TCI's market risk is exposure to short-term interest rates from
variable rate borrowings. The impact on TCI's financial statements of
refinancing fixed rate debt that matured during 2001 was not material. As
permitted, management intends to convert a significant portion of those
borrowings from variable rates to fixed rates in 2002. If market interest rates
for variable rate debt average 100 basis points more in 2002 than they did
during 2001, TCI's interest expense would increase, and income would decrease by
$1.4 million. This amount is determined by considering the impact of
hypothetical interest rates on TCI's borrowing cost. This analysis did not
consider the effects of the reduced level of overall economic activity that
could exist in such an environment. Further, in the event of a change of such
magnitude, management would likely take actions to further mitigate its exposure
to the change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that
would be taken and their possible effects, the sensitivity analysis assumes no
change in TCI's financial structure.

        The following table contains only those exposures that existed at
December 31, 2001. Anticipation of exposures or risk on positions that could
possibly arise was not considered. TCI's ultimate interest rate risk and its
effect on operations will depend on future capital market exposures, which
cannot be anticipated with a probable assurance level. Dollars in thousands.


                                                                                                                     
Assets
Notes receivable
Variable interest rate-fair value ..................................................................................... $2,932




                                        2002           2003           2004          2005        2006     THEREAFTER      TOTAL
                                      -------         ------         ------        ------      ------    ----------     -------
                                                                                                   
Instrument's maturities ..........    $    --         $1,738         $1,369         $ --        $ --        $ --         $3,107
Instrument's amortization ........         --             --             --           --          --          --             --
Interest .........................        213             90             39           --          --          --            342
Average rate .....................        7.0%           6.0%           5.8%          --          --          --

Fixed interest rate-fair value ...                                                                                      $20,378




                                        2002           2003           2004        2005       2006      THEREAFTER        TOTAL
                                      -------         ------         ------      ------      ------    ----------       -------
                                                                                                   
Instrument's maturities .....         $12,206         $5,047         $1,970      $   --      $   --      $   --         $19,223
Instrument's amortization....              48             45             49          56          62          99             359
Interest ....................           1,493            684            262          20          14           8           2,481
Average rate ................            13.9%          13.2%          11.8%       10.4%       10.4%       10.4%




                                      245


                                                                                                                  
Liabilities
Non-trading Instruments-Equity
  Price Risk
Notes payable
Variable interest rate-fair value ...                                                                                $142,097




                                        2002          2003         2004         2005         2006     THEREAFTER      TOTAL
                                      --------      -------      -------      -------      -------    ----------     --------
                                                                                                
Instrument's maturities .........     $ 71,956      $18,739      $24,194      $ 9,510      $ 1,636      $ 9,877      $135,912
Instrument's amortization .......        1,453        1,014          905          680          409        6,081        10,542
Interest ........................        6,168        3,487        2,650        1,541        1,032        9,159        24,037
Average rate ....................          6.3%         6.2%         5.6%         5.9%         6.3%         6.3%
Fixed interest rate-fair value ..                                                                                    $319,778




                                          2002         2003         2004         2005         2006      THEREAFTER      TOTAL
                                      --------      -------      -------      -------      -------    ----------     --------
                                                                                                
Instrument's maturities .........     $ 75,187      $17,818      $48,826      $15,864      $14,530      $97,937      $270,162
Instrument's amortization .......        4,159        3,526        3,565        3,130        3,106       23,930        41,416
Interest ........................       23,125       18,651       17,296       13,733       12,445       55,671       140,921
Average rate ....................          8.5%         8.3%         8.0%         7.8%         7.8%         7.8%



        At June 30, 2002, TCI's exposure to a change in interest rates on its
debt is as follows:





                                  Balance         Weighted Average Interest Rate           Effect of 1% Increase In Base Rates
                                  -------         ------------------------------           -----------------------------------
                                                                                  
Notes payable:
  Variable rate.........         $ 160,244                   6.20%                                  $   1,602
                                 =========                                                          =========

Total decrease in TCI's
  annual net income.....                                                                            $   1,602
                                                                                                    =========

Per share...............                                                                            $     .20
                                                                                                    =========




                                      246


                                MANAGEMENT OF TCI

                     DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF TCI

        The following table sets forth certain information as of July 23, 2002
regarding TCI's executive officers and directors:




Name                                                             Age         Position
----                                                             ---         --------
                                                                       
Mark W. Branigan*...........................                     48          Executive Vice President -- Residential
Henry A. Butler.............................                     52          Director
Earl D. Cecil**.............................                     73          Director
Louis J. Corna*.............................                     54          Executive Vice President - Tax
Ronald E. Kimbrough*........................                     49          Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
David W. Starowicz*.........................                     46          Executive Vice President -- Commercial Asset Management
Ted P. Stokely..............................                     68          Director and Chairman of the Board
Martin L. White.............................                     62          Director



        HENRY BUTLER: Director (Affiliated) (since December 2001) of TCI. Broker
-- Land Sales (since 1992) of Basic Capital Management, Inc. ("BCM");
Owner/Operator (1989 to 1991) of Butler Interests, Inc.; and Director (since
December 2001) of IOT.


        TED P. STOKELY: Director (Independent) (since April 1990) and Chairman
of the board (since January 1995) of TCI. General Manager (since January 1995)
of ECF Senior Housing Corporation, a nonprofit corporation; General Manager
(since January 1993) of Housing Assistance Foundation, Inc., a nonprofit
corporation; General Manager since April 2002 of Unified Housing Foundation,
Inc., a Texas 501(c)3 non-profit corporation that owns apartments; and Director
(since April 1990) and Chairman of the board (since January 1995) of IOT.


        MARTIN L. WHITE: Director (Independent) (since January 1995) of TCI.
Chief Executive Officer (since 1995) of Builders Emporium, Inc.; Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer (since 1993) of North American Trading Company Ltd.;
President and Chief Operating Officer (since 1992) of Community Based
Developers, Inc.; and Director (since January 1995) of IOT.

        In addition to the foregoing officers, TCI has several vice presidents
and assistant secretaries who are not listed herein. The business address of
each director and executive officer is 1800 Valley View Lane, Suite 300, Dallas,
Texas 75234. The business telephone number of each person is 469-522-4200. Each
director and executive officer is a citizen of the United States.


--------

* See "The Advisor - BCM - Directors and Principal Officers of Advisor" for
background and business experience information.

** See "Management of ARL - Directors and Executive Officers of ARL" for
background and business experience information.


                                      247



        Although the TCI board of directors is directly responsible for managing
the affairs of TCI and for setting the policies which guide it, its day-to-day
operations are performed by BCM, a contractual advisor under the supervision of
the board. The duties of BCM include, among other things, locating,
investigating, evaluating and recommending real estate and mortgage note
investment and sales opportunities, as well as financing and refinancing
sources. BCM also serves as a consultant in connection with TCI's business plan
and investment decisions made by the TCI board. BCM is indirectly owned by a
trust for the children of Gene E. Phillips. Mr. Phillips is not an officer or
director of BCM, but serves as a representative of the trust, is involved in
daily consultation with the officers of BCM and has significant influence over
the conduct of BCM's business, including the rendering of its advisory services
and the making of investment decisions for itself and for TCI.


        BCM has been providing advisory services to TCI since March 28, 1989.
BCM also serves as advisor to IOT and ARL. The directors of TCI are also
directors of IOT. The officers of TCI also serve as officers of ARL, IOT, and
BCM. As of July 16, 2002, TCI owned approximately 24% of IOT's outstanding
shares of common stock and ARL indirectly owned approximately 28.5% and BCM
directly and indirectly owned approximately 14.5% of the outstanding shares of
TCI's common stock.

        Since February 1, 1990, affiliates of BCM have provided property
management services to TCI. Currently, Triad provides such property management
services. Triad subcontracts with other entities for the provision of
property-level management services to TCI. The general partner of Triad is BCM.
The limited partner of Triad is GS Realty, a related party. Triad subcontracts
the property-level management and leasing of 52 of TCI's commercial properties
and the two commercial properties owned by real estate partnerships in which TCI
and IOT are partners to Regis, a related party, which is a company owned by GS
Realty. Regis is entitled to receive property and construction management fees
and leasing commissions in accordance with the terms of its property-level
management agreement with Triad. Regis also is entitled to receive real estate
brokerage commissions in accordance with the terms of a non-exclusive brokerage
agreement. Regis Hotel Corporation, a related party, manages TCI's four hotels.

        TCI has no employees. Employees of BCM render services to TCI.


GENE E. PHILLIPS

        Gene E. Phillips: Age 65, serves as a representative of a trust for the
benefit of his children that indirectly owns BCM. As the trust's representative,
Mr. Phillips is involved in daily consultation with the officers of BCM and has
significant influence over the conduct of BCM's business, including the
rendering of its advisory services and the making of investment decisions for
itself and for ARL, TCI and IOT. Mr. Phillips has been an advisor to BCM since
its inception in July 2000 and before that to American Realty Trust, Inc.,
currently a subsidiary of ARL, since February 6, 1989. In addition, Mr. Phillips
has been actively involved in advising entities affiliated with the trust for
more than the last five years. In August 2002, Mr. Phillips and five
corporations, including BCM, affiliated with Mr. Phillips or the trust for his
children that indirectly owns BCM, agreed in negotiations with the staff of the
SEC to enter into an Order Instituting Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, in an administrative proceeding
brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission and pay a substantial civil
penalty in connection




                                      248



therewith. Although the Order has been agreed to by Mr. Phillips, the five
entities affiliated with Mr. Phillips or the trust and the staff of the SEC, it
has not been formally approved by the SEC. The Order in its current form finds,
among other things, that Mr. Phillips and each of the five corporations,
including BCM, had violated Section 13(d) and 10(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and Rules 10b-5, 13d-1 and 13d-2 promulgated
thereunder, by failing to file reports required under Section 13(d) with respect
to the securities of Greenbriar Corporation. The Order further determines that
Mr. Phillips had substantial contact with the management of BCM and had a
significant influence on its advisory services and investment decisions as well
as the investment decisions of the five other entities that are the subject of
the Order. The Order also determines that Mr. Phillips exercised the same
influence over the management and investment decisions of American Realty Trust,
Inc., currently a subsidiary of ARL. The Order requires Mr. Phillips and the
five corporations, including BCM, to cease and desist from committing or causing
any violation of Sections 10(b) and 13(d) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5,
13d-1 and 13d-2 promulgated thereunder. Mr. Phillip's business address is 1800
Valley View Lane, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas 75234. Mr. Phillips business
telephone number is 469-522-4200. Mr. Phillips is a citizen of the United
States.


                          EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION OF TCI

        TCI has no employees, payroll or benefit plans and pays no compensation
to its executive officers. The executive officers of TCI, who are also officers
or employees of BCM, TCI's advisor, are compensated by BCM. Such executive
officers perform a variety of services for BCM and the amount of their
compensation is determined solely by BCM. BCM does not allocate the cash
compensation of its officers among the various entities for which it serves as
advisor. See "Directors, Executive Officers and Advisor of ARL" for a more
detailed discussion of the compensation payable to BCM.

        The only remuneration paid by TCI is to the directors who are not
officers or directors of BCM or its affiliated companies. The independent
directors (1) review the business plan of TCI to determine that it is in the
best interest of stockholders, (2) review the advisory contract, (3) supervise
the performance of the advisor and review the reasonableness of the compensation
paid to the advisor in terms of the nature and quality of services performed,
(4) review the reasonableness of the total fees and expenses of TCI and (5)
select, when necessary, a qualified independent real estate appraiser to
appraise properties acquired.

        Each independent director receives compensation in the amount of $30,000
per year, plus reimbursement for expenses. The chairman of the board receives an
additional fee of $3,000 per year. In addition, each independent director
receives an additional fee of $1,000 per day for any special services rendered
by him to TCI outside of his ordinary duties as director, plus reimbursement of
expenses.

        During 2001, $302,318 was paid to Independent Directors in total
Directors' fees for all services including the annual fee for service during the
period January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001, and 2001 special service fees
as follows: Roy E. Bode, $59,873; Earl D. Cecil, $7,003; Collene C. Currie,
$79,743; Cliff Harris, $70,333; Joseph Mizrachi, $50,716; and Richard D. Morgan,
$34,650.



                                      249


DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN

        TCI has established the TCI Director Plan for the purpose of attracting
and retaining directors who are not officers or employees of TCI or BCM. The TCI
Director Plan provides for the grant of options that are exercisable at fair
market value of TCI's common stock on the date of grant. The TCI Director Plan
was approved by stockholders at their annual meeting on October 10, 2000,
following which each then-serving independent director was granted options to
purchase 5,000 shares of TCI common stock. On January 1 of each year, each
independent director will receive options to purchase 5,000 shares of common
stock. The options are immediately exercisable and expire on the earlier of the
first anniversary of the date on which a director ceases to be a director or 10
years from the date of grant.

        As of June 30, 2002, TCI had 140,000 shares of common stock reserved for
issuance under the TCI Director Plan of which options for 130,000 shares were
outstanding.



                                      250

                    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
                          OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT OF TCI

        SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS. The following table
sets forth the ownership of TCI's common stock, both beneficially and of record,
both individually and in the aggregate, for those persons or entities known to
be beneficial owners of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock
as of the close of business on July 16, 2002.








                                                                                        Shares of Series
                                                              Amount and                  G Redeemable      Percentage of
                                                               Nature of                   Convertible      Class if the
                                                              Beneficial                 Preferred Stock   Non-Affiliates
                                                             Ownership of    Percent      Beneficially        Elect to
                                                              TCI Common        of       Owned After the       Receive
               Name of Beneficial Owner                          Stock       Class(1)      TCI Merger          Cash(2)
               ------------------------                      ------------    --------   ----------------   --------------
                                                                                               
EQK Holdings, Inc.(4)(5)(6)..................                 3,994.300        49.5%               --             --
Basic Capital Management, Inc.(5)(7).........                 1,166,947        14.5%        1,140,472           97.8%



                                                                                   Shares of
                                                              Percentage of        Series H
                                                              Class if the        Redeemable
                                                             Non-Affiliates       Convertible           Percentage
                                                                Elect to           Preferred           of Class if
                                                             Receive Series          Stock               the Non-
                                                              G Redeemable       Beneficially           Affiliates
                                                               Convertible        Owned After            Elect to
                                                                Preferred           the IOT              Receive
               Name of Beneficial Owner                           Stock             Merger               Cash(3)
               ------------------------                      --------------      ------------          -----------
                                                                                              
EQK Holdings, Inc.(4)(5)(6)..................                       --                   --                 --
Basic Capital Management, Inc.(5)(7).........                     28.3%             106,802                100%


                                                                                         Shares of ARL
                                                                                         Common Stock
                                                                                      Beneficially Owned
                                                                                     After the TCI and IOT
                                                            Percentage of Class        Mergers Assuming
                                                                if the Non-        Conversion of all Series
                                                            Affiliates Elect to         G and Series H
                                                              Receive Series H            Redeemable
                                                                 Redeemable          Convertible Preferred
                                                                Convertible         Stock and Nonaffiliates      Percentage
               Name of Beneficial Owner                       Preferred Stock        Elect to Receive Cash        of Class
               ------------------------                     -------------------    ------------------------      ----------
                                                                                                        
EQK Holdings, Inc.(4)(5)(6)..................                         --                             --               --
Basic Capital Management, Inc.(5)(7).........                       15.6%                     9,721,229             66.9%



(1)     Percentage is based upon 8,072,594 shares of TCI common stock
        outstanding at July 16, 2002.

(2)     Percentage is based upon 1,165,699 shares of Series G redeemable
        convertible preferred stock outstanding after the TCI merger if all
        persons not affiliated with ARL elect to receive cash and 4,025,344
        shares of Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock outstanding
        after the TCI merger if all persons not affiliated with ARL elect to
        receive Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock.

(3)     Percentage is based upon 106,802 shares of Series H redeemable
        convertible preferred stock outstanding after the IOT merger if all
        persons not affiliated with ARL elect to receive cash and 683,282 shares
        of Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock outstanding after the
        TCI merger if all persons not affiliated with ARL elect to receive
        Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock.

(4)     Includes 3,994,300 shares of TCI common stock of which ARL may be deemed
        to beneficially own. EQK Holdings, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
        American Realty Trust, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ARL.

(5)     The business address of EQK Holdings and BCM is 1800 Valley View Lane,
        Suite 300, Dallas, Texas 75234.

(6)     The shares of TCI common stock owned by EQK Holdings will be cancelled
        as part of the TCI merger.

(7)     Includes 26,475 shares of TCI common stock owned by Syntek Asset
        Management L.P., a subsidiary of ARL, that may be deemed to be
        indirectly beneficially owned by BCM. The general partners of Syntek
        Asset Management, L.P., are Gene E. Phillips and Syntek Asset
        Management, Inc. Syntek Asset Management, Inc. is a wholly-owned
        subsidiary of BCM. Mr. Gene


                                      251


E. Phillips' business address is 1800 Valley View Lane, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas
75234. The shares of TCI common stock held by Syntek Asset Management L.P. will
be cancelled as part of the TCI merger. The business address of Syntek Asset
Management L.P. is 1800 Valley View Lane, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas 75234.




                                      252


        SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT. The following table sets forth the
ownership of TCI's common stock, both beneficially and of record, both
individually and in the aggregate, for the directors and executive officers of
TCI as of the close of business on July 16, 2002.





                                                                       Shares of
                                                                       Series G
                                            Amount                    Redeemable                         Percentage of
                                          and Nature                  Convertible                      Class if the Non-
                                              of                       Preferred      Percentage of    Affiliates Elect
                                          Beneficial                     Stock        Class if the        to Receive
                                           Ownership                 Beneficially    Non-Affiliates        Series G
                                            of TCI       Percent      Owned After       Elect to          Redeemable
                                            Common          of          the TCI          Receive          Convertible
            Name of Beneficial Owner         Stock       Class(1)       Merger           Cash(2)        Preferred Stock
            ------------------------      ----------     --------    ------------    --------------    -----------------
                                                                                         
Mark W. Branigan(4)(5)..................   5,187,722        64.5%       1,140,472        97.8%              28.3%
Henry A. Butler.........................          --          --               --          --                 --
Earl D. Cecil...........................          --          --               --          --                 --
Louis J. Corna(4)(5)....................   5,187,722        64.5%       1,140,472        97.8%              28.3%
Ronald E. Kimbrough(4)(5)...............   5,187,722        64.5%       1,140,472        97.8%              28.3%
David W. Starowicz(4)(5)................   5,187,722        64.5%       1,140,472        97.8%              28.3%
Ted P. Stokely..........................       9,000            *           9,000            *                  *
Martin L. White.........................      14,000            *          14,000            *                  *
Donald W. Phillips(6)...................       2,000            *           2,000            *                  *
All Directors and Executive Officers as
  a group (8 individuals)(4)(5).........   5,211,122        64.8%       1,163,872        99.8%              29.6%


                                                                                                      Shares of ARL
                                                                                                      Common Stock
                                                                                                   Beneficially Owned
                                                                                                  After the TCI and IOT
                                        Shares of Series                      Percentage of         mergers Assuming
                                          H Redeemable     Percentage of    Class if the Non-   Conversion of all Series
                                          Convertible      Class if the    Affiliates Elect to       G and Series H
                                        Preferred Stock   Non-Affiliates    Receive Series H           Redeemable
                                          Beneficially       Elect to          Redeemable         Convertible Preferred
                                        Owned After the       Receive          Convertible       Stock and Nonaffiliates  Percent of
            Name of Beneficial Owner       IOT Merger         Cash(3)        Preferred Stock      Elect to Receive Cash     Class
            ------------------------    ----------------  --------------   -------------------  ------------------------  ----------
                                                                                                           
Mark W. Branigan(4)(5)..................    106,802            100%                15.6%                9,721,229            66.9%
Henry A. Butler.........................         --             --                   --                        --              --
Earl D. Cecil...........................         --             --                   --                     1,000               *
Louis J. Corna(4)(5)....................    106,802            100%                15.6%                9,721,229            66.9%
Ronald E. Kimbrough(4)(5)...............    106,802            100%                15.6%                9,721,229            66.9%
David W. Starowicz(4)(5)................    106,802            100%                15.6%                9,721,229            66.9%
Ted P. Stokely..........................         --             --                   --                    20,250               *
Martin L. White.........................         --             --                   --                    36,000               *
Donald W. Phillips(6)...................      2,000              *                    *                     9,500               *
All Directors and Executive Officers as
  a group (8 individuals)(4)(5).........    106,802            100%                15.6%                9,778,729            67.3%



----------

*       Less than 1%

(1)     Percentage is based upon 8,042,594 shares of common stock outstanding at
        July 16, 2002.

(2)     Percentage is based upon 1,165,699 shares of Series G redeemable
        convertible preferred stock outstanding after the TCI merger if all
        persons not affiliated with ARL elect to receive cash and 4,025,344
        shares of Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock outstanding
        after the TCI merger if all persons not affiliated with ARL elect to
        receive Series G redeemable convertible preferred stock.

(3)     Percentage is based upon 106,802 shares of Series H redeemable
        convertible preferred stock outstanding after the IOT merger if all
        persons not affiliated with ARL elect to receive cash and 683,282 shares
        of Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock outstanding after the
        TCI merger if all persons not affiliated with ARL elect to receive
        Series H redeemable convertible preferred stock.



                                      253



(4)     Includes 26,475 shares of TCI common stock owned by Syntek Asset
        Management, L.P., 1,166,947 shares of TCI common stock owned by BCM and
        3,994,300 shares of TCI common stock owned by EQK. The executive
        officers of TCI disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares. Each of
        the directors of BCM may be deemed to be beneficial owners by virtue of
        their positions as directors of BCM. The directors of ARL and BCM
        disclaim such beneficial ownership. The business address of each
        beneficial owner is 1800 Valley View Lane, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas
        75234.

(5)     Includes 106,802 shares of IOT common stock held by BCM. The executive
        officers of TCI disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares. Each of
        the directors of BCM may be deemed to be beneficial owners by virtue of
        their positions as directors of BCM.


(6)     Donald W. Phillips serves as a Trustee of the May Trust. BCM is
        indirectly owned by the May Trust.




                                      254

                            PERFORMANCE GRAPH OF TCI

        The following performance graph compares the cumulative total
stockholder return on TCI's shares of common stock with the DJ Equity Index and
the DJ Real Estate Index. The comparison assumes that $100 was invested on
December 31, 1996 in TCI's shares of common stock and in each of the indices and
further assumes the reinvestment of all distributions. Past performance is not
necessarily an indicator of future performance.


                              [PERFORMANCE GRAPH]




                                             12/31/1996   12/31/1997   12/31/1998   12/31/1999   12/31/2000   12/31/2001
                                             ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
                                                                                            
Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. ...      100         159          132          136           101         182
Dow Jones US Realty Index .................      100         118           93           88           112         126
Dow Jones US Total Market Index ...........      100         132          165          202           183         161




                                      255


                              INFORMATION ABOUT IOT

                                 BUSINESS OF IOT

        IOT, a Nevada corporation, is the successor to a California business
trust named Income Opportunity Realty Trust organized on December 14, 1984,
which commenced operations on April 15, 1985. IOT has elected to be treated as a
REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code. IOT has, in the opinion of
management, qualified for federal taxation as a REIT for all periods since May
1, 1985.

        IOT files annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and
other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any document filed by IOT
at the SEC's public reference room in Washington, D.C. The public reference room
at the SEC's office in Washington, D.C. is located at 450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public
reference rooms. The company's SEC filings are also available to the public from
commercial document retrieval services and at the web site maintained by the SEC
at "http:\\www.sec.gov." Because IOT's common stock is listed on the AMEX
(symbol: "IOT"), reports and other information concerning IOT can also be
inspected at the office of the AMEX, 86 Trinity Place, New York, New York 10006.

        At December 31, 2001, IOT's real estate consisted of 16 properties held
for investment. In addition, IOT owns interests in two partnerships, each of
which owns a property and a third partnership which holds a wraparound mortgage
note receivable. IOT's real estate portfolio is more fully discussed in "--
Properties of IOT."

BUSINESS PLAN

        IOT's business is investing in equity interests in real estate through
direct equity investments and partnerships, and financing real estate and real
estate related activities through investments in mortgage loans. IOT's real
estate is located in the Pacific, Southeast and Southwest regions of the
continental United States. Information regarding IOT's real estate portfolio is
set forth in "-- Properties of IOT," and in Schedule III to the IOT consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement and
prospectus.

        IOT's business is not seasonal. Management has determined to continue to
pursue a balanced investment strategy, seeking both current income and capital
appreciation. With respect to new investments, management's plan of operation is
to acquire higher class apartment and commercial properties in keeping with the
current class of properties in IOT's real estate portfolio. In 2002, management
intends to focus on income producing property acquisitions to maintain a balance
between income producing and non-income producing properties. Management does
not expect that IOT will seek to fund or acquire additional mortgage loans. IOT
may, however, originate mortgage loans in conjunction with providing purchase
money financing of a property sale. Management also intends to continue its
strategy of maximizing each property's operating income by aggressive property
management through closely monitoring expenses while at the same time making
property renovations and/or improvements where appropriate. While renovation
and/or improvement expenditures increase the amount of



                                      256


revenue required to cover operating expenses, management believes that such
expenditures are necessary to maintain or enhance the value of IOT's properties.

        The board of directors currently intends to continue its policy of
prohibiting IOT from incurring aggregate secured and unsecured indebtedness in
excess of 300% of IOT's net asset value (defined as the book value of all assets
of IOT minus all of its liabilities); however, the board may alter such policy
at any time.

MANAGEMENT OF THE COMPANY

        Although the board of directors is directly responsible for managing the
affairs of IOT and for setting the policies which guide it, the day-to-day
operations of IOT are performed by BCM, a contractual advisor under the
supervision of the Board. BCM's duties include, among other things, locating,
investigating, evaluating and recommending real estate and mortgage note
investment and sales opportunities, as well as financing and refinancing
sources. BCM also serves as a consultant in connection with IOT's business plan
and investment decisions made by the Board.


        BCM is indirectly owned by a trust for the children of Gene E. Phillips.
Mr. Phillips is not an officer or director of BCM, but serves as a
representative of the trust, is involved in daily consultation with the officers
of BCM and has significant influence over the conduct of BCM's business,
including the rendering of its advisory services and the making of investment
decisions for itself and for IOT. BCM is more fully described in "The Advisor --
BCM."


        BCM has been providing advisory services to IOT since March 28, 1989.
BCM also serves as advisor to TCI and directors of IOT are also directors of
TCI. BCM also serves as Advisor to ART. The officers of IOT also serve as
officers of ART, TCI and BCM. As of March 31, 2002, ART and TCI owned
approximately 28.5% and 24.0%, respectively, of IOT's outstanding shares of
common stock and BCM owned approximately 7.4% of IOT's outstanding shares of
common stock.

        Since February 1, 1990, affiliates of BCM have provided property
management services to IOT. Currently Triad Realty Services, Ltd. ("Triad")
provides such property management services. Triad subcontracts with other
entities for the provision of property-level management services to IOT. The
general partner of Triad is BCM. The limited partner of Triad is GS Realty
Services, Inc. ("GS Realty"), a related party. Triad subcontracts the
property-level management and leasing of IOT's seven office buildings and the
two commercial properties owned by real estate partnerships in which IOT and TCI
are partners to Regis Realty, Inc. ("Regis"), a related party, which is a
company also owned by GS Realty. Regis is entitled to receive property and
construction management fees and leasing commissions in accordance with the
terms of its property-level management agreement with Triad.

        Regis also is entitled to receive real estate brokerage commissions in
accordance with the terms of a nonexclusive brokerage agreement as discussed in
"The Advisor."

        IOT has no employees. Employees of BCM render services to IOT.



                                      257



GENE E. PHILLIPS

Gene E. Phillips: Age 65, serves as a representative of a trust for the benefit
of his children that indirectly owns BCM. As the trust's representative, Mr.
Phillips is involved in daily consultation with the officers of BCM and has
significant influence over the conduct of BCM's business, including the
rendering of its advisory services and the making of investment decisions for
itself and for ARL, TCI and IOT. Mr. Phillips has been an advisor to BCM since
its inception in July 2000 and before that to American Realty Trust, Inc.,
currently a subsidiary of ARL, since February 6, 1989. In addition, Mr. Phillips
has been actively involved in advising entities affiliated with the trust for
more than the last five years. In August 2002, Mr. Phillips and five
corporations, including BCM, affiliated with Mr. Phillips or the trust for his
children that indirectly owns BCM, agreed in negotiations with the staff of the
SEC to enter into an Order Instituting Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, in an administrative proceeding
brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission and pay a substantial civil
penalty in connection therewith. Although the Order has been agreed to by Mr.
Phillips, the five corporations affiliated with Mr. Phillips or the trust and
the staff of the SEC, it has not been formally approved by the SEC. The Order
found, among other things, that Mr. Phillips and each of the five corporations,
including BCM, had violated Section 13(d) and 10(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and Rules 10b-5, 13d-1 and 13d-2 promulgated
thereunder, by failing to file reports required under Section 13(d) with respect
to the securities of Greenbriar Corporation. The Order further determines that
Mr. Phillips had substantial contact with the management of BCM and had a
significant influence on its advisory services and investment decisions as well
as the investment decisions of the five other entities that are the subject of
the Order. The Order also determines that Mr. Phillips exercised the same
influence over the management and investment decisions of American Realty Trust,
Inc., currently a subsidiary of ARL. The Order requires Mr. Phillips and the
five corporations, including BCM, to cease and desist from committing or causing
any violation of Sections 10(b) and 13(d) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5,
13d-1 and 13d-2 promulgated thereunder. Mr. Phillip's business address is 1800
Valley View Lane, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas 75234. Mr. Phillips business
telephone number is 469.522.4200. Mr. Phillips is a citizen of the United
States.


COMPETITION

        The real estate business is highly competitive and IOT competes with
numerous entities engaged in real estate activities (including certain entities
described in "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions of ARL, TCI and
IOT--Related Party Transactions"), some of which have greater financial
resources than those of IOT. Management believes that success against such
competition is dependent upon the geographic location of the property, the
performance of the property-level managers in areas such as marketing,
collection and control of operating expenses, the amount of new construction in
the area and the maintenance and appearance of the property. Additional
competitive factors with respect to commercial properties are the ease of access
to the property, the adequacy of related facilities, such as parking, and
sensitivity to market conditions in setting rent levels. With respect to
apartments, competition is also based upon the design and mix of units and IOT's
ability to provide a community atmosphere for the tenants. Management believes
that beyond general economic circumstances and trends, the rate at which
properties are renovated or the rate new properties are developed in the
vicinity of each of IOT's properties also are competitive factors.



                                      258


        To the extent that IOT seeks to sell any of its properties, the sales
prices for such properties may be affected by competition from other real estate
entities and financial institutions also attempting to sell their properties
located in the same areas as well as aggressive buyers attempting to penetrate
or dominate a particular market.

        As described above and in "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions of ARL, TCI and IOT--Related Party Transactions," the officers and
directors of IOT also serve as officers or directors of certain other entities,
also advised by BCM, and which have business objectives similar to those of IOT.
IOT's directors, officers and advisor owe fiduciary duties to such other
entities as well as to IOT under applicable law. In determining to which entity
a particular investment opportunity will be allocated, the officers, directors
and advisor consider the respective investment objectives of each entity and the
appropriateness of a particular investment in light of each entity's existing
real estate and mortgage notes receivable portfolios. To the extent that any
particular investment opportunity is appropriate to more than one of the
entities, the investment opportunity will be allocated to the entity which has
funds available for investment for the longest period of time, or, if
appropriate, the investment may be shared among all or some of such entities.

        In addition, as described in "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions of ARL, TCI and IOT--Related Party Transactions," IOT also competes
with other entities which are affiliates of BCM, which may have investment
objectives similar to IOT's and that may compete with it in the acquisition,
sale, leasing and financing of real estate. In resolving any potential conflicts
of interest which may arise, BCM has informed management that it intends to
continue to exercise its best judgment as to what is fair and reasonable under
the circumstances in accordance with applicable law.

CERTAIN FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH REAL ESTATE AND RELATED INVESTMENTS

        IOT is subject to all the risks incident to ownership and financing of
real estate and interests therein, many of which relate to the general
illiquidity of real estate investments. These risks include, but are not limited
to, changes in general or local economic conditions, changes in interest rates
and the availability of permanent mortgage financing which may render the
acquisition, sale or refinancing of a property difficult or unattractive and
which may make debt service burdensome, changes in real estate and zoning laws,
increases in real estate taxes, federal or local economic or rent controls,
floods, earthquakes, hurricanes and other acts of God and other factors beyond
the control of management or BCM. The illiquidity of real estate investments
also may impair the ability of management to respond promptly to changing
circumstances. Management believes that such risks are partially mitigated by
the diversification by geographic region and property type of IOT's real estate
portfolio. However, to the extent property acquisitions are concentrated in any
particular geographic region or property type, the advantages of diversification
may be mitigated.



                                      259


                                PROPERTIES OF IOT

PROPERTIES

        IOT's principal offices are located at 1800 Valley View Lane, Suite 300,
Dallas, Texas 75234 and are, in the opinion of management, suitable and adequate
for IOT's present operations.

        IOT's real estate portfolio at December 31, 2001, is set forth in
Schedule III to the IOT consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in
this joint proxy statement and prospectus. The discussions set forth below under
the headings "Real Estate" provide certain summary information concerning IOT's
real estate portfolio.

        IOT's real estate portfolio consists of 16 owned properties and an
investment in two partnerships each of which owns a commercial property. IOT
holds a fee simple title to the owned properties. IOT holds one mortgage note
receivable, and a partnership in which it is a 40% general partner that holds a
wraparound mortgage note. The discussion set forth below under the heading "Real
Estate" provides certain summary information concerning IOT's real estate and
further summary information with respect to its owned properties and its
partnership investments.

        IOT's real estate is geographically diverse. At December 31, 2001, IOT
held equity investments in apartments and office buildings in the Pacific,
Southwest and Southeast regions of the continental United States, as shown more
specifically in the table under "Real Estate" below. The majority of IOT's
properties are, however, located in California and Texas. At December 31, 2001,
IOT held a mortgage note secured by a second lien on 165 acres of unimproved
land in The Colony, Texas, as described more specifically under "Mortgage
Loans," below.

        At December 31, 2001, one of IOT's properties, the Travelers land
parcel, exceeded 10% of IOT's total assets. At December 31, 2001, 95% of IOT's
assets consisted of owned properties and less than 1% consisted of investments
in partnerships. The remaining 5% of IOT's assets were cash, cash equivalents
and other assets. The percentage of IOT's assets invested in any one category is
subject to change and no assurance can be given that the composition of IOT's
assets in the future will approximate the percentages listed above. See
"Business of IOT--Business Plan."

        To continue to qualify for federal taxation as a REIT under the Code,
IOT is required, among other things, to hold at least 75% of the value of its
total assets in real estate assets, government securities, cash and cash
equivalents at the close of each quarter of each taxable year.

GEOGRAPHIC REGIONS

        IOT has divided the continental United States into the following
geographic regions.

        Northeast region comprised of the states of Connecticut, Delaware,
Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania,
Rhode Island and Vermont, and the District of Columbia. IOT has no properties in
this region.



                                      260


        Southeast region comprised of the states of Alabama, Florida, Georgia,
Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia. IOT has 1
commercial property in this region.

        Southwest region comprised of the states of Arizona, Arkansas,
Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Texas. IOT has 7 apartments and 2 commercial
properties in this region.

        Midwest region comprised of the states of Illinois, Indiana, Iowa,
Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio,
South Dakota, West Virginia and Wisconsin. IOT has no properties in this region.

        Mountain region comprised of the states of Colorado, Idaho, Montana,
Nevada, Utah and Wyoming. IOT has no properties in this region.

        Pacific region comprised of the states of California, Oregon and
Washington. IOT has 4 commercial properties in this region.

        Excluded from above are two parcels of unimproved land in the Southwest
Region, as described below.

REAL ESTATE

        At December 31, 2001, 95% of IOT's assets were invested in real estate,
on a leveraged basis, in the Pacific, Southeast and Southwest regions of the
continental United States. IOT's real estate portfolio consists of 16 owned
properties and an investment in two partnerships, each of which owns a
commercial property.

        TYPES OF REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS. IOT's real estate consists of
apartments and commercial properties (office buildings) having established
income-producing capabilities. In selecting real estate for investment, the
location, age and type of property; gross rents; lease terms; financial and
business standing of tenants; operating expenses; fixed charges; land values and
physical condition are considered. IOT may acquire properties subject to, or
assume, existing debt and may mortgage, pledge or otherwise obtain financing for
its properties. The IOT board may alter the types of and criteria for selecting
new real estate investments and for obtaining financing without a vote of
stockholders.

        IOT has typically invested in developed real estate, although it also
may invest in new construction or development either directly or in partnership
with nonaffiliated parties or affiliates (subject to approval by the Board). To
the extent that IOT invests in construction and development projects, it will be
subject to business risks, such as cost overruns and construction delays,
associated with such higher risk projects.

        In the opinion of management, IOT's properties are adequately covered by
insurance.



                                      261


        The following table sets forth the percentages, by property type and
geographic region, (other than two parcels of unimproved land, as described
below) of IOT's owned real estate at December 31, 2001.



REGION                                       APARTMENTS               COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES
------                                       ----------               ---------------------
                                                                
Pacific...........................               --%                          69%
Southwest.........................              100                           18
Southeast.........................               --                           13
                                                ---                          ---
                                                100%                         100%
                                                ===                          ===


        The foregoing table is based solely on the number of apartment units and
commercial square footage owned and does not reflect the value of IOT's
investment in each region. IOT owns two parcels of unimproved land, 1.01 acres
and 204 acres, both in the Southwest region. See Schedule III to the IOT
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement and prospectus for a detailed description of IOT's real estate.

        A summary of the activity in IOT's owned real estate portfolio during
2001 is as follows:


                                                      
Owned properties at January 1, 2001 ..............         16
Properties purchased .............................         --
Properties sold ..................................         --
                                                         ----
Owned properties at December 31, 2001 ............         16
                                                         ====


        PROPERTIES HELD FOR INVESTMENT. Set forth below are IOT's owned
properties at December 31, 2001, all of which were held for investment and the
monthly rental rate for apartments and the average annual rental rate for office
buildings and occupancy thereof at December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999:



                                                                              RENT PER SQUARE FOOT               OCCUPANCY %
                                              UNITS/                     ----------------------------     --------------------------
PROPERTY                LOCATION              SQUARE FOOTAGE/ACRES       2001      2000          1999     2001       2000       1999
--------                --------              --------------------       ----      ----          ----     ----       ----       ----
                                                                                                        
APARTMENTS
Brighton Court .....    Midland, TX           60 Units/90,672 Sq.Ft.    $  .54     $  .53        $   *      93         93          *
Del Mar ............    Midland, TX           92 Units/105,348 Sq.Ft.      .50        .50            *      98         98          *
Enclave ............    Midland, TX           68 Units/89,734 Sq.Ft.       .57        .56            *      93         93          *
Meridian ...........    Midland, TX           280 Units/264,000 Sq.Ft.     .45        .41          .46      95         95         69
Signature Place ....    Midland, TX           57 Units/72,480 Sq.Ft.       .57        .56            *      86         86          *
Sinclair Place .....    Midland, TX           114 Units/91,529 Sq.Ft.      .50        .49            *      96         96          *
Treehouse ..........    San Antonio, TX       106 Units/88,957 Sq.Ft.      .84        .83          .80      95         95         96

OFFICE BUILDINGS
2010 Valley View ...    Farmers Branch, TX    39,568 Sq. Ft.             17.98      17.40        16.26      87         86         64
5600 Mowry .........    Newark, CA            56,120 Sq. Ft.             26.70      24.64        22.94      72        100        100
Akard Plaza ........    Dallas, TX            42,895 Sq. Ft.             16.95      15.46        15.34      90         91         92
Chuck Yeager .......    Chantilly, VA         60,060 Sq. Ft.             13.02      11.21        14.70     100         41         41
Daley Plaza ........    San Diego, CA         122,795 Sq. Ft.            18.42      15.32        14.68      98         88         79




                                      262


                                                                                                        
La Mesa Village ....    La Mesa, CA           92,611 Sq. Ft.             19.45      16.87        17.29      68         77         88
Westlake Village ...    Westlake Village, CA  45,500 Sq. Ft.             18.72      18.10        16.96      60         52         70

LAND
Frankel ............    Midland County, TX    1.01 Acres
Travelers ..........    Farmers Branch, TX    204 Acres


*Property was purchased in 2000.
(1) On January 28, 2002, IOT sold the 122,795 sq. ft. Daley Plaza in San Diego,
California, for a sales price of $15.5 million to Janey Enterprises, LP. The
sale constituted 8.14% of the total assets of IOT as of December 31, 2001. IOT
received $8.1 million in cash after the payoff of $8.6 million in debt and
various closing costs and recognized a gain on the sale of $7.1 million

        PARTNERSHIP PROPERTIES. Set forth below is the commercial property owned
by each of the two partnerships in which IOT is an equity investor and the
average annual rental rate and occupancy thereof at December 31, 2001, 2000 and
1999:



                                                                             RENT PER SQUARE FOOT                OCCUPANCY %
                                                                        -----------------------------     --------------------------
PROPERTY                LOCATION              SQUARE FOOTAGE            2001       2000          1999     2001       2000       1999
--------                --------              --------------            ----       ----          ----     ----       ----       ----
                                                                                                        
SHOPPING CENTER
Chelsea Square          Houston, TX           70,275 Sq. Ft.            $ 9.63     $ 9.31        $ 8.78     77         77        100

OFFICE BUILDING
Eton Square             Tulsa, OK             222,654 Sq. Ft.            11.27      10.52          9.77     85         59         87


        TCI is a 63.7% limited partner and IOT is a 36.3% general partner in the
Tri-City which owns the Chelsea Square Shopping Center. In February 2000, the
Chelsea Square Shopping Center was financed in the amount of $2.1 million.
Tri-City received net cash of $2.0 million after the payment of various closing
costs. The mortgage bore interest at a fixed rate of 10.24% per annum until
February 2001, and a variable rate thereafter, currently 10% per annum, requires
monthly payments of principal and interest of $20,601 and matures in February
2005. TCI received a distribution of $1.3 million of the net financing proceeds.
IOT received a distribution of $739,000 of the net financing proceeds. The
business purpose of the transaction was to draw equity from the Chelsea Square
Shopping Center.


        IOT owns a 10% limited partner interest and TCI owns a 90% general
partner interest in TCI Eton Square, L.P., which owns the Eton Square Building
in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

IOT FEDERAL TAX BASIS OF DEPRECIABLE PROPERTY AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001


        For each IOT property upon which depreciation is taken, the table set
forth below includes (i) the Federal tax basis; (ii) rate, (iii) method and (iv)
life claimed as of December 31, 2001.



                                                             Accumulated
                       Gross Federal           Tax          Net Federal Tax
Property                 Tax Basis         Depreciation         Basis                Rate      Method(1)     Life
--------               -------------       ------------     ---------------          ----      ---------     ----
                                                                                          
Apartments
Brighton Court          $ 3,051,349        $  117,599        $ 2,933,750              100%       ADS        40 years
Del Mar                   2,918,682           112,486          2,806,196              100        ADS        40 years




                                      263




                                                             Accumulated
                       Gross Federal           Tax          Net Federal Tax
Property                 Tax Basis         Depreciation         Basis                Rate      Method(1)     Life
--------               -------------       ------------     ---------------          ----      ---------     ----
                                                                                          
Enclave                   2,918,682           112,486          2,806,196              100        ADS        40 years
Meridian                  4,552,319           232,350          4,319,969              100        ADS        40 years
Signature Place           2,388,012            92,034          2,295,978              100        ADS        40 years
Sinclair Place            1,990,010            76,695          1,913,315              100        ADS        40 years
Treehouse                 2,325,236           697,207          1,628,029              100        ADS        20-40 years

Office Buildings
2010 Valley View          3,316,937           279,017          3,037,920              100        ADS        10-40 years
5600 Mowry                5,512,892           543,438          4,969,454              100        ADS        40 years
Akard Plaza               3,230,346           314,863          2,915,483              100        ADS        40 years
Chuck Yeager              5,707,935           601,989          5,105,946              100        ADS        40 years
Daley Plaza               7,206,703           879,607          6,327,096              100        ADS        20-40 years
La Mesa Village           7,515,139           823,201          6,691,938              100        ADS        40 years
Westlake Village          3,561,378           355,504          3,205,874              100        ADS        40 years
                         ----------         ---------         ----------
      TOTAL              56,195,620         5,238,476         50,957,144
                         ==========         =========         ==========


(1) ADS = Alternative Depreciation System
    MACRS = Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System

MORTGAGE LOANS

        Prior to 1991, a substantial portion of IOT's assets had been invested
in mortgage notes secured by income-producing real estate. IOT's mortgage notes
had included first, wraparound and junior mortgage loans. Prior to the third
quarter of 2000, management had not been seeking to fund or acquire new mortgage
loans, other than those which may have originated in conjunction with IOT's
providing purchase money financing of a property sale. See "Business of IOT."
BCM, in its capacity as a mortgage servicer, services the mortgage notes.

        JUNIOR MORTGAGE LOANS. Junior mortgage loans are loans secured by
mortgages that are subordinate to one or more prior liens either on the fee or a
leasehold interest in real estate. Recourse on the loans ordinarily includes the
real estate which secures the loan, other collateral and personal guarantees of
the borrower.

        The following discussion briefly describes the junior mortgage loan
funded in 2000.

        In September 2000, IOT funded a $1.5 million loan, secured by a second
lien on 165 acres of unimproved land in The Colony, Texas. In May 2001, IOT
received $1.0 million as a partial principal paydown. The loan bears interest at
18.0% per annum, requires monthly payments of interest only and matured in
January 2002. In January 2002, the loan was paid off in April 2002.

        PARTNERSHIP MORTGAGE LOANS. IOT owns a 40% general partner interest and
TCI owns a 60% general partner interest in Nakash Income Associates ("NIA"),
which holds a wraparound mortgage note receivable secured by a building occupied
by a Wal-Mart in Maulden, Missouri. IOT advanced the partnership $24,000 in
2001.

CERTAIN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS

        IOT is treated as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. As a result of
the merger, IOT will lose its status as a REIT. Neither ARL nor TCI is a REIT.



                                      264


        The following is a summary of certain U. S. federal income tax
consequences relating to the taxation of a REIT. Because the following is a
summary, it does not address all tax considerations pertaining to a REIT or its
stockholders. Special rules not discussed below may apply to tax exempt
organizations, broker-dealers, non U.S. persons, trusts, estates, regulated
investment companies, financial institutions, insurance companies and other
forms of entities subject to special tax treatment under the Code. The following
summary does not address, state, local or non U.S. tax considerations. This
summary is not intended to be and should not be construed as tax advice and you
are urged to consult with your own tax advisor.

        REQUIREMENTS FOR REIT STATUS. To qualify as a REIT an entity must:

        -       be organized as a corporation, trust or association;

        -       be managed by one or more trustees or directors;

        -       have transferable shares or certificates;

        -       be taxable as a domestic corporation but for the operation of
                Sections 856 - 859 of the Code;

        -       not be a financial institution or insurance company;

        -       be owned by 100 or more persons;

        -       not be closely held; and

        -       elect to be taxed as a REIT.

        In addition to the above requirements, a REIT must meet other tests
contained in the Code, including the asset and income tests described below.

        ASSET AND INCOME TESTS. At the close of each calendar quarter of its
taxable year, a REIT must satisfy the following six asset tests:

        -       75% of the value of the REIT's total assets must consist of real
                estate assets, cash and cash items and government securities;

        -       not more the 25% of the value of the REIT's total assets may
                consist of securities other than those includable under the 75%
                test;

        -       not more than 20% of the value of the REIT's total assets is
                represented by securities of one or more taxable REIT
                subsidiaries;

        -       not more than 5% of the value of a REIT's total assets may
                consist of securities of any one issuer, other than those of a
                taxable REIT subsidiary and securities includable in the 75%
                test;

        -       the REIT does not hold securities possessing more than 10% of
                the total voting power of the outstanding securities of any one
                issuer, other than those of a taxable REIT subsidiary and
                securities includable under the 75% test; and

        -       the REIT does not hold securities having a value of more than
                10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one
                issuer, other than those of a taxable REIT subsidiary and
                securities includable under the 75% asset test.

        In addition to the asset tests, a REIT must satisfy the following two
income tests each year:



                                      265


        -       75% of a REIT's gross income (excluding gross income from
                prohibited transactions) must consist of rents from real
                property, interest on obligations secured by mortgages, gain
                from the sale of real property that was not held primarily for
                sale, dividends from other REITs and gain from the sale of REIT
                shares, refunds and abatements of real property taxes, income
                and gain from foreclosure property, commitment and certain other
                fees, qualified temporary investment income, and gain from the
                sale of certain other property; and

        -       95% of the REIT's gross income (excluding gross income from
                prohibited transactions) must consist of items that would
                satisfy the 75% income test and dividends, interest and gain
                from the sale or other disposition of stocks or securities.

        TAXATION OF A REIT. A REIT generally is not subject to federal income
tax on the income that it distributes to stockholders if it meets certain
distribution and other requirements described in the Code. In general, a REIT
calculates its taxable income similar to other corporations except a REIT is
entitled to a deduction for dividends paid. A REIT is required to distribute to
its stockholders each year at least 90% of its taxable income (excluding net
capital gain).

        A REIT will be taxed at regular corporate rates on its undistributed
"REIT taxable income." REIT taxable income is the taxable income of the REIT
subject to specified adjustments, including a deduction for dividends paid. If a
REIT has net capital gain, the REIT's tax is the lower of the tax imposed on the
REIT taxable income at regular corporate rates or the sum of (x) the tax at
corporate rates on REIT taxable income computed without regard to net capital
gain and the deduction for capital gain dividends, and (y) a tax on
undistributed net capital gain at the rate provided in Code Section 1201(a). A
REIT generally is subject to the alternative minimum tax. If a REIT has "net
income from foreclosure property" it is subject to tax on the income at the
highest corporate rate. A REIT's net income from a "prohibited transaction" is
subject to a 100% tax. If a REIT fails to satisfy the 75% or 95% income tests
discussed above, but has maintained its qualification as a REIT because other
requirements are met, it is subject to 100% tax on the taxable income
attributable to the gross income which has caused it to fail the income test. A
REIT is subject to a 4% excise tax if it fails to make certain minimum
distributions during a calendar year.

        DISTRIBUTIONS TO REIT STOCKHOLDERS. In general, distributions to REIT
stockholders that are made out of current accumulated earnings and profits that
are not designated as capital gain dividends, will be taxable as ordinary income
and will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction generally
available for corporations. REIT distributions in excess of the REIT's earnings
and profits will be considered a return of capital and will not be taxable to
the extent that the distributions do not exceed the adjusted tax basis of the
stockholder in its stock. However, such distributions will reduce the adjusted
basis of such stock. Distributions that exceed a stockholder's adjusted basis in
its stock will be taxable as capital gain if the stock is held as a capital
asset.

        A REIT may elect to designate distributions of its net capital gain as a
capital gain dividend. A distribution designated by a REIT as a capital gain
dividend is treated as a long-term capital gain to the stockholder.



                                      266


                            LEGAL PROCEEDINGS OF IOT

OLIVE LITIGATION

        In February 1990, IOT, together with National Income Realty Trust,
Continental Mortgage and Equity Trust ("CMET") and TCI, three real estate
entities with, at the time, the same officers, directors or trustees and advisor
as IOT, entered into a settlement (the "Settlement") of a class and derivative
action entitled Olive et al. v. National Income Realty Trust et al., relating to
the operation and management of each of the entities. On April 23, 1990, the
Court granted final approval of the terms of the Settlement. The Settlement was
modified in 1994 (the "Modification").

        On January 27, 1997, the parties entered into an Amendment to the
Modification effective January 9, 1997 (the "Olive Amendment"). The Olive
Amendment provided for the settlement of additional matters raised by
plaintiffs' counsel in 1996. The Court issued an order approving the Olive
Amendment on July 3, 1997.

        The Olive Amendment provided that IOT's board retain a
management/compensation consultant or consultants to evaluate the fairness of
the BCM advisory contract and any contract of its affiliates with IOT, CMET and
TCI, including, but not limited to, the fairness to IOT, CMET and TCI of such
contracts relative to other means of administration. In 1998, the board engaged
a management/compensation consultant to perform the evaluation which was
completed in September 1998.

        In 1999, plaintiffs' counsel asserted that the board did not comply with
the provision requiring such engagement and requested that the Court exercise
its retained jurisdiction to determine whether there was a breach of this
provision of the Olive Amendment. In January 2000, the board engaged another
management/compensation consultant to perform the required evaluation again.
This evaluation was completed in April 2000 and was provided to plaintiffs'
counsel. The board believes that any alleged breach of the Olive Amendment has
been fully remedied by the Board's engagement of the second consultant. Although
several status conferences on this matter have been held, there has been no
court order resolving whether there was any breach of the Olive Amendment.

        In October 2000, plaintiffs' counsel asserted that the stock option
agreement to purchase TCI shares, which was entered into by IOT and ARL, an
affiliate of IOT, in October 2000 with an investment fund, breached a provision
of the Modification. As a result of this assertion, IOT assigned all of its
rights to purchase the TCI shares under this stock option agreement to ARL.

        The board believes that the provisions of the Settlement, Modification
and the Olive Amendment terminated on April 28, 1999. However, in September
2000, the Court ruled that certain provisions of the Modification continue to be
effective after the termination date. This ruling was appealed to the United
States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by IOT and TCI.

        On October 23, 2001, IOT, TCI and ARL jointly announced a preliminary
agreement with the plaintiffs' counsel for complete settlement of all disputes
in the lawsuit. In February 2002, the court granted final approval for the
proposed settlement. Under the proposal, the appeal has been dismissed and ARL
will acquire all of the outstanding shares of IOT and TCI



                                      267


not currently owned by ARL for a cash payment or shares of ARL preferred stock.
ARL will pay $19.00 cash per IOT share and $17.50 cash per TCI share for the
stock held by nonaffiliated stockholders. ARL would issue one share of Series H
redeemable convertible preferred stock with a liquidation value of $21.50 per
share for each share of IOT common stock for stockholders who elect to receive
ARL preferred stock in lieu of cash. ARL would issue one share of Series G
redeemable convertible preferred stock with a liquidation value of $20.00 per
share for each share of TCI common stock for stockholders who elect to receive
ARL preferred stock in lieu of cash. Each share of Series H redeemable
convertible preferred stock will be convertible into 2.25 shares of ARL common
stock during a 75-day period that commences fifteen days after the date of the
first ARL Form 10-Q filing that occurs after the closing of the merger
transaction. Upon the acquisition of the IOT and TCI shares, IOT and TCI would
become wholly-owned subsidiaries of ARL. The transaction is subject to the
negotiation of a definitive merger agreement and a vote of the stockholders of
all three entities. IOT has the same board as TCI and the same advisor as TCI
and ARL.



                                      268


                         SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA OF IOT

                  The following is a summary of financial data incorporated by
reference in this joint proxy statement and prospectus. You should read the
following data in conjunction with the more detailed information contained in
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations of IOT" and the IOT consolidated financial statements and related
notes appearing elsewhere in this joint proxy statement and prospectus.




                                 FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                          JUNE 30,                             FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                 -------------------------    --------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    2002           2001          2001           2000           1999         1998           1997
                                 -----------    ----------    -----------    -----------    ----------   -----------    ----------
                                         (unaudited)                      (dollars in thousands, except per share)
                                                                                                   
EARNINGS DATA
Rents ........................   $     5,202         5,425    $    13,001    $    13,731    $   15,968   $    14,326    $   12,221
Property expense .............         2,725         2,649          6,591          6,969         6,768         6,462         5,900
                                 -----------    ----------    -----------    -----------    ----------   -----------    ----------
Operating income .............         2,477         2,776          6,410          6,762         9,200         7,864         6,321

Interest income ..............           378           137            194            319            29           172           266
Income (loss) from equity
  partnerships ...............         5,776         4,362             (9)           (61)          148           113            52
Gain on sale of real estate ..         7,105             0             --         20,878         1,525           180         3,953
                                 -----------    ----------    -----------    -----------    ----------   -----------    ----------
                                       4,184        (1,449)           185         21,136         1,702           465         4,271

Other expense ................             0             0         10,057         11,104         9,580         9,008         7,275
                                 -----------    ----------    -----------    -----------    ----------   -----------    ----------
Net income (loss) ............         4,184        (1,449)        (3,462)   $    16,794    $    1,322   $      (679)   $    3,317
                                 ===========    ==========    ===========    ===========    ==========   ===========    ==========

PER SHARE DATA ...............          2.90         (0.95)
Net income (loss) ............                                $     (2.32)   $     11.03    $      .87   $      (.44)   $     2.18
                                 ===========    ==========    ===========    ===========    ==========   ===========    ==========
Dividends per share ..........   $        --            --             --    $       .45    $      .60   $       .60    $      .40
Weighted average
  Common shares outstanding ..     1,438,945     1,514,045      1,493,675      1,522,510     1,527,386     1,521,832     1,519,888






                                         FOR THE SIX
                                         MONTHS ENDED
                                           JUNE 30,                         FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                         ------------      -------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             2002           2001           2000           1999           1998           1997
                                            -------        -------        -------        -------        -------        -------
                                         (unaudited)
                                                                                                     
BALANCE SHEET DATA
Real estate held for investment, net        $79,179        $87,315        $86,277        $86,542        $83,691        $81,914
Real estate held for sale, net .....             --             --             --             --             --             --
       Foreclosed ..................             --
       Other .......................             --
Notes and interest receivable, net .          6,530            505          1,500             --             --          2,010
Total assets .......................         95,693         91,833         96,519         91,185         88,695         90,309
Notes and interest payable .........         54,448         54,426         54,206         62,852         60,786         61,323
Stockholders' equity ...............          39,40         35,222         39,998         23,991         23,560         25,131
Book value per share ...............        $ 27.39        $ 24.48        $ 26.42        $ 15.69        $ 15.44        $ 16.53





                                      269


           MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
                        AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF IOT

INTRODUCTION

        IOT invests in equity interests in real estate through acquisitions,
leases, partnerships and in mortgage loans. IOT is the successor to a California
business trust organized on December 14, 1984, which commenced operations on
April 10, 1985.


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

        Critical accounting policies are those that are both important to the
presentation of IOT's financial condition and results of operations and require
management's most difficult, complex or subjective judgments. IOT's critical
accounting policies relate to the evaluation of impairment of long-lived assets
and the evaluation of the collectibility of accounts and notes receivable.

        If events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value
of a rental property to be held and used or land held for development may be
impaired, management performs a recoverability analysis based on estimated
undiscounted cash flows to be generated from the property in the future. If the
analysis indicates that the carrying value is not recoverable from future cash
flows, the property is written down to estimated fair value and an impairment
loss is recognized. If management decides to sell rental properties or land held
for development, management evaluates the recoverability of the carrying amounts
of the assets. If the evaluation indicates that the carrying value is not
recoverable from estimated net sales proceeds, the property is written down to
estimated fair value less costs to sell and an impairment loss is recognized
within income from continuing operations. IOT's estimates of cash flow and fair
values of the properties are based on current market conditions and consider
matters such as rental rates and occupancies for comparable properties, recent
sales data for comparable properties and, where applicable, contracts or the
results of negotiations with purchasers or prospective purchasers. IOT's
estimates are subject to revision as market conditions and IOT's assessments of
them change.

        IOT's allowance for doubtful accounts receivable and notes receivable is
established based on analysis of the risk of loss on specific accounts. The
analysis places particular emphasis on past due accounts. Management considers
such information as the nature and age of the receivable, the payment history of
the tenant or other debtor, the financial condition of the tenant or other
debtor and IOT's assessment of its ability to meet its lease or interest
obligations. IOT's estimate of the required allowance, which is reviewed on a
quarterly basis, is subject to revision as these factors change and is sensitive
to the effects of economic and market conditions.


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES


        Cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2002, were $69,000, compared with
$66,000 at December 31, 2001. IOT's principal sources of cash have been, and
will continue to be property operations, proceeds from property sales,
financings and refinancings and partnership distributions. Management
anticipates that IOT will generate excess cash from operations in




                                      270


2002 due to increased rental receipts at its properties, however, such excess
will not be sufficient to discharge all of IOT's debt obligations as they
mature. Management intends to selectively sell income producing real estate,
refinance real estate and incur additional borrowings against real estate to
meet its cash requirements.

        IOT's cash from property operations (rents collected less payments for
expenses applicable to rental income) decreased to $1.5 million in the six
months ended June 30, 2002, from $2.9 million in 2001. Of this decrease, $1.1
million was due to payment of escrows and taxes and $300,000 was due to
decreased occupancies at IOT's commercial properties.

        Interest paid decreased to $1.9 million for the six months ended June
30, 2002, from $2.7 million paid in 2001. Of this decrease, $269,000 was due to
the Traveler's land refinancing in 2001, $279,000 was due to the Daley sale;
$147,000 was due to the refinancing of all IOT's apartments and the remaining
amount was due to lower variable interest rates.

        During the six months ended June 30, 2002, IOT paid $503,000 to its
advisor compared to $432,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2001. Fees paid to
the advisor are based on gross assets and 7.5% of net income. The increase in
advisory and net income fees was due to IOT's net income during the first
quarter of 2002.

        General and administrative expenses paid increased to $613,000 in the
six months ended June 30, 2002, from $436,000 paid in 2001. The increase was due
to increases in insurance and investor relations.

        In the first quarter of 2002, IOT sold one office building for $15.5
million, receiving net cash of $8.1 million after the payoff of existing debt
and the payment of various closing costs. IOT also funded two loans in the first
quarter for $7.1 million.

        In the second quarter of 2002, IOT received $500,000 cash on one
mortgage note and $5.4 million cash on its residential property refinancing.

        Management reviews the carrying values of IOT's properties at least
annually and whenever events or a change in circumstances indicate that
impairment may exist. Impairment is considered to exist if, in the case of a
property, the future cash flow from the property (undiscounted and without
interest) is less than the carrying amount of the property. If impairment is
found to exist, a provision for loss is recorded by a charge against earnings.
The property review generally includes selective property inspections,
discussions with the manager of the property, visits to selected properties in
the area and a review of the following: (1) the property's current rents
compared to market rents, (2) the property's expenses, (3) the property's
maintenance requirements, and (4) the property's cash flows.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


        THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 COMPARED TO JUNE 30, 2001. IOT
had a loss of $889,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002, and net income
of $4.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002, which included gains on
sale of real estate totaling $7.1 million, as compared to net losses of $732,000
and $1.4 million for the corresponding periods in




                                      271


2001. Fluctuations in components of revenue and expense between the 2002 and
2001 periods are discussed below.

        Rents in the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, were $2.5 million
and $5.2 million as compared to $2.8 million and $5.4 million in the
corresponding periods in 2001. These decreases were due to decreased occupancies
at IOT's commercial properties. IOT's commercial properties in California were
the largest contributors to the decrease where occupancies decreased by 24%,
falling to 63% in 2002 from 87% in 2001. Rents for the remainder of 2002 are
expected to remain constant or decline as market forces in California continue
to drive rents lower.

        Property operations expense in the three and six months ended June 30,
2002, was $1.4 million and $2.7 million, as compared to $1.3 million and $2.6
million in the corresponding periods in 2001. This increase was due to taxes on
IOT's land and operations expenses remaining constant throughout the commercial
and residential properties. Property operations expense for the remainder of
2002 is expected to remain constant.

        Interest income in the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, was
$310,000 and $348,000, as compared to $62,000 and $134,000 in the corresponding
periods in 2001. Interest income for the remainder of 2002 is expected to
decrease due to the payment of one loan in April and another loan maturing in
September 2002.

        Equity in income of partnerships in the three and six months ended June
30, 2002, was $48,000 and $30,000, as compared to a loss of $6,000 and income of
$3,000 in the corresponding periods in 2001. The increase was primarily due to a
$950,000 lease buy out from a tenant of which $95,000 was IOT's equity portion
at Eton Square Office Building.

        Interest expense in the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, was
$1.3 million and $2.3 million, as compared to the $1.4 million and $2.7 million
in the corresponding periods in 2001. Of these decreases $108,000 and $299,000
was due to the Traveler's land loan refinancing in 2001, $234,000 and $399,000
was due to the apartment loan refinancing and the remaining amount was due to
lower interest rates. Interest expense for the remaining quarters of 2002 is
expected to approximate the second quarter of 2002.

        Advisory fee expense in the three and six months ended June 30, 2002,
was $163,000 and $348,000, as compared to $234,000 and $391,000 in the
corresponding periods in 2001. The advisory fee is based on IOT's gross assets.
Advisory fees for the remaining quarters of 2002 are expected to approximate the
second quarter of 2002.

        Net income fee was $411,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2002. The
net income fee is payable to IOT's advisor based on 7.5% of IOT's net income.

        General and administrative expense was $352,000 and $637,000 for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2002, as compared to $161,000 and $472,000
in the corresponding periods in 2001. The three and six month increase was
primarily due to an increase in insurance and investor relations. General and
administrative expense for the remaining quarters of 2002 is expected to
approximate that of the second quarter of 2002.



                                      272


        2001 COMPARED TO 2000. IOT reported a net loss of $3.5 million in 2001,
as compared to net income of $16.8 million in 2000, which included gains on real
estate totaling $20.9 million. Fluctuations in these and the other components of
revenue and expense are discussed in the following paragraphs.

        Rents decreased to $13.0 million in 2001 from $13.7 million in 2000. Of
this decrease, $1.6 million was due to the sale of two commercial properties in
2000 and $2.0 million was due to the sale of three apartments in 2000. This
decrease was offset by increases of $1.4 million due to the purchase of five
apartment properties in 2000 and $1.3 million and $151,000 was due to increased
rental rates at IOT's commercial and apartment properties, respectively. Rents
in 2002 are expected to decrease as IOT selectively sells properties.

        Property operations expense decreased to $6.6 million in 2001 from $7.0
million in 2000. Of this decrease, $1.1 million was due to the sale of three
apartments and $570,000 due to the sale of two commercial properties in 2000.
This decrease was offset by an increase of $673,000 due to the purchase of five
apartments in 2000, $320,000 was due to increased utility, cleaning, repairs,
and insurance expenses at IOT's commercial properties, and $250,000 was due to
an increase in property taxes for IOT's land. Properties operations expense is
expected to decrease in 2002 as IOT selectively sells properties.

        Interest income decreased to $194,000 in 2001 from $319,000 in 2000.
This decrease was due to a decrease in short-term investments, and from a $1.0
million principal paydown received in May 2001 on IOT's only note receivable.
Interest income is expected to decrease as IOT's mortgage loan is paid in full
in 2002.

        Interest expense increased to $6.1 million in 2001 from $5.1 million in
2000. Of this increase, $345,000 and $2.0 million was due to the purchase of
five apartments and one unimproved land parcel in 2000, respectively, and
$174,000 was due to one loan refinanced in 2001. These increases were offset by
decreases of $441,000 due to the sale of two commercial properties; $755,000 due
to the sale of three apartments; and $134,000 due to the sale of two unimproved
land parcels in 2000. The remaining decrease of $203,000 was due to lower
variable interest rates at IOT's apartment and commercial properties. Interest
expense in 2002 is expected to decrease from 2001 due to a decrease in
outstanding debt.

        Depreciation expense decreased to $2.4 million in 2001 from $2.5 million
in 2000. A decrease of $427,000 was from the sale of five properties in 2000,
offset by an increase of $138,000 from the purchase of five properties in 2000
and an increase of $200,000 was from tenant improvements. Depreciation expense
in 2002 is expected to approximate 2001.

        Advisory fee to affiliate increased to $817,000 in 2001 from $664,000 in
2000. The increase was attributable to an increase in gross assets, the basis of
such fee. The advisory fee in 2002 is expected to approximate 2001. See Note 8.
"Advisory Agreement" to the IOT consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this joint proxy statement and prospectus.

        IOT paid no net income fee in 2001 compared to the $1.4 million in 2000.
The net income fee is based on 7.5% of IOT's net income.



                                      273


        General and administrative expense decreased to $739,000 in 2001 from
$1.5 million in 2000. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in taxes.

        Equity losses of partnerships was $9,000 in 2001 compared to $61,000 in
2000. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in operating expenses at Eton
Square Office Building.

        In 2001, IOT realized no gains on the sale of real estate.

        In 2000, gains on sale of real estate totaling $20.9 million were
realized: $903,000 on the sale of La Monte Park A