Form 10-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2009.
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO .
Commission File No. 0-13375
LSI INDUSTRIES INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10000 Alliance Road |
|
|
Ohio
|
|
Cincinnati, Ohio 45242
|
|
IRS Employer I.D. |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
No. 31-0888951 |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
|
|
(513) 793-3200
(Telephone number of principal executive offices)
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
|
Common shares, no par value
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC |
|
|
(NASDAQ Global Select Market) |
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of December 31, 2008, the aggregate market value of the registrants common stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $133,300,000 based upon a closing sale price of
$6.87 per share as reported on The Nasdaq Global Select Market.
At August 28, 2009 there were 24,038,889 no par value Common Shares issued and outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrants Proxy Statement filed with the Commission for its 2009 Annual Meeting
of Shareholders
are incorporated by reference in Part III, as specified.
LSI INDUSTRIES INC.
2009 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
This Form 10-K contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, that are subject to numerous assumptions, risks or uncertainties. The Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as guidance, forecasts,
estimates, anticipates, projects, plans, expects, intends, believes, seeks,
may, will, should or the negative versions of those words and similar expressions, and by
the context in which they are used. Such statements are based upon current expectations of the
Company and speak only as of the date made. Actual results could differ materially from those
contained in or implied by such forward-looking statements as a result of a variety of risks
and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the impact
of competitive products and services, product demand and market acceptance risks, potential
costs associated with litigation and regulatory compliance, reliance on key customers,
financial difficulties experienced by customers, the cyclical and seasonal nature of our
business, the adequacy of reserves and allowances for doubtful accounts, fluctuations in
operating results or costs, unexpected difficulties in integrating acquired businesses, the
ability to retain key employees of acquired businesses and unfavorable economic and market
conditions. These risks and uncertainties also include, but are not limited to, those
described in Part I, Item IA. Risk Factors and elsewhere in this report and those described
from time to time in our future reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The
Company undertakes no obligation to publicly revise or update any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or circumstances.
PART I
Our Company
We are a leading provider of comprehensive corporate visual image solutions through the
combination of extensive screen and digital graphics capabilities, a wide variety of high quality
indoor and outdoor lighting products, and related professional services. We also provide graphics
and lighting products and professional services on a stand-alone basis. Our company is the leading
provider of corporate visual image solutions to the petroleum/convenience store industry. We use
this leadership position to penetrate national retailers and multi-site retailers, including quick
service and casual restaurants, video rental and eyewear chains, retail chain stores and automobile
dealerships located primarily in the United States. In addition, we are a leading provider of
digital solid-state LED video screens and LED (light emitting diode) specialty lighting to such
markets or industries as sports stadiums and arenas, digital billboards, and entertainment. We
design and develop all aspects of the solid-state LED video screens and lighting, from the
electronic circuit board, to the software to drive and control the LEDs, to the structure of the
LED product.
Our focus on product development and innovation creates products that are essential components
of our customers corporate visual image strategy. We develop and manufacture lighting, graphics
and solid-state LED video screen and lighting products and distribute them through an extensive
multi-channel distribution network that allows us to effectively service our target markets.
Representative customers include British Petroleum/Amoco/Arco, Chevron Texaco, 7-Eleven,
ExxonMobil, Shell, Burger King, Dairy Queen, Taco Bell, Wendys, Best Buy, CVS Pharmacies, Inc.,
Target Stores, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Chrysler, Ford, General Motors, Nissan, Saturn, and Toyota.
We service our customers at the corporate, franchise and local levels.
We believe that national retailers and niche market companies are increasingly seeking
single-source suppliers with the project management skills and service expertise necessary to
execute a comprehensive visual image program. The integration of our graphics, lighting,
technology and professional services capabilities allows our customers to outsource to us the
development of an entire visual image program from the planning and design stage through
installation. Our approach is to combine standard, high-production lighting products, custom
graphics applications and professional services to create complete customer-focused visual image
solutions. We also offer products and services on a stand-alone basis to service our existing
image solutions customers, to establish a presence in a new market or to create a relationship with
a new customer. We believe that our ability to combine graphics and lighting products and
professional services into a comprehensive visual image solution differentiates us from our
competitors who offer only stand-alone products for lighting or graphics and who lack professional
services offerings. During the past several years, we have continued to enhance our ability to
provide comprehensive corporate visual image solutions by adding additional graphics capabilities,
lighting products, LED video screens, LED lighting products and professional services through
acquisitions and internal development.
- 1 -
Our business is organized as follows: the Lighting Segment, which represented 69% of our
fiscal 2009 net sales; the Graphics Segment, which represented 26% of our fiscal 2009 net sales;
the Technology Segment, which represented 2% of our fiscal 2009 net sales; and an All Other
Category, which represented 3% of our fiscal 2009 net sales. Our most significant market, which
includes sales of both the Lighting Segment and the Graphics Segment, is the petroleum /
convenience store market with approximately 23%, 28%, and 26% of total net sales concentrated in
this market in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. See Note 2 of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page F-30 of this Form 10-K for additional
information on business segments. Net sales by segment are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Lighting Segment |
|
$ |
160,475 |
|
|
$ |
183,694 |
|
|
$ |
191,697 |
|
Graphics Segment |
|
|
60,765 |
|
|
|
85,244 |
|
|
|
107,764 |
|
Technology Segment |
|
|
4,576 |
|
|
|
9,136 |
|
|
|
17,132 |
|
All Other Category |
|
|
7,983 |
|
|
|
27,212 |
|
|
|
20,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Sales |
|
$ |
233,799 |
|
|
$ |
305,286 |
|
|
$ |
337,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting Segment
Our lighting segment manufactures and markets outdoor and indoor lighting for the commercial,
industrial and multi-site retail markets, including the petroleum / convenience store market. Our
products are designed and manufactured to provide maximum value and meet the high-quality,
competitively-priced product requirements of our niche markets. We generally avoid specialty or
custom-designed, low-volume products for single order opportunities. We do, however, design
proprietary products used by our national account customers in large volume, and occasionally also
provide custom products for large, specified projects. Our concentration is on our high-volume,
standard product lines that meet our customers needs. By focusing our product offerings, we
achieve significant manufacturing and cost efficiencies.
Our lighting fixtures, poles and brackets are produced in a variety of designs, styles and
finishes. Important functional variations include types of mounting, such as pole, bracket and
surface, and the nature of the light requirement, such as down-lighting, wall-wash lighting, canopy
lighting, flood-lighting, area lighting and security lighting. Our engineering staff performs
photometric analyses, wind load safety studies for all light fixtures and also designs our fixtures
and lighting systems. Our lighting products utilize a wide variety of different light sources,
including high-intensity discharge metal-halide, fluorescent, and solid-state LED. The major
products and services offered within our lighting segment include: exterior area lighting,
interior lighting, canopy lighting, landscape lighting, LED lighting, light poles, lighting
analysis and photometric layouts. All of our products are designed for performance, reliability,
ease of installation and service, as well as attractive appearance. The Company also has a focus
on designing lighting system solutions and implementing strategies related to energy savings in
substantially all markets served.
We offer our customers expertise in developing and utilizing high-performance LED color and
white lightsource solutions for our Lighting, Graphics and Technology applications, which, when
combined with the Companys lighting fixture expertise and technology has the potential to result
in a broad spectrum of white light LED fixtures that offer equivalent or improved lighting
performance with significant energy and maintenance savings as compared to the present metal halide
and fluorescent lighting fixtures.
The $23.2 million or 12.6% decrease in Lighting Segment net sales in fiscal 2009 is primarily
the result of a $13.3 million or 17% net decrease in lighting sales to our niche markets (petroleum
/ convenience stores, automotive dealerships, and quick service restaurants) and national retail
accounts, and a $9.9 million or 9.2% decrease in commissioned net sales to the commercial /
industrial lighting market.
The $8.0 million or 4.2% decrease in Lighting Segment net sales in fiscal 2008 is primarily
the net result of a $10.0 million or 10.3% increase in commissioned net sales to the commercial and
industrial lighting market, offset by a $17.9 million or 18.9% decrease in lighting sales to our
niche markets of petroleum / convenience stores, automotive dealerships, and retail national
accounts (one large national retailer represented approximately $14.9 million of this reduction as
their new store construction program slowed and the Company has transitioned from primarily
interior lighting to primarily exterior lighting under a new contract).
- 2 -
Graphics Segment
The Graphics Segment manufactures and sells exterior and interior visual image elements
related to graphics. These products are used in graphics displays and visual image programs in
several markets, including the petroleum/convenience store market and multi-site retail operations.
Our extensive lighting and graphics expertise, product offering, visual image solution
implementation capabilities and other professional services represent significant competitive
advantages. We work with corporations and design firms to establish and implement cost effective
corporate visual image programs. Increasingly, we have become the primary supplier of exterior and
interior graphics for our customers. We also offer installation or installation management
(utilizing pre-qualified independent subcontractors throughout the United States) services for
those customers who desire that we become involved in the installation of interior or exterior
graphics products.
Our business can be significantly impacted by participation in a customers image conversion
program, especially if it were to involve a roll out of that new image to a significant number
of that customers and its franchisees retail sites. The impact to our business can be very
positive with growth in net sales and profitability when we are engaged in an image conversion
program. This can be followed in subsequent periods by lesser amounts of business or negative
comparisons following completion of an image conversion program, unless we are successful in
replacing that completed business with participation in a new image conversion program of similar
size with one or more customers. An image conversion program can potentially involve any or all of
the following improvements, changes or refurbishments at a customers retail site: interior or
exterior lighting (see discussion above about our lighting segment), interior or exterior store
signage and graphics, and installation of these products in both the prototype and roll out phases
of their program. We believe our retail customers are implementing image conversions on a more
frequent basis than in the past, approximately every five to seven years versus ten to fifteen
years in the past, in order to maintain a safe, fresh look or new image on their site in order to
continue to attract customers to their site, and maintain or grow their market share.
The major products and services offered within our Graphics Segment include the following:
signage and canopy graphics, pump dispenser graphics, building fascia graphics, decals, interior
signage and marketing graphics, aisle markers, wall mural graphics, fleet graphics, prototype
program graphics, installation services for graphics products and solid state LED video screens for
the sports and advertising markets.
The $24.5 million or 28.7% decrease in Graphics Segment net sales in fiscal 2009 is primarily
the result of completion of programs for certain graphics customers, including an image conversion
program for a national drug store retailer ($4.3 million decrease), two petroleum / convenience
store customers programs ($25.7 million decrease), reductions of net sales to ten other petroleum
/ convenience store customers ($7.0 million decrease) and changes in volume or completion of other
graphics programs. These decreases were partially offset by increased net sales to certain other
customers, including a reimaging program for a grocery customer ($8.9 million increase), and sales
of solid-state LED video screens for sports markets ($5.7 million increase).
The $22.5 million or 20.9% decrease in Graphics Segment net sales in fiscal 2008 is primarily
the result of completion of programs for certain graphics customers or reduction of net sales to
other graphics customers, including an image conversion program for a national drug store retailer
($16.6 million decrease), two petroleum / convenience store customers ($8.0 million decrease),
reduced sales to a telecommunications company ($2.2 million decrease) and changes in volume or
completion of other graphics programs. These decreases were partially offset by increased net
sales to certain other customers, including sales related to an image conversion program in the
petroleum / convenience store market ($6.1 million
increase).
- 3 -
Technology Segment
The Technology Segment was created on June 26, 2006 when the Company acquired substantially
all the net assets of SACO Technologies, Inc., which it renamed LSI Saco Technologies, at a total
purchase price of $45.1 million. The new subsidiary has continued to operate in Montreal, Canada
as a worldwide leader and pioneer in the design, production, and support of high-performance light
engines and large format video screens using LED (light emitting diode) technology. LSI Saco
Technologies offers its customers expertise in developing and utilizing high-performance LED color
and white lightsource solutions for both lighting and graphics applications. The Company acquired
SACO Technologies primarily in order to obtain LED technology and also to enter into the large
format video screen business for the sports and entertainment markets. This LED technology has
significant potential for the Companys Lighting Segment to be combined with the Companys existing
lighting fixture expertise and technology to develop a broad spectrum of white light LED fixtures
that offer equivalent or improved lighting performance with significant energy and maintenance
savings as compared to the present metal halide and fluorescent lighting fixtures. Additionally,
this LED technology is used in the Companys Graphics Segment to light, accent and provide color
lighting to graphics display and visual image programs of the Companys retail, quick service
restaurant and sports market customers.
Net sales of the Technology Segment were $4,576,000 and $9,136,000 in fiscal years 2009 and
2008, respectively. The decrease in fiscal 2009 relates primarily to decreased sales of
solid-state LED video screens for the sports and advertising markets ($3.0 million) and decreased
sales of specialty LED lighting ($2.1 million). Fiscal 2008 net sales of $9,136,000 decreased $8.0
million or 48% from the prior fiscal year primarily as a result of reduced sales of video screens
for the sports markets ($6.5 million) and billboard market ($2.0 million) and reduced specialty LED
lighting sales ($1.7 million), partially offset by increased net sales of LED video screens to the
entertainment market ($0.8 million) and advertising market ($1.2 million).
All Other Category
The All Other Category includes the results of all LSI operations that are not able to be
aggregated into one of the three reportable business segments. Operating results of LSI Marcole,
LSI Adapt, LSI Images as well as Corporate Administrative expenses are included in the All Other
Category. The major products and services offered by operations included in the All Other Category
include: electrical wire harnesses (for LSIs light fixtures and for the white goods or appliance
industry); exterior and interior menu board systems primarily for the quick service restaurant
market; and surveying, permitting and installation management services related to products of the
Graphics Segment.
Fiscal 2009 net sales of $7,983,000 decreased $19.2 million or 71% from the prior fiscal year
primarily as a net result of one menu board conversion program that was completed in fiscal 2008
($19.8 million decrease). Fiscal 2008 net sales of the All Other Category of $27,212,000 increased
$6.4 million or 30% from the prior year primarily as a net result of one menu board conversion
program that was completed in fiscal 2008 ($10.1 million increase), a $2.9 million decrease in
sales to a second menu board customer, and decreased net sales to electrical wire harness customers
($1.2 million decrease).
Goodwill Impairment
In fiscal 2009, we recorded a $14,467,000 non-cash goodwill impairment charge. Charges
totaling $11,185,000 were recorded in the Lighting Segment, charges totaling $716,000 were recorded
in the Graphics Segment, and charges in the amount of $2,566,000 were recorded in the All Other
Category. Impairment tests conducted in three of the four fiscal quarters indicated there were
full or partial impairments of goodwill in one of our reporting units in our Lighting Segment, one
reporting unit
in the Graphics Segment and one reporting unit in our All Other Category due to the combination of
a decline in the market capitalization of the Company at certain quarter-end balance sheet dates
and a decline in the estimated forecasted discounted cash flows which management attributes to a
weaker economic cycle impacting certain of our customers, notably national retailers.
- 4 -
Our Competitive Strengths
Single Source Comprehensive Visual Image Solution Provider. We believe that we are the only
company serving our target markets that combines significant graphics capabilities, lighting
products and installation implementation capabilities to create comprehensive image solutions. We
believe that our position as a single-source provider creates a competitive advantage over
competitors who can only address either the lighting or the graphics component of a customers
corporate visual image program. Using our broad visual image solutions capabilities, our customers
can maintain complete control over the creation of their visual image programs while avoiding the
added complexity of coordinating separate lighting and graphics suppliers and service providers
among multiple suppliers. We can use high technology software to produce computer-generated
virtual prototypes of a customers new or improved retail site image. We believe that these
capabilities are unique to our target markets and they allow our customers to make educated,
cost-effective decisions quickly.
Proven Ability to Penetrate Target Markets. We have grown our business by establishing a
leadership position in the majority, as defined by our revenues, of our target markets, including
petroleum/convenience stores, automobile dealerships and specialty retailers. Although our
relationship with our customers may begin with the need for a single product or service, we
leverage our broad product and service offering to identify additional products and solutions. We
combine existing graphics, lighting and image element offerings, develop products and add services
to create comprehensive solutions for our customers.
Product Development Focus. We believe that our ability to successfully identify and develop
new products has allowed us to expand our market opportunity and enhance our market position. Our
product development initiatives are designed to increase the value of our product offering by
addressing the needs of our customers and target markets through innovative retrofit enhancements
to existing products or the development of new products. In addition, we believe our product
development process creates value for our customers by producing products that offer energy efficiency, low
maintenance requirements and long-term operating performance at a competitive price based upon the
latest technologies available.
Strong Relationships with our Customers. We have used our innovative products and
high-quality services to develop close, long-standing relationships with a large number of our
customers. Many of our customers are recognized among the leaders in their respective markets;
including customers such as BP, Chrysler, CVS Caremark and Burger King. Their use of our products
and services raises the visibility of our capabilities and facilitates the acceptance of our
products and services in their markets. Within each of these markets, our ability to be a single
source provider of image solutions often creates repeat business opportunities through corporate
reimaging programs. We have served some of our customers since our inception in 1976.
Well-capitalized Balance Sheet. As part of our long-term operating strategy, we believe the
Company maintains a conservative capital structure. With a strong equity base, we are able to
preserve operating flexibility in times of industry expansion and contraction. In the current
business environment, a strong balance sheet demonstrates financial viability to our existing and
targeted customers. In addition, a strong balance sheet enables us to continue important R&D and
capital spending.
- 5 -
Aggressive Use of Our Image Center Capabilities. Our image center capabilities provide us
with a distinct competitive advantage to demonstrate the effectiveness of integrating graphics and
lighting into a complete corporate visual image program. Our technologically advanced image
centers, which demonstrate the depth and breadth of our product and service offerings, have become
an effective component of our sales process.
Maintain our Vertically Integrated Business Model. We consider our company to be a vertically
integrated manufacturer rather than a product assembler. We focus on developing unique
customer-oriented products, solutions and technology, and outsource certain non-core processes and
product components as necessary.
Sales, Marketing and Customers
Our lighting products are sold primarily throughout the United States, but also in Canada,
Australia and Latin America (about 3% of total net sales are outside the United States) using a
combination of regional sales managers, independent sales representatives and distributors.
Although in some cases we sell directly to national firms, more frequently we are designated as a
preferred vendor for product sales to customer-owned as well as franchised, licensed and dealer
operations. Our graphics products, which are program-driven, technology products, and products and
services sold by company operations in the All Other Category are sold primarily through our own
sales force. Our marketing approach and means of distribution vary by product line and by type of
market.
Sales are developed by contacts with national retail marketers, branded product companies,
franchise and dealer operations. In addition, sales are also achieved through recommendations from
local architects, engineers, petroleum and electrical distributors and contractors. Our sales are
partially seasonal as installation of outdoor lighting and graphic systems in the northern states
decreases during the winter months.
Our image center capabilities are an important part of our sales process. The image center,
unique within the lighting and graphics industry, is a facility that can produce a
computer-generated virtual prototype of a customers facility on a large screen through the
combination of high technology software and audio/visual presentation. With these capabilities,
our customers can instantly explore a wide variety of lighting and graphics alternatives to develop
consistent day and nighttime images. Our image centers give our customers more options, greater
control, and more effective time utilization in the development of lighting, graphics and visual
image solutions, all with much less expense than traditional prototyping. In addition to being
cost and time effective for our customers, we believe that our image center capabilities result in
the best solution for our customers needs.
The image centers also contain comprehensive indoor and outdoor product display areas that
allow our customers to see many of our products and services in one setting. This aids our
customers in making quick and effective lighting and graphic design decisions through hands-on
product demonstrations and side-by-side comparisons. More importantly, our image center
capabilities allow us to expand our customers interest from just a single product into other
products and solutions. We believe that our image center capabilities have further enhanced our
position as a highly qualified outsourcing partner capable of guiding a customer through image
alternatives utilizing our lighting and graphics products and services. We believe this capability
distinguishes us from our competitors and will become increasingly beneficial in attracting
additional customers.
Manufacturing and Operations
We design, engineer and manufacture substantially all of our lighting and graphics products
through a vertically integrated business model. By emphasizing high-volume production of standard
product lines, we achieve significant manufacturing efficiencies. When appropriate, we utilize
alliances with vendors to outsource certain products and assemblies. LED products and related
software are engineered, designed and final-assembled by the Company, while much of the
manufacturing has been performed by select qualified vendors. In fiscal 2007, we made all
necessary preparations to begin
manufacturing within the Company certain components for certain LED video screens and
products. We are not dependent on any one supplier for any of our component parts.
- 6 -
The principal raw materials and purchased components used in the manufacturing of our products
are steel, aluminum, wire, sockets, lamps, certain fixture housings, acrylic and glass lenses,
lighting ballasts, inks, various graphics substrates such as decal material and vinyls, LEDs and
electrical components. We source these materials and components from a variety of suppliers.
Although an interruption of these supplies and components could disrupt our operations, we believe
generally that alternative sources of supply exist and could be readily arranged. We strive to
reduce price volatility in our purchases of raw materials and components through quarterly or
annual contracts with certain of our suppliers. Our lighting operations generally carry relatively
small amounts of finished goods inventory, except for certain products that are stocked to meet
quick delivery requirements. Most often, lighting products are made to order and shipped shortly
after they are manufactured. Our graphics operations manufacture custom graphics products for
customers who frequently require us to stock certain amounts of finished goods in exchange for
their commitment to that inventory. Our technology operation carries LED and LED component
inventory due to longer lead times, and makes products to order and ships shortly after assembly is
complete. In some Graphics programs, customers also give us a cash advance for the inventory that
we stock for them. Customers purchasing LED video screens routinely give us cash advances for
large projects prior to shipment.
We believe we are a low-cost producer for our types of products, and as such, are in a
position to promote our product lines with substantial marketing and sales activities.
Our manufacturing operations are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory
requirements relating to environmental protection and occupational health and safety. We do not
expect to incur material capital expenditures with regard to these matters and believe our
facilities are in compliance with such regulations.
Competition
We experience strong competition in all segments of our business, and in all markets served by
our product lines. Although we have many competitors, some of which have greater financial and
other resources, we do not compete with the same companies across our entire product and service
offerings. We believe product quality and performance, price, customer service, prompt delivery,
and reputation to be important competitive factors.
We have several product and process patents which have been obtained in the normal course of
business. In general, we do not believe that patent protection is critical to our business,
however we do believe that patent protection is important for a few select products.
Additional Information
Our sales are partially seasonal as installation of outdoor lighting and graphic systems in
the northern states lessens during the harshest winter months. We had a backlog of orders, which
we believe to be firm, of $40.5 million and $29.8 million at June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
All orders are believed to be shippable within twelve months. The increase as of June 30, 2009
relates primarily to a $22 million project with a petroleum / convenience store customer to install
retrofit solid-state LED lighting at over 1,100 of its sites in North America.
We have approximately 1,160 full-time and 80 temporary employees as of June 30, 2009. We
offer a comprehensive compensation and benefit program to most employees, including competitive
wages, a discretionary bonus plan, a profit-sharing plan and retirement plan, and a 401(k) savings
plan (for U.S. employees), a non-qualified deferred compensation plan (for certain employees), an
equity compensation plan, and medical and dental insurance.
- 7 -
We file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and
8-K. You may read and copy any materials filed with the SEC at its public reference room at 100 F.
Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may also obtain that information by calling
the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and
information statements and other information regarding us. The address of that site is
http://www.sec.gov. Our internet address is http://www.lsi-industries.com. We
make available free of charge through our internet web site our annual report on Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on Form
10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports
filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as
reasonably practical after we electronically file them with the SEC. LSI is not including the
other information contained on its website as part of or incorporating it by reference into this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
LSI Industries Inc. is an Ohio corporation, incorporated in 1976.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the following factors which could materially affect our business, financial condition, cash flows
or future results. Any one of these factors could cause the Companys actual results to vary
materially from recent results or from anticipated future results. The risks described below are
not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us
or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition and/or operating results.
The markets in which we operate are subject to competitive pressures that could affect selling
prices, and therefore could adversely affect our operating results.
Our businesses operate in markets that are highly competitive, and we compete on the basis of
price, quality, service and/or brand name across the industries and markets served. Some of our
competitors for certain products, primarily in the Lighting Segment, have greater sales, assets and
financial resources than we have. Some of our competitors are based in foreign countries and have
cost structures and prices in foreign currencies. Accordingly, currency fluctuations could cause
our U.S. dollar-priced products to be less competitive than our competitors products which are
priced in other currencies. Competitive pressures could affect prices we charge our customers or
demand for our products, which could adversely affect our operating results. Additionally,
customers for our products are attempting to reduce the number of vendors from which they purchase
in order to reduce the size and diversity of their inventories and their transaction costs. To
remain competitive, we will need to invest continuously in manufacturing, marketing, customer
service and support, and our distribution networks. We may not have sufficient resources to
continue to make such investments and we may be unable to maintain our competitive position.
Lower levels of economic activity in our end markets could adversely affect our operating
results.
Our businesses operate in several market segments including commercial, industrial, retail,
petroleum / convenience store and entertainment. Operating results can be negatively impacted by
volatility in these markets. Future downturns in any of the markets we serve could adversely
affect our overall sales and profitability.
- 8 -
Our operating results may be adversely affected by unfavorable economic and market
conditions.
Economic conditions worldwide have from time to time contributed to slowdowns in our industry
at large, as well as to the specific segments and markets in which we operate. When combined with
ongoing customer consolidation activity and periodic manufacturing and inventory initiatives, the
current uncertain macro-economic climate, including but not limited to the effects of weakness in
credit markets, could lead to reduced demand from our customers and increased price competition for
our products, increased risk of excess and obsolete inventories and higher overhead costs as a
percentage of revenue. If the markets in which we participate experience further economic
downturns, as well as a slow recovery period, this could negatively impact our sales and revenue
generation, margins and operating expenses, and consequently have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Price increases or significant shortages of raw materials and components could adversely affect
our operating margin.
The Company purchases large quantities of raw materials and components mainly steel,
aluminum, ballasts, sockets, wire, plastic, lenses, glass, vinyls, inks, LEDs, and corrugated
cartons. Materials comprise the largest component of costs, representing nearly 62% and 60% of the
cost of sales in 2009 and 2008, respectively. While we have multiple sources of supply for each of
our major requirements, significant shortages could disrupt the supply of raw materials. Further
increases in the price of these raw materials and components could further increase the Companys
operating costs and materially adversely affect margins. Although the Company attempts to pass
along increased costs in the form of price increases to customers, the Company may be unsuccessful
in doing so for competitive reasons. Even when price increases are successful, the timing of such
price increases may lag significantly behind the incurrence of higher costs.
We have a concentration of net sales to the petroleum / convenience store market, and any
substantial change could have an adverse affect on our business.
Approximately 23% of our net sales in fiscal year 2009 are concentrated in the petroleum /
convenience store market. Sales to this market segment are dependent upon the general conditions
prevailing in and the profitability of the petroleum and convenience store industries and general
market conditions. Our petroleum market business is subject to reactions by the petroleum industry
to world political events, particularly those in the Middle East, and to the price and supply of
oil. Major disruptions in the petroleum industry generally result in a curtailment of retail
marketing efforts, including expansion and refurbishing of retail outlets, by the petroleum
industry and adversely affect our business. Any substantial change in purchasing decisions by one
or more of our largest customers, whether due to actions by our competitors, customer financial
constraints, industry factors or otherwise, could have an adverse effect on our business.
Difficulties with integrating acquisitions could adversely affect operating costs and expected
benefits from those acquisitions.
We have pursued and will continue to seek potential acquisitions to complement and expand our
existing businesses, increase our revenues and profitability, and expand our markets through
acquisitions. We cannot be certain that we will be able to identify, acquire or profitably manage
additional companies or successfully integrate such additional companies without substantial costs,
delays or other problems. Also, companies acquired recently and in the future may not achieve
revenues, profitability or cash flows that justify our investment in them. We expect to spend
significant time and effort in expanding our existing businesses and identifying, completing and
integrating acquisitions. We expect to face competition for acquisition candidates which may limit
the number of acquisition opportunities available to us, possibly leading to a decrease in the rate
of growth of our revenues and profitability, and may result in higher acquisition prices. The
success of these acquisitions we do make will depend on our ability to integrate these businesses
into our operations. We may encounter difficulties in integrating acquisitions into our operations
and in managing strategic investments. Therefore, we may not realize the degree or timing of the
benefits anticipated when we first enter into a transaction.
- 9 -
If acquisitions are made in the future and goodwill and intangible assets are recorded on the
balance sheet, circumstances could arise in which the goodwill and intangible assets could become
impaired and therefore would be written off.
We have pursued and will continue to seek potential acquisitions to complement and expand our
existing businesses, increase our revenues and profitability, and expand our markets through
acquisitions. As a result of acquisitions, we have significant goodwill and intangible assets
recorded on our balance sheet. We will continue to evaluate the recoverability of the carrying
amount of our goodwill and intangible assets on an ongoing basis, and we may incur substantial
non-cash impairment charges, which would adversely affect our financial results. There can be no
assurance that the outcome of such reviews in the future will not result in substantial impairment
charges. Impairment assessment inherently involves judgment as to assumptions about expected
future cash flows and the impact of market conditions on those assumptions. Future events and
changing market conditions may impact our assumptions as to prices, costs, holding periods or other
factors that may result in changes in our estimates of future cash flows. Although we believe the
assumptions we used in testing for impairment are reasonable, significant changes in any one of our
assumptions could produce a significantly different result. If there were to be a decline in our
market capitalization and a decline in estimated forecasted discounted cash flows, there could be
an impairment of the goodwill and intangible assets. A non-cash impairment charge could be
material to the net income of the reporting period in which it is recorded.
If customers do not accept new products, we could experience a loss of competitive position
which could adversely affect future revenues.
The Company is committed to product innovation on a timely basis to meet customer demands.
Development of new products for targeted markets requires the Company to develop or otherwise
leverage leading technologies in a cost-effective and timely manner. Failure to meet these
changing demands could result in a loss of competitive position and seriously impact future
revenues. Products or technologies developed by others may render the Companys products or
technologies obsolete or noncompetitive. A fundamental shift in technologies in key product
markets could have a material adverse effect on the Companys operating results and competitive
position within the industry. More specifically, the development of new or enhanced products is a
complex and uncertain process requiring the anticipation of technological and market trends. We may
experience design, manufacturing, marketing or other difficulties, such as an inability to attract
a sufficient number of experienced engineers, that could delay or prevent our development,
introduction or marketing of new products or enhancements and result in unexpected expenses. Such
difficulties could cause us to lose business from our customers and could adversely affect our
competitive position. In addition, added expenses could decrease the profitability associated with
those products that do not gain market acceptance.
Our business is cyclical and seasonal, and in downward economic cycles our operating profits
and cash flows could be adversely affected.
Historically, sales of our products have been subject to cyclical variations caused by changes
in general economic conditions. Our revenues in our third quarter ending March 31 are also
affected by the impact of weather on construction and installation programs and the annual budget
cycles of major customers. The demand for our products reflects the capital investment decisions
of our customers, which depend upon the general economic conditions of the markets that our
customers serve, including, particularly, the petroleum and convenience store industries. During
periods of expansion in construction and industrial activity, we generally have benefited from
increased demand for our products. Conversely, downward economic cycles in these industries result
in reductions in sales and pricing of our products, which may reduce our profits and cash flow.
During economic downturns, customers also tend to delay
purchases of new products. The cyclical and seasonal nature of our business could at times
adversely affect our liquidity and financial results.
- 10 -
A loss of key personnel or inability to attract qualified personnel could have an adverse
affect on our operating results.
The Companys future success depends on the ability to attract and retain highly skilled
technical, managerial, marketing and finance personnel, and, to a significant extent, upon the
efforts and abilities of senior management. The Companys management philosophy of cost-control
results in a very lean workforce. Future success of the Company will depend on, among other
factors, the ability to attract and retain other qualified personnel, particularly management,
research and development engineers and technical sales professionals. The loss of the services of
any key employees or the failure to attract or retain other qualified personnel could have a
material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations.
The costs of litigation and compliance with environmental regulations, if significantly
increased, could have an adverse affect on our operating profits.
We are, and may in the future be, a party to any number of legal proceedings and claims,
including those involving patent litigation, product liability, employment matters, and
environmental matters, which could be significant. Given the inherent uncertainty of litigation,
we can offer no assurance that existing litigation or a future adverse development will not have a
material adverse impact. We are also subject to various laws and regulations relating to
environmental protection and the discharge of materials into the environment, and it could
potentially be possible we could incur substantial costs as a result of the noncompliance with or
liability for clean up or other costs or damages under environmental laws.
Uncertainties inherent in certain tax and accounting matters could adversely affect our
operating results.
The discussion of goodwill impairment and tax matters in Notes 6, 8 and 12 to our consolidated
financial statements beginning on page F-35 is incorporated by reference.
|
|
|
ITEM 1B. |
|
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
None.
- 11 -
The Company has fourteen facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Size |
|
Location |
|
Status |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1)
|
|
LSI Industries Corporate
Headquarters, and
lighting fixture and
graphics manufacturing
|
|
243,000 sq. ft.,
(includes 66,000
sq. ft. of office
space)
|
|
Cincinnati, OH
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2)
|
|
LSI Industries pole
manufacturing and dry
powder-coat painting
|
|
122,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Cincinnati, OH
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3)
|
|
LSI Metal Fabrication
and LSI Images manufacturing and dry
powder-coat painting
|
|
98,000 sq. ft.
(includes 5,000
sq. ft. of office
space)
|
|
Independence, KY
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4)
|
|
LSI Integrated Graphics
office; screen printing
manufacturing; and
architectural graphics
manufacturing
|
|
198,000 sq. ft.
(includes 34,000 sq.
ft. of office space)
|
|
Houston, TX
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5)
|
|
Greenlee Lighting office
and manufacturing
|
|
40,000 sq. ft.
(includes 4,000 sq. ft.
of office space)
|
|
Dallas, TX
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6)
|
|
Grady McCauley office
and manufacturing
|
|
210,000 sq. ft.
(includes 20,000
sq. ft. of office space)
|
|
North Canton, OH
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7)
|
|
LSI Marcole office and
manufacturing of electrical
wire harnesses; contract
assembly services
|
|
61,000 sq. ft.
(includes 5,000 sq. ft.
of office space)
|
|
Manchester, TN
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8)
|
|
LSI MidWest Lighting
office and manufacturing
|
|
163,000 sq. ft.
(includes 6,000 sq. ft.
of office space and
27,000 sq. ft. of leased
warehouse space)
|
|
Kansas City, KS
|
|
Owned and
Leased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9)
|
|
LSI Retail Graphics office
and manufacturing
|
|
57,000 sq. ft.
(includes 11,000 sq. ft.
of office space)
|
|
Woonsocket, RI
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10)
|
|
LSI Lightron office
and manufacturing
|
|
170,000 sq. ft. (includes
10,000 sq. ft. of office
space)
|
|
New Windsor, NY
|
|
Owned and
Leased (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11)
|
|
LSI West Coast
Distribution Center
|
|
24,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Fontana, CA
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12)
|
|
LSI Adapt offices
|
|
2,000 sq. ft.
|
|
North Canton, OH
Charlotte, NC
|
|
Owned
Leased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13)
|
|
LSI Saco Technologies
office and manufacturing
|
|
32,000 sq. ft. (includes
9,000 sq. ft. of office
space)
|
|
Montreal, Canada
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14)
|
|
LSI ADL Technology office
and manufacturing
|
|
57,000 sq. ft. (includes
11,000 sq. ft. of office
space)
|
|
Hilliard, OH
|
|
Owned (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The land at this facility is leased and the building is owned. |
|
(b) |
|
This subsidiary and facility were acquired July 22, 2009. |
The Company considers these facilities (total of 1,477,000 square feet) adequate for its
current level of operations.
- 12 -
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
Nothing to report.
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
None in the fourth quarter.
PART II
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
(a) |
|
Common share information appears in Note 17 SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED) under
Range of share prices beginning on page F-45 of this Form 10-K. Information related to
Earnings (loss) per share and Cash dividends paid per share appears in SELECTED FINANCIAL
DATA on page F-47 of this Form 10-K. LSIs shares of common stock are traded on the NASDAQ
Global Select Market under the symbol LYTS. |
|
|
|
The Companys policy with respect to dividends, as revised by the Board of Directors in
August 2007, is to pay a quarterly cash dividend representing a payout ratio of between
50% and 70% of the then current fiscal year net income forecast. Accordingly, the
Board of Directors established a new indicated annual cash dividend rate of $0.20 per
share beginning with the first quarter of fiscal 2009 consistent with the above
dividend policy. In addition to the four quarterly dividend payments, the Company may
declare a special year-end cash and/or stock dividend. The Company has paid annual
cash dividends beginning in fiscal 1987 through fiscal 1994, and quarterly cash
dividends since fiscal 1995. |
|
|
|
At August 18, 2009, there were 427 shareholders of record. The Company believes this
represents approximately 3,000 beneficial shareholders. |
(b) |
|
The Company does not purchase into treasury its own common shares for general purposes.
However, the Company does purchase its own common shares, through a Rabbi Trust, as
investments of employee/participants of the LSI Industries Inc. Non-Qualified Deferred
Compensation Plan. Purchases of Company common shares for this Plan in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2009 were as follows: |
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total Number of |
|
|
(or Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
(a) Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
Value) of Shares that |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
(b) Average |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
May Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced Plans or |
|
|
Under the Plans or |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
Programs |
|
4/1/09 to 4/30/09 |
|
|
806 |
|
|
$ |
5.85 |
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
5/1/09 to 5/31/09 |
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
$ |
4.67 |
|
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
6/1/09 to 6/30/09 |
|
|
902 |
|
|
$ |
4.61 |
|
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,717 |
|
|
$ |
5.00 |
|
|
|
2,717 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All acquisitions of shares reflected above have been made in connection with the Companys
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, which does not contemplate a limit on shares to be
acquired. |
- 13 -
The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return on the Companys Common Shares
during the five fiscal years ended June 30, 2009 with a cumulative total return on the NASDAQ Stock
Market Index (U.S. companies) and the Dow Jones Electrical Equipment Index. The comparison assumes
$100 was invested June 30, 2004 in the Companys Common Shares and in each of the indexes
presented; it also assumes reinvestment of dividends.
The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of
future stock price performance.
|
|
|
ITEM 6. |
|
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
Selected Financial Data begins on page F-47 of this Form 10-K.
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations appears on pages
F-1 through F-15 of this Form 10-K.
- 14 -
|
|
|
ITEM 7A. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in variable interest rates, changes in
prices of raw materials and component parts, and changes in foreign currency translation rates.
Each of these risks is discussed below.
Interest Rate Risk
The Company earns interest income on its cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments
and pays interest expense on its debt. Because of variable interest rates, the Company is exposed
to risk of interest rate fluctuations, which impact interest income, interest expense, and cash
flows. With the significant increase in the Companys short-term cash investments and fourth
quarter fiscal 2007 pay down of all variable rate debt, the adverse exposure to interest rate
fluctuations has decreased considerably.
All of the Companys $45,000,000 available lines of credit are subject to interest rate
fluctuations, should the Company borrow on these lines of credit. Additionally, the Company
expects to generate cash from its operations that will subsequently be used to pay down as much of
the debt (if any is outstanding) as possible or invest cash in short-term investments (if no debt
is outstanding), while still funding the growth of the Company.
Raw Material Price Risk
The Company purchases large quantities of raw materials and components mainly steel,
aluminum, ballasts, sockets, wire, plastic, lenses, glass, vinyls, inks, LEDs and corrugated
cartons. The Companys operating results could be affected by the availability and price
fluctuations of these materials. The Company uses multiple suppliers, has alternate suppliers for
most materials, and has no significant dependence on any single supplier. No significant supply
problems have been encountered in recent years. Price risk for these materials is related to
increases in commodity items that affect all users of the materials, including the Companys
competitors. For the year ended June 30, 2009, the raw material component of cost of goods sold
subject to price risk was approximately $112 million. The Company does not actively hedge or use
derivative instruments to manage its risk in this area. The Company does, however, seek new
vendors, negotiate with existing vendors, and at times commit to minimum volume levels to mitigate
price increases. The Company negotiates supply agreements with certain vendors to lock in prices
over a negotiated period of time. In response to the rising material prices, the Companys
Lighting Segment announced price increases ranging from 3% to 6%, depending on the product,
effective with August 2006 orders. Because of continued raw material cost increases, the Company
announced additional selected price increases ranging from 5% to 12% effective with August 2008
orders. The Companys Graphics Segments generally establishes new sales prices, reflective of the
then current raw material prices, for each custom graphics program as it begins.
Foreign Currency Translation Risk
As a result of the Companys June 2006 acquisition of SACO Technologies, Inc. (headquartered
in Montreal, Canada), the Company became exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates
in the operation of its Canadian business. However, a substantial amount of SACOs business is
conducted in U.S. dollars, therefore, any potential risk is deemed immaterial.
- 15 -
|
|
|
ITEM 8. |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Begins |
|
Index to Financial Statements |
|
on Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Statement Schedules: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-46 |
|
Schedules other than those listed above are omitted for the reason(s) that they are either
not applicable or not required or because the information required is contained in the
financial statements or notes thereto. Selected quarterly financial data is found in NOTE 17 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
ITEM 9. |
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (the Exchange Act)) that are
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Companys reports under the
Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in
the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management,
including the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company periodically reviews the design
and effectiveness of its disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting. The
Company makes modifications to improve the design and effectiveness of its disclosure controls and
internal control structure, and may take other corrective action, if its reviews identify a need
for such modifications or actions. The Companys disclosure controls and procedures are designed
to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives.
As of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K, an evaluation was completed under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, regarding the design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures. Based on this evaluation, our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective
as of June 30, 2009.
- 16 -
Changes in Internal Control
As described in our Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, the Company concluded that
it had a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to the
identification of reporting units under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142,
Goodwill and Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142). The Company has remediated this material weakness
by the implementation of new procedures with respect to how the goodwill impairment tests are
conducted. Management reanalyzed the technical application of SFAS No. 142 and redefined its
reporting units for goodwill impairment testing. The goodwill impairment tests are now performed
at the operating segment level, which is the lowest level discrete financial information available
and regularly reviewed by management. These additional procedures have been designed to ensure
that all technical aspects of SFAS No. 142 are properly considered and applied.
Other than as described above, there were no changes in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the
fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting. See Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting on page F-16.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
On
September 8, 2009, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
notified Deloitte & Touche LLP that they would be dismissed
as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm
upon filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. On that same
date, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors notified Grant
Thornton LLP that they would be engaged as the Companys
independent registered public accounting firm upon filing of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
PART III
ITEMS 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III are incorporated by reference to the LSI Industries Inc.
Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held November 19, 2009, as filed with
the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
The description of equity compensation plans required by Regulation S-K, Item 201(d) is
incorporated by reference to the LSI Industries Inc. Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting
of Shareholders to be held November 19, 2009, as filed with the Commission pursuant to
Regulation 14A.
- 17 -
The following table presents information about the Companys equity compensation plans (LSI
Industries Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan, the LSI Industries Inc. 1995 Directors Stock Option Plan
and the 2003 Equity Compensation Plan) as of June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining available |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
for future issuance |
|
|
|
Number of securities to |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
under equity |
|
|
|
be issued upon |
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
compensation plans |
|
|
|
exercise of outstanding |
|
|
exercise price of |
|
|
(excluding securities |
|
|
|
options, warrants and |
|
|
outstanding options, |
|
|
reflected in column |
|
Plan category |
|
rights |
|
|
warrants and rights |
|
|
(a)) |
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
|
|
1,537,212 |
|
|
$ |
13.07 |
|
|
|
897,683 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,537,212 |
|
|
$ |
13.07 |
|
|
|
897,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) |
|
The following documents are filed as part of this report: |
|
(1) |
|
Consolidated Financial Statements Appear as part of Item 8 of this Form 10-K. |
|
(2) |
|
Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules Appear as part of Item 8 of this Form 10-K. |
|
(3) |
|
Exhibits Exhibits set forth below are either on file
with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and are incorporated by reference as exhibits
hereto,
or are filed with this Form 10-K. |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of June 26, 2006 among LSI
Industries Inc. (LSI or the Registrant), Jalbout Holdings
Inc., 3970957 Canada, Inc., Saco Technologies Inc., 4349466
Canada Inc., Fred Jalbout and Bassam Jalbout filed as Exhibit
2.1 to LSIs Form 8-K filed
June 29, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of July 22, 2009 among
LSI Industries Inc., LSI Acquisition Inc., ADL Technology
Inc., ADL Engineering Inc., and Craig A. Miller, Kevin A.
Kelly and David T. Feeney filed as Exhibit 2.1 to LSIs Form
8-K filed July 24, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of LSI filed as Exhibit 3.1 to LSIs
Form S-3 Registration Statement File No. 33-65043. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Code of Regulations of LSI filed as
Exhibit 3 to LSIs Form 8-K filed January 22, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
Amendment to Code of Regulations of LSI filed as Exhibit 3 to
LSIs Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2004. |
- 18 -
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Credit Agreement by and among LSI as the Borrower, the banks party
thereto as the lenders thereunder, PNC Bank National Association as
the Administrative Agent and the Syndication Agent, Dated as of
March 30, 2001 filed as Exhibit 4 to LSIs Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2001. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Amendment to Credit Agreement (Dated June 26, 2006) filed as
Exhibit 10.5 to LSIs Form 8-K filed June 29, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
Amendment No. 6 to Credit Agreement dated January 12, 2007 among
the Registrant, PNC Bank, National Association, in its capacity as
Lender and The Fifth Third Bank filed as Exhibit 10.1 to LSIs Form
8-K filed January 17, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
Amended and Restated 364 Day Notes executed by Registrant in favor
of PNC Bank, National Association and Fifth Third Bank dated March
18, 2009 filed as Exhibit 10.2 to LSIs Form 8-K filed March 18,
2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
Loan Agreement dated January 12, 2007 among The Fifth Third Bank,
LSI Saco Technologies Inc. and LSI, as guarantor, filed as Exhibit
10.2 to LSIs Form 8-K filed January 17, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
Continuing and Unlimited Guaranty Agreement dated January 12, 2007
executed by the Registrant filed as Exhibit 10.3 to LSIs Form 8-K
filed January 17, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
Amendment to Credit Agreement (Dated March 18, 2009) filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to LSIs Form 8-K filed March 18, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
First Amendment to Loan Agreement and Guaranty dated as of June 8,
2007 among the Registrant, LSI Saco Technologies Inc., and Fifth
Third Bank filed as Exhibit 10.1 to LSIs
Form 8-K filed June 11,
2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
* |
|
LSI Industries Inc. Retirement Plan (Amended and Restated as of
February 1, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10 |
* |
|
Fourth Amendment to the LSI Industries Inc. Retirement Plan
(Amended and Restated as of February 1, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.11 |
* |
|
LSI Industries Inc. 1995 Directors Stock Option Plan (Amended as
of December 6, 2001) filed as Exhibit 10 to LSIs Form S-8
Registration Statement File No. 333-100038. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.12 |
* |
|
LSI Industries Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan (Amended as of December
6, 2001) filed as Exhibit 10 to LSIs Form S-8 Registration
Statement File No. 333-100039. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.13 |
* |
|
LSI Industries Inc. 2003 Equity Compensation Plan (Amended and
Restated through January 25,
2006) filed as Exhibit 10.2 to LSIs
Form 8-K filed January 5, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14 |
* |
|
Trust Agreement Establishing the Rabbi Trust Agreement by and
between LSI Industries Inc. and Prudential Bank & Trust, FSB filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to LSIs Form 8-K filed January 5, 2006. |
- 19 -
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.15 |
* |
|
LSI Industries Inc. Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (Amended
and Restated as of December 31, 2008) filed as Exhibit 10 to LSIs
Form 8-K filed October 23, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.16 |
* |
|
Amended Agreement dated January 25, 2005 with Robert J. Ready filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to LSIs Form 8-K filed January 27, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.17 |
* |
|
Amended Agreement dated January 25, 2005 with James P. Sferra filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to LSIs Form 8-K filed January 27, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.18 |
* |
|
LSI Industries Inc. 2006 Corporate Officer Incentive Compensation Plan
filed as Exhibit 10.1 to LSIs Form 8-K filed January 26, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.19 |
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of June 26, 2006 by and between
LSI Industries Inc. and Saco Technologies Inc. filed as Exhibit 10.2
to LSIs Form 8-K filed June 29, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.20 |
* |
|
Employment Agreement dated as of June 26, 2006 by and between 4349466
Canada Inc. and Fred Jalbout filed as Exhibit 10.3 to LSIs Form 8-K
filed June 29, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.21 |
|
|
Lease Agreement between 3970957 Canada, Inc. and 4349466 Canada Inc.
filed as Exhibit 10.4 to LSIs Form 8-K filed June 29, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.22 |
|
|
Escrow Agreement dated as of July 22, 2009 among LSI Acquisition Inc.,
Craig A. Miller, Kevin A. Kelly, David T. Feeney and U.S. Bank,
National Association filed as Exhibit 10.1 to LSIs Form 8-K filed
July 24, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.23 |
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of July 22, 2009 by and between
LSI Industries Inc. and Craig A. Miller, Kevin A. Kelly and David T.
Feeney filed as Exhibit 10.2 to LSIs Form 8-K filed July 24, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.24 |
|
|
Real Estate Purchase Agreement between Kelmilfeen Ltd. and LSI
Acquisition Inc. dated July 22, 2009 filed as Exhibit 10.3 to LSIs
Form 8-K filed July 24, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
Code of Ethics filed as Exhibit 14 to LSIs Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer |
|
|
|
* |
|
Management Compensatory Agreements. |
LSI will provide shareholders with any exhibit upon the payment of a specified reasonable fee,
which fee shall be limited to LSIs reasonable expenses in furnishing such exhibit.
- 20 -
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSI INDUSTRIES INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: September 11, 2009
|
|
BY:
|
|
/s/ Robert J. Ready
Robert J. Ready
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and President |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
|
|
/s/ Robert J. Ready
Robert J. Ready
|
|
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer,
and President |
Date: September 11, 2009
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
/s/ Ronald S. Stowell
Ronald S. Stowell
|
|
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer) |
Date: September 11, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Gary P. Kreider
Gary P. Kreider
|
|
Director |
Date: September 11, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Dennis B. Meyer
Dennis B. Meyer
|
|
Director |
Date: September 11, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Wilfred T. OGara
Wilfred T. OGara
|
|
Director |
Date: September 11, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark A. Serrianne
Mark A. Serrianne
|
|
Director |
Date: September 11, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James P. Sferra
James P. Sferra
|
|
Secretary; Executive Vice
President
Manufacturing; and Director |
Date: September 11, 2009 |
|
|
- 21 -
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Companys forward looking statements and disclosures as presented earlier in this Form
10-K in the Safe Harbor Statement should be referred to when reading Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Net Sales by Business Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Lighting Segment |
|
$ |
160,475 |
|
|
$ |
183,694 |
|
|
$ |
191,697 |
|
Graphics Segment |
|
|
60,765 |
|
|
|
85,244 |
|
|
|
107,764 |
|
Technology Segment |
|
|
4,576 |
|
|
|
9,136 |
|
|
|
17,132 |
|
All Other Category |
|
|
7,983 |
|
|
|
27,212 |
|
|
|
20,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
233,799 |
|
|
$ |
305,286 |
|
|
$ |
337,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) by Business Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Lighting Segment |
|
$ |
(3,911 |
) |
|
$ |
15,310 |
|
|
$ |
17,219 |
|
Graphics Segment |
|
|
2,646 |
|
|
|
(14,027 |
) |
|
|
19,012 |
|
Technology Segment |
|
|
(486 |
) |
|
|
(4,876 |
) |
|
|
480 |
|
All Other Category |
|
|
(12,660 |
) |
|
|
(7,377 |
) |
|
|
(4,161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(14,411 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,970 |
) |
|
$ |
32,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As fiscal 2009 progressed, the Company encountered a global economic recession with
unprecedented negative economic forces, including declining industrial production, rapidly
increasing unemployment, roller coaster commodity pricing, and record low confidence levels, as
well as issues such as malfunctioning credit markets which could affect many customers and a
decimated housing market that indirectly could affect the Companys business. Taken as a whole,
these factors have caused a substantial reduction in demand for our lighting and graphics
products. Virtually all of our markets have been adversely impacted and our business has suffered
as a result. During these difficult and uncertain economic conditions, we have taken a number of
proactive steps to right size LSI Industries to meet todays challenges. Such actions include
strict control of expenses, capital expenditure reductions, close management of accounts receivable
and inventories, headcount reductions, and maintaining a conservative financial position coupled
with positive free cash flow. We believe the economy will eventually improve. As we continue to
adjust our expense levels to lower production rates and manage working capital efficiently, we are
also strategically positioning the business for future growth and are very positive about the
longer term outlook and opportunities for the Company, notwithstanding the current economic
recession that will likely continue to impact results during the next several quarters. LSI is
facing a period of challenging business conditions in the near term due to the general economic
recession but expects to emerge a stronger and more efficient company as business conditions
improve.
The Companys total net sales of products and services related to solid-state LED technology
in light fixtures and video screens for sports, advertising and entertainment markets totaled $18.9
million in fiscal 2009, representing approximately a 150% increase from last years net sales of
$7.5 million. In addition, the Company sells certain elements of graphic identification programs
that contain solid-state LED light sources.
F-1
Results of Operations
2009 Compared to 2008
Lighting Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
160,475 |
|
|
$ |
183,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
(3,911 |
) |
|
$ |
15,310 |
|
Lighting Segment net sales of $160,475,000 in fiscal 2009 decreased 12.6% from fiscal 2008 net
sales of $183,694,000. The $23.2 million decrease in Lighting Segment net sales is primarily the
result of a $13.3 million or 17% net decrease in lighting sales to our niche markets (petroleum /
convenience stores, automotive dealerships, and quick service restaurants) and national retail
accounts, and a $9.9 million or 9.2% decrease in commissioned net sales to the commercial /
industrial lighting market. Sales of lighting to the petroleum / convenience store market
represented 19% and 16% of Lighting Segment net sales in fiscal years 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Net sales of lighting to this, the Companys largest niche market, were up 2.2% from last year to
$30,279,000. The petroleum / convenience store market has been, and will continue to be, a very
important niche market for the Company.
Gross profit of $36,403,000 in fiscal 2009 decreased $12.4 million or 25% from the same period
last year, and decreased from 25.9% to 21.9% as a percentage of Lighting Segment net sales
(customer plus intra-segment net sales). The decrease in amount of gross profit is due to
decreased Lighting net sales and margins, caused in part by higher manufacturing overhead costs as
a percentage of net sales due to the lower sales volume. The following items also influenced the
Lighting Segments gross profit margin: competitive pricing pressures; decreased direct labor as a
percentage of net sales; decreased indirect wage, compensation and benefits costs ($0.9 million
decrease); $0.5 million decreased supplies; $0.4 million decreased depreciation expense; $0.3
million decreased repairs and maintenance; $0.2 million decreased utilities; and $0.2 million
decreased property and real estate taxes.
Selling and administrative expenses of $29,129,000 in fiscal year 2009 decreased $3.2 million,
and increased to 18.2% as a percentage of Lighting Segment net sales from 17.6% in the same period
last year. Employee compensation and benefits expense increased $0.2 million in fiscal 2009 as
compared to last year, and other changes of expense between years include decreased sales
commission expense ($2.9 million), decreased advertising and literature expense ($0.2 million),
increased bad debt expense ($0.2 million), increased research and development expense ($0.7
million), decreased customer relations expense ($0.3 million) and increased outside services
expense ($0.1 million).
The Company recorded a full impairment of goodwill in one reporting unit in the Lighting
Segment in fiscal 2009, and accordingly recorded a non-cash expense in the amount of $11,185,000 as
compared to impairments totaling $1,097,000 of certain intangible assets last year. The
impairments in both years were related to a decline in the market value of the Companys stock as
well as a decline in the estimated forecasted discounted cash flows expected by the respective
reporting units.
The Lighting Segment fiscal 2009 operating loss of $(3,911,000) compares to operating income
of $15,310,000 last year. This decrease of $19.2 million was the result of decreased net sales and
decreased gross profit, and increased impairment charges, partially offset by decreased selling and
administrative expenses.
F-2
Graphics Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
60,765 |
|
|
$ |
85,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
2,646 |
|
|
$ |
(14,027 |
) |
Graphics Segment net sales of $60,765,000 in fiscal 2009 decreased 28.7% from fiscal 2008 net
sales of $85,244,000. The $24.5 million decrease in Graphics Segment net sales is primarily the
result of completion of programs for certain graphics customers, including an image conversion
program for a national drug store retailer ($4.3 million decrease), two petroleum / convenience
store customers programs ($25.7 million decrease), reductions of net sales to ten other petroleum
/ convenience store customers ($7.0 million decrease) and changes in volume or completion of other
graphics programs. These decreases were partially offset by increased net sales to certain other
customers, including a reimaging program for a grocery customer ($8.9 million increase), and sales
of solid-state LED video screens for sports markets ($5.7 million increase). Sales responsibility
related to solid-state LED video screens for sports markets was transferred in fiscal 2009 from the
Technology Segment to the Graphics Segment. Sales of graphics products and services to the
petroleum / convenience store market represented 40% and 65% of Graphics Segment net sales in
fiscal years 2009 and 2008, respectively. Net sales of graphics to this, the Companys largest
niche market, were down 56% from last year to $24,295,000. The petroleum / convenience store
market has been, and will continue to be, a very important niche market for the Company. Net sales
of products and services related to solid-state LED video screens totaled $5.7 million in fiscal
2009, with no such sales in the Graphics Segment last year.
Image and brand programs, whether full conversions or enhancements, are important to the
Companys strategic direction. Image programs include situations where our customers refurbish
their retail sites around the country by replacing some or all of the lighting, graphic elements,
menu board systems and possibly other items they may source from other suppliers. These image
programs often take several quarters to complete and involve both our customers corporate-owned
sites as well as their franchisee-owned sites, the latter of which involve separate sales efforts
by the Company with each franchisee. The Company may not always be able to replace net sales
immediately when a large image conversion program has concluded. Brand programs typically occur as
new products are offered or new departments are created within an existing retail store. Relative
to net sales to a customer before and after an image or brand program, net sales during the program
are typically significantly higher, depending upon how much business is awarded to the Company.
Sales related to a customers image or brand program are reported in either the Lighting Segment,
Graphics Segment, or the All Other Category depending upon the product and/or service provided.
Gross profit of $13,382,000 in fiscal 2009 decreased $8.1 million or 38% from last year, and
decreased from 24.7% to 21.5% as a percentage of Graphics Segment net sales (customer plus
intra-segment net sales). The decrease in amount of gross profit is due both to decreased Graphics
net sales and margins (both product and installation), increased material costs as a percentage of
Graphics Segment net sales, and under utilized manufacturing capacity. The following items also
influenced the Graphics Segments gross profit margin: competitive pricing pressures, decreased
direct labor reflective of less sales volume, and other manufacturing expenses in support of
production requirements ($1.3 million of decreased indirect wage, compensation and benefits costs;
$0.4 million decreased supplies and repairs and maintenance; $0.2 million decreased outside
services; and $0.2 million decreased depreciation and utilities).
F-3
Selling and administrative expenses of $10,020,000 in fiscal year 2009 decreased $1.8 million,
and increased to 16.5% as a percentage of Graphics Segment net sales from 13.8% in the same period
last year. Employee compensation and benefits expense decreased $0.8 million in fiscal 2009 as
compared to last year, and other changes of expense between years include decreased bad debt
expense ($0.2 million), decreased customer relations expense ($0.3 million), decreased outside
services expense ($0.2 million), decreased travel and entertainment ($0.1 million), decreased
research and development ($0.2 million) and decreased supplies expense ($0.1 million).
The Company recorded a full impairment of goodwill in one reporting unit in the Graphics
Segment in fiscal 2009, and accordingly recorded a non-cash expense in the amount of $716,000 as
compared to full or partial goodwill and intangible asset impairments
of $23,739,000 last year. The
impairments in both years were related to a decline in the market value of the Companys stock as
well as a decline in the estimated forecasted discounted cash flows expected by the respective
reporting units.
The Graphics Segment fiscal 2009 operating income of $2,646,000 compares to an operating loss
of $(14,027,000) last year. This increased operating income of $16.7 million was the result of
decreased net sales and decreased gross profit, offset by significantly decreased impairment
charges and by decreased selling and administrative expenses.
Technology Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
4,576 |
|
|
$ |
9,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
(486 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,876 |
) |
Technology Segment net sales of $4,576,000 in fiscal 2009 decreased 49.9% from fiscal 2008 net
sales of $9,136,000. The $4.6 million decrease in Technology Segment net sales is primarily the
net result of decreased sales of solid-state LED video screens for sports and advertising markets
($3.0 million) and decreased sales of specialty LED lighting ($2.1 million), partially offset by
increased sales of solid-state LED video screens to the entertainment market ($0.8 million). Sales
responsibility related to solid-state LED video screens for sports markets was transferred in
fiscal 2009 from the Technology Segment to the Graphics Segment.
Gross profit of $1,028,000 in fiscal 2009 decreased $0.2 million or 16% from the same period
last year, and decreased from 12.4% to 11.5% as a percentage of Technology Segment net sales
(customer plus intra-segment net sales). The decrease in amount of gross profit is due to
decreased Technology net sales and margins, partially offset by decreased indirect wages ($0.1
million).
Selling and administrative expenses of $1,514,000 in fiscal year 2009 decreased $1.5 million,
and increased to 33.1% as a percentage of Technology Segment net sales from 32.7% last year.
Employee compensation and benefits expense decreased $0.2 million in fiscal 2009 as compared to
last year, and other changes of expense between years include decreased warranty expense ($0.6
million), increased outside services ($0.2 million), decreased sales commissions expense ($0.2
million) and decreased expense related to amortization of intangibles ($0.2 million).
The Company recorded a full impairment of goodwill in the reporting unit in the Technology
Segment in fiscal 2008, and accordingly recorded a non-cash expense in the amount of $3,119,000.
There was no impairment charge in fiscal 2009. The impairment was related to a decline in the
market value of the Companys stock as well as a decline in the estimated forecasted discounted
cash flows expected by the reporting unit.
F-4
The Technology Segment fiscal 2009 operating loss of $(486,000) compares to an operating loss
of $(4,876,000) last year. This increase in operating income of $4.4 million was the net result of
decreased net sales and gross profit, offset by decreased selling and administrative expenses and
no impairment charge in fiscal 2009 as compared to a $3.1 million impairment in fiscal 2008.
All Other Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
7,983 |
|
|
$ |
27,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
(12,660 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,377 |
) |
All Other Category net sales of $7,983,000 in fiscal 2009 decreased 70.7% from fiscal 2008 net
sales of $27,212,000. The $19.2 million decrease in All Other Category net sales is primarily the
result of the fiscal 2008 completion of a menu board replacement program ($19.8 million decrease)
and changes in volume or completion of other customer programs.
Image and brand programs, whether full conversions or enhancements, are important to the
Companys strategic direction. Image programs include situations where our customers refurbish
their retail sites around the country by replacing some or all of the lighting, graphic elements,
menu board systems and possibly other items they may source from other suppliers. These image
programs often take several quarters to complete and involve both our customers corporate-owned
sites as well as their franchisee-owned sites, the latter of which involve separate sales efforts
by the Company with each franchisee. The Company may not always be able to replace net sales
immediately when a large image conversion program has concluded. Brand programs typically occur as
new products are offered or new departments are created within an existing retail store. Relative
to net sales to a customer before and after an image or brand program, net sales during the program
are typically significantly higher, depending upon how much business is awarded to the Company.
Sales related to a customers image or brand program are reported in either the Lighting Segment,
Graphics Segment, or the All Other Category depending upon the product and/or service provided.
Gross profit of $1,014,000 in fiscal 2009 decreased $7.9 million or 89% from last year, and
decreased from 22.5% to 8.4% as a percentage of the All Other Category net sales (customer plus
intra-segment net sales). The decrease in amount of gross profit is primarily due to decreased net
sales and margins, competitive pricing pressures, partially offset by decreased direct labor
reflective of less sales volume, as well as decreased indirect wage, compensation and benefits
costs ($0.1 million reduction).
Selling and administrative expenses of $11,108,000, which includes Corporate administration
expenses, in fiscal year 2009 decreased $5.2 million. Changes of expense between years include
decreased employee compensation and benefits expense ($0.2 million), decreased menu board patent
infringement settlement costs ($2.6 million), decreased legal fees primarily as a result of
settlement of menu board patent litigation ($0.5 million), decreased research and development
expense ($0.6 million), decreased depreciation expense ($0.4 million), increased audit/accounting
and outside services fees ($0.2 million), decreased customer relations expense ($0.1 million) and
decreased warranty expense ($0.1 million).
The Company recorded a partial impairment of goodwill in one reporting unit in the All Other
Category in fiscal 2009, and accordingly recorded a non-cash expense in the amount of $2,566,000
with no similar impairment expense in the prior year. The impairment was related to a decline in
the market value of the Companys stock as well as a decline in the estimated forecasted discounted
cash flows expected by that reporting unit.
The All Other Category fiscal 2009 operating loss of $(12,660,000) compares to an operating
loss of $(7,377,000) in the same period last year. This increased loss of $5.3 million was the
result of decreased net sales and decreased gross profit, and a goodwill impairment expense in
fiscal 2009, partially offset by decreased selling and administrative expenses.
F-5
Consolidated Results
The Company reported net interest income of $8,000 in fiscal 2009 as compared to net interest
income of $279,000 last year. The Company was in a positive cash position and was debt free for
substantially all of fiscal 2008 and generated interest income on invested cash. The Company was
occasionally in a borrowing position in fiscal 2009 and, when in a cash investment position, earned
interest at lower rates than the prior year.
The $989,000 income tax benefit in fiscal 2009 reflects a tax benefit of $105,000 related to
the operations of the Company (which includes a $333,000 release of a FIN 48 income tax liability
associated with a voluntary disclosure program) and a tax benefit of $884,000 associated with the
$14,467,000 impairment of goodwill (the majority of which was non-deductible for tax purposes).
Income tax expense in fiscal 2008 was $2,357,000, which is reflective of income tax expense on the
reduced normal operating results, $1.8 million of valuation reserves on the Companys Canadian net
operating loss tax benefit and on Canadian tax credits, and the tax benefit recorded on the
impairment charges (goodwill and intangible assets), some of which is not deductible for tax
purposes.
The Company reported a net loss of $(13,414,000) in fiscal 2009 as compared to a net loss of
$(13,048,000) last year. The increased net loss is primarily the result of decreased operating
income in the all Segments (which includes pre-tax goodwill and intangible asset impairments of
$14,467,000 and $27,955,000 in fiscal years 2009 and 2008, respectively) and less net interest
income, partially offset by decreased income tax expense. The diluted loss per share was $(0.62)
in fiscal 2009, as compared to a diluted loss per share of $(0.60) last year. The weighted average
common shares outstanding for purposes of computing diluted (loss) per share in fiscal 2009 were
21,800,000 shares as compared to 21,764,000 shares last year.
2008 Compared to 2007
Net sales of $305,286,000 in fiscal 2008 decreased 9.5% from fiscal 2007 net sales of
$337,453,000. Lighting Segment net sales decreased 4.2% to $183,694,000, Graphics Segment net
sales decreased 20.9% to $85,244,000, Technology Segment net sales decreased 46.7% to $9,136,000
and net sales in the All Other Category increased 30.5% to $27,212,000 as compared to the prior
year. Sales to the petroleum / convenience store market represented 28% and 26% of net sales in
fiscal years 2008 and 2007, respectively. Net sales to this, the Companys largest niche market,
are reported in both the Lighting and Graphics Segments, depending upon the product or service
sold, and were down 2% from last year to $84,897,000 as Graphics sales to this market increased 4%
and Lighting sales decreased 9%. The petroleum / convenience store market has been, and will
continue to be, a very important niche market for the Company; however, if sales to other markets
and customers increase more than net sales to this market, then the percentage of net sales to the
petroleum / convenience store market would be expected to decline. See Note 3 to these financial
statements on Major Customer Concentrations.
The $8.0 million or 4.2% decrease in Lighting Segment net sales is primarily the net result of
a $10.0 million or 10.3% increase in commissioned net sales to the commercial and industrial
lighting market, offset by a $17.9 million or 18.9% decrease in lighting sales to our niche markets
of petroleum / convenience stores, automotive dealerships, and retail national accounts (one large
national retailer represented approximately $14.9 million of this reduction as their new store
construction program slowed and the Company has transitioned from primarily interior lighting to
primarily the exterior lighting under a new contract).
F-6
The $22.5 million or 20.9% decrease in Graphics Segment net sales is primarily the result of
completion of programs for certain graphics customers or reduction of net sales to other graphics
customers, including an image conversion program for a national drug store retailer ($16.6 million
decrease), two petroleum / convenience store customers ($8.0 million decrease), reduced sales to a
telecommunications company ($2.2 million decrease) and changes in volume or completion of other
graphics programs. These decreases were partially offset by increased net sales to certain other
customers, including sales related to an image conversion program in the petroleum / convenience
store market ($6.1 million increase).
Image and brand programs, whether full conversions or enhancements, are important to the
Companys strategic direction. Image programs include situations where our customers refurbish
their retail sites around the country by replacing some or all of the lighting, graphic elements,
menu board systems and possibly other items they may source from other suppliers. These image
programs often take several quarters to complete and involve both our customers corporate-owned
sites as well as their franchisee-owned sites, the latter of which involve separate sales efforts
by the Company with each franchisee. The Company may not always be able to replace net sales
immediately when a large image conversion program has concluded. Brand programs typically occur as
new products are offered or new departments are created within an existing retail store. Relative
to net sales to a customer before and after an image or brand program, net sales during the program
are typically significantly higher, depending upon how much of the lighting or graphics business is
awarded to the Company. Sales related to a customers image or brand program are reported in
either the Lighting or Graphics Segment or the All Other Category, depending upon the product
and/or service provided.
The $8.0 million or 46.7% decrease in Technology Segment net sales is primarily the result of
reduced sales to an LED billboard customer ($2.0 million decrease), reduced sales to customers
involved in sports scoreboards and video screens ($6.5 million decrease), and decreased sales of
specialty LED lighting to two customers ($1.7 million decrease). These decreases were partially
offset by increased sales of LED video screens to the entertainment market ($0.8 million) and
advertising market ($1.2 million increase).
The $6.4 million or 30.5% increase in net sales of the All Other Category is primarily the
result of a menu board conversion for a quick service restaurant retailer which was completed in
fiscal 2008 ($10.1 million increase in product and installation net sales), a decrease in net sales
to a second menu board customer ($2.9 million decrease), and decreased net sales to electrical wire
harness customers ($1.2 million decrease).
Gross profit of $80,427,000 in fiscal 2008 decreased 10% from last year, and decreased from
26.4% to 26.3% as a percentage of net sales. The decrease in amount of gross profit is primarily
due to decreased Graphics net sales and margins, both product and installation, partially offset by
increased gross profit from reduced lighting net sales. The following items also influenced the
Companys gross profit margin on a consolidated basis: competitive pricing pressures; increased
cost of materials; decreased direct labor reflective of less sales volume; an unfavorable $1.0
million net realizable value reserve and refurbishment reserve recorded on some Technology Segment
inventory; net decreased wage, compensation and benefits costs ($0.6 million increase in Lighting,
$1.0 million decrease in Graphics and $0.4 million decrease in the All Other Category); $0.5
million of decreased outside services (primarily in Graphics); $0.3 million decreased lease and
rental expense (Graphics and the All Other Category); $0.3 million decreased repairs and
maintenance (primarily Lighting and Graphics); $0.2 million decreased supplies; and $0.1 million
decreased utilities and property taxes).
F-7
Selling and administrative expenses of $60,642,000 in fiscal year 2008 increased $3.4 million,
and increased to 19.9% as a percentage of net sales from 17.0% last year. Employee compensation
and benefits expense increased $0.4 million in fiscal 2008 as compared to last year (decreases of
$0.5 million and $0.2 million in the Lighting and Graphics Segments, respectively, and increases of
$0.5 and $0.6 million in the Technology Segment and All Other Category, respectively). Other
changes of expense between years include increased sales commission expense ($2.0 million in
Lighting), increased research & development expense ($1.5 million, primarily associated with
research and development spending related to solid-state LED technology), increased outside
services ($1.0 million primarily in the All Other Category), decreased legal expenses ($0.8 million
in the All Other Category),
reduced customer rebates and accommodations ($0.4 million primarily in Graphics), increased
warranty expense ($0.7 million increase in the Technology Segment, partially offset by decreases of
$0.1 million and $0.3 million in Lighting and Graphics, respectively), decreased bad debt expense
($0.3 million primarily in Graphics), decreased depreciation expense ($0.3 million in the All Other
Category), and increased repairs and maintenance ($0.1 million in the All Other Category).
The Company recorded a $2.8 million expense in fiscal 2008 in the All Other Category related
to the Companys offer to settle in a menu board patent litigation. Even though the offer to
settle this matter was made in the first quarter of fiscal 2009, as a type one subsequent event,
the $2.8 million charge is required to be recorded in fiscal 2008. While the Company believes its
menu board designs did not infringe upon the plaintiffs patents, management believes it is in the
best interests of the Company to achieve certainty in this matter, and therefore has extended a
settlement offer. See Note 14 for further discussion. The Company had recorded a favorable
reversal of a $0.6 million loss contingency reserve in fiscal 2007 related to this same menu board
patent litigation following a favorable summary judgment decision in the lower court.
In fiscal 2008, the Company recorded a $27,955,000 non-cash impairment charge in the fourth
quarter as follows: goodwill ($26,175,000) and certain intangible assets ($1,780,000). Impairment
charges totaling $23,739,000 were recorded in the Graphics Segment, $3,119,000 in the Technology
Segment and charges in the amount of $1,097,000 were recorded in the Lighting Segment. There was
no similar impairment expense in fiscal 2007. Step one of the annual impairment test indicated
there was a material impairment of goodwill and certain intangible assets in two of the Companys
reporting units within its Graphics Segment, two reporting units in its Lighting Segment and one
reporting unit in its Technology Segment due to the combination of a decline in the market
capitalization of the Company at June 30, 2008 and a decline in the estimated forecasted discounted
cash flows expected by the Company which management attributes to a weaker economic cycle impacting
certain of the Companys customers, notably national retailers. Additionally and included in the
amounts above, the Company determined that a certain trade name in its Lighting Segment was no
longer going to be used in marketing efforts, and therefore a related intangible asset had no value
as the Company more than ever before emphasizes and relies upon its LSI brand name recognition in
the lighting markets it serves.
The Company reported net interest income of $279,000 in fiscal 2008 as compared to net
interest expense of $823,000 last year. The Company was in a positive cash position and was debt
free for substantially all of fiscal 2008 and generated interest income on invested cash. The
Company was in a borrowing position the first nine and one-half months of fiscal 2007.
The effective tax rate in fiscal 2007 was 34.5%, resulting in an income tax expense of
$10,938,000. Income tax expense in fiscal 2008 was $2,357,000, which is reflective of income tax
expense on the reduced normal operating results, $1.8 million of valuation reserves on the
Companys Canadian net operating loss tax benefit and on Canadian tax credits, and the tax credit
provision recorded on the impairment charges (goodwill and intangible assets), some of which is not
deductible for tax purposes. The Company expects an effective income tax rate in fiscal 2009 of
approximately 37.5%.
The Company reported a net loss of $13,048,000 in fiscal 2008 as compared to net income of
$20,789,000 last year. The decrease is primarily the result of decreased gross profit on decreased
net sales, a non-cash goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge in fiscal 2008, increased
operating expenses, all partially offset by decreased income tax expense and net interest income as
compared to net interest expense last year. Diluted loss per share was $0.60 in fiscal 2008, as
compared to diluted earnings per share of $0.95 last year. The weighted average common shares
outstanding for purposes of computing diluted earnings per share in fiscal 2008 were 21,764,000
shares as compared to 21,924,000 shares last year.
F-8
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company considers its level of cash on hand, borrowing capacity, current ratio and working
capital levels to be its most important measures of short-term liquidity. For long-term liquidity
indicators, the Company believes its ratio of long-term debt to equity and its historical levels of
net cash flows from operating activities to be the most important measures.
At June 30, 2009, the Company had working capital of $72.5 million, compared to $72.9 million
at June 30, 2008. The ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 4.70 to 1 as compared to
a ratio of 3.32 to 1 at June 30, 2008. The $0.4 million decrease in working capital from June 30,
2008 to June 30, 2009 was primarily related to decreased inventory ($10.3 million) and decreased
net accounts receivable ($9.2 million), partially offset by decreased accounts payable ($6.2
million), decreased accrued expenses ($5.6 million), increased cash and cash equivalents ($7.0
million), and increased other current assets ($0.3 million). The Company has a strategy of
aggressively managing working capital, including reduction of the accounts receivable days sales
outstanding (DSO) and reduction of inventory levels, without reducing service to our customers.
The Company generated $16.5 million of cash from operating activities in fiscal 2009 as
compared to a generation of $12.7 million last year. This $3.8 million increase in net cash flows
from operating activities is primarily the net result of less net income ($0.4 million
unfavorable), reduced non-cash goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge in fiscal 2009
($13.5 million unfavorable), less of a reduction in accounts receivable (unfavorable change of $7.9
million), a decrease rather than an increase in inventories (favorable change of $11.3 million),
less of a reduction in customer prepayments (favorable change of $16.7 million), a larger decrease
in accounts payable (unfavorable change of $1.8 million), a larger decrease in accrued expenses and
other assets (unfavorable change of $5.8 million), decreased depreciation and amortization
(unfavorable $1.0 million), a smaller increase in the reserves for bad debts (favorable $0.2
million), a larger decrease in obsolete inventory reserves ($0.2 million unfavorable) and decrease
in deferred income tax assets rather than an increase (favorable $6.9 million). The fiscal 2008
significant reduction in customer prepayments is related to the completion of a menu board
replacement program in the Graphics Segment.
Net accounts receivable were $29.7 million and $38.9 million at June 30, 2009 and June 30,
2008, respectively. The decrease of $9.2 million in net receivables is primarily due to a higher
amount of net sales in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 as compared to the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2009, plus the affect of decreased DSO (Days Sales Outstanding). The DSO decreased to 51
days at June 30, 2009 from 54 days at June 30, 2008. The Company believes that its receivables are
ultimately collectible or recoverable, net of certain reserves, and that aggregate allowances for
doubtful accounts are adequate.
Net inventories at June 30, 2009 decreased $10.3 million from June 30, 2008 levels. Based on
a strategy of reducing inventory and in response to customer programs and the timing of shipments,
inventory decreases occurred in the Lighting Segment of approximately $4.1 million (some of this
inventory supports certain graphics programs), in the Graphics Segment of approximately $3.5
million, in the Technology Segment of approximately $1.6 million and in the All Other Category of
approximately $1.1 million since June 30, 2008.
F-9
Cash generated from operations and borrowing capacity under two line of credit facilities are
the Companys primary source of liquidity. The Company has an unsecured $40 million revolving line
of credit with its bank group, with all $40 million of the credit line available as of August 14,
2009. This line of credit consists of a $30 million two year committed credit facility expiring in
the third quarter of fiscal 2011 and a $10 million committed credit facility expiring in the third
quarter of fiscal 2010. Additionally, the Company has a separate $5 million line of credit,
renewable annually in the third fiscal quarter, for the working capital needs of its Canadian
subsidiary, LSI Saco Technologies. Renewal actions on the $30 million line of credit in the third
quarter of fiscal 2009 were such that the interest rate
and unused credit line cost remained the same, but the bank group did not add back a third year of
commitment to the line. With respect to the $10 million line of credit (formerly this was a $20
million line), the bank group made this a committed line, increased the interest rate by 200 basis
points and added an unused credit fee of 30 basis points, and as a result, the Company reduced the
amount available on this portion of the overall line of credit from $20 million down to $10
million. Renewal action on the $5 million Canadian line of credit was postponed by the bank to the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. In the renewal, the bank increased the interest rate to be
consistent with the U.S. $10 million line of credit. As of August 14, 2009, all $5 million of this
line of credit is available. The Company believes that the $45 million total of available lines of
credit plus cash flows from operating activities is adequate for the Companys fiscal 2010
operational and capital expenditure needs. The Company is in compliance with all of its loan
covenants.
The Company used $3.0 million of cash related to investing activities in fiscal 2009 as
compared to a generation of $4.3 million last year. The primary change between years relates to
the fiscal 2008 divestiture of short-term investments ($8.0 million unfavorable) and decreased
purchase of fixed assets ($0.7 million favorable). Capital expenditures of $3.0 million in fiscal
2009 compared to $3.7 million last year. Spending in both periods is primarily for tooling and
equipment, with $1.8 million also being spent in fiscal 2009 for a facility for the Graphics
Segment. The Company expects fiscal 2010 capital expenditures to be approximately $3.0 million,
exclusive of business acquisitions.
The Company used $6.5 million of cash related to financing activities in fiscal 2009 as
compared to a use of $12.7 million in the same period last year. The $6.2 million favorable change
between periods is primarily the result of lower cash dividend payments ($6,471,000 in fiscal 2009
as compared to $13,580,000 in the same period last year). The $7.1 million reduction in dividend
payments between years is primarily the net result of a special year-end dividend of approximately
$1.1 million paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 with none in fiscal 2009, and a lower per
share dividend rate beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Additionally, the Company had
cash flow from the exercise of stock options in fiscal 2008, while there were no exercises in
fiscal 2009 ($1.1 million unfavorable).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
Contractual Obligations as |
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
1-3 |
|
|
3-5 |
|
|
More than |
|
of June 30, 2009 (a) |
|
Total |
|
|
1 year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt Obligations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Capital Lease Obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Lease Obligations |
|
|
5,623 |
|
|
|
1,589 |
|
|
|
3,863 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Purchase Obligations |
|
|
16,781 |
|
|
|
16,625 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Long-Term Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
22,404 |
|
|
$ |
18,214 |
|
|
$ |
4,019 |
|
|
$ |
169 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The liability for uncertain tax positions of $2.7 million is not included due to the
uncertainty of timing of payments. |
The Company has financial instruments consisting primarily of cash and cash equivalents and
short-term investments, revolving lines of credit, and long-term debt. The fair value of these
financial instruments approximates carrying value because of their short-term maturity and/or
variable, market-driven interest rates. The Company has no financial instruments with off-balance
sheet risk and has no off balance sheet arrangements.
F-10
On August 19, 2009 the Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.05
per share (approximately $1,202,000) payable September 8, 2009 to shareholders of record on
September 1, 2009. The Companys cash dividend policy is that the indicated annual dividend rate
will be set between 50% and 70% of the expected net income for the current fiscal year.
Consideration will
also be given by the Board to special year-end cash or stock dividends. The declaration and amount
of any cash and stock dividends will be determined by the Companys Board of Directors, in its
discretion, based upon its evaluation of earnings, cash flow, capital requirements and future
business developments and opportunities, including acquisitions. Accordingly, the Board
established a new indicated annual cash dividend rate of $0.20 per share beginning with the first
quarter of fiscal 2010 consistent with the above dividend policy.
Carefully selected acquisitions have long been an important part of the Companys strategic
growth plans. The Company continues to seek out, screen and evaluate potential acquisitions that
could add to our product lines or enhance the Companys position in selected markets. The Company
believes adequate financing for any such investments or acquisitions will be available through
future borrowings or through the issuance of common or preferred shares in payment for acquired
businesses. In July 2009, the Company made an acquisition that will vertically integrate the
supply chain for certain components of the Companys various solid-state LED products. The new
company will operate under the name LSI ADL Technology Inc., and will design, engineer, and
manufacture custom designed circuit boards, assemblies, and sub-assemblies used in various
applications including the control of solid-state LED lighting. With the acquisition of AdL
Technology, we made a decision to further establish and advance our leadership position in LED
lighting by vertically integrating our capabilities in connection with designing, engineering, and
producing the solid-state electronics that control and power LEDs. LSI ADL will allow us to stay
on the leading edge of product development, while at the same time providing opportunities to drive
down manufacturing costs and control delivery of key components. ADLs capabilities will also have
applications in our other LED product lines such as digital scoreboards, advertising ribbon boards
and billboards.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Company is required to make estimates and judgments in the preparation of its financial
statements that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and
related footnote disclosures. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on
various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results
of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities.
The Company continually reviews these estimates and their underlying assumptions to ensure they
remain appropriate. The Company believes the items discussed below are among its most significant
accounting policies because they utilize estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently
uncertain and therefore are based on managements judgment. Significant changes in the estimates
or assumptions related to any of the following critical accounting policies could possibly have a
material impact on the financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition. Revenue is recognized when title to goods and
risk of loss have passed to the customer, there is persuasive evidence of a purchase arrangement,
delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, and collectibility is reasonably assured.
Revenue is typically recognized at time of shipment. Sales are recorded net of estimated returns,
rebates and discounts. Amounts received from customers prior to the recognition of revenue are
accounted for as customer pre-payments and are included in accrued expenses.
The Company has four sources of revenue: revenue from product sales; revenue from
installation of products; service revenue generated from providing integrated design, project
and construction management, site engineering and site permitting; and revenue from shipping
and handling.
F-11
Product revenue is recognized on product-only orders upon passing of title and risk of loss,
generally at time of shipment. However, product revenue related to orders where the customer
requires the Company to install the product is recognized when the product is installed. Other
than normal product warranties or the possibility of installation or post-shipment service, support
and maintenance of certain solid-state LED video screens, billboards, or active digital signage,
the Company has no post-shipment responsibilities.
Installation revenue is recognized when the products have been fully installed. The Company
is not always responsible for installation of products it sells and has no post-installation
responsibilities, other than normal warranties.
Service revenue from integrated design, project and construction management, and site
permitting is recognized when all products have been installed at each individual retail site of
the customer on a proportional performance basis.
Shipping and handling revenue coincides with the recognition of revenue from sale of the
product.
The Company evaluates the appropriateness of revenue recognition in accordance with Emerging
Issues Task Force (EITF) 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, and AICPA
Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition. Our solid-state LED video
screens, billboards and active digital signage contain software elements which the Company has
determined are incidental and excluded from the scope of SOP 97-2.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes; accordingly, deferred income taxes are
provided on items that are reported as either income or expense in different time periods for
financial reporting purposes than they are for income tax purposes. Deferred income tax assets and
liabilities are reported on the Companys balance sheet. Significant management judgment is
required in developing the Companys income tax provision, including the determination of deferred
tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowances that might be required against deferred tax
assets.
The Company operates in multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these
jurisdictions. The Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities routinely review the
Companys tax returns. These audits can involve complex issues which may require an extended
period of time to resolve. In managements opinion, adequate provision has been made for potential
adjustments arising from these examinations.
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, on July 1, 2007. As a result of adoption, the Company recognized
$2,582,000 in reserves for uncertain tax positions and recorded a charge of $2,582,000 to the
July 1, 2007 retained earnings balance.
The Company is recording estimated interest and penalties related to potential underpayment of
income taxes as a component of tax expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The
reserve for uncertain tax positions is not expected to change significantly in the next 12 months.
F-12
Asset Impairment
Carrying values of goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are reviewed at
least annually for possible impairment in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 142 (SFAS No. 142), Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The Companys impairment
review involves the estimation of the fair value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets
using a combination of a market approach and an income (discounted cash flow) approach, at the
reporting unit level, that requires significant management judgment with respect to revenue and
expense growth rates, changes in working capital and the selection and use of an appropriate
discount rate. The estimates of fair value of reporting units are based on the best information
available as of the date of the assessment. The use of different assumptions would increase or
decrease estimated discounted future operating cash flows and could increase or decrease an
impairment charge. Company management uses its judgment in assessing whether assets may have
become impaired between annual impairment tests. Indicators such as adverse business conditions,
economic factors and technological change or competitive activities may signal that an asset has
become impaired. Also see Note 6.
Carrying values for long-lived tangible assets and definite-lived intangible assets, excluding
goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, are reviewed for possible impairment as
circumstances warrant in connection with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 (SFAS
No. 144), Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. Impairment reviews are
conducted at the judgment of Company management when it believes that a change in circumstances in
the business or external factors warrants a review. Circumstances such as the discontinuation of a
product or product line, a sudden or consistent decline in the forecast for a product, changes in
technology or in the way an asset is being used, a history of negative operating cash flow, or an
adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate, among others, may trigger an impairment
review. The Companys initial impairment review to determine if a potential impairment charge is
required is based on an undiscounted cash flow analysis at the lowest level for which identifiable
cash flows exist. The analysis requires judgment with respect to changes in technology, the
continued success of product lines and future volume, revenue and expense growth rates, and
discount rates.
Credit and Collections
The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts receivable for probable estimated
losses resulting from either customer disputes or the inability of its customers to make required
payments. If the financial condition of the Companys customers were to deteriorate, resulting in
their inability to make the required payments, the Company may be required to record additional
allowances or charges against income. The Company determines its allowance for doubtful accounts
by first considering all known collectibility problems of customers accounts, and then applying
certain percentages against the various aging categories based on the due date of the remaining
receivables. The resulting allowance for doubtful accounts receivable is an estimate based upon
the Companys knowledge of its business and customer base, and historical trends. The Company also
establishes allowances, at the time revenue is recognized, for returns and allowances, discounts,
pricing and other possible customer deductions. These allowances are based upon historical trends.
F-13
New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This Statement provides a new
definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Statement
applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. SFAS
No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, or the Companys fiscal
year 2009. Four FASB Staff Positions (FSP) were subsequently issued.
In February 2007, FSP No. 157-2 delayed the effective date of this SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and
non-financial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a nonrecurring basis to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, or the
Companys fiscal year 2010. FSP No. 157-1, also issued in February 2007, excluded FASB No. 13
Accounting for Leases and other accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements
for purposes of lease classification or measurement under FASB No. 13. However, this scope
exception does not apply to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that
are required to be measured at fair value under FASB Statement No. 141, Business Combinations or
FASB No. 141R, Business Combinations. This FSP is effective upon initial adoption of SFAS No.
157. There was no impact on the Companys consolidated results of operations, cash flows or
financial position as a result of adoption of this Statement, nor will there be with the adoption
of FSP No. 157-2 on July 1, 2009.
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141(R), Business Combinations, which replaces
SFAS No. 141. The statement retains the purchase method of accounting for acquisitions, but
requires a number of changes, including changes in the way assets and liabilities are
recognized in purchase accounting. It also changes the recognition of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed arising from contingencies, requires the capitalization of in-process
research and development at fair value, and requires the expensing of acquisition related costs
as incurred. In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Staff
Position FSP No. 141(R)-1 which applies to all assets and liabilities assumed in a business
combination that arise from contingencies that would be within the scope of SFAS No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies, if not acquired or assumed in a business combination, except
for assets or liabilities arising from contingencies that are subject to specific guidance in
SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) and FSP No. 141(R)-1 are effective
beginning July 1, 2009 and will apply prospectively to business combinations completed on or
after that date.
In December 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Emerging Issues Task Force
EITF 08-7, Accounting for Defensive Intangible Assets, which clarifies how to account for
acquired intangible assets in situations in which an entity does not intend to actively use the
asset but intends to hold (lock up) the asset to prevent others from obtaining access to the
asset (a defensive intangible asset), except for intangible assets that are used in research
and development activities. EITF 08-7 is effective for LSI for intangible assets acquired on
or after July 1, 2009.
In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS
107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. This FSP
requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods as
well as in annual financial statements. This FSP is effective for interim reporting periods ending
after June 15, 2009.
In May 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 165, Subsequent Events. This Statement establishes general standards of
accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the
financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In particular, this Statement sets
forth: (1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity
should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in
the financial statements; (2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or
transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and (3) the
disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance
sheet date. SFAS No. 165 is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, or
the Companys fiscal year ending June 30, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 165 did not have a
material impact on the Companys results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
F-14
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). This Statement amends
certain requirements of FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, to improve financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable
interest entities and to provide more relevant and reliable information to users of financial
statements. SFAS No. 167 is effective as of the beginning of the Companys first annual reporting
period that begins after November 15, 2009, or the Companys fiscal year beginning July 1, 2010.
The Company will evaluate the impact of adopting SFAS No. 167 and cannot currently estimate the
impact on its consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. This Statement identifies the sources of
accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of
financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States. It establishes the Codification as the
source of authoritative GAAP and states that rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) under federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for
SEC registrants. SFAS No. 168 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual
periods ending after September 15, 2009, or the Companys first fiscal quarter ended September 30,
2009.
F-15
MANAGEMENTS REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Management of LSI Industries Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company or LSI) is responsible for
the preparation and accuracy of the financial statements and other information included in this
report. LSIs Management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Securities Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of Management, including LSIs Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2009, based on the
criteria set forth in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance
that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all
control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues
and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the reality
that judgments in decision making can be faulty, the possibility of human error, and the
circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures.
In meeting its responsibility for the reliability of the financial statements, the Company depends
upon its system of internal accounting controls. The system is designed to provide reasonable
assurance that assets are safeguarded and that transactions are properly authorized and recorded.
The system is supported by policies and guidelines, and by careful selection and training of
financial management personnel. The Company also has a Disclosure Controls Committee, whose
responsibility is to help ensure appropriate disclosures and presentation of the financial
statements and notes thereto. Additionally, the Company has an Internal Audit Department to assist
in monitoring compliance with financial policies and procedures.
The Board of Directors meets its responsibility for overview of the Companys financial statements
through its Audit Committee which is composed entirely of independent Directors who are not
employees of the Company. The Audit Committee meets periodically with Management and Internal
Audit to review and assess the activities of each in meeting their respective responsibilities.
Deloitte & Touche LLP has full access to the Audit Committee to discuss the results of their audit
work, the adequacy of internal accounting controls, and the quality of financial reporting.
Based upon LSIs evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 2009. We
reviewed the results of Managements assessment with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.
Additionally, our independent registered public accounting firm audited and independently assessed
the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Deloitte & Touche
LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting, which is presented in the
financial statements.
Robert J. Ready
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Ronald S. Stowell
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
F-16
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
LSI Industries Inc.
Cincinnati, Ohio
We have audited LSI Industries Inc.s and subsidiaries (the Companys) internal control over
financial reporting as of June 30, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control
over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, included in the accompanying Managements Report On Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal control
over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on that risk, and
performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that
our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the
supervision of, the companys principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons
performing similar functions, and effected by the companys board of directors, management, and
other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes
those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the
possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to
error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any
evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods
are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company has maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of June 30, 2009, based on the criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of
and for the year ended June 30, 2009 of the Company and our report dated September 11, 2009
expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule and
includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the Companys adoption of Financial Accounting
Standards Board
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an Interpretation of Financial
Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 109, on July 1, 2007.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio
September 11, 2009
F-17
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
LSI Industries Inc.
Cincinnati, Ohio
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of LSI Industries Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
June 30, 2009. Our audits also included the consolidated financial statement schedule listed in
the Index at Item 15. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are
the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of LSI Industries Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, and
the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended June 30, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. Also, in our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Financial
Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
Interpretation of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 109, on July 1, 2007.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2009,
based on the criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated September 11, 2009
expressed an unqualified opinion on the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio
September 11, 2009
F-18
LSI INDUSTRIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007
(In thousands, except per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
233,799 |
|
|
$ |
305,286 |
|
|
$ |
337,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products and services sold |
|
|
181,972 |
|
|
|
224,859 |
|
|
|
248,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
51,827 |
|
|
|
80,427 |
|
|
|
89,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
51,571 |
|
|
|
60,642 |
|
|
|
57,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss contingency (see Note 14) |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
(590 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment |
|
|
14,467 |
|
|
|
27,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(14,411 |
) |
|
|
(10,970 |
) |
|
|
32,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (income) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(14,403 |
) |
|
|
(10,691 |
) |
|
|
31,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(989 |
) |
|
|
2,357 |
|
|
|
10,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(13,414 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,048 |
) |
|
$ |
20,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share (see Note 4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.62 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
) |
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.62 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
) |
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
21,800 |
|
|
|
21,764 |
|
|
|
21,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
21,800 |
|
|
|
21,764 |
|
|
|
21,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these financial statements.
F-19
LSI INDUSTRIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, 2009 and 2008
(In thousands, except shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
13,986 |
|
|
$ |
6,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable, less
allowance for doubtful accounts of
$532 and $585, respectively |
|
|
29,681 |
|
|
|
38,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
40,196 |
|
|
|
50,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refundable income taxes |
|
|
3,619 |
|
|
|
1,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
4,635 |
|
|
|
6,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
92,117 |
|
|
|
104,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
6,501 |
|
|
|
6,190 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
35,270 |
|
|
|
33,344 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
61,342 |
|
|
|
62,473 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,280 |
|
|
|
102,132 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(61,237 |
) |
|
|
(57,378 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
42,043 |
|
|
|
44,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill, net |
|
|
1,558 |
|
|
|
16,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Intangible Assets, net |
|
|
12,981 |
|
|
|
15,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets, net |
|
|
4,419 |
|
|
|
4,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
153,118 |
|
|
$ |
184,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these financial statements.
F-20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
9,249 |
|
|
$ |
15,452 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
10,368 |
|
|
|
15,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
19,617 |
|
|
|
31,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Long-Term Liabilities |
|
|
3,028 |
|
|
|
3,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares, without par value;
Authorized 1,000,000 shares, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, without par value; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 30,000,000 shares; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding 21,579,741 and 21,585,390
shares, respectively |
|
|
82,833 |
|
|
|
81,665 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
47,640 |
|
|
|
67,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
130,473 |
|
|
|
149,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities & shareholders equity |
|
$ |
153,118 |
|
|
$ |
184,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these financial statements.
F-21
LSI INDUSTRIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
For the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007
(In thousands, except per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
21,462 |
|
|
$ |
78,087 |
|
|
$ |
86,898 |
|
|
$ |
164,985 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,789 |
|
|
|
20,789 |
|
Stock compensation awards |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
Purchase of treasury shares, net |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(292 |
) |
Deferred stock compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
229 |
|
Stock option expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
721 |
|
Stock options exercised, net |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
537 |
|
Dividends $0.51 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,952 |
) |
|
|
(10,952 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2007 |
|
|
21,493 |
|
|
|
79,326 |
|
|
|
96,735 |
|
|
|
176,061 |
|
|
Net (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,048 |
) |
|
|
(13,048 |
) |
Adoption of FIN 48 reserve for
uncertain tax positions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,582 |
) |
|
|
(2,582 |
) |
Stock compensation awards |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
Purchase of treasury shares, net |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(177 |
) |
Deferred stock compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
Stock option expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
Stock options exercised, net |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
Dividends $0.63 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,580 |
) |
|
|
(13,580 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
21,585 |
|
|
|
81,665 |
|
|
|
67,525 |
|
|
|
149,190 |
|
|
Net (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,414 |
) |
|
|
(13,414 |
) |
Stock compensation awards |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
Purchase of treasury shares, net |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
Deferred stock compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
Stock option expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,184 |
|
Stock options exercised, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends $0.30 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,471 |
) |
|
|
(6,471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
21,580 |
|
|
$ |
82,833 |
|
|
$ |
47,640 |
|
|
$ |
130,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these financial statements.
F-22
LSI INDUSTRIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(13,414 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,048 |
) |
|
$ |
20,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash items included in net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,746 |
|
|
|
8,789 |
|
|
|
9,002 |
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment |
|
|
14,467 |
|
|
|
27,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
(5,904 |
) |
|
|
545 |
|
Deferred compensation plan |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
Stock option expense |
|
|
1,184 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
721 |
|
Issuance of common shares as compensation |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
(Gain) loss on disposition of fixed assets |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
166 |
|
Inventory obsolescence reserve |
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change (excluding effects of acquisitions) in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, gross |
|
|
9,229 |
|
|
|
17,130 |
|
|
|
(4,359 |
) |
Inventories, gross |
|
|
10,541 |
|
|
|
(746 |
) |
|
|
(4,408 |
) |
Refundable income taxes |
|
|
(1,785 |
) |
|
|
(1,470 |
) |
|
|
(225 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(6,203 |
) |
|
|
(4,382 |
) |
|
|
(3,140 |
) |
Accrued expenses and other |
|
|
(6,044 |
) |
|
|
(224 |
) |
|
|
3,281 |
|
Customer prepayments |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(16,670 |
) |
|
|
14,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
16,486 |
|
|
|
12,660 |
|
|
|
36,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment |
|
|
(2,994 |
) |
|
|
(3,723 |
) |
|
|
(5,960 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3,846 |
|
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,000 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of a business, net of cash received |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(2,992 |
) |
|
|
4,282 |
|
|
|
(10,255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
958 |
|
|
|
9,881 |
|
Payment of long-term debt |
|
|
(1,282 |
) |
|
|
(958 |
) |
|
|
(26,474 |
) |
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(6,471 |
) |
|
|
(13,580 |
) |
|
|
(10,952 |
) |
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
537 |
|
Issuance of treasury shares |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Purchase of treasury shares |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(6,500 |
) |
|
|
(12,681 |
) |
|
|
(27,300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
6,994 |
|
|
|
4,261 |
|
|
|
(591 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
6,992 |
|
|
|
2,731 |
|
|
|
3,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
13,986 |
|
|
$ |
6,992 |
|
|
$ |
2,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these financial statements.
F-23
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Consolidation:
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of LSI Industries Inc. (an Ohio
corporation) and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. All intercompany transactions
and balances have been eliminated.
Revenue Recognition:
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition. Revenue is recognized when title to goods and
risk of loss have passed to the customer, there is persuasive evidence of a purchase arrangement,
delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, and collectibility is reasonably assured.
Revenue is typically recognized at time of shipment. Sales are recorded net of estimated returns,
rebates and discounts. Amounts received from customers prior to the recognition of revenue are
accounted for as customer pre-payments and are included in accrued expenses.
The Company has four sources of revenue: revenue from product sales; revenue from installation
of products; service revenue generated from providing integrated design, project and
construction management, site engineering and site permitting; and revenue from shipping and
handling.
Product revenue is recognized on product-only orders upon passing of title and risk of loss,
generally at time of shipment. However, product revenue related to orders where the customer
requires the Company to install the product is recognized when the product is installed. Other
than normal product warranties or the possibility of installation or post-shipment service, support
and maintenance of certain solid state LED video screens, billboards, or active digital signage,
the Company has no post-shipment responsibilities.
Installation revenue is recognized when the products have been fully installed. The Company is not
always responsible for installation of products it sells and has no post-installation
responsibilities, other than normal warranties.
Service revenue from integrated design, project and construction management, and site permitting is
recognized when all products have been installed at each individual retail site of the customer on
a proportional performance basis.
Shipping and handling revenue coincides with the recognition of revenue from sale of the product.
The Company evaluates the appropriateness of revenue recognition in accordance with Emerging Issues
Task Force (EITF) 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, and AICPA Statement of
Position (SOP) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition. Our solid-state LED video screens, billboards
and active digital signage contain software elements which the Company has determined are
incidental and excluded from the scope of SOP 97-2.
F-24
Credit and Collections:
The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts receivable for probable estimated losses
resulting from either customer disputes or the inability of its customers to make required
payments. If the financial condition of the Companys customers were to deteriorate, resulting in
their inability to make the required payments, the Company may be required to record additional
allowances or charges against income. The Company determines its allowance for doubtful accounts
by first considering all
known collectibility problems of customers accounts, and then applying certain percentages against
the various aging categories of the remaining receivables. The resulting allowance for doubtful
accounts receivable is an estimate based upon the Companys knowledge of its business and customer
base, and historical trends. The Company also establishes allowances, at the time revenue is
recognized, for returns and allowances, discounts, pricing and other possible customer deductions.
These allowances are based upon historical trends.
The following table presents the Companys net accounts receivable at the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
6/30/09 |
|
|
6/30/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
30,213 |
|
|
$ |
39,442 |
|
less Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(532 |
) |
|
|
(585 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
29,681 |
|
|
$ |
38,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Investments:
Short-term investments consist of tax free (federal) investments in high grade government agency
backed bonds for which the interest rate resets weekly and the Company has a seven day put option.
These investments are classified as available-for-sale securities and are stated at fair market
value, which represents the most recent reset amount at period end. The Company invested in these
types of short-term investments for certain periods of time during fiscal years 2007 and 2008.
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
The cash balance includes cash and cash equivalents which have original maturities of less than
three months. At June 30, 2009 and 2008 the bank balances included $0 and $3,376,000,
respectively, in excess of FDIC insurance limits.
Inventories:
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with appropriate reserves recorded for
obsolete inventory. Cost is determined on the first-in, first-out basis.
Property, Plant and Equipment and Related Depreciation:
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Major additions and betterments are capitalized
while maintenance and repairs are expensed. For financial reporting purposes, depreciation is
computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings |
|
28 - 40 years |
Machinery and equipment |
|
3 - 10 years |
Computer software |
|
3 - 8 years |
Costs related to the purchase, internal development, and implementation of the Companys fully
integrated enterprise resource planning/business operating software system are either capitalized
or expensed in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of
Position 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal
Use. The current business operating software was first implemented in January 2000. All costs
capitalized for the business operating software are being depreciated over an eight year life from
the date placed in service. Other purchased computer software is being depreciated over periods
ranging from three to five years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of
fifteen years or the remaining term of the lease. The Company recorded $5,667,000, $6,463,000, and
$6,674,000 of depreciation expense in the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
F-25
Intangible Assets:
Intangible assets consisting of customer relationships, trade names and trademarks, patents,
technology and software, and non-compete agreements are recorded on the Companys balance sheet and
the definite-lived intangible assets are being amortized to expense on a straight line basis over
periods ranging between two and twenty years. The excess of cost over fair value of assets
acquired (goodwill) is not amortized but is subject to review for impairment. See additional
information about goodwill and intangibles in Note 6. The Company periodically evaluates
intangible assets for permanent impairment.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments:
The Company customarily has financial instruments consisting primarily of cash and cash equivalents
and short-term investments, revolving lines of credit, and long-term debt. The fair value of these
financial instruments approximates carrying value because of their short-term maturity and/or
variable, market-driven interest rates. The Company has no financial instruments with off-balance
sheet risk.
Product Warranties:
The Company offers a limited warranty that its products are free of defects in workmanship and
materials. The specific terms and conditions vary somewhat by product line, but generally cover
defects returned within one to five years from date of shipment. The Company records warranty
liabilities to cover the estimated future costs for repair or replacement of defective returned
products as well as products that need to be repaired or replaced in the field after installation.
The Company calculates its liability for warranty claims by applying estimates to cover unknown
claims, as well as estimating the total amount to be incurred for known warranty issues. The
Company periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liabilities and adjusts the
amounts as necessary.
Changes in the Companys warranty liabilities, which are included in accrued expenses in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets, during the years ended June 30 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of the year |
|
$ |
257 |
|
|
$ |
314 |
|
Additions charged to expense |
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
1,141 |
|
Deductions for repairs and replacements |
|
|
(591 |
) |
|
|
(1,198 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of the year |
|
$ |
223 |
|
|
$ |
257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingencies:
The Company is party to various negotiations, customer bankruptcies, and legal proceedings arising
in the normal course of business. The Company provides reserves for these matters when a loss is
probable and reasonably estimable. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these
matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position, results of
operations, cash flows or liquidity. See also Note 14.
Employee Benefit Plans:
The Company has a defined contribution retirement plan and a discretionary profit sharing plan
covering substantially all of its non-union employees in the United States, and a non-qualified
deferred compensation plan covering certain employees. The costs of employee benefit plans are
charged to expense and funded annually. Total costs were $1,592,000 in 2009, $2,197,000 in 2008,
and $2,064,000 in 2007.
F-26
Research and Development Costs:
Research and development expenses are costs directly attributable to new product development and
consist of salaries, payroll taxes, employee benefits, materials, supplies, depreciation and other
administrative costs. All costs are expensed as incurred and are classified as operating expenses.
Research and development costs incurred total $4,052,000 for fiscal 2009, $4,111,000 for fiscal
2008, and $2,592,000 for fiscal 2007.
Advertising Expense:
The Company recorded $301,000, $530,000 and $556,000 of advertising expense in 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Advertising costs are expensed the first time the advertising occurs. Expense
related to printed product or capabilities literature, brochures, etc. is recorded on a ratable
basis over the useful life of that printed media.
Income Taxes:
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 109 (SFAS No. 109) and Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48
(FIN 48); accordingly, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon the
difference between the financial statement basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using
enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are reported on the Companys balance sheet. See also
Note 8 and Note 12.
Earnings Per Common Share:
The computation of basic earnings per common share is based on the weighted average common shares
outstanding for the period, net of treasury shares held in the Companys non-qualified deferred
compensation plan. The computation of diluted earnings per share is based on the weighted average
common shares outstanding for the period and includes common share equivalents. Common share
equivalents include the dilutive effect of stock options, contingently issuable shares and common
shares to be issued under a deferred compensation plan, all of which totaled 226,000 shares in
2009, 210,000 shares in 2008, and 448,000 shares in 2007. See also Note 4.
Stock Options:
The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R), Share-Based
Payment, effective July 1, 2005. SFAS No. 123(R) requires public entities to measure the cost of
employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments and recognize this cost
over the period during which an employee is required to provide the services.
There were no disqualifying dispositions of shares from stock option exercises in fiscal 2009. The
Company recorded $228,500 in fiscal 2008 as a reduction of federal income taxes payable, $221,300
as an increase in common stock, and $7,200 as a reduction of income tax expense to reflect the tax
credits it will receive as a result of disqualifying dispositions of shares from stock option
exercises. This had the effect of reducing cash flow from operating activities and increasing cash
flow from financing activities by $221,300. The Company recorded $115,200 in fiscal 2007 as a
reduction of federal income taxes payable, $104,950 as an increase in common stock, and $10,250 as
a reduction of income tax expense to reflect the tax credits it will receive as a result of
disqualifying dispositions of shares from stock option exercises. This had the effect of reducing
cash flow from operating activities and increasing cash flow from financing activities by $104,950.
See further discussion in Note 10.
F-27
New Accounting Pronouncements:
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This Statement provides a new
definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Statement
applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. SFAS
No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, or the Companys fiscal
year 2009. Four FASB Staff Positions (FSP) were subsequently issued. In February 2007, FSP No.
157-2 delayed the effective date of this SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and non-financial
liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a
nonrecurring basis to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, or the Companys fiscal year
2010. FSP No. 157-1, also issued in February 2007, excluded FASB No. 13 Accounting for Leases
and other accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements for purposes of lease
classification or measurement under FASB No. 13. However, this scope exception does not apply to
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that are required to be measured
at fair value under FASB Statement No. 141, Business Combinations or FASB No. 141R, Business
Combinations. This FSP is effective upon initial adoption of SFAS No. 157. There was no impact
on the Companys consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position as a result
of adoption of this Statement, nor will there be with the adoption of FSP No. 157-2 on July 1,
2009.
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141(R), Business Combinations, which replaces
SFAS No. 141. The statement retains the purchase method of accounting for acquisitions, but
requires a number of changes, including changes in the way assets and liabilities are
recognized in purchase accounting. It also changes the recognition of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed arising from contingencies, requires the capitalization of in-process
research and development at fair value, and requires the expensing of acquisition related costs
as incurred. In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Staff
Position FSP No. 141(R)-1 which applies to all assets and liabilities assumed in a business
combination that arise from contingencies that would be within the scope of SFAS No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies, if not acquired or assumed in a business combination, except
for assets or liabilities arising from contingencies that are subject to specific guidance in
SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) and FSP No. 141(R)-1 are effective
beginning July 1, 2009 and will apply prospectively to business combinations completed on or
after that date.
In December 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Emerging Issues Task Force
EITF 08-7, Accounting for Defensive Intangible Assets, which clarifies how to account for
acquired intangible assets in situations in which an entity does not intend to actively use the
asset but intends to hold (lock up) the asset to prevent others from obtaining access to the
asset (a defensive intangible asset), except for intangible assets that are used in research
and development activities. EITF 08-7 is effective for LSI for intangible assets acquired on
or after July 1, 2009.
In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS
107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. This FSP
requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods as
well as in annual financial statements. This FSP is effective for interim reporting periods ending
after June 15, 2009.
F-28
In May 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 165, Subsequent Events. This Statement establishes general standards of
accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the
financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In particular, this Statement sets
forth: (1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity
should evaluate
events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial
statements; (2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions
occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and (3) the disclosures that an
entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. SFAS
No. 165 is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, or the Companys
fiscal year ending June 30, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 165 did not have a material impact on
the Companys results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). This Statement amends
certain requirements of FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, to improve financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable
interest entities and to provide more relevant and reliable information to users of financial
statements. SFAS No. 167 is effective as of the beginning of the Companys first annual reporting
period that begins after November 15, 2009, or the Companys fiscal year beginning July 1, 2010.
The Company will evaluate the impact of adopting SFAS No. 167 and cannot currently estimate the
impact on its consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. This Statement identifies the sources of
accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of
financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States. It establishes the Codification as the
source of authoritative GAAP and states that rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) under federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for
SEC registrants. SFAS No. 168 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual
periods ending after September 15, 2009, or the Companys first fiscal quarter ended September 30,
2009.
Comprehensive Income:
The Company does not have any comprehensive income items, other than net income.
Subsequent Events:
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, the Company has evaluated subsequent events for potential
recognition and disclosure through September 11, 2009, the date of financial statement issuance.
Reclassifications:
Certain reclassifications may have been made to prior year amounts in order to be consistent with
the presentation for the current year.
Use of Estimates:
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
F-29
NOTE 2 BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information, establishes standards for reporting information regarding
operating segments in annual financial statements and requires selected information of those
segments to be presented in interim financial statements. Operating segments are identified as
components of an enterprise for which separate discrete financial information is available for
evaluation by the chief operating decision maker (the Companys President and Chief Executive
Officer) in making decisions on how to allocate resources and assess performance. While the Company
has twelve operating segments, it has only three reportable operating business segments (Lighting,
Graphics, and Technology) and an All Other Category.
The Lighting Segment includes outdoor, indoor, and landscape lighting that has been fabricated and
assembled for the commercial, industrial and multi-site retail lighting markets, including the
petroleum/convenience store market. The Lighting Segment includes the operations of LSI Ohio
Operations, LSI Metal Fabrication, LSI MidWest Lighting, LSI Lightron and LSI Greenlee Lighting.
These operations have been integrated, thereby allowing the Company to achieve similar economic
characteristics and meet the other requirements for aggregation in segment reporting.
The Graphics Segment designs, manufactures and installs exterior and interior visual image elements
related to image programs, solid-state LED digital advertising and sports video screens. These
products are used in visual image programs in several markets, including the petroleum/convenience
store market, multi-site retail operations, sports, and advertising. The Graphics Segment includes
the operations of Grady McCauley, LSI Retail Graphics and LSI Integrated Graphic Systems, which
have been aggregated as such facilities manufacture two-dimensional graphics with the use of screen
and digital printing, fabricate three-dimensional structural graphics sold in the multi-site retail
and petroleum/convenience store markets, and exhibit each of the similar economic characteristics
and meet the other requirements for aggregation in segment reporting.
The Technology Segment designs and produces high-performance light engines, large format video
screens using LED (light emitting diode) technology, and certain specialty LED lighting. The
primary markets served with LED video screens are the entertainment market, outdoor advertising
billboards and sports markets not served by our Graphics Segment. The Technology Segment includes
the operations of LSI Saco Technologies.
The All Other Category includes the Companys operating segments that do not meet the aggregation
criteria, nor the criteria to be a separate reportable segment. Operations of LSI Marcole
(electrical wire harnesses), LSI Images (menu board systems), and LSI Adapt (surveying, permitting
and installation management services related to products of the Graphics Segment) are combined into
the All Other Category. Additionally, the Companys Corporate Administration expense is included
in the All Other Category.
The Company recorded an impairment of goodwill in fiscal 2009 in the amount of $14,467,000. This
non-cash charge is included in the Lighting Segment in the amount of $11,185,000, in the Graphics
Segment in the amount of $716,000 and in the All Other Category in the amount of $2,566,000. The
Company recorded an impairment of goodwill and certain intangible assets in fiscal 2008 in the
amount of $27,955,000. These non-cash charges are included in the Graphics Segment in the amount
of $23,739,000, in the Technology Segment in the amount of $3,119,000 and in the Lighting Segment
in the amount of $1,097,000. See further discussion in Note 6. The Company also recorded an
expense of $200,000 in fiscal 2009 and of $2,800,000 in fiscal 2008 for a loss contingency in the
All Other Category related to a menu board patent lawsuit. See Note 14.
F-30
Summarized financial information for the Companys reportable business segments is provided for the
following periods and as of June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting Segment |
|
$ |
160,475 |
|
|
$ |
183,694 |
|
|
$ |
191,697 |
|
Graphics Segment |
|
|
60,765 |
|
|
|
85,244 |
|
|
|
107,764 |
|
Technology Segment |
|
|
4,576 |
|
|
|
9,136 |
|
|
|
17,132 |
|
All Other Category |
|
|
7,983 |
|
|
|
27,212 |
|
|
|
20,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
233,799 |
|
|
$ |
305,286 |
|
|
$ |
337,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting Segment |
|
$ |
(3,911 |
) |
|
$ |
15,310 |
|
|
$ |
17,219 |
|
Graphics Segment |
|
|
2,646 |
|
|
|
(14,027 |
) |
|
|
19,012 |
|
Technology Segment |
|
|
(486 |
) |
|
|
(4,876 |
) |
|
|
480 |
|
All Other Category |
|
|
(12,660 |
) |
|
|
(7,377 |
) |
|
|
(4,161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(14,411 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,970 |
) |
|
$ |
32,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting Segment |
|
$ |
977 |
|
|
$ |
1,950 |
|
|
$ |
4,139 |
|
Graphics Segment |
|
|
1,933 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
861 |
|
Technology Segment |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
All Other Category |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,994 |
|
|
$ |
3,723 |
|
|
$ |
5,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting Segment |
|
$ |
3,467 |
|
|
$ |
3,852 |
|
|
$ |
3,804 |
|
Graphics Segment |
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
Technology Segment |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
All Other Category |
|
|
2,595 |
|
|
|
2,975 |
|
|
|
3,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,746 |
|
|
$ |
8,789 |
|
|
$ |
9,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Identifiable assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting Segment |
|
$ |
72,222 |
|
|
$ |
97,169 |
|
|
$ |
91,756 |
|
Graphics Segment |
|
|
32,280 |
|
|
|
34,517 |
|
|
|
59,541 |
|
Technology Segment |
|
|
12,317 |
|
|
|
13,806 |
|
|
|
42,549 |
|
All Other Category |
|
|
36,299 |
|
|
|
38,722 |
|
|
|
39,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
153,118 |
|
|
$ |
184,214 |
|
|
$ |
233,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment net sales represent sales to external customers. Intersegment revenues were eliminated in
consolidation as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting Segment intersegment
net sales |
|
$ |
6,097 |
|
|
$ |
4,278 |
|
|
$ |
3,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graphics Segment intersegment
net sales |
|
$ |
1,479 |
|
|
$ |
1,781 |
|
|
$ |
1,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology Segment intersegment
net sales |
|
$ |
4,400 |
|
|
$ |
814 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Category intersegment
net sales |
|
$ |
4,307 |
|
|
$ |
12,755 |
|
|
$ |
11,411 |
|
F-31
Segment operating income, which is used in managements evaluation of segment performance,
represents net sales less all operating expenses including impairment of goodwill and intangible
assets, but excluding interest expense and interest income.
Identifiable assets are those assets used by each segment in its operations. Corporate assets,
which consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments, refundable income
taxes, and certain intangible assets, are included in the All Other Category.
The Company considers its geographic areas to be: 1) the United States, and 2) Canada. The
majority of the Companys operations are in the United States; one operation is in Canada. The
geographic distribution of the Companys net sales and long-lived assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net sales (a): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
229,223 |
|
|
$ |
296,150 |
|
|
$ |
320,321 |
|
Canada |
|
|
4,576 |
|
|
|
9,136 |
|
|
|
17,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
233,799 |
|
|
$ |
305,286 |
|
|
$ |
337,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Long-lived assets (b): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$ |
45,898 |
|
|
$ |
47,928 |
|
|
$ |
47,907 |
|
Canada
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
$ |
898 |
|
|
$ |
981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46,462 |
|
|
$ |
48,826 |
|
|
$ |
48,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a. |
|
Net sales are attributed to geographic areas based upon the location of the operation making
the sale. |
|
b. |
|
Long-lived assets includes property, plant and equipment, and other long term assets.
Goodwill and intangible assets are not included in long-lived assets. |
NOTE 3 MAJOR CUSTOMER CONCENTRATIONS
There was no concentration of receivables as of June 30, 2009 or 2008. There were no customers or
customer programs representing 10% or more of the Companys net sales in fiscal years 2009, 2008 or
2007.
F-32
NOTE 4 EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
The following table presents the amounts used to compute earnings per common share and the effect
of dilutive potential common shares on net income and weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(13,414 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,048 |
) |
|
$ |
20,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
during the period, net
of treasury shares (a) |
|
|
21,574 |
|
|
|
21,554 |
|
|
|
21,476 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
in the Deferred Compensation Plan
during the period |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
21,800 |
|
|
|
21,764 |
|
|
|
21,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(0.62 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
) |
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(13,414 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,048 |
) |
|
$ |
20,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
21,800 |
|
|
|
21,764 |
|
|
|
21,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities (b): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of common shares to be
issued under stock option plans,
and contingently issuable shares,
if any |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding (c) |
|
|
21,800 |
|
|
|
21,764 |
|
|
|
21,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(0.62 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
) |
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes shares accounted for like treasury stock in accordance with EITF 97-14. |
|
(b) |
|
Calculated using the Treasury Stock method as if dilutive securities were exercised
and the funds were used to purchase common shares at the average market price during the
period. |
|
(c) |
|
Options to purchase 1,512,367 common shares, 563,467 common shares, and 206,261 common
shares at June 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively, were not included in the computation
of diluted earnings per share because the exercise price was greater than the average fair
market value of the common shares. |
NOTE 5 BALANCE SHEET DATA
The following information is provided as of June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Inventories: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
20,498 |
|
|
$ |
25,150 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
7,097 |
|
|
|
7,955 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
12,601 |
|
|
|
17,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
40,196 |
|
|
$ |
50,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
$ |
5,788 |
|
|
$ |
7,060 |
|
Customer prepayments |
|
|
1,816 |
|
|
|
1,820 |
|
Accrued sales commissions |
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
1,552 |
|
Loss contingency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
|
1,845 |
|
|
|
2,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,368 |
|
|
$ |
15,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-33
NOTE 6 GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142 (SFAS No. 142) Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets, the Company is required to perform an annual impairment test of its
goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. The Company performs this test as of July
1st of each fiscal year and on an interim basis when an event occurs or circumstances
change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying
amount. The Company uses a combination of the market approach and the income (discounted cash flow)
approach in determining the fair value of its reporting units. Under SFAS No. 142, the goodwill
impairment test is a two-step process. Under the first step, the fair value of the Companys
reporting unit is compared to its respective carrying value. An indication that goodwill is
impaired occurs when the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value. When there
is an indication that goodwill is impaired, the Company is required to perform a second step. In
step two, the actual impairment of goodwill is calculated by comparing the implied fair value of
the goodwill with the carrying value of the goodwill.
The Company identified its reporting units in conjunction with its annual goodwill impairment
testing. In connection with the integration of LSI Saco Technologies, the Company allocated
certain amounts of the goodwill and intangible assets that resulted from the LSI Saco Technologies
acquisition to certain of its reporting units based upon the relative fair values of these
reporting units. The Company relies upon a number of factors, judgments and estimates when
conducting its impairment testing. These include operating results, forecasts, anticipated future
cash flows and market place data, to name a few. There are inherent uncertainties related to these
factors and judgments in applying them to the analysis of goodwill impairment.
Due to current economic conditions, the effects of the recession on the Companys markets and the
decline in the Companys stock price, management believed that additional goodwill impairment tests
were required as of December 31, 2008, March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009. The impairment test
performed as of June 30, 2009 is actually the Companys annual goodwill impairment test that was to
be performed as of July 1, 2009; however, because the conditions that resulted in goodwill
impairment were present as of June 30, 2009, the estimated impairment charge of $260,000 was recorded as of that date.
Based upon the Companys analysis as of these three balance sheet dates, it was determined that the
goodwill associated with three reporting units was either fully or partially impaired. The total
amount of the goodwill impairment in fiscal 2009 was $14,467,000, of which $11,185,000 was full
impairment of the goodwill in one reporting unit in the Lighting Segment, $716,000 was full
impairment of the goodwill in one reporting unit in the Graphics Segment, and $2,566,000 was a
partial impairment of goodwill in one reporting unit in the All Other Category. The impairment
charges were due to a combination of a decline in the market capitalization of the Company and/or a
decline in the estimated forecasted discounted cash flows since the previous goodwill impairment
test was performed.
The Company had previously performed its annual goodwill impairment test as of July 1, 2008. For
purposes of this test, the Company determined that it had six operating segments or individual
subsidiaries, which were determined to be the Companys reporting units, that have goodwill. Based
upon the Companys analysis, it was determined that the goodwill associated with three reporting
units was either fully or partially impaired in the amount of $26,175,000. It was also determined
that other intangible assets associated with three reporting units was either fully or partially
impaired. The total amount of impairment associated with other intangible assets was $1,780,000.
Total impairment for both goodwill and other intangible assets was $27,955,000. The majority of
impairment charges occurred in the Graphics Segment and totaled $23,739,000. The remaining
impairment charges occurred in the Lighting Segment in the amount of $1,097,000 and in the
Technology Segment in the amount of $3,119,000. The majority of the impairment charge in the
Lighting Segment occurred as a result of the fiscal 2008 review of long-lived assets in connection
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-lived Assets. It was determined that a certain trade name was fully impaired
because it was no longer used in the Companys marketing efforts. An impairment charge of $746,000
was recorded as of June 30,
2008 related to this trade name. The remaining impairment charge of $27,209,000 was primarily
comprised of goodwill and was a direct result of the SFAS No. 142 testing. This impairment charge
was due primarily to the combination of a decline in the market capitalization of the Company at
June 30, 2008 and the decline in the estimated forecasted discounted cash flows expected by the
Company. This impairment charge was recorded in fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 rather than in the
first quarter of fiscal 2009 due to the decline in the companys stock price as of June 30, 2008.
A similar analysis was performed as of July 1, 2007 and July 1, 2006 and there was no impairment of
goodwill.
F-34
The following table presents information about the Companys goodwill and other intangible assets
on the dates or for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
As of June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
1,650 |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
1,558 |
|
|
$ |
16,549 |
|
|
$ |
524 |
|
|
$ |
16,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Intangible
Assets |
|
$ |
22,219 |
|
|
$ |
9,238 |
|
|
$ |
12,981 |
|
|
$ |
22,219 |
|
|
$ |
7,159 |
|
|
$ |
15,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2009, by operating
segment, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting |
|
|
Graphics |
|
|
Technology |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Category |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
11,320 |
|
|
$ |
24,030 |
|
|
$ |
3,119 |
|
|
$ |
3,731 |
|
|
$ |
42,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,056 |
) |
|
|
(3,119 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2008 |
|
|
11,320 |
|
|
|
974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,731 |
|
|
|
16,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
(11,185 |
) |
|
|
(716 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,566 |
) |
|
|
(14,467 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,165 |
|
|
$ |
1,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization by major other intangible asset class is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Intangible Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
7,472 |
|
|
$ |
4,173 |
|
|
$ |
7,472 |
|
|
$ |
3,620 |
|
Patents |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
LED Technology
firmware, software |
|
|
10,448 |
|
|
|
4,478 |
|
|
|
10,448 |
|
|
|
2,985 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,660 |
|
|
|
9,238 |
|
|
|
18,660 |
|
|
|
7,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks and tradenames |
|
|
3,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Intangible Assets |
|
$ |
22,219 |
|
|
$ |
9,238 |
|
|
$ |
22,219 |
|
|
$ |
7,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-35
Aggregate amortization expense for other intangible assets was $2,079,000 in fiscal 2009,
$2,326,000 in fiscal 2008 and $2,328,000 in fiscal 2007.
The Company expects to record amortization expense over each of the next five years as follows:
2010 through 2011 $2,080,000 per year; 2012 $2,079,000; 2013 $1,816,000; 2014 $110,000.
NOTE 7 REVOLVING LINES OF CREDIT AND LONG-TERM DEBT
The Company has an unsecured $40 million revolving line of credit with its bank group. As of June
30, 2009, all $40 million of this line of credit was available. A portion of this credit facility
is a $10 million committed line of credit that expires in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. The
remainder of the credit facility is a $30 million three year committed line of credit that expires
in fiscal 2011. Annually in the third quarter, the $30 million credit facility is renewable with
respect to adding an additional year of commitment to replace the year just ended. Interest on the
$30 million revolving line of credit is charged based upon an increment over the LIBOR rate as
periodically determined, an increment over the Federal Funds Rate as periodically determined, or at
the banks base lending rate, at the Companys option. The increment over the LIBOR borrowing
rate, as periodically determined, fluctuates between 50 and 75 basis points depending upon the
ratio of indebtedness to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA).
The increment over the Federal Funds borrowing rate, as periodically determined, fluctuates between
150 and 200 basis points, and the commitment fee on the unused balance of the $30 million committed
portion of the line of credit fluctuates between 15 and 25 basis points based upon the same
leverage ratio. Interest on the $10 million line of credit is charged based upon a 250 basis point
increment over the LIBOR rate as periodically determined. Under terms of these agreements, the
Company has agreed to a negative pledge of assets, to maintain minimum levels of profitability and
net worth, and is subject to certain maximum levels of leverage. The Company has obtained a waiver
from its bank group related to submittal of its third quarter Form 10-Q and is in compliance with
all of its loan covenants as of June 30, 2009.
The Company also has a $5 million line of credit for its Canadian subsidiary. The line of credit
expires in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. Interest on the Canadian subsidiarys line of credit
is charged based upon an increment over the LIBOR rate or based upon a 250 basis point increment
over the United States base rates if funds borrowed are denominated in U.S. dollars or an increment
over the Canadian prime rate if funds borrowed are denominated in Canadian dollars. There have
been only minimal borrowings against this line of credit during the year ended June 30, 2009.
NOTE 8 RESERVE FOR UNCERTAIN TAX LIABILITIES
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, on July 1, 2007. As a result of adoption, the Company recognized
$2,582,000 in reserves for uncertain tax positions and recorded a charge of $2,582,000 to the
July 1, 2007 retained earnings balance. At June 30, 2009, tax and interest, net of potential
federal tax benefits, were $1,873,000 and $447,000, respectively, of the total reserves of
$2,734,000. Additionally, penalties were $414,000 of the reserve at June 30, 2009. Of the
$2,734,000 reserve for uncertain tax positions, $2,320,000 would have an unfavorable impact on the
effective tax rate if recognized. At June 30, 2008, tax and interest, net of potential federal tax
benefits, were $2,098,000 and $534,000, respectively, of the total reserves of $3,225,000.
Additionally, penalties were $593,000 of the reserve
at June 30, 2008. Of the $3,225,000 reserve for uncertain tax positions, $2,632,000 would have an
unfavorable impact on the effective tax rate if recognized.
F-36
The Company recognized a $226,000 tax benefit in fiscal 2009 related to the decrease in reserves
for uncertain tax positions and a $385,000 tax expense in fiscal 2008 related to the increase in
reserves for uncertain tax positions. The Company is recording estimated interest and penalties
related to potential underpayment of income taxes as a component of tax expense in the Consolidated
Statement of Operations. While it is reasonably possible that the amount of reserves for uncertain
tax positions may change in the next twelve months, the Company does not anticipate that total
reserves for uncertain tax positions will significantly change due to the settlement of audits or
the expiration of statutes of limitations in the next twelve months.
The fiscal 2009 and 2008 activity in the Liability for Uncertain Tax Positions, which is included
in Other Long-Term Liabilities, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Balance at beginning of the fiscal year |
|
$ |
3,040 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Unrecognized
tax reserve July 1, 2007 Adoption |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,449 |
|
Increases
tax positions in prior period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
Decreases
tax positions in prior period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increases
tax positions in current period |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
436 |
|
Decreases
tax positions in current period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements and payments |
|
|
(361 |
) |
|
|
(179 |
) |
Lapse of statute of limitations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax reserve end of the fiscal year |
|
$ |
2,693 |
|
|
$ |
3,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return in the United States, and files various
combined and separate tax returns in several foreign, state, and local jurisdictions. With limited
exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. Federal, state and local tax examinations by
tax authorities for fiscal years ending prior to June 30, 2005.
NOTE 9 CASH DIVIDENDS
The Company paid cash dividends of $6,471,000, $13,580,000, and $10,952,000 in fiscal years 2009,
2008, and 2007, respectively. In August 2009, the Companys Board of Directors declared a $0.05
per share regular quarterly cash dividend (approximately $1,202,000) payable on September 8, 2009
to shareholders of record September 1, 2009.
NOTE 10 EQUITY COMPENSATION
On July 1, 2005, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, which requires the
Company to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity
instruments and to recognize this cost in the financial statements over the period during which an
employee is required to provide services.
F-37
Stock Options
The Company has an equity compensation plan that was approved by shareholders which covers all of
its full-time employees, outside directors and advisors. The options granted or stock awards made
pursuant to this plan are granted at fair market value at date of grant or award. Options granted
to non-employee directors become exercisable 25% each ninety days (cumulative) from date of grant
and options granted to employees generally become exercisable 25% per year (cumulative) beginning
one year after the date of grant. The number of shares reserved for issuance is 2,250,000, of
which 897,683
shares were available for future grant or award as of June 30, 2009. This plan allows for the
grant of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights,
restricted and unrestricted stock awards, performance stock awards, and other stock awards. As of
June 30, 2009, a total of 1,537,212 options for common shares were outstanding from this plan as
well as two previous stock option plans (both of which had also been approved by shareholders), and
of these, a total of 830,087 options for common shares were vested and exercisable. The
approximate unvested stock option expense as of June 30, 2009 that will be recorded as expense in
future periods is $2,069,100. The weighted average time over which this expense will be recorded
is approximately 22 months.
The fair value of each option on the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model. The below listed weighted average assumptions were used for grants in the periods
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
4.60 |
% |
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
|
2.97 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
Expected life |
|
5.1 yrs. |
|
|
4.3 yrs. |
|
|
6.5 yrs. |
|
At June 30, 2009, the 365,800 options granted in fiscal 2009 to non-employee directors had exercise
prices ranging from $4.34 to $8.98, fair values ranging from $1.12 to $2.21, and remaining
contractual lives of approximately nine and one-half to ten years.
At June 30, 2008, the 328,200 options granted in fiscal 2008 to both employees and non-employee
directors had exercise prices ranging from $12.58 to $19.76, fair values ranging from $3.07 to
$6.61, and remaining contractual lives of between four years eight months and nine years two
months.
At June 30, 2007, the 250,700 options granted during fiscal 2007 to employees and non-employee
directors had exercise prices ranging from $13.83 to $18.19, fair values ranging from $4.88 to
$6.43 per option, and remaining contractual lives of four years to nearly ten years.
The Company records stock option expense using a straight line Black-Scholes method with an
estimated 6.6% forfeiture rate (revised in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 from the 4.2%
forfeiture rate previously used). The expected volatility of the Companys stock was calculated
based upon the historic monthly fluctuation in stock price for a period approximating the expected
life of option grants. The risk-free interest rate is the rate of a five year Treasury security at
constant, fixed maturity on the approximate date of the stock option grant. The expected life of
outstanding options is determined to be less than the contractual term for a period equal to the
aggregate group of option holders estimated weighted average time within which options will be
exercised. It is the Companys policy that when stock options are exercised, new common shares
shall be issued. The Company recorded $1,184,000, $1,246,000, and $721,000 of expense related to
stock options in fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. As of June 30, 2009, the Company
expects that approximately 671,500 outstanding stock options having a weighted average exercise
price of $13.86, no aggregate intrinsic value, and weighted average remaining contractual terms of
8.3 years will vest in the future.
F-38
Information related to all stock options for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 is shown
in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Contractual Term |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at 6/30/08 |
|
|
1,197,482 |
|
|
$ |
14.44 |
|
|
6.5 years |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
365,800 |
|
|
$ |
8.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures |
|
|
(26,070 |
) |
|
$ |
12.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at 6/30/09 |
|
|
1,537,212 |
|
|
$ |
13.07 |
|
|
6.4 years |
|
|
$ |
33,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at 6/30/09 |
|
|
830,087 |
|
|
$ |
12.52 |
|
|
4.8 years |
|
|
$ |
2,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Contractual Term |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at 6/30/07 |
|
|
983,788 |
|
|
$ |
12.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,642,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
328,200 |
|
|
$ |
19.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures |
|
|
(9,500 |
) |
|
$ |
16.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(105,006 |
) |
|
$ |
9.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at 6/30/08 |
|
|
1,197,482 |
|
|
$ |
14.44 |
|
|
6.5 years |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at 6/30/08 |
|
|
615,482 |
|
|
$ |
11.43 |
|
|
4.9 years |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Contractual Term |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at 6/30/06 |
|
|
783,957 |
|
|
$ |
10.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,232,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
250,700 |
|
|
$ |
17.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures |
|
|
(4,750 |
) |
|
$ |
11.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(46,119 |
) |
|
$ |
10.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at 6/30/07 |
|
|
983,788 |
|
|
$ |
12.16 |
|
|
6.3 years |
|
|
$ |
5,642,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at 6/30/07 |
|
|
540,631 |
|
|
$ |
10.33 |
|
|
4.7 years |
|
|
$ |
4,090,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-39
The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
was $913,700 and $391,000, respectively.
The Company received $855,000 of cash and 8,068 common shares of the Companys stock from employees
who exercised 105,006 options during the twelve months ended June 30, 2008. Additionally, the
Company recorded $228,500 in fiscal 2008 as a reduction of federal income taxes payable, $221,300
as an increase in common stock, and $7,200 as a reduction of income tax expense related to the
exercises of stock options in which the employees sold the common shares prior to the passage of
twelve months from the date of exercise.
Information related to unvested stock options for the twelve months ended June 30, 2009 is shown in
the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Contractual Term |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding unvested
stock options at 6/30/08 |
|
|
582,000 |
|
|
$ |
17.62 |
|
|
8.2 years |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(235,125 |
) |
|
$ |
15.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures |
|
|
(5,550 |
) |
|
$ |
16.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
365,800 |
|
|
$ |
8.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding unvested
stock options at 6/30/09 |
|
|
707,125 |
|
|
$ |
13.72 |
|
|
8.3 years |
|
|
$ |
31,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Compensation Awards
The Company awarded a total of 6,032 and 2,558 common shares in fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008,
respectively, valued at their approximate $40,680 and $43,875 fair market values, respectively, on
the dates of issuance pursuant to the compensation programs for non-employee Directors who receive
a portion of their compensation as an award of Company stock and employees who receive a nominal
stock award following their twentieth employment anniversary. Stock compensation awards are made
in the form of newly issued common shares of the Company.
Deferred Compensation Plan
The Company has a non-qualified deferred compensation plan providing for both Company contributions
and participant deferrals of compensation. The Plan is fully funded in a Rabbi Trust. All Plan
investments are in common shares of the Company. As of June 30, 2009 there were 33 participants,
all with fully vested account balances. A total of 222,832 common shares with a cost of
$2,455,900, and 211,511 common shares with a cost of $2,426,800 were held in the Plan as of June
30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively, and, accordingly, have been recorded as treasury shares.
The change in the number of shares held by this plan is the net result of share purchases and sales
on the open stock market for compensation deferred into the Plan and for distributions to
terminated employees. The Company does not issue new common shares for purposes of the
non-qualified deferred compensation plan. The Company accounts for assets held in the
non-qualified deferred compensation plan in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force 97-14,
Accounting for Deferred Compensation Arrangements where amounts earned are held in a Rabbi Trust
and invested. For fiscal year 2010, the Company estimates the Rabbi Trust for the Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation Plan will make net repurchases in the range of 15,000 to 18,000 common shares
of the Company. During fiscal years 2009 and 2008, the Company used approximately $188,500 and
$262,100, respectively, to purchase common shares of the Company
in the open stock market for either employee salary deferrals or Company contributions into the
non-qualified deferred compensation plan. The Company does not currently repurchase its own common
shares for any other purpose.
F-40
NOTE 11 LEASES AND PURCHASE COMMITMENTS
The Company leases certain of its facilities and equipment under operating lease arrangements.
Rental expense was $2,243,000 in 2009, $2,554,000 in 2008, and $2,779,000 in 2007. Minimum annual
rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases are: $1,589,000 in 2010, $1,558,000 in
2011, $1,296,000 in 2012, $1,008,000 in 2013 and $169,000 in 2014. Purchase commitments, including
minimum annual rental commitments, of the Company totaled $22,404,000 and $22,546,000 as of June
30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively.
NOTE 12 INCOME TAXES
The following information is provided for the years ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Components of income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
(13,911 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,818 |
) |
|
$ |
32,376 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
(492 |
) |
|
|
(4,873 |
) |
|
|
(649 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
$ |
(14,403 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,691 |
) |
|
$ |
31,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal |
|
$ |
(1,629 |
) |
|
$ |
7,523 |
|
|
$ |
9,898 |
|
State and local |
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current |
|
|
(1,990 |
) |
|
|
8,261 |
|
|
|
10,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
(5,904 |
) |
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
$ |
(989 |
) |
|
$ |
2,357 |
|
|
$ |
10,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation to federal statutory rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal statutory tax rate |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
State and local taxes, net of federal benefit |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
Impact of Foreign Operations |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
Federal and state tax credits |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
(27.9 |
) |
|
|
(36.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
(15.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
(22.0 |
)% |
|
|
34.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of deferred income tax assets and (liabilities) at June 30, 2009 and 2008 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves against current assets |
|
$ |
160 |
|
|
$ |
377 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
1,093 |
|
|
|
1,191 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
(4,049 |
) |
|
|
(4,065 |
) |
Loss contingency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
Goodwill, acquisition costs and intangible assets |
|
|
5,181 |
|
|
|
4,832 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
State net operating loss carryover and credits |
|
|
958 |
|
|
|
940 |
|
Foreign net operating loss carryover and credits |
|
|
1,940 |
|
|
|
1,819 |
|
Valuation reserve |
|
|
(1,940 |
) |
|
|
(1,819 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax asset |
|
$ |
4,233 |
|
|
$ |
5,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-41
Reconciliation to the balance sheets as of June 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Deferred income tax asset included in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
$ |
1,253 |
|
|
$ |
2,627 |
|
Long-term deferred income tax asset |
|
|
2,980 |
|
|
|
2,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax asset |
|
$ |
4,233 |
|
|
$ |
5,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009 the Company has recorded two deferred state income tax assets, one in the
amount of $18,000 related to a state net operating loss carryover generated by the Companys New
York subsidiary, and the other in the amount of $940,000, net of federal tax benefits, related to
non-refundable state tax credits. As of June 30, 2008 the Company had recorded two deferred state
income tax assets, one in the amount of $5,000 related to a state net operating loss carryover
generated by the Companys New York subsidiary, and the other in the amount of $935,000, net of
federal tax benefits, related to non-refundable state tax credits. The Company has determined that
these deferred state income tax assets totaling $958,000 and $940,000 as of June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, do not require any valuation reserves because, in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 (SFAS No. 109), these assets will, more likely than not, be
realized. The activity netted to an additional state income tax expense of $25,000, $16,000 and
$249,000, respectively, in fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007.
Additionally, as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company has recorded deferred tax assets for its
Canadian subsidiary related to net operating loss carryover and to research and development tax
credits totaling $1,940,000 and $1,819,000, respectively. In view of the impairment of the
goodwill and certain intangible assets on the financial statements of this subsidiary and two
consecutive loss years, the Company has determined these assets, more likely than not, will not be
realized. Accordingly, full valuation reserves of $1,940,000 and $1,819,000 were recorded as of
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
NOTE 13 SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
1,576 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
$ |
564 |
|
|
$ |
10,877 |
|
|
$ |
9,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares as compensation
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
NOTE 14 LOSS CONTINGENCY
The Company is party to various negotiations and legal proceedings arising in the normal course of
business, most of which are dismissed or resolved with minimal expense to the Company, exclusive of
legal fees. Since October 2000, the Company had been the defendant in a complex lawsuit alleging
patent infringement with respect to some of the Companys menu board systems sold over the past
approximately eleven years. Pursuant to settlement discussions initiated by the plaintiffs, the
Company made a $2,800,000 offer to settle this matter and, accordingly, recorded a loss contingency
reserve in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. Following additional discussions in the second
quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company reached a full and complete settlement of all matters related
to this menu board patent
infringement lawsuit. Accordingly, an additional $200,000 expense was recorded in the second
quarter of fiscal 2009 and a payment of $3,000,000 was made to the plaintiffs.
F-42
NOTE 15 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company has recorded expense for the following related party transactions in the fiscal years
indicated (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL |
|
$ |
266 |
|
|
$ |
177 |
|
|
$ |
222 |
|
American Engineering and Metal Working |
|
$ |
202 |
|
|
$ |
192 |
|
|
$ |
559 |
|
3970957 Canada Inc. |
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
189 |
|
|
$ |
176 |
|
As of the balance sheet date indicated, the Company had the following liabilities recorded with
respect to related party transactions (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL |
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
American Engineering and Metal Working |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
The law firm of Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL, of which one of the Companys independent outside
directors is a senior partner, is the Companys primary outside law firm providing legal services
in most all areas required other than patents and intellectual property. The manufacturing firm of
American Engineering and Metal Working, which is owned and operated by the son of the president of
the Companys Graphics Segment, provides metal fabricated components. 3970957 Canada Inc., which
is owned by the president and another executive of the Companys LSI Saco Technologies subsidiary,
owns the building that the Canadian operation occupies and rents. All related parties provide the
Company either products or services at market-based arms-length prices.
NOTE 16 SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On July 22, 2009, the Company completed the acquisition of certain net assets and 100% of the
business of three related companies (AdL Technology, AdL Engineering and Kelmilfeen collectively,
AdL), which were privately owned and based in Columbus, Ohio. Consideration for the asset
purchase of these businesses totaled $15,781,480, and consisted of 2,469,676 shares of LSIs
unregistered common stock (the fair value of which was determined based upon the closing market
price of LSIs common shares on the acquisition date) and cash of $1,333,875. This purchase price
exceeds the fair value of the net assets being acquired, and it is estimated that when the purchase
price allocation has been completed there will be significant goodwill recorded with this
acquisition, as well as certain intangible assets. Additionally, LSI assumed long-term debt of
$3,368,874 in the purchase of substantially all net assets of these businesses. The goodwill
associated with the acquisition of AdL will consist largely of the synergies expected from
combining AdL and LSI Industries and the vertical integration of the design and manufacture of
electronic circuit boards used in many of the Companys products. None of the goodwill will be
deductible by the Company for tax purposes. Certain information necessary to perform the purchase
accounting and determine the opening July 22, 2009 balance sheet of this 100% owned subsidiary, LSI
ADL Technology, is not available at the time of filing of this Form 10-K. The following
information is not available: (1) U.S. GAAP financial statements of the three acquired companies
as of July 22, 2009 have not been prepared; (2) the valuation of all acquired fixed assets has not
been finalized; and (3) the valuation of any intangible assets is in process, but has not been
completed. It is expected that there wont be any contingent liabilities or assets associated with
the purchase of AdL. There were approximately $60,000 of acquisition related costs included in the
June 30, 2009 financial statements, and the operations of LSI ADL Technology
will be included in the Companys operating results beginning July 23, 2009. Subject to further
analysis, it is likely that the results of LSI ADL Technology will be reported in its own separate
reportable business segment beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
F-43
LSI ADL Technology Inc. will design, engineer, and manufacture custom designed circuit boards,
assemblies, and sub-assemblies used in various applications including the control of solid-state
LED lighting. With the acquisition of AdL, we made a decision to further establish and advance our
leadership position in LED lighting by vertically integrating our capabilities in connection with
designing, engineering, and producing the solid-state electronics that control and power LEDs. LSI
ADL will allow us to stay on the leading edge of product development, while at the same time
providing opportunities to drive down manufacturing costs and control delivery of key components.
ADLs capabilities will also have applications in our other LED product lines such as digital
scoreboards, advertising ribbon boards and billboards. The management team and all employees of the
acquired companies remain with LSI ADL Technology.
NOTE 17 SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Fiscal |
|
(In thousands except per share data) |
|
Sept. 30 |
|
|
Dec. 31 |
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
Year |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
75,838 |
|
|
$ |
60,787 |
|
|
$ |
46,989 |
|
|
$ |
50,185 |
|
|
$ |
233,799 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
18,179 |
|
|
|
13,257 |
|
|
|
8,774 |
|
|
|
11,617 |
|
|
|
51,827 |
|
Loss contingency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,250 |
|
|
|
957 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
14,467 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
2,687 |
|
|
|
(13,377 |
) |
|
|
(2,467 |
) |
|
|
(257 |
) |
|
|
(13,414 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
(0.61 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.62 |
)(a) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
(0.61 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.62 |
)(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of share prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
10.91 |
|
|
$ |
8.28 |
|
|
$ |
7.39 |
|
|
$ |
6.51 |
|
|
$ |
10.91 |
|
Low |
|
$ |
7.02 |
|
|
$ |
4.25 |
|
|
$ |
2.75 |
|
|
$ |
4.15 |
|
|
$ |
2.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
90,001 |
|
|
$ |
84,062 |
|
|
$ |
64,780 |
|
|
$ |
66,443 |
|
|
$ |
305,286 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
25,751 |
|
|
|
23,459 |
|
|
|
15,982 |
|
|
|
15,235 |
|
|
|
80,427 |
|
Loss contingency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
Goodwill and intangible
asset impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,955 |
|
|
|
27,955 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
6,953 |
|
|
|
4,823 |
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
(25,821 |
) |
|
|
(13,048 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(1.18 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
)(a) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(1.18 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
)(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of share prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
21.39 |
|
|
$ |
23.05 |
|
|
$ |
18.65 |
|
|
$ |
14.41 |
|
|
$ |
23.05 |
|
Low |
|
$ |
15.70 |
|
|
$ |
17.42 |
|
|
$ |
8.12 |
|
|
$ |
8.04 |
|
|
$ |
8.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
86,667 |
|
|
$ |
81,640 |
|
|
$ |
75,323 |
|
|
$ |
93,823 |
|
|
$ |
337,453 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
23,122 |
|
|
|
22,194 |
|
|
|
18,474 |
|
|
|
25,389 |
|
|
|
89,179 |
|
Net income |
|
|
5,495 |
|
|
|
5,035 |
|
|
|
3,298 |
|
|
|
6,961 |
|
|
|
20,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.96 |
(a) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of share prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
18.95 |
|
|
$ |
20.81 |
|
|
$ |
20.04 |
|
|
$ |
18.45 |
|
|
$ |
20.81 |
|
Low |
|
$ |
12.83 |
|
|
$ |
15.22 |
|
|
$ |
15.22 |
|
|
$ |
14.65 |
|
|
$ |
12.83 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The total of the earnings per share for each of the four quarters does not equal the total
earnings per share for the full year because the calculations are based on the average shares
outstanding during each of the individual periods. |
At August 18, 2009, there were 427 shareholders of record. The Company believes this represents
approximately 3,000 beneficial shareholders.
F-44
LSI INDUSTRIES INC.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(In thousands except per share)
The following data has been selected from the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for
the periods and dates indicated:
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
233,799 |
|
|
$ |
305,286 |
|
|
$ |
337,453 |
|
|
$ |
280,470 |
|
|
$ |
282,440 |
|
Cost of products and services sold |
|
|
181,972 |
|
|
|
224,859 |
|
|
|
248,274 |
|
|
|
209,057 |
|
|
|
210,144 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
51,571 |
|
|
|
60,642 |
|
|
|
57,219 |
|
|
|
49,898 |
|
|
|
48,494 |
|
Loss contingency (a) |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
(590 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
590 |
|
Goodwill and intangible asset
impairment (b) |
|
|
14,467 |
|
|
|
27,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(14,411 |
) |
|
|
(10,970 |
) |
|
|
32,550 |
|
|
|
21,515 |
|
|
|
23,026 |
|
Interest (income) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(550 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(14,403 |
) |
|
|
(10,691 |
) |
|
|
31,727 |
|
|
|
21,987 |
|
|
|
22,873 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(989 |
) |
|
|
2,357 |
|
|
|
10,938 |
|
|
|
7,544 |
|
|
|
8,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(13,414 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,048 |
) |
|
$ |
20,789 |
|
|
$ |
14,443 |
|
|
$ |
14,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.62 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
) |
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.62 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
) |
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid per share |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
21,800 |
|
|
|
21,764 |
|
|
|
21,676 |
|
|
|
20,194 |
|
|
|
19,782 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
21,800 |
|
|
|
21,764 |
|
|
|
21,924 |
|
|
|
20,429 |
|
|
|
20,087 |
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(At June 30) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
72,500 |
|
|
$ |
72,863 |
|
|
$ |
68,397 |
|
|
$ |
66,787 |
|
|
$ |
67,189 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
153,118 |
|
|
|
184,214 |
|
|
|
233,612 |
|
|
|
224,401 |
|
|
|
172,637 |
|
Long-term debt,
including current
maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
130,473 |
|
|
|
149,190 |
|
|
|
176,061 |
|
|
|
164,985 |
|
|
|
138,040 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The Company recorded loss contingency reserves in fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2005, and
reversed a loss contingency reserve in fiscal 2007 all related to a patent litigation
matter. See Note 14. |
|
(b) |
|
The Company recorded a significant impairment of goodwill and intangible assets in fiscal 2008 and 2009. See Note 6. |
F-45
LSI INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009, 2008, AND 2007
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COLUMN A |
|
COLUMN B |
|
|
COLUMN C |
|
|
COLUMN D |
|
|
COLUMN E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Charged to |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
Beginning |
|
|
Costs and |
|
|
(a) |
|
|
End of |
|
Description |
|
of Period |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
Deductions |
|
|
Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
585 |
|
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
(188 |
) |
|
$ |
532 |
|
Year Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
822 |
|
|
$ |
155 |
|
|
$ |
(392 |
) |
|
$ |
585 |
|
Year Ended June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
656 |
|
|
$ |
469 |
|
|
$ |
(303 |
) |
|
$ |
822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Obsolescence Reserve: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,638 |
|
|
$ |
1,568 |
|
|
$ |
(1,796 |
) |
|
$ |
1,410 |
|
Year Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,606 |
|
|
$ |
1,479 |
|
|
$ |
(1,447 |
) |
|
$ |
1,638 |
|
Year Ended June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,584 |
|
|
$ |
1,687 |
|
|
$ |
(1,665 |
) |
|
$ |
1,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Reserve: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,819 |
|
|
$ |
121 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,940 |
|
Year Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,819 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,819 |
|
Year Ended June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
622 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(622 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
For Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, deductions are uncollectible accounts charged off, less
recoveries. |
F-46
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
* |
|
LSI Industries Inc. Retirement Plan (Amended and Restated as of February 1, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10 |
* |
|
Fourth Amendment to the LSI Industries Inc. Retirement Plan (Amended and Restated as of February 1, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer |
|
|
|
* |
|
Management Compensatory Agreements. |
LSI will provide shareholders with any exhibit upon the payment of a specified reasonable
fee, which fee shall be limited to LSIs reasonable expenses in furnishing such exhibit.