UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.  )

Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

o		Preliminary Proxy Statement
o		Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ		Definitive Proxy Statement
o		Definitive Additional Materials
o		Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

 

RRI ENERGY, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

þ		No fee required.
o		Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

	(1)		Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
	(2)		Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
	(3)		Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
	(4)		Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
	(5)		Total fee paid:

o		Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o		Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

	(1)		Amount Previously Paid:
	(2)		Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
	(3)		Filing Party:
	(4)		Date Filed:

 

Proxy Statement
and
Notice of 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

 

April 6, 2010

 

 

NOTICE OF 2010 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

 

Dear Stockholder:

 

You are invited to attend the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of RRI Energy, Inc. on Wednesday, May 19, 2010, beginning at 9:00 a.m., Central Time, at the Magnolia Hotel, 1100 Texas Avenue, Houston, Texas.

 

At the meeting, stockholders will be asked to:

 

 

This year we are furnishing proxy materials to our stockholders over the Internet. You may read, print and download our proxy statement and annual report at https://www.eproxyaccess.com/rri2010. On or about April 6, 2010, we mailed our stockholders a notice containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials and vote online. The notice also provides instructions on how you can request proxy materials to be sent to you by mail or email and how you can enroll to receive proxy materials by mail or email for future meetings.

 

Stockholders of record at the close of business on March 29, 2010 are entitled to vote. Each share entitles the holder to one vote. You can vote over the Internet at https://www.eproxyaccess.com/rri2010 or by telephone by following the instructions found on the Internet site. You may also vote in person at the meeting or, if you request to receive proxy materials by mail or email, by completing and returning a proxy card. For specific voting information, see “General Information” beginning on page 1 of the enclosed proxy statement. Please vote in advance of the meeting even if you plan to attend.

 

Attendance is limited to stockholders of RRI Energy, Inc., their proxy holders and our guests. Check-in will begin at 8:15 a.m. Stockholders holding stock in brokerage accounts must bring a brokerage statement or other evidence of share ownership as of March 29, 2010 in order to be admitted to the meeting.

 

Sincerely,

 

Michael L. Jines

Executive Vice President,

General Counsel and Corporate Secretary and

Chief Compliance Officer

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

RRI ENERGY, INC.
1000 Main Street
Houston, Texas 77002
(832) 357-3000

 

PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

 

 

We are providing these proxy materials to you in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of RRI Energy, Inc. for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Meeting”) and for any adjournment or postponement of the Meeting. In this proxy statement, we refer to RRI Energy, Inc. as “we,” “our” or “us.”

 

We are making these proxy materials available to you on the Internet. On or about April 6, 2010, we mailed a notice to our stockholders containing instructions on how to access the proxy materials at
https://www.eproxyaccess.com/rri2010 and vote online. In addition, stockholders may request proxy materials to be sent to them by mail or email.

 

At the Meeting, stockholders will be asked to elect directors and ratify our independent auditors.

 

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 29, 2010, the record date for the Meeting, are entitled to receive notice of and participate in the Meeting. If you were a stockholder of record on that date, you are entitled to vote all of the shares you held on that date at the Meeting, or any postponements or adjournments of the Meeting.

 

If your shares are registered directly in your name, you are the holder of record of these shares and the notice was sent directly to you. If you hold your shares in a brokerage account or through a bank or other holder of record, you hold the shares in “street name,” and your broker, bank or other holder of record sent the voting instructions to you.

 

If you hold your shares indirectly in the RRI Energy, Inc. Savings Plan (formerly the Reliant Energy, Inc. Savings Plan) or the RRI Energy, Inc. Union Savings Plan (formerly the Reliant Energy, Inc. Union Savings Plan) (collectively, the “RRI Benefit Plans”), you have the right to direct the trustee of the RRI Benefit Plans (the “Trustee”) how to vote your shares as described in the voting materials sent to you by the Trustee.

 

You have one vote for each share of our common stock you owned as of the record date for the Meeting.

 

You may vote over the Internet at https://www.eproxyaccess.com/rri2010 by following the instructions provided in the notice mailed to you or by telephone by following the instructions found on the Internet site. You may also vote in person at the Meeting or, if you request proxy materials by mail or email, by completing and returning a proxy card.

If you hold your shares in street name, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other holder of record how to vote by following the instructions sent to you by the holder of record. If you desire to vote in person at the Meeting, as a holder in street name, you must provide a legal proxy from your bank, broker or other holder of record.

 

Yes, you may change your vote at any time prior to the vote tabulation at the Meeting by (a) voting in person at the Meeting, (b) casting a vote over the Internet or by telephone at a later date or (c) sending a written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary by mail to RRI Energy, Inc., P.O. Box 3795, Houston, Texas 77253 or by facsimile at (832) 357-0140. If you request proxy materials by mail or email, you may also change your vote by mailing a proxy card with a later date. If you recast your vote, only your later dated proxy (whether cast by Internet, telephone, mail or in person) will be counted.

 

The Board recommends a vote FOR election of five directors to our Board to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and the Board and the Audit Committee recommend a vote FOR ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent auditors for fiscal year 2010. If any other matter properly comes before the Meeting, Michael L. Jines and Allison B. Cunningham (the “Proxy Holders”) will vote as recommended by the Board or, if no recommendation is given, in their own discretion.

 

We will have a quorum, and will be able to conduct the business of the Meeting, if the holders of a majority of shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote are represented in person or by proxy at the Meeting. As of the record date, 353,413,315 shares of common stock, representing the same number of votes, were outstanding. The presence of the holders of at least 176,706,659 shares of common stock will be required to establish a quorum. Proxies received but marked as abstentions or broker non-votes will be included in the calculation of the quorum. For more information regarding broker non-votes, see “—How are my votes counted?”

 

Directors are elected if the votes cast for that nominee’s election exceed the votes cast against that nominee’s election. Ratification of KPMG LLP’s appointment requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock represented at the Meeting and entitled to vote.

 

In both proposals, you may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN.” If you “ABSTAIN” on voting for any nominee for director, your vote will not be counted as a vote cast and will have no effect on whether such nominee is elected. Broker non-votes have the same effect as an abstention in director elections. If you “ABSTAIN” on the ratification of KPMG LLP’s appointment, your vote will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” that proposal.

 

Broker non-votes, if any, will not be counted as having been entitled to vote or as a vote cast. A broker non-vote occurs when the broker holding shares in street name is unable to vote on a proposal because the proposal is not routine and the owner has not provided any instructions on that matter. The election of directors is a non-routine item. New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules determine whether proposals are routine or not routine. A broker holding shares for an owner in street name may vote for a routine proposal without voting instructions. The ratification of KPMG LLP’s appointment is a routine item.

 

If you request proxy materials by mail or email and send a proxy card without indicating your vote, your shares will be voted “FOR” the director nominees listed on the proxy card and “FOR” the proposal to ratify the selection of our independent auditors.

 

You must provide voting instructions to the Trustee for the shares you hold indirectly in the RRI Benefit Plans by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 16, 2010. If you do not timely provide voting instructions, then the Trustee will vote your shares in the same proportion as the shares for which timely instructions were received, unless to do so would be prohibited by law.

 

We do not know of any matters that will be considered at the Meeting other than the items set forth in this proxy statement. If other matters are properly raised at the Meeting, your proxy authorizes the Proxy Holders to vote as they think best, unless authority to do so is withheld by you in your proxy.

 

If the Meeting is postponed or adjourned, your proxy will still be good and may be voted at the postponed or adjourned meeting. You will still be able to change or revoke your proxy until it is voted at the Meeting.

 

The following section summarizes information about our corporate governance policies, our Board and its committees and the director nomination process.

 

We are committed to sound corporate governance principles. To evidence this commitment, the Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines, which, along with the charters of the Board committees, our Business Ethics Policy and our corporate compliance program, provide the framework for our corporate governance. Complete copies of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, charters of the Board committees and our Business Ethics Policy are available on our website at www.rrienergy.com or in print to any stockholder who requests them from our Investor Relations department at 832-357-7000. The Board and management regularly review corporate governance developments and the Board modifies these charters and guidelines and management modifies the policy and program as appropriate.

 

We have adopted a written Business Ethics Policy, which is a code of conduct and ethics for our directors, executives and employees and satisfies the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) definition of a “code of ethics.” Our Business Ethics Policy prohibits our directors, executives and employees from having relationships or engaging in activities which might conflict with, or give the appearance of conflicting with, our interests or which might affect that person’s independence or judgment. This policy is based upon our value of acting with absolute integrity.

 

All of our directors, executives and employees are required to annually certify their compliance with the Business Ethics Policy. The policy requires any exception to or waiver of the policy for a director or executive be made only by the Board or an independent Board committee and disclosed on our website. To date, we have not received any requests for or granted any waivers of the policy for any of our executives or directors.

Among other things, the policy addresses:

 

 

The policy prohibits any director or executive from seeking or accepting credit or an extension of credit in the form of a personal loan from us, trading our securities acquired in connection with their service or employment during any retirement plan “black-out period” and, in the case of executives, receiving any tax services from our independent auditors.

 

Under the terms of our Business Ethics Policy, each of our independent directors is required to ensure that he or she does not have any relationships or engage in any activities that would result in the director not being independent. Prior to engaging in any material relationship or activity that could reasonably be expected to affect his or her independence, the director must consult with our General Counsel, who determines whether the relationship or activity is addressed and permitted by our independence standards. Our General Counsel refers the matter to the Board if the specific relationship or activity is not addressed by our independence standards. If our General Counsel or Board determines that the relationship or activity would jeopardize the director’s independence, the director is not permitted to engage in the activity or relationship. For a discussion regarding our independence standards, see “Corporate Governance—Director Independence.”

 

The policy includes procedures for directors and employees to report possible violations of laws, regulations or the policy. Reports may be made to an employee’s immediate supervisor, our Chief Compliance Officer, any member of the Office of Ethics and Compliance or any other senior company official. Reports may also be made anonymously to the Chief Compliance Officer through a toll-free compliance hotline, a web address, or a mailing address administered by an independent third party. All reported violations are investigated promptly and, to the extent possible, treated confidentially. It is our policy that there will be no acts of retaliation, intimidation, threat, coercion or discrimination against any individual for truthfully reporting, furnishing information or assisting or participating in any manner in an investigation, compliance review or other activity related to the administration of our Business Ethics Policy.

 

Under our corporate compliance program, our employees and directors annually participate in a series of ethics and compliance training courses that define problematic relationships and activities and promote understanding of conflicts of interests and our values, including acting with absolute integrity and communicating openly, honestly and frequently. Our senior leadership team monitors compliance with the Business Ethics Policy and confirms that our current policies and controls adequately ensure that our business practices are consistent with the Business Ethics Policy. The Audit Committee provides oversight of the program.

 

To align our directors and executives with the interests of our stockholders, we have stock ownership guidelines for our directors and executives. All non-management directors have an ownership target of 30,000 shares of our common stock. In addition, our President and Chief Executive Officer has an ownership target of 120,000 shares, all executive vice presidents have targets of 60,000 shares, and all senior vice presidents that are executives have targets of 30,000 shares. The target stock ownership levels are expected to be achieved within five years of the adoption of the guidelines (March 7, 2011) or within five years of first appointment to the Board or election as an executive, whichever is later. Each executive is expected to retain at least 50% of the after-tax earned restricted or performance shares until twelve months after the vesting date. The Nominating & Governance Committee may approve requests for exclusions to the retention expectation, for purposes of estate planning, gifts to charity, education or the purchase of a primary residence. All of our directors have met the target stock ownership guidelines and all of our executives have either met or are on track to meet the target stock ownership guidelines by the deadline provided for in the guidelines.

 

Because speculation in our securities based on fluctuations in the market may cause conflicts of interests with our stockholders, our Insider Trading Policy prohibits trading in options, warrants, puts and calls related to our securities and it also prohibits selling our securities short or holding our securities in margin accounts.

 

Our Board currently has five members (its authorized size). All members of our Board are non-management directors, except Mark Jacobs, who serves as our Chief Executive Officer. We separated the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board when Joel Staff retired as our Chief Executive Officer in May 2007. Mr. Staff remained Chairman of the Board until June 2009, at which time Steven Miller became our independent Chairman of the Board. Before that, Mr. Miller served as our independent lead director. Because of Mr. Miller’s professional experience and tenure on our Board and Mr. Jacob’s relatively recent promotion to Chief Executive Officer, the Board concluded it was appropriate to have the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer roles separated. Because we have an independent Chairman of the Board, we do not now have an independent lead director.

 

The Board oversees all areas of major risk exposure for the Company and is assisted in this role by the Risk & Finance Oversight Committee and the Audit Committee. The Risk & Finance Oversight Committee is provided with regular reports from management on our key enterprise risks, and meets periodically with our internal auditor and management to discuss specific risks and assess the effectiveness of our risk management systems. The Audit Committee is regularly provided with accounting, auditing and other financial information and internal control and corporate compliance reports and meets periodically with our internal auditor, independent auditor, Chief Compliance Officer and management to discuss such information. See “Summary of Committee Responsibilities.”

 

At least once a year, the Nominating & Governance Committee reviews all relationships each director has with us, including any charitable contributions we make to organizations where our directors serve as board members. The Nominating & Governance Committee reports the results of its review to the Board, which then determines which directors satisfy our independence standards. Rather than adopting categorical standards of independence, the Board assesses independence on a case-by-case basis, in each case consistent with the legal requirements described in our committee charters and the listing standards of the NYSE. These standards provide that a director cannot be independent unless the board affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with us. In addition, a director is not independent if the director does not meet the objective tests described in the NYSE listing standards. Under the NYSE listing standards, audit committee members must also satisfy the SEC rule regarding independence.

The Board determined that Ms. Perez and Messrs. Barnett, Miller and Silverstein are independent directors. In addition, the Board determined that Pastor Caldwell and Messrs. Breeding and Transier were independent directors during their service on the Board in 2009. The Board considered Pastor Caldwell’s consulting relationship with a contractor that provided some of our call center services for our former retail business. In determining that the relationship did not constitute a material relationship, the Board noted that Pastor Caldwell did not have any interest in the transactions between us and the contractor, did not serve as an executive, partner or employee of the contractor and had no ownership interest in the contractor.

 

Mr. Jacobs, our President and Chief Executive Officer, is not considered by the Board to be an independent director because of his employment with the Company. Mr. Staff was not considered by the Board to be an independent director during his service on the Board in 2009 because he was employed as our Chief Executive Officer until his retirement in May 2007. Each member of our Audit, Nominating & Governance and Compensation Committees is independent under the SEC’s rules and regulations and the listing standards of the NYSE.

 

To facilitate candid discussion among our non-management directors, the agenda for each Board and committee meeting includes an executive session of non-management directors. The Chairman presides over meetings of non-management directors and assists in the preparation of the agenda for each meeting.

 

During 2009, the Board met 17 times and all directors attended 100% of the meetings. All of our directors attended the 2009 annual meeting and we expect all directors standing for reelection will attend the 2010 Meeting.

 

We regularly offer an in-house seminar to the Board on topics relevant to their responsibilities as directors and provide updates on significant issues and trends in corporate governance. Each director is also encouraged to attend external seminars addressing corporate governance each year. New directors participate in an orientation program conducted by our management and existing directors. The Nominating & Governance Committee annually reviews and evaluates the director education and orientation program. A copy of our Guidelines for Director Orientation and Continuing Education is available on our website at www.rrienergy.com.

 

To ensure that each director is able to devote sufficient time to performing his or her duties, our Corporate Governance Guidelines prohibit our directors from serving on the boards of more than three other public companies. In addition, the Board and the Nominating & Governance Committee take into account service on other boards as a factor in evaluating director performance and committee assignments. The Audit Committee’s Charter prohibits committee members from serving on the audit committee of more than two other public companies.

 

The Nominating & Governance Committee evaluates material changes in the personal or professional status of a director that could be expected to diminish the director’s ability to effectively function as a member of the Board. In addition, as part of the annual director evaluation process, the Board considers changes in professional status and health, family, business or personal issues that may bear on effectiveness of Board service. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require directors to submit a resignation letter if they have a substantial job change. The Board has discretion to accept or reject these resignations.

 

The Nominating & Governance Committee conducts an annual evaluation to determine whether the Board, its committees and its members are functioning effectively. The evaluation focuses on the Board’s (and each Board committee’s and member’s) contribution as a whole to us and on areas that the Board, any Board

committee, any individual director and/or management believe can be improved. Additionally, each year, the Chairman of the Board or the Lead Director meets privately with each director for an individual director evaluation. The Chairman of the Board or the Lead Director confirms to the Board, at its next regularly scheduled meeting, the completion of the individual director evaluation process and presents to the Board any appropriate conclusions or recommendations for action.

 

Prior to 2009, the Compensation Committee annually reported to the Board on succession planning. Beginning in 2010, succession planning will be reviewed and evaluated at the Board level. As part of this process, the non-management members of the Board will solicit views from our Chief Executive Officer on potential successors to our Chief Executive Officer and senior executives. We have also adopted a policy regarding succession in the event of an emergency involving or the unexpected resignation, retirement or incapacity of our Chief Executive Officer or Chairman of the Board.

 

Our bylaws provide that, to be elected, each nominee must receive more votes cast for his or her election than votes cast against his or her election. In contested elections where the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected, the vote standard will be a plurality of votes cast. These bylaw provisions cannot be changed without stockholder approval.

 

In addition, our Corporate Governance Guidelines include a director resignation policy, which is summarized as follows:

 

 

With one exception, each of our directors attended all of the meetings held by all Board committees on which they served in 2009. One of our prior directors missed one meeting.

 

 

 

 

All of our standing committees have charters, which are available at www.rrienergy.com.

 

Audit Committee

 

The purposes of the Audit Committee are to oversee:

 

 

In addition, the Audit Committee annually reviews our disclosures regarding deficiencies, if any, in the design or operation of internal controls.

 

The Board has determined that Ms. Perez and Mr. Silverstein are qualified as audit committee financial experts under the SEC’s rules and regulations and are independent audit committee members under the NYSE listing standards. In addition, the Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee and Mr. Miller have the requisite accounting and related financial management expertise under the NYSE listing standards. In 2009, the Board also determined that Mr. Transier, the former Chairman of our Audit Committee, was qualified as an audit committee financial expert, was an independent audit committee member under the NYSE listing standards and had the requisite accounting and related financial management expertise under the NYSE listing standards.

Compensation Committee

 

The purposes of the Compensation Committee are to:

 

 

The Compensation Committee has discretion to establish and delegate some or all of its authority to subcommittees. During 2009, the Compensation Committee did not establish or utilize a subcommittee for considering or determining executive or director compensation, and it has no current plans to do so. For information regarding the Compensation Committee and its independent consultant’s role in setting compensation, see “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Director Compensation.”

 

Nominating & Governance Committee

 

The purposes of the Nominating & Governance Committee are to:

 

 

In addition, the Nominating & Governance Committee reviews all relationships each director has with us and reports the results of its review to the Board with appropriate recommendations, if any, for approval.

 

Risk & Finance Oversight Committee

 

The purposes of the Risk & Finance Oversight Committee are to:

 

 

In addition, the Risk & Finance Oversight Committee annually reviews our environmental policies and initiatives.

Special Committee

 

The purpose of the Special Committee was to oversee the process of exploring strategic alternatives to enhance stockholder value and make associated recommendations to the Board. The Special Committee is no longer in place because the Board concluded its review of strategic alternatives in April 2009.

 

During 2009, all members of the Compensation Committee were independent directors and no member is or was our employee. During 2009, none of our executives served on a compensation committee (or equivalent) or a board of directors of another entity that had an executive serving on our Compensation Committee or Board.

 

The Nominating & Governance Committee considers prospective nominees for Board membership suggested by Board members, management or stockholders. The Committee may also retain a third-party executive search firm to assist it in identifying prospective nominees.

 

Once the Nominating & Governance Committee has identified a prospective nominee, it decides whether to conduct a full evaluation of the candidate. This decision is based on information provided to the Committee with the recommendation of the candidate, the Committee’s knowledge of the candidate and possible inquiries to the person making the recommendation or others. The Committee’s primary considerations are the need for additional Board members to fill vacancies or expand the size of the Board and the likelihood that the candidate can satisfy the evaluation factors described below. As stated in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Committee also considers the diversity of and the optimal mix of talent and experience on the Board. This may include professional experience and industry background, the need for expertise in particular areas, geographic location, the balance of management and independent directors, gender, race, age and other factors as the Committee deems relevant. The Committee annually assesses its effectiveness in connection with its self-evaluation process and as it considers potential nominees for the Board.

 

The Committee next evaluates the candidate’s standards and qualifications, including the candidate’s experience, independence, knowledge, commitment to our values, skills, expertise, independence of mind, integrity, service on the boards of other public companies, openness, ability to work as part of a team, willingness to commit the required time and familiarity with our business. Following an evaluation and interviews, the Committee makes a recommendation to the Board regarding the candidate. After considering the recommendation, the Board determines whether or not to extend an offer to the candidate for Board membership.

 

A stockholder who wishes to recommend a prospective nominee for the Board should notify us at RRI Energy, Inc., P.O. Box 3795, Houston, Texas 77253. The notice should be addressed to the attention of the Corporate Secretary or the Chairman of the Nominating & Governance Committee in care of the Corporate Secretary. The notice should include whatever supporting material the stockholder considers appropriate. The Nominating & Governance Committee will also consider whether to nominate any person nominated by a stockholder pursuant to the provisions of our bylaws relating to stockholder nominations as described in “Dates for Submission of Stockholder Proposals for 2011 Annual Meeting” below.

 

Stockholders and other parties interested in communicating directly with the Chairman of the Nominating & Governance Committee, the Chairman of the Board, the non-management directors as a group or the Board may do so by writing in care of the Corporate Secretary at P.O. Box 3795, Houston, Texas 77253. Instructions on how to communicate with the Board are also available on our website at www.rrienergy.com.

Additionally, under the terms of our Business Ethics Policy, anyone desiring to raise a complaint or concern regarding accounting, internal control or auditing matters directly with the Audit Committee has the ability to do so by contacting EthicsPoint, Inc., a third-party vendor, at the following mailing address, web address or toll free number:

 

RRI Energy Ethics & Compliance Helpline

c/o EthicsPoint, Inc.

P.O. Box 230369

Portland, OR 97281-0369

Attention: Audit Committee

www.guideline.lrn.com

Toll Free Number: (866) 693-8442

 

Such complaints and concerns will be forwarded directly to the Chairman of the Audit Committee.

 

The Nominating & Governance Committee has approved a process for handling correspondence received by us and addressed to non-management members of the Board. Our Corporate Secretary reviews all correspondence that, in his opinion, deals with the functions of the Board or otherwise requires their attention. The Corporate Secretary has the discretion not to forward unsolicited marketing materials, mass mailings, unsolicited publications, surveys and questionnaires, resumes and other forms of job inquiries and requests for business contacts or referrals. In addition, the Corporate Secretary may, in his discretion, handle any director communication that is an ordinary course of business matter, including routine questions, complaints, comments and related communications that can appropriately be handled by management. However, directors may at any time request copies of all correspondence that is addressed to members of the Board. Concerns relating to accounting, internal controls or auditing matters are immediately brought to the attention of our internal audit department or Chief Compliance Officer and handled in accordance with our Business Ethics Policy.

 

 

The first proposal to be voted on at the Meeting is the election of five directors for a term of office expiring at our 2011 annual meeting. The Board, based on recommendations from the Nominating & Governance Committee, nominated and recommends each of the five directors named below. Each of the directors named below has exhibited a commitment to our values, integrity, independence of mind, openness, the ability to work as part of a team, a willingness to commit their time and familiarity with our business. It is because of these qualifications, as well as the skills, expertise, professional experiences and industry background noted below that we believe each of these directors should serve on our Board.

 

We have no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unavailable for election. If any nominee becomes unavailable for election, the Board can name a substitute nominee and proxies will be voted for the substitute nominee, unless discretionary authority has been withheld.

 

 

Mr. Barnett is a member of the Board of Directors of Enterprise Products GP, LLC, the general partner of Enterprise Products Partners L.P., and is Chairman of its Audit, Conflicts and Governance Committee. Mr. Barnett also serves on the Board of Directors of Westlake Chemical Corporation and is Chairman of its Nominating and Governance Committee and a member of its Audit Committee. Mr. Barnett retired from the law firm Baker Botts LLP in December 1997 where he served as its managing partner for 14 years. From 1996 to 2005, he served as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Rice University. In 2005, Mr. Barnett was honored as Director of the Year by the National Association of Corporate Directors. Through his extensive managerial experience and experience with legal and corporate governance matters, we believe Mr. Barnett has strong qualifications relevant to service on our Board.

 

 

Mr. Jacobs has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since May 2007. He served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from July 2002 to May 2007. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Jacobs was a managing director with Goldman, Sachs and Co. and had a long-standing advisory relationship with us, serving in both the Mergers and Acquisitions and Energy and Power groups. He has played a major role in key initiatives during his tenure with the Company and with Goldman. Because of this experience and his role as our Chief Executive Officer, we believe Mr. Jacobs’ membership is important to our Board.

 

 

Mr. Miller has served as Chairman and President of SLM Discovery Ventures, Inc., a company pursuing commercial ventures in support of volunteerism, social outreach and higher education academic achievement, since September 2002. He retired as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Shell Oil Company in September 2002, following a long career at Shell beginning in 1967 that involved extensive experience in plant operations, trading and commodities, marketing and regulatory activities. Mr. Miller also served as a director of Applied Materials, Inc. from 1999 through 2005 and chaired their Compensation Committee from 2003 to 2005. Mr. Miller’s extensive industry experience and leadership skills lead us to believe that he should serve as our director.

 

 

Ms. Perez has served as an independent financial consultant with The Medallion Company, LLC, an investment advisory/consultation and professional money management company, since September 2002. Ms. Perez also serves on the Board of Directors of Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., a leading producer of construction aggregates, including those used for emission controls. She serves as Chair of its Finance Committee and a member of its Audit Committee and its Ethics, Environment, Safety and Health Committee. She is an audit committee financial expert. These experiences lead us to believe that Ms. Perez is well-qualified to serve on our Board.

 

 

Mr. Silverstein served as General Partner and Portfolio Manager of SILCAP LLC, a market-neutral hedge fund that principally invests in utilities and energy companies, from January 1993 until his retirement in December 2005. Previously, he served as portfolio manager specializing in utilities and energy companies and as senior equity utility analyst. Mr. Silverstein has given numerous speeches and has testified before Congress on a variety of energy-related issues. He is an audit committee financial expert and played a critical role on our Special Committee in 2008-2009. These experiences, Mr. Silverstein’s extensive industry knowledge and his success as the head of a major investment fund in the utility and merchant power sector lead us to believe that he brings an important perspective to our Board.

 

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR
EACH OF THE NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE.

 

 

The Audit Committee annually reviews the qualifications, performance and independence of our independent auditors in accordance with regulatory requirements and guidelines and evaluates whether to change our independent auditors. Based on this review, the Audit Committee decided to appoint KPMG LLP as our independent auditors to conduct our audit for 2010.

 

Although stockholder approval is not required for the appointment of KPMG LLP, the Board and the Audit Committee have determined that it is a good corporate governance practice. Ratification requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares entitled to vote on the matter and represented in person or by proxy at the Meeting. If our stockholders do not ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee may reconsider the appointment. However, even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may select different independent auditors if it subsequently determines that such a change would be in the best interest of us and our stockholders.

 

THE BOARD AND THE AUDIT COMMITTEE RECOMMEND A VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION
OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS.

 

The following table shows the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of March 29, 2010 by each director, the executives and the former executives named in the “Summary Compensation Table” and all directors, executives and former executives named in the “Summary Compensation Table” as a group. None of these shares are pledged as security.

 

 

 

The following table sets forth information about persons whom we know to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of our issued and outstanding common stock based solely on our review of the Schedule 13G or Schedule 13D Statement of Beneficial Ownership filed by these persons with the SEC as of the date of such filing:

 

 

 

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), requires our directors, executives and persons who own more than 10% of our outstanding common stock to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock with the SEC. Based on our review of the reports submitted to us and representations from reporting persons that they have complied with the applicable filing requirements, we believe that during 2009, all of our directors, executives and greater than 10% stockholders complied with the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, except that the following executives and former executives did not timely file forms to report the grant and cash settlement of cash units under our long-term incentive plan. The grant of restricted stock units and stock options under our long-term incentive plan and in connection with these awards were timely filed. Each of Messrs. Jacobs, Jines, Livengood and Landrum and Mesdames Taylor and Kupiec did not timely file one Form 4 in February 2007 to report the grant of performance-based cash units and did not timely file one

Form 4 in June 2007 to report the cash settlement of such cash units. Each of Messrs. Dobson, Herndon, Jacobs, Jines, Livengood, Myres, Landrum and Griffey and Mesdames Taylor and Kupiec did not timely file one Form 4 in February 2008 to report the grant of performance-based cash units, which have not vested. Mr. Freysinger did not timely report his ownership of performance-based cash units in his Form 3 filed in June 2009. Mr. Herndon did not timely report his ownership of time-based cash units in his Form 3 filed in November 2007 and did not timely file one Form 4 in May 2009 to report the cash settlement of such cash units. The Company timely disclosed these awards, our long-term incentive plan and the underlying award programs and forms of agreements, as applicable, in its filings with the SEC.

 

During 2009, there were no transactions in which we were a participant and the amount involved exceeded $120,000 and in which any related person, including our executives and directors, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest. See “Corporate Governance—Our Governance Practices” for a discussion of our policies and procedures related to conflicts of interest.

 

In late 2008, our Board initiated a process to review strategic alternatives, which led to the sale of our retail business. These events and the resulting changes to our business led to the following changes in our executive compensation program:

 

 

See “—How are executive compensation amounts determined” and “—Why do we choose to pay each element?” for additional information.

 

Our direct compensation program for executives consists of base salary, annual incentive awards and long-term incentive awards. Our executives may also be eligible for benefits under our executive severance plan and change-in control-agreements. See “—How were payment amounts and trigger events determined for termination and change-in-control?” and “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control.” Using these elements, the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) has approved a compensation program designed to prudently use our resources while meeting the following objectives:

 

 

Our Chief Executive Officer has access to the internal and external compensation information described below, and conducts each of our other executive’s annual performance review. Our Senior Vice President, Human Resources provides input and makes recommendations to our Chief Executive Officer regarding compensation philosophy and structure, the structure and design of annual incentive awards and long-term incentive awards, and our executive severance plan and change-in-control agreements. Other members of our management team may also give input or make recommendations to our Chief Executive Officer regarding these matters. Using all of that information, our Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to the Committee regarding the compensation of our other executives. In each case, the Committee independently reviews the data, considers the Chief Executive Officer’s proposals, may request further proposals from the Chief Executive Officer, consults with Towers Watson as needed, and makes its own determinations for our executives. For additional information regarding Towers Watson’s role in the compensation process, see “How are executive compensation amounts determined?”

 

In setting the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, the Committee consults with each non-management director for his/her views of the Chief Executive Officer’s performance and compensation. The Committee then presents a report to the Board so that all directors have an opportunity to be heard in advance of the Committee’s final action.

 

In determining target compensation levels for each executive, the Committee considers:

 

 

None of these factors are weighted, but are considered together.

 

Market Data

 

Market data is a key consideration for the Committee. The Committee has retained Towers Watson & Co. (“Towers Watson”), a nationally recognized independent compensation consultant, to annually provide competitive market data for base salary, target annual incentive awards and expected value of target long-term incentive awards. In conducting the competitive analysis, Towers Watson gathers information from us, public filings and appropriate survey sources. Towers Watson reports the results of the competitive analysis to the Compensation Committee but does not make recommendations. The Committee considers these data for general market movement and trends and the positioning of our executives relative to the market. The Committee reviewed and considered market data as prepared by Towers Watson in early 2009 for the following groups:

 

 

Towers Watson prepared the market data on a composite basis and the Committee did not review individual company data.

 

The two broader groups are surveyed because we do not compete exclusively within our peer group for leadership talent and they represent a talent market for non-industry specific positions. The market data for these two groups is size-adjusted to our revenue size by Towers Watson to provide appropriate comparisons. All three reference groups are included, where available, in the consideration of each element of 2009 compensation for each executive.

 

Market data for target total direct compensation (base salary, targeted annual incentive and expected value of target long-term incentive awards) is developed at both the 50th and 75th percentiles for each reference point in order to provide a broad market view; however, the Committee does not seek to target total direct compensation at any particular level. Each executive’s position relative to the market data is reflective of his/her experience (both with us and with other organizations) and the other factors described below. All of the executives were below the 75th percentile for the peer group and the energy industry companies and four were also below the 50th percentile. All of the executives for which comparable market data was available were below the 50th percentile for the broader general industry companies.

In light of the sale of our Texas retail business in the second quarter of 2009 and the cyclical commodity-based nature of wholesale power generation, the Committee reconsidered the peer groups used for assessing executive compensation and determined to review and consider market data in 2010 for the following groups:

 

 

As with the market data considered by the Committee in 2009, Towers Watson prepared this market data on a composite basis and the Committee did not review individual company data. Again, the two broader groups are surveyed because we do not compete exclusively within our peer group for leadership talent and they represent a talent market for non-industry specific positions. The market data for these two groups is size-adjusted to our revenue size by Towers Watson to provide appropriate comparisons. All three reference groups are included in the consideration of each element of 2010 compensation for each executive.

 

Individual Performance

 

The Committee also considers individual performance, including achievement of individualized goals, current and potential impact on corporate performance, reputation, skills, experience, criticality and demonstration of our values as important factors. Our values are to:

 

 

The system used for our executives’ annual performance evaluations is the same as for all employees (except our President and Chief Executive Officer). See “What is the role of our executives in the compensation process?”

 

Corporate Performance

 

Significant portions of our annual incentive awards and long-term incentive awards are tied to corporate and operational results, which must be achieved in order for any payout to be earned. See “Why do we choose to pay each element?”

 

Compensation History

 

In determining an executive’s compensation, the Committee considers the base salary and the annual incentive target and payout history of each executive for the preceding four years. The Committee also considers each executive’s equity holdings, including the date of any grants, the types of awards (restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock options or cash-based), the vesting provisions, the expiration dates, the

exercise prices, if applicable, and the number of units or shares granted. The Committee reviews these historical awards to ensure an appropriate portion of executive compensation provides retention value, but no formula is used. When Mr. Brast was appointed as an executive in May 2009, he became ineligible to receive the discretionary bonus that had previously been available in connection with his position in commercial operations and that had comprised a significant portion of his total compensation in prior years. In March 2010, the Committee awarded Mr. Brast a supplemental cash payment of $60,000 so that his total compensation earned for 2009 was more closely aligned to his historical compensation.

 

Internal Equity

 

Differences in levels of compensation among our executives exist because of differences in their roles and responsibilities and based on all of the factors discussed above. The Committee does not use formulas in determining compensation amounts, but is mindful of internal equity and the impact of perceived fairness related to its decisions.

 

To achieve our compensation program’s objectives, the Committee believes that a significant portion of executive compensation should be composed of variable, at risk elements, with the majority of these elements being based on alignment with our stockholders and achievement of our long-term success. Base salaries attract and retain the talent we need to lead our business. The Committee strives for a balanced and effective mix of elements, which are not weighted in any particular manner. We have no policies or formulas for allocating among different forms of pay.

 

The table below sets forth the allocation range of fixed and variable compensation for our executives based on the Committee’s determinations during 2009. See “Summary Compensation Table” and “2009 Grants of Plan-Based Awards.”

 

 

 

Base Salary

 

Base salary is paid in cash commensurate with the responsibilities of each individual’s position. The Committee annually reviews base salary and approves adjustments based on the factors discussed under “How are executive compensation amounts determined?” The Committee believes the base salaries provide a competitive level of fixed compensation based on the individual’s experience and performance as well as the position’s market value. For 2009 base salaries, see “Summary Compensation Table.” In February 2009, the Committee made no increases in 2009 base pay for executives. In making this determination, the Committee considered the market’s response to the current economic climate, the most common trends relative to base pay, and the fact that we were exploring a full range of possible strategic alternatives to enhance stockholder value.

 

Annual Incentive Awards

 

Annual incentive awards are paid in cash and are tied to annual achievement of the performance metrics described below. The purpose of our annual incentive awards is to encourage superior performance on key corporate and employee metrics that we believe are critical to our business. Annual incentive awards are defined as a specified target percentage of base salary. These target percentages for executives are approved by the Committee based on the market data surveys prepared by Towers Watson and internal equity. The table below reflects the percentage of 2009 base salary that the executives were eligible to receive.

 

 

 

As a general rule, the Committee approves the structure of the annual incentive awards for the current year during the first quarter. In mid-2009, in light of the economic environment and the recent sale of our Texas retail business, management and the Committee undertook a comprehensive review of the annual incentive award metrics and approved revised metrics that emphasize performance, efficiency and effectiveness, the factors that we believe are important in driving our success and that we can control despite the cyclical nature of our business and the uncertain economy. The table below reflects the initial and revised 2009 metrics.

 

 

 

The metric payout amounts and the determination of threshold, target and opportunity are based on a number of factors, including:

 

 

Generally, the target level is consistent with our annual operating plan, with threshold and opportunity levels that take into account the types of factors listed above. The weighting of the different performance metrics is recommended by management and approved by the Committee based on the assessment of the relative priorities of the specific performance metrics.

 

 

 

See non-equity incentive plan compensation in the “Summary Compensation Table” for valuation disclosure related to 2009 annual incentive awards for each executive.

 

Long-Term Incentive Awards

 

Given the sale of our Texas retail business and the current market environment, the Committee determined that our long-term incentive awards for 2009 should serve as a retention vehicle and also align our

executives’ interests with those of our stockholders. In June 2009, the Committee granted the executives long-term incentive awards structured as follows:

 

 

In June 2009, the Committee approved the awards following its review of management’s proposals, which considered market data prepared by Towers Watson, individual performance, long-term potential, retention risk, difficulty of replacement, long-term impact of position and internal equity. These factors are not weighted but are considered in the aggregate. Given the unusual circumstances in 2009, including the review of strategic alternatives, the sale of our retail business and the volatility and decline in our stock price, the Committee opted in 2009 to include only time-based award vehicles, rather than performance-based award vehicles. In the prior two years, stock options and performance units tied to stock price were included as part of the long-term incentive awards. The grant date market values of the 2009 long-term incentive awards were generally lower than the grant date market values of the 2008 long-term incentive awards in recognition of the less-leveraged nature of time-based awards compared to the performance-based awards used in the past. In early 2010, the Committee approved a return to a long-term incentive award structure that includes both time- and performance-based award vehicles. The 2010 awards will include (i) time-based, common-stock settled restricted stock units with three-year cliff vesting, (ii) time-based common stock options that vest ratably over a three-year period and (iii) performance-based, cash-settled cash units that payout based on the level of our three-year average total shareholder return relative to the composite average of our peer group.

 

See “—How does each element and our decisions regarding that element fit into our compensation program’s objectives and affect other elements?” above for each executive’s targeted allocation of long-term incentive compensation, and see “Summary Compensation Table” and “2009 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” for valuation disclosure related to 2009 long-term incentive awards for each executive.

 

Executive Perquisites

 

With the exception of executive officer relocation (where applicable), we do not provide substantial personal benefits or perquisites. We do allow up to $5,000 per year for each executive in reimbursement for specified financial planning services and a one-time allowance of $5,000 for estate planning and financial planning services.

 

We provide for payments and benefits if an executive is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason in connection with a change-in-control. In addition, under our executive severance plan, we provide for payments and other benefits if an executive’s employment is involuntarily terminated other than by reason of death, disability, cause or a change-in-control. We periodically review the payment multiples and the triggering events for receipt of these payments and benefits with Towers Watson to ensure consistency with market practice.

 

The change-in-control triggering events were selected so that our executives can evaluate potential change-in-control triggering events impartially and without self-interest and so that our executives would be encouraged to continue their attention and dedication to us without regard to the security of their employment following a change in our control. We choose to provide severance benefits for termination in these circumstances to provide financial assistance and resolve any possible related claims against us that may arise. The potential payments under these arrangements do not affect the other elements of the executives’ compensation. See “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control.”

 

We encourage stock ownership by executives through the use of equity awards and mandatory holding periods. In addition, the Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines for our directors and executives. See “Corporate Governance—Stock Ownership Guidelines and Mandatory Holding Period.” Other than Mr. Dobson, who joined us in October 2007 and Mr. Myres, who joined us in December 2007, each executive meets or exceeds the applicable target stock ownership guidelines. Messrs. Dobson and Myres are on track to meet the guidelines by the deadline provided for in the guidelines.

 

As a general rule, the Committee approves our executives’ base salaries, payout of annual incentive awards for the prior year, and annual and long-term incentive awards for the current year at its first regular quarterly meeting (generally in February or March). In light of the sale of our Texas retail business in the second quarter of 2009, the Committee approved long-term incentive awards and revised annual incentive awards in mid-2009.

 

Any awards for newly hired executives are granted on the first business day of the month immediately following the executive’s appointment date. Offers to executive candidates are reviewed with the Committee prior to being made. Any equity awards included in an offer are subject to the Committee’s approval.

 

Our executives do not have any role in establishing the timing of grants or vesting of equity or equity-based awards. We do not have any program, plan or practice to time grants of equity or equity-based awards in coordination with the release of material non-public information and we do not set grant dates for new executives in coordination with the release of such information. We have not timed, and do not intend to time, our release of material non-public information for the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation. See “2009 Grants of Plan-Based Awards.”

 

The Committee considers tax, tax deductibility and accounting treatment of various compensation alternatives. However, these are not typically driving factors. The Committee may approve non-deductible compensation arrangements if it believes they are in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders taking into account several factors, including our ability to utilize the deduction based on projected taxable income.

 

The Compensation Committee oversees the compensation plans, policies and programs of RRI Energy, Inc. on behalf of the Board of Directors. In performing its oversight function, the Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Based on these reviews and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s proxy statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

The undersigned members of the Compensation Committee have submitted this Report to the Board of Directors.

 

Compensation Committee,

 

Steven L. Miller (Chairperson)

Laree E. Perez

Evan J. Silverstein

 

The following table sets forth the compensation of our President and Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, each of our other three most highly compensated executives who were serving as of December 31, 2009, our former Chief Operating Officer and our former Chief Risk and Compliance Officer. None of our executives has an employment agreement or arrangement. For further discussion of executive compensation, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

		Unvested Units as of 12/31/2009
Name		Restricted Stock Units				Cash Units				Vesting Date
Mark Jacobs			27,079								2/20/2010
			10,746								5/16/2010
			10,747								5/16/2011
			10,747								5/16/2012
			55,851								2/19/2011
			237,500				237,500				6/19/2012
Rick Dobson			9,700								11/1/2010
			20,589								2/19/2011
			87,500				87,500				6/19/2012
Michael Jines			12,464								2/20/2010
			10,508								2/19/2011
			50,000				50,000				6/19/2012
Rogers Herndon			8,072								2/20/2010
			7,637								2/19/2011
			50,000				50,000				6/19/2012
David Brast			3,647								2/20/2010
			4,268								2/19/2011
			25,000				25,000				6/19/2012