e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-4879
Diebold,
Incorporated
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
34-0183970 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
|
|
|
5995 Mayfair Road, PO Box 3077, North Canton, Ohio
|
|
44720-8077 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (330) 490-4000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ
No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer þ
|
|
Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Non-Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
Common Stock, $1.25 Par Value 65,290,714 shares as of April 21, 2011
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
279,562 |
|
|
$ |
328,658 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
272,644 |
|
|
|
273,123 |
|
Trade receivables, less allowances for doubtful accounts of $24,911
and $24,868, respectively |
|
|
418,586 |
|
|
|
404,501 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
474,125 |
|
|
|
444,575 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
100,616 |
|
|
|
106,160 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
32,248 |
|
|
|
32,111 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
143,450 |
|
|
|
124,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,721,231 |
|
|
|
1,714,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities and other investments |
|
|
73,627 |
|
|
|
76,138 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
656,311 |
|
|
|
646,235 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
453,772 |
|
|
|
442,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
202,539 |
|
|
|
203,462 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
54,718 |
|
|
|
49,961 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
272,394 |
|
|
|
269,398 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
207,028 |
|
|
|
206,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,531,537 |
|
|
$ |
2,519,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
$ |
21,883 |
|
|
$ |
15,038 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
187,682 |
|
|
|
214,288 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
231,982 |
|
|
|
205,173 |
|
Payroll and other benefits liabilities |
|
|
54,911 |
|
|
|
78,515 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
291,619 |
|
|
|
296,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
788,077 |
|
|
|
809,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
615,010 |
|
|
|
550,368 |
|
Pensions and other benefits |
|
|
79,955 |
|
|
|
100,152 |
|
Postretirement and other benefits |
|
|
23,364 |
|
|
|
23,096 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
32,068 |
|
|
|
31,126 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
15,779 |
|
|
|
15,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diebold, Incorporated shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares, no par value, 1,000,000 authorized shares, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, $1.25 par value, 125,000,000 authorized shares, 76,794,248 and 76,365,124
issued shares, 65,528,307 and 65,717,103 outstanding shares, respectively |
|
|
95,993 |
|
|
|
95,456 |
|
Additional capital |
|
|
316,956 |
|
|
|
308,699 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
903,147 |
|
|
|
919,296 |
|
Treasury shares, at cost (11,265,941 and 10,648,021 shares, respectively) |
|
|
(457,373 |
) |
|
|
(435,922 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
88,307 |
|
|
|
73,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Diebold, Incorporated shareholders equity |
|
|
947,030 |
|
|
|
961,155 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
30,254 |
|
|
|
28,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
977,284 |
|
|
|
989,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
2,531,537 |
|
|
$ |
2,519,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
249,783 |
|
|
$ |
257,745 |
|
Services |
|
|
364,374 |
|
|
|
361,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
614,157 |
|
|
|
618,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
188,863 |
|
|
|
192,277 |
|
Services |
|
|
275,890 |
|
|
|
268,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
464,753 |
|
|
|
460,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
149,404 |
|
|
|
158,010 |
|
Selling and administrative expense |
|
|
121,111 |
|
|
|
98,977 |
|
Research, development and engineering expense |
|
|
19,424 |
|
|
|
18,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,535 |
|
|
|
117,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
8,869 |
|
|
|
40,585 |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income |
|
|
10,898 |
|
|
|
7,471 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(8,673 |
) |
|
|
(9,055 |
) |
Foreign exchange loss, net |
|
|
(1,046 |
) |
|
|
(4,641 |
) |
Miscellaneous, net |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before taxes |
|
|
10,071 |
|
|
|
35,069 |
|
Taxes on income |
|
|
5,925 |
|
|
|
9,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
4,146 |
|
|
|
25,192 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(970 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
4,135 |
|
|
|
24,222 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
1,634 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
$ |
2,501 |
|
|
$ |
23,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
65,762 |
|
|
|
66,298 |
|
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
66,230 |
|
|
|
66,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
2,512 |
|
|
$ |
24,894 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(970 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
$ |
2,501 |
|
|
$ |
23,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash flow from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,135 |
|
|
$ |
24,222 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
19,246 |
|
|
|
19,587 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
3,435 |
|
|
|
3,226 |
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
(1,484 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
Devaluation of Venezuelan balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,968 |
|
Equity in earnings of an investee |
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
|
(753 |
) |
Cash (used in) provided by changes in certain assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
(8,072 |
) |
|
|
(66,657 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(21,955 |
) |
|
|
3,573 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
7,277 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
(15,419 |
) |
|
|
(30,849 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(29,404 |
) |
|
|
(5,283 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
25,078 |
|
|
|
17,762 |
|
Certain other assets and liabilities |
|
|
(65,444 |
) |
|
|
(34,165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(90,151 |
) |
|
|
(56,223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,202 |
|
Proceeds from maturities of investments |
|
|
59,292 |
|
|
|
76,752 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investments |
|
|
7,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for purchases of investments |
|
|
(56,720 |
) |
|
|
(63,719 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(10,902 |
) |
|
|
(11,103 |
) |
Increase in certain other assets |
|
|
(4,103 |
) |
|
|
(5,864 |
) |
Collections on purchased finance receivables |
|
|
7,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
2,197 |
|
|
|
(2,732 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(18,650 |
) |
|
|
(18,095 |
) |
Debt borrowings |
|
|
156,637 |
|
|
|
127,578 |
|
Debt repayments |
|
|
(85,210 |
) |
|
|
(93,370 |
) |
Issuance of common shares |
|
|
4,017 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
Repurchase of common shares |
|
|
(21,451 |
) |
|
|
(11,355 |
) |
Other |
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
35,958 |
|
|
|
5,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
(9,102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(49,096 |
) |
|
|
(62,553 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period |
|
|
328,658 |
|
|
|
328,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period |
|
$ |
279,562 |
|
|
$ |
265,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
5
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of March 31, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 1: CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Diebold, Incorporated and
its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) have been prepared in accordance with the instructions
to Form 10-Q and therefore do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair
presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles; however, such information reflects all adjustments
(consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management,
necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods.
The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and notes contained in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2010. In addition, some of the Companys statements in this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q may involve risks and uncertainties that could significantly impact expected future
results. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 are not necessarily
indicative of results to be expected for the full year.
The Company has reclassified the presentation of certain prior-year information to conform to the
current presentation.
NOTE 2: EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding.
Diluted earnings per share is based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and
all potential dilutive common shares. Under the two-class method of computing earnings per share,
non-vested share-based payment awards that contain rights to receive non-forfeitable dividends are
considered participating securities. The Companys participating securities include restricted
stock units, deferred shares and shares that were vested, but deferred by the employee. The Company
calculated basic and diluted earnings per share under both the treasury stock method and the
two-class method. For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, there was no impact in the
per share amounts calculated under the two methods, therefore the treasury stock method is
disclosed.
The following represents amounts used in computing earnings per share and the effect on the
weighted-average number of shares of dilutive common stock for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income used in basic and diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
2,512 |
|
|
$ |
24,894 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(970 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
$ |
2,501 |
|
|
$ |
23,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of common shares used in basic earnings per share |
|
|
65,762 |
|
|
|
66,298 |
|
Effect of dilutive shares |
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares used in diluted earnings per share |
|
|
66,230 |
|
|
|
66,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive shares (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive shares not used in calculating diluted weighted-average shares |
|
|
2,023 |
|
|
|
2,393 |
|
6
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of March 31, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 3: EQUITY
The following tables present changes in shareholders equity attributable to Diebold, Incorporated
and the noncontrolling interests for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Diebold, Incorporated shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of the period |
|
$ |
961,155 |
|
|
$ |
1,046,379 |
|
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
|
2,501 |
|
|
|
23,924 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
14,674 |
|
|
|
(12,219 |
) |
Interest rate hedges |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(187 |
) |
Pensions and other postretirement benefits |
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
1,363 |
|
Unrealized (loss) gain, net on available for sale securities |
|
|
(673 |
) |
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
|
17,182 |
|
|
|
13,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares |
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
Additional capital |
|
|
8,257 |
|
|
|
7,856 |
|
Treasury shares |
|
|
(21,451 |
) |
|
|
(11,355 |
) |
Dividends declared |
|
|
(18,650 |
) |
|
|
(18,095 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of the period |
|
$ |
947,030 |
|
|
$ |
1,038,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of the period |
|
$ |
28,659 |
|
|
$ |
25,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
1,634 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
1,905 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interest holders |
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of the period |
|
$ |
30,254 |
|
|
$ |
25,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of March 31, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 4: SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
The Companys share-based compensation payments to employees are recognized in the statement of
income based on their grant-date fair values during the period in which the employee is required to
provide services in exchange for the award. Share-based compensation is recognized as a component
of selling and administrative expense. Total share-based compensation expense for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $3,435 and $3,226, respectively.
Options outstanding and exercisable as of March 31, 2011 under the Companys 1991 Equity and
Performance Incentive Plan (as Amended and Restated as of April 13, 2009) and changes during the
three months ended March 31, 2011, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Term |
|
|
Value (1) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(per share) |
|
|
(in years) |
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2011 |
|
|
3,152 |
|
|
$ |
36.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired or forfeited |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
28.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
27.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
33.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
3,356 |
|
|
$ |
36.79 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
10,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
$ |
40.01 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options vested and expected to vest (2) at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
3,330 |
|
|
$ |
36.85 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
9,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value (the difference between the closing price of the
Companys common shares on the last trading day of the first quarter of 2011 and the
exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been
received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on March 31,
2011. The amount of aggregate intrinsic value will change based on the fair market value of
the Companys common shares. |
|
(2) |
|
The options expected to vest are the result of applying the pre-vesting forfeiture rate
assumption to total outstanding non-vested options. |
The following tables summarize information on non-vested restricted stock units (RSUs),
performance shares and deferred shares for the three months ended March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Grant-Date Fair Value |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at January 1, 2011 |
|
|
594 |
|
|
$ |
29.06 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
26.79 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
25.70 |
|
Granted |
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
32.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
764 |
|
|
$ |
30.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Shares (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at January 1, 2011 |
|
|
742 |
|
|
$ |
31.15 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
30.23 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
28.91 |
|
Granted |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
39.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
720 |
|
|
$ |
34.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director Deferred Shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
$ |
33.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
76 |
|
|
$ |
34.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
90 |
|
|
$ |
33.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Non-vested performance shares are based on a maximum potential payout. Actual shares
granted at the end of the performance period may be less than the maximum potential payout
level depending on achievement of performance share objectives. |
8
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of March 31, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 5: INCOME TAXES
The effective tax rate on continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was 58.8
percent compared to 28.2 percent for the same period of 2010. The 30.6 percentage point increase
is due mainly to operating losses in certain Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) jurisdictions
for which no tax benefit is recognized. Because these operating losses are relatively large when
compared to income from continuing operations before taxes, the impact on the effective tax rate
for the first quarter of 2011 is significant. Foreign income tax assessments and interest on
uncertain tax positions also results in an increase to the effective tax rate.
In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as well as the Health Care and
Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (the Acts) were signed into law. Beginning in 2013, the Acts
eliminate the tax deduction of retiree prescription drug expenses that are reimbursed under
Medicare Part D. The resulting deferred tax charge of $339 from enactment of the Acts was
recognized in the results for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The charge increased the
quarterly rate by approximately one percentage point.
NOTE 6: INVESTMENTS
The Companys investments, primarily in Brazil, consist of certificates of deposit and U.S. dollar
indexed bond funds, which are classified as available-for-sale and stated at fair value based upon
quoted market prices and net asset values, respectively. Unrealized gains and losses are recorded
in other comprehensive income (OCI). Realized gains and losses are recognized in investment income
and are determined using the specific identification method. Realized net losses from the sale of
securities for the three months ended March 31, 2011 were $164. Proceeds from the sale of
available-for-sale securities were $7,117 during the three months ended March 31, 2011.
The Company has deferred compensation plans that enable certain employees to defer receipt of a
portion of their cash or share-based compensation and non-employee directors to defer receipt of
director fees at the participants discretion. For deferred cash-based compensation, the Company
established a rabbi trust that is recorded at the fair value of the underlying securities within
securities and other investments. The related deferred compensation liability is recorded at fair
value within other long-term liabilities. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on marketable
securities in the rabbi trust are recognized in investment income.
The Companys investments, excluding cash surrender value of insurance contracts of $64,936 and
$67,976 as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost Basis |
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
As of March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
$ |
227,705 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
227,705 |
|
U.S. dollar indexed bond funds |
|
|
46,909 |
|
|
|
(1,970 |
) |
|
|
44,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
274,614 |
|
|
$ |
(1,970 |
) |
|
$ |
272,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held in a rabbi trust |
|
$ |
8,228 |
|
|
$ |
463 |
|
|
$ |
8,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
$ |
221,706 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
221,706 |
|
U.S. dollar indexed bond funds |
|
|
52,714 |
|
|
|
(1,297 |
) |
|
|
51,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
274,420 |
|
|
$ |
(1,297 |
) |
|
$ |
273,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held in a rabbi trust |
|
$ |
8,068 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
8,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of March 31, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 7: ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
Trade Receivables The Company evaluates the collectability of trade receivables based on (1) a
percentage of sales based on historical loss experience and current trends and (2) periodic
adjustments for known events such as specific customer circumstances and changes in the aging of
accounts receivable balances. After all efforts at collection have been unsuccessful, the account
is deemed uncollectible and is written off.
Financing Receivables The Company evaluates the collectability of notes and finance lease
receivables (collectively, financing receivables) based on a specific customer circumstances,
credit risk changes and payment patterns and historical loss experience. When the collectability
is determined to be at risk based on the above criteria, the Company records the allowance for
credit losses which represents the Companys current exposure less estimated reimbursement from
insurance claims. After all efforts at collection have been unsuccessful, the account is deemed
uncollectible and is written off.
The following table summarizes the Companys allowance for credit losses and recorded investment in
financing receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leases |
|
|
Receivable |
|
|
Total |
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2011 |
|
$ |
378 |
|
|
$ |
470 |
|
|
$ |
848 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1,217 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
Recoveries |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Write-offs |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance individually evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
1,687 |
|
|
$ |
2,012 |
|
Balance collectively evaluated for impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
1,687 |
|
|
$ |
2,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded investment in financing receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance individually evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
120,625 |
|
|
$ |
24,287 |
|
|
$ |
144,912 |
|
Balance collectively evaluated for impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
120,625 |
|
|
$ |
24,287 |
|
|
$ |
144,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company records interest income and any fees or costs related to financing receivables using
the effective interest method over the term of the lease or loan. The Company reviews the aging of
its financing receivables to determine past due and delinquent accounts. Credit quality is
reviewed at inception and is re-evaluated as needed based on customer specific circumstances.
Receivable balances greater than 60 days past due are reviewed and may be placed on nonaccrual
status based on customer specific circumstances. Upon receipt of payment on nonaccrual financing
receivables, interest income is recognized and accrual of interest is resumed once the account has
been made current or the specific circumstances have been resolved.
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the recorded investment in past-due finance lease
receivables on nonaccrual status was $278 and $531, respectively. The recorded investment in
finance lease receivables past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest was $405 and $560 as
of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The recorded investment in impaired notes
receivable and the related allowance was $7,513 and $1,687, respectively, as of March 31, 2011. The
recorded investment in impaired notes receivable and the related allowance was $7,513 and $470,
respectively, as of December 31, 2010. The net investment in
impaired notes receivable is expected to be recovered from insurance
claims. The following table summarizes the Companys aging of
past-due notes receivable balances as of March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
31-60 days past due |
|
$ |
206 |
|
61-90 days past due |
|
|
|
|
> 90 days past due |
|
|
6,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total past due |
|
$ |
6,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
10
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of March 31, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 8: INVENTORIES
Major classes of inventories are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Finished goods |
|
$ |
193,700 |
|
|
$ |
184,944 |
|
Service parts |
|
|
170,341 |
|
|
|
166,317 |
|
Raw materials and work in process |
|
|
110,084 |
|
|
|
93,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
474,125 |
|
|
$ |
444,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 9: OTHER ASSETS
Included in other assets are net capitalized software development costs of $55,541 and $55,575 as
of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Amortization expense on capitalized software
of $4,576 and $4,081 was included in product cost of sales for the three months ended March 31,
2011 and 2010, respectively. Other long-term assets also consist of patents, trademarks and other
intangible assets. Where applicable, other assets are stated at cost and, if applicable, are
amortized ratably over the relevant contract period or the estimated life of the assets. Fees to
renew or extend the term of the Companys intangible assets are expensed when incurred. Impairment
of long-lived assets is recognized when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. If the expected future undiscounted cash flows
are less than the carrying amount of the asset group, an impairment loss may be recognized at that
time to reduce the asset to the lower of its fair value or its net book value.
Investment in Affiliate Investment in the Companys non-consolidated affiliate is accounted for
under the equity method and consists of a 50 percent ownership in Shanghai Diebold King Safe
Company, Ltd. The balance of this investment as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $12,543
and $12,118, respectively, and fluctuated based on equity earnings. Equity earnings from the
non-consolidated affiliate are included in miscellaneous, net in the condensed consolidated
statements of income and were $425 and $753 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively.
NOTE 10: DEBT
Outstanding debt balances were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Notes payable current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncommitted lines of credit |
|
$ |
21,780 |
|
|
$ |
15,038 |
|
Other |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,883 |
|
|
$ |
15,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit facility |
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
|
$ |
235,000 |
|
Senior notes |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
Industrial development revenue bonds |
|
|
11,900 |
|
|
|
11,900 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,110 |
|
|
|
3,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
615,010 |
|
|
$ |
550,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2011, the Company had various international short-term uncommitted lines of credit
with borrowing limits of $100,642. The weighted-average interest rate on outstanding borrowings on
the short-term uncommitted lines of credit as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was 3.80 and
3.01 percent, respectively. Short-term uncommitted lines mature in less than one year. The amount
available under the short-term uncommitted lines at March 31, 2011 was $78,862.
In October 2009, the Company entered into a three-year revolving credit facility. As of March 31,
2011, the Company had borrowing limits under this facility totaling $506,275 ($400,000 and 75,000,
translated). Under the terms of the credit facility agreement, the Company has the ability, subject
to various approvals, to increase the borrowing limits by $200,000 and 37,500, respectively. Up to
$30,000 and 15,000 of the revolving credit facility is available under a swing line subfacility.
The weighted-average interest rate on outstanding credit facility borrowings as of March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010 was 2.67 and 2.71 percent, respectively, which is variable based on the
London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). The amount available under the revolving credit facility as
of March 31, 2011 was $206,275.
11
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of March 31, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
In March 2006, the Company issued senior notes in an aggregate principal amount of $300,000 with a
weighted-average fixed interest rate of 5.50 percent. The maturity dates of the senior notes are
staggered, with $75,000, $175,000 and $50,000 becoming due in 2013, 2016 and 2018, respectively.
Additionally, the Company entered into a derivative transaction to hedge interest rate risk on
$200,000 of the senior notes, which was treated as a cash flow hedge. This reduced the effective
interest rate by 14 basis points from 5.50 to 5.36 percent.
In 1997, industrial development revenue bonds were issued on behalf of the Company. The proceeds
from the bond issuances were used to construct new manufacturing facilities in the United States.
The Company guaranteed the payments of principal and interest on the bonds by obtaining letters of
credit. The bonds were issued with a 20-year original term and are scheduled to mature in 2017.
Each industrial development revenue bond carries a variable interest rate, which is reset weekly by
the remarketing agents. The weighted-average interest rate on the bonds was 0.76 and 0.57 percent
as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
The Companys debt agreements contain various restrictive financial covenants, including net debt
to capitalization and net interest coverage ratios. As of March 31, 2011, the Company was in
compliance with the financial covenants in its debt agreements.
NOTE 11: BENEFIT PLANS
The Company has pension plans covering certain U.S. employees. Plans that cover certain salaried
employees provide pension benefits based on the employees compensation during the ten years before
retirement. The Companys funding policy for salaried plans is to contribute annually based on
actuarial projections and applicable regulations. Plans covering certain hourly employees and union
members generally provide benefits of stated amounts for each year of service. The Companys
funding policy for hourly plans is to make at least the minimum annual contributions required by
applicable regulations. Employees of the Companys operations in countries outside of the United
States participate to varying degrees in local pension plans, which in the aggregate are not
significant.
In addition to providing pension benefits, the Company provides healthcare and life insurance
benefits (referred to as other benefits) for certain retired employees. Eligible employees may be
entitled to these benefits based upon years of service with the Company, age at retirement and
collective bargaining agreements. Currently, the Company has made no commitments to increase these
benefits for existing retirees or for employees who may become eligible for these benefits in the
future. There are no plan assets and the Company funds the benefits as the claims are paid.
The following table sets forth the net periodic benefit cost for the Companys defined benefit
pension plans and other benefits for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Other Benefits |
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
2,713 |
|
|
$ |
2,499 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest cost |
|
|
7,872 |
|
|
|
7,681 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(10,183 |
) |
|
|
(9,603 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
2,406 |
|
|
|
1,373 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension benefit cost |
|
$ |
2,873 |
|
|
$ |
1,998 |
|
|
$ |
201 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows
There have been no significant changes to the 2011 plan year contribution amounts previously
disclosed. For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, contributions of $20,697 and
$12,684, respectively, were made to the qualified and non-qualified pension plans.
12
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of March 31, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 12: GUARANTEES AND PRODUCT WARRANTIES
In 1997, industrial development revenue bonds were issued on behalf of the Company. The Company
guaranteed the payments of principal and interest on the bonds (refer to note 10) by obtaining
letters of credit. The carrying value of the bonds was $11,900 as of March 31, 2011 and December
31, 2010.
The Company provides its global operations guarantees and standby letters of credit through various
financial institutions to suppliers, customers, regulatory agencies and insurance providers. If the
Company is not able to make payment or fulfill contractual obligations, the suppliers, customers,
regulatory agencies and insurance providers may draw on the pertinent bank. At March 31, 2011, the
maximum future payment obligations related to these various guarantees totaled $76,218, of which
$22,848 represented standby letters of credit to insurance providers, and no associated liability
was recorded. At December 31, 2010, the maximum future payment obligations relative to these
various guarantees totaled $74,629, of which $23,202 represented standby letters of credit to
insurance providers, and no associated liability was recorded.
The Company provides its customers a manufacturers warranty and records, at the time of the sale,
a corresponding estimated liability for potential warranty costs. Estimated future obligations due
to warranty claims are based upon historical factors such as labor rates, average repair time,
travel time, number of service calls per machine and cost of replacement parts. Changes in the
Companys warranty liability balance are illustrated in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
$ |
78,313 |
|
|
$ |
62,673 |
|
Current period accruals (a) |
|
|
18,411 |
|
|
|
10,924 |
|
Current period settlements |
|
|
(19,252 |
) |
|
|
(12,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31 |
|
$ |
77,472 |
|
|
$ |
61,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
includes the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations |
NOTE 13: DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The Company uses derivatives to mitigate the economic consequences associated with the fluctuations
in currencies and interest rates.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE
Non-Designated Hedges A substantial portion of the Companys operations and revenues are
international. As a result, changes in foreign exchange rates can create substantial foreign
exchange gains and losses from the revaluation of non-functional currency monetary assets and
liabilities. The Companys policy allows the use of foreign exchange forward contracts with
maturities of up to 24 months to mitigate the impact of currency fluctuations on those foreign
currency asset and liability balances. The Company elected not to apply hedge accounting to its
foreign exchange forward contracts. Thus, spot-based gains/losses offset revaluation gains/losses
within foreign exchange loss, net and forward-based gains/losses represent interest expense. The
fair value of the Companys non-designated foreign exchange forward contracts was ($359) and
($3,135) as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
INTEREST RATE
Cash Flow Hedges The Company has variable rate debt and is subject to fluctuations in interest
related cash flows due to changes in market interest rates. The Companys policy allows derivative
instruments designated as cash flow hedges that fix a portion of future variable-rate interest
expense. The Company has a pay-fixed receive-variable interest rate swap, with a total notional
amount of $25,000, to hedge against changes in the LIBOR benchmark interest rate on a portion of
the Companys LIBOR-based borrowings. Changes in value that are deemed effective are accumulated
in other comprehensive income and reclassified to interest expense when the hedged interest is
accrued. To the extent that it becomes probable that the Companys variable rate borrowings will
not occur, the gains or losses on the related cash flow hedges will be reclassified from other
comprehensive income to interest expense.
In December 2005 and January 2006, the Company executed cash flow hedges by entering into
receive-variable and pay-fixed interest rate swaps, with a total notional amount of $200,000,
related to the senior notes issuance in March 2006. Amounts previously recorded in other
comprehensive income related to the pre-issuance cash flow hedges will continue to be reclassified
on a straight-line basis through February 2016.
The fair value of the Companys interest rate contracts was ($2,991) and ($3,371) as of March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
13
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of March 31, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The gain (loss) recognized on designated derivative instruments for the three months ended March
31, 2011 and 2010 was not material. Gains and losses related to interest rate contracts that are
reclassified from accumulated OCI are recorded in interest expense on the statement of income. The
Company anticipates reclassifying $768 from other comprehensive income to interest expense within
the next 12 months.
The following table summarizes the (loss) gain recognized on non-designated derivative instruments
for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Income Statement Location |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
$ |
(1,849 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,486 |
) |
|
Interest expense |
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
(6,217 |
) |
|
|
6,944 |
|
|
Foreign exchange loss, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(8,066 |
) |
|
$ |
5,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 14: RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER CHARGES
The following table summarizes the impact of the Companys restructuring charges (benefits) on the
condensed consolidated statements of income for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cost of sales products |
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
(214 |
) |
Cost of sales services |
|
|
6,074 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
Selling and administrative expense |
|
|
5,604 |
|
|
|
1,157 |
|
Research, development and engineering expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
11,801 |
|
|
$ |
1,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the Companys restructuring (benefits) charges within continuing
operations for its Diebold North America (DNA) and Diebold International (DI) reporting segments
for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
DNA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
184 |
|
Other (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
131 |
|
DI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance |
|
|
11,605 |
|
|
|
1,365 |
|
Other (2) |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
(564 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
11,801 |
|
|
$ |
1,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net other restructuring benefits in the DNA segment include an accrual adjustment
related to the pension obligation. |
|
(2) |
|
Net other restructuring charges in the DI segment include legal and professional fees. |
Restructuring charges of $11,580 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 related to the
Companys plan for the EMEA reorganization which realigns resources and further leverages the
existing shared services center. As of March 31, 2011, the Company anticipates additional
restructuring costs in the range of $9,000 to $14,000 to be incurred into 2012 related to its EMEA
restructuring plan. As management concludes on certain aspects of the EMEA restructuring plan, the
anticipated future costs related to this plan are subject to change.
Net restructuring charges of $107 and $1,378 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively, related to reductions in the Companys global workforce, including realignment of the
organization and resources to better support opportunities in emerging growth markets and
consolidation of certain international facilities in efforts to optimize overall operational
performance. This plan resulted in a workforce reduction which primarily affected its Canton, Ohio
area facilities. The Company does not expect any material remaining costs related to this workforce
reduction.
Net restructuring charges (benefits) of $114 and $(292) for the three months ended March 31, 2011
and 2010, respectively, related to the Companys strategic global manufacturing realignment plans.
14
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of March 31, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The following table summarizes the Companys cumulative total restructuring costs for the
significant plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global |
|
|
Global |
|
|
|
EMEA |
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
Workforce |
|
|
|
Reorganization |
|
|
Realignment |
|
|
Reductions |
|
Costs incurred to date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DNA |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,579 |
|
|
$ |
21,425 |
|
DI |
|
|
11,580 |
|
|
|
25,178 |
|
|
|
20,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs incurred to date |
|
$ |
11,580 |
|
|
$ |
36,757 |
|
|
$ |
41,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the Companys restructuring accrual balances and related activity:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2011 |
|
$ |
3,340 |
|
Liabilities incurred |
|
|
11,801 |
|
Liabilities paid |
|
|
(1,785 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
13,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Charges and Expense Reimbursements
Other charges and expense reimbursements consist of items that the Company determines are
non-routine in nature. Net non-routine expense of $5,771 impacted the three months ended March 31,
2011 compared to net non-routine income of $4,080 in the same period of 2010. Net non-routine
expenses for 2011 consisted primarily of legal and compliance costs related to the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act (FCPA) investigation. Net non-routine income for 2010 consisted primarily of
reimbursements from the Companys director and officer (D&O) insurance carriers and was recorded in
selling and administrative expense. The Company continues to pursue reimbursement of the remaining
legal and other expenditures incurred as a result of the government investigations with its D&O
insurance carriers.
NOTE 15: FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
The Company measures its financial assets and liabilities using one or more of the following three
valuation techniques:
Market approach Prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions
involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities.
Cost approach Amount that would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset
(replacement cost).
Income approach Techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount based
upon market expectations.
The hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value is
divided into three levels:
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities,
unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not
active or inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly
or indirectly.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data.
15
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of March 31, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value
Assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurement are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
$ |
227,705 |
|
|
$ |
227,705 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
221,706 |
|
|
$ |
221,706 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. dollar indexed bond funds |
|
|
44,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held in a rabbi trust |
|
|
8,691 |
|
|
|
8,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,163 |
|
|
|
8,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent consideration on sale
of business |
|
|
2,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,030 |
|
|
|
2,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
284,545 |
|
|
$ |
236,396 |
|
|
$ |
46,119 |
|
|
$ |
2,030 |
|
|
$ |
284,241 |
|
|
$ |
229,869 |
|
|
$ |
52,342 |
|
|
$ |
2,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation |
|
$ |
8,691 |
|
|
$ |
8,691 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,163 |
|
|
$ |
8,163 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
2,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,221 |
|
|
$ |
8,691 |
|
|
$ |
4,530 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15,594 |
|
|
$ |
8,163 |
|
|
$ |
7,431 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Investments The Company has investments in certificates of deposit that are
recorded at cost, which approximates fair value. Additionally, the Company has investments in U.S.
dollar indexed bond funds that are classified as available-for-sale and stated at fair value. U.S.
dollar indexed bond funds are reported at net asset value, which is the practical expedient for
fair value as determined by banks where funds are held.
Assets Held in a Rabbi Trust / Deferred Compensation The fair value of the assets held in a rabbi
trust (refer to note 6) is derived from investments in a mix of money market, fixed income and
equity funds managed by Vanguard. The related deferred compensation liability is recorded at fair
value.
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts A substantial portion of the Companys operations and revenues
are international. As a result, changes in foreign exchange rates can create substantial foreign
exchange gains and losses from the revaluation of non-functional currency monetary assets and
liabilities. The foreign exchange contracts are valued using the market approach based on
observable market transactions of forward rates.
Interest Rate Swaps The Company has variable rate debt and is subject to fluctuations in interest
related cash flows due to changes in market interest rates. The Companys policy allows it to
periodically enter into derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges to fix some portion
of future variable rate based interest expense. The Company has a pay-fixed receive-variable
interest rate swap to hedge against changes in the LIBOR benchmark interest rate on a portion of
the Companys LIBOR- based borrowings. The fair value of the swap is determined using the income
approach and is calculated based on LIBOR rates at the reporting date.
Contingent Consideration on Sale of Business The Companys sale of its U.S. elections systems
business included contingent consideration related to 70 percent of any cash collected over a
five-year period on the accounts receivable balance of the sold business as of August 31, 2009. The
fair value of the contingent consideration was determined based on recent collections on the
accounts receivable as well as the probability of future anticipated collections (level 3 inputs)
and was recorded at the net present value of the future anticipated cash flows.
16
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of March 31, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Assets and Liabilities Not Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
In addition to assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the
Company measures certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a non-recurring basis. The
Companys non-financial assets, including goodwill, intangible assets and property, plant and
equipment, are measured at fair value when there is an indication of impairment. These assets are
recorded at fair value determined using level 3 inputs, only when an impairment charge is
recognized.
Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Carrying Value
The fair value of the Companys cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables and accounts payable,
approximates the carrying value due to the relative short maturity of these instruments. The fair
value and carrying value of the Companys debt instruments are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value |
|
Notes payable current |
|
$ |
21,883 |
|
|
$ |
21,883 |
|
|
$ |
15,038 |
|
|
$ |
15,038 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
631,005 |
|
|
|
615,010 |
|
|
|
565,499 |
|
|
|
550,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt instruments |
|
$ |
652,888 |
|
|
$ |
636,893 |
|
|
$ |
580,537 |
|
|
$ |
565,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the Companys industrial development revenue bonds are measured using unadjusted
quoted prices in active markets for identical assets categorized as level 1 inputs. The fair value
of the Companys current notes payable and credit facility debt instruments approximates the
carrying value due to the relative short maturity of the revolving borrowings under these
instruments. The fair values of the Companys long-term senior notes was estimated using market
observable inputs for the Companys comparable peers with public debt, including quoted prices in
active markets, market indices and interest rate measurements, considered level 2 inputs.
NOTE 16: SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Companys segments are comprised of two sales channels: DNA and DI. The DNA segment sells and
services financial and retail systems in the United States and Canada. The DI segment sells and
services financial and retail systems over the remainder of the globe as well as voting and lottery
solutions in Brazil. Each segment buys the goods it sells from the Companys manufacturing plants
or through external suppliers. Intercompany sales between legal entities are eliminated in
consolidation. Each year, intercompany pricing is agreed upon which drives operating profit
contribution.
The reconciliation between segment information and the condensed consolidated financial statements
is disclosed. Revenue summaries by geographic area and product and service solutions are also
disclosed. Certain information not routinely used in the management of the DNA and DI segments,
information not allocated back to the segments or information that is impractical to report is not
shown. Items not allocated are as follows: investment income; interest expense; equity in the net
income of investees accounted for by the equity method; income tax
expense or benefit; foreign exchange gains and losses; miscellaneous,
net; and
discontinued operations.
17
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of March 31, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The following table presents information regarding the Companys segment information as of and for
the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
DNA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer revenues |
|
$ |
305,964 |
|
|
$ |
296,200 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
19,626 |
|
|
|
19,145 |
|
Operating profit |
|
|
17,406 |
|
|
|
9,284 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
5,779 |
|
|
|
6,753 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
6,759 |
|
|
|
6,516 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
462,840 |
|
|
|
445,548 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,012,990 |
|
|
|
1,090,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer revenues |
|
|
308,193 |
|
|
|
322,799 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
15,266 |
|
|
|
9,752 |
|
Operating (loss) profit |
|
|
(8,537 |
) |
|
|
31,301 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
5,123 |
|
|
|
4,350 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
5,224 |
|
|
|
6,151 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
193,471 |
|
|
|
165,319 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,518,547 |
|
|
|
1,428,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer revenues |
|
|
614,157 |
|
|
|
618,999 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
34,892 |
|
|
|
28,897 |
|
Operating profit |
|
|
8,869 |
|
|
|
40,585 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
10,902 |
|
|
|
11,103 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
11,983 |
|
|
|
12,667 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
656,311 |
|
|
|
610,867 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
2,531,537 |
|
|
|
2,519,561 |
|
The following table presents information regarding the Companys revenue by geographic region for
the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Diebold North America |
|
$ |
305,964 |
|
|
$ |
296,200 |
|
Diebold International: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latin America including Brazil |
|
|
152,888 |
|
|
|
149,527 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
83,889 |
|
|
|
98,442 |
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa |
|
|
71,416 |
|
|
|
74,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Diebold International |
|
|
308,193 |
|
|
|
322,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total customer revenues |
|
$ |
614,157 |
|
|
$ |
618,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of March 31, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The following table presents information regarding the Companys revenue by product and service
solution for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Financial self-service: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
198,640 |
|
|
$ |
203,700 |
|
Services |
|
|
264,456 |
|
|
|
267,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial self-service |
|
|
463,096 |
|
|
|
471,508 |
|
Security: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
43,413 |
|
|
|
51,450 |
|
Services |
|
|
99,918 |
|
|
|
93,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total security |
|
|
143,331 |
|
|
|
144,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial self-service & security |
|
|
606,427 |
|
|
|
616,399 |
|
Election and lottery systems: |
|
|
7,730 |
|
|
|
2,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total customer revenues |
|
$ |
614,157 |
|
|
$ |
618,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 17: DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Included in loss from discontinued operations were costs related to the Companys U.S.-based
elections systems business and the EMEA-based security business which were both previously
discontinued.
19
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of March 31, 2011
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
ITEM 2: MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
Managements discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes that appear elsewhere in this quarterly report.
Introduction
As expected, in the first
quarter of 2011, the Company got off to a slow start. As previously communicated, the Company
expects an unusually strong second half of 2011. During the first quarter of 2011, the Company saw
significant strengthening of orders in the U.S. regional bank space as the North America market
continues to rebound. Moving forward, the Company will create shareholder value by leveraging its
growing advantage in services, continuing to restructure its operations in Europe, Middle East and
Africa (EMEA) and taking advantage of key market opportunities around the world and leveraging
opportunities in the security business.
During the first quarter of 2011, the Company saw progress in key markets around the world,
especially in North America where orders benefitted from particularly strong financial self-service
growth, led by growth in excess of 30 percent in the U.S. regional bank space. Orders in EMEA
increased 43.9 percent compared with a relatively weak prior-year period. Latin America orders
were down during the quarter, primarily as a result of timing of major bank orders from Brazil.
Looking at Asia Pacific, as anticipated, the year started slowly in both revenue and orders. This
is largely due to declines in China, where we are anticipating a strong second half. Given the
second quarter timing of major, pending orders in China and Brazil as well as the Brazil voting
revenue slated for the third and fourth quarters, the Company remains optimistic in its position
for the remainder of the year.
Income from continuing operations attributable to Diebold, Incorporated, net of tax, for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 was $2,512 or $0.04 per share, a decrease of $22,382 and $0.33 per
share, respectively, from the same period in 2010. Total revenue for the three months ended March
31, 2011 was $614,157, a decrease of 0.8 percent from the same period in 2010.
Vision and strategy
The Companys vision is to be recognized as the essential partner in creating and implementing
ideas that optimize convenience, efficiency and security. This vision is the guiding principle
behind the Companys transformation to becoming a more services-oriented company. Today, service
comprises more than 50 percent of the Companys revenue. The Company expects that this percentage
will continue to grow over time as the Company continues to build on its strong base of maintenance
and advanced services to deliver world-class integrated services. Financial institutions are eager
to reduce costs and optimize the management and productivity of their ATM channels and they are
increasingly exploring new solutions. The Company remains uniquely positioned to provide the
infrastructure necessary to manage all aspects of an ATM network. The Companys newest
availability management solution, OpteView® Resolve (SM), represents an exponential leap forward.
This software solution gathers business intelligence and interacts with an array of external
systems to manage the entire ATM availability cycle from end to end.
In the first quarter of 2011, the Company brought in an additional $50,000 in
integrated services contracts, significantly exceeding the prior-year period. By comparison, in
all of 2010, the Company signed about $150,000 in integrated services contracts. One example of
the type of customer the Company is signing on is Wichita Falls, Texas-based Union Square Federal
Credit Union. As part of its contract, the Company will provide several
integrated services, including Advisor ATM status monitoring, OpteView remote services, endpoint
protection monitoring, software subscription management and help desk support.
Another area of focus within the financial self-service business is broadening the Companys
deposit automation solutions set, including check imaging, envelope-free currency acceptance,
teller automation, and payment and document imaging solutions. The
20
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of March 31, 2011
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Companys ImageWay® check-imaging solution fulfills an industry-wide demand for
cutting-edge technologies that enhance efficiencies and greatly reduce operating costs for
customers. For example, in North America the Company is experiencing increasing demand from
regional and community financial institutions for deposit automation terminals because these
institutions are finding themselves at a competitive disadvantage with larger rivals that have
aggressively deployed this technology.
Within the security business, the Companys solution set for financial customers is comprehensive,
including fire and high-end enterprise security solutions. Many of the Companys opportunities for
growth lie within the financial market segment as financial institutions look to improve their
security infrastructure, ensure compliance and drive operational efficiencies. The Company has
built the capabilities to compete for select niche opportunities in the retail, enterprise and
government sectors. During the first quarter of 2011, growth in overall security services was
driven by the enterprise security segment, in which revenue increased more
than 20 percent compared to the same
period of 2010. The Company will leverage its experience to capitalize on the opportunities in this space, particularly as it
continues to win major projects such as the new World Trade Center Transportation Hub in New York
City. The Companys integrated system will include the installation of video surveillance, access
control and alarm devices throughout the hub.
The focus for 2011 is to continue striking an appropriate balance between reducing costs and
investing in future growth. There are many opportunities that lie ahead and the Company will
continue to invest in developing new software solutions, services and security solutions,
particularly as it relates to growth in emerging markets.
Cost savings initiatives, restructuring and other charges
In 2006, the Company launched the SmartBusiness (SB) 100 initiative to deliver $100,000 in cost
savings by the end of 2008. In September 2008, the Company announced a new goal to achieve an
additional $100,000 in cost savings called SB 200. The SB 200 initiative has led to
rationalization of product development, streamlining procurement, realigning the Companys
manufacturing footprint and improving logistics. Building on that success, the Company
recently launched SB 300, which will shift the focus from cost of sales to operating expenses and is
targeted to achieve an additional $100,000 in efficiencies during the next three years.
The Company is committed to making the strategic decisions that not only streamline operations, but
also enhance its ability to serve its customers. The Company remains confident in its ability to
continue to execute on cost-reduction initiatives, deliver solutions that help improve customers
businesses and create shareholder value. During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the
Company incurred pre-tax net restructuring charges of $11,801 and $1,116, respectively.
Restructuring charges in 2011 primarily related to Companys plan for the EMEA reorganization,
which realigns resources and further leverages the existing shared services center. Restructuring
charges in 2010 primarily related to reductions in the Companys global workforce.
Other charges and expense reimbursements consist of items that the Company determines are
non-routine in nature. Net non-routine expense of $5,771 impacted the three months ended March 31,
2011 compared to net non-routine income of $4,080 in the same period of 2010. Net non-routine
expenses for 2011 consisted primarily of legal and compliance costs related to the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act (FCPA) investigation. Net non-routine income for 2010 consisted primarily of
reimbursements from the Companys director and officer (D&O) insurance carriers. The Company
continues to pursue reimbursement of the remaining legal and other expenditures incurred as a
result of the government investigations with its D&O insurance carriers.
Business Drivers
The business drivers of the Companys future performance include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
demand for new service offerings, including integrated services and outsourcing; |
|
|
|
|
demand for security products and services for the financial, enterprise, retail and
government sectors; |
|
|
|
|
timing of a self-service upgrade and/or replacement cycle, including deposit automation in
mature markets such as the United States; and |
|
|
|
|
high levels of deployment growth for new self-service products in emerging markets, such as
Asia Pacific. |
21
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of March 31, 2011
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion of the Companys financial condition and results of operations provides
information that will assist in understanding the financial statements and the changes in certain
key items in those financial statements. Comments on significant fluctuations follow the table.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial
statements and the accompanying notes that appear elsewhere in this quarterly report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
Dollars |
|
Net sales |
|
Dollars |
|
Net sales |
Net sales |
|
$ |
614,157 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
618,999 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
149,404 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
|
158,010 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
140,535 |
|
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
117,425 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
Operating profit |
|
|
8,869 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
40,585 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
4,146 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
25,192 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(970 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
1,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
|
2,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter 2011 Comparisons with First Quarter 2010
Net Sales
The following table represents information regarding our net sales for the three months ended March
31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
Net sales |
|
$ |
614,157 |
|
|
$ |
618,999 |
|
|
$ |
(4,842 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Financial self-service sales in the first quarter of 2011 decreased by $8,412 or 1.8 percent
compared to the same period of 2010. The decrease in financial self-service sales included a net
favorable currency impact of $13,774, of which approximately 60 percent related to the Brazilian
real. North America increased $8,721 or 5.3 percent due to strong growth within the U.S. regional
business. International sales decreased by $17,133 or 5.6 percent related to the following: Asia
Pacific decreased $11,582 or 12.6 percent, EMEA decreased $3,255 or 4.4 percent, and Latin America
including Brazil decreased by $2,296 or 1.6 percent. The decrease in Asia Pacific resulted from
lower sales volume in China, Thailand and India, with partially offsetting favorability from strong
growth in a few other countries within the region. The decrease in
EMEA was due to declines in some Western European countries partially offset by new business growth in the Middle
East. The decrease in Latin America including Brazil was mainly driven by the decision of a large
outsourcing client to switch to an insourcing model and the impact of some large order in Colombia
during the first quarter of 2010, partially offset with a net favorable currency impact and growth
in other areas throughout the region.
Security solutions sales in the first quarter of 2011 decreased by $1,560 or 1.1 percent compared
to the same period of 2010. North America increased $1,043 or 0.8 percent. International decreased
by $2,603 or 18.1 percent. The international decrease resulted primarily from a decline in Asia
Pacific by $2,971 or 46.2 percent due to decreases in electronic security revenue for Australia and
India.
The Brazilian-based lottery systems sales increased $5,135 in the first quarter of 2011 compared to
the same period of 2010.
22
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of March 31, 2011
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Gross Profit
The following table represents information regarding our gross profit for the three months ended
March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ Change/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%
Point Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Gross profit products |
|
$ |
60,920 |
|
|
$ |
65,468 |
|
|
$ |
(4,548 |
) |
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
Gross profit services |
|
|
88,484 |
|
|
|
92,542 |
|
|
|
(4,058 |
) |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit |
|
$ |
149,404 |
|
|
$ |
158,010 |
|
|
$ |
(8,606 |
) |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin products |
|
|
24.4 |
% |
|
|
25.4 |
% |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gross margin services |
|
|
24.3 |
% |
|
|
25.6 |
% |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross margin |
|
|
24.3 |
% |
|
|
25.5 |
% |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decline in product gross margin in the first quarter 2011 compared to the same period of 2010
was primarily a result of geographic mix influenced by lower volume in Asia Pacific and lower
margin performance in EMEA mainly attributable to revenue mix within the region. These decreases to
product gross margin were partially offset by favorable revenue mix in Diebold North America (DNA)
resulting from a larger concentration of sales in the U.S. regional bank space and Canada.
Additionally, product gross margin in the three months ended March 31, 2011 included restructuring
costs of $123 compared to a restructuring benefit of $214 in the same period of 2010.
The decrease in service gross margin resulted from higher restructuring charges in the first
quarter of 2011 primarily related to the EMEA reorganization. Service gross margin included $6,074
and $314 of restructuring charges in the first quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Operating Expenses
The following table represents information regarding our operating expenses for the three months
ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Selling and administrative expense |
|
$ |
121,111 |
|
|
$ |
98,977 |
|
|
$ |
22,134 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
Research, development and engineering expense |
|
|
19,424 |
|
|
|
18,448 |
|
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
140,535 |
|
|
$ |
117,425 |
|
|
$ |
23,110 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expense increased in the first quarter of 2011 from higher non-routine
and restructuring expenses, lower non-routine income, increased spend, and $1,642 of unfavorable
currency impact. Selling and administrative expense in the first quarter of 2011 included $5,771 of
non-routine expense resulting mainly from legal fees related to the FCPA investigation. The first
quarter of 2010 included net non-routine income of $4,080 consisting primarily of reimbursements
from the Companys D&O insurance carriers. In addition, selling and administrative expense included
$5,604 and $1,157 of restructuring charges in the first quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The
first quarter 2011 restructuring charges primarily related to the EMEA reorganization.
Research, development and engineering expense as a percent of net sales in 2011 and 2010 was 3.2
percent and 3.0 percent, respectively. The increase as a percent of net sales was due to lower
sales volume.
23
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of March 31, 2011
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Operating Profit
The following table represents information regarding our operating profit for the three months
ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ Change/ |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
%
Point Change |
|
% Change |
Operating profit |
|
$ |
8,869 |
|
|
$ |
40,585 |
|
|
$ |
(31,716 |
) |
|
|
(78.1 |
) |
Operating profit margin |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
The decrease in operating profit in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period of 2010
resulted from lower gross profit in relation to both product and service sales. Operating profit in
the first quarter of 2011 also decreased due to higher operating expenses stemming from higher
restructuring charges, higher non-routine expenses, lower non-routine income and unfavorable
currency impact.
Other Income (Expense)
The following table represents information regarding our other income (expense) for the three
months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Investment income |
|
$ |
10,898 |
|
|
$ |
7,471 |
|
|
$ |
3,427 |
|
|
|
45.9 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(8,673 |
) |
|
|
(9,055 |
) |
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
Foreign exchange loss, net |
|
|
(1,046 |
) |
|
|
(4,641 |
) |
|
|
3,595 |
|
|
|
(77.5 |
) |
Miscellaneous, net |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
(686 |
) |
|
|
(96.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
$ |
1,202 |
|
|
$ |
(5,516 |
) |
|
$ |
6,718 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income in the first quarter of 2011 was favorable compared to the same period of 2010,
primarily driven by Brazil with a combination of higher investment dollars and favorable interest
rates. The improvement in foreign exchange loss, net was mainly related to the currency devaluation
in Venezuela during the first quarter of 2010.
Income from Continuing Operations
The following table represents information regarding our income from continuing operations for the
three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ Change/ |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
%
Point Change |
|
% Change |
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
4,146 |
|
|
$ |
25,192 |
|
|
$ |
(21,046 |
) |
|
|
(83.5 |
) |
Percent of net sales |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
58.8 |
% |
|
|
28.2 |
% |
|
|
30.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in net income from continuing operations in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the
first quarter of 2010 resulted from lower gross profit and higher operating expenses. These
decreases to net income from continuing operations were partially offset by favorable other income
(expense) between years and lower taxes on income. The 30.6 percentage point increase in the
effective tax rate is due mainly to operating losses in certain EMEA jurisdictions for which no tax
benefit is recognized in the financial statements.
Loss from Discontinued Operations
The following table represents information regarding our loss from discontinued operations for the
three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
(970 |
) |
|
$ |
959 |
|
|
|
(98.9 |
) |
First quarter 2011 and 2010 loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, included costs primarily
related to the U.S. elections systems business which was previously discontinued.
24
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of March 31, 2011
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net Income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated
The following table represents information regarding our net income for the three months ended
March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
$ |
2,501 |
|
|
$ |
23,924 |
|
|
$ |
(21,423 |
) |
|
|
(89.5 |
) |
Based on the results from continuing and discontinued operations discussed above, the Company
reported net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated of $2,501 and $23,924 for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Segment Analysis and Operating Profit Summary
The following table represents information regarding our revenue by reporting segment for the three
months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
DNA |
|
$ |
305,964 |
|
|
$ |
296,200 |
|
|
$ |
9,764 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
DI |
|
|
308,193 |
|
|
|
322,799 |
|
|
|
(14,606 |
) |
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
614,157 |
|
|
$ |
618,999 |
|
|
$ |
(4,842 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in DNA net sales in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period of 2010 was
due to higher product volume in the U.S. regional bank space and Canada. There was also a
corresponding increase to installation revenue as a result of the U.S. regional business growth.
These increases were partially offset by a decline in the U.S. national business.
The Diebold International (DI) net sales decrease included a net favorable currency impact of
$14,015 of which 60 percent related to Brazil. The decrease in DI was primarily a result of lower
sales volume within Asia Pacific and decreased outsourcing revenue in Brazil.
The following table represents information regarding our operating profit (loss) by reporting
segment for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
DNA |
|
$ |
17,406 |
|
|
$ |
9,284 |
|
|
$ |
8,122 |
|
|
|
87.5 |
|
DI |
|
|
(8,537 |
) |
|
|
31,301 |
|
|
|
(39,838 |
) |
|
|
(127.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating profit |
|
$ |
8,869 |
|
|
$ |
40,585 |
|
|
$ |
(31,716 |
) |
|
|
(78.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DNA operating profit in the first quarter of 2011 was favorably impacted by higher sales volume in
the U.S. regional bank space and Canada, as well as favorable performance in U.S. service and
manufacturing. This favorability was partially offset by higher operating expenses resulting from
higher non-routine expense and lower non-routine income in the first quarter of 2011 compared to
the same period of 2010.
The decrease in DI operating profit in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the first quarter of
2010 was attributable to a combination of lower sales volume and lower gross profit margin
performance due in part to higher restructuring charges. Operating expenses also increased as a
result of higher restructuring charges, the net impact of non-routine expenses and income between
years, increased spend and unfavorable currency impact.
Refer to note 16 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further details of segment
revenue and operating profit.
25
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of March 31, 2011
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Capital resources are obtained from income retained in the business, borrowings under the Companys
senior notes, committed and uncommitted credit facilities, long-term industrial revenue bonds, and
operating and capital leasing arrangements. Management expects that the Companys capital resources
will be sufficient to finance planned working capital needs, research and development activities,
investments in facilities or equipment, pension contributions, dividends and the purchase of the
Companys common shares for at least the next 12 months. A
vast majority of the Companys cash and cash
equivalents and short-term investments reside in international tax jurisdictions. Repatriation of
these funds could be negatively impacted by potential foreign and domestic taxes. Part of the
Companys growth strategy is to pursue strategic acquisitions. The Company has made acquisitions in
the past and intends to make acquisitions in the future. The Company intends to finance any future
acquisitions with either cash and short-term investments, cash provided from operations, borrowings
under available credit facilities, proceeds from debt or equity offerings and/or the issuance of
common shares.
The following table summarizes the results of our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows
for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net cash flow (used in) provided by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
(90,151 |
) |
|
$ |
(56,223 |
) |
Investing activities |
|
|
2,197 |
|
|
|
(2,732 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
35,958 |
|
|
|
5,504 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and
cash equivalents |
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
(9,102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(49,096 |
) |
|
$ |
(62,553 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities was $90,151 for the three months ended March 31, 2011, an
increase of $33,928 from $56,223 for the same period in 2010. Cash flows from operating activities
are generated primarily from operating income and managing the components of working capital. Cash
flows from operating activities during the three months ended March 31, 2011 were negatively
affected by a $20,087 decrease in net income and changes in prepaid expenses and accounts payable,
as well as an increase in inventories as the Company prepares for order fulfillment in the second
half of 2011. In addition, changes in certain other assets and liabilities negatively impacted
cash flows from operating activities, including contributions of $20,697 to the qualified and
non-qualified pension plans in the first three months of 2011 compared to $12,684 in the same
period of 2010. These changes were partially offset by favorable changes in trade receivables,
other current assets, and deferred revenue.
Net cash provided by in investing activities was $2,197 for the three months ended March 31, 2011,
a change of $4,929 from cash used in investing activities of $2,732 for the same period in 2010.
The change was primarily due to $7,338 in collections on purchased finance receivables, partially
offset by a $3,344 decrease in net proceeds on investments.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $35,958 for the three months ended March 31, 2011, an
increase of $30,454 from $5,504 for the same period of 2010. The increase was primarily due to a
$37,219 increase in debt net borrowings activity and a $3,402
increase in issuance of common shares related to stock compensation activity. This was partially
offset by an increase of $10,096 in cash used to repurchase common shares.
The effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents for the three months included
March 31, 2010 included $6,549 of devaluation related to Venezuela.
Under the Companys share repurchase program, 3,477,000 common shares remained available as of
March 31, 2011 for additional share repurchases. The Company anticipates repurchasing these shares
in 2011, depending on market conditions and the level of operating and other investing activities.
As of March 31, 2011, the Company had various international short-term uncommitted lines of credit
with borrowing limits of $100,642. The amount available under the short-term uncommitted lines at
March 31, 2011 was $78,862.
In October 2009, the Company entered into a three-year revolving credit facility. As of March 31,
2011, the Company had borrowing limits under this facility totaling $506,275 ($400,000 and 75,000,
translated). Under the terms of the credit facility agreement, the Company has the ability, subject
to various approvals, to increase the borrowing limits by $200,000 and 37,500, respectively. Up to
$30,000 and 15,000 of the revolving credit facility is available under a swing line subfacility.
The weighted-average interest rate on outstanding credit facility borrowings as of March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010 was 2.67 and 2.71 percent, respectively, which is
26
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of March 31, 2011
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
variable based on the
London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). The amount available under the revolving credit facility as
of March 31, 2011 was $206,275.
In March 2006, the Company issued senior notes in an aggregate principal amount of $300,000 with a
weighted-average fixed interest rate of 5.50 percent. The maturity dates of the senior notes are
staggered, with $75,000, $175,000 and $50,000 becoming due in 2013, 2016 and 2018, respectively.
Additionally, the Company entered into a derivative transaction to hedge interest rate risk on
$200,000 of the senior notes, which was treated as a cash flow hedge. This reduced the effective
interest rate by 14 basis points from 5.50 to 5.36 percent.
The Companys financing agreements contain various restrictive financial covenants, including net
debt to capitalization and net interest coverage ratios. As of March 31, 2011, the Company was in
compliance with the financial covenants in its debt agreements.
Dividends The Company paid dividends of $18,650 and $18,095 in the three months ended March 31,
2011 and 2010, respectively. Quarterly dividends were $0.28 and $0.27 per share for the first
quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Contractual Obligations In the first quarter of 2011, the Company entered into a direct
purchasing agreement for materials through a contract manufacturing agreement for a total
negotiated price of $5,725. The following table summarizes the Companys approximate commitment
to make future payments related to this agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
Direct purchasing agreement |
|
$ |
4,992 |
|
|
$ |
4,515 |
|
|
$ |
477 |
|
Except for the direct purchasing agreement noted above, all contractual cash obligations with
initial and remaining terms in excess of one year and contingent liabilities remained generally
unchanged at March 31, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements The Company does not participate in transactions that facilitate
off-balance sheet arrangements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Managements discussion and analysis of the Companys financial condition and results of operations
are based upon the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements. The preparation of these
financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events.
These estimates and the underlying assumptions affect the amounts of assets and liabilities
reported, disclosures about contingent assets and liabilities and reported amounts of revenues and
expenses. Such estimates include the value of purchase consideration, valuation of trade
receivables, inventories, goodwill, intangible assets, other long-lived assets, legal
contingencies, guarantee obligations, indemnifications and assumptions used in the calculation of
income taxes, pension and postretirement benefits and customer incentives, among others. These
estimates and assumptions are based on managements best estimates and judgment. Management
evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other
factors, including the economic difficulties in the U.S. credit markets and the global markets.
Management monitors the economic conditions and other factors and will adjust such estimates and
assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate. As future events and their effects cannot be
determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates. Changes
in
those estimates resulting from continuing changes in the economic environment will be reflected in
the financial statements in future periods.
Management believes there have been no significant changes during the three months ended March 31,
2011 to the items that the Company disclosed as its critical accounting policies and estimates in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the
Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
27
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of March 31, 2011
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT DISCLOSURE
In this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, statements that are not reported financial results or other
historical information are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements give current
expectations or forecasts of future events and are not guarantees of future performance. These
forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, the Companys future operating
performance, the Companys share of new and existing markets, the Companys short- and long-term
revenue and earnings growth rates, the Companys implementation of cost-reduction initiatives and
measures to improve pricing, including the optimization of the Companys manufacturing capacity.
The use of the words will, believes, anticipates, expects, intends and similar
expressions is intended to identify forward-looking statements that have been made and may in the
future be made by or on behalf of the Company.
Although the Company believes that these forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable
assumptions regarding, among other things, the economy, its knowledge of its business, and on key
performance indicators that impact the Company, these forward-looking statements involve risks,
uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those
expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements. The Company is not obligated to update
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak
only as of the date hereof. Some of the risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking
statements include, but are not limited to:
|
|
competitive pressures, including pricing pressures and technological developments; |
|
|
changes in the Companys relationships with customers, suppliers, distributors and/or
partners in its business ventures; |
|
|
changes in political, economic or other factors such as currency exchange rates, inflation
rates, recessionary or expansive trends, taxes and regulations and laws affecting the
worldwide business in each of the Companys operations, including Brazil, where a significant
portion of the Companys revenue is derived; |
|
|
the amount of cash and non-cash charges in connection with the restructuring of the
Companys EMEA operations; |
|
|
the Companys ability to take actions to mitigate the effect of the Venezuelan currency
devaluation, further devaluation, actions of the Venezuelan government, and economic
conditions in Venezuela; |
|
|
the continuing effects of the economic downturn and the disruptions in the financial
markets, including the bankruptcies, restructurings or consolidations of financial
institutions, which could reduce our customer base and/or adversely affect our customers
ability to make capital expenditures, as well as adversely impact the availability and cost of
credit; |
|
|
acceptance of the Companys product and technology introductions in the marketplace; |
|
|
the Companys ability to maintain effective internal controls; |
|
|
changes in the Companys intention to repatriate cash and cash equivalents and short-term
investments residing in international tax jurisdictions could negatively impact foreign and
domestic taxes; |
|
|
unanticipated litigation, claims or assessments, as well as the impact of any current or
pending lawsuits; |
|
|
variations in consumer demand for financial self-service technologies, products and
services; |
|
|
potential security violations to the Companys information technology systems; |
|
|
the investment performance of the Companys pension plan assets, which could require us to
increase the Companys pension contributions, and significant changes in health care costs,
including those that may result from government action such as the recently enacted U.S.
health care legislation; |
|
|
the amount and timing of repurchases of the Companys common shares, if any; |
|
|
the outcome of the Companys global FCPA review and any actions taken by government
agencies in connection with the Companys self disclosure, including the pending SEC
investigation; and |
|
|
|
the Companys ability to achieve benefits from its cost-reduction initiatives and other
strategic changes. |
28
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of March 31, 2011
ITEM 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Refer to the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. There
has been no material change in this information since December 31, 2010.
ITEM 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
This quarterly report includes the certifications of our chief executive officer (CEO) and
chief financial officer (CFO) required by Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act. See Exhibits 31.1 and
31.2. This Item 4 includes information concerning the controls and control evaluations referred to
in those certifications.
Based on the performance of procedures by management, designed to ensure the reliability of
financial reporting, management believes that the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements fairly present, in all material respects, the Companys financial position, results of
operations and cash flows as of the dates, and for the periods presented. Refer to Note 1 in the
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under
the Exchange Act) are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports
filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and that such information is accumulated
and communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosures.
In connection with the preparation of this quarterly report, management, under the supervision and
with the participation of the CEO and CFO, conducted an evaluation of disclosure controls and
procedures. Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2011. No change was made to the Companys
internal control over financial reporting during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control
over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
(dollars in thousands)
At March 31, 2011, the Company was a party to several lawsuits that were incurred in the normal
course of business, none of which individually or in the aggregate is considered material by
management in relation to the Companys financial position or results of operations. In
managements opinion, the Companys consolidated financial statements would not be materially
affected by the outcome of these legal proceedings, commitments, or asserted claims.
In addition to the routine legal proceedings noted above the Company was a party to the lawsuits
described below at March 31, 2011:
401(k) and Securities Class Actions
The Company has been served with various lawsuits, filed against it and certain current and former
officers and directors, by participants in the Companys 401(k) savings plan. These complaints seek
compensatory damages in unspecified amounts, fees and expenses related to such lawsuits and the
granting of extraordinary equitable and/or injunctive relief. For each of these lawsuits, the date
each complaint was filed, the name of the plaintiff and the federal court in which such lawsuit is
pending are as follows:
|
|
|
McDermott v. Diebold, Inc., et al., No. 5:06CV170 (N.D. Ohio, filed January 24, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
Barnett v. Diebold, Inc., et al., No. 5:06CV361 (N.D. Ohio, filed February 15, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
Farrell v. Diebold, Inc., et al., No. 5:06CV307 (N.D. Ohio, filed February 8, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
Forbes v. Diebold, Inc., et al., No. 5:06CV324 (N.D. Ohio, filed February 10, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
Gromek v. Diebold, Inc., et al., No. 5:06CV579 (N.D. Ohio, filed March 14, 2006). |
The McDermott, Barnett, Farrell, Forbes and Gromek cases, which allege breaches of fiduciary duties
under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 with respect to the 401(k) plan, have
been consolidated into a single proceeding. In May 2009, the Company agreed to settle the 401(k)
class action litigation for $4,500 to be paid out of the Companys insurance policies. On February
11, 2011, the court entered an order approving the settlement and dismissed the litigation with
prejudice.
On June 30, 2010, a shareholder filed a putative class action complaint in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio alleging violations of the federal securities laws
against the Company, certain current and former officers, and the Companys independent auditors
(Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. KPMG et al., No. 10-CV-1461).
The complaint
29
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of March 31, 2011
seeks unspecified compensatory damages on behalf of a class of persons who purchased
the Companys stock between June 30, 2005
and January 15, 2008 and fees and expenses related to the lawsuit. The complaint generally relates
to the matters set forth in the court documents filed by the SEC in June 2010 finalizing the
settlement of civil charges stemming from the investigation of the Company conducted by the
Division of Enforcement of the SEC (SEC Settlement).
On October 19, 2010, an alleged shareholder of the Company filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit
in the Stark County, Ohio, Court of Common Pleas, alleging claims on behalf of the Company against
certain current and former officers and directors of the Company for breach of fiduciary duty,
unjust enrichment and corporate waste (Levine v. Geswein et al., Case No. 2010-CV-3848).
The complaint generally relates to the matters set forth in the court documents filed by the SEC in
June 2010 in connection with the SEC Settlement, and asserts that the defendants are liable to the
Company for alleged damages associated with the SEC investigation, settlement, and related
litigation. It also asserts that alleged misstatements in the Companys publicly issued financial
statements caused the Companys common stock to trade at artificially inflated prices between 2004
and 2006, and that defendants harmed the Company by causing it to repurchase its common stock in
the open market at inflated prices during that period. The complaint seeks an award of money
damages against the defendants and in favor of the Company in an unspecified amount, as well as
unspecified equitable and injunctive relief and attorneys fees and expenses.
Management is unable to determine the financial statement impact, if any, of the putative federal
securities class action and the shareholder derivative lawsuit.
Labor and Wage Actions
On August 28, 2009, a purported class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California alleging that a class of all California technicians
employed by the Company who were scheduled to be on standby were: (a) not paid for all hours that
they worked; (b) not paid overtime compensation at the correct rate of pay; (c) not properly paid
for missed meal and rest breaks; and (d) not given correct paycheck stubs (Francisco v.
Diebold, Incorporated, Case No. CV 1889 WQH WMC). The complaint seeks additional overtime and
other compensation under the California Labor Code, various civil penalties and attorneys fees and
expenses, and a request for an injunction for future compliance with the California Labor Code
provisions that were alleged to have been violated. A mediation was held in the first quarter of
2011, which resulted in a tentative settlement, subject to agreement on final settlement terms and
court approval, that is not considered material to the consolidated financial statements.
On May 7, 2010, a purported collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act was filed in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida alleging that field service
employees of the Company nationwide were not paid for the time spent logging into the Companys
computer network in the morning, for travel to their first jobs and for meal periods that were
supposedly automatically deducted from the employees pay but, allegedly, not taken (Nichols v.
Diebold, Incorporated, Case No. 3:10cv150/RV/MD). The lawsuit seeks unpaid overtime, liquidated
damages equal to the amount of unpaid overtime and attorneys fees. In December 2010, the
plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit, which resulted in a tentative settlement in the amount
of $9,500 subject to agreement on final settlement terms and court approval. This tentative
settlement was recorded in selling and administrative expense in the fourth quarter of 2010.
Election Business Related Actions
The Company, including certain of its subsidiaries, filed a lawsuit on May 30, 2008 (Premier
Election Solutions, Inc., et al. v. Board of Elections of Cuyahoga County, et al., Case No.
08-CV-05-7841 (Franklin Cty. Ct Common Pleas)) against Cuyahoga County, the Board of Elections of
Cuyahoga County, Ohio, the Board of County Commissioners of Cuyahoga County, Ohio (collectively,
Cuyahoga County), and Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner (Secretary) regarding several Ohio
contracts under which certain of the Companys subsidiaries provided voting equipment and related
services to the State of Ohio and a number of its counties. The lawsuit was precipitated by
Cuyahoga Countys threats to sue the Company for unspecified damages. The complaint sought a
declaration that the Company met its contractual obligations.
In response, Cuyahoga County and the Secretary filed several claims against the Company and its
former subsidiaries alleging that the voting system was defective and seeking declaratory relief
and unspecified damages under several theories of recovery. In addition, Cuyahoga County and the
Secretary sought to pierce the Companys corporate veil and hold Diebold, Incorporated directly
liable for acts and omissions alleged to have been committed by its subsidiaries (even though
Diebold, Incorporated is not a party to the contracts). In connection with the Companys subsequent
sale of those subsidiaries, the Company agreed to indemnify the former subsidiaries and their
purchaser from any and all liabilities arising out of the lawsuit. The Secretary also added or
sought to add to the case all of the Ohio counties using the former subsidiaries voting equipment.
While many of the Ohio counties opposed the Secretarys actions, the Butler County Board of
Elections joined the Secretarys claims.
30
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of March 31, 2011
In March 2010, the Company and Cuyahoga County agreed to settle their claims for $7,500, to be paid
out of the Companys insurance policies, and the court has dismissed that portion of the lawsuit
Since then, the Company has also reached settlement agreements with the Secretary and all of the
Ohio counties using the former subsidiaries voting equipment, except Butler County. The
settlements are for immaterial amounts, to be paid out of the Companys insurance policies, and
free or discounted products and services, to be provided by the Companys former subsidiaries or
third parties. On November 1, 2010, all of the claims in the lawsuit, except those of Butler
County, were dismissed. For procedural purposes, simultaneously with the dismissal entry on
November 1, 2010, the Company and its former subsidiaries filed a claim against Butler County
seeking a declaration that it is not entitled to relief on its claims. Settlement discussions with
Butler County are ongoing.
Global FCPA Review
During the second quarter of 2010, while conducting due diligence in connection with a potential
acquisition in Russia, the Company identified certain transactions and payments by its subsidiary
in Russia (primarily during 2005 to 2008) that potentially implicate the FCPA, particularly the
books and records provisions of the FCPA. As a result, the Company is conducting an internal
review and collecting information related to its global FCPA compliance.
In the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company identified certain transactions within its Asia Pacific
operation over the past several years which may also potentially implicate the FCPA. The Companys
current assessment indicates that the transactions and payments in question to date do not
materially impact or alter the Companys consolidated financial statements in any year or in the
aggregate. The Companys internal review is ongoing, and accordingly, there can be no assurance
that it will not find evidence of additional transactions that potentially implicate the FCPA.
The Company has voluntarily self-reported its findings to the SEC and the DOJ and is cooperating
with these agencies in their review. The Company has been informed that the SECs inquiry now has
been converted to a formal, non-public investigation. The Company also received a subpoena for
documents from the SEC and a voluntary request for documents from the DOJ in connection with the
investigation. The Company cannot predict the length, scope or results of its review or these
government investigations, or the impact, if any, on its results of operations.
ITEM 1A: RISK FACTORS
Refer to the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
ITEM 2: UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Information concerning the Companys share repurchases made during the first quarter of 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
that May Yet Be |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Average Price |
|
Part of Publicly |
|
Purchased Under |
Period |
|
Purchased (1) |
|
Paid Per Share |
|
Announced Plans (2) |
|
the Plans (2) |
January |
|
|
6,092 |
|
|
$ |
32.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,123,051 |
|
February |
|
|
220,828 |
|
|
|
34.17 |
|
|
|
132,000 |
|
|
|
3,868,000 |
|
March |
|
|
391,000 |
|
|
|
35.06 |
|
|
|
391,000 |
|
|
|
3,477,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
617,920 |
|
|
|
34.71 |
|
|
|
523,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes 6,092 and 88,828 shares in January and February, respectively, surrendered or
deemed surrendered to the Company in connection with the Companys share-based compensation
plans. |
|
(2) |
|
The Company purchased 523,000 common shares in the first quarter of 2011 pursuant to its
share repurchase plan. The total number of shares repurchased as part of the publicly
announced share repurchase plan was 10,399,949 as of March 31, 2011. The plan was approved by
the Board of Directors in April 1997 and authorized the repurchase of up to 2.0 million
shares. The plan was amended in June 2004 to authorize the repurchase of an additional 2.0
million shares, and was further amended in August and December 2005 to authorize the
repurchase of an additional six million shares. In February 2007, the Board of Directors
approved an increase in the Companys share repurchase program by authorizing the repurchase
of up to an additional 2.0 million of the Companys outstanding common shares. In February
2011, the Board of Directors approved an increase in the Companys share repurchase program by
authorizing the repurchase of up to an additional 1.9 million of the Companys outstanding
common shares. The Company may purchase shares from time to time in open market purchases or
privately negotiated transactions. The Company may make all or part of the purchases pursuant
to accelerated share repurchases or Rule 10b5-1 plans. The plan has no expiration date. |
31
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of March 31, 2011
ITEM 3: DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4: [REMOVED AND RESERVED]
ITEM 5: OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6: EXHIBITS
|
|
|
3.1(i)
|
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Diebold, Incorporated incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1(i) to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1994 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
3.1(ii)
|
|
Amended and Restated Code of Regulations incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1(ii) to
Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (Commission File
No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Certificate of Amendment by Shareholders to Amended Articles of Incorporation of Diebold,
Incorporated incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Registrants Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 1996 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Amended Articles of Incorporation of Diebold, Incorporated
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1998 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
|
|
*101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
*101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
*101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
*101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
*101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
* |
|
XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a
part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the
Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections. |
32
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of March 31, 2011
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED
|
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: May 4, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Thomas W. Swidarski
|
|
|
|
Thomas W. Swidarski |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 4, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Bradley C. Richardson
|
|
|
|
Bradley C. Richardson |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
33
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of March 31, 2011
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
EXHIBIT NO. |
|
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
|
|
*101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
*101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
*101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
*101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
*101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
* |
|
XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration
statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for
purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these
sections. |
34