UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 000-27031

FULLNET COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

OKLAHOMA		73-1473361
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

201 Robert S. Kerr Avenue, Suite 210
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102

(405) 236-8200
(Registrant’s telephone number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

As of August 13, 2010, 7,922,721 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.00001 par value, were outstanding.

 

 

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets — June 30, 2010 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2009 (Derived from Audited Statements)			3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations — Three and Six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)			4
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit — Six months ended June 30, 2010 (Unaudited)			5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)			6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)			7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			14
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			20
Item 4. Controls and Procedures			20
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings			22
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			22
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities			22
Item 5. Other Information			22
Item 6. Exhibits			22
Signatures			27
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit 32.2

FullNet Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

						DECEMBER 31,
		JUNE 30,				2009
		2010				(Derived from
		(Unaudited)				Audited Statements)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash		$	18,154			$	11,905
Accounts receivable, net			17,753				15,043
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			7,564				11,705
Total current assets			43,471				38,653
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net			90,034				120,944
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net			297				998
OTHER ASSETS			5,250				5,250
TOTAL		$	139,052			$	165,845
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable, current portion		$	516,645			$	492,533
Accrued and other current liabilities, current portion			1,455,916				1,317,892
Notes payable, current portion			521,694				510,636
Deferred revenue			137,442				96,066
Total current liabilities			2,631,697				2,417,127
ACCRUED AND OTHER LIABILITIES, less current portion			9,131				—
NOTES PAYABLE, less current portion			286,242				297,300
Total liabilities			2,927,070				2,714,427
STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Common stock — $.00001 par value; authorized, 10,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 7,852,464 and 7,355,308 shares in 2010 and 2009, respectively			79				74
Common stock issuable, 70,257 and 567,413 shares in 2010 and 2009, respectively			57,596				57,601
Additional paid-in capital			8,397,784				8,397,733
Accumulated deficit			(11,243,477	)			(11,003,990	)
Total stockholders’ deficit			(2,788,018	)			(2,548,582	)
TOTAL		$	139,052			$	165,845

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

FullNet Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30, 2010				June 30, 2009				June 30, 2010				June 30, 2009
REVENUES
Access service revenues		$	75,198			$	108,208			$	163,666			$	229,265
Co-location and other revenues			322,611				354,876				656,139				701,546
Total revenues			397,809				463,084				819,805				930,811
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES
Cost of access service revenues			48,750				49,426				97,683				104,113
Cost of co-location and other revenues			95,513				98,079				188,443				196,863
Selling, general and administrative expenses			338,942				319,090				698,925				654,618
Depreciation and amortization			15,612				57,672				33,683				115,879
Total operating costs and expenses			498,817				524,267				1,018,734				1,071,473
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS			(101,008	)			(61,183	)			(198,929	)			(140,662	)
INTEREST EXPENSE			(20,370	)			(23,253	)			(40,558	)			(42,693	)
NET LOSS		$	(121,378	)		$	(84,436	)			(239,487	)			(183,355	)
Net loss per share —basic		$	(.02	)		$	(.01	)		$	(.03	)		$	(.02	)
Net loss per share — assuming dilution		$	(.02	)		$	(.01	)		$	(.03	)		$	(.02	)
Weighted average shares outstanding — basic			7,922,721				7,425,565				7,922,721				7,425,565
Weighted average shares outstanding — assuming dilution			7,922,721				7,425,565				7,922,721				7,425,565

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

FullNet Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT (UNAUDITED)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2010

										Common				Additional
		Common stock								Stock				Paid In				Accumulated
		Shares				Amount				Issuable				Capital				Deficit				Total
Balance at January 1, 2010			7,355,308			$	74			$	57,601			$	8,397,733			$	(11,003,990	)		$	(2,548,582	)
Common stock issuable at December 31, 2009 issued on January 20, 2010			497,156				5				(5	)			—				—				—
Stock compensation expense			—				—				—				51				—				51
Net loss			—				—				—				—				(239,487	)			(239,487	)
Balance at June 30, 2010			7,852,464			$	79			$	57,596			$	8,397,784			$	(11,243,477	)		$	(2,788,018	)

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

FullNet Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

		Six Months Ended
		June 30, 2010				June 30, 2009
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss		$	(239,487	)		$	(183,355	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization			33,683				115,879
Stock compensation			51				69
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable			3,704				(296	)
Net (increase) decrease in
Accounts receivable			(6,414	)			(933	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			4,141				(4,928	)
Net increase (decrease) in
Accounts payable — trade			24,112				(8,362	)
Accrued and other liabilities			147,155				93,256
Deferred revenue			41,376				(11,974	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities			8,321				(644	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of property and equipment			(2,072	)			(2,104	)
Net cash used in investing activities			(2,072	)			(2,104	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Principal payments on borrowings under notes payable			—				(500	)
Net cash used in financing activities			—				(500	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash			6,249				(3,248	)
Cash at beginning of period			11,905				11,753
Cash at end of period		$	18,154			$	8,505
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid for interest		$	8,920			$	2,233
Warrant extension granted in settlement of liabilities			—				3,445

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

FullNet Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

1.

UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2009.

The information furnished reflects, in the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim periods presented. Operating results of the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that will be reported for the year ending December 31, 2010.

2.

MANAGEMENT’S PLANS

At June 30, 2010, current liabilities exceed current assets by $2,588,226. The Company does not have a line of credit or credit facility to serve as an additional source of liquidity. Historically the Company has relied on shareholder loans as an additional source of funds. The Company is in default on various loans (see Note 9 Notes Payable). These factors raise substantial doubts about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

During September 2005, the Company received an invoice from AT&T (formerly SBC) of approximately $230,000 for services alleged to have been rendered to it between June 1, 2004 and June 30, 2005. Since then, the Company has received a number of additional invoices from AT&T which cover services through February 2007 and total approximately $7,970,000. AT&T then stopped invoicing the Company for these monthly services and simply sent monthly Inter Company Billing Statements reflecting the balance of approximately $7,970,000 with no further additions. The last Inter Company Billing Statement received by the Company was dated December 15, 2007 and reflected a balance of approximately $7,970,000. The alleged services were eventually identified by AT&T as Switched Access services. The Company formally notified AT&T in writing that it disputes these invoices and requested that AT&T withdraw and/or credit all of these invoices in full. AT&T has not responded to the Company’s written dispute. The Company believes AT&T has no basis for these charges. Therefore, the Company has not recorded any expense or liability related to these billings. An adverse outcome regarding this claim could have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon continued operations of the Company that in turn is dependent upon the Company’s ability to meet its financing requirements on a continuing basis, to maintain present financing, to achieve the objectives of its business plan and to succeed in its future operations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue in existence.

The Company’s business plan includes, among other things, expansion of its Internet access services through mergers and acquisitions and the development of its web hosting, co-location, and traditional telephone services. Execution of the Company’s business plan will require significant capital to fund capital expenditures, working capital needs and debt service. Current cash balances will not be sufficient to fund the Company’s current business plan beyond the next few months. As a consequence, the Company is currently focusing on revenue enhancement and cost cutting opportunities as well as working to sell non-core assets and to extend vendor payment terms. The Company continues to seek additional convertible debt or equity financing as well as the placement of a credit facility to fund the Company’s liquidity. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain additional capital on satisfactory terms, or at all, or on terms that will not dilute the shareholder’s interests.

3.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures; accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.

4.

LOSS PER SHARE

Loss per share — basic is calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of stock outstanding during the period, including shares issuable without additional consideration. Loss per share — assuming dilution is calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period adjusted for the effect of dilutive potential shares calculated using the treasury stock method.

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30, 2010				June 30, 2009				June 30, 2010				June 30, 2009
Numerator:
Net loss		$	(121,378	)		$	(84,436	)		$	(239,487	)		$	(183,355	)
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding — basic			7,922,721				7,425,565				7,922,721				7,425,565
Effect of dilutive stock options			—				—				—				—
Effect of dilutive warrants			—				—				—				—
Weighted average shares outstanding — assuming dilution			7,922,721				7,425,565				7,922,721				7,425,565
Net loss per share — basic		$	(.02	)		$	(.01	)		$	(.03	)		$	(.02	)
Net loss per share — assuming dilution		$	(.02	)		$	(.01	)		$	(.03	)		$	(.02	)

Basic and diluted loss per share was the same for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 because there was a net loss for each period.

5.

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Accounts receivable consist of the following:

		June 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
Accounts receivable		$	212,036			$	205,622
Less allowance for doubtful accounts			(194,283	)			(190,579	)
		$	17,753			$	15,043

6.

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consist of the following:

		June 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
Computers and equipment		$	1,479,799			$	1,477,727
Leasehold improvements			966,915				966,915
Software			57,337				57,337
Furniture and fixtures			28,521				28,521
			2,532,572				2,530,500
Less accumulated depreciation			(2,442,538	)			(2,409,556	)
		$	90,034			$	120,944

Depreciation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $15,301 and $54,884, respectively. Depreciation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $32,982 and $109,886, respectively.

7.

INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets consist primarily of acquired customer bases and covenants not to compete and are carried net of accumulated amortization. The Company amortizes these intangible assets over their estimated useful lives and in direct relation to any decreases in the acquired customer bases to which they relate. Management believes that such amortization reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset are consumed or otherwise used.

Amortization expense for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 relating to intangible assets was $311 and $2,788, respectively. Amortization expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 relating to intangible assets was $701 and $5,993, respectively.

8.

ACCRUED AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

Accrued and other current liabilities consist of the following:

		June 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
Accrued interest		$	493,583			$	463,676
Accrued deferred compensation			776,466				700,157
Accrued other liabilities			194,998				154,059
			1,465,047				1,317,892
Less current portion			1,455,916				1,317,892
		$	9,131			$	—

9.

NOTES PAYABLE

Notes payable consist of the following:

		June 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
Convertible promissory notes; interest at 12.5% of face amount, payable quarterly; these notes are unsecured and are matured at June 30, 2010 (convertible into approximately 1,003,659 shares at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009) (2)		$	510,636			$	510,636
Secured promissory note from a shareholder; interest at 6%, requires monthly installments of interest only for the first year then monthly installments of $3,301 including principal and interest; maturing December 30, 2011; secured by all tangible and intangible assets of the Company (1)			297,300				297,300
			807,936				807,936
Less current portion			521,694				510,636
		$	286,242			$	297,300

Pursuant to the provisions of the convertible promissory notes, the conversion price was reduced from $1.00 per share on January 15, 2001 to $.49 per share on December 31, 2003 for failure to register under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the common stock underlying the convertible promissory notes and underlying warrants on February 15, 2001. Reductions in conversion price are recognized at the date of reduction by an increase to additional paid-in capital and an increase in the discount on the convertible promissory notes. Furthermore, the interest rate was increased to 12.5% per annum from 11% per annum because the registration statement was not filed before March 1, 2001. At June 30, 2010, the outstanding principal and interest of the convertible promissory notes was $1,004,219.

On January 1, 2002, the Company recorded 11,815 shares of common stock issuable in payment of $11,815 accrued interest on a portion of the Company’s convertible promissory notes.

In November and December 2003 and March 2004, $455,000, $50,000 and $5,636, respectively, of these convertible promissory notes matured. The Company has not made payment or negotiated an extension of these notes, and the lenders have not made any demands. The Company is currently developing a plan to satisfy these notes subject to the approval of each individual note holder.

10.

COMMON STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

The following table summarizes the Company’s employee stock option activity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010:

		Three Months				Weighted				Six Months				Weighted
		Ended				Average				Ended				Average
		June 30, 2010				Exercise Price				June 30, 2010				Exercise Price
Options outstanding, beginning of the period			2,348,251			$	.53				2,368,384			$	.50
Options cancelled during the period			(90,000	)			2.64				(110,133	)			2.70
Options outstanding, end of the period			2,258,251			$	.39				2,258,251			$	.39

The Company records compensation cost for new and modified awards over the related vesting period of such awards prospectively.

In January 2009, the Company agreed to extend the expiration date on 425,000 of common stock purchase warrants for a lessor in return for a credit of $3,445 on an operating lease.

The following table summarizes the Company’s common stock purchase warrant and non-employee stock option activity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010:

Three Months

Weighted

Six Months

Weighted

Ended

Average

Ended

Average

June 30, 2010

Exercise Price

June 30, 2010

Exercise Price

Warrants and non-employee stock options outstanding, beginning and end of the period

591,000

$

.49

591,000

$

.49

11.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06)

In January 2010, previously released guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures was amended. The amendment requires disclosure of transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements, and also requires more detailed disclosure about the activity within Level 3 fair value measurements. The fair value measurements hierarchy gives the highest priority (“Level 1”) to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities and the lowest priority (“Level 3”) to unobservable inputs. Fair value measurements primarily based on observable market information are given a “Level 2” priority. A portion of the amendment was effective for the Company on January 1, 2010 and requires the disclosure of transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements; the amendment’s requirements related to Level 3 disclosures are effective for the Company on January 1, 2011. This guidance affects new disclosures only and will have no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

12.

COMMON STOCK

On December 29, 2009 the Company converted $248,578 of accrued interest on an interim loan from a shareholder into 497,156 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $.50 per share. These shares were issuable at December 31, 2009, were equal to approximately 6.8% of the total number of shares outstanding and were issued on January 20, 2010. During the fourth quarter of 2009 this transaction was accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring and a gain on debt forgiveness of $235,663 was recorded. In connection with the conversion, the Company also agreed to issue additional shares of stock to the holder of a secured promissory note in the event that any additional shares are issued at less than $.50 per share, excluding employee stock options, prior to the payment in full of the secured promissory note (see Note 9 — Notes Payable). During the six months ended June 30, 2010, no shares were issued by the Company at less than $.50 per share.

13.

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

ASC 820-10 requires that an entity disclose the fair value of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate the value. The Company considers the carrying value of certain financial instruments on the balance sheets, including cash, accounts receivable, and other assets to be reasonable estimates of fair value. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the carrying amount of the Company’s liabilities for corporate borrowings and other obligations was $2,927,070 and $2,714,427, respectively, and the fair value was estimated to be approximately $139,000 and $165,000, respectively. These amounts are based on the present value of estimated future cash outflows which is discounted based on the risk of nonperformance due to the uncertainty of the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

14.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS

The Company has an operating lease for certain equipment which is leased from one of its shareholders whose parent company holds a $297,300 secured promissory note (see Note 9 — Notes Payable). The original lease was dated November 21, 2001 and the terms were $6,088 per month for 12 months with a fair market purchase option at the end of the lease. Upon default on the lease, the Company was allowed to continue leasing the equipment on a month-to-month basis at the same monthly rate as the original lease. The Company was unable to make the month-to-month payments. In January and November 2006, the Company agreed to extend the expiration date on of common stock purchase warrants exercisable for the purchase of 425,000 common stock shares and a credit of $17,960 and for the purchase of 140,000 common stock shares and a credit of $3,940, respectively, on the operating lease. In September 2007, the lessor agreed to cease the monthly lease payments effective January 1, 2007 which generated a total of $54,795 of forgiveness of debt income. The lessor also agreed to accept payments of $499 per month on the balance owed. In January and December 2009, the Company agreed to extend the expiration date on 425,000 and 140,000, respectively, of common stock purchase warrants exercisable for the purchase of 425,000 common stock shares and a credit of $3,445 and for the purchase of 140,000 common stock shares and a credit of $773, respectively, on the operating lease. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 the Company had recorded $256,443 in unpaid lease payments. The loss of this equipment would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company has been unable to make all of the required payments pursuant to the terms of the September 2007 agreement. The lessor has not made any formal demands for payment or instituted collection action; however the Company is in discussions with the lessor to restructure this liability.

15.

CONCENTRATIONS

During the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company had one customer that comprised approximately 14% and 12% of total revenues, respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, this customer comprised approximately 12% of total revenues.

16.

EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The Company offers a SIMPLE IRA plan for all eligible employees. Employees meeting certain eligibility requirements can participate in the plan. Under the plan, the Company matches employee contributions to the plan up to 3% of the employee’s salary. The Company made matching contributions of $2,852 and $3,249, respectively, during the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. The Company made matching contributions of $5,769 and $6,612, respectively, during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.

17.

CONTINGENCIES

During September 2005, the Company received an invoice from AT&T (formerly SBC) of approximately $230,000 for services alleged to have been rendered to the Company between June 1, 2004 and June 30, 2005. Through February 2006, the Company received a number of additional invoices from AT&T making adjustments to these amounts and expanding the service period through September 30, 2005, at which point the balance due was alleged to be approximately $400,000.

AT&T then began invoicing the Company on a monthly basis (two months in arrears of the alleged service date) for these services and continued invoicing the Company for these monthly services through February 2007, at which point the alleged balance due was approximately $7,970,000. AT&T then stopped invoicing the Company for these monthly services and simply sent monthly Inter Company Billing Statements reflecting the balance of approximately $7,970,000 with no further additions.

The last Inter Company Billing Statement received by the Company was dated December 15, 2007 and reflected a balance of approximately $7,970,000. The alleged services were eventually identified by AT&T as Switched Access services. The Company formally notified AT&T in writing that it disputed these billings and requested that AT&T withdraw and/or credit all of these billings in full. AT&T has not responded to the Company’s written dispute, nor has it sent the Company any further Inter Company Billing Statements since December 15, 2007. AT&T has never taken any other steps to attempt to collect these amounts nor has it ever responded to the Company’s written dispute of said amounts. The Company believes AT&T has no basis for these charges. Therefore, the Company has not recorded any expense or liability related to these billings.

As a provider of telecommunications, the Company is affected by regulatory proceedings in the ordinary course of its business at the state and federal levels. These include proceedings before both the Federal Communications Commission and the Oklahoma Corporation Commission (“OCC”). In addition, in its operations the Company relies on obtaining many of its underlying telecommunications services and/or facilities from incumbent local exchange carriers or other carriers pursuant to interconnection or other agreements or arrangements. In January 2007, the Company concluded a regulatory proceeding pursuant to the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 before the OCC relating to the terms of its interconnection agreement with Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. d/b/a AT&T, which succeeds a prior interconnection agreement. The OCC approved this agreement in May 2007. This agreement may be affected by regulatory proceedings at the federal and state levels, with possible adverse impacts on the Company. The Company is unable to accurately predict the outcomes of such regulatory proceedings at this time, but an unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

On February 24, 2009, the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission issued an Omnibus Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (“NAL”) to the Company in the amount of $20,000 for failure to timely file a certification report concerning so-called Customer Proprietary Network Information (“CPNI”). There were approximately 690 other telecommunications companies included in the NAL. Each company has the opportunity to submit further evidence and arguments in response to the NAL to show that no forfeiture should be imposed or that some lesser amount should be assessed. The Company filed a formal response to the NAL pursuant to which it requested waiver of the Forfeiture. The FCC has not yet responded to the Company’s request. The Company has not recorded any expense or liability related to the NAL.

18.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the time of filing these financial statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed information in our Form 10-K and the financial statements contained therein, including the notes thereto, and our other periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission since December 31, 2009 (collectively referred to as the “Disclosure Documents”). Certain forward-looking statements contained in this Report and in the Disclosure Documents regarding our business and prospects are based upon numerous assumptions about future conditions which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate and actual events and results may materially differ from anticipated results described in such statements. Our ability to achieve these results is subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including those inherent risks and uncertainties generally in the Internet service provider and competitive local exchange carrier industries, the impact of competition and pricing, changing market conditions, and other risks. Any forward-looking statements contained in this Report represent our judgment as of the date of this Report. We disclaim, however, any intent or obligation to update these forward-looking statements. As a result, the reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. References to us in this report include our subsidiaries: FullNet, Inc. (“FullNet”), FullTel, Inc. (“FullTel”) and FullWeb, Inc. (“FullWeb”).

Overview

We are an integrated communications provider offering integrated communications and Internet connectivity to individuals, businesses, organizations, educational institutions and government agencies. Through our subsidiaries, we provide high quality, reliable and scalable Internet access, web hosting, equipment co-location and traditional telephone services. Our overall strategy is to become a successful integrated communications provider for residents and small to medium-sized businesses in Oklahoma.

Our principal executive offices are located at 201 Robert S. Kerr Avenue, Suite 210, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102, and our telephone number is (405) 236-8200. We also maintain Internet sites on the World Wide Web (“WWW”) at www.fullnet.net and www.fulltel.com. Information contained on our Web sites is not and should not be deemed to be a part of this Report.

Company History

We were founded in 1995 as CEN-COM of Oklahoma, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation, to bring dial-up Internet access and education to rural locations in Oklahoma that did not have dial-up Internet access. We changed our name to FullNet Communications, Inc. in December 1995. Today we are a total solutions provider to individuals and companies seeking a “one-stop shop” in Oklahoma.

Our current business strategy is to become a successful integrated communications provider in Oklahoma. We expect to grow through the acquisition of additional customers for our carrier-neutral co-location space and traditional telephone services, as well as through the acquisition of Internet service providers.

We market our carrier neutral co-location solutions in our network operations center to other competitive local exchange carriers, Internet service providers and web-hosting companies. Our co-location facility is carrier neutral, allowing customers to choose among competitive offerings rather than being restricted to one carrier. Our network operations center is Telco-grade and provides customers a high level of operative reliability and security. We offer flexible space arrangements for customers and 24-hour onsite support with both battery and generator backup.

Through FullTel, our wholly owned subsidiary, we are a fully licensed competitive local exchange carrier or CLEC in Oklahoma. FullTel activates local access telephone numbers for the cities in which we market, sell and operate our retail FullNet Internet service provider brand, wholesale dial-up Internet service; our business-to-business network design, connectivity, domain and Web hosting businesses; and traditional telephone services. At June 30, 2010 FullTel provided us with local telephone access in approximately 232 cities.

Our common stock trades on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol FULO. While our common stock trades on the OTC Bulletin Board, it is very thinly traded, and there can be no assurance that our stockholders will be able to sell their shares should they so desire. Any market for the common stock that may develop, in all likelihood, will be a limited one, and if such a market does develop, the market price may be volatile.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth certain statement of operations data as a percentage of revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:

		Three Months Ended																Six Months Ended
		June 30, 2010								June 30, 2009								June 30, 2010								June 30, 2009
		Amount				Percent				Amount				Percent				Amount				Percent				Amount				Percent
Revenues:
Access service revenues		$	75,198				18.9	%		$	108,208				23.4	%		$	163,666				20.0	%		$	229,265				24.6	%
Co-location and other revenues			322,611				81.1				354,876				76.6				656,139				80.0				701,546				75.4
Total revenues			397,809				100.0				463,084				100.0				819,805				100.0				930,811				100.0
Cost of access service revenues			48,750				12.3				49,426				10.7				97,683				11.9				104,113				11.2
Cost of co-location and other revenues			95,513				24.0				98,079				21.2				188,443				23.0				196,863				21.2
Selling, general and administrative expenses			338,942				85.2				319,090				68.9				698,925				85.3				654,618				70.3
Depreciation and amortization			15,612				3.9				57,672				12.5				33,683				4.1				115,879				12.5
Total operating costs and expenses			498,817				125.4				524,267				113.3				1,018,734				124.3				1,071,473				115.2
Loss from operations			(101,008	)			(25.4	)			(61,183	)			(13.3	)			(198,929	)			(24.3	)			(140,662	)			(15.2	)
Interest expense			(20,370	)			(5.1	)			(23,253	)			(5.0	)			(40,558	)			(4.9	)			(42,693	)			(4.6	)
Net loss		$	(121,378	)			(30.5	)%		$	(84,436	)			(18.3	)%		$	(239,487	)			(29.2	)%		$	(183,355	)			(19.8	)%

Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 (the “2010 2nd Quarter”) Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 (the “2009 2nd Quarter”)

Revenues

Access service revenues decreased $33,010 or 30.5% to $75,198 for the 2010 2nd Quarter from $108,208 for the same period in 2009 primarily due to a decline in number of our customers.

Co-location and other revenues decreased $32,265 or 9.1% to $322,611 for the 2010 2nd Quarter from $354,876 for the same period in 2009. This decrease was primarily attributable to a decline in usage by our wholesale customers of $44,892 offset by the net addition of new customers and the sale of additional services to existing customers.

Operating Costs and Expenses

Cost of access service revenues remained relatively the same at $48,750 for the 2010 2nd Quarter and $49,426 for the same period in 2009. Cost of access service revenues as a percentage of access service revenues increased to 64.8% during the 2010 2nd Quarter, compared to 45.7% during the same period in 2009.

Cost of co-location and other revenues decreased $2,566 or 2.6% to $95,513 for the 2010 2nd Quarter from $98,079 for the same period in 2009 primarily related to reductions in recurring rental costs and equipment maintenance costs. Cost of co-location and other revenues as a percentage of co-location and other revenues increased to 29.6% during the 2010 2nd Quarter, compared to 27.6% during the same period in 2009.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $19,852 or 6.2% to $338,942 for the 2010 2nd Quarter compared to $319,090 for the same period in 2009 primarily attributable to increases in employee related costs, rent and bad debt expense of $8,372, $18,071 and $3,423, respectively. These increases were offset primarily by decreases in professional services and utilities of $6,932 and $4,050, respectively. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues increased to 85.2% during the 2010 2nd Quarter from 68.9% during the 2009 2nd Quarter.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $42,060 or 72.9% to $15,612 for the 2010 2nd Quarter compared to $57,672 for the 2009 2nd Quarter primarily related to several assets reaching full depreciation.

Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased $2,883 or 12.4% to $20,370 for the 2010 2^nd Quarter compared to $23,253 for the same period in 2009 primarily due to a lower interest rate resulting from the conversion of an interim loan to a secured promissory note in December 2009.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 (the “2010 Period”) Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 (the “2009 Period”)

Revenues

Access service revenues decreased $65,599 or 28.6% to $163,666 for the 2010 Period from $229,265 for 2009 Period primarily due to a decline in our number of customers.

Co-location and other revenues decreased $45,407 or 6.5% to $656,139 for the 2010 Period from $701,546 for the 2009 Period. This decrease was primarily attributable to a decline in usage by our wholesale customers of $79,434 offset by the net addition of new customers and the sale of additional services to existing customers.

Operating Costs and Expenses

Cost of access service revenues decreased $6,430 or 6.2% to $97,683 for the 2010 Period from $104,113 for the 2009 Period. This decrease was primarily due to reductions in recurring costs associated with our network. Cost of access service revenues as a percentage of access service revenues increased to 59.7% during the 2010 Period, compared to 45.4% during the 2009 Period.

Cost of co-location and other revenues decreased $8,420 or 4.3% to $188,443 for the 2010 Period from $196,863 for the 2009 Period primarily attributable to reductions in recurring rental costs and equipment maintenance costs. Cost of co-location and other revenues as a percentage of co-location and other revenues increased to 28.7% during the 2010 Period, compared to 28.1% during the 2009 Period.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $44,307 or 6.8% to $698,925 for the 2010 Period compared to $654,618 for the 2009 Period primarily attributable to increases in employee related costs, rent and property tax of $30,022, $18,282 and $3,511, respectively. These increases were offset by a decrease in utilities of $8,535. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues increased to 85.3% during the 2010 Period from 70.3% during the 2009 Period.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $82,196 or 70.9% to $33,683 for the 2010 Period compared to $115,879 for the 2009 Period primarily related to several assets reaching full depreciation.

Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased $2,135 or 5.0% to $40,558 for the 2010 Period compared to $42,693 for the 2009 Period primarily due to a lower interest rate resulting from the conversion of an interim loan to a secured promissory note in December 2009.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of June 30, 2010, we had $18,154 in cash and $2,631,697 in current liabilities, including $137,442 of deferred revenues that will not require settlement in cash.

At June 30, 2010, we had a working capital deficit of $2,588,226, while at December 31, 2009 we had a working capital deficit of $2,378,474. We do not have a line of credit or credit facility to serve as an additional source of liquidity. Historically we have relied on shareholder loans as an additional source of funds.

As of June 30, 2010, of the $260,202 we owed to our trade creditors $169,062 was past due. We have no formal agreements regarding payment of these amounts. At June 30, 2010, $256,443 payable under a matured lease obligation was outstanding and we had outstanding principal and interest owed on matured notes totaling $1,004,219. We have not made payment or negotiated an extension of the notes and the lenders have not made any payment demands. We are currently developing a plan to satisfy these notes on terms acceptable to the note holders.

In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company had one customer that comprised approximately 14% and 12%, respectively, of total revenues. During each of the 2nd Quarter 2010 and 2009, this customer comprised approximately 12% of total revenues.

During September 2005, we received an invoice from AT&T (formerly SBC) of approximately $230,000 for services alleged to have been rendered to us between June 1, 2004 and June 30, 2005. Since then, we have received a number of additional invoices from AT&T which cover services through February 2007 and total approximately $7,970,000. AT&T stopped invoicing us for these monthly services and simply sent monthly Inter Company Billing Statements reflecting the balance of approximately $7,970,000 with no further additions. The last Inter Company Billing Statement we received was dated December 15, 2007 and reflected a balance of approximately $7,970,000. The alleged services were eventually identified by AT&T as Switched Access services. We formally notified AT&T in writing that we dispute these invoices and requested that AT&T withdraw and/or credit all of these invoices in full. AT&T has not responded to our written dispute. We believe AT&T has no basis for these charges. Therefore, we have not recorded any expense or liability related to these billings.

During February 2009, the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission issued an Omnibus Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (“NAL”) to us in the amount of $20,000 for failure to timely file a certification report concerning so-called Customer Proprietary Network Information (“CPNI”). There were approximately 690 other telecommunications companies included in the NAL. Each company has the opportunity to submit further evidence and arguments in response to the NAL to show that no forfeiture should be imposed or that some lesser amount should be assessed. We have filed a formal response to the NAL pursuant to which we requested waiver of the Forfeiture. The FCC has not yet responded to our request. We have not recorded any expense or liability related to this NAL.

Cash flow for the six-month periods ending June 30, 2010 and 2009 consist of the following.

		For the Six-Month Periods Ended
		June 30,
		2010				2009
Net cash flows provided by (used in) operations		$	8,321			$	(644	)
Net cash flows used in investing activities			(2,072	)			(2,104	)
Net cash flows provided by financing activities			—				(500	)

The planned expansion of our business will require significant capital to fund capital expenditures, working capital needs, and debt service. Our principal capital expenditure requirements will include:

•

mergers and acquisitions and

•

further development of operations support systems and other automated back office systems

Because our cost of developing new networks and services, funding other strategic initiatives, and operating our business depend on a variety of factors (including, among other things, the number of subscribers and the service for which they subscribe, the nature and penetration of services that may be offered by us, regulatory changes, and actions taken by competitors in response to our strategic initiatives), it is almost certain that actual costs and revenues will materially vary from expected amounts and these variations are likely to increase our future capital requirements. Our current cash balances will not be sufficient to fund our current business plan beyond a few months. As a consequence, we are currently focusing on revenue enhancement and cost cutting opportunities as well as working to sell non-core assets and to extend vendor payment terms. We continue to seek additional convertible debt or equity financing as well as the placement of a credit facility to fund our liquidity needs. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional capital on satisfactory terms or at all or on terms that will not dilute our shareholders’ interests.

Until we obtain sufficient additional capital, the further development of our network will be delayed or we will be required take other actions. Our inability to obtain additional capital resources has had and will continue to have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our ability to fund the capital expenditures and other costs contemplated by our business plan and to make scheduled payments with respect to bank borrowings will depend upon, among other things, our ability to seek and obtain additional financing in the near term. Capital will be needed in order to implement our business plan, deploy our network, expand our operations and obtain and retain a significant number of customers in our target markets. Each of these factors is, to a large extent, subject to economic, financial, competitive, political, regulatory, and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.

There is no assurance that we will be successful in developing and maintaining a level of cash flows from operations sufficient to permit payment of our outstanding indebtedness. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to service our indebtedness, we will be required to modify or abandon our growth plans, limit our capital expenditures, restructure or refinance our indebtedness or seek additional capital or liquidate our assets. There is no assurance that (i) any of these strategies could be effectuated on satisfactory terms, if at all, or on a timely basis or (ii) any of these strategies will yield sufficient proceeds to service our debt or otherwise adequately fund operations.

Financing Activities

We have a secured promissory note from a shareholder which requires monthly installments of interest only through December 30, 2010 then monthly installments of $3,301 including principal and interest which matures December 30, 2011 and is secured by all of our tangible and intangible assets (see Note 9 — Notes Payable to our financial statements, above). We agreed to issue additional shares of stock to the shareholder in the event that any additional shares are issued at less than $.50 per share, excluding employee stock options, prior to the payment in full of the secured promissory note. At June 30, 2010, the outstanding principal and interest of the secured promissory note was $297,300.

We have an operating lease for certain equipment which is leased from one of our shareholders whose parent company holds a $297,300 secured promissory note (see Note 9 — Notes Payable). The original lease was dated November 21, 2001 and the terms were $6,088 per month for 12 months with a fair market purchase option at the end of the lease. Upon default on the lease, we were allowed to continue leasing the equipment on a month-to-month basis at the same monthly rate as the original lease. We were unable to make the month-to-month payments. In January and November 2006, we agreed to extend the expiration date of common stock purchase warrants exercisable for the purchase of 425,000 common stock shares and a credit of $17,960 and for the purchase of 140,000 common stock shares and a credit of $3,940, respectively, on the operating lease. In September 2007, the lessor agreed to cease the monthly lease payments effective January 1, 2007 which generated a total of $54,795 of forgiveness of debt income. The lessor also agreed to accept payments of $499 per month on the balance owed. In January and December 2009, the Company agreed to extend the expiration date on 425,000 and 140,000, respectively, of common stock purchase warrants exercisable for the purchase of 425,000 common stock shares and a credit of $3,445 and for the purchase of 140,000 common stock shares and a credit of $773, respectively, on the operating lease. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 we had recorded $256,443 in unpaid lease payments. The loss of this equipment would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We have been unable to make all of the required payments pursuant to the terms of the September 2007 agreement. The lessor has not made any formal demands for payment or instituted collection action; however we are in discussions with the lessor to restructure this liability.

Pursuant to the provisions of the convertible promissory notes (see Note 9 — Notes Payable to our financial statements, above), the conversion price was reduced from $1.00 per share on January 15, 2001 to $.49 per share on December 31, 2003 for failure to register under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the common stock underlying the convertible promissory notes and underlying warrants on February 15, 2001. Reductions in conversion price were recognized at the date of reduction by an increase to additional paid-in capital and an increase in the discount on the notes payable. Furthermore, the interest rate was increased to 12.5% per annum from 11% per annum because the registration statement was not filed before March 1, 2001. In November and December 2003 and March 2004, $455,000, $50,000 and $5,636, respectively, of these convertible promissory notes matured. We have not made payment or negotiated an extension of these notes, and the lenders have not made any demands. At June 30, 2010, the outstanding principal and interest of the convertible promissory notes was $1,004,219.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASU No. 2010-06)

In January 2010, previously released guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures was amended. The amendment requires disclosure of transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements, and also requires more detailed disclosure about the activity within Level 3 fair value measurements. The fair value measurements hierarchy gives the highest priority (“Level 1”) to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities and the lowest priority (“Level 3”) to unobservable inputs. Fair value measurements primarily based on observable market information are given a “Level 2” priority. A portion of the amendment was effective for us on January 1, 2010 and requires the disclosure of transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements; the amendment’s requirements related to Level 3 disclosures are effective for us at on January 1, 2011. This guidance affects new disclosures only and will have no impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. In applying our accounting principles, we must often make individual estimates and assumptions regarding expected outcomes or uncertainties. As you might expect, the actual results or outcomes are generally different than the estimated or assumed amounts. These differences are usually minor and are included in our consolidated financial statements as soon as they are known. Our estimates, judgments and assumptions are continually evaluated based on available information and experience. Because of the use of estimates inherent in the financial reporting process, actual results could differ from those estimates.

During September 2005, we received a back billing from AT&T (formerly SBC) of approximately $230,000. Since then, we have received a number of additional back billings from AT&T that total in excess of $7,900,000. We believe AT&T has no basis for these charges, have reviewed these billings with our attorneys and are vigorously disputing the charges. Therefore, we have not recorded any expense or liability related to these billings.

During February 2009, the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission issued an Omnibus Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (“NAL”) to us in the amount of $20,000 for failure to timely file a certification report concerning so-called Customer Proprietary Network Information (“CPNI”). There were approximately 690 other telecommunications companies included in the NAL. Each company has the opportunity to submit further evidence and arguments in response to the NAL to show that no forfeiture should be imposed or that some lesser amount should be assessed. We filed a formal response to the NAL pursuant to which we requested waiver of the Forfeiture. The FCC has not yet responded to our request. We have not recorded any expense or liability related to these billings.

We periodically review the carrying value of our intangible assets when events and circumstances warrant such a review. One of the methods used for this review is performed using estimates of future cash flows. If the carrying value of our intangible assets is considered impaired, an impairment charge is recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the intangible assets exceeds its fair value. We believe that the estimates of future cash flows and fair value are reasonable. Changes in estimates of such cash flows and fair value, however, could affect the calculation and result in additional impairment charges in future periods.

We periodically review the carrying value of our property and equipment whenever business conditions or events indicate that those assets may be impaired. If the estimated future undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the property and equipment are less than the carrying value of the assets, the assets are written down to fair market value and a charge is recorded to current operations. Significant and unanticipated changes in circumstances, such as significant adverse changes in business climate, adverse actions by regulators, unanticipated competition, loss of key customers and/or changes in technology or markets, could require a provision for impairment in a future period.

Item 3.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

As a smaller reporting company, we are not required and have not elected to report any information under this item.

Item 4.		Controls and Procedures

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are responsible primarily for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. These controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Furthermore, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are responsible for the design and supervision of our internal controls over financial reporting that are then effected by and through our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These policies and procedures

•

pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

•

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and

•

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Our Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer conducted their evaluation using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control — Integrated Framework. Based upon their evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and the internal controls over financial reporting as of the last day of the period covered by this Report, they concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting were fully effective during and as of the last day of the period covered by this Report and reported to our auditors and the audit committee of our board of directors that no change in our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting occurred during the period covered by this Report that would have materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting. In conducting their evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting, these executive officers did not discover any fraud that involved management or other employees who have a significant role in our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting. Furthermore, there were no significant changes in our disclosure controls and procedures, internal controls over financial reporting, or other factors that could significantly affect our disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls over financial reporting subsequent to the date of their evaluation. Because no significant deficiencies or material weaknesses were discovered, no corrective actions were necessary or taken to correct significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in our internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.		Legal Proceedings

As a provider of telecommunications, we are affected by regulatory proceedings in the ordinary course of our business at the state and federal levels. These include proceedings before both the Federal Communications Commission and the Oklahoma Corporation Commission (“OCC”). In addition, in our operations we rely on obtaining many of our underlying telecommunications services and/or facilities from incumbent local exchange carriers or other carriers pursuant to interconnection or other agreements or arrangements. In January 2007, we concluded a regulatory proceeding pursuant to the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 before the OCC relating to the terms of our interconnection agreement with Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. d/b/a AT&T, which succeeds a prior interconnection agreement. The OCC approved this agreement in May 2007. This agreement may be affected by regulatory proceedings at the federal and state levels, with possible adverse impacts on us. We are unable to accurately predict the outcomes of such regulatory proceedings at this time, but an unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Item 2.		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3.		Defaults Upon Senior Securities

We are in default on convertible promissory notes that matured in November 2003, December 2003 and March 2004. These notes bear interest at 12.5% per annum and are convertible into approximately 1,003,659 shares of our common stock. We were unable to pay these notes at maturity and are currently developing a plan to satisfy these notes on terms acceptable to the note holders. At June 30, 2010, the aggregate outstanding principal and accrued interest of the convertible promissory notes was $1,004,219. We have not made payment or negotiated an extension of these notes, and the lenders have not made any demands.

Item 5.		Other Information

During the three months ended June 30, 2010 all events reportable on Form 8-K were reported.

Item 6.		Exhibits

(a)

The following exhibits are either filed as part of or are incorporated by reference in this Report:

Exhibit
Number				Exhibit
	3.1			Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB, file number 000-27031 and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	3.2			Bylaws (filed as Exhibit 2.2 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB, file number 000-27031 and incorporated herein by reference)		#
	4.1			Specimen Certificate of Registrant’s Common Stock (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	4.2			Certificate of Correction to the Amended Certificate of Incorporation and the Ninth Section of the Certificate of Incorporation (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on form 10-SB, file number 000-27031 and incorporated by reference).		#

Exhibit
Number				Exhibit
	4.3			Certificate of Correction to Articles II and V of Registrant’s Bylaws (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB, file number 000-27031 and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	4.4			Form of Warrant Agreement for Interim Financing in the amount of $505,000 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ended March 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	4.5			Form of Warrant Certificate for Florida Investors for Interim Financing in the amount of $505,000 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ended March 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	4.6			Form of Promissory Note for Florida Investors for Interim Financing in the amount of $505,000 (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ended March 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	4.7			Form of Warrant Certificate for Georgia Investors for Interim Financing in the amount of $505,000 (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ended March 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	4.8			Form of Promissory Note for Georgia Investors for Interim Financing in the amount of $505,000 (filed as Exhibit 4.5 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ended March 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	4.9			Form of Warrant Certificate for Illinois Investors for Interim Financing in the amount of $505,000 (filed as Exhibit 4.6 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ended March 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	4.10			Form of Promissory Note for Illinois Investors for Interim Financing in the amount of $505,000 (filed as Exhibit 4.7 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ended March 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	4.11			Form of Warrant Agreement for Interim Financing in the amount of $500,000 (filed as Exhibit 4.8 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ended March 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	4.12			Form of Warrant Certificate for Interim Financing in the amount of $500,000 (filed as Exhibit 4.9 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ended March 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	4.13			Form of Promissory Note for Interim Financing in the amount of $500,000 (filed as Exhibit 4.10 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ended March 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	4.14			Form of Convertible Promissory Note for September 29, 2000, private placement (filed as Exhibit 4.13 to Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	4.15			Form of Warrant Agreement for September 29, 2000, private placement (filed as Exhibit 4.13 to Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	4.16			Form of 2001 Exchange Warrant Agreement (filed as Exhibit 4.16 to Registrant’s Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference)		#
	4.17			Form of 2001 Exchange Warrant Certificate (filed as Exhibit 4.17 to Registrant’s Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference)		#
	10.1			Financial Advisory Services Agreement between the Company and National Securities Corporation, dated September 17, 1999 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference).		#

Exhibit
Number				Exhibit
	10.2			Lease Agreement between the Company and BOK Plaza Associates, LLC, dated December 2, 1999 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	10.3			Interconnection agreement between Registrant and Southwestern Bell dated March 19, 1999 (filed as Exhibit 6.1 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB, file number 000-27031 and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	10.4			Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Animus Communications, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 6.2 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB, file number 000-27031 and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	10.5			Registrar Accreditation Agreement effective February 8, 2000, by and between Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers and FullWeb, Inc. d/b/a FullNic f/k/a Animus Communications, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ended March 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	10.6			Master License Agreement For KMC Telecom V, Inc., dated June 20, 2000, by and between FullNet Communications, Inc. and KMC Telecom V, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ended June 30, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	10.7			Domain Registrar Project Completion Agreement, dated May 10, 2000, by and between FullNet Communications, Inc., FullWeb, Inc. d/b/a FullNic and Think Capital (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ended June 30, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	10.8			Amendment to Financial Advisory Services Agreement between Registrant and National Securities Corporation, dated April 21, 2000 (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ended June 30, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	10.9			Asset Purchase Agreement dated June 2, 2000, by and between FullNet of Nowata and FullNet Communications, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on June 20, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	10.10			Asset Purchase Agreement dated February 4, 2000, by and between FullNet of Bartlesville and FullNet Communications, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on February 18, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	10.11			Agreement and Plan of Merger Among FullNet Communications, Inc., FullNet, Inc. and Harvest Communications, Inc. dated February 29, 2000 (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	10.12			Asset Purchase Agreement dated January 25, 2000, by and between FullNet of Tahlequah, and FullNet Communications, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on February 9, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	10.13			Promissory Note dated August 2, 2000, issued to Timothy J. Kilkenny (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).		#
	10.14			Warrant Agreement dated August 2, 2000, issued to Timothy J. Kilkenny (filed as Exhibit 10.14 to Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).		#
	10.15			Warrant Certificate dated August 2, 2000 issued to Timothy J. Kilkenny (filed as Exhibit 10.15 to Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).		#
	10.16			Stock Option Agreement dated December 8, 2000, issued to Timothy J. Kilkenny (filed as Exhibit 10.16 to Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).		#

Exhibit
Number				Exhibit
	10.17			Warrant Agreement dated November 9, 2000, issued to Roger P. Baresel (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).		#
	10.18			Warrant Agreement dated December 29, 2000, issued to Roger P. Baresel (filed as Exhibit 10.18 to Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).		#
	10.19			Stock Option Agreement dated February 29, 2000, issued to Wallace L Walcher (filed as Exhibit 10.19 to Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).		#
	10.20			Stock Option Agreement dated February 17, 1999, issued to Timothy J. Kilkenny (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB, file number 000-27031 and incorporated herein by reference).		#
	10.21			Stock Option Agreement dated October 19, 1999, issued to Wesdon C. Peacock (filed as Exhibit 10.21 to Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).		#
	10.22			Stock Option Agreement dated April 14, 2000, issued to Jason C. Ayers (filed as Exhibit 10.22 to Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).		#
	10.23			Stock Option Agreement dated May 1, 2000, issued to B. Don Turner (filed as Exhibit 10.23 to Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).		#
	10.24			Form of Stock Option Agreement dated December 8, 2000, issued to Jason C. Ayers, Wesdon C. Peacock, B. Don Turner and Wallace L. Walcher (filed as Exhibit 10.24 to Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).		#
	10.25			Warrant Certificate Dated November 9, 2000, issued to Roger P. Baresel (filed as Exhibit 10.25 to Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).		#
	10.26			Warrant Certificate Dated November 9, 2000, issued to Roger P. Baresel (filed as Exhibit 10.26 to Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).		#
	10.27			Warrant Certificate Dated December 29, 2000, issued to Roger P. Baresel (filed as Exhibit 10.27 to Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).		#
	10.28			Stock Option Agreement dated October 13, 2000, issued to Roger P. Baresel (filed as Exhibit 10.28 to Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).		#
	10.29			Stock Option Agreement dated October 12, 1999, issued to Travis Lane (filed as Exhibit 10.29 to Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).		#
	10.30			Promissory Note dated January 5, 2001, issued to Generation Capital Associates (filed as Exhibit 10.30 to Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).		#
	10.31			Placement Agency Agreement dated November 8, 2000 between FullNet Communications, Inc. and National Securities Corporation (filed as Exhibit 10.31 to Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).		#
	10.32			Promissory Note dated January 25, 2000, issued to Fullnet of Tahlequah, Inc.		#
	10.33			Promissory Note dated February 7, 2000, issued to David Looper		#
	10.34			Promissory Note dated February 29, 2000, issued to Wallace L. Walcher		#
	10.35			Promissory Note dated June 2, 2000, issued to Lary Smith		#
	10.36			Promissory Note dated June 15, 2001, issued to higganbotham.com L.L.C.		#
	10.37			Promissory Note dated November 19, 2001, issued to Northeast Rural Services		#
	10.38			Promissory Note dated November 19, 2001, issued to Northeast Rural Services		#

Exhibit
Number				Exhibit
	10.39			Form of Convertible Promissory Note dated September 6, 2002		#
	10.40			Employment Agreement with Timothy J. Kilkenny dated July 31, 2002		#
	10.41			Employment Agreement with Roger P. Baresel dated July 31, 2002		#
	10.42			Letter from Grant Thornton LLP to the Securities and Exchange Commission dated January 30, 2003		#
	10.43			Form 8-K dated January 30, 2003 reporting the change in certifying accountant		#
	10.44			Form 8-K dated September 20, 2005 reporting the change in certifying accountant		#
	10.45			Secured Promissory Note and Security Agreement dated December 30, 2009, issued to High Capital Funding, LLC		#
	22.1			Subsidiaries of the Registrant		#
	31.1			Certification pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of Timothy J. Kilkenny		*
	31.2			Certification pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of Roger P. Baresel		*
	32.1			Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Timothy J. Kilkenny		*
	32.2			Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Roger P. Baresel		*

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.