e6vk
FORM 6-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Compagnie Générale de Géophysique-Veritas
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
CGG Veritas
(Translation of registrants name into English)
Republic of France
Tour Maine Montparnasse
33, avenue du Maine
75015 Paris
France
(33) 1 64 47 45 00
(Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F þ Form 40-F
(Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this form is also thereby
furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.)
Yes o No þ
(If
Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82 -
____________.)
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This document includes forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking
statements on our current views and assumptions about future events.
These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties. Factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements
include, among others, the following factors:
|
|
|
the impact of the current economic and credit environment; |
|
|
|
|
exposure to the credit risk of customers; |
|
|
|
|
the social, political and economic risks of our global operations; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to integrate successfully the businesses or assets we acquire; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties and delays in achieving synergies and cost savings; |
|
|
|
|
any write-downs of goodwill on our balance sheet; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to sell our seismic data library; |
|
|
|
|
exposure to foreign exchange rate risk; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to finance our operations on acceptable terms; |
|
|
|
|
the timely development and acceptance of our new products and services; |
|
|
|
|
ongoing operational risks and our ability to have adequate insurance against such risks; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties and costs in protecting intellectual property rights and exposure to
infringement claims by others; |
|
|
|
|
the level of capital expenditures by the oil and gas industry and changes in demand for
seismic products and services; |
|
|
|
|
our clients ability to unilaterally terminate certain contracts in our backlog; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of competition; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties in temporarily or permanently reducing the capacity of our fleet; |
|
|
|
|
the seasonal nature of our revenues; |
|
|
|
|
the costs of compliance with governmental regulation, including environmental, health and
safety laws; |
|
|
|
|
our substantial indebtedness and the restrictive covenants in our debt agreements; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to access the debt and equity markets during the periods covered by the
forward-looking statements, which will depend on general market conditions and on our credit
ratings for our debt obligations; |
|
|
|
|
exposure to interest rate risk; and |
|
|
|
|
our success at managing the foregoing risks. |
We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks, uncertainties and
assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this document might not occur.
-3-
Certain of these risks are described in our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2009 that we filed with the SEC on April 23, 2010. Our annual report on Form 20-F is
available on our website at www.cggveritas.com or on the website maintained by the SEC at
www.sec.gov. You may request a copy of our annual report on Form 20-F, which includes our complete
audited financial statements, at no charge, by calling our investor relations department at + 33 1
6447 3831, sending an electronic message to invrelparis@cggveritas.com or
invrelhouston@cggveritas.com or writing to CGG Veritas Investor Relations Department, Tour Maine
Montparnasse 33, avenue du Maine 75015 Paris, France.
-4-
Item 1: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE-VERITAS, S.A.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
amounts in millions of |
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
US$ (2) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
255.7 |
|
|
|
349.0 |
|
|
|
480.3 |
|
|
|
691.9 |
|
Trade accounts and notes receivable, net |
|
|
609.9 |
|
|
|
832.4 |
|
|
|
564.1 |
|
|
|
812.7 |
|
Inventories and work-in-progress, net |
|
|
257.5 |
|
|
|
351.4 |
|
|
|
223.8 |
|
|
|
322.4 |
|
Income tax assets |
|
|
54.8 |
|
|
|
74.8 |
|
|
|
66.3 |
|
|
|
95.5 |
|
Other current assets, net |
|
|
119.7 |
|
|
|
163.3 |
|
|
|
89.5 |
|
|
|
129.0 |
|
Assets held for sale, net |
|
|
74.5 |
|
|
|
101.7 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,372.1 |
|
|
|
1,872.6 |
|
|
|
1,437.3 |
|
|
|
2,070.6 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
113.7 |
|
|
|
155.2 |
|
|
|
74.3 |
|
|
|
107.0 |
|
Investments and other financial assets, net |
|
|
33.2 |
|
|
|
45.4 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
51.7 |
|
Investments in companies under equity method |
|
|
71.7 |
|
|
|
97.9 |
|
|
|
99.0 |
|
|
|
142.7 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
701.8 |
|
|
|
957.9 |
|
|
|
677.7 |
|
|
|
976.3 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
816.4 |
|
|
|
1,114.2 |
|
|
|
728.9 |
|
|
|
1,050.1 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,970.6 |
|
|
|
2,689.4 |
|
|
|
1,868.1 |
|
|
|
2,691.2 |
|
Total non-current assets |
|
|
3,707.4 |
|
|
|
5,060.0 |
|
|
|
3,483.9 |
|
|
|
5,019.0 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
|
5,079.5 |
|
|
|
6,932.6 |
|
|
|
4,921.2 |
|
|
|
7,089.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank overdrafts |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Current portion of financial debt |
|
|
67.2 |
|
|
|
91.7 |
|
|
|
113.5 |
|
|
|
163.5 |
|
Trade accounts and notes payable |
|
|
264.9 |
|
|
|
361.6 |
|
|
|
179.8 |
|
|
|
259.0 |
|
Accrued payroll costs |
|
|
105.6 |
|
|
|
144.1 |
|
|
|
118.5 |
|
|
|
170.7 |
|
Income taxes liability |
|
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
42.5 |
|
|
|
61.2 |
|
Advance billings to customers |
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
26.0 |
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
34.3 |
|
Provisions current portion |
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
40.2 |
|
|
|
58.0 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
157.2 |
|
|
|
214.6 |
|
|
|
158.7 |
|
|
|
228.5 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
656.0 |
|
|
|
895.3 |
|
|
|
679.7 |
|
|
|
979.2 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
143.2 |
|
|
|
195.5 |
|
|
|
120.7 |
|
|
|
173.9 |
|
Provisions non-current portion |
|
|
84.9 |
|
|
|
115.9 |
|
|
|
104.6 |
|
|
|
150.7 |
|
Financial debt |
|
|
1,333.9 |
|
|
|
1,820.5 |
|
|
|
1,282.8 |
|
|
|
1,848.0 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
32.7 |
|
|
|
44.6 |
|
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
46.0 |
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
1,594.7 |
|
|
|
2,176.5 |
|
|
|
1,540.0 |
|
|
|
2,218.6 |
|
Common stock 228,050,011 shares authorized and
151,416,626 shares with a 0.40 nominal value
issued and outstanding at September 30, 2010 and
151,146,594 at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
60.6 |
|
|
|
82.7 |
|
|
|
60.5 |
|
|
|
87.1 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,967.5 |
|
|
|
2,685.2 |
|
|
|
1,965.9 |
|
|
|
2,832.1 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
882.3 |
|
|
|
1,204.2 |
|
|
|
1,136.0 |
|
|
|
1,636.5 |
|
Treasury shares |
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
|
|
(22.5 |
) |
|
|
(13.5 |
) |
|
|
(19.4 |
) |
Net income (loss) for the period attributable to
owners of CGGVeritas SA |
|
|
(27.0 |
) |
|
|
(36.9 |
) |
|
|
(264.3 |
) |
|
|
(380.7 |
) |
Income and expense recognized directly in equity |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
(83.4 |
) |
|
|
(113.8 |
) |
|
|
(224.2 |
) |
|
|
(323.0 |
) |
Equity attributable to owners of CGGVeritas SA |
|
|
2,780.9 |
|
|
|
3,795.4 |
|
|
|
2,661.3 |
|
|
|
3,833.8 |
|
Non-controlling interests, presented within equity |
|
|
47.9 |
|
|
|
65.4 |
|
|
|
40.2 |
|
|
|
58.0 |
|
Total equity |
|
|
2,828.8 |
|
|
|
3,860.8 |
|
|
|
2,701.5 |
|
|
|
3,891.8 |
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
5,079.5 |
|
|
|
6,932.6 |
|
|
|
4,921.2 |
|
|
|
7,089.6 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the exchange rate of US$1.365 per
on the balance sheet date. |
|
(2) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the exchange rate of US$1.441 per
on the balance sheet date. |
See notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
-5-
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE-VERITAS, S.A.
UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
except per share data, amounts in millions of |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
US$ (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
517.7 |
|
|
|
656.3 |
|
|
|
512.2 |
|
|
|
731.4 |
|
Other income from ordinary activities |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
Total income from ordinary activities |
|
|
518.6 |
|
|
|
657.5 |
|
|
|
517.3 |
|
|
|
738.4 |
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
(436.8 |
) |
|
|
(555.1 |
) |
|
|
(412.8 |
) |
|
|
(587.4 |
) |
Gross profit |
|
|
81.8 |
|
|
|
102.4 |
|
|
|
104.5 |
|
|
|
151.0 |
|
Research and development expenses, net |
|
|
(16.4 |
) |
|
|
(20.8 |
) |
|
|
(15.1 |
) |
|
|
(21.5 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(35.6 |
) |
|
|
(44.3 |
) |
|
|
(36.4 |
) |
|
|
(52.3 |
) |
Marketing and selling expenses |
|
|
(15.1 |
) |
|
|
(19.1 |
) |
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
|
|
(23.2 |
) |
Other revenues (expenses), net |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
|
40.7 |
|
|
|
57.7 |
|
Expenses related to financial debt |
|
|
(29.0 |
) |
|
|
(36.9 |
) |
|
|
(26.9 |
) |
|
|
(38.1 |
) |
Income provided by cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Cost of financial debt, net |
|
|
(28.5 |
) |
|
|
(36.3 |
) |
|
|
(26.6 |
) |
|
|
(37.6 |
) |
Other financial income (loss) |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
(9.5 |
) |
Income of consolidated companies before income taxes |
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
|
|
(18.9 |
) |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
Deferred taxes on currency translation |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
Other income taxes |
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
|
|
(13.0 |
) |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
Total income taxes |
|
|
(9.5 |
) |
|
|
(12.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
Net income from consolidated companies |
|
|
(23.4 |
) |
|
|
(31.0 |
) |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
Equity in income of investees |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(24.6 |
) |
|
|
(32.5 |
) |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
Attributable to : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owners of CGGVeritas SA |
|
|
(26.6 |
) |
|
|
(35.0 |
) |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding |
|
|
151,412,779 |
|
|
|
151,412,779 |
|
|
|
150,629,662 |
|
|
|
150,629,662 |
|
Dilutive potential shares from stock-options |
|
|
331,736 |
|
|
|
331,736 |
|
|
|
366,871 |
|
|
|
366,871 |
|
Dilutive potential shares from free shares |
|
|
314,773 |
|
|
|
314,773 |
|
|
|
243,000 |
|
|
|
243,000 |
|
Adjusted weighted average number of shares and
assumed option exercises when dilutive |
|
|
152,059,288 |
|
|
|
152,059,288 |
|
|
|
151,239,533 |
|
|
|
151,239,533 |
|
Net income (loss) per share attributable to
owners of CGGVeritas SA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
(0.18 |
) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
(0.18 |
) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Corresponding to the nine months ended September 30 in US dollars less the six months
ended June in US dollars. |
-6-
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE-VERITAS, S.A.
UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
except per share data, amounts in millions of |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
US$ (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
1,513.7 |
|
|
|
1,999.3 |
|
|
|
1,733.3 |
|
|
|
2,361.4 |
|
Other income from ordinary activities |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
Total income from ordinary activities |
|
|
1,516.2 |
|
|
|
2,002.6 |
|
|
|
1,740.0 |
|
|
|
2,370.5 |
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
(1,228.6 |
) |
|
|
(1,622.8 |
) |
|
|
(1,320.6 |
) |
|
|
(1,799.2 |
) |
Gross profit |
|
|
287.6 |
|
|
|
379.8 |
|
|
|
419.4 |
|
|
|
571.3 |
|
Research and development expenses, net |
|
|
(45.2 |
) |
|
|
(59.6 |
) |
|
|
(45.1 |
) |
|
|
(61.5 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(132.1 |
) |
|
|
(174.5 |
) |
|
|
(135.1 |
) |
|
|
(184.1 |
) |
Marketing and selling expenses |
|
|
(45.1 |
) |
|
|
(59.6 |
) |
|
|
(45.4 |
) |
|
|
(61.9 |
) |
Other revenues (expenses), net |
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
(69.3 |
) |
|
|
(94.4 |
) |
Operating income |
|
|
75.9 |
|
|
|
100.3 |
|
|
|
124.5 |
|
|
|
169.4 |
|
Expenses related to financial debt |
|
|
(80.7 |
) |
|
|
(106.6 |
) |
|
|
(79.6 |
) |
|
|
(108.5 |
) |
Income provided by cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Cost of financial debt, net |
|
|
(78.8 |
) |
|
|
(104.1 |
) |
|
|
(77.9 |
) |
|
|
(106.2 |
) |
Other financial income (loss) |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
|
|
(13.2 |
) |
Income of consolidated companies before income taxes |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
36.7 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
Deferred taxes on currency translation |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
Other income taxes |
|
|
(18.7 |
) |
|
|
(24.7 |
) |
|
|
(13.3 |
) |
|
|
(18.2 |
) |
Total income taxes |
|
|
(20.6 |
) |
|
|
(27.2 |
) |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
Net income from consolidated companies |
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
|
|
(19.4 |
) |
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
|
43.1 |
|
Equity in income of investees |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
|
|
(23.7 |
) |
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
50.4 |
|
Attributable to : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owners of CGGVeritas SA |
|
|
(27.0 |
) |
|
|
(35.6 |
) |
|
|
32.6 |
|
|
|
44.4 |
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding |
|
|
151,314,859 |
|
|
|
151,314,859 |
|
|
|
150,797,818 |
|
|
|
150,797,818 |
|
Dilutive potential shares from stock-options |
|
|
386,508 |
|
|
|
386,508 |
|
|
|
320,760 |
|
|
|
320,760 |
|
Dilutive potential shares from free shares |
|
|
314,773 |
|
|
|
314,773 |
|
|
|
243,000 |
|
|
|
243,000 |
|
Adjusted weighted average number of shares and
assumed option exercises when dilutive |
|
|
152,016,140 |
|
|
|
152,016,140 |
|
|
|
151,361,578 |
|
|
|
151,361,578 |
|
Net income (loss) per share attributable to
owners of CGGVeritas SA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
(0.18 |
) |
|
|
(0.24 |
) |
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
(0.18 |
) |
|
|
(0.24 |
) |
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the average exchange rate for the period of
US$1.321 per . |
|
(2) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the average exchange rate for the period of
US$1.362 per . |
-7-
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE-VERITAS, S.A.
UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
Amounts in millions of |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income from statements of operations |
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on cash flow hedges |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
Net gain (loss) on cash flow hedges |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on actuarial changes on pension plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) on actuarial changes on pension plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences on foreign currency translation |
|
|
142.0 |
|
|
|
(104.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) for the period, net of
taxes, in companies consolidated under equity method |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) for the period, net of taxes |
|
|
138.5 |
|
|
|
(99.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net comprehensive income (loss) for the period |
|
|
120.5 |
|
|
|
(62.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owners of CGGVeritas SA |
|
|
110.3 |
|
|
|
(63.3 |
) |
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
-8-
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE-VERITAS, S.A.
UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
amounts in millions of |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
US$ (2) |
|
OPERATING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
|
|
(23.7 |
) |
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
50.4 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
164.7 |
|
|
|
217.5 |
|
|
|
222.4 |
|
|
|
303.0 |
|
Multi-client surveys amortization |
|
|
126.0 |
|
|
|
166.4 |
|
|
|
150.0 |
|
|
|
204.4 |
|
Variance on provisions |
|
|
(55.5 |
) |
|
|
(73.3 |
) |
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
46.5 |
|
Expense & income calculated on stock-option |
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
Net gain on disposal of fixed assets |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Equity in income of affiliates |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
Dividends received from affiliates |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-cash items |
|
|
(13.8 |
) |
|
|
(18.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
Net cash including net cost of financial debt and income taxes |
|
|
219.7 |
|
|
|
290.2 |
|
|
|
448.0 |
|
|
|
610.4 |
|
Less net cost of financial debt |
|
|
78.8 |
|
|
|
104.1 |
|
|
|
77.9 |
|
|
|
106.2 |
|
Less income taxes expenses |
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
27.2 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
Net cash excluding net cost of financial debt and income taxes |
|
|
319.1 |
|
|
|
421.5 |
|
|
|
530.9 |
|
|
|
723.5 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
|
(49.3 |
) |
|
|
(65.1 |
) |
|
|
(60.5 |
) |
|
|
(82.4 |
) |
Net cash before changes in working capital |
|
|
269.8 |
|
|
|
356.4 |
|
|
|
470.4 |
|
|
|
641.1 |
|
- change in trade accounts and notes receivables |
|
|
(31.1 |
) |
|
|
(41.1 |
) |
|
|
73.3 |
|
|
|
99.8 |
|
- change in inventories and work-in-progress |
|
|
(24.2 |
) |
|
|
(32.0 |
) |
|
|
65.1 |
|
|
|
88.7 |
|
- change in other currents assets |
|
|
(26.2 |
) |
|
|
(34.6 |
) |
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
- change in trade accounts and notes payable |
|
|
51.7 |
|
|
|
68.3 |
|
|
|
(84.0 |
) |
|
|
(114.4 |
) |
- change in other current liabilities |
|
|
(19.1 |
) |
|
|
(25.2 |
) |
|
|
(59.0 |
) |
|
|
(80.4 |
) |
Impact of changes in exchange rate |
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
(14.4 |
) |
|
|
(19.8 |
) |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
238.4 |
|
|
|
314.9 |
|
|
|
472.2 |
|
|
|
643.4 |
|
INVESTING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchases of tangible and intangible assets (including
variation of fixed assets suppliers) |
|
|
(165.2 |
) |
|
|
(218.2 |
) |
|
|
(130.1 |
) |
|
|
(177.3 |
) |
Increase in multi-client surveys |
|
|
(177.4 |
) |
|
|
(234.3 |
) |
|
|
(191.8 |
) |
|
|
(261.3 |
) |
Proceeds from disposals of tangible and intangible |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Total net proceeds from financial assets |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net acquisition of investments |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(65.8 |
) |
|
|
(89.6 |
) |
Impact of changes in consolidation scope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
Variation in loans granted |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
Variation in subsidies for capital expenditures |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Variation in other financial assets |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(334.9 |
) |
|
|
(442.3 |
) |
|
|
(393.3 |
) |
|
|
(536.0 |
) |
FINANCING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debts |
|
|
(47.4 |
) |
|
|
(62.6 |
) |
|
|
(177.6 |
) |
|
|
(242.0 |
) |
Total issuance of long-term debts |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
243.5 |
|
|
|
331.8 |
|
Reimbursement on leasing |
|
|
(50.8 |
) |
|
|
(67.1 |
) |
|
|
(22.3 |
) |
|
|
(30.4 |
) |
Change in short-term loans |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
Financial interest paid (3) |
|
|
(57.2 |
) |
|
|
(75.5 |
) |
|
|
(65.3 |
) |
|
|
(89.0 |
) |
Net proceeds from capital increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- from shareholders |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
- from non-controlling interest of consolidated companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposal (acquisition) of treasury shares |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
Dividend paid to non-controlling interest |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(158.2 |
) |
|
|
(208.9 |
) |
|
|
(20.7 |
) |
|
|
(28.2 |
) |
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
(15.6 |
) |
|
|
20.7 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(224.6 |
) |
|
|
(342.9 |
) |
|
|
42.6 |
|
|
|
99.9 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
480.3 |
|
|
|
691.9 |
|
|
|
516.9 |
|
|
|
719.4 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
|
255.7 |
|
|
|
349.0 |
|
|
|
559.5 |
|
|
|
819.3 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the average exchange rate for the
period of US$1.321 per (except cash and cash equivalents balances converted at the
closing exchange rate of US$1.365 per at September 30, 2010 and of US$1.441 per at
December 31, 2009). |
|
(2) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the average exchange rate for the
period of US$1.362 per (except cash and cash
equivalents balances converted at the closing exchange rate of US$1.464 per at September
30, 2009 and of US$1.392 per at December 31, 2008). |
|
(3) |
|
Includes US$4.5 million related to issuing fees in the nine months ended September
30, 2010 (amendment of Term Loan B), and US$13.6 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 (amendment of Term Loan B and issuance of senior notes due 2016). |
-9-
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE-VERITAS, S.A.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and expense |
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
Equity attributable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Recognized directly |
|
|
translation |
|
|
to owners of |
|
|
Non controlling |
|
|
|
|
(amounts in millions of euros, except share data) |
|
Shares issued |
|
|
Share capital |
|
|
paid-in capital |
|
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
shares |
|
|
in equity |
|
|
adjustment |
|
|
CGGVeritas SA |
|
|
interests |
|
|
Total equity |
|
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
|
|
150,617,709 |
|
|
|
60.2 |
|
|
|
1,964.7 |
|
|
|
1,132.2 |
|
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(176.4 |
) |
|
|
2,960.1 |
|
|
|
38.5 |
|
|
|
2,998.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital increase |
|
|
375,760 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.6 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
Cost of share-based payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
6.4 |
|
Operations on treasury shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Net gain (loss) on actuarial changes on pension plan (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) on cash flow hedges (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
Exchange differences on foreign currency translation(3). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101.7 |
) |
|
|
(101.7 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(104.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income(1)+(2)+(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
(101.7 |
) |
|
|
(95.9 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(99.0 |
) |
Changes in consolidation scope and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
150,993,469 |
|
|
|
60.4 |
|
|
|
1,964.8 |
|
|
|
1,169.9 |
|
|
|
(13.2 |
) |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
(278.1 |
) |
|
|
2,907.1 |
|
|
|
37.2 |
|
|
|
2,944.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and expense |
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
Equity attributable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Recognized directly |
|
|
translation |
|
|
to owners of |
|
|
Non controlling |
|
|
|
|
(amounts in millions of euros, except share data) |
|
Shares issued |
|
|
Share capital |
|
|
paid-in capital |
|
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
shares |
|
|
in equity |
|
|
adjustment |
|
|
CGGVeritas SA |
|
|
interests |
|
|
Total equity |
|
Balance at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
151,146,594 |
|
|
|
60.5 |
|
|
|
1,965.9 |
|
|
|
871.7 |
|
|
|
(13.5 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(224.2 |
) |
|
|
2,661.3 |
|
|
|
40.2 |
|
|
|
2,701.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital increase |
|
|
270,032 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27.0 |
) |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
Cost of share-based payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
8.0 |
|
Operations on treasury shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
Net gain (loss) on actuarial changes on pension plan (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) on cash flow hedges (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
Exchange differences on foreign currency translation (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140.8 |
|
|
|
140.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
142.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income(1)+(2)+(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
140.8 |
|
|
|
137.3 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
138.5 |
|
Changes in consolidation scope and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
151,416,626 |
|
|
|
60.6 |
|
|
|
1,967.5 |
|
|
|
855.3 |
|
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(83.4 |
) |
|
|
2,780.9 |
|
|
|
49.7 |
|
|
|
2,828.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-10-
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE-VERITAS, S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 1Summary of significant accounting policies
Compagnie Générale de Géophysique Veritas, S.A. (the Company) and its subsidiaries
(together, the Group) is a global participant in the geophysical services industry, providing a
wide range of seismic data acquisition, processing and interpretation services as well as related
processing and interpretation software to clients in the oil and gas exploration and production
business. It is also a global manufacturer of geophysical equipment.
Given that the Company is listed on Euronext Paris and pursuant to European regulation
n°1606/2002 dated July 19, 2002, the accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with International IAS34 as issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and adopted by the European Union.
These interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been authorized by the
Audit Committee for issue on November 5, 2010.
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires
management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates due to the change
in economic conditions, changes in laws and regulations, changes in strategy and the inherent
imprecision associated with the use of estimates.
The interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a historical
cost basis, except for certain financial assets and liabilities that have been measured at fair
value.
Critical accounting policies
The interim condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all the
information and disclosures required in the annual financial statements, and should be read in
conjunction with the Groups annual financial statements as of and for the year ended December
31, 2009 included in its report on Form 20-F for the year 2009 filed with the SEC on April 23,
2010.
The accounting policies adopted in the preparation of the interim condensed consolidated
financial statements are consistent with those followed in the preparation of the Groups annual
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009, except for the adoption of the following
new Standards and Interpretations:
|
|
|
IFRIC 12 Service Concession Arrangements adopted by the European Union in June 2009,
and applicable on January 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
IFRIC 16 Hedges of a Net Investment in a Foreign Operation adopted by the European
Union in June 2009, and applicable on January 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
IAS 27 Amendment Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements adopted by the
European Union in June 2009, and applicable on January 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
IFRS 3R Business Combinations adopted by the European Union in June 2009, and
applicable on January 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
IFRIC 15 Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate adopted by the European Union
in July 2009, and applicable on January 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
Amendment to IAS 39: Eligible Hedged Items Combinations reclassification of financial
assets adopted by the European Union in September 2009, and applicable as of January 1,
2010 |
|
|
|
|
IFRIC 17 Distributions of Non-cash Assets to Owners adopted by the European Union in
November 2009, and applicable as of January 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
IFRIC 18 Transfers of assets from customers adopted by the European Union in December
2009, and applicable as of January 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
2006-2008 annual improvements to IFRS 5 adopted by the European Union in 2009, and
applicable as of January 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
2007-2009 annual improvements to IFRS adopted by the European Union in March 2010, and
applicable as of January 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
Amendment to IFRS2 Group cash-settled share-based payment transactions adopted by the
European Union in March 2010, and applicable as of January 1, 2010. |
The adoption of these new standards and interpretations did not have any material impact on the
Groups interim financial statements.
-11-
At the date of issuance of these financial statements, the following Standards and
Interpretations were issued but not yet adopted by the European Union:
|
|
|
IFRS9 Financial instruments: Recognition and Measurement of financial assets |
|
|
|
|
2008-2010 annual improvements to IFRS |
|
|
|
|
Amendment to IAS32 Classification of rights issues- adopted by the European Union in
December 2009, and applicable as of January 1, 2011. |
|
|
|
|
IAS24 Related Party Disclosures adopted by the European Union in July 2010, and
applicable as of January 1, 2011. |
|
|
|
|
Amendment to IFRIC 14 Prepayments of a Minimum Funding Requirement adopted by the
European Union in July 2010, and applicable as of January 1, 2011. |
|
|
|
|
IFRIC 19 Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments adopted by the
European Union in July 2010, and applicable as of January 1, 2011. |
The Group has not opted for the early adoption of these Standards, Amendments and
Interpretations and it is currently reviewing them to measure the potential impact on the interim
condensed consolidated financial statements. At this stage, we do not anticipate any significant
impact.
Use of estimates
Significant estimates in preparing financial statements that could have a material impact on
the carrying values of assets and liabilities are:
|
|
|
Amortization of multi-client data library, |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and, if applicable, impairment of tangible and intangible assets, including
goodwill, |
|
|
|
|
Development costs, |
|
|
|
|
Valuation of investments, |
|
|
|
|
Recoverability of goodwill and intangible assets, |
|
|
|
|
Income taxes, and |
|
|
|
|
Employee benefit plans. |
Judgments
The major accounting matters that are subject to management judgments, which have a material
effect on the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities recognized in the interim condensed
consolidated financial statements, relate to:
|
|
|
Collectibility of accounts receivable, |
|
|
|
|
Recoverability of deferred tax assets, |
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets and liabilities as part of the different purchase price allocations,
and |
|
|
|
|
Provision for contingencies, claims and litigations. |
Operating revenues
Operating revenues are recognized when they can be measured reliably, and when it is likely
that the economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to the entity, which is at the
point that such revenues have been realized or are considered realizable. For contracts where the
percentage of completion method of accounting is being applied, revenues are only recognized when
the costs incurred for the transaction and the cost to complete the transaction can be measured
reliably and such revenues are considered earned and realizable.
Revenues related to multi-client surveys result from (i) pre-commitments and (ii) licenses
after completion of the surveys (after-sales).
Pre-commitments Generally, we obtain commitments from a limited number of customers before a
seismic project is completed. These pre-commitments cover part or all of the survey area blocks. In
return for the commitment, the customer typically gains the
-12-
right to direct or influence the project specifications, advance access to data as it is being
acquired, and favorable pricing. We record payments that it receives during periods of mobilization
as advance billing in the balance sheet in the line item Advance billings to customers.
We recognize pre-commitments as revenue when production is begun based on the physical
progress of the project.
After sales Generally, we grant a license entitling non-exclusive access to a complete and
ready-for-use, specifically defined portion of our multi-client data library in exchange for a
fixed and determinable payment. We recognize after sales revenue upon the client executing a valid
license agreement and having been granted access to the data. Within thirty days of execution and
access, the client may exercise our warranty that the medium on which the data is transmitted (a
magnetic cartridge) is free from technical defects. If the warranty is exercised, the Company will
provide the same data on a new magnetic cartridge. The cost of providing new magnetic cartridges is
negligible.
After sales volume agreementsWe enter into a customer arrangement in which we agree to grant
licenses to the customer for access to a specified number of blocks of the multi-client library.
These arrangements typically enable the customer to select and access the specific blocks for a
limited period of time. We recognize revenue when the blocks are selected and the client has been
granted access to the data and if the corresponding revenue can be reliably estimated. Within
thirty days of execution and access, the client may exercise our warranty that the medium on which
the data is transmitted (a magnetic cartridge) is free from technical defects. If the warranty is
exercised, the Company will provide the same data on a new magnetic cartridge. The cost of
providing new magnetic cartridges is negligible.
In exclusive surveys, we perform seismic services (acquisition and processing) for a specific
customer. We recognize proprietary/contract revenues as the services are rendered. We evaluate the
progress to date, in a manner generally consistent with the physical progress of the project, and
recognize revenues based on the ratio of the project cost incurred during that period to the total
estimated project cost.
The billings and the costs related to the transit of seismic vessels at the beginning of the
survey are deferred and recognized over the duration of the contract by reference to the technical
stage of completion.
In some exclusive survey contracts and a limited number of multi-client survey contracts, we
are required to meet certain milestones. We defer recognition of revenue on such contracts until
all milestones that provide the customer a right of cancellation or refund of amounts paid have
been met.
We recognize revenues on equipment sales upon delivery to the customer. Any advance billings
to customers are recorded in current liabilities.
|
|
|
Software and hardware sales |
We recognize revenues from the sale of software and hardware products following acceptance of
the product by the customer at which time we have no further significant vendor obligations
remaining. Any advance billings to customers are recorded in current liabilities.
If an arrangement to deliver software, either alone or together with other products or
services, requires significant production, modification, or customization of software, the entire
arrangement is accounted for as a production-type contract, i.e. using the percentage of completion
method.
If the software arrangement provides for multiple deliverables (e.g. upgrades or enhancements,
post-contract customer support such as maintenance, or services), the revenue is allocated to the
various elements based on specific objective evidence of fair value, regardless of any separate
allocations stated within the contract for each element. Each element is appropriately accounted
for under the applicable accounting standard.
Maintenance revenues consist primarily of post contract customer support agreements and are
recorded as advance billings to customers and recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over
the contract period.
|
|
|
Other geophysical services |
Revenues from our other geophysical services are recognized as the services are performed and,
when related to long-term contracts, using the proportional performance method of recognizing
revenues.
|
|
|
Customer loyalty programs |
-13-
We may grant award credits to our main clients. These award credits are contractually based on
cumulative services provided during the calendar year and attributable to future services.
These credits are considered as a separate component of the initial sale and measured at their fair
value by reference to the contractual rates and the forecasted cumulative revenues for the calendar
year. These proceeds are recognized as revenue only when the obligation has been fulfilled.
Multi-client surveys
Multi-client surveys consist of seismic surveys to be licensed to customers on a non-exclusive
basis. All costs directly incurred in acquiring, processing and otherwise completing seismic
surveys are capitalized into the multi-client surveys (including transit costs when applicable).
The value of our multi-client library is stated on our balance sheet at the aggregate of those
costs less accumulated amortization or at fair value if lower. We review the library for potential
impairment at each balance sheet date at the relevant level (independent surveys or groups of
surveys).
We amortize the multi-client surveys over the period during which the data is expected to be
marketed using a pro-rata method based on recognized revenues as a percentage of total estimated
sales.
In this respect, we use five amortization rates 50%, 65%, 75%, 80% or 83.3% of revenues
depending on the category of the surveys. Multi-client surveys are classified into a same category
when they are located in the same area with the same estimated sales ratio, such estimates
generally relying on the historical patterns. The 65% amortization rate is applied to the surveys
acquired as a result of our acquisition of Veritas.
For all categories of surveys and starting from data delivery, a minimum straight-line
depreciation scheme is applied over a five-year period, if total accumulated depreciation from the
applicable amortization rate is below this minimum level.
Multi-client surveys acquired as part of the business combination with Veritas and which have
been valued for purchase price allocation purposes are amortized based on 65% of revenues and an
impairment loss is recognized on a survey by survey basis in case of any indication of impairment.
Development costs
Expenditures on research activities undertaken with the prospect of gaining new scientific or
technological knowledge and understanding are recognized in the income statement as expenses as
incurred and are presented as Research and development
expenses, net.
Expenditures on development activities, whereby research findings are applied to a plan or
design for the production of new or substantially improved products and processes, are capitalized
if:
|
|
|
the project is clearly defined, and costs are separately identified and reliably measured, |
|
|
|
|
the product or process is technically and commercially feasible, |
|
|
|
|
we have sufficient resources to complete development, and |
|
|
|
|
the intangible asset is likely to generate future economic benefits, either because it is
useful to us or through an existing market for the intangible asset itself or for its products. |
The expenditures capitalized include the cost of materials, direct labor and an appropriate
proportion of overhead. Other development expenditures are recognized in the income statement as
expenses as incurred and are presented as Research and development expenses, net.
Capitalized development expenditures are stated at cost less accumulated amortization and
impairment losses. We amortize capitalized developments costs over 5 years.
Research & development expenses in our income statement represent the net cost of development
costs that are not capitalized, of research costs, offset by government grants acquired for
research and development.
-14-
Note 2 Acquisitions and divestitures
On January 22, 2010, we sold our seismic vessel Harmattan for U.S.$3.4 million.
On February 9, 2010, we exercised our purchase option for the seismic vessel Geo Challenger
for NOK250 million. We also sent a termination notice for our time charter on the Pacific Titan.
On June 30, 2010, we entered into an agreement with Norfield AS providing for us to acquire
full ownership of the seismic vessel Voyager in exchange for certain assets as part of the
restructuring of Norfield AS. As a result of such agreement, 63.4 million of assets to be
transferred were classified as held for sale on our balance sheet as of September 30, 2010. This
agreement is still subject to certain conditions precedent.
On July 1, 2010, we took delivery of the Oceanic Vega, our new seismic vessel. Eidesvik
Seismic Vessel AS, owner of the Oceanic Vega is accounted for under the equity method since
December 31, 2009 in our financial statements.
Note 3Financial debt
On February 26, 2010, we repaid 35 million under our French revolving facility.
On July 15, 2010, we amended our US senior facilities agreement. This amendment extended the
maturity of U.S.$348 million out of the total U.S.$515 million outstanding as of June 30, 2010 from
January 2014 to January 2016 and increased the Companys headroom under its financial covenants.
In consideration of such amendment, the applicable margin for all borrowings under the US
senior facilities increased by 1.0% for the amounts whose maturity was extended.
The tranche whose maturity was extended to 2016 will have its maturity accelerate to February
2015 if our senior notes due May 2015 are not refinanced by February 2015.
As amended, the financial covenants in the senior facilities agreement include:
|
|
|
a maximum ratio of total net financial debt to EBITDAS (2.75:1 for any relevant period
expiring in the rolling 12-month period ending September 30 and December 31, 2010, and
March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2011, 2.50:1 for any relevant period
expiring in the rolling 12-month period ending March 31, June 30, September 30 and
December 31, 2012, 2.25:1 for any relevant period expiring in the rolling 12-month period
ending March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2013 and 2.00:1 for any relevant
period expiring in the rolling 12-month period ending March 31, June 30, September 30 and
December 31, 2014, and 1.75:1 for any relevant period expiring in the rolling 12-month
period ending March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2015, respectively) |
|
|
|
|
and a minimum ratio of EBITDAS to total interest costs (3.50:1 for any relevant period
expiring in the rolling 12-month periods-ending September 30 and December 31, 2010, and
March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2011, and March 31, June 30, September
30 and December 31, 2012, 4.00:1 for any relevant period expiring in the rolling 12-month
period ending March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2013, 4.50:1 for any
relevant period expiring in the rolling 12-month period ending March 31, June 30,
September 30 and December 31, 2014, and 5.00:1 for any relevant period expiring in the
rolling 12-month period ending March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2015,
respectively). |
Our net financial debt amounted to 1,147.6 million at September 30, 2010 compared to 918.7
at December 31, 2009.
As of September 30, 2010 the Group had 6 million available in unused short-term credit
lines and overdraft facilities and 245 million in unused long-term credit lines.
All covenants were complied with as of September 30, 2010.
Note 4Common stock and stock options plans
As of September 30, 2010 the Companys share capital consisted of 151,416,626 shares, each
with a nominal value of 0.40.
-15-
New stock-option plans and performance shares allocation plan
On January 6, 2010, the Board of Directors allocated 220,000 stock options to one
beneficiary pursuant to a shareholders resolution. The exercise price of the stock options is
14.71. The stock options expire on January 6, 2018. 110,000 of these stock options vest
immediately, 55,000 will vest as of January 7, 2011 and 55,000 will vest as of January 7, 2012.
On March 22, 2010, the Board of Directors allocated:
|
|
|
1,348,150 stock options to 338 beneficiaries pursuant to a shareholders resolution. The
exercise price of the stock options is 19.44. The stock options expire on March 22, 2018.
Rights to these options vest by one-third during each of the first three years of the plan; |
|
|
|
|
509,925 performance shares to 332 beneficiaries pursuant to a shareholders resolution,
including 73,125 performance shares that were allocated to executive officers who were
members of the Executive Committee (excluding the Chairman and the Chief Executive
Officer); |
|
|
|
|
200,000 stock options to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Their exercise price
is 19.44. Rights to these options vest by one-third during each of the first three years
of the plan. Such vesting is subject to performance conditions based on the fulfillment of
one of the following objectives: |
|
|
|
A share price performance objective relative to the share price considering the SBF 120
index; |
|
|
|
|
A share price performance objective relative to the ADS price considering the PHLX Oil
Services Sectorsm (OSXsm) index; or |
|
|
|
|
A financial indicator in the form of an EBITDAS objective expressed in U.S.$ and related to
the target for the annual variable part of compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer. |
|
|
The options have an eight-year duration subject to the requirement, for all French
residents, to hold the resulting shares in registered form from their purchase date until
March 22, 2014 inclusive, except in limited cases listed in the plan regulation. |
Note 5Analysis by operating segment and geographic area
Beginning July 1, 2010, our Group has been organized in five divisions and currently
operates in two industry segments:
|
|
|
Geophysical services segment, which comprises: |
|
|
|
Marine contract: seismic data acquisition offshore undertaken by us on
behalf of a specific client; |
|
|
|
|
Land contract: seismic data acquisition for land, transition zones and
shallow water undertaken by us on behalf of a specific client; |
|
|
|
|
Processing and Imaging: processing and imaging as well as interpretation
of geophysical data, data management and reservoir studies for clients, and |
|
|
|
|
Multi-client land and marine: seismic data acquisition undertaken by us
and licensed to a number of clients on a non-exclusive basis; |
|
|
|
Geophysical equipment segment, which we conduct through Sercel Holding S.A. and its
subsidiaries, comprises our manufacturing and sales activities for seismic equipment used
for data acquisition, both on land and offshore. |
We report financial information by operating segment in accordance with our internal reporting
system and the internal segment information that is used to manage and measure our performance.
Inter-company sales between the two segments are made at prices approximating market prices
and relate primarily to equipment sales made by the geophysical equipment segment to the
geophysical services segment. These inter-segment sales, and the related operating income
recognized by the geophysical equipment segment are eliminated in consolidation and presented in
the column Eliminations and Adjustments in the tables that follow.
Operating income of an industry segment represents operating revenues and other income from
ordinary activities less expenses of that segment. It includes non-recurring and unusual items,
which are disclosed in the operating segment, if material. General corporate expenses, which
include Group management, financing, and legal activities, have been included in the column
Eliminations and Adjustments in the tables that follow. The Group does not disclose financial
expenses or revenues by operating segment because these items are not followed by the segment
management and because financing and investment are mainly managed at the corporate level.
-16-
Identifiable assets are those used in the operations of each industry segment.
Unallocated and corporate assets consist primarily of financial assets, including cash and cash
equivalents.
Due to the constant changes in work locations, the Group does not track its assets based on
country of origin or ownership.
The following tables present revenues, operating income and identifiable assets by operating
segment, and operating revenues by geographic area (by location of customers).
Analysis by operating segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
(in millions of euros) |
|
Services |
|
|
Equipment |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Total |
|
|
(a) |
|
|
Equipment |
|
|
Adjustments (a) |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenues from unaffiliated customers |
|
|
363.7 |
|
|
|
154.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
517.7 |
|
|
|
400.0 |
|
|
|
112.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
512.2 |
|
Inter-segment revenues |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
(40.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.4 |
|
|
|
(30.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
364.0 |
|
|
|
194.3 |
|
|
|
(40.6 |
) |
|
|
517.7 |
|
|
|
400.0 |
|
|
|
142.6 |
|
|
|
(30.4 |
) |
|
|
512.2 |
|
Other income from ordinary activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
Total income from ordinary activities |
|
|
364.0 |
|
|
|
195.2 |
|
|
|
(40.6 |
) |
|
|
518.6 |
|
|
|
404.1 |
|
|
|
143.6 |
|
|
|
(30.4 |
) |
|
|
517.3 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(12.2 |
) |
|
|
57.9 |
|
|
|
(24.6 |
) (b) |
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
(13.5 |
) (b) |
|
|
40.7 |
|
Equity in income (loss) of investees |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Capital expenditures (c) |
|
|
118.1 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
132.4 |
|
|
|
85.7 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
103.5 |
|
Depreciation and amortization (d) |
|
|
(89.7 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(99.1 |
) |
|
|
162.6 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
(46.2 |
) |
|
|
123.7 |
|
Investments in companies under equity method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The segment information related to our Services segment for the three months ended September
30, 2009 was restated to reflect the change in our internal financial reporting in 2010: (i)
Operating income for our Services segment is presented after elimination of amortization
expense corresponding to past inter-company capital expenditures between our Equipment
segment and Services segment; (ii) Capital expenditures for our Services segment are
presented after elimination of inter-segment margin. These eliminations were previously
presented in Eliminations and Adjustments". |
|
(b) |
|
Includes general corporate expenses of 8.1 million for the three months ended September 30,
2010 and 7.6 million for the comparable period in 2009. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes (i) investments in multi-client surveys of 49.4 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and 47.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 (ii)
equipment acquired under capital leases for 9.9 million for the three months ended September
30, 2010 and none for the comparable period of 2009, (iii) and capitalized development costs
of 8.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2.8 million for the
comparable period of 2009, in the Services segment. Capitalized development costs in the
Equipment segment were 0.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 0.2
million for the comparable period of 2009. |
|
(d) |
|
Includes multi-client survey amortization of 45.8 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and 61.0 million for the comparable period of 2009. |
-17-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 (1) |
|
|
2009 (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
(in millions of US$) |
|
Services |
|
|
Equipment |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Equipment |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenues from unaffiliated customers |
|
|
460.6 |
|
|
|
195.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
656.3 |
|
|
|
570.9 |
|
|
|
160.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
731.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter-segment revenues |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
51.2 |
|
|
|
(51.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.8 |
|
|
|
(42.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
461.1 |
|
|
|
246.9 |
|
|
|
(51.7 |
) |
|
|
656.3 |
|
|
|
570.9 |
|
|
|
203.3 |
|
|
|
(42.8 |
) |
|
|
731.4 |
|
Other income from ordinary activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
Total income from ordinary activities |
|
|
461.1 |
|
|
|
248.1 |
|
|
|
(51.7 |
) |
|
|
657.5 |
|
|
|
576.6 |
|
|
|
204.6 |
|
|
|
(42.8 |
) |
|
|
738.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
|
|
74.0 |
|
|
|
(31.0 |
) |
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
|
40.7 |
|
|
|
36.5 |
|
|
|
(19.5 |
) |
|
|
57.7 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Corresponding to the nine months ended September 30 in US dollars less the six month ended June
30 in US dollars. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
(in millions of euros) |
|
Services |
|
|
Equipment |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Total |
|
|
(a) |
|
|
Equipment |
|
|
(a) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Revenues from unaffiliated customers |
|
|
1,082.5 |
|
|
|
431.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,513.7 |
|
|
|
1,333.6 |
|
|
|
399.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,733.3 |
|
Inter-segment revenues |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
112.6 |
|
|
|
(113.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
72.1 |
|
|
|
(72.6 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
1,083.1 |
|
|
|
543.8 |
|
|
|
(113.2 |
) |
|
|
1,513.7 |
|
|
|
1,334.1 |
|
|
|
471.8 |
|
|
|
(72.6 |
) |
|
|
1,733.3 |
|
Other income from ordinary activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
Total income from ordinary activities |
|
|
1,083.1 |
|
|
|
546.3 |
|
|
|
(113.2 |
) |
|
|
1,516.2 |
|
|
|
1,338.3 |
|
|
|
474.3 |
|
|
|
(72.6 |
) |
|
|
1,740.0 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
143.9 |
|
|
|
(70.0) |
(b) |
|
|
75.9 |
|
|
|
70.4 |
|
|
|
108.2 |
|
|
|
(54.1) |
(b) |
|
|
124.5 |
|
Equity in income (loss) of investees |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
Capital expenditures (c) |
|
|
329.8 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
356.4 |
|
|
|
317.7 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
344.7 |
|
Depreciation and amortization (d) |
|
|
263.4 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
290.7 |
|
|
|
350.1 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
372.4 |
|
Investments in companies under equity method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Identifiable assets |
|
|
4,202.2 |
|
|
|
805.4 |
|
|
|
(260.5 |
) |
|
|
4,747.1 |
|
|
|
4,152.6 |
|
|
|
728.8 |
|
|
|
(243.6 |
) |
|
|
4,637.8 |
|
Unallocated and corporate assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
332.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
643.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,079.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,281.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The segment information related to our Services segment for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 was restated to reflect the change in our internal financial reporting in 2010: (i)
Operating income for our Services segment is presented after elimination of amortization
expense corresponding to past inter-company capital expenditures between our Equipment
segment and Services segment; (ii) Capital expenditures for our Services segment are
presented after elimination of inter-segment margin. These eliminations were previously
presented in Eliminations and Adjustments. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes general corporate expenses of 29.7million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 27.9 million for the comparable period in 2009. |
-18-
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Includes (i) investments in multi-client surveys of 177.4 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 191.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, (ii)
equipment acquired under capital leases for 9.9 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2010 and 22.7 for the comparable period of 2009, (iii) capitalized development costs of
15.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 9.2 million for the
comparable period of 2009 in the Services segment. Capitalized development costs in the
Equipment segment were 2.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 1.2
million for the comparable period of 2009. |
|
(d) |
|
Includes multi-client survey amortization of 126.0 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 150.0 million for the comparable period of 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
(in millions of US$) |
|
(1) |
|
|
Equipment(2) |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Total (3) |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Equipment |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Revenues from unaffiliated customers |
|
|
1,431.6 |
|
|
|
567.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,999.3 |
|
|
|
1,816.6 |
|
|
|
544.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,361.4 |
|
Inter-segment revenues |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
148.2 |
|
|
|
(148.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
98.3 |
|
|
|
(99.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
1,432.3 |
|
|
|
715.9 |
|
|
|
(148.9 |
) |
|
|
1,999.3 |
|
|
|
1,817.3 |
|
|
|
643.1 |
|
|
|
(99.0 |
) |
|
|
2,361.4 |
|
Other income from ordinary activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
Total income from ordinary activities |
|
|
1,432.3 |
|
|
|
719.2 |
|
|
|
(148.9 |
) |
|
|
2,002.6 |
|
|
|
1,823.0 |
|
|
|
646.5 |
|
|
|
(99.0 |
) |
|
|
2,370.5 |
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
189.4 |
|
|
|
(91.8 |
) |
|
|
100.3 |
|
|
|
96.0 |
|
|
|
147.5 |
|
|
|
(74.1 |
) |
|
|
169.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the average exchange rate for the period of
US$1.323 per in 2010 and of US$1.362 per in 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Dollar amounts were converted at the average rate of US$1.317 per for the Equipment segment. |
|
(3) |
|
Dollar amounts for the Consolidated total were converted at the rate of US$1.321 per ,
corresponding to the weighted average based on each segments operating revenues. |
Revenues by geographic area
The following table sets forth our consolidated operating revenues by location of customers,
and the percentage of total consolidated operating revenues represented thereby:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Except percentages, in millions of |
|
|
|
|
US$ (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
US$ (1) |
|
|
North America |
|
|
137.0 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
174.0 |
|
|
|
105.8 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
150.8 |
|
Central and South Americas |
|
|
54.2 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
68.4 |
|
|
|
55.2 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
77.1 |
|
Europe, Africa and Middle East |
|
|
232.3 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
295.4 |
|
|
|
243.6 |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
346.9 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
94.2 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
118.5 |
|
|
|
107.6 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
156.6 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
517.7 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
656.3 |
|
|
|
512.2 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
731.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Corresponding to the nine months ended September 30 in US dollars less the six month ended June
30 in US dollars. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Except percentages, in millions of |
|
|
|
|
US$ (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
US$ (1) |
|
|
North America |
|
|
389.8 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
514.8 |
|
|
|
348.6 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
474.9 |
|
Central and South Americas |
|
|
169.9 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
224.4 |
|
|
|
126.9 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
172.9 |
|
Europe, Africa and Middle East |
|
|
645.6 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
852.8 |
|
|
|
786.4 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
1,071.4 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
308.4 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
407.3 |
|
|
|
471.4 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
642.2 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,513.7 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,999.3 |
|
|
|
1,733.3 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
2,361.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the average exchange rate for the period of
US$1.321 per in 2010 and of US$1.362 per in 2009. |
-19-
Note
6Other revenues (expenses)
Marine restructuring plan
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we paid approximately U.S.$30 million
related to our 2009 marine restructuring plan, which was offset by the use of the corresponding
provisions.
Note
7Commitments and contingencies
Capital expenditures, other commitments and contingencies
On March 5, 2010, we extended the charter period for our seismic vessel Vanquish until
November 2020. Either two five-year-extension options or a purchase option (U.S.$44 million) can be
exercised thereafter.
On June 17, 2010, we extended the bareboat charter period for our seismic vessel Endeavour
until March 2018, for an additional commitment of approximately U.S.$30 million, with two
additional five-year extension options.
Litigation and other risks
On January 29, 2010, a Texarkana, Texas jury found that Sercel Inc. infringed United States
Patent No. 5,852,242 and that patent-holder ION Geophysical Corporation was entitled to
U.S.$25.2 million in lost profits. On September 16, 2010 the Federal District Court in Texarkana
overturned the jurys verdict with respect to one theory of infringement claimed by ION. The court
also sustained the jurys verdict on another theory of infringement and the validity of the patent.
The court reduced the damages award to U.S.$10.7 million. The parties are expecting the courts
final judgment prior to any further action. The court had previously found the product claims of
the patent invalid, and one of the claims for a method of manufacturing not infringed. Sercel is
confident that its products do not infringe any valid claims of the patent in question.
We do not believe this litigation will have a material adverse effect on our financial
position or results of operations. Thus, no provision was recorded in the consolidated financial
statements, except for the fees related to prepare the defense.
Note
8Subsequent events
On October 1, 2010, we took delivery of our new Galileo headquarters building in Massy
pursuant to a 12 year lease contract with a purchase option exercisable from the end of the sixth
year until the end of the lease agreement.
On October 21, 2010, the Board of Directors allocated 120,000 stock options to three
beneficiaries pursuant to a shareholders resolution. The exercise price of the stock options is
16.88. The plan expires on October 21, 2018. Rights to these options vest by one-third during
each of the first three years of the plan.
On November 4, 2010, we amended our U.S.$200 million French revolving facility, dated February
7, 2007, in order to align covenant levels with our amended senior U.S. facilities and extend the
maturity by two years, from February 2012 to February 2014. Total Leverage Ratio covenant levels
increased from 2.25 to 2.75 in 2010 declining thereafter to 2.0 in 2014; and EBITDAS to total
interest cost covenant levels decreased from 4.00 to 3.50 in 2010 increasing thereafter to 4.50 in
2014.
In consideration of the amendment, interest rates increased from Libor + 300bps to Libor +
325bps (initially), and will then be adjusted based on the CGGVeritas corporate ratings.
-20-
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE-VERITAS, S.A.
Item 2: MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Group organization
Beginning July 1, 2010, our Group has been organized in five divisions and currently operates
in two industry segments:
|
|
|
Geophysical services segment, which comprises: |
|
|
|
Marine contract: seismic data acquisition offshore undertaken by us on
behalf of a specific client; |
|
|
|
|
Land contract: seismic data acquisition for land, transition zones and
shallow water undertaken by us on behalf of a specific client; |
|
|
|
|
Processing and Imaging: processing and imaging as well as interpretation
of geophysical data, data management and reservoir studies for clients, and |
|
|
|
|
Multi-client land and marine: seismic data acquisition undertaken by us
and licensed to a number of clients on a non-exclusive basis; |
|
|
|
Geophysical equipment segment, which we conduct through Sercel Holding S.A. and its
subsidiaries, comprises our manufacturing and sales activities for seismic equipment used
for data acquisition, both on land and marine. |
We report financial information by operating segment in accordance with our internal reporting
system and the internal segment information that is used to manage and measure our performance.
Factors Affecting Results of Operations
Geophysical market environment
Overall demand for geophysical services and equipment is dependent on spending by oil and gas
companies for exploration, development and production and field management activities. We believe
the level of spending of such companies depends on their assessment of their ability to efficiently
supply the oil and gas market in the future and the current balance of hydrocarbon supply and
demand.
The geophysical market has historically been extremely cyclical. We believe many factors
contribute to the volatility of this market, such as the geopolitical uncertainties that can harm
the confidence and visibility that are essential to our clients long-term decision-making
processes and the expected balance in the mid to long term between supply and demand for
hydrocarbons. In the fourth quarter of 2009, we recognized an impairment loss on goodwill of 216
million on our marine division as a result of market conditions.
Demand for seismic equipment in 2010 has been driven by technological requirements, with a
premium for differentiating technology. In geophysical services, commercial activity is
increasingly supported by new opportunities in most regions, especially for high-end advanced
solutions, work in challenging environments and unconventional plays. Overall geophysical services
in 2010 will be shaped by multi-client sales at the end of the year, while contract market
conditions both land and marine remain difficult.
Foreign exchange fluctuations
As a company that derives a substantial amount of its revenue from sales internationally, our
results of operations are affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Movements between
the U.S. dollar and euro or other currencies may adversely affect our business by negatively
impacting our revenues and income.
As certain trends in our business may be obscured by currency fluctuations, we have translated
certain euro amounts in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and
Results of Operations into U.S. dollars. See Item 5: Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
Trend Information Currency Fluctuations of our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
-21-
Unless otherwise indicated, balance sheet data expressed in U.S. dollars have been converted
from euros at the exchange rate on the relevant balance sheet date, and income statement data in
U.S. dollars have been converted from euros at the average exchange rate for the relevant period.
The exchange rates as of December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2010 were U.S.$1.441, and U.S.$1.365
respectively, per euro, and the average exchange rates for the nine-month periods ended September,
2009 and 2010 were U.S.$1.362 and U.S.$1.321, respectively, per euro.
Acquisitions and divestitures
On January 22, 2010, we sold our seismic vessel Harmattan for U.S.$3.4 million.
On February 9, we exercised our purchase option for the seismic vessel Geo Challenger for
NOK250 million. We also sent a termination notice for our time charter on the Pacific Titan.
On June 30, 2010, we entered into an agreement with Norfield AS providing for us to acquire
full ownership of the seismic vessel Voyager in exchange for certain assets as part of the
restructuring of Norfield AS. As a result of such agreement, 63.4 million of assets to be
transferred were classified as held for sale on our balance sheet as of September 30, 2010. This
agreement is still subject to certain conditions precedent.
On July 1, 2010, we took delivery of the Oceanic Vega, our new seismic vessel.
On October 1, 2010, we took delivery of our new headquarter building in Massy pursuant to a 12
year lease contract with a purchase option exercisable from the end of the sixth year until the end
of the lease agreement.
Indebtedness
On February 26, 2010, we repaid 35 million of our French revolving facility.
On July 15, 2010, we amended our US senior facilities agreement. This amendment extended the
maturity of U.S.$348 million out of the total U.S.$513 million outstanding as of September 30, 2010
from January 2014 to January 2016 and increased the Companys headroom under its financial
covenants.
In consideration of such amendment, the applicable margin for all borrowings under the US
senior facilities increased by 1.0% for the amounts whose maturity was extended.
The tranche whose maturity was extended to 2016 will have its maturity accelerate to February
2015 if our senior notes due May 2015 are not refinanced by February 2015.
As amended, the financial covenants in the senior facilities agreement include:
|
|
|
a maximum ratio of total net financial debt to EBITDAS (2.75:1 for any relevant period
expiring in the rolling 12-month period ending September 30 and December 31, 2010, and
March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2011, 2.50:1 for any relevant period
expiring in the rolling 12-month period ending March 31, June 30, September 30 and
December 31, 2012, 2.25:1 for any relevant period expiring in the rolling 12-month period
ending March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2013 and 2.00:1 for any relevant
period expiring in the rolling 12-month period ending March 31, June 30, September 30 and
December 31, 2014, and 1.75:1 for any relevant period expiring in the rolling 12-month
period ending March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2015, respectively) |
|
|
|
|
and a minimum ratio of EBITDAS to total interest costs (3.50:1 for any relevant period
expiring in the rolling 12-month periods-ending September 30 and December 31, 2010, and
March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2011, and March 31, June 30, September
30 and December 31, 2012, 4.00:1 for any relevant period expiring in the rolling 12-month
period ending March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2013, 4.50:1 for any
relevant period expiring in the rolling 12-month period ending March 31, June 30,
September 30 and December 31, 2014, and 5.00:1 for any relevant period expiring in the
rolling 12-month period ending March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2015,
respectively). |
On November 4, 2010, we amended our U.S.$200 million French revolving facility, dated February
7, 2007, in order to align covenant levels with our amended senior U.S. facilities and extend the
maturity by two years, from February 2012 to February 2014. Total Leverage Ratio covenant levels
increased from 2.25 to 2.75 in 2010 declining thereafter to 2.0 in 2014; and EBITDAS to total
interest cost covenant levels decreased from 4.00 to 3.50 in 2010 increasing thereafter to 4.50 in
2014.
In consideration of the amendment, interest rates increased from Libor + 300bps to Libor +
325bps (initially), and will then be adjusted based on the CGGVeritas corporate ratings.
-22-
New stock-option plans and performance shares allocation plan
On January 6, 2010, the Board of Directors allocated 220,000 stock options to one
beneficiary pursuant to a shareholders resolution. The exercise price of the stock options is
14.71. The stock options expire on January 6, 2018. 110,000 of these stock options vest
immediately, 55,000 will vest as of January 7, 2011 and 55,000 will vest as of January 7, 2012.
On March 22, 2010, the Board of Directors allocated:
|
|
|
1,348,150 stock options to 338 beneficiaries pursuant to a shareholders resolution. The
exercise price of the stock options is 19.44. The stock options expire on March 15, 2018.
Rights to these options vest by one-third during each of the first three years of the plan; |
|
|
|
|
509,925 performance shares to 332 beneficiaries pursuant to a shareholders resolution,
including 73,125 performance shares that were allocated to executive officers who were
members of the Executive Committee (excluding the Chairman and the Chief Executive
Officer); |
|
|
|
|
200,000 stock options to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Their exercise price
is 19.44. Rights to these options vest by one-third during each of the first three years
of the plan. Such vesting is subject to performance conditions based on the fulfillment of
one of the following objectives: |
|
|
|
A share price performance objective relative to the share price considering the SBF 120
index; |
|
|
|
|
A share price performance objective relative to the ADS price considering the PHLX Oil
Services Sectorsm (OSXsm) index;
or |
|
|
|
|
A financial indicator of EBITDAS objective expressed in U.S.$ and related to the target for
the annual variable part of compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
The options have an eight-year duration subject to the requirement, for all French residents,
to hold the resulting shares in registered form from their purchase date until March 22, 2018
inclusive, except in limited cases listed in the plan regulation |
On October 21, 2010, the Board of Directors allocated 120,000 stock options to three
beneficiaries pursuant to a shareholders resolution. The exercise price of the stock options is
16.88. The plan expires on October 21, 2018. Rights to these options vest by one-third during
each of the first three years of the plan.
Legal proceedings, claims and other contingencies
On January 29, 2010, a Texarkana, Texas jury found that Sercel Inc. infringed United States
Patent No. 5,852,242 and that patent-holder ION Geophysical Corporation was entitled to U.S.$25.2
million in lost profits. On September 16, 2010 the Federal District Court in Texarkana overturned
the jurys verdict with respect to one theory of infringement claimed by ION. The court also
sustained the jurys verdict on another theory of infringement and the validity of the patent. The
court reduced the damages award to U.S.$10.7 million. The parties are expecting the courts final
judgment prior to any further action. The court had previously found the product claims of the
patent invalid, and one of the claims for a method of manufacturing not infringed. Sercel is
confident that its products do not infringe any valid claims of the patent in question.
We do not believe this litigation will have a material adverse effect on our financial
position or results of operations. Thus, no provision was recorded in the consolidated financial
statements, except for the fees related to prepare the defense.
Backlog
Our backlog as of October 1, 2010 was U.S.$1.6 billion. Contracts for services are occasionally
modified by mutual consent and in certain instances are cancelable by the customer on short
notice without penalty. Consequently, backlog as of any particular date may not be indicative of
actual operating results for any succeeding period.
-23-
Three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to three months ended September 30, 2009
Operating revenues
The following table sets forth our consolidated operating revenues by division, and the
percentage of total consolidated operating revenues represented thereby, during each of the
periods stated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Except percentages, in millions of |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$(1) |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$(1) |
|
|
% |
|
Marine contract |
|
|
136.8 |
|
|
|
172.6 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
189.0 |
|
|
|
270.8 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
Land contract |
|
|
65.2 |
|
|
|
82.2 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
59.3 |
|
|
|
85.3 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Processing & Imaging |
|
|
73.7 |
|
|
|
93.5 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
70.7 |
|
|
|
100.7 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Multi-client |
|
|
88.0 |
|
|
|
112.4 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
80.8 |
|
|
|
114.1 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Services |
|
|
363.7 |
|
|
|
460.7 |
|
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
400.0 |
|
|
|
570.9 |
|
|
|
78 |
% |
Equipment |
|
|
154.0 |
|
|
|
195.6 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
112.2 |
|
|
|
160.5 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
517.7 |
|
|
|
656.3 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
512.2 |
|
|
|
731.4 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated as the nine months ended September 30, in U.S.$, less the six
months ended June 30, in U.S.$. |
Our consolidated operating revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2010
increased 1% to 517.7 million from 512.2 million for the comparable period of 2009. Expressed in
U.S dollars, our consolidated operating revenues decreased 10% to U.S.$656.3 million in the three
months ended September 30, 2009 from U.S.$731.4 million for the comparable period of 2009. This
decrease was due to our Services segment, while revenues from our Equipment segment increased
significantly.
Services
Operating revenues for our Services segment (excluding intra-group sales) decreased 9% to
363.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 from 400.0 million for the comparable
period of 2009. In U.S. dollar terms, operating revenues for our Services segment decreased 19%,
mainly as a result of our vessel reduction plans and lower vessel utilization rates in challenging
marine and North America land market conditions.
Marine contract
Operating revenues from our Marine contract division for the three months ended September
30, 2010 decreased 28% to 136.8 million from 189.0 million for the comparable period of 2009
(and decreased 36% in U.S. dollar terms) principally due to the decommissioning of our lower-end
vessels as part of our marine restructuring plan begun in 2009 and lower vessel utilization
rates. The fleet availability and production rates were both at 87% for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 compared to 90% and 93% respectively for the three months ended September 30,
2009. 90% of our high end 3D fleet operated on contract during the three months ended September
30, 2010 and 86% for the comparable period of 2009. During the three months ended September 30,
2010, the seismic vessel Oceanic Vega was delivered and completed its first survey in the Barents
Sea, before mobilizing to Mexico to acquire a large wide-azimuth dual vessel survey with the
Vanquish, which was upgraded to 12 Sentinel streamers in August.
Land contract
Operating revenues from our Land contract division increased 10% to 65.2 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 from 59.3 million for the comparable period of 2009, and
decreased 4% in U.S. dollar terms mainly due to challenging market conditions in North America.
Activity remained high in the Middle East.
Processing & Imaging
Operating revenues from our Processing & Imaging division increased 4% to 73.7 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2010 from 70.7 million for the comparable period of 2009
(and decreased 7% in US dollar terms). Demand remained strong for our advanced capabilities, such
as our RTM 3D gather depth processing technology and our reservoir solutions, particularly for
shale gaz. We now operate 12 dedicated centers and continued to develop our leadership with a
three year extension
- 24 -
contract for one center in Aberdeen.
Multi-client
Operating revenues from our Multi-client division for the three months ended September 30,
2010 increased 9% to 88.0 million from 80.8 million for the comparable period of 2009 (and
decreased 1% in U.S. dollar terms).
Multi-client marine data library revenues increased 13% to 60.4 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2010 from 53.8 million for the comparable period of 2009 (and was
stable U.S. dollar terms) principally due to good level of after-sales. Prefunding decreased 26%
to 28.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 from 38.0 million for the
comparable period of 2009 (and decreased 34% in U.S. dollar terms), with a high prefunding rate
of 102%. After-sales worldwide doubled to 32.5 million for the three months ended September 30,
2010 from 15.8 million for the comparable period of 2009 (and increased 82% in U.S. dollar
terms).
Multi-client land data library revenues increased 2% to 27.6 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2010 from 27.1 million for the comparable period of 2009 (and decreased 6% in
U.S. dollar terms). In addition to the ongoing survey in the Haynesville basin, in September we
began the acquisition of a multi-phase program in the Marcellus basin. Prefunding decreased 6% to 16.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 from 18.0
million for the comparable period of 2009 (and decreased 12% in U.S. dollar terms) due to a lower
prefunding rate of 81%. The decrease of prefunding was offset by higher revenues from after-sales,
which increased 19% to 10.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 from 9.0
million for the comparable period of 2009.
Equipment
Operating revenues for our Equipment segment, including intra-group sales, increased 36% to
194.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 from 142.6 million for the comparable
period of 2009. In U.S. dollar terms, revenues increased 21% to U.S.$246.9 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2010 from U.S.$203.3 million for the comparable period of 2009. Strong
demand for increasing channel counts for high density surveys and regional activity drove growth in
land equipment this quarter. Sentinel solid streamer sales, along with increased technology take-up
of SeaRay OBC systems, kept marine sales at a good level.
Operating revenues for our Equipment segment, excluding intra-group sales, increased 37% to
154.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 from 112.2 million for the comparable
period in 2009 (and increased 22% in U.S. dollar terms).
Operating Expenses
Cost of operations, including depreciation and amortization, increased 6% to 436.8 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2010 from 412.8 million for the comparable period of
2009, and decreased 5% in U.S. dollar terms mainly due to lower activity in marine contract. As a
percentage of operating revenues, cost of operations increased to 84% for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 from 80% for the comparable period of 2009. Gross profit decreased 22% to 81.8
million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 from 104.5 million for the comparable period
of 2009, representing 16% and 20% of operating revenues, respectively.
Research and development expenditures increased 9% to 16.4 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2010, from 15.1 million for the comparable period of 2009, representing 3% of
operating revenues for both periods.
General and administrative expenses decreased 2% to 35.6 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 from 36.4 million for the comparable period of 2009 (and decreased 15% in
U.S. dollar terms), as a result of cost saving measures. As a percentage of operating revenues, general and administrative costs decreased to 6% for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 from 7% for the comparable period of 2009.
Selling and marketing expenses decreased 8% to 15.1 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 from 16.5 million for the comparable period of 2009 (and decreased 18% in U.S.
dollar terms).
Other revenues amounted to 6.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared
to 4.2 million for three months ended September 30, 2009.
Operating Income (Loss)
Our operating income was 21.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared
to operating income of 40.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 as a result of
the factors described above.
-25-
Operating loss for our Services segment was 12.2 million for the three months ended September
30, 2010 compared to operating income of 29.0 million for the three months ended September 30,
2009.
Operating income from our Equipment segment increased 130% to 57.9 million for three months
ended September 30, 2010 from 25.2 million for the comparable period of 2009.
Financial Income and Expenses
Cost of net financial debt increased 7% to 28.5 million for the three months ended September
30, 2009 from 26.6 million for the comparable period of 2009, and decreased 3% in U.S. dollar
terms, mainly due to lower interest rates on our floating rate debt.
Other financial expense was 6.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010
compared to 6.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, due to currency
fluctuations.
Income Taxes
Income taxes increased to 9.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 from
1.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, mainly due to foreign deemed and U.S. taxation.
Equity in Income (Loss) of Affiliates
Loss from investments accounted for under the equity method was 1.2 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2010 from an income of 2.9 million for the comparable period of 2009.
The decrease is mainly attributable to our share in the income of Argas and Eidesvik Seismic Vessel AS (Oceanic Vega), our joint ventures in Saudi
Arabia and in Norway, respectively.
Net Income (Loss)
Net loss was 24.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to net
income of 8.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 as a result of the factors
discussed above.
-26-
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to nine months ended September 30, 2009
Operating revenues
The following table sets forth our consolidated operating revenues by division, and the
percentage of total consolidated operating revenues represented thereby, during each of the
periods stated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
Except percentages, in millions of |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$(1) |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$(1) |
|
|
% |
|
Marine contract |
|
|
431.4 |
|
|
|
570.7 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
664.2 |
|
|
|
904.8 |
|
|
|
38 |
% |
Land contract |
|
|
208.4 |
|
|
|
275.6 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
220.6 |
|
|
|
300.5 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Processing & Imaging |
|
|
212.4 |
|
|
|
280.9 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
219.7 |
|
|
|
299.2 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Multi-client |
|
|
230.3 |
|
|
|
304.5 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
229.1 |
|
|
|
312.1 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
Total Services |
|
|
1,082.5 |
|
|
|
1,431.7 |
|
|
|
72 |
% |
|
|
1,333.6 |
|
|
|
1,816.6 |
|
|
|
77 |
% |
Equipment |
|
|
431.2 |
|
|
|
567.7 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
399.7 |
|
|
|
544.8 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,513.7 |
|
|
|
1,999.4 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,733.3 |
|
|
|
2,361.4 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euros amounts converted
at the average exchange rates of U.S.$1.321, U.S.$1.323, and
U.S.$1.317 for the Group, the Services segment and the Equipment
segment, respectively, per in 2010; and U.S.$1.362, U.S.$1.362,
and U.S.$1.363 for the Group, the Services segment and the Equipment
segment, respectively, per in 2009. |
Our consolidated operating revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
decreased 13% to 1,513.7 million from 1,733.3 million for the comparable period of 2009.
Expressed in U.S dollars, our consolidated operating revenues decreased 15% to U.S.$1,999.4 million
in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from U.S.$2,361.4 million for the comparable period of
2009. This decrease was mainly due to our Services segment.
Services
Operating revenues for our Services segment (excluding intra-group sales) decreased 19% to
1,082.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from 1,333.6 million for the
comparable period of 2009. Expressed in U.S dollars, operating revenues decreased 21%, reflecting
our fleet capacity reduction program and low prices in the marine market.
Marine contract
Operating revenues from our Marine contract division for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 decreased 35% to 431.4 million from 664.2 million for the comparable period of 2009 (and
decreased 37% in U.S. dollar terms) principally due to low prices in the marine market and the
vessel reduction following our marine restructuring plan launched in 2009.
Land contract
Operating revenues from our Land contract division decreased 6% to 208.4 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 from 220.6 million for the comparable period of 2009 (and
decreased 8% in U.S. dollar terms), as a result of reduced demand in North America.
Processing & Imaging
Operating revenues from our Processing & Imaging division decreased 3% to 212.4 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from 219.7 million for the comparable period of 2009
(and decreased 6% in U.S. dollar terms).
Multi-client
Operating revenues from our Multi-client division for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 increased 1% to 230.3 million from 229.1 million for the comparable period of 2009, and
decreased 2% in U.S. dollar terms.
-27-
Multi-client marine data library revenues decreased 13% to 159.4 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 from 183.4 million for the comparable period of 2009 (and
decreased 16% in U.S. dollar terms) principally due to reduced planned investments. Prefunding
decreased 28% to 82.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from 115.4 million
for the comparable period of 2009 (and decreased 30% in U.S. dollar terms). After-sales increased
13% to 76.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from 68.0 million for the
comparable period of 2009 (and increased 9% in U.S. dollar terms), with a higher level of
activity worldwide.
Multi-client land data library revenues increased 55% to 70.9 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 from 45.7 million for the comparable period of 2009 (and increased 51%
in U.S. dollar terms). Prefunding increased significantly 82% to 40.9 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 from 22.5 million for the comparable period of 2009 (and
increased 77% in U.S. dollar terms) due to strong interest for our seismic data in the U.S.
After-sales increased 29% to 30.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from
23.2 million for the comparable period of 2009 (and increased 25% in U.S. dollar terms).
Equipment
Operating revenues for our Equipment segment, including intra-group sales, increased 15% to
543.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from 471.8 million for the comparable
period of 2009. In U.S. dollar terms, revenues increased 11% to U.S.$715.9 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 from U.S.$643.1 million for the comparable period of 2009 as a
result of increasing demand for marine equipment and sustained demand in land products for high
channel counts crews and regional activity.
Operating revenues for our Equipment segment, excluding intra-group sales, increased 8% to
431.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from 399.7 million for the comparable
period in 2009 (and increased 4% in U.S. dollar terms).
Operating Expenses
Cost of operations, including depreciation and amortization, decreased 7% to 1,228.6 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from 1,320.6 million for the comparable period of
2009, mainly due to lower activity in marine contract and the impact of our marine restructuring
plan and certain reduction of liabilities. As a percentage of operating revenues, cost of
operations increased to 81% for the nine months ended September 31, 2010 from 76% for the
comparable period of 2009. Gross profit decreased 33% to 287.6 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 from 419.4 million for the comparable period of 2009, representing 19% and 24%
of operating revenues, respectively.
Research and development expenditures were stable at 45.2 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009, representing 3% of
operating revenues for both periods.
General and administrative expenses decreased 2% to 132.1 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 from 135.1 million for the comparable period of 2009 (and decreased 5% in
U.S. dollar terms). As a percentage of operating revenues, general and administrative costs
represented 9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to 8% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009.
Selling and marketing expenses were stable at 45.1 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Other revenues amounted to 10.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010,
mainly due to disposal of assets and asset fair value adjustments. Other expenses for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 amounted to 69.3 million, mainly due to the marine restructuring
plan.
Operating Income (Loss)
Our operating income decreased 39% to 75.9 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 from 124.5 million for the comparable period of 2009, as a result of the factors described
above.
Operating income from our Services segment decreased to 2.0 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 from 70.4 million for the comparable period of 2009.
Operating income from our Equipment segment increased 33% to 143.9 million for nine months
ended September 30, 2010 from 108.2 million for the comparable period of 2009 (and increased 28%
in U.S. dollar terms).
-28-
Financial Income and Expenses
Cost of net financial debt increased 1% to 78.8 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2010 from 77.9 million for the comparable period of 2009 (and decreased 2% in U.S. dollar
terms).
Other financial income was 8.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared
to financial expenses of 9.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, mainly due to
currency fluctuations.
Income Taxes
Income taxes increased to 20.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from
5.0 million for the comparable period of 2009. Before deferred taxes on currency translation,
the effective tax rate was 317% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to 36% for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 notably due to foreign deemed and U.S. taxation.
Equity in Income (Loss) of Affiliates
Loss from investments accounted for under the equity method was 3.3 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 compared to an income of 5.3 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. The decrease was mainly attributable to our share in the income of Argas and Eidesvik Seismic Vessel AS (Oceanic Vega), and our
joint ventures in Saudi Arabia and in Norway, respectively.
Net Income (Loss)
Net loss was 18.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to a net
income of 37.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as a result of the factors
discussed above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal capital needs are for the funding of ongoing operations, capital
expenditures (particularly repairs and improvements to our seismic vessels and acquisition of
seismic vessels), investments in our multi-client data library and acquisitions (such as Veritas in
2007 and Wavefield in 2008).
We intend to fund our liquidity needs through cash generated by operations, senior notes and
borrowings under our U.S. and French facilities. Our U.S. facilities consist of a Term Loan B
facility (U.S.$513 million outstanding as of September 30, 2010) maturing January 2014 (U.S.$166
million) and January 2016 (U.S.$347 million) and a $140 million U.S. revolving facility (undrawn as
of September 30, 2010) maturing January 2012. The French facility consists of a U.S.$200 million
senior secured revolving facility maturing February 2014, as amended on November 4, 2010.
We believe that we are not subject to near-term liquidity constraints, given our liquidity
available as of September 30, 2010, our cash flow generation capability and prospects, and our
near-to mid-term debt repayment schedule.
Cash Flows
Operations
Net cash provided by operating activities was 238.4 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 compared to 472.2 million for the comparable period of 2009. Before changes in
working capital, net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 decreased to 269.8 million from 470.4 million for the comparable period for 2009 mainly due
to the significant decrease in EBITDAS. Changes in working capital had an unfavorable impact on
cash from operating activities of 31.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010
compared to a positive impact of 1.8 million for the comparable period for 2009.
Investing activities
Net cash used in investing activities was 334.9 million in the nine months ended September
30, 2010 compared to 393.3 million for nine months ended September 30, 2009.
In the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we purchased tangible and intangible assets for
165.2 million mainly to equip our seismic vessels Viking 2 and Oceanic Vega with Sentinel
streamers compared to 130.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
-29-
We also invested 177.4 million in our multi-client library, mainly in the Gulf of Mexico
and Brazil, compared to 191.8 million in the comparable period of 2009. As of September 30,
2010, the net book value of our multi-client data library was 545.6 million compared to 469.1
million as of December 31, 2009.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we acquired the remaining 30% of Wavefield
for 62 million as part of the mandatory offer launched in December 30, 2008 and the squeeze-out
process closed on February 16, 2009.
Financing activities
Net cash used in financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was
158.2 million compared to 20.7 million for nine months ended September 30, 2009.
On February 26, 2010, we repaid 35 million under our French revolving facility.
On June 9, 2009, we issued US$350 million principal amount of 91/2 % senior notes
due 2016. The senior notes were issued at a price of 97.0% of their principal amount, resulting
in a yield of 10⅛ %. The senior notes will mature on May 15, 2016.
Net debt
Net financial debt as of September 30, 2010 was 1,147.6 million compared to 918.7 million
as of December 31, 2009. The ratio of net financial debt to equity increased to 41% as of
September 30, 2010 from 35% as of December 31, 2009.
Gross financial debt is the amount of bank overdrafts, plus current portion of financial
debt, plus financial debt, and net financial debt is gross financial debt less cash and cash
equivalents. Net financial debt is presented as additional information because we understand that
certain investors believe that netting cash against debt provides a clearer picture of the
financial liability exposure. However, other companies may present net financial debt differently
than we do. Net financial debt is not a measure of financial performance under IFRS and should not
be considered as an alternative to any other measures of performance derived in accordance with
IFRS.
The following table presents a reconciliation of net financial debt to financing items of the
balance sheet at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions of euros) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
Bank overdrafts |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
67.2 |
|
|
|
113.5 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,333.9 |
|
|
|
1,282.8 |
|
Gross financial debt |
|
|
1,403.3 |
|
|
|
1,399.0 |
|
Less : cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(255.7 |
) |
|
|
(480.3 |
) |
|
|
|
Net financial debt |
|
|
1,147.6 |
|
|
|
918.7 |
|
|
|
|
For a more detailed description of our financing activities, see Liquidity and Capital
Resources in our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009.
EBITDAS
EBITDAS for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was 377.6 million compared to 505.9
million for the comparable period of 2009, representing 25% and 29% of operating revenues,
respectively.
We define EBITDAS as earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, amortization and share-based
compensation cost. Share-based compensation includes both stock options and shares issued under our
performance share allocation plans. EBITDAS is presented as additional information because we
understand that it is a measure used by certain investors to determine our operating cash flow and
historical ability to meet debt service and capital expenditure requirements. However, other
companies may present EBITDAS and related measures differently than we do. EBITDAS is not a measure
of financial performance under IFRS and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flow
from operating activities or as a measure of liquidity or an alternative to net income as
indicators of our operating performance or any other measures of performance derived in accordance
with IFRS.
-30-
The following table presents a reconciliation of EBITDAS to Net cash provided by operating
activity, according to our cash-flow statement, for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
(in millions of euros) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
EBITDAS |
|
|
377.6 |
|
|
|
505.9 |
|
Other financial income (loss) |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
Variance on provisions |
|
|
(55.5 |
) |
|
|
34.1 |
|
Net gain on disposal of assets |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
3.6 |
|
Dividends received from affiliates |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other non cash items |
|
|
(13.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
Income taxes paid |
|
|
(49.3 |
) |
|
|
(60.5 |
) |
Change in trade accounts receivable |
|
|
(31.1 |
) |
|
|
73.3 |
|
Change in inventories |
|
|
(24.2 |
) |
|
|
65.1 |
|
Change in other current assets |
|
|
(26.2 |
) |
|
|
20.8 |
|
Change in trade accounts payable |
|
|
51.7 |
|
|
|
(84.0 |
) |
Change in other current liabilities |
|
|
(19.1 |
) |
|
|
(59.0 |
) |
Impact of changes in exchange rate |
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
(14.4 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
238.4 |
|
|
|
472.2 |
|
|
|
|
Contractual obligations
The following table sets forth our future cash obligations as of September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
(in millions of euros) |
|
Less than 1 year |
|
2-3 years |
|
4-5 years |
|
More than 5
years |
|
Total |
Financial Debt |
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
|
512.8 |
|
|
|
746.2 |
|
|
|
1,298.9 |
|
Capital Lease Obligations (not discounted) |
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
46.8 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
80.1 |
|
|
|
185.4 |
|
Operating Leases |
|
|
180.4 |
|
|
|
259.2 |
|
|
|
169.8 |
|
|
|
240.9 |
|
|
|
850.3 |
|
Other Long-Term Obligations (bond interest) |
|
|
98.2 |
|
|
|
188.9 |
|
|
|
166.0 |
|
|
|
54.5 |
|
|
|
507.6 |
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Cash Obligations |
|
|
324.6 |
|
|
|
520.7 |
|
|
|
875.2 |
|
|
|
1,121.7 |
|
|
|
2,842.2 |
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of EBITDAS to U.S. GAAP
Summary of differences between IFRS and u.s. gaap with respect to
EBITDAS
The principal differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP as they relate to our EBITDAS relate to the
treatment of pension plans, development costs and derivative instruments and hedging activities.
Pension plan
Pursuant to an exemption provided by IFRS 1 First-time adoption of IFRS, we have elected to
record unrecognized actuarial gains and losses as of January 1, 2004 to retained earnings. Under
U.S. GAAP, this exemption is not applicable, which generates a difference resulting from the
amortization of actuarial gains and losses recognized in statement of income.
Under IFRS, in accordance with IAS 19 Revised, actuarial gains or losses are recognized in the
statement of recognized income and expense (SORIE) attributable to shareholders.
Under U.S. GAAP, we apply Statement 158 Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plan, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R), effective
for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006.
Gains or losses are amortized over the remaining service period of employees expected to receive
benefits under the plan, and therefore recognized in the income statement.
-31-
Development costs
Under IFRS, expenditure on development activities, whereby research findings are applied to a plan
or design for the production of new or substantially improved products and processes, is
capitalized if:
|
|
|
the project is clearly defined, and costs are separately identified and reliably
measured, |
|
|
|
|
the product or process is technically and commercially feasible, |
|
|
|
|
the Group has sufficient resources to complete development, and |
|
|
|
|
the intangible asset is likely to generate future economic benefits. |
Under U.S. GAAP, all expenditures related to research and development are recognized as an expense
in the income statement.
Derivative instruments and hedging activity
Under IFRS, long-term contracts in foreign currencies (primarily U.S. dollar) are not considered to
include embedded derivatives when such contracts are routinely denominated in this currency
(primarily U.S. dollar) in the industry.
Under U.S. GAAP, such an exemption does not exist and embedded derivatives in long-term contracts
in foreign currencies (primarily U.S. dollar) are recorded in the balance sheet at fair value and
revenues and expenses with a non-U.S. client or supplier are recognized at the forward exchange
rate negotiated at the beginning of the contract. The variation of fair market value of the
embedded derivative foreign exchange contracts is recognized in the income statement in the line
item Other financial income (loss).
Provision for marine redundancy plan
Under IFRS, a provision for redundancy plan should be recognized when the entity has a detailed
formal plan for the restructuring, and has raised a valid expectation for those affected that it
will carry out the restructuring by starting to implement that plan or announcing its main features
to those affected by it.
Under U.S. GAAP, termination benefits can be recognized only when those affected have rendered all
services required to receive benefits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
Unaudited |
|
September 30, |
|
In millions of euros |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
EBITDAS as reported |
|
|
377.6 |
|
|
|
505.9 |
|
Actuarial gains (losses) on pension plan |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Cancellation of IFRS capitalization of development costs |
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
Derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
Cancellation of redundancy provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.7 |
|
|
|
|
EBITDAS according to U.S. GAAP |
|
|
366.1 |
|
|
|
520.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3: |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the period
covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
-32-
THIS FORM 6-K REPORT IS HEREBY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE PROSPECTUS CONTAINED IN CGG
VERITAS REGISTRATION STATEMENTS ON FORM S-8 (REGISTRATION STATEMENT NO. 333-150384,
NO.333-158684 AND NO.333-166250) AND SHALL BE A PART THEREOF FROM THE DATE ON WHICH THIS REPORT IS
FURNISHED, TO THE EXTENT NOT SUPERSEDED BY DOCUMENTS OR REPORTS SUBSEQUENTLY FILED OR
FURNISHED.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, CGGVeritas has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Stéphane-Paul Frydman
|
|
|
Compagnie Générale de Géophysique Veritas |
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Stéphane-Paul Frydman
|
|
|
Stéphane-Paul Frydman |
|
|
Group Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Date: November 9, 2010
-33-