424B3
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration
No. 333-158237
June 17,
2009
Dear Fellow Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend our upcoming annual meeting
of stockholders of Wyeth to be held on Monday, July 20,
2009, at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, at the Hyatt
Morristown at Headquarters Plaza, 3 Speedwell Avenue,
Morristown, New Jersey. As we announced on January 26,
2009, Wyeth and Pfizer Inc. entered into a merger agreement,
dated as of January 25, 2009, which provides for a merger
in which Wyeth will become a
wholly-owned
subsidiary of Pfizer. If the merger is completed, you will have
the right to receive, in exchange for each share of Wyeth common
stock you own immediately prior to the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
$33.00 in cash; and
|
|
|
|
0.985 of a share of Pfizer common stock.
|
Under limited circumstances, Pfizer may be required to decrease
the exchange ratio of 0.985 of a share of Pfizer common stock
and increase the cash portion of the merger consideration by an
amount having an equivalent value (based on the average price of
Pfizer common stock traded over a specified period of time prior
to closing).
The Wyeth board of directors has approved and declared advisable
the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement and has determined that the merger agreement
and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement,
including the merger, are fair to, and in the best interests of,
Wyeth and its stockholders. Therefore, the Wyeth board of
directors recommends that you vote FOR the adoption
of the merger agreement.
The common stock of Pfizer and Wyeth are traded on the New York
Stock Exchange under the symbols PFE and
WYE, respectively. Based on the closing price of
Pfizer common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on
January 23, 2009, the last trading day before public
announcement of the merger agreement, the merger consideration
represented approximately $50.19 in value for each share of
Wyeth common stock. Based on the closing price of Pfizer common
stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 16, 2009, the
latest practicable date before the date of the accompanying
proxy
statement/prospectus,
the merger consideration represented approximately $46.95 in
value for each share of Wyeth common stock. The merger will be a
taxable transaction for Wyeth stockholders for United States
federal income tax purposes.
We are asking you to vote to adopt the merger agreement at the
2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Wyeth. At this meeting
you also will be asked to vote on the election of Wyeth
directors and other Wyeth annual meeting matters.
The Wyeth board of directors recommends that Wyeth
stockholders vote FOR the proposal to adopt the
merger agreement and FOR each of the other proposals
described in the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus, other
than the two stockholder proposals, each of which the Wyeth
board of directors recommends that Wyeth stockholders vote
AGAINST.
Your vote is very important. As a condition to
completion of the merger, an affirmative vote of holders of a
majority of the combined voting power of the outstanding shares
of Wyeth common stock and Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock
entitled to vote on the proposal, voting together as a single
class, is required. Approval of the other matters at the meeting
is not a condition to completion of the merger. Whether or
not you expect to attend the meeting in person, we urge you to
submit your proxy as promptly as possible (1) through the
Internet, (2) by telephone or (3) by marking, signing
and dating the enclosed proxy card and returning it in the
postage-paid envelope provided. If you have any questions
about the merger or need assistance voting your shares, please
call D. F. King & Co., Inc., which is assisting Wyeth
with the solicitation of proxies, toll-free at 1-800-859-8509 or
call collect at
1-212-269-5550.
The obligations of Pfizer and Wyeth to complete the merger are
subject to several conditions set forth in the merger agreement
and summarized in the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus.
More information about Pfizer, Wyeth, the meeting, the merger
and the other proposals for consideration at the meeting is
contained in the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus. You
are encouraged to read carefully the accompanying proxy
statement/prospectus in its entirety including the section
titled Risk Factors beginning on page 47.
On behalf of the Wyeth board of directors, thank you for your
continued support.
Sincerely,
Bernard Poussot
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Neither the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission nor any
state securities commission has approved or disapproved of the
securities to be issued under the accompanying proxy
statement/prospectus or determined that the accompanying proxy
statement/prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation
to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The accompanying proxy statement/prospectus is dated
June 17, 2009 and is first being mailed to the stockholders
of Wyeth on or about June 18, 2009.
II-1
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
The accompanying proxy statement/prospectus incorporates
important business and financial information about Pfizer and
Wyeth from other documents that are not included in or delivered
with the proxy statement/prospectus. This information is
available to you without charge upon your request. You can
obtain the documents incorporated by reference into the proxy
statement/prospectus by requesting them in writing or by
telephone from the appropriate company at the following
addresses and telephone numbers:
|
|
|
Pfizer Inc.
235 East 42nd Street
New York, New York 10017
Attn: Investor Relations
Tel: 1-212-573-2323
|
|
Wyeth
Five Giralda Farms
Madison, New Jersey 07940
Attn: Investor Relations
Tel: 1-877-552-4744
|
In addition, if you have questions about the merger, the other
meeting matters or the proxy statement/prospectus, would like
additional copies of the proxy statement/prospectus or need to
obtain proxy cards or other information related to the proxy
solicitation, you may contact D.F. King & Co., Inc.,
Wyeths proxy solicitor, at the address and telephone
number listed below. You will not be charged for any of these
documents that you request.
D.F.
King & Co., Inc.
48 Wall Street, 22nd Floor
New York, New York 10005
1-800-859-8509 (toll free) or 1-212-269-5550 (call collect)
In order to receive timely delivery of the documents in
advance of the annual meeting of stockholders, you must request
the information no later than July 13, 2009.
For more information, see Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 247.
Five Giralda Farms
Madison, New Jersey 07940
Notice of Annual Meeting of
Stockholders
To the Stockholders of Wyeth:
We are pleased to invite you to attend the 2009 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders of Wyeth (the meeting), which will
be held on July 20, 2009 at 9:00 a.m., Eastern
Daylight Time, in the Plaza Ballroom of the Hyatt Morristown at
Headquarters Plaza, 3 Speedwell Avenue, Morristown, New Jersey,
for the following purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
To consider and vote on a proposal to adopt the Agreement and
Plan of Merger, dated as of January 25, 2009 (as it may be
amended from time to time, the merger agreement),
among Pfizer Inc. (Pfizer), Wagner Acquisition
Corp., a
wholly-owned
subsidiary of Pfizer, and Wyeth, a copy of which is attached as
Annex A to the proxy statement/prospectus accompanying this
notice;
|
|
|
|
To approve the adjournment of the meeting, if necessary, to
solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to
adopt the merger agreement at the time of the meeting;
|
|
|
|
To elect 11 nominees to the Wyeth board of directors, each to
hold office until the earliest of Wyeths 2010 annual
meeting of stockholders, his or her removal or resignation or,
if the merger is completed, the effective time of the merger;
|
|
|
|
To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as
Wyeths independent registered public accounting firm for
2009; and
|
|
|
|
To consider and vote upon two stockholder proposals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
A stockholder proposal regarding reporting on Wyeths
political contributions and trade association payments; and
|
|
|
|
A stockholder proposal regarding special stockholder meetings.
|
Please refer to the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus with
respect to the business to be transacted at the meeting. The
Wyeth board of directors has determined that the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, including the merger, are advisable and are fair to,
and in the best interests of, Wyeth and its stockholders and
recommends that Wyeth stockholders vote FOR the
proposal to adopt the merger agreement. In addition, the
Wyeth board of directors recommends that you vote
FOR the proposal to adjourn the meeting, if
necessary, to permit further solicitation of proxies for the
adoption of the merger agreement, FOR the election
of each of our nominees for director as proposed herein,
FOR the ratification of the selection by our audit
committee of the independent registered public accounting firm,
and AGAINST each of the stockholder proposals.
The Wyeth board of directors has chosen the close of business on
June 5, 2009, as the record date that will
determine the stockholders who are entitled to receive notice
of, and to vote at, the meeting or at any adjournment or
postponement of the meeting. A list of the names of Wyeth
stockholders of record will be available at the meeting and for
10 days prior to the meeting for any purpose germane to the
meeting during regular business hours at the Hyatt Morristown at
Headquarters Plaza, 3 Speedwell Avenue, Morristown, New Jersey.
Only holders of record of Wyeth common stock and preferred stock
at the close of business on the record date are entitled to vote
at the meeting, provided that such shares remain outstanding on
the date of the meeting. On April 23, 2009, Wyeth announced
that, pursuant to a request by Pfizer, it would redeem all of
its
outstanding preferred stock, effective on July 15, 2009,
and as a result, no preferred stock will be outstanding at the
time of the meeting and former holders thereof will not be
entitled to vote such shares at the meeting. Adoption of the
merger agreement by the Wyeth stockholders is a condition to the
merger and requires the affirmative vote of holders of a
majority of the combined voting power of the outstanding shares
of Wyeth common stock and preferred stock entitled to vote on
the proposal, voting together as a single class. Approval of the
other matters at the meeting is not a condition to completion of
the merger.
Under Delaware law, holders of record of Wyeth common stock who
do not vote in favor of adoption of the merger agreement have
the right to seek appraisal of the fair value of their shares of
stock if the merger is completed. To exercise your appraisal
rights, you must strictly follow the procedures prescribed by
Delaware law, including, among other things, submitting a
written demand for appraisal to Wyeth before the vote is taken
on the adoption of the merger agreement, and you must not vote
in favor of adoption of the merger agreement. These procedures
are summarized in the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus in
the section titled Appraisal Rights beginning on
page 114 (the text of the applicable provisions of Delaware
law is included as Annex D to the accompanying proxy
statement/prospectus).
As authorized by the board of directors,
EILEEN M. LACH
Corporate Secretary
Madison, New Jersey
June 17, 2009
YOUR VOTE
IS IMPORTANT!
WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE MEETING IN PERSON, WE
URGE YOU TO SUBMIT YOUR PROXY AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE
(1) THROUGH THE INTERNET, (2) BY TELEPHONE OR
(3) BY MARKING, SIGNING AND DATING THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD
AND RETURNING IT IN THE POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED. You
may revoke your proxy at any time before the meeting. If your
shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee,
please follow the instructions on the voting instruction card
furnished to you by such record holder.
The accompanying proxy statement/prospectus provides a detailed
description of the merger, the merger agreement and the other
matters to be considered at the meeting. We urge you to read the
accompanying proxy statement/prospectus, including any documents
incorporated by reference into the accompanying proxy
statement/prospectus, and its annexes carefully and in their
entirety. If you have any questions concerning the merger, the
other meeting matters or the accompanying proxy
statement/prospectus, would like additional copies of the
accompanying proxy statement/prospectus or need help voting your
shares, please contact Wyeths proxy solicitor:
D. F. King & Co., Inc.
48 Wall Street, 22nd Floor
New York, New York 10005
1-800-859-8509 (toll free)
1-212-269-5550 (call collect)
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy
Materials for Wyeths 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
to Be Held on July 20, 2009: The accompanying proxy
statement/prospectus, Wyeths 2008 Annual Review and
Wyeths 2008 Financial Report are available at
www.wyeth.com/2009proxymaterials.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iii
CHAPTER ONE
THE MERGER
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT VOTING PROCEDURES FOR THE ANNUAL
MEETING
The following are some questions that you, as a stockholder
of Wyeth, may have regarding the merger and the other matters
being considered at Wyeths 2009 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, which is referred to as the meeting, and the
answers to those questions. You are urged to carefully read this
proxy statement/prospectus and the other documents referred to
in this proxy statement/prospectus in their entirety because the
information in this section does not provide all of the
information that might be important to you with respect to the
merger and the other matters being considered at the meeting.
Additional important information is contained in the annexes to,
and the documents incorporated by reference into, this proxy
statement/prospectus. In this proxy statement/prospectus, unless
stated to the contrary, the terms the company,
we, our, ours, and
us refer to Wyeth and its subsidiaries.
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Why am I receiving this document? |
|
A: |
|
Pfizer and Wyeth have agreed to a merger, pursuant to which
Wyeth will become a
wholly-owned
subsidiary of Pfizer and will no longer be a publicly held
corporation. In addition to the payment of cash, in the merger,
Pfizer will issue shares of Pfizer common stock as part of the
consideration to be paid to holders of Wyeth common stock.
Pfizer also will issue shares of a new series of preferred stock
in exchange for any Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock
outstanding at the effective time of the merger; however on
April 23, 2009, Wyeth announced that, pursuant to a request
by Pfizer, it would redeem all of its outstanding Wyeth $2
Convertible Preferred Stock, effective on July 15, 2009.
Therefore, it is expected that there will not be any shares of
Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding at the
effective time of the merger. In such case, Pfizer will not
create or issue a new series of preferred stock in connection
with the merger. In order to complete the merger, Wyeth
stockholders must vote to adopt the merger agreement. |
|
|
|
We are delivering this document to you as both a proxy statement
of Wyeth and a prospectus of Pfizer. It is a proxy statement
because the Wyeth board of directors is soliciting proxies from
its stockholders to vote on the adoption of the merger agreement
at Wyeths 2009 annual meeting of stockholders as well as
the other matters set forth in the notice of the meeting and
described in this proxy statement/prospectus, and your proxy
will be used at the meeting or at any adjournment or
postponement of the meeting. It is a prospectus because Pfizer
will issue Pfizer common stock to the Wyeth common stockholders
in the merger (and, if any shares of Wyeth $2 Convertible
Preferred Stock are outstanding at the effective time of the
merger, will issue shares of Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred
Stock to the holders of Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock). |
|
Q: |
|
What am I being asked to vote on? |
|
A: |
|
Wyeths stockholders are being asked to vote on the
following proposals: |
|
|
|
to adopt the merger agreement between Pfizer and
Wyeth;
|
|
|
|
to approve the adjournment of the meeting, if
necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there are not
sufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement at the time of
the meeting;
|
|
|
|
to elect to the Wyeth board of directors each of the
nominees for director named in this proxy statement/prospectus;
|
|
|
|
to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP as Wyeths independent registered public accounting
firm for 2009; and
|
|
|
|
the following two stockholder proposals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
a stockholder proposal regarding reporting on Wyeths
political contributions and trade association payments; and
|
|
|
|
a stockholder proposal regarding special stockholder meetings.
|
1
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Are there any other matters to be addressed at the
meeting? |
|
A: |
|
We know of no other matters to be brought before the meeting,
but if other matters are brought before the meeting or at any
adjournment or postponement of the meeting, the officers named
in your proxy intend to take such action as in their judgment is
in the best interest of Wyeth and its stockholders. |
|
Q: |
|
What is a proxy and how do I vote? |
|
A: |
|
A proxy is a legal designation of another person to vote your
shares on your behalf. If you hold shares in your own name or if
you participate in Wyeths BuyDIRECT Stock Purchase and
Sale Plan through The Bank of New York Mellon, you may submit a
proxy for your shares by using the toll-free number or the
Internet Web site if your proxy card includes instructions for
using these quick, cost-effective and easy methods for
submitting proxies. You also may submit a proxy in writing by
simply filling out, signing and dating your proxy card and
mailing it in the prepaid envelope included with these proxy
materials. If you submit a proxy by telephone or the Internet
Web site, please do not return your proxy card by mail. You will
need to follow the instructions when you submit a proxy using
any of these methods to make sure your shares will be voted at
the meeting. You also may vote by submitting a ballot in person
if you attend the meeting. However, we encourage you to submit a
proxy by mail by completing your proxy card, by telephone or via
the Internet even if you plan to attend the meeting. |
|
|
|
If you hold shares through a broker or other nominee, you may
instruct your broker or other nominee to vote your shares by
following the instructions that the broker or nominee provides
to you with these materials. Most brokers offer the ability for
stockholders to submit voting instructions by mail by completing
a voting instruction card, by telephone and via the Internet. If
you hold shares through a broker or other nominee and wish to
vote your shares at the meeting, you must obtain a legal proxy
from your broker or nominee and present it to the inspector of
election with your ballot when you vote at the meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
When is this proxy statement/prospectus being mailed? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
This proxy statement/prospectus and the proxy card are first
being sent to Wyeth stockholders on or near June 18, 2009. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Must you give voting instructions if you participate in
Wyeths BuyDIRECT Stock Purchase and Sale Plan? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. If you participate in Wyeths BuyDIRECT Stock
Purchase and Sale Plan and do not submit a proxy by mail by
completing your proxy card, by telephone or via the Internet,
your shares will not be voted. |
|
Q: |
|
When and where will the meeting be held? |
|
A: |
|
The meeting will be held in the Plaza Ballroom of the Hyatt
Morristown at Headquarters Plaza located at 3 Speedwell Avenue,
Morristown, New Jersey on July 20, 2009 at 9:00 a.m.,
Eastern Daylight Time. |
|
Q. |
|
Who is entitled to vote at the meeting? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
All holders of Wyeth common stock and Wyeth $2 Convertible
Preferred Stock who held shares at the close of business on the
record date (June 5, 2009) are entitled to
receive notice of and to vote at the meeting provided that such
shares remain outstanding on the date of the meeting. On
April 23, 2009, Wyeth announced that, pursuant to a request
from Pfizer made in accordance with the terms and conditions of
the merger agreement, Wyeth will redeem all of its outstanding
Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock, effective on July 15,
2009; accordingly, Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock will not
be outstanding at the time of the meeting and former holders
thereof will not be entitled to vote such shares at the meeting. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
As a Wyeth stockholder, why am I electing Wyeth directors,
ratifying the appointment of an independent registered public
accounting firm for Wyeth and considering two Wyeth stockholder
proposals when I am being asked to adopt the merger
agreement? |
|
A: |
|
Delaware law requires Wyeth to hold a meeting of its
stockholders each year. Wyeth has determined that it will
observe this requirement and hold the meeting to elect directors
to the Wyeth board of directors, ratify the appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Wyeths independent
registered public accounting firm |
2
|
|
|
|
|
for 2009 and consider two Wyeth stockholder proposals. The Wyeth
directors elected at the meeting will serve as directors of
Wyeth following the meeting through the earliest of Wyeths
2010 annual meeting of stockholders, his or her removal or
resignation, or, if the merger is completed, the effective time
of the merger. At the effective time of the merger, the
individuals serving as Wyeth directors immediately prior to the
effective time of the merger will no longer be Wyeth directors
and two members of the Wyeth board of directors who were members
of the Wyeth board of directors as of the date of the merger
agreement will be appointed to the Pfizer board of directors.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP will not continue to conduct an
independent audit of Wyeth following the merger. The election of
the nominees for director, the ratification of the selection of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Wyeths independent
registered public accounting firm and the stockholder proposals
are not conditions to completion of the merger. |
|
Q: |
|
Why is my vote important? |
|
A: |
|
If you do not submit a proxy or vote in person at the meeting,
it will be more difficult for us to obtain the necessary quorum
to hold the meeting. In addition, your failure to submit a proxy
or to vote in person will have the same effect as a vote against
the adoption of the merger agreement. If you hold your shares
through a broker, your broker will not be able to cast a vote on
the adoption of the merger agreement without instructions from
you. The Wyeth board of directors recommends that you vote
FOR the adoption of the merger agreement. |
|
Q: |
|
How many shares may be voted at the meeting? |
|
A: |
|
All stockholders who hold shares of Wyeth common stock or Wyeth
$2 Convertible Preferred Stock at the close of business on the
record date (June 5, 2009) are entitled to vote
at the meeting provided that such shares remain outstanding on
the date of the meeting. As of the close of business on the
record date, there were 1,333,898,690 shares of Wyeth
common stock and 7,600 shares of Wyeth $2 Convertible
Preferred Stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting.
Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote and each
share of Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock is entitled to 36
votes. On April 23, 2009, Wyeth announced that, pursuant to
a request from Pfizer made in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the merger agreement, Wyeth will redeem all of its
outstanding Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock, effective on
July 15, 2009; accordingly, Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred
Stock will not be outstanding at the time of the meeting and
former holders thereof will not be entitled to vote such shares
at the meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
What constitutes a quorum for the meeting? |
|
A: |
|
A majority of the outstanding shares having voting power being
present in person or represented by proxy constitutes a quorum
for the meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
How many votes are required for the approval of each item? |
|
A: |
|
The following are the vote requirements for the various
proposals: |
|
|
|
Adoption of the Merger
Agreement: To adopt the merger agreement, the
holders of a majority of the combined voting power of the
outstanding shares of Wyeth common stock and Wyeth $2
Convertible Preferred Stock entitled to vote on the proposal,
voting together as a single class, must vote in favor of
adoption of the merger agreement.
|
|
|
|
Election of Directors: Nominees
receiving a majority of the votes cast will be elected as a
director. This means that for a nominee for director to be
elected to the Wyeth board of directors, the number of votes
cast for that director nominee must exceed the number of votes
cast against that director nominee.
|
|
|
|
All Other Matters: All other
matters on the agenda will be decided by the affirmative vote of
the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or
represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote thereon
in accordance with the Wyeth bylaws.
|
|
Q: |
|
Can you keep your vote secret? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. You may request that your vote be kept secret until
after the meeting by asking us to do so on your proxy card or by
following the instructions when submitting your proxy by
telephone or via the Internet Web site. |
3
|
|
|
Q: |
|
How will abstentions be counted? |
|
A: |
|
Abstentions are counted as present and entitled to vote for
purposes of determining a quorum. If you abstain from voting in
the election of directors, you will effectively not vote on that
matter at the meeting. Abstentions are not considered to be
votes cast under the Wyeth bylaws or under the laws of Delaware
(Wyeths state of incorporation) and will have no effect on
the outcome of the vote for the election of directors. For
the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, abstentions have the
same effect as a vote against the merger. For the proposal
to adjourn the meeting to solicit additional proxies, the
proposal to ratify the independent registered public accounting
firm and for each of the two stockholder proposals, abstentions
are treated as present and entitled to vote at the meeting and
therefore have the same effect as a vote against the matter. |
|
Q: |
|
How will my shares be represented at the meeting? |
|
A: |
|
At the meeting, the officers named in your proxy card will vote
your shares in the manner you requested if you correctly
submitted your proxy. If you sign your proxy card and return it
without indicating how you would like to vote your shares, your
proxy will be voted as the Wyeth board of directors recommends,
which is: |
|
|
|
FOR the adoption of the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
FOR the approval of the adjournment of the
meeting, if necessary to solicit additional proxies if there are
not sufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement at the time
of the meeting;
|
|
|
|
FOR the election to the Wyeth board of
directors of each of the nominees for director named in this
proxy statement/prospectus;
|
|
|
|
FOR the ratification of the appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Wyeths independent
registered public accounting firm for 2009; and
|
|
|
|
AGAINST the following two stockholder
proposals:
|
|
|
|
a stockholder proposal regarding reporting on
Wyeths political contributions and trade association
payments; and
|
|
|
|
a stockholder proposal regarding special stockholder
meetings.
|
|
Q: |
|
What happens if I sell my shares after the record date but
before the meeting? |
|
A: |
|
The record date of the meeting is earlier than the date of the
meeting and the date that the merger is expected to be
completed. If you transfer your Wyeth shares after the record
date but before the date of the meeting, you will retain your
right to vote at the meeting (provided that such shares remain
outstanding on the date of the meeting), but you will not have
the right to receive the merger consideration to be received by
Wyeths stockholders in the merger. In order to receive the
merger consideration, you must hold your shares through
completion of the merger. |
|
Q: |
|
What do I do if I receive more than one proxy
statement/prospectus or set of voting instructions? |
|
A: |
|
If you hold shares directly as a record holder and also in
street name, or otherwise through a nominee, you may
receive more than one proxy statement/prospectus and/or set of
voting instructions relating to the meeting. These should each
be voted and/or returned separately in order to ensure that all
of your shares are voted. |
|
Q: |
|
Are Wyeth stockholders entitled to seek appraisal rights if
they do not vote in favor of the adoption of the merger
agreement? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. Under Delaware law, record holders of
Wyeth common stock who do not vote in favor of the adoption of
the merger agreement will be entitled to seek appraisal rights
in connection with the merger, and if the merger is completed,
obtain payment in cash of the fair value of their shares of
common stock as determined by the Delaware Chancery Court,
instead of the merger consideration. To exercise your appraisal
rights, you must strictly follow the procedures prescribed by
Delaware law. These procedures are summarized in this proxy
statement/prospectus. In addition, the text of the applicable
provisions of Delaware law is included as Annex D to this proxy
statement/prospectus. Failure to strictly comply with these
provisions will result in a loss of the right of appraisal. |
4
|
|
|
Q: |
|
If my Wyeth shares are held in street name by my broker, will
my broker automatically vote my shares for me? |
|
A: |
|
No. If your shares are held in an account at a broker,
you must instruct the broker on how to vote your shares. If you
do not provide voting instructions to your broker, your shares
will not be voted on any proposal on which your broker does not
have discretionary authority to vote. This is called a broker
non-vote. In these cases, the broker can register your shares as
being present at the meeting for purposes of determining the
presence of a quorum but will not be able to vote on those
matters for which specific authorization is required. Under the
current rules of the New York Stock Exchange, which is referred
to as the NYSE, we believe that brokers do not have
discretionary authority to vote on the proposal to adopt the
merger agreement or the two stockholder proposals. A broker
non-vote will have the same effect as a vote against adoption of
the merger agreement but will have no effect on whether the two
stockholder proposals are approved. |
|
Q: |
|
Can I revoke my proxy? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. You may revoke your proxy at any time before the
meeting. If you are a stockholder of record or participate in
Wyeths BuyDIRECT Stock Purchase and Sale Plan through The
Bank of New York Mellon in your own name, you can revoke your
proxy before it is exercised by written notice to the Corporate
Secretary of Wyeth, by timely delivery of a valid, later-dated
proxy card or a later-dated proxy submitted by telephone or via
the Internet, or by voting by ballot in person if you attend the
meeting. Simply attending the meeting will not revoke your
proxy. If you hold shares through a broker or other nominee, you
may submit new voting instructions by contacting your broker or
other nominee. |
|
Q: |
|
Who may attend the meeting? |
|
A: |
|
Wyeth stockholders (or their authorized representatives) and
Wyeths invited guests may attend the meeting. Verification
of stock ownership will be required at the meeting. If you own
your shares in your own name or hold them through a broker (and
can provide documentation showing ownership such as a letter
from your broker or a recent account statement) at the close of
business on the record date (June 5, 2009), you will be
permitted to attend the meeting. Stockholders may call the Wyeth
Office of the Corporate Secretary at
1-973-660-6073
to obtain directions to the Hyatt Morristown at Headquarters
Plaza, 3 Speedwell Avenue, Morristown, New Jersey. |
|
Q: |
|
Will cameras and recording devices be permitted at the
meeting? |
|
A: |
|
No. Stockholders are not permitted to bring cameras
or recording equipment into the meeting room. |
|
Q: |
|
If I am a Wyeth stockholder, should I send in my Wyeth stock
certificates now? |
|
A: |
|
No. After completion of the merger, Pfizer will send
you instructions for exchanging your Wyeth stock certificates
for the merger consideration. Unless you specifically request to
receive Pfizer stock certificates, the shares of Pfizer stock
you receive in the merger will be issued in book-entry form. |
|
Q: |
|
Will a proxy solicitor be used? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. Wyeth has engaged D.F. King & Co., Inc. to
assist in the solicitation of proxies for the meeting and Wyeth
estimates it will pay D.F. King & Co., Inc. a fee of
approximately $75,000. Wyeth has also agreed to reimburse D.F.
King & Co., Inc. for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses and
disbursements incurred in connection with the proxy solicitation
and to indemnify D.F. King & Co., Inc. against certain
losses, costs and expenses. In addition, our officers and
employees may request the return of proxies by telephone or in
person, but no additional compensation will be paid to them. |
|
Q: |
|
Who should I call with questions? |
|
A: |
|
Wyeth stockholders should call D.F. King & Co., Inc.,
Wyeths proxy solicitor, toll-free at 1-800-859-8509 or
collect at 1-212-269-5550 with any questions about the merger
and the other matters to be voted on at the meeting, or to
obtain additional copies of this proxy statement/prospectus or
additional proxy cards. |
5
SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information from this proxy
statement/prospectus. It may not contain all of the information
that is important to you. You are urged to carefully read the
entire proxy statement/prospectus and the other documents
referred to in this proxy statement/prospectus because the
information in this section does not provide all the information
that might be important to you with respect to the merger
agreement, the merger and the other matters being considered at
the meeting. See Where You Can Find More Information
beginning on page 247. Each item in this summary refers to
the page of this proxy statement/prospectus on which that
subject is discussed in more detail.
Information
about the Companies (page 51)
Pfizer
Pfizer, a Delaware corporation, is a research-based, global
pharmaceutical company that discovers, develops, manufactures
and markets leading prescription medicines for humans and
animals. Pfizer operates in two business segments:
pharmaceutical and animal health. Pfizer also operates several
other businesses, including the manufacture of gelatin capsules,
contract manufacturing and bulk pharmaceutical chemicals.
Pfizers pharmaceutical business is the largest
pharmaceutical business in the world. Each year, Pfizers
pharmaceuticals help over 100 million people throughout the
world live longer, healthier lives. With medicines across 11
therapeutic areas, Pfizer helps to treat and prevent many of the
most common and most challenging conditions of recent time.
Pfizers products are in Cardiovascular and Metabolic
Diseases, Central Nervous System Disorders, Arthritis and Pain,
Infectious and Respiratory Diseases, Urology, Oncology,
Ophthalmology and Endocrine Disorders.
Pfizers common stock (NYSE: PFE) is listed on the NYSE.
Pfizer is a member of the S&P 500 and the Fortune 500. The
principal executive offices of Pfizer are located at 235 East
42nd Street, New York, New York,
10017-5755,
and its telephone number is
1-212-573-2323.
Additional information about Pfizer and its subsidiaries is
included in documents incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 247.
Wagner
Acquisition Corp.
Wagner Acquisition Corp., sometimes referred to in this proxy
statement/prospectus as Merger Sub, a direct wholly-owned
subsidiary of Pfizer, was formed solely for the purpose of
consummating the merger. Wagner Acquisition Corp. has not
carried on any activities to date, except for activities
incidental to its formation and activities undertaken in
connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement. The principal executive offices of Wagner Acquisition
Corp. are located at 235 East 42nd Street, New York, New
York,
10017-5755,
and its telephone number is
1-212-573-2323.
Wyeth
Wyeth, a Delaware corporation, organized in 1926, is currently
engaged in the discovery, development, manufacture, distribution
and sale of a diversified line of products in three primary
businesses: Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Wyeth Consumer Healthcare,
and Fort Dodge Animal Health. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals
includes branded human ethical pharmaceuticals, biotechnology
products, vaccines and nutritional products. Wyeth
Pharmaceuticals products include neuroscience therapies,
musculoskeletal therapies, vaccines, nutritional products,
anti-infectives, womens health care products, hemophilia
treatments, gastroenterology drugs, immunological products and
oncology therapies. Wyeth Consumer Healthcare products include
pain management therapies, including analgesics and heat wraps,
cough/cold/allergy remedies, nutritional supplements, and
hemorrhoidal care and personal care items sold over-the-counter.
Fort Dodge Animal Health products include vaccines,
pharmaceuticals, parasite control and growth implants.
Wyeths common stock (NYSE: WYE) and Wyeths $2
Convertible Preferred Stock (NYSE: WYEPR) are listed on the
NYSE. Wyeth is a member of the S&P 500 and Fortune 500. The
principal executive offices
6
of Wyeth are located at Five Giralda Farms, Madison, New Jersey
07940, and its telephone number is
1-973-660-5000.
Additional information about Wyeth and its subsidiaries is
included in documents incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 247.
The
Merger (page 118)
Pfizer, Wyeth and Merger Sub entered into the Agreement and Plan
of Merger, dated as of January 25, 2009, which, as it may
be amended from time to time, is referred to in this proxy
statement/prospectus as the merger agreement. Subject to the
terms and conditions of the merger agreement, Merger Sub will be
merged with and into Wyeth, with Wyeth continuing as the
surviving corporation. Upon the completion of the merger, Wyeth
will be a
wholly-owned
subsidiary of Pfizer, and Wyeth common stock and Wyeth $2
Convertible Preferred Stock will no longer be outstanding or
publicly traded.
A copy of the merger agreement is attached as Annex A to
this proxy statement/prospectus. You are encouraged to
read the merger agreement carefully in its entirety because it
is the legal agreement that governs the merger.
Merger
Consideration (page 119)
If the merger is completed, you will have the right to receive,
subject to adjustment under limited circumstances, in exchange
for each share of Wyeth common stock you own immediately prior
to the effective time of the merger, a combination of $33.00 in
cash, without interest, and 0.985 of a share of Pfizer common
stock (which is sometimes referred to in this proxy
statement/prospectus as the exchange ratio), which together are
sometimes referred to in this proxy statement/prospectus as the
merger consideration. Pfizer will not issue any fractional
shares of Pfizer common stock in the merger. Wyeth stockholders
who would otherwise be entitled to a fractional share of Pfizer
common stock will instead receive an amount in cash based on the
volume weighted average price of Pfizer common stock for the
five consecutive trading days ending two days prior to the
effective time of the merger, as such prices are reported on the
NYSE Transaction Reporting System.
Other than possible adjustments described in the next paragraph
below, the exchange ratio of 0.985 of a share of Pfizer common
stock is fixed, which means that it will not change between now
and the date of the merger, including as a result of a change in
the trading price of Pfizer common stock or Wyeth common stock.
Therefore, the value of the shares of Pfizer common stock
received by Wyeth stockholders in the merger will depend on the
market price of Pfizer common stock at the time the merger is
completed.
The exchange ratio will be adjusted if the exchange ratio would
result in Pfizer issuing in excess of 19.9% of its outstanding
common stock as a result of the merger. In such circumstance,
the exchange ratio will be reduced to the minimum extent
necessary so that the number of shares of Pfizer common stock
issued or issuable as a result of the merger will equal no more
than 19.9% of its outstanding common stock and the cash portion
of the merger consideration will be increased by an equivalent
value (based on the volume weighted average price of Pfizer
common stock for the five consecutive trading days ending two
days prior to the effective time of the merger, as such prices
are reported on the NYSE Transaction Reporting System).
At the time of the execution of the merger agreement, the number
of shares of Pfizer common stock (and securities convertible or
exercisable for Pfizer common stock) expected to be issued in
the merger constituted less than 19.9% of Pfizers
outstanding shares of common stock, and Pfizer and Wyeth
currently do not anticipate that any adjustment to the exchange
ratio will be required. A vote by Wyeth stockholders for the
adoption of the merger agreement constitutes approval of the
merger whether or not the exchange ratio and cash portion are
adjusted as described above.
Upon completion of the merger, each share of Wyeth $2
Convertible Preferred Stock issued and outstanding immediately
prior to completion of the merger will be converted into the
right to receive one share of a new series of Pfizer preferred
stock having the same powers, designations, preferences and
rights (to the
7
fullest extent practicable) as the shares of the Wyeth $2
Convertible Preferred Stock. We refer to this new series of
Pfizer preferred stock in this proxy statement/prospectus as the
Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock. However, on
April 23, 2009, Wyeth announced that, pursuant to a request
from Pfizer made in accordance with the terms and conditions of
the merger agreement, Wyeth will redeem all of its outstanding
Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock, effective on July 15,
2009. Therefore, it is expected that there will not be any
shares of Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding at
the effective time of the merger. In such case, Pfizer will not
create or issue a new series of preferred stock in connection
with the merger.
Treatment
of Wyeth Stock Options and Other Equity-Based Awards
(page 120)
Each outstanding option to acquire Wyeth common stock granted
under Wyeths stock incentive plans, which is referred to
in this proxy statement/prospectus as a Wyeth stock option,
whether or not then vested and exercisable, will become fully
vested and exercisable immediately prior to, and then will be
canceled at, the effective time of the merger, and the holder of
such option will be entitled to receive as soon as practicable
after the effective time of the merger but in no event later
than ten business days following the effective time of the
merger an amount in cash, without interest and less any
applicable tax to be withheld, equal to (i) the excess, if
any, of the per share value of the merger consideration to be
received by holders of Wyeth common stock in the merger over the
per share exercise price of such Wyeth stock option multiplied
by (ii) the total number of shares of Wyeth common stock
underlying such Wyeth stock option, with the aggregate amount of
such payment rounded up to the nearest cent. The per share
value of the merger consideration is equal to the sum of
(x) the cash portion of the merger consideration, plus
(y) the market value of the stock portion of the merger
consideration (determined based on the volume weighted average
of the price of Pfizer common stock for the five consecutive
trading days ending two days prior to the effective time of the
merger, as such prices are reported on the NYSE Transaction
Reporting System). If the per share exercise price of any Wyeth
stock option is equal to or greater than the per share value of
the merger consideration, then the stock option will be canceled
without any payment to the stock option holder.
Also at the effective time of the merger, each outstanding share
of restricted stock, each outstanding deferred stock unit award
(which is referred to in this proxy statement/prospectus as a
DSU) and each outstanding restricted stock unit award (which is
referred to in this proxy statement/prospectus as a RSU),
including each outstanding performance share unit award (but
excluding certain RSUs that constitute deferred compensation, as
discussed below), will become fully vested and then will be
canceled and the holder of such vested awards will be entitled
to receive an amount in cash, without interest and less any
applicable tax to be withheld, equal to the per share value of
the merger consideration in respect of each share of Wyeth
common stock into which the vested portion of such outstanding
restricted stock, DSU and RSU, as applicable, would otherwise be
convertible (except that with respect to any performance share
unit award which by the terms of the award agreement pursuant to
which it was granted provides for a lesser percentage of such
performance share unit award to become vested upon the effective
time of the merger, such performance share unit award will only
become vested as to such lesser percentage (with the remaining
unvested portion being canceled without payment)). These cash
amounts will be paid out as soon as practicable after the
effective time of the merger but in no event later than ten
business days following the effective time of the merger.
Also at the effective time of the merger, each outstanding RSU
that constitutes deferred compensation under Section 409A of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (which is referred to
in this proxy statement/prospectus as the Internal Revenue
Code), and that cannot be immediately settled at closing
due to tax law restrictions, which units will be referred to in
this proxy statement/prospectus as 409A RSUs, will, as of
the effective time of the merger, become a vested right to
receive the merger consideration in respect of each share of
Wyeth common stock into which such 409A RSU would otherwise
be convertible. Such merger consideration will be deposited into
a grantor trust in which the cash portion of the merger
consideration will accrue interest at a designated market rate
and the portion of the merger consideration that is Pfizer
common stock will accrue dividends in the form of additional
shares of Pfizer common stock in the same amount and at the same
time as dividends are paid on Pfizer common stock, and all of
these amounts, less any applicable tax to be withheld, will be
paid out in accordance with the applicable payment schedules
provided for under
8
the applicable stock incentive plan, award agreement and/or
deferral elections (which are, collectively, referred to in this
proxy statement/prospectus as deferred payment terms) made by
the holders of such 409A RSUs.
Also at the effective time of the merger, each phantom share of
Wyeth common stock credited to any non-employee directors
account under the Wyeth Directors Deferral Plan (including
phantom shares attributable to dividend equivalents) will be
converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to
the per share value of the merger consideration, and all such
non-employee director accounts will be paid out in cash, without
interest and less any applicable taxes to be withheld, as soon
as practicable after the effective time of the merger but in no
event later than ten business days following the effective time
of the merger, except in the case of certain accounts considered
grandfathered under Section 409A of the Internal
Revenue Code, which instead will be paid out in accordance with
the applicable payment schedules provided under the terms of the
Directors Deferral Plan.
Also at the effective time of the merger, each phantom share of
Wyeth common stock credited to any participants account
under the Wyeth Supplemental Employee Savings Plan, the Wyeth
2005 (409A) Deferred Compensation Plan and the Wyeth Deferred
Compensation Plan will be converted into phantom merger
consideration, which, to the extent provided for under the terms
of these plans, will become eligible to be reinvested in other
phantom investment options provided for under these plans, to be
paid (less tax withholding) to participants in such plans in
accordance with the terms of the applicable plan
and/or
deferral
and/or
payment election form.
Also at the effective time of the merger, each outstanding right
to receive a share of Wyeth common stock under the Wyeth
Management Incentive Plan will be converted into a right to
receive the merger consideration, payable in accordance with and
subject to the terms of such plan.
Recommendation
of the Wyeth Board of Directors (page 68)
The Wyeth board of directors believes that the merger agreement
and the merger are advisable and are fair to, and in the best
interests of, Wyeth and its stockholders and has approved the
merger and the merger agreement. The Wyeth board of directors
recommends that Wyeth stockholders vote FOR adoption
of the merger agreement.
For the factors considered by the Wyeth board of directors in
reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement, see
Proposal 1: The Merger Wyeths
Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Wyeth Board of
Directors beginning on page 68.
In addition, the Wyeth board of directors recommends that
Wyeth stockholders vote FOR the other Wyeth
proposals described in this proxy statement/prospectus, other
than the two stockholder proposals, each of which the Wyeth
board of directors recommends that Wyeth stockholders vote
AGAINST.
Opinions
of Wyeths Financial Advisors (page 72)
In connection with the merger, the Wyeth board of directors
received separate opinions, each dated January 25, 2009,
from Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, referred to in
this proxy statement/prospectus as Morgan Stanley, and Evercore
Group L.L.C., referred to in this proxy statement/prospectus as
Evercore, in each case, as to the fairness, from a financial
point of view and as of the date of such opinion, of the merger
consideration to be received by holders of Wyeth common stock.
The full text of Morgan Stanleys and Evercores
written opinions, which set forth, among other things, the
procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and
limitations on the scope of review undertaken in rendering their
respective opinions, are attached as Annexes B and C,
respectively, to this proxy statement/prospectus. Each
opinion was directed to the Wyeth board of directors and
addresses only the fairness, from a financial point of view, of
the merger consideration to be received by holders of Wyeth
common stock. Neither opinion addresses any other aspect of the
proposed merger nor does it constitute a recommendation to any
stockholder as to how such stockholder should vote or act with
respect to any matters relating to the merger agreement.
9
Interests
of Wyeths Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
(page 98)
In considering the recommendation of the Wyeth board of
directors with respect to the merger agreement, Wyeth
stockholders should be aware that Wyeths directors and
executive officers have interests in the merger that may be
different from, or in addition to, Wyeths stockholders
generally. The Wyeth board of directors was aware of these
interests, and considered these interests, among other matters,
in evaluating and negotiating the merger agreement and the
merger, and in recommending to the stockholders that the merger
agreement be adopted.
These interests and arrangements include:
|
|
|
|
|
vesting of all unvested Wyeth stock options held by Wyeths
directors and employees (including all current executive
officers) and the cancelation of these stock options (with
holders of stock options having a per share exercise price that
is less than the per share value of the merger consideration
receiving an amount in cash (without interest and less tax
withholding) equal to (i) the excess of the per share value of
the merger consideration over the per share option exercise
price, multiplied by (ii) the total number of shares of Wyeth
common stock underlying all such options, but stock options
having a per share exercise price that is greater than or equal
to the per share value of the merger consideration being
canceled without consideration);
|
|
|
|
vesting of all unvested RSUs held by Wyeth employees (including
all executive officers), except that certain RSUs held by
certain executive officers will only become vested as to 80% of
such unvested RSUs, and the cancelation of all vested RSUs in
exchange for an amount in cash (without interest and less tax
withholding) equal to the per share value of the merger
consideration for each share of Wyeth common stock into which
such vested portion of the RSU would otherwise be convertible,
except for RSUs that constitute deferred compensation under
applicable tax rules, which will become a vested right to
receive merger consideration for each share of Wyeth common
stock into which such RSUs would otherwise be convertible, to be
paid (less tax withholding) in accordance with the applicable
deferred payment terms;
|
|
|
|
change-in-control
severance agreements with Wyeths current executive
officers;
|
|
|
|
vesting of all unvested DSUs held by Wyeths directors and
the cancelation of those units in exchange for an amount in cash
(without interest and less tax withholding) equal to the per
share value of the merger consideration for each share of Wyeth
common stock subject to such DSU;
|
|
|
|
the conversion of all phantom shares of Wyeth common stock held
by (i) Wyeths directors under the Wyeth Directors
Deferral Plan into the right to receive an amount in cash
(without interest and less tax withholding) equal to the per
share value of the merger consideration of such phantom shares
and (ii) Wyeth employees (including executive officers)
under the Wyeth Deferred Compensation Plans and Supplemental
Employee Savings Plan into phantom merger consideration which,
to the extent provided for under the terms of these plans, will
become eligible to be reinvested in other phantom investment
options provided for under these plans, and all amounts payable
under all such plans will be paid in accordance with the
applicable payment terms (less tax withholding);
|
|
|
|
long-term incentive awards for 2009, payable in cash, to
designated Wyeth employees (including all current executive
officers), which generally will become vested as to 100% of the
amount of the award on the third anniversary of the applicable
grant date (or, if earlier, upon a qualifying termination of
employment following the effective time of the merger);
|
|
|
|
the continued service on the Pfizer board of directors by two
members of the Wyeth board of directors who were members of the
Wyeth board of directors as of the date of the merger
agreement; and
|
|
|
|
rights to indemnification and directors and officers
liability insurance.
|
In addition, on April 7, 2009, Pfizer announced its
intention to retain certain Wyeth executive officers in senior
Pfizer leadership roles following consummation of the merger. In
connection with that announcement, Pfizer has entered into new
employment arrangements with these executive officers contingent
upon the consummation of the merger.
10
Board of
Directors of Pfizer following Completion of the Merger
(page 109)
Upon completion of the merger, it is expected that the Pfizer
board of directors will be composed of 16 members. In
addition to the individuals serving on the Pfizer board of
directors at the effective time of the merger, two members of
the Wyeth board of directors who were members of the Wyeth board
of directors as of the date of the merger agreement will be
appointed to the Pfizer board of directors. Pfizers
Corporate Governance Committee will review and evaluate
potential candidates from the Wyeth board of directors through
customary procedures to assess the independence and
qualifications of such Wyeth directors. Upon completion of the
Corporate Governance Committees evaluation, the committee
will recommend nominees. Based on the recommendation of the
Corporate Governance Committee and its own independent
evaluation, the Pfizer board of directors will appoint two
legacy Wyeth directors to the Pfizer board of directors. The
remaining directors of Wyeth will resign as of the effective
time of the merger. As of the date of this proxy
statement/prospectus, no determination has been made as to the
identity of the two Wyeth directors who will be appointed to the
Pfizer board of directors.
Regulatory
Approvals Required for the Merger (page 110)
Pfizer and Wyeth have agreed to use their reasonable best
efforts to obtain all regulatory approvals required to complete
the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. These
approvals include approval under, or notices pursuant to, the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvement Act of 1976, as amended, which is referred
to in this proxy statement/prospectus as the HSR Act, the
Council Regulation No. 4064/89 of the European
Community, which is referred to in this proxy
statement/prospectus as the EC Merger Regulation, the China
anti-monopoly law and the applicable antitrust regulatory laws
in Australia and Canada. In using its reasonable best efforts to
obtain the required regulatory approvals, Pfizer may be
obligated to sell, divest or dispose of certain of its assets or
businesses (which may include the sale, divestiture or
disposition of assets or businesses of the surviving corporation
at or following the effective time of the merger) or take other
action to avoid the commencement of any action to prohibit any
of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, or if
already commenced, to avoid the entry of, or to effect the
dissolution of, any injunction, temporary restraining order or
other order in any action so as to enable the closing of the
merger to occur. However, Pfizer will not be required to
propose, negotiate, commit to or effect any sale, divestiture or
disposition of assets or business of Wyeth or its subsidiaries
or Pfizer or its subsidiaries or offer to take any such action
where such sale, divestiture or disposition, individually or in
the aggregate, would be of assets or a business of Wyeth or its
subsidiaries or Pfizer or its subsidiaries that would result in
the one year loss of net sales revenues (measured by
net 2008 sales revenue) in excess of $3 billion.
Expected
Timing of the Merger
Wyeth and Pfizer currently expect to complete the merger during
the end of the third quarter or during the fourth quarter of
2009, subject to receipt of Wyeth stockholder approval,
governmental and regulatory approvals, and other usual and
customary closing conditions. However, no assurance can be given
as to when, or if, the merger will occur.
Financing
(page 147)
On March 12, 2009, Pfizer entered into a
364-Day
Bridge Loan Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as
administrative agent, and the lenders thereto pursuant to which,
subject to certain conditions, the lenders agreed to provide
borrowings up to an aggregate principal amount of
$22.5 billion. On March 24, 2009, in connection with
its financing of the merger, Pfizer issued $13.5 billion of
senior unsecured notes in a public offering. On June 3,
2009, in connection with its financing of the merger, Pfizer
issued 5.85 billion and £1.50 billion of
senior unsecured notes (totaling approximately
$10.5 billion) in a private placement pursuant to
Regulation S of the Securities Act. Due to the issuance of
the senior unsecured notes, the bridge loan agreement has been
terminated.
11
Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger
(page 112)
The merger generally will be a taxable transaction for
U.S. federal income tax purposes to U.S. holders of
Wyeth common stock
and/or Wyeth
$2 Convertible Preferred Stock (to the extent such shares remain
outstanding at the effective time of the merger). You should
consult your tax advisor for a full understanding of the
particular tax consequences of the merger.
Appraisal
Rights (page 114)
Under Delaware law, record holders of Wyeth common stock who do
not vote in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement and
who properly assert their appraisal rights will be entitled to
seek appraisal for, and obtain payment in cash for the
judicially determined fair value of, their shares of Wyeth
common stock if the merger is completed, in lieu of receiving
the merger consideration. This value could be more than, the
same as, or less than the value of the merger consideration. The
relevant provisions of the General Corporation Law of the State
of Delaware, which are referred to in this proxy
statement/prospectus as the DGCL, are included as Annex D
to this proxy statement/prospectus. You are encouraged to read
these provisions carefully and in their entirety. Moreover, due
to the complexity of the procedures for exercising the right to
seek appraisal, Wyeth stockholders who are considering
exercising such rights are encouraged to seek the advice of
legal counsel. Failure to strictly comply with these provisions
will result in loss of the right of appraisal. Under Delaware
law, record holders of Wyeths $2 Convertible
Preferred Stock are not entitled to appraisal rights in
connection with the merger; however, if such a holder becomes a
record holder of Wyeth common stock upon the conversion of Wyeth
$2 Convertible Preferred Stock, such holder will be
entitled to appraisal rights with respect to such common stock
so long as the holder complies with the statutory requirements
for exercising appraisal rights. It is expected that there will
not be any shares of Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock
outstanding as of the effective time of the merger as Wyeth has
announced that all such shares will be redeemed effective
July 15, 2009.
Listing
of Pfizer Stock (page 116)
Application will be made by Pfizer to have the shares of Pfizer
common stock (and Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock, if
necessary, which is not expected to be the case) to be issued in
the merger approved for listing on the NYSE, where Pfizer common
stock currently is traded. If the merger is consummated, Wyeth
shares will no longer be listed on the NYSE, and will be
deregistered under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, which is referred to in this proxy
statement/prospectus as the Exchange Act.
Litigation
Relating to the Merger (page 116)
Wyeth, the members of the Wyeth board of directors, Pfizer
and/or Wagner Acquisition Corp. are named as defendants in
purported class action lawsuits brought by Wyeth stockholders
challenging Wyeths proposed merger with Pfizer. The
plaintiffs in such actions generally allege that (i) each
member of the Wyeth board of directors breached his or her
fiduciary duties to Wyeth and its stockholders by authorizing
the sale of Wyeth to Pfizer for what plaintiffs deem
inadequate consideration; (ii) Wyeth directly
breached
and/or aided
and abetted the other defendants alleged breach of
fiduciary duties; and/or (iii) Pfizer and/or Wagner
Acquisition Corp. aided and abetted the alleged breach of
fiduciary duties by Wyeth and its directors. These lawsuits
generally seek, among other things, to enjoin the defendants
from consummating the merger on the
agreed-upon
terms. On June 10, 2009, Wyeth, Wyeths directors and
Pfizer entered into a memorandum of understanding with the
plaintiffs in a consolidated action brought in Delaware
reflecting an agreement in principle to settle such action based
on their agreement to include in this proxy statement/prospectus
certain additional disclosures relating to the transaction. The
memorandum of understanding is subject to customary conditions
including completion of appropriate settlement documentation,
completion of due diligence to confirm the fairness of the
settlement, approval by the Delaware Court of Chancery, and
consummation of the merger. If the settlement is consummated,
such action will be dismissed with prejudice.
12
No
Solicitation by Wyeth (page 132)
Subject to certain exceptions, Wyeth has agreed not to initiate,
solicit or knowingly encourage any inquiries or the making of
any proposal or offer from any third party relating to an
acquisition of Wyeth, or enter into an agreement relating to an
acquisition proposal by a third party. Notwithstanding these
restrictions, however, the merger agreement provides that, under
specified circumstances and prior to the adoption by the Wyeth
stockholders of the merger agreement, in response to an
unsolicited acquisition proposal or inquiry from a third party
who, in the good faith judgment of the Wyeth board of directors,
is credible and reasonably capable of making a proposal that is
superior to the merger, Wyeth may furnish information regarding
Wyeth to, and participate in discussions and negotiations with,
such third party.
Conditions
to Complete the Merger (page 141)
The obligations of each of Pfizer and Wyeth to complete the
merger are subject to the satisfaction (or, where legally
permissible, waiver) of the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
adoption of the merger agreement by Wyeths stockholders;
|
|
|
|
absence of any statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation,
judgment, order, injunction (whether temporary, preliminary or
permanent), decision, opinion or decree issued by a court or
other governmental entity in the United States or the European
Union that makes the merger illegal or prohibits the
consummation of the merger;
|
|
|
|
the applicable waiting period (and any extension thereof) under
the HSR Act will have expired or been terminated, and
competition approvals and authorizations required from the
European Commission and Chinas Ministry of Commerce and
the applicable antitrust governmental authorities in Australia
and Canada will have been obtained;
|
|
|
|
|
|
approval for the listing on the NYSE of the Pfizer common stock
and, if necessary, the Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock to
be issued to the Wyeth stockholders in the merger, subject to
official notice of issuance;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the registration statement on
Form S-4,
of which this proxy statement/prospectus forms a part, having
been declared effective by the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, or the SEC, and the absence of an effective stop
order suspending effectiveness of the
Form S-4
or proceedings pending before the SEC for that purpose;
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of the other party will be
true and correct, subject to certain materiality thresholds, as
of the date of the merger agreement and as of the closing date
of the merger; and
|
|
|
|
the other party shall have performed or complied with, in all
material respects, all of its material agreements and covenants
under the merger agreement at or prior to the consummation of
the merger.
|
In addition, Pfizers obligation to complete the merger is
subject to the lenders who are parties to the commitment letter
obtained by Pfizer in connection with the execution of the
merger agreement, which is referred to in this proxy
statement/prospectus as the commitment letter (or, in the event
that alternative financing has been arranged, the lenders or
other financing sources who have committed to such alternative
financing) not having declined to make the financing (or such
alternate financing) available primarily by reason of the
failure of either or both of the following conditions, which
together are referred to in this proxy statement/prospectus as
the Specified Financing Conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
Pfizer having on the closing date, and taking into account the
merger, (a) an unsecured long-term obligations rating of at
least A2 (with stable, or better, outlook) and a
commercial paper credit rating of at least
P-1
(which rating will be affirmed) from Moodys Investors
Services, Inc. and (b) a long-term issuer credit rating of
at least A (with stable, or better, outlook) and a
short-term issuer credit rating of at least
A-1
(which rating will be affirmed) from Standard &
Poors Ratings Group; and
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
since December 31, 2007, and subject to specified
exceptions, there not having been any event, occurrence,
development or state of circumstances or facts or condition that
has had or would reasonably be expected to have, individually or
in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on Pfizer.
|
As of June 3, 2009, Pfizer replaced the commitments
provided under the bridge loan agreement with permanent
financing through the issuance of senior unsecured notes, and
therefore the Specified Financing Conditions are no longer
applicable.
Pfizer and Wyeth cannot be certain when, or if, the conditions
to the merger will be satisfied or waived, or that the merger
will be completed.
Closing
(page 118)
Under the terms of the merger agreement, the closing of the
merger will occur on the fifth business day following the
satisfaction or (subject to applicable law) waiver of the
conditions to closing (other than conditions that, by their
nature, cannot be satisfied until the closing of the merger, but
subject to fulfillment or waiver of those conditions). However,
if on such fifth business day, the proceeds of the financing
contemplated by the commitment letter (or alternative financing)
are unavailable, the closing will not be required to occur until
the earlier of (i) the tenth business day after Wyeth
delivers an election notice to Pfizer and
(ii) December 31, 2009.
An election notice is a notice to be sent to Pfizer by Wyeth
under certain circumstances for the purpose of notifying Pfizer
of Wyeths intention to exercise its right to cause Pfizer
to specifically perform its obligations under the merger
agreement or its right to terminate the merger agreement in the
event that Pfizer does not close the merger on the scheduled
closing date. Wyeth is not permitted to deliver an election
notice until the earlier of (i) the tenth business day
following the satisfaction or (subject to applicable law) waiver
of the conditions to closing (other than conditions that, by
their nature, cannot be satisfied until the closing) and
(ii) December 31, 2009. As a result, if the proceeds
from Pfizers financing contemplated by the commitment
letter (or alternative financing) were unavailable on the
initially scheduled closing date, then the closing would not be
required to occur until at least 15 business days following the
initially scheduled closing date or, if earlier,
December 31, 2009. In no event will Pfizer be obligated to
close the merger prior to July 31, 2009.
Termination
of the Merger Agreement (page 142)
|
|
|
|
|
Pfizer and Wyeth may mutually agree to terminate the merger
agreement before completing the merger, even after stockholder
approval, as long as the termination is approved by each of the
Pfizer board of directors and the Wyeth board of directors.
|
|
|
|
In addition, either of Pfizer or Wyeth may terminate the merger
agreement if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the merger has not been consummated by October 31, 2009 (or
if an election notice has been, or is capable of being,
delivered by Wyeth to Pfizer within five business days of
October 31, 2009, then such date will be extended to twenty
business days after October 31, 2009, and in no event after
December 31, 2009), unless all conditions have been
satisfied other than the condition related to receipt of
antitrust regulatory approvals, in which case the date upon
which Pfizer or Wyeth may terminate the merger agreement will be
extended to December 31, 2009 (such date, as may be
extended, being referred to as the termination date);
|
|
|
|
a governmental entity in the United States or European Union has
issued a final and non-appealable order, judgment, decision,
opinion, decree or ruling or taken any other action permanently
enjoining or otherwise permanently prohibiting the consummation
of the merger;
|
|
|
|
Wyeths stockholders have failed to adopt the merger
agreement; or
|
|
|
|
the other party has breached its respective representations,
warranties, covenants or agreements under the merger agreement
such that the applicable closing conditions would not be
satisfied (and such breach is incapable of being cured prior to
the termination date).
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
Pfizer may also terminate the merger agreement if the Wyeth
board of directors changes its recommendation of the merger
agreement, or takes certain other actions or fails to take
certain other actions in a manner that is inconsistent with its
recommendation of the merger agreement.
|
|
|
|
Wyeth may also terminate the merger agreement if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pfizer does not consummate the merger within five business days
following the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions to the
merger (other than (i) the condition relating to
Pfizers financing sources not declining to make the
financing (or alternative financing) available primarily by
reason of the failure to satisfy either or both of the Specified
Financing Conditions and (ii) the other conditions that, by
their nature, cannot be satisfied until the closing of the
merger, but subject to the fulfillment or waiver of those
conditions), due to the failure of the condition described in
clause (i) above, in which case, Wyeth must deliver an
election notice notifying Pfizer of its intention to exercise
its right to terminate the merger agreement, and may terminate
the merger agreement only if Pfizer does not consummate the
merger on the earlier of (x) the tenth business day
following the date on which Pfizer receives such election notice
and (y) December 31, 2009; or
|
|
|
|
at any time prior to the adoption of the merger agreement by
Wyeths stockholders, if the Wyeth board of directors
determines to enter into a superior proposal, but only if Wyeth
(i) is not in material breach of its agreement not to
solicit alternative proposals and (ii) the applicable
termination fee is paid substantially concurrently with such
termination.
|
As of June 3, 2009, Pfizer replaced the commitments
provided under the bridge loan agreement with permanent
financing through the issuance of senior unsecured notes, and
therefore the termination right relating to the Specified
Financing Conditions is no longer applicable.
Termination
Fees and Expenses (page 144)
Termination
Fees
If the merger agreement is terminated under certain
circumstances including, among others, those involving a third
party acquisition proposal, or a change in the Wyeth board of
directors recommendation of the merger agreement to
Wyeths stockholders, Wyeth may be obligated to pay Pfizer
a termination fee of up to $2 billion (and, in addition,
reimburse Pfizer for up to $700 million of Pfizers
actual expenses incurred in connection with the merger under
certain circumstances relating to a change in recommendation by
the Wyeth board of directors). In addition, if all conditions to
the merger agreement are satisfied or waived (excluding
(i) the condition relating to Pfizers financing
sources not declining to make the financing (or alternative
financing) available primarily by reason of the failure to
satisfy either or both of the Specified Financing Conditions and
(ii) the other conditions that, by their nature, cannot be
satisfied until the closing of the merger, but subject to the
fulfillment or waiver of those conditions) and Pfizer does not
consummate the merger, then Wyeth may terminate the merger
agreement and require Pfizer to pay a cash termination fee of
$4.5 billion on or after the tenth business day following
delivery of an election notice if the closing has not occurred.
As of June 3, 2009, Pfizer replaced the commitments
provided under the bridge loan agreement with permanent
financing through the issuance of senior unsecured notes, and
therefore the Specified Financing Conditions and the
$4.5 billion termination fee are no longer applicable.
Other
Fees and Expenses
Generally, except as noted above, all fees and expenses incurred
in connection with the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement will be paid by the party
incurring those expenses.
Specific
Performance (page 145)
Each party is entitled to seek an injunction or injunctions to
prevent a breach of the merger agreement and to enforce
specifically the terms and provisions of the merger agreement in
the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware or any court of
the United States located in the State of Delaware. This
remedy is in addition to any other remedy to which the parties
are entitled at law or in equity.
15
However, if Pfizer does not consummate the merger within five
business days following the satisfaction or waiver (subject to
applicable law) of the conditions to the merger (excluding
conditions that, by their nature, cannot be satisfied until the
closing of the merger, but subject to the fulfillment or waiver
of those conditions) and if the proceeds from the financing (or
alternative financing) are unavailable on such date, then Wyeth
may deliver to Pfizer an election notice exercising its right to
seek specific performance, and Wyeth cannot require Pfizer to
close until a date that is the earlier of (x) the tenth business
day following the day on which Pfizer receives an election
notice from Wyeth and (y) December 31, 2009. If Pfizer
fails to consummate the merger due to Pfizers financing
sources declining to make the financing (or alternative
financing) available primarily by reason of the non-satisfaction
of either or both of the Specified Financing Conditions, Wyeth
does not have the right to require Pfizer to consummate the
merger. As of June 3, 2009, Pfizer replaced the commitments
provided under the bridge loan agreement with permanent
financing through the issuance of senior unsecured notes, and
therefore the Specified Financing Conditions are no longer
applicable.
Comparative
Per Share Market Price and Dividend Information
(page 20)
Pfizer common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol
PFE. Wyeth common stock is listed on the NYSE under
the symbol WYE. The following table shows the
closing sale prices of Pfizer common stock and Wyeth common
stock as reported on the NYSE on January 23, 2009, the last
trading day before the merger agreement was announced, and
on June 16, 2009, the last full trading day before the
date of this proxy statement/prospectus. This table also shows
the implied value of the merger consideration proposed for each
share of Wyeth common stock, which was calculated by adding
(a) the cash portion of the merger consideration, or $33.00
and (b) the closing price of Pfizers common stock as
of the specified date, multiplied by the exchange ratio of 0.985.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied per Share
|
|
|
Pfizer
|
|
Wyeth
|
|
Value of Merger
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Consideration
|
|
At January 23, 2009
|
|
$
|
17.45
|
|
|
$
|
43.74
|
|
|
$
|
50.19
|
|
At June 16, 2009
|
|
$
|
14.16
|
|
|
$
|
44.05
|
|
|
$
|
46.95
|
|
The market price of Pfizer common stock and Wyeth common
stock will fluctuate prior to the merger. You should obtain
current market quotations for the shares.
Pfizer currently pays a quarterly dividend on its common stock
and last paid dividends on June 2, 2009, of $0.16 per
share. In January 2009, Pfizer announced that it would reduce
its quarterly dividend per share to $0.16, effective with the
dividend to be paid in the second quarter of 2009. Under the
terms of the merger agreement, during the period before the
closing of the merger, Pfizer is prohibited from paying any
dividends other than its regular quarterly dividends at the
current rate, which is not to exceed $0.16 per share.
Wyeth currently pays a quarterly dividend on its common stock,
and last paid dividends on June 1, 2009, of $0.30 per
share. On June 11, 2009, Wyeth announced its next dividend
of $0.30 per share, which will be payable on September 1,
2009. Under the terms of the merger agreement, during the period
before the closing of the merger, Wyeth is prohibited from
paying any dividends other than its regular quarterly dividends
at the current rate, which is not to exceed $0.30 per share.
Rights of
Wyeth Stockholders Will Change as a Result of the Merger
(page 151)
Wyeth stockholders receiving merger consideration will have
different rights once they become Pfizer stockholders due to
differences between the governing documents of Pfizer and Wyeth.
These differences are described in detail under Comparison
of Rights of Pfizer Stockholders and Wyeth Stockholders.
Wyeth
Annual Meeting (pages 52 and 165)
The meeting will be held in the Plaza Ballroom of the Hyatt
Morristown at Headquarters Plaza located at 3 Speedwell
Avenue, Morristown, New Jersey on July 20, 2009 at
9:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time. At the meeting, Wyeth
stockholders will be asked to vote on the following proposals:
|
|
|
|
|
to adopt the merger agreement;
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
to approve the adjournment of the meeting, if necessary, to
solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to
adopt the merger agreement at the time of the meeting;
|
|
|
|
to elect to the Wyeth board of directors each of the nominees
for director named in this proxy statement/prospectus;
|
|
|
|
to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as
Wyeths independent registered public accounting firm for
2009; and
|
|
|
|
the following two stockholder proposals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
a stockholder proposal regarding reporting on Wyeths
political contributions and trade association payments; and
|
|
|
|
a stockholder proposal regarding special stockholder meetings.
|
Record Date. Only holders of record at the
close of business on June 5, 2009 will be entitled to vote
at the meeting, provided that such shares remain outstanding on
the date of the meeting. As of the close of business on the
record date of June 5, 2009, there were
1,333,898,690 shares of Wyeth common stock and
7,600 shares of Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock
outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting. Each holder of
Wyeth common stock is entitled to one vote for each share of
common stock owned as of the record date. Each holder of Wyeth
$2 Convertible Preferred Stock is entitled to 36 votes for each
share of Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock owned as of
the record date, provided that such shares are outstanding on
the date of the meeting. On April 23, 2009, Wyeth announced
that, pursuant to a request from Pfizer made in accordance with
the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, Wyeth will
redeem all of its outstanding Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred
Stock, effective on July 15, 2009; accordingly, Wyeth $2
Convertible Preferred Stock will not be outstanding at the time
of the meeting and former holders thereof will not be entitled
to vote such shares at the meeting.
Required Vote. To adopt the merger agreement,
the holders of a majority of the combined voting power of the
outstanding shares of Wyeth common stock and Wyeth $2
Convertible Preferred Stock entitled to vote on the proposal,
voting together as a single class, must vote in favor of
adoption of the merger agreement. Because approval is based on
the affirmative vote of a majority of the combined voting power
of the shares outstanding, a Wyeth stockholders failure to
vote or an abstention will have the same effect as a vote
against adoption of the merger agreement.
Nominees receiving a majority of the votes cast will be elected
as a director. Abstentions and failures to be present to vote
will have no effect on the election of directors.
All other matters on the agenda will be decided by the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares
present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and
entitled to vote thereon in accordance with Wyeths bylaws.
Because approval of such other matters is based on the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares
present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote, abstentions
will have the same effect as a vote against such matters, but
failures to be present to vote will have no effect on such
matters.
As of the close of business on the record date, directors and
executive officers of Wyeth and their affiliates had the right
to vote approximately 1,165,000 shares of Wyeth common
stock (and no shares of Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock),
or less than 0.1% of the combined voting power of the
outstanding Wyeth common stock and preferred stock entitled to
be voted at the meeting. As of the close of business on the
record date, Pfizer had the right to vote 1,000 shares of
Wyeth common stock which Pfizer will be entitled to vote at the
meeting.
No Pfizer
Stockholder Approval
Pfizer stockholders are not required to adopt the merger
agreement or approve the merger or the issuance of shares of
Pfizer common stock as part of the merger consideration.
17
COMPARATIVE
PER SHARE DATA
The following table sets forth selected historical per share
information of Pfizer and Wyeth and unaudited pro forma combined
per share information after giving effect to the merger between
Pfizer and Wyeth, under the acquisition method of accounting,
assuming that 0.985 of a share of Pfizer common stock had
been issued in exchange for each outstanding share of Wyeth
common stock. The acquisition method of accounting is based on
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (which is referred
to in this proxy statement/prospectus as SFAS) No. 141R
(SFAS No. 141R), Business Combinations, as
amended, which Pfizer adopted on January 1, 2009, and uses
the fair value concepts defined in SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements, as amended, which Pfizer has
adopted as required. SFAS No. 141R, as amended,
requires, among other things, that most assets acquired and
liabilities assumed be recognized at their fair values as of the
acquisition date and that the fair value of in-process research
and development be recorded on the balance sheet regardless of
the likelihood of success as of the acquisition date. The
acquisition accounting is dependent upon certain valuations of
Wyeths assets and liabilities and other studies that have
yet to commence or progress to a stage where there is sufficient
information for a definitive measurement. Accordingly, the pro
forma adjustments reflect the assets and liabilities of Wyeth at
their preliminary estimated fair values. Differences between
these preliminary estimates and the final acquisition accounting
will occur and these differences could have a material impact on
the unaudited pro forma combined per share information set forth
in the following table.
In accordance with the requirements of the SEC, the pro forma
and pro forma equivalent per share information gives effect to
the merger as if the merger had been effective on
January 1, 2008, in the case of income from continuing
operations and dividends paid data, and March 29, 2009, in
the case of book value per share data. You should read this
information in conjunction with the selected historical
financial information, included elsewhere in this proxy
statement/prospectus, and the historical financial statements of
Pfizer and Wyeth and related notes that have been filed with the
SEC, certain of which are incorporated in this proxy
statement/prospectus by reference. See Selected
Consolidated Historical Financial Data of Pfizer beginning
on page 22, Selected Consolidated Historical
Financial Data of Wyeth beginning on page 26 and
Where You Can Find More Information beginning on
page 247. The unaudited Pfizer pro forma combined per share
information is derived from, and should be read in conjunction
with, the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
statements and related notes included in this proxy
statement/prospectus. See Pfizer and Wyeth Unaudited Pro
Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements beginning on
page 28. The historical per share information of Pfizer and
Wyeth below is derived from audited financial statements as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the
quarterly period ended March 29, 2009, for Pfizer, and
March 31, 2009, for Wyeth. The unaudited pro forma Wyeth
per share equivalents are calculated by multiplying the
unaudited Pfizer pro forma combined per share amounts by the
exchange ratio of 0.985. The exchange ratio does not include the
$33.00 cash portion of the merger consideration.
The unaudited pro forma combined per share information does not
purport to represent what the actual results of operations of
Pfizer and Wyeth would have been had the companies been combined
during these periods or to project Pfizers and
Wyeths results of operations that may be achieved after
the merger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the
|
|
As of and for the
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DATA
|
|
March 29, 2009
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
UNAUDITED PFIZER PRO FORMA COMBINED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
1.12
|
|
Cash dividends(1)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Book value(2)
|
|
|
9.85
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the
|
|
As of and for the
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DATA
|
|
March 29, 2009
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
PFIZER-HISTORICAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
1.19
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
1.19
|
|
Cash dividends paid(1)
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
1.28
|
|
Book value(2)
|
|
|
8.96
|
|
|
|
8.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the
|
|
As of and for the
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
WYETH HISTORICAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
$
|
3.31
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.89
|
|
|
|
3.27
|
|
Cash dividends paid(1)
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
Book value(2)
|
|
|
14.81
|
|
|
|
14.40
|
|
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA WYETH EQUIVALENTS(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
Cash dividends(1)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Book value
|
|
|
9.70
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On June 2, 2009, Pfizer paid a second quarter 2009 dividend
of $0.16 per share of common stock. On March 3, 2009,
Pfizer paid a first quarter 2009 dividend of $0.32 per share of
common stock. In January 2009, Pfizer announced that, effective
with the dividend to be paid in the second quarter of 2009, its
quarterly dividend per share of common stock would be reduced to
$0.16 ($0.80 per share of common stock annualized for 2009).
Following the first quarter of 2009, Pfizer will not declare or
pay a quarterly dividend in excess of $0.16 per share of common
stock prior to consummation of the merger and any future payment
of Pfizers quarterly dividend is subject to future
approval and declaration by the Pfizer board of directors. On
June 1, 2009, Wyeth paid a second quarter 2009 dividend of
$0.30 per share of common stock. On March 2, 2009, Wyeth
paid a first quarter dividend of $0.30 per share of common
stock ($1.20 per share of common stock annualized). On
June 11, 2009, Wyeth declared its next dividend of $0.30
per share, which will be payable on September 1, 2009. Wyeth
will not declare or pay a quarterly dividend in excess of $0.30
per share of common stock prior to consummation of the merger
and any future payment of Wyeths quarterly dividend is
subject to future approval and declaration by the Wyeth board of
directors. The dividend policy of Pfizer following the merger
will be determined by the Pfizer board of directors following
the merger. |
|
(2) |
|
Amount is calculated by dividing stockholders equity by
common shares outstanding. Pro forma book value per share as of
December 31, 2008 is not meaningful as purchase accounting
adjustments were calculated as of March 29, 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
Amounts are calculated by multiplying unaudited Pfizer pro forma
combined per share amounts by the exchange ratio in the merger
(0.985 of a share of Pfizer common stock for each share of
Wyeth common stock). |
19
COMPARATIVE
PER SHARE MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
Market
Prices
Each of Pfizer common stock and Wyeth common stock is listed on
the NYSE. The following table sets forth the high and low sales
prices of shares of Pfizer common stock and Wyeth common stock
as reported on the NYSE, and the quarterly cash dividends
declared per share for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pfizer Common Stock
|
|
|
Wyeth Common Stock
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
27.41
|
|
|
$
|
24.55
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
52.25
|
|
|
$
|
47.75
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
27.73
|
|
|
$
|
25.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
62.20
|
|
|
$
|
50.51
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
26.15
|
|
|
$
|
23.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
58.00
|
|
|
$
|
43.65
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
25.71
|
|
|
$
|
22.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
49.54
|
|
|
$
|
43.65
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
24.24
|
|
|
$
|
20.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
48.84
|
|
|
$
|
38.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
21.60
|
|
|
$
|
17.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
48.72
|
|
|
$
|
41.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
20.13
|
|
|
$
|
17.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
49.80
|
|
|
$
|
35.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
19.39
|
|
|
$
|
14.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
38.80
|
|
|
$
|
28.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
18.48
|
|
|
$
|
11.62
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
45.33
|
|
|
$
|
36.40
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
Second Quarter (through June 16, 2009)
|
|
$
|
15.60
|
|
|
$
|
12.75
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
45.24
|
|
|
$
|
41.63
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In January 2009, Pfizer announced that it would reduce its
quarterly dividend per share to $0.16, effective with the
dividend to be paid in the second quarter of 2009. See below for
more information about dividends. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
On June 11, 2009, Wyeth announced its next dividend of
$0.30 per share, which will be payable on September 1, 2009. |
On January 22, 2009, the last trading day before the publication
of press reports regarding a potential merger, the high and low
sales prices of shares of Pfizer common stock as reported on the
NYSE were $17.34 and $17.02, respectively. On January 23,
2009, the last trading day before the merger agreement was
announced, the high and low sales prices of shares of Pfizer
common stock as reported on the NYSE were $17.52 and $16.55,
respectively. On June 16, 2009, the last full trading day
before the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, the high and
low sale prices of shares of Pfizer common stock as reported on
the NYSE were $14.46 and $14.11, respectively.
On January 22, 2009, the last trading day before the publication
of press reports regarding a potential merger, the high and low
sales prices of shares of Wyeth common stock as reported on the
NYSE were $39.42 and $38.08, respectively. On January 23,
2009, the last trading day before the merger agreement was
announced, the high and low sales prices of shares of Wyeth
common stock as reported on the NYSE were $44.88 and $41.70,
respectively. On June 16, 2009, the last full trading day
before the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, the high and
low sale prices of shares of Wyeth common stock as reported on
the NYSE were $44.37 and $43.81, respectively.
Pfizer stockholders and Wyeth stockholders are advised to obtain
current market quotations for Pfizer common stock and Wyeth
common stock. The market price of Pfizer common stock and Wyeth
common stock will fluctuate between the date of this proxy
statement/prospectus and the completion of the merger. No
assurance can be given concerning the market price of Pfizer
common stock before or after the effective time of the merger or
Wyeth common stock before the effective time of the merger.
20
Dividends
Pfizer currently pays a quarterly dividend on its common stock
and last paid dividends on June 2, 2009, of $0.16 per
share. In January 2009, Pfizer announced that it would reduce
its quarterly dividend per share to $0.16, effective with the
dividend to be paid in the second quarter of 2009. Under the
terms of the merger agreement, during the period before the
closing of the merger, Pfizer is prohibited from paying any
dividends other than its regular quarterly dividends at the
current rate, which is not to exceed $0.16 per share.
Wyeth currently pays a quarterly dividend on its common stock
and last paid dividends on June 1, 2009, of $0.30 per
share. On June 11, 2009, Wyeth declared its next dividend
of $0.30 per share, which will be payable on September 1,
2009. Under the terms of the merger agreement, during the period
before the closing of the merger, Wyeth is prohibited from
paying any dividends other than its regular quarterly dividends
at the current rate, not in excess of $0.30 per share.
After completion of the merger, former Wyeth stockholders who
hold the Pfizer stock they received as part of the merger
consideration will receive whatever dividends are declared and
paid on Pfizer stock following the merger. There can be no
assurance that any regular quarterly dividends will be declared
or paid by Pfizer or as to the amount or timing of such
dividends, if any. Any future dividends will be made at the
discretion of the Pfizer board of directors.
Until you have provided to the exchange agent your signed letter
of transmittal and any other items specified by the letter of
transmittal with respect to your shares of Wyeth common stock,
any dividends or other distributions declared after the
effective time of the merger with respect to Pfizer common stock
into which shares of Wyeth common stock may have been converted
will accrue but will not be paid with respect to your shares.
Pfizer will pay to former Wyeth stockholders any unpaid
dividends or other distributions, without interest, only after
they have duly surrendered their Wyeth stock certificates. On
April 23, 2009, Wyeth announced that, pursuant to a request
from Pfizer made in accordance with the terms and conditions of
the merger agreement, Wyeth will redeem all of its outstanding
Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock, effective on
July 15, 2009. Therefore, it is expected that there will
not be any shares of Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock
outstanding at the effective time of the merger. In such case,
Pfizer will not create or issue a new series of preferred stock
in connection with the merger.
No comparative information exists with respect to the Wyeth $2
Convertible Preferred Stock and Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred
Stock because there are currently no shares of Pfizer $2
Convertible Preferred Stock authorized, issued or outstanding.
21
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF PFIZER
The selected financial data of Pfizer for each of the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007 are derived from Pfizers
audited consolidated financial statements and related notes
contained in its Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, which is incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus. The selected
financial data of Pfizer for each of the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004 and as of December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004 have been derived from Pfizers audited
consolidated financial statements for such years, which have not
been incorporated into this proxy statement/prospectus by
reference. The selected financial data of Pfizer as of and for
the three months ended March 29, 2009 and March 30,
2008 are derived from Pfizers unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in
its Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 29, 2009, which is
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.
Pfizers management believes the interim financial
statements include all normal and recurring adjustments that are
considered necessary for the fair presentation of the results
for the interim period. The information set forth below is only
a summary and is not necessarily indicative of the results of
future operations of Pfizer or the combined company, and you
should read the following information together with
Pfizers audited consolidated financial statements, the
notes related thereto and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
contained in Pfizers Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended on December 31, 2008, and Pfizers
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, the notes
related thereto and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
contained in Pfizers Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 29, 2009, which are
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of/for Three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
As of/for the Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
($ in millions, except ratios and per common share data)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
10,867
|
|
|
$
|
11,848
|
|
|
$
|
48,296
|
|
|
$
|
48,418
|
|
|
$
|
48,371
|
|
|
$
|
47,405
|
|
|
$
|
48,988
|
|
Research and development expenses(a)
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
1,791
|
|
|
|
7,945
|
|
|
|
8,089
|
|
|
|
7,599
|
|
|
|
7,256
|
|
|
|
7,513
|
|
Other costs and expenses
|
|
|
4,805
|
|
|
|
5,924
|
|
|
|
27,349
|
|
|
|
28,234
|
|
|
|
25,586
|
|
|
|
26,341
|
|
|
|
25,850
|
|
Acquisition-related in-process research and development
charges(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
1,652
|
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
Restructuring charges and acquisition-related costs(c)
|
|
|
554
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
2,675
|
|
|
|
2,534
|
|
|
|
1,323
|
|
|
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
1,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before provision for taxes on
income, allocation to noncontrolling interests and cumulative
effect of a change in accounting principles
|
|
|
3,803
|
|
|
|
3,557
|
|
|
|
9,694
|
|
|
|
9,278
|
|
|
|
13,028
|
|
|
|
10,800
|
|
|
|
13,403
|
|
Provision for taxes on income
|
|
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
|
(763
|
)
|
|
|
(1,645
|
)
|
|
|
(1,023
|
)
|
|
|
(1,992
|
)
|
|
|
(3,178
|
)
|
|
|
(2,460
|
)
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to Pfizer Inc.
before cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principles
|
|
|
2,728
|
|
|
|
2,788
|
|
|
|
8,026
|
|
|
|
8,213
|
|
|
|
11,024
|
|
|
|
7,610
|
|
|
|
10,936
|
|
Discontinued operations net of tax
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
8,313
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principles net of tax(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Pfizer Inc.
|
|
|
2,729
|
|
|
|
2,784
|
|
|
|
8,104
|
|
|
|
8,144
|
|
|
|
19,337
|
|
|
|
8,085
|
|
|
|
11,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of/for Three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
As of/for the Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
($ in millions, except ratios and per common share data)
|
|
|
Effective tax rate continuing operations
|
|
|
28.2
|
%
|
|
|
21.5
|
%
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
|
|
15.3
|
%
|
|
|
29.4
|
%
|
|
|
18.4
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization(e)
|
|
$
|
1,008
|
|
|
$
|
1,487
|
|
|
$
|
5,090
|
|
|
$
|
5,200
|
|
|
$
|
5,293
|
|
|
$
|
5,576
|
|
|
$
|
5,093
|
|
Property, plant and equipment additions(e)
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
1,701
|
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
|
2,050
|
|
|
|
2,106
|
|
|
|
2,601
|
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
2,133
|
|
|
|
2,138
|
|
|
|
8,541
|
|
|
|
7,975
|
|
|
|
6,919
|
|
|
|
5,555
|
|
|
|
5,082
|
|
Working capital(f)
|
|
|
30,913
|
|
|
|
29,329
|
|
|
|
16,067
|
|
|
|
25,014
|
|
|
|
25,559
|
|
|
|
18,433
|
|
|
|
17,582
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
12,936
|
|
|
|
15,383
|
|
|
|
13,287
|
|
|
|
15,734
|
|
|
|
16,632
|
|
|
|
16,233
|
|
|
|
17,593
|
|
Total assets(f)
|
|
|
122,932
|
|
|
|
118,550
|
|
|
|
111,148
|
|
|
|
115,268
|
|
|
|
115,546
|
|
|
|
116,970
|
|
|
|
125,848
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
21,064
|
|
|
|
8,143
|
|
|
|
7,963
|
|
|
|
7,314
|
|
|
|
5,546
|
|
|
|
6,347
|
|
|
|
7,279
|
|
Long-term capital(g)
|
|
|
84,354
|
|
|
|
83,144
|
|
|
|
68,662
|
|
|
|
80,134
|
|
|
|
84,993
|
|
|
|
81,895
|
|
|
|
88,959
|
|
Total Pfizer Inc. stockholders equity
|
|
|
60,255
|
|
|
|
67,417
|
|
|
|
57,556
|
|
|
|
65,010
|
|
|
|
71,358
|
|
|
|
65,764
|
|
|
|
68,433
|
|
Earnings per common share basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to Pfizer Inc.
before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principles
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
1.19
|
|
|
|
1.19
|
|
|
|
1.52
|
|
|
|
1.03
|
|
|
|
1.45
|
|
Discontinued operations net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
1.15
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principles net of tax(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Pfizer Inc.
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
1.18
|
|
|
|
2.67
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
|
|
1.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to Pfizer Inc.
before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principles
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
1.19
|
|
|
|
1.18
|
|
|
|
1.52
|
|
|
|
1.02
|
|
|
|
1.43
|
|
Discontinued operations net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principles net of tax(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Pfizer Inc.
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
1.17
|
|
|
|
2.66
|
|
|
|
1.09
|
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value per share (December 31)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.71
|
|
|
|
22.73
|
|
|
|
25.90
|
|
|
|
23.32
|
|
|
|
26.89
|
|
Market value per share (March 29, 2009/March 30, 2008)
|
|
|
14.04
|
|
|
|
20.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Pfizer Inc. stockholders equity
|
|
|
4.63
|
%
|
|
|
4.20
|
%
|
|
|
13.22
|
%
|
|
|
11.94
|
%
|
|
|
28.20
|
%
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
Cash dividends paid per common share
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
1.28
|
|
|
$
|
1.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.96
|
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of/for Three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
As of/for the Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
($ in millions, except ratios and per common share data)
|
|
|
Pfizer Inc. stockholders equity per common share
|
|
$
|
8.96
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
$
|
8.56
|
|
|
$
|
9.65
|
|
|
$
|
10.05
|
|
|
$
|
8.98
|
|
|
$
|
9.21
|
|
Current ratio
|
|
|
2.32:1
|
|
|
|
2.35:1
|
|
|
|
1.59:1
|
|
|
|
2.15:1
|
|
|
|
2.16:1
|
|
|
|
1.65:1
|
|
|
|
1.63:1
|
|
Weighted-average shares used to calculate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share amounts
|
|
|
6,723
|
|
|
|
6,739
|
|
|
|
6,727
|
|
|
|
6,917
|
|
|
|
7,242
|
|
|
|
7,361
|
|
|
|
7,531
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share amounts
|
|
|
6,753
|
|
|
|
6,762
|
|
|
|
6,750
|
|
|
|
6,939
|
|
|
|
7,274
|
|
|
|
7,411
|
|
|
|
7,614
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Research and development expenses includes co-promotion charges
and milestone payments for intellectual property rights of
$150 million in the three months ended March 29, 2009;
$377 million in 2008; $603 million in 2007;
$292 million in 2006; $156 million in 2005 and
$160 million in 2004. |
|
(b) |
|
In the three months ended March 30, 2008 and in the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004, Pfizer
recorded charges for the estimated portion of the purchase price
of acquisitions allocated to in-process research and
development. As a result of adopting Financial Accounting
Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
141R, Business Combinations, as amended, beginning
January 1, 2009, acquisition-related in-process research and
development related to future acquisitions will be recorded on
Pfizers consolidated balance sheet as indefinite-lived
intangible assets. Pfizer made no acquisitions in the
first-quarter of 2009. |
|
(c) |
|
Restructuring charges and acquisition-related costs primarily
includes the following: |
|
|
|
Three months ended March 29, 2009 Restructuring
charges of $157 million related to Pfizers
cost-reduction initiatives and acquisition-related costs of
$397 million related to Pfizers pending acquisition
of Wyeth. The acquisition-related costs are comprised of
transaction costs of $369 million and pre-integration and
other costs of $28 million. The transaction costs include
banking, legal, accounting and other costs directly related to
Pfizers pending acquisition of Wyeth and through
March 29, 2009 substantially represent fees related to the
bridge-term facility entered into with financial institutions on
March 12, 2009 to partially fund the pending acquisition of
Wyeth. Pre-integration costs represent external, incremental
costs directly related to Pfizers pending acquisition of
Wyeth and include costs associated with preparing for systems
and other integration activities. |
|
|
|
Three months ended March 30, 2008 Restructuring
charges of $178 million related to Pfizers
cost-reduction initiatives. |
|
|
|
2008 Restructuring charges of $2.6 billion
related to Pfizers cost-reduction initiatives. |
|
|
|
2007 Restructuring charges of $2.5 billion
related to Pfizers cost-reduction initiatives. |
|
|
|
2006 Restructuring charges of $1.3 billion
related to Pfizers cost-reduction initiatives. |
|
|
|
2005 Integration costs of $532 million and
restructuring charges of $372 million related to
Pfizers acquisition of Pharmacia in 2003 and restructuring
charges of $438 million related to Pfizers
cost-reduction initiatives. |
|
|
|
2004 Integration costs of $454 million and
restructuring charges of $680 million related to
Pfizers acquisition of Pharmacia in 2003. |
|
(d) |
|
In 2005, as a result of the Financial Accounting Standards Board
adopting Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional
Asset Retirement Obligations, referred to as FIN 47, Pfizer
recorded a non-cash pre-tax charge of $40 million
($23 million, net of tax). |
|
(e) |
|
Includes discontinued operations. |
24
|
|
|
(f) |
|
For 2005 and 2004, includes assets held for sale of
Pfizers Consumer Healthcare business, and for 2004, also
includes in-vitro allergy and autoimmune diagnostic testing,
surgical ophthalmic, certain European generics, confectionery
and shaving businesses and the femhrt, Loestrin and Estrostep
womens health product lines. |
|
(g) |
|
Defined as long-term debt, deferred taxes, noncontrolling
interests and Pfizer Inc. stockholders equity. |
Pfizers ratio of fixed charges and preference dividends to
earnings for the three months ended March 29, 2009 is
attached as an exhibit to Pfizers Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 29, 2009, which is
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.
Pfizers ratio of combined fixed charges and preference
dividends to earnings for 2004 through 2008 is attached as an
exhibit to Pfizers Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, which is incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.
25
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF WYETH
The selected financial data of Wyeth for each of the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007 are derived from Wyeths
audited consolidated financial statements and related notes
contained in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008, which is incorporated by reference into
this proxy statement/prospectus. The selected financial data of
Wyeth for each of the years ended December 31, 2005 and
2004 and as of December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 have been
derived from Wyeths audited consolidated financial
statements for such years, which have not been incorporated into
this proxy statement/prospectus by reference. The selected
financial data of Wyeth as of and for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008 are derived from
Wyeths unaudited consolidated condensed financial
statements and related notes contained in its Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, which is
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.
Wyeths management believes the interim financial
statements include all normal and recurring adjustments that are
considered necessary for the fair presentation of the results
for the interim period. The information set forth below is only
a summary and is not necessarily indicative of the results of
future operations of Wyeth or the combined company, and you
should read the following information together with Wyeths
audited consolidated financial statements, the notes related
thereto and Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in
Wyeths Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended on December 31, 2008 and Wyeths
unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements, the notes
related thereto and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
contained in Wyeths Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, which are incorporated by
reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands, except per common share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of Net Revenue and Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
|
$5,376,973
|
|
|
|
$5,710,649
|
|
|
$
|
22,833,908
|
|
|
$
|
22,399,798
|
|
|
$
|
20,350,655
|
|
|
$
|
18,755,790
|
|
|
$
|
17,358,028
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations(a)(b)
|
|
|
1,198,160
|
|
|
|
1,196,947
|
|
|
|
4,417,833
|
|
|
|
4,615,960
|
|
|
|
4,196,706
|
|
|
|
3,656,298
|
|
|
|
1,233,997
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing
operations(a)(b)
|
|
|
0.89
|
|
|
|
0.89
|
|
|
|
3.27
|
|
|
|
3.38
|
|
|
|
3.08
|
|
|
|
2.70
|
|
|
|
0.91
|
|
Dividends per common share
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
1.06
|
|
|
|
1.01
|
|
|
|
0.94
|
|
|
|
0.92
|
|
Period-End Financial Position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
23,739,097
|
|
|
$
|
23,142,165
|
|
|
$
|
23,481,340
|
|
|
$
|
22,983,598
|
|
|
$
|
17,514,241
|
|
|
$
|
18,044,841
|
|
|
$
|
14,438,029
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
6,249,088
|
|
|
|
6,624,069
|
|
|
|
6,850,423
|
|
|
|
7,324,279
|
|
|
|
7,221,848
|
|
|
|
9,947,961
|
|
|
|
8,535,542
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
43,998,392
|
|
|
|
43,456,557
|
|
|
|
44,031,724
|
|
|
|
42,717,282
|
|
|
|
36,478,715
|
|
|
|
35,841,126
|
|
|
|
33,629,704
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
10,740,734
|
|
|
|
11,669,921
|
|
|
|
10,826,013
|
|
|
|
11,492,881
|
|
|
|
9,096,743
|
|
|
|
9,231,479
|
|
|
|
7,792,311
|
|
Average stockholders equity
|
|
|
19,450,436
|
|
|
|
18,759,347
|
|
|
|
18,692,189
|
|
|
|
16,431,645
|
|
|
|
13,323,562
|
|
|
|
10,921,136
|
|
|
|
9,571,142
|
|
Outstanding Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding used for diluted
earnings (loss) per share calculation (in thousands)
|
|
|
1,354,297
|
|
|
|
1,360,311
|
|
|
|
1,357,466
|
|
|
|
1,374,342
|
|
|
|
1,374,053
|
|
|
|
1,363,417
|
|
|
|
1,354,489
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operation contained in
Wyeths Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and Wyeths
Quarterly |
26
|
|
|
|
|
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 for a
discussion of productivity initiatives and other significant
items for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
and for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
March 30, 2008. |
|
(b) |
|
Pre-tax charges of $4,500,000 in 2004, related to the litigation
brought against Wyeth regarding the use of the diet drugs
Redux or Pondimin are included in Income (loss)
from continuing operations. |
27
PFIZER
AND WYETH
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of income
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and for the
three months ended March 29, 2009 combine the historical
consolidated statements of income of Pfizer and Wyeth, giving
effect to the merger as if it had occurred on January 1,
2008. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet
as of March 29, 2009 combines the historical consolidated
balance sheets of Pfizer and Wyeth, giving effect to the merger
as if it had occurred on March 29, 2009. The historical
consolidated financial information has been adjusted in the
unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements to
give effect to pro forma events that are (1) directly
attributable to the merger, (2) factually supportable, and
(3) with respect to the statements of income, expected to
have a continuing impact on the combined results. The unaudited
pro forma condensed combined financial information should be
read in conjunction with the accompanying notes to the unaudited
pro forma condensed combined financial statements. In addition,
the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information
was based on and should be read in conjunction with the:
|
|
|
|
|
separate historical financial statements of Pfizer as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2008 and the related notes
included in Pfizers Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, which is incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus;
|
|
|
|
separate historical financial statements of Wyeth as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2008 and the related notes
included in Wyeths Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, which is incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus;
|
|
|
|
separate historical financial statements of Pfizer as of and for
the three months ended March 29, 2009 and the related notes
included in Pfizers Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 29, 2009, which is
incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement/prospectus; and
|
|
|
|
separate historical financial statements of Wyeth as of and for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 and the related notes
included in Wyeths Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, which is incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.
|
For ease of reference, all pro forma statements use
Pfizers period-end date and no adjustments were made to
Wyeths reported information for its different quarter-end
date.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information
has been presented for informational purposes only. The pro
forma information is not necessarily indicative of what the
combined companys financial position or results of
operations actually would have been had the merger been
completed as of the dates indicated. In addition, the unaudited
pro forma condensed combined financial information does not
purport to project the future financial position or operating
results of the combined company. There were no material
transactions between Pfizer and Wyeth during the periods
presented in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial statements that would need to be eliminated.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information
has been prepared using the acquisition method of accounting
under existing U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles, or GAAP standards, which are subject to change and
interpretation. Pfizer has been treated as the acquirer in the
merger for accounting purposes. The acquisition accounting is
dependent upon certain valuations and other studies that have
yet to commence or progress to a stage where there is sufficient
information for a definitive measurement. Accordingly, the pro
forma adjustments are preliminary and have been made solely for
the purpose of providing unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial information. Differences between these preliminary
estimates and the final acquisition accounting will occur and
these differences could have a material impact on the
accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
statements and the combined companys future results of
operations and financial position.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information
does not reflect any cost savings, operating synergies or
revenue enhancements that the combined company may achieve as a
result of the merger or the costs to integrate the operations of
Pfizer and Wyeth or the costs necessary to achieve these cost
savings, operating synergies and revenue enhancements.
28
Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Combined
Statement
of Income
For the Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Pfizer
|
|
|
Wyeth
|
|
|
(Note 6)
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
48,296
|
|
|
|
22,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,130
|
|
Cost and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
8,112
|
|
|
|
5,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,018
|
|
Selling, informational and administrative expenses
|
|
|
14,537
|
|
|
|
6,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,079
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
7,945
|
|
|
|
3,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,254
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
2,668
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
2,895
|
(a)
|
|
|
5,642
|
|
Acquisition-related in-process research and development charges
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
664
|
|
Restructuring charges and acquisition-related costs
|
|
|
2,675
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,142
|
|
Other
deductions-net
|
|
|
2,032
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
2,086
|
(b)
|
|
|
4,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before provision for taxes on
income
|
|
|
9,694
|
|
|
|
6,358
|
|
|
|
(4,981
|
)
|
|
|
11,071
|
|
Provision for taxes on income
|
|
|
1,645
|
|
|
|
1,920
|
|
|
|
(1,606
|
)(c)
|
|
|
1,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before allocation to
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
8,049
|
|
|
|
4,438
|
|
|
|
(3,375
|
)
|
|
|
9,112
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to Pfizer/Wyeth
|
|
$
|
8,026
|
|
|
|
4,418
|
|
|
|
(3,375
|
)
|
|
|
9,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to Pfizer/Wyeth
per common share basic
|
|
$
|
1.19
|
|
|
|
3.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to Pfizer/Wyeth
per common share diluted
|
|
$
|
1.19
|
|
|
|
3.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares used to calculate earnings per common
share amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
6,727
|
|
|
|
1,333
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
8,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
6,750
|
|
|
|
1,357
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
8,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid per common share
|
|
$
|
1.28
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial statements, which are an integral part of
these statements. The pro forma adjustments are explained in
Note 6. Pro Forma Adjustments beginning on
page 41.
29
Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Combined
Statement
of Income
For the Three Months Ended March 29, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Pfizer
|
|
|
Wyeth
|
|
|
(Note 6)
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
10,867
|
|
|
|
5,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,244
|
|
Cost and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
1,408
|
|
|
|
1,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,713
|
|
Selling, informational and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,876
|
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,426
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,478
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
724
|
(a)
|
|
|
1,321
|
|
Restructuring charges and acquisition-related costs
|
|
|
554
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
(396
|
)(d)
|
|
|
257
|
|
Other (income)/deductions-net
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
452
|
(b)
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before provision for taxes on
income
|
|
|
3,803
|
|
|
|
1,693
|
|
|
|
(780
|
)
|
|
|
4,716
|
|
Provision for taxes on income
|
|
|
1,074
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
(226
|
)(c)
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before allocation to
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
2,729
|
|
|
|
1,203
|
|
|
|
(554
|
)
|
|
|
3,378
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to Pfizer/Wyeth
|
|
$
|
2,728
|
|
|
|
1,198
|
|
|
|
(554
|
)
|
|
|
3,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to Pfizer/Wyeth
per common share basic
|
|
$
|
.41
|
|
|
|
.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to Pfizer/Wyeth
per common share diluted
|
|
$
|
.40
|
|
|
|
.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares used to calculate earnings per common
share amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
6,723
|
|
|
|
1,332
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
8,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
6,753
|
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
8,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid per common share
|
|
$
|
.32
|
|
|
|
.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial statements, which are an integral part of
these statements. The pro forma adjustments are explained in
Note 6. Pro Forma Adjustments beginning on
page 41.
30
Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Combined
Balance
Sheet
As of March 29, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Pfizer
|
|
|
Wyeth
|
|
|
(Note 6)
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,247
|
|
|
|
8,830
|
|
|
|
(8,830
|
)(e)
|
|
|
1,247
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
32,805
|
|
|
|
5,717
|
|
|
|
(27,428
|
)(e)
|
|
|
11,094
|
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
9,596
|
|
|
|
3,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,228
|
|
Short-term loans
|
|
|
793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
793
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
4,458
|
|
|
|
3,054
|
|
|
|
4,600
|
(f)
|
|
|
12,112
|
|
Taxes and other current assets
|
|
|
5,055
|
|
|
|
2,506
|
|
|
|
(1,364
|
)(c)(j)
|
|
|
6,197
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
54,253
|
|
|
|
23,739
|
|
|
|
(33,022
|
)
|
|
|
44,970
|
|
Long-term investments and loans
|
|
|
13,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,536
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
12,936
|
|
|
|
10,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,917
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
21,482
|
|
|
|
4,255
|
|
|
|
8,339
|
(g)
|
|
|
34,076
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets, less accumulated amortization
|
|
|
16,923
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
50,502
|
(h)
|
|
|
67,823
|
|
Other assets, deferred taxes and deferred charges
|
|
|
3,802
|
|
|
|
4,625
|
|
|
|
29
|
(i)
|
|
|
8,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
122,932
|
|
|
|
43,998
|
|
|
|
25,848
|
|
|
|
192,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings, including current portion of long-term
debt
|
|
$
|
7,613
|
|
|
|
853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,466
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,573
|
|
|
|
1,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,657
|
|
Dividends payable
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
1,132
|
(c)(j)
|
|
|
2,183
|
|
Accrued compensation and related items
|
|
|
1,565
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,807
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
12,046
|
|
|
|
3,561
|
|
|
|
496
|
(c)(k)
|
|
|
16,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
23,340
|
|
|
|
6,249
|
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
|
|
31,217
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
21,064
|
|
|
|
10,740
|
|
|
|
8,792
|
(l)
|
|
|
40,596
|
|
Pension benefit obligations
|
|
|
4,038
|
|
|
|
1,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,683
|
|
Postretirement benefit obligations
|
|
|
1,604
|
|
|
|
1,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,396
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
2,849
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
16,212
|
(c)
|
|
|
19,279
|
|
Other taxes payable
|
|
|
6,770
|
|
|
|
1,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,348
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
2,826
|
|
|
|
1,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
62,491
|
|
|
|
24,177
|
|
|
|
26,632
|
|
|
|
113,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
(378
|
)(m)
|
|
|
509
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
70,201
|
|
|
|
7,546
|
|
|
|
11,606
|
(n)
|
|
|
89,353
|
|
Employee benefit trust
|
|
|
(285
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(285
|
)
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
(57,363
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57,363
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
51,863
|
|
|
|
13,625
|
|
|
|
(13,900
|
)(o)
|
|
|
51,588
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(expense)
|
|
|
(4,673
|
)
|
|
|
(1,888
|
)
|
|
|
1,888
|
(p)
|
|
|
(4,673
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Pfizer/Wyeth stockholders equity
|
|
|
60,255
|
|
|
|
19,727
|
|
|
|
(784
|
)
|
|
|
79,198
|
|
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
60,441
|
|
|
|
19,821
|
|
|
|
(784
|
)
|
|
|
79,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
122,932
|
|
|
|
43,998
|
|
|
|
25,848
|
|
|
|
192,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial statements, which are an integral part of
these statements. The pro forma adjustments are explained in
Note 6. Pro Forma Adjustments beginning on
page 41.
31
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1.
|
Description
of Transaction
|
On January 25, 2009, Pfizer and Wyeth entered into the
merger agreement, pursuant to which, subject to the terms and
conditions set forth in the merger agreement, Wyeth will become
a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pfizer. Upon completion of the
merger, each share of Wyeth common stock issued and outstanding
will be converted into the right to receive, subject to
adjustment under limited circumstances, a combination of $33.00
in cash, without interest, and 0.985 of a share of Pfizer common
stock in a taxable transaction. Pfizer will not issue more than
19.9% of its outstanding common stock at the acquisition date in
connection with the merger. The exchange ratio of 0.985 of a
share of Pfizer common stock will be adjusted if the exchange
ratio would result in Pfizer issuing in excess of 19.9% of its
outstanding common stock as a result of the merger. In this
circumstance, the exchange ratio will be reduced to the minimum
extent necessary so that the number of shares of Pfizer common
stock issued or issuable as a result of the merger will equal no
more than 19.9% of its outstanding common stock and the cash
portion of the merger consideration will be increased by an
equivalent value (based on the volume weighted average price of
Pfizer common stock for the five consecutive trading days ending
two days prior to the effective time of the merger, as such
prices are reported on the NYSE Transaction Reporting System).
Pfizer and Wyeth currently do not anticipate that any adjustment
to the exchange ratio will be required. Accordingly, Pfizer does
not believe that a potential adjustment to the merger
consideration as described above will have a material effect on
the pro forma financial statement balances.
Each outstanding Wyeth stock option, whether or not then vested
and exercisable, will become fully vested and exercisable
immediately prior to, and then will be canceled at, the
effective time of the merger, and the holder of such option will
be entitled to receive as soon as practicable after the
effective time of the merger but in no event later than ten
business days following the effective time of the merger an
amount in cash, without interest and less any applicable tax to
be withheld, equal to (i) the excess, if any, of the per
share value of the merger consideration to be received by
holders of Wyeth common stock in the merger over the per share
exercise price of such Wyeth stock option multiplied by
(ii) the total number of shares of Wyeth common stock
underlying such Wyeth stock option, with the aggregate amount of
such payment rounded up to the nearest cent. If the per share
exercise price of any Wyeth stock option is equal to or greater
than the per share value of the merger consideration, then the
stock option will be canceled without any payment to the stock
option holder.
Also at the effective time of the merger, each outstanding share
of restricted stock, each outstanding DSU and each outstanding
RSU, including each outstanding performance share unit award
(but excluding certain RSUs that constitute deferred
compensation, as discussed below), will become fully vested and
then will be canceled and converted into the right to receive an
amount in cash equal to the per share value of the merger
consideration in respect of each share of Wyeth common stock
into which the vested portion of such outstanding restricted
stock, DSU and RSU award, as applicable, would otherwise be
convertible (except that with respect to any performance share
unit award which by the terms of the award agreement pursuant to
which it was granted provides for a lesser percentage of such
performance share unit award to become vested upon the effective
time of the merger, such performance share unit award will only
become vested as to such percentage (with the remaining unvested
portion being canceled without payment)). These cash amounts
will be paid out as soon as practicable after the effective time
of the merger but in no event later than ten business days
following the effective time of the merger in accordance with
the terms of the applicable plans. However, at the effective
time of the merger, each 409A RSU will, as of the effective time
of the merger, become a vested right to receive the merger
consideration in respect of each share of Wyeth common stock
into which such 409A RSU would otherwise be convertible. Such
merger consideration will be deposited into a grantor trust in
which the cash portion of the merger consideration will accrue
interest at a designated market rate, the portion of the merger
consideration that is Pfizer common stock will accrue dividends
in the form of additional shares of Pfizer common stock in the
same amount and at the same time as dividends are paid on Pfizer
common stock, and all of these amounts will be paid out in
accordance with the applicable payment schedules provided for
under the applicable deferred payment terms of such 409A RSUs.
For purposes of these
32
unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements, it
is assumed that there are no RSU awards that cannot be
immediately settled due to tax law restrictions.
Upon completion of the merger, each share of Wyeth $2
Convertible Preferred Stock issued and outstanding immediately
prior to completion of the merger will be converted into the
right to receive one share of a new series of Pfizer preferred
stock having the same powers, designations, preferences and
rights (to the fullest extent practicable) as the shares of the
Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock. On April 23, 2009,
Wyeth announced that, pursuant to a request from Pfizer made in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the merger
agreement, Wyeth will redeem all of its outstanding Wyeth $2
Convertible Preferred Stock, effective on July 15, 2009 at
a redemption price of $60.08 per share. Therefore, it is
expected that there will not be any shares of Wyeth $2
Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding at the effective time of
the merger. In such case, Pfizer will not create or issue a new
series of preferred stock in connection with the merger. Prior
to the redemption date, holders of Wyeth $2 Convertible
Preferred Stock can elect to convert all, or a portion, of their
holdings into Wyeth common stock. Each share of Wyeth $2
Convertible Preferred Stock can be converted into 36 shares
of Wyeth common stock. For purposes of these unaudited pro forma
condensed combined financial statements, Pfizer has assumed
holders of Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock will elect to
convert their shares into Wyeth common stock prior to the
redemption date since Pfizer believes that election would be
most favorable to such holders.
The merger is subject to Wyeth stockholder approval,
governmental and regulatory approvals, and other usual and
customary closing conditions. The merger is expected to be
completed at the end of the third quarter or during the fourth
quarter of 2009.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information
was prepared using the acquisition method of accounting and was
based on the historical financial statements of Pfizer and
Wyeth. For ease of reference, all pro forma statements use
Pfizers period-end date and no adjustments were made to
Wyeths reported information for its different quarter-end
date. Certain reclassifications have been made to the historical
financial statements of Wyeth to conform with Pfizers
presentation, primarily related to the presentation of
amortization expense of intangible assets, acquisition-related
in-process research and development charges, restructuring
charges, net interest income, noncontrolling interests, accrued
compensation-related liabilities and noncurrent tax liabilities.
Included in Wyeths restructuring charges of
$467 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 is a
net gain on the sale of a manufacturing facility in Japan of
$105 million.
The acquisition method of accounting is based on Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 141R, Business
Combinations, as amended, which Pfizer adopted on
January 1, 2009 and uses the fair value concepts defined in
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, as
amended, which Pfizer has adopted as required. The unaudited pro
forma condensed combined financial information was prepared
using the acquisition method of accounting, under these existing
U.S. GAAP standards, which are subject to change and
interpretation.
SFAS No. 141R, as amended, requires, among other
things, that most assets acquired and liabilities assumed be
recognized at their fair values as of the acquisition date and
that the fair value of acquired in-process research and
development be recorded on the balance sheet regardless of the
likelihood of success as of the acquisition date. In addition,
SFAS No. 141R, as amended, establishes that the
consideration transferred be measured at the closing date of the
merger at the then-current market price; this particular
requirement will likely result in a per share equity component
that is different from the amount assumed in these unaudited pro
forma condensed combined financial statements.
SFAS No. 157, as amended, defines the term fair
value and sets forth the valuation requirements for any
asset or liability measured at fair value, expands related
disclosure requirements and specifies a hierarchy of valuation
techniques based on the nature of the inputs used to develop the
fair value measures. Fair value is defined in
SFAS No. 157, as amended, as the price that
would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date. This is an exit price concept for
the valuation of the asset or liability. In addition, market
participants are assumed to be buyers and
33
sellers in the principal (or the most advantageous) market for
the asset or liability. Fair value measurements for an asset
assume the highest and best use by these market participants. As
a result of these standards, Pfizer may be required to record
assets which are not intended to be used or sold
and/or to
value assets at fair value measures that do not reflect
Pfizers intended use of those assets. Many of these fair
value measurements can be highly subjective and it is also
possible that other professionals, applying reasonable judgment
to the same facts and circumstances, could develop and support a
range of alternative estimated amounts.
Under the acquisition method of accounting, the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed will be recorded as of the completion of
the merger, primarily at their respective fair values and added
to those of Pfizer. Financial statements and reported results of
operations of Pfizer issued after completion of the merger will
reflect these values, but will not be retroactively restated to
reflect the historical financial position or results of
operations of Wyeth.
Under SFAS No. 141R, as amended, acquisition-related
transaction costs (i.e., advisory, legal, valuation, other
professional fees) and certain acquisition-related restructuring
charges impacting the target company are not included as a
component of consideration transferred but are accounted for as
expenses in the periods in which the costs are incurred. Total
advisory, legal, regulatory and valuation costs expected to be
incurred by Pfizer are estimated to be approximately
$150 million, of which Pfizer estimates $30 million
has been paid in the three months ended March 29, 2009 and
are reflected in these unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial statements as a reduction to cash and retained
earnings. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
statements do not reflect any restructuring and integration
charges expected to be incurred in connection with the merger
but these charges are expected to be in the range of
approximately $6 to $8 billion. These costs will be
expensed as incurred. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial statements do not reflect anticipated
acquisition-related transaction costs to be incurred by Wyeth,
which are estimated to be approximately $135 million.
Upon consummation of the merger, Pfizer will review Wyeths
accounting policies. As a result of that review, Pfizer may
identify differences between the accounting policies of the two
companies that, when conformed, could have a material impact on
the combined financial statements. At this time, Pfizer is not
aware of any differences that would have a material impact on
the combined financial statements. The unaudited pro forma
condensed combined financial statements do not assume any
differences in accounting policies.
34
|
|
4.
|
Estimate
of Consideration Expected to be Transferred
|
The following is a preliminary estimate of consideration
expected to be transferred to effect the acquisition of Wyeth:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Form of
|
|
|
Calculation
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Consideration
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
Number of shares of Wyeth common stock outstanding as of
March 29, 2009
|
|
|
1,332.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiplied by Pfizers stock price as of June 4, 2009
multiplied by the exchange ratio of 0.985 ($14.64x0.985)
|
|
$
|
14.42
|
|
|
$
|
19,213
|
|
|
Pfizer
common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares of Wyeth common stock outstanding as of
March 29, 2009
|
|
|
1,332.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiplied by cash consideration per common share outstanding
|
|
$
|
33.00
|
|
|
$
|
43,969
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares of Wyeth common stock into which Wyeth $2
Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding at March 29, 2009
is convertible (8,896 actual shares x 36)(a)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiplied by Pfizers stock price as of June 4, 2009
multiplied by the exchange ratio of 0.985 ($14.64x0.985)
|
|
$
|
14.42
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
Pfizer
common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares of Wyeth common stock into which Wyeth $2
Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding at March 29, 2009
is convertible (8,896 actual shares x 36)(a)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiplied by cash consideration per common share outstanding
|
|
$
|
33.00
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares of Wyeth stock options vested and unvested as
of March 29, 2009 expected to be canceled and exchanged for
a cash payment
|
|
|
55.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiplied by the difference between the per share value of the
merger consideration and the weighted-average option exercise
price of
in-the-money
options
|
|
$
|
5.62
|
|
|
$
|
309
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of outstanding shares of restricted stock and each
outstanding deferred or restricted stock unit, including
performance share unit awards, as of March 29, 2009,
expected to be canceled
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiplied by the per share value of the merger consideration
|
|
$
|
47.42
|
|
|
$
|
446
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimate of consideration expected to be transferred(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
63,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain amounts may reflect rounding adjustments.
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Under the terms of the merger agreement, upon completion of the
merger, each share of Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock
issued and outstanding immediately prior to completion of the
merger will be converted into the right to receive one share of
a new series of Pfizer preferred stock having the same powers,
designations, preferences and rights (to the fullest extent
practicable) as the shares of the Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred
Stock. As of March 29, 2009, 8,896 actual shares of the
Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock were outstanding. On
April 23, 2009, Wyeth announced that, pursuant to a request
from Pfizer made in accordance with the terms and conditions of
the merger agreement, Wyeth will redeem all of its outstanding
Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock, effective on July 15,
2009, at a redemption price of $60.08 per share. Therefore, it
is expected that there will not be any shares of Wyeth $2
Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding at the effective time of
the merger. In such case, Pfizer will not create or issue a new
series of preferred stock in connection with the merger. Prior
to the redemption date, holders of Wyeth $2 Convertible
Preferred Stock can elect to convert all, or a portion, of their
holdings into Wyeth common stock. Each share of Wyeth $2
Convertible Preferred Stock can be converted into 36 shares
of Wyeth common stock. For purposes of these unaudited pro forma
condensed combined |
35
|
|
|
|
|
financial statements, Pfizer has assumed holders of Wyeth $2
Convertible Preferred Stock will elect to convert their shares
into Wyeth common stock prior to the redemption date since
Pfizer believes that election would be most favorable to such
holders. |
|
(b) |
|
The estimated consideration expected to be transferred reflected
in these unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
statements does not purport to represent what the actual
consideration transferred will be when the merger is
consummated. In accordance with SFAS No. 141R, as amended,
the fair value of equity securities issued as part of the
consideration transferred will be measured on the closing date
of the merger at the then-current market price. This requirement
will likely result in a per share equity component different
from the $14.42 assumed in these unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial statements and that difference may be
material. Pfizer believes that an increase or decrease by as
much as 35% in the Pfizer common stock price on the closing date
of the merger from the common stock price assumed in these
unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements is
reasonably possible based upon the recent history of
Pfizers common stock price. A change of this magnitude
would increase or decrease the consideration expected to be
transferred by about $7 billion, which would be reflected
in these unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
statements as an increase or decrease to goodwill. |
|
|
5.
|
Estimate
of Assets to be Acquired and Liabilities to be
Assumed
|
The following is a preliminary estimate of the assets to be
acquired and the liabilities to be assumed by Pfizer in the
merger, reconciled to the estimate of consideration expected to
be transferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Book value of net assets acquired at March 29, 2009
|
|
$
|
19,727
|
|
Adjusted for:
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination of existing goodwill and intangible assets
|
|
|
(4,653
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted book value of net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
15,074
|
|
Adjustments to:
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories(a)
|
|
|
4,600
|
|
Property, plant and equipment(b)
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets(c)
|
|
|
50,900
|
|
Debt(d)
|
|
|
208
|
|
Contingencies(e)
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes(f)
|
|
|
(19,424
|
)
|
Goodwill(g)
|
|
|
12,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimate of consideration expected to be transferred
|
|
$
|
63,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
As of the effective time of the merger, inventories are required
to be measured at fair value, which Pfizer believes will
approximate net realizable value. Pfizer does not have detailed
information at this time as to the specific finished goods on
hand, the actual stage of completion of
work-in-progress
inventories (which inventories represent approximately 55% of
total inventories, as disclosed in Wyeths Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, which is
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus)
or the specific types and nature of raw materials and supplies.
However, the fair valuation of inventory should ordinarily
result in an increase to pre-acquisition book value due to lower
of cost or market requirements. This expectation is particularly
true in the pharmaceutical industry where the selling price is
significantly influenced by ownership of intellectual property
and less by the costs associated with the manufacturing of the
products. For these reasons, Pfizer believes including a fair
value
step-up
adjustment for inventory is factually supportable and provides a
reasonable indication of the adjustment that is likely to occur. |
Because Pfizer has limited access to Wyeth information until the
consummation date, for purposes of these unaudited pro forma
condensed combined financial statements, a fair value adjustment
has been
36
estimated by referencing selected transactions between 2004 and
2008 in the life science, consumer and animal health sectors
(because these are the sectors in which Wyeth operates), such as
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The acquisition, by a pharmaceutical company, of a
biopharmaceutical company engaged in developing, manufacturing,
marketing and selling prescription medicines for
11 billion.
|
|
|
|
The acquisition, by a pharmaceutical company, of a portfolio of
animal health products for more than 100 million.
|
|
|
|
The acquisition, by a pharmaceutical company, of a company
engaged in the manufacturing and marketing of pharmaceutical
drugs for $3.9 billion.
|
|
|
|
The acquisition, by a consumer products company, of a company
engaged in the manufacturing and marketing of consumer products
for $2.9 billion.
|
|
|
|
The acquisition, by a consumer products company, of a company
engaged in the manufacturing and marketing of consumer products
for $11.8 billion.
|
|
|
|
The acquisition, by a diversified pharmaceutical and
consumer-health company, of a company engaged in the consumer
health business for more than $100 million.
|
|
|
|
The acquisition, by a consumer products company, of a company
engaged in the production and distribution of consumer products
for $1.6 billion.
|
Just as Pfizers knowledge of Wyeth inventories is limited,
its knowledge of the inventories in these transactions is also
limited. The nature of the inventories associated with these
transactions could vary substantively from the nature of the
Wyeth inventories. For example, differences could occur in
composition (raw materials,
work-in-progress,
finished goods), in geographic location, in stage of completion,
in terms of cost structure and complexity of manufacturing and
selling effort, and in terms of intellectual property value,
among other things. Further, unknown to Pfizer, there could be
unique circumstances associated with one or more of these
transactions that could distort the inventory trend of the group
as a whole and that might not be representative of the Wyeth
inventories.
While no assurance can be given that these selected transactions
are representative of the Wyeth transaction generally or of the
Wyeth inventory specifically and while the use of a trend cannot
be considered to be a precise measurement, Pfizer did use these
selected transactions to estimate the degree of fair value
step-up that
may be associated with inventory because Pfizer believes that
this directional information is important to understand.
Specifically, Pfizer estimated the breakdown of Wyeth inventory
by segment by performing a pro-rata allocation of inventory
using 2008 sales information by segment and assuming that
working capital requirements would not vary significantly across
the pharmaceutical, consumer and animal health sectors. This
resulted in most inventories being characterized as
pharmaceutical inventory, which Pfizer believes is a reasonable
outcome. Pfizer then applied the weighted average fair value
step-up
percentage associated with the sector groupings of the selected
transactions. As expected, the calculated
step-up
adjustment was significant as a percentage of book value (about
150%) and virtually all of the adjustment is associated with
work-in-progress
and finished goods inventory. The magnitude of the estimated
step-up is
not unexpected and is consistent with the pharmaceutical
business model, where selling price seeks to recover the
significant upfront investment in research and development,
which under U.S. GAAP is expensed as incurred.
The estimated
step-up is
preliminary, subject to change and could vary materially from
the actual
step-up
calculated after consummation date. But, despite the uncertainty
associated with the estimated
step-up,
Pfizer has included this pro forma adjustment because of its
experience in the pharmaceutical, consumer and animal health
sectors and because of its previous experience in acquiring a
large multi-national company with operations in these same
sectors (Pharmacia Corporation, acquired in 2003, had a 130%
step-up from
book value acquired).
|
|
|
(b) |
|
As of the effective time of the merger, property, plant and
equipment is required to be measured at fair value, unless those
assets are classified as
held-for-sale
on the acquisition date. The acquired assets can include assets
that are not intended to be used or sold, or that are intended
to be used in a manner other than their highest and best use.
Pfizer does not have sufficient information at this time as to
the specific |
37
|
|
|
|
|
nature, age, condition or location of the land, buildings,
machinery and equipment, and construction-in- progress, as
applicable, and Pfizer does not know the appropriate valuation
premise, in-use or in-exchange, as the valuation premise
requires a certain level of knowledge about the assets being
evaluated as well as a profile of the associated market
participants. All of these elements can cause differences
between fair value and net book value. |
For purposes of these unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial statements, Pfizer referenced selected acquisition
transactions (see those discussed in (a) above) in the life
science, consumer and animal health sectors (because these are
the sectors in which Wyeth operates) and observed that fair
value adjustments that increase property, plant and equipment
can be significant and the estimated remaining useful lives of
the underlying assets can range from 10 to 15 years. Pfizer
believes that reductions to book value of specific assets within
property, plant and equipment are also possible.
Just as Pfizers knowledge of Wyeth property, plant and
equipment is limited, its knowledge of the property, plant and
equipment in the selected transactions is also limited. The
nature of the property, plant and equipment associated with
those transactions could vary substantively from the nature of
the Wyeth property, plant and equipment. For example,
differences could occur in the specific nature, age, condition
or location or mix of the land, buildings, machinery and
equipment, and construction-in-progress, as applicable. Further,
unknown to Pfizer, there could be unique circumstances
associated with one or more of those transactions that could
distort the results of the group as a whole and that might not
be representative of the total Wyeth property, plant and
equipment.
While no assurance can be given that these selected transactions
are representative of the Wyeth transaction generally or of the
Wyeth property, plant and equipment specifically, Pfizer did
reference these selected transactions to understand the
potential degree of fair value
step-up that
may be associated with property, plant and equipment.
Pfizers conclusion at the end of this review was that no
additional directional information as to a
step-up or
step-down could be determined and that the specific nature,
condition and other traits associated with property, plant and
equipment noted in this section are determinative of fair value.
Accordingly, for the purposes of these unaudited pro forma
condensed combined financial statements, Pfizer believes, to the
best of its knowledge, that the current Wyeth book values
represent the best estimate of fair value. This estimate is
preliminary and subject to change and could vary materially from
the actual adjustment on the consummation date. For each
$1 billion of fair value adjustment that changes property,
plant and equipment, there could be an annual change in
depreciation expense approximating $100 million
($25 million per quarter), assuming a weighted-average
useful life of 10 years.
|
|
|
(c) |
|
As of the effective time of the merger, identifiable intangible
assets are required to be measured at fair value and these
acquired assets could include assets that are not intended to be
used or sold or that are intended to be used in a manner other
than their highest and best use. For purposes of these unaudited
pro forma condensed combined financial statements, it is assumed
that all assets will be used and that all assets will be used in
a manner that represents the highest and best use of those
assets, but it is not assumed that any market participant
synergies will be achieved. The consideration of synergies has
been excluded because they are not considered to be factually
supportable, which is a required condition for these pro forma
adjustments. |
The fair value of identifiable intangible assets is determined
primarily using the income method, which starts with
a forecast of all the expected future net cash flows. Under the
HSR Act and other relevant laws and regulations, there are
significant limitations regarding what Pfizer can learn about
the specifics of the Wyeth intangible assets and any such
process will take several months to complete. It is estimated
that the number of distinct intangibles acquired could be in the
hundreds.
At this time, Pfizer does not have sufficient information as to
the amount, timing and risk of cash flows of all of these
intangible assets, particularly those assets still in the
research and development phase. Some of the more significant
assumptions inherent in the development of intangible asset
values, from the perspective of a market participant, include:
the amount and timing of projected future cash flows (including
revenue, cost of sales, research and development costs, sales
and marketing expenses, and working capital/contributory asset
charges); the discount rate selected to measure the risks
inherent in the
38
future cash flows; and the assessment of the assets life
cycle and the competitive trends impacting the asset, as well as
other factors. However, for purposes of these unaudited pro
forma condensed combined financial statements and using publicly
available information, such as historical product revenues,
Wyeths cost structure, and certain other high-level
assumptions, the fair value of the identifiable intangible
assets and their weighted-average useful lives have been
estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Fair Value
|
|
|
Estimated Useful Life
|
|
|
Developed technology finite-lived
|
|
$
|
30.9 billion
|
|
|
|
11 years
|
|
Brands finite-lived
|
|
|
3.3 billion
|
|
|
|
20 years
|
|
Brands indefinite-lived
|
|
|
5.0 billion
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
In-process R&D indefinite-lived
|
|
|
11.7 billion
|
|
|
|
Unknown*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
50.9 billion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Acquired in-process research and development assets are
initially recognized at fair value and are classified as
indefinite-lived assets until the successful completion or
abandonment of the associated research and development efforts.
Accordingly, during the development period after the acquisition
date, these assets will not be amortized into earnings; instead
these assets will be subject to periodic impairment testing.
Upon successful completion of the development process for an
acquired in-process research and development project,
determination as to the useful life of the asset will be made;
at that point in time, the asset would then be considered a
finite-lived intangible asset and Pfizer would begin to amortize
the asset into earnings. |
These preliminary estimates of fair value and weighted-average
useful life will likely be different from the final acquisition
accounting, and the difference could have a material impact on
the accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial statements. Once Pfizer has full access to the
specifics of the Wyeth intangible assets, additional insight
will be gained that could impact (i) the estimated total
value assigned to intangible assets, (ii) the estimated
allocation of value between finite-lived and indefinite-lived
intangible assets and/or (iii) the estimated
weighted-average useful life of each category of intangible
assets. The estimated intangible asset values and their useful
lives could be impacted by a variety of factors that may become
known to us only upon access to additional information and/or by
changes in such factors that may occur prior to the effective
time of the merger. These factors include but are not limited to
the regulatory, legislative, legal, technological and
competitive environments. Increased knowledge about these and/or
other elements could result in a change to the estimated fair
value of the Wyeth intangible assets and/or to the estimated
weighted-average useful lives from what we have assumed in these
unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements. The
combined effect of any such changes could then also result in a
significant increase or decrease to our estimate of associated
amortization expense.
|
|
|
(d) |
|
As of the effective time of the merger, debt is required to be
measured at fair value. Pfizer has calculated the adjustment
using publicly available information and believes the pro forma
adjustment amount to be reasonable. |
|
(e) |
|
As of the effective time of the merger, except as specifically
excluded, contingencies are required to be measured at fair
value, if the acquisition-date fair value of the asset or
liability arising from a contingency can be determined. If the
acquisition-date fair value of the asset or liability cannot be
determined, the asset or liability would be recognized at the
acquisition date if both of the following criteria were met:
(i) it is probable that an asset existed or that a
liability had been incurred at the acquisition date, and
(ii) the amount of the asset or liability can be reasonably
estimated. These criteria are to be applied using the guidance
in SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies
(SFAS 5), and FASB Interpretation No. 14,
Reasonable Estimation of the Amount of a Loss
(FIN 14). As disclosed in Wyeths 2008 Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, which is incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus, Wyeth is
involved in various legal proceedings, including product
liability, patent, commercial, environmental and antitrust
matters, of a nature considered normal to its business.
However, Pfizer does not have sufficient information at this
time to evaluate if the fair value of these contingencies |
39
|
|
|
|
|
can be determined and, if determinable, to value them under a
fair value standard. A fair valuation effort would require
intimate knowledge of complex legal matters and associated
defense strategies, which cannot occur prior to the consummation
date. As required, Wyeth currently accounts for these
contingencies under SFAS 5 and FIN 14. If fair value
cannot be determined for Wyeths contingencies, the
combined company would continue to account for the Wyeth
contingencies using SFAS 5 and FIN 14. Since Wyeths
current accounting approach is subject to external audit and as
Wyeth management, unlike Pfizer management, has full and
complete access to relevant information about these
contingencies, Pfizer believes that it has no basis for
modifying Wyeths current application of these standards.
So, for the purpose of these unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial statements, Pfizer has not adjusted the Wyeth
book values. This approach is preliminary and subject to change. |
In addition, Wyeth has recorded provisions for uncertain tax
positions. As disclosed in Wyeths 2008 Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, which is incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus, these
assessments involve complex judgments about future events
and rely on estimates and assumptions by management.
Income taxes are exceptions to both the recognition and fair
value measurement principles of SFAS No. 141R, as
amended; they continue to be accounted for under the guidance of
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes
(SFAS 109), as amended, and related interpretative
guidance. As such, the combined company would continue to
account for the Wyeth uncertain tax positions using SFAS 109, as
amended. Since Wyeths current accounting approach is
subject to external audit and as Wyeth management, unlike Pfizer
management, has full and complete access to relevant information
about these tax positions, Pfizer believes that it has no basis
for modifying Wyeths current application of these
standards. Accordingly, for the purpose of these unaudited pro
forma condensed combined financial statements, Pfizer has not
adjusted the Wyeth book values. This assessment is preliminary
and subject to change.
|
|
|
(f) |
|
As of the effective time of the merger, Pfizer will provide
deferred taxes and other tax adjustments as part of the
accounting for the acquisition, primarily related to the
estimated fair value adjustments for acquired inventory and
intangibles (see Note 6. Pro Forma Adjustments,
items (f) and (h)). In addition, Pfizer will provide deferred
taxes on Wyeths unremitted earnings for which no taxes
have been previously provided, as it is Pfizers current
intention to repatriate these earnings as opposed to permanently
reinvesting them overseas. The amount of these deferred taxes,
which is calculated by Wyeth on an annual basis as of
December 31, is based upon Wyeths 2008 Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, which is incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus, and this
disclosure is the basis for Pfizers repatriation
adjustment. The pro forma adjustment to record the effect of
deferred taxes and other tax adjustments was computed as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Estimated fair value of identifiable intangible assets to be
acquired
|
|
$
|
50,900
|
|
Estimated fair value adjustment of inventory to be acquired
|
|
|
4,600
|
|
Estimated fair value adjustment of debt to be assumed
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated fair value adjustments of assets to be acquired
and liabilities to be assumed
|
|
$
|
55,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes associated with the estimated fair value
adjustments of assets to be acquired and liabilities to be
assumed, at 30%(i)
|
|
$
|
16,713
|
|
Estimated tax on Wyeths historical unremitted earnings(ii)
|
|
|
2,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated adjustment to taxes
|
|
$
|
19,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain amounts may reflect rounding adjustments.
|
|
|
(i) |
|
Represents an estimate of the weighted-average statutory tax
rates in the various jurisdictions where the fair value
adjustments may occur. Amount is included in the pro forma
adjustments to Deferred taxes ($15,332 million)
and Other current liabilities
($1,381 million see Note 6. Pro Forma
Adjustments, item (k)). |
40
|
|
|
(ii) |
|
As calculated by Wyeth and disclosed in Wyeths 2008 Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, which is incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus. Included in
pro forma adjustment to Income taxes payable
($1,831 million) see Note 6. Pro Forma
Adjustments, item (j) and Deferred taxes
($880 million). |
|
|
|
(g) |
|
Goodwill is calculated as the difference between the acquisition
date fair value of the consideration expected to be transferred
and the values assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed. Goodwill is not amortized. |
This note should be read in conjunction with Note 1.
Description of Transaction; Note 2. Basis of
Presentation; Note 4. Estimate of Consideration
Expected to be Transferred; and Note 5. Estimate of
Assets to be Acquired and Liabilities to be Assumed.
Adjustments included in the column under the heading Pro
Forma Adjustments represent the following:
(a) To adjust amortization expense to an estimate of
intangible asset amortization, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
March 29, 2009
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Eliminate Wyeths historical intangible asset amortization
expense
|
|
$
|
(79
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
Estimated amortization expense of developed
technology finite-lived (estimated to be
$30.9 billion over useful life of 11 years)
|
|
|
2,809
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
Estimated amortization expense of brands
finite-lived (estimated to be $3.3 billion over useful life
of 20 years)
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated adjustment to intangible asset amortization expense
|
|
$
|
2,895
|
|
|
$
|
724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) To record the following adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
March 29, 2009
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Amortization of the fair value adjustment to debt
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
Additional expense on incremental debt to finance the merger(*)
|
|
|
1,241
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
Estimate of forgone interest income on the combined
companys cash and cash equivalents and short-term
investments used to effect the merger(**)
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,086
|
|
|
$
|
452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Pfizer estimates additional interest expense of
$1,241 million in 2008 and $311 million in the first
three months of 2009 associated with the incremental debt Pfizer
has issued in connection with the merger: |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional interest expense of approximately $1,231 million
in 2008 and $308 million in the first three months of 2009
based on $22.5 billion of U.S. and foreign currency
denominated senior unsecured notes Pfizer has issued in 2009 to
partially fund the merger. The debt securities are a combination
of fixed and floating rate notes with nine maturity tranches
ranging from 2-30 years. The fixed rate securities total
$21.25 billion and have individual coupon rates ranging
from 3.63%-7.20%. The floating rate notes total
$1.25 billion and bear interest at
3-month
LIBOR (which was 1.22810% when these notes were issued in March
2009), plus 195 basis points. The weighted-average U.S.
dollar effective interest rate associated with the
$22.5 billion of debt is 5.47%. If LIBOR were to increase
or decrease by 0.125% from the rate assumed on the
$1.25 billion floating rate notes, pro forma interest
expense could increase or decrease by about $1.6 million
for 2008 and $0.4 million for the first three months of
2009. |
41
|
|
|
|
|
Additional interest expense of approximately $10 million in
2008 and $3 million in the first three months of 2009 for
the amortization of bond issuance costs associated with the
$22.5 billion of debt securities Pfizer issued in
connection with the merger. Bond issuance costs associated with
the $22.5 billion of debt securities are approximately
$116 million ($61 million of issuance costs associated
with debt securities Pfizer issued in March 2009 and
$55 million of issuance costs associated with debt
securities Pfizer issued in June 2009 to partially fund the
merger (see items (e) and (i))), which are amortized over the
weighted-average life of the debt of 11.29 years (see item
(l)). |
|
|
|
(**) |
|
For purposes of these unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial statements, Pfizer estimated the forgone interest
income in 2008 of the combined company as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
the loss of Wyeths entire interest income in 2008 of
$467 million has been assumed, under the assumption that
all of Wyeths cash and short-term investments would be
used to partially fund the merger; and |
|
|
|
the loss of approximately $389 million of Pfizers
interest income on short-term investments has been assumed,
under the assumption that a portion of these investments will be
used to partially fund the merger. Pfizers estimate is
based on a weighted-average annual interest rate realized in
2008 of 3.98%. |
|
|
|
|
|
For purposes of these unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial statements, Pfizer estimated the forgone interest
income for the combined entity in the three months ended
March 29, 2009 could be approximately $144 million
associated with short-term investments assumed to have been used
to partially fund the merger. Pfizers estimate is based on
a weighted-average annual interest rate realized in the three
months ended March 29, 2009 of 2.48%. |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
To record an estimate of the tax impacts of the acquisition on
the balance sheet and income statement, primarily related to the
additional expense associated with incremental debt to finance
the merger, estimated fair value adjustments for acquired
inventory, intangibles and debt, the elimination of transaction
costs directly attributable to the merger assumed to be
non-recurring, repatriation decisions and the assumed
utilization of deferred tax attributes, as applicable (see items
(a), (b), (d), (f), (h), (j), (k) and (l) and Note 5,
Estimates of Assets to be Acquired and Liabilities to be
Assumed, item (f)). |
Pfizer has assumed a 39% tax rate when estimating the tax
impacts of the additional expense on incremental debt to finance
the merger because the debt is an obligation of a U.S. entity
and taxed at the estimated combined effective U.S. federal
statutory and state rate. Except for those tax impacts related
to the incremental debt incurred to finance the merger, Pfizer
has generally assumed a blended 30% tax rate when estimating the
tax impacts of the acquisition, representing a weighted-average
estimate of the statutory tax rates in the various jurisdictions
where these adjustments are reasonably expected to occur. Pfizer
believes that including an estimated blended tax rate is
factually supportable in that it is derived from statutory rates
and recognizes that Wyeth is a large multinational corporation
with operations in most countries of the world. The effective
tax rate of the combined company could be significantly
different (either higher or lower) depending on post-acquisition
activities, including repatriation decisions, cash needs and the
geographical mix of income.
|
|
|
(d) |
|
To eliminate advisory, legal and regulatory costs incurred in
the three months ended March 29, 2009, which are directly
attributable to the pending merger but which are not expected to
have a continuing impact on the combined entitys results,
as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Eliminate Pfizers advisory, legal and regulatory costs
assumed to be non-recurring
|
|
$
|
(369
|
)
|
Eliminate Wyeths acquisition-related transaction costs
assumed to be non-recurring
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e) |
|
To record the cash portion of the merger consideration estimated
to be $44,734 million and to record estimated payments of
$280 million in additional fees related to a bridge term
facility and permanent debt financing, which are assumed to be
paid on or before the acquisition, $120 million for
Pfizers remaining acquisition-related transaction costs
and $124 million to fund deferred compensation plans at
Wyeth upon the effective time of the merger. The cash is
expected to be sourced from a combination of permanent |
42
|
|
|
|
|
debt financing completed in June 2009 ($9.0 billion),
available cash and cash equivalents ($8,830 million) and
the sale or redemption of certain short-term investments
($27,428 million), which includes the proceeds from the
$13.5 billion of debt issued in March 2009 to partially
fund the merger. The $280 million in fees consist of
$225 million (including $220 million of fees
previously accrued see item (k)) associated
with a $22.5 billion bridge term facility Pfizer entered
into on March 12, 2009, which was subsequently terminated
in June 2009, and approximately $55 million in costs
incurred in connection with Pfizers issuance in June 2009
of permanent debt financing to partially fund the merger. |
|
(f) |
|
To adjust acquired inventory to an estimate of fair value.
Pfizers cost of sales will reflect the increased valuation
of Wyeths inventory as the acquired inventory is sold,
which for purposes of these unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial statements is assumed will occur within the
first year post-acquisition. There is no continuing impact of
the acquired inventory adjustment on the combined operating
results and as such is not included in the unaudited pro forma
condensed combined statement of income. |
|
(g) |
|
To adjust goodwill to an estimate of acquisition-date goodwill,
as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Eliminate Wyeths historical goodwill
|
|
$
|
(4,255
|
)
|
Estimated transaction goodwill
|
|
|
12,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(h) |
|
To adjust intangible assets (including in-process research and
development intangibles) to an estimate of fair value, as
follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Eliminate Wyeths historical intangible assets
|
|
$
|
(398
|
)
|
Estimated fair value of intangible assets acquired
|
|
|
50,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
50,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) |
|
To adjust other assets, deferred taxes and deferred charges, as
follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Eliminate Pfizers historical deferred charges associated
with a bridge term facility entered into on March 12, 2009
in connection with the merger and subsequently terminated in
June 2009
|
|
$
|
(150
|
)
|
Estimated costs to fund deferred compensation plans at Wyeth
upon merger
|
|
|
124
|
|
Estimated debt issuance costs associated with permanent
financing issued in June 2009 in connection with the merger
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(j) |
|
To adjust income taxes payable, as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Estimated tax on Wyeths historical unremitted earnings
|
|
$
|
1,831
|
|
Reclassification of other tax amounts on the balance sheet to
Income taxes payable(*)
|
|
|
(699
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
These reclassifications result from certain business decisions
expected to be executed to fund the merger, which is expected to
result in the utilization of certain tax credits and
carryforwards. These amounts were previously included in
Other current liabilities
($665 million see item (k)) and
Taxes and other current assets ($1,364 million). |
43
|
|
|
(k) |
|
To adjust other current liabilities as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Estimated deferred taxes associated with the estimated fair
value adjustments of assets to be acquired and liabilities to be
assumed, at 30%
|
|
$
|
1,381
|
|
Reclassification to Income taxes payable
see item (j)
|
|
|
(665
|
)
|
Elimination of accrued fees associated with the bridge term
facility costs assumed paid see item (e)
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(l) |
|
To record the debt incurred by Pfizer to effect the merger and
to adjust Wyeths debt to an estimate of fair value, as
follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Establish incremental borrowings to effect the merger(*)
|
|
$
|
9,000
|
|
Estimated fair value decrease to debt assumed
|
|
|
(208
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
In June 2009, Pfizer issued foreign currency denominated senior
unsecured notes (totaling approximately $10.5 billion) to
partially fund the merger. Of the approximately $10.5 billion of
senior unsecured notes issued in June 2009, $9.0 billion is
reflected in this item (l), and together with the
$13.5 billion of senior unsecured notes Pfizer issued in
March 2009, Pfizer has completed the $22.5 billion of
permanent financing it needs to partially fund the merger. The
$22.5 billion of debt securities consist of nine maturity
tranches ranging from 2-30 years and have a weighted
average life of 11.29 years (see item (b)). |
|
|
|
(m) |
|
To record the stock portion of the merger consideration, at par,
and to eliminate Wyeths common stock, at par, as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Eliminate Wyeth common stock
|
|
$
|
(444
|
)
|
Issuance of Pfizer common stock
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(378
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(n) |
|
To record the stock portion of the merger consideration, at fair
value less par, and to eliminate Wyeths additional
paid-in-capital,
as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Eliminate Wyeth additional paid-in capital
|
|
$
|
(7,546
|
)
|
Issuance of Pfizer common stock
|
|
|
19,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(o) |
|
To eliminate Wyeths retained earnings, and to record
estimated non-recurring costs of Pfizer for advisory, legal,
regulatory and valuation costs and certain costs related to the
bridge term facility, which Pfizer will not utilize, as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Eliminate Wyeth retained earnings
|
|
$
|
(13,625
|
)
|
Remaining fees associated with the bridge term facility entered
into on March 12, 2009 in connection with the merger and
subsequently terminated in June 2009
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
Estimated remaining advisory, legal, regulatory and valuation
costs assumed to be non-recurring
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(13,900
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements
do not reflect anticipated acquisition-related transaction costs
to be incurred by Wyeth, which are estimated to be approximately
$135 million.
|
|
|
(p) |
|
To eliminate Wyeths accumulated other comprehensive
expense. |
44
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements
do not present a combined dividend per share amount. On
June 2, 2009, Pfizer paid a second quarter 2009 dividend of
$0.16 per share of common stock. On March 3, 2009, Pfizer
paid a first quarter 2009 dividend of $0.32 per share of common
stock. In January 2009, Pfizer announced that, effective with
the dividend to be paid in the second quarter of 2009, its
quarterly dividend per share of common stock would be reduced to
$0.16 ($0.80 per share of common stock annualized for 2009).
Following the first quarter of 2009, Pfizer will not declare or
pay a quarterly dividend in excess of $0.16 per share of common
stock prior to consummation of the merger and any future payment
of Pfizers quarterly dividend is subject to future
approval and declaration by the Pfizer board of directors. On
June 1, 2009, Wyeth paid a second quarter 2009 dividend of
$0.30 per share of common stock. On March 2, 2009, Wyeth
paid a first quarter dividend of $0.30 per share of common stock
($1.20 per share of common stock annualized). On June 11,
2009, Wyeth declared its next dividend of $0.30 per share, which
will be payable on September 1, 2009. Wyeth will not
declare or pay a quarterly dividend in excess of $0.30 per share
of common stock prior to consummation of the merger and any
future payment of Wyeths quarterly dividend is subject to
future approval and declaration by the Wyeth board of directors.
The dividend policy of Pfizer following the merger will be
determined by the Pfizer board of directors following the merger.
The unaudited pro forma combined basic and diluted earnings per
share for the period presented are based on the combined basic
and diluted weighted-average shares. The historical basic and
diluted weighted average shares of Wyeth were assumed to be
replaced by the shares expected to be issued by Pfizer to effect
the merger.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements
do not reflect the expected realization of annual cost savings
of $4 billion by 2012. These savings are expected in
selling, informational and administrative functions, research
and development and manufacturing. Although Pfizer management
expects that cost savings will result from the merger, there can
be no assurance that these cost savings will be achieved. The
unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements do
not reflect estimated restructuring and integration charges
associated with the expected cost savings, which could be in the
range of approximately $6 to $8 billion and which will be
expensed as incurred.
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This proxy statement/prospectus (including information included
or incorporated by reference herein) includes
forward-looking statements (as that term is defined
under Section 21E of the Exchange Act
and/or the
United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995).
There are forward-looking statements throughout this proxy
statement/prospectus, including, without limitation, under the
headings Summary, Proposal 1: The
Merger Wyeths Reasons for the Merger;
Recommendation of the Wyeth Board of Directors,
Proposal 1: The Merger Pfizers
Reasons for the Merger, Proposal 1: The
Merger Wyeth Unaudited Prospective Financial
Information, Proposal 1: The
Merger Pfizer Unaudited Prospective Financial
Information, Proposal 1: The
Merger Regulatory Approvals Required for the
Merger, and Proposal 1: The
Merger Litigation Relating to the Merger,
and in statements containing words such as expect,
estimate, project, budget,
forecast, anticipate,
contemplate, intend, plan,
may, will, could,
should, would, believes,
predicts, potential,
continue, and similar expressions which are intended
to identify such forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements include, without limitation,
Pfizers and Wyeths expectations with respect to the
synergies, costs and charges, capitalization and anticipated
financial impacts of the merger and related transactions;
approval of the merger and related transactions by Wyeths
stockholders; the satisfaction of the closing conditions to the
merger; the timing of the completion of the merger and the
results of operations, financial condition and capital resources
for 2009 for each of Pfizer and Wyeth, as set forth under the
caption Our Expectations for 2009 in Pfizers
2008 Financial Report, which is incorporated by reference into
Pfizers Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and under the caption
2009 Outlook in Wyeths 2008 Financial Report,
which is incorporated by reference into Wyeths Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, respectively, and
each such
Form 10-K
is incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement/prospectus.
45
These forward-looking statements involve significant risks and
uncertainties that could cause the actual results to differ
materially from the expected results. Most of these factors are
outside Pfizers and Wyeths control and difficult to
predict. Factors that may cause such differences include, but
are not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
those discussed and identified in public filings with the SEC
made by Pfizer or Wyeth;
|
|
|
|
the possibility that the estimated synergies will not be
realized, or will not be realized within the expected time
period;
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
actions taken or conditions imposed by the United States and
foreign governments;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;
|
|
|
|
the possibility that the merger may be more expensive to
complete than anticipated, including as a result of unexpected
factors or events;
|
|
|
|
the possibility that the integration of Wyeths business
and operations with those of Pfizer may be more difficult
and/or take
longer than anticipated, may be more costly than anticipated and
may have unanticipated adverse results relating to Wyeths
or Pfizers existing businesses;
|
|
|
|
adverse outcomes of pending or threatened litigation or
government investigations;
|
|
|
|
anticipated dates on which Pfizer and Wyeth will begin marketing
certain products or therapies or will reach specific milestones
in the development and implementation of their respective
business strategies;
|
|
|
|
the ability to respond to and the impact of the loss of patent
protection to Pfizers, Wyeths or the combined
companys drugs;
|
|
|
|
the impact of competition in the industries and in the specific
markets in which Pfizer and Wyeth, respectively, operate,
including competition from the makers of generic drugs;
|
|
|
|
the ability to successfully complete clinical trials and obtain
and maintain regulatory approval for new products in the United
States and other countries; and
|
|
|
|
the ability to attract and retain qualified management and other
personnel.
|
Other factors include the possibility that the merger does not
close, including due to the failure to receive required
stockholder or regulatory approvals, or the failure of other
closing conditions.
Pfizer and Wyeth caution that the foregoing list of factors is
not exclusive. Additional information concerning these and other
risk factors is discussed under the heading Risk
Factors and elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus
and in documents incorporated by reference in this proxy
statement/prospectus, including Pfizers Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, which was filed with
the SEC on February 27, 2009 and is incorporated by
reference into this proxy statement/prospectus, Wyeths
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as amended by
its Annual Report on Form
10-K/A,
which was filed with the SEC on February 27, 2009 and
April 30, 2009, respectively, and is incorporated by
reference into this proxy statement/prospectus, including under
Part I, Item IA in each of Pfizers and
Wyeths Annual Reports on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, and each of
Pfizers and Wyeths most recently filed Quarterly
Reports on Form 10-Q, and any amendments thereto. All
subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements
concerning Pfizer, Wyeth, Wyeths stockholder meeting, the
merger, the related transactions or other matters attributable
to Pfizer or Wyeth or any person acting on their behalf are
expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary
statements above. These forward-looking statements speak only as
of the date on which the statements were made and Pfizer and
Wyeth expressly disclaim any obligation to release publicly any
updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement included
in this proxy statement/prospectus or elsewhere, whether written
or oral, relating to the matters discussed in this proxy
statement/prospectus.
46
RISK
FACTORS
In addition to the other information included or incorporated by
reference in this proxy
statement/prospectus,
you should carefully consider the risk factors described below
in evaluating whether to adopt the merger agreement.
Because
the exchange ratio is fixed and the market price of Pfizer
common stock will fluctuate, Wyeth stockholders cannot be sure
of the value of the merger consideration they will
receive.
Upon the completion of the merger, each share of Wyeth common
stock outstanding immediately prior to the merger will be
converted into the right to receive, subject to adjustment under
limited circumstances, a combination of $33.00 in cash, without
interest, and 0.985 of a share of Pfizer common stock. Because
the exchange ratio of 0.985 of a share of Pfizer common stock is
fixed (subject to adjustment under limited circumstances), the
value of the stock portion of the merger consideration will
depend on the market price of Pfizer common stock at the time
the merger is completed. The value of the stock portion of the
merger consideration will vary from the date of the announcement
of the merger agreement, the date that this proxy
statement/prospectus was mailed to Wyeth stockholders, the date
of the Wyeth annual meeting and the date the merger is completed
and thereafter. Accordingly, at the time of the Wyeth annual
meeting, Wyeth stockholders will not know or be able to
calculate the market value of the merger consideration they
would receive upon completion of the merger. The share price of
Pfizer common stock is subject to the general price fluctuations
in the market for publicly-traded equity securities, and the
price of Pfizers common stock has experienced significant
volatility in the past. Neither company is permitted to
terminate the merger agreement or resolicit the vote of Wyeth
stockholders solely because of changes in the market prices of
either companys stock. There will be no adjustment to the
merger consideration for changes in the market price of either
shares of Pfizer common stock or shares of Wyeth common stock.
Stock price changes may result from a variety of factors,
including, among others, general market and economic conditions,
changes in Pfizers and Wyeths respective businesses,
operations and prospects, and regulatory considerations. Many of
these factors are beyond Pfizers and Wyeths control.
You should obtain current market quotations for shares of Pfizer
common stock and for shares of Wyeth common stock.
Pfizer
may fail to realize all of the anticipated benefits of the
merger, which may adversely affect the value of the Pfizer
common stock that you receive in the merger.
The success of the merger will depend, in part, on Pfizers
ability to realize the anticipated benefits and cost savings
from combining the businesses of Pfizer and Wyeth. However, to
realize these anticipated benefits and cost savings, Pfizer must
successfully combine the businesses of Pfizer and Wyeth. If
Pfizer is not able to achieve these objectives within the
anticipated time frame, or at all, the anticipated benefits and
cost savings of the merger may not be realized fully or at all
or may take longer to realize than expected and the value of
Pfizers common stock may be adversely affected.
Pfizer and Wyeth have operated and, until the completion of the
merger, will continue to operate, independently. It is possible
that the integration process could result in the loss of key
employees, result in the disruption of each companys
ongoing businesses or identify inconsistencies in standards,
controls, procedures and policies that adversely affect
Pfizers ability to maintain relationships with customers,
suppliers, distributors, creditors, lessors, clinical trial
investigators or managers of its clinical trials or to achieve
the anticipated benefits of the merger.
Specifically, issues that must be addressed in integrating the
operations of Wyeth into Pfizers operations in order to
realize the anticipated benefits of the merger include, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
integrating the research and development, manufacturing,
distribution, marketing and promotion activities and information
technology systems of Pfizer and Wyeth;
|
|
|
|
conforming standards, controls, procedures and policies,
business cultures and compensation structures between the
companies;
|
|
|
|
consolidating corporate and administrative infrastructures;
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
consolidating sales and marketing operations;
|
|
|
|
retaining existing customers and attracting new customers;
|
|
|
|
identifying and eliminating redundant and underperforming
operations and assets;
|
|
|
|
coordinating geographically dispersed organizations;
|
|
|
|
managing tax costs or inefficiencies associated with integrating
the operations of the combined company; and
|
|
|
|
making any necessary modifications to operating control
standards to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the
rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
|
Integration efforts between the two companies will also divert
management attention and resources. An inability to realize the
full extent of, or any of, the anticipated benefits of the
merger, as well as any delays encountered in the integration
process, could have an adverse effect on Pfizers business
and results of operations, which may affect the value of the
shares of Pfizers common stock after the completion of the
merger.
In addition, the actual integration may result in additional and
unforeseen expenses, and the anticipated benefits of the
integration plan may not be realized. Actual cost and sales
synergies, if achieved at all, may be lower than Pfizer expects
and may take longer to achieve than anticipated. If Pfizer is
not able to adequately address these challenges, Pfizer may be
unable to successfully integrate Wyeths operations into
its own, or to realize the anticipated benefits of the
integration of the two companies.
Some
directors and executive officers of Wyeth have interests in the
merger that may differ from the interests of Wyeth
stockholders.
When considering the recommendation of the Wyeth board of
directors to vote FOR adoption of the merger
agreement, stockholders should be aware that the Wyeth directors
and executive officers have interests in the merger that may be
different from, or in addition to, Wyeths stockholders
generally. Following the merger, two members of the Wyeth board
of directors who were members of the Wyeth board of directors as
of the date of the merger agreement will be appointed to the
Pfizer board of directors. Wyeth non-employee directors and
executive officers are entitled to receive certain benefits upon
completion of the merger, including accelerated vesting and
payout (in cash or merger consideration) of stock options and
other outstanding equity-based awards. Assuming a qualifying
termination of the employment of all of Wyeths executive
officers following the merger, the executive officers would be
entitled to receive severance payments and benefits. Based on
the assumptions set forth in Proposal 1: The
Merger Interests of Certain Persons in the
Merger, Wyeths active named executive officers may
be entitled to receive aggregate cash payments of up to
approximately $61.0 million for accelerated vesting and
pay-out of stock options and other outstanding equity-based and
long-term incentive awards upon completion of the merger, and
assuming a qualifying termination of employment immediately
following completion of the merger, such named executive
officers may additionally be entitled to receive payments and
benefits valued at up to approximately $64.8 million in the
aggregate under the change in control severance agreements (plus
protection for any associated excise taxes). On April 7,
2009, Pfizer announced its intention to retain certain Wyeth
executive officers in senior Pfizer leadership roles following
consummation of the merger. In connection with that
announcement, Pfizer has entered into new employment
arrangements with these executive officers contingent upon the
consummation of the merger which provide that following the
merger the executive will receive an increased base salary,
receive a sign-on bonus (payable part in cash and part in Pfizer
restricted stock units), become eligible to participate in
Pfizers Global Performance Plan and Executive Long-Term
Incentive Program, receive a pension guarantee such that the
combination of straight life annuity pension benefits from
Pfizer and Wyeth is no less than a certain amount per year, and
become eligible to receive certain other benefits, consistent
with the terms applicable to similarly situated Pfizer
executives. In addition, in the event that these executives are
required to pay any excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of
the Internal Revenue Code directly related to payments in the
nature of compensation as a result of the merger, they will each
be entitled to receive a gross-up payment in respect of any such
excise tax imposed on them individually. In addition, Pfizer has
agreed to, and will cause the surviving corporation to, continue
certain indemnification arrangements, and, to the extent not
obtained by Wyeth prior to the consummation of the merger cause
the surviving corporation to obtain directors and
officers liability insurance, in each case, for the
directors and executive officers of Wyeth. The Wyeth board of
directors was aware of these
48
interests (other than the entering into of new employment
arrangements with Pfizer by certain Wyeth executive officers who
will be retained by Pfizer following the consummation of the
merger, which Pfizer announced on April 7, 2009), and
considered these interests, among other matters, in evaluating,
negotiating and approving the merger agreement and the merger.
See Proposal 1: the Merger Interests of
Certain Persons in the Merger beginning on page 98
for a further description of these interests, including the
aggregate cash payments that each executive officer and director
is entitled to receive upon completion of the merger.
The
market price of Pfizer common stock after the merger may be
affected by factors different from those affecting the shares of
Wyeth or Pfizer currently.
Upon completion of the merger, holders of Wyeth common stock
will become holders of Pfizer common stock. The businesses of
Pfizer differ from those of Wyeth in important respects and,
accordingly, the results of operations of the combined company
and the market price of Pfizers shares of common stock
following the merger may be affected by factors different from
those currently affecting the independent results of operations
of Pfizer and Wyeth. For a discussion of the businesses of
Pfizer and Wyeth and of certain factors to consider in
connection with those businesses, see the documents incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus referred to
under Where You Can Find More Information beginning
on page 247.
Failure
to complete the merger could negatively impact the stock price
and the future business and financial results of Pfizer and
Wyeth.
If the merger is not completed, the ongoing businesses of Pfizer
and Wyeth may be adversely affected and, without realizing any
of the benefits of having completed the merger, Pfizer and Wyeth
will be subject to a number of risks, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Wyeth may be required to pay Pfizer a termination fee of up to
$2 billion if the merger is terminated under certain
circumstances (plus, in certain circumstances relating to a
change in recommendation by the Wyeth board of directors, Wyeth
also would be obligated to reimburse Pfizer for up to
$700 million of Pfizers actual expenses incurred in
connection with the merger), all as described in the merger
agreement and summarized in this proxy statement/prospectus;
|
|
|
|
Pfizer and Wyeth will be required to pay certain costs relating
to the merger, whether or not the merger is completed;
|
|
|
|
under the merger agreement, Wyeth is subject to certain
restrictions on the conduct of its business prior to completing
the merger which may affect its ability to execute certain of
its business strategies; and
|
|
|
|
matters relating to the merger (including integration planning)
may require substantial commitments of time and resources by
Pfizer and Wyeth management, which could otherwise have been
devoted to other opportunities that may have been beneficial to
Pfizer and Wyeth as independent companies, as the case may be.
|
Pfizer and Wyeth also could be subject to litigation related to
any failure to complete the merger or related to any enforcement
proceeding commenced against Pfizer or Wyeth to perform their
respective obligations under the merger agreement. If the merger
is not completed, these risks may materialize and may adversely
affect Pfizers and Wyeths business, financial
results and stock price.
The
required regulatory approvals may not be obtained or may contain
materially burdensome conditions that could have an adverse
effect on Pfizer.
Completion of the merger is conditioned upon the receipt of
certain governmental approvals, including, without limitation,
the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period
under the HSR Act, the issuance by the European Commission of a
decision under the EC Merger Regulation declaring the merger
compatible with the common market, the approval of the merger
under the China anti-monopoly law and the approval of the merger
by the antitrust regulators in Canada and Australia. Although
Pfizer and Wyeth have agreed in the merger agreement to use
their reasonable best efforts to obtain the requisite
governmental approvals, there can be no assurance that these
approvals will be obtained. In addition, the governmental
authorities from which these approvals are required may impose
conditions on the completion of the merger or
49
require changes to the terms of the merger. Under the terms of
the merger agreement, Pfizer is required, if necessary to
receive antitrust approval, to make divestitures of assets of
Pfizer or Wyeth so long as such divestitures, individually or in
the aggregate, would not result in the one year loss of net
sales revenues (measured by net 2008 sales revenue) in
excess of $3 billion. If Pfizer becomes subject to any
material conditions in order to obtain any approvals required to
complete the merger, the business and results of operations of
the combined company may be adversely affected.
Several
lawsuits have been filed against Wyeth, the members of the Wyeth
board of directors, Pfizer
and/or
Wagner Acquisition Corp. challenging the merger, and an adverse
judgment in such lawsuits may prevent the merger from becoming
effective or from becoming effective within the expected
timeframe.
Wyeth, the members of the Wyeth board of directors, Pfizer
and/or
Wagner Acquisition Corp. are named as defendants in purported
class action lawsuits brought by Wyeth stockholders challenging
the proposed merger, seeking, among other things, to enjoin the
defendants from consummating the merger on the
agreed-upon
terms. On June 10, 2009, Wyeth, Wyeths directors and
Pfizer entered into a memorandum of understanding with the
plaintiffs in a consolidated action brought in Delaware
reflecting an agreement in principle to settle such action based
on their agreement to include in this proxy statement/prospectus
certain additional disclosures relating to the transaction. The
memorandum of understanding is subject to customary conditions
including completion of appropriate settlement documentation,
completion of due diligence to confirm the fairness of the
settlement, approval by the Delaware Court of Chancery, and
consummation of the merger. If the settlement is consummated,
such action will be dismissed with prejudice. See
Litigation Relating to the Merger beginning on
page 116 for more information about the class action
lawsuits related to the merger that have been filed and the
memorandum of understanding.
One of the conditions to the closing of the merger is that no
judgment, order, injunction (whether temporary, preliminary or
permanent), decision, opinion or decree issued by a court or
other governmental entity in the United States or the European
Union that makes the merger illegal or prohibits the
consummation of the merger shall be in effect. As such, if the
plaintiffs are successful in obtaining an injunction prohibiting
the defendants from consummating the merger on the agreed upon
terms, then such injunction may prevent the merger from becoming
effective, or from becoming effective within the expected
timeframe.
Pfizer
has incurred substantial additional indebtedness to finance the
merger and will assume Wyeths existing indebtedness upon
completion of the merger, which may decrease Pfizers
business flexibility and will increase its borrowing
costs.
In connection with its financing of the merger, Pfizer increased
its indebtedness by approximately $24 billion, which
includes $13.5 billion of senior unsecured notes issued on
March 24, 2009 and 5.85 billion and
£1.50 billion of senior unsecured notes issued on
June 3, 2009 (totaling approximately $10.5 billion).
In addition, upon completion of the merger, Pfizer will assume
Wyeths debt obligations of approximately
$11.6 billion. Wyeths debt obligations contain
covenants restricting certain actions by it and its subsidiaries
including prohibitions, with specified exemptions, against
liens, sale and lease back transactions and certain
consolidations, mergers and sales of assets. These covenants,
the financial and other covenants to which Pfizer agreed in
connection with the acquisition debt financing, and
Pfizers increased indebtedness and higher debt-to-equity
ratio in comparison to that of Pfizer on a recent historical
basis may have the effect, among other things, of reducing
Pfizers flexibility to respond to changing business and
economic conditions and will increase borrowing costs.
Pfizer,
Wyeth and, subsequently, the combined company must continue to
retain, motivate and recruit executives and other key employees,
which may be difficult in light of uncertainty regarding the
merger, and failure to do so could negatively affect the
combined company.
For the merger to be successful, during the period before the
merger is completed, both Pfizer and Wyeth must continue to
retain, motivate and recruit executives and other key employees.
The combined company also must be successful at retaining key
employees following the completion of the merger. Experienced
employees in the pharmaceutical industry are in high demand and
competition for their talents can be intense. Employees of both
Pfizer and Wyeth may experience uncertainty about their future
role with the combined company until,
50
or even after, strategies with regard to the combined company
are announced or executed. These potential distractions of the
merger may adversely affect the ability of Pfizer, Wyeth or the
combined company to attract, motivate and retain executives and
other key employees and keep them focused on applicable
strategies and goals. A failure by Pfizer, Wyeth or the combined
company to retain and motivate executives and other key
employees during the period prior to or after the completion of
the merger could have a negative impact on the business of
Pfizer, Wyeth or the combined company.
The
shares of Pfizer common stock to be received by Wyeth
stockholders as a result of the merger will have different
rights from the shares of Wyeth common stock.
Upon completion of the merger, Wyeth stockholders will become
Pfizer stockholders and their rights as stockholders will be
governed by Pfizers certificate of incorporation and
bylaws. The rights associated with Wyeth common stock are
different from the rights associated with Pfizer common stock.
Please see Comparison of Rights of Pfizer Stockholders and
Wyeth Stockholders beginning on page 151 for a
discussion of the different rights associated with Pfizer common
stock.
Pfizer
will incur significant transaction and merger-related costs in
connection with the merger.
Pfizer expects to incur a number of non-recurring costs
associated with combining the operations of the two companies.
The substantial majority of non-recurring expenses resulting
from the merger will be comprised of transaction costs related
to the merger, facilities and systems consolidation costs and
employment-related costs. Pfizer will also incur transaction
fees and costs related to formulating integration plans.
Additional unanticipated costs may be incurred in the
integration of the two companies businesses. Although
Pfizer expects that the elimination of duplicative costs, as
well as the realization of other efficiencies related to the
integration of the businesses, should allow Pfizer to offset
incremental transaction and merger-related costs over time, this
net benefit may not be achieved in the near term, or at all.
The
merger may not be accretive and may cause dilution to
Pfizers earnings per share, which may negatively affect
the market price of Pfizers common stock.
Pfizer currently anticipates that the merger will be accretive
to earnings per share during the second full calendar year after
the merger. This expectation is based on preliminary estimates
which may materially change. Pfizer could also encounter
additional transaction and integration-related costs or other
factors such as the failure to realize all of the benefits
anticipated in the merger. All of these factors could cause
dilution to Pfizers earnings per share or decrease or
delay the expected accretive effect of the merger and cause a
decrease in the price of Pfizers common stock.
Risks
Relating to Pfizer and Wyeth
Pfizer and Wyeth are, and will continue to be, subject to the
risks described in (i) Part I, Item 1A in
Pfizers Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the SEC on
February 27, 2009 and (ii) Part I, Item 1A
in Wyeths Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the SEC on
February 27, 2009, in each case incorporated by reference
into this proxy statement/prospectus. See Where You Can
Find More Information beginning on page 247 for the
location of information incorporated by reference into this
proxy statement/prospectus.
INFORMATION
ABOUT THE COMPANIES
Pfizer
Pfizer, a Delaware corporation, is a research-based, global
pharmaceutical company that discovers, develops, manufactures
and markets leading prescription medicines for humans and
animals. Pfizer operates in two business segments:
pharmaceutical and animal health. Pfizer also operates several
other businesses, including the manufacture of gelatin capsules,
contract manufacturing and bulk pharmaceutical chemicals.
Pfizers pharmaceutical business is the largest
pharmaceutical business in the world. Each year, Pfizers
51
pharmaceuticals help over 100 million people throughout the
world live longer, healthier lives. With medicines across 11
therapeutic areas, Pfizer helps to treat and prevent many of the
most common and most challenging conditions of recent time.
Pfizers products are in Cardiovascular and Metabolic
Diseases; Central Nervous System Disorders; Arthritis and Pain;
Infectious and Respiratory Diseases; Urology; Oncology;
Ophthalmology; and Endocrine Disorders.
Pfizers common stock (NYSE: PFE) is listed on the NYSE.
Pfizer is a member of the S&P 500 and the Fortune 500. The
principal executive offices of Pfizer are located at 235 East
42nd Street, New York, New York,
10017-5755
and its telephone number is
1-212-573-2323.
Additional information about Pfizer and its subsidiaries is
included in documents incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 247.
Wagner
Acquisition Corp.
Wagner Acquisition Corp., a direct
wholly-owned
subsidiary of Pfizer, was formed solely for the purpose of
consummating the merger. Wagner Acquisition Corp. has not
carried on any activities to date, except for activities
incidental to its formation and activities undertaken in
connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement. The principal executive offices of Wagner Acquisition
Corp. are located at 235 East 42nd Street, New York, New
York,
10017-5755
and its telephone number is
1-212-573-2323.
Wyeth
Wyeth, a Delaware corporation, organized in 1926, is currently
engaged in the discovery, development, manufacture, distribution
and sale of a diversified line of products in three primary
businesses: Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Wyeth Consumer Healthcare,
and Fort Dodge Animal Health. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals
includes branded human ethical pharmaceuticals, biotechnology
products, vaccines and nutritional products. Wyeth
Pharmaceuticals products include neuroscience therapies,
musculoskeletal therapies, vaccines, nutritional products,
anti-infectives, womens health care products, hemophilia
treatments, gastroenterology drugs, immunological products and
oncology therapies. Wyeth Consumer Healthcare products include
pain management therapies, including analgesics and heat wraps,
cough/cold/allergy remedies, nutritional supplements, and
hemorrhoidal care and personal care items sold over-the-counter.
Fort Dodge Animal Health products include vaccines,
pharmaceuticals, parasite control and growth implants.
Wyeth common stock (NYSE: WYE) and Wyeth $2 Convertible
Preferred Stock (NYSE: WYEPR) are listed on the NYSE. Wyeth is a
member of the S&P 500 and the Fortune 500. The principal
executive offices of Wyeth are located at Five Giralda Farms,
Madison, New Jersey, 07940 and its telephone number is
1-973-660-5000.
Additional information about Wyeth and its subsidiaries is
included in documents incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 247.
THE WYETH
ANNUAL MEETING
Date,
Time and Place
The meeting will be held in the Plaza Ballroom of the Hyatt
Morristown at Headquarters Plaza located at 3 Speedwell Avenue,
Morristown, New Jersey on July 20, 2009 at 9:00 a.m.,
Eastern Daylight Time.
Purpose
At the meeting, Wyeth stockholders will be asked to vote on the
following proposals:
|
|
|
|
|
to adopt the merger agreement;
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
to approve the adjournment of the meeting, if necessary, to
solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to
adopt the merger agreement at the time of the meeting;
|
|
|
|
to elect to the Wyeth board of directors each of the nominees
for director named in this proxy statement/prospectus;
|
|
|
|
to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as
Wyeths independent registered public accounting firm for
2009; and
|
|
|
|
the following two stockholder proposals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
a stockholder proposal regarding reporting on Wyeths
political contributions and trade association payments; and
|
|
|
|
a stockholder proposal regarding special stockholder meetings.
|
Wyeth
Record Date; Stock Entitled to Vote
Only holders of record at the close of business on June 5,
2009 will be entitled to vote at the meeting, provided that such
shares remain outstanding on the date of the meeting.
As of the close of business on the record date of June 5,
2009, there were 1,333,898,690 shares of Wyeth common stock
and 7,600 shares of Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock
outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting. Each holder of
Wyeth common stock is entitled to one vote for each share of
common stock owned as of the record date. Each holder of Wyeth
$2 Convertible Preferred Stock is entitled to 36 votes for each
share of Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock owned as of the
record date, provided that such shares are outstanding on the
date of the meeting. On April 23, 2009, Wyeth announced
that, pursuant to a request from Pfizer made in accordance with
the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, Wyeth will
redeem all of its outstanding Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred
Stock, effective on July 15, 2009; accordingly, Wyeth $2
Convertible Preferred Stock will not be outstanding at the time
of the meeting and former holders thereof will not be entitled
to vote such shares at the meeting.
Quorum
A majority of the outstanding shares having voting power being
present in person or represented by proxy constitutes a quorum
for the meeting.
Required
Vote
To adopt the merger agreement, the holders of a majority of the
combined voting power of the outstanding shares of Wyeth common
stock and Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock entitled to vote
on the proposal, voting together as a single class, must vote in
favor of adoption of the merger agreement. Because approval
is based on the affirmative vote of a majority of the combined
voting power of the shares outstanding, a Wyeth
stockholders failure to vote or an abstention will have
the same effect as a vote against adoption of the merger
agreement.
Nominees receiving a majority of the votes cast will be elected
as a director. Abstentions and failures to be present to vote
will have no effect on the election of directors.
All other matters on the agenda will be decided by the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares
present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and
entitled to vote thereon in accordance with Wyeths bylaws.
Because approval of such other matters is based on the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares
present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote, abstentions
will have the same effect as a vote against such matters, but
failures to be present to vote will have no effect on such
matters.
Abstentions
Abstentions are counted as present and entitled to vote for
purposes of determining a quorum. If you abstain from voting in
the election of directors, you will effectively not vote on that
matter at the meeting.
53
Abstentions are not considered to be votes cast under the Wyeth
bylaws or under the laws of Delaware (our state of
incorporation) and will have no effect on the outcome of the
vote for the election of directors. For the proposal to adopt
the merger agreement, abstentions have the same effect as a vote
against adoption of the merger agreement. For the proposal to
adjourn the meeting to solicit additional proxies, the proposal
to ratify the independent registered public accounting firm and
for each of the two stockholder proposals, abstentions are
treated as present and entitled to vote at the meeting and
therefore have the same effect as a vote against these proposals.
Voting of
Proxies by Holders of Record
If you hold shares in your own name or if you participate in
Wyeths BuyDIRECT Stock Purchase and Sale Plan through The
Bank of New York Mellon, you may submit a proxy for your shares
by using the toll-free number or the Internet Web site if your
proxy card includes instructions for using these quick,
cost-effective and easy methods for submitting proxies. You also
may submit a proxy in writing by simply filling out, signing and
dating your proxy card and mailing it in the prepaid envelope
included with these proxy materials. If you submit a proxy by
telephone or the Internet Web site, please do not return your
proxy card by mail. You will need to follow the instructions
when you submit a proxy using any of these methods to make sure
your shares will be voted at the meeting. You also may vote by
submitting a ballot in person if you attend the meeting.
However, we encourage you to submit a proxy by mail by
completing your proxy card, by telephone or via the Internet
even if you plan to attend the meeting. If you hold shares
through a broker or other nominee, you may instruct your broker
or other nominee to vote your shares by following the
instructions that the broker or nominee provides to you with
these materials. Most brokers offer the ability for stockholders
to submit voting instructions by mail by completing a voting
instruction card, by telephone and via the Internet. If you hold
shares through a broker or other nominee and wish to vote your
shares at the meeting, you must obtain a legal proxy from your
broker or nominee and present it to the inspector of election
with your ballot when you vote at the meeting.
Your vote is important. Accordingly, please submit your proxy by
telephone, through the Internet or by mail, whether or not you
plan to attend the meeting in person. Proxies must be received
by 5:00 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on July 19, 2009.
Shares Held
in Street Name
If your shares are held in an account at a broker, you must
instruct the broker on how to vote your shares. If you do not
provide voting instructions to your broker, your shares will not
be voted on any proposal on which your broker does not have
discretionary authority to vote. This is called a broker
non-vote. In these cases, the broker can register your shares as
being present at the meeting for purposes of determining the
presence of a quorum but will not be able to vote on those
matters for which specific authorization is required. Under
current rules of the NYSE, we believe that brokers do not have
discretionary authority to vote on the proposal to adopt the
merger agreement or the two stockholder proposals. A broker
non-vote will have the same effect as a vote against adoption of
the merger agreement but will have no effect on whether the two
stockholder proposals are approved.
Revocability
of Proxies
You may revoke your proxy at any time before the meeting. If you
are a stockholder of record or participate in Wyeths
BuyDIRECT Stock Purchase and Sale Plan through The Bank of New
York Mellon in your own name, you can revoke your proxy before
it is exercised by written notice to the Corporate Secretary of
Wyeth, by timely delivery of a valid, later-dated proxy card or
a later-dated proxy submitted by telephone or via the Internet,
or by voting by ballot in person if you attend the meeting.
Simply attending the meeting will not revoke your proxy. If you
hold shares through a broker or other nominee, you may submit
new voting instructions by contacting your broker or other
nominee.
54
Solicitation
of Proxies
This proxy statement/prospectus is furnished in connection with
the solicitation of proxies by the Wyeth board of directors to
be voted at our annual meeting of stockholders to be held on
July 20, 2009 at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, in the
Plaza Ballroom of the Hyatt Morristown at Headquarters Plaza, 3
Speedwell Avenue, Morristown, New Jersey.
This proxy statement/prospectus and the proxy card are first
being sent to Wyeth stockholders on or near June 18, 2009.
Wyeth has engaged D.F. King & Co., Inc. to assist in
the solicitation of proxies for the meeting and Wyeth estimates
it will pay D.F. King & Co., Inc. a fee of
approximately $75,000. Wyeth has also agreed to reimburse D.F.
King & Co., Inc. for reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses and disbursements incurred in connection with the proxy
solicitation and to indemnify D.F. King & Co., Inc.
against certain losses, costs and expenses. In addition, our
officers and employees may request the return of proxies by
telephone or in person, but no additional compensation will be
paid to them.
PROPOSAL
1: THE MERGER
The following is a discussion of the proposed merger and the
merger agreement. This is a summary only and may not contain all
of the information that is important to you. A copy of the
merger agreement is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus
as Annex A and is incorporated by reference herein. Wyeth
stockholders are urged to read this entire proxy
statement/prospectus, including the merger agreement, for a more
complete understanding of the merger.
Structure
of the Merger
Subject to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement and
in accordance with Delaware law, Merger Sub will be merged with
and into Wyeth, with Wyeth surviving the merger and becoming a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Pfizer. Upon completion of the
merger, each share of Wyeth common stock issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the effective time of the merger, except
for shares of restricted stock (the holders of which will be
entitled to receive cash consideration pursuant to separate
terms of the merger agreement described below in The
Merger Agreement Treatment of Wyeth Stock Options
and Other Equity-Based Awards beginning on page 120),
shares of Wyeth common stock held directly and indirectly by
Wyeth and Pfizer (which will be canceled as a result of the
merger) and shares with respect to which appraisal rights are
properly exercised and not withdrawn as described below in
Appraisal Rights beginning on
page 114, will be converted into the right to receive,
subject to adjustment under limited circumstances as described
below, a combination of $33.00 in cash, without interest, and
0.985 of a share of Pfizer common stock. Other than possible
adjustments as described in the next paragraph below, the
exchange ratio of 0.985 of a share of Pfizer common stock is
fixed, which means that it will not change between now and the
date of the merger, including as a result of a change in the
trading price of Pfizer common stock or Wyeth common stock.
Therefore, the value of the shares of Pfizer common stock
received by Wyeth stockholders in the merger will depend on the
market price of Pfizer common stock at the time the merger is
completed.
The exchange ratio will be adjusted if between signing of the
merger agreement and the effective time of the merger the
outstanding Pfizer common stock or Wyeth common stock is changed
into a different number of shares or different class by reason
of any reclassification, recapitalization, stock split,
split-up, combination or exchange of shares or the declaration
of a stock dividend or dividend payable in any other securities
is declared with a record date within such period, or any
similar event occurs, in which case the exchange ratio will be
adjusted such that the holders of Wyeth common stock will be
provided with the same economic effect as contemplated by the
merger agreement. In addition, the exchange ratio will be
adjusted if the exchange ratio would result in Pfizer issuing in
excess of 19.9% of its outstanding common stock as a result of
the merger. In such circumstance, the exchange ratio will be
reduced to the minimum extent necessary so that the number of
shares of Pfizer common stock issued or issuable as a result of
the merger will equal no more than 19.9% of its outstanding
common stock and the cash portion of the merger consideration
will be increased by
55
an equivalent value (based on the volume weighted average price
of Pfizer common stock for the five consecutive trading days
ending two days prior to the effective time of the merger, as
such prices are reported on the NYSE Transaction Reporting
System).
At the time of the execution of the merger agreement, the number
of shares of Pfizer common stock (and securities convertible or
exercisable for Pfizer common stock) expected to be issued in
the merger constituted less than 19.9% of Pfizers
outstanding shares of common stock, and Pfizer and Wyeth
currently do not anticipate that any adjustment to the exchange
ratio will be required. A vote by Wyeth stockholders for the
adoption of the merger agreement constitutes approval of the
merger whether or not the exchange ratio is adjusted as
described above.
Upon completion of the merger, each share of Wyeth $2
Convertible Preferred Stock issued and outstanding immediately
prior to completion of the merger will be converted into the
right to receive one share of a new series of Pfizer preferred
stock having the same powers, designations, preferences and
rights (to the fullest extent practicable) as the shares of the
Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock. However, on April 23,
2009, Wyeth announced that, pursuant to a request from Pfizer
made in accordance with the terms and conditions of the merger
agreement, Wyeth will redeem all of its outstanding Wyeth $2
Convertible Preferred Stock, effective on July 15, 2009.
Therefore, it is expected that there will not be any shares of
Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding at the
effective time of the merger. In such case, Pfizer will not
create or issue a new series of preferred stock in connection
with the merger.
Background
of the Merger
In light of the changing business environment for pharmaceutical
companies over the past several years, the Pfizer board of
directors, together with its senior management, has regularly
evaluated business development strategies, including strategic
acquisitions. As part of this review, Pfizer identified Wyeth as
a potential acquisition candidate and determined that a
transaction with Wyeth would meet many of Pfizers business
development objectives. The Pfizer board of directors reviewed
and discussed the merits of a potential combination with Wyeth
and in early June 2008 authorized Jeffrey Kindler, the Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of Pfizer, to contact Bernard
Poussot, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Wyeth, to discuss a potential transaction.
The Wyeth board of directors, together with its senior
management, has in the ordinary course regularly evaluated
business development strategies and reviewed Wyeths
strategic alternatives, including from time to time potential
business combinations and other strategic alliances, in pursuing
its objective of enhancing stockholder value.
On June 6, 2008, Mr. Kindler contacted
Mr. Poussot to request a meeting to discuss views on the
current direction and potential future of the pharmaceutical
industry and to explore possible collaborative opportunities.
After conferring with Mr. Robert Essner, who was at that
time the Chairman of the Wyeth board of directors, and with the
other members of the Wyeth boards Executive Committee,
independent directors John P. Mascotte and Victor F. Ganzi,
Mr. Poussot agreed to meet with Mr. Kindler, and
Messrs. Poussot and Kindler met on June 19, 2008. At
the meeting, Mr. Kindler discussed his views of the
then-current pharmaceutical industry and economic environment
and suggested that there could be meaningful benefits to a
Pfizer/Wyeth combination. Mr. Kindler did not discuss a
potential purchase price, form of consideration or other
specifics regarding a possible business combination transaction.
Mr. Poussot responded that Wyeth was confident with its
strategy as an independent company, but he would report this
meeting to the Wyeth board of directors. At its regularly
scheduled meeting on June 26, 2008, Mr. Poussot
reported to the Wyeth board of directors on his meeting with
Mr. Kindler. Following discussion, the board instructed
Mr. Poussot to advise Mr. Kindler that it was not
interested in Wyeth having any further discussions at such time
and that it believed that the best interests of Wyeths
stockholders would be served by Wyeth remaining an independent
company. Mr. Poussot called Mr. Kindler later that day
to advise him of the boards position.
On June 26, 2008, the Pfizer board of directors held a
meeting during which a potential transaction with Wyeth was
discussed. In addition, between June 19, 2008 and
August 20, 2008, Pfizers senior management, along
with its legal and financial advisors, performed a thorough
review of Wyeths business based on publicly available
information and an extensive analysis of whether Pfizer should
continue to pursue a transaction with Wyeth.
56
On August 20, 2008, the Pfizer board of directors held a
meeting, which was attended by members of Pfizers senior
management, representatives of Cadwalader,
Wickersham & Taft LLP (Cadwalader),
Pfizers legal advisor, and representatives of Goldman,
Sachs & Co. (Goldman Sachs) and Merrill
Lynch & Co. (Merrill Lynch), Pfizers
financial advisors. At the meeting, a potential transaction with
Wyeth was discussed, including the effect of integrating Wyeth
into Pfizers operating model, a financial analysis of
Wyeth and Pfizer, both on a standalone basis and as a combined
company and Pfizers valuation of Wyeth. Based on the
analysis provided at the meeting and discussion among the
directors, senior management and Pfizers legal and
financial advisors, the Pfizer board of directors authorized
management to make a proposal to Wyeth regarding a potential
business combination transaction.
On August 25, 2008, Mr. Kindler again contacted
Mr. Poussot to request another meeting. Mr. Kindler
noted that Pfizer had continued to evaluate a potential business
combination with Wyeth and had formulated a proposal that Pfizer
believed would provide value to all parties. After conferring
with the other members of the Wyeth boards Executive
Committee, independent directors Messrs. Mascotte and
Ganzi, Mr. Poussot agreed to meet again with
Mr. Kindler.
At a meeting with Mr. Poussot on September 9, 2008,
Mr. Kindler made a preliminary, non-binding proposal
(referred to as the September 9 Proposal) for a transaction in
which Pfizer would acquire Wyeth for $53.00 per share
(consisting of $34.50 in cash and $18.50 of Pfizer common stock
at a fixed exchange ratio), plus a contingent value right of
$3.00 per share in additional consideration that would be
payable if and when Wyeths pipeline Alzheimers
product, bapineuzumab, achieved certain conditions relating to
regulatory approval. The closing price per share of Wyeth common
stock on the day before this meeting was $41.27, and
Mr. Kindler noted that the $53.00 proposal represented a
28% premium over that price and a 25% premium over the prior
30-day
average price per share of Wyeth common stock.
Following this meeting, Mr. Poussot informed the Wyeth
directors of the conversation he had with Mr. Kindler, and
thereafter Mr. Poussot informed Mr. Kindler that the
Wyeth board would discuss Pfizers September 9 Proposal at
its regularly scheduled board meeting on September 25, 2008.
At the September 25, 2008 board meeting, Mr. Poussot
described in detail the substance of his meeting with
Mr. Kindler and Pfizers September 9 Proposal. The
board meeting was attended by members of Wyeths senior
management, representatives of Simpson Thacher &
Bartlett LLP (Simpson Thacher), Wyeths legal
advisor, and representatives of Morgan Stanley and Evercore,
Wyeths financial advisors. A representative of Simpson
Thacher discussed with the board the directors fiduciary
duties in reviewing the non-binding proposal made by Pfizer. In
connection with this discussion, it was noted for the board that
a director, Raymond McGuire, was a senior member of Citigroup,
which could seek to become involved in some manner if it were to
learn of any potential transaction involving Wyeth, and that
although information walls and procedures were in place to
prevent material non-public information from being shared and to
protect against any potential conflicts of interest, the board
should revisit this situation in the event of any future
developments involving Citigroup. Members of Wyeths senior
management reviewed with the board its analysis of the business
opportunities and challenges that Wyeth might anticipate over
the course of the next five years in the event it were to remain
an independent company. The principal business opportunities for
Wyeth over the next five years that were discussed with the
board included those opportunities presented by products in
Wyeths pipeline, the potential for Wyeth to grow its
product portfolio through acquisitions or licensing arrangements
and the potential for Wyeth to expand its business into emerging
markets and further grow its market presence in various markets
outside of the United States in which Wyeth already has an
established business. The principal challenges and risks facing
Wyeth over the next five years that members of Wyeths
senior management discussed with the board included the
possibility of an extended global recession, the risk that
Wyeths current pipeline fails to achieve expected results
in terms of the number of new products and revenue opportunities
the pipeline generates over the course of the next several
years, the risks presented by the loss of revenue with respect
to some of Wyeths currently marketed products that will
lose patent protection in the coming years or otherwise face an
increase in competition, the potential for future regulatory
changes that could adversely impact Wyeths financial
performance and the possibility of continued slowing growth
rates in the pharmaceutical industry. Representatives of Morgan
Stanley discussed with the board financial considerations
relating to Pfizers September 9 Proposal. As part of this
discussion, representatives of Morgan Stanley discussed with the
Wyeth board the potential value of the contingent value right
proposed by
57
Pfizer, including that such right was worth less than the $3
face amount when considered on a present value and probability
weighted basis. Representatives of Morgan Stanley and Evercore
also discussed with the board their preliminary views on
Pfizers ability to obtain financing and Pfizers
business and prospects. In addition, representatives of Morgan
Stanley and Evercore discussed with the board their preliminary
views on Wyeths potential strategic alternatives,
including operating as an independent company and potential
alternative strategic transactions, such as a possible merger
with a comparably sized pharmaceuticals company, and the
prospects of a third party having the ability and desire to make
a proposal that would be competitive with Pfizers
September 9 Proposal, which was viewed at that time as possible
but not likely.
The members of the board and the others present discussed the
matters presented and thereafter Wyeths non-employee
directors (referred to as the independent directors), engaged in
further discussions in executive session regarding the matters
that had been discussed by the entire board. In the executive
session, the directors determined that Wyeth should not seek to
end all communications with Pfizer, but the board instructed
Mr. Poussot to inform Mr. Kindler that the Wyeth board
had concluded that Pfizers September 9 Proposal was
deficient and the board had significant concerns as to the
feasibility of any proposal given existing market dislocations.
The directors also decided to request that management further
review its key assumptions used in its analysis of Wyeths
business opportunities and challenges, such as the assumptions
relating to the potential revenues for key Wyeth products and
the prospects and timing of approval of products in Wyeths
pipeline, to better reflect what management believed to be
reasonably achievable, especially in light of the changing
general economic and industry conditions, and also to review the
effects of extending the analysis through 2015. In addition, the
board determined that the independent directors on the Wyeth
Executive Committee and an additional independent director,
Raymond McGuire, should serve as an advisory group (referred to
as the Advisory Group) for Mr. Poussot and the rest of the
Wyeth management team between board meetings in connection with
any ongoing matters relating to Pfizer. Also on
September 25, 2008, the Pfizer board of directors met and
received an update from Mr. Kindler regarding the status of
discussions with Wyeth.
In a phone call with Mr. Kindler on September 26,
2008, Mr. Poussot communicated the conclusions of the Wyeth
board regarding Pfizers September 9 Proposal.
Mr. Poussot noted that Pfizers September 9 Proposal
raised a number of questions that would need to be answered,
such as Pfizers plans for financing the transaction,
expected synergies and the expected pro forma dividends to be
paid by Pfizer. Mr. Kindler responded that Pfizer thought
that the original rationale for the transaction remained and
that a transaction would provide immediate economic value to
Wyeths stockholders and compelling long-term value
creation for the combined company. Mr. Kindler urged
Mr. Poussot to meet with him again, and following
additional phone calls a meeting was established for
October 14, 2008.
In the meantime, Wyeths senior management met with the
Advisory Group on October 5 and October 9, 2008, to prepare
for a meeting with the full board of directors on
October 12, 2008 to further consider and discuss
Pfizers September 9 Proposal and Wyeths financial
plan through 2015. At the October 12, 2008 special meeting
of the Wyeth board of directors, members of senior management
presented a financial plan for Wyeth. Wyeths senior
management reviewed with the board the key assumptions
incorporated into this plan and discussed with the board the
effects that changes to various key assumptions would have on
the plan, including changes to the assumptions relating to the
potential revenues for key Wyeth products and the prospects and
timing of approval of products in Wyeths pipeline. During
the course of this review, Wyeths senior management also
discussed with the board a number of potential risks and
opportunities associated with the plan, such as the
opportunities that may be presented in emerging markets and
through Wyeths pipeline and the risks presented by the
loss of patent protection for some of Wyeths currently
marketed products as well as the risks presented by a global
recession.
Representatives of Morgan Stanley and Evercore joined the
meeting following the presentation of the plan to the board and
discussed financial considerations relating to Pfizers
September 9 Proposal, including financial considerations based
on Wyeths financial plan presented to the board at the
meeting. Representatives of Morgan Stanley and Evercore also
discussed with the board the ability of Pfizer to finance a
transaction with Wyeth, the potential financial impact of such a
transaction on Pfizer, Pfizers acquisition history and
Wyeths strategic alternatives, including their further
perspectives on the prospects of a third party having the
ability and desire to make a proposal that would be competitive
with Pfizers September 9 Proposal. During
58
the course of this discussion, it was noted that the likelihood
of any financial buyer having the ability and desire to make a
proposal that would be competitive with Pfizers September
9 proposal was considered very low for a number of reasons,
including that a financial buyer would require even more debt
financing than Pfizers proposal required, the ability of a
financial buyer to obtain such a significant amount of debt
financing was unlikely given the difficult credit market
conditions that existed at the time and a financial buyer would
not have the same synergy opportunities as Pfizer or other third
parties in Wyeths industry. The members of the board and
senior management then had a lengthy discussion, in which
representatives of Wyeths financial and legal advisors
participated, about the matters presented, including
Wyeths future prospects and what views Pfizer might
express at the upcoming October 14, 2008 meeting between
Messrs. Poussot and Kindler, particularly in light of the
deteriorating market environment.
Between September 9, 2008 and October 14, 2008, when
Messrs. Poussot and Kindler met again to discuss
Pfizers September 9 Proposal, there was a period of severe
market disruption and volatility that followed the announcement
that Lehman Brothers was filing for bankruptcy as well as
numerous other events negatively affecting the financial
services industry. During this period, all major market indices
declined significantly, including a greater than 21% drop in the
S&P 500 index and a greater than 19% drop in the Dow Jones
Industrial Average. Also during this timeframe, the Large Cap
Pharma index declined approximately 14%, Wyeths share
price declined approximately 19% and Pfizers share price
declined approximately 11%. It was observed during the course of
the Wyeth board meeting on October 12, 2008 that the
closing price per share of Wyeth common stock on
October 10, 2008, the last trading day prior to the board
meeting, was $29.89, such that the $53.00 per share value of the
cash and Pfizer common stock contained in the September 9
Proposal by Pfizer now represented a 77% premium as opposed to
the 28% premium it represented at the time it was made only one
month earlier.
Also between September 9, 2008 and October 14, 2008,
Pfizers senior management, together with its legal advisor
and the three financial advisors then working with Pfizer,
Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch and J.P. Morgan Securities
Inc. (J.P. Morgan), held several meetings to discuss
Pfizers September 9 Proposal in light of changes in market
and credit conditions. Mr. Kindler also discussed the
matter with members of the Pfizer board of directors. As a
result of these discussions, Pfizer determined that in light of
the market conditions, moving forward with a transaction on the
terms of the September 9 Proposal would not be in the best
interest of Pfizer.
On October 14, 2008, Messrs. Poussot and Kindler met
to discuss Pfizers September 9 Proposal. Mr. Kindler
informed Mr. Poussot that although he and the Pfizer board
remained determined to complete a transaction with Wyeth, Pfizer
could not proceed at that time as a result of the market
declines and Pfizers view that it was not feasible to
obtain the necessary financing in the current market
environment. Mr. Kindler said that he intended to contact
Mr. Poussot at the end of the month to provide an update on
Pfizers thoughts with respect to a transaction.
Mr. Poussot agreed that in light of the current market
environment it was not practical to continue to discuss a
transaction. Mr. Poussot also noted that the Wyeth board
would expect Pfizer to demonstrate its ability to finance any
potential transaction prior to engaging in the future in any
meaningful discussions about a business combination transaction.
Following the meeting, Mr. Poussot briefed the Wyeth
directors on the matters discussed with Mr. Kindler.
Between October 14, 2008 and October 29, 2008,
Pfizers senior management, together with its legal and
financial advisors held several meetings to discuss the terms of
a revised proposal to provide to Wyeth. Mr. Kindler also
discussed the terms of a revised proposal with members of the
Pfizer board of directors. On October 29, 2008,
Mr. Kindler contacted Mr. Poussot to request another
meeting. Mr. Kindler noted that he was in a position to
address further his proposal for a business combination
transaction, and a meeting was set for November 5, 2008. On
October 30, 2008, the Pfizer board of directors held a
meeting at which the submission of a revised proposal to Wyeth
was discussed and the Pfizer board of directors authorized
Mr. Kindler to make a revised proposal to Wyeth.
At the November 5, 2008 meeting between
Messrs. Poussot and Kindler, Mr. Kindler made a
revised preliminary, non-binding proposal for a transaction in
which Pfizer would acquire Wyeth for $46.00 per share,
consisting of $30.00 in cash and $16.00 of Pfizer stock at a
fixed exchange ratio, which was the same percentage mix of cash
and stock as the September 9 Proposal (this revised proposal is
referred to as the
59
November 5 Proposal). Mr. Kindler noted that the $46.00
proposal represented a premium similar to the premium inherent
in the September 9 Proposal when viewed based on the prior
30-day
average price per share of Wyeth common stock. Based on the
$35.01 closing price per share of Wyeth common stock on the day
before this meeting, the November 5 Proposal represented a 31%
premium. Mr. Kindler also stated that Pfizer and its board
of directors were committed to pursuing a transaction with Wyeth
and wanted to move quickly to announce a transaction.
Mr. Poussot responded that he would discuss this proposal
with the Wyeth board of directors but that his reaction was that
the proposal significantly undervalued Wyeth. Mr. Kindler
noted that Pfizer was confident it could arrange the necessary
financing. Mr. Kindler indicated that Pfizer was prepared
to hold meetings between each companys chief financial
officer and financial advisors to address any questions that
Wyeths representatives may have regarding Pfizers
proposal, including questions raised by Wyeth such as the
proposed structure of the financing, the expected synergies in
the transaction and Pfizers expected pro forma dividend.
Later in the day on November 5, 2008, members of Wyeth
management and Wyeths legal and financial advisors held a
meeting with the Advisory Group during which Mr. Poussot
reported on his meeting with Mr. Kindler. Following this
meeting, a special meeting of the board of directors was
arranged for November 9, 2008, and Mr. Poussot
informed Mr. Kindler that he would get back to him
regarding the November 5 Proposal by the middle of the following
week.
At the November 9, 2008 special meeting, Mr. Poussot
described in detail to the Wyeth board of directors the
substance of his meeting with Mr. Kindler and the November
5 Proposal made by Pfizer. A representative of Simpson Thacher
made a presentation to the directors describing their fiduciary
duties in considering Pfizers November 5 Proposal. Members
of senior management then reported to the board that they had
revisited Wyeths financial plan presented to the board at
its October 12, 2008 meeting to begin assessing the
viability of that plan in light of the deterioration in the
market environment since the plan was originally constructed
and, based on this review, which was still ongoing, had formed
preliminary views as to appropriate revisions to various key
assumptions. The Wyeth senior management team discussed with the
board various changes in the industry environment that could
affect the plan, including changes that could result from a
slowing of the economic growth in emerging growth markets and
from a global recession, but noted that it was too early to
determine whether, and to what extent they would do so. In
addition, the Wyeth senior management team also discussed with
the board that changes in foreign exchange rates, interest rates
and the value of pension plan investments already were
negatively affecting the plan. The board was then presented with
managements preliminary view on how a revised financial
plan, adjusted for the various changes discussed that were
already negatively affecting Wyeths financial results,
would compare to the plan previously reviewed with the board.
Members of Wyeths senior management noted that this
revised financial plan was preliminary as the severity of the
economic downturn and its ultimate impact on Wyeths
financial results remained very uncertain at that time.
Also at the November 9, 2008 meeting, representatives of
Morgan Stanley and Evercore discussed with the board a
comparison of the September 9 Proposal and the November 5
Proposal and the market performance of Pfizer, Wyeth and their
industry peers since Pfizer made its September 9 Proposal. In
this regard, it was noted that from (and including)
September 9, 2008 through (and including) November 7,
2008, the last trading day prior to Wyeths board meeting,
the Large Cap Pharma index declined approximately 9%,
Wyeths share price declined approximately 20% and
Pfizers share price declined approximately 12%.
Representatives of Morgan Stanley and Evercore also discussed
financial considerations relating to Pfizers November 9
Proposal, including financial considerations based on the
various plan cases presented to the board by Wyeths senior
management, and further discussed with the board the ability of
Pfizer to finance a transaction with Wyeth in the current market
environment, Wyeths potential strategic alternatives and
the prospects of a third party having the ability and desire to
make a proposal that would be competitive with Pfizers
November 9 Proposal. The members of the board and senior
management, along with the outside advisors present, then had a
lengthy discussion about the matters presented, potential
responses to Pfizer and the possible reactions that Pfizer may
have to such potential responses, including the prospects of
Pfizer publicly announcing an unsolicited offer for Wyeth and
the potential implications that could follow from such an
unsolicited offer. Wyeths independent directors held
further discussions in executive session, along with
60
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz (Wachtell
Lipton), which was engaged as counsel to the independent
directors prior to this meeting, regarding the matters that had
been discussed earlier at the meeting.
Following the discussions at this meeting, the Wyeth board of
directors concluded that it should confirm to Pfizer that its
November 5 Proposal significantly undervalued Wyeth and that, in
addition to the valuation issue, Pfizer would need to address
the questions raised by Wyeth regarding Pfizers proposed
financing, including the structure of Pfizers contemplated
financing and whether, and to what extent Pfizer intended to use
cash on hand as part of the financing, and the questions raised
by Wyeth regarding the potential future value of the Pfizer
shares proposed to be issued to Wyeths stockholders, such
as expected synergies and Pfizers ongoing dividend policy.
The Wyeth independent directors instructed Mr. Poussot to
inform Mr. Kindler of this conclusion and to convey to
Mr. Kindler that there was no basis for further discussions
unless he thought Pfizer could substantially improve the
November 5 Proposal and was prepared to address the various
threshold questions raised by Wyeth.
In a phone call with Mr. Kindler on November 10, 2008,
Mr. Poussot communicated the conclusions of the Wyeth board
regarding Pfizers November 5 Proposal. Later that day,
Mr. Poussot briefed the Wyeth directors on his discussion
with Mr. Kindler. On November 12, 2008,
Mr. Kindler called Mr. Poussot to request a meeting
between each companys chief executive officer, chief
financial officer and financial advisors to discuss the
questions Wyeth had with respect to Pfizers proposal.
Mr. Kindler did not make a new proposal at this time but
stated that he understood the Wyeth boards position. After
conferring with the Advisory Group, Mr. Poussot agreed to
the proposed meeting, which was then scheduled for
November 19, 2008.
On November 19, 2008, a meeting was held among
Messrs. Kindler and Poussot, Frank DAmelio,
Pfizers Chief Financial Officer, Greg Norden, Wyeths
Chief Financial Officer, and a representative from each of
Morgan Stanley and Evercore and each of Goldman Sachs, Merrill
Lynch and J.P. Morgan. Pfizers representatives
outlined various elements of Pfizers proposed transaction,
including Pfizers views on the strengths and prospects of
the combined company. Representatives of Pfizer also described
Pfizers potential financing, which was anticipated to
include up to $27.5 billion in bank commitments,
$23.5 billion of such commitments to be funded commitments
and $4 billion of such commitments to be in the form of
commercial paper backstop commitments. In addition,
representatives of Pfizer stated that as a result of the
transaction Pfizers ongoing applicable tax rate would
likely be approximately 30%. Pfizers valuation also
assumed between $3 billion and $4 billion of synergies
that would be realized within approximately three years.
Pfizers representatives also discussed the potential
financial profile of the combined company. Representatives of
Pfizer stated that in connection with the transaction, Pfizer
would likely decrease its annual dividend. However, the dividend
would likely not be decreased below the industry average and the
annual dividend, plus the revenue and earnings growth that would
be realized by a transaction with Wyeth, would provide for an
attractive total return for shareholders of the combined
company. During the course of the meeting, Mr. Poussot
reiterated that the Wyeth board of directors had rejected the
November 5 Proposal as undervaluing Wyeth.
The Wyeth board of directors met on November 20, 2008 at a
regularly scheduled meeting, and discussed further Pfizers
November 5 Proposal. At this meeting, Messrs. Poussot and
Norden, along with representatives of Morgan Stanley and
Evercore, reported in detail the substance of the discussions at
the November 19, 2008 meeting. The closing price per share
of Wyeth common stock on November 19, 2008 was $33.34. The
directors and others present then had a lengthy discussion
regarding the Pfizer proposal and the status of the negotiations
and they discussed the prospects of an unsolicited offer by
Pfizer, which possibility had been suggested by representatives
of Pfizers financial advisors, and the possible
implications of any such unsolicited offer by Pfizer, including
that Pfizer could make such an unsolicited offer at a price
lower than the price offered in the November 5 Proposal. Members
of senior management and representatives of Morgan Stanley and
Evercore offered their perspectives on the possibility of a
third party having the ability and desire to make a proposal
that would be competitive with Pfizers November 5
Proposal. The board discussed the advantages and disadvantages
of initiating conversations with third parties about a potential
business combination transaction at this juncture, during which
it was noted that although contacting third parties could
potentially have the advantage of leading to a proposal that was
competitive with Pfizers November 5 Proposal, such
contacts might fail to elicit such a competitive proposal and
would substantially increase the risk of information leaks that
could prove disruptive to, and have negative effects on, the
operations of Wyeths business. Following further
discussion, the independent directors met and further discussed
the matters
61
presented at the meeting. After considering a variety of
possible next steps, the Wyeth board authorized Morgan Stanley
and Evercore to engage in discussions with Pfizers
financial advisors to further explain why the Wyeth board viewed
the current offer price of $46.00 per share as inadequate and to
further explore Pfizers views on other elements of a
transaction.
On November 21, 2008, Mr. Poussot contacted
Mr. Kindler to inform him that the Wyeth board had agreed
to authorize Wyeths financial advisors to meet with
Pfizers financial advisors but that the boards
position regarding the inadequacy of the November 5 Proposal
remained unchanged. Between November 21 and December 13,
2008, representatives of Morgan Stanley and Evercore had
numerous discussions with representatives of Goldman Sachs
during which possible transaction terms were discussed,
including the form and amount of consideration to be paid by
Pfizer in the transaction. The Advisory Group was regularly
updated by Mr. Poussot and Wyeths financial advisors
during this timeframe.
On December 3, 2008, the Pfizer board of directors met to
discuss the status of Pfizers negotiations with Wyeth and
to further analyze the merits of a transaction with Wyeth. In
addition, between November 21 and December 13, 2008,
Mr. Kindler also held several discussions with members of
the Pfizer board of directors to update them on the status of
discussions with Wyeth and to discuss the terms of a revised
proposal to be delivered by Pfizer to Wyeth.
On December 13, 2008, representatives of Pfizer delivered
to Wyeth a further revised non-binding proposal for a
transaction in which Pfizer would acquire Wyeth for $47.50 per
share, consisting of $31.50 in cash and $16.00 in Pfizer common
stock at a fixed exchange ratio (this revised proposal is
referred to as the December 13 Proposal). Pfizer specified that
the exchange ratio for the shares of Pfizer common stock under
its revised proposal would be calculated based on a short
pre-signing measurement period but would be fixed at the time of
signing at an exchange ratio of no greater than 0.976 of a share
of Pfizer common stock. The closing price per share of Pfizer
common stock on the day before Pfizer made this revised proposal
was $16.92 and the closing price per share of Wyeth common stock
on the day before Pfizer made this revised proposal was $36.00.
It was noted that the $47.50 proposal represented a 32% premium
over such closing price per share of Wyeth common stock and a
39% premium over the prior
30-day
average price per share of Wyeth common stock. Pfizers
December 13 Proposal also provided that the parties would enter
into a standard merger agreement and that Pfizer
contemplated arranging financing over a three to four week
period.
The Advisory Group, together with Wyeths senior management
and legal and financial advisors, convened on December 15,
2008 to discuss Pfizers December 13 Proposal. The Advisory
Group was advised of the recent communications between
Pfizers and Wyeths financial advisors, including
suggestions by representatives of Pfizers financial
advisors that Pfizer was committed to the proposed transaction
and could make an offer directly to Wyeths stockholders.
The Advisory Group and those present engaged in a lengthy
discussion regarding Pfizers December 13 Proposal and the
status of the negotiations during which they discussed various
potential responses to Pfizer and the potential implications of
such responses. Following the discussion, the Advisory Group
concluded that in advance of a special meeting of the Wyeth
board of directors, Morgan Stanley and Evercore should seek
further information regarding the December 13 Proposal and
express to Goldman Sachs that in addition to the proposed price
per share, Pfizers December 13 Proposal raised issues
regarding the determination of the exchange ratio and the
proposed process of significantly expanding the number of
financing sources prior to signing a definitive merger agreement.
On December 16, 2008, representatives of Morgan Stanley and
Evercore met with representatives of Goldman Sachs to discuss
the issues raised by the Advisory Group and seek further
information. During the course of this meeting Goldman Sachs
further discussed Pfizers proposed process and structure
with respect to the necessary financing and emphasized, in
response to questions raised by representatives of Morgan
Stanley and Evercore, that although Pfizer may be willing to
consider alternative methods of determining the exchange ratio
with respect to the stock component of the proposal, Pfizer
expected that once the exchange ratio was determined it would be
fixed and not subject to any price collar.
Also on December 16, 2008, a representative from another
company in Wyeths industry (referred to as Company
X) contacted Morgan Stanley. The representative of Company
X noted that he had heard that there
62
was a transaction in development involving Wyeth and asked if
Company X could participate in a sale process if one were taking
place.
On December 17, 2008, the Wyeth board of directors convened
a special meeting to discuss the recent developments relating to
Pfizer and Company X. Mr. Poussot described to the board of
directors in detail Pfizers December 13 Proposal.
Representatives of Morgan Stanley and Evercore reported on the
various discussions they had with representatives of Goldman
Sachs on Pfizers behalf, including discussions regarding
Pfizers proposed mechanism for determining the exchange
ratio and Pfizers proposed process for obtaining committed
financing by expanding Pfizers current lending group by up
to five additional banks. A discussion ensued regarding
potential responses to Pfizer, including making a
counter-proposal in which part of the consideration to Wyeth
stockholders would include short-term notes to be issued by
Pfizer (a form of seller financing) and the potential advantages
that including such notes in a transaction could have in terms
of augmenting value and certainty and obviating the need for
Pfizer to significantly expand its lending group and risking a
leak prior to the execution of a merger agreement.
Representatives of Morgan Stanley then reported on the
conversations with Company X and noted that it was possible that
Company X could make a proposal competitive with Pfizers
December 13 Proposal, but noted that Company Xs ability to
arrange significant financing was not as strong as Pfizers
ability to do so. Representatives of Simpson Thacher and
Wachtell Lipton advised the Wyeth directors regarding their
fiduciary duties in connection with the boards ongoing
evaluation of Pfizers December 13 Proposal and the
approach made by Company X. Following further discussion
regarding the matters presented and potential next steps,
including the prospects of Pfizer acting on an unsolicited basis
at or below the price contained in Pfizers December 13
Proposal, the Wyeth board of directors concluded that it should
respond to Pfizer by stressing the boards view that the
proposed price continued to be inadequate and by proposing a
seller financing alternative for Pfizers consideration,
for the reasons discussed by the board, and a mechanism whereby
the exchange ratio was determined after the execution of a
merger agreement in an effort to enhance the value of the stock
portion of the proposed consideration. The independent directors
believed that Mr. Poussot should deliver the response
directly to Mr. Kindler and emphasize that Pfizer needed to
improve its proposed price before Wyeth would be prepared to
engage in further negotiations. Following the board meeting, a
meeting between Messrs. Poussot and Kindler was set for
December 23, 2008. The Wyeth board of directors also
concluded that Mr. Poussot should speak directly with the
chief executive officer of Company X to better assess Company
Xs desire and ability to make a proposal. The board
decided to refrain from disclosing to Pfizer the contact made by
Company X until Wyeth had more information upon which to
evaluate the prospects of Company Xs desire and ability to
make a proposal that would be competitive with Pfizers
December 13 Proposal.
Also on December 17, 2008, Mr. Poussot spoke with the
chief executive officer of Company X to discuss Company Xs
interest in pursuing a transaction with Wyeth. Mr. Poussot
informed Company X that, although Wyeth was confident in its
prospects as an independent company, if Company X had an
interest in holding discussions it should be prepared to convey
its preliminary views on a valuation of Wyeth as quickly as
possible. The chief executive officer of Company X responded
that he would be prepared to discuss value within a week.
On December 23, 2008, Mr. Poussot met with
Mr. Kindler to deliver Wyeths response to
Pfizers December 13 Proposal. Mr. Poussot noted that,
with respect to the structure of a proposed transaction, Wyeth
was prepared to provide an alternative source of financing
through seller financing, which could reduce financing
completion risk and the need for Pfizer to significantly expand
its lending group prior to signing a merger agreement.
Mr. Poussot also proposed that the exchange ratio on the
stock portion of the consideration should be calculated based on
a short measurement period following the announcement of a
merger in an effort to increase the certainty around the value
of the Pfizer common stock to be delivered to Wyeths
stockholders. Mr. Poussot then discussed with
Mr. Kindler that the Wyeth board of directors viewed
Pfizers $47.50 proposed price as undervaluing Wyeth and
that the proposed price would need to be improved. During this
meeting, and at a subsequent meeting held later that day which
also included a representative from each of Morgan Stanley and
Goldman Sachs, Mr. Kindler stated that Pfizer may have some
modest flexibility with respect to the proposed price.
Mr. Kindler also stated that Pfizer would not agree to a
transaction in which Pfizer was obligated to close regardless of
whether it received the proceeds from its contemplated financing.
63
On December 24, 2008, Mr. Poussot and representatives
of Morgan Stanley reported to the Advisory Group on the
substance of the December 23, 2008 meetings.
Representatives of Simpson Thacher discussed with the Advisory
Group Pfizers view that any definitive merger agreement
would contain some form of conditionality around financing,
which raised deal certainty issues that would need to be
addressed if negotiations progressed. The Advisory Group
concluded that Wyeth should not initiate any further discussions
with Pfizer at this time.
Also on December 24, 2008, the chief executive officer of
Company X contacted Mr. Poussot. Company Xs chief
executive officer noted that Company X was no longer sure
whether it could make an attractive proposal for the combination
of Wyeth and Company X. Company Xs chief executive officer
suggested that the most Company X likely could offer in terms of
valuation was a price per share of Wyeth common stock in the
mid-$40s. Neither Mr. Kindler, nor any representatives of
Pfizer were made aware of the discussions of representatives of
Wyeth and representatives of Company X with respect to a
potential transaction.
On December 31, 2008, Mr. Kindler contacted
Mr. Poussot to inform him that Pfizer had continued to
consider the concerns expressed by Wyeth and that he would like
to meet with Mr. Poussot the following week for a further
discussion. A meeting between Messrs. Poussot and Kindler
was subsequently scheduled for and held on January 5, 2009.
At this meeting, Mr. Kindler did not make a revised
proposal on price, but stated that he would be willing to
discuss the issue with Pfizers board. Mr. Kindler
noted that, in response to concerns expressed during the
previous weeks by Wyeth, Pfizer determined it could receive the
necessary committed financing by adding only two additional
lenders to its financing group and that Pfizer therefore was not
interested in the seller financing structure proposed by Wyeth.
Mr. Kindler also noted that Pfizer would be willing to
execute a merger agreement that only had a limited financing
condition and that if such condition were not satisfied Pfizer
would be willing to pay liquidated damages to Wyeth, and that
Pfizer would agree to be obligated to perform all of its other
obligations in a transaction.
Between December 23, 2008 and January 5, 2009,
Pfizers senior management, together with its legal and
financial advisors, held several meetings during which Pfizer
formulated a response to Wyeths proposal and discussed a
revised proposal to be delivered to Wyeth. During this period,
Mr. Kindler also updated members of the Pfizer board of
directors on the status of negotiations with Wyeth and consulted
with them as to the revised terms to be proposed by Pfizer.
On January 6, 2009, a meeting of the Advisory Group was
held during which Mr. Poussot reported in detail on the
substance of his meeting with Mr. Kindler on
January 5, 2009. The Advisory Group, together with members
of Wyeths senior management and financial and legal
advisors, discussed the status of the negotiations, including
with respect to the determination of the exchange ratio, the
structure of Pfizers proposed financing condition and
related liquidated damages, and the fact that the circumstances
in which Wyeth could engage with third parties regarding
competing acquisition proposals and the related termination
events and remedies still would have to be negotiated with
Pfizer. Following discussion, the Advisory Group concluded that
Wyeths management and members of Wyeths financial
and legal advisors should continue to explore whether a mutually
acceptable resolution could be reached on the key parameters of
a transaction.
Following the meeting of the Advisory Group on January 6,
2009, Mr. Kindler sent Mr. Poussot a full summary of
key proposed terms and contacted Mr. Poussot to emphasize
Pfizers position that the exchange ratio needed to be
agreed before the execution of a definitive merger agreement.
The summary of key terms sent by Mr. Kindler specified that
the exchange ratio should be determined through a
10-day
pre-signing measurement period and should in no event be greater
than 0.966 of a share of Pfizer common stock. In addition, the
summary of terms set forth Pfizers proposed financing
condition, including the element of such condition relating to
minimum credit ratings being received from Moodys
Investors Services, Inc. (Moodys) and
Standard & Poors Ratings Group
(S&P).
On January 7 and January 8, 2009, a series of meetings were
held between Messrs. Norden and DAmelio,
representatives of Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs and
representatives of Simpson Thacher and Cadwalader. During the
course of these meetings, the key terms of a transaction were
discussed in detail, including how the exchange ratio should be
calculated, the structure of the financing condition, and the
circumstances in which Wyeth could engage with third parties
regarding competing acquisition proposals and the related
termination events and remedies.
64
The Advisory Group met again on January 9, 2009 to be
updated on recent developments. The Advisory Group, together
with members of Wyeths senior management and
representatives of Wyeths financial and legal advisors,
discussed the status of the negotiations. Representatives of
Morgan Stanley and Evercore offered their perspectives on the
potential risks associated with Pfizers proposed financing
condition, including their views regarding the minimum ratings
condition being proposed by Pfizer. Members of senior management
updated the Advisory Group on Wyeths recent financial
results and the ongoing review of Wyeths financial plan.
Following further discussion, the Advisory Group recommended
that negotiations should continue to explore whether a mutually
acceptable resolution could be reached on the key terms being
discussed between the parties, and in connection with further
discussions Wyeth should propose a method of calculating the
exchange ratio that would result in a higher ratio than that
proposed by Pfizer, further limitations on Pfizers
financing condition, and a liquidated damages amount equal to
$8 billion as opposed to the approximately $2 billion
proposed by Pfizer in connection with the failure to satisfy the
limited financing condition.
Between January 10 and January 13, 2009, representatives of
Wyeth and Pfizer continued to discuss the key parameters of a
potential transaction. During this time Messrs. Poussot and
Kindler spoke on multiple occasions, during which
Mr. Poussot maintained that the $47.50 offer was not
acceptable to the Wyeth board and Mr. Kindler indicated
that Pfizer may be prepared to increase its offer from $47.50
per share to approximately $50.00 per share, consisting of
$33.00 in cash and 0.985 of a share of Pfizer common stock. The
Advisory Group was updated at a meeting on January 12, 2009
as negotiations of the key transaction parameters continued.
On January 13, 2009, the Pfizer board of directors held a
meeting, at which members of Pfizers senior management
reported to the board on the status of the negotiations with
Wyeth and the status of the financing with respect to the
potential acquisition of Wyeth.
On January 14, 2009, the Wyeth board of directors convened
a special meeting to discuss the status of the negotiations with
Pfizer. Mr. Poussot described to the board of directors the
negotiations that had taken place over the preceding several
weeks. He then reported that Pfizers management was
prepared to recommend to its board a transaction in which each
share of Wyeth common stock would receive $33.00 in cash and
0.985 of a share of Pfizer common stock, which represented a
total value of $50.33, or a 32% premium over the price per share
of Wyeth common stock, based on closing prices of Pfizer and
Wyeth common stock on January 13, 2009. Mr. Poussot
further reported that the financing condition would be limited
to maintenance of specified minimum credit ratings and the lack
of a material adverse event affecting Pfizer and that in the
event Pfizer did not complete the transaction as a result of its
inability to secure financing due to the failure of either of
these conditions, then it would pay liquidated damages to Wyeth
equal to $4.5 billion. Representatives of Morgan Stanley
and Evercore offered their perspectives on the status of the
negotiations and the proposed consideration payable to Wyeth
common stockholders. Representatives of Simpson Thacher
described the other key terms discussed by the parties,
including the termination events and related termination fees
and Pfizers requirements associated with seeking required
regulatory approvals. Representatives of Simpson Thacher also
reported to the board of directors that Pfizer intended to
approach Citigroup as a potential financing source with respect
to the transaction in the event the parties were to proceed with
negotiations, and if that were the case the directors should
remain mindful of Mr. McGuires position at Citigroup
notwithstanding that appropriate information walls and
procedures were in place designed to prevent material non-public
information regarding Wyeth or Pfizer from being shared between
Mr. McGuire on the one hand and Citigroup on the other
hand. The board discussed the elements of the proposed Pfizer
transaction, including the possibility of making a
counter-proposal to Pfizer with respect to the proposed merger
consideration. In this regard, the board determined that, based
on Pfizers insistence that it would not agree to any
further increase in the merger consideration, making a
counter-proposal could jeopardize the potential basis on which
Pfizer might move forward on a negotiated basis with Wyeth.
Following further discussion, the board of directors concluded
that Wyeths management and financial and legal advisors
should continue to explore whether a mutually acceptable
transaction could be reached on the revised terms proposed by
Pfizer.
Between January 14 and January 16, 2009, representatives of
Pfizer and Wyeth continued to negotiate the key parameters of a
transaction, including that Pfizer would not enter into
exclusive arrangements with more
65
than five lenders that would preclude such lending firm from
participating in the financing of a possible proposal by a third
party in competition with Pfizers proposal for Wyeth,
would agree to certain restrictions designed to have Pfizer
conserve cash prior to a closing in an effort to ensure that the
minimum ratings condition was satisfied and that the termination
fee payable by Wyeth in the event of circumstances involving a
third-party acquisition proposal would be tiered with the lower
fee equal to $1.5 billion, and the higher fee equal to
$2.0 billion.
During the course of these negotiations, the Advisory Group was
regularly updated by members of Wyeths management and
representatives of Wyeths advisors. Members of the Pfizer
board of directors were also regularly updated by
Mr. Kindler as to the status of the negotiations. On
January 16, 2009, Wyeth and Pfizer entered into a
confidentiality agreement, which also contained mutual
standstill restrictions that, among other things, prohibited
either party from instigating an unsolicited offer to acquire
the other partys stock for a period of six months.
Following execution of the confidentiality agreement and
continuing through January 25, 2009, Pfizers and
Wyeths representatives conducted a due diligence review of
each others business. In addition, representatives of
Pfizer, accompanied by Mr. Norden, made presentations
regarding the proposed transaction to Moodys and S&P.
On January 18, 2009, Cadwalader delivered a draft merger
agreement to Simpson Thacher, and on January 20, 2009,
Simpson Thacher delivered comments on the draft merger agreement
to Cadwalader. Thereafter, between January 20 and
January 25, 2009, Wyeth, Pfizer and their respective
representatives engaged in negotiations of the terms of the
merger agreement, as well as the terms of Pfizers
financing commitment letters. Throughout these negotiations,
Wyeth continued to emphasize the importance of certainty of
closing. During this period, Messrs. Poussot and Kindler
also began discussions regarding Pfizer appointing two members
of the current Wyeth board of directors to the Pfizer board of
directors upon completion of the merger, which Pfizer ultimately
agreed to in the merger agreement.
On January 22, 2009, Wyeth convened a regularly scheduled
board meeting. At the beginning of the meeting, Mr. McGuire
left the meeting and Mr. Mascotte advised the other
directors that Citigroup, Mr. McGuires employer, had
agreed to become one of Pfizers five financing sources and
an advisor to Pfizer in connection with the proposed
transaction. Mr. Mascotte reported that Wyeth had been
assured that appropriate information walls and procedures
remained in place to assure the confidentiality of any
information to which Mr. McGuire had access in his capacity
as a director of Wyeth. Following a discussion among the
directors and representatives of Simpson Thacher and Wachtell
Lipton, the directors concluded that it would be desirable to
have Mr. McGuire remain an active participant in the Wyeth
board of directors consideration of a transaction with
Pfizer. Mr. McGuire then rejoined the meeting and the Wyeth
board of directors was advised of the status of the ongoing
negotiations. Also at this meeting, members of Wyeths
senior management reported to the board on the due diligence
review that it had conducted to date regarding Pfizers
business and prospects, including its review of information
received from Pfizer with respect to Pfizers plans to
resolve investigations regarding allegations of past off-label
promotional practices concerning Bextra. Later in the day on
January 22, 2009, Pfizer and Wyeth were advised of the
expected ratings that S&P would assign to a combined
Pfizer/Wyeth, and on January 23, 2009, Moodys also
advised what its expected ratings would be. The expected ratings
from S&P were three notches above the minimum
ratings condition to be included in the financing condition in
the merger agreement and the expected ratings from Moodys
were one notch above the minimum ratings condition
to be included in the financing condition in the merger
agreement.
On the morning of January 25, 2009, the Pfizer board of
directors met to review and consider the proposed merger. At the
meeting, members of senior management provided an overview of
the proposed merger, including the material transaction terms.
Members of senior management also provided a summary of
Pfizers due diligence review from both an operational and
legal perspective. A representative of Cadwalader discussed with
the board certain material terms of the merger agreement which
had been previously negotiated by Pfizer and Wyeth. Members of
senior management discussed with the Pfizer board the financial
forecasts for each of Wyeth and Pfizer on a standalone basis,
and the impact that a transaction would have on such forecasts.
In addition, members of senior management discussed with the
board the status of the negotiations with certain banks
regarding a commitment to finance a transaction with Wyeth and
summarized the material terms that had been negotiated in
connection with such commitment. Representatives of Goldman
Sachs,
66
Merrill Lynch and J.P. Morgan reviewed with the board of
directors certain financial aspects of the proposed merger.
Following consideration of the terms of the proposed merger and
discussion among the directors, senior management and
Pfizers legal and financial advisors, the Pfizer board
determined that the terms of the merger and the related
transactions contemplated thereby, are advisable and fair to,
and in the best interests of, Pfizer and its stockholders.
In the afternoon of January 25, 2009, the Wyeth board of
directors met and reviewed the terms and conditions of the
proposed merger. At the meeting, representatives from Simpson
Thacher and Wachtell Lipton reviewed with the directors the
fiduciary duties of the members of the board. Members of senior
management then presented to the board Wyeths financial
plan, which had previously been presented to the board (the
Wyeth base case financial projections; see
Wyeth Unaudited Prospective Financial
Information beginning on page 94). The senior
management team discussed with the board the key assumptions in
the plan reflecting the recent trends in the industry and
macro-economic environments. The senior management team further
discussed potential alternative cases in the event that the
assumptions underlying the plan turned out to be overly
aggressive or overly conservative. Members of senior management
also reported to the board on the due diligence review it
conducted regarding Pfizers business and prospects and
discussed with the board of directors the results of the
meetings Pfizer held with the ratings agencies. In connection
with the review of Pfizers business and prospects, members
of senior management reported on Pfizers expected
announcement of its 2008 financial results and 2009 earnings
guidance and that in the event the proposed merger were
announced Pfizer expected to announce, concurrently with such
merger announcement, a decrease in its quarterly dividend to
$0.16 per share. It was noted that Pfizers resulting
annual dividend would be approximately equal to the average
dividend yield of companies in the large capitalization
pharmaceutical industry and that also accompanying any merger
announcement would be an announcement regarding the potential
synergies that were anticipated to be realized as a result of
the merger, such that the transaction could offer significant
opportunities to enhance long-term value for the stockholders of
the combined company. The directors discussed with Wyeths
senior management and financial advisors the potential impact
the announcement of a merger with Wyeth, along with the dividend
reduction and other information Pfizer expected to announce in
connection with the merger announcement and its 2008 financial
results and 2009 earnings guidance, could have on Pfizers
stock price. Representatives from Simpson Thacher then reviewed
with the board of directors the proposed terms of the merger
agreement and commitment letters. Each of Morgan Stanley and
Evercore separately reviewed with the board of directors its
financial analysis of the merger consideration to be received by
holders of Wyeth common stock. Morgan Stanley rendered to the
Wyeth board of directors its oral opinion, which was
subsequently confirmed in writing, dated January 25, 2009,
to the effect that, as of such date, and based on and subject to
the various assumptions, qualifications and limitations set
forth in such opinion, the per share merger consideration to be
received by the holders of shares of Wyeth common stock entitled
to receipt thereof pursuant to the merger agreement was fair,
from a financial point of view, to such holders. Evercore also
delivered to the board of directors an oral opinion, which
opinion was confirmed by delivery of a written opinion, dated
January 25, 2009, to the effect that, as of that date and
based on and subject to the assumptions made, matters considered
and limitations on the scope of review undertaken as set forth
in such opinion, the per share consideration to be received in
the merger by holders of Wyeth common stock was fair, from a
financial point of view, to such holders.
Also at this meeting, the directors discussed with Wyeths
senior management, financial advisors and outside legal counsel
potential execution risks associated with the proposed merger,
including the risks that one or more closing conditions may not
be satisfied, the risks that Pfizer might otherwise fail to
obtain all of the contemplated proceeds pursuant to the
commitment letter, and the risks associated with the review of
the transaction by U.S. and foreign antitrust and
competition authorities. Wyeths senior management further
discussed with the Wyeth board the effects of the economy on
Wyeth, including the potential risks and opportunities
associated with the financial plan and the existing market
disruption and volatility and potential duration and impact
thereof. In addition, the Wyeth board discussed with
Wyeths senior management, financial advisors and outside
legal counsel the lack of any credible interest expressed by any
third party following press reports on the evening of
January 22, 2009 speculating as to the proposed merger,
including no further indication from Company X that it could
make an offer competitive with the Pfizer proposal. During the
course of this discussion, it was noted that in addition to the
lack of interest expressed following
67
such press reports, the proposed merger agreement provided that
the termination fee payable by Wyeth in the event it were to
terminate the merger agreement in favor of a superior proposal
was lower if a potential acquiror were to make a proposal within
the first 30 days following execution of the merger
agreement that ultimately led to such termination. The
30-day
period was viewed by the Wyeth board, in consultation with its
advisors, as adequate for potential acquirors to make such a
proposal, particularly given the substantial amount of publicly
available information about Wyeth and that if a third party were
interested in making a superior proposal it likely would be one
of the other large pharmaceutical companies that was already
familiar with the risks and opportunities associated with
Wyeths businesses. The directors and representatives of
Simpson Thacher and Wachtell Lipton went into executive session
and continued the discussion of the transaction, including a
discussion of the process and timing of the regulatory review of
the transaction (which was also attended by Wyeths General
Counsel). Thereafter, Wyeths independent directors and
representatives of Wachtell Lipton engaged in further
discussions, and then determined to adjourn the meeting until
later in the evening so that Wyeths representatives could
seek to finalize the merger agreement.
After adjourning the meeting, representatives of Wyeth and
Pfizer further negotiated the provisions concerning the timing
of Wyeths ability to exercise its remedies in the event of
a financing failure. The Wyeth board then reconvened its meeting
later in the evening of January 25, 2009, and
representatives of Simpson Thacher described the proposed
resolution of the open points in the merger agreement. Following
consideration of the proposed merger agreement and the merger,
and including the facts and circumstances regarding the
alternatives available to Wyeth, the Wyeth board of directors
determined that the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, including the merger, are advisable and
fair to, and in the best interests of, Wyeth and its
stockholders, approved the merger agreement and the merger and
resolved to recommend that Wyeth stockholders vote in favor of
the adoption of the merger agreement. Mr. McGuire recused
himself from the vote to avoid any perception of a potential
conflict of interest arising out of his employment with
Citigroup, which was one of the financing sources that had
agreed to provide the debt financing to Pfizer pursuant to
Pfizers commitment letters. In addition, Mr. Gary
Rogers was unable to attend the meeting when it reconvened and
therefore did not participate in the vote of the board.
Over the course of the evening of January 25, 2009,
representatives of Simpson Thacher and Cadwalader finalized the
merger agreement and other related documents, and the merger
agreement was executed by Pfizer, Wyeth and Merger Sub as of
January 25, 2009.
On January 26, 2009, prior to the opening of trading on the
NYSE, Pfizer and Wyeth issued a joint press release announcing
the transaction.
Wyeths
Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Wyeth Board of
Directors
The Wyeth board of directors carefully evaluated the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. The Wyeth
board of directors determined that the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby, including the proposed
merger, are advisable and fair to, and in the best interests of,
Wyeth and its stockholders. At a meeting held on
January 25, 2009, the Wyeth board of directors resolved to
approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby, including the proposed merger, and to recommend to the
stockholders of Wyeth that they vote for the adoption of the
merger agreement.
In the course of reaching its recommendation, the Wyeth board of
directors consulted with Wyeths senior management and its
financial advisors and outside legal counsel and considered a
number of substantive factors, both positive and negative, and
potential benefits and detriments of the merger to Wyeth and its
stockholders. The Wyeth board of directors believed that, taken
as a whole, the following factors supported its decision to
approve the proposed merger:
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration; Historical Market Prices. The
value of the consideration to be received by Wyeth stockholders
pursuant to the merger, including that the implied merger
consideration as of January 25, 2009 of $50.19 per share,
represented a significant premium over the market prices at
which Wyeth common stock had previously traded, including a
premium of approximately:
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.3% over the closing price of Wyeth common stock of $38.83 per
share on January 22, 2009, the last trading day prior to
press reports regarding the proposed merger;
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
33.1% over the average closing price of Wyeth common stock for
one month prior to January 22, 2009; and
|
|
|
|
42.6% over the average closing price of Wyeth common stock for
the three months prior to January 22, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncertainty of Future Common Stock Market
Price. The Wyeth board of directors considered
Wyeths business, financial condition, results of
operations, pipeline, intellectual property, management,
competitive position and prospects, as well as current industry,
economic and stock and credit market conditions. The Wyeth board
of directors considered Wyeths financial plan and the
initiatives and the potential execution risks associated with
such plan and the effects of the recent economic downturn on
Wyeth specifically, and the global health care industry,
generally. In connection with these considerations, the Wyeth
board of directors considered the attendant risk that, if Wyeth
did not enter into the merger agreement with Pfizer, the price
that might be received by Wyeths stockholders selling
shares of Wyeth common stock in the open market could be less
than the merger consideration, especially in light of recent
negative trends and volatility in the stock market.
|
|
|
|
Significant Portion of Merger Consideration in
Cash. The fact that a large portion of the merger
consideration will be paid in cash, giving Wyeth stockholders an
opportunity to immediately realize value for a significant
portion of their investment and providing certainty of value.
The Wyeth board of directors also considered the fact that Wyeth
stockholders would be able to reinvest the cash consideration
received in the merger in Pfizer common stock if they desired to
do so.
|
|
|
|
Participation in Potential Upside. The
benefits to the combined company that could result from the
merger, including an enhanced competitive and financial
position, increased diversity and depth in its product line,
pipelines and geographic areas and the potential to realize
significant cost and sales synergies, and the fact that, since a
portion of the merger consideration will be paid in Pfizer
stock, Wyeth stockholders would have the opportunity to
participate in any future earnings or growth of the combined
company and future appreciation in the value of Pfizer common
stock following the merger should they determine to retain the
Pfizer common stock payable in the merger.
|
|
|
|
Financial Advisors Opinions. The fact
that the Wyeth board of directors received separate opinions,
each dated January 25, 2009, from Morgan Stanley and
Evercore, in each case, as to the fairness, from a financial
point of view and as of the date of such opinion, of the merger
consideration to be received by holders of Wyeth common stock,
as more fully described below under the headings
Opinion of Morgan Stanley beginning on
page 72 and Opinion of Evercore
beginning on page 83.
|
|
|
|
Terms of the Merger Agreement. The terms and
conditions of the merger agreement, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
The limited closing conditions to Pfizers obligations
under the merger agreement, including the fact that the merger
agreement is not subject to approval by Pfizer stockholders;
|
|
|
|
The provisions of the merger agreement that allow Wyeth to
engage in negotiations with, and provide information to, third
parties in response to credible inquiries from third parties
regarding alternative acquisition proposals;
|
|
|
|
The provisions of the merger agreement that allow the Wyeth
board of directors to change its recommendation that Wyeth
stockholders vote in favor of the adoption of the merger
agreement in response to certain acquisition proposals and
certain intervening events, if the Wyeth board of directors
determines in good faith that the failure to change its
recommendation could reasonably be determined to be inconsistent
with its fiduciary duties under applicable law;
|
|
|
|
The ability of Wyeth to specifically enforce the terms of the
merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
The obligation of Pfizer to pay to Wyeth $4.5 billion in
liquidated damages if the merger agreement is terminated by
Wyeth in the event that all conditions are satisfied (or capable
of being satisfied) other than the condition relating to
Pfizers financing sources declining to make financing
available primarily due to the failure of either or both of the
Specified Financing Conditions; and
|
|
|
|
The provisions of the merger agreement that require Pfizer to
take certain actions designed to conserve cash which would
facilitate Pfizer obtaining the requisite minimum credit rating
from
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
Moodys and S&P, including the restriction prohibiting
Pfizer from making acquisitions for which the cash consideration
paid prior to closing of the merger exceeds $750 million in
the aggregate, the restriction prohibiting Pfizer from effecting
any buybacks of its outstanding equity securities for
consideration in excess of $500 million in the aggregate
(subject to certain exceptions) and the requirement that Pfizer
not increase its quarterly dividend above $0.16 per share during
the pendency of the merger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efforts to Consummate the Transaction. The
belief that regulatory approvals and clearances necessary to
complete the merger would likely be obtained and the obligation
of Pfizer in the merger agreement (i) to use its reasonable
best efforts to obtain those approvals and clearances and
(ii) to negotiate, offer to commit and effect (and if such
offer is accepted, commit to and effect) any sale, divestiture
or disposition of any assets or businesses of Pfizer or any of
its subsidiaries (including after the closing of the merger,
Wyeth) as may be required in order to avoid any injunction or
order by a governmental entity that would prevent the closing of
the merger, except to the extent that such sale, divestiture or
disposition would result in the one year loss of net sales
revenues (as measured by net 2008 sales revenue) in excess of
$3 billion.
|
|
|
|
Financing Strength of Pfizer. The likelihood
that Pfizer would be able to finance the merger given
Pfizers financial resources, the financing commitments
that it obtained from J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A., Banc of America Securities LLC, Bank of
America, N.A., Barclays Bank PLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P. and the indications from
rating agencies that, as of the date of such indications, Pfizer
would retain credit ratings above the requisite minimum ratings
after giving effect to the merger and the financing thereof.
|
|
|
|
Absence of Competing Offers. The Wyeth board
of directors belief, in consultation with its legal and
financial advisors, that it was unlikely that any strategic
purchaser would make a higher offer for Wyeth based on market
conditions and antitrust considerations. In this regard, the
Wyeth board of directors noted that, although Company X had
approached Wyeth on an unsolicited basis prior to the signing of
the merger agreement, Company X ultimately suggested a possible
transaction value well below the implied offer price made by
Pfizer at such time. The Wyeth board of directors also noted
that Wyeth did not receive any inquiries concerning alternative
transactions following the publication of press reports on the
evening of January 22, 2009 speculating as to the proposed
transaction with Pfizer. In addition, the Wyeth board of
directors noted that in view of the difficult credit environment
and the size of the transaction, it was unlikely that a
non-strategic buyer would be in a position to propose a
transaction with more attractive terms (both in terms of value
and certainty of closing) than the proposed merger. The Wyeth
board of directors noted that, in the event that any third party
were to seek to make such a proposal, Wyeth retained the ability
to consider unsolicited proposals after the execution of the
merger agreement and to enter into an agreement with respect to
an acquisition proposal under certain circumstances
(concurrently with terminating the merger agreement and paying a
termination fee to Pfizer, with a lower termination fee payable
if the merger agreement were terminated for this reason as a
result of an alternative proposal made within 30 days after
the date of the merger agreement). The Wyeth board of directors,
in consultation with Wyeths legal and financial advisors,
believed that the termination fees payable by Wyeth in such
circumstances, as a percentage of the equity value of the
transaction, were at levels consistent with or favorable to the
fees payable in customary and comparable merger transactions,
and that such fees would not unduly impede the ability of third
parties from making a superior bid to acquire Wyeth if such
third parties were interested in doing so.
|
|
|
|
Ability of Pfizer to Make an Unsolicited
Offer. The fact that Pfizer could publicly
announce an unsolicited offer for Wyeth were Wyeth unwilling to
proceed with a negotiated transaction, which could result in a
significant disruption to Wyeths business, and the risk
that Pfizer would be able to consummate such an unsolicited
offer at a price lower than the price offered by Pfizer during
its negotiations with Wyeth.
|
|
|
|
Fixed Stock Portion of Merger
Consideration. The fact that because the stock
portion of the merger consideration is a fixed number of shares
of Pfizer common stock, Wyeths stockholders will have the
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
opportunity to benefit from any increase in the trading price of
Pfizer common shares between the announcement of the merger
agreement and the completion of the merger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Availability of Appraisal Rights. The fact
that appraisal rights would be available to holders of Wyeth
common stock under Delaware law and that there was no condition
in the merger agreement relating to the number of shares of
Wyeth common stock that could dissent from the merger.
|
The Wyeth board of directors also considered certain potentially
negative factors in its deliberations concerning the merger,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Stock Portion of Merger
Consideration. The fact that because the stock
portion of the merger consideration is a fixed exchange ratio of
shares of Pfizer common stock to Wyeth common stock, Wyeth
stockholders could be adversely affected by a decrease in the
trading price of Pfizer common stock during the pendency of the
merger, and the fact that the merger agreement does not provide
Wyeth with a price-based termination right or other similar
protection. The Wyeth board of directors determined that this
structure was appropriate and the risk acceptable in view of
factors such as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Wyeth board of directors review of the relative
intrinsic values and financial performance of Pfizer and
Wyeth; and
|
|
|
|
The fact that a substantial portion of the merger consideration
will be paid in a fixed cash amount which reduces the impact of
a decline in the trading price of Pfizer common stock on the
value of the merger consideration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Possible Failure to Achieve Synergies. The
risk that the potential benefits and synergies sought in the
merger will not be realized or will not be realized within the
expected time period, and the risks associated with the
integration by Pfizer of Wyeth.
|
|
|
|
Smaller Ongoing Equity Participation in the Combined Company
by Wyeth Stockholders. The fact that because only
a limited portion of the merger consideration will be in the
form of Pfizer common stock, Wyeths stockholders will have
a smaller ongoing equity participation in the combined company
(and, as a result, a smaller opportunity to participate in any
future earnings or growth of the combined company and future
appreciation in the value of Pfizer common stock following the
merger) than they have in Wyeth. The Wyeth board of directors
considered, however, that Wyeth stockholders would be able to
reinvest the cash received in the merger in Pfizer common stock.
|
|
|
|
Inclusion of Limited Financing Condition. The
fact that the merger agreement provides that Pfizer will not be
obligated to consummate the merger if it fails to obtain the
financing primarily due to the failure of either or both of the
Specified Financing Conditions, in which case Pfizer would be
obligated to pay to Wyeth $4.5 billion in liquidated
damages.
|
|
|
|
Terms of Pfizers Financing
Commitments. The fact that the financing
commitment letters obtained by Pfizer contain closing conditions
similar to those found in the merger agreement, including
(i) the absence of a material adverse effect on Pfizer,
(ii) the absence of a material adverse effect on Wyeth and
(iii) the maintenance by Pfizer of certain minimum credit
ratings.
|
|
|
|
Risk of Non-Completion. The possibility that
the merger might not be completed as a result of the failure of
Wyeths stockholders to adopt the merger agreement, the
failure by Pfizer to obtain its financing or otherwise, and the
effect the resulting public announcement of termination of the
merger agreement may have on:
|
|
|
|
|
|
The trading price of Wyeths common stock; and
|
|
|
|
Wyeths operating results, particularly in light of the
costs incurred in connection with the transaction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Possible Deterrence of Competing Offers. The
risk that various provisions of the merger agreement, including
the requirement that Wyeth must pay to Pfizer a
break-up fee
of either $1.5 billion or $2 billion, depending on
when an acquisition proposal is received by Wyeth, if the merger
agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, may
discourage other parties potentially interested in an
acquisition of, or combination with, Wyeth from pursuing that
opportunity. See The Merger Agreement Expenses
and Fees beginning on page 144.
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
Possible Disruption of the Business and Costs and
Expenses. The possible disruption to Wyeths
business that may result from the merger, the resulting
distraction of the attention of Wyeths management and
potential attrition of Wyeth employees, as well as the costs and
expenses associated with completing the merger.
|
|
|
|
Restrictions on Operation of Wyeths
Business. The requirement that Wyeth conduct its
business only in the ordinary course prior to the completion of
the merger and subject to specified restrictions on the conduct
of Wyeths business without Pfizers prior consent
(which consent may not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or
conditioned), which might delay or prevent Wyeth from
undertaking certain business opportunities that might arise
pending completion of the merger.
|
|
|
|
Merger Consideration Taxable. The fact that
any gains arising from the receipt of the merger consideration
would be taxable to Wyeths stockholders for United States
federal income tax purposes.
|
|
|
|
Other Risks. The risks described in the
section entitled Risk Factors beginning on
page 47.
|
The Wyeth board of directors concluded that the potentially
negative factors associated with the proposed merger were
outweighed by the potential benefits that it expected the Wyeth
stockholders would achieve as a result of the merger, including
the belief of the Wyeth board of directors that the proposed
merger would maximize the immediate value of Wyeths
stockholders shares and eliminate the risks and
uncertainty affecting the future prospects of Wyeth, including
the potential execution risks associated with its strategic
plan. Accordingly, the Wyeth board of directors determined that
the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,
including the merger, are advisable and fair to, and in the best
interests of, Wyeth and its stockholders.
In addition, the Wyeth board of directors was aware of and
considered the interests that Wyeths directors and
executive officers may have with respect to the merger that
differ from, or are in addition to, their interests as
stockholders of Wyeth generally, as described in
Interests of Certain Persons in the
Merger beginning on page 98.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
considered by the Wyeth board of directors is not exhaustive,
but Wyeth believes it includes all the material factors
considered by the Wyeth board of directors. In view of the wide
variety of factors considered in connection with its evaluation
of the merger and the complexity of these matters, the Wyeth
board of directors did not consider it practicable to, and did
not attempt to, quantify or otherwise assign relative or
specific weight or values to any of these factors. Rather, the
Wyeth board of directors viewed its position and recommendation
as being based on an overall analysis and on the totality of the
information presented to and factors considered by it. In
addition, in considering the factors described above, individual
directors may have given different weights to different factors.
After considering this information, the Wyeth board of directors
approved the merger agreement and the merger, and recommended
that Wyeth stockholders adopt the merger agreement.
This explanation of Wyeths reasons for the merger and
other information presented in this section is forward-looking
in nature and, therefore, should be read in light of the factors
described under Cautionary Statement Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements beginning on page 45.
Opinions
of Wyeths Financial Advisors
Opinion of Morgan Stanley. Wyeth retained
Morgan Stanley in 2008 to act as its financial advisor in
connection with the potential sale of Wyeth. Wyeth selected
Morgan Stanley to act as its financial advisor based on Morgan
Stanleys qualifications, expertise, reputation and its
knowledge of the business and affairs of Wyeth. As financial
advisor to Wyeth, on January 25, 2009, Morgan Stanley
rendered to the Wyeth board of directors its oral opinion, which
opinion was confirmed by delivery of its written opinion dated
as of the same date, that, as of such date and based upon and
subject to the various assumptions, qualifications and
limitations set forth in its opinion, the merger consideration
to be received by the holders of shares of Wyeths common
stock entitled to receipt thereof pursuant to the merger
agreement was fair from a financial point of view to such
holders.
The full text of the written opinion of Morgan Stanley, dated
January 25, 2009, is attached as Annex B to this proxy
statement/prospectus and is incorporated by reference in its
entirety into this
72
proxy statement/prospectus. The opinion sets forth, among
other things, the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters
considered and qualifications and limitations of the reviews
undertaken by Morgan Stanley in rendering its opinion. You
should read the entire opinion carefully and in its entirety.
Morgan Stanleys opinion is directed to the Wyeth board of
directors and addresses only the fairness from a financial point
of view of the merger consideration to be received by the
holders of shares of Wyeths common stock entitled to
receipt thereof pursuant to the merger agreement as of the date
of the opinion. It does not address any other aspect of the
merger and does not constitute a recommendation to the
stockholders of Wyeth as to how to vote or act on any matter
with respect to the merger.
In connection with rendering its opinion, Morgan Stanley, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available financial statements and
other business and financial information of Wyeth and Pfizer,
respectively;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain internal financial statements and other
financial and operating data concerning Wyeth prepared by the
management of Wyeth;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain financial projections concerning Wyeth prepared
by the management of Wyeth;
|
|
|
|
discussed the past and current operations and financial
condition and the prospects of Wyeth with senior executives of
Wyeth;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain internal financial statements and other
financial and operating data concerning Pfizer prepared by the
management of Pfizer;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain financial projections concerning Pfizer
prepared by the management of Pfizer;
|
|
|
|
discussed the past and current operations and financial
condition and the prospects of Pfizer with senior executives of
Pfizer;
|
|
|
|
discussed certain information relating to certain strategic,
financial and operational benefits and costs anticipated from
the merger with senior executives of Wyeth and Pfizer;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the pro forma impact of the merger on certain financial
ratios of the combined company;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain historical reported prices and trading activity
for Wyeths common stock and Pfizers common stock;
|
|
|
|
compared the financial performance of Wyeth and Pfizer and
certain historical prices and trading activity of Wyeths
common stock and Pfizers common stock with those of
certain other publicly-traded companies comparable with Wyeth
and Pfizer, respectively, and their securities;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the financial terms, to the extent publicly available,
of certain comparable acquisition transactions;
|
|
|
|
participated in discussions and negotiations among
representatives of Wyeth, Pfizer and their financial and legal
advisors;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the merger agreement, the executed commitment letter
from certain lenders dated January 25, 2009 (the Debt
Financing Commitment Letter) and certain related
documents; and
|
|
|
|
considered such other factors and performed such other analyses
as Morgan Stanley deemed appropriate.
|
For purposes of its opinion, Morgan Stanley assumed and relied
upon, without independent verification, the accuracy and
completeness of the information that was publicly available or
supplied or otherwise made available to it by Wyeth and Pfizer
and that formed a substantial basis for its opinion. With
respect to the financial projections, including information
relating to certain strategic, financial and operational
benefits and costs anticipated from the merger, Morgan Stanley
assumed that they had been reasonably prepared on bases
reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments
of the respective managements of Wyeth and Pfizer of the
respective future financial performance of Wyeth and Pfizer.
Morgan Stanley also assumed that the terms of the merger
agreement would not result in an adjustment to the Exchange
Ratio (as defined in the merger agreement) (other than an
adjustment as provided in the merger agreement so as not to
issue shares of Pfizer common stock in excess of the Maximum
Share Number (as defined in the merger agreement)). In addition,
Morgan Stanley assumed that the merger would be consummated in
accordance with the terms
73
described in the merger agreement with no waiver, delay or
amendment of any material terms or conditions, including, among
other things, that the financing of the merger would be
consummated in accordance with the terms described in the Debt
Financing Commitment Letter. Morgan Stanley assumed that in
connection with the receipt of all the necessary governmental,
regulatory or other approvals and consents required for the
proposed merger, no delays, limitations, conditions or
restrictions would be imposed that would adversely affect in any
material respect the contemplated benefits expected to be
derived from the proposed merger.
In its opinion, Morgan Stanley noted that it is not a legal,
regulatory, accounting or tax advisor and that as financial
advisor it relied upon, without independent verification, the
assessment of Wyeth and Pfizer and their respective legal,
regulatory or tax advisors with respect to such matters. Morgan
Stanley expressed no opinion with respect to the fairness of the
amount or nature of the compensation to any of Wyeths
officers, directors or employees, or any class of such persons,
relative to the consideration to be received by the holders of
shares of Wyeths common stock. Morgan Stanley relied upon,
without independent verification, the assessment by the
managements of Wyeth and Pfizer of: (i) the strategic,
financial and other benefits expected to result from the merger;
(ii) the timing and risks associated with the integration
of Wyeth and Pfizer; and (iii) the validity of, and risks
associated with, Wyeth and Pfizers existing and future
technologies, intellectual property, products, services and
business models. Morgan Stanley also expressed no opinion as to
the Preferred Stock Merger Consideration (as defined in the
merger agreement) or as to the relative fairness of any portion
of the consideration to holders of shares of Wyeths common
stock on the one hand, and holders of shares of any series of
Wyeth preferred stock, on the other hand. Morgan Stanley did not
make any independent valuation or appraisal of the assets or
liabilities of Wyeth or Pfizer, nor was it furnished with any
such appraisals. Morgan Stanleys opinion was necessarily
based on financial, economic, market and other conditions as in
effect on, and the information made available to it as of, the
date of the opinion. Events occurring after the date of the
opinion may affect Morgan Stanleys opinion and the
assumptions used in preparing it, and Morgan Stanley did not
assume any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm its opinion.
Morgan Stanleys opinion did not in any manner address the
prices at which Wyeths common stock or Pfizers
common stock would trade following the announcement of the
merger or at any other time.
Other than Pfizer and one other party, which each expressed
interest to Morgan Stanley prior to execution of the merger
agreement in the possible acquisition of Wyeth or certain of its
constituent businesses, in arriving at its opinion, Morgan
Stanley was not authorized to solicit, and did not solicit,
interest from any party with respect to an acquisition, business
combination or other extraordinary transaction, involving Wyeth
or any of its assets.
For purposes of its analyses, Morgan Stanley valued the Wyeth
common stock on a fully diluted basis, assuming the vesting of
all outstanding Wyeth restricted stock units, the exercise of
all in-the-money Wyeth stock options and the conversion of all
outstanding shares of Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock. For
purposes of its analyses, Morgan Stanley utilized projections
based on Wall Street analyst consensus estimates for each of
Wyeth and Pfizer, as compiled by Thomson First Call, a service
that compiles broker research and earnings estimates, and
projections for each of Wyeth and Pfizer prepared by their
respective managements. Wyeth management provided Morgan Stanley
with (i) the Wyeth management base case projections, (ii)
the Wyeth management upside case projections and (iii) the Wyeth
management downside case projections. Pfizer management provided
Morgan Stanley with one set of five-year projections.
The Wyeth management base case projections reflected the most
recent internal estimates of Wyeths management, as of
January 25, 2009, as to the future financial performance of
Wyeth. A summary of the base case projections, including
selected unaudited prospective financial data contained in such
base case, is included in this proxy statement/prospectus in the
section titled Wyeth Unaudited Prospective
Financial Information beginning on page 94. The Wyeth
management upside case is a risk adjusted plan that used more
positive assumptions than those made in the base case with
respect to matters such as product performance and growth and
that also used more moderate assumptions than those made in the
base case with respect to ultimate impact of the global economic
downturn on Wyeths financial performance. The Wyeth
management downside case, on the other hand, assumed that the
global economic downturn worsens meaningfully, both in terms of
the length and severity of such downturn, and also used more
negative assumptions with respect to matters such as product
performance and growth. In addition, the downside case used
other more negative assumptions, such as adverse regulatory
developments affecting the pharmaceutical industry and a further
74
worsening of exchange rates, than those made in the base case.
The Wyeth management upside and downside cases were not made
available to Pfizer or any of its representatives.
The following is a brief summary of the material analyses
performed by Morgan Stanley in connection with its opinion dated
January 25, 2009. This summary of financial analyses
includes information presented in tabular format. In order to
fully understand the financial analyses used by Morgan Stanley,
the tables must be read together with the text of each summary.
The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the
financial analyses.
Transaction
Premium Analysis
Morgan Stanley calculated the implied premium to the average
price of Wyeths common stock based on merger consideration
per share of Wyeths common stock of $33.00 in cash and
0.985 of a share of Pfizer common stock and the weighted
average price of Wyeths and Pfizers common stock
derived from their closing prices on January 15, 2009, for
periods varying from one calendar day to one calendar year.
Morgan Stanley selected January 15, 2009 for the purpose of
its analyses as it was the last trading day, in which the daily
traded volume of Wyeths common stock was consistent with
the average daily traded volume of Wyeths common stock
over the previous six months. The following table summarizes
Morgan Stanleys analysis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pfizer Average
|
|
Implied
|
|
Wyeth Average Price
|
|
|
|
|
Price per Share of
|
|
Transaction
|
|
per Share of Common
|
|
Implied Premium to
|
Range
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Value
|
|
Stock
|
|
Wyeth Average Price
|
|
1 calendar day
|
|
$
|
17.39
|
|
|
$
|
50.13
|
|
|
$
|
38.38
|
|
|
|
30.6
|
%
|
5 calendar days
|
|
$
|
17.40
|
|
|
$
|
50.13
|
|
|
$
|
37.82
|
|
|
|
32.6
|
%
|
10 calendar days
|
|
$
|
17.50
|
|
|
$
|
50.23
|
|
|
$
|
38.04
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
%
|
20 calendar days
|
|
$
|
17.63
|
|
|
$
|
50.36
|
|
|
$
|
37.83
|
|
|
|
33.1
|
%
|
30 calendar days
|
|
$
|
17.46
|
|
|
$
|
50.19
|
|
|
$
|
37.41
|
|
|
|
34.2
|
%
|
60 calendar days
|
|
$
|
16.82
|
|
|
$
|
49.57
|
|
|
$
|
35.87
|
|
|
|
38.2
|
%
|
90 calendar days
|
|
$
|
16.89
|
|
|
$
|
49.64
|
|
|
$
|
34.94
|
|
|
|
42.1
|
%
|
120 calendar days
|
|
$
|
17.10
|
|
|
$
|
49.85
|
|
|
$
|
35.09
|
|
|
|
42.0
|
%
|
1 calendar year
|
|
$
|
19.08
|
|
|
$
|
51.79
|
|
|
$
|
40.63
|
|
|
|
27.5
|
%
|
Morgan Stanley also noted that the merger consideration had an
implied value of $50.19 per share of Wyeths common stock
based upon the closing price of Pfizers common stock on
January 23, 2009, the last trading day prior to
announcement of the proposed merger, and that based on such
value, an all-stock transaction using Pfizers closing
stock price on January 23, 2009 would have resulted in an
exchange ratio of 2.876 shares of Pfizers common
stock for each share of Wyeths common stock. Morgan
Stanley compared this exchange ratio to the closing price of
Wyeths common stock relative to Pfizers common stock
over varying periods of time and calculated the implied premium
for each such period. The following table summarizes Morgan
Stanleys analysis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
Implied
|
Time Period
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Premium
|
|
3 calendar months
|
|
|
2.068
|
x
|
|
|
39.1
|
%
|
6 calendar months
|
|
|
2.126
|
x
|
|
|
35.3
|
%
|
1 calendar year
|
|
|
2.140
|
x
|
|
|
34.4
|
%
|
2 calendar years
|
|
|
2.074
|
x
|
|
|
38.7
|
%
|
3 calendar years
|
|
|
2.010
|
x
|
|
|
43.1
|
%
|
Analysis
of Precedent Transactions
Morgan Stanley performed a precedent transactions analysis,
which is designed to imply a value of a company based on
publicly available financial terms and premia of selected
transactions that share some characteristics with the merger.
Morgan Stanley compared the premia paid in all 22 transactions
from December 2, 1998 through July 18, 2008 of which
it was aware in which the aggregate value of the transaction
75
was at least $5 billion and the target company was a
publicly traded pharmaceutical company. It was Morgan
Stanleys judgment that public transactions of this size
were most relevant, for comparative purposes, to the proposed
acquisition of Wyeth by Pfizer.
These transactions are listed below:
|
|
|
|
|
Announcement Date
|
|
Acquiror
|
|
Target
|
|
November 4, 1999
|
|
Pfizer Inc.
|
|
Warner-Lambert Company
|
January 17, 2000
|
|
Glaxo Wellcome PLC
|
|
SmithKline Beecham PLC
|
January 26, 2004
|
|
Sanofi-Synthélabo S.A.
|
|
Aventis S.A.
|
July 15, 2002
|
|
Pfizer Inc.
|
|
Pharmacia Corp.
|
December 9, 1998
|
|
Zeneca Group P.L.C.
|
|
Astra A.B.
|
December 20, 1999
|
|
Monsanto Co.
|
|
Pharmacia & Upjohn Inc.
|
March 23, 2006
|
|
Bayer AG
|
|
Schering AG
|
December 17, 2001
|
|
Amgen Inc.
|
|
Immunex Corp.
|
April 23, 2007
|
|
AstraZeneca PLC
|
|
MedImmune, Inc.
|
December 2, 1998
|
|
Sanofi S.A.
|
|
Synthélabo S.A.
|
March 27, 2001
|
|
Johnson & Johnson
|
|
ALZA Corporation
|
October 10, 2003
|
|
General Electric Company
|
|
Amersham plc
|
July 18, 2008
|
|
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
|
|
Barr Pharmaceutical, Inc.
|
July 25, 2005
|
|
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
|
|
IVAX Corporation
|
April 10, 2008
|
|
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
|
|
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
February 24, 2004
|
|
Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co.
|
|
Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
|
September 1, 2005
|
|
Novartis International AG
|
|
Chiron Corporation
|
June 12, 2008
|
|
Invitrogen Corporation
|
|
Applied Biosystems, Inc.
|
February 25, 2005
|
|
Sankyo Co., Ltd.
|
|
Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
|
June 20, 2003
|
|
IDEC Pharmaceuticals Corporation
|
|
Biogen, Inc.
|
May 20, 2007
|
|
Hologic, Inc.
|
|
Cytyc Corporation
|
July 7, 2008
|
|
Fresenius SE
|
|
APP Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
The following table summarizes Morgan Stanleys findings
with respect to the premia paid for these transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium to Prior Price
|
|
|
1-Day Prior to
|
|
1-Week Prior to
|
|
4-Weeks Prior to
|
Precedent Transactions Premia
|
|
Announcement
|
|
Announcement
|
|
Announcement
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
25.1
|
%
|
|
|
26.2
|
%
|
|
|
29.9
|
%
|
Median
|
|
|
23.5
|
%
|
|
|
26.5
|
%
|
|
|
27.7
|
%
|
High
|
|
|
52.9
|
%
|
|
|
59.0
|
%
|
|
|
78.1
|
%
|
Low
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)%
|
From its analysis of each precedent transaction, Morgan Stanley
also calculated that the premia paid as a percentage of the
targets unaffected, one-month average,
three-month average and six-month average stock price ranged
from 25% to 45%. Based on this range of premia and the
unaffected as of January 15, 2009, one-month average,
three-month average and six-month average prices of Wyeths
common stock as of January 15, 2009, this analysis implied
a range for Wyeths common stock of approximately $48 to
$56 per share, $47 to $54 per share, $44 to $51 per share and
$47 to $55 per share, respectively.
Morgan Stanley did not compare the proposed merger to these
precedent transactions based on the implied P/E multiple (which
is defined below under Comparable Companies
Analysis) of each transaction because, in Morgan
Stanleys judgment, the significant volatility in public
trading multiples of large
76
capitalization pharmaceutical companies during the period from
1998 through January 2009 made such comparison uninstructive.
No company or transaction utilized in the precedent transaction
analyses is identical to Wyeth, Pfizer or the merger. In
evaluating the precedent transactions, Morgan Stanley made
judgments and assumptions with regard to general business,
market and financial conditions and other matters, which are
beyond the control of Wyeth and Pfizer, such as the impact of
competition on the business of Wyeth, Pfizer or the industry
generally, industry growth and the absence of any adverse
material change in the financial condition of Wyeth, Pfizer or
the industry or in the financial markets in general, which could
affect the public trading value of the companies and the
aggregate value of the transactions to which they are being
compared.
Comparable
Company Analysis
Morgan Stanley performed a comparable company analysis, which
attempts to provide an implied value of a company by comparing
it to similar companies. Morgan Stanley compared selected
financial information for Wyeth with publicly available
information for comparable healthcare companies that shared
similar characteristics with Wyeth. Morgan Stanley considered
various factors such as their global presence, market
capitalization, business mix, product mix, product pipeline and
product development activities in selecting the companies used
in its analysis. The companies used in this comparison included
those companies listed below:
U.S
Pharmaceutical Companies:
|
|
|
|
|
Abbott Laboratories
|
|
|
|
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
|
|
|
|
Eli Lilly and Company
|
|
|
|
Johnson & Johnson
|
|
|
|
Merck & Co., Inc.
|
|
|
|
Pfizer Inc.
|
|
|
|
Schering-Plough Corporation
|
|
|
|
Amgen, Inc.
|
European
Pharmaceutical Companies:
|
|
|
|
|
AstraZeneca PLC
|
|
|
|
GlaxoSmithKline plc
|
|
|
|
Novartis AG
|
|
|
|
Roche Holding Ltd.
|
|
|
|
sanofi-aventis
|
Based upon Institutional Broker Estimate System
(IBES), consensus estimates for calendar year 2009
earnings per share (EPS) and long-term growth rate
of EPS, and using the closing prices as of January 23, 2009
for shares of the comparable companies, Morgan Stanley
calculated the following ratios for each of these companies:
|
|
|
|
|
the closing stock price divided by the estimated IBES consensus
EPS for calendar year 2009, referred to below as the P/E
multiple; and
|
|
|
|
the P/E multiple divided by the estimated IBES consensus
long-term growth rate of EPS, referred to below as the
P/E/G ratio.
|
77
Based on the analysis of the relevant metrics for each of the
comparable companies, Morgan Stanley calculated (i) that
the mean P/E multiple was 10.7x and the mean P/E/G ratio was
1.8x and (ii) that Wyeths P/E multiple as of
January 15, 2009, was 10.4x and its P/E/G ratio was 5.2x.
Based on the relevant financial statistic(s) as provided by
Wyeth management and publicly available information, Morgan
Stanley calculated that the price offered by Pfizer for each
share of Wyeths common stock constituted an implied
transaction P/E multiple of 13.6x and this represented an
approximately 31% premium to Wyeths P/E multiple as of
January 15, 2009.
No company included in the comparable company analysis is
identical to Wyeth. In evaluating the comparable companies,
Morgan Stanley made judgments and assumptions with regard to
industry performance, general business, economic, market and
financial conditions and other matters. Many of these matters
are beyond the control of Wyeth, such as the impact of
competition on the business of Wyeth and the industry in
general, industry growth and the absence of any material adverse
change in the financial condition and prospects of Wyeth or the
industry or in the financial markets in general. Mathematical
analysis, such as determining the arithmetic mean or median, or
the high or low, is not in itself a meaningful method of using
comparable company data.
Equity
Research Analyst Price Targets Analysis
Morgan Stanley reviewed and analyzed future public market
trading price targets for Wyeths common stock and
Pfizers common stock prepared and published by equity
research analysts. These targets reflect each analysts
estimate of the future public market trading price of
Wyeths common stock and Pfizers common stock. Morgan
Stanley noted that the range of equity analyst price targets of
Wyeths common stock was between approximately $33 and $48
per share. Morgan Stanley further calculated that using a cost
of equity of 8.5% and a discount period of one year, the present
value of the equity analyst price target range for Wyeths
common stock was approximately $30 to $44 per share, with a mean
target price of $40.82 and a median target price of $40.00.
Morgan Stanley noted that the merger consideration had an
implied value of $50.19 per share of Wyeths common stock
based upon $17.45 per share of Pfizer common stock, the closing
price of Pfizers common stock on January 23, 2009,
the last trading day prior to announcement of the proposed
merger.
Morgan Stanley also noted that the range of equity analyst price
targets of Pfizers common stock was between approximately
$16 and $30 per share, with a mean target price of $20.13 and a
median target price of $19.00. Morgan Stanley further calculated
that using a cost of equity of 8.5% and a discount period of one
year to 2.5 years, the present value of the equity analyst
price target range for Pfizers common stock was
approximately $15 to $24 per share.
In each case above, the cost of equity was calculated using the
capital asset pricing model, which is a theoretical financial
model that estimates the cost of equity capital based on a
companys beta which is a measure of a
companys volatility relative to the overall market, a 6%
market risk premium and a relevant predicted beta and risk-free
rate. The public market trading price targets published by
securities research analysts do not necessarily reflect current
market trading prices for Wyeths and Pfizers common
stock and these estimates are subject to uncertainties,
including the future financial performance of Wyeth and Pfizer
and future financial market conditions.
Discounted
Equity Value Analysis
Morgan Stanley performed a discounted equity value analysis,
which is designed to provide insight into the future price of a
companys common equity as a function of the companys
future earnings and its current forward price to earnings
multiples. Morgan Stanley calculated ranges of implied equity
values per share for Wyeth, based on discounted equity values
that were based on estimated 2012 net income utilizing Wall
Street analyst estimates compiled by Thomson First Call and the
Wyeth management projections described above. The 2012 net
income estimates were used by Morgan Stanley because that is the
last year for which both Wyeth projections and Wall Street
analyst estimates were available. In arriving at the estimated
equity values per share of Wyeths common stock, Morgan
Stanley applied a 9.0x to 11.0x next twelve-month P/E multiple
78
range to Wyeths expected 2012 net income and
discounted those values to present value at an assumed 7.5% to
9.5% cost of equity. Morgan Stanley selected a 9.0x to 11.0x
next twelve-month P/E multiple based on the next twelve-month
P/E multiples of other healthcare companies that Morgan Stanley
viewed as sharing similar characteristics with Wyeth. Morgan
Stanley selected a 7.5% to 9.5% cost of equity range using the
capital asset pricing model, as described above. Morgan Stanley
then added the present value of the dividends paid on
Wyeths common stock over the period beginning on
January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2012. The present
value of these dividends was calculated using a 7.5% to 9.5%
cost of equity. Based on the calculations set forth above, this
analysis implied a range for Wyeths common stock of
approximately $31 to $39 per share, based on Wall Street analyst
estimates, approximately $30 to $38 per share, based on the
Wyeth management base case projections, approximately $33 to $42
per share, based on the Wyeth management upside case
projections, and approximately $26 to $32 per share, based on
the Wyeth management downside case projections. Morgan Stanley
noted that the merger consideration had an implied value of
$50.19 per share of Wyeths common stock based upon the
closing price of Pfizers common stock on January 23,
2009, the last trading day prior to announcement of the proposed
merger.
Morgan Stanley also calculated ranges of implied equity values
per share for Pfizer, based on discounted equity values that
were based on estimated 2012 net income utilizing Wall
Street analyst estimates compiled by Thomson First Call and the
Pfizer management projections described above. In arriving at
the estimated equity values per share of Pfizers common
stock, Morgan Stanley applied a 8.0x to 10.0x next twelve months
P/E multiple range to Pfizers expected 2012 net
income and discounted those values to present value at an
assumed 7.5% to 9.5% cost of equity. Morgan Stanley selected a
8.0x to 10.0x next twelve month P/E multiple based on the next
twelve month P/E multiples of other healthcare companies that
Morgan Stanley viewed as sharing similar characteristics with
Pfizer. Morgan Stanley selected a 7.5% to 9.5% cost of equity
range using the capital asset pricing model, as described above.
Morgan Stanley then added the present value of the dividends
paid on Pfizers common stock over the period beginning on
January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2012. The present
value of these dividends was calculated using a 7.5% to 9.5%
cost of equity. Based on the calculations set forth above, this
analysis implied a range for Pfizers common stock of
approximately $15 to $19 per share, based on Wall Street analyst
estimates and approximately $17 to $21 per share, based on the
Pfizer management projections. Morgan Stanley noted that the
closing stock price of Pfizer common stock on January 23,
2009, the last trading day before the announcement of the
merger, was $17.45.
Leveraged
Recapitalization Analysis
Morgan Stanley performed a leveraged recapitalization analysis
to determine the potential value of Wyeth common stock following
a substantial repurchase of Wyeths shares. Morgan Stanley
calculated ranges of implied equity values per share for Wyeth,
based on estimated 2012 net income utilizing Wall Street
analyst estimates compiled by Thomson First Call and the Wyeth
management projections described above assuming a hypothetical
leveraged recapitalization of Wyeth in which Wyeth repurchased
$10 billion of its common stock in 2009. In connection with
this analysis, Morgan Stanley assumed a purchase of shares at a
10% premium to the January 23, 2009 closing price of Wyeth
common stock, a 7.5% to 9.5% cost of equity, a 7.5% cost of
debt, and a 9.0x to 11.0x next twelve months P/E multiple.
Morgan Stanley selected a 7.5% to 9.5% cost of equity range
using the capital asset pricing model, as described above.
Morgan Stanley calculated Wyeths cost of debt based on the
trading price of Wyeths bonds at the time Morgan Stanley
prepared its analysis. Morgan Stanley compared Wyeths P/E
multiple with those of other healthcare companies that Morgan
Stanley viewed as sharing similar characteristics with Wyeth to
calculate the P/E multiple range used in its analysis. Based on
the calculations set forth above, this analysis implied a range
for Wyeths common stock of approximately $34 to $42 per
share, based on Wall Street analyst estimates, approximately $34
to $42 per share, based on the Wyeth management base case
projections, approximately $37 to $46 per share, based on the
Wyeth management upside case projections, and approximately $28
to $36 per share, based on the Wyeth management downside case
projections. Morgan Stanley noted that the merger consideration
had an implied value of $50.19 per share of Wyeths common
stock based upon the closing price of Pfizers common stock
on January 23, 2009, the last trading day prior to
announcement of the proposed merger.
79
Sum of
the Parts Analysis
Morgan Stanley performed a sum of the parts analysis, which is
designed to imply a value of a company based on the separate
valuation of the companys business segments. Morgan
Stanley calculated ranges of implied equity values per share for
Wyeth, assuming a hypothetical disposition of Wyeths
Nutrition, Consumer and Animal Health divisions. Morgan Stanley
valued Wyeths divisions using multiple ranges derived from
comparable precedent transactions. Morgan Stanley used a 3.5x to
4.5x multiple of aggregate value to estimated 2008 revenue for
Wyeths Nutrition and Consumer divisions, and 11.0x to
13.0x multiple of aggregate value to estimated 2009 EBITDA for
the Animal Health division. EBITDA means earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and other
(income) expense, net. Morgan Stanley selected the multiple
ranges that it used in valuing each of Wyeths Nutrition,
Consumer and Animal Health divisions based on Morgan
Stanleys review of information available to it about
precedent comparable transactions in each of these industry
segments. The Pharmaceutical division was valued at a public
market trading multiple range of 9.0x to 11.0x estimated 2009
P/E multiple. Based on the multiple ranges described above, and
including the net present value of the step-up in the tax basis
of the assets which would result from such a theoretical
transaction, this analysis implied a range for Wyeths
common stock of approximately $33 to $40 per share. Morgan
Stanley noted that the merger consideration had an implied value
of $50.19 per share of Wyeths common stock based upon the
closing price of Pfizers common stock on January 23,
2009, the last trading day prior to announcement of the proposed
merger.
Discounted
Cash Flow Analysis
Morgan Stanley performed a discounted cash flow analysis, which
is designed to imply a value of a company by calculating the
present value of estimated future cash flows of the company.
Morgan Stanley calculated ranges of implied equity values per
share for Wyeth, based on discounted cash flow analyses
utilizing Wall Street analyst estimates compiled by Thomson
First Call and Wyeth management projections for the calendar
years 2009 through 2013. In arriving at the estimated equity
values per share of Wyeths common stock, Morgan Stanley
calculated a terminal value by applying a range of perpetual
free cash flow growth rates ranging from (0.5)% to 0.5%. Such
rate range was derived, based on Morgan Stanleys judgment,
after considering a number of factors, including growth of the
overall economy, projected earnings expectations for comparable
pharmaceutical companies and Wyeths upcoming patent
expiration profile. Morgan Stanley observed that this range
implied P/E multiples for Wyeth that were consistent with the
P/E multiples of the comparable companies studied by Morgan
Stanley and identified above under Comparable
Companies Analysis. The unlevered free cash flows and the
terminal value were then discounted to present values using a
range of weighted average cost of capital from 7.0% to 9.0%.
Morgan Stanley selected this range using the capital asset
pricing model. The weighted average cost of capital is a measure
of the average expected return on all of a given companys
equity securities and debt based on their proportions in such
companys capital structure. Based on the calculations set
forth above, this analysis implied a range for Wyeths
common stock of approximately $40 to $55 per share, based on
Wall Street analyst estimates, approximately $43 to $60 per
share, based on the Wyeth management base case projections, $47
to $64 per share, based on the Wyeth management upside case
projections, and approximately $36 to $49 per share, based on
the Wyeth management downside case projections. Morgan Stanley
noted that the merger consideration had an implied value of
$50.19 per share of Wyeths common stock based upon the
closing price of Pfizers common stock on January 23,
2009, the last trading day prior to announcement of the proposed
merger.
Morgan Stanley also calculated ranges of implied equity values
per share for Pfizer, based on discounted cash flow analyses
using Wall Street analyst estimates compiled by Thomson First
Call and Pfizer management projections for the calendar years
2009 through 2013. In arriving at the estimated equity values
per share of Pfizers common stock, Morgan Stanley
calculated a terminal value by applying a range of perpetual
free cash flow rates ranging from (4.0%) to (2.0%). Such rate
range was derived, based on Morgan Stanleys judgment,
after considering a number of factors, including growth of the
overall economy, projected earnings expectations for comparable
pharmaceutical companies and Pfizers upcoming patent
expiration profile. The unlevered free cash flows and the
terminal value were then discounted to present values using a
range of weighted average cost of capital from 7.0% to 9.0%.
Morgan Stanley selected this range using the capital asset
pricing model. Based on the calculations set forth above, this
analysis implied a range for Pfizers
80
common stock of approximately $21 to $27, based on Wall Street
analyst estimates, and $23 to $29 per share, based on the Pfizer
management projections. Morgan Stanley noted that the closing
stock price of Pfizer common stock on January 23, 2009, the
last day before the announcement of the merger, was $17.45.
Synergies
Valuation
Morgan Stanley also analyzed the premium paid by Pfizer as
compared to the total value of the $4 billion in expected
annual, run-rate, pre-tax synergies. The total value of the
synergies was calculated using four benchmark methodologies.
First, Morgan Stanley capitalized the $4 billion in annual
synergies at both Pfizers and Wyeths 2009 P/E
multiples, and at the blended 2009 P/E multiple. The blended
2009 P/E multiple combines Pfizers and Wyeths
respective 2009 P/E multiples based on their respective
contributions to the combined companys after-tax earnings
before interest and taxes. Morgan Stanley also calculated the
discounted cash flow value of the synergies assuming an 8%
weighted average cost of capital; a 7.0x exit multiple applied
to 2012 after-tax earnings before interest and taxes of the
combined company; costs to achieve synergies of $1.25 per $1.00
of synergies spread over the first two full years after the
effective date; and a gradual phase-in of the $4 billion in
annual synergies over the projected period on the following
schedule: 15% in calendar year 2009; 67.5% in calendar year
2010; 92.5% in calendar year 2011; and full synergies
thereafter. These four benchmarks for the total value of the
synergies were then compared to the $16.3 billion
total-dollar implied premium of the transaction based on
Wyeths stock price as of January 15, 2009. The
results of this analysis are outlined below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009E P/E Multiple
|
|
|
|
|
Pfizer
|
|
Blended
|
|
Wyeth
|
|
DCF
|
Valuation Basis
|
|
(7.0x)
|
|
(7.8x)
|
|
(10.4x)
|
|
Value
|
|
|
(In billions of dollars)
|
|
Total Value of Synergies
|
|
$
|
19.6
|
|
|
$
|
22.7
|
|
|
$
|
32.5
|
|
|
$
|
20.6
|
|
Premium Paid as a Percentage of Total Value of Synergies
|
|
|
83.0
|
%
|
|
|
71.8
|
%
|
|
|
50.0
|
%
|
|
|
79.0
|
%
|
Pro
Forma Accretion/Dilution Analysis
Based on financial information provided by the management of
Pfizer and Wyeth and other publicly available information,
Morgan Stanley calculated the accretion/dilution of the earnings
per share of Pfizers common stock as a result of the
merger for each of the years ended December 31, 2009
through December 31, 2012 by comparing the projected EPS of
the pro forma entity and Pfizer as a standalone entity for each
year. This calculation assumed merger consideration of $33.00
per share in cash and 0.985 of a share of Pfizer common stock at
a share price of $17.45 as of January 23, 2009 and a pro
forma effective tax rate of 30%, among other assumptions. This
analysis indicated that the merger would be dilutive to
Pfizers calendar year 2009 estimated EPS and accretive to
Pfizers calendar years 2010, 2011 and 2012 estimated EPS.
Pro
Forma Trading Analysis
Morgan Stanley performed a sensitivity analysis for the purpose
of illustrating the potential effect of the combined company
achieving certain potential synergies in 2010 on the value of
the merger consideration (assuming merger consideration of
$33.00 in cash and 0.985 of a share of Pfizer common stock per
share of Wyeths common stock). For purposes of this
analysis, Morgan Stanley reviewed a range of pro forma 2009
P/E trading
multiples, including Pfizers 2009 P/E multiple of 7.0x, a
blended 2009 P/E multiple of 7.8x based on after-tax earnings
before interest and taxes of the combined company and
Wyeths 2009 P/E multiple, each of which was based on Wall
Street analyst consensus estimates for each of Wyeths and
Pfizers 2009 earnings, as compiled by Thomson First Call.
Using an 8.5% discount rate (i.e., the midpoint in the 7.5% to
9.5% range of Wyeths cost of equity used by Morgan Stanley
for its other analyses), Morgan Stanley then calculated the
current value of the merger consideration (assuming merger
consideration of $33.00 in cash and 0.985 of a share of
Pfizer common stock per share of Wyeths common stock),
based on the combined Pfizer management and Wyeth base case
management projections of estimated 2009 earnings, on the one
hand, and Wall Street analyst consensus estimates of 2009
earnings for each of Wyeth and Pfizer, on the other hand. In
each such case, for purposes of this analysis, Morgan Stanley
assumed a 7.5% cost of debt and that Pfizer would discontinue
its share repurchase program. Morgan Stanley then calculated
that the current value of the merger consideration would be
$49.67 per share of Wyeths common stock assuming
Pfizers 2009 P/E
81
multiple of 7.0x, $51.58 per share of Wyeths common stock
assuming a blended 2009 P/E multiple of 7.8x and $57.68 per
share of Wyeths common stock assuming Wyeths 2009
P/E multiple of 10.4x, based on the combined Pfizer and Wyeth
base case management projections. Morgan Stanley also calculated
that the current value of the merger consideration would be
$49.29 per share of Wyeths common stock assuming
Pfizers 2009 P/E multiple of 7.0x, $51.15 per share of
Wyeths common stock assuming a blended 2009 P/E multiple
of 7.8x and $57.11 per share of Wyeths common stock
assuming Wyeths 2009 P/E multiple of 10.4x, based on
consensus Wall Street analyst estimates. Both of these analyses
assumed that the combined company was able to achieve 67.5% of
$4.0 billion of pre-tax synergies in 2010, excluding costs
to achieve such synergies. Morgan Stanley then calculated that
the current value of the merger consideration would be $52.37
per share of Wyeths common stock based on the blended 2009
P/E multiple of 7.8x and based on the combined Pfizer and Wyeth
base case management projections, and $51.96 per share of
Wyeths common stock based on the blended 2009 P/E multiple
of 7.8x and based on Wall Street analyst consensus estimates, if
the combined company were able to achieve 100% of
$4.0 billion of pre-tax synergies in 2010, excluding costs
to achieve such synergies.
General
In connection with the review of the merger by the Wyeth board
of directors, Morgan Stanley performed a variety of financial
and comparative analyses for purposes of rendering its opinion.
The preparation of a financial opinion is a complex process and
is not necessarily susceptible to a partial analysis or summary
description. In arriving at its opinion, Morgan Stanley
considered the results of all of its analyses as a whole and did
not attribute any particular weight to any analysis or factor it
considered. Morgan Stanley believes that selecting any portion
of its analyses, without considering all analyses as a whole,
would create an incomplete view of the process underlying its
analyses and opinion. In addition, Morgan Stanley may have given
various analyses and factors more or less weight than other
analyses and factors, and may have deemed various assumptions
more or less probable than other assumptions. As a result, the
ranges of valuations resulting from any particular analysis
described above should not be taken to be Morgan Stanleys
view of the actual value of Wyeth or Pfizer. In performing its
analyses, Morgan Stanley made numerous assumptions with respect
to industry performance, general business and economic
conditions and other matters. Many of these assumptions are
beyond the control of Wyeth and Pfizer. Any estimates contained
in Morgan Stanleys analyses are not necessarily indicative
of future results or actual values, which may be significantly
more or less favorable than those suggested by such estimates.
Morgan Stanley conducted the analyses described above solely as
part of its analysis of the fairness of the merger consideration
pursuant to the merger agreement from a financial point of view
to holders of shares of Wyeths common stock and in
connection with the delivery of its opinion to the Wyeth board
of directors. These analyses do not purport to be appraisals or
to reflect the prices at which shares of common stock of Wyeth
might actually trade.
Morgan Stanleys opinion and its presentation to the Wyeth
board of directors was one of many factors taken into
consideration by the Wyeth board of directors in deciding to
approve, adopt and authorize the merger agreement. Consequently,
the analyses as described above should not be viewed as
determinative of the opinion of the Wyeth board of directors
with respect to the merger consideration or of whether the Wyeth
board of directors would have been willing to agree to a
different merger consideration. The merger consideration was
determined through arms-length negotiations between Wyeth
and Pfizer and was approved by the Wyeth board of directors.
Morgan Stanley provided advice to Wyeth during these
negotiations. Morgan Stanley did not, however, recommend any
specific merger consideration to Wyeth or that any specific
merger consideration constituted the only appropriate merger
consideration for the merger.
Morgan Stanleys opinion was approved by a committee of
Morgan Stanley investment banking and other professionals in
accordance with its customary practice.
Morgan Stanley is a global financial services firm engaged in
the securities, investment management and individual wealth
management business. Its securities business is engaged in
securities underwriting, trading and brokerage activities,
foreign exchange, commodities and derivatives trading, prime
brokerage, as well as
82
providing investment banking, financing and financial advisory
services. Morgan Stanley, its affiliates, directors and officers
may at any time invest on a principal basis or manage funds that
invest, hold long or short positions, finance positions, and may
trade or otherwise structure and effect transactions, for their
own account or the accounts of its customers, in debt or equity
securities or loans of Pfizer, Wyeth, or any other company, or
any currency or commodity, that may be involved in this
transaction, or any related derivative instrument. During the
two-year period prior to the date of Morgan Stanleys
opinion, Morgan Stanley provided financial advisory and
financing services unrelated to the merger to each of Wyeth and
Pfizer for which Morgan Stanley was compensated.
Under the terms of its engagement letter, Morgan Stanley
provided Wyeth with financial advisory services in connection
with the merger for which it will be paid a fee of
$65 million, a portion of which became payable at or prior
to the time of public announcement of the merger and $50 million
of which is contingent upon completion of the merger. In
addition, Wyeth may pay to Morgan Stanley a discretionary fee if
Wyeth so determines in its sole discretion. Wyeth has also
agreed to reimburse Morgan Stanley for its expenses incurred in
performing its services. In addition, Wyeth has agreed to
indemnify Morgan Stanley and its affiliates, their respective
directors, officers, agents and employees and each person, if
any, controlling Morgan Stanley or any of its affiliates against
certain liabilities and expenses, including certain liabilities
under the federal securities laws, related to or arising out of
Morgan Stanleys engagement.
Opinion of Evercore Group L.L.C. On
January 25, 2009, at a meeting of the Wyeth board of
directors, Evercore delivered to the Wyeth board of directors an
oral opinion, which opinion was confirmed by delivery of a
written opinion dated January 25, 2009, to the effect that,
as of that date and based on and subject to assumptions made,
matters considered and limitations on the scope of review
undertaken by Evercore as set forth therein, the merger
consideration to be received by holders of Wyeth common stock
was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders.
The full text of Evercores written opinion, dated
January 25, 2009, which sets forth, among other things, the
procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and
limitations on the scope of review undertaken in rendering its
opinion, is attached as Annex C to this proxy
statement/prospectus and is incorporated by reference in its
entirety into this proxy statement/prospectus. Evercores
opinion was directed to the Wyeth board of directors and
addresses only the fairness, from a financial point of view, of
the merger consideration. The opinion does not address any other
aspect of the proposed merger and does not constitute a
recommendation to any stockholder as to how such stockholder
should vote or act with respect to any matters relating to the
merger. Evercores opinion does not address the relative
merits of the merger as compared to other business or financial
strategies that might be available to Wyeth, nor does it address
the underlying business decision of Wyeth to engage in the
merger.
In connection with rendering its opinion, Evercore, among other
things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available business and financial
information relating to Wyeth and Pfizer that Evercore deemed to
be relevant, including publicly available research
analysts estimates;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain non-public historical financial statements and
other non-public historical financial and operating data
relating to Wyeth and Pfizer prepared and furnished to Evercore
by the respective managements of Wyeth and Pfizer;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain non-public projected financial data relating to
Wyeth under alternative business assumptions prepared and
furnished to Evercore by Wyeths management;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain non-public projected financial data relating to
Pfizer prepared and furnished to Evercore by Pfizers
management;
|
|
|
|
discussed the past and current operations, financial projections
and current financial condition of Wyeth and Pfizer with the
managements of Wyeth and Pfizer;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the reported prices and the historical trading activity
of Wyeth common stock and Pfizer common stock;
|
|
|
|
compared the financial performance of Wyeth and Pfizer and their
respective stock market trading multiples with those of certain
other publicly traded companies that Evercore deemed relevant;
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed Wyeths financial performance and compared the
valuation multiples for Wyeth implied in the merger with those
of certain other transactions that Evercore deemed relevant;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the amount and timing of the integration costs and cost
savings estimated by the managements of Wyeth and Pfizer to
result from the merger, referred to collectively as the
synergies;
|
|
|
|
considered the potential pro forma financial impact of the
merger on Pfizer based on projected financial data relating to
Wyeth and Pfizer prepared and furnished to Evercore by the
respective managements of Wyeth and Pfizer and other assumptions
provided by Wyeths management;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
performed such other analyses and examinations and considered
such other factors that Evercore deemed appropriate.
|
For purposes of its analysis and opinion, Evercore assumed and
relied upon, without undertaking any independent verification
of, the accuracy and completeness of all of the information
publicly available, and all of the information supplied or
otherwise made available to, discussed with, or reviewed by
Evercore, and Evercore assumed no liability for such
information. With respect to the projected financial data
relating to Wyeth and Pfizer referred to above and the
synergies, Evercore assumed that they were reasonably prepared
on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and
good faith judgments of managements of Wyeth and Pfizer as to
the future financial performance of Wyeth under the alternative
business assumptions reflected therein, the future financial
performance of Pfizer and such synergies. Evercore expressed no
view as to any projected financial data relating to Wyeth or
Pfizer, the synergies or the assumptions on which they were
based. Evercore relied, at Wyeths direction, without
independent verification, upon the assessments of the
managements of Wyeth and Pfizer as to (i) the products and
product candidates of Wyeth and Pfizer and the risks associated
with such products and product candidates (including, without
limitation, the potential impact of drug competition and the
probability of successful testing, development and marketing,
and approval by appropriate governmental authorities, of such
products and product candidates) and (ii) Pfizers
ability to integrate the businesses of Wyeth and Pfizer.
For purposes of rendering its opinion, Evercore assumed, in all
respects material to its analysis, that the representations and
warranties of each party contained in the merger agreement were
true and correct, that each party would perform all of the
covenants and agreements required to be performed by it under
the merger agreement and that the merger would be consummated in
accordance with the terms set forth in the merger agreement
without material modification, waiver or delay. Evercore also
assumed that all governmental, regulatory or other consents,
approvals or releases necessary for the consummation of the
merger would be obtained without any material delay, limitation,
restriction or condition that would have an adverse effect on
Wyeth or the consummation of the merger or materially reduce the
benefits of the merger to the holders of Wyeth common stock.
Evercore did not make or assume any responsibility for making
any independent valuation or appraisal of the assets or
liabilities, contingent or otherwise, of Wyeth or Pfizer and was
not furnished with any such valuations or appraisals, nor did
Evercore evaluate the solvency or fair value of Wyeth or Pfizer
under any state or federal laws relating to bankruptcy,
insolvency or similar matters. Evercores opinion was
necessarily based upon information made available to Evercore as
of the date of its opinion and financial, economic, market and
other conditions as they existed and could be evaluated on the
date of its opinion. Subsequent developments may affect
Evercores opinion and Evercore does not have any
obligation to update, revise or reaffirm its opinion.
Evercore was not asked to pass upon, and expressed no opinion
with respect to, any matter other than the fairness to the
holders of Wyeth common stock, from a financial point of view,
of the merger consideration. Evercore did not express any view
on, and its opinion did not address, the fairness of the
proposed merger to, or any consideration received in connection
with the merger by, the holders of any other securities,
creditors or other constituencies of Wyeth or Pfizer, nor as to
the fairness of the amount or nature of any compensation to be
paid or payable to any of the officers, directors or employees
of Wyeth or Pfizer, or any class of such persons, whether
relative to the merger consideration or otherwise. In connection
with Evercores engagement, Evercore was not authorized to,
and it did not, solicit third party indications of interest with
respect to the
84
acquisition of any or all shares of Wyeth common stock or any
business combination or other extraordinary corporate
transaction involving Wyeth. Evercore expressed no opinion as to
the price at which shares of Wyeth common stock or shares of
Pfizer common stock would trade at any time. Evercore is not a
legal, regulatory, accounting or tax expert and assumed the
accuracy and completeness of assessments by Wyeth and its
advisors with respect to legal, regulatory, accounting and tax
matters. The issuance of Evercores opinion was approved by
an opinion committee of Evercore.
Except as described above, Wyeth imposed no other instructions
or limitations on Evercore with respect to the investigations
made or the procedures followed by Evercore in rendering its
opinion. Evercores opinion was only one of many factors
considered by the Wyeth board of directors in its evaluation of
the merger and should not be viewed as determinative of the
views of the Wyeth board of directors or management with respect
to the merger or the merger consideration.
Set forth below is a summary of the material financial analyses
reviewed by Evercore with the Wyeth board of directors on
January 25, 2009 in connection with rendering its opinion.
The following summary, however, does not purport to be a
complete description of the analyses performed by Evercore. The
order of the analyses described and the results of these
analyses do not represent relative importance or weight given to
these analyses by Evercore. Except as otherwise noted, the
following quantitative information, to the extent that it is
based on market data, is based on market data as it existed on
or before January 23, 2009 (the last trading day prior to
public announcement of the merger), and is not necessarily
indicative of current market conditions.
The following summary of financial analyses includes
information presented in tabular format. These tables must be
read together with the text of each summary in order to
understand fully the financial analyses. The tables alone do not
constitute a complete description of the financial analyses.
Considering the tables below without considering the full
narrative description of the financial analyses, including the
methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could
create a misleading or incomplete view of Evercores
financial analyses. For purposes of the analyses summarized
below relating to Wyeth, the implied per share merger
consideration refers to the $50.19 implied per share value
of the merger consideration reflecting the cash portion of the
consideration of $33.00 and the implied value of the stock
portion of the consideration of 0.985 of a share of Pfizer
common stock based on the closing price of Pfizer common stock
on January 23, 2009. In connection with certain of its
analyses relating to Wyeth, Evercore utilized financial
forecasts prepared by Wyeths management referred to above
under Opinions of Wyeths Financial
Advisors Opinion of Morgan Stanley as the
Wyeth management base case, the Wyeth management upside case and
the Wyeth management downside case. In addition, discount rates
utilized in the discounted illustrative future stock price
analyses and the discounted cash flow analyses for Wyeth and
Pfizer described below were determined taking into
consideration, among other things, a cost of equity calculation
(in the case of the discounted illustrative future stock price
analyses for Wyeth and Pfizer) and a weighted average cost of
capital calculation (in the case of the discounted cash flow
analyses for Wyeth and Pfizer), each of which is a commonly used
method for purposes of calculating discount rates in financial
analyses.
Wyeth
Financial Analyses
Historical Trading Prices; Implied Transaction Premiums and
Research Analyst Stock Price Targets. Evercore
reviewed the historical daily closing prices of Wyeth common
stock over the 52-week period ended on January 22, 2009
(the last trading day prior to press reports regarding the
proposed merger) and compared the following high and low daily
closing prices of Wyeth common stock for the one-month,
three-month and 52-week periods ended January 22, 2009 with
the implied per share merger consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical Closing Prices
|
|
|
|
|
of Wyeth Common Stock
|
|
Implied per Share
|
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
One-Month
|
|
$
|
36.09
|
|
|
$
|
39.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-Month
|
|
$
|
30.79
|
|
|
$
|
39.56
|
|
|
$
|
50.19
|
|
52-Week
|
|
$
|
29.89
|
|
|
$
|
49.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
Evercore also calculated the following premiums paid in the
merger based on the implied per share merger consideration
relative to closing prices of Wyeth common stock as set forth
below, including the average daily closing price of Wyeth common
stock for selected periods ended January 22, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical Closing Prices
|
|
Premium Based on Implied
|
|
|
of Wyeth Common Stock
|
|
per Share Merger Consideration
|
|
January 23, 2009
|
|
$
|
43.74
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
%
|
January 22, 2009
|
|
$
|
38.83
|
|
|
|
29.3
|
%
|
One-Week Average
|
|
$
|
38.75
|
|
|
|
29.5
|
%
|
One-Month Average
|
|
$
|
37.72
|
|
|
|
33.1
|
%
|
Three-Month Average
|
|
$
|
35.19
|
|
|
|
42.6
|
%
|
Six-Month Average
|
|
$
|
37.50
|
|
|
|
33.8
|
%
|
One-Year Average
|
|
$
|
40.56
|
|
|
|
23.8
|
%
|
52-Week High
|
|
$
|
49.48
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
52-Week Low
|
|
$
|
29.89
|
|
|
|
67.9
|
%
|
Three-Year Average
|
|
$
|
46.45
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
Evercore also reviewed publicly available research
analysts price targets for Wyeth common stock published in
research reports between October 17, 2008 and
January 22, 2009, which ranged from $33.00 to $48.00 per
share.
Selected Companies Trading Analysis. Evercore
performed a selected companies trading analysis of Wyeth in
order to derive implied per share equity reference ranges for
Wyeth based on the stock market trading multiples of other
publicly-traded companies in the pharmaceutical industry, which
is the industry in which Wyeth operates. In this analysis, using
publicly available information, Evercore compared the stock
market trading multiples of Wyeth and the following seven
publicly-traded U.S. and six publicly-traded
European companies in the pharmaceutical industry. These
companies were selected generally because they are
publicly-traded pharmaceutical companies primarily based in the
United States or the European Union which, like Wyeth, have
diversified branded product portfolios and market
capitalizations in excess of $30 billion:
|
|
|
U.S. Pharmaceutical Companies
|
|
European Pharmaceutical Companies
|
Abbott Laboratories
|
|
AstraZeneca PLC
|
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
|
|
Bayer AG
|
Eli Lilly and Company
|
|
GlaxoSmithKline plc
|
Johnson & Johnson
|
|
Novartis AG
|
Merck & Co., Inc.
|
|
Roche Holding Ltd.
|
Pfizer Inc.
|
|
sanofi-aventis
|
Schering-Plough Corporation
|
|
|
Evercore reviewed, among other things, enterprise values,
calculated as equity market value based on closing stock prices
on January 23, 2009, plus debt, preferred stock and
minority interests, less cash and cash equivalents, as a
multiple of calendar years 2009 and 2010 estimated earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, commonly
referred to as EBITDA, for the selected publicly-traded
companies. Evercore also reviewed closing stock prices on
January 23, 2009 as a multiple of calendar years 2009 and
2010 estimated earnings per share, commonly referred to as EPS,
for the selected publicly-traded companies. Multiples for the
selected publicly-traded companies were based on publicly
available filings and publicly available research analysts
consensus estimates. Evercore then applied ranges of selected
multiples derived from the selected publicly-traded companies
(which ranges of selected multiples were based primarily on
selected publicly-traded companies with product mixes and
historical and projected EBITDA and net income growth
trajectories similar to those of Wyeth) of 6.0x to 8.0x in the
case of calendar year 2009 EBITDA, 5.5x to 7.5x in the case of
calendar year 2010 EBITDA, 9.0x to 12.0x in the case of calendar
year 2009 EPS and 8.0x to 11.0x in the case of calendar year
2010 EPS to corresponding financial data of Wyeth based on the
86
Wyeth management base case. This analysis indicated the
following implied per share equity reference ranges for Wyeth,
as compared to the implied per share merger consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied per Share Equity
|
|
Implied per Share
|
|
|
Reference Ranges for Wyeth
|
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
2009E EBITDA
|
|
$
|
34.72 - $45.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010E EBITDA
|
|
$
|
32.77 - $43.87
|
|
|
$
|
50.19
|
|
2009E EPS
|
|
$
|
30.84 - $41.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010E EPS
|
|
$
|
26.42 - $36.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums Paid Analysis. Evercore performed a
premiums paid analysis of Wyeth in order to derive implied per
share equity reference ranges for Wyeth based on the premiums
paid in selected transactions. In this analysis, using publicly
available information, Evercore reviewed the premiums paid in
the 15 largest transactions (based on transaction value)
involving U.S. corporations that were announced between
January 1, 1998 and January 23, 2009, which
transactions, referred to as the selected U.S. M&A
transactions, are listed below:
|
|
|
|
|
Announced Year
|
|
Acquiror
|
|
Target
|
2006
|
|
AT&T Inc.
|
|
BellSouth Corporation
|
2005
|
|
The Procter & Gamble Company
|
|
The Gillette Company
|
2004
|
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
|
|
Bank One Corporation
|
2003
|
|
Bank of America Corporation
|
|
FleetBoston Financial Corporation
|
2002
|
|
Pfizer Inc.
|
|
Pharmacia Corporation
|
2000
|
|
America Online, Inc.
|
|
Time Warner Inc.
|
1999
|
|
Pfizer Inc.
|
|
Warner-Lambert Company
|
1999
|
|
Qwest Communications International Inc.
|
|
U S WEST, Inc.
|
1999
|
|
AT&T Corp.
|
|
MediaOne Group, Inc.
|
1998
|
|
Exxon Corporation
|
|
Mobil Corporation
|
1998
|
|
Bell Atlantic Corporation
|
|
GTE Corporation
|
1998
|
|
AT&T Corp.
|
|
Tele-Communications, Inc.
|
1998
|
|
SBC Communications Inc.
|
|
Ameritech Corporation
|
1998
|
|
NationsBank Corporation
|
|
BankAmerica Corporation
|
1998
|
|
Travelers Group Inc.
|
|
Citicorp
|
Evercore also reviewed the premiums paid in the following 15
transactions, referred to as the selected
pharmaceutical/biotechnology transactions, involving target
companies in the pharmaceutical/biotechnology industry that were
announced between January 1, 1994 and January 23,
2009. These transactions were selected because they involved
publicly-held target companies with large market capitalizations
in the pharmaceutical/biotechnology industry, which is the
industry in which Wyeth operates:
|
|
|
|
|
Announced Year
|
|
Acquiror
|
|
Target
|
2008
|
|
Roche Holding Ltd
|
|
Genentech, Inc.
|
2007
|
|
AstraZeneca PLC
|
|
MedImmune, Inc.
|
2006
|
|
Merck KGgA
|
|
Serono SA
|
2006
|
|
Bayer AG
|
|
Schering AG
|
2005
|
|
Novartis AG
|
|
Chiron Corporation
|
2004
|
|
Sanofi-Synthelabo
|
|
Aventis
|
2002
|
|
Pfizer Inc.
|
|
Pharmacia Corporation
|
2001
|
|
Johnson & Johnson
|
|
ALZA Corporation
|
2000
|
|
Glaxo Wellcome plc
|
|
SmithKline Beecham plc
|
1999
|
|
Pfizer Inc.
|
|
Warner-Lambert Company
|
1998
|
|
Zeneca Group plc
|
|
Astra AB
|
1998
|
|
Sanofi SA
|
|
Synthelabo SA
|
1996
|
|
Sandoz AG
|
|
Ciba-Geigy AG
|
1995
|
|
Glaxo plc
|
|
Wellcome plc
|
1994
|
|
American Home Products Corporation
|
|
American Cyanamid Company
|
87
Evercore reviewed the premiums paid in the selected transactions
referenced above based on the value of the per share
consideration received in the relevant transaction relative to
the closing stock price of the target company one day, one week
and four weeks prior to the announcement date of the
transaction. This indicated the following implied high, mean,
median and low premiums for the selected transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Premiums
|
|
Implied Premiums for Selected
|
|
|
for Selected U.S. M&A Transactions
|
|
Pharmaceutical/Biotechnology Transactions
|
|
|
High
|
|
Mean
|
|
Median
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Mean
|
|
Median
|
|
Low
|
|
One Day Prior
|
|
|
69.1
|
%
|
|
|
27.1
|
%
|
|
|
25.3
|
%
|
|
|
(1.5
|
%)
|
|
|
52.3
|
%
|
|
|
27.6
|
%
|
|
|
23.5
|
%
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
One Week Prior
|
|
|
61.4
|
%
|
|
|
27.6
|
%
|
|
|
27.7
|
%
|
|
|
(1.7
|
%)
|
|
|
56.7
|
%
|
|
|
31.8
|
%
|
|
|
27.6
|
%
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
Four Weeks Prior
|
|
|
68.5
|
%
|
|
|
28.5
|
%
|
|
|
21.9
|
%
|
|
|
(1.3
|
%)
|
|
|
70.8
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
30.5
|
%
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
Evercore then applied a range of selected premiums of 20% to 35%
derived from the selected transactions (which range of selected
premiums was based primarily on the overall range of mean and
median premiums for the selected transactions) to the closing
price of Wyeth common stock on January 22, 2009 and the
closing price of Wyeth common stock one week and four weeks
prior to January 22, 2009. This analysis indicated the
following implied per share equity reference ranges for Wyeth,
as compared to the implied per share merger consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied per Share Equity
|
|
Implied per Share
|
|
|
Reference Ranges for Wyeth
|
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
One Day Prior
|
|
$
|
46.60 - $52.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Week Prior
|
|
$
|
46.06 - $51.81
|
|
|
$
|
50.19
|
|
Four Weeks Prior
|
|
$
|
43.31 - $48.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discounted Illustrative Future Stock Price
Analysis. Evercore performed a discounted
illustrative future stock price analysis of Wyeth in order to
derive implied per share equity reference ranges for Wyeth based
on the implied present value of illustrative future stock prices
of Wyeth. In this analysis, Evercore calculated illustrative
future stock prices of Wyeth on December 31, 2011 by
applying the ranges of selected multiples of calendar year 2009
EBITDA and EPS of 6.0x to 8.0x and 9.0x to 12.0x, respectively,
derived from the selected publicly-traded companies described
above under Wyeth Financial
Analyses Selected Companies Trading
Analysis to estimated EBITDA and EPS of Wyeth for calendar
year 2012 based on the Wyeth management base case, the Wyeth
management upside case, the Wyeth management downside case and
publicly available research analysts estimates for Wyeth,
referred to as the Wyeth Wall Street case. These illustrative
future stock prices were discounted to present value as of
December 31, 2008 using discount rates of 7.5% to 9.5% and
were increased to reflect the present value of future dividends
projected to be paid by Wyeth in 2009, 2010 and 2011 under each
case. This analysis indicated the following implied per share
equity reference ranges for Wyeth, as compared to the implied
per share merger consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied per Share Equity
|
|
Implied per Share
|
|
|
Reference Ranges for Wyeth
|
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
2012E EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wyeth Management Base Case
|
|
$
|
37.23 - $49.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wyeth Management Upside Case
|
|
$
|
40.25 - $53.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wyeth Management Downside Case
|
|
$
|
31.74 - $42.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wyeth Wall Street Case
|
|
$
|
37.12 - $48.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012E EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
50.19
|
|
Wyeth Management Base Case
|
|
$
|
30.34 - $41.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wyeth Management Upside Case
|
|
$
|
33.45 - $45.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wyeth Management Downside Case
|
|
$
|
26.60 - $36.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wyeth Wall Street Case
|
|
$
|
28.95 - $39.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Evercore
performed a discounted cash flow analysis of Wyeth in order to
derive implied per share equity reference ranges for Wyeth based
on the implied present value of projected future cash flows of
Wyeth. In this analysis, Evercore calculated implied per share
equity reference ranges for Wyeth under the Wyeth management
base case, the Wyeth management upside case, the Wyeth
management downside case and the Wyeth Wall Street case based on
the sum of the (i) implied present values, using
88
discount rates ranging from 7.0% to 9.0%, of Wyeths
projected unlevered free cash flows for calendar years 2009
through 2012 (excluding annual expenditures on business
alliances and acquisitions) and (ii) implied present
values, using discount rates ranging from 7.0% to 9.0% of the
terminal value of Wyeths future cash flows beyond calendar
year 2012 calculated by applying a range of EBITDA terminal
multiples of 6.0x to 8.0x derived from the selected
publicly-traded companies described above under
Wyeth Financial Analyses Selected
Companies Trading Analysis to Wyeths calendar year
2013 projected EBITDA. This analysis indicated the following
implied per share equity reference ranges for Wyeth, as compared
to the implied per share merger consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied per Share Equity
|
|
Implied per Share
|
|
|
Reference Ranges for Wyeth
|
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
Wyeth Management Base Case
|
|
$
|
43.53 - $56.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wyeth Management Upside Case
|
|
$
|
47.93 - $61.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wyeth Management Downside Case
|
|
$
|
37.51 - $48.30
|
|
|
$
|
50.19
|
|
Wyeth Wall Street Case
|
|
$
|
38.70 - $49.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Transaction Multiples for Selected Precedent
Pharmaceuticals/Biotechnology M&A Transactions. Using
publicly available information, Evercore reviewed implied
transaction data for the 15 transactions involving target
companies in the pharmaceutical/biotechnology industry referred
to above under Wyeth Financial
Analyses Premiums Paid Analysis. Evercore
reviewed transaction values in the selected transactions,
calculated as the purchase price paid for the target
companys equity, plus debt, preferred stock and minority
interests, less cash and cash equivalents, as multiples, to the
extent publicly available, of latest 12 months revenue,
EBITDA and earnings before interest, other (income) expense, net
and taxes, commonly referred to as EBIT. Evercore also reviewed
purchase prices paid in the selected transactions as a multiple
of latest 12 months net income. Multiples for the selected
transactions were based on publicly available information at the
time of announcement of the relevant transaction. This analysis
indicated the following implied high, mean, median and low
multiples for the selected transactions (other than implied
EBITDA, EBIT and net income multiples for the AstraZeneca
PLC/MedImmune, Inc. transaction, which were excluded as
outliers), as compared to corresponding multiples implied for
Wyeth in the merger based on the implied per share merger
consideration and the Wyeth management base case:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Multiples
|
|
Implied Multiples for Wyeth
|
|
|
for Selected Transactions
|
|
Based on Implied per
|
|
|
High
|
|
Mean
|
|
Median
|
|
Low
|
|
Share Merger Consideration
|
|
Total Enterprise Value/LTM Revenue
|
|
|
12.3
|
x
|
|
|
5.4
|
x
|
|
|
4.7
|
x
|
|
|
1.5
|
x
|
|
|
2.9
|
x
|
Total Enterprise Value/LTM EBITDA
|
|
|
34.1
|
x
|
|
|
19.4
|
x
|
|
|
18.2
|
x
|
|
|
10.6
|
x
|
|
|
8.3
|
x
|
Total Enterprise Value/LTM EBIT
|
|
|
62.5
|
x
|
|
|
24.9
|
x
|
|
|
20.2
|
x
|
|
|
10.3
|
x
|
|
|
9.4
|
x
|
Purchase Price/LTM Net Income
|
|
|
51.4
|
x
|
|
|
31.2
|
x
|
|
|
28.4
|
x
|
|
|
13.7
|
x
|
|
|
14.2
|
x
|
Pfizer
Financial Analyses
Historical Trading Prices and Research Analyst Stock Price
Targets. Evercore reviewed the historical daily
closing prices of Pfizer common stock over the 52-week period
ended January 23, 2009 and compared the following high and
low daily closing prices of Pfizer common stock for the
one-month, three-month and 52-week periods ended
January 23, 2009 with the closing price of Pfizer common
stock on January 23, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical Closing Prices
|
|
|
|
|
of Pfizer Common Stock
|
|
Closing Price of Pfizer Common
|
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Stock on January 23, 2009
|
|
One-Month
|
|
$
|
17.01
|
|
|
$
|
18.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-Month
|
|
$
|
14.45
|
|
|
$
|
18.41
|
|
|
$
|
17.45
|
|
52-Week
|
|
$
|
14.45
|
|
|
$
|
23.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evercore also reviewed publicly available research
analysts price targets for Pfizer common stock published
in research reports between October 20, 2008 and
January 16, 2009, which ranged from $16.00 to $30.00 per
share.
89
Selected Companies Trading Analysis. Evercore
performed a selected companies trading analysis of Pfizer in
order to derive implied per share equity reference ranges for
Pfizer based on the stock market trading multiples of other
publicly-traded companies in the pharmaceutical industry, which
is the industry in which Pfizer operates. These companies were
selected generally because they are publicly-traded
pharmaceutical companies primarily based in the United States or
the European Union which, like Pfizer, have diversified branded
product portfolios and market capitalizations in excess of
$30 billion. In this analysis, using publicly available
information, Evercore compared the stock market trading
multiples of Pfizer, Wyeth and the other publicly-traded
U.S. and European pharmaceutical companies referred to
above under Wyeth Financial
Analyses Selected Companies Trading Analysis.
Evercore reviewed, among other things, enterprise values as a
multiple of calendar years 2009 and 2010 estimated EBITDA and
closing stock prices on January 23, 2009 as a multiple of
calendar years 2009 and 2010 estimated EPS. Multiples for Pfizer
and the selected publicly-traded companies, including Wyeth,
were based on publicly available filings and publicly available
research analysts consensus estimates. Evercore then
applied ranges of selected multiples derived from the selected
publicly-traded companies (which ranges of selected multiples
were based primarily on selected publicly-traded companies with
product mixes and historical and projected EBITDA and net income
growth trajectories similar to those of Pfizer) of 4.0x to 6.0x
in the case of calendar years 2009 and 2010 EBITDA and 6.5x to
9.5x in the case of calendar years 2009 and 2010 EPS to
corresponding financial data of Pfizer based on internal
estimates of Pfizers management, referred to as the Pfizer
management case. This analysis indicated the following implied
per share equity reference ranges for Pfizer, as compared to the
closing price of Pfizer common stock on January 23, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied per Share Equity
|
|
Closing Price of Pfizer
|
|
|
Reference Ranges for Pfizer
|
|
Common Stock on January 23, 2009
|
|
2009E EBITDA
|
|
$
|
14.83 - $20.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010E EBITDA
|
|
$
|
17.56 - $24.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009E EPS
|
|
$
|
13.84 - $20.23
|
|
|
$
|
17.45
|
|
2010E EPS
|
|
$
|
16.95 - $24.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evercore also applied ranges of selected multiples derived from
the selected publicly-traded companies (which ranges of selected
multiples were based primarily on selected publicly-traded
companies with product mixes and historical and projected EBITDA
and net income growth trajectories similar to those of Pfizer
excluding Lipitor) of 5.5x to 7.5x in the case of calendar year
2009 EBITDA, 5.0x to 7.0x in the case of calendar year 2010
EBITDA, 8.5x to 11.5x in the case of calendar year 2009 EPS and
7.5x to 10.5x in the case of calendar year 2010 EPS to
corresponding financial data of Pfizer based on the Pfizer
management case excluding financial data attributable to
Lipitor, which is expected to begin to face generic drug
competition in the near future. Evercore added to the resulting
implied per share equity reference ranges the estimated present
value of future cash flows from Lipitor using discount rates of
6.0% to 8.0% and the projected incremental future net income
contribution from Lipitor during calendar years 2009 through
2025 based on internal estimates of Pfizers management and
extrapolations from those estimates. This analysis indicated the
following implied per share equity reference ranges for Pfizer,
as compared to the closing price of Pfizer common stock on
January 23, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing Price of
|
|
|
Implied per Share Equity
|
|
Pfizer Common Stock
|
|
|
Reference Ranges for Pfizer
|
|
on January 23, 2009
|
|
2009E EBITDA
|
|
$
|
14.90 - $18.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010E EBITDA
|
|
$
|
17.96 - $22.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009E EPS
|
|
$
|
12.03 - $15.21
|
|
|
$
|
17.45
|
|
2010E EPS
|
|
$
|
15.28 - $20.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
Discounted Illustrative Future Stock Price
Analysis. Evercore performed a discounted
illustrative future stock price analysis of Pfizer in order to
derive implied per share equity reference ranges for Pfizer
based on the implied present value of illustrative future stock
prices of Pfizer. In this analysis, Evercore calculated
illustrative future stock prices of Pfizer on December 31,
2012 by applying the ranges of selected multiples of calendar
year 2009 EBITDA and EPS excluding financial data attributable
to Lipitor of 5.5x to 7.5x and 8.5x to 11.5x, respectively,
derived from the selected publicly-traded companies described
above under Pfizer Financial
Analyses Selected Companies Trading Analysis
to estimated EBITDA and EPS of Pfizer for calendar year 2013
based on the Pfizer management case and publicly available
research analysts estimates for Pfizer, referred to as the
Pfizer Wall Street case. These illustrative future stock prices
were discounted to present value as of December 31, 2008
using discount rates of 7.5% to 9.5% and were increased to
reflect the present value of future dividends projected to be
paid by Pfizer in 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 under each case.
This analysis indicated the following implied per share equity
reference ranges for Pfizer, as compared to the closing price of
Pfizer common stock on January 23, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing Price of
|
|
|
Implied per Share Equity
|
|
Pfizer Common Stock
|
|
|
Reference Ranges for Pfizer
|
|
on January 23, 2009
|
|
2013E EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pfizer Management Case
|
|
$
|
21.36 - $27.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pfizer Wall Street Case
|
|
$
|
17.72 - $22.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17.45
|
|
2013E EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pfizer Management Case
|
|
$
|
17.29 - $23.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pfizer Wall Street Case
|
|
$
|
15.18 - $20.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Evercore
performed a discounted cash flow analysis of Pfizer in order to
derive implied per share equity reference ranges for Pfizer
based on the implied present value of projected future cash
flows of Pfizer. In this analysis, Evercore calculated implied
per share equity reference ranges for Pfizer under the Pfizer
management case and the Pfizer Wall Street case based on the sum
of the (i) implied present values, using discount rates
ranging from 7.0% to 9.0%, of Pfizers projected unlevered
free cash flows for calendar years 2009 through 2012 and
(ii) implied present values, using discount rates ranging
from 7.0% to 9.0%, of the terminal value of Pfizers future
cash flows beyond calendar year 2012 calculated by applying a
range of forward EBITDA terminal multiples of 5.5x to 7.5x
derived from the selected publicly-traded companies described
above under Pfizer Financial
Analyses Selected Companies Trading
Analysis to Pfizers calendar year 2013 projected
EBITDA. This analysis indicated the following implied per share
equity reference ranges for Pfizer, as compared to the closing
price of Pfizer common stock on January 23, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing Price of
|
|
|
Implied per Share Equity
|
|
Pfizer Common Stock
|
|
|
Reference Ranges for Pfizer
|
|
on January 23, 2009
|
|
Pfizer Management Case
|
|
$
|
22.04 - $28.15
|
|
|
$
|
17.45
|
|
Pfizer Wall Street Case
|
|
$
|
18.74 - $23.26
|
|
Pro Forma
Accretion/Dilution Analysis
Evercore reviewed the potential pro forma financial effect of
the merger on Pfizers estimated EPS for calendar years
2009 through 2012 after giving effect to potential synergies
estimated by the managements of Wyeth and Pfizer to result from
the merger. For purposes of this analysis, Evercore utilized,
per Wyeths management, an assumed pro forma effective tax
rate of 30%, cost of debt of 7.5% and reduction in Pfizers
future dividends by 50%. Estimated financial data of Wyeth were
based on the Wyeth management base case and estimated financial
data of Pfizer were based on the Pfizer management case. Based
on the implied per share merger consideration, this analysis
indicated that the merger would be dilutive to Pfizers
calendar year 2009 estimated EPS, neutral to Pfizers
calendar year 2010 estimated EPS and accretive to Pfizers
calendar years 2011 and 2012 estimated EPS. The actual results
achieved by the combined company may vary from projected results
and the variations may be material.
91
General
In connection with the review of the merger by the Wyeth board
of directors, Evercore performed a variety of financial and
comparative analyses for purposes of rendering its opinion. The
preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and is
not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary
description. Selecting portions of the analyses or of the
summary described above, without considering the analyses as a
whole, could create an incomplete view of the processes
underlying Evercores opinion. In arriving at its fairness
determination, Evercore considered the results of all the
analyses and did not draw, in isolation, conclusions from or
with regard to any one analysis or factor considered by it for
purposes of its opinion. Rather, Evercore made its determination
as to fairness on the basis of its experience and professional
judgment after considering the results of all the analyses. In
addition, Evercore may have considered various assumptions more
or less probable than other assumptions, so that the range of
valuations resulting from any particular analysis described
above should therefore not be taken to be Evercores view
of the value of Wyeth. No company used in the above analyses as
a comparison is identical to Wyeth or Pfizer, and no transaction
used is identical to the merger. In applying ranges of selected
multiples or premiums in the selected companies trading analyses
and premiums paid analysis summarized above, some of the trading
multiples of the selected companies and transaction premiums for
the selected transactions were necessarily outside such ranges,
and Evercore and the Wyeth board of directors did not, when
deriving or reviewing selected ranges, quantify or consider how
many trading multiples or premiums were outside such ranges.
Accordingly, such analyses may not necessarily utilize all
companies or transactions (or data derived therefrom) that could
be deemed comparable to Wyeth, Pfizer or the merger. Further,
Evercores analyses involve complex considerations and
judgments concerning financial and operating characteristics and
other factors that could affect the acquisition, public trading
or other values of the companies or transactions used, including
judgments and assumptions with regard to industry performance,
general business, economic, market and financial conditions and
other matters, many of which are beyond the control of Wyeth and
Pfizer.
Evercore prepared these analyses for the purpose of providing an
opinion to the Wyeth board of directors as to the fairness, from
a financial point of view, of the merger consideration to be
received by the holders of Wyeth common stock. These analyses do
not purport to be appraisals or to necessarily reflect the
prices at which the business or securities actually may be sold.
Any estimates contained in these analyses are not necessarily
indicative of actual future results, which may be significantly
more or less favorable than suggested by such estimates.
Accordingly, estimates used in, and the results derived from,
Evercores analyses are inherently subject to substantial
uncertainty, and Evercore assumes no responsibility if future
results are materially different from those forecasted in such
estimates. The merger consideration to be received by the
holders of Wyeth common stock pursuant to the merger agreement
was determined through negotiations between Wyeth and Pfizer and
was approved by the Wyeth board of directors. Evercore did not
recommend any specific merger consideration to Wyeth or that any
given merger consideration constituted the only appropriate
merger consideration.
Under the terms of Evercores engagement, Wyeth has agreed
to pay Evercore an aggregate fee of $24 million, portions
of which became payable in connection with Evercores
engagement or when Evercore rendered its opinion and
$19 million of which will become payable if the merger is
completed. In addition, Wyeth agreed to reimburse
Evercores reasonable expenses and to indemnify Evercore
and related parties for certain liabilities, including
liabilities under federal securities laws, arising out of its
engagement. Evercore may provide financial or other services to
Wyeth or Pfizer in the future and in connection with any such
services Evercore may receive compensation.
In the ordinary course of business, Evercore or its affiliates
may actively trade the securities, or related derivative
securities, or financial instruments of Wyeth, Pfizer and their
respective affiliates, for its own account and for the accounts
of its customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long
or short position in such securities or instruments.
Wyeth engaged Evercore to act as a financial advisor based on
its qualifications, experience and reputation. Evercore is an
internationally recognized investment banking firm and is
regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses in connection
with mergers and acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, competitive
biddings, private placements and valuations for corporate and
other purposes.
92
Pfizers
Reasons for the Merger
The Pfizer board of directors reasons for entering into
the merger agreement include:
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the proposed Wyeth acquisition, Pfizer had developed
and publicly articulated a set of strategic objectives. The
acquisition of Wyeth provided an opportunity for Pfizer to
advance each of these strategic objectives in a single
transaction. Pfizers strategic objectives and the
contributions of the proposed Wyeth acquisition towards them are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Become a Leader in Biologics: Wyeth brings
Enbrel, manufacturing excellence, and pipeline
|
|
|
|
Enter the Vaccines Market: Wyeth brings
Prevnar, and a strong late-stage vaccines pipeline
|
|
|
|
Expand Invest to Win Areas: Wyeth augments
in-line and pipeline portfolios in inflammation, neuroscience,
oncology and infectious disease
|
|
|
|
Strengthen Leadership in Emerging
Markets: Wyeth solidifies Pfizers leading
position with new products
|
|
|
|
Create New Opportunities for Established
Products: Wyeth increases the breadth and depth
of portfolio
|
|
|
|
Invest in Complementary Business: Wyeth adds
Consumer and Nutritionals businesses, and enhances Pfizers
Animal Health business
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pfizers belief that the combined entity will be one of the
most diversified in the industry and will benefit from
complementary patient-centric business units as well as adding
strong consumer health and nutritional businesses;
|
|
|
|
Pfizers belief that the combination will better enable
Pfizer to respond to other key opportunities and challenges,
such as pricing and access, intellectual property rights,
product competition, the regulatory environment and pipeline
productivity and a changing business environment;
|
|
|
|
Pfizers belief that the combined company will enable
Pfizer to deliver consistent and stable earnings growth and
strong operating cash flow and will bring Pfizer many new points
of product entry across the world to better serve patients,
physicians and customers;
|
|
|
|
Pfizers expectation that it will realize approximately
$4 billion in synergies as a result of the merger, all
within approximately 36 months from the effective date of
the merger. Cost synergies for the Wyeth acquisition were
estimated by using a combination of three approaches:
(1) benchmarks from comparable transactions, in which
Pfizer estimated synergies both on the company level and on the
cost line item level, (2) Pfizers experience with
cost savings achieved in previous large transactions, and
(3) an analysis of Wyeths assumed and Pfizers
actual detailed cost structures, in order to identify
duplication of resources. The combination of these approaches
resulted in estimated synergies of approximately
$4.0 billion, with approximately 50 percent from
SI&A, and 50 percent from R&D and manufacturing;
|
|
|
|
Pfizers expectation that the merger will decrease its
reliance on primary care medicines and create a leading
specialty pharmaceutical company;
|
|
|
|
Pfizers expectation that the merger will decrease the
proportion of Pfizers revenue that comes from primary care
products by approximately 20% to just over half of revenues,
with no drug accounting for more than 10% of the combined
companys revenue, in each case, in 2012;
|
|
|
|
the opportunity to address the significant challenge of
Lipitors loss of exclusivity in 2012;
|
|
|
|
the ability to strengthen Pfizers position in the animal
health sector with Wyeths array of vaccines and strong
vaccine research capability; and
|
|
|
|
the ability to maximize the potential of Wyeths product
portfolio by using Pfizers expansive global infrastructure
to better distribute those products into emerging markets.
|
93
In view of the wide variety of factors considered in connection
with its evaluation of the merger and the complexity of these
matters, the Pfizer board of directors did not find it useful
and did not attempt to assign any relative or specific weights
to the various factors that it considered in reaching its
determination to approve the merger and the merger agreement. In
addition, individual members of the Pfizer board of directors
may have given differing weights to different factors. The
Pfizer board of directors conducted an overall analysis of the
factors described above, including through discussions with, and
inquiry of, Pfizers management and outside legal and
financial advisors regarding certain of the matters described
above.
Wyeth
Unaudited Prospective Financial Information
Wyeth does not as a matter of course make public long-term
projections as to future revenues, earnings or other results due
to, among other reasons, the uncertainty of the underlying
assumptions and estimates. However, Wyeth is including this
prospective financial information in this proxy
statement/prospectus to provide its stockholders access to
certain non-public unaudited prospective financial information
that was made available to the Pfizer board of directors, the
Wyeth board of directors and Wyeths financial advisors in
connection with the merger. This information included estimates
of revenue, net income and earnings per share for the fiscal
years 2009 through 2013. The unaudited prospective financial
information was not prepared with a view toward public
disclosure, and the inclusion of this information should not be
regarded as an indication that any of Wyeth, its financial
advisors, Pfizer or any other recipient of this information
considered, or now considers, it to be necessarily predictive of
actual future results. None of Pfizer, Wyeth or their respective
affiliates assumes any responsibility for the accuracy of this
information.
While presented with numeric specificity, the unaudited
prospective financial information reflects numerous estimates
and assumptions with respect to industry performance, general
business, economic, regulatory, litigation, market and financial
conditions, foreign currency rates, interest on investments, and
matters specific to Wyeths business, such as approval and
successful launch of new products and competitive conditions,
many of which are beyond Wyeths control. The unaudited
prospective financial information was, in general, prepared
solely for internal use and is subjective in many respects. As a
result, there can be no assurance that the prospective results
will be realized or that actual results will not be
significantly higher or lower than estimated. Since the
unaudited prospective financial information covers multiple
years, such information by its nature becomes less predictive
with each successive year. Wyeths stockholders are urged
to review Wyeths most recent SEC filings for a description
of risk factors with respect to Wyeths business. See
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements beginning on page 45 and Where You
Can Find More Information beginning on page 247. The
unaudited prospective financial information was not prepared
with a view toward complying with GAAP, the published guidelines
of the SEC regarding projections or the guidelines established
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants for
preparation and presentation of prospective financial
information. Neither Wyeths independent registered public
accounting firm, nor any other independent accountants, have
compiled, examined, or performed any procedures with respect to
the unaudited prospective financial information contained
herein, nor have they expressed any opinion or any other form of
assurance on such information or its achievability. The report
of Wyeths independent registered public accounting firm
contained in Wyeths Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, which is incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus relates to
Wyeths historical financial information. It does not
extend to the unaudited prospective financial information and
should not be read to do so. Furthermore, the unaudited
prospective financial information does not take into account any
circumstances or events occurring after the date it was prepared.
94
The following table presents selected unaudited prospective
financial data for the fiscal years ending 2009 through 2013,
which is referred to in this proxy
statement/prospectus
(including in Opinions of Wyeths
Financial Advisors beginning on page 72) as the Wyeth
management base case:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Year Ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
(In billions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
22.4
|
|
|
$
|
22.3
|
|
|
$
|
22.5
|
|
|
$
|
24.1
|
|
|
$
|
25.5
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
4.6
|
|
|
$
|
4.4
|
|
|
$
|
4.6
|
|
|
$
|
5.3
|
|
|
$
|
5.8
|
|
Earnings Per Share(1)
|
|
$
|
3.43
|
|
|
$
|
3.30
|
|
|
$
|
3.44
|
|
|
$
|
3.92
|
|
|
$
|
4.31
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Earnings per share figures were calculated on a post stock-based
compensation expense basis and assume approximately
1.34 billion shares of Wyeth common stock outstanding in
each year, except for 2009 where it assumes 1.35 billion
shares of Wyeth common stock outstanding. |
In preparing the above unaudited prospective financial
information, Wyeth made the following material assumptions for
the period from 2009 to 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
no legislative changes affecting the U.S. pharmaceutical
market;
|
|
|
|
no significant economic or regulatory changes to Wyeths
key product markets;
|
|
|
|
no significant impact from pending litigations and patent
challenges;
|
|
|
|
an increase of generic competition based on industry models or
existing contractual arrangements;
|
|
|
|
exclusion of merger-related transaction costs and productivity
initiatives charges;
|
|
|
|
no legislative changes affecting U.S. multinationals;
|
|
|
|
a significant decrease in interest on investments;
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 foreign currency rates were used for all
years, accordingly, the impact of foreign currency volatility in
2009 has not been considered; and
|
|
|
|
inclusion of Project Impact savings reflecting a 10% reduction
in headcount and $1.0 billion to $1.5 billion annualized
cost savings when fully implemented.
|
No assurances can be given that these assumptions will
accurately reflect future conditions. In addition, although
presented with numerical specificity, the above unaudited
prospective financial information reflects numerous assumptions
and estimates as to future events made by Wyeths
management that Wyeths management believed were reasonable
at the time the unaudited prospective financial information was
prepared. The above unaudited prospective financial information
does not give effect to the merger. Wyeths stockholders
are urged to review Wyeths most recent SEC filings for a
description of Wyeths reported and anticipated results of
operations, financial condition and capital resources during
2009, including the discussion under the caption 2009
Outlook (which forms a part of Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations) in Wyeths 2008 Financial Report, which
is incorporated by reference into Wyeths Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which is
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.
Readers of this proxy statement/prospectus are cautioned not to
place undue reliance on the unaudited prospective financial
information set forth above. No representation is made by Wyeth,
Pfizer or any other person to any stockholder of Wyeth regarding
the ultimate performance of Wyeth compared to the information
included in the above unaudited prospective financial
information. The inclusion of unaudited prospective financial
information in this proxy statement/prospectus should not be
regarded as an indication that such prospective financial
information will be an accurate prediction of future events, and
they should not be relied on as such.
WYETH DOES NOT INTEND TO UPDATE OR OTHERWISE REVISE THE ABOVE
PROSPECTIVE FINANCIAL INFORMATION TO REFLECT CIRCUMSTANCES
EXISTING AFTER THE DATE WHEN MADE OR TO REFLECT THE OCCURRENCE
OF FUTURE EVENTS, EVEN IN THE EVENT THAT ANY OR ALL OF THE
ASSUMPTIONS UNDERLYING SUCH PROSPECTIVE FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ARE NO LONGER APPROPRIATE.
95
Pfizer
Unaudited Prospective Financial Information
Pfizer does not as a matter of course make public long-term
projections as to future revenues, earnings or other results due
to, among other reasons, the uncertainty of the underlying
assumptions and estimates. However, in connection with the
review of the merger, Pfizer management prepared unaudited
prospective financial information on a stand-alone, pre-merger
basis. Pfizer is electing to provide the unaudited prospective
financial information in this proxy statement/prospectus to
provide the stockholders of Wyeth access to certain non-public
unaudited prospective financial information that was made
available to the Pfizer board of directors, the Wyeth board of
directors and Wyeths and Pfizers financial advisors
in connection with the merger. The unaudited prospective
financial information was not prepared with a view toward public
disclosure and the inclusion of this information should not be
regarded as an indication that any of Pfizer, Wyeth or any other
recipient of this information considered, or now considers, it
to be necessarily predictive of actual future results. None of
Pfizer, Wyeth or their respective affiliates assumes any
responsibility for the accuracy of this information.
The unaudited prospective financial information was, in general,
prepared solely for internal use and is subjective in many
respects and thus subject to interpretation. While presented
with numeric specificity, the unaudited prospective financial
information reflects numerous estimates and assumptions made by
the management of Pfizer with respect to industry performance
and competition, general business, economic, market and
financial conditions and matters specific to Pfizers
business, all of which are difficult to predict and many of
which are beyond Pfizers control. As a result, there can
be no assurance that the unaudited prospective financial
information will be realized or that actual results will not be
significantly higher or lower than estimated. Since the
unaudited prospective financial information covers multiple
years, such information by its nature becomes less predictive
with each successive year. Wyeths stockholders are urged
to review Pfizers most recent SEC filings for a
description of risk factors with respect to Pfizers
business. See Cautionary Statement Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements beginning on page 45 and
Where You Can Find More Information beginning on
page 247. The unaudited prospective financial information
was not prepared with a view toward complying with GAAP, the
published guidelines of the SEC regarding projections or the
guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants for preparation and presentation of
prospective financial information. Neither Pfizers
independent registered public accounting firm, nor any other
independent accountants, have compiled, examined, or performed
any procedures with respect to the unaudited prospective
financial information contained herein, nor have they expressed
any opinion or any other form of assurance on such information
or its achievability, and assume no responsibility for, and
disclaim any association with, the unaudited prospective
financial information. Furthermore, the unaudited prospective
financial information does not take into account any
circumstances or events occurring after the date it was prepared.
The following table presents selected unaudited prospective
financial information for the fiscal years ending 2009 through
2013, which is referred to in this proxy statement/prospectus
(including in Opinions of Wyeths
Financial Advisors beginning on page 72) as the
Pfizer management projections:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pfizer Inc. Stand-Alone Data
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
(in billions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
45
|
.4
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
.2
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
.5
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
.2
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
.6
|
|
Adjusted income*
|
|
$
|
14
|
.4
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
.6
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
.8
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
.0
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
.7
|
|
Adjusted diluted earnings per share*
|
|
$
|
2
|
.13
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
.61
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
.63
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
.21
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
.17
|
|
96
Reconciliations for the unaudited prospective financial
information for the fiscal years ending from 2009 through 2013
of adjusted income and adjusted diluted EPS to reported net
income and reported diluted EPS are provided below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pfizer Inc. Stand-Alone Data
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
(in billions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Adjusted income*
|
|
$
|
14
|
.4
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
.6
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
.8
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
.0
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
.7
|
|
Purchase accounting impacts of transactions completed as of
12/31/08
|
|
|
(1
|
.6)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
.7)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
.7)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
.6)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
.5)
|
|
Costs related to cost-reduction initiatives
|
|
|
(1
|
.6)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
.5)
|
|
|
|
(0
|
.6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported net income
|
|
$
|
11
|
.2
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
.4
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
.4
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
.4
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
2
|
.13
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
.61
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
.63
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
.21
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
.17
|
|
Purchase accounting impacts
|
|
|
(
|
.24)
|
|
|
|
(
|
.25)
|
|
|
|
(
|
.25)
|
|
|
|
(
|
.24)
|
|
|
|
(
|
.22)
|
|
Costs related to cost-reduction initiatives
|
|
|
(
|
.24)
|
|
|
|
(
|
.22)
|
|
|
|
(
|
.09)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
1
|
.65
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
.14
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
.29
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
.97
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts may not add due to rounding.
In preparing the above unaudited prospective financial
information, Pfizer made the following material assumptions for
the period from 2009 to 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
product launches of existing and newly developed products in
several major markets during the period;
|
|
|
|
an increase in generic competition for certain branded
pharmaceuticals as a result of expiration or loss of patent
protection based on their current patent expiration dates;
|
|
|
|
no material changes to Pfizers U.S. pharmaceutical
pricing and reimbursement practices;
|
|
|
|
no significant legislative changes affecting the
U.S. pharmaceutical market;
|
|
|
|
no significant economic or regulatory changes to Pfizers
key products or markets;
|
|
|
|
no significant impact from pending litigations and patent
challenges;
|
|
|
|
foreign currency rates as follows: 2009 reflects
January 15, 2009 foreign exchange rates; 2010
2013 reflects average of 2006, 2007, and 2008 foreign exchange
rates; as a result, foreign exchange has less of an impact in
2009 than in 2010 through 2013;
|
|
|
|
inclusion of cost reduction initiatives savings reflecting a
$2 billion net decrease in Pfizers Adjusted total
costs** implicit in Adjusted income by the end of 2011; and
|
|
|
|
no impacts of the effects of business-development transactions
not completed as of December 31, 2008 including, but not
limited to, any acquisition related financing strategies or
their associated tax impacts.
|
No assurances can be given that these assumptions will
accurately reflect future conditions. In addition, although
presented with numerical specificity, the above unaudited
prospective financial information reflects numerous assumptions
and estimates as to future events made by Pfizers
management that Pfizers management believed were
reasonable at the time the unaudited prospective financial
information was prepared. The above unaudited prospective
financial information does not give effect to the merger.
Wyeths stockholders are urged to review Pfizers most
recent SEC filings for a description of Pfizers reported
and anticipated results of operations, financial condition and
capital resources during 2009, including in Pfizers 2008
Financial Report under the caption Our Expectations for
2009, which is incorporated by reference into
Pfizers 2008 Annual Report filed on
Form 10-K,
which is incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement/prospectus.
Readers of this proxy statement/prospectus are cautioned not to
place undue reliance on the unaudited prospective financial
information set forth above. No representation is made by
Pfizer, Wyeth, or any other person to any stockholder of Wyeth
regarding the ultimate performance of Pfizer compared to the
information included in the above prospective financial
information. The inclusion of unaudited prospective financial
information in this proxy statement/prospectus should not be
regarded as an indication that such prospective financial
information will be an accurate prediction of future events nor
construed as financial guidance, and they should not be relied
on as such.
97
PFIZER DOES NOT INTEND TO UPDATE OR OTHERWISE REVISE THE ABOVE
PROSPECTIVE FINANCIAL INFORMATION TO REFLECT CIRCUMSTANCES
EXISTING AFTER THE DATE WHEN MADE OR TO REFLECT THE OCCURRENCE
OF FUTURE EVENTS, EVEN IN THE EVENT THAT ANY OR ALL OF THE
ASSUMPTIONS UNDERLYING SUCH PROSPECTIVE FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ARE NO LONGER APPROPRIATE.
|
|
|
* |
|
Adjusted income and Adjusted diluted earnings
per share (EPS) are defined as reported net income and
reported diluted EPS excluding purchase-accounting adjustments,
acquisition-related costs, discontinued operations and certain
significant items. Adjusted Cost of Sales, Adjusted SI&A
expenses and Adjusted R&D expenses are income statement
line items prepared on the same basis, and therefore, components
of the overall adjusted income measure. As described under
Adjusted Income in the Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
section of Pfizers
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, management uses
adjusted income, among other factors, to set performance goals
and to measure the performance of the overall company. Pfizer
believes that investors understanding of Pfizers
performance is enhanced by disclosing this measure. The adjusted
income and its components and adjusted diluted EPS measures are
not, and should not be viewed as, substitutes for U.S. GAAP net
income and its components and diluted EPS. |
|
** |
|
Adjusted total costs represents primarily the total
of Adjusted Cost of Sales*, Adjusted SI&A expenses* and
Adjusted R&D expenses*. |
Interests
of Certain Persons in the Merger
In considering the recommendation of the Wyeth board of
directors with respect to the merger agreement, stockholders
should be aware that Wyeths directors and executive
officers have interests in the merger that may be different
from, or in addition to, Wyeths stockholders generally.
The Wyeth board of directors was aware of these interests (other
than those set forth under Retention of Wyeth
Executives below), and considered these interests, among
other matters, in evaluating and negotiating the merger
agreement and the merger, and in recommending to the
stockholders that the merger agreement be adopted.
Appointment
of Directors
The merger agreement provides that, upon completion of the
merger, Pfizer will appoint to the Pfizer board of directors two
members of the Wyeth board of directors who were members of the
Wyeth board of directors as of the date of the merger agreement.
Pfizers Corporate Governance Committee will review and
evaluate potential candidates from the Wyeth board of directors
through customary procedures to assess the independence and
qualifications of such Wyeth directors. Upon completion of the
Corporate Governance Committees evaluation, the committee
will recommend nominees. Based on the recommendation of the
Corporate Governance Committee and its own independent
evaluation, the Pfizer board of directors will appoint two
legacy Wyeth directors to the Pfizer board of directors. As of
the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, no determination
has been made as to the identity of the two Wyeth directors who
will be appointed to the Pfizer board of directors.
Retention
of Wyeth Executives
One of Pfizers primary objectives for the merger is to
retain talented executives from both Pfizer and Wyeth to lead
the combined organization. On April 7, 2009, Pfizer announced
that it planned to retain several senior Wyeth executives in
senior Pfizer leadership positions following consummation of the
merger. G. Mikael Dolsten, M.D., Ph.D., currently President,
Wyeth Research, will become President, Biotherapeutics of Pfizer
and a member of Pfizers Executive Leadership Team. Cavan
M. Redmond, currently President, Wyeth Consumer Healthcare and
Animal Health Businesses, will become President, Diversified
Businesses Group of Pfizer and a member of Pfizers
Executive Leadership Team. Geno J. Germano, currently President,
U.S., Pharmaceuticals and Womens Health Care, Wyeth
Pharmaceuticals, will become President, Specialty Care and
Vaccines of Pfizer. Each of Dr. Dolsten, Mr. Redmond
and Mr. Germano has agreed that his new employment
arrangement with Pfizer will be contingent upon the closing of
the merger and that his employment arrangement with Pfizer
following the merger will supersede any employment arrangement
he
98
currently has with Wyeth. In connection with their employment
with Pfizer following the merger, Dr. Dolsten, Mr. Redmond and
Mr. Germano will receive an increased base salary, receive a
sign-on bonus (payable part in cash and part in Pfizer
restricted stock units), become eligible to participate in
Pfizers Global Performance Plan and Executive Long-Term
Incentive Program, receive a pension guarantee such that the
combination of straight life annuity pension benefits from
Pfizer and Wyeth is no less than a certain amount per year, and
become eligible to receive certain other benefits, consistent
with the terms applicable to similarly situated Pfizer
executives. In addition, in the event that Dr. Dolsten, Mr.
Redmond and Mr. Germano are required to pay any excise tax
imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code directly
related to payments in the nature of compensation as a result of
the merger, they will each be entitled to receive a gross-up
payment in respect of any such excise tax imposed on them
individually. Further, Dr. Dolsten and Mr. Redmond will be
eligible to participate in Pfizers Executive Severance
Plan for Executive Leadership Team Members. In consideration of
these new terms of employment, Dr. Dolsten, Mr. Redmond and Mr.
Germano have agreed to waive any and all rights under their
change of control severance agreements with Wyeth.
Effect
of the Merger on Outstanding Equity Awards Under Wyeths
Stock Incentive Plans
General
Under the terms of Wyeths stock incentive plans,
outstanding equity awards held by Wyeths employees
(including executive officers) and directors generally vest in
full upon consummation of a change in control. The following
discussion describes the specific treatment of these awards in
the merger, which will constitute a change in control for
purposes of the plans. These awards were granted in the ordinary
course of business as part of maintaining the market
competitiveness of the total compensation offered by Wyeth to
its executive officers and other key employees. Each of
Mr. Poussot, Dr. Kamarck, Mr. Kelly,
Mr. Mahady, Mr. Portwood, Mr. Stein and
Ms. Wold currently meet the eligibility requirements for
retirement under Wyeths stock incentive plans and, as
such, under the terms of such plans, absent the merger, vesting
of their awards would be accelerated by retirement, with the
exception of the special promotional grant of RSUs made to
Mr. Poussot in January 2008, which would not vest upon
retirement, and performance share unit awards, which vest upon
retirement but would be paid based on future company performance.
Stock
Options
Each outstanding Wyeth stock option, whether or not then vested
and exercisable, will become fully vested and exercisable
immediately prior to, and then will be canceled at, the
effective time of the merger, and the holder of such stock
option will be entitled to receive an amount in cash, without
interest and less any applicable tax to be witheld, equal to:
(i) the excess, if any, of:
|
|
|
|
|
(x) the cash portion of the merger consideration,
plus (y) the market value of the stock portion of
the merger consideration (determined based on the volume
weighted average of the price of Pfizer common stock for the
five consecutive trading days ending two days prior to the
effective time of the merger, as such prices are reported on the
NYSE Transaction Reporting System); minus
|
|
|
|
the per share exercise price of such Wyeth stock option;
multiplied by
|
(ii) the total number of shares of Wyeth common stock
underlying such Wyeth stock option.
This amount will be paid in a lump sum as soon as practicable
after the effective time of the merger but in no event later
than ten business days following the effective time of the
merger.
If the per share exercise price of any stock option is equal to
or greater than the per share value of the merger consideration,
then the stock option will be canceled without any payment to
the stock option holder.
99
The following table sets forth the number of outstanding vested
and unvested stock options to acquire Wyeth common stock held by
Wyeths directors and executive officers as of May 29,
2009, and the estimated consideration that each of them will
receive after the effective time of the merger in connection
with the cancelation of their stock options, assuming continued
employment through the effective time of the merger. The actual
per share value of the merger consideration payable at the
effective time of the merger may vary, and the table is based on
an assumed per share value of the merger consideration of $47.96
(i.e., $33.00 per share, plus the value of 0.985 of
a share of Pfizer common stock of $14.96 based on the $15.19
closing price of Pfizers common stock on the NYSE on
May 29, 2009). Stock options with an exercise price equal
to or greater than such assumed value are set forth in a
separate column titled No. of Shares Underlying
Out-of-the-Money Options to Be Canceled, as these stock
options would be canceled without any payment using this assumed
value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
No. of Shares
|
|
|
No. of Shares
|
|
Exercise
|
|
No. of Shares
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Price
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
|
Out-of-the-
|
|
|
Unvested
|
|
of Unvested
|
|
Vested
|
|
of Vested
|
|
Total Estimated
|
|
|
Money
|
|
|
In-the-Money
|
|
In-the-Money
|
|
In-the-Money
|
|
In-the-Money
|
|
Resulting Option
|
|
|
Options to Be
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Options
|
|
Options
|
|
Options
|
|
Consideration
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(#)
|
Non-Employee Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert M. Amen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Critelli
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frances D. Fergusson, Ph.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
43.5700
|
|
|
$
|
17,560
|
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
Victor F. Ganzi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
Robert Langer, Sc.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
$
|
41.8950
|
|
|
$
|
48,520
|
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
John P. Mascotte
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
$
|
41.6133
|
|
|
$
|
76,160
|
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
Raymond J. McGuire
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
Mary Lake Polan, M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
$
|
41.6133
|
|
|
$
|
76,160
|
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
Gary L. Rogers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
John R. Torell III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
$
|
41.6133
|
|
|
$
|
76,160
|
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
Executive Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy P. Cost
|
|
|
57,000
|
|
|
$
|
43.2905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
266,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard R. DeLuca, Jr.
|
|
|
13,334
|
|
|
$
|
44.5600
|
|
|
|
50,626
|
|
|
$
|
40.7442
|
|
|
$
|
410,643
|
|
|
|
|
61,800
|
|
Mikael Dolsten, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
|
52,000
|
|
|
$
|
43.0800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
253,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geno J. Germano
|
|
|
33,334
|
|
|
$
|
44.5600
|
|
|
|
102,667
|
|
|
$
|
42.0650
|
|
|
$
|
718,558
|
|
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
Thomas Hofstaetter, Ph.D.
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
|
$
|
44.5600
|
|
|
|
106,250
|
|
|
$
|
40.7478
|
|
|
$
|
842,796
|
|
|
|
|
71,250
|
|
Michael Kamarck, Ph.D.
|
|
|
23,334
|
|
|
$
|
44.5600
|
|
|
|
52,844
|
|
|
$
|
43.2730
|
|
|
$
|
327,015
|
|
|
|
|
137,400
|
|
John C. Kelly
|
|
|
26,667
|
|
|
$
|
44.5600
|
|
|
|
209,833
|
|
|
$
|
40.3074
|
|
|
$
|
1,696,436
|
|
|
|
|
159,520
|
|
Andreas Krebs
|
|
|
11,040
|
|
|
$
|
44.5600
|
|
|
|
25,188
|
|
|
$
|
42.4848
|
|
|
$
|
175,445
|
|
|
|
|
33,260
|
|
Joseph M. Mahady
|
|
|
92,000
|
|
|
$
|
44.5600
|
|
|
|
187,000
|
|
|
$
|
43.1328
|
|
|
$
|
1,215,486
|
|
|
|
|
454,000
|
|
Gregory Norden
|
|
|
66,000
|
|
|
$
|
44.5600
|
|
|
|
108,834
|
|
|
$
|
42.7538
|
|
|
$
|
791,012
|
|
|
|
|
205,010
|
|
Denise M. Peppard
|
|
|
34,667
|
|
|
$
|
44.5600
|
|
|
|
25,931
|
|
|
$
|
44.2314
|
|
|
$
|
214,554
|
|
|
|
|
100,084
|
|
Charles A. Portwood
|
|
|
24,767
|
|
|
$
|
44.5600
|
|
|
|
156,883
|
|
|
$
|
41.7407
|
|
|
$
|
1,059,910
|
|
|
|
|
200,860
|
|
Bernard Poussot
|
|
|
246,667
|
|
|
$
|
44.5600
|
|
|
|
312,667
|
|
|
$
|
43.4105
|
|
|
$
|
2,261,146
|
|
|
|
|
782,300
|
|
Cavan M. Redmond
|
|
|
31,334
|
|
|
$
|
44.5600
|
|
|
|
121,666
|
|
|
$
|
40.8298
|
|
|
$
|
974,039
|
|
|
|
|
115,500
|
|
Lawrence V. Stein
|
|
|
58,000
|
|
|
$
|
44.5600
|
|
|
|
241,000
|
|
|
$
|
41.4207
|
|
|
$
|
1,773,171
|
|
|
|
|
313,200
|
|
Mary Katherine Wold
|
|
|
29,634
|
|
|
$
|
44.5600
|
|
|
|
211,316
|
|
|
$
|
40.3372
|
|
|
$
|
1,711,575
|
|
|
|
|
164,550
|
|
Other
Equity Awards
At the effective time of the merger, each of the other
outstanding equity-based awards (including restricted stock,
DSUs, and RSUs, including performance share unit awards) under
Wyeths stock incentive plans will immediately vest as to
100% of any unvested portion of the outstanding award, except
with respect to performance share unit awards held by certain
executive officers, which awards will vest at 80% of target
100
upon the effective time of the merger (with the remaining
unvested portion being canceled without payment) and are
therefore shown at 80% of target in the tables that follow.
Set forth below is the effect the merger will have on each type
of outstanding unvested equity award other than stock options.
This discussion does not describe the effect of the merger on
shares of Wyeth common stock held outright by directors and
executive officers or which have been previously earned and
deferred into Wyeths Restricted Stock Trust, as these
shares are outstanding and will be exchanged for merger
consideration in the same manner as all other outstanding Wyeth
shares (with the cash portion of any such merger consideration
that is deposited into Wyeths Restricted Stock Trust to
accrue interest at a designated market rate until such merger
consideration (and such accrued interest) is paid as set forth
under the applicable deferred payment terms).
Outstanding
Equity Awards Under Wyeths Non-Employee Director
Plans
Each share of restricted stock (including restricted stock that
has been optionally deferred) and each DSU held by Wyeths
non-employee directors under the 1994 Restricted Stock Plan for
Non-Employee Directors, the 2006 Non-Employee Director Stock
Incentive Plan and the 2008 Non-Employee Director Stock
Incentive Plan, as applicable, will be canceled at the effective
time of the merger, and the holder of each such award will be
entitled to receive an amount in cash (without interest and less
tax withholdings) equal to the per share value of the merger
consideration in respect of each share of Wyeth common stock
subject to each such award. In addition, holders of DSUs and
holders of restricted stock that has been optionally deferred
will also receive an amount in cash equal to any dividend
equivalents then credited to the holders account which
have not yet been converted into shares of Wyeth common stock.
Any consideration paid to holders of these awards will be paid
as soon as practicable after the effective time of the merger,
but in no event later than ten business days following the
effective time of the merger.
The following table sets forth the number of unvested shares of
such restricted stock and unvested DSUs (together with any
dividend equivalents) held by Wyeths non-employee
directors as of May 29, 2009, and the estimated total
consideration that each non-employee director will receive upon
vesting and cancelation of such restricted stock and DSUs
following the effective time of the merger, based on an assumed
per share value of the merger consideration equal to $47.96
(calculated as described above):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of Shares of
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
Optionally Deferred
|
|
Total Resulting
|
|
|
No. of Shares of
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
Consideration
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
and DSUs
|
|
($)
|
|
Non-Employee Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert M. Amen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,050
|
|
|
$
|
146,278
|
|
Michael J. Critelli
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,050
|
|
|
$
|
146,278
|
|
Frances D. Fergusson, Ph.D.
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
|
1,635
|
|
|
$
|
193,519
|
|
Victor F. Ganzi
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
2,481
|
|
|
$
|
157,357
|
|
Robert Langer, Sc.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John P. Mascotte
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond J. McGuire
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Lake Polan, M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary L. Rogers
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
153,472
|
|
John R. Torell III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with the 2008 Non-Employee Director Stock
Incentive Plan, on the date of the meeting, each non-employee
director will receive an automatic grant of DSUs for 2009. These
DSUs also will be canceled and converted in the merger into the
right to receive an amount in cash (without interest and less
tax withholdings) equal to the per share value of the merger
consideration in respect of each share of Wyeth common stock
otherwise subject to such DSU.
In addition, all shares of phantom stock credited to any
non-employee directors account under the Wyeth
Directors Deferral Plan (under which non-employee
directors annual fees may be deferred as specified by each
non-employee director into phantom Wyeth common stock or into a
cash account), including any phantom stock
101
credited to such accounts in respect of dividend equivalents on
phantom Wyeth common stock, will be converted into the right to
receive an amount in cash (without interest and less tax
withholdings) equal to the product of (x) the per share
value of the merger consideration and (y) the number of
shares of phantom Wyeth common stock credited to such account,
which accounts will be paid as soon as practicable after the
effective time of the merger, but in no event later than ten
business days following the effective time of the merger, except
that certain accounts considered grandfathered under
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code because they were
earned or vested prior to December 31, 2004, will be paid
out in accordance with the applicable payment elections of the
non-employee directors and as otherwise provided under the terms
of the Wyeth Directors Deferral Plan. These grandfathered
accounts will continue to accrue deemed interest at the same
rate as all other cash amounts previously credited to the
non-employee directors accounts under this plan. The
following table sets forth the estimated value of each
non-employee directors phantom stock account under the
Directors Deferral Plan, as of May 29, 2009, assuming
that the value of a share of phantom Wyeth common stock credited
to each such account is equal to $47.96 (calculated as described
above):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Amount of
|
|
Estimated Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
Account Balance
|
|
Account Balance Payable
|
|
Total Estimated
|
|
|
Payable at Merger
|
|
after Merger
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Non-Employee Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert M. Amen
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
173,046
|
|
|
$
|
173,046
|
|
Michael J. Critelli
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frances D. Fergusson, Ph.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Victor F. Ganzi
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
101,007
|
|
|
$
|
101,007
|
|
Robert Langer, Sc.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John P. Mascotte
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
865,929
|
|
|
$
|
865,929
|
|
Raymond J. McGuire
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Lake Polan, M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H.
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
974,519
|
|
|
$
|
974,519
|
|
Gary L. Rogers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John R. Torell III
|
|
$
|
877,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
877,395
|
|
Amounts credited to any non-employee directors cash
account under the Wyeth Directors Deferral Plan will also
be paid out in cash in accordance with the applicable payment
schedule under the Wyeth Directors Deferral Plan.
Outstanding
Equity Awards Under Wyeths Employee Stock Incentive
Plans
At the effective time of the merger, in general, each
outstanding RSU granted by Wyeth under any of its stock
incentive plans, including each performance share unit award
held by Wyeths employees (including executive officers),
will become fully vested and then will be canceled and the
holder of such vested RSUs (other than certain RSUs that
constitute deferred compensation) will be entitled to receive an
amount in cash (without interest and less tax withholdings)
equal to the per share value of the merger consideration in
respect of each share of Wyeth common stock into which the
vested portion of the RSU or performance share unit award would
otherwise be convertible (except that with respect to any
performance share unit award which by the terms of the award
agreement pursuant to which it was granted provides for a lesser
percentage of such performance share unit award to become vested
upon the effective time of the merger, such performance share
unit award will only become vested as to such lesser percentage,
with the remaining unvested portion of such awards being
canceled without payment). These cash amounts will be paid out
as soon as practicable after the effective time of the merger
but in no event later than ten business days following the
effective time of the merger in accordance with the terms of the
applicable plans.
At the effective time of the merger, each 409A RSU, held by
Wyeths employees (including the executive officers) that
first becomes vested as a result of the merger will, as of the
effective time of the merger, become a vested right to receive
the merger consideration in respect of each share of Wyeth
common stock into which such 409A RSU would otherwise be
convertible. Such merger consideration will be deposited into a
grantor trust. During the period in which the merger
consideration remains in the grantor trust, the cash portion of
the merger consideration will accrue interest at a designated
market rate (as set forth in the Wyeth 2005 (409A)
102
Deferred Compensation Plan) and the portion of the merger
consideration that is Pfizer common stock will accrue dividends
in the form of additional shares of Pfizer common stock in the
same amount and at the same time as dividends are paid on Pfizer
common stock and all of these amounts, less any applicable taxes
to be withheld, will be paid out in accordance with the
applicable payment terms of the 409A RSUs.
The following table sets forth the number of the unvested
outstanding RSUs, including performance share unit awards (shown
at 100% or 80% of target, as applicable) (x) that will be
canceled in exchange for an amount in cash equal to the per
share value of the merger consideration and (y) that will
be converted into the right to receive the merger consideration,
in each case held by Wyeths executive officers as of
May 29, 2009, and the respective estimated total value of
such RSUs and performance share unit awards, based on an assumed
per share value of the merger consideration equal to $47.96
(calculated as described above):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of RSUs and
|
|
Total Resulting Merger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Share
|
|
Consideration to be held in Trust
|
|
|
No. of RSUs and
|
|
|
|
Unit Awards to be
|
|
and Payable after the Merger
|
|
|
Performance Share
|
|
Estimated
|
|
Converted into
|
|
|
|
No. of Shares of
|
|
|
Unit Awards to be
|
|
Total Resulting
|
|
Merger
|
|
Cash
|
|
Pfizer Common
|
|
|
Cashed Out
|
|
Consideration
|
|
Consideration
|
|
Consideration
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
(#)
|
|
Executive Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy P. Cost
|
|
|
17,400
|
|
|
$
|
834,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard R. DeLuca, Jr.
|
|
|
22,210
|
|
|
$
|
1,065,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mikael Dolsten, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
|
82,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,932,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geno J. Germano
|
|
|
45,672
|
|
|
$
|
2,190,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Hofstaetter, Ph.D.
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
|
$
|
1,079,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Kamarck, Ph.D.
|
|
|
16,500
|
|
|
$
|
791,340
|
|
|
|
8,280
|
|
|
$
|
273,240
|
|
|
|
8,156
|
|
John C. Kelly
|
|
|
12,950
|
|
|
$
|
621,082
|
|
|
|
9,710
|
|
|
$
|
320,430
|
|
|
|
9,564
|
|
Andreas Krebs
|
|
|
22,430
|
|
|
$
|
1,075,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph M. Mahady
|
|
|
89,952
|
|
|
$
|
4,314,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory Norden
|
|
|
82,333
|
|
|
$
|
3,948,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denise M. Peppard
|
|
|
39,520
|
|
|
$
|
1,895,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles A. Portwood
|
|
|
24,770
|
|
|
$
|
1,187,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bernard Poussot
|
|
|
363,600
|
|
|
$
|
17,438,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cavan M. Redmond
|
|
|
42,750
|
|
|
$
|
2,050,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lawrence V. Stein
|
|
|
63,052
|
|
|
$
|
3,023,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Katherine Wold
|
|
|
14,096
|
|
|
$
|
676,044
|
|
|
|
10,570
|
|
|
$
|
348,810
|
|
|
|
10,411
|
|
Wyeth
2009 Cash Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards
As part of maintaining the market competitiveness of the total
compensation offered to its executives, Wyeth traditionally has
made annual grants of equity-based long-term incentive awards in
the spring of each year. In the case of executive officers,
these awards generally have been made in the form of stock
options and performance share unit awards settled in shares of
Wyeth common stock. In connection with the proposed merger,
Wyeth agreed, at Pfizers request, that in lieu of granting
equity-based long-term incentive awards for 2009, Wyeth would
grant long-term incentive awards settled in cash. On
February 26, 2009, the Compensation and Benefits Committee
of the Wyeth board of directors adopted, and the Wyeth board of
directors ratified the adoption of, the Wyeth 2009 Cash
Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP). The LTIP provides
for the grant of cash-settled awards to eligible employees in an
amount not to exceed $300 million in the aggregate.
In general, an employee who receives an award under the LTIP,
subject to continued employment, will become vested as to 100%
of the amount of his or her award on the third anniversary of
the grant date. However, an employee will become immediately
vested as to 100% of the amount of his or her award in the event
that, before the third anniversary of the award grant date:
(i) his or her employment is terminated by the company
without cause (after the proposed merger is consummated),
(ii) he or she resigns for good reason (after the proposed
merger is consummated) or (iii) he or she dies or becomes
disabled. Awards under the LTIP are forfeited in their entirety
if an employee is terminated for cause by the company or resigns
(or retires) without good reason prior to the vesting date. The
definitions of cause and good reason are
103
defined in the LTIP by reference to the definitions of those
terms in the severance agreement or plan applicable to the
employee at the time of any such termination. To comply with
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, any early
payment of such award may be delayed until six months after the
date of separation from service, or, if earlier, the date of
death, if the executive officer is a specified
employee (as such term is defined under such
Section 409A) at the time of his or her dismissal.
The following table sets forth the amount that each of the
executive officers would receive pursuant to his or her award
under the LTIP if each such executive officers employment
were to be terminated without cause immediately following the
effective time of the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Due from
|
|
|
2009 LTIP Award
|
|
|
($)
|
|
Executive Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy P. Cost
|
|
$
|
758,800
|
|
Richard R. DeLuca, Jr.
|
|
$
|
416,000
|
|
Mikael Dolsten, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
$
|
3,000,100
|
|
Geno J. Germano
|
|
$
|
1,492,500
|
|
Thomas Hofstaetter, Ph.D.
|
|
$
|
681,200
|
|
Michael Kamarck, Ph.D.
|
|
$
|
1,091,400
|
|
John C. Kelly
|
|
$
|
799,800
|
|
Andreas Krebs
|
|
$
|
890,200
|
|
Joseph M. Mahady
|
|
$
|
3,620,300
|
|
Gregory Norden
|
|
$
|
3,035,100
|
|
Denise M. Peppard
|
|
$
|
1,350,000
|
|
Charles A. Portwood
|
|
$
|
609,200
|
|
Bernard Poussot
|
|
$
|
10,250,000
|
|
Cavan M. Redmond
|
|
$
|
1,067,500
|
|
Lawrence V. Stein
|
|
$
|
2,109,000
|
|
Mary Katherine Wold
|
|
$
|
889,200
|
|
Wyeths
Deferred Compensation Plans, Supplemental Employee Savings Plan
and Tax-Qualified Savings Plan
Currently, certain participants (including certain executive
officers) in Wyeths Deferred Compensation Plans and
Supplemental Employee Savings Plan (both non-qualified
retirement plans) have elected to invest a portion of their
deferred compensation in a fund that tracks phantom shares of
Wyeth common stock. In the merger, each of these phantom shares
will be converted into phantom merger consideration, which, to
the extent provided for under the terms of these plans, will
become eligible to be reinvested in other phantom investment
options provided for under these plans, and all amounts payable
under these plans will be paid to participants in accordance
with the applicable payment terms. In addition, in the merger,
any right to receive a share of Wyeth common stock outstanding
under the Wyeth Management Incentive Plan will be converted into
the right to receive the merger consideration, to be paid to
participants in the plan in accordance with and subject to the
terms of the plan.
Additionally, as of the closing of the merger, all of
Wyeths employees (including its executive officers) who
participate in its defined contribution plans (401(k) plan and
Supplemental Employee Savings Plan) will become fully vested (to
the extent not already vested) in all employer matching
contributions made to their accounts under these plans.
Change
in Control Severance Agreements
Wyeth has entered into change in control severance agreements
with each of its executive officers. These change in control
severance agreements provide Wyeth executive officers with a
one-time, lump-sum cash severance payment, as well as other
benefits, in the event their employment is involuntarily
terminated without cause or they resign for good reason within
three years of the occurrence of a change in control of Wyeth
(which would be triggered by the merger), as discussed under
Chapter 2: The Wyeth Annual Meeting Executive
Compensation Potential Payments upon Termination or
Change in Control Change in Control
104
Severance Agreements beginning on page 223. Under the
current change in control severance agreements, which we
sometimes refer to in this proxy statement/prospectus as the
2006 change in control severance agreements, an executive
officer terminating employment under qualifying circumstances
during the three years following the merger would receive the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
A lump-sum cash severance payment equal to three times the sum
of (x) the executive officers annual base salary as
in effect at the change in control (or if increased thereafter,
as in effect at such time) and (y) the average of the
executive officers three highest bonuses over the prior
five years, or if the executive officer has less than three
years of bonus history, the average of the actual years (the
Bonus amount); if however, the executive officer has
not been awarded one full-years bonus (i.e., in the case
of Dr. Dolsten and Mr. Cost), then the
executives Bonus amount would be equal to 100% of base
salary; and
|
|
|
|
A lump-sum cash payment equal to the pro rata portion of the
Bonus amount for the year in which the executive officers
employment terminates.
|
An executive officer also would be entitled to the following
additional benefits pursuant to the change in control severance
agreements in the event his or her employment terminates under
qualifying circumstances following a change in control:
|
|
|
|
|
On the date of termination, the executive officer would be given
three additional years of credit for age and service for
purposes of calculating the pension benefit to which he or she
is entitled under the Wyeth Retirement Plan U.S.,
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and, if applicable,
Executive Retirement Plan and assuming, in calculating the
benefit, that the executive earned annually during the three
additional years of service, the same compensation (base salary
and bonus) the executive earned in the 12 months preceding
the termination date or, if greater, in the 12 months
preceding the change in control. Further, this benefit would be
determined without any reduction for the receipt of benefits
prior to the normal retirement age of 65 or age 60, as
applicable, provided that this eligibility for an unreduced
pension payable at age 55 is achieved only if, at the
executives termination, the sum of the executive
officers age and years of service equals or exceeds 60,
after adding three years to both service and age. Assuming a
qualifying termination of employment immediately following
completion of the merger, all of the executive officers other
than Mr. Cost and Dr. Dolsten would be eligible for
the unreduced pension, in all cases commencing not earlier than
age 55.
|
|
|
|
If, at the time of termination, either (1) the executive
officer is age 50 or older on the termination date, or
(2) the sum of the executive officers age and years
of service equals or exceeds 60, after adding three years to
both service and age, the executive officer would be entitled to
retiree medical coverage. Retiree medical coverage begins after
the completion of the executives three years of benefit
continuation described below. Assuming a qualifying termination
of employment immediately following completion of the merger,
all of the executive officers would become entitled to retiree
medical coverage pursuant to the change in control severance
agreements, except Messrs. Poussot, Mahady and Stein, who
are already entitled to these benefits on any termination by
virtue of their age and years of service.
|
|
|
|
For three years from the date of termination, the executive
officer would be given continued coverage under Wyeths
health and welfare benefit plans (but excluding Wyeths
disability plans) in which the executive officer was
participating immediately prior to the termination. However, if
welfare benefits are provided by a subsequent employer,
Wyeths obligation to provide these benefits will terminate.
|
|
|
|
The executive officer would be entitled to a one-time cash
payment equal to $60,000, in lieu of the continuation of any
fringe benefits.
|
|
|
|
The executive officer would be provided with outplacement or
executive officer recruiting services at a cost to Wyeth of no
more than 10% of the executive officers base salary (but
in no event exceeding $25,000) and payment by Wyeth of all legal
fees and expenses reasonably incurred by the executive officer,
if any, in enforcing the agreement. Because legal fees are
purely speculative, these fees have not been displayed in the
table following this discussion.
|
105
In addition, if any RSUs or stock options are terminated or
forfeited upon or following the termination of the executive
officers employment under the terms of any plan (which is
not expected to occur in the case of any qualifying termination
of employment immediately following completion of the merger),
the executive officer would receive for any terminated or
forfeited RSUs or stock options an amount equal to the total of:
|
|
|
|
|
the cashout value (as defined in the change in control severance
agreements) of all the shares covered by the RSUs forfeited
(with units converted to shares based on the target
awards); and
|
|
|
|
the excess of (x) the cashout value of all the shares
subject to stock options that were forfeited over (y) the
aggregate exercise price of the shares subject to the forfeited
stock options.
|
To comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code,
to the extent the severance and other benefits under the change
in control severance agreements are deemed to provide a deferral
of compensation under Section 409A and the executive
officer is a specified employee (as such term is
defined under Section 409A) at the time of his or her
dismissal, no payments or benefits would be provided until six
months after the date of separation from service, or, if
earlier, the date of death, at which point Wyeth would be
required to make a one-time, lump-sum cash payment of the
delayed amounts plus interest.
Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code generally imposes
a 20% excise tax on an executive officer on certain payments
made to him or her in connection with a change in control. This
excise tax is imposed upon payments and benefits paid to the
executive officer that are contingent upon a change in control
transaction, which would include payments and benefits under
Wyeths change in control severance agreements as well as
pursuant to the terms of Wyeths stock incentive plans. The
change in control severance agreements generally provide that
Wyeth will put its executive officers in the same after-tax
position that they would have been in but for the imposition of
this excise tax (each executive officer otherwise remains
responsible for his or her own income taxes). In the event that
any payments made in connection with a change in control are
subjected to the excise tax, Wyeth would be obligated to
gross-up
an executive officers payments for all of these excise
taxes plus any federal, state and local income tax applicable to
the excise tax gross-up and for penalties and
applicable interest only if payments (net after tax) exceed 110%
of the executive officers so-called safe-harbor
amount (which is generally three times the historical
W-2
compensation). If payments are between 100% and 110% of the
safe-harbor amount, the executive officer would be cut back to
$1.00 below the safe harbor amount, and Wyeth would not have a
gross-up
obligation.
106
The following table sets forth the estimated amount of payments
and the value of benefits that each executive officer (each of
whom has entered into a change in control severance agreement)
would receive in the event of a qualifying termination of his or
her employment immediately following completion of the merger
and assuming the merger occurs on September 30, 2009,
together with an estimate of the
gross-up
payments for excise and related taxes to be paid by Wyeth:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
Incremental
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross-up
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
Award
|
|
Incremental
|
|
Health and
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
for Excise
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
(i.e., 2009
|
|
Pension
|
|
Welfare
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
and Related
|
|
|
Benefit
|
|
Bonus)
|
|
Benefits
|
|
Benefits
|
|
Perquisites
|
|
to Executive
|
|
|
Taxes
|
Executive Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy P. Cost
|
|
$
|
2,940,000
|
|
|
$
|
367,500
|
|
|
$
|
457,606
|
|
|
$
|
229,383
|
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,079,489
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,357,894
|
|
Richard R. DeLuca, Jr.
|
|
$
|
1,907,967
|
|
|
$
|
188,242
|
|
|
$
|
2,568,839
|
|
|
$
|
240,524
|
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,990,572
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,785,805
|
|
Mikael Dolsten, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
$
|
4,740,000
|
|
|
$
|
592,500
|
|
|
$
|
731,897
|
|
|
$
|
231,461
|
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,380,858
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,663,856
|
|
Geno J. Germano
|
|
$
|
3,122,924
|
|
|
$
|
371,231
|
|
|
$
|
5,433,688
|
|
|
$
|
236,286
|
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
9,249,129
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,045,724
|
|
Thomas Hofstaetter, Ph.D.
|
|
$
|
2,719,710
|
|
|
$
|
321,300
|
|
|
$
|
770,479
|
|
|
$
|
155,484
|
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,051,973
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,303,565
|
|
Michael Kamarck, Ph.D.
|
|
$
|
2,943,478
|
|
|
$
|
342,120
|
|
|
$
|
1,703,211
|
|
|
$
|
189,214
|
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,263,023
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,478,707
|
|
John C. Kelly
|
|
$
|
3,171,800
|
|
|
$
|
395,450
|
|
|
$
|
783,029
|
|
|
$
|
103,503
|
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,538,782
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,583,188
|
|
Andreas Krebs
|
|
$
|
2,968,445
|
|
|
$
|
325,111
|
|
|
$
|
1,188,101
|
|
|
$
|
223,848
|
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,790,505
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,506,727
|
|
Joseph M. Mahady
|
|
$
|
6,277,000
|
|
|
$
|
847,750
|
|
|
$
|
4,495,627
|
|
|
$
|
6,390
|
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
11,711,767
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,443,829
|
|
Gregory Norden
|
|
$
|
4,820,100
|
|
|
$
|
567,525
|
|
|
$
|
8,685,499
|
|
|
$
|
231,356
|
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
14,389,480
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,029,613
|
|
Denise M. Peppard
|
|
$
|
2,486,800
|
|
|
$
|
284,200
|
|
|
$
|
2,761,542
|
|
|
$
|
211,910
|
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,829,452
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,571,503
|
|
Charles A. Portwood
|
|
$
|
3,077,640
|
|
|
$
|
375,660
|
|
|
$
|
1,180,001
|
|
|
$
|
178,387
|
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,896,688
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,268,266
|
|
Bernard Poussot
|
|
$
|
11,100,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,612,500
|
|
|
$
|
11,501,498
|
|
|
$
|
7,872
|
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
24,306,870
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,114,398
|
|
Cavan M. Redmond
|
|
$
|
2,817,830
|
|
|
$
|
321,958
|
|
|
$
|
2,940,350
|
|
|
$
|
236,195
|
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,401,333
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,584,017
|
|
Lawrence V. Stein
|
|
$
|
5,052,000
|
|
|
$
|
698,250
|
|
|
$
|
2,179,692
|
|
|
$
|
4,284
|
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
8,019,226
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,999,619
|
|
Mary Katherine Wold
|
|
$
|
3,540,960
|
|
|
$
|
410,490
|
|
|
$
|
2,356,034
|
|
|
$
|
179,475
|
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,571,959
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,599,580
|
|
The foregoing estimates (particularly the
gross-up
for excise and related taxes) are based on a number of
assumptions, including individual effective tax rates. Facts and
circumstances at the time of any change in control transaction
and termination thereafter as well as changes in the applicable
executive officers compensation history preceding such a
transaction could materially impact whether and to what extent
the excise tax will be imposed and therefore the amount of any
potential
gross-up.
Amounts shown in the above table represent the estimated
incremental pension benefits associated with termination
following a change in control. Specifically, the amounts shown
represent the incremental increase under the agreements (from a
retirement absent a change in control) in the lump-sum value of
benefits based on a retirement following a change in control for
executive officers who are age 55 or older and the
incremental increase in the present value of the lump-sum value
payable at age 55 for executive officers who are not yet
age 55 (using the interest rate for determining lump sums
as in effect for the second quarter of 2009).
Indemnification
and Insurance of Wyeth Directors and Executive
Officers
Prior to the effective time of the merger, Wyeth will, and if
Wyeth is unable to, Pfizer will cause the surviving corporation
to, obtain and fully pay for tail prepaid insurance
policies with a claims period of at least six years from and
after the effective time of the merger from an insurance carrier
with the same or better credit rating as Wyeths current
insurance carrier with respect to directors and
officers liability insurance and fiduciary insurance
(collectively referred to as D&O Insurance),
for all past or present directors, officers or employees of
Wyeth and its subsidiaries (in all of their capacities) and all
fiduciaries under any Wyeth benefit plans (collectively referred
to as the Indemnified Parties), with terms,
conditions, retentions and levels of coverage at least as
favorable as Wyeths existing D&O Insurance with
respect to matters existing or occurring prior to the effective
time of the merger (including with respect to acts or omissions
occurring in connection with the merger agreement and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby). If such
tail prepaid insurance policies have been obtained,
Pfizer will, and will cause the surviving corporation after the
effective time of the merger to, maintain such policies in full
force and effect, for their full term, and to continue to honor
its respective obligations thereunder.
107
If Wyeth and the surviving corporation for any reason fail to
obtain such tail prepaid insurance policies as of
the effective time of the merger, the surviving corporation
will, and Pfizer will cause the surviving corporation to,
continue to maintain in effect the current D&O Insurance,
at no expense to the beneficiaries, for a period of at least six
years from and after the effective time of the merger. However,
Pfizer (or any successor) may substitute therefor policies of at
least the same terms, conditions, retentions and levels of
coverage and amounts which are, in the aggregate, as favorable
to the Indemnified Parties as provided in the existing policies
as of the date of the merger agreement. If such insurance is
unavailable, the surviving corporation will, and Pfizer will
cause the surviving corporation to, purchase the best available
D&O Insurance for such six-year period from an insurance
carrier with the same or better credit rating as Wyeths
current insurance carrier with respect to Wyeths existing
D&O Insurance with terms, conditions, retentions and with
levels of coverage at least as favorable as provided in
Wyeths existing policies as of the date of the merger
agreement with respect to claims, actions, suits, proceedings or
investigations, whether civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative, arising out of or pertaining to facts or events
that occurred prior to, at or after the effective time of the
merger (including with respect to acts or omissions occurring in
connection with the merger agreement and the consummation of the
transactions contemplated thereby). However, neither Pfizer nor
the surviving corporation is required to expend annually in
excess of 300% of the annual premiums currently paid by Wyeth
for such coverage; and, to the extent that the annual premiums
of such coverage exceed that amount, the surviving corporation
is required to use all reasonable efforts to cause to be
maintained the maximum amount of coverage as is available for
300% of such annual premium.
From and after the effective time of the merger, Pfizer will,
and will cause the surviving corporation to indemnify, defend
and hold harmless all Indemnified Parties against any costs,
expenses (including attorneys fees and expenses and
disbursements), judgments, fines, losses, claims, damages or
liabilities incurred in connection with any claim, action, suit,
proceeding or investigation, whether civil, criminal,
administrative or investigative, arising out of or pertaining to
the fact that the Indemnified Party is or was an officer,
director, employee or fiduciary of Wyeth or any of its
subsidiaries or a fiduciary under any Wyeth benefit plan, or is
or was serving at the request of Wyeth or any of its
subsidiaries as a director, officer or employee of any other
corporation, limited liability company, partnership, joint
venture, trust or other business or non-profit enterprise
(including an employee benefit plan), whether asserted or
claimed prior to, at or after the effective time of the merger
(including with respect to acts or omissions occurring in
connection with the merger agreement and the consummation of the
transactions contemplated thereby), and provide advancement of
expenses to the Indemnified Parties (within ten days of receipt
by Pfizer or the surviving corporation from an Indemnified Party
of a request therefor), in all such cases to the same extent
that such persons are indemnified or have the right to
advancement of expenses as of the date of the merger agreement
by Wyeth under the certificate of incorporation, bylaws and
indemnification agreements, if any, of Wyeth or any of its
subsidiaries. In the event of any claim, action, suit, hearing,
proceeding or investigation, whether civil, criminal or
administrative, Pfizer will, and will cause the surviving
corporation to (x) not settle, compromise or consent to the
entry of any judgment in such proceeding or threatened claim,
action, suit, hearing, proceeding or investigation (and in which
indemnification could be sought by an Indemnified Party), unless
such settlement, compromise or consent includes an unconditional
release of such Indemnified Party from all liability arising out
of such claim, action, suit, hearing, proceeding or
investigation or such Indemnified Party otherwise consents in
writing, and (y) cooperate in the defense of such matter.
Additionally, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law,
Pfizer will, and will cause the surviving corporation to,
include and cause to be maintained in effect in the surviving
corporations (or any successors) certificate of
incorporation and bylaws for a period of six years after the
effective time of the merger, the current provisions contained
in the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of Wyeth
regarding elimination of liability of directors, and
indemnification of and advancement of expenses to directors,
officers and employees of Wyeth.
The rights of the Indemnified Parties under the merger agreement
are in addition to any rights such Indemnified Parties may have
under the certificate of incorporation or bylaws of Wyeth or any
of its subsidiaries, or under any applicable contracts or laws.
The rights of the Indemnified Parties under the merger agreement
are intended to be for the benefit of, and may be enforced by,
the Indemnified Parties.
108
The obligations of Pfizer and the surviving corporation to the
Indemnified Parties under the merger agreement shall not be
terminated, amended or modified in any manner so as to adversely
affect the Indemnified Parties (including their successors,
heirs and legal representatives).
Board of
Directors of Pfizer Following Completion of the Merger
Upon completion of the merger, the Pfizer board of directors is
expected to be composed of 16 members. In addition to the
individuals serving on the Pfizer board of directors at the
effective time of the merger, two members of the Wyeth board of
directors that were members of the Wyeth board of directors as
of the date of the merger agreement will be appointed to the
Pfizer board of directors. Pfizers Corporate Governance
Committee will review and evaluate potential candidates from the
Wyeth board of directors through customary procedures to assess
the independence and qualifications of such Wyeth directors.
Upon completion of the Corporate Governance Committees
evaluation, the committee will recommend nominees. Based on the
recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee and its own
independent evaluation, the Pfizer board of directors will
appoint two legacy Wyeth directors to the Pfizer board of
directors. The remaining directors of Wyeth will resign as of
the effective time of the merger. As of the date of this proxy
statement/prospectus, no determination has been made as to the
identity of the two Wyeth directors who will be appointed to the
Pfizer board of directors.
Information about the current Pfizer directors and executive
officers can be found in the documents listed under the heading
Where You Can Find More Information beginning on
page 247.
Pfizers
Dividend Policy
Pfizer currently pays a quarterly dividend on its common stock
and last paid dividends on June 2, 2009, of $0.16 per
share. In January 2009, Pfizer announced that it would reduce
its quarterly dividend per share to $0.16, effective with the
dividend to be paid in the second quarter of 2009. Under the
terms of the merger agreement, during the period before the
closing of the merger Pfizer is prohibited from paying any
dividends other than its regular quarterly dividends at the
current rate, which is not to exceed $0.16 per share.
Manner
and Procedure for Exchanging Shares of Wyeth Stock; No
Fractional Shares
The conversion of Wyeth common stock into the right to receive
the merger consideration will occur automatically at the
effective time of the merger. The conversion, if necessary, of
Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock (to the extent not redeemed
prior to the effective time of the merger) into the right to
receive Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock will occur
automatically at the effective time of the merger. However, on
April 23, 2009, Wyeth announced that, pursuant to a request
from Pfizer made in accordance with the terms and conditions of
the merger agreement, Wyeth will redeem all of its outstanding
Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock, effective on July 15,
2009. Therefore, it is expected that there will not be any
shares of Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding at
the effective time of the merger. In such case, Pfizer will not
create or issue a new series of preferred stock in connection
with the merger.
Prior to the completion of the merger, Pfizer will select a
commercial bank or trust company reasonably acceptable to Wyeth
to act as the exchange agent, for the purpose of exchanging
certificates or book entry shares representing Wyeth shares for
the merger consideration and to perform other duties as
explained in the merger agreement. Simultaneously with or prior
to the effective time of the merger, Pfizer will deposit or
cause to be deposited with such exchange agent a cash amount in
immediately available funds sufficient to pay the aggregate cash
portion of the merger consideration and book-entry shares (or
certificates if requested) of Pfizer common stock and Pfizer $2
Convertible Preferred Stock representing the aggregate stock
portion of the merger consideration, in each case, payable to
Wyeths stockholders. If you hold your own shares of Wyeth
common stock in certificated form, promptly after the effective
time of the merger, and in no event later than the fifth
business day following the effective time of the merger, the
exchange agent will mail you a letter of transmittal which will
contain instructions on how to surrender your shares of Wyeth
common stock in exchange for the merger consideration (and, if
necessary, your shares of Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock
in exchange for Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock). The
exchange agent will pay you the merger consideration to which
you are entitled after you have provided to the exchange agent
your signed letter of
109
transmittal, surrendered your stock and provided any other items
specified by the letter of transmittal. You should not submit
your Wyeth stock certificates for exchange until you receive the
transmittal instructions and a form of letter of transmittal
from the exchange agent. Holders of book-entry shares will
automatically receive the merger consideration and will not be
required to deliver a certificate or an executed letter of
transmittal to the exchange agent. Except as described above,
interest will not be paid or accrue in respect of the merger
consideration. Merger consideration paid to you will be reduced
by any applicable taxes.
In the event of a transfer of ownership of Wyeth common stock or
Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock that is not registered in
Wyeths transfer agents records, payment of the
merger consideration as described above will be made to a person
other than the person in whose name the certificate so
surrendered is registered only if the certificate is properly
endorsed or otherwise is in proper form for transfer; and the
person requesting the exchange must pay any transfer or other
taxes required by reason of the payment of the merger
consideration to such other person.
Wyeth stockholders will not receive any fractional shares of
Pfizer common stock pursuant to the merger. Instead of any
fractional shares, stockholders will be paid an amount in cash
for such fraction of a share calculated by multiplying
(A) the fractional share interest to which such holder
(after taking into account all shares of Wyeths common
stock surrendered by such holder) would otherwise be entitled by
(B) the volume weighted average price of Pfizer common
stock for the five consecutive trading days ending two days
prior to the effective time of the merger, as such prices are
reported on the NYSE Transaction Reporting System.
Additionally, one year after the effective time of the merger,
the exchange agent will deliver to Pfizer all cash and shares of
Pfizer common stock remaining in the exchange fund administered
by the exchange agent that have not been distributed to holders
of Wyeth shares. Thereafter, Wyeth stockholders must look only
to Pfizer, and Pfizer will remain liable, for payment of the
merger consideration on their shares of Wyeth common stock. Any
portion of the exchange fund administered by the exchange agent
remaining unclaimed by holders of shares of Wyeth common stock
five years after the effective time of the merger (or
immediately prior to such time as such amounts would otherwise
escheat to or become property of any governmental authority)
will, to the extent permitted by applicable law, become the
property of the surviving corporation.
Regulatory
Approvals Required for the Merger
Pfizer and Wyeth have agreed to use their reasonable best
efforts to obtain all regulatory approvals required to complete
the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. These
approvals include approval under, or notices pursuant to, the
HSR Act, the EC Merger Regulation, the China anti-monopoly law
and the applicable antitrust regulatory laws in Australia and
Canada. In using its reasonable best efforts to obtain the
required regulatory approvals, Pfizer may be obligated to sell,
divest or dispose of certain of its assets or businesses (which
may include the sale, divestiture or disposition of assets or
businesses of the surviving corporation at or following the
effective time of the merger) or take other action to avoid the
commencement of any action to prohibit any of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, or if already commenced,
to avoid the entry of, or to effect the dissolution of, any
injunction, temporary restraining order or other order in any
action so as to enable the closing of the merger to occur.
However, Pfizer will not be required to propose, negotiate,
commit to or effect any sale, divestiture or disposition of
assets or business of Wyeth or its subsidiaries or Pfizer or its
subsidiaries or offer to take any such action where such action,
sale, divestiture or disposition, individually or in the
aggregate, would be of assets or a business of Wyeth or its
subsidiaries or Pfizer or its subsidiaries that would result in
the one year loss of net sales revenues (measured by
net 2008 sales revenue) in excess of $3 billion.
Department of Justice, Federal Trade Commission and Other
United States Antitrust Authorities. The merger
is subject to the HSR Act. The HSR Act and related rules
prohibit the completion of transactions such as the merger
unless the parties notify the Federal Trade Commission, or the
FTC, and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, or
the DOJ, in advance. Pfizer and Wyeth filed the required HSR
notification and report form on March 4, 2009. The HSR Act
further provides that a transaction or portion of a transaction
that is notifiable under the Act, such as the merger, may not be
consummated until the expiration of a 30
calendar-day
waiting period, or the early termination of that waiting period,
following the parties filing of their respective
110
HSR Act notification forms. However, because the FTC issued a
Request for Additional Information and Documentary Material
(Second Request) to the parties on April 3,
2009, prior to the expiration of the initial waiting period, the
parties must observe a second
30-day
waiting period, which would begin to run only after both parties
have substantially complied with the Second Request, unless the
waiting period is terminated earlier or extended with the
consent of the parties.
At any time before or after the acquisition is completed, either
the DOJ or FTC could take action under the antitrust laws in
opposition to the merger, including seeking to enjoin the
acquisition or seeking divestiture of substantial assets of
Pfizer or Wyeth or their subsidiaries. Private parties also may
seek to take legal action under the antitrust laws under some
circumstances. Based upon an examination of information
available relating to the businesses in which the companies are
engaged, Pfizer and Wyeth believe that the merger will receive
the necessary regulatory clearance. However, Pfizer and Wyeth
can give no assurance that a challenge to the merger on
antitrust grounds will not be made, or, if such a challenge is
made, that Pfizer and Wyeth will prevail.
In addition, the merger may be reviewed by the attorneys general
in the various states in which Pfizer and Wyeth operate. These
authorities may claim that there is authority, under the
applicable state and federal antitrust laws and regulations, to
investigate
and/or
disapprove of the merger under the circumstances and based upon
the review set forth in applicable state laws and regulations.
There can be no assurance that one or more state attorneys
general will not attempt to file an antitrust action to
challenge the merger.
European Union. Both Pfizer and Wyeth sell
products to customers based in the European Union. The EC Merger
Regulation (Regulation 139 of 2004) requires
notification of and approval by the European Commission of
mergers or acquisitions involving parties with worldwide sales
and European Union sales exceeding given thresholds. Pfizer and
Wyeth filed a formal notification of the merger with the
European Commission on May 29, 2009. The European
Commission has 25 business days after receipt of such formal
notification, which period may be extended by the European
Commission in certain circumstances, to issue its decision
regarding the merger.
Other Non-U.S. Approvals to be
Obtained. Approvals of the merger under the China
anti-monopoly law and by the antitrust regulators in Australia
and Canada also are a condition to the merger agreement.
Although not a condition to closing, Pfizer and Wyeth have
agreed to use their reasonable best efforts to make necessary
registrations, declarations, notices and filings in additional
jurisdictions (see The Merger Agreement
Agreement to Use Reasonable Best Efforts beginning on
page 130).
Timing. Pfizer and Wyeth cannot assure you
that all of the regulatory approvals described above will be
obtained and, if obtained, Pfizer and Wyeth cannot assure you as
to the timing of any approvals, the ability to obtain the
approvals on satisfactory terms or the absence of any litigation
challenging such approvals. Pfizer and Wyeth also cannot assure
you that the DOJ, the FTC or any state attorney general will not
attempt to challenge the merger on antitrust grounds, and, if
such a challenge is made, Pfizer and Wyeth cannot assure you as
to its result.
Pfizer and Wyeth are not aware of any material governmental
approvals or actions that are required for completion of the
merger other than those described above. It is presently
contemplated that if any such additional governmental approvals
or actions are required, those approvals or actions will be
sought. There can be no assurance, however, that any additional
approvals or actions will be obtained.
Merger
Expenses, Fees and Costs
Generally, all fees and expenses incurred in connection with the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement will be paid by the party incurring those expenses.
Pursuant to the merger agreement, however, termination fees are
payable by Pfizer and Wyeth if the merger agreement is
terminated under certain circumstances (and, in the case of
termination fees that may be payable by Wyeth, such fees may
include, in specified circumstances, reimbursement of actual
expenses incurred by Pfizer in connection with the merger of up
to $700 million) (see The Merger
Agreement Expenses and Fees beginning on
page 144).
111
Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger
The following discussion sets forth the material
U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger to
U.S. holders (as defined below) of (1) Wyeth common
stock that exchange their Wyeth common stock for Pfizer common
stock and cash
and/or
(2) Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock that exchange
their Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock (together with
Wyeth common stock, Wyeth stock) for Pfizer $2
Convertible Preferred Stock. It is expected that there will not
be any shares of Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock
outstanding at the effective time of the merger as Wyeth has
announced that such shares will be redeemed effective
July 15, 2009.
This discussion does not address any tax consequences arising
under the laws of any state, local or foreign jurisdiction, or
under any U.S. federal laws other than those pertaining to
income tax. This discussion is based upon the Internal Revenue
Code, the Treasury regulations promulgated under the Internal
Revenue Code and court and administrative rulings and decisions,
all as in effect on the date of this proxy statement/prospectus.
These laws may change, possibly retroactively, and any change
could affect the accuracy of the statements and conclusions set
forth in this discussion.
This discussion addresses only those holders of Wyeth stock that
hold their shares as a capital asset within the meaning of
Section 1221 of the Internal Revenue Code. Further, this
discussion does not address all aspects of U.S. federal
income taxation that may be relevant to holders of Wyeth stock
in light of their particular circumstances or that may be
applicable to them if they are subject to special treatment
under the U.S. federal income tax laws, including, without
limitation:
|
|
|
|
|
a bank or other financial institution;
|
|
|
|
a tax-exempt organization;
|
|
|
|
an S corporation or other pass-through entity;
|
|
|
|
an insurance company;
|
|
|
|
a mutual fund;
|
|
|
|
a regulated investment company or real estate investment trust;
|
|
|
|
a dealer or broker in stocks and securities, or currencies;
|
|
|
|
a trader in securities that elects mark-to-market treatment;
|
|
|
|
a holder of Wyeth stock subject to the alternative minimum tax
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code;
|
|
|
|
a holder of Wyeth stock that received such Wyeth shares through
the exercise of an employee stock option, pursuant to a tax
qualified retirement plan or otherwise as compensation;
|
|
|
|
a person that is not a U.S. holder (as defined below);
|
|
|
|
a person that has a functional currency other than the
U.S. dollar;
|
|
|
|
a holder of Wyeth stock that holds such Wyeth shares as part of
a hedge, straddle, constructive sale, conversion or other
integrated transaction; or
|
|
|
|
a U.S. expatriate.
|
The determination of the actual tax consequences of the merger
to a holder of Wyeth stock will depend on the holders
specific situation. Holders of Wyeth stock should consult their
own tax advisors as to the tax consequences of the merger in
their particular circumstances, including the applicability and
effect of the alternative minimum tax and any state, local,
foreign or other tax laws and of changes in those laws.
For purposes of this discussion, the term
U.S. holder means a beneficial owner of Wyeth
stock that is for U.S. federal income tax purposes
(1) an individual citizen or resident of the United States,
(2) a corporation, including any entity treated as a
corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, created
or
112
organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state
thereof or the District of Columbia, (3) a trust if
(x) a U.S. court is able to exercise primary
supervision over the trusts administration and one or more
U.S. persons are authorized to control all substantial
decisions of the trust or (y) it has a valid election in
effect under applicable Treasury regulations to be treated as a
U.S. person, or (4) an estate that is subject to
U.S. federal income tax on its income regardless of its
source.
The U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger to a
partner in an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for
U.S. federal income tax purposes that holds Wyeth stock
generally will depend on the status of the partner and the
activities of the partnership. Partners in a partnership holding
Wyeth stock should consult their own tax advisors.
Consequences
of the Merger Generally
The receipt of Pfizer common stock and cash
and/or
Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock (which would only be
issued if the Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock is not
redeemed prior to the effective time of the merger) in exchange
for Wyeth stock in the merger generally will be a taxable
transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A
U.S. holder of Wyeth stock who receives Pfizer common stock
and cash
and/or
Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock in the merger generally
will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference, if
any, between (1) the sum of the fair market value of Pfizer
common stock and cash, including any cash received in lieu of
fractional shares of Pfizer common stock,
and/or
Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock received in the merger,
and (2) such holders adjusted tax basis in its Wyeth
stock exchanged therefor. Gain or loss and holding period will
be determined separately for each block of Wyeth stock,
i.e., shares acquired at the same cost in a single
transaction, exchanged in the merger. Any capital gain or loss
will be long-term capital gain or loss if the
U.S. holders holding period for its Wyeth stock is
more than one year at the time of the merger. Currently,
long-term capital gain for non-corporate taxpayers is taxed at a
maximum federal income tax rate of 15%. If the U.S. holder
has held its Wyeth stock for one year or less at the time of the
merger, any capital gain or loss will be short-term capital gain
or loss. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to
certain limitations. A U.S. holders aggregate tax
basis in its Pfizer common stock
and/or
Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock received in the merger
will equal the fair market value of such stock at the effective
time of the merger, and the holders holding period for
such stock will begin on the day after the merger.
Dissenting
Stockholders
A U.S. holder who exercises appraisal rights with respect
to the merger will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the
difference, if any, between the cash received via appraisal and
such holders adjusted tax basis in its Wyeth stock with
respect to which the appraisal rights were exercised. This
capital gain or loss will be long-term or short-term capital
gain or loss depending upon the holders holding period for
its Wyeth stock with respect to which the appraisal rights were
exercised, as described in the immediately preceding paragraph.
For more details regarding appraisal rights with respect to the
merger, see Appraisal Rights beginning
on page 114.
Information
Reporting and Backup Withholding
Information reporting and backup withholding may apply to
payments made in connection with the merger. Backup withholding
will not apply, however, to a holder of Wyeth stock who
(1) furnishes a correct taxpayer identification number
(TIN), certifies that such holder is not subject to
backup withholding on the substitute
Form W-9
(or appropriate successor form) included in the letter of
transmittal that such holder will receive, and otherwise
complies with all applicable requirements of the backup
withholding rules; or (2) provides proof that such holder
is otherwise exempt from backup withholding. Backup withholding
is not an additional tax, and any amounts withheld under the
backup withholding rules may be refunded or credited against a
holders U.S. federal income tax liability, if any,
provided that such holder furnishes the required information to
the Internal Revenue Service in a timely manner. The Internal
Revenue Service may impose a penalty upon any taxpayer that
fails to provide the correct TIN.
This summary of the material U.S. federal income tax
consequences of the merger to holders of Wyeth stock is for
general information only and is not tax advice. The
determination of the actual tax
113
consequences of the merger to a holder of Wyeth stock will
depend on the holders specific situation. Holders of Wyeth
stock should consult their own tax advisors as to the tax
consequences of the merger in their particular circumstances,
including the applicability and effect of the alternative
minimum tax and any state, local, foreign or other tax laws and
of changes in those laws.
Appraisal
Rights
In connection with the merger, record holders of Wyeth common
stock who comply with the procedures summarized below will be
entitled to appraisal rights if the merger is completed. Under
Delaware law, record holders of Wyeths $2 Convertible
Preferred Stock are not entitled to appraisal rights in
connection with the merger; however, if such a holder becomes a
record holder of Wyeth common stock upon the conversion of Wyeth
$2 Convertible Preferred Stock, such holder will be entitled to
appraisal rights with respect to such common stock so long as
the holder complies with the statutory requirements for
exercising appraisal rights. Under Section 262 of the DGCL
(which is referred to as Section 262), as a result of
completion of the merger, holders of shares of Wyeth common
stock, with respect to which appraisal rights are properly
demanded and perfected and not withdrawn or lost, are entitled,
in lieu of receiving the merger consideration, to have the
fair value of their shares at the effective time of
the merger (exclusive of any element of value arising from the
accomplishment or expectation of the merger) judicially
determined and paid to them in cash by complying with the
provisions of Section 262. Wyeth is required to send a
notice to that effect to each stockholder not less than
20 days prior to the meeting. This proxy
statement/prospectus constitutes that notice to you.
Stockholders of record who desire to exercise their appraisal
rights must satisfy all of the following conditions.
A stockholder who desires to exercise appraisal rights must
(a) not vote in favor of the adoption of the merger
agreement and (b) deliver a written demand for appraisal of
the stockholders shares to the Corporate Secretary of
Wyeth before the vote on the merger agreement at the meeting.
A demand for appraisal must be executed by or for the
stockholder of record, fully and correctly, as the
stockholders name appears on the certificates representing
shares. If shares are owned of record in a fiduciary capacity,
such as by a trustee, guardian or custodian, such demand must be
executed by the fiduciary. If shares are owned of record by more
than one person, as in a joint tenancy or tenancy in common, the
demand must be executed by all joint owners. An authorized
agent, including an agent of two or more joint owners, may
execute the demand for appraisal for a stockholder of record;
however, the agent must identify the record owner and expressly
disclose that, in exercising the demand, the agent is acting as
agent for the record owner. In addition, the stockholder must
continuously hold the shares of record from the date of making
the demand through the effective time of the merger.
A record owner, such as a broker, who holds shares as a nominee
for others may exercise appraisal rights with respect to the
shares held for all or less than all beneficial owners of shares
as to which the holder is the record owner. In that case, the
written demand must set forth the number of shares covered by
the demand. Where the number of shares is not expressly stated,
the demand will be presumed to cover all shares outstanding in
the name of the record owner.
Beneficial owners who are not record owners and who intend to
exercise appraisal rights should instruct the record owner to
comply strictly with the statutory requirements with respect to
the exercise of appraisal rights before the vote on the adoption
of the merger agreement at the meeting. A holder of shares held
in street name who desires appraisal rights with
respect to those shares must take such actions as may be
necessary to ensure that a timely and proper demand for
appraisal is made by the record owner of the shares. Shares held
through brokerage firms, banks and other financial institutions
are frequently deposited with and held of record in the name of
a nominee of a central security depositary, such as
Cede & Co., The Depository Trust Companys
nominee. Any holder of shares desiring appraisal rights with
respect to such shares who held such shares through a brokerage
firm, bank or other financial institution is responsible for
ensuring that the demand for appraisal is made by the record
holder. The stockholder should instruct such firm, bank or
institution that the demand for appraisal must be made by the
record holder of the shares, which might be the nominee of a
central security depositary if the shares have been so deposited.
114
As required by Section 262, a demand for appraisal must be
in writing and must reasonably inform Wyeth of the identity of
the record holder (which might be a nominee as described above)
and of such holders intention to seek appraisal of such
shares.
Stockholders of record who elect to demand appraisal of their
shares must mail or deliver their written demand to: Wyeth, Five
Giralda Farms, Madison, New Jersey 07940, Attention: Corporate
Secretary. The written demand for appraisal should specify the
stockholders name and mailing address, the number of
shares owned, and that the stockholder is demanding appraisal of
his, her or its shares. The written demand must be received by
Wyeth prior to the meeting. Neither voting (in person or by
proxy) against, abstaining from voting on or failing to vote on
the proposal to adopt the merger agreement will alone suffice to
constitute a written demand for appraisal within the meaning of
Section 262. In addition, the stockholder must not vote its
shares of common stock in favor of adoption of the merger
agreement. Because a proxy that does not contain voting
instructions will, unless revoked, be voted in favor of adoption
of the merger agreement, a stockholder who votes by proxy and
who wishes to exercise appraisal rights must vote against the
adoption of the merger agreement or abstain from voting on the
adoption of the merger agreement.
Within 120 days after the effective time of the merger,
either the surviving corporation in the merger or any
stockholder who has timely and properly demanded appraisal of
such stockholders shares and who has complied with the
requirements of Section 262 and is otherwise entitled to
appraisal rights, or any beneficial owner of the stock for which
a demand for appraisal has been properly made, may commence an
appraisal proceeding by filing a petition in the Delaware Court
of Chancery demanding a determination of the fair value of the
shares of all stockholders who have properly demanded appraisal.
If a petition for an appraisal is timely filed, after a hearing
on such petition, the Delaware Court of Chancery will determine
which stockholders are entitled to appraisal rights and
thereafter will appraise the shares owned by those stockholders,
determining the fair value of the shares exclusive of any
element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation
of the merger, together with interest to be paid, if any, upon
the amount determined to be the fair value. Unless the Delaware
Court of Chancery in its discretion determines otherwise for
good cause shown, interest from the effective date of the merger
through the date of payment of the judgment shall be compounded
quarterly and shall accrue at 5% over the Federal Reserve
discount rate (including any surcharges) as established from
time to time during the period between the effective date of the
merger and the date of payment of the judgment. In determining
fair value, the Delaware Court of Chancery is to take into
account all relevant factors. In Weinberger v. UOP,
Inc., et al., the Delaware Supreme Court discussed the
factors that could be considered in determining fair value in an
appraisal proceeding, stating that proof of value by any
techniques or methods which are generally considered acceptable
in the financial community and otherwise admissible in
court should be considered and that [f]air price
obviously requires consideration of all relevant factors
involving the value of a company. The Delaware Supreme
Court stated that in making this determination of fair value the
court must consider market value, asset value, dividends,
earnings prospects, the nature of the enterprise and any other
facts which were known or which could be ascertained as of the
date of merger which throw any light on future prospects of the
merged corporation. The Delaware Supreme Court construed
Section 262 to mean that elements of future value,
including the nature of the enterprise, which are known or
susceptible of proof as of the date of the merger and not the
product of speculation, may be considered. However, the
Delaware Supreme Court noted that Section 262 provides that
fair value is to be determined exclusive of any element of
value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the
merger.
Stockholders considering seeking appraisal should bear in mind
that the fair value of their shares determined under
Section 262 could be more than, the same as, or less than
the merger consideration they are entitled to receive pursuant
to the merger agreement if they do not seek appraisal of their
shares, and that opinions of investment banking firms as to the
fairness from a financial point of view of the consideration
payable in a transaction are not opinions as to, and do not
address, fair value under Section 262.
The cost of the appraisal proceeding may be determined by the
Delaware Court of Chancery and charged upon the parties as the
Delaware Court of Chancery deems equitable in the circumstances.
Upon application of a stockholder seeking appraisal rights, the
Delaware Court of Chancery may order that all or a portion of
the expenses incurred by such stockholder in connection with the
appraisal proceeding, including, without limitation, reasonable
attorneys fees and the fees and expenses of experts, be
charged pro rata against the
115
value of all shares entitled to appraisal. In the absence of
such a determination of assessment, each party bears its own
expenses.
Except as explained in the last sentence of this paragraph, at
any time within 60 days after the effective time of the
merger, any stockholder who has demanded appraisal and who has
not commenced an appraisal proceeding or joined that proceeding
as a named party, shall have the right to withdraw such
stockholders demand for appraisal and to accept the cash
and Pfizer common stock to which the stockholder is entitled
pursuant to the merger. After this period, the stockholder may
withdraw such stockholders demand for appraisal only with
the consent of the surviving corporation. If no petition for
appraisal is filed with the Delaware Court of Chancery within
120 days after the effective time of the merger,
stockholders rights to appraisal shall cease and all
stockholders shall be entitled only to receive the merger
consideration as provided for in the merger agreement. Inasmuch
as the parties to the merger agreement have no obligation to
file such a petition, and have no present intention to do so,
any stockholder who desires that such petition be filed is
advised to file it on a timely basis. No petition timely filed
in the Delaware Court of Chancery demanding appraisal shall be
dismissed as to any stockholders without the approval of the
Delaware Court of Chancery, and that approval may be conditioned
upon such terms as the Delaware Court of Chancery deems just.
The foregoing is a brief summary of Section 262 that sets
forth the procedures for demanding statutory appraisal rights.
This summary, however, is not a complete statement of all
applicable requirements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to Section 262, a copy of the text of which is
attached hereto as Annex D. Failure to comply with all the
procedures set forth in Section 262 will result in the loss
of a stockholders statutory appraisal rights.
Restrictions
on Sales of Shares by Certain Affiliates
The shares of Pfizer common stock to be issued in connection
with the merger will be freely transferable under the
U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Act, except for shares issued to any stockholder who may be
deemed to be an affiliate of Pfizer for purposes of
Rule 144 under the Securities Act. Persons who may be
deemed to be affiliates include individuals or entities that
control, are controlled by, or under the common control with
Pfizer and may include the executive officers, directors and
significant stockholders of Pfizer.
Stock
Exchange Listing of Pfizer Stock and Delisting and
Deregistration of Wyeth Stock
Application will be made to have the shares of Pfizer common
stock and, if necessary, Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock
to be issued in the merger approved for listing on the NYSE,
where Pfizer common stock currently is traded. If the merger is
consummated, Wyeth common stock and Wyeth $2 Convertible
Preferred Stock will no longer be listed on the NYSE, and will
be deregistered under the Exchange Act.
Litigation
Relating to the Merger
Beginning on January 26, 2009, purported class actions were
commenced by Wyeth stockholders challenging Wyeths
proposed merger with Pfizer in the United States District Court
for the District of New Jersey, the Superior Court of New
Jersey, Chancery Division (Morris County) and the Delaware
Chancery Court.
In the New Jersey federal court action, Drogin v. Wyeth, et
al., 09 Civ. 383 (D.N.J.), plaintiff filed an amended
complaint on April 16, 2009 alleging that the members of
the Wyeth board of directors breached their fiduciary duties by
authorizing the sale of Wyeth to Pfizer for inadequate
consideration, and by failing to disclose certain information
regarding the proposed merger. The complaint asserts that Wyeth
breached fiduciary duties
and/or aided
and abetted the Wyeth directors breaches of fiduciary
duties. The complaint also asserts that Pfizer and Wagner
Acquisition Corp. aided and abetted the alleged breaches of
fiduciary duty by Wyeths board members. The parties have
stipulated that defendants are not obligated to answer, move to
dismiss or otherwise respond to the amended complaint until
June 18, 2009. Discovery has not yet commenced in this case.
116
Three actions were filed in New Jersey Superior Court (C-10-09;
C-13-09; C-11-09), and these actions were consolidated on
March 9, 2009. The plaintiffs filed a consolidated
complaint on April 16, 2009, alleging that the members of
the Wyeth board of directors breached their fiduciary duties by
authorizing the sale of Wyeth to Pfizer for inadequate
consideration. The complaint also asserts that Wyeth breached
fiduciary duties
and/or aided
and abetted breaches of fiduciary duties by Wyeths
directors. Pfizer is not named as a defendant. On April 17,
2009, the court stayed these actions in favor of the
consolidated action pending in Delaware Chancery Court. On
May 7, 2009 the plaintiffs filed a motion in the Appellate
Division of the New Jersey Superior Court for leave to appeal
the order staying these actions in favor of the Delaware
litigation. Defendants filed a memorandum of law in opposition
to plaintiffs motion on May 18, 2009. On May 18,
2009, the New Jersey Superior Court dismissed these actions
without prejudice. On June 12, 2009, the Appellate Division of
the New Jersey Superior Court denied the plaintiffs motion
for leave to appeal the order staying these actions in favor of
the Delaware litigation.
Three actions were filed in Delaware Chancery Court and were
consolidated under the caption In re Wyeth Shareholders
Litigation on February 19, 2009 (consolidated Civil
Action No.
4329-VCN)
(the Delaware Action). On April 1, 2009, the
plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint alleging that the
members of the Wyeth board of directors breached their fiduciary
duties by authorizing the sale of Wyeth to Pfizer for inadequate
consideration, and by failing to disclose certain information
regarding the proposed merger, including, among other things:
(1) the assumptions underlying the estimates of discounted cash
flows set forth in the proxy statement/prospectus and the rates
used to discount those cash flows to present value; (2) the
grounds for the conclusion by the Wyeth board of directors that
earlier offers by Pfizer were inadequate; (3) the substance of
any efforts to obtain competing offers and proposals for Wyeth;
and (4) whether and how the Wyeth board of directors in
evaluating and negotiating the proposed merger considered
Pfizers announcement of a dividend reduction, the
impending patent expiration of Lipitor, and potential regulatory
approval of Wyeths pipeline Alzheimers drug. The
complaint also asserts that Wyeth and Pfizer aided and abetted
the alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by Wyeths board
members.
All of these actions seek, among other things, to enjoin the
defendants from consummating the proposed merger on the agreed
upon terms.
On June 10, 2009, Wyeth, Wyeths directors and Pfizer
entered into a memorandum of understanding with the plaintiffs
in the Delaware Action reflecting an agreement in principle to
settle the Delaware Action based on their agreement to include
in this proxy statement/prospectus certain additional
disclosures relating to the transaction. Wyeth, Wyeths
directors and Pfizer each have denied, and continue to deny,
that they have committed or aided and abetted in the commission
of any violation of law or engaged in any of the wrongful acts
alleged in the Delaware Action, and expressly maintain that they
diligently and scrupulously complied with their fiduciary and
other legal duties. Wyeth, Pfizer, and the members of
Wyeths board of directors believe the Delaware Action is
without merit, and they entered into the memorandum of
understanding solely to avoid the risk of delaying the merger
and to minimize the expense of litigation. The memorandum of
understanding is subject to customary conditions including
completion of appropriate settlement documentation, completion
of due diligence to confirm the fairness of the settlement,
approval by the Delaware Court of Chancery, and consummation of
the merger.
If the settlement is consummated, the Delaware Action will be
dismissed with prejudice and the defendants and other released
persons will receive from or on behalf of all persons and
entities who held Wyeths common stock at any time from
January 26, 2009 through the date of consummation of the
merger a release of all claims relating to the merger, the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated therein, and
the disclosures made in connection therewith (including the
claims asserted in the lawsuits filed in New Jersey state and
federal court described above). Members of the purported
plaintiff class will be sent notice of the proposed settlement,
and a hearing before the Delaware Court of Chancery will be
scheduled regarding, among other things, approval of the
proposed settlement and any application by plaintiffs
counsel for an award of attorneys fees and expenses.
117
THE
MERGER AGREEMENT
The following summary describes material provisions of the
merger agreement. This summary does not purport to be complete
and may not contain all of the information about the merger
agreement that is important to you. This summary is subject to,
and qualified in its entirety by reference to, the merger
agreement, which is attached to this proxy
statement/prospectus
as Annex A and is incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement/prospectus.
You are urged to read the merger agreement carefully and in its
entirety, as it is the legal document governing the merger.
The merger agreement summary below is included in this proxy
statement/prospectus
only to provide you with information regarding the terms and
conditions of the merger agreement, and not to provide any other
factual information regarding Wyeth, Pfizer or their respective
businesses. Accordingly, the representations and warranties and
other provisions of the merger agreement should not be read
alone, but instead should be read only in conjunction with the
information provided elsewhere in this proxy
statement/prospectus
and in the documents incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find More
Information on page 247.
The representations, warranties and covenants contained in
the merger agreement and described in this proxy
statement/prospectus were made only for purposes of the merger
agreement and as of specific dates and may be subject to more
recent developments, were made solely for the benefit of the
parties to the merger agreement and may be subject to
limitations agreed upon by the contracting parties, including
being qualified by reference to confidential disclosures, for
the purposes of allocating risk between parties to the merger
agreement instead of establishing these matters as facts, and
may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different
from what may be viewed as material by you or by other
investors. Accordingly, these representations and warranties
alone may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the
date they were made or at any other time. The representations
and warranties contained in the merger agreement do not survive
the effective time of the merger. Investors should not rely on
the representations, warranties and covenants or any description
thereof as characterizations of the actual state of facts or
condition of Wyeth, Pfizer or Merger Sub or any of their
respective subsidiaries or affiliates. Moreover, information
concerning the subject matter of the representations, warranties
and covenants may change after the date of the merger agreement,
which subsequent information may or may not be fully reflected
in public disclosures by Wyeth and Pfizer.
The
Merger
Each of the Wyeth board of directors and the Pfizer board of
directors has approved the merger agreement, which provides for
the merger of Merger Sub with and into Wyeth upon the terms, and
subject to the conditions, of the merger agreement. Wyeth will
be the surviving corporation in the merger and, following the
merger, will be a
wholly-owned
subsidiary of Pfizer, and Wyeth common stock and Wyeth $2
Convertible Preferred Stock will no longer be publicly traded.
Upon consummation of the merger, the directors of Merger Sub
will be the initial directors of the surviving corporation and
the officers of Wyeth will be the initial officers of the
surviving corporation.
Closing
Under the terms of the merger agreement, the closing of the
merger will occur on the fifth business day following the
satisfaction or (subject to applicable law) waiver of the
conditions to closing (other than conditions that, by their
nature, cannot be satisfied until the closing of the merger, but
subject to fulfillment or waiver of those conditions). However,
if on such fifth business day, the proceeds of the financing (or
alternative financing) contemplated by the commitment letter are
unavailable, the closing will not be required to occur until the
earlier of (i) the tenth business day after Wyeth delivers
an election notice to Pfizer and (ii) December 31,
2009.
An election notice is a notice to be sent to Pfizer by Wyeth
under certain circumstances for the purpose of notifying Pfizer
of Wyeths intention to exercise its right to cause Pfizer
to specifically perform its obligations under the merger
agreement or its right to terminate the merger agreement in the
event that Pfizer does not close the merger on the scheduled
closing date. Wyeth is not permitted to deliver an election
notice until the earlier of (i) the tenth business day
following the satisfaction or (subject to applicable law) waiver
of
118
the conditions to closing (other than conditions that, by their
nature, cannot be satisfied until the closing) and
(ii) December 31, 2009. As a result, if the proceeds
from Pfizers financing (or alternative financing)
contemplated by the commitment letter are unavailable on the
initially scheduled closing date, then the closing will not be
required to occur until at least 15 business days following the
initially scheduled closing date or, if earlier,
December 31, 2009. In no event will Pfizer be obligated to
close the merger prior to July 31, 2009.
In addition, if the closing of the merger cannot occur as
scheduled due to an act of God, war, terrorism, flood, banking
moratorium or suspension of payments in respect of federal or
state banks in the United States (whether or not mandatory), the
closing will automatically be postponed until the earliest date
that is reasonably practicable following the conclusion of such
event, and if such date is after the termination date (as
described below), then the termination date will automatically
be extended to such date.
Effective
Time
At the closing of the merger, Wyeth will file a certificate of
merger with the Secretary of State of Delaware. The merger will
become effective when the certificate of merger is filed with
the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware or at a later
time as agreed to by Pfizer and Wyeth and set forth in the
certificate of merger.
Merger
Consideration
At the effective time of the merger, each share of Wyeth common
stock issued and outstanding, except for shares of restricted
stock (the holders of which will be entitled to receive cash
consideration pursuant to separate terms of the merger agreement
described below in Treatment of Wyeth Stock
Options and Other Equity-Based Awards), shares of Wyeth
common stock held directly and indirectly by Wyeth and Pfizer
(which will be canceled as a result of the merger) and shares
with respect to which appraisal rights are validly exercised (as
described below in Appraisal Rights),
will be converted into the right to receive, subject to certain
adjustments as described below, a combination of $33.00 in cash,
without interest, and 0.985 of a share of Pfizer common stock.
Pfizer will not issue any fractional shares of Pfizer common
stock in the merger. Instead, a Wyeth stockholder who otherwise
would have received a fraction of a share of Pfizer common stock
will receive an amount in cash rather than a fractional share.
This cash amount will be determined by multiplying the fraction
of a share of Pfizer common stock to which the holder would
otherwise be entitled by the volume weighted average price of
Pfizer common stock for the five consecutive trading days ending
two days prior to the effective time of the merger, as such
prices are reported on the NYSE Transaction Reporting System.
Other than a possible adjustment under limited circumstances as
described in the next paragraph below, the exchange ratio of
0.985 of a share of Pfizer common stock is fixed, and it will
not change between now and the date of the merger, including as
a result of a change in the trading price of Pfizer common stock
or Wyeth common stock. Therefore, the value of the shares of
Pfizer common stock received by Wyeth stockholders in the merger
will depend on the market price of Pfizer common stock at the
time the merger is completed.
In the event that the total number of shares of common stock of
Pfizer issuable as a result of the merger, together with the
shares, if any, of Pfizer common stock issuable upon conversion
of the Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock to be issued to
holders of the Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock and the
Wyeth Floating Rate Convertible Senior Debentures Due 2024,
referred to in this proxy statement/prospectus as the
convertible debentures, would exceed 19.9% of the outstanding
shares of common stock of Pfizer immediately prior to the
effective time of the merger, the stock portion of the merger
consideration will be reduced to the minimum extent necessary so
that the number of shares of Pfizer common stock issued or
issuable as a result of the merger will equal no more than 19.9%
of its outstanding common stock and the cash portion of the
merger consideration will be increased by an equivalent value
(based on the volume weighted average price of Pfizer common
stock for the five consecutive trading days ending two days
prior to the effective time of the merger, as such prices are
reported on the NYSE Transaction Reporting System). If the
number of shares of common stock of Pfizer changes before the
merger is completed because of a reclassification,
recapitalization, stock split,
split-up,
combination or exchange of shares or the declaration of a stock
dividend or a dividend payable in any other securities with a
record date within such period, or any similar event shall have
occurred, the exchange ratio will be adjusted such that the
holders of Wyeth common stock will be provided with the same
economic effect as contemplated by the merger agreement.
119
At the time of the execution of the merger agreement, the number
of shares of Pfizer common stock (and securities convertible or
exercisable for Pfizer common stock) expected to be issued in
the merger constituted less than 19.9% of Pfizers
outstanding shares of common stock, and Pfizer and Wyeth
currently do not anticipate that any adjustment to the exchange
ratio will be required. A vote by Wyeth stockholders for the
adoption of the merger agreement constitutes approval of the
merger whether or not the exchange ratio and cash portion are
adjusted as described above.
Each share of Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the
merger, other than shares of Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred
Stock held directly or indirectly by Wyeth and Pfizer (which
will be canceled as a result of the merger), will be converted
into the right to receive one share of a new series of Pfizer
preferred stock having the same powers, designations,
preferences and rights (to the fullest extent practicable) as
the shares of the Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock. In the
event that Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock is issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the merger, the Pfizer
preferred stock to be issued to holders of the Wyeth $2
Convertible Preferred Stock will be convertible into the amount
of Pfizer common stock equal to the product of (i) the
number of shares of Wyeth common stock into which a share of
Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible immediately
prior to the effective time of the merger and (ii) the sum
of the (A) 0.985 (or such amount into which the exchange ratio
is adjusted) and (B) the quotient of $33.00 (or such amount
that the cash consideration to be paid to holders of Wyeth
common stock is adjusted into) and the volume weighted average
price of Pfizer common stock for the five consecutive trading
days ending two days prior to the effective time of the merger,
as such prices are reported on the NYSE Transaction Reporting
System. However, on April 23, 2009, Wyeth announced that,
pursuant to a request from Pfizer made in accordance with the
terms and conditions of the merger agreement, Wyeth will redeem
all of its outstanding Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock,
effective on July 15, 2009. Therefore, it is expected that
there will not be any shares of Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred
Stock outstanding at the effective time of the merger. In such
case, Pfizer will not create or issue a new series of preferred
stock in connection with the merger.
Treatment
of Wyeth Stock Options and Other Equity-Based Awards
Each outstanding Wyeth stock option granted under Wyeths
stock incentive plans, whether or not then vested and
exercisable, will become fully vested and exercisable
immediately prior to, and then will be canceled at, the
effective time of the merger, and the holder of such option will
be entitled to receive an amount in cash, without interest and
less any applicable tax to be withheld, equal to (i) the
excess, if any, of the per share value of the merger
consideration over the per share exercise price of such Wyeth
stock option multiplied by (ii) the total number of shares
of Wyeth common stock underlying such Wyeth stock option, with
the aggregate amount of such payment rounded up to the nearest
cent. The amount will be paid in a lump sum as soon as
practicable after the effective time of the merger but in no
event later than ten business days following the effective time
of the merger.
Each RSU, representing a right to receive one share of Wyeth
common stock granted by Wyeth under any of its stock incentive
plans, including each performance share unit award denominated
in RSUs (but excluding any DSU and 409A RSUs, as discussed
below), which is outstanding immediately prior to the effective
time of the merger will become fully vested (except that any
performance share unit award, which by the terms of the award
agreement pursuant to which it was granted provides for a lesser
percentage of such performance share unit award to become vested
upon the consummation of the merger, will only become vested as
to such lesser percentage), and then will be canceled at the
effective time of the merger, and the holder of such vested RSU
will be entitled to receive an amount in cash, without interest
and less any applicable taxes to be withheld, equal to the per
share value of the merger consideration in respect of each share
of Wyeth common stock into which the vested portion of the RSU
would otherwise be convertible, which consideration will be paid
in a lump sum as soon as practicable after the effective time of
the merger but in no event later than ten business days
following the effective time of the merger.
Each 409A RSU that first becomes vested as a result of the
merger will, as of the effective time of the merger, become a
vested right to receive the merger consideration in respect of
each share of Wyeth common stock into which the 409A RSU would
otherwise be convertible. The consideration to be paid to the
holders of these 409A RSUs will be deposited in a grantor trust
that satisfies the requirements of Revenue Procedure
120
92-64 and
that will serve as the funding source of the surviving
corporation to satisfy its obligations to pay each former holder
of a 409A RSU the amount of consideration due to such holder at
such time and manner as may be provided under the terms of the
applicable deferred payment terms. Additionally, during the
period that any of this consideration remains in the grantor
trust, the cash portion of the merger consideration will accrue
interest at a designated market rate (as set forth in the Wyeth
2005 (409A) Deferred Compensation Plan) and the portion of the
merger consideration that is Pfizer common stock will accrue
dividends in the form of additional shares of Pfizer common
stock (with any cash dividends being reinvested into shares of
Pfizer common stock) in the same amount(s) and at the same
time(s) as dividends are paid on Pfizers common stock.
With respect to any 409A RSU that has become vested in
accordance with its terms, other than as a result of the merger,
and any RSU that would have constituted, either in whole or in
part, a deferral of compensation subject to Section 409A of
the Internal Revenue Code but for the fact the RSU was earned or
vested prior to December 31, 2004 (and any dividend
equivalents that have been credited with respect to such RSU),
for which there is outstanding a corresponding share of Wyeth
common stock held in the Wyeth Restricted Stock Trust for the
purpose of satisfying Wyeths obligations to deliver shares
of Wyeth common stock in respect of each of these vested RSUs in
accordance with the applicable deferred payment terms, each such
share held in such trust will be converted into the merger
consideration immediately upon the effective time of the merger.
This merger consideration will be held in the Wyeth Restricted
Stock Trust and any payment due in respect of the Wyeth common
stock to be delivered in satisfaction of such Wyeth obligations,
will be made in accordance with the applicable deferred payment
terms. Additionally, during the period that any of this
consideration is held in the Wyeth Restricted Stock Trust, the
cash portion of the merger consideration will accrue interest at
the market rate (as set forth in the Wyeth 2005 (409A) Deferred
Compensation Plan) and the portion of the merger consideration
that is Pfizer common stock will accrue, in additional shares of
Pfizer common stock, dividends in the same amount(s) and at the
same time(s) as dividends paid on Pfizer common stock.
Each DSU, representing a right to receive one share of Wyeth
common stock granted by Wyeth under Wyeths 2008
Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan or 2006 Non-Employee
Director Stock Incentive Plan, which is outstanding immediately
prior to the effective time of the merger will become vested and
then canceled at the effective time of the merger, and the
holder of such DSU will be entitled to receive, without interest
and less any applicable taxes to be withheld, (1) an amount
in cash equal to the per share value of the merger consideration
in respect of each share of Wyeth common stock subject to the
DSU (including shares attributable to dividend equivalents
accrued on such DSU and converted into additional shares of
Wyeth common stock subject to such DSU), and (2) an amount
in cash equal to any dividend equivalents then credited to the
holders DSU account which have not yet been converted into
shares of Wyeth common stock, all in accordance with the terms
of Wyeths 2008 Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan
or 2006 Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan, as
applicable, and which consideration will be paid in a lump sum
as soon as practicable after the effective time of the merger
but in no event later than ten business days following the
effective time of the merger.
Pursuant to the terms of Wyeths Directors Deferral
Plan, each phantom share of Wyeth common stock credited to a
participants account thereunder (including phantom shares
attributable to dividend equivalents) will be converted into the
right to receive an amount in cash, without interest and less
any applicable taxes to be withheld, equal to the per share
value of the merger consideration, which consideration will be
paid in a lump sum as soon as practicable after the effective
time of the merger but in no event later than ten business days
following the effective time of the merger, except that certain
amounts credited to a participants account that do not
under the terms of this plan become payable upon the effective
time of the merger (i.e., amounts considered
grandfathered under Section 409A of the
Internal Revenue Code) (plus interest that accrues at a
prescribed deemed rate of interest under this plan) will instead
be paid out in accordance with applicable payment schedules
provided for under the plan.
Each share of restricted stock, granted by Wyeth under the 1994
Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors that is either
unvested or vested but held in the Wyeth Restricted Stock Trust,
and that is outstanding immediately prior to the effective time
of the merger will, to the extent not vested, vest as of the
effective time of the merger, and at the effective time of the
merger, the holders of all such restricted stock will be
121
entitled to receive an amount in cash, without interest and less
any applicable taxes to be withheld, equal to the per share
value of the merger consideration to be received by holders of
Wyeth common stock in the merger in cancelation of each share of
such restricted stock, which consideration will be paid to such
holders as soon as practicable after the effective time of the
merger but in no event later than ten business days following
the effective time of the merger. Wyeth is obligated to
reacquire any shares of restricted stock held under the Wyeth
Restricted Stock Trust prior to the effective time of the merger.
Each phantom share of Wyeth common stock credited to a
participants account under any of the Wyeth Supplemental
Employee Savings Plan, the Wyeth 2005 (409A) Deferred
Compensation Plan and the Wyeth Deferred Compensation Plan will
be converted into the right to receive a phantom amount equal to
the merger consideration, with the cash portion of this phantom
merger consideration accruing interest at a designated market
rate (as set forth in the Wyeth 2005 (409A) Deferred
Compensation Plan) unless and until such cash portion component
of this phantom merger consideration is notionally invested in
another phantom investment option, to the extent provided for
under the applicable plan, and the stock portion of this phantom
merger consideration will earn dividend equivalents in the same
manner as would otherwise be earned under the applicable plan
terms.
Each outstanding right to receive a share of Wyeth common stock
under the Wyeth Management Incentive Plan will be converted into
a right to receive the merger consideration, payable in
accordance with and subject to the terms of such plan.
Appraisal
Rights
Record holders of Wyeth common stock who do not vote in favor of
the adoption of the merger agreement and who properly assert
their appraisal rights in compliance with Section 262 of
the DGCL will be entitled to seek appraisal for, and obtain
payment in cash for the judicially determined fair value of,
their shares of Wyeth common stock if the merger is completed,
in lieu of receiving the merger consideration. This value could
be more than, the same as, or less than the value of the merger
consideration. The relevant provisions of the DGCL are included
as Annex D to this proxy statement/prospectus. You are
encouraged to read these provisions carefully and in their
entirety. Moreover, due to the complexity of the procedures for
exercising the right to seek appraisal, Wyeth stockholders who
are considering exercising such rights are encouraged to seek
the advice of legal counsel. If a holder of shares of Wyeth
common stock does not vote in favor of adoption of the merger
agreement and properly asserts appraisal rights with respect to
such shares, such shares of Wyeth common stock will not be
converted into the right to receive the merger consideration at
the effective time of the merger. However, if such stockholder
fails to perfect or otherwise properly waives, withdraws or
loses the right to appraisal under Section 262 of the DGCL,
whether before of after the effective time of the merger, then
that Wyeth stockholder will not be paid the judicially
determined fair value of their shares of Wyeth common stock in
accordance with Section 262 of the DGCL, and the shares of
Wyeth common stock held by such Wyeth stockholder will be
exchangeable solely for the merger consideration. Under Delaware
law, record holders of Wyeths $2 Convertible Preferred
Stock are not entitled to appraisal rights in connection with
the merger; however, if such a holder becomes a record holder of
Wyeth common stock upon the conversion of Wyeth $2 Convertible
Preferred Stock, such holder will be entitled to appraisal
rights with respect to such common stock so long as the holder
complies with the statutory requirements for exercising
appraisal rights. See Proposal 1: The
Merger Appraisal Rights beginning on
page 114.
Conversion
of Shares; Exchange of Certificates
The conversion of Wyeth common stock into the right to receive
the merger consideration will occur automatically at the
effective time of the merger. The conversion, if necessary, of
Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock (to the extent not redeemed
prior to the effective time of the merger) into the right to
receive Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock will occur
automatically at the effective time of the merger. However, on
April 23, 2009, Wyeth announced that, pursuant to a request
from Pfizer made in accordance with the terms and conditions of
the merger agreement, Wyeth will redeem all of its outstanding
Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock, effective on July 15,
2009. Therefore, it is expected that there will not be any
shares of Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding at
the effective time of the merger. In such case, Pfizer will not
create or issue a new series of preferred stock in connection
with the merger.
122
Prior to the effective time of the merger, Pfizer will select a
commercial bank or trust company reasonably acceptable to Wyeth
to act as the exchange agent, for the purpose of exchanging
certificates or book entry shares representing Wyeth shares for
the merger consideration and perform other duties as explained
in the merger agreement. Simultaneously with or prior to the
effective time of the merger, Pfizer will deposit or cause to be
deposited with such exchange agent a cash amount in immediately
available funds sufficient to pay the aggregate cash portion of
the merger consideration and book-entry shares (or certificates
if requested) of Pfizer common stock and Pfizer $2 Convertible
Preferred Stock representing the aggregate stock portion of the
merger consideration, in each case, payable to Wyeths
stockholders. In addition, Pfizer will make available to the
exchange agent from time to time as needed cash payable to
holders of Wyeth common stock in lieu of fractional shares and
for any dividends or distributions declared following the
effective time of the merger, but prior to the time holders of
Wyeth common stock exchange their shares for the merger
consideration.
Following the effective time of the merger, there will be no
further transfers of shares of Wyeth stock.
If you hold your shares of Wyeth common stock in certificated
form, promptly after the effective time of the merger, and in no
event later than the fifth business day following the effective
time of the merger, the exchange agent will mail you a letter of
transmittal which will contain instructions on how to surrender
your shares of Wyeth common stock in exchange for the merger
consideration (and, if necessary, your shares of Wyeth $2
Convertible Preferred Stock in exchange for Pfizer $2
Convertible Preferred Stock). The exchange agent will pay you
the merger consideration to which you are entitled after you
have provided to the exchange agent your signed letter of
transmittal, surrendered your shares of Wyeth stock and provided
any other items specified by the letter of transmittal. You
should not submit your Wyeth stock certificates for exchange
until you receive the transmittal instructions and a form of
letter of transmittal from the exchange agent. Holders of
book-entry shares will automatically receive the merger
consideration and will not be required to deliver a certificate
or an executed letter of transmittal to the exchange agent.
Except as described above, interest will not be paid or accrue
in respect of the merger consideration. The merger consideration
paid to you will be reduced by any applicable tax withholding.
In the event of a transfer of ownership of Wyeth common stock or
Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock that is not registered in
Wyeths transfer agents records, payment of the
merger consideration as described above will be made to a person
other than the person in whose name the certificate so
surrendered is registered only if the certificate is properly
endorsed or otherwise is in proper form for transfer; and the
person requesting the exchange must pay any transfer or other
taxes required by reason of the payment of the merger
consideration to such other person.
Wyeth stockholders will not receive any fractional shares of
Pfizer common stock pursuant to the merger. Instead of any
fractional shares, stockholders will be paid an amount in cash
for such fraction of a share calculated by multiplying
(A) the fractional share interest to which such holder
(after taking into account all shares of Wyeths common
stock surrendered by such holder) would otherwise be entitled by
(B) the volume weighted average price of Pfizer common
stock for the five consecutive trading days ending two days
prior to the effective time of the merger, as such prices are
reported on the NYSE Transaction Reporting System.
One year after the effective time of the merger, the exchange
agent will deliver to Pfizer all cash and shares of Pfizer
common stock remaining in the exchange fund administered by the
exchange agent that have not been distributed to holders of
Wyeth shares. Thereafter, Wyeth stockholders must look only to
Pfizer, and Pfizer will remain liable, for payment of the merger
consideration on their shares of Wyeth stock. Any portion of the
exchange fund administered by the exchange agent remaining
unclaimed by holders of shares of Wyeth common stock five years
after the effective time of the merger (or immediately prior to
such time as such amounts would otherwise escheat to or become
property of any governmental authority) will, to the extent
permitted by applicable law, become the property of the
surviving corporation.
Dividends
and Distributions
If you hold your shares of Wyeth common stock in certificated
form, until you have provided to the exchange agent your signed
letter of transmittal and any other items specified by the
letter of transmittal with
123
respect to your shares of Wyeth common stock
and/or Wyeth
$2 Convertible Preferred Stock, any dividends or other
distributions declared after the effective time of the merger
with respect to Pfizer common stock into which shares of Wyeth
common stock may have been converted, or Pfizer $2 Convertible
Preferred Stock into which shares of Wyeth $2 Convertible
Preferred Stock (to the extent not redeemed prior to the
effective time of the merger) may have been converted, will
accrue but will not be paid with respect to your shares. Pfizer
will pay to former Wyeth stockholders any unpaid dividends or
other distributions, without interest, only after they have duly
surrendered their Wyeth stock certificates. There can be no
assurance that any regular quarterly dividends will be declared
or paid by Pfizer following the effective time of the merger, or
as to the amount or timing of such dividends, if any. Any future
dividends will be made at the discretion of the Pfizer board of
directors.
Prior to the effective time of the merger, Wyeth may not declare
or pay any dividends or distributions on its common stock or $2
Convertible Preferred Stock without Pfizers prior written
consent which is not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or
delayed by Pfizer, other than:
|
|
|
|
|
regular quarterly cash dividends on Wyeth common stock at a rate
not to exceed $0.30 per share of Wyeth common stock with record
dates and payment dates consistent with the prior dividend
practice; and
|
|
|
|
regular quarterly cash dividends on Wyeth $2 Convertible
Preferred Stock at a rate not to exceed $0.50 per share of Wyeth
$2 Convertible Preferred Stock with record dates and payment
dates consistent with the prior dividend practice.
|
Representations
and Warranties
Each of Pfizer and Wyeth has made representations and warranties
to the other regarding, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
corporate matters, including due organization, good standing and
qualification;
|
|
|
|
capitalization;
|
|
|
|
corporate authority to enter into and perform the obligations
contemplated by the merger agreement, enforceability of the
merger agreement, approval of the merger agreement by the
parties boards of directors and stockholder voting
requirements to consummate the merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
required governmental filings and consents;
|
|
|
|
the absence of conflicts with, or violations of, organizational
documents, other contracts and applicable laws, in each case, as
a result of the merger;
|
|
|
|
the timely filing and accuracy of periodic reports and other
filings with the SEC since January 1, 2006, as well as with
respect to financial statements contained therein, internal
controls and compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002;
|
|
|
|
conduct of business in the ordinary course since
September 30, 2008 and absence of any event, occurrence,
development or state of circumstances or facts or condition that
has had or would reasonably be expected to have, a material
adverse effect on either party since December 31, 2007;
|
|
|
|
absence of certain legal proceedings (pending or threatened) and
orders;
|
|
|
|
compliance with applicable laws;
|
|
|
|
tax matters;
|
|
|
|
intellectual property matters;
|
|
|
|
regulatory compliance;
|
|
|
|
brokers fees payable in connection with the
merger; and
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
the absence of any representation or warranty by either party
except for those expressly set forth in the merger agreement and
the acknowledgement by each party of certain investigations made
of the other party and such partys businesses.
|
Wyeth has made additional representations and warranties about
itself to Pfizer as to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
title to, or leasehold interest in, certain properties;
|
|
|
|
matters with respect to certain material contracts;
|
|
|
|
employee matters, including employee benefit plans;
|
|
|
|
labor matters;
|
|
|
|
environmental matters;
|
|
|
|
matters with respect to insurance policies; and
|
|
|
|
absence of transactions with affiliates.
|
In addition, Pfizer has made additional representations and
warranties about itself to Wyeth as to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the activities of Merger Sub;
|
|
|
|
matters with respect to financing of the acquisition; and
|
|
|
|
ownership of Wyeth capital stock by Pfizer and its subsidiaries.
|
Many of Wyeths and Pfizers representations and
warranties are qualified by a material adverse effect standard.
For purposes of the merger agreement, material adverse
effect, with respect to either party, is defined to mean
an effect, event, development, change, state of facts,
condition, circumstance or occurrence that is or would be
reasonably expected to be materially adverse to the financial
condition, assets, liabilities, business or results of
operations of such party and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole;
provided, however, that a material adverse effect is deemed not
to include effects, events, developments, changes, states of
facts, conditions, circumstances or occurrences arising out of,
relating to or resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
changes generally affecting the economy, financial or securities
markets or political or regulatory conditions, to the extent
such changes do not adversely affect such party and its
subsidiaries in a disproportionate manner relative to other
participants in the pharmaceutical or biotechnology industry;
|
|
|
|
changes in the pharmaceutical or biotechnology industry, to the
extent such changes do not adversely affect such party and its
subsidiaries in a disproportionate manner relative to other
participants in the pharmaceutical or biotechnology industry;
|
|
|
|
any change in law or the interpretation thereof or GAAP or the
interpretation thereof, to the extent such changes do not
adversely affect such party and its subsidiaries in a
disproportionate manner relative to other participants in the
pharmaceutical or biotechnology industry;
|
|
|
|
acts of war, armed hostility or terrorism to the extent such
changes do not adversely affect such party and its subsidiaries
in a disproportionate manner relative to other participants in
the pharmaceutical or biotechnology industry;
|
|
|
|
any change attributable to the negotiation, execution or
announcement of the merger, including any litigation resulting
therefrom, and any adverse change in customer, distributor,
employee, supplier, financing source, licensor, licensee,
sub-licensee, stockholder, co-promotion or joint venture partner
or similar relationships, including, in the case of Wyeth and
its subsidiaries, as a result of the identity of Pfizer;
|
|
|
|
any failure by such party to meet any internal or published
industry analyst projections or forecasts or estimates of
revenues or earnings for any period (although facts and
circumstances giving rise to such
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
failure that are not otherwise excluded from the definition of
material adverse effect may be taken into account in determining
whether there has been a material adverse effect);
|
|
|
|
|
|
any change in the price or trading volume of such partys
common stock on the NYSE (although facts and circumstances
giving rise to such change that are not otherwise excluded from
the definition of material adverse effect may be taken into
account in determining whether there has been a material adverse
effect); and
|
|
|
|
compliance with the terms of, or the taking of any action
required by, the merger agreement.
|
Conduct
of Business Prior to Closing
Wyeth has agreed in the merger agreement that, until the earlier
of the effective time of the merger and termination of the
merger agreement, except as expressly contemplated by the merger
agreement, required by applicable law or applicable stock
exchange or regulatory organization or with Pfizers prior
written approval, which is not to be unreasonably withheld,
conditioned or delayed, Wyeth and its subsidiaries will conduct
their business in the ordinary and usual course consistent with
Wyeths past practice and, to the extent consistent
therewith, will use their reasonable best efforts to:
|
|
|
|
|
preserve their assets;
|
|
|
|
keep available the services of current officers, key employees
and consultants of Wyeth and its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
preserve Wyeths business organization intact and maintain
its existing relations and goodwill with customers, suppliers,
distributors, creditors, lessors, clinical trial investigators
or managers of its clinical trials; and
|
|
|
|
comply in all material respects with all applicable laws.
|
Wyeth has further agreed in the merger agreement that until the
effective time of the merger, with certain exceptions and except
with Pfizers prior written consent, which is not to be
unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed, Wyeth will not,
and will not permit any of its subsidiaries to, among other
things, undertake the following actions:
|
|
|
|
|
amend or propose to amend the organizational documents of Wyeth
or its significant subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
issue, sell, pledge, dispose of, grant, transfer or encumber, or
authorize the issuance, sale, pledge, disposition, grant,
transfer or encumbrance of any shares of, or securities
convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for, or options,
warrants, calls, commitments or rights of any kind to acquire,
or based on the value of, any shares of its capital stock of any
class or any equity interest, voting debt of Wyeth or any of its
subsidiaries (other than issuances upon the exercise or
conversion, as the case may be, of Wyeth stock options or Wyeth
$2 Convertible Preferred Stock, or the settlement of other
equity awards);
|
|
|
|
other than pursuant to cash management or investment portfolio
activities in the ordinary course of business, acquire
(including by merger, consolidation, or acquisition of stock or
assets or intellectual property or any other business
combination) any ownership interest in any corporation or other
business organization or any assets or any interest in any
assets from any other person for consideration valued in excess
of $50 million individually or $200 million in the
aggregate;
|
|
|
|
enter into any strategic licensing, joint venture,
collaboration, alliance, co-promotion or similar agreement for
consideration valued in excess of $50 million individually
or $200 million in the aggregate for all such contracts or
enter into any agreement that would (1) constitute a
material contract of Wyeth, (2) limit or restrict Wyeth or
its subsidiaries or Pfizer or any of its affiliates or any
successor of such entities, in each case, after the effective
time of the merger, from engaging or competing in, or require
any of them to work exclusively with the party to such agreement
in, any material line of business or in any material geographic
area or, in the case of the pharmaceutical or animal health
business, in the research, development, manufacture and
commercialization of any antibody or
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
therapeutic agent directed at a specific antigen or other target
or product or in any therapeutic area, class of drugs or
mechanism of action or modality (other than any limitation or
restriction which Wyeth would have the right to terminate upon a
change of control at no cost and with no such continuing
material restrictions or obligations to Wyeth or Pfizer or any
of their respective subsidiaries) or (3) be reasonably
expected to interfere with the parties ability to
consummate the merger;
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) purchase financial instruments that at the time of
purchase qualify as Level III assets (as defined in FASB
Statement No. 157); (2) change in a material manner the
average duration of Wyeths investment portfolio or the
average credit quality of such portfolio, except for changes
that would reduce investment risk in such portfolio;
(3) materially change investment guidelines with respect to
Wyeths investment portfolio except for changes that would
reduce investment risk of Wyeths investment portfolio;
(4) hypothecate, repo, encumber or otherwise pledge assets
in Wyeths investment portfolio; or (5) invest new
surplus cash from operations in securities other than short-term
liquid securities permitted by Pfizers investment
guidelines (which are required to be implemented by Wyeth with
respect to such new surplus cash as soon as practicable after
the date of the merger agreement);
|
|
|
|
enter into interest rate swaps, foreign exchange or commodity
agreements and other similar hedging arrangements (other than
for purposes of offsetting a bona fide exposure);
|
|
|
|
merge or consolidate Wyeth or any of its subsidiaries with any
person or adopt a plan of complete or partial liquidation or
resolutions providing for a complete or partial liquidation,
dissolution, restructuring, recapitalization or other
reorganization of Wyeth or any of its subsidiaries (other than
any such transaction between direct or indirect wholly-owned
subsidiaries of Wyeth that would not result in material adverse
tax consequences or material loss of tax benefits or loss of any
material asset);
|
|
|
|
sell, pledge, dispose of, transfer, lease, license, guarantee or
encumber, or authorize the sale, pledge, disposition, transfer,
lease, license, guarantee or encumbrance of any material
property or assets (including intellectual property) of Wyeth or
any of its subsidiaries, except (1) pursuant to existing
contracts or commitments, (2) for the sale of goods and
services in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice, (3) transactions involving property or assets of
Wyeth or any of its subsidiaries having a value no greater than
$120 million in the aggregate for all such transfers,
(4) in connection with any waiver, release, assignment,
settlement or compromise of litigation otherwise permitted under
the merger agreement, or (5) in connection with cash
management or investment portfolio activities in the ordinary
course of business;
|
|
|
|
split, combine, reclassify, subdivide or amend the terms of its
outstanding capital stock or any other securities of Wyeth or
enter into any agreement with respect to voting of any of its
capital stock or any securities convertible into or exchangeable
for such shares;
|
|
|
|
declare, set aside, make or pay any dividend or other
distribution on any shares of capital stock of Wyeth or its
subsidiaries, except (1) for regular quarterly cash
dividends not in excess of $0.30 per share of Wyeth common
stock, (2) for regular quarterly cash dividends not in
excess of $0.50 per share of Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred
Stock, in each case, with usual record and payment dates for
such dividends in accordance with past dividend practice and
(3) between or among wholly-owned subsidiaries of Wyeth;
|
|
|
|
purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of its capital
stock, any securities convertible or exchangeable or exercisable
for any shares of capital stock or any other securities,
including the convertible debentures and Wyeth $2 Convertible
Preferred Stock, except for purchases, redemptions or other
acquisitions of capital stock or other securities
(1) required by the terms of Wyeth stock incentive plans or
the indenture for the convertible debentures, (2) in order
to pay taxes or satisfy withholding obligations in respect of
such taxes in connection with the exercise of Wyeth stock
options or vesting of RSUs or DSUs or the lapse of restrictions
in respect of any other equity interests in Wyeth, in each case
pursuant to the terms of the applicable Wyeth stock incentive
plans, (3) required by the terms of any plans, arrangements
or agreements existing on the date of the merger agreement and
between Wyeth or any of its subsidiaries and any director or
employee of Wyeth or any of its subsidiaries, or
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
(4) prepayment, repurchase or redemption of all or any
portion of the convertible debentures for an amount less than or
equal to par, plus any accrued and unpaid interest incurred up
to the date on which such convertible debentures are prepaid,
repurchased or redeemed;
|
|
|
|
|
|
incur any indebtedness for borrowed money or issue any debt
securities, warrants or other rights to acquire debt securities
of Wyeth or any of its subsidiaries or assume, guarantee or
endorse, as an accommodation or otherwise, the obligations of
any other person for borrowed money (other than under existing
working capital facilities and letter of credit facilities in
the ordinary course);
|
|
|
|
|
|
make any loans, capital contributions to, or investments in, any
person in amounts in excess of $50 million in the aggregate
except for (1) cash management or investment portfolio
activities in the ordinary course of business and consistent
with the restrictions on Wyeth investment portfolio set forth in
the merger agreement or (2) in connection with certain
transactions permitted by the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
make or agree to make any capital expenditures in excess of
$1.2 billion in the aggregate for all such capital
expenditures or commit to any new capital projects in excess of
$50 million individually and $100 million in the
aggregate for all such capital expenditures that are not
contemplated by Wyeths 2009 operating plan;
|
|
|
|
terminate, cancel, renew, or request or agree to any material
amendment or material modification to, material change in, or
material waiver under, any material contract of Wyeth, or enter
into or materially amend any contract that, if existing on the
date of the merger agreement, would be a material contract of
Wyeth;
|
|
|
|
subject to limited exceptions, (1) increase the number of
employees of Wyeth and its subsidiaries, or (2) enter into
an employment agreement or relationship with any person who
earns a base salary of more than or equal to $215,000;
|
|
|
|
enter into, modify, amend or terminate any contract or waive,
release or assign any rights or claims under any contract, which
would be reasonably likely to (1) impair the ability of
Wyeth to perform its obligations under the merger agreement in
any material respect or (2) prevent or materially delay or
impair the consummation of the merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
except as required pursuant to any Wyeth benefit plans, foreign
benefit plans, collective bargaining agreements, the terms of
the merger agreement or any applicable law, and subject to
limited exceptions, (1) grant or provide or adopt a plan or
agreement to grant or provide any retention, change in control,
severance or termination payments or benefits to any current or
former director, officer, employee or consultant of Wyeth or any
of its subsidiaries, (2) subject to certain limited
exceptions, increase the compensation, bonus or pension,
welfare, severance or other benefits of, pay any bonus to, or
make any new equity awards to any current or former director,
officer, employee or consultant of Wyeth or any of its
subsidiaries, (3) establish, adopt, amend or terminate any
Wyeth benefit plan or amend the terms of any outstanding
equity-based awards, (4) take any action to accelerate the
vesting or payment, or fund or in any other way secure the
payment, of compensation or benefits under any Wyeth benefit
plan, (5) change any actuarial or other assumptions used to
calculate funding obligations with respect to any Wyeth benefit
plan or to change the manner in which contributions to such
plans are made or the basis on which such contributions are
determined, or (6) issue or forgive any loans to directors,
officers, employees, contractors or any of their respective
affiliates except for any such issuance that would not violate
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is consistent with past practice and
policy;
|
|
|
|
pre-pay any long-term indebtedness for borrowed money or change
the terms or extend the maturity of any long-term indebtedness
(other than under existing working capital facilities and in
respect of the convertible debentures for an amount less than or
equal to par, plus any accrued and unpaid interest);
|
|
|
|
make any material change in its method of accounting or its
accounting practices, policies or principles, unless required by
law, a governmental entity or GAAP, or (1) change its
fiscal year, (2) make, change or revoke any material United
States tax election, (3) settle or compromise the
U.S. federal income tax
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
examination for the 2002 through 2005 tax years, or
(4) settle or compromise any other tax claim where the
amount of cash to be paid to the relevant taxing authority upon
such settlement or compromise of such claim exceeds
$25 million;
|
|
|
|
|
|
waive, release, assign, settle or compromise: (1) any
product liability claim asserted against Wyeth or its
subsidiaries concerning hormone therapy products; (2) any
other product liability claims asserted against Wyeth or its
subsidiaries, except any compromises or settlements involving
the payment of monetary damages in an amount less than
$5 million individually or $50 million in the
aggregate; or (3) any claim which upon resolution would be
material to Wyeth and its subsidiaries taken as a whole, would
involve the payment by Wyeth of an amount in excess of
$25 million individually and $100 million in the
aggregate (excluding from such aggregate amount individual
claims involving payment of less than $1 million) or would
involve the imposition of injunctive relief against Wyeth that
would materially limit or restrict the business of Pfizer and
its subsidiaries following the effective time of the
merger; or
|
|
|
|
authorize or enter into an agreement to do any of the actions
described in the preceding bullets.
|
Pfizer has agreed in the merger agreement that, until the
earlier of the effective time of the merger and termination of
the merger agreement, except as expressly contemplated by the
merger agreement, required by applicable law or applicable stock
exchange or regulatory organization or with Wyeths prior
written approval, which is not to be unreasonably withheld,
conditioned or delayed, Pfizer and its subsidiaries will conduct
their business in the ordinary and usual course consistent with
Pfizers past practice and, to the extent consistent
therewith, will use their reasonable best efforts to:
|
|
|
|
|
preserve their assets;
|
|
|
|
preserve Pfizers business organization intact and maintain
its existing relations and goodwill with customers, suppliers,
distributors, creditors, lessors, clinical trial investigators
or managers of its clinical trials; and
|
|
|
|
comply in all material respects with all applicable laws.
|
Pfizer has further agreed in the merger agreement that until the
effective time of the merger, with certain exceptions and except
with Wyeths prior written consent, which is not to be
unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed, Pfizer will not,
and will not permit any of its subsidiaries to, among other
things, undertake the following actions:
|
|
|
|
|
acquire (including, by merger, consolidation, or acquisition of
stock, assets or any acquisition or license of intellectual
property or any other business combination or collaboration) any
interest in any corporation, partnership, other business
organization or any division thereof or any assets or interest
in any assets from any other person for consideration (other
than acquisitions or licenses for which the cash consideration
paid prior to the effective time of the merger, together with
the cash consideration paid prior to the effective time of the
merger for any other such acquisitions or licenses does not
exceed $750 million in the aggregate);
|
|
|
|
merge or consolidate Pfizer with any person or adopt a plan of
complete or partial liquidation or resolutions providing for a
complete or partial liquidation, dissolution, restructuring,
recapitalization or other reorganization of Pfizer;
|
|
|
|
purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of its capital
stock, any securities convertible or exchangeable or exercisable
for any shares of capital stock or any other securities for
consideration in excess of $500 million in the aggregate,
except any purchase, redemption or other acquisition (1) of
such securities made in connection with the financing of the
merger subject to Wyeths prior written consent, which
consent will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or
delayed, (2) required by the terms of Pfizer benefit plans
or Pfizers Series A Convertible Perpetual Preferred
Stock, (3) in order to pay taxes or satisfy withholding
obligations in respect of such taxes in connection with the
exercise of Pfizer stock options, the lapse of restrictions or
settlement of awards granted pursuant to the applicable Pfizer
benefit plans or (4) required by the terms of any plans,
arrangements or agreements existing on
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
the date of the merger agreement between Pfizer or any of its
subsidiaries and any director or employee of Pfizer or any of
its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
|
|
declare, set aside, make or pay any dividend or other
distribution on any shares of its capital stock, except for
regular quarterly cash dividends not in excess of $0.16 per
share of Pfizer common stock with usual record and payment dates
for such dividends in accordance with past dividend practice;
|
|
|
|
enter into, modify, amend or terminate any contract or waive,
release or assign any rights or claims under any contract, which
would be reasonably likely to (1) impair the ability of
Pfizer to perform its obligations under the merger agreement in
any material respect or (2) prevent or materially delay or
impair the consummation of the merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement; or
|
|
|
|
authorize or enter into an agreement to do any of the actions
described in the preceding bullets.
|
Agreement
to Use Reasonable Best Efforts
Subject to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement,
each of Pfizer and Wyeth has agreed to use its reasonable best
efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all actions and to do, or
cause to be done, all things necessary, proper or advisable
under the merger agreement and applicable laws and regulations
to consummate the merger and the other transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement as soon as practicable, including
(1) preparing and filing, in consultation with the other
party and as promptly as practicable and advisable, all
documentation to effect all necessary applications, notices,
petitions, filings, tax ruling requests and other documents and
to obtain as promptly as practicable all consents, clearances,
waivers, licenses, orders, registrations, approvals, permits,
tax rulings and authorizations necessary or advisable to be
obtained from any third party
and/or any
governmental entity in order to consummate the merger or any of
the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and
(2) taking all reasonable steps as may be necessary to
obtain all such material consents, clearances, waivers,
licenses, registrations, permits, authorizations, tax rulings,
orders and approvals.
In addition, each of Pfizer and Wyeth has agreed to make or
cause to be made, in consultation and cooperation with the other
and as promptly as practicable and advisable, (1) an
appropriate filing of a Notification and Report Form pursuant to
the HSR Act, (2) all appropriate filings required pursuant
to the EC Merger Regulation, (3) all appropriate filings
required pursuant to the China anti-monopoly law and
(4) all other necessary registrations, declarations,
notices and filings relating to the merger with other
governmental entities under any other antitrust, competition,
trade regulation or other regulatory law (including under
applicable regulatory law in Australia and Canada) with respect
to the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and to
respond to any inquiries received and supply as promptly as
practicable any additional information and documentary material
that may be requested pursuant to the HSR Act and any other
regulatory law. Pfizer and Wyeth have agreed to take all other
actions reasonably necessary to cause the expiration or
termination of the applicable waiting periods under the HSR Act
and any other regulatory law as soon as practicable and not
extend any waiting period under the HSR Act or any other
regulatory law or enter into any agreement with a governmental
entity not to consummate the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement, except with the prior written consent of the
other party, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld or
delayed.
If necessary to obtain any regulatory approval pursuant to any
regulatory law, or if any action (including any action by a
private party) is instituted (or threatened to be instituted by
a governmental entity), in either case, challenging the merger
or any other transaction contemplated by the merger agreement as
violative of any regulatory law, each of Pfizer and Wyeth will
cooperate with each other to obtain such regulatory approval,
including by contesting any such challenge.
To the extent permissible under applicable law, Pfizer and Wyeth
will, in connection with their respective efforts to obtain all
requisite approvals, clearances and authorizations for the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement under the HSR
Act or any other regulatory law, use their reasonable best
efforts to (i) cooperate in all respects with each other in
connection with any filing or submission and in connection with
any investigation or other inquiry, including any proceeding
initiated by a private party, (ii) promptly
130
inform the other party of any communication received by such
party from, or given by such party to, the DOJ, the FTC or any
other governmental entity and of any material communication
received or given in connection with any proceeding by a private
party, in each case regarding any of the transactions
contemplated hereby, (iii) permit the other party, or the
other partys legal counsel, to review any communication
given by it to, and consult with each other in advance of any
meeting or conference with, the DOJ, the FTC or any such other
governmental entity or, in connection with any proceeding by a
private party, with any other person, (iv) give the other
party the opportunity to attend and participate in such meetings
and conferences to the extent allowed by applicable law or by
the applicable governmental entity, (v) in the event one
party is prohibited by applicable law or by the applicable
governmental entity from participating in or attending any
meetings or conferences, keep the other promptly and reasonably
apprised with respect thereto and (vi) cooperate in the
filing of any memoranda, white papers, filings, correspondence,
or other written communications explaining or defending the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, articulating
any regulatory or competitive argument,
and/or
responding to requests or objections made by any governmental
entity.
If any objections under regulatory law are asserted with respect
to the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement or if
any suit or proceeding, whether judicial or administrative, is
instituted by any governmental entity or any private party
challenging any of the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement as violative of any regulatory law, each of Pfizer and
Wyeth has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to:
(1) oppose or defend against any action to prevent or
enjoin consummation of the merger agreement (and the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement),
and/or
(2) take such action as reasonably necessary to overturn
any regulatory action by any governmental entity to block
consummation of the merger agreement (and the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement), including by defending
any suit, action, or other legal proceeding brought by any
governmental entity in order to avoid entry of, or to have
vacated, overturned or terminated, including by appeal if
necessary, in order to resolve any such objections or challenge
as such governmental entity or private party may have to such
transactions under such regulatory law so as to permit
consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement.
Pfizer has agreed to, and to cause its subsidiaries to, propose,
negotiate, offer to commit and effect (and if such offer is
accepted, commit to and effect), by consent decree, hold
separate order, or otherwise, the sale, divestiture or
disposition of such assets or businesses of Pfizer or any of its
subsidiaries, or effective as of the effective time of the
merger, Wyeth or its subsidiaries, or otherwise offer to take or
offer to commit to take any action (including any action that
limits its freedom of action, ownership or control with respect
to, or its ability to retain or hold, any of the businesses,
assets, product lines, properties or services of Pfizer, any of
its subsidiaries, the surviving corporation or its subsidiaries)
which it is lawfully capable of taking and if the offer is
accepted, take or commit to take such action, in each case, as
may be required in order to avoid the commencement of any action
to prohibit the merger or any other transaction contemplated by
the merger agreement, or if already commenced, to avoid the
entry of, or to effect the dissolution of, any injunction,
temporary restraining order or other order in any action so as
to enable the closing to occur as soon as reasonably possible
and in any event not later than October 31, 2009 unless such
date is extended in accordance with the terms of the merger
agreement. Notwithstanding the previous sentence, neither Pfizer
nor any of its subsidiaries will be required to propose,
negotiate, commit to or effect any such sale, divestiture or
disposition of assets or business of Pfizer or Wyeth, or any of
their respective subsidiaries, or offer to take or offer to
commit to take any such action where such action, sale,
divestiture or disposition, individually or in the aggregate,
would be of assets or a business of Wyeth or its subsidiaries or
Pfizer or its subsidiaries, and such action, sale, divestiture
or disposition would result in the one year loss of net sales
revenues (as measured by net 2008 sales revenues), in
excess of $3 billion. For purposes of calculating the loss of
net sales revenues in the preceding sentence, the least amount
of lost revenues (as measured by net 2008 sales revenues)
as may be required to avoid the commencement of any action to
prohibit the merger or any other transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement, or if already commenced, to avoid the
entry of, or to effect the dissolution of, any injunction,
temporary restraining order or other order in any action, will
be used in the event that Pfizer elects to offer any action,
sale, divestiture or disposition that would result in a higher
loss of net sales revenues (as measured by net 2008 sales
revenues), than reasonably required to achieve such result.
131
Agreement
Not to Solicit Other Offers
Wyeth has agreed that it will not, it will cause its
subsidiaries not to, and it will use its reasonable best efforts
to cause its and its subsidiaries directors, officers,
employees, investment bankers, financing sources, financial
advisors, attorneys, accountants, other advisors, agents
and/or
representatives not to, directly or indirectly:
|
|
|
|
|
initiate, solicit or knowingly encourage any inquiries or the
making of any proposal or offer from any third party relating to
any acquisition proposal (as defined below) with respect to
Wyeth;
|
|
|
|
enter into or participate in any substantive discussion or
negotiation with respect to, or provide any confidential
information or data to any person relating to, an acquisition
proposal;
|
|
|
|
enter into any merger agreement, letter of intent, agreement in
principle, share purchase agreement, asset purchase agreement,
share exchange agreement, option agreement or other similar
contract relating to an acquisition proposal or enter into any
contract or agreement in principle requiring Wyeth to abandon,
terminate or breach its obligations under the merger agreement
or fail to consummate the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
take any action to make the provisions of any fair
price, moratorium, control share
acquisition, business combination or other
similar anti-takeover statute or regulation (including any
transaction under, or a third party becoming an interested
stockholder under, Section 203 of the DGCL), or any
restrictive provision of any applicable anti-takeover provision
in Wyeths certificate of incorporation or bylaws,
inapplicable to any transactions contemplated by an acquisition
proposal; or
|
|
|
|
resolve, propose or agree to undertake any of the actions listed
above.
|
However, prior to the adoption of the merger agreement by
Wyeths stockholders, Wyeth may furnish information with
respect to Wyeth and its subsidiaries and participate in
discussions or negotiations in response to an unsolicited
acquisition proposal or any inquiry relating to a potential
acquisition proposal made or received after the date of the
merger agreement from a third party whom the Wyeth board of
directors (or the executive committee thereof) determines, in
good faith, is credible and is reasonably capable of making a
superior proposal, in each case under circumstances not
involving a breach of Wyeths non-solicitation obligations,
if Wyeth (1) has first entered into a confidentiality
agreement with the party making such acquisition proposal or
inquiry on terms that are overall no less favorable to Wyeth
than those contained in the confidentiality agreement between
Wyeth and Pfizer and (2) promptly provides to Pfizer any
information concerning Wyeth or its subsidiaries provided to
such other person which was not previously provided to Pfizer.
Wyeth has agreed:
|
|
|
|
|
to immediately cease and cause to be terminated any
solicitation, discussion or negotiation with any persons
conducted prior to the execution of the merger agreement by
Wyeth, its subsidiaries or any of their representatives with
respect to any acquisition proposal and to promptly request the
return or destruction of all confidential information provided
by or on behalf of Wyeth or any of its subsidiaries to such
person in connection with the consideration of any acquisition
proposal to the extent that Wyeth is entitled to have such
documents returned or destroyed;
|
|
|
|
to notify Pfizer in writing promptly (but no later than
24 hours) after it receives any acquisition proposal or
inquiry of the type described above and to provide Pfizer with
certain information regarding such acquisition proposal or
inquiry;
|
|
|
|
to keep Pfizer reasonably informed, on a reasonably current
basis, of the status of any material developments with respect
to, any such acquisition proposal and to provide Pfizer with
copies of all written inquiries and correspondence with respect
to such acquisition proposal or inquiry no later than 24 hours
following receipt thereof;
|
|
|
|
not to, and to cause its subsidiaries not to, (i) enter
into any contract subsequent to the date of the merger agreement
that prohibits Wyeth from providing information concerning any
acquisition proposal
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
or inquiry to Pfizer, or (ii) terminate, waive, amend or
modify, or grant permission under, the standstill provisions of
any agreement to which it or any of its subsidiaries is a party
which prohibits the counterparty from making, effecting,
entering into, making or participating in any solicitation of
proxies in respect of, seeking, proposing or otherwise acting
alone or in concert with others, to influence the management or
the Wyeth board of directors with respect to, or advising,
assisting, knowingly encouraging or acting as a financing source
for, an acquisition proposal; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
to enforce the standstill provisions of any agreements which
prohibit the counterparty from making, effecting, entering into,
making or participating in any solicitation of proxies in
respect of, seeking, proposing or otherwise acting alone or in
concert with others, to influence the management or the Wyeth
board of the directors with respect to, or advising, assisting,
knowingly encouraging or acting as a financing source for, an
acquisition proposal to, and to cause subsidiaries of Wyeth to,
take all steps necessary to terminate any waiver of any such
standstill provision that may have been previously granted
unless the Wyeth board of directors concludes in good faith,
after consultation with outside counsel, that taking such action
could reasonably be determined to be inconsistent with its
fiduciary duties under applicable law, and to, and to cause its
subsidiaries to, otherwise enforce any such standstill
provisions.
|
As used in the merger agreement, an acquisition
proposal means any offer or proposal by any third party
concerning any of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
a merger, consolidation, other business combination or similar
transaction involving Wyeth or any of its subsidiaries, pursuant
to which such person would own 15% or more of the consolidated
assets, revenues or net income of Wyeth and its subsidiaries,
taken as a whole;
|
|
|
|
a sale, lease, license or other disposition directly or
indirectly by merger, consolidation, business combination, share
exchange, joint venture or otherwise, of assets of Wyeth
(including equity interests of any of its subsidiaries) or any
subsidiary of Wyeth representing 15% or more of the consolidated
assets, revenues or net income of Wyeth and its subsidiaries,
taken as a whole;
|
|
|
|
the issuance or sale or other disposition (including by way of
merger, consolidation, business combination, share exchange,
joint venture or similar transaction) of equity interests
representing 15% or more of the voting power of Wyeth;
|
|
|
|
a transaction or series of transactions in which any person will
acquire beneficial ownership or the right to acquire beneficial
ownership of equity interests representing 15% or more of the
voting power of Wyeth; or
|
|
|
|
any combination of any of the transactions described in the four
immediately preceding bullets.
|
In addition, if Wyeth receives an acquisition proposal which the
Wyeth board of directors concludes in good faith, after
consultation with outside counsel and Wyeths financial
advisors, constitutes a superior proposal (as defined below),
Wyeth may terminate the merger agreement upon three business
days prior written notice to Pfizer to enter into a
definitive agreement with respect to such superior proposal.
As used in the merger agreement, superior proposal
means a bona fide written acquisition proposal (except the
references in the definition of acquisition proposal
to 15% will be replaced by 50%), which,
in the good faith judgment of the Wyeth board of directors
(after consultation with Wyeths financial advisors and
outside counsel), taking into account the various legal,
financial and regulatory aspects of the proposal, including the
financing terms thereof, and the person making such proposal
(1) if accepted, is reasonably likely to be consummated,
and (2) if consummated would result in a transaction that
is more favorable to Wyeths stockholders, from a financial
point of view, than the merger (it being understood that the
inclusion of any seller financing in such
acquisition proposal, pursuant to which Wyeth stockholders may
be issued debt instruments as part of the consideration payable
in connection with the transactions contemplated by such
acquisition proposal, will not create any inference that, nor be
used by Pfizer to assert or otherwise claim that, an acquisition
proposal is not a superior proposal).
133
Recommendation
of the Wyeth Board of Directors
The Wyeth board of directors adopted a resolution recommending
that the Wyeth stockholders adopt the merger agreement. Under
the merger agreement, other than as described below, Wyeth
agreed that its board of directors would recommend adoption of
the merger agreement to its stockholders and not
(1) withdraw, modify or qualify (or publicly propose to
withdraw, modify or qualify) in any manner adverse to Pfizer
such recommendation or (2) approve, adopt or recommend any
acquisition proposal. Any of these actions is referred to as a
Change of Recommendation.
However, the Wyeth board of directors may make a Change of
Recommendation upon three business days prior written
notice to Pfizer under the following circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
in response to an intervening event (as defined below) if the
Wyeth board of directors concludes in good faith, after
consultation with outside counsel, that the failure to take such
action could reasonably be determined to be inconsistent with
its fiduciary duties under applicable law; or
|
|
|
|
in response to an acquisition proposal if the Wyeth board of
directors concludes in good faith, after consultation with
outside counsel, that the failure to take such action could
reasonably be determined to be inconsistent with its fiduciary
duties under applicable law.
|
As used in the merger agreement, intervening event
means, with respect to Wyeth, a material event or circumstance
that was not known to the Wyeth board of directors on the date
of the merger agreement (or if known, the consequences of which
were not known to or reasonably foreseeable by the Wyeth board
of directors as of such date), which event or circumstance, or
any material consequences thereof, becomes known to the Wyeth
board of directors prior to the time at which Wyeth stockholders
adopt the merger agreement, except that in no event will the
receipt, existence or terms of an acquisition proposal or
inquiry or any matter relating thereto or consequence thereof
constitute an intervening event.
Employee
Matters
At the effective time of the merger, Pfizer has agreed to
provide employment to, or to cause the surviving corporation to
provide employment to, employees who were employed by Wyeth or
its subsidiaries as of the effective time of the merger (except
that nothing in the merger agreement will require Pfizer (or
after the effective time of the merger, the surviving
corporation) to retain employment of any particular Wyeth
employee for any fixed period of time following the effective
time of the merger).
From and after the effective time of the merger until the second
anniversary of such effective time of the merger, Pfizer has
agreed to provide, or to cause the surviving corporation to
provide, to each employee who was employed by Wyeth or its
subsidiaries as of the effective time of the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
the same annual base salary or wage rate in effect as of the
date of the merger agreement and the same annual incentive and
bonus opportunities provided by Wyeth in respect of 2008 as set
forth under the applicable Wyeth benefit plan; and
|
|
|
|
employee benefits which are substantially comparable, in the
aggregate, to those provided to similarly situated employees (as
a group), in each case by Wyeth and its subsidiaries immediately
prior to the effective time of the merger;
|
except that:
|
|
|
|
|
the obligations in the prior two bullet points will not take
into account any change in control- or transaction-based
retention, transition, stay or similar bonus arrangements for
purposes of defining either annual incentive and bonus
opportunities or employee benefits;
|
|
|
|
with respect to employees who are subject to collective
bargaining agreements, compensation and benefits will be
provided in accordance with the applicable collective bargaining
agreements;
|
|
|
|
so long as Pfizer honors, or causes the surviving corporation to
honor, the provisions of the merger agreement relating to 2009
annual bonuses with respect to a particular employee (other than
any
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
employee who participates in a Wyeth benefit plan that is a
sales force incentive or integrated metrics reports bonus
program), Pfizer will be deemed to have satisfied its
obligations with respect to annual cash incentive or bonus
opportunities to be provided to such employee in respect of 2009;
|
|
|
|
|
|
so long as Pfizer honors, or causes the surviving corporation to
honor, the provisions of the merger agreement concerning the
Company Special Transaction Severance Plan or CIC Severance
Agreements (each as defined in the merger agreement), as
applicable to a given employee, Pfizer will be deemed to have
satisfied its obligations to provide severance payments
and/or
benefits to any such employee as may otherwise be required to be
provided in the merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
with respect to any employees based outside the United States,
Pfizers obligations under these provisions of the merger
agreement are to be modified to the extent necessary to comply
with applicable laws of the foreign countries and political
subdivisions thereof in which such employees are based.
|
At all times following the effective time of the merger, Pfizer
has agreed to, or to cause the surviving corporation to agree
to, treat former employees of Wyeth or any of its subsidiaries
who, as of the effective time of the merger, are eligible to
receive post-retirement health benefits under the applicable
Wyeth benefit plans, no less favorably than similarly situated
former employees of Pfizer with respect to post-retirement
health benefits.
With respect to any Pfizer benefit plans in which Wyeth
employees first become eligible to participate on or after the
effective time of the merger, Pfizer has agreed to, or to cause
the surviving corporation to agree to:
|
|
|
|
|
waive any pre-existing condition exclusions and waiting periods
with respect to participation and coverage requirements
otherwise applicable to former Wyeth employees under any such
Pfizer benefit plans providing medical, dental or vision
benefits to the same extent such limitation would have been
waived or satisfied under the analogous Wyeth benefit plan in
which such former Wyeth employee participated immediately prior
to the effective time of the merger;
|
|
|
|
provide each former Wyeth employee with credit for any
co-payments and deductibles paid prior to the effective time of
the merger during the calendar year in which such effective time
occurs (or if later, paid in the year in which such employee is
first eligible to participate), to the same extent such credit
was given under the analogous Wyeth benefit plan prior to the
effective time of the merger, in satisfying any applicable
deductible or out-of-pocket requirements under any such Pfizer
benefit plan in which the employee participates during the
calendar year in which such effective time occurs (or if later,
the year in which such employee is first eligible to
participate); and
|
|
|
|
recognize all service of each former Wyeth employee prior to the
effective time of the merger to Wyeth, its subsidiaries and any
predecessor entities of Wyeth or any of its subsidiaries (as
well as service to Pfizer and its affiliates (including the
surviving corporation) after the effective time of the merger),
for all purposes (including, but not limited to, eligibility to
participate, vesting credit, entitlement to benefits and benefit
accrual) of any Pfizer benefit plans (including those providing
for vacation and paid time-off) in which any such employee
participates after the effective time of the merger except that
Pfizer will not recognize such service to the extent it would
result in any duplication of benefits for the same period of
service.
|
Under the terms of the merger agreement, none of the Pfizer
obligations described in this Employee
Matters section are to be construed to (1) limit the
right of Pfizer or any of its subsidiaries (including the
surviving corporation and its subsidiaries) to amend or
terminate any Wyeth benefit plan or other employee benefit plan,
to the extent such amendment or termination is permitted by the
terms of the applicable plan, or (2) require Pfizer or any
of its subsidiaries (including the surviving corporation and its
subsidiaries) to retain the employment of any particular
employee of Wyeth or its subsidiaries for any fixed period of
time following the closing date.
Wyeth has also agreed to take certain actions to reacquire
shares of restricted stock from the Wyeth Restricted Stock Trust.
135
Financing
Cooperation
Financing
Pfizer has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to take, or
cause to be taken, all actions and to do, or cause to be done,
all things necessary, proper or advisable to consummate and
obtain the financing for the merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement on the terms and conditions
described in the commitment letter, including, among others, to
satisfy on a timely basis all conditions applicable to Pfizer in
the commitment letter that are within its control and to comply
with its obligations under the commitment letter, and enforce
its rights under the commitment letter in the event of a breach
by the financing sources that impedes or delays the closing,
including seeking specific performance of the parties providing
the financing.
If any portion of the financing contemplated by the commitment
letter becomes unavailable, Pfizer must use its reasonable best
efforts to arrange and obtain alternative financing from
alternative financial institutions in an amount sufficient to
consummate the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement
upon conditions no less favorable to Pfizer and Wyeth than those
in the commitment letter as promptly as practicable following
the occurrence of such event. Pfizer has agreed to give Wyeth
prompt oral and written notice of any material breach by any
party to the commitment letter, of any condition that is not
likely to be satisfied or of any termination of the commitment
letter (in no event will such notice be given later than 48
hours after the occurrence of such event). Pfizer has also
agreed to keep Wyeth informed on a reasonably current basis of
the status of its efforts to arrange the financing.
Pfizer has the right to amend, replace, supplement or otherwise
modify, or waive any of its rights under, the commitment letter
and/or
substitute other debt or equity financing for all or any portion
of the financing contemplated by the commitment letter from the
same and/or
alternative financing sources or reduce the amount of financing
under the commitment letter in its reasonable discretion (but
not to an amount below the amount that is required, together
with the financial resources of Pfizer and Merger Sub, to
consummate the merger) so long as such actions do not
(A) expand upon the conditions precedent or contingencies
to the financing as set forth in the commitment letter or
(B) prevent or impede or delay the consummation of the
merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement. On March 12, 2009, Pfizer entered into the Bridge
Term Facility contemplated by the commitment letter. On
March 24, 2009, in connection with its financing of the
merger, Pfizer issued $13.5 billion of senior unsecured
notes in a public offering. On June 3, 2009, in connection
with its financing of the merger, Pfizer issued
5.85 billion and £1.50 billion of senior
unsecured notes (totaling approximately $10.5 billion) in a
private placement pursuant to Regulation S of the
Securities Act. Due to the issuance of the senior unsecured
notes, as of June 3, 2009, the commitments under the bridge
loan agreement have been replaced by the proceeds obtained by
Pfizer through the issuance of the senior unsecured notes, and
the bridge loan agreement has been terminated.
Cooperation
of Wyeth
Wyeth has agreed to provide, and to cause its subsidiaries to
provide, and to use its reasonable best efforts to cause each of
its and their respective representatives, including legal, tax,
regulatory and accounting, to provide all cooperation reasonably
requested by Pfizer in connection with the financing, including:
|
|
|
|
|
providing information relating to Wyeth and its subsidiaries to
the financing parties (including information to be used in the
preparation of an information package regarding the business,
operations, financial projections and prospects of Pfizer and
Wyeth customary for such financing or reasonably necessary for
the completion of the financing by the financing parties) to the
extent reasonably requested by Pfizer to assist in preparation
of customary offering or information documents to be used for
the completion of the financing as contemplated by the
commitment letter;
|
|
|
|
participating in a reasonable number of meetings (including
customary
one-on-one
meetings with the parties acting as lead arrangers for the
financing and senior management and representatives, with
appropriate seniority and expertise, of Wyeth), presentations,
road shows, drafting sessions, due diligence sessions (including
accounting due diligence sessions) and sessions with the rating
agencies;
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
assisting in the preparation of (1) any customary offering
documents, bank information memoranda, prospectuses and similar
documents (including historical and pro forma financial
statements and information) for any of the financing, and
(2) materials for rating agency presentations;
|
|
|
|
cooperating with the marketing efforts for any of the financing
(including consenting to the use of Wyeths and its
subsidiaries logos; provided that such logos are used
solely in a manner that is not intended to or reasonably likely
to harm or disparage Wyeth or its subsidiaries or the reputation
or goodwill of Wyeth or any of its subsidiaries);
|
|
|
|
executing and delivering (or using reasonable best efforts to
obtain from its advisors), and causing its subsidiaries to
execute and deliver (or use reasonable best efforts to obtain
from its advisors), customary certificates (including a
certificate of the principal financial officer of Wyeth or any
subsidiary with respect to solvency matters), accounting comfort
letters (including consents of accountants for use of their
reports in any materials relating to the financing), legal
opinions or other documents and instruments relating to
guarantees and other matters ancillary to the financing as may
be reasonably requested by Pfizer as necessary and customary in
connection with the financing;
|
|
|
|
assisting in (1) the preparation of and entering into one
or more credit agreements, currency or interest hedging
agreements, or other agreements or (2) the amendment of any
of Wyeths or its subsidiaries existing credit
agreements, currency or interest hedging agreements, or other
agreements, in each case, on terms satisfactory to Pfizer and
that are reasonably requested by Pfizer in connection with the
financing provided that no obligation of Wyeth or any of its
subsidiaries under any such agreements or amendments will be
effective until the effective time of the merger;
|
|
|
|
as promptly as practicable, furnishing Pfizer and the financing
parties with all financial and other information regarding Wyeth
and its subsidiaries as may be reasonably requested by Pfizer to
assist in preparation of customary offering or information
documents to be used for the completion of the financing as
contemplated by the commitment letter;
|
|
|
|
using its reasonable best efforts, as appropriate, to have its
independent accountants provide their reasonable cooperation and
assistance;
|
|
|
|
using its reasonable best efforts to permit any cash and
marketable securities of Wyeth and its subsidiaries to be made
available to the Pfizer
and/or
Merger Sub at the closing;
|
|
|
|
providing authorization letters to the financing parties
authorizing the distribution of information to prospective
lenders and containing a representation to the financing parties
that the public side versions of such documents, if any, do not
include material non-public information about Wyeth or its
affiliates or securities;
|
|
|
|
using its reasonable best efforts to ensure that the financing
parties benefit from the existing lending relationships of Wyeth
and its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
providing audited consolidated financial statements of Wyeth
covering the three fiscal years immediately preceding the
closing for which audited consolidated financial statements are
currently available and unaudited financial statements of Wyeth
(excluding footnotes) for any interim period or periods ended
after the date of the most recent audited financial statements
and at least 45 days prior to the effective time of the
merger;
|
|
|
|
cooperating reasonably with Pfizers financing
sources due diligence, to the extent customary and
reasonable and to the extent not unreasonably interfering with
the business of Wyeth; and
|
|
|
|
terminating and repaying in full the commitments under the
Credit Agreement, dated as of August 2, 2007, among Wyeth,
the lenders party thereto, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as
administrative agent, on or prior to the closing date.
|
Wyeth is not required to take any of the actions described above
to the extent taking such action would interfere unreasonably
with Wyeths or its subsidiaries ongoing operations.
137
Additionally, the merger agreement limits Wyeths
obligation to incur any fees or liabilities with respect to the
financing prior to the effective time of the merger. Pfizer has
also agreed to reimburse Wyeth for all reasonable out-of-pocket
costs and to indemnify and hold harmless Wyeth, its
subsidiaries, and their respective representatives from and
against all losses, damages, claims, costs or expenses suffered
or incurred by any of them in connection with the arrangement of
the financing and any information used in connection therewith.
Other
Covenants and Agreements
The merger agreement contains certain other covenants and
agreements relating to, among other things:
Wyeth Stockholders Meeting. Wyeth has
agreed to take all lawful action to call, give notice of,
convene and hold a meeting of stockholders of Wyeth on a date as
soon as reasonably practicable following the effectiveness of
Pfizers
Form S-4
registration statement, of which this proxy statement/prospectus
forms a part, for the purpose of obtaining stockholder approval
of the adoption of the merger agreement. The Wyeth board of
directors has agreed to recommend adoption of the merger
agreement by Wyeth stockholders and, except as otherwise
permitted in the merger agreement, not to withdraw, modify or
qualify (or publicly propose to withdraw, modify or qualify) in
any manner adverse to Pfizer such recommendation or approve,
adopt or recommend any acquisition proposal except as otherwise
set forth above under Agreement Not to Solicit
Other Offers.
Access to Information/Employees. During
the period prior to the effective time of merger, Wyeth has
agreed to, and will cause each of its subsidiaries to, afford to
Pfizer and its representatives reasonable access during normal
business hours and upon reasonable prior notice to Wyeth to its
and its subsidiaries properties, books, contracts,
commitments, records, officers and employees and all other
information reasonably requested by them. However, Wyeth may
restrict access to the extent that (i) in Wyeths
reasonable judgment, Wyeth or its subsidiaries is required by an
applicable law to restrict or prohibit access to any such
properties or information, (ii) in Wyeths reasonable
judgment, the information is subject to confidentiality
obligations to a third party, (iii) disclosure of the
information would result in the disclosure of trade secrets of
third parties or (iv) disclosure of the information or
document could result in the loss of attorney-client privilege,
but in each of the foregoing cases, Wyeth has agreed to use its
commercially reasonable best efforts to obtain the required
consent of such third party to provide such access or disclosure
or develop an alternative to providing such information. Each of
Pfizer and Wyeth will, and will cause its respective directors,
officers, employees, investment bankers, financing sources,
financial advisors, attorneys, accountants or other advisors,
agents
and/or
representatives to, hold and keep confidential any nonpublic
information in accordance with the terms of the confidentiality
agreement, dated January 16, 2009, between Pfizer and Wyeth.
Indemnification and Insurance. Prior to
the effective time of the merger, Wyeth will, and if Wyeth is
unable to, Pfizer will cause the surviving corporation to,
obtain and fully pay for tail prepaid insurance
policies with a claims period of at least six years from and
after the effective time of the merger from an insurance carrier
with the same or better credit rating as Wyeths current
insurance carrier with respect to D&O Insurance for all
Indemnified Parties, with terms, conditions, retentions and
levels of coverage at least as favorable as Wyeths
existing D&O Insurance with respect to matters existing or
occurring prior to the effective time of the merger (including
with respect to acts or omissions occurring in connection with
the merger agreement and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated thereby). If such tail prepaid
insurance policies have been obtained, Pfizer will, and will
cause the surviving corporation after the effective time of the
merger to, maintain such policies in full force and effect, for
their full term, and to continue to honor its respective
obligations thereunder.
If Wyeth and the surviving corporation for any reason fail to
obtain such tail prepaid insurance policies as of
the effective time of the merger, the surviving corporation
will, and Pfizer will cause the surviving corporation to,
continue to maintain in effect the current D&O Insurance,
at no expense to the beneficiaries, for a period of at least six
years from and after the effective time of the merger. However,
Pfizer (or any successor) may substitute therefore policies of
at least the same terms, conditions, retentions and levels of
coverage and amounts which are, in the aggregate, as favorable
to the Indemnified Parties as provided in the existing policies
as of the date of the merger agreement. If such insurance is
unavailable, the surviving
138
corporation will, and Pfizer will cause the surviving
corporation to, purchase the best available D&O Insurance
for such six-year period from an insurance carrier with the same
or better credit rating as Wyeths current insurance
carrier with respect to Wyeths existing D&O Insurance
with terms, conditions, retentions and with levels of coverage
at least as favorable as provided in Wyeths existing
policies as of the date of the merger agreement with respect to
claims, actions, suits, proceedings or investigations, whether
civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, arising out of
or pertaining to facts or events that occurred prior to, at or
after the effective time of the merger (including with respect
to acts or omissions occurring in connection with the merger
agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated
thereby). However, neither Pfizer nor the surviving corporation
is required to expend annually in excess of 300% of the annual
premiums currently paid by Wyeth for such coverage; and, to the
extent that the annual premiums of such coverage exceed that
amount, the surviving corporation is required to use all
reasonable efforts to cause to be maintained the maximum amount
of coverage as is available for 300% of such annual premium.
From and after the effective time of the merger, Pfizer will,
and will cause the surviving corporation to indemnify, defend
and hold harmless all Indemnified Parties against any costs,
expenses (including attorneys fees and expenses and
disbursements), judgments, fines, losses, claims, damages or
liabilities incurred in connection with any claim, action, suit,
proceeding or investigation, whether civil, criminal,
administrative or investigative, arising out of or pertaining to
the fact that the Indemnified Party is or was an officer,
director, employee or fiduciary of Wyeth or any of its
subsidiaries or a fiduciary under any Wyeth benefit plan, or is
or was serving at the request of Wyeth or any of its
subsidiaries as a director, officer or employee of any other
corporation, limited liability company, partnership, joint
venture, trust or other business or non-profit enterprise
(including an employee benefit plan), whether asserted or
claimed prior to, at or after the effective time of the merger
(including with respect to acts or omissions occurring in
connection with the merger agreement and the consummation of the
transactions contemplated thereby), and provide advancement of
expenses to the Indemnified Parties (within ten days of receipt
by Pfizer or the surviving corporation from an Indemnified Party
of a request therefor), in all such cases to the same extent
that such persons are indemnified or have the right to
advancement of expenses as of the date of the merger agreement
by Wyeth under the certificate of incorporation, bylaws and
indemnification agreements, if any, of Wyeth or any of its
subsidiaries. In the event of any claim, action, suit, hearing,
proceeding or investigation, whether civil, criminal or
administrative, Pfizer will, and will cause the surviving
corporation to (x) not settle, compromise or consent to the
entry of any judgment in such proceeding or threatened claim,
action, suit, hearing, proceeding or investigation (and in which
indemnification could be sought by an Indemnified Party
hereunder), unless such settlement, compromise or consent
includes an unconditional release of such Indemnified Party from
all liability arising out of such claim, action, suit, hearing,
proceeding or investigation or such Indemnified Party otherwise
consents in writing, and (y) cooperate in the defense of
such matter.
Additionally, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law,
Pfizer will, and will cause the surviving corporation to,
include and cause to be maintained in effect in the surviving
corporations (or any successors) certificate of
incorporation and bylaws for a period of six years after the
effective time of the merger, the current provisions contained
in the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of Wyeth
regarding elimination of liability of directors, and
indemnification of and advancement of expenses to directors,
officers and employees of Wyeth.
The rights of the Indemnified Parties under the merger agreement
are in addition to any rights such Indemnified Parties may have
under the certificate of incorporation or bylaws of Wyeth or any
of its subsidiaries, or under any applicable contracts or laws.
The rights of the Indemnified Parties under the merger agreement
are intended to be for the benefit of, and may be enforced by,
the Indemnified Parties.
The obligations of Pfizer and the surviving corporation to the
Indemnified Parties under the merger agreement may not be
terminated, amended or modified in any manner so as to adversely
affect the Indemnified Parties (including their successors,
heirs and legal representatives).
Public Announcements. Pfizer and Wyeth
have agreed to consult with the other and consider in good faith
the views of the other party before issuing any public release
or announcement or making any other public statement with
respect to the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement. However, either party may issue a public release,
announcement or make such other public statement to the extent
required by applicable law or by the rules and regulations of
any applicable U.S. securities exchange or regulatory body
or
139
governmental entity to which the relevant party is subject so
long as such party uses its commercially reasonable efforts to
permit the other party reasonable time to comment on such public
release, announcement or public statement in advance of its
issuance.
Listing. Pfizer will use reasonable
best efforts to cause the Pfizer common stock and Pfizer $2
Convertible Preferred Stock, if any, to be issued or reserved
for issuance in connection with the merger to be approved for
listing on the NYSE prior to the effective time of the merger.
Pfizer and Wyeth Dividends. The merger
agreement requires Pfizer and Wyeth to coordinate with the other
regarding the payment of dividends and the record dates and
payment dates relating to any dividends in respect of either
companys common stock from and after the date of the
merger agreement until the completion of the merger with the
intention that holders of Wyeth common stock and Pfizer common
stock will not receive two dividends, or fail to receive one
dividend for any single calendar quarter with respect to their
shares of Wyeth common stock or Pfizer common stock or any
shares of Pfizer common stock that holders of Wyeth common stock
receive as part of the merger consideration.
Section 16 Matters. Each of Pfizer
and Wyeth has agreed that prior to the consummation of the
merger it will take all steps necessary to exempt under
Rule 16b-3
promulgated under the Exchange Act any dispositions of Wyeth
common stock or the acquisitions of Pfizer common stock by Wyeth
officers or directors pursuant to the merger.
Cooperation. Each of Pfizer and Wyeth
has agreed to establish a mechanism, subject to applicable law,
reasonably acceptable to each party pursuant to which such
parties will confer on an ongoing basis regarding the status of
the ongoing operations of Wyeth and its subsidiaries and certain
integration planning matters.
Wyeth Convertible Debentures and Wyeth $2 Convertible
Preferred Stock. Subject to applicable law,
to the extent requested by Pfizer and to the extent redeemable
under the applicable governing documents, prior to the effective
time of the merger, Wyeth has agreed, as promptly as practicable
following such request, to use its reasonable best efforts to
effect, prior to the effective time of the merger, the
redemption of any or all of the outstanding aggregate principal
amount of the indebtedness issued under the indenture governing
Wyeths convertible debentures in accordance with its
terms. If any of the holders of Wyeths convertible
debentures elect to convert the convertible debentures in
accordance with the terms of the indenture governing the
convertible debentures, then Wyeth has agreed to settle any such
conversion in cash pursuant to its right to elect the form of
settlement.
To the extent requested by Pfizer, as promptly as practicable
following such request, Wyeth has agreed to use its reasonable
best efforts to effect, prior to the effective time of the
merger, the redemption of all outstanding shares of Wyeth $2
Convertible Preferred Stock in accordance with the terms of the
Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock Certificate of Designation
and the applicable provisions of the DGCL. In accordance with
this provision, Wyeth announced that, pursuant to a request from
Pfizer, Wyeth will fully redeem all of its outstanding Wyeth $2
Convertible Preferred Stock, effective on July 15, 2009.
Therefore, it is expected that there will not be any shares of
Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding at the
effective time of the merger. In such case, Pfizer will not
create or issue a new series of preferred stock in connection
with the merger.
Board Representation. Upon completion
of the merger, it is expected that the Pfizer board of directors
will be composed of 16 members. In addition to the individuals
serving on the Pfizer board of directors at the effective time
of the merger, two members of the Wyeth board of directors who
were members of the Wyeth board of directors as of the date of
the merger agreement will be appointed to the Pfizer board of
directors. Pfizers Corporate Governance Committee will
review and evaluate potential candidates from the Wyeth board of
directors through customary procedures to assess the
independence and qualifications of such Wyeth directors. Upon
completion of the Corporate Governance Committees
evaluation, the committee will recommend nominees. Based on the
recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee and its own
independent evaluation, the Pfizer board of directors will
appoint two legacy Wyeth directors to the Pfizer board of
directors. The remaining directors of Wyeth will resign as of
the effective time of the merger. As of
140
the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, no determination
has been made as to the identity of the two Wyeth directors who
will be appointed to the Pfizer board of directors.
Conditions
to Complete the Merger
Each of Pfizers, Merger Subs and Wyeths
obligation to effect the merger is subject to the satisfaction
(or, where legally permissible, waiver) of the following
conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
adoption of the merger agreement by Wyeths stockholders;
|
|
|
|
absence of any statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation,
judgment, order, injunction (whether temporary, preliminary or
permanent), decision, opinion or decree issued by a court or
other governmental entity in the United States or the European
Union that makes the merger illegal or prohibits the
consummation of the merger;
|
|
|
|
the applicable waiting period (and any extension thereof) under
the HSR Act will have expired or been terminated, and
competition approvals and authorizations required from the
European Commission and Chinas Ministry of Commerce and
the applicable antitrust governmental authorities in Australia
and Canada will have been obtained;
|
|
|
|
approval for the listing on the NYSE of the Pfizer common stock
and, if necessary, the Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock, if
any, to be issued to the Wyeth stockholders in the merger,
subject to official notice of issuance; and
|
|
|
|
the registration statement on
Form S-4,
of which this proxy statement/prospectus forms a part, having
been declared effective by the SEC and the absence of an
effective stop order suspending the effectiveness of the
Form S-4 or proceedings pending before the SEC for that
purpose.
|
Pfizers and Merger Subs obligation to effect the
merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the following
conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
(i) the representations and warranties of Wyeth regarding
the organization, good standing and qualification,
capitalization, and corporate authority of Wyeth will be true
and correct (other than in de minimis respects), (ii) the
representations and warranties of Wyeth related to the absence
of any event or occurrence having a material adverse effect on
Wyeth since December 31, 2007 will be true and correct in
all respects, and (iii) all other representations and
warranties of Wyeth will be true and correct (without giving
effect to any materiality or material adverse effect
qualifications contained in such representations and
warranties), in each case, when made and as of the date of
closing of the merger (other than those representations and
warranties that were made only as of a specified date, which
need only be true and correct as of such specified date), except
in the case of representations and warranties described in
clause (iii) above, where the failure to be true and
correct has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have
a material adverse effect on Wyeth;
|
|
|
|
Wyeth shall have performed or complied with, in all material
respects, all of its material agreements and covenants under the
merger agreement at or prior to the consummation of the merger;
|
|
|
|
receipt of a certificate executed by Wyeths chief
executive officer or chief financial officer as to the
satisfaction of the conditions described in the preceding two
bullets; and
|
|
|
|
the lenders who are parties to the commitment letter (or, in the
event that alternative financing has been arranged, the lenders
or other financing sources who have committed to such
alternative financing) not having declined to make the financing
(or such alternative financing) available to Pfizer on the date
that would otherwise have been the date of consummation of the
merger, primarily by reason of the failure of either or both of
the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pfizer having on the closing date, and taking into account the
merger, (a) an unsecured long-term obligations rating of at
least A2 (with stable, or better, outlook) and a
commercial paper credit rating of at least
P-1
(which rating will be affirmed) from Moodys Investors
Services, Inc. and (b) a long-term issuer credit rating of
at least A (with stable, or better, outlook) and a
short-term
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
issuer credit rating of at least
A-1
(which rating will be affirmed) from Standard &
Poors Ratings Group (it being understood that an unsecured
long-term obligations rating of higher than A2 and a
long-term issuer credit rating of higher than A will
satisfy the foregoing, as applicable, irrespective of whether or
not such ratings are subject to negative watch or
negative outlook); or
|
|
|
|
|
|
since December 31, 2007, there not having been any event,
occurrence, development or state of circumstances or facts or
condition that has had or would reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on
Pfizer, except (a) as disclosed in Pfizers SEC
filings filed since January 1, 2008 but prior to the
execution date of the merger agreement (other than certain
risk-related disclosures made in such filings) or (b) as
set forth in Pfizers disclosure letter to the merger
agreement.
|
Wyeths obligation to effect the merger is subject to the
satisfaction or waiver of the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
(i) the representations and warranties of Pfizer and Merger
Sub regarding the organization, good standing and qualification,
capitalization, and corporate authority of Pfizer and Merger Sub
will be true and correct (other than in de minimis respects),
(ii) the representations and warranties of Pfizer and
Merger Sub related to the absence of any event or occurrence
having a material adverse effect on Pfizer since
December 31, 2007 will be true and correct in all respects,
and (iii) all other representations and warranties of
Pfizer and Merger Sub will be true and correct (without giving
effect to any materiality or material adverse effect
qualifications contained in such representations and
warranties), in each case, when made and as of the date of
closing of the merger (other than those representations and
warranties that were made only as of a specified date, which
need only be true and correct as of such specified date), except
in the case of representations and warranties described in
clause (iii) above, where the failure of such
representations and warranties to be true and correct has not
had and would not reasonably be expected to have a material
adverse effect on Pfizer;
|
|
|
|
Pfizer and Merger Sub will have performed or complied with, in
all material respects, all of its material agreements and
covenants under the merger agreement at or prior to the closing
date of the merger; and
|
|
|
|
receipt of a certificate executed by Pfizers and Merger
Subs chief executive officer or chief financial officer as
to the satisfaction of the conditions described in the preceding
two bullets.
|
As of June 3, 2009, Pfizer replaced the commitments
provided under the bridge loan agreement with permanent
financing through the issuance of senior unsecured notes, and
therefore the Specified Financing Conditions are no longer
applicable.
Pfizer and Wyeth cannot provide assurance as to when or if all
of the conditions to the merger can or will be satisfied or
waived by the appropriate party, or that the merger will be
completed. As of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus,
Pfizer and Wyeth have no reason to believe that any of these
conditions will not be satisfied. In no event will Pfizer be
required to consummate the merger prior to July 31, 2009.
Termination
of the Merger Agreement
Pfizer and Wyeth may mutually agree to terminate the merger
agreement before completing the merger, even after stockholder
approval, as long as the termination is approved by each of the
Pfizer board of directors and the Wyeth board of directors.
In addition, either of Pfizer or Wyeth may terminate the merger
agreement under the following circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger has not been consummated by the termination date;
|
|
|
|
a governmental entity in the United States or European Union has
issued a final and non-appealable order, judgment, decision,
opinion, decree or ruling or taken any other action permanently
enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the consummation of the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement; or
|
|
|
|
Wyeths stockholders have failed to vote for adoption of
the merger agreement.
|
142
Pfizer may also terminate the merger agreement under the
following circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
Wyeth breaches its representations and warranties, covenants or
agreements under the merger agreement such that the applicable
closing conditions will not have been satisfied (and such breach
is incapable of being cured prior to the termination
date); or
|
|
|
|
(1) the Wyeth board of directors effects a Change of
Recommendation in response to an acquisition proposal from a
third party and following its good faith determination that
failure to take such action could reasonably be determined to be
inconsistent with its fiduciary duties, (2) the Wyeth board
of directors approves or recommends, or enters into or allows
Wyeth or any of its subsidiaries to enter into, a merger
agreement, letter of intent, agreement in principle, share
purchase agreement, asset purchase agreement, share exchange
agreement, option agreement or other similar contract relating
to an acquisition proposal, (3) following the date any bona
fide acquisition proposal or any material modification thereto
is first published, sent or given to the stockholders of Wyeth,
Wyeth fails to issue a press release that expressly reaffirms
its recommendation of the merger agreement within ten business
days following Pfizers written request to do so (which
request may be made by Pfizer one time following any such
acquisition proposal or any material modifications thereto),
(4) if any tender offer or exchange offer is commenced with
respect to the outstanding Wyeth common stock prior to
stockholder adoption of the merger agreement, and the Wyeth
board of directors shall not have recommended that Wyeths
stockholders reject such tender offer or exchange offer and not
tender their Wyeth common stock into such tender offer or
exchange offer within ten business days after commencement of
such tender offer or exchange offer, unless Wyeth has issued a
press release that expressly reaffirms the recommendation of the
merger agreement within such ten business day period,
(5) Wyeth shall have failed to include its recommendation
in the proxy statement or (6) Wyeth or the Wyeth board of
directors publicly announces its intentions to do any of actions
listed above (any and all of the above, a Change of
Recommendation Termination Event); or
|
|
|
|
the Wyeth board of directors effects a Change of Recommendation
specifically due to the occurrence of an intervening event.
|
Wyeth may terminate the merger agreement under the following
circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
Pfizer breaches its representations and warranties, covenants or
agreements under the merger agreement such that certain
applicable closing conditions will not have been satisfied (and
such breach is incapable of being cured prior to the termination
date); or
|
|
|
|
at any time prior to Wyeths stockholders adoption of
the merger agreement, if the Wyeth board of directors determines
to accept a superior proposal, but only if Wyeth (1) is not
in material breach of its agreement not to solicit alternative
proposals and (2) the applicable termination fee is paid
substantially concurrently with such termination.
|
In addition, if all conditions to the merger agreement are
satisfied or waived (other than (i) the condition relating
to Pfizers financing sources not declining to make the
financing (or alternative financing) available primarily by
reason of the failure to satisfy either or both of the Specified
Financing Conditions and (ii) conditions that, by their
nature, cannot be satisfied until the closing of the merger, but
subject to the fulfillment or waiver of those conditions), and
the closing does not occur within five business days following
such satisfaction or waiver due to the failure of the condition
described in clause (i) above, then Wyeth may deliver an
election notice notifying Pfizer of its intention to exercise
its right to terminate the merger agreement, and may terminate
the merger agreement if Pfizer does not consummate the merger on
the earlier of (x) the tenth business day following the
date on which Pfizer receives such election notice and
(y) December 31, 2009. This termination right is
referred to as the specified financing condition termination
right.
As of June 3, 2009, Pfizer replaced the commitments
provided under the bridge loan agreement with permanent
financing through the issuance of senior unsecured notes, and
therefore the termination right relating to the Specified
Financing Conditions is no longer applicable.
143
Effect of
Termination
If the merger agreement is terminated, it will become void, and
there will be no liability on the part of Pfizer, Merger Sub or
Wyeth, except that (1) both Pfizer and Wyeth will remain
liable for any fraud or any willful and material breach of the
merger agreement and (2) designated provisions of the
merger agreement will survive the termination, including those
relating to the confidential treatment of information, payment
of fees and expenses (including termination fees), and the
indemnification of Wyeth in connection with arranging the
financing.
Expenses
and Fees
In general, each of Pfizer and Wyeth will be responsible for all
expenses incurred by it in connection with the negotiation and
completion of the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement.
Termination
Fees Payable by Wyeth
Under the terms of the merger agreement, Wyeth would have been
obligated to pay Pfizer a $1.5 billion cash termination fee
if, within 30 days after the date of the merger agreement,
Wyeth had received an alternative written acquisition proposal
and the Wyeth board of directors had made a good-faith
determination within such
30-day
period that such proposal was, or was reasonably likely to lead
to, a superior proposal, and either:
|
|
|
|
|
Pfizer had terminated the merger agreement due to the occurrence
of a Change of Recommendation Termination Event; or
|
|
|
|
Wyeth had terminated the merger agreement to enter into a
transaction with the same third party providing such acquisition
proposal.
|
Wyeth did not receive any written acquisition proposals during
the 30-day
period following the date of the merger agreement.
In a case where the $1.5 billion cash termination fee
described above is not payable, Wyeth would be obligated to pay
Pfizer a $2 billion cash termination fee if:
|
|
|
|
|
Pfizer terminates the merger agreement due to the occurrence of
a Change of Recommendation Termination Event; or
|
|
|
|
Wyeth terminates the merger agreement in order to enter into a
superior proposal; or
|
|
|
|
Pfizer terminates the merger agreement (1) because Wyeth
has breached its representations and warranties, covenants or
agreements under the merger agreement and such breach has
resulted in the failure of certain closing conditions, and such
breach is incapable of being cured prior to the termination
date, (2) prior to the time of such breach a third party
acquisition proposal had been known to the senior management or
board of directors of Wyeth and shall not have been withdrawn
prior to the breach giving rise to termination and
(3) Wyeth enters into a definitive agreement, or
consummates a transaction, with respect to an acquisition
proposal within 12 months of the termination; or
|
|
|
|
either Pfizer or Wyeth terminates the merger agreement
(1) due to the Wyeth stockholders failure to adopt
the merger agreement, (2) prior to the time of the
stockholder vote a third party acquisition proposal had been
publicly announced or publicly made known to Wyeths
stockholders and (3) Wyeth enters into a definitive
agreement or consummates a transaction with respect to such
acquisition proposal within 12 months of the termination of
the merger agreement.
|
For the purposes of the two immediately preceding bullets, an
acquisition proposal has the meaning described above
in Agreement Not to Solicit Other
Offers, except that references to 15% are changed to 50%.
In addition, Wyeth would be obligated to pay Pfizer a
$2 billion termination fee, and reimburse Pfizers
expenses actually incurred in connection with the merger by
Pfizer in an amount up to $700 million, if (1) the
144
merger agreement is terminated by Pfizer due to the Wyeth board
of directors effecting a Change of Recommendation specifically
due to the occurrence of an intervening event and
(2) neither the $1.5 billion termination fee nor the
$2 billion termination fee described above is payable to
Pfizer.
Termination
Fee Payable by Pfizer
Under the terms of the merger agreement, Pfizer is required to
pay Wyeth a cash termination fee of $4.5 billion in the
event that (i) Wyeth or Pfizer exercises its right to
terminate the merger agreement due to the failure of the closing
of the merger to occur by the termination date where all
conditions (other than (a) the condition relating to
Pfizers financing sources not declining to make the
financing (or alternative financing) available primarily by
reason of the failure to satisfy either or both of the Specified
Financing Conditions and (b) those other conditions that,
by their nature, cannot be satisfied until the closing of the
merger, but which would be satisfied if the closing date of the
merger were the date of termination) have been satisfied or
waived or (ii) Wyeth exercises its right to terminate the
merger agreement pursuant to the specified financing condition
termination right.
In the event that the merger agreement is terminated and the
$4.5 billion cash termination fee is paid to Wyeth as
described in the preceding paragraph, the payment of such
termination fee will be the sole and exclusive remedy of Wyeth,
its subsidiaries, stockholders, affiliates, officers, directors,
employees and representatives against Pfizer, Merger Sub or any
of their related persons, representatives or affiliates for, and
in no event will Wyeth seek to recover any other money damages
or seek any other remedy based on a claim in law or equity with
respect to any loss suffered as a result of the failure of the
merger to be consummated, the termination of the merger
agreement, any liabilities or obligations under the merger
agreement, or any claims or actions arising out of or relating
to any breach, termination or failure of or under the merger
agreement, in each case, with respect to a termination of the
merger agreement as a result of the failure of either or both of
the Specified Financing Conditions and any event related thereto.
As of June 3, 2009, Pfizer replaced the commitments
provided under the bridge loan agreement with permanent
financing through the issuance of senior unsecured notes, and
therefore the Specified Financing Conditions and the
$4.5 billion termination fee are no longer applicable.
Specific
Performance
Each party is entitled to seek an injunction or injunctions to
prevent a breach of the merger agreement and to enforce
specifically the terms and provisions of the merger agreement in
the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware or any court of
the United States located in the State of Delaware. This remedy
is in addition to any other remedy to which the parties are
entitled at law or in equity.
However, if Pfizer does not consummate the merger within five
business days following the satisfaction or waiver (subject to
applicable law) of the conditions to the merger (excluding
conditions that, by their nature, cannot be satisfied until the
closing of the merger, but subject to the fulfillment or waiver
of those conditions) and the proceeds from the financing
(or alternative financing) are unavailable on such date then
Wyeth may deliver to Pfizer an election notice exercising its
right to seek specific performance, and Wyeth cannot require
Pfizer to close until a date that is the earlier of (x) the
tenth business day following the date on which Pfizer receives
an election notice from Wyeth and (y) December 31,
2009. If Pfizer fails to consummate the merger due to
Pfizers financing sources declining to make the financing
(or alternative financing) available on such date primarily as a
result of the non-satisfaction of either or both of the
Specified Financing Conditions, then Wyeth does not have the
right to require Pfizer to consummate the merger.
As of June 3, 2009, Pfizer replaced the commitments
provided under the bridge loan agreement with permanent
financing through the issuance of senior unsecured notes, and
therefore the Specified Financing Conditions are no longer
applicable.
145
Amendment,
Waiver and Extension of the Merger Agreement
Subject to applicable law, the parties may amend the merger
agreement by action taken or authorized by their respective
boards of directors. However, after the adoption of the merger
agreement by the Wyeth stockholders, there may not be, without
further approval of Wyeths stockholders, any amendment of
the merger agreement that requires their further approval in
accordance with applicable law (including the rules of any
relevant stock exchange).
At any time prior to the completion of the merger, each of
Pfizer and Wyeth, by action taken or authorized by their
respective boards of directors, may:
|
|
|
|
|
extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations or
other acts of the other party;
|
|
|
|
waive any breach of or inaccuracies in the representations and
warranties of the other party; or
|
|
|
|
waive compliance by the other party with any of the other
agreements or conditions contained in the merger agreement.
|
146
DESCRIPTION
OF DEBT FINANCING
In connection with the merger, on March 12, 2009, Pfizer
entered into a bridge loan agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A. as administrative agent. The bridge loan agreement had a
term of 364 days and provided Pfizer with unsecured
financing in an aggregate principal amount of up to
$22.5 billion. On March 24, 2009, in connection with
its financing of the merger, Pfizer issued $13.5 billion of
senior unsecured notes in a public offering. On June 3,
2009, in connection with its financing of the merger, Pfizer
issued 5.85 billion and £1.50 billion of
senior unsecured notes (totaling approximately
$10.5 billion) in a private placement pursuant to
Regulation S of the Securities Act. Due to the issuance of
the senior unsecured notes, as of June 3, 2009, the
commitments under the bridge loan agreement have been replaced
with the proceeds obtained by Pfizer through the issuance of the
senior unsecured notes, and the bridge loan agreement has been
terminated.
DESCRIPTION
OF PFIZERS SHARE CAPITAL
The following discussion is a summary of the terms of the
capital stock of Pfizer and should be read in conjunction with
Comparison of Rights of Pfizer Stockholders and Wyeth
Stockholders beginning on page 151. This summary is
not meant to be complete and is qualified by reference to the
relevant provisions of the DGCL and Pfizers restated
certificate of incorporation and bylaws. You are urged to read
those documents carefully. Copies of the Pfizer restated
certificate of incorporation and bylaws are incorporated by
reference and will be sent to Pfizer and Wyeth stockholders upon
request. See Where You Can Find More Information
beginning on page 247.
Authorized
Capital Stock
Prior to Completion of the
Transaction. Under the Pfizer restated
certificate of incorporation, Pfizers authorized capital
stock consists of 12,000,000,000 shares of common stock,
par value $0.05 per share, and 27,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, without par value, of which 7,500 shares
of preferred stock have been designated Series A
convertible perpetual preferred stock each of which has a stated
value of $40,300.00 per share. As of May 5, 2009, there
were 6,747,979,039 shares of Pfizer common stock issued and
outstanding (excluding approximately 2,117,000,000 shares held
in Pfizers treasury), and as of December 31, 2008,
there were 1,804 shares of Series A convertible perpetual
preferred stock (with no preferred shares held in Pfizers
treasury).
Description
of Common Stock
Common Stock Outstanding. The
outstanding shares of Pfizer common stock are, and the shares of
Pfizer common stock issued in the merger will be, duly
authorized, validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.
Voting Rights. Each holder of Pfizer
common stock is entitled to one vote for each share of Pfizer
common stock held of record on the applicable record date on all
matters submitted to a vote of stockholders.
Dividend Rights; Rights upon
Liquidation. The holders of Pfizer common
stock are entitled to receive, from funds legally available for
the payment thereof, dividends when and as declared by
resolution of the Pfizer board of directors, subject to any
preferential dividend rights granted to the holders of any
outstanding Pfizer preferred stock. In the event of liquidation,
each share of Pfizer common stock is entitled to share pro rata
in any distribution of Pfizers assets after payment or
providing for the payment of liabilities and the liquidation
preference of any outstanding Pfizer preferred stock.
Preemptive Rights. Holders of Pfizer
common stock have no preemptive rights to purchase, subscribe
for or otherwise acquire any unissued or treasury shares or
other securities.
Description
of Preferred Stock
Preferred Stock Outstanding. The Pfizer
board of directors has approved the issuance of a series of
preferred stock designated Series A convertible perpetual
preferred stock. There are 7,500 shares designated in the
series, of which 1,804 shares are outstanding as of
December 31, 2008. All shares of the preferred stock are
held by an Employee Stock Ownership Plan, which is referred to
in this proxy statement/prospectus as the Preferred ESOP Trust.
The per-share stated value is $40,300.
147
Rank. With respect to dividend rights
and rights on liquidation, dissolution and
winding-up,
the Series A convertible perpetual preferred stock ranks
senior to the common stock of Pfizer and junior to all other
preferred stock unless designated as ranking senior or on a
parity with the new convertible perpetual preferred stock.
Voting Rights. The vote of at least
662/3%
of the outstanding Series A convertible perpetual preferred
stock, voting separately as a series, will be required to adopt
any alteration, amendment or repeal of any provision of
Pfizers certificate of incorporation, if such amendment,
alteration or repeal would alter or change the powers,
preferences or special rights of the Series A convertible
perpetual preferred stock so as to affect them adversely. Each
share of preferred stock is entitled to 2,574.87 votes in any
matter submitted to the stockholders to vote.
Dividend Rights. The holders of Pfizer
Series A convertible perpetual preferred stock are entitled
to receive, when, as and if declared by the board of directors
of Pfizer out of funds legally available therefor, cash
dividends in an amount per share not to exceed $2,518.75 per
annum, payable quarterly in arrears. No interest accrues on
accumulated but unpaid dividends on the Pfizer Series A
convertible perpetual preferred stock. Holders of shares of
Pfizer Series A convertible perpetual preferred stock will
not be entitled to any other dividends. Pfizer is prohibited
from paying dividends on any stock ranking pari passu with the
Series A convertible perpetual preferred stock, unless the
Series A convertible perpetual preferred stock is paid a
proportionate amount of such dividends. In addition, Pfizer is
prohibited from making any dividend payment on stock ranking
junior to the Series A convertible perpetual preferred
stock if any dividends on the Series A convertible
perpetual preferred stock remain unpaid. In the event that
Pfizer has not paid a dividend, Pfizer is not restricted from
redeeming the Series A convertible perpetual preferred
stock.
Rights upon Liquidation. Upon any
voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up
of Pfizer, the holders of Series A convertible perpetual
preferred stock will be entitled to receive liquidating
distributions in the amount of $40,300 per share, plus an amount
equal to all accrued and unpaid dividends thereon to the date
fixed for distribution, before any distribution or payment is
made to holders of common stock of Pfizer or on any other class
of Pfizer stock ranking junior to the Series A convertible
perpetual preferred stock.
Conversion Rights. The holders of
shares of Pfizer Series A convertible perpetual preferred
stock have the right, at their option, to convert any or all of
such preferred shares into shares of common stock of Pfizer
initially at a conversion price equal to $15.651285 per share of
common stock with each share of Series A convertible
perpetual preferred stock being valued at $40,300 for such
purpose. Holders of Series A convertible perpetual preferred
stock may initially convert each share, at the holders
option, into 2,574.8685 shares of Pfizer common stock with
equal voting rights.
Redemption. Upon the giving of
specified notice, Pfizer, at its option, will be entitled to
redeem any or all shares of Pfizer Series A convertible
perpetual preferred stock, at a redemption price of $40,300 per
share, plus an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid dividends
thereon to and including the date of redemption.
Pfizer must redeem all shares of Pfizer Series A
convertible perpetual preferred stock at the redemption price
plus an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid dividends thereon
to and including the date of redemption in the event that the
Preferred ESOP Trust is terminated, the Preferred ESOP is
terminated or the Preferred ESOP is eliminated from the
Preferred ESOP Trust.
In addition, Pfizer must redeem the Pfizer Series A
convertible perpetual preferred stock at the redemption price of
$40,300 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends thereon to
the date fixed for redemption if either of the following events
occur: (1) when and to the extent necessary for such holder
to make any payments of principal, interest or premium due and
payable under the promissory note from the trustee of the
employee stock ownership plan to Pfizer or any indebtedness,
expenses or costs incurred by the holder for the benefit of the
plan, or (2) in the event that the plan is not initially
determined by the Internal Revenue Service to be qualified
employer securities.
In lieu of paying the redemption price in cash, Pfizer will be
entitled, at its sole option, to make payment of the redemption
price in shares of common stock of Pfizer, or in a combination
of common stock and cash.
148
Consolidation, Merger. In the event the
Pfizer consummates any consolidation or merger or similar
business combination, pursuant to which the common stock of
Pfizer is exchanged solely for or changed, reclassified or
converted solely into stock of any successor or resulting
corporation that constitutes qualifying employer
securities with respect to a holder of Series A
convertible perpetual preferred stock within the meaning of the
Internal Revenue Code and the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act, the Series A convertible perpetual preferred
stock will be assumed by and will become preferred stock of such
successor or resulting corporation, having in respect of such
corporation the same powers, preferences and relative,
participating, optional or other special rights, and the
qualifications, limitations or restrictions that the Pfizer
Series A convertible perpetual preferred stock had
immediately prior to such transaction.
In the event Pfizer consummates any business combination of the
type described in the preceding paragraph pursuant to which the
common stock of Pfizer is exchanged for consideration that does
not constitute qualifying employer securities, the
outstanding shares of Pfizer Series A convertible perpetual
preferred stock will be automatically converted into the number
of shares of common stock of Pfizer into which such shares of
Series A convertible perpetual preferred stock could have
been converted at such time.
Description
of Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock
The merger agreement provides that each holder of Wyeth $2
Convertible Preferred Stock will be issued a share of a new
series of Pfizer preferred stock having the same powers,
designations, preferences and rights (to the fullest extent
practicable) as the shares of the Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred
Stock, which Pfizer intends to call $2 Convertible Preferred
Stock. However, the merger agreement also provides that, upon
the request of Pfizer, Wyeth will use its reasonable best
efforts to redeem all outstanding shares of Wyeth $2 Convertible
Preferred Stock prior to the effective time of the merger in
accordance with the terms of the Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred
Stock Certificate of Designations and the applicable provisions
of the DGCL. On April 23, 2009, Wyeth announced that,
pursuant to a request by Pfizer, it would redeem all of its
outstanding Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock, effective on
July 15, 2009. Therefore, it is expected that there will
not be any shares of Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock
outstanding at the effective time of the merger. In such case,
Pfizer will not create or issue a new series of $2 Pfizer
Convertible Preferred Stock in connection with the merger. If,
however, shares of Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock are
outstanding at the effective time of the merger and Pfizer $2
Convertible Preferred Stock is issued at closing, the Pfizer $2
Convertible Preferred Stock will have the following rights,
powers, designations and preferences:
Designation and Amount. The new Pfizer
preferred stock, which will be received by former holders of
Wyeths $2 Convertible Preferred Stock in accordance with
the merger agreement to the extent that the Wyeth $2 Convertible
Preferred Stock is not redeemed prior to the effective time of
the merger, will have no par value. The new Pfizer preferred
stock will be designated as Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred
Stock.
Rank. With respect to dividend rights
and rights on liquidation, dissolution and
winding-up,
the Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock will rank senior to
the common stock of Pfizer and senior to the Pfizer
Series A convertible perpetual preferred stock.
Voting Rights. The consent of at least
662/3%
of the outstanding Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock, voting
separately as a class, will be required to create or authorize
any class of stock ranking senior to or on parity with the
Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock or any obligation or
security convertible into shares of stock of any such class.
Additionally, the vote of at least
662/3%
of the outstanding Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock, voting
separately as a class, will be required to amend, alter, change
or repeal, in a manner prejudicial to the holder thereof, any of
the express terms of the Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock.
Each share of Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock will be
entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of shares of
Pfizer common stock into which such share of Pfizer $2
Convertible Preferred Stock would be entitled to be converted
into, voting together with the holders of Pfizer Common Stock as
a single class, for the election of directors and upon any other
matter submitted to the stockholders to vote at any annual or
special meeting.
Right to Elect Directors. If and when
dividends payable on all Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock
outstanding are in default in an amount equivalent to six
(6) full quarterly-yearly dividends, and until all such
149
dividends are paid or declared and set apart for payment, the
number of directors of the corporation shall be two more than
the full number constituting the board of directors immediately
prior to such default. The holders of all Pfizer $2 Convertible
Preferred Stock, voting separately as a class with any other
series of preferred stock having voting power in the premises,
shall be entitled to a special voting right to elect directors
to fill the two vacancies resulting from such increase in the
number of directors. In order to elect the two additional
directors, a meeting of those holders entitled to vote on such
directors shall be held at any time after the holders become
entitled to elect such directors, upon call by the holders of
not less than 1,000 shares of Pfizer $2 Convertible
Preferred Stock or upon call by the Secretary of Pfizer at the
request in writing of any stockholder addressed to the Secretary
at the principal office of Pfizer. At all meetings of
stockholders held for the purpose of electing directors during
such times as the holders of Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred
Stock shall have the special right, voting separately as one
class, to elect directors, the presence in person or by proxy of
the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of preferred
stock entitled to vote separately as a class shall be required
to constitute a quorum of such class for the election of
directors for such class; provided, however, that the absence of
a quorum of the holders of such class shall not prevent the
election at any such meeting or adjournment thereof of any other
directors by the necessary quorum of the holders of all classes
of stock having voting rights for the election of directors
(other than as a separate class) if such quorum is present in
person or by proxy at such meeting; and provided further that in
the absence of a quorum of the holders of stock having the right
to vote separately as a class, a majority of those holders of
the stock of such class who are present in person or by proxy
shall have power to adjourn the election of the directors to be
elected by such class from time to time without notice other
than announcement at the meeting until the holders of the
requisite number of shares shall be present in person or by
proxy. Such holders shall have the right to elect two directors
to hold office until the next annual meeting, provided that the
terms of office of all such directors shall terminate upon the
curing of all defaults in dividends on Pfizer $2 Convertible
Preferred Stock, unless dividend defaults still exist on other
preferred stock. If and when all dividends then in default on
Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock shall be paid, the holders
of such stock shall be divested of the special voting right and
the number of directors of the corporation shall be reduced by
two. In the case of any vacancy in the board of directors
occurring among the directors elected by the holders of Pfizer
$2 Convertible Preferred Stock in exercise of their special
voting right, such holders of Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred
Stock and of any other series of preferred stock then
outstanding and entitled to vote may elect a successor to hold
office for the unexpired term of directors whose place shall be
vacant. In all other cases, any vacancy among the directors
shall be filled by the vote of a majority of the remaining
directors.
Dividend Rights. The holders of Pfizer
$2 Convertible Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive,
when, as and if declared by the board of directors of Pfizer out
of funds legally available therefor, cumulative cash dividends
in an amount per share not to exceed $2.00 per annum, payable
quarterly on January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1
in each year. Pfizer will be prohibited from paying dividends on
any stock ranking pari passu with the Pfizer $2 Convertible
Preferred Stock, unless the Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred
Stock is paid a proportionate amount of such dividends. In
addition, Pfizer is prohibited from making any dividend payment
on stock ranking junior to the Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred
Stock if any dividends on the Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred
Stock remain unpaid. In the event that Pfizer has not paid a
dividend, Pfizer will not be restricted from redeeming the
Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock.
Rights upon Liquidation. Upon any
voluntary liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up
of Pfizer, the holders of Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock
will be entitled to receive distributions in the amount of
$60.00 per share, plus an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid
dividends thereon to the date fixed for liquidation, dissolution
or
winding-up,
before any distribution or payment is made to holders of common
stock of Pfizer. Upon any involuntary liquidation, dissolution
or
winding-up
of Pfizer, the holders of Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock
will be entitled to receive distributions in the amount of
$52.50 per share, plus an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid
dividends thereon to the date fixed for liquidation, dissolution
or
winding-up,
before any distribution or payment is made to holders of common
stock of Pfizer.
Conversion Rights. Subject to certain
adjustments, including those appropriately made to fully reflect
the effect of any dividend, stock split (including reverse stock
split) and reclassification, the holders of shares of Pfizer $2
Convertible Preferred Stock will have the right, at their
option, to convert each such preferred share into the number of
shares of Pfizer common stock equal to the product of (i) the
number of shares of
150
Wyeth common stock into which a share of Wyeth $2 Convertible
Preferred Stock is convertible immediately prior to the
effective time of the merger and (ii) the sum of
(A) 0.985 and (B) (x) $33.00 divided by (y) the
volume weighted average price of Pfizer common stock on the NYSE
Transaction Reporting System for the five consecutive trading
days ending two days prior to the effective time of the merger.
Upon conversion, no payment or adjustment shall be made for
dividends on such shares. No fractional shares shall be issued
upon conversion of such preferred shares, but in lieu thereof,
Pfizer shall pay the holder of such shares an amount in cash
equal to the value of such fractional interest in common stock
determined upon the basis of the closing price per share on the
NYSE on the date upon which the certificate representing such
shares shall be surrendered for conversion.
Redemption. Upon the giving of
specified notice, Pfizer, at its option, will be entitled to
redeem any or all shares of Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred
Stock, at a redemption price of $60.00 per share, plus an amount
equal to all accrued and unpaid dividends thereon to and
including the date of redemption if, at the time of mailing of
the notice of redemption, the average market price per share, as
defined below, of Pfizer common stock is (i) at least a
specified price per share calculated immediately prior to the
effective time of the merger based on the conversion rate
applicable on issuance of the $2 Pfizer Convertible Preferred
Stock, or (ii) in the event that an adjustment in the
number of shares issuable upon conversion of Pfizer $2
Convertible Preferred Stock shall have occurred, a market price
that will be calculated at the time of redemption based on the
then current conversion rate.
Average market price per share shall be the average of the daily
mean of the high and low sales prices, or bid prices, as the
case may be, for five consecutive business days commencing ten
business days before the time in question on which the
transactions have been reported by the NYSE.
Transfer
Agent
The transfer agent and registrar for Pfizer common stock, Pfizer
Series A convertible perpetual preferred stock and Pfizer
$2 Convertible Preferred Stock will be Computershare
Trust Company, N.A.
Listing
of Pfizer Common Stock and Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred
Stock
It is a condition to the completion of the transaction that the
shares of Pfizer common stock and Pfizer $2 Convertible
Preferred Stock, if any, to be issued in the transaction be
approved for listing on the NYSE, subject to official notice of
issuance.
COMPARISON
OF RIGHTS OF PFIZER STOCKHOLDERS
AND WYETH STOCKHOLDERS
Both Pfizer and Wyeth are incorporated under the laws of the
State of Delaware and, accordingly, the rights of the
stockholders of each are currently governed by the DGCL. Upon
completion of the merger, all outstanding shares of Wyeth common
stock and Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock (to the extent
such shares remain outstanding at the effective time of the
merger), will be converted into the right to receive the merger
consideration, which will include shares of Pfizer common stock
and cash, and Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock (which would
only be issued if the Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock
is not redeemed prior to the effective time of the merger),
respectively. Therefore, upon completion of the merger, the
rights of the former Wyeth stockholders will be governed by
Delaware law, the certificate of incorporation of Pfizer, as
amended, and the bylaws of Pfizer, as amended.
The following discussion is a summary of the current rights of
Pfizer stockholders and the current rights of Wyeth
stockholders. While this summary includes the material
differences between the two, this summary may not contain all of
the information that is important to you. You are urged to
carefully read this entire proxy statement/prospectus, the
relevant provisions of the DGCL and the other governing
documents referred in this proxy statement/prospectus for a more
complete understanding of the differences between being a
stockholder of Pfizer and a stockholder of Wyeth. Pfizer and
Wyeth have filed with the SEC their respective governing
documents referenced in this summary of stockholder rights and
will send copies of these
151
documents to you, without charge, upon your request. See
Where You Can Find More Information beginning on
page 247.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of Pfizer Stockholders
|
|
Rights of Wyeth Stockholders
|
|
Authorized Capital Stock
|
|
Pfizer is authorized under its certificate of incorporation to
issue 12,027,000,000 shares, consisting of
12,000,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.05 per
share, and 27,000,000 shares of preferred stock, without
par value.
|
|
The authorized capital stock of Wyeth consists of
2,400,000,000 shares of common stock,
$0.331/3 par
value per share, and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock,
$2.50 par value per share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Meetings of Stockholders
|
|
Pfizers bylaws provide that a special meeting of
stockholders may be called by the board of directors and shall
be called by the Chair of the Pfizer Board or the Secretary at
the request in writing of a majority of the board of directors
or one or more record holders of shares of stock of Pfizer
representing in the aggregate not less than twenty-five percent
(25%) of the total number of shares of stock entitled to vote on
the matter or matters to be brought before the proposed special
meeting.
|
|
Wyeths bylaws provide that, subject to the rights of
preferred stockholders, and unless otherwise provided by law, a
special meeting of stockholders may be called only by the
Chairman or Vice Chairman of the board of directors or the
President or by the Secretary on the written request of a
majority of all the directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholder Proposals
|
|
Pfizers bylaws allow for business to be properly brought
before an annual meeting of Pfizer by a stockholder (other than
the nomination of a person for election as a director, which is
discussed below), if the stockholder intending to propose the
business (the Proponent) gives timely notice thereof
in writing to the Secretary of Pfizer.
|
|
Wyeths bylaws provide that for matters to be properly
brought before an annual meeting by a stockholder (other than
nominations for the election of directors, which are discussed
below), the stockholder must give written notice of the proposed
matter, either by personal delivery or by United States mail,
postage prepaid, to the Secretary of Wyeth, not later than 90
days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding
annual meeting or not later than 10 days after notice or public
disclosure of the date of the annual meeting shall be given or
made to stockholders, whichever date shall be earlier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To be timely, a Proponents notice must be delivered to or
mailed and received at the principal executive offices of
Pfizer: (1) by the close of business 60 days in advance of
the anniversary of the previous years annual meeting if
such meeting is to be held on a day which is within 30 days
preceding the anniversary of the previous years annual
meeting or 90 days in advance of the anniversary of the
previous years annual meeting if such meeting is to be held on
or after the anniversary of the previous years annual
meeting; and (2) with respect to any other annual meeting of
stockholders, the close
|
|
Any such notice shall set forth as to each item of business the
stockholder shall propose to bring before the meeting (i) the
name and address of the stockholder proposing such item of
business, (ii) a description of such item of business and the
reasons for conducting it at such meeting and, in the event that
such item of business shall include a proposal to amend either
the certificate of incorporation or the bylaws, the text of the
proposed amendment, (iii) a representation that the stockholder
is a holder of record of stock of Wyeth entitled to vote at such
meeting and
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of Pfizer Stockholders
|
|
Rights of Wyeth Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of business on the tenth day following the date of public
disclosure of the date of such meeting.
|
|
intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to
propose such item of business and (iv) any material interest of
the stockholder in such item of business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Proponents notice to the Secretary of Pfizer shall set
forth as to each matter the Proponent proposes to bring before
the annual meeting: (a) a brief description of the business
desired to be brought before the annual meeting and the reasons
for conducting such business at the annual meeting, (b) the name
and address of the Proponent, and of any holder of record of the
Proponents shares as they appear on Pfizers books,
(c) the class and number of shares of Pfizer which are owned by
the Proponent (beneficially and of record) and owned by any
holder of record of the Proponents shares, as of the date
of the Proponents notice, and a representation that the
Proponent will notify Pfizer in writing of the class and number
of such shares owned of record and beneficially as of the record
date for the meeting promptly following the later of the record
date or the date notice of the record date is first publicly
disclosed, (d) any material interest of the Proponent in such
business, (e) a description of any agreement, arrangement or
understanding with respect to such business between or among the
Proponent and any of its affiliates or associates, and any
others (including their names) acting in concert with any of the
foregoing, and a representation that the Proponent will notify
Pfizer in writing of any such agreement, arrangement or
understanding in effect as of the record date for the meeting
promptly following the later of the record date or the date
notice of the record date is first publicly disclosed, (f) a
description of any agreement, arrangement or understanding
(including any derivative or short positions, profit interests,
options, hedging transactions, and borrowed or loaned shares)
that has been entered into as of the date of the
Proponents notice by, or on behalf of, the Proponent or
any of its affiliates or associates, the effect or intent of
which is to mitigate loss to, manage risk or benefit of share
price changes for, or increase or decrease the voting power of
the Proponent or any of its affiliates or associates with
respect to shares of stock
|
|
Wyeths bylaws state that only matters which have been
properly brought before an annual meeting of stockholders in
accordance with its bylaws shall be conducted at such meeting,
and the presiding officer may refuse to permit any matters to be
brought before such meeting which shall not have been properly
brought before it in accordance with the foregoing procedure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of Pfizer Stockholders
|
|
Rights of Wyeth Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Pfizer, and a representation that the Proponent will notify
Pfizer in writing of any such agreement, arrangement or
understanding in effect as of the record date for the meeting
promptly following the later of the record date or the date
notice of the record date is first publicly disclosed, (g) a
representation that the Proponent is a holder of record or
beneficial owner of shares of Pfizer entitled to vote at the
annual meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at
the meeting to propose such business, and (h) a representation
whether the Proponent intends to deliver a proxy statement
and/or form of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of
Pfizers outstanding shares required to approve the
proposal and/or otherwise to solicit proxies from stockholders
in support of the proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominations of Candidates for Election to the Board of
Directors
|
|
Pfizers bylaws state that any stockholder entitled to vote
at the election of directors at an annual meeting of
stockholders or a special meeting of stockholders at which
directors are to be elected pursuant to Pfizers notice of
meeting may nominate one or more persons for such election only
if written notice of such stockholders intent to make such
nomination is delivered to or mailed and received by the
Secretary of Pfizer.
Any such notice must be received by the Secretary not later
than the following dates: (1) with respect to an annual meeting
of stockholders, by the close of business 60 days in
advance of the anniversary of the previous years annual
meeting if such meeting is to be held on a day which is within
30 days preceding the anniversary of the previous
years annual meeting or 90 days in advance of the
anniversary of the previous years annual meeting if such
meeting is to be held on or after the anniversary of the
previous years annual meeting; and (2) with respect to any
other annual meeting of stockholders or a special meeting of
stockholders at which directors are to be elected pursuant to
Pfizers notice of meeting, by the close of business on the
tenth day following the date of public disclosure of the date of
such meeting.
|
|
Wyeths bylaws state that nominations for the election of
directors may be made by the board of directors or a committee
appointed by the board of directors or by any stockholder
entitled to vote in the election of directors generally.
However, any stockholder entitled to vote in the election of
directors may nominate one or more persons for election as
directors only if written notice of such stockholders
intent to make such nomination or nominations has been given,
either by personal delivery or by United States mail, postage
prepaid, to the Secretary of Wyeth not later than (i) with
respect to an election to be held at an annual meeting of
stockholders, 90 days prior to the anniversary date of the
immediately preceding annual meeting, and (ii) with respect to
an election to be held at a special meeting of stockholders for
the election of directors, the close of business on the tenth
day following the date on which notice of such meeting is first
given to stockholders.
Each such notice shall set forth: (a) the name and address of
the stockholder who intends to make the nomination and of the
person or persons to be nominated; (b) a representation that the
stockholder is a holder of record (or beneficial holder, which
must be verified by proper documentation) of Wyeth stock
entitled to
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of Pfizer Stockholders
|
|
Rights of Wyeth Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vote at such meeting and intends to appear in person or by
proxy at the meeting to nominate the person or persons specified
in the notice; (c) a description of all arrangements or
understandings between the stockholder and each nominee and any
other person or persons (naming such person or persons) pursuant
to which the nomination or nominations are to be made by the
stockholder; (d) such other information regarding each nominee
proposed by such stockholder as would be required to be included
in a proxy statement filed pursuant to the proxy rules of the
SEC; and (e) the consent of each nominee to serve as a director
of the corporation if so elected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The written notice of the stockholder intending to make the
nomination, also known as the Proponent, shall set forth: (i)
the name, age, business address and residence address of each
nominee proposed in such notice, (ii) the principal occupation
or employment of each such nominee, (iii) the number of shares
of capital stock of Pfizer which are owned of record and
beneficially by each such nominee, (iv) a statement whether each
such nominee, if elected, intends to tender, promptly following
such persons failure to receive the required vote for
election or reelection at the next meeting at which such person
would face election or reelection, an irrevocable resignation
effective upon acceptance of such resignation by the board of
directors, in accordance with Pfizers Corporate Governance
Principles, (v) with respect to each nominee for election or
reelection to the board of directors, include a completed and
signed questionnaire, representation and agreement required by
paragraph 15 of Article II of the Pfizer bylaws, (vi) such
other information concerning each such nominee as would be
required to be disclosed in a proxy statement soliciting proxies
for the election of such nominee as a director in an election
contest (even if an election contest is not involved), or that
is otherwise required to be disclosed, under the rules of the
SEC.
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of Pfizer Stockholders
|
|
Rights of Wyeth Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following information must be included in the notice as to
the Proponent: (a) the name and address of the Proponent, and of
any holder of record of the Proponents shares as they
appear on Pfizers books, (b) the class and number of
shares of Pfizer which are owned by the Proponent (beneficially
and of record) and owned by any holder of record of the
Proponents shares, as of the date of the Proponents
notice, and a representation that the Proponent will notify
Pfizer in writing of the class and number of such shares owned
of record and beneficially as of the record date for the meeting
promptly following the later of the record date or the date
notice of the record date is first publicly disclosed, (c) a
description of any agreement, arrangement or understanding with
respect to such nomination between or among the Proponent and
any of its affiliates or associates, and any others (including
their names) acting in concert with any of the foregoing, and a
representation that the Proponent will notify Pfizer in writing
of any such agreement, arrangement or understanding in effect as
of the record date for the meeting promptly following the later
of the record date or the date notice of the record date is
first publicly disclosed, (d) a description of any agreement,
arrangement or understanding (including any derivative or short
positions, profit interests, options, hedging transactions, and
borrowed or loaned shares) that has been entered into as of the
date of the Proponents notice by, or on behalf of, the
Proponent or any of its affiliates or associates, the effect or
intent of which is to mitigate loss to, manage risk or benefit
of share price changes for, or increase or decrease the voting
power of the Proponent or any of its affiliates or associates
with respect to shares of stock of Pfizer, and a representation
that the Proponent will notify Pfizer in writing of any such
agreement, arrangement or understanding in effect as of the
record date for the meeting promptly following the later of the
record date or the date notice of the record date is first
publicly disclosed, (e) a representation that the Proponent is a
holder of record or beneficial owner of shares of Pfizer
entitled to vote at the meeting and intends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of Pfizer Stockholders
|
|
Rights of Wyeth Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the
person or persons specified in the notice, and (f) a
representation whether the Proponent intends to deliver a proxy
statement and/or form of proxy to holders of at least the
percentage of Pfizers outstanding capital stock required
to approve the nomination and/or otherwise to solicit proxies
from stockholders in support of the nomination.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, Pfizer may require any proposed nominee to furnish
such other information as it may reasonably require to determine
the eligibility of such proposed nominee to serve as an
independent director of Pfizer or that could be material to a
reasonable stockholders understanding of the independence,
or lack thereof, of such nominee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To be eligible to be a nominee for election or reelection as a
director of Pfizer, a person must deliver to the Secretary of
Pfizer at the principal executive offices of Pfizer a written
questionnaire with respect to the background and qualification
of such person and the background of any other person or entity
on whose behalf the nomination is being made (which
questionnaire shall be provided by the Secretary of Pfizer upon
written request) and a written representation and agreement (in
the form provided by the Secretary upon written request) that
such person (i) is not and will not become a party to (A) any
agreement, arrangement or understanding with, and has not given
any commitment or assurance to, any person or entity as to how
such person, if elected as a director of Pfizer, will act or
vote on any issue or question (a Voting Commitment)
that has not been disclosed to Pfizer or (B) any Voting
Commitment that could limit or interfere with such persons
ability to comply, if elected as a director of Pfizer, with such
persons fiduciary duties under applicable law, (ii) is not
and will not become a party to any agreement, arrangement or
understanding with any person or entity other than Pfizer with
respect to any direct or indirect compensation, reimbursement or
indemnification in connection with
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of Pfizer Stockholders
|
|
Rights of Wyeth Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
service or action as a director that has not been disclosed
therein, and (iii) in such persons individual capacity and
on behalf of any person or entity on whose behalf the nomination
is being made, would be in compliance, if elected as a director
of Pfizer, and will comply with, applicable law and all
applicable publicly disclosed corporate governance, conflict of
interest, corporate opportunities, confidentiality and stock
ownership and trading policies and guidelines of Pfizer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Stockholder Meetings
|
|
The DGCL requires notice to stockholders of the place (if any),
date, and hour, and means of remote communication, if any, of
each annual and special stockholders meeting at least
10 days, but no more than 60 days, before the meeting
date unless other provisions of the DGCL require a different
notice. In the case of a special meeting, the notice must also
state the purpose or purposes for which the meeting is called.
Pursuant to the DGCL, notice of a stockholders meeting to
vote upon a merger or a sale of all or substantially all of the
corporations assets must be delivered at least
20 days before the meeting date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pfizers bylaws provide that written notice of an annual or
special meeting shall be given to each stockholder entitled to
vote thereat, not less than ten nor more than sixty days prior
to the meeting.
|
|
Wyeths bylaws provide that written notice of each meeting
of stockholders must be mailed, not less than ten days prior to
the meeting, to each stockholder entitled to vote at such
address as appears on the stock books of Wyeth. The notice must
specify the time and place of the meeting and, with respect to
special meetings, the matter or matters to be acted upon at such
meeting.
|
|
|
|
Number of Directors
|
|
The DGCL provides that the board of directors of a Delaware
corporation must consist of one or more directors as fixed by
the corporations certificate of incorporation or bylaws.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pfizers certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide
that the Pfizer board of directors shall not be less than ten,
nor more than twenty- four members, the exact number within said
limits to be fixed from time to time solely by resolution of the
board of directors, acting by the vote of not less than a
majority of the directors then in office. Pfizers bylaws
further provide that a majority of the directors shall consist
of persons who are not employees of Pfizer or of any subsidiary
of Pfizer. Should the death, resignation or other removal of any
non- employee director result in the failure of the requirement
set forth in the preceding sentence to be met, such requirement
shall not apply during the time of the vacancy caused by the
death, resignation
|
|
Wyeths certificate of incorporation provides that the
board of directors shall be fixed and may be altered in
accordance with the bylaws. Wyeths bylaws provide that the
Wyeth board of directors shall be not less than eight nor more
than fifteen in number as determined from time to time by the
board of directors, except in certain preferred stock dividend
default situations as provided in Wyeths certificate of
incorporation, pursuant to which holders of Wyeth $2 Convertible
Preferred Stock shall be entitled to elect two additional
directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of Pfizer Stockholders
|
|
Rights of Wyeth Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or removal of any such non-employee director.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Election of Directors
|
|
Pfizers bylaws provide that a nominee for director shall
be elected to the board of directors if the votes cast for such
nominees election exceed the votes cast against such
nominees election; provided, however, that directors shall
be elected by a plurality of the votes cast at any meeting of
stockholders for which (i) the Secretary of Pfizer receives a
notice that a stockholder has nominated a person for election to
the board of directors in compliance with the advance notice
requirements for stockholder nominees for director and (ii) such
nomination has not been withdrawn by such stockholder on or
prior to the day next preceding the date Pfizer first mails its
notice of meeting for such meeting to the stockholders. If
directors are to be elected by a plurality of the votes cast,
stockholders shall not be permitted to vote against a nominee.
|
|
Wyeths bylaws provide that except with respect to the
filling of vacancies in the membership of the board of
directors, each director will be elected to the Wyeth board of
directors by the vote of the majority of the votes cast with
respect to that directors election at any meeting for the
election of directors at which a quorum is present, provided,
however, that if the number of nominees exceeds the number of
directors to be elected, the directors shall be elected by the
vote of a plurality of the votes cast at any such meeting and
entitled to vote on the election of directors. Under
Wyeths bylaws, a majority of the votes cast means that the
number of votes cast for a director must exceed the
number of votes cast against that director.
If an incumbent director is not elected by a majority of the
votes cast (unless the director election standard is a plurality
of the votes cast as discussed above), the incumbent director
shall offer to tender his or her resignation to the board of
directors. Wyeths Nominating and Governance Committee will
make a recommendation to the board of directors on whether to
accept or reject the directors offer to tender his or her
resignation, or whether other action should be taken. The board
of directors will act on such committees recommendation
and publicly disclose its decision within 90 days from the
date of the certification of the election results. An incumbent
director who offers to tender his or her resignation may not
participate in the committees recommendation or in the
board of directors decision. An incumbent director who has
offered to tender his or her resignation must promptly tender
such resignation upon the board of directors acceptance of
such offer. If a directors offer to tender his or her
resignation is accepted by the board of directors, or if a
nominee for director is not elected and the nominee is not an
incumbent director, then the board of directors may fill the
resulting vacancy as set forth in the bylaws or may decrease
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of Pfizer Stockholders
|
|
Rights of Wyeth Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the size of the board of directors accordingly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wyeths certificate of incorporation provides that if and
when dividends payable on the Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred
Stock are in default in an amount equivalent to six full
quarter-yearly dividends on all shares of such series of
preferred stock at the time outstanding, the number of directors
of Wyeth shall thereupon, and until all dividends in default on
such series shall have been paid or declared and set apart for
payment, be two more than the full number constituting the board
of directors immediately prior to such default. The holders of
all shares of $2 Convertible Preferred Stock, voting separately
as one class, will be entitled to elect directors to fill the
vacancies resulting from such increase in the number of
directors of Wyeth. Such holders will elect such two directors
to hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders;
provided, however, that the terms of office of all such
directors shall terminate upon the curing of all defaults in
dividends on such series, unless dividend defaults shall still
exist on other series of preferred stock.
|
|
|
|
Removal of Directors
|
|
Under the DGCL, directors may be removed from office, with or
without cause, by a majority stockholder vote.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pfizer certificate of incorporation and bylaws are silent
with respect to the removal of directors and such removal is
therefore governed by the applicable provisions of the DGCL.
|
|
Wyeths certificate of incorporation provides that a
director may (except directors elected by shares of preferred
stock voting separately as a class), by vote of a majority of
the entire board of directors for any cause deemed by them
sufficient, be removed as a director.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limitation on Liability of Directors
|
|
Pfizers certificate of incorporation provides that, the
liability of Pfizers directors to Pfizer or its
stockholders shall be eliminated to the fullest extent permitted
by the DGCL as amended from time to time.
|
|
Wyeths certificate of incorporation provides that no
director shall be personally liable to Wyeth or its stockholders
for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary duty by such
director as a director, except (i) for breach of the
directors duty of loyalty to Wyeth or its stockholders,
(ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve
intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii)
pursuant to section 174 of the DGCL, or (iv) for any transaction
from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of Pfizer Stockholders
|
|
Rights of Wyeth Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indemnification and Advancement of Expenses of Directors and
Officers
|
|
Pfizers bylaws provides that Pfizer shall indemnify and
hold harmless, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law
as it presently exists or may hereafter be amended, any person
who was or is made or is threatened to be made a party or is
otherwise involved in any action, suit or proceeding, whether
civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (a
proceeding) by reason of the fact that he or she, or
a person for whom he or she is the legal representative, is or
was a director, officer, employee or agent of Pfizer or is or
was serving at the request of Pfizer as a director, officer,
employee or agent of another corporation or of a partnership,
joint venture, trust, nonprofit entity, or other enterprise,
including service with respect to employee benefit plans,
against all liability and loss suffered and expenses (including
attorneys fees) reasonably incurred by such person. Pfizer
shall be required to indemnify a person in connection with a
proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such person only if
the proceeding (or part thereof) was authorized by the board of
directors of Pfizer.
|
|
Wyeths bylaws provides that Wyeth shall indemnify and hold
harmless, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law as
it presently exists or may hereafter be amended (but, in the
case of any such amendment, only to the extent such amendment
permits Wyeth to provide broader indemnification rights than
such law permitted Wyeth to provide prior to such amendment),
any person who was or is made or threatened to be made a party,
or is otherwise involved in, any threatened, pending or
completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal,
administrative or investigative (a proceeding), by
reason of the fact that such person is or was a director,
officer or employee of Wyeth or is or was serving at the request
of Wyeth as a director, officer or employee of a related entity,
against all expense, liability and loss (including
attorneys fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in
settlement) actually and reasonably incurred by such person in
connection therewith; provided, however, that, except as
otherwise expressly provided in the bylaws, Wyeth shall be
required to indemnify such person in connection with a
proceeding (or part thereof) commenced by such person only if
the commencement of such proceeding (or part thereof) by such
person was authorized in the specific case by the Wyeth board of
directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pfizer shall pay the expenses (including attorneys fees)
incurred by an officer or director of Pfizer in defending any
proceeding in advance of its final disposition, provided,
however, that the payment of such expenses shall be made only
upon receipt of an undertaking by the director or officer to
repay all amounts advanced if it shall ultimately be determined
that the director or officer is not entitled to be indemnified.
Payment of such expenses incurred by other employees and agents
of Pfizer may be made by the board of directors in its
discretion upon such terms and conditions, if any, as it deems
appropriate.
|
|
Wyeth shall, to the fullest extent not prohibited by applicable
law, pay the expenses (including attorneys fees)
reasonably incurred by any person who is or was a director or
officer of Wyeth or is or was serving at the request of Wyeth as
a director or officer of a related entity, in defending any
proceeding referred to in the preceding paragraph in advance of
its final disposition upon receipt of an undertaking acceptable
to Wyeth by or on behalf of such person to repay all such
amounts if it shall ultimately be determined that such person is
not entitled to be indemnified under the bylaws, such
undertaking to include a certification by such person that he or
she acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably
believed to be in the best interests of Wyeth and, in the case
of a criminal proceeding, had no reason to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of Pfizer Stockholders
|
|
Rights of Wyeth Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
believe his or her conduct was unlawful. Such expenses
reasonably incurred by other persons may be so paid by Wyeth
upon such terms and conditions, if any, as Wyeth deems
appropriate. The bylaws provide that Wyeth has the authority, to
the extent and in the manner permitted by law, to indemnify and
to advance expenses to any person, whether or not such person
has any rights to indemnification or advancement of expenses
under Wyeths bylaws, when and as authorized by appropriate
corporate action.
|
|
|
|
Transactions With Related Parties
|
|
The DGCL generally provides that no transaction between a
corporation and one or more of its directors or officers, or
between a corporation and any other corporation or other
organization in which one or more of its directors or officers,
are directors or officers, or have a financial interest, shall
be void or voidable solely for this reason, or solely because
the director or officer is present at or participates in the
meeting of the board or committee which authorizes the
transaction, or solely because any such directors or
officers votes are counted for such purpose, if: (1) the
material facts as to the directors or officers
interest and as to the transaction are known to the board of
directors or the committee, and the board or committee in good
faith authorizes the transaction by the affirmative votes of a
majority of the disinterested directors, even though the
disinterested directors be less than a quorum; (2) the material
facts as to the directors or officers interest and
as to the transaction are disclosed or are known to the
stockholders entitled to vote thereon, and the transaction is
specifically approved in good faith by vote of the stockholders;
or (3) the transaction is fair as to the corporation as of the
time it is authorized, approved or ratified, by the board of
directors, a committee or the stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wyeths certificate of incorporation provides that a
director shall not, in the absence of fraud, be disqualified by
his office from dealing or contracting with Wyeth either as a
vendor, purchaser or otherwise, nor in the absence of fraud
shall any transaction or contract of Wyeths be void or
voidable by reason of the fact that any director or any firm of
which any director is a member, or any corporation of which any
director is a stockholder or director is in any way interested
in such transaction or contract, provided that such transaction
or contract is or shall be authorized, ratified or approved
either:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) by vote of a majority of a quorum of the board of directors
or of the executive committee without counting in such majority
or quorum any director so interested or a member of a firm so
interested or a stockholder or a director of a corporation so
interested, or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of Pfizer Stockholders
|
|
Rights of Wyeth Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) by vote at a stockholders meeting of the holders of
record of a majority of all the outstanding shares of stock of
Wyeth, or by writing or writings signed by a majority of such
holders; nor shall any director be liable to account to Wyeth
for any profit realized by him from or through any such
transaction or contract of Wyeth ratified or approved as
aforesaid by reason of the fact that he or any firm of which he
is a member or any corporation of which he is a stockholder or
director was interested in such transaction or contract. Nothing
in the certificate of incorporation creates any liability in the
events above described or prevents the authorization,
ratification or approval of such contracts or transactions in
any other manner permitted by law.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
Pfizers certificate of incorporation provides that after
the requirements with respect to preferential dividends, if any,
on the preferred stock shall have been met and after Pfizer
shall have complied with all the requirements, if any, with
respect to the setting aside of sums as purchase, retirement or
sinking funds, then and not otherwise the holders of common
stock shall be entitled to receive such dividends as may be
declared from time to time by the board of directors. Currently,
Pfizers Series A Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock,
which provides dividends at the rate of 6.25%, ranks senior to
Pfizers common stock with respect to receiving dividends.
|
|
Wyeths certificate of incorporation provides that the
dividend rate on Wyeths $2 Convertible Preferred Stock
shall be $2.00 per annum, payable in cash quarterly on January
1, April 1, July 1 and October 1 in each year. Holders of Wyeth
$2 Convertible Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive, when
and as declared by the board of directors, out of funds legally
available for the payment of dividends, dividends at the annual
rates fixed by the board of directors, in preference to
dividends on any other class of stock of Wyeth including to
holders of the common stock.
|
163
PROPOSAL 2:
ADJOURNMENT OF THE MEETING
Adjournment
of the Meeting
Although it is not currently expected, the meeting may be
adjourned to solicit additional proxies if there are not
sufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement. In that event,
Wyeth may ask its stockholders to vote upon the proposals
to elect directors to the Wyeth board of directors, ratify the
appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Wyeths
independent registered public accounting firm for 2009, consider
two stockholder proposals, and consider the adjournment of the
meeting to solicit additional proxies, but not the proposal to
adopt the merger agreement.
In this proposal, we are asking you to authorize the holder of
any proxy solicited by the Wyeth board of directors to vote in
favor of granting discretionary authority to the proxies or
attorneys-in-fact to adjourn the meeting for the purpose of
soliciting additional proxies. If Wyeth stockholders approve the
adjournment proposal, we could adjourn the meeting and any
adjourned session of the meeting and use the additional time to
solicit additional proxies, including the solicitation of
proxies from stockholders that have previously returned properly
executed proxies or authorized a proxy by telephone or via the
Internet Web site. Additionally, we may seek to adjourn the
meeting if a quorum is not present at the meeting.
Vote
Required and Board Recommendation
Approval of the proposal to adjourn the meeting requires an
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of
Wyeth common stock and Wyeth $2 Convertible Preferred Stock
present in person or by proxy at the meeting and entitled to
vote on the proposal, voting together as a single class. No
proxy that is specifically marked AGAINST adoption
of the merger agreement will be voted in favor of the
adjournment proposal, unless it is specifically marked
FOR the proposal to adjourn the meeting.
Our board of directors recommends that you vote
FOR the proposal to adjourn the meeting, if
necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there are not
sufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement.
164
CHAPTER
TWO THE WYETH ANNUAL MEETING
PROPOSAL 3:
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
We are planning to elect 11 directors to the Wyeth board of
directors who will hold office until the earliest of the
effective time of the merger, Wyeths 2010 annual meeting
of stockholders or his or her removal or resignation. At the
effective time of the merger, the individuals serving as Wyeth
directors immediately prior to the closing of the merger will no
longer be Wyeth directors and two members of the Wyeth board of
directors who were members of the Wyeth board of directors as of
the date of the merger agreement will be appointed to the Pfizer
board of directors. All of the nominees currently are members of
the Wyeth board of directors. Professor John D. Feerick retired
from the Wyeth board of directors on July 31, 2008, in
accordance with the Wyeth Corporate Governance
Guidelines, which mandates retirement from service on the
Wyeth board of directors no later than the last day of the
calendar month in which a director reaches age 72. The
Wyeth board of directors took action to decrease the number of
directors from 12 to 11 upon Professor Feericks
retirement. Mr. Robert Essner retired from the Wyeth board
of directors as of June 27, 2008 in connection with his
retirement from Wyeth, and Mr. Ivan G. Seidenberg resigned
from the Wyeth board of directors as of February 29, 2008.
We have no reason to believe that any nominee for director, if
elected, would not serve. If any nominee is not available and
the Wyeth board of directors chooses to designate a substitute
nominee, your vote (through your proxy) would be cast for the
substitute nominee.
Nominees
for Election as Directors of Wyeth
|
|
|
Robert M. Amen
|
|
Mr. Amen is 59 years old and has been a Director of Wyeth
since October 2007. Since July 2006, he has been the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of International Flavors
& Fragrances Inc., a leading creator and manufacturer of
flavors and fragrances used in a wide variety of consumer
products and packaged goods. He was previously with
International Paper Company, a paper and packaging company,
where he was President from 2003 until 2006 and previously
Executive Vice President.
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Critelli
|
|
Mr. Critelli is 60 years old and has been a Director of
Wyeth since April 2008. Mr. Critelli was Executive Chairman
of Pitney Bowes Inc., a provider of mailstream solutions, from
May 2007 to December 2008 and a Director from 1994 to December
2008. Mr. Critelli previously was the Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Pitney Bowes Inc. from January 1997 through
May 2007. Mr. Critelli is also a Director of Eaton Corporation.
|
|
|
|
Frances D. Fergusson, Ph.D.
|
|
Dr. Fergusson is 64 years old and has been a Director
of Wyeth since January 2005. She is a Professor at Vassar
College and is President Emeritus of the College, a position she
held from 1986 to July 2006. She is also a Director of Mattel,
Inc.
|
165
|
|
|
Victor F. Ganzi
|
|
Mr. Ganzi is 62 years old and has been a Director of Wyeth
since December 2005. Mr. Ganzi was the President and Chief
Executive Officer from 2002 to 2008 and a Director from 1990 to
2008 of The Hearst Corporation, a diversified communications
company. He is also a Director of Gentiva Health Services, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Robert Langer, Sc.D
|
|
Dr. Langer is 60 years old and has been a Director of
Wyeth since January 2004. He was named an Institute Professor at
Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2006 and has been on
the faculty of Massachusetts Institute of Technology since 1977.
He is also a Director of Alseres Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Echo
Therapeutics, Inc. and Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
|
|
|
John P. Mascotte
|
|
Mr. Mascotte is 70 years old and has been a Director of
Wyeth since 1995. He is the retired President and Chief
Executive Officer of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City,
Inc., a position he held from 1997 through 2001. He is also the
former Chairman of Johnson & Higgins of Missouri, Inc. and
former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Continental
Corporation.
|
|
|
|
Raymond J. McGuire
|
|
Mr. McGuire is 52 years old and has been a Director of
Wyeth since October 2006. Mr. McGuire has been Co-Head, Global
Investment Banking at Citi since 2005. Prior to that, Mr.
McGuire was the Global Co-Head of Mergers & Acquisitions at
Morgan Stanley from 2003 to May 2005; a Managing Director at
Morgan Stanley from 2000 to 2003; a Managing Director in the
Mergers and Acquisitions Group of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
from 1994 to 2000; and one of the original members of
Wasserstein Perella & Co., Inc. where he became a
Partner/Managing Director in 1991.
|
166
|
|
|
Mary Lake Polan,
M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H.
|
|
Dr. Polan is 65 years old and has been a Director of
Wyeth since 1995. She joined Stanford University School of
Medicine in 1990 and is currently Professor and Chair Emeritus
of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Stanford, as
well as Adjunct Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at
Columbia University School of Medicine. She is also a Director
of Quidel Corporation.
|
|
|
|
Bernard Poussot
|
|
Mr. Poussot is 57 years old and has been a Director of
Wyeth since January 2007. Mr. Poussot is Chairman of the Wyeth
board of directors, a position he has held since June 2008, our
Chief Executive Officer, a position he has held since January
2008, and our President, a position he has held since April
2006. He was our Chief Operating Officer from January 2007
through December 2007 and our Vice Chairman from April 2006
through December 2007. From June 2002 to April 2006, he was
Executive Vice President of Wyeth and President, Wyeth
Pharmaceuticals. From January 2001 to June 2002, he served as
Senior Vice President of Wyeth and President, Wyeth
Pharmaceuticals. Prior to that, Mr. Poussot held positions of
increasing responsibility since joining Wyeth in 1986.
|
|
|
|
Gary L. Rogers
|
|
Mr. Rogers is 64 years old and has been a Director of Wyeth
since October 2005. He is former Vice Chairman of General
Electric Company, a position he held from 2001 through 2003.
Prior to that, Mr. Rogers held various executive positions
during his long tenure at General Electric. He is also a
Director of Rohm and Haas Company and W.W. Grainger, Inc.
|
|
|
|
John R. Torell III
|
|
Mr. Torell is 69 years old and has been a Director of Wyeth
since 1982. He is Partner at Core Capital Group, LLC, a position
he has held since 2000. He is also Chairman of Indecomm Global
Services Corporation and International Executive Services Corps.
He is the former President of Manufacturers Hanover Corporation
and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, former Chairman of the
Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of CalFed Inc. and
former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Fortune Bancorp.
|
THE WYETH BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE
FOR THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THESE NOMINEES AS
DIRECTORS.
167
INDEPENDENCE
OF DIRECTORS
The Wyeth board of directors annually determines the
independence of our directors based on a review by the directors
and the Nominating and Governance Committee. The NYSE Corporate
Governance Standards require that a majority of the board be
independent and that for a director to qualify as independent,
the board must affirmatively determine that the director has no
material relationship with Wyeth, either directly or as a
partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a
relationship with us. In determining whether a material
relationship exists, the Wyeth board of directors and the
Nominating and Governance Committee broadly consider all
relevant facts and circumstances brought to their attention
through the processes described below. In addition, the Wyeth
board or directors has a specific set of procedures designed to
ensure the continued independence of any director whose employer
does, or potentially may do, significant business with Wyeth.
The Wyeth Corporate Governance Guidelines adopted by the
Wyeth board of directors contain standards of independence that
meet or exceed the NYSE Corporate Governance Standards. These
independence standards are set out in detail in
Section II.b. of the Wyeth Corporate Governance
Guidelines available on the Corporate Governance section of
our Internet Web site at www.wyeth.com and generally
provide that a director will not be considered independent if:
|
|
|
|
|
the director is, or has been within the last three years, an
employee of Wyeth, or an immediate family member of the director
is, or has been within the last three years, an executive
officer of Wyeth;
|
|
|
|
the director, or an immediate family member of the director, has
received more than $120,000 in any
12-month
period in the last three years in direct compensation from
Wyeth, other than director fees and pension or other forms of
deferred compensation for prior service;
|
|
|
|
the director is a current partner or employee of our internal or
external auditor, the director has an immediate family member
who is a current partner of such a firm, the director has an
immediate family member who is a current employee of such a firm
and personally works on our audit, or the director or an
immediate family member of the director was within the last
three years (but is no longer) a partner or employee of such a
firm and personally worked on our audit within that time;
|
|
|
|
the director or an immediate family member of the director is,
or in the last three years has been, employed as an executive
officer of another company where any of Wyeths current
executives serve on that companys compensation
committee; or
|
|
|
|
the director is employed by another company (other than a
charitable organization), or an immediate family member of the
director is employed as an executive officer of a company, that
has made payments to, or received payments from, Wyeth for
property or services in an amount which, in any of the last
three years, exceeds the greater of $1 million and 2% of
such other companys consolidated gross revenue.
|
Please consult the Wyeth Corporate Governance Guidelines
for specific information on how we apply these standards.
The Wyeth Corporate Governance Guidelines also provide
that the following relationships will not be considered material
relationships that would impair a directors independence:
|
|
|
|
|
if a director of Wyeth is an executive officer or an employee,
or the directors immediate family member is an executive
officer, of another company that makes payments to, or receives
payments from, Wyeth for property or services in an amount
which, in any single fiscal year, does not exceed the greater of
(i) $1 million and (ii) 2% of such other
companys consolidated gross revenues;
|
|
|
|
if a director of Wyeth is an executive officer or employee of
another company that is indebted to Wyeth, or to which Wyeth is
indebted, and the total amount of the indebtedness is less than
2% of the consolidated assets of the company wherein the
director serves as an executive officer or employee;
|
|
|
|
if a director of Wyeth is an executive officer of another
company in which Wyeth owns an equity interest and the amount of
the equity interest held by Wyeth is less than 10% of the total
shareholders equity of the company at which the director
serves as an executive officer; or
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
if a director of Wyeth serves as a director, officer or trustee
of a charitable organization and Wyeths contributions to
the organization in the most recently completed fiscal year are
less than the greater of (i) $1 million and
(ii) 2% of that organizations gross revenue.
|
Pursuant to the Wyeth Corporate Governance Guidelines and
the categorical standards of independence that they set forth,
the Wyeth board or directors reviewed the independence of each
of its directors in February 2009, taking into account potential
conflicts of interest, transactions or other relationships that
would reasonably be expected to potentially compromise any of
our directors independence. In performing this review, the
Wyeth board of directors, together with the Nominating and
Governance Committee, reviewed a memorandum prepared by
Wyeths internal audit and law departments, which included
an analysis of directors responses to a questionnaire
inquiring about, among other things, their relationships (and
those of their immediate family members) with us, their
affiliations with other companies and other potential conflicts
of interest.
As a result of this review, the Wyeth board of directors, based
on the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance
Committee, affirmatively determined that all of Wyeths
directors are independent of Wyeth and its management under the
standards set forth in the Wyeth Corporate Governance
Guidelines, with the exception of Mr. Poussot, who is
not independent because of his employment as our Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer.
In making independence determinations with regard to our
non-employee directors, the Wyeth board or directors and the
Nominating and Governance Committee considered the following
categories and types of transactions, relationships and
arrangements:
|
|
|
|
|
With respect to Mr. Ganzi, who previously served as a
director and the President and Chief Executive Officer of The
Hearst Corporation, and Dr. Polan, whose spouse serves as
the current Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of the
Board and Chairman of the Executive Committee of Hearst, certain
arms-length, ordinary course commercial transactions
between Wyeth and Hearst;
|
|
|
|
With respect to Mr. Mascotte, a pledge of cash donations
and product supplies by Wyeth to the Ghana Essential Medicines
Initiative, a charitable initiative to support the availability
of pharmaceutical supplies in Ghana supported by The Population
Council, leading pharmaceutical companies and The Mascotte
Family Fund of the Aspen Community Foundation; and
|
|
|
|
With respect to Mr. McGuire, who serves as Co-Head, Global
Investment Banking at Citi, certain arms-length, ordinary
course commercial banking, financial advisory, underwriting and
other financial services arrangements and transactions between
Wyeth and Citi.
|
In each case, the transactions, relationships and arrangements
considered were determined to be within the applicable
categorical independence standards under the Wyeth Corporate
Governance Guidelines.
In addition, Mr. Essner, who served as the Chairman of the
Wyeth board of directors until June 27, 2008, was
considered not independent by the Wyeth board of directors
because of his employment as our Chairman through that date and
his prior role as our Chief Executive Officer. Professor
Feerick, who served on the Wyeth board of directors until
July 31, 2008, and Mr. Seidenberg, who served on the
Wyeth board of directors until February 29, 2008, were
considered independent by the Wyeth board of directors. In
determining the independence of Mr. Seidenberg, who serves
as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Verizon
Communications Inc., the Wyeth board of directors and the
Nominating and Governance Committee considered certain
arms-length, ordinary course commercial transactions
between Wyeth and Verizon. These relationships were determined
to be within the applicable categorical independence standards
under the Wyeth Corporate Governance Guidelines.
In November 2008, the Wyeth board of directors amended the
Wyeth Corporate Governance Guidelines to establish the
role of the lead director, which will be active and filled by an
independent director whenever our Chairman does not qualify as
an independent director under the Wyeth Corporate Governance
Guidelines. The first lead director will be appointed at the
first Wyeth board meeting following the meeting for a one-year
term, subject to renewal for a maximum of two additional
twelve-month periods. The lead director will receive a cash
retainer of $20,000 per year, paid in quarterly installments
(prorated for the portion of any calendar quarter served). The
Wyeth Charter of the Lead Director of the Board of
Directors is available on the Wyeth Internet Web site at
www.wyeth.com.
169
DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION
We use a combination of cash and equity-based incentive
compensation to attract and retain highly qualified candidates
to serve as non-employee directors on the Wyeth board of
directors. In setting non-employee director compensation, we
consider both the high level of expertise and the time
commitment that board service requires. For information
regarding the impact of our proposed merger with Pfizer on our
director compensation programs, see Chapter 1: The
Merger Interests of Certain Persons in the
Merger beginning on page 98.
Mr. Poussot, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer, and Mr. Essner, our former Chairman, were Wyeth
employees during 2008. The 2008 compensation for each of
Messrs. Poussot and Essner is discussed below under
Executive Compensation beginning on page 185.
Compensation
Framework for Non-Employee Directors
In 2008, we implemented a new compensation framework for
non-employee directors, which consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
a determination every two years by the Nominating and Governance
Committee of a total fixed annual dollar amount of compensation
to be provided to each non-employee director (set at $220,000
for 2008 and 2009);
|
|
|
|
the delivery of that total fixed annual compensation 40% in cash
and 60% in equity, with an annual cash retainer fee representing
the cash portion and DSUs representing the equity
portion; and
|
|
|
|
a separate annual cash committee chairman fee of $15,000, but no
other meeting or committee service fees.
|
Under this compensation framework, beginning in 2008, we no
longer grant stock options to non-employee directors. As part of
this compensation framework, the Wyeth board of directors
adopted the Wyeth 2008 Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive
Plan, which was approved by our stockholders at our 2008 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders. Under this plan, each non-employee
director was granted DSUs for 2008 with a value equal to 60% of
$220,000, measured using the closing price of our common stock
on the date of the grant, which was the date of the Wyeth 2008
Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Distribution of shares covered
by DSUs is deferred until the later of the termination of the
non-employee directors service on the Wyeth board of
directors or a later date elected by the non-employee director.
Each annual DSU vests on the earlier of (1) the day
immediately prior to our next annual meeting of stockholders and
(2) 12 months from the date of grant, except that DSUs
granted to newly elected directors do not vest until the date
that is 12 months and 30 days from the date of grant.
However, if a director has not yet served for at least two
continuous years on the Wyeth board of directors, vesting is
delayed until he or she meets this two-year service requirement.
The DSUs also become immediately vested upon (1) the
termination of the directors service on the Wyeth board or
directors (following at least two years of continuous service)
on account of death or mandatory retirement, (2) a change
in control, such as our contemplated merger with Pfizer or
(3) the exercise of discretion by the Compensation
Committee (as defined below) to accelerate vesting. DSUs are
credited to a bookkeeping account established for each
non-employee director, and a number of shares of our common
stock equal to the number of DSUs granted to each non-employee
director is contributed to a grantor trust on the grant date. On
each date that cash dividends are otherwise payable to the
holders of common stock, the DSUs are credited with dividend
equivalents. As the dividend equivalents in any deferred unit
account equal the value of additional full shares of stock, we
contribute shares of stock to the grantor trust. Directors have
the ability to direct the trustee of the grantor trust with
respect to the voting of the shares of common stock underlying
the DSUs, and the trustee does not have discretion to vote those
shares unless instructed to do so.
Under our 1994 Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors,
each non-employee director first elected as a director prior to
April 27, 2006 is entitled to receive an initial grant of
800 shares of restricted stock and four subsequent annual
grants of 800 shares of restricted stock for a total of
4,000 shares of restricted stock over a five-year period.
These awards vest on the fifth anniversary of election to the
Wyeth board of directors and are subject to the terms and
conditions of the plan, which includes a provision for the
acceleration of vesting of outstanding restricted stock awards
upon a change in control. Non-employee
170
directors may elect to defer receipt of their shares following
the end of the vesting period, in which case these deferred
shares are contributed to a grantor trust following the end of
the vesting period. Non-employee directors first elected on or
after April 27, 2006 do not receive these awards. Four of
our continuing non-employee directors received 800 share
annual grants in 2008 as scheduled under this plan.
Directors
Deferral Plan
We also maintain our Directors Deferral Plan, under which
non-employee directors fees may be deferred in amounts
specified by each non-employee director. The deferred amounts
accrue interest, compounded quarterly, at a market rate set
annually (equal to 120% of the applicable federal long-term
rate) or may be allocated to phantom stock units on a quarterly
basis. Phantom stock units accrue dividend equivalents that are
credited quarterly and are paid in cash upon distribution from
the plan.
Other
Benefits
During 2008, non-employee directors were entitled to participate
in our medical, dental, vision and prescription drug plans by
paying the full applicable premium associated with their
coverage. Wyeth directors also receive business travel and
accident insurance coverage and may participate in our
charitable matching gift program, which currently provides that
Wyeth matches 50%, up to a maximum of $12,500 per year, of
charitable gifts by directors. We provide or reimburse directors
for first-class air travel to and from meetings of the Wyeth
board of directors. We invited directors
spouses/significant others to attend one off-site meeting of the
Wyeth board of directors in 2008, and we paid the costs of this
attendance in order to encourage attendance and foster social
interaction among the members of the Wyeth board of directors.
2008 Directors
Compensation Table
The following table presents compensation information for our
non-employee directors for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008. The table presents compensation
information for all non-employee directors who served on the
Wyeth board of directors during 2008; however, Professor Feerick
and Messrs. Critelli and Seidenberg served on the Wyeth
board of directors for only part of the year. Mr. Critelli
was elected to the Wyeth board of directors at the
April 24, 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Professor
Feerick retired effective July 31, 2008 in connection with
the mandatory retirement provisions of the Wyeth Corporate
Governance Guidelines and Mr. Seidenberg resigned
effective February 29, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or Paid
|
|
Stock
|
|
Option
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
in Cash(1)
|
|
Awards(2)
|
|
Awards(2)
|
|
Compensation(3)
|
|
Total
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Robert M. Amen
|
|
$
|
88,000
|
|
|
$
|
63,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,500
|
|
|
$
|
158,624
|
|
Michael J. Critelli
|
|
$
|
60,440
|
|
|
$
|
45,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
105,837
|
|
John D. Feerick
|
|
$
|
81,000
|
|
|
$
|
152,822
|
|
|
$
|
13,395
|
|
|
$
|
18,500
|
|
|
$
|
265,717
|
|
Frances D. Fergusson, Ph.D.
|
|
$
|
103,000
|
|
|
$
|
159,413
|
|
|
$
|
13,395
|
|
|
$
|
10,159
|
|
|
$
|
285,967
|
|
Victor F. Ganzi
|
|
$
|
103,000
|
|
|
$
|
142,528
|
|
|
$
|
13,395
|
|
|
$
|
2,102
|
|
|
$
|
261,025
|
|
Robert Langer, Sc.D.
|
|
$
|
88,000
|
|
|
$
|
195,451
|
|
|
$
|
13,395
|
|
|
$
|
21,418
|
|
|
$
|
318,264
|
|
John P. Mascotte
|
|
$
|
103,000
|
|
|
$
|
112,085
|
|
|
$
|
13,395
|
|
|
$
|
26,448
|
|
|
$
|
254,928
|
|
Raymond J. McGuire
|
|
$
|
88,000
|
|
|
$
|
126,310
|
|
|
$
|
22,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
236,469
|
|
Mary Lake Polan, M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H.
|
|
$
|
103,000
|
|
|
$
|
112,085
|
|
|
$
|
13,395
|
|
|
$
|
12,638
|
|
|
$
|
241,118
|
|
Gary L. Rogers
|
|
$
|
88,000
|
|
|
$
|
145,699
|
|
|
$
|
13,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
247,094
|
|
Ivan G. Seidenberg
|
|
$
|
22,000
|
|
|
$
|
(46,410
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,130
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,500
|
|
|
$
|
(41,040
|
)
|
John R. Torell III
|
|
$
|
103,000
|
|
|
$
|
112,085
|
|
|
$
|
13,395
|
|
|
$
|
5,761
|
|
|
$
|
234,241
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects the aggregate dollar amount of annual retainer and
committee chairman fees earned and payable in cash. Non-employee
directors are permitted to defer director fees and, for 2008,
under the Directors Deferral Plan, directors deferred the
following amounts: $88,000 for Mr. Amen, $103,000 for
Mr. Ganzi and $22,000 for Mr. Seidenberg. |
171
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The column entitled Stock Awards represents the
compensation cost recognized for financial statement reporting
purposes in 2008 in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment (SFAS No. 123R), disregarding the
estimate of forfeitures related to service-based vesting
conditions, for restricted stock granted in 2008 and prior years
under the 1994 Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors
and DSUs granted in 2007 and 2008 under both our prior and new
non-employee director compensation frameworks. The column
entitled Option Awards represents the compensation
cost recognized for financial statement reporting purposes in
2008 in accordance with SFAS No. 123R, disregarding
the estimate of forfeitures related to service-based vesting
conditions, for stock options granted in 2007 under our prior
non-employee director compensation framework. DSUs were granted
under our 2006 Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan and
our 2008 Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan, and stock
options were granted under our 2006 Non-Employee Director Stock
Incentive Plan. Amounts shown for Mr. Seidenberg reflect
the reversal of compensation cost in accordance with
SFAS No. 123R, resulting from his forfeiture of
unvested DSUs and unvested stock option awards upon his
resignation from the Wyeth board of directors. The expense for
restricted stock and DSUs is based upon the share price of our
common stock on the grant date of the award and is recognized
pro rata over the vesting period. Stock option expense is
determined based upon the Black-Scholes option pricing model
based on the following assumptions and is recognized pro rata
over the vesting period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Grant
|
|
Expected Life of Options
|
|
|
5.5 Years
|
*
|
Expected Volatility
|
|
|
19.91%
|
*
|
Expected Dividend Yield
|
|
|
2.11%
|
|
Risk-Free Rate
|
|
|
4.58%
|
*
|
|
|
* |
Due to the mandatory retirement age of 72 set forth in the
Wyeth Corporate Governance Guidelines, for Professor
Feerick, assumptions for the 2007 grant were an expected life of
the options of 4.0 years, expected volatility of 19.24% and
a risk free rate of 4.55%.
|
The following table shows equity grants awarded in 2008 to
non-employee directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 Restricted Stock Plan
|
|
2008 Non-Employee
|
|
|
|
|
for Non-Employee Directors
|
|
Director Stock Incentive Plan
|
|
Total Grant Date
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
Number of
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Grant
|
|
Number of
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Fair Value of Stock
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
Shares
|
|
Fair Value*
|
|
Date
|
|
Units
|
|
Fair Value*
|
|
Awards*
|
|
Mr. Amen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
|
$
|
132,031
|
|
|
$
|
132,031
|
|
Mr. Critelli
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
|
$
|
132,031
|
|
|
$
|
132,031
|
|
Prof. Feerick
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
|
$
|
132,031
|
|
|
$
|
132,031
|
|
Dr. Fergusson
|
|
|
01/02/2008
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
$
|
35,112
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
|
$
|
132,031
|
|
|
$
|
167,143
|
|
Mr. Ganzi
|
|
|
12/01/2008
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
$
|
25,720
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
|
$
|
132,031
|
|
|
$
|
157,751
|
|
Dr. Langer
|
|
|
01/02/2008
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
$
|
35,112
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
|
$
|
132,031
|
|
|
$
|
167,143
|
|
Mr. Mascotte
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
|
$
|
132,031
|
|
|
$
|
132,031
|
|
Mr. McGuire
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
|
$
|
132,031
|
|
|
$
|
132,031
|
|
Dr. Polan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
|
$
|
132,031
|
|
|
$
|
132,031
|
|
Mr. Rogers
|
|
|
10/01/2008
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
$
|
30,456
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
|
$
|
132,031
|
|
|
$
|
162,487
|
|
Mr. Seidenberg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Torell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
|
$
|
132,031
|
|
|
$
|
132,031
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Grant date fair value for restricted stock and DSUs was computed
by multiplying the number of shares by the market value of our
common stock on the grant date. The grant date fair values were
developed solely for the purpose of comparative disclosure in
accordance with SEC rules using the same valuation model and
assumptions, disregarding the estimate of forfeitures relating
to service-based vesting conditions, as applied for purposes of
our consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and are not intended to predict future
prices of our common stock or our future dividend distributions.
The ultimate values of these equity awards will depend on the
future market price of our common stock and |
172
|
|
|
|
|
cannot be forecasted with reasonable accuracy. The actual value,
if any, a holder will realize upon sale of restricted stock and
the stock received upon conversion of DSUs will depend on the
market value of our common stock on the date of sale. |
The following table presents all outstanding stock option awards
held at December 31, 2008 by each person who served as a
non-employee director during 2008. In each case, these stock
options were granted prior to 2008 under our former compensation
programs for non-employee directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised Options
|
|
Option Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
Price
|
|
Option
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable*
|
|
($)
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
Mr. Amen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Critelli
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Feerick
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
$
|
65.1875
|
|
|
|
4/22/2009
|
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
$
|
56.5938
|
|
|
|
4/27/2010
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
56.5250
|
|
|
|
4/26/2011
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
60.7050
|
|
|
|
4/25/2012
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
41.0500
|
|
|
|
4/24/2013
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
40.2200
|
|
|
|
4/22/2014
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
43.5700
|
|
|
|
4/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
48.2200
|
|
|
|
7/31/2011
|
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
56.0000
|
|
|
|
7/31/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Fergusson
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
43.5700
|
|
|
|
4/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
48.2200
|
|
|
|
4/27/2016
|
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
56.0000
|
|
|
|
4/26/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Ganzi
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
48.2200
|
|
|
|
4/27/2016
|
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
56.0000
|
|
|
|
4/26/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Langer
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
40.2200
|
|
|
|
4/22/2014
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
43.5700
|
|
|
|
4/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
48.2200
|
|
|
|
4/27/2016
|
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
56.0000
|
|
|
|
4/26/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Mascotte
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
$
|
65.1875
|
|
|
|
4/22/2009
|
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
$
|
56.5938
|
|
|
|
4/27/2010
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
56.5250
|
|
|
|
4/26/2011
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
60.7050
|
|
|
|
4/25/2012
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
41.0500
|
|
|
|
4/24/2013
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
40.2200
|
|
|
|
4/22/2014
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
43.5700
|
|
|
|
4/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
48.2200
|
|
|
|
4/27/2016
|
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
56.0000
|
|
|
|
4/26/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. McGuire
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
56.0000
|
|
|
|
4/26/2017
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised Options
|
|
Option Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
Price
|
|
Option
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable*
|
|
($)
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
Dr. Polan
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
$
|
65.1875
|
|
|
|
4/22/2009
|
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
$
|
56.5938
|
|
|
|
4/27/2010
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
56.5250
|
|
|
|
4/26/2011
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
60.7050
|
|
|
|
4/25/2012
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
41.0500
|
|
|
|
4/24/2013
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
40.2200
|
|
|
|
4/22/2014
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
43.5700
|
|
|
|
4/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
48.2200
|
|
|
|
4/27/2016
|
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
56.0000
|
|
|
|
4/26/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Rogers
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
48.2200
|
|
|
|
4/27/2016
|
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
56.0000
|
|
|
|
4/26/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Seidenberg
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
$
|
65.1875
|
|
|
|
4/22/2009
|
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
$
|
56.5938
|
|
|
|
4/27/2010
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
56.5250
|
|
|
|
4/26/2011
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
60.7050
|
|
|
|
4/25/2012
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
41.0500
|
|
|
|
4/24/2013
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
40.2200
|
|
|
|
4/22/2014
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
43.5700
|
|
|
|
4/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
48.2200
|
|
|
|
2/28/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
29,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Torell
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
$
|
65.1875
|
|
|
|
4/22/2009
|
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
$
|
56.5938
|
|
|
|
4/27/2010
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
56.5250
|
|
|
|
4/26/2011
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
60.7050
|
|
|
|
4/25/2012
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
41.0500
|
|
|
|
4/24/2013
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
40.2200
|
|
|
|
4/22/2014
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
43.5700
|
|
|
|
4/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
48.2200
|
|
|
|
4/27/2016
|
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
56.0000
|
|
|
|
4/26/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Non-employee directors did
not hold any unexercisable stock options at December 31,
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, at December 31, 2008, each current
non-employee director had 2,963 DSUs granted in 2008 that had
not yet vested; Dr. Fergusson, Mr. Ganzi and
Mr. Rogers had 3,200 shares of restricted stock that
had not yet vested; and Dr. Langer had 4,000 shares of
restricted stock that had not yet vested, but which subsequently
vested in January 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents Wyeths matching contributions under our
charitable matching gift program, the aggregate incremental cost
to us of non-business activities in connection with the offsite
meeting of the Wyeth board |
174
|
|
|
|
|
of directors in 2008 and the reimbursement by us of taxes
incurred by the director as a result of such attendance as
follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matching
|
|
Activities at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charitable
|
|
Off-Site Board
|
|
Reimbursement
|
|
Total All Other
|
Name
|
|
Contributions
|
|
Meeting
|
|
of Taxes
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Mr. Amen
|
|
$
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,500
|
|
Mr. Critelli
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Feerick
|
|
$
|
18,500
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,500
|
|
Dr. Fergusson
|
|
$
|
1,500
|
*
|
|
$
|
1,289
|
|
|
$
|
7,370
|
|
|
$
|
10,159
|
|
Mr. Ganzi
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,117
|
|
|
$
|
985
|
|
|
$
|
2,102
|
|
Dr. Langer
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
985
|
|
|
$
|
10,433
|
|
|
$
|
21,418
|
|
Mr. Mascotte
|
|
$
|
12,500
|
|
|
$
|
1,170
|
|
|
$
|
12,778
|
|
|
$
|
26,448
|
|
Mr. McGuire
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Polan
|
|
$
|
10,750
|
|
|
$
|
1,003
|
|
|
$
|
885
|
|
|
$
|
12,638
|
|
Mr. Rogers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Seidenberg
|
|
$
|
12,500
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,500
|
|
Mr. Torell
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
$
|
985
|
|
|
$
|
4,526
|
|
|
$
|
5,761
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Amount for Professor Feerick includes $6,000 in matching
contributions paid by Wyeth in 2008 for donations made by
Professor Feerick in late 2007; amount for Dr. Fergusson
represents matching contributions paid by Wyeth in 2009 for
donations made by Dr. Fergusson in late 2008; and amount
for Mr. Seidenberg represents matching contributions paid
by Wyeth in 2008 for donations made by Mr. Seidenberg in
late 2007. |
|
|
|
We invited directors spouses/significant others to attend
one off-site meeting of the Wyeth board of directors in 2008,
and we paid the costs of this attendance in order to encourage
attendance and foster social interaction among the members of
the Wyeth board of directors, which we view as a legitimate
business purpose, and accordingly, we have not included the
costs of travel, lodging and activities that we considered to be
business-related. Amounts shown reflect the aggregate
incremental cost to us of non-business activities at the meeting. |
175
MEETINGS
AND COMMITTEES OF THE WYETH BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Board
Meetings
During 2008, there were ten meetings of the Wyeth board of
directors. Each incumbent member of the Wyeth board of directors
attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Wyeth board of
directors and the committees on which he or she was a member
that were held during the time he or she was a director in 2008.
In addition, all but one of the directors then serving on the
Wyeth board of directors attended the 2008 Wyeth Annual Meeting
of Stockholders.
Committees
of the Wyeth Board of Directors
The Wyeth board of directors has, as standing committees, an
Audit Committee, a Compensation and Benefits Committee (the
Compensation Committee), a Nominating and Governance
Committee, a Corporate Issues Committee and a Science and
Technology Committee. The members of these standing committees
are all non-employee independent directors whom the Wyeth board
of directors has determined satisfy the definition of
independent directors under NYSE Corporate
Governance Standards and the Wyeth Corporate Governance
Guidelines. In addition, the Audit Committee consists of
directors whom the Wyeth board of directors has determined
satisfy the independence criteria set forth in
Rule 10A-3
under the Exchange Act, and the Compensation Committee consists
of directors whom the Wyeth board of directors has determined
satisfy the definition of non-employee directors
under
Rule 16b-3
under the Exchange Act and outside directors under
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Audit
Committee is a separately designated standing committee
established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the
Exchange Act. The charters of each of the standing committees
can be found at the Corporate Governance section of our Internet
Web site at www.wyeth.com. The Wyeth board of directors
also has an Executive Committee, which includes Mr. Poussot
as the Chairman. The following table shows the directors
currently serving on each of these committees, the number of
committee meetings in 2008 and a brief description of the
functions of each of these committees.
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Meetings in
|
Committee
|
|
Members*
|
|
Key Functions of Committee
|
|
2008
|
|
Audit
|
|
John P. Mascotte, Chairman**
Robert M. Amen**
Victor F. Ganzi**
Gary L. Rogers
John R. Torell III
|
|
Hiring (subject to ratification by the stockholders) and approving the fees of our independent registered public accounting firm.
Pre-approving non-audit services and evaluating performance and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm.
Reviewing and discussing our periodic financial statements and other disclosure and risk management and control policies and procedures, as appropriate, with management and our independent registered public accounting firm, and seeking to ensure the integrity of the financial reporting process and compliance with applicable laws and accounting initiatives.
Reviewing, and approving, ratifying or making recommendations to the Wyeth board of directors regarding, related person transactions as defined under applicable disclosure regulations to the extent not delegated to another committee of the Wyeth board of directors.
Issuing an annual report of the Audit Committee for inclusion in the proxy statement.
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
and Benefits
|
|
Victor F. Ganzi, Chairman
Robert M. Amen
Michael J. Critelli
John P. Mascotte
Gary L. Rogers
|
|
Evaluating performance of, and determining and approving the salary of, our Chief Executive Officer.
Evaluating performance of, and recommending to the Wyeth board of directors the salaries of our executive officers (other than our Chief Executive Officer) and other senior executives.
Administering our incentive compensation and equity incentive plans, overseeing other benefit plans and approving performance targets related to compensation programs.
Establishing and administering performance-based compensation programs under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Periodically evaluating the competitiveness of our compensation programs and incentive, retirement and other plans and programs.
|
|
|
7
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Meetings in
|
Committee
|
|
Members*
|
|
Key Functions of Committee
|
|
2008
|
|
Nominating and
Governance
|
|
Frances D. Fergusson, Ph.D., Chairman
Robert Langer, Sc.D.
John P. Mascotte
Raymond J. McGuire
Mary Lake Polan, M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H.
|
|
Establishing criteria and procedures for recommending director candidates to the Wyeth board of directors, including those submitted by stockholders.
Having sole authority to hire search firms to identify candidates for the Wyeth board of directors.
Making recommendations to the Wyeth board of directors on the functions and size of board committees.
Screening and nominating board candidates.
Overseeing other corporate governance matters, including the evaluation of the functioning of the Wyeth board of directors and its committees, and recommending corporate governance principles.
Annually evaluating the charters of each of the committees of the Wyeth board of directors.
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Issues
|
|
John R. Torell III, Chairman
Michael J. Critelli
Frances D. Fergusson, Ph.D.
Robert Langer, Sc.D.
Raymond J. McGuire
Mary Lake Polan, M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H.
|
|
Reviewing our major public and social policies, practices and programs and making recommendations to the Wyeth board of directors as appropriate on public issues, including environmental, health and safety matters, employment practices, charitable contributions, community outreach and political contributions.
Reviewing and making recommendations regarding stockholder proposals relating to public and social issues.
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Science and
Technology
|
|
Mary Lake Polan, M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H., Chairman
Frances D. Fergusson, Ph.D.
Robert Langer, Sc.D.
|
|
Reviewing and reporting to the Wyeth board of directors regarding scientific matters relating to our research and development programs and technology initiatives.
Reviewing our ability to acquire and maintain innovative science and technology through mechanisms including, but not limited to, acquisitions, collaborations and alliances.
Periodically reviewing our pharmaceutical product pipeline.
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
Bernard Poussot, Chairman
Victor F. Ganzi
John P. Mascotte
|
|
Authorized, under our bylaws, during the intervals between
meetings of the Wyeth board of directors, to perform all duties
and exercise all powers of the board except those that are
required by law, our Certificate of Incorporation or our bylaws
to be performed or exercised by the entire Wyeth board of
directors.
|
|
|
5
|
***
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Mr. Michael J. Critelli joined the Compensation
Committee and the Corporate Issues Committee upon joining the
Wyeth board of directors in April 2008. Mr. Ivan G.
Seidenberg served on the Compensation Committee, the Corporate
Issues Committee and the Executive Committee through his
resignation from |
178
|
|
|
|
|
the Wyeth board of directors in February 2008. Professor
John D. Feerick served on the Audit Committee and the
Nominating and Governance Committee through his retirement from
the Wyeth board of directors in July 2008. Mr. Robert
Essner served on the Executive Committee through his retirement
from the Wyeth board of directors in June 2008. |
|
** |
|
Each of Messrs. Amen, Ganzi and Mascotte has been
determined by the Wyeth board of directors to be an audit
committee financial expert as defined under applicable SEC
rules. Mr. Amen has served in a variety of finance and
other executive roles, including as president and controller of
International Paper Company and as chief executive officer of
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc., and has a
Masters of Business Administration with a concentration in
finance, among many other qualifications. Mr. Ganzi
practiced as a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) at a national
public accounting firm, was the managing partner of a large law
firm and served as chief financial and legal officer of Hearst,
among many other qualifications. Mr. Mascotte is a CPA, was
a tax specialist at a national public accounting firm and has
served as chief executive officer of Blue Cross and Blue Shield
of Kansas City, Inc. and The Continental Corporation, among many
other qualifications. |
|
*** |
|
The Executive Committee acted on one occasion in 2008 between
meetings of the Wyeth board of directors by unanimous written
consent. This action was specifically delegated in advance and
ratified by the full Wyeth board of directors. |
Additional
Information Regarding the Compensation and Benefits
Committee
The Compensation Committee assists the Wyeth board of directors
in establishing the compensation of our executive officers and
setting the overall compensation philosophy and objectives for
Wyeth, and is actively involved in overseeing the design, review
and updating, as appropriate, of our compensation programs. The
Compensation Committee determines and approves the compensation
of our Chief Executive Officer.
The Compensation Committee typically makes compensation
decisions for our principal corporate officers, including all of
our named executive officers, with some decisions being ratified
and/or made
by the full Wyeth board of directors upon recommendations from
the Compensation Committee. In this proxy statement/prospectus,
the executive officers included in the compensation tables below
are referred to as our named executive officers. The
Compensation Committee meets regularly throughout the year, with
the agenda for each meeting established through consultation
among the Compensation Committees chairman, our Corporate
Secretary and senior management. Meetings are regularly attended
by our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer; our
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; our Senior
Vice President, Human Resources; and our Corporate Secretary. At
each meeting, the Compensation Committee also meets in executive
session without any members of management present.
Pursuant to authority granted under its charter, the
Compensation Committee has engaged Exequity LLP (Exequity), a
nationally recognized compensation consulting firm to advise the
Compensation Committee and to assist it in assessing
compensation developments and trends and their potential effects
on Wyeth and our plans. The Compensation Committee has sole
responsibility for engaging this consulting firm. Exequity
regularly provides reports to the Compensation Committee
regarding competitive compensation data, developments and
trends. Exequity also participates in Compensation Committee
meetings and routinely meets with the Compensation Committee in
executive session. Exequity does not provide any other services
to Wyeth. Wyeth management has engaged a separate, nationally
recognized compensation consulting firm, Towers, Perrin,
Forster & Crosby, Inc. to advise it on compensation
matters, including the provision of peer competitiveness data.
The compensation consulting firm engaged by the Compensation
Committee is not affiliated with the compensation consulting
firm engaged by management.
The Compensation Committee meets in executive session for all
compensation decisions made for Mr. Poussot and, prior to
his retirement, Mr. Essner. These determinations are made
in consultation with the Compensation Committees
compensation consultant outside the presence of management. For
each other named executive officer, our Chief Executive Officer
makes a recommendation to the Compensation Committee regarding
base salary, annual cash incentive awards and long-term
incentive awards, as applicable. In making these
recommendations, our Chief Executive Officer, in consultation
with our Senior Vice President,
179
Human Resources, generally begins with each named executive
officers base salary or award, as applicable, and total
compensation for the prior year and makes appropriate
adjustments for the current year based on, among other things,
Wyeths performance, the executives individual
performance, trends in the marketplace, the executives
potential for advancement, retention, experience, positioning
relative to other executives, the relative difficulty of
achieving particular company or individual objectives and any
other considerations they deem relevant. These recommendations
are reviewed, discussed (including through a presentation made
by the Chief Executive Officer), modified as deemed appropriate
by the Compensation Committee in consultation with its
compensation consultant, and then adopted by the Compensation
Committee or recommended by the Compensation Committee for
adoption by the full Wyeth board of directors in an executive
session of the non-employee directors, as appropriate.
To assist in its evaluation of our Chief Executive
Officers recommendations and its compensation decisions,
the Compensation Committee generally is provided with the
following information for its review in advance of each meeting:
|
|
|
|
|
Current and historical data on base salaries, annual cash
incentive awards and long-term equity incentive awards for each
named executive officer;
|
|
|
|
Peer competitiveness data, generally including both a median and
a 75th percentile analysis regarding each element of direct
compensation and total direct compensation (i.e., base salary,
annual cash incentive awards and long-term incentive
compensation);
|
|
|
|
An estimate of future pension benefits and the effect of base
salary increases and annual cash incentive awards on future
pension benefits;
|
|
|
|
A report of Wyeths performance that includes a discussion
of financial results, research and development, operational
efficiency, talent management, status of litigation,
manufacturing performance and other key developments; and
|
|
|
|
Information provided by the Compensation Committees
compensation consultant and by managements compensation
consultant, which may consist in part of the peer
competitiveness data referenced above as well as analyses from
outside the industry.
|
These materials are intended to ensure that the Compensation
Committee is informed in making its decisions on each individual
element in the context of the other elements of our compensation
programs (including pay mix) and total direct compensation,
as well as prior years compensation and prevailing
practices in our peer group. The pension estimates are used as a
confirmatory measure to ensure that no particular compensation
decision has a disproportionate impact on pension benefits. The
information presented in these materials often differs in form
from the required presentation in the Summary Compensation
Table included under Executive Compensation.
For example, in reviewing long-term equity incentive awards, the
Compensation Committee typically focuses on the full potential
value to the executive and expense to Wyeth associated with a
particular award over its lifetime rather than solely the impact
on current year compensation expense as required to be reflected
in the Summary Compensation Table included under
Executive Compensation. Similarly, with respect to
pension benefits, the Compensation Committee concentrates on
ongoing monitoring of Wyeths pension plans and the manner
in which a particular compensation decision might impact future
pension benefits to an executive rather than the year-over-year
change in pension value shown in Executive
Compensation Summary Compensation Table.
In administering our incentive compensation and equity incentive
plans and overseeing our other benefit plans, the Compensation
Committee may delegate authority for administration of these
plans to our Chief Executive Officer or to any other committee,
to the extent permitted under law, and under conditions and
limitations as the Wyeth board of directors and Compensation
Committee may from time to time establish.
See Executive Compensation Compensation
Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 185 for
additional information regarding the Compensation
Committees determinations regarding executive compensation.
180
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Messrs. Ganzi, Amen, Critelli, Mascotte and Rogers and,
prior to his retirement, Mr. Seidenberg served on the
Compensation Committee during 2008. There were no Compensation
Committee interlocks during 2008.
Additional
Information Regarding the Nominating and Governance
Committee
The Nominating and Governance Committee acts as a screening and
nominating committee for candidates considered for nomination by
the Wyeth board of directors for election as directors. In this
capacity, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers the
composition of the Wyeth board of directors with respect to many
factors, including the balance of expertise and professional
experience. The Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates
prospective nominees identified on its own initiative as well as
self-nominated candidates and candidates referred or recommended
to it by members of the Wyeth board of directors, management,
stockholders and search companies. The Nominating and Governance
Committee uses the same criteria for evaluating candidates
proposed by other members of the Wyeth board of directors,
management and search companies and candidates proposed by
stockholders and self-nominated candidates in accordance with
the procedures identified below. The Nominating and Governance
Committees Criteria and Procedures for Board Candidate
Selection for the Board of Directors is attached to this
proxy
statement/prospectus
as Annex E.
If the merger is consummated, there will be no annual meeting of
Wyeth stockholders in 2010. If the merger is not consummated,
Wyeth will hold a 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, in which
case stockholders may submit names of qualified candidates for
service on the Wyeth board of directors along with detailed
information on their backgrounds to our Corporate Secretary for
referral to the Nominating and Governance Committee. Under our
bylaws, nominations for elections to be held at an annual
meeting must be received no later than 90 days prior to the
anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting,
which is April 21, 2010 for the 2010 annual meeting, if
any. In the case of elections to be held at a special meeting,
nominations must be received no later than the 10th day
following the date notice is first given to stockholders of the
special meeting.
181
SECTION 16(a)
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Our executive officers, directors and owners of more than 10% of
our securities are required under Section 16(a) of the
Exchange Act to file reports of ownership and changes in
ownership with the SEC, the NYSE and Wyeth. Most transactions
are reportable within two business days of the transaction and
are required to be filed electronically with the SEC through its
EDGAR system. To facilitate compliance, we have undertaken the
responsibility to prepare and file these reports on behalf of
our executive officers and directors. Based upon inquiries made
of our directors and executive officers and a review of the
filings made on their behalf during 2008 and Wyeths
records, we believe that all reports were timely filed in 2008,
except that the ownership of 71 shares of Wyeth common
stock was inadvertently omitted from Michael J. Critellis
Form 3 filed on April 28, 2008. The Form 3 was
subsequently amended to report these shares on October 3,
2008.
SECURITIES
OWNED BY MANAGEMENT
The table below shows the number of shares of Wyeth common stock
beneficially owned on May 29, 2009, by:
|
|
|
|
|
each of our current directors;
|
|
|
|
each of our named executive officers; and
|
|
|
|
all of our current directors and executive officers as a group.
|
We calculate beneficial ownership by including shares owned in
each directors or executive officers name (or by any
member of his or her immediate family sharing his or her home).
We also include shares held by a broker for the benefit of the
officer or director and securities which the officer or director
could purchase within 60 days (such as exercisable or
potentially exercisable stock options, which are listed in a
separate column). Amounts shown below do not include phantom
stock units (as they are not beneficially owned
under applicable rules) or additional shares acquired after
May 29, 2009. Amounts shown in the table below include
common stock that has been earned but the receipt of which has
been deferred into a restricted stock trust for the
benefit of certain of our executive officers and directors under
which they have sole voting power but do not have dispositive
power prior to distribution. No director or executive officer
owns shares of our preferred stock.
182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potentially
|
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Wyeth Common Stock
|
|
Exercisable Options
|
|
Percent of Class
|
|
Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert M. Amen
|
|
|
3,050
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Michael J. Critelli
|
|
|
4,121
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Frances D. Fergusson, Ph.D.
|
|
|
9,638
|
(2)
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Victor F. Ganzi
|
|
|
18,885
|
(3)
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Robert Langer, Sc.D.
|
|
|
9,604
|
(2)
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
John P. Mascotte
|
|
|
14,545
|
(4)
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Raymond J. McGuire
|
|
|
4,361
|
(5)
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Mary Lake Polan, M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H.
|
|
|
11,373
|
(4)
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Bernard Poussot
|
|
|
404,613
|
(6)
|
|
|
1,341,634
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Gary L. Rogers
|
|
|
8,804
|
(3)
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
John R. Torell III
|
|
|
11,245
|
(7)
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Other Named Executive Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory Norden
|
|
|
45,099
|
|
|
|
301,840
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Joseph M. Mahady
|
|
|
271,620
|
(8)
|
|
|
733,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Lawrence V. Stein
|
|
|
47,432
|
(9)
|
|
|
432,250
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
*
|
Mikael Dolsten, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Robert Essner
|
|
|
672,746
|
(10)
|
|
|
4,399,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Robert R. Ruffolo, Jr., Ph.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
555,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
All current executive officers and directors as a group
(26 persons)
|
|
|
1,192,853
|
(11)
|
|
|
5,231,952
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than one percent (1%). |
|
(1) |
|
Includes or, in the case of Mr. Amen, represents 2,963 DSUs
awarded under our 2008 Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive
Plan (plus accrued dividend equivalents) held in the restricted
stock trust. In the case of Mr. Critelli, also includes
71 shares held by, or jointly with, his spouse. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents 2,400 DSUs awarded under our 2006 Non-Employee
Director Stock Incentive Plan and 2,963 DSUs awarded under our
2008 Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan (in each case,
plus accrued dividend equivalents) held in the restricted stock
trust and 4,000 shares of restricted stock awarded under
our 1994 Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors
(1,600 shares of which, plus accrued dividend equivalents,
are held in the restricted stock trust in the case of
Dr. Fergusson). |
|
(3) |
|
Includes or, in the case of Mr. Rogers, represents 2,400
DSUs awarded under our 2006 Non-Employee Director Stock
Incentive Plan and 2,963 DSUs awarded under our 2008
Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan (in each case, plus
accrued dividend equivalents) held in the restricted stock trust
and 3,200 shares of restricted stock awarded under our 1994
Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors
(2,400 shares of which, plus accrued dividend equivalents,
are held in the restricted stock trust in the case of
Mr. Ganzi). |
|
(4) |
|
Includes 4,000 shares of restricted stock awarded under our
1994 Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors, 2,400
DSUs awarded under our 2006 Non-Employee Director Stock
Incentive Plan and 2,963 DSUs awarded under our 2008
Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan (in each case, plus
accrued dividend equivalents) held in the restricted stock trust. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes 1,200 DSUs awarded under our 2006 Non-Employee Director
Stock Incentive Plan and 2,963 DSUs awarded under our 2008
Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan (in each case, plus
accrued dividend equivalents) held in the restricted stock trust. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes 7,982 shares owned jointly with
Mr. Poussots spouse and 260,997 shares held in
the restricted stock trust. |
183
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Represents 4,000 shares of restricted stock awarded under
our 1994 Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors, 2,400
DSUs awarded under our 2006 Non-Employee Director Stock
Incentive Plan and 2,963 DSUs awarded under our 2008
Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan (in each case, plus
accrued dividend equivalents) held in the restricted stock trust
and 700 shares owned by Mr. Torells spouse. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes 201,205 shares held in the restricted stock trust. |
|
(9) |
|
Includes 5,479 shares held in the restricted stock trust.
Does not include certain securities, including certain
securities shown as outstanding under Executive
Compensation Outstanding Equity Awards at 2008
Year-End and Proposal 1: The Merger
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger, that are
subject to a domestic relations order pursuant to which the
economic interest in certain shares held in the restricted stock
trust and the economic interest in certain stock options was
transferred to Mr. Steins former spouse (i.e., such
stock options were retained by Mr. Stein due to plan
restrictions on transfer, but his former spouse will receive the
economic benefit from, and has discretion with respect to,
exercises and sales). |
|
(10) |
|
Includes 428,709 shares owned jointly with
Mr. Essners spouse. |
|
(11) |
|
Includes 576,853 shares held in the restricted stock trust. |
SECURITIES
OWNED BY CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
Based on a review of Schedules 13D and 13G filed by holders with
the SEC, we are not aware of any person or entity beneficially
owning more than 5% of Wyeths outstanding common stock or
preferred stock.
184
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis
outlines our compensation objectives and philosophy, the key
components of our compensation programs and our compensation
decision-making process. It includes a discussion of how and why
2008 compensation decisions were made for our named executive
officers.
Overview
Compensation for named executive officers at Wyeth consists of
four key components base salaries, annual cash
incentive awards (i.e., cash bonus), long-term equity incentive
awards and post-employment benefits. We also provide limited
perquisites. Our compensation programs are designed to focus our
executives on working toward achievement of our key objectives
of bringing to the world products that improve lives and deliver
outstanding value to our customers and stockholders. Our
industry is highly scientific, regulated, dynamic and
challenging, and our key employees are highly educated,
dedicated and experienced. Our long-term vitality requires
large, long-term investments in drug discovery and innovation
that are not expected to produce near-term returns, and our
compensation programs seek to reward and motivate both
short-term and long-term success. Our long-term equity incentive
program, in particular, is intended to both produce superior
long-term performance and drive long-term value for our
stockholders.
Our compensation programs serve four principal objectives:
|
|
|
|
|
Attract and retain outstanding executives with long-term
industry experience and who deliver superior performance;
|
|
|
|
Motivate our executives to achieve our business and strategic
goals, both financial and operational;
|
|
|
|
Reward our executives for achieving outstanding company and
individual performance and developing executive talent; and
|
|
|
|
Produce value for our stockholders by continuing to increase the
strength and sustainability of Wyeth.
|
The Wyeth board of directors and management believe that
fundamental changes in our business are necessary for our future
sustainability and success, particularly as a result of the
challenging regulatory, intellectual property and competitive
environment that our industry continues to confront.
Accordingly, in 2008, we launched Project Impact, which is a
company-wide program designed to initially address short-term
fiscal challenges, particularly the significant loss of sales
and profits resulting from the launch of generic versions of
Protonix. Longer term, Project Impact would include
strategic actions designed to fundamentally change how Wyeth
structures its operations to adapt to the continuously changing
business climate. The Compensation Committee is particularly
focused on these goals and, subject to our contemplated merger
with Pfizer, intends to judge managements performance in
the coming years, at least in part, on managements efforts
to reshape Wyeth for the future.
The Wyeth board of directors and management also believe that
our continued success requires leadership from every person in
every job at every location around the world. To this end, we
launched a company-wide set of leadership priorities
aspire high, think broadly, be decisive, build talent and
execute flawlessly recognizing that everyone at
Wyeth has the potential to be a leader, whether they are an
individual contributor, manager of people or a senior executive.
Our leadership priorities define the standard of behavior that
we believe is essential to reinforce in everything we do and are
important as an advancement of Wyeths culture. These
leadership priorities have been communicated across Wyeth in all
divisions and functions, and are being incorporated in our
employee performance and development systems.
We have a pay-for-performance philosophy that is
reflected in our compensation arrangements, in which a
significant portion of our executives total compensation
is at-risk, based on company and individual performance. To
drive our executives to produce results for Wyeth that create
long-term value for our
185
stockholders, our performance-based compensation in 2008
included a mix of compensation opportunities and performance
measures to complement base salary, such that:
|
|
|
|
|
A portion of the value of an executives total direct
compensation (i.e., base salary, annual cash incentive awards
and annual long-term incentive awards) was discretionary based
on the Compensation Committees assessment of both
Wyeths performance and individual executive performance
(annual cash incentive awards);
|
|
|
|
A portion of the value of an executives total direct
compensation was based directly on our actual financial
performance against pre-set targets and total stockholder return
(TSR) versus our peers (performance share unit awards); and
|
|
|
|
A portion of the value of an executives total direct
compensation was tied directly to changes in our stock price
(stock options, RSUs and performance share unit awards).
|
The Wyeth board of directors has a Compensation Committee
consisting entirely of independent directors. The composition of
the Compensation Committee underwent changes in 2008, with the
appointment of a new Compensation Committee Chairman and two new
members of the Wyeth board of directors joining the Compensation
Committee. As discussed further in the section entitled
Meetings and Committees of the Wyeth Board of
Directors, the Compensation Committee sets the overall
compensation philosophy and objectives for Wyeth and is actively
involved in assessing and overseeing the design of our
compensation programs. The Compensation Committee reviews and
recommends to the Wyeth board of directors the compensation and
benefits provided to each of our principal corporate officers
and also specifically reviews and approves corporate goals and
objectives for our Chief Executive Officer and evaluates his
performance in light of those goals. The Compensation Committee
meets regularly with our Chief Executive Officer and our Senior
Vice President, Human Resources and also engages a compensation
consultant for advice regarding compensation decisions. The
Compensation Committee meets in executive session at each
meeting without management present. In 2008, the Compensation
Committee continued to refine its compensation philosophy as
described more fully under Key Changes and
Other Actions in 2008.
As discussed in greater detail below with respect to individual
compensation decisions, compensation for our named executive
officers in 2008 was driven primarily by:
|
|
|
|
|
Our successful strategic and financial response to the at
risk launch of generic versions of Protonix,
including the launch of our own generic version and the
deployment of Project Impact initiatives;
|
|
|
|
Our strong financial performance, highlighted by Wyeth exceeding
its earnings per share (EPS) goals for the year, in the face of
a challenging pharmaceutical industry and economic environment,
and our successful operating performance;
|
|
|
|
New product approvals, including Pristiq for the
treatment of major depressive disorder, Xyntha and
subcutaneous Relistor, and delays in the regulatory
review of several of our other pipeline products;
|
|
|
|
Year-over-year stock price decline and negative total
stockholder return performance during 2008, but which compared
favorably with total stockholder return performance of the
S&P 500 Index and the market-weighted Peer Group
Index performing better than the S&P 500 Index
by 24.4 percentage points and the market-weighted Peer
Group Index by 10.2 percentage points;
|
|
|
|
Executive succession and key business changes that resulted from
the establishment of our new executive leadership team,
including the promotion and recruitment of important new key
executives, who quickly and seamlessly transitioned to full
functionality; and
|
|
|
|
Outstanding work of our named executive officers with respect to
our contemplated merger with Pfizer.
|
186
Components
of Compensation
Our executive compensation programs for named executive officers
consist of several elements, each of which complements the
others in providing a total compensation package designed to
support our core compensation objectives. These components are
summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
Pay Element
|
|
What Pay Element Rewards/Reflects
|
|
Primary Purpose of Pay Element
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
Performance of executive responsibilities; reflects experience
and tenure in role, skills and level of responsibility.
|
|
To provide a fixed amount of compensation commensurate with
market norms for similar jobs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Cash Incentive Awards
|
|
Annual company and individual performance and achievement of
Wyeths financial and other objectives.
|
|
To motivate executives to achieve superior company and
individual performance through a variable and discretionary
award design.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Equity Incentives (Stock Options and Performance Share
Unit Awards)
|
|
Long-term focus, achievement of performance goals (e.g., EPS and total stockholder return ranking), increases in stockholder value, and continued employment during the vesting/holding period of an award:
Three-year period applicable to performance share unit awards, with additional one-year holding period for the 2008 awards.
Three-year phased vesting for stock options.
|
|
To motivate long-term performance, align executive compensation
with stock price performance and other performance measures and
retain key executives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Awards
|
|
Long-term focus and continued employment during the vesting
period.
|
|
Awarded upon initial employment and major promotion or for
executive retention (not part of annual grant to named executive
officers).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits (Primarily Defined Benefit Pension Plans and Defined
Contribution Savings Plans) and Perquisites
|
|
Long-term service and desire to keep executives focused.
|
|
To provide a competitive benefits program that addresses
employee health, welfare and retirement needs. Also to provide
executives with a meaningful level of post-employment income
consistent with their contribution to Wyeths success over
their careers, as well as to offer competitive perquisites that
enable executives to maximize efficiency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Control Severance Agreements
|
|
Need for retention and employment security in a dynamic industry.
|
|
To provide for company stability and continuity of management
during times of uncertainty (e.g., pending our contemplated
merger with Pfizer) and to allow us to attract and retain key
executives by providing protections consistent with the market
for executive talent.
|
187
Key
Changes and Other Actions in 2008
As part of its role, the Compensation Committee continually
reviews our compensation programs and, from time to time, makes
changes that are designed to better serve our compensation
philosophy and objectives, to reflect current industry practice,
to comply with changes in law, rules and regulations or to adopt
emerging best practices. As a result of these efforts, we made
the following key changes to our compensation and benefits
programs in 2008:
Benchmarking Philosophy. Prior to 2008, the
Compensation Committee considered a benchmark at or near the
75th percentile of our peer group for decisions related to
long-term equity incentives, adjusted for assessment of overall
performance against approved performance factors. Decisions
related to other compensation elements were generally targeted
to be between the median and the 75th percentile of our
peer group. During 2008, the Compensation Committee reevaluated
Wyeths historical benchmarking practices, and beginning
with the 2009 base salary decisions, the Compensation Committee
has articulated a philosophy of targeting total direct
compensation for named executive officers at or near the median
of our peer group, as described under Peer
Group Analysis. As described more fully below, although
benchmarking provides a valuable point of reference, actual
compensation for any particular named executive officer may be
higher or lower than the benchmark as a result of Wyeth and
individual performance, experience, skills, potential for
advancement, relative tenure in position, current
responsibilities relative to other executives within Wyeth,
retention objectives, succession planning, fluctuations in stock
price and other factors that the Compensation Committee
considers relevant.
Alignment of Compensation Calendar. To
facilitate its focus on total direct compensation and to enhance
executive efficiency, the Compensation Committee approved a
management proposal to align the compensation planning calendar
beginning with compensation decisions to be made in 2009. As a
result of this effort, annual compensation decisions regarding
the components of total direct compensation base
salaries, annual cash incentive awards and annual long-term
incentive awards will be made during a single
consolidated time period each year.
Pay
for Performance
We implement our
pay-for-performance
culture through our pay mix, which is weighted significantly
toward performance-dependent forms of compensation. Our
compensation opportunities include a mix of approaches for
implementing pay-for performance: performance evaluated in the
discretion of the Compensation Committee (e.g., annual cash
incentive awards), stock price performance (e.g., stock
options), and performance against pre-established financial
targets (e.g., performance share unit awards).
The discretionary nature of our annual cash incentive award
program for named executive officers provides the Compensation
Committee with the opportunity to evaluate and appropriately
recognize individual executive performance in the context of
Wyeths overall performance for the completed year,
including performance with respect to key value drivers, which
may include for a given year, among other things, EPS, cost
management, achievements in research and development, and
regulatory compliance. Notably, this discretionary evaluation of
performance differs from the target-based nature of our
performance share unit awards, which are described below. For a
detailed discussion of our annual cash incentive award program
and the key factors considered by the Compensation Committee in
making 2008 annual cash incentive award decisions, see
Annual Cash Incentive Awards beginning
on page 191.
Our long-term equity incentive program generally represents the
largest portion of the total annual compensation paid to our
executives, because we believe that equity-based compensation is
the most effective means to encourage our leaders to deliver
enhanced stockholder value over the long term. Our named
executive officers also are subject to stock ownership
guidelines as described below. Accordingly, named executive
officers have a significant amount of value and future pay at
risk based on our stock price performance. Because we only make
option grants with an exercise price at the current market price
of our common stock on the date of grant, an executive does not
realize any value from stock options unless and until our
stockholders benefit from an increase in share price following
the date of grant.
188
The ultimate value of performance share unit awards granted
under our long-term equity incentive award program depends upon
our EPS performance against internal targets and our relative
TSR ranking among our peer group, together with our stock price
at the time of conversion. In particular, as described more
fully below in the narrative to the table entitled
2008 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
beginning on page 207, the performance share unit awards
granted to our named executive officers in 2008 may be
converted to between 0% and 200% of a pre-set target number of
shares of our common stock (one share per unit) based primarily
on EPS performance in 2010 against a target that would be set by
the Compensation Committee in early 2010, subject to our
contemplated merger with Pfizer. The awards generally are
structured to allow the Compensation Committee negative
discretion to reduce the amount of the award that may be earned
based on EPS to reflect, among other factors it may consider,
our TSR ranking (top 2, middle 4, bottom 2) over the period
from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2010
compared with that of the peer group described in the second
paragraph under Peer Group Analysis
below. We expect that these awards would operate similarly to
performance share unit awards granted to other key employees in
2008, under which the number of shares that may be earned based
on EPS will be increased by 25 percentage points if our TSR
ranking is in the top two of our peer group and generally will
be decreased by 25 percentage points if our TSR ranking is
in the bottom two of our peer group, with a TSR ranking in the
middle category having no impact. This award design, which
utilizes a target number of shares that assumes our achievement
of 100% of the 2010 EPS target and a top 2 TSR
ranking for the three-year period (i.e., the target number of
performance share unit awards granted to named executive
officers was increased by 25%), was instituted for the grants
made to named executive officers in 2007 and 2008 and is
intended to preserve our ability to deduct this compensation
under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Basing the number of shares earned upon conversion of
performance share unit awards primarily on EPS, with TSR ranking
serving as a key additional factor, reflects two important sets
of corporate objectives. First is Wyeths performance
against our internal goals and guidance to the financial
community. Second is our relative stock price and dividend
performance against that of our peer companies. We have selected
EPS as the financial measure of performance for performance
share unit awards, because we believe that the majority of
investors use EPS as the primary method for evaluating our
annual financial performance. The EPS target for a given year is
not established by formula. Rather, after considering
Wyeths business goals and anticipated challenges for the
year in question, during the first 90 days of the
applicable performance year the Compensation Committee sets a
target that is designed to encourage superior company
performance. Typically, the EPS target established by the
Compensation Committee has been consistent with our earnings
guidance range announced to the financial community. We use EPS
for a single performance year (i.e., the third year of the
award) rather than over a period of years due to the volatile
and dynamic nature of our industry where a single unexpected
event early in a performance period could predetermine whether
or not targets would be met over a longer period and thereby
dilute the intended incentive effect. This is particularly
evident in the case of a challenge to a patent during the patent
term of a blockbuster product, market reaction to clinical trial
results or negative publicity related to the perceived safety or
efficacy of a marketed product (whether or not supported by
medical evidence). This structure, coupled with our stock
ownership guidelines, reflects long-term performance and aligns
with stockholder interests.
The Compensation Committee retains the ability to exclude
certain significant items in determining whether EPS targets
were achieved and has, in the past, excluded both positive and
negative items in making this determination. These significant
items are excluded because they are considered to be
non-recurring or unusual in nature and are of such significance
or magnitude that their inclusion would not present an accurate
reflection of the underlying operating performance of Wyeth. For
example, in 2006, 2007 and 2008 we excluded charges related to
our productivity initiatives, and in 2006 we also excluded an
income tax credit related to a reduction of certain deferred tax
asset valuation allowances. The exclusion of these non-recurring
or unusual items is consistent with how we discuss our
performance with investors and analysts and our earnings
guidance to the financial community. We also specifically
exclude equity-based compensation from both the target and our
determination of EPS achieved for purposes of these awards.
For 2008, an average of approximately 76% of the total direct
compensation received by our named executive officers consisted
of performance-based compensation.
189
Determination
and Analysis of 2008 Compensation for Named Executive
Officers
The Compensation Committee made compensation decisions in 2008
on an
element-by-element
basis at different points during the year. However, the
Compensation Committee made decisions for each element in the
context of the total compensation package for each named
executive officer and the relationship of that element to the
other elements of compensation, including the impact on
retirement benefits. As described above, beginning in 2009,
Wyeth is implementing a compensation calendar alignment
initiative under which the time period for making key
compensation decisions for base salary, annual cash incentive
awards and annual long-term incentive grants is being
consolidated into a single cycle in the first quarter of the
year.
The Compensation Committee targets at or near the median of our
peer group (as described under Peer Group
Analysis beginning on page 197) for total direct
compensation, as may be adjusted by our Chief Executive
Officers and the Compensation Committees assessment
of the executive, which often takes into account Wyeth and
individual performance, experience, skills, potential for
advancement, relative tenure in position, current
responsibilities relative to other executives within Wyeth,
retention objectives, succession planning and other factors.
However, at times when merited by Wyeth and individual
performance as determined by the Compensation Committee based on
the facts and circumstances and after taking into account these
other factors, the Compensation Committee may award a total
direct compensation package in excess of the median. The
Compensation Committee may also consider fluctuations in stock
price and Wyeths performance relative to that of the other
companies within our peer group, including, for example,
comparative TSR or EPS performance or research and development
progress. In conducting its compensation analysis, the
Compensation Committee reviews the competitiveness of total
direct compensation, as well as of each individual element,
recognizing that each individual component may be higher or
lower than the median as a result of the above and other factors
with an ultimate target of total direct compensation at or near
the median.
In general, absent extraordinary circumstances and after taking
into account the above individual factors, base salary levels
typically approximate the peer group median, with annual cash
incentive awards and long-term equity incentive awards operating
as the potential mechanisms for distinction. In the case of
newly promoted executives, the Compensation Committee often sets
the new base salary at a level that allows the Compensation
Committee to recognize the promotion to a new role while at the
same time (1) reflecting relative experience in the new
role to that of individuals holding similar positions at peer
companies, and (2) providing the Compensation Committee the
opportunity to reward future performance and development. See
Meetings and Committees of the Wyeth Board of
Directors beginning on page 176 for a discussion of
the Compensation Committees process for determining
compensation for our named executive officers.
The key decisions made by the Compensation Committee with
respect to 2008 compensation for our named executive officers
are described below. In each case, the Compensation Committee
viewed the individual compensation component and the resulting
total direct compensation for our named executive officers as
being within a reasonable range around the median of our peer
group, after accounting for the factors and considerations
described above.
Consistent with our objectives of attracting, retaining and
motivating top-tier performance from our executives, the
Compensation Committee generally does not view aggregate amounts
earned or benefits accumulated by an executive from prior
service with Wyeth as a significant factor in making current
compensation decisions. Rather, the Compensation Committee bases
current compensation decisions primarily on the current business
environment and performance of each executive and his or her
role in the overall performance of Wyeth during the subject
period. Amounts realized upon vesting or exercise of equity
awards do not impact pension benefits, which are determined by
reference to formulas set forth in our pension plans that do not
include equity in the calculations.
Base
Salary
Base salaries for senior executives in 2008 and 2009 were set in
the preceding November and typically apply for the entire
following calendar year, except in special circumstances, such
as when an executive is promoted
and/or
assumes increased responsibilities during the year. Pursuant to
the compensation calendar alignment initiative referenced above,
subject to our contemplated merger with Pfizer, we expect that
base
190
salary decisions for our most senior executives, along with
annual cash incentive awards and long-term incentive awards,
will be made in the first quarter of each year beginning in 2010.
2008 Base Salary Determinations. In November
2007, the Compensation Committee determined the base salary
increases for our named executive officers that became effective
at the beginning of 2008. The Compensation Committee recognized
the promotion of Mr. Poussot to President and Chief
Executive Officer by setting his base salary at $1,450,000 for
2008, which was approximately 16% below the median of the peer
group. In determining Mr. Poussots salary increase,
the Compensation Committee reviewed, among other things, market
data regarding compensation arrangements for recently appointed
chief executive officers, Mr. Poussots long tenure
with Wyeth and his significant experience in the pharmaceutical
industry. Mr. Nordens 2008 base salary increase of
10% was intended to reflect his strong performance since his
promotion to Chief Financial Officer and, as a result, to bring
his salary closer to the peer group median. The Compensation
Committee increased Mr. Mahadys 2008 base salary by
approximately 16% over his 2007 base salary as a result of his
promotion to Senior Vice President, Wyeth and President, Wyeth
Pharmaceuticals effective January 1, 2008, which gave him
additional responsibility for our Pharmaceuticals and Consumer
Healthcare manufacturing and distribution operations.
Mr. Essners base salary rate during the time of his
employment in 2008 remained unchanged from 2007, as provided in
his employment agreement. Mr. Steins 10% base salary
increase for 2008 was intended to reflect his experience, tenure
in role, and strong performance in managing company litigation
matters, as well as to bring his salary closer to the peer group
median. For Dr. Dolsten, who joined Wyeth in June 2008,
annual base salary was set at $750,000, in consideration of his
experience level, positioning against the peer group median and
internal senior executive pay levels. The Compensation Committee
approved a 3.5% increase in base salary for Dr. Ruffolo for
2008, which was consistent with the salary increases for other
executives.
2009 Base Salary Determinations. In November
2008, the Compensation Committee determined the base salary
increases for our named executive officers that became effective
at the beginning of 2009. The Compensation Committee recognized
the success of Mr. Poussots first year as President
and Chief Executive Officer, as well as his additional role as
Chairman beginning in June 2008, by increasing his base salary
by 6.9% to $1,550,000 for 2009, which is approximately 10% below
the median of the peer group. In addition, in determining
Mr. Poussots salary increase, the Compensation
Committee recognized Mr. Poussots leadership during
Wyeths response to the at risk launch of
generic competition to Protonix, including the deployment
of Project Impact. The Compensation Committee also considered
the tight clustering of CEO base salaries at our peer companies.
Mr. Nordens 2009 base salary increase of 10.4% was
intended to reflect his continued strong performance in his
first full year as Chief Financial Officer and, as a result, to
continue to bring his salary closer to, but still approximately
7.5% below, the peer group median. The Compensation Committee
approved a 5.3% increase in base salary for Dr. Dolsten,
which is approximately 19% below the median of our peer group,
reflecting his tenure in the role. The Compensation Committee
also approved 4.0% increases in the base salaries for each of
Messrs. Mahady and Stein, which were consistent with the
range of salary increases for other executives.
Annual
Cash Incentive Awards
The Compensation Committee determines, and the Wyeth board of
directors ratifies, the annual cash incentive awards payable to
our named executive officers, which are paid following
completion of the fiscal year (following receipt of the audit
report for the fiscal years financial statements). These
awards generally are paid under our stockholder approved
Executive Incentive Plan. While the Executive Incentive Plan
sets the putative maximum amount for any individual annual cash
incentive award (two-tenths of one percent of consolidated net
earnings, if any, as adjusted for unusual or infrequent items in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles), each executive is evaluated based on his individual
performance and contribution to Wyeths overall performance
taking into account the context of the business environment, and
the Compensation Committee has full discretion (subject to the
maximum award amount) to determine the annual cash incentive
award to be paid to each executive. In recent years, annual cash
incentive awards for named executive officers have typically
ranged between 100% and 200% of base salary. Our annual cash
191
incentive awards are reported in the Summary
Compensation Table beginning on page 203 as
non-equity incentive plan compensation.
In connection with annual cash incentive awards, during the
first quarter of each year, the Compensation Committee reviews
managements business plan for Wyeth, which contains
performance objectives that are both short- and long-term in
nature and are reflective of the challenges in the
pharmaceutical industry. The Compensation Committees
review of the business plan generally focuses on financial goals
for Wyeth, product performance objectives, cost management, and
key research and development milestones. With the assistance of
management, the Compensation Committee tracks performance
against the plan during the year, including through financial
performance and research and development reviews that highlight
both progress and shortfalls. At the first Compensation
Committee meeting after the end of each year, both the
Compensation Committee and the Wyeth board of directors,
together with management, review Wyeths performance versus
the plan and also consider additional factors, such as
unanticipated events. The Compensation Committee also reviews
each individual named executive officers performance
relative to Wyeths financial and other objectives for the
prior year.
Annual cash incentive awards are not based on a formulaic
approach. Rather, annual cash incentive awards are based on the
Compensation Committees assessment of Wyeths
performance against the business plan during the calendar year,
the Compensation Committees assessment (as informed by its
interactions with these executives at various points in the
year) of each individual executives contribution to that
performance, and other individual accomplishments, taking into
account any unexpected developments impacting performance
against the business plan. The Compensation Committee does not
set a specific target for these awards and the ultimate award is
determined at the discretion of the Compensation Committee based
upon this analysis of Wyeth and individual performance, with
competitive market positioning considered as a guide to the
range of potential awards. The Compensation Committee relies
heavily on measurable performance criteria in evaluating company
performance, with achievement of our financial goals for Wyeth
overall typically the most significant factor in the
Compensation Committees determination of annual cash
incentive awards to our named executive officers. However, we do
not prospectively set all or any specific financial goal or
other element of the business plan as a specific Wyeth goal or
target for purposes of these awards.
In early 2009, the Compensation Committee made its
determinations of the annual cash incentive awards for our
senior executives for the 2008 performance year based on a
variety of factors, including Wyeths performance and the
competitiveness of total direct compensation.
The Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Poussot an annual
cash incentive of $2,750,000, an increase of 37.5% over 2007,
reflecting its assessment of combined 2008 company and
individual performance, including Wyeths financial results
for 2008 and Mr. Poussots performance in his first
year as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. Among
the individual performance factors, the Compensation Committee
considered the deftness and competency displayed by
Mr. Poussot in responding to the at risk launch
of generic competition to Protonix, which the
Compensation Committee believes may contribute to Wyeths
ability to address future risks of generic competition to other
products; Wyeths positive response to challenges in the
research and development area of the business;
Mr. Poussots expansion of strategic planning to a
five-year cycle and his articulated vision for Wyeth based on a
strategy of innovation, diversification and accelerated growth
market expansion; and Mr. Poussots outstanding work
on the contemplated merger with Pfizer. The Compensation
Committee also considered the level of bonuses recommended for
our other named executive officers, market data for bonus and
cash compensation for chief executive officers at our peer
companies, the annual cash incentive award made to
Mr. Essner in 2007, and Mr. Poussots tenure as
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman. This award resulted in
total direct compensation for Mr. Poussot approximately 15%
below the peer group median.
For Wyeths other named executive officers, the
Compensation Committee adopted the recommendations made by
Mr. Poussot. Mr. Nordens 2008 annual cash
incentive award of $1,078,000, an increase of approximately 44%
over 2007 and resulting in total direct compensation
approximating the peer group median, reflects his performance
during his first full year as Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, including Wyeth exceeding its financial
targets; Mr. Nordens sponsorship of Project Impact,
with targeted
192
savings of $1.0 to $1.5 billion when fully implemented; his
execution of Wyeths foreign exchange hedging program; and
Mr. Nordens outstanding work on the contemplated
merger with Pfizer. His award also reflects his leadership and
command of his role as Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Mahady
received an annual cash incentive award of $1,341,000, an
increase of approximately 22% over his 2007 award and resulting
in total direct compensation approximately 10% above the peer
group median, reflecting his strong performance in 2008. Key
individual performance factors considered in determining
Mr. Mahadys award were: the 2% increase in 2008
Pharmaceutical division net revenues over 2007;
Mr. Mahadys key role in Wyeths response to the
at risk launch of generic competition to
Protonix, including the launch of our own generic; the
expansion of Enbrels position as the top biotech
product and the expansion of Prevnar sales volume, which
resulted in the highest
12-month
revenue attainment of any vaccine in history; and his
development and support of Project Impact initiatives. For
Mr. Stein, who received an annual cash incentive award of
$978,000, an increase of approximately 9.9% over his 2007 award
and resulting in total direct compensation approximately 17%
above the peer group median, the Compensation Committee
considered Mr. Steins management of product liability
litigation, including diet drug and hormone therapy litigation
and patent litigation, such as our litigation relating to
Protonix and Effexor, as well as his development
and support of Project Impact initiatives and outstanding work
on the contemplated merger with Pfizer. Dr. Dolsten
received a 2008 annual cash incentive award of $750,000, the
guaranteed minimum bonus under the terms of his offer letter.
Under the terms of Mr. Essners employment agreement,
Mr. Essner was entitled to an annual cash incentive award
for 2008 of no less than his annual cash incentive award for
2007, prorated for time actually worked in 2008. Pursuant to
this agreement, the Compensation Committee awarded
Mr. Essner an annual cash incentive award of $1,600,000,
which represents an amount approximately equal to his 2007 bonus
prorated for the period of his employment in 2008.
Under the terms of Dr. Ruffolos consulting agreement,
Dr. Ruffolo was entitled to receive an annual cash
incentive award for 2008 (pro-rated for the period of his
employment during 2008), in an amount determined by the
Compensation Committee. Pursuant to that agreement, the
Compensation Committee approved an award of $645,000, which
represents an amount approximately equal to his 2007 annual cash
incentive award prorated for the period of his employment in
2008.
These determinations of annual cash incentive awards were made
against the backdrop of Wyeths overall performance in
2008, including the increase in worldwide net revenue of 2% to
$22.8 billion for the 2008 full year, driven by growth in
excess of 10% for Prevnar, Zosyn and nutritional
products and 27% growth for Enbrel and the favorable
impact of foreign exchange, with greater than 50% of net revenue
coming from outside the United States. The Compensation
Committee also considered the decrease in net income and diluted
earnings per share of 4% and 3%, respectively, for the 2008 full
year as compared to 2007, and that diluted earnings per share,
before certain significant items, for 2008 was comparable to
2007 and exceeded budget. In addition, the Compensation
Committee considered our total stockholder return, which was
negative 12.6% for the period from January 1, 2008 through
December 31, 2008, ranking fourth in our peer group, but
which compared favorably with total stockholder return
performance of the S&P 500 Index and the market-weighted
Peer Group Index performing better than the S&P
500 Index by 24.4 percentage points and the market-weighted
Peer Group Index by 10.2 percentage points. These
calculations of TSR include reinvestment of dividends. The
Compensation Committee also considered the achievement of
certain research and development milestones, such as new product
approvals for Pristiq for the treatment of major
depressive disorder, Xyntha and subcutaneous
Relistor, and delays in the regulatory review of several
of our other pipeline products.
Long-Term
Equity Incentives
We aim to offer a long-term incentive opportunity to our named
executive officers that, if we achieve or exceed our performance
goals, conveys competitive value when compared with our peer
companies. However, the ultimate value of equity incentive
awards is determined by our performance, with the value
fluctuating both above and below our targets depending upon our
stock price and other performance metrics. The Compensation
Committee considers both prior years awards and the peer
group market in setting the grant
193
levels of these awards, and as a general matter, annual equity
awards typically represent a number of options and performance
share units consistent with the previous years award,
unless there is a significant change in performance,
responsibility or market practices. In 2008, approximately 30%
of the estimated value of long-term equity incentive awards
granted to active named executive officers as part of the annual
grant program (i.e., excluding the special RSUs described below)
was in the form of stock options, and approximately 70% of the
estimated value was in the form of performance share unit awards.
2008 Grants. In April 2008, the Compensation
Committee granted the stock options and performance share unit
awards shown in the table labeled 2008 Grants of
Plan-Based Awards to our named executive officers and
these grants were ratified by the Wyeth board of directors. In
addition, certain named executive officers also received RSUs in
2008. The difference in magnitude between Mr. Essners
and Mr. Poussots 2008 equity grants and the grants to
our other named executive officers is primarily market driven,
i.e., intended to represent an opportunity consistent with the
value of equity grants made to other chairmen and chief
executive officers in our peer group.
In determining the number of stock options and performance share
unit awards granted to Mr. Poussot in April 2008, the
Compensation Committee reviewed the market trends for equity
grants to chief executive officers, and awarded a grant that
approximated the median for peer group CEOs, reflecting
Mr. Poussots new position as Chief Executive Officer,
the Compensation Committees confidence in
Mr. Poussot, the deftness and competency displayed by
Mr. Poussot in handling difficult issues, such as the
at risk launch of generic competition to
Protonix, and Mr. Poussots role in assuming an
efficient and successful succession in leadership. In addition,
by awarding Mr. Poussot an equity grant equivalent to the
number of options and performance share unit awards granted to
Mr. Essner in his final year as our chief executive
officer, the Compensation Committee sought to acknowledge
Mr. Poussots leadership position and the forward
looking nature of equity compensation, as well as to address
internal pay equity considerations in connection with the 2008
grant to Mr. Essner. The Compensation Committee also
considered that the grant date fair value of the award made to
Mr. Poussot in 2008 was lower than the award made to
Mr. Essner in 2007 as a result of Wyeths lower stock
price.
Mr. Poussot also was granted a special award of 120,000
RSUs upon his promotion to Chief Executive Officer in January
2008. These units vest in one-third increments on the third,
fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date and do not
accelerate upon retirement. The Compensation Committee believes
that the structure of this award serves two principal purposes:
retention and rewarding increases in stockholder value. The
Compensation Committee approved the structure and value of this
award, in consultation with its compensation consultant,
following a review of stock awards granted to newly promoted or
hired chief executive officers at peer and Fortune
250 companies in an effort to review a broad data set of
recent chief executive officer appointments. This analysis
indicated that a majority of internally promoted chief executive
officers received a promotional equity grant and that the value
of the award to Mr. Poussot would be consistent with
prevailing market practice.
Mr. Nordens 2008 grant reflects his first stock
option grant since becoming Chief Financial Officer, and
accordingly, represents a significant increase in number over
his prior years option grant. In addition, by increasing
the number of stock options and performance share unit awards
awarded over the numbers awarded in 2007, the Compensation
Committee rewarded Mr. Nordens leadership and
financial performance after a full year as Chief Financial
Officer and sought to signal its confidence in
Mr. Nordens capabilities and critical role.
Mr. Norden also received a special retention award of
19,250 RSUs, which will vest in one-third increments on the
first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant. This
special grant was awarded to recognize Mr. Nordens
highly marketable talent and bring his equity and total direct
compensation opportunity, when taken together with his other
grants, closer to the median for chief financial officers in the
peer group.
The Compensation Committee increased the number of options and
performance share unit awards granted to Mr. Mahady in each
case by approximately 25% over his 2007 award in an effort to
recognize Mr. Mahadys expanded responsibilities in
2008, his overall strong and consistent performance in
pharmaceutical product revenue growth, and his long service and
experience with Wyeth. For Mr. Stein, the
194
Compensation Committee awarded an increase of approximately 10%
in the number of both stock options and performance share unit
awards as compared to his 2007 grant to reflect his strong
performance. In each case, the grant date fair value of the
award in 2008 was lower than in 2007 as a result of Wyeths
lower stock price.
For Dr. Dolsten, who received an equity grant in connection
with his employment, the Compensation Committees goal was
to compensate Dr. Dolsten for value he was forfeiting by
leaving his prior employment, as well as to provide him with an
equity opportunity similar to that provided to Dr. Ruffolo
when he served as President, Wyeth Research.
The target number of performance share unit awards granted to
our named executive officers also reflects the negative
discretion design of these awards described under the
caption Pay for Performance and in the
narrative to the table entitled 2008 Grants of
Plan-Based Awards.
Under the terms of Mr. Essners employment agreement,
Mr. Essner was eligible to receive a long-term equity
incentive award in April 2008 as determined by the Compensation
Committee. In determining to award Mr. Essner a number of
stock options and performance share unit awards comparable to
his 2007 grant (after adjusting for tax related differences in
year-over-year award design), the Compensation Committee noted
that Mr. Essner exhibited a sustained and impressive level
of earnings growth throughout his tenure and effectively and
efficiently transitioned responsibilities to Mr. Poussot.
In addition, the Compensation Committee sought to compensate
Mr. Essner for his commitment to remain with Wyeth until
June 2008 as requested by the Wyeth board of directors and for
his continuing availability and assistance in connection with
ongoing litigation as set forth in his employment agreement. The
Compensation Committee considered both the number of options and
performance share unit awards relative to Mr. Essners
2007 grant, as well as the grant date fair value in determining
the final award.
The Compensation Committee also considered a number of
additional factors relating to Wyeths performance in
determining equity grants for all of our named executive
officers in April 2008, particularly the 6% increase in our
worldwide net revenue in the 2008 first quarter over the 2007
first quarter, despite the significant negative impact from
launches of infringing generic versions of Protonix,
driven by growth of Effexor, Enbrel, Prevnar
and nutritional products. The Compensation Committee also
considered the 5% and 3% decreases in our net income and diluted
EPS, respectively, for the 2008 first quarter over the 2007
first quarter as well as the 1% decrease in our net income,
before certain significant items, and the flat diluted EPS,
before significant items, for the 2008 first quarter over the
2007 first quarter. The Compensation Committee also considered
that TSR was negative 11.4% for the period from January 1, 2007
through December 31, 2007, performing lower than the peer
group described in the second paragraph under
Peer Group Analysis beginning on
page 197 by approximately 19 percentage points, and
1.5% for the period from January 1, 2008 through
April 16, 2008, outperforming the peer group described in
the second paragraph under Peer Group
Analysis beginning on page 197 by approximately
11 percentage points. These calculations of TSR include
reinvestment of dividends. The Compensation Committee also noted
continued research and development progress, particularly the
FDA approval of Lybrel, Torisel, Pristiq
for major depressive disorder and Xyntha in the
preceding 12 months, as well as setbacks, such as the
termination of the collaboration agreement with Solvay
Pharmaceuticals for bifeprunox and the receipt of approvable
letters for Pristiq for the treatment of vasomotor
symptoms associated with menopause and Viviant for the
prevention of osteoporosis.
In anticipation of his retirement, the Compensation Committee
did not award any equity incentive compensation to
Dr. Ruffolo in 2008.
Conversion of Performance Share Unit Awards Granted in
2006. Performance share unit awards granted in
2006 were convertible to between 0% and 200% of a pre-set target
number of shares (one share per unit) based on EPS performance
in 2008 and TSR ranking from January 1, 2006 to
December 31, 2008. For the 2008 performance year, in early
2008 the Compensation Committee established an EPS target of
$3.58 per share and a corresponding EPS performance graph
detailing the resulting conversion of the performance share unit
awards at different levels of EPS achievement, both in excess of
and less than the EPS target. This EPS target was exclusive of
equity-based compensation. In setting the EPS target for 2008,
the Compensation Committee created a wider range around the
mid-point EPS target than in recent years in light of the
195
uncertainty surrounding the at risk generic
competition to Protonix, and also reviewed the
consistency with the assumptions made in Wyeths earnings
guidance. In early 2009, the Compensation Committee determined
that our actual EPS achievement, as adjusted, for 2008 was $3.68
per share (i.e., reported EPS of $3.27 for 2008, exclusive of
equity-based compensation of $0.15 per share-diluted after-tax
and charges of $0.26 per share-diluted after-tax related to our
productivity initiatives referred to as Project Impact, which
have been excluded because they are unusual due to their nature
and magnitude). In addition, the Compensation Committee
determined that our total stockholder return for the period from
2006-2008
placed us sixth among our peer group (i.e., in the middle four),
resulting in no effect upon the conversion of these awards.
Based on this achievement, performance share unit awards granted
in 2006 were earned at 136% of target. See the table labeled
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in
2008 beginning on page 213 for a description of the
amount earned by each of our named executive officers. One
significant reason for the difference between the values shown
in the Stock Awards column in the
Summary Compensation Table for 2008,
2007 and 2006 is the percentage of target at which performance
share unit awards were earned (i.e., 136% for 2008, 116.8% for
2007, and 200% for 2006).
Additional details regarding stock options and performance share
unit awards can be found in the tables labeled
2008 Grants of Plan-Based Awards and
Outstanding Equity Awards at
2008 Year-End in this proxy statement/prospectus,
including a description of the performance share unit awards
granted in 2008, 2007 and 2006.
Post-Employment
Benefits
We offer defined benefit pension plans that provide a benefit
based on a participants years of service, base salary,
annual cash incentive award and age at retirement. As described
in detail in the section entitled Pension
Benefits beginning on page 214, these programs reward
tenure (up to 30 years). Pension benefits vest upon
completion of five years of service and generally first become
available at age 55. If an executive (or another employee)
completes 10 or more years of service and reaches age 55
while employed, the individual becomes eligible for early
retirement and retiree medical benefits under our plans. We do
not include options, restricted stock or performance share unit
awards in calculating pension benefits.
As discussed in the section entitled Pension
Benefits beginning on page 214 we maintain the
qualified Wyeth Retirement Plan U.S., which is
available to all eligible non-union employees, the Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan and the Executive Retirement Plan. We
also maintain a qualified 401(k) plan that provides for employee
contributions and Wyeth matching contributions of 50% up to the
first 6% of covered pay, thereby allowing employees to save for
their post-retirement economic needs. The Wyeth Supplemental
Employee Savings Plan provides a means for employees to make
contributions in excess of the Internal Revenue Code limits
applied to our qualified 401(k) plan and receive the benefit of
a Wyeth match on those contributions. See
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
beginning on page 218. Similarly, we established the
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan because the Wyeth
Retirement Plan U.S. limits the benefit that
can be paid to plan participants in accordance with Internal
Revenue Code requirements. The Supplemental Executive Retirement
Plan provides a benefit for that portion of the pension benefit
based on a participants actual earnings that cannot be
paid from the Wyeth Retirement Plan U.S. on
account of the Internal Revenue Code limitations. The Executive
Retirement Plan was established more than 10 years ago as a
tool to attract key experienced executives to Wyeth. The
Executive Retirement Plan provides, among other features, a
credit of three additional years of service beyond what the
executive actually has completed in computing his or her pension
benefit. This provision begins phasing out at age 62 and
completely phases out by age 65, facilitating succession.
The Executive Retirement Plan also provides for normal
retirement at age 60 rather than at age 65 (which is
the normal retirement age for our Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan and the Wyeth Retirement Plan U.S.).
In 2008, we amended the eligibility criteria for participation
in the Executive Retirement Plan to provide that our Chief
Financial Officer would be eligible to participate. Previously,
Mr. Norden was not eligible to participate solely as a
result of his age (he is not yet 55) though certain of the
executives who report directly to him participate in the plan as
do certain other executives who have not yet reached age 55
but were grandfathered into the plan under prior eligibility
criteria. The Compensation Committee determined that amending
the eligibility criteria to allow for CFO participation,
196
regardless of age, so long as the other eligibility criteria are
met, was advisable in order to achieve and maintain internal
compensation equity among Wyeths executive management
team. See Pension Benefits beginning on
page 214 for a detailed description of these plans.
We also maintain deferred compensation plans for our executives.
Our Deferred Compensation Plan allows any employee whose base
salary is in excess of $155,000 to defer a portion of his or her
base salary and annual cash incentive award in addition to what
he or she might contribute to our qualified 401(k) plan or the
Wyeth Supplemental Employee Savings Plan. This program provides
executives with a tax-advantaged manner to save for retirement
or a specific financial need.
Perquisites
We supply limited perquisites to our named executive officers,
which we believe are reasonable and competitive. These
perquisites include financial planning and tax preparation
services and an annual physical examination. For security and
other reasons, the Wyeth board of directors requires that, when
feasible, Mr. Poussot use the corporate aircraft for
personal flights. Prior to his retirement, this requirement also
applied to Mr. Essner. Mr. Essner is entitled to
limited continued use of the corporate aircraft pursuant to his
employment agreement as described under
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change
in Control beginning on page 221. Other executive
officers may, on rare occasions, use the corporate aircraft for
personal trips with the permission of the Chief Executive
Officer. In addition, we provided Mr. Essner with the use
of a company car and the occasional use of a car and driver
prior to his retirement, and we provide Mr. Poussot with a
car and driver. Mr. Essner is also entitled to occasional
post-employment use of a car and driver pursuant to his
employment agreement.
Our corporate headquarters is located in Madison, New Jersey,
and our Pharmaceuticals division headquarters is located in
Collegeville, Pennsylvania. As a result of their respective
promotions to President and Chief Executive Officer (January
2008) and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(June 2007), Messrs. Poussot and Norden changed their
principal offices from Collegeville to Madison but continue to
work frequently in both locations. In lieu of relocation of
these executives from the Collegeville area to the Madison area,
beginning with their respective promotions, we are providing
Mr. Norden with a leased apartment and related expenses in
proximity to Madison and Mr. Poussot with a monthly housing
allowance to be used for housing in proximity to Madison. These
housing benefits were approved for a two-year period, following
which time the Compensation Committee intends to evaluate their
continued necessity. In addition, both of these executives are
provided with use of the corporate helicopter and company
automobiles and drivers for commuting purposes, and are
reimbursed for the tax liability for any related imputed income.
We also are providing certain relocation and commuting benefits
to Dr. Dolsten in connection with his employment.
As shown in the Summary Compensation
Table beginning on page 203, we generally reimburse
our named executive officers for the tax liability associated
with the perquisites related to, or provided in lieu of,
relocation, including commuting. We also historically have
reimbursed our Chairman and our President for the tax liability
associated with the use of a car and driver and personal (i.e.,
non-commuting and non-business) use of the corporate aircraft.
However, in order to reduce the overall cost to Wyeth,
Mr. Poussot elected not to receive a
gross-up
for income taxes associated with, and not to provide any
reimbursement to us for, his personal use of corporate aircraft
during 2008, resulting in net cash savings to Wyeth. See the
footnotes to the Summary Compensation
Table beginning on page 203 for additional details
about these benefits.
Peer
Group Analysis
We review data, referred to as benchmarking, that
compares the compensation paid or awarded to our senior
executives, including our named executive officers, to that paid
or awarded to similarly situated executives at a peer group of
pharmaceutical companies consisting of Abbott Laboratories,
Amgen Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Eli Lilly and Company,
Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer
and Schering-Plough Corporation. We have selected this peer
group because these companies have a type and breadth of
activities and products, a complexity of operations and a
geographic scale similar to that of Wyeth, and we compete with
them for key experienced talent. We believe this peer
information is an important factor
197
in ensuring the competitiveness of our total compensation and
the manner in which we allocate compensation among the different
elements. Although benchmarking provides a valuable point of
reference, actual compensation for any particular named
executive officer may be higher or lower than the benchmark as a
result of Wyeth and individual performance, experience, skills,
potential for advancement, relative tenure in position, current
responsibilities relative to other executives within Wyeth,
retention objectives, succession planning, fluctuations in stock
price and other factors that the Compensation Committee
considers relevant. As a result, the extent to which
benchmarking may impact a particular compensation decision may
vary by year and by position. In addition, benchmarking involves
inherent limitations and subjectivity, and it is often necessary
to take into account the impact of timing differences on the
data and to make judgments regarding comparability of positions
and other factors across companies. From time to time in prior
years (though not in 2008), we have considered data on a broader
group of international pharmaceutical companies for specific
positions where we did not believe that sufficient data were
available from our principal peer group.
For the total stockholder return ranking component of our
performance share unit awards, we evaluate our total stockholder
return ranking for a pre-defined three-year period against that
of a peer group of companies consisting of Abbott Laboratories,
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Eli Lilly and Company,
Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer
and Schering-Plough Corporation. We utilize this smaller peer
group in analyzing Wyeths performance rather than the
larger benchmark group described above because we believe that
the investment community views this smaller group as most
comparable with Wyeth and evaluates their performance using
similar criteria. This group may be amended in the Compensation
Committees discretion due to mergers, consolidations or
other appropriate circumstances.
Post-Termination
Arrangements
As discussed in more detail under Potential
Payments upon Termination or Change in Control beginning
on page 221, we have entered into change in control
severance agreements with members of senior management
(including our named executive officers) and other key employees
that provide for severance and other benefits following a change
in control if we or the surviving company terminates the
executives employment other than for cause or
the executive terminates his or her employment for good
reason. Executives and other U.S. employees who do
not have change in control severance agreements may be entitled
to severance under our Special Transaction Severance Plan if
their employment is terminated by the surviving company without
cause or the employee terminates his or her employment with good
reason following a change in control.
Our change in control severance agreements are designed to
attract and retain senior managers and other key employees and
to provide for continuity of management in the event of a
potential change in control of Wyeth, such as our contemplated
merger with Pfizer. These change in control agreements were
introduced in 1998 in order to help retain our executive
officers and key employees in an environment of publicized
potential merger discussions and growing concerns about the
potential impact of our diet drug litigation. These agreements
have proved critically important over the years in retaining and
continuing to attract key talent to successfully manage Wyeth
through industry consolidation, rapid change in the
pharmaceutical business environment, important new product
launches, the continued challenges of our diet drug litigation
and the negative impact on the revenue of our Premarin
family from the July 2002 hormone therapy subset of the
Womens Health Initiative study. In response to the changed
circumstances of both Wyeth and the pharmaceutical industry, in
2006 the Compensation Committee undertook a review of the 1998
agreements. The Compensation Committee determined that, while
these agreements remained important in attracting and retaining
key executives in light of industry consolidation and
competitiveness and while they generally were consistent with
prevailing norms, the potential payments and benefits under the
1998 agreements could be reduced without compromising the
retention of our key employees or our competitiveness in
attracting key talent. Accordingly, the 2006 agreements sought
to align certain terms of these agreements more closely with the
then current industry benchmark and to streamline certain
provisions. The 2006 agreements continue to provide appropriate
protection to senior managers (including the named executive
officers) and other key employees if a change in control occurs
and the individuals employment is terminated, allowing
these executives and employees to minimize individual employment
concerns when considering and facilitating
198
corporate transactions that are in the best interests of our
stockholders. These agreements also are intended to help retain
executives and other key employees during continued industry
consolidation. For a discussion of these agreements and the
effects of various terminations on outstanding equity awards,
see Potential Payments upon Termination or
Change in Control beginning on page 221. For a
discussion of amounts potentially payable to our executive
officers under the change in control severance agreements in the
event of a qualifying termination after the closing of the
contemplated merger with Pfizer, see Proposal 1: The
Merger Interests of Certain Persons in the
Merger beginning on page 98.
In December 2007, we entered into a letter agreement amending
Mr. Essners employment agreement in order to reflect
his announced retirement as Chief Executive Officer, effective
December 31, 2007, and his continued role as an employee
and Chairman of the Wyeth board of directors during 2008. The
amended agreement confirmed that Mr. Essner would not be
entitled to any severance payments or pension enhancements under
the agreement as a result of his retirement as Chief Executive
Officer. Among other things, the letter agreement set
Mr. Essners annual base salary rate for 2008 at his
2007 salary of $1,728,500 and provided that Mr. Essner
would be eligible for a cash incentive award in respect of 2008
that would be no less than the award he earned in respect of
2007, prorated as applicable. The amended employment agreement
provides Mr. Essner with specified post-employment benefits
for a five-year period following his retirement.
As part of the terms of Dr. Dolstens employment, we
agreed to provide him with two years of severance should his
employment be terminated for any reason without cause, other
than in connection with a change in control, in which case his
change in control severance agreement would apply. We also
entered into a consulting agreement with Dr. Ruffolo upon
his retirement in order to retain his continued consulting
services for a one-year period following his retirement. See
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change
in Control beginning on page 221 for a description of
these agreements.
Other
Factors and Information Considered in Compensation
Decisions
Tax
Deductibility
In allocating compensation among base salary, annual cash
incentive awards and long-term equity incentive awards, the
Compensation Committee considers the potential tax deductibility
of various forms of compensation.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally
disallows a tax deduction for public companies for
non-performance-based compensation of more than $1 million
paid in any year to the Chief Executive Officer and certain
other highly compensated officers required to be reported in our
annual proxy statement. Accordingly, base salaries and other
non-performance-based compensation as defined in
Section 162(m) in excess of $1 million paid to these
officers in any year is not deductible by Wyeth. There is an
exception under Section 162(m) for performance-based
compensation meeting specified requirements. Our stock options,
annual cash incentive awards and, beginning with the 2007 grants
to these officers, our performance share unit awards, are all
generally structured in a manner intended to preserve tax
deductibility.
We have paid, and in the future may pay, compensation that may
not be fully tax deductible for purposes of Section 162(m),
where such compensation is, in the judgment of the Compensation
Committee, consistent with our overall compensation objectives
and philosophy. For example, reflective of his performance and
leadership role within Wyeth, Mr. Poussots base
salary is in excess of $1 million. In addition, as
described above, in 2008 we made a special promotional grant of
service-vesting RSUs to Mr. Poussot in connection with his
promotion to Chief Executive Officer and a special grant of
service-vesting RSUs to Mr. Norden to adjust his total
equity opportunity to the market for chief financial officers,
which may not be tax deductible on account of
Section 162(m).
Accounting
Implications
Each element of the compensation we pay to our executives is
expensed in our financial statements as required by
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. As one of
many factors, we consider the financial statement impact in
determining the amount of, and allocation among the elements of,
compensation.
199
Compensation
Consultant
See Meetings and Committees of the Wyeth Board of
Directors beginning on page 176 for a discussion of
the use of compensation consultants by the Compensation
Committee and management. The Compensation Committees
compensation consultant is not affiliated with the compensation
consultant engaged by management.
Timing
of Equity Grants and Equity Grant Policy
Equity awards typically are granted to all eligible employees,
including our named executive officers, on the date of a
regularly scheduled meeting of the Compensation Committee. In
2008 and prior years, these annual grants were made in
connection with our annual stockholders meeting (generally in
April of each year). The Compensation Committee sets the level
of the award and, in connection with stock option grants, the
exercise price on the date of the grant, which under the terms
of our various stock incentive plans, must be at or above the
closing price of our common stock on the grant date. In addition
to the annual grants, executives may receive equity awards in
connection with promotions or other extraordinary circumstances,
such as the grant to Mr. Poussot on January 2, 2008 in
connection with his promotion to Chief Executive Officer and the
special RSUs granted to Mr. Norden on April 24, 2008.
The Compensation Committee determined each of these awards at a
regularly scheduled meeting held on or prior to the grant date,
with a grant date of the effective date of the promotion for
Mr. Poussot and a grant date of the date of the meeting for
Mr. Norden. Newly hired executives also receive an equity
award in connection with their employment, such as the grant of
stock options and performance share unit awards made to
Dr. Dolsten in June 2008 in connection with his employment.
These awards are granted on the date of the Compensation
Committee meeting immediately following the date of hire or
promotion or, in some cases, on the first day of employment if
the Compensation Committee has acted on the matter at a meeting
in advance of such date of hire. In addition, the Compensation
Committee has delegated to the Special Interim Grant Committee,
on which only our Chief Executive Officer serves, the authority
to grant options and RSUs to middle management in connection
with initial employment, promotion, or first attainment of a
salary level entitling an employee to a grant of options
and/or RSUs.
Such options are granted on the date our Chief Executive Officer
approves them and have an exercise price equal to fair market
value on the date of grant. This delegated authority does not
extend to granting awards to our named executive officers or
other officers, any employee who is subject to Section 16
of the Exchange Act or any employee who is eligible to receive
grants in the Executive Grant Category. The Executive Grant
Category in 2008 covered employees with a minimum annual base
salary of $194,000.
We do not have a program, plan or practice of timing equity
grants to our executives in coordination with the release of
material non-public information. The vast majority of our equity
awards (to both our executive officers and other eligible
employees), including the annual grant, are granted at our
regularly scheduled Compensation Committee meetings. Because
these meetings generally are scheduled one year in advance, the
timing of disclosure by Wyeth of material non-public information
typically does not impact the timing of our equity grants.
However, before approving any grant of equity, including a
regularly scheduled annual grant, the Compensation Committee
views it as part of its responsibility to take into account all
facts and circumstances so as to ensure that the grant is
consistent with our compensation philosophy and objectives.
Policy
on the Recoupment of Incentive-Based Compensation
In September 2007, the Wyeth board of directors, upon the
recommendation of the Compensation Committee, adopted a policy
on the recoupment of performance-based compensation in
restatement situations. The policy provides that if the Wyeth
board of directors determines that a senior executive has
engaged in fraud or willful misconduct that caused or otherwise
contributed to the need for a material restatement of our
financial results, the Wyeth board of directors will review all
performance-based compensation awarded to or earned by that
senior executive on the basis of performance during fiscal
periods materially affected by the restatement. If, in the view
of the Wyeth board of directors, the performance-based
compensation would have been lower if it had been based on the
restated results, the Wyeth board of directors will, to the
extent permitted by applicable law, seek recoupment from that
senior executive of any portion of such performance-based
compensation as it deems appropriate after a review of all
relevant facts and circumstances. The Wyeth
200
board of directors may delegate one or more of the duties or
powers under the policy to one or more committees of the Wyeth
board of directors consisting solely of independent directors.
Executive
Stock Ownership Guidelines
In order to encourage significant ownership of stock in Wyeth by
senior executives and by virtue of that ownership align the
personal interests of senior executives with those of our
stockholders, we have adopted stock ownership guidelines for
senior executives. Authority to administer these guidelines has
been delegated to the Chief Executive Officer, who reports
periodically to the Compensation Committee with respect to these
matters. The guideline for our Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer is Wyeth share ownership with a value of at least eight
times base salary. Officers who report directly to our Chief
Executive Officer have a guideline of Wyeth share ownership
value of at least six times base salary, and other executives
who are members of the Management, Law/Regulatory Review, Human
Resources, Benefits and Compensation, and Operations committees
have a guideline of four times base salary. Other executives and
key employees also are encouraged to maintain share ownership.
Executives may increase their share ownership through a variety
of methods, including the receipt and retention of the various
forms of equity awards granted by Wyeth (including a portion of
the value of vested in-the-money stock options and unvested
performance shares), and are expected to achieve target levels
within five years. The Compensation Committee reviews the
guidelines and the state of our senior executives
compliance with the guidelines regularly. In connection with its
annual assessment undertaken in November 2008, the Compensation
Committee determined that as a result of our then current stock
price and recent market activity, only some of our named
executive officers met their ownership guidelines, including
Mr. Poussot who exceeded his guideline by several
multiples. Employees are not permitted to enter into short sales
or other transactions in derivatives of our common stock.
201
Summary
Compensation Table
The following table summarizes the total compensation earned for
2008, 2007 and 2006 by the persons serving in 2008 as our
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Mr. Poussot), our Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer (Mr. Norden), our former Chairman of the
Wyeth board of directors (Mr. Essner), our former Senior
Vice President and President, Wyeth Research (Dr. Ruffolo)
and our three next most highly paid executive officers
(Mr. Mahady, Mr. Stein and Dr. Dolsten),
calculated and presented in accordance with the rules and
regulations of the SEC. The table below shows
Mr. Nordens compensation for 2008 and 2007 only, as
he first became a named executive officer in 2007, and
Mr. Steins and Dr. Dolstens compensation
for 2008 only, as they first became named executive officers in
2008. We refer to these seven persons throughout the
compensation tables as our named executive officers.
As discussed more fully under Compensation
Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 185,
compensation for our named executive officers consists of a
combination of base salary, annual cash incentive awards (i.e.,
cash bonuses), long-term equity incentive awards, pension
benefits and perquisites. Long-term equity incentive
compensation is awarded under our stock incentive plans,
generally in the form of annual grants of stock options and
performance share unit awards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
Change in
|
|
All
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Option
|
|
Plan
|
|
Pension
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Name and
|
|
|
|
Salary(1)
|
|
Awards(2)
|
|
Awards(3)
|
|
Compensation(4)
|
|
Value(5)
|
|
Compensation(6)
|
|
Total
|
Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Bernard Poussot
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
1,450,000
|
|
|
$
|
8,041,484
|
|
|
$
|
3,796,200
|
|
|
$
|
2,750,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,662,990
|
|
|
$
|
656,723
|
|
|
$
|
21,357,397
|
|
Chairman, President and
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
1,050,400
|
|
|
$
|
4,349,760
|
|
|
$
|
2,590,040
|
|
|
$
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,400,863
|
|
|
$
|
263,845
|
|
|
$
|
12,654,908
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
967,035
|
|
|
$
|
5,518,110
|
|
|
$
|
4,060,380
|
|
|
$
|
1,700,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,003,211
|
|
|
$
|
160,112
|
|
|
$
|
14,408,848
|
|
Gregory Norden
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
770,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,454,967
|
|
|
$
|
600,310
|
|
|
$
|
1,078,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,629,028
|
|
|
$
|
199,370
|
|
|
$
|
7,731,675
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
583,033
|
|
|
$
|
1,027,240
|
|
|
$
|
468,970
|
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
|
$
|
167,817
|
|
|
$
|
75,148
|
|
|
$
|
3,072,208
|
|
Joseph M. Mahady
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
925,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,012,655
|
|
|
$
|
2,182,120
|
|
|
$
|
1,341,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,276,187
|
|
|
$
|
34,250
|
|
|
$
|
9,771,212
|
|
Senior Vice President and
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
787,233
|
|
|
$
|
2,313,180
|
|
|
$
|
2,118,050
|
|
|
$
|
1,100,000
|
|
|
$
|
823,207
|
|
|
$
|
29,117
|
|
|
$
|
7,170,787
|
|
President, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
695,600
|
|
|
$
|
3,875,270
|
|
|
$
|
1,441,860
|
|
|
$
|
950,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,390,888
|
|
|
$
|
26,368
|
|
|
$
|
8,379,986
|
|
Lawrence V. Stein
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
724,220
|
|
|
$
|
2,168,619
|
|
|
$
|
892,620
|
|
|
$
|
978,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,541,441
|
|
|
$
|
28,050
|
|
|
$
|
6,332,950
|
|
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mikael Dolsten, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
406,250
|
|
|
$
|
1,414,537
|
|
|
$
|
92,899
|
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
105,771
|
|
|
$
|
2,769,457
|
|
Senior Vice President and President, Wyeth Research
|
|
|
Robert Essner
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
857,703
|
|
|
$
|
11,717,960
|
|
|
$
|
3,796,200
|
|
|
$
|
1,600,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,566,308
|
|
|
$
|
338,660
|
|
|
$
|
20,876,831
|
|
Former Chairman
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
1,728,500
|
|
|
$
|
10,169,080
|
|
|
$
|
4,691,600
|
|
|
$
|
3,200,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,083,894
|
|
|
$
|
232,057
|
|
|
$
|
24,105,131
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
1,662,000
|
|
|
$
|
18,201,380
|
|
|
$
|
5,305,400
|
|
|
$
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,531,044
|
|
|
$
|
147,138
|
|
|
$
|
32,846,962
|
|
Robert R. Ruffolo, Jr., Ph.D
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
459,458
|
|
|
$
|
2,483,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
645,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,023,321
|
|
|
$
|
140,229
|
|
|
$
|
4,751,206
|
|
Former Senior
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
756,100
|
|
|
$
|
2,509,610
|
|
|
$
|
1,394,800
|
|
|
$
|
1,100,000
|
|
|
$
|
880,411
|
|
|
$
|
23,183
|
|
|
$
|
6,664,104
|
|
Vice President and President,
Wyeth Research
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
727,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,345,220
|
|
|
$
|
1,423,400
|
|
|
$
|
1,100,000
|
|
|
$
|
964,881
|
|
|
$
|
27,310
|
|
|
$
|
8,587,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amount shown in the Salary column for
Dr. Dolsten reflects payment of base salary at an annual
rate of $750,000 from his date of hire, and for Mr. Essner
and Dr. Ruffolo reflects payment of base salary at an
annual rate of $1,728,500 and $782,500, respectively, through
their dates of retirement. Each of our named executive officers
deferred a portion of his base salary into the Wyeth Savings
Plan, as amended (401(k)). Each of our named executive officers
(other than Dr. Dolsten) also deferred a portion of his
base salary into the Wyeth Supplemental Employee Savings Plan,
as amended (SESP), which is reflected in the Non-Qualified
Deferred Compensation table below. |
|
|
|
In November 2008, the Wyeth board of directors set the 2009 base
salaries for our active named executive officers at $1,550,000
for Mr. Poussot, $850,000 for Mr. Norden, $962,000 for
Mr. Mahady, $753,000 for Mr. Stein and $790,000 for
Dr. Dolsten. |
|
(2) |
|
We recognize the expense associated with performance share unit
awards ratably from the date of grant through the completion of
the applicable performance period, initially assuming
achievement at 100% of target and ultimately reflecting actual
achievement. |
203
The amounts shown in the Stock Awards column for
2008 represent:
|
|
|
|
|
the compensation cost in accordance with
SFAS No. 123R, disregarding the estimate of
forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions, for
performance share unit awards granted in 2008 and in prior
years, thereby reflecting the pro rata expenses associated with
the 2006, 2007 and 2008 grants of performance share unit awards;
|
|
|
|
the following incremental amounts reflecting the conversion of
the 2006 performance share unit awards, which relate primarily
to the 2008 performance year, at 136% of target (rather than
100%): $1,404,288 for Mr. Poussot, $351,072 for
Mr. Norden, $667,037 for Mr. Mahady, $482,724 for
Mr. Stein, $2,984,112 for Mr. Essner and $719,698 for
Dr. Ruffolo, as a result of the determination by the
Compensation Committee in early 2009 that we achieved 2008 EPS,
as adjusted, of $3.68 per share (i.e., exclusive of equity-based
compensation and charges related to our productivity
initiatives) and a total stockholder return ranking in the
middle tier of our specified peer group of eight companies for
the period from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2008.
The 2008 EPS target of $3.58 per share for the 2006 awards was
established by the Compensation Committee in early 2008; and
|
|
|
|
the compensation cost in accordance with
SFAS No. 123R, disregarding the estimate of
forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions, for
RSUs as follows: for Mr. Poussot, the pro rata cost of a
special award granted to him in 2008 in connection with his
promotion to Chief Executive Officer, and for Mr. Norden,
the pro rata cost of awards granted to him in 2005, 2006 and
2007 prior to his promotion to Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer and a special award granted to him in 2008
related to his promotion to Chief Financial Officer.
|
See notes 2 and 4 to Outstanding Equity
Awards at 2008 Year-End beginning on page 211
for a description of these awards.
The assumptions used for computing the compensation costs of
these awards were the same as those reflected for such years in
note 13 to our consolidated financial statements for the
year ended December 31, 2008, included in our 2008
Financial Report, which is incorporated by reference into
Wyeths Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, which is incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Represents the compensation cost determined in accordance with
SFAS No. 123R, disregarding the estimate of forfeitures
related to service-based vesting conditions, for stock option
awards based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which
is recognized pro rata over the employee service period. The
vesting period for determining compensation cost generally is
the shorter of three years or the time period prior to when the
individual reaches the age and service required for retirement
eligibility. The amounts shown for 2008 represent: |
|
|
|
|
|
for Messrs. Poussot, Stein and Essner, the full expense for
stock options granted in 2008 and do not include any expense for
prior year awards, as these executives satisfied the age and
service requirements for retirement eligibility prior to 2008;
|
|
|
|
for Mr. Norden, who does not become eligible for retirement
until October 2012, the pro rata costs of stock options granted
in 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008;
|
|
|
|
for Mr. Mahady, who became eligible for retirement in April
2008, the pro rata costs of stock options granted in 2005, 2006
and 2007 and the full expense for stock options granted in 2008;
|
|
|
|
for Dr. Dolsten, who does not become eligible for
retirement until September 2013, the pro rata costs of stock
options granted in 2008 upon his date of hire; and
|
|
|
|
for Dr. Ruffolo, no expense because he did not receive a
grant of stock options in 2008 and he satisfied the age and
service requirements for retirement eligibility prior to 2008.
|
Prior to the implementation of SFAS No. 123R, we
recognized cost over the three-year vesting period without
regard to retirement eligibility. As allowed under
SFAS No. 123R, we have continued to recognize pre-2006
stock option expense on a pro rata basis over the three-year
vesting period; the
204
above amounts shown for 2008 do not include the pro rata costs
for pre-2006 stock option grants of approximately $153,879,
$80,285, $481,710 and $128,233, for Mr. Poussot,
Mr. Stein, Mr. Essner and Dr. Ruffolo,
respectively, which were expensed by us in 2008.
The assumptions used for computing the compensation costs of
these awards were the same as those reflected for such years in
note 13 to our consolidated financial statements for the
year ended December 31, 2008, included in our 2008
Financial Report, which is incorporated by reference into
Wyeths Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, which is incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Reflects the annual cash incentive awards (i.e., cash bonuses)
earned for 2008, 2007 and 2006 under our stockholder-approved
Executive Incentive Plan, as amended, or, in the case of
Mr. Norden in 2007 and Dr. Dolsten and Mr. Essner
in 2008, under our Performance Incentive Award program, and paid
in the first quarter of 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. These
awards were determined and finalized by our Compensation
Committee in the February following the applicable completed
performance year and were paid shortly thereafter. The terms of
our Executive Incentive Plan, which is designed to preserve the
tax deductibility to Wyeth of annual cash incentive award
payments, provide that the maximum annual cash incentive award
that may be paid to any one participant in any one year is
two-tenths of one percent of our consolidated earnings, if any,
for the applicable year (adjusted to omit the effects of unusual
and infrequent items). As discussed in more detail under
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
beginning on page 185, the Compensation Committee applies
negative discretion to determine the actual cash incentive award
made to each individual for the given fiscal year. None of the
named executive officers elected to defer his 2008, 2007 or 2006
annual cash incentive award. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents the aggregate change in actuarial present value of
each named executive officers accumulated benefits under
our defined benefit pension plans from December 31, 2007 to
December 31, 2008, December 31, 2006 to
December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2005 to
December 31, 2006, respectively, which are the measurement
dates used for financial statement reporting purposes for our
consolidated financial statements, based on the following
assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
For valuing lump-sum payments, a discount rate of 4.0% for the
December 31, 2008 measurement date, 4.0% for the
December 31, 2007 measurement date, 4.0% for the
December 31, 2006 measurement date and 4.4% for the
December 31, 2005 measurement date.
|
|
|
|
For valuing annuity payments, a discount rate of 6.25% for the
December 31, 2008 measurement date, 6.45% for the
December 31, 2007 measurement date, 5.90% for the
December 31, 2006 measurement date and 5.65% for the
December 31, 2005 measurement date.
|
|
|
|
For the December 31, 2008 measurement date, eighty-five
percent (85%) of all retirees were expected to elect lump-sum
payments, and for the December 31, 2007 and the
December 31, 2006 measurement dates, seventy percent (70%)
of all retirees were expected to elect lump-sum payments; the
remainder were assumed to elect payments in an annuity form.
|
Amounts shown reflect valuations without taking into account any
distributions from the plans for retired executives during the
year.
None of our named executive officers were credited with any
above-market or preferential earnings on deferred compensation
in 2008, 2007 or 2006 under any of our plans.
205
|
|
|
(6) |
|
For 2008, reflects amounts for personal use of company aircraft,
aircraft commuting, personal use of automobiles,
company-provided housing/relocation, reimbursement of taxes,
Wyeths matching contributions to the Wyeth Savings Plan
(401(k)) and the Supplemental Employee Savings Plan (SESP), and
other benefits, as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provided
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
Aircraft
|
|
Personal Use of
|
|
Housing/
|
|
Reimbursement
|
|
401(k)
|
|
SESP
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Aircraft
|
|
Commuting
|
|
Automobiles
|
|
Relocation
|
|
of Taxes
|
|
Match
|
|
Match
|
|
Other
|
|
All Other
|
Name
|
|
(a)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
(d)
|
|
(e)
|
|
(e)
|
|
(f)
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Mr. Poussot
|
|
$
|
189,986
|
|
|
$
|
18,235
|
|
|
$
|
10,504
|
|
|
$
|
132,000
|
|
|
$
|
147,876
|
|
|
$
|
6,900
|
|
|
$
|
37,913
|
|
|
$
|
113,309
|
|
|
$
|
656,723
|
|
Mr. Norden
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,757
|
|
|
$
|
11,369
|
|
|
$
|
72,504
|
|
|
$
|
77,076
|
|
|
$
|
6,900
|
|
|
$
|
17,075
|
|
|
$
|
8,689
|
|
|
$
|
199,370
|
|
Mr. Mahady
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,900
|
|
|
$
|
21,850
|
|
|
$
|
5,500
|
|
|
$
|
34,250
|
|
Mr. Stein
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,900
|
|
|
$
|
15,650
|
|
|
$
|
5,500
|
|
|
$
|
28,050
|
|
Dr. Dolsten
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,742
|
|
|
$
|
33,706
|
|
|
$
|
14,904
|
|
|
$
|
44,332
|
|
|
$
|
4,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
105,771
|
|
Mr. Essner
|
|
$
|
202,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,586
|
|
|
$
|
6,900
|
|
|
$
|
21,188
|
|
|
$
|
64,474
|
|
|
$
|
338,660
|
|
Dr. Ruffolo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,900
|
|
|
$
|
7,829
|
|
|
$
|
125,500
|
|
|
$
|
140,229
|
|
|
|
|
a. |
|
The Wyeth board of directors made it a requirement, for security
reasons, that Mr. Poussot and, prior to his retirement,
Mr. Essner, use the corporate aircraft for business and
personal travel where feasible. The Wyeth board of directors
believes that this requirement also enables more efficient use
of these executives travel time and helps to preserve
confidentiality. Mr. Essner is entitled to limited
post-employment usage of our corporate aircraft pursuant to his
employment agreement. See Potential Payments upon
Termination or Change in Control beginning on
page 221 for a description of Mr. Essners
employment agreement. Other executive officers may, on rare
occasions, use the corporate aircraft for personal trips with
the permission of the Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
As a result of their respective promotions to President and
Chief Executive Officer (January 2008) and Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer (June 2007),
Messrs. Poussot and Norden, respectively, changed their
principal offices from Collegeville, Pennsylvania to Madison,
New Jersey but continue to work frequently in both locations.
Beginning with their respective promotions, Messrs. Poussot
and Norden use the corporate helicopter for periodic commuting,
as does Dr. Dolsten in connection with his relocation to
Collegeville, Pennsylvania. |
|
|
|
We have valued the aggregate incremental cost of each of
Mr. Poussots and Mr. Essners personal use
of our corporate aircraft using a method that takes into account
the cost of fuel, trip-related maintenance, crew travel
expenses, on-board supplies and catering, landing fees,
trip-related expenses, any customs, foreign permit and similar
fees, and other variable costs, net of any reimbursements made
to Wyeth by the officer for his use of the aircraft in the case
of Mr. Essner. The aggregate incremental cost also includes
all such costs related to positioning flights. We valued the
aggregate incremental cost of aircraft commuting by allocating
the estimated total annual variable costs associated with use of
the helicopter for all helicopter trips on a per passenger basis
(i.e., by calculating the hourly per passenger variable cost for
all helicopter trips in 2008 and allocating it to the commuting
and/or personal trips made by the officer). Because our aircraft
are used primarily for business travel, in calculating
incremental cost, we do not include the fixed costs that do not
change based on personal usage. Aggregate incremental cost is
not the same as the valuation used for calculating taxable
income to the executives, which is calculated pursuant to U.S.
Treasury regulations. We have not included amounts related to
the loss of a tax deduction to Wyeth on account of personal use
of corporate aircraft in valuing this benefit. |
|
b. |
|
Costs related to automobile usage for commuting and/or personal
purposes by Mr. Poussot, Mr. Norden, Dr. Dolsten
and Mr. Essner, including post-employment use by
Mr. Essner pursuant to his employment agreement, are shown
at estimated aggregate incremental cost to Wyeth based upon the
number of miles traveled and the estimated incremental cost per
mile, including an estimate of allocable driver overtime costs
or, in the case of Dr. Dolsten, the cost of third-party-provided
transportation. Costs related to the company-owned automobile
provided to Mr. Essner prior to his retirement are shown at
full cost to Wyeth although the vehicle was used for business as
well as personal transportation. |
206
|
|
|
c. |
|
For Messrs. Poussot and Norden, amounts shown represent a
monthly housing allowance and payments for company-provided
housing, respectively, in lieu of relocation. Beginning with
their respective promotions, we provide Mr. Poussot with a
monthly housing allowance to be used for housing in proximity to
Madison, New Jersey and Mr. Norden with a leased apartment
and related expenses in proximity to Madison, New Jersey. For
Dr. Dolsten, amount shown represents company-paid living
expenses related to his relocation to Collegeville, Pennsylvania
in connection with his employment. |
|
d. |
|
Amounts shown represent reimbursement by us of taxes incurred by
the executive as a result of imputed income as follows: for
Mr. Poussot, from helicopter and automobile usage for
commuting/personal use, the monthly housing allowance and
specified air travel; for Mr. Norden, from helicopter and
automobile usage for commuting and company-provided housing; for
Dr. Dolsten, from the travel/commuting costs and living
expenses related to his relocation to Collegeville, Pennsylvania
in accordance with our relocation policy; and for
Mr. Essner, from his personal use of corporate aircraft
prior to his retirement. See Compensation
Discussion and Analysis Determination and Analysis
of 2008 Compensation for Named Executive Officers
Perquisites beginning on page 197. |
|
e. |
|
We provide matching contributions of 50% on the first 6% of
covered pay that the named executive officer contributes to the
Wyeth Savings Plan (401(k)) and the Supplemental Employee
Savings Plan. |
|
f. |
|
This column reports other benefits provided to named executive
officers. These other benefits include: (1) financial
planning, (2) home security for Mr. Poussot
($101,302), including installation costs in connection with his
promotion to Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Essner
($14,602), (3) non-business activities for director spouses
in connection with our off-site board meeting (see
Director Compensation beginning on
page 170), and/or (4) an annual physical examination.
In the case of Mr. Essner, this column also includes an
estimate of the post-employment benefits that he received in
2008 under his employment agreement ($43,000), with the
exception of home security, the use of a company-owned
automobile and driver and the company aircraft, which are
included in the other applicable columns or clauses. In the case
of Dr. Ruffolo, these benefits include payments in
connection with his post-retirement consulting agreement
($125,000). Please see Potential Payments Upon
Termination or Change in Control beginning on
page 221 for a description of the post-employment benefits
provided to Mr. Essner and Dr. Ruffolo under their
employment and consulting agreements. |
For additional detail regarding the amounts shown for 2006 and
2007, please refer to our proxy statements for our 2007 and 2008
Annual Meetings of Stockholders.
2008
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table provides a summary of grants of plan-based
awards made to our named executive officers in 2008.
The columns entitled Estimated Potential Payouts under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards represent annual cash
incentive awards that are generally payable to named executive
officers under our stockholder-approved Executive Incentive
Plan. There are no future payouts associated with these awards
as payouts have already occurred and are shown in the
Summary Compensation Table beginning on
page 203. See Compensation Discussion and
Analysis beginning on page 185 and note 1 below
for additional details.
The columns entitled Estimated Future Payouts under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards represent performance share unit
awards for the 2010 performance year granted on April 24,
2008 under our 2005 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan to
Mr. Poussot, Mr. Norden, Mr. Mahady,
Mr. Stein and Mr. Essner and, on his June 16,
2008 employment date, to Dr. Dolsten. These awards are
composed of units that may be converted to between 0% and 200%
of a pre-set target number of shares of our common stock (one
share per unit). Pursuant to these awards, in early 2010, the
Compensation Committee would set an EPS target for 2010, and in
early 2011, the Compensation Committee would compare the actual
EPS performance for 2010 against the target EPS to determine
what percentage of the target award may be earned. The awards
generally are structured to allow the Compensation Committee
negative discretion to reduce the amount of the award that may
be earned based on EPS performance to reflect, among other
factors it may consider, our total stockholder return ranking
(top 2, middle 4, bottom 2) compared with that of our peer
group listed in the second paragraph under
Compensation Discussion and
207
Analysis Peer Group Analysis over the period
from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2010. The
Compensation Committee set the target number of shares to assume
our achievement of 100% of the 2010 EPS target and a top
2 TSR ranking for the three-year period, with the
Compensation Committee retaining the ability to reduce the
number of shares earned to reflect actual TSR ranking, among
other factors. If actual EPS achievement would result in 0% of
the target award being earned, an executive may still receive up
to 25% of the target award (assuming we have consolidated
earnings in 2010) at the discretion of the Compensation
Committee based on, among other factors, favorable TSR
performance. This award design is intended to preserve our
ability to deduct this compensation under Section 162(m) of
the Internal Revenue Code. The executives would forfeit these
performance share unit awards upon termination of employment
prior to conversion for any reason other than death, disability
or retirement (in which case the units would be converted if,
when and to the extent the performance criteria are satisfied).
These units generally would vest upon a change in control, such
as our contemplated merger with Pfizer (in which case the units
would be converted at 80% of target). In order to enhance the
long-term retention aspect of these awards, any shares received
upon conversion of the 2008 performance share unit awards are
subject to a one-year holding period, during which time these
shares would be subject to forfeiture upon termination, other
than on account of death, disability, retirement, change in
control or as determined in the discretion of the Compensation
Committee.
These columns also include 51,250 performance share units
granted on June 16, 2008 to Dr. Dolsten in connection
with his employment under our 2005 Amended and Restated Stock
Incentive Plan that will convert to shares of our common stock
based on the 2009 performance year. The performance share unit
awards for the 2009 performance year are described in
note 2 to the table entitled Outstanding
Equity Awards at 2008 Year-End and in our proxy
statement for our 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
In connection with his promotion to Chief Executive Officer,
Mr. Poussot received a special grant of 120,000 RSUs on
January 2, 2008. Mr. Norden also received a special
grant of 19,250 RSUs on April 24, 2008 related to his
promotion to Chief Financial Officer. These grants were made
under our 2005 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan.
Assuming continued employment, the units granted to
Mr. Poussot will vest and convert to shares of our common
stock in one-third increments on the third, fourth and fifth
anniversaries of the date of grant, and the units granted to
Mr. Norden will vest in one-third increments on the first,
second and third anniversaries of the date of grant. RSUs are
subject to earlier vesting in the event of death, disability,
retirement or a change in control, such as our contemplated
merger with Pfizer, although Mr. Poussots RSUs do not
vest upon retirement and accordingly would be subject to
forfeiture to the extent not vested on his retirement date.
These awards are shown under the column All Other Stock
Awards.
208
The column entitled All Other Option Awards reflects
our grant of stock options to our named executive officers under
our 2005 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan on
April 24, 2008 and, in the case of Dr. Dolsten, on
June 16, 2008. Options expire 10 years from the date
of grant and become exercisable in one-third increments on the
first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant,
provided that the named executive officer has at least two years
of service. Options would become fully vested earlier in the
case of retirement, death or disability or in the event of a
change in control.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
Awards:
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Potential Payouts
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
or Base
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
Under Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
Shares
|
|
Securities
|
|
Price of
|
|
of Stock and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards(1)
|
|
Awards
|
|
of Stock
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Options
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
Action
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
or Units
|
|
Options
|
|
Award
|
|
Awards(2)
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
Date
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
($/Sh)
|
|
($)
|
|
Bernard Poussot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
9,533,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/2/2008
|
|
|
|
1/2/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,573,200
|
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
192,000
|
|
|
|
384,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,956,480
|
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370,000
|
|
|
$
|
44.56
|
|
|
|
3,796,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,325,880
|
|
Gregory Norden
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
|
$
|
9,533,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
790,598
|
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
56,250
|
|
|
|
112,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,331,000
|
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,000
|
|
|
$
|
44.56
|
|
|
|
1,015,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,137,338
|
|
Joseph M. Mahady
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1,100,000
|
|
|
$
|
9,533,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
62,500
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,590,000
|
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,000
|
|
|
$
|
44.56
|
|
|
|
1,415,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,005,880
|
|
Lawrence V. Stein
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
890,000
|
|
|
$
|
9,533,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
41,000
|
|
|
|
82,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,699,040
|
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,000
|
|
|
$
|
44.56
|
|
|
|
892,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,591,660
|
|
Mikael Dolsten, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/16/2008
|
*
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
51,250
|
|
|
|
102,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,733,675
|
|
|
|
|
6/16/2008
|
**
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
51,250
|
|
|
|
102,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,123,800
|
|
|
|
|
6/16/2008
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,000
|
|
|
$
|
43.08
|
|
|
|
513,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,371,235
|
|
Robert Essner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1,600,000
|
|
|
$
|
9,533,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
153,600
|
|
|
|
307,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,148,544
|
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
4/24/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370,000
|
|
|
$
|
44.56
|
|
|
|
3,796,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,944,744
|
|
Robert R. Ruffolo, Jr., Ph.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
641,700
|
|
|
$
|
9,533,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents grant for the 2009 performance year. |
|
|
|
** |
|
Represents grant for the 2010 performance year. |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Annual cash incentive awards generally are paid to named
executive officers under our stockholder-approved Executive
Incentive Plan, which, in order to preserve tax deductibility to
Wyeth of this compensation, is designed as a so-called
negative discretion plan. There is no target or
maximum under the Executive Incentive Plan, other than a
putative maximum amount that may be paid to any one participant
in any one year of two-tenths of one percent of consolidated
earnings (adjusted to omit the effects of unusual and infrequent
items). Pursuant to SEC rules, the maximum amounts
shown in the table above reflect this putative maximum. The plan
permits the Compensation Committee to award any amount that does
not exceed the putative maximum. For purposes of presentation,
the amounts shown as target represent the annual
cash incentive awards actually paid to each named executive
officer for 2007 (pro-rated for actual months worked in 2008 in
the case of Mr. Essner and Dr. Ruffolo). Actual annual
cash incentive awards paid for 2008 are reported in the
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the
Summary Compensation Table, and there
are no future payouts associated with these awards, which are
shown here in accordance with SEC rules. While
Dr. Dolstens annual cash incentive award was
determined in the same manner as awards under the Executive
Incentive Plan, Dr. Dolsten was not designated as a
participant in the Executive Incentive Plan in 2008 because he
became a named executive officer after |
209
|
|
|
|
|
the date of designation for 2008. In addition, pursuant to the
offer letter in connection with his employment, Dr. Dolsten
was entitled to receive a minimum bonus of $750,000 for 2008.
For each of Mr. Essner and Dr. Dolsten, the actual
annual cash incentive award for 2008 was ultimately paid under
our Performance Incentive Award program. See
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
beginning on page 185 for a discussion of the determination
of actual awards for 2008 under the Executive Incentive Plan and
the Performance Incentive Award program. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the grant date fair value of performance share unit
awards (based on 100% of target achievement), RSUs and stock
options granted in 2008 computed in accordance with
SFAS No. 123R, disregarding the estimate of
forfeitures relating to service-based vesting conditions, using
the same valuation model and assumptions as applied for purposes
of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2008, included in our 2008 Financial Report,
which is incorporated by reference into Wyeths Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, which is incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus. These values
were developed solely for the purpose of comparative disclosure
in accordance with SEC rules and are not intended to predict
future performance, future prices of our common stock or our
future dividend distributions. The ultimate values of these
equity awards will depend on our future performance and the
future market price of our common stock and cannot be forecasted
with reasonable accuracy. The actual value, if any, a holder
will realize upon exercise of an option will depend on the
excess of the market value of our common stock over the exercise
price on the date the option is exercised. The actual value, if
any, a holder will realize upon sale of shares received upon
conversion of RSUs and performance share unit awards will depend
on the number of shares into which such award ultimately
converts (in the case of performance share unit awards) and the
market value of our common stock on the date of the sale. |
|
|
|
The value of performance share unit awards granted on
April 24, 2008 for the 2010 performance year, based on 100%
of target achievement, was calculated to be $41.44 per unit or,
in the case of Mr. Essner, who received the form of award
granted to other key employees in light of his announced
retirement rather than the form of award for continuing named
executive officers, $46.54 per unit. The values of
Dr. Dolstens performance share unit awards granted on
June 16, 2008 for the 2009 performance year and the 2010
performance year, based on 100% of target achievement, were
calculated to be $53.34 and $41.44, respectively, per unit. The
value of Mr. Poussots RSUs granted on January 2,
2008 was calculated to be $38.11 per unit; and the value of
Mr. Nordens RSUs granted on April 24, 2008 was
calculated to be $41.07 per unit. For a discussion of the
assumptions used in determining grant date fair value of our
performance share unit awards and RSUs granted in 2008, please
see note 13 to our consolidated financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2008, included in our 2008
Financial Report, which is incorporated by reference into
Wyeths Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, which is incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus. |
|
|
|
For stock option awards granted on April 24, 2008 and
June 16, 2008, the values (equaling $10.26 and $9.88 per
option, respectively) were developed using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model in accordance with SFAS No. 123R
based on the assumptions set forth in note 13 to our
consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2008, included in our 2008 Financial Report,
which is incorporated by reference into Wyeths Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, which is incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus. |
210
Outstanding
Equity Awards at 2008 Year-End
The following table provides a summary of equity awards
outstanding at December 31, 2008 for each of our named
executive officers. The table does not include our performance
share unit awards that were earned and vested in early 2009, as
these awards are presented in the table under
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in
2008 beginning on page 213 because they were earned
and vested based on 2008 performance.
Amounts shown in the table below for stock awards outstanding at
year-end represent granted but unvested performance share unit
awards shown at 100% of target and, in the case of
Messrs. Poussot and Norden, unvested RSUs. Performance
share unit awards will convert at between 0% and 200% of target
based on future performance as more fully described in
note 2 below and under Compensation
Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 185.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Incentive
|
|
Equity Incentive
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards:
|
|
Plan Awards: Market
|
|
|
of Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
or Payout Value of
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units of
|
|
Market Value of
|
|
Unearned Shares,
|
|
Unearned Shares,
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
Stock That
|
|
Shares or Units of
|
|
Units or
|
|
Units or Other
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Options
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Option
|
|
Have Not
|
|
Stock That
|
|
Other Rights
|
|
Rights That Have
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
Price
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Vested
|
|
Have Not Vested
|
|
That Have Not Vested (2)
|
|
Not Vested (3)
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
($)
|
|
Date(1)
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
Bernard Poussot
|
|
|
97,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
62.3125
|
|
|
|
5/20/2009
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
4,501,200
|
(4)
|
|
|
(2007
|
)
|
|
|
112,500
|
|
|
$
|
4,219,875
|
|
|
|
|
118,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
56.5938
|
|
|
|
4/27/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2008
|
)
|
|
|
192,000
|
|
|
|
7,201,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
56.5250
|
|
|
|
4/26/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304,500
|
|
|
$
|
11,421,795
|
|
|
|
|
157,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
60.7050
|
|
|
|
4/25/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40.2200
|
|
|
|
4/22/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
43.5700
|
|
|
|
4/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
$
|
48.2200
|
|
|
|
4/27/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,666
|
|
|
|
133,334
|
|
|
$
|
56.0000
|
|
|
|
4/26/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370,000
|
|
|
$
|
44.5600
|
|
|
|
4/24/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: 876,100
|
|
|
|
563,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory Norden
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
62.3125
|
|
|
|
5/20/2009
|
|
|
|
28,750
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
1,078,413
|
(4)
|
|
|
(2007
|
)
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
937,750
|
|
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
56.5938
|
|
|
|
4/27/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2008
|
)
|
|
|
56,250
|
|
|
|
2,109,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
56.5250
|
|
|
|
4/26/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,250
|
|
|
$
|
3,047,688
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
60.7050
|
|
|
|
4/25/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
41.0500
|
|
|
|
4/24/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40.2200
|
|
|
|
4/22/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
43.5700
|
|
|
|
4/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,666
|
|
|
|
13,334
|
|
|
$
|
48.2200
|
|
|
|
4/27/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,003
|
|
|
|
24,007
|
|
|
$
|
56.0000
|
|
|
|
4/26/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,000
|
|
|
$
|
44.5600
|
|
|
|
4/24/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: 273,503
|
|
|
|
136,341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph M. Mahady
|
|
|
66,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
62.3125
|
|
|
|
5/20/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2007
|
)
|
|
|
49,940
|
|
|
$
|
1,873,249
|
|
|
|
|
76,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
56.5938
|
|
|
|
4/27/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2008
|
)
|
|
|
62,500
|
|
|
|
2,344,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
56.5250
|
|
|
|
4/26/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,440
|
|
|
$
|
4,217,624
|
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
60.7050
|
|
|
|
4/25/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40.2200
|
|
|
|
4/22/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
43.5700
|
|
|
|
4/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,666
|
|
|
|
34,334
|
|
|
$
|
48.2200
|
|
|
|
4/27/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,000
|
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
|
$
|
56.0000
|
|
|
|
4/26/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,000
|
|
|
$
|
44.5600
|
|
|
|
4/24/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: 555,266
|
|
|
|
244,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lawrence V. Stein
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
62.3125
|
|
|
|
5/20/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2007
|
)
|
|
|
37,815
|
|
|
$
|
1,418,441
|
|
|
|
|
51,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
56.5938
|
|
|
|
4/27/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2008
|
)
|
|
|
41,000
|
|
|
|
1,537,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
56.5250
|
|
|
|
4/26/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,815
|
|
|
$
|
2,956,351
|
|
|
|
|
56,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
60.7050
|
|
|
|
4/25/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
34.6750
|
|
|
|
10/28/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
41.0500
|
|
|
|
4/24/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40.2200
|
|
|
|
4/22/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
43.5700
|
|
|
|
4/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,000
|
|
|
|
24,000
|
|
|
$
|
48.2200
|
|
|
|
4/27/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,400
|
|
|
|
52,800
|
|
|
$
|
56.0000
|
|
|
|
4/26/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,000
|
|
|
$
|
44.5600
|
|
|
|
4/24/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: 493,400
|
|
|
|
163,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Incentive
|
|
Equity Incentive
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards:
|
|
Plan Awards: Market
|
|
|
of Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
or Payout Value of
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units of
|
|
Market Value of
|
|
Unearned Shares,
|
|
Unearned Shares,
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
Stock That
|
|
Shares or Units of
|
|
Units or
|
|
Units or Other
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Options
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Option
|
|
Have Not
|
|
Stock That
|
|
Other Rights
|
|
Rights That Have
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
Price
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Vested
|
|
Have Not Vested
|
|
That Have Not Vested (2)
|
|
Not Vested (3)
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
($)
|
|
Date(1)
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
Mikael Dolsten, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,000
|
|
|
$
|
43.0800
|
|
|
|
6/16/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2007
|
)
|
|
|
51,250
|
|
|
$
|
1,922,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2008
|
)
|
|
|
51,250
|
|
|
|
1,922,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,500
|
|
|
$
|
3,844,776
|
|
Robert Essner
|
|
|
177,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
62.3125
|
|
|
|
5/20/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2007
|
)
|
|
|
192,000
|
|
|
$
|
7,201,920
|
|
|
|
|
207,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
56.5938
|
|
|
|
4/27/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2008
|
)
|
|
|
153,600
|
|
|
|
5,761,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
56.5250
|
|
|
|
4/26/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
345,600
|
|
|
$
|
12,963,456
|
|
|
|
|
630,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
62.4000
|
|
|
|
6/21/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
540,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
60.7050
|
|
|
|
4/25/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
41.0500
|
|
|
|
4/24/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
480,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40.2200
|
|
|
|
4/22/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
432,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
43.5700
|
|
|
|
4/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
48.2200
|
|
|
|
4/27/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
56.0000
|
|
|
|
4/26/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
44.5600
|
|
|
|
4/24/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: 4,576,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert R. Ruffolo, Jr., Ph.D.
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
53.8500
|
|
|
|
1/23/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2007
|
)
|
|
|
51,250
|
|
|
$
|
1,922,388
|
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
56.5250
|
|
|
|
4/26/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
60.7050
|
|
|
|
4/25/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
43.5700
|
|
|
|
4/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
48.2200
|
|
|
|
4/27/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
56.0000
|
|
|
|
4/26/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: 555,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Options expire 10 years from the date of grant and, subject
to ongoing service, vest in one-third increments on the first,
second and third anniversaries of the date of grant, provided
the executive has completed two or more years of service.
Options would become fully vested earlier in the case of
retirement, death, disability or a change in control, such as
our contemplated merger with Pfizer. See 2008
Grants of Plan-Based Awards beginning on page 207 for
more information on stock options. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the 2007 and 2008 performance share unit awards,
shown at 100% of target, which generally were granted in 2007
and 2008 and which can be earned based on 2009 and 2010 EPS
performance among other factors, respectively, and remained
outstanding at December 31, 2008. These awards generally
were granted in connection with the annual grants under our
long-term incentive compensation program, except that a portion
of Mr. Nordens 2007 performance share unit award was
granted to him in June 2007 in connection with his promotion to
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and
Dr. Dolstens 2007 and 2008 performance share unit
awards were granted to him upon his employment in June 2008. The
2007 performance share unit awards may be earned in early 2010
based on 2009 EPS performance. The 2008 performance share unit
awards may be earned in early 2011 based on 2010 EPS
performance. The Compensation Committee may then apply negative
discretion to reduce the amount of the award that may be earned
based on EPS by applying other factors as deemed appropriate by
the Compensation Committee, including total stockholder return
ranking for the years
2007-2009
for the 2007 award and for the years
2008-2010
for the 2008 award, as more fully described under
2008 Grants of Plan-Based Awards and in
the section entitled Compensation Discussion
and Analysis. The executives would forfeit these
performance share unit awards upon termination of employment
prior to conversion for any reason other than death, disability
or retirement (in which case the units would be converted if,
when and to the extent the performance criteria are satisfied).
These units also would vest upon a change in control, such as
our contemplated merger with Pfizer (in which case the units
generally would convert at 80% of target). |
212
|
|
|
|
|
The table does not include performance share unit awards granted
in 2006, which were earned and vested in February 2009 based on
2008 performance. As these awards vested based on performance
completed in 2008, we have included these awards in the table
entitled Option Exercises and Stock Vested in
2008. |
|
(3) |
|
Aggregate market or payout value of all performance share unit
awards not yet earned was computed by multiplying $37.51, the
closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on
December 31, 2008, by the number of shares issuable upon
conversion of performance share unit awards at 100% of target. |
|
(4) |
|
For Mr. Poussot, represents a special award of 120,000 RSUs
granted on January 2, 2008 upon his promotion to Chief
Executive Officer, which vest and convert into shares of our
common stock in one-third increments on the third, fourth and
fifth anniversaries of the date of grant. For Mr. Norden,
includes RSUs granted prior to his promotion to Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer as follows:
5,000 units on April 27, 2006 and 4,500 units on
April 26, 2007. These awards vest and convert into shares
of common stock on the third anniversary of the date of grant.
For Mr. Norden, also includes a special award of
19,250 units granted on April 24, 2008, which vest and
convert into shares of our common stock in one-third increments
on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of
grant. All RSUs would vest earlier in the event of a change in
control, such as our contemplated merger with Pfizer. Unless
otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, RSUs would
be forfeited upon termination of employment prior to vesting
(conversion) for any reason other than death, disability or
retirement (in which case the units would immediately vest).
However, Mr. Poussots units do not vest upon
retirement and accordingly would be subject to forfeiture to the
extent not vested on his retirement date. Recipients of RSUs are
not entitled to vote or receive dividends with respect to those
units unless and until the units vest and convert to shares of
common stock. The market value of these RSUs was computed based
on a per unit value of $37.51, the closing market price of our
common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2008. |
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested in 2008
The following table presents all stock awards that were earned
based on performance completed in 2008. As discussed in detail
in the section entitled Compensation
Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 185 the
number of shares acquired on vesting of stock awards represents
performance share unit awards granted in 2006 that were
convertible at between 0% and 200% of a pre-set target number of
shares (one share per unit) of common stock based on performance
completed during 2008 and converted at 136% of target in early
2009. For Mr. Norden, the number of shares acquired on
vesting of stock awards also includes shares of common stock
acquired in 2008 upon vesting of RSUs granted in 2005. None of
our named executive officers exercised any stock options in 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares Acquired
|
|
Value Realized on
|
|
of Shares Acquired
|
|
Value Realized
|
|
|
on Exercise
|
|
Exercise
|
|
on Vesting(1)(2)
|
|
on Vesting(2)(3)
|
Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
Bernard Poussot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,800
|
|
|
$
|
4,476,032
|
|
Gregory Norden
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,890
|
|
|
$
|
1,329,730
|
|
Joseph M. Mahady
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,680
|
|
|
$
|
2,126,115
|
|
Lawrence V. Stein
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,400
|
|
|
$
|
1,538,636
|
|
Mikael Dolsten, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Essner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,200
|
|
|
$
|
9,511,568
|
|
Robert R. Ruffolo, Jr., Ph.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,760
|
|
|
$
|
2,293,966
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents, or in the case of Mr. Norden includes, shares
received upon conversion of performance share unit awards based
on performance completed in 2008. As described under
Compensation Discussion and Analysis, in
early 2009, the Compensation Committee determined that Wyeth
achieved EPS, as adjusted, of $3.68 per share (exclusive of
equity-based compensation and charges related to our
productivity initiatives) and a total stockholder return ranking
against our peers in the middle tier, such that these units were
converted at 136% of the applicable target awards granted in
2006. For Mr. Norden, this |
213
|
|
|
|
|
column also includes 4,690 RSUs awarded in April 2005, prior to
his promotion to Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer that converted to shares of common stock on the
April 21, 2008 vesting date. |
|
(2) |
|
Does not include shares received at 116.8% of the applicable
target award upon conversion of performance share unit awards
granted in 2005 based upon the 2007 performance year, which the
Compensation Committee approved on February 28, 2008, based
on its determination that Wyeth exceeded the EPS target set by
the Compensation Committee for the 2007 performance year. These
shares are not included because they were earned based on
performance completed prior to January 1, 2008 and were
reported in the applicable tables in the proxy statement for our
2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. |
|
(3) |
|
Value realized upon vesting of these awards is based on the
closing price of our common stock on the trading day immediately
preceding the date of conversion. For the conversion of the 2006
performance share unit awards that was approved by the
Compensation Committee on February 26, 2009 and converted
into common stock upon filing of Wyeths Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, which was filed with
the SEC on February 27, 2009, the closing price of
Wyeths common stock on February 26, 2009 (the
immediately preceding trading day) was $41.14. For conversion of
the RSUs that were awarded to Mr. Norden in April 2005 and
vested on April 21, 2008, the closing price of our common
stock on the trading day immediately preceding the date of
conversion was $44.93. |
Pension
Benefits
Our
Plans
We maintain three defined benefit pension plans in which our
named executive officers may be eligible to participate. The
Wyeth Retirement Plan U.S. is our broad-based
tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan. The other two plans,
the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and the Executive
Retirement Plan, are nonqualified supplemental retirement plans.
Wyeth
Retirement Plan U.S.
Under the Wyeth Retirement Plan U.S., the benefit
accrued and payable following retirement is determined according
to the following formula:
|
|
|
|
|
Two percent multiplied by final average annual pension
earnings multiplied by the number of years of credited
service (up to 30 years), minus
|
|
|
|
A Social Security offset that is equal to 1/60th of the
annual Primary Social Security Benefit multiplied by the number
of years of credited service (up to 30 years).
|
In applying this formula, the amount of final average
annual pension earnings is the average of the five highest
annual pension earnings during the
10-year
period immediately preceding the retirement date. Compensation
used for determining pension earnings includes: (1) base
salary, (2) any annual cash incentive awards (i.e., cash
bonuses) paid and (3) sales commissions, sales bonuses or
overtime pay received in the prior calendar year. Equity awards
are not included in pension earnings.
Because this plan is a qualified plan, benefits are capped on
account of Internal Revenue Code limitations as described below.
Employees become participants in the Wyeth Retirement
Plan U.S. upon the attainment of age 21
and the completion of one year of service and become vested in
their benefits after five years of service. Benefits become
payable at age 65. Additionally, a participant can retire
early and receive a benefit if he or she is at least
55 years old with five or more years of service.
If the participant retires at or after age 55 with 10 or
more years of service, he or she will receive upon early
commencement of his or her benefit, a subsidized benefit, which
provides that the benefit is reduced by three percent for each
year that payment starts before age 65 rather than a larger
annual reduction which applies absent the subsidy. For
participants with at least five years of service but less than
10 years of service at retirement between ages 55 and
65, the subsidy is not provided.
214
Benefits at retirement can be paid out in various forms of
annuities as well as in a single lump sum.
Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan
The Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan is an excess benefit
plan designed to provide that portion of an executives
pension benefit that cannot be paid under the Wyeth Retirement
Plan U.S. on account of limitations imposed
upon the Wyeth Retirement Plan U.S. by the
Internal Revenue Code. The law limits: (1) the amount of
annual earnings that may be used to determine benefits (the
compensation limitation for 2008 was $230,000) and (2) the
maximum benefit payable under a qualified plan at age 65.
Additionally, deferred compensation cannot be included when
determining benefits under the Wyeth Retirement Plan
U.S.
The Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans material
terms, including the formula for determining the accrued
benefit, are the same as under the Wyeth Retirement
Plan U.S. described above, except that the
above-referenced Internal Revenue Code limitations are not
applicable to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. An
executives benefit under the Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan is offset by the benefit payable under the Wyeth
Retirement Plan U.S.
Executive
Retirement Plan
We also maintain the Executive Retirement Plan, which provides
to certain highly compensated executives, including each of our
named executive officers other than Dr. Dolsten, an
additional retirement benefit that is based upon the average of
the three highest annual pension earnings during the
10-year
period immediately preceding the retirement date.
Under the Executive Retirement Plan, the benefit accrued and
payable following retirement is determined according to the
following formula:
|
|
|
|
|
Two percent multiplied by final average annual pension
earnings multiplied by the number of years of credited
service with three additional years of service added (maximum
total credited service cannot exceed 30 years), minus
|
|
|
|
A Social Security offset equal to 1/60th of the annual
Primary Social Security Benefit multiplied by the number of
years of credited service with three additional years added
(maximum total credited service cannot exceed 30 years),
minus
|
|
|
|
Any benefits paid under the Wyeth Retirement Plan
U.S., the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and any Wyeth
foreign pension plan.
|
The Executive Retirement Plan recognizes service with any
subsidiary or affiliate, including overseas operations. The
Executive Retirement Plan provides each executive with three
additional years of service that is reduced for each year (or
part thereof) that a participant works beyond age 62. As
with the Wyeth Retirement Plan U.S. and the
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, the same payout options,
including a lump sum, are available.
In applying this formula, the amount of final average
annual pension earnings is the average of the three
(rather than five, as is the case of the Wyeth Retirement
Plan U.S. and the Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan) highest annual pension earnings during the
10-year
period immediately preceding the early or normal retirement
date. The same elements of compensation considered for the Wyeth
Retirement Plan U.S. and the Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan are used for the Executive Retirement
Plan.
An executive is eligible for participation in the Executive
Retirement Plan upon the attainment of age 55 and after
meeting one of the following requirements:
|
|
|
|
|
the executive has an annual base salary of $430,000 or greater
(in 2008) and $440,000 or greater (beginning in 2009),
which threshold may be adjusted upward annually;
|
|
|
|
the executive is a member of the Wyeth Management Committee (the
Wyeth board of directors approves Wyeth Management Committee
members); or
|
215
|
|
|
|
|
the executive is selected by the Chief Executive Officer for
inclusion in the Executive Retirement Plan and approved by the
Wyeth board of directors.
|
Certain executives, although not age 55 at
December 31, 2008, are participants in the Executive
Retirement Plan because they satisfied earlier eligibility
requirements and were grandfathered when the requirements were
changed. In addition, Mr. Norden, although not age 55
at December 31, 2008, is eligible to participate in the
Executive Retirement Plan pursuant to an amendment to the plan
providing that, subject to meeting the other eligibility
criteria for participation in the plan, the person serving as
our chief financial officer is eligible to participate in the
Executive Retirement Plan regardless of whether he or she has
reached the age of 55.
Eligibility for early retirement is the same as for the Wyeth
Retirement Plan U.S. and the Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan; however, normal retirement under the
Executive Retirement Plan is age 60 rather than
age 65. For a participant in the Executive Retirement Plan
retiring after age 55 with 10 or more years of service, the
reduction for early commencement is 3% for each year that
payments commence early, but the reduction is from age 60
rather than age 65. Benefits may first commence at or after
age 55.
Valuation
Method and Material Assumptions for All Plans
The assumptions used for calculating the present value of the
accumulated benefits payable at age 60 (the normal
retirement age under the Executive Retirement Plan in which all
of the named executive officers participate) are those used for
financial statement reporting purposes. For these purposes, it
was assumed that 85% of participants elect the lump-sum option,
with the remaining 15% electing a life annuity. Therefore, to
calculate the present value of the accumulated benefits, we
assumed a weighting of 85% at an interest rate of 4.0% and the
unloaded 1994 Group Annuity Mortality table projected to 2002
and blended 50% male and 50% female as referenced in Revenue
Ruling
2001-62
under the Internal Revenue Code (GATT mortality)
(assumptions used for valuing lump-sum cash payments under the
plans for financial statement reporting purposes) and 15% at an
interest rate of 6.25% and the 1994 Group Annuity Mortality
table (assumptions used for valuing annuities for financial
statement reporting purposes). These amounts then are discounted
back to the participants actual age using 6.25% per year.
The table below provides the present value of accumulated
benefits for each of our named executive officers, including the
number of years of credited service recognized under each of our
plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Years of
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
During Last
|
|
|
|
|
Credited Service(1)
|
|
Benefits
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
Name
|
|
Plan Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Bernard Poussot
|
|
Wyeth Retirement Plan U.S.
|
|
|
17.9
|
|
|
$
|
700,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
|
|
|
17.9
|
|
|
|
7,864,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Retirement Plan
|
|
|
25.3
|
|
|
|
7,823,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,388,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory Norden
|
|
Wyeth Retirement Plan U.S.
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
|
$
|
539,973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
|
|
2,087,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Retirement Plan
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
|
|
1,378,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,005,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph M. Mahady
|
|
Wyeth Retirement Plan U.S.
|
|
|
29.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,072,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
|
|
|
29.6
|
|
|
|
7,608,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Retirement Plan
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
|
|
2,616,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,298,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lawrence V. Stein
|
|
Wyeth Retirement Plan U.S.
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
$
|
707,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
4,286,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Retirement Plan
|
|
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
2,734,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,728,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Years of
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
During Last
|
|
|
|
|
Credited Service(1)
|
|
Benefits
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
Name
|
|
Plan Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Mikael Dolsten, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
Wyeth Retirement Plan U.S.
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Retirement Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Essner
|
|
Wyeth Retirement Plan U.S.
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
929,298
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
Executive Retirement Plan
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Robert R. Ruffolo, Jr., Ph.D.
|
|
Wyeth Retirement Plan U.S.
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
253,035
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,736,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Retirement Plan
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
2,956,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,693,821
|
|
|
$
|
253,035
|
*
|
|
|
|
* |
|
In accordance with the terms of the Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan and the Executive Retirement Plan,
Mr. Essner elected to notionally roll over his entire
accrued benefits (minus applicable employment taxes) under the
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan ($20,541,437) and the
Executive Retirement Plan ($8,907,502) into the Deferred
Compensation Plan. As a result of such notional rollover,
Mr. Essner did not receive any payments from the
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan or the Executive
Retirement Plan in 2008. In addition, Wyeths obligations
to Mr. Essner under the Supplemental Executive Retirement
Plan and the Executive Retirement Plan were extinguished. Based
on the notional rollover election and in accordance with tax
rules (including 409A), Mr. Essner became eligible to
receive the amounts notionally rolled over (plus accrued
interest) into the Deferred Compensation Plan as follows: as of
the first quarter of 2009, $15,070,659 and as of July 1,
2009, $14,378,280 (minus applicable employment taxes). The
amount Mr. Essner became eligible to receive in the first
quarter of 2009 includes an increase in his accrued benefits
under the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and the
Executive Retirement Plan after December 31, 2008, as a
result of the annual cash incentive award (i.e., cash bonus) he
earned for 2008. See Non-Qualified Deferred
Compensation beginning on page 218. |
|
|
|
Dr. Ruffolo, who retired effective August 1, 2008,
elected to receive his Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
and Executive Retirement Plan accrued benefits in the form of a
lump sum and did not elect to notionally roll over these
benefits into any other Wyeth plan. Based on this election and
in accordance with tax rules (including 409A), he became
eligible to receive these benefits as of the first quarter of
2009 in the amounts of $1,850,802 and $3,058,748 (minus
applicable employment taxes) from the Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan and the Executive Retirement Plan, respectively,
plus accrued interest. |
|
|
|
Each of Mr. Essner and Dr. Ruffolo received a lump-sum
payment under the Wyeth Retirement Plan U.S. in
the amounts shown in the column entitled Payments During
Last Fiscal Year above in connection with his retirement. |
|
(1) |
|
The number of years of credited service in the Executive
Retirement Plan for Mr. Poussot includes the time that
Mr. Poussot worked for an international affiliate of Wyeth.
As discussed in detail in the narrative preceding this table,
the Executive Retirement Plan grants each participant three
additional years of service to a maximum of 30 years. |
|
|
|
The present value of the accumulated benefits related to the
three additional years of service credited (maximum total
credited service cannot exceed 30 years) under the
Executive Retirement Plan for Mr. Norden, Mr. Mahady,
Mr. Stein and Dr. Ruffolo is $534,059, $156,930,
$1,214,980 and $1,387,543, respectively. For Mr. Essner,
the present value of the accumulated benefits related to the
three additional years of service credited under the Executive
Retirement Plan was $3,838,499. For Mr. Poussot, the
present value of accumulated benefits related to the additional
years of service credited under the Executive Retirement |
217
|
|
|
|
|
Plan is $4,797,998, of which $1,940,755 is related to the three
additional years of service and $2,857,243 is related to his
4.4 years of service with an international affiliate of
Wyeth. |
As of December 31, 2008, each of Messrs. Poussot,
Mahady and Stein satisfied the provisions of each of the three
plans that would permit them to retire (age 55 and five
years of service) and commence receipt of benefits. If each of
Messrs. Poussot, Mahady or Stein had retired effective as
of January 1, 2009 (i.e., a December 31, 2008
termination of employment), he could have elected to receive his
benefit in the form of a lump sum. The estimated amount of the
lump sum would have been as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
Name
|
|
Lump Sum as of January 1, 2009
|
|
Mr. Poussot
|
|
$
|
22,208,574
|
|
Mr. Mahady
|
|
$
|
14,869,316
|
|
Mr. Stein
|
|
$
|
8,279,968
|
|
For Mr. Norden, who did not satisfy the provisions of the
plans that would permit him to retire and commence receipt of
benefits as of December 31, 2008, the estimated present
value as of January 1, 2009 of the lump sum that would be
payable at age 55 assuming a termination date as of
December 31, 2008, would be $3,954,639.
The discount rate and mortality table for determining lump sums
are different from the financial assumptions used to calculate
the present value of accumulated benefits displayed in the
larger Pension Benefits table. The
actuarial assumptions used to determine the above estimated lump
sums at January 1, 2009 are a discount rate and a mortality
table as specified in the Wyeth Retirement Plan
U.S. (GATT mortality). The discount rate is determined
quarterly as defined in the Wyeth Retirement Plan
U.S. and was 4.5% for the preceding calculations.
Non-Qualified
Deferred Compensation
Our
Plans
We maintain two non-qualified deferred compensation plans in
which our named executive officers may participate: the
Supplemental Employee Savings Plan and the Deferred Compensation
Plan.
Supplemental
Employee Savings Plan
We maintain a tax-qualified 401(k) savings plan, the Wyeth
Savings Plan, which is our broad-based savings plan, in which
all non-union U.S. employees who have attained age 21
are eligible to participate. The Wyeth Savings Plan allows
employees to save up to 50% of covered pay (salary, overtime,
sales commissions or sales bonuses) on a before-tax basis,
after-tax basis, or a combination of both and receive a Company
match of 50% on the first 6% of covered pay that the employee
contributes.
The Supplemental Employee Savings Plan supplements the Wyeth
Savings Plan and provides a means for eligible employees to
receive the employer matching contribution on any salary, sales
commission or sales bonus that cannot otherwise be matched in
the Wyeth Savings Plan. The Wyeth Savings Plan is subject to
federal law that limits the amount of annual earnings that may
be used to determine contributions under the plan ($230,000 for
2008). In addition, the law limits the annual
additions (which include before-tax, after-tax and Company
matching contributions) that may be made to a savings plan. For
2008, the dollar limit on annual additions was $46,000. For
2008, there also was an annual limitation of $15,500 ($20,500
for employees over age 50) on employee pre-tax
contributions.
Participants in the Supplemental Employee Savings Plan may
choose from a number of investment options, which are the same
as those offered in the Wyeth Savings Plan and are as follows:
Fidelity International Discovery; Spartan U.S. Equity
Index; Fidelity Low Priced Stock; Morgan Stanley Institutional
Fund Trust Value Portfolio Advisor Class;
Wyeth Common Stock Fund; Fidelity Magellan; Fidelity Real Estate
Investment; Fidelity Capital Appreciation; Oppenheimer
Developing Markets; Robertson Stephens Partners; Fidelity
Balanced; Interest Income; Fidelity High Income; Fidelity New
Markets Income; PIMCO
218
Total Return Administrative Class; Fidelity Freedom
2005; Fidelity Freedom 2010; Fidelity Freedom 2015; Fidelity
Freedom 2020; Fidelity Freedom 2025; Fidelity Freedom 2030;
Fidelity Freedom 2035; Fidelity Freedom 2040; Fidelity Freedom
2045; Fidelity Freedom 2050.
Earnings are calculated based on an individual
participants investment selection. Participants may change
investment selections daily. Supplemental Employee Savings Plan
distributions generally are available only following termination
and only in a lump sum.
Deferred
Compensation Plan
We offer employees earning a base salary of $155,000 or more,
including our named executive officers, the ability to defer a
portion of their annual cash compensation, including salary,
annual cash incentive awards (i.e., cash bonuses), sales
commissions and sales bonuses. As with the Supplemental Employee
Savings Plan, earnings are calculated based on an individual
executives investment selection. The Deferred Compensation
Plan offers both in-service and retirement distribution options
and offers distributions in the form of lump sums and
installments. Participants may direct investments, and earnings
track the following types of fund options: Balanced Portfolio,
International Portfolio, Large Cap Portfolio, Large Cap Value
Portfolio, Small Cap Value Portfolio, S&P 500 Index
Portfolio, Company Stock Fund and Market Interest Option.
The following table presents a summary of the activity in the
Supplemental Employee Savings Plan and the Deferred Compensation
Plan for our named executive officers in 2008. The aggregate
balance at last fiscal year-end represents participant
contributions, Company match and earnings/losses on those
amounts, as well as, in the case of Mr. Essner, the
notional rollover of his accrued benefit under the Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan and the Executive Retirement Plan into
the Deferred Compensation Plan in 2008 in connection with his
retirement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
|
Registrant
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions in
|
|
|
Contributions in
|
|
|
Earnings in
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last Fiscal
|
|
|
Last Fiscal
|
|
|
Last Fiscal
|
|
|
Withdrawals/
|
|
|
Last Fiscal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year(1)
|
|
|
Year(2)
|
|
|
Year(3)
|
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
Year-End(4)
|
|
Name
|
|
Plan Name
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Bernard Poussot
|
|
Deferred Compensation Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Employee Savings Plan
|
|
$
|
75,826
|
|
|
$
|
37,913
|
|
|
$
|
37,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
867,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
75,826
|
|
|
$
|
37,913
|
|
|
$
|
37,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
867,982
|
|
Gregory Norden
|
|
Deferred Compensation Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Employee Savings Plan
|
|
$
|
34,150
|
|
|
$
|
17,075
|
|
|
$
|
8,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
224,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
34,150
|
|
|
$
|
17,075
|
|
|
$
|
8,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
224,845
|
|
Joseph M. Mahady
|
|
Deferred Compensation Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,104,658
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Employee Savings Plan
|
|
$
|
43,700
|
|
|
$
|
21,850
|
|
|
|
(153,084
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
43,700
|
|
|
$
|
21,850
|
|
|
$
|
(144,138
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,464,872
|
|
Lawrence V. Stein
|
|
Deferred Compensation Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Employee Savings Plan
|
|
$
|
31,299
|
|
|
$
|
15,650
|
|
|
$
|
(106,438
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
260,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
31,299
|
|
|
$
|
15,650
|
|
|
$
|
(106,438
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
260,675
|
|
Mikael
Dolsten, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
Deferred Compensation Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Employee Savings Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Essner
|
|
Deferred Compensation Plan
|
|
$
|
27,799,775
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
922,393
|
|
|
$
|
4,773,847
|
|
|
$
|
28,535,716
|
(6)
|
|
|
Supplemental Employee Savings Plan
|
|
|
42,376
|
|
|
$
|
21,188
|
|
|
|
69,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,504,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
27,842,151
|
|
|
$
|
21,188
|
|
|
$
|
992,068
|
|
|
$
|
4,773,847
|
|
|
$
|
30,040,017
|
|
Robert R. Ruffolo, Jr., Ph.D
|
|
Deferred Compensation Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Employee Savings Plan
|
|
$
|
15,658
|
|
|
$
|
7,829
|
|
|
$
|
14,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
324,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
15,658
|
|
|
$
|
7,829
|
|
|
$
|
14,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
324,304
|
|
219
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the aggregate amount of each named executive
officers deferral contributions in 2008 as well as the
notional rollover of Mr. Essners accrued benefit
under certain of our pension plans. See notes 5 and 6
below. All of the Supplemental Employee Savings Plan
contributions for 2008 are included as part of salary in the
Summary Compensation Table. Other than
Mr. Essners notional rollover, none of our named
executive officers elected to defer compensation into the
Deferred Compensation Plan in 2008. See
Pension Benefits beginning on
page 214. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the aggregate amount of Wyeths contributions in
2008 to the Supplemental Employee Savings Plan on behalf of each
named executive officer. These amounts are included as part of
total compensation in the Summary Compensation
Table for 2008 under the column entitled All Other
Compensation. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the dollar amount of aggregate interest or other
earnings/losses credited in 2008. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents account balances at December 31, 2008.
Supplemental Employee Savings Plan balances as of
December 31, 2008 were invested as follows: for
Mr. Poussot (invested in Interest Income); for
Mr. Norden (invested in Interest Income); for
Mr. Mahady (invested in Spartan U.S. Equity Index and Wyeth
Common Stock Fund); for Mr. Stein (invested in Interest
Income, Fidelity International Discovery, Fidelity Magellan,
Morgan Stanley Institutional
Fund Trust Value Advisor Class, Spartan
U.S. Equity Index and Wyeth Common Stock Fund); for
Mr. Essner (invested in Interest Income) and for
Dr. Ruffolo (invested in Interest Income). Deferred
Compensation Plan balances as of December 31, 2008 were
invested as follows: for Mr. Mahady (invested in the
Balanced Portfolio, the International Portfolio, the Small Cap
Value Portfolio and the Market Interest Option) and for
Mr. Essner (invested in the Market Interest Option). Of
these account balances, the following amounts were reported to
the named executive officer in the Summary
Compensation Table for 2006, 2007 and 2008 as salary and
all other compensation: for Mr. Poussot, $255,258, for
Mr. Norden, $83,448, for Mr. Mahady, $158,955, for
Mr. Essner, $328,659 and for Dr. Ruffolo, $116,916. In
addition, of these account balances, $46,949 was reported to
Mr. Stein in the Summary Compensation
Table for 2008 as salary and all other compensation. See
notes 1 and 2 above for additional information regarding
amounts reported as compensation in the
Summary Compensation Table in 2008
beginning on page 203. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents Mr. Essners notional rollover of his
accrued benefit under the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
and the Executive Retirement Plan in the aggregate amount of
$28,398,149 (minus applicable employment taxes) to the Deferred
Compensation Plan in 2008 in connection with his retirement. An
additional aggregate amount of $1,050,790 (minus any applicable
employment taxes) under the Supplemental Executive Retirement
Plan and the Executive Retirement Plan was notionally rolled
over in the first quarter of 2009. This additional aggregate
amount reflects the increase in Mr. Essners accrued
benefits under these plans as a result of the annual cash
incentive award (i.e., cash bonus) he earned for 2008. |
|
(6) |
|
Amounts include the $28,398,149 (exclusive of employment taxes)
notionally rolled over from the Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan and the Executive Retirement Plan to the
Deferred Compensation Plan, of which $14,019,869 (minus
applicable employment taxes) was distributed in January 2009. |
Certain of our named executive officers were required to defer
the receipt of shares under equity awards (other than options)
granted prior to April 21, 2005 until retirement or other
termination. For awards granted on or after April 21, 2005
but before November 15, 2007, deferral was permissive
rather than mandatory. Deferral is no longer a feature of our
equity awards. All such deferred shares were credited to a
restricted stock trust that is not credited with interest;
however, shares in the restricted stock trust are credited with
dividends, as and when dividends are issued to our stockholders
and at the same rate. As indicated in the table above entitled
Securities Owned by Management, many of our named
executive officers have a significant amount of Wyeth common
stock that has been earned in respect of prior performance but
that may not be received or disposed of by the executive prior
to termination. These deferred shares are not included in the
above table.
220
Potential
Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
Our generally applicable company policies and plans provide for
certain benefits upon retirement or a change in control. In
addition, we have entered into change in control severance
agreements with members of our senior management and other key
employees, which are described below. We also entered into an
employment agreement with Mr. Essner in January 2007 (which
was amended in December 2007), a post-employment consulting
agreement with Dr. Ruffolo and a severance arrangement with
Dr. Dolsten, each of which is described below.
For information regarding potential payments and benefits to our
executive officers and directors in connection with our
contemplated merger with Pfizer, see Proposal 1: The
Merger Interests of Certain Persons in the
Merger beginning on page 98. The discussion below is
required to be included in the proxy statement for our annual
meeting each year and, in accordance with SEC rules, all
information described in this section is presented as if a
triggering event occurred on December 31, 2008, and does
not reflect our contemplated merger with Pfizer.
Generally
Applicable Company Policies and Plans
Severance. As described below, we have entered
into change in control severance agreements with members of
senior management and other key employees that provide for
severance and other benefits following a change in control if we
or the surviving company terminates his or her employment other
than for cause or he or she terminates his or her
employment for good reason. Executives and other
U.S. employees who do not have change in control severance
agreements may be entitled to severance under our Special
Transaction Severance Plan if their employment is terminated by
the surviving company without cause or the employee terminates
his or her employment with good reason following a change in
control. We have also agreed to provide specified benefits under
Mr. Essners amended employment agreement, payments
under Dr. Ruffolos post-employment consulting
agreement and severance under Dr. Dolstens severance
arrangement following termination of employment, each as
described below. In all other circumstances, our Compensation
Committee retains full discretion to provide or decline to
provide severance payments or benefits to named executive
officers upon termination of employment.
Pension Benefits. Our pension plans are
described under the section entitled Pension
Benefits. The disclosure in that section includes
estimated lump sums as of January 1, 2009 for each of
Messrs. Poussot, Mahady and Stein, and an estimate of the
present value as of January 1, 2009 of a lump sum payable
at age 55 for Mr. Norden under our pension plans. That
section also includes the actual lump-sum payment under the
Wyeth Retirement Plan U.S. and a description of
the lump sum elections and estimated payments to which
Mr. Essner and Dr. Ruffolo will be entitled following
the six-month and one-year holding periods in connection with
their retirements. Incremental increases in pension benefits
under our change in control severance agreements are described
under Change in Control Severance
Agreements beginning on page 223.
Health and Welfare Benefits. Under
company-wide plans, U.S. employees who are both age 55
or older and have completed 10 or more years of service at the
time they separate from employment with Wyeth are eligible to
participate in our retiree medical program following retirement.
For Messrs. Poussot, Mahady and Stein, who by virtue of
their age and years of service are entitled to retiree medical
benefits upon any termination of employment, the estimated
present value of these benefits if any of them terminated for
any reason as of December 31, 2008 would have been
$194,537, $206,080 and $178,416, respectively. In addition,
Mr. Essner, who by virtue of his age and years of service
was entitled to retiree medical benefits in connection with his
retirement during 2008, is receiving retiree medical benefits
with an estimated present value of $160,883 as of
December 31, 2008. Dr. Ruffolo was not eligible for
retiree medical benefits in connection with his retirement, as
he did not satisfy the ten-year service requirement. In the
event of the death of Messrs. Poussot, Mahady, Essner or
Stein, respectively, as of such date, Mr. Poussots
spouse would have been entitled to receive medical benefits with
an estimated present value of $104,550, Mr. Mahadys
spouse would have been entitled to receive medical benefits with
an estimated present value of $109,313, Mr. Essners
spouse would have been entitled to receive medical benefits with
an estimated present value of $90,219 and
221
Mr. Steins dependent children would have been
entitled to receive medical benefits with an estimated present
value of $98,135. Mr. Norden and Dr. Dolsten did not
meet the age and service requirements for retiree medical
benefits as of December 31, 2008. See
Change in Control Severance Agreements
beginning on page 223 for a discussion of continued health
and welfare benefits available as a result of those agreements.
Vesting
of Equity
Retirement. Under our company-wide stock
incentive plans, participants in the United States who are both
age 55 or older and who have completed at least five years
of service at the time they separate from employment with Wyeth
are entitled to vesting of outstanding stock options and RSUs
upon their retirement. Under the terms of the applicable award
agreements, the retiring individual is entitled to continue to
hold his or her stock options following retirement for the
balance of the original option term. For performance share unit
awards, as the performance cycle for each prior grant completes,
the units held by the retiring individual will convert, if, when
and to the extent performance is achieved. In each such case,
these awards are subject to certain non-competition
requirements. For RSUs, this generally means that the individual
is entitled to full conversion of the units into stock upon
retirement. However, the 120,000 RSUs awarded to
Mr. Poussot on January 2, 2008, in connection with his
promotion to Chief Executive Officer do not vest upon retirement
and accordingly would be subject to forfeiture to the extent not
vested on his retirement date prior to vesting.
For Messrs. Poussot, Mahady and Stein, who met the
eligibility requirements under our various stock incentive plans
for retirement as of December 31, 2008, the estimated value
of unvested equity awards that would have vested in the event of
retirement on December 31, 2008 would have been as follows
(assuming performance share unit awards are earned at target):
For Mr. Poussot $0 for stock options and
$11,421,795 for performance share unit awards, for
Mr. Mahady $0 for stock options and $4,217,624
for performance share unit awards, and for
Mr. Stein $0 for stock options and $2,956,351
for performance share unit awards. For Mr. Essner and
Dr. Ruffolo, who met the eligibility requirements under our
various stock incentive plans for retirement as of their 2008
retirement dates, the value of unvested equity awards that
vested upon their respective retirement dates, together with the
estimated value of unvested performance share unit awards at
December 31, 2008 (assuming performance share unit awards
are earned at target) was as follows: For
Mr. Essner $973,100 for stock options and
$12,963,456 for performance share unit awards, and for
Dr. Ruffolo $0 for stock options and $1,922,388
for performance share unit awards. As of December 31, 2008,
Mr. Norden and Dr. Dolsten were not
retirement-eligible under our various stock incentive plans.
Change in Control. Under our company-wide
stock incentive plans, upon a change in control, such as our
contemplated merger with Pfizer, all unvested stock options,
performance share unit awards and RSUs immediately vest. In the
case of performance share unit awards granted in 2007 and 2008,
these awards would convert to shares of our common stock at 80%
of target upon a change in control, rather than 0% to 200% of
target based on future performance with respect to named
executive officers. Assuming a change in control had occurred on
December 31, 2008, the estimated value of unvested equity
awards that would have vested upon such change in control would
have been as follows: For Mr. Poussot $0 for
stock options, $9,137,436 for performance share unit awards and
$4,501,200 for RSUs; for Mr. Norden $0 for
stock options, $2,438,150 for performance share unit awards and
$1,078,413 for RSUs; for Mr. Mahady $0 for
stock options and $3,374,025 for performance share unit awards;
for Mr. Stein $0 for stock options and
$2,365,006 for performance share unit awards; and for
Dr. Dolsten $0 for stock options and $3,075,820
for performance share unit awards. Mr. Essners and
Dr. Ruffolos performance share unit awards also would
have converted upon a change in control to shares of our common
stock at 80% of target in the case of the 2007 awards and at
100% of target in the case of the 2008 awards, rather than 0% to
200% of target based on future performance. Assuming a change in
control had occurred on December 31, 2008, the estimated
value of their performance share unit awards that would have
vested upon such a change in control would have been as follows:
For Mr. Essner $11,523,072 and for
Dr. Ruffolo $1,537,910.
222
Death. Under the terms of our equity awards,
death is afforded the same treatment as retirement other than
with respect to the 120,000 RSUs granted to Mr. Poussot in
connection with his promotion in January 2008, which would vest
upon death but not on retirement. Accordingly, if any named
executive officer had died as of December 31, 2008, his
equity awards would have become vested, and based on those same
assumptions, the estimated values would have been the same as
those set forth under Retirement above in the case
of Messrs. Poussot, Mahady and Stein, together with, in the
case of Mr. Poussot, $4,501,200 for RSUs, and would have
been as follows for Mr. Norden and Dr. Dolsten: for
Mr. Norden $0 for stock options, $3,047,688 for
performance share awards and $1,078,413 for RSUs; and for
Dr. Dolsten $0 for stock options and $3,844,775
for performance share unit awards. For Mr. Essner and
Dr. Ruffolo, the estimated values would have been the same
as those shown for their performance share unit awards under
Retirement above.
Computation of Values. The calculations in
this Vesting of Equity section are based on the per
share closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on
December 31, 2008, which was $37.51, except that
calculations for stock options vested upon the 2008 retirements
of Mr. Essner and Dr. Ruffolo are based on the per
share closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on their
respective July 1, 2008, and August 1, 2008 effective
retirement dates, which were $47.19 and $40.24, respectively. In
the case of stock options, these amounts represent the aggregate
spread (i.e., the difference between the exercise price and the
closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2008 or
their respective retirement dates); in the case of performance
share unit awards, these amounts represent an assumed full
conversion of these awards to shares of our common stock at 100%
of target except in the event of a change in control, in which
case, the performance share unit awards generally vest at 80% of
target (and not including performance share unit awards granted
in 2006 because these awards were converted to shares of our
common stock at 136% of target in February 2009 and are reported
in the table in the section titled Option Exercises and
Stock Vested in 2008 beginning on page 213); and in
the case of RSUs, these amounts represent the value of the
common stock issuable upon conversion of such units as of
December 31, 2008. In the case of retirement or death, the
actual number of shares received upon conversion of the
performance share unit awards could be between 0% and 200% of
target amounts.
Other
We also provide life insurance and other benefits to our named
executive officers on substantially the same basis as provided
to our other employees. Employees, including named executive
officers, may also purchase voluntary life insurance coverage.
Change
in Control Severance Agreements
We have entered into change in control severance agreements with
approximately 30 members of our senior management team,
including each of our named executive officers. We also have
entered into change in control severance agreements with
approximately 532 other key employees; however, these agreements
have important differences from those entered into with our
senior management team (e.g., the change in control severance
agreements entered into with our other key employees generally
provide for severance and other benefits on the basis of a
two-year severance period rather than a three-year severance
period). Because Mr. Essners and
Dr. Ruffolos change in control severance agreements
terminated in connection with their retirements, they are
excluded from the following discussion.
The change in control severance agreements are intended to
provide for continuity of management in the event of a potential
change in control of Wyeth, such as our contemplated merger with
Pfizer, and generally provide that if a change in control of
Wyeth occurs, the executive will receive a one-time, cash
severance payment, as well as other benefits, if we or the
surviving company terminates his or her employment other than
for cause or he or she terminates his or her
employment for good reason (each as described below).
223
The change in control agreements were introduced in 1998 in
order to help retain our executive officers and key employees in
an environment of publicized potential merger discussions and
growing concerns about the potential impact of our diet drug
litigation. In determining the severance multiples, other
benefits and triggering events under these agreements, the
Compensation Committee and the Wyeth board of directors surveyed
and evaluated similar arrangements at a wide range of large
companies, including many of the companies in our peer group,
and determined that these terms were consistent with prevailing
norms and appropriate in light of the Wyeth and industry
environment described above, after consultation with both
outside counsel and the Compensation Committees
compensation consultant. These agreements have proved critically
important over the years in retaining and continuing to attract
key talent to successfully manage our Company through industry
consolidation, rapid change in the pharmaceutical industry
environment, important new product launches, the challenges of
our diet drug litigation and the negative impact on the revenue
of our Premarin family from the July 2002 hormone therapy
subset of the Womens Health Initiative study.
In response to the changed circumstances of both our Company and
the pharmaceutical industry, the Compensation Committee
undertook a review of the 1998 agreements in 2006. The
Compensation Committee, in consultation with both outside
counsel and its compensation consultant, determined that while
these agreements remained important in attracting and retaining
key executives in light of industry consolidation and
competitiveness and while they generally were consistent with
prevailing norms, the potential payments and benefits under the
1998 agreements could be reduced without compromising the
retention of our key employees or our competitiveness in
attracting key talent. Accordingly, the 2006 agreements sought
to align certain terms of these agreements more closely with the
then current industry benchmark and to streamline certain
provisions. The 2006 agreements continue to provide appropriate
protection to senior managers (including the named executive
officers) and other key employees if a change in control occurs
and the individuals employment is terminated, allowing
these executives and employees to minimize individual employment
concerns when considering and facilitating corporate
transactions that are in the best interests of our stockholders.
These agreements also are intended to help retain executives and
other key employees during continued industry consolidation.
In August 2006, we gave notice to all employees (including both
the senior management team and the other key employees) with
whom we maintain these change in control severance agreements
that the change in control severance agreements established in
1998, which we refer to as the 1998 agreements, would not be
extended beyond the year ending December 31, 2008 (the
earliest possible termination date under the terms of the 1998
agreements). This meant that if we had undergone a change in
control on or prior to December 31, 2008, the provisions of
the 1998 agreements would have been applicable to that
transaction and would have governed a termination of employment
for 36 months thereafter. In connection with that notice,
we also entered into replacement change in control severance
agreements, which we refer to as the 2006 agreements, with those
members of senior management and other key employees that would
apply to change in control transactions occurring on or after
January 1, 2009. Newly hired executives (such as
Dr. Dolsten) who received a change in control severance
agreement following that notice received only the 2006
agreement, which applied immediately in their case. In 2007, we
further amended all change in control severance agreements to
comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
The 2006 agreements generally reduced the benefits available to
executives (as compared to the 1998 agreements) upon a
termination following a change in control by, among other
things, including only salary and bonus in the severance
calculation and eliminating from the severance calculation an
amount equal to the value of stock options and restricted stock
and/or
performance share units granted to the executive. The 2006
agreements also changed the bonus component of the severance
calculation by moving from the highest bonus in the prior five
years to the average of the three highest bonuses over the prior
five years. The 2006 agreements also eliminated the provision in
the 1998 agreements permitting a member of the senior management
team (including named executive officers) to terminate his or
her employment during the 90 days following the first
anniversary of a change in control for any reason, with that
termination constituting a termination for good reason and
thereby entitling the executive to payment of severance and
other benefits.
224
General
Description of Our Change in Control Severance
Agreements
The 2006 change in control severance agreements apply to change
in control transactions occurring on or after January 1,
2009, and through December 31, 2011, and would govern
employment termination events for up to 36 months following
a change in control transaction. The 2006 agreements will
automatically extend in one-year increments unless we provide a
notice of non-renewal no later than September 30 in the year two
years prior to the December 31 termination date. A change in
control as defined in the agreements would include any of the
following events:
|
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of 20% or more of our voting securities by any
person or persons acting in concert;
|
|
|
|
the consummation of any merger or business combination involving
us, the sale or lease of our assets or any combination of the
foregoing unless in any case our stockholders retain at least
65% of the resulting entity; or
|
|
|
|
the replacement of a majority of our directors (or their
designees) during a two-year period.
|
The proposed merger with Pfizer, if consummated, would
constitute a change in control under these agreements.
The 2006 agreements generally provide that if a change in
control of Wyeth occurs, the executive will receive a one-time,
lump-sum cash severance payment, as well as other benefits, if
we or the surviving company terminate his or her employment
other than for cause or the executive terminates his
or her employment for good reason.
For the 30 members of senior management (including the named
executive officers), under the 2006 agreements, if following a
change in control the executive is terminated for any reason
other than for cause or if the executive terminates
his or her employment for good reason, then the
executive would be entitled to a one-time, lump-sum cash
severance payment equal to three times the sum of (x) the
executives annual base salary as in effect at the time of
the change in control (or, if increased thereafter, as in effect
at such time) and (y) the average of the executives
three highest bonuses (annual cash incentive awards) over the
prior five years, or if the executive has less than three years
of bonus history, the average of the actual years (the
Bonus amount). If however, the executive has not
been awarded one full-years bonus, then the
executives bonus would be equal to 100% of base salary for
the members of our senior management team. All of our named
executive officers other than Dr. Dolsten have more than
three years of bonus history. The executive also would receive a
lump-sum cash payment equal to the pro rata portion of the Bonus
amount for the year in which the executives employment
terminates, calculated through the date of termination. Under
the 2006 agreements, an executive would be entitled to these
severance and other benefits if, following the signing of an
agreement for a change in control as defined in
Section 409A (but prior to the consummation), he or she is
terminated without cause at the request of the other party to
the agreement or otherwise in anticipation of the change in
control.
Under the 2006 agreements, termination for cause
generally consists of a conviction of, or a plea of guilty or no
contest to, a felony, or willful engagement in gross misconduct
that is materially and demonstrably injurious to us. Under the
2006 agreements, an executive can terminate his or her
employment for good reason for, among other things,
removal of the executive from his or her position or a
substantial diminution in the nature or status of his or her
responsibilities, a reduction in the executives base
salary or a failure to continue in effect any incentive
compensation (or equitable alternative) on the terms and level
of benefit at least as favorable as the terms and level of
benefit provided prior to the change in control, specified
relocations of the executives place of business, failure
to pay deferred compensation when due, failure to provide
benefits (in the aggregate) as favorable as existed prior to the
change in control, and failure of our successor to assume the
severance agreement.
An executive also would be entitled to the following additional
benefits pursuant to the 2006 agreements in the event his or her
employment terminates under qualifying circumstances following a
change in control:
|
|
|
|
|
On the date of termination, the executive would be given three
additional years of credit for age and service for purposes of
calculating the pension benefit to which he or she is entitled
under our Wyeth
|
225
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plan U.S., Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan and, if applicable, Executive Retirement Plan
and assuming, in calculating the benefit, that the executive
earned annually during the three additional years of service,
the same compensation (base salary and bonus) the executive
earned in the 12 months preceding the termination date or,
if greater, in the 12 months preceding the change in
control. Further, this benefit would be determined without any
reduction for the receipt of benefits prior to the normal
retirement age of 65 or age 60, as applicable, provided
that this eligibility for an unreduced pension payable at
age 55 is achieved only if, at the executives
termination, the sum of the executives age and years of
service equals or exceeds 60, after adding three years to both
service and age. All of our named executive officers other than
Dr. Dolsten would be eligible for the unreduced pension, in
all cases commencing not earlier than age 55.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If, at the time of termination, either (1) the executive is
age 50 or older on the termination date, or (2) the
sum of the executives age and years of service equals or
exceeds 60, after adding three years to both service and age,
the executive would be entitled to retiree medical coverage.
Retiree medical coverage begins after the completion of the
executives three years of benefit continuation described
below. All of our named executive officers are over age 50.
|
|
|
|
For three years from the date of termination, the executive
would be given continued coverage under our health and welfare
benefit plans (but excluding our disability plans) in which the
executive was participating immediately prior to the
termination. However, if welfare benefits are provided by a
subsequent employer, our obligation to provide those benefits
would terminate.
|
|
|
|
The executive would be entitled to a one-time cash payment equal
to $60,000, in lieu of the continuation of any fringe benefits.
|
|
|
|
The executive would be provided with outplacement or executive
recruiting services at a cost to us of no more than 10% of the
executives base salary (but in no event exceeding $25,000)
and payment by us of all legal fees and expenses reasonably
incurred by the executive, if any, in enforcing the agreement.
Because legal fees are purely speculative, these fees have not
been displayed in the Estimated Values of Post-Termination
Payments and Other Benefits under the 2006 Change in Control
Severance Agreements table following this discussion.
|
In addition, if any RSUs or stock options are terminated or
forfeited upon or following the termination of the
executives employment under the terms of any plan, the
executive would receive for any terminated or forfeited RSUs or
stock options an amount equal to the total of:
|
|
|
|
|
the cashout value (as defined in the agreements) of all the
shares covered by the RSUs forfeited (with units converted to
shares based on the target awards); and
|
|
|
|
the excess of (a) the cashout value of all the shares
subject to stock options that were forfeited over (b) the
aggregate exercise price of the shares subject to the forfeited
stock options.
|
To comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code,
to the extent the severance and other benefits under the 2006
agreements are deemed to provide a deferral of compensation
under Section 409A and the executive is a specified
employee (as such term is defined under Section 409A)
at the time of his or her dismissal, no payments or benefits
would be provided until six months after the date of separation
from service, or, if earlier, the date of death, at which point
we would be required to make a one-time, lump-sum cash payment
of the delayed amounts plus interest.
In the event that any payments made in connection with a change
in control were subjected to the excise tax imposed on excess
parachute payments by the Internal Revenue Code, under the 2006
agreements we would be obligated to
gross-up
the executives payments for all of these excise taxes plus
any federal, state and local income tax applicable to the excise
tax gross-up and for penalties and applicable
interest only if payments (net after tax) exceed 110% of the
executives or key employees so-called
safe-harbor amount (which is generally three times
the historical
W-2
compensation). If payments are between 100% and 110% of the
safe-harbor amount, the executive or key employee would be cut
back to $1.00 below the safe harbor amount, and we would not
have a
gross-up
obligation.
226
Under the terms of the 2006 agreements, executives have agreed
not to divulge any of our confidential information and are
prohibited from soliciting Wyeth employees or exclusive
long-term contractors to leave employment with Wyeth for two
years following the date of termination.
Estimated
Values of Post-Termination Payments and Other Benefits under the
2006 Change in Control Severance Agreements
The following table presents the estimated values of the
payments and other benefits that would have been provided to
each of our named executive officers upon an involuntary
termination following a change in control under the terms of our
2006 change in control severance agreements discussed above.
Because our 1998 change in control severance agreements
terminated on December 31, 2008, we have not presented these
agreements in the table below. For additional detail on the 1998
agreements, including calculations of severance and other
benefits under these agreements, see our proxy statement for our
2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
In preparing this table, in accordance with SEC rules, we have
assumed that a change in control occurred on December 31,
2008, that the named executive officer was immediately
terminated, and that the 2006 change in control severance
agreements were in effect and applicable as of December 31,
2008.
As further described in the narrative following the table, the
table below is intended to reflect only estimated incremental
post-termination payments and other benefits attributable to the
2006 change in control severance agreements and accordingly does
not include (1) estimated amounts that would be realized
upon vesting of stock options, performance share unit awards and
RSUs upon a retirement or a change in control for all
participants generally under our stock incentive plans
(estimates of these amounts are provided under
Generally Applicable Company Policies and
Plans Vesting of Equity), (2) the
estimated value of pension and health and welfare benefits that
would be received upon termination of employment under our
pension and health and welfare plans absent the change in
control severance agreements (estimates of these amounts are
provided under Pension Benefits and
Generally Applicable Company Policies and
Plans), and (3) previously earned compensation the
receipt of which was deferred until retirement or other
termination (which is reported in the table in the section
entitled Non-Qualified Deferred
Compensation and the table entitled Securities Owned
by Management). Estimates of potentially required
gross-up
payments for excise and related taxes under our 2006 change in
control severance agreements are provided in the narrative
following the table.
The amounts presented in the following table are estimates only
and do not necessarily reflect the actual value of the payments
and other benefits that would be received by the named executive
officers, which would be known only at the time that employment
actually terminates and if a change in control were actually to
occur. Accordingly, see the narrative following the table for
additional explanations and assumptions made in making these
estimates.
Estimated
Values of Post-Termination Payments and Other Benefits under
2006 Change in Control Severance Agreements Assuming a Change in
Control and Qualifying Termination as of December 31, 2008
(for estimated values relating to our contemplated merger with
Pfizer, see Chapter 1: The Merger
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Cash
|
|
|
|
Incremental
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
Incremental
|
|
Health and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
Award (i.e.,
|
|
Pension
|
|
Welfare
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Severance
|
|
Bonus)
|
|
Benefits
|
|
Benefits
|
|
Perquisites
|
|
Total
|
|
Bernard Poussot
|
|
$
|
9,310,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,653,333
|
|
|
$
|
12,932,574
|
|
|
$
|
7,872
|
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
23,988,779
|
|
Gregory Norden
|
|
$
|
3,925,100
|
|
|
$
|
538,367
|
|
|
$
|
8,044,659
|
|
|
$
|
225,322
|
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
12,818,448
|
|
Joseph M. Mahady
|
|
$
|
5,690,300
|
|
|
$
|
971,767
|
|
|
$
|
5,601,159
|
|
|
$
|
6,390
|
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
12,354,616
|
|
Lawrence V. Stein
|
|
$
|
4,850,160
|
|
|
$
|
892,500
|
|
|
$
|
2,312,578
|
|
|
$
|
4,284
|
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
8,144,522
|
|
Mikael Dolsten, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
$
|
4,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
|
$
|
496,838
|
|
|
$
|
225,193
|
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,057,031
|
|
227
Cash Severance. Amounts shown in the above
table represent estimated cash severance payments calculated in
accordance with the 2006 change in control severance agreements
assuming a transaction and termination at December 31, 2008.
Termination Year Cash Incentive Award (i.e.,
Bonus). Amounts shown in the above table
represent a pro-rated annual award (100% because termination is
assumed to occur as of December 31, 2008) based on the
average of the named executive officers three highest
annual cash incentive awards over the prior five years, or 100%
of base salary in the case of Dr. Dolsten.
Incremental Pension Benefits. Amounts shown in
the above table represent the estimated incremental pension
benefits associated with termination following a change in
control. Specifically, the amounts shown represent the
incremental increase under the agreements (from a retirement
absent a change in control) in the lump-sum value of benefits
based on a retirement following a change in control on
December 31, 2008 for Mr. Poussot, Mr. Mahady and
Mr. Stein and the incremental increase in the present value
of the lump-sum value payable at age 55 for Mr. Norden
and Dr. Dolsten.
Under our pension plans, individuals may elect to receive
pension benefits (including the incremental benefit from the
change in control severance agreements) in a lump sum or various
annuity forms. In accordance with the applicable plan documents,
the lump-sum benefits were calculated with a discount rate of
4.50%, which is determined quarterly, and GATT mortality. The
total (not incremental) annual single life annuity would be
$2,367,633 for Mr. Poussot, $1,346,600 for Mr. Mahady
and $742,233 for Mr. Stein commencing immediately, and for
Mr. Norden $931,648 and for Dr. Dolsten $40,077
commencing at age 55, and, absent a change in control, the
total single life annuity per year for their lives would be
$1,496,301 for Mr. Poussot, $978,142 for Mr. Mahady
and $580,187 for Mr. Stein commencing immediately, and
$307,043 for Mr. Norden commencing at age 55.
Dr. Dolsten did not meet the service requirement for
participation in Wyeths retirement plans as of
December 31, 2008. However, in the event of a change in
control, Dr. Dolsten would be granted additional service
credit making him eligible to receive retirement benefits under
the 2006 agreement.
Incremental Health and Welfare Benefits. As
described above, under retirement policies generally applicable
to all U.S. salaried employees, Messrs. Poussot,
Mahady and Stein by virtue of their age and years of service are
entitled to retiree medical benefits upon any termination. In
addition, under the 2006 change in control severance agreements,
three years of continuation of certain other welfare benefits
also would be provided, which comprise the incremental amounts
shown for Messrs. Poussot, Mahady and Stein in the above
table. Mr. Norden and Dr. Dolsten each would become
eligible for retiree medical benefits and three years of dental,
life insurance and other retiree benefits under the terms of the
2006 change in control severance agreements, and the amounts
shown in the table above represent the estimated value of these
benefits.
Perquisites. The amounts shown in the above
table represent a $60,000 payment in lieu of continuation of
perquisites and $25,000 for outplacement services.
Gross-Up
for Excise Taxes. The above table does not
include additional potentially required
gross-up
payments for excise and related taxes that might be payable in
connection with a change in control under our 2006 change in
control severance agreements. In general, Section 4999 of
the Internal Revenue Code imposes a 20% excise tax on an
executive on certain payments made to him or her in connection
with a change in control. Our 2006 change in control severance
agreements generally provide that we will put our executives in
the same after-tax position that they would have been in but for
the imposition of this excise tax (each executive officer
otherwise remains responsible for his or her own income taxes).
In general, this excise tax is imposed upon payments and
benefits paid to the executive that are contingent upon a change
in control transaction, which in our case would include payments
and benefits under our change in control severance agreements as
well as pursuant to the terms of our stock incentive plans.
The following are estimates of
gross-up
payments under the 2006 change in control severance agreements,
calculated as if a change in control transaction had occurred on
December 31, 2008 and the executive had been terminated on
the same day, calculated by Hewitt Associates LLC:
$17.3 million for
228
Mr. Poussot; $8.3 million for Mr. Norden;
$7.8 million for Mr. Mahady; $5.2 million for
Mr. Stein; and $4.6 million for Dr. Dolsten.
The foregoing estimates are based on a number of assumptions.
Facts and circumstances at the time of any change in control
transaction and termination thereafter as well as changes in the
applicable named executive officers compensation history
preceding such a transaction could materially impact whether and
to what extent the excise tax will be imposed and therefore the
amount of any potential
gross-up.
For purposes of performing these calculations, we have made the
following additional assumptions: for Messrs. Poussot and
Norden, an individual effective tax rate of 39.31% (composed of
a federal tax rate of 35.00%, a Pennsylvania state tax rate of
3.07% and FICA/FUTA of 1.45%), for Mr. Mahady, an
individual effective tax rate of 40.24% (composed of a federal
tax rate of 35.00%, a Pennsylvania state tax rate of 3.07%, a
local tax rate of 1.00% and FICA/FUTA of 1.45%), for
Mr. Stein, an individual effective tax rate of 44.79%
(composed of a federal tax rate of 35.00%, a New Jersey state
tax rate of 8.97% and FICA/FUTA of 1.45%), and for
Dr. Dolsten, an individual effective tax rate of 42.82%
(composed of a federal tax rate of 35.00%, a New York State tax
rate of 6.85% and FICA/FUTA of 1.45%) and 120% Applicable
Federal Semi-annual Rate (AFR) as of December 2008 (for
short-term 1.63%, mid-term 3.40% and long-term 5.28%). AFR is
applicable in determining the value of accelerating vesting of
stock options and RSUs in computing these excise taxes.
Other
Post-Employment Arrangements for Named Executive
Officers
Employment
Agreement Mr. Essner
On January 25, 2007, we entered into an employment
agreement with Mr. Essner in order to secure
Mr. Essners continued services as our Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer and his agreement that, following
termination of his employment, he will assist us with litigation
and regulatory matters and refrain from competing against us. At
the time of entering into the agreement, the Wyeth board of
directors determined that entry into the agreement was an
important retention tool, that the payments and benefits
available to Mr. Essner under the agreement were
appropriate in light of Mr. Essners role and
contribution to Wyeth and that such terms were competitive and
consistent with employment agreements entered into with other
chief executive officers at other large companies. While we have
not entered into employment agreements with any of our other
executive officers, the Wyeth board of directors believed that
it was in the best interests of Wyeth to enter into this
agreement with Mr. Essner in order to secure his continued
services and to assist Wyeth in its succession planning. The
agreement was recommended by the Compensation Committee and
approved by the Wyeth board of directors.
On December 20, 2007, Mr. Essner and we entered into a
letter agreement amending certain terms of the employment
agreement to reflect his announced retirement as Chief Executive
Officer effective as of January 1, 2008. In this proxy
statement/prospectus, we refer to the employment agreement as
amended by the letter agreement as Mr. Essners
amended employment agreement. The Compensation Committee
recommended and the Wyeth board of directors approved the
amended employment agreement in order to reflect
Mr. Essners announced retirement as Chief Executive
Officer and Mr. Essners agreement to remain as an
employee of Wyeth and as Chairman of the Wyeth board of
directors for a period of transition. The amended agreement
confirmed that Mr. Essner was not entitled to severance
payments or pension enhancements under the agreement as a result
of his retirement. Each of the Compensation Committee and
Mr. Essner utilized independent counsel to assist with the
development of the agreement and the amended agreement.
The amended employment agreement provided that Mr. Essner
would continue as an employee and Chairman of the Wyeth board of
directors until December 31, 2008, subject to earlier
termination (1) on 30 days notice (unless notice
is waived by the other party) at the election of Wyeth or
Mr. Essner or (2) on account of cause or
death. Under the agreement, termination for cause
generally consisted of a conviction of, or a plea of guilty or
no contest to, a felony, or willful engagement in gross
misconduct that is materially and demonstrably injurious to us.
Mr. Essners annual base salary rate for 2008 remained
unchanged from 2007 at $1,728,500, and he was eligible for an
annual cash incentive award (bonus) in respect of 2008 (no less
than the award he earned in respect of 2007, prorated for the
number of calendar days Mr. Essner was employed in 2008),
as determined by the Compensation Committee. This award was paid
in March 2009 and is reflected in the Summary Compensation
Table beginning on page 203. Under the terms of the
amended
229
employment agreement, Mr. Essner also was eligible to
receive a long-term equity incentive award in April 2008 as
determined by the Compensation Committee. This award was granted
in April 2008 and is reflected in the 2008 Grants of
Plan-Based
Awards table beginning on page 207.
The amended employment agreement provides that for a period of
five years after termination of his employment, Mr. Essner
will provide reasonable assistance to us with regulatory and
litigation matters as to which he had any particular knowledge
in connection with his employment at Wyeth. Mr. Essner also
has agreed not to compete against us or solicit any of our
employees or significant customers, clients or distributors
during this five-year period.
The amended employment agreement provided that, upon any
termination other than for cause or upon the expiration of the
term on December 31, 2008, Mr. Essner received his
salary through the date of termination and payment for any
accrued but unpaid vacation, he retained all of his rights to
benefits earned prior to termination under Company benefit plans
in which he participated, and he was entitled to payment of an
annual cash incentive award (bonus) for 2008 as described above,
prorated for the number of calendar days Mr. Essner was
employed in 2008. Mr. Essner also was entitled to vesting
of all outstanding time-based equity awards and
performance-based equity awards (if, when and to the extent
applicable performance targets are met) consistent with the
terms of our generally applicable Company equity plans and
retiree health and welfare benefits in accordance with our
generally applicable retirement policy. Until the earlier to
occur of (1) Mr. Essners death or (2) a
five-year period after any such termination of employment, we
also will provide to Mr. Essner reasonable home and
personal security, an office and secretarial support, up to
75 hours annually of personal use of company aircraft, and
access to a company-provided car and driver for occasional
personal use. To comply with Section 409A, the amended
agreement provided that Mr. Essner must pay for these
benefits for the first six months following termination and that
we would reimburse him for these payments following the end of
the six-month period. We are entitled to discontinue the
benefits referred to in the third sentence of this paragraph if
Mr. Essner fails to provide the post-termination assistance
or comply with the post-termination covenants described above.
Upon Mr. Essners retirement as an employee in June
2008, he became entitled to receive the benefits described in
the third sentence of the preceding paragraph, which had an
estimated value of $1.6 million as of his retirement date.
This amount is solely an estimate and does not necessarily
reflect the actual value of the benefits that Mr. Essner
will receive.
Consulting
Agreement Dr. Ruffolo
In connection with Dr. Ruffolos retirement, we
entered into a consulting agreement with Dr. Ruffolo and
Ruffolo Consulting, LLC (a company owned by Dr. Ruffolo),
effective as of August 1, 2008, pursuant to which
Dr. Ruffolo consults with and advises us on matters within
his expertise as we may reasonably request from time to time,
including assistance in regulatory matters and litigation, new
products
and/or
licensing matters, candidate assessment and transition support,
with Dr. Ruffolos services being limited to no more
than 20% of the average level of services performed by him over
the 36 months immediately preceding his retirement. The
consulting agreement, which may be terminated by any party on
90 days notice, is for a term of one year and may
continue for additional one-year terms at our election.
During the initial one-year term, we will pay to Ruffolo
Consulting, LLC consulting fees consisting of $25,000 per month,
together with reimbursement of expenses, if applicable.
Following the initial one-year term, if the term of the
consulting agreement is extended, we will pay to Ruffolo
Consulting, LLC consulting fees at a mutually agreed upon daily
rate for actual services rendered on an as needed basis. In
addition, Dr. Ruffolo was entitled to receive an annual
incentive compensation award for 2008 (pro-rated for the period
of his employment during 2008), in an amount determined by the
Compensation Committee in its sole discretion. This award was
paid to Dr. Ruffolo in a lump sum in March 2009 and is
reflected in the Summary Compensation
Table beginning on page 203.
230
Offer
Letter Dr. Dolsten
In connection with Dr. Dolstens employment, we agreed
that if Dr. Dolstens employment is terminated by us
for any reason other than gross misconduct, theft, conviction of
a felony, or under circumstances that would entitle him to any
payment under a change of control severance agreement, in
exchange for his execution of a waiver and release, we would
provide him with a severance benefit equal to two times his base
salary, at the rate in effect on the date immediately prior to
his termination. This severance benefit would be paid monthly
over a
24-month
period following such a termination; provided, however, that in
order to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue
Code, if Dr. Dolsten were a specified employee
(specified employees are identified annually as our 100 highest
statutory
W-2
compensated employees) on his termination date, no severance
payments would be made until the first day of the seventh month
following termination and he would receive on such date a
payment equal to seven months of base salary (7/24th of
total severance) and the balance of the severance benefit would
be paid in equal portions monthly thereafter. If
Dr. Dolstens employment had been terminated as of
December 31, 2008, absent a circumstance under which he
would be entitled to any payment under a change in control
agreement, he would have been entitled to aggregate severance
payments of $1,500,000, paid as described in the preceding
sentence.
231
TRANSACTIONS
WITH MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS
We retained the law firm of Pepper Hamilton LLP in connection
with various legal matters in 2008 and have paid or are expected
to pay approximately $3.35 million for these services. In
2009, we have retained and expect to continue to retain this
firm, with net billings of approximately $544,000 as of March
2009. Nina M. Gussack is a partner at Pepper Hamilton and the
sister-in-law
of Lawrence V. Stein, Senior Vice President and General Counsel
of Wyeth. As part of Pepper Hamiltons overall
representation of Wyeth, Ms. Gussack has provided
specialized legal advice regarding clinical trial and drug
development to Wyeth. Following Mr. Steins promotion
to General Counsel of Wyeth as of July 1, 2003, the Audit
Committee of the Wyeth board of directors established procedures
for hiring Pepper Hamilton while Mr. Stein is General
Counsel. Under these procedures, which require the approval of
the Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer for
retention, Mr. Stein is not directly involved in
determinations to retain Pepper Hamilton, although as General
Counsel he has a right to veto any retention which has been
approved.
In addition, in 2007 we entered into an employment agreement
with Mr. Essner, our former Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, and in 2008 we entered into a consulting agreement with
Dr. Ruffolo, our former Senior Vice President and
President, Wyeth Research, and Ruffolo Consulting LLC, each of
which is described under Executive
Compensation Potential Payments upon Termination or
Change in Control beginning on page 221.
See Proposal 1: The Merger Interests
of Certain Persons in the Merger beginning on page 98
for information regarding vesting of equity and estimates of
payments and benefits that our executive officers and directors
may receive as a result of the contemplated merger with Pfizer,
if consummated.
Review
and Approval of Transactions with Management and
Others
We maintain various policies and procedures relating to the
review, approval or ratification of transactions in which Wyeth
is a participant and in which any of our directors, executive
officers, 10% stockholders (if any) or their family members have
a direct or indirect material interest. We refer to these
individuals and entities in this proxy statement/prospectus as
related persons. The Wyeth Code of Conduct, which is
available on our Internet Web site at www.wyeth.com,
prohibits Wyeth employees, including our executive officers,
and, in some cases, their family members, from engaging in
specified activities without prior written consent from the
Wyeth Ethics Office. These activities typically relate to
situations where a Wyeth employee, and, in some cases, an
immediate family member, may have significant financial or
business interests in another company competing with or doing
business with Wyeth, or who stands to benefit in some way from
such a relationship or activity. The Wyeth Code of Conduct
also requires that our independent directors disclose
potential conflicts of interest to us for evaluation by the
Wyeth board of directors.
Each year, we require our directors and executive officers to
complete a questionnaire, among other things, to identify any
transactions or potential transactions with us in which a
director or an executive officer or one of their family members
or associated entities has an interest. We also require that
directors and executive officers notify our Corporate Secretary
of any changes during the course of the year to the information
provided in the annual questionnaire as soon as possible.
The Audit Committee of the Wyeth board of directors, pursuant to
its charter, has responsibility for reviewing and approving,
ratifying or making recommendations to the Wyeth board of
directors regarding related person transactions as defined under
SEC regulations to the extent not delegated to another committee
of the Wyeth board of directors. In addition, the Wyeth board of
directors annually determines the independence of directors
based on a review by the directors and the Nominating and
Governance Committee as described under Independence of
Directors beginning on page 168. Additionally, the
Wyeth board of directors has adopted a specific set of
procedures designed to ensure the continued independence of any
director whose employer does, or potentially may do, significant
business with Wyeth.
We believe that these policies and procedures collectively
ensure that all related person transactions requiring disclosure
under SEC rules are appropriately reviewed and approved or
ratified. Each of the transactions disclosed above in this
section has been reviewed and approved or ratified by the Wyeth
board of directors.
232
REPORT OF
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The following is the report of the Audit Committee with respect
to Wyeths audited financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
Wyeths management has primary responsibility for
Wyeths internal controls and preparing Wyeths
consolidated financial statements. Wyeths independent
registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,
is responsible for performing an independent audit of
Wyeths consolidated financial statements and of its
internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(PCAOB). The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the
Wyeth board of directors in its general oversight of
Wyeths financial reporting, internal controls and audit
functions.
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed Wyeths
audited financial statements with management. The Audit
Committee has also had many discussions, including the required
discussions with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Wyeths
independent registered public accounting firm, regarding matters
related to the conduct of the annual integrated audit of
Wyeths financial statements and of its internal control
over financial reporting. The content of these communications is
governed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as
amended, Communication with Audit Committees, and
PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 5, An Audit of Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting That Is Integrated with an
Audit of Financial Statements. The Audit Committee has
also received written disclosures and the letter from
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP with the applicable requirements of
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the
independent accountants communications with the audit
committee concerning independence.
The Audit Committee is governed by the Audit Committee Charter
adopted by the Wyeth board of directors, a copy of which is
available on the Wyeth Internet Web site at
www.wyeth.com. Each of the members of the Audit Committee
qualifies as an independent director under the
current applicable listing standards of the NYSE.
Based upon the review and discussions referred to above, the
Audit Committee has recommended to the Wyeth board of directors
that Wyeths audited financial statements be included in
Wyeths Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
John P. Mascotte, Chairman
Robert M. Amen
Victor F. Ganzi
Gary L. Rogers
John R. Torell III
233
REPORT OF
THE NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE ON
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
A. Outlook of the Nominating and Governance Committee
on Corporate Governance
One of the methods used by Wyeth to secure and maintain the
confidence of its stockholders and other stakeholders, including
customers, patients and employees, is its monitoring,
assessment, adoption and implementation of sound principles of
corporate governance. Substantial responsibility for good
corporate governance rests with the Wyeth board of directors,
including the Nominating and Governance Committee and the role
it has assumed in providing guidance and oversight to management
in the service of the long-term interests of Wyeth and its
stockholders. Keeping the Wyeth board of directors apprised of
trends and best practices in corporate governance, advising on
the appropriateness of Wyeth adopting new governance practices
and policies, and creating mechanisms to place the Wyeth board
of directors in a position to make informed, educated decisions,
are priorities of the Nominating and Governance Committee. The
Nominating and Governance Committee has focused on board
governance duties and responsibilities through the adoption and
annual evaluations of the Wyeth board of directors
committee charters and the Wyeth Corporate Governance
Guidelines (the Governance Guidelines) and the
arms-length process for selecting candidates to become
members of the Wyeth board of directors outlined in the
Criteria and Procedures for Board Candidate Selection.
The current versions of these documents, as well as other
corporate governance documentation, can be accessed on the
Corporate Governance section of Wyeths Internet Web site
at www.wyeth.com.
B. Developments in 2008
The Nominating and Governance Committee, in keeping with its
mandate, continues to study, evaluate and improve upon
Wyeths solid record of good corporate governance. During
mid-2008, two members of the Wyeth board of directors retired.
Professor John D. Feerick retired pursuant to the mandatory
director retirement provisions of the Governance
Guidelines. Robert Essner retired from the Wyeth board of
directors in connection with his retirement as Chairman of
Wyeth, which, under the Governance Guidelines, disallowed
his continued membership on the Wyeth board of directors
following his departure as a full-time employee of Wyeth. In
anticipation of these departures, during 2008 the Nominating and
Governance Committee engaged in an extensive evaluation of the
composition, size and functioning of the Wyeth board of
directors. With the retirements of these long-term, experienced
members of the Wyeth board of directors, the majority of the
Wyeth board of directors had fewer than five years of service on
the Wyeth board of directors. Thus, the Nominating and
Governance Committee began to reassess the previously disclosed
position of the Wyeth board of directors with respect to the
establishment of the role of a lead director. The Nominating and
Governance Committee considered the potential for enhancement of
communications among members of the Wyeth board of directors and
with management, the possible facilitation of the functioning of
the Wyeth board of directors, and the augmentation of channels
to stockholder communications that could come from establishment
of a lead director position. The Nominating and Governance
Committee reviewed the possible scope of duties and authority of
a lead director, a lead director selection process and the
duration of any such appointment. The potential benefits of
establishing such role were balanced with the robust working
dynamic and open communications characteristic of the Wyeth
board of directors, which the Nominating and Governance
Committee sought to safeguard. Following the completion of the
Nominating and Governance Committees analysis and
recommendation to the Wyeth board of directors, the Wyeth board
of directors adopted an amendment to the Governance
Guidelines establishing the role of the lead director to be
filled at such times when there is a Chairman of the Wyeth board
of directors who does not qualify as an independent director
under the terms of the Governance Guidelines. The Wyeth
board of directors also adopted the Wyeth Charter of the Lead
Director of the Board of Directors, which can be accessed on
the Corporate Governance section of Wyeths Internet Web
site at www.wyeth.com. At the first Wyeth board meeting
following the annual meeting, the non-management members of the
Wyeth board of directors will appoint the lead director of Wyeth.
In 2008, consistent with past practice, the Nominating and
Governance Committee also identified the strategic topics to be
addressed during the year by the Wyeth board of directors and
its committees. The
234
significant issues identified, including consolidation within
the pharmaceutical industry, were vigorously analyzed by the
Wyeth board of directors in 2008.
C. Questions and Answers About the Wyeth Board of
Directors, Board Committees, and Governance Policies
Below are several questions and answers that provide some
highlights of our governance practices and policy initiatives.
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Is the Wyeth board of directors comprised of a majority of
independent directors? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. The Wyeth board of directors currently consists
entirely of non-employee directors, other than Mr. Poussot.
In fact, we consider the Wyeth board of directors
independence to be one of its great strengths. For the past
several years, the individual or individuals serving as the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and/or President have been
the only member(s) of management on the Wyeth board of
directors. |
|
|
|
The Governance Guidelines adopted by the Wyeth board of
directors contain standards of independence that meet or exceed
the NYSE Corporate Governance Standards. These independence
standards are set out in detail in Section II.b. of the
Governance Guidelines available on the Corporate
Governance section of our Internet Web site at
www.wyeth.com. |
|
|
|
Pursuant to these Guidelines and the categorical standards of
independence that they set forth, the Wyeth board of directors
reviewed the independence of each of its directors in February
2009, taking into account potential conflicts of interest,
transactions or other relationships that would reasonably be
expected to potentially compromise any of the directors
independence. As a result of this review, the Wyeth board of
directors, based on the recommendation of the Nominating and
Governance Committee, affirmatively determined that all of
Wyeths directors are independent of Wyeth and its
management under the standards set forth in the Governance
Guidelines, with the exception of Mr. Poussot, who is
not independent because of his employment as our Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer. |
|
Q: |
|
What committees of the Wyeth board of directors are comprised
of a majority of independent directors? |
|
A: |
|
Since their inception, the Audit Committee, the Compensation
Committee, the Corporate Issues Committee, and the Science and
Technology Committee have been comprised only of independent
directors, as determined under applicable NYSE Corporate
Governance Standards. The Nominating and Governance Committee
also is currently, and has been for the past eleven years,
comprised only of independent directors, as determined under
applicable NYSE Corporate Governance Standards and the
Governance Guidelines. |
|
Q: |
|
Are any of Wyeths management directors part of
interlocking relationships? |
|
A: |
|
No. Mr. Poussot is currently the only member of
management on the Wyeth board of directors, and he is not on the
board of directors of any companies that either employ an
executive who sits on the Wyeth board of directors or include on
its board another member of the Wyeth board of directors. |
|
Q: |
|
What happens when one of Wyeths non-employee directors
accepts a new directorship or changes professions? |
|
A: |
|
Under Wyeths protocols and procedures for the review of
potential conflicts of interest, any new directorship or other
significant affiliation involving another entity and one of our
directors is reviewed for its impact on the directors
independence. According to the Governance Guidelines, a
non-employee director must offer not to stand for re-election
following a change in primary profession or employment. The
Nominating and Governance Committee then makes a recommendation
to the Wyeth board of directors whether to accept or reject that
offer as appropriate under the circumstances. |
235
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Does Wyeth require regular meetings of its non-employee
directors and/or have a lead independent director? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. Regular executive sessions of the non-employee
directors are required under the Governance Guidelines.
Executive sessions of the non-employee directors, who also are
all independent directors, were held at every regularly
scheduled Wyeth board of directors meeting in 2008. In 2008 and
early 2009, the Chairman of each respective standing committee
on a rotating basis chaired the executive sessions of the
non-employee directors in keeping with prior practice. As
indicated above, following the selection of a lead director by
the Wyeth board of directors from among the non-management
directors at its first meeting following the annual meeting, the
lead director will chair these executive sessions. |
|
Q: |
|
What sort of financial expertise do the members of
Wyeths Audit Committee have? |
|
A: |
|
All of our Audit Committee members meet the current NYSE listing
standards for both independence and financial literacy. The
Wyeth board of directors has designated three members of our
Audit Committee to be audit committee financial
experts as defined by the SEC. |
|
Q: |
|
On how many audit committees of public companies may a Wyeth
director simultaneously serve? |
|
A: |
|
Pursuant to the Governance Guidelines, a member of the
Audit Committee may not simultaneously serve on the audit
committee of more than three public companies. |
|
Q: |
|
Are committees of the Wyeth board of directors authorized to
independently engage outside advisors? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. The committees of the Wyeth board of directors are
authorized to seek outside counsel and expert advice. Two
committees, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and
Governance Committee, hired and actively consulted with
independent consulting firms in 2008. In addition, the Audit
Committee retains the independent registered public accountants
of Wyeth, subject to ratification by Wyeths stockholders. |
|
Q: |
|
Does Wyeth have a director education policy? |
|
A: |
|
The Nominating and Governance Committee has identified several
director education programs, accredited by a corporate
governance rating agency and sponsored by prominent
institutions, from which new directors must choose at least one
program to attend. Other directors are also invited to attend
director education programs to learn about new fields related to
board service. |
|
Q: |
|
Does Wyeth have a policy regarding director attendance at
meetings of the Wyeth board of directors and its committees? |
|
A: |
|
Although Wyeth has no formal meeting attendance policy, it is
the expectation of the Chairman that all members of the Wyeth
board of directors attend every Wyeth board meeting and the
meetings of the committees on which they sit, unless special
circumstances require that they be excused. Such circumstances
are ordinarily discussed with the Chairman in advance of an
unattended meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
Did all directors attend last years Annual Meeting of
Stockholders? |
|
A: |
|
All directors then serving on the Wyeth board of directors
attended last years Annual Meeting of Stockholders, with
the exception of one director who had been excused due to
illness. |
|
Q: |
|
What is the procedure for a stockholder to submit the name of
a candidate for consideration as a potential nominee to the
Wyeth board of directors? |
|
A: |
|
In accordance with our bylaws, the name and qualifications of
the potential candidate should be submitted to the Corporate
Secretary of Wyeth. The Nominating and Governance Committee then
considers the qualifications of the potential candidate at its
next regularly scheduled meeting in accordance with the
Nominating and Governance Committees Criteria and
Procedures for Board Candidate Selection. When an executive
search firm is under contract, potential candidates are reviewed
by the search firm under the set of specifications being used
for the search. |
236
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Are the charters of any of the committees of the Wyeth board
of directors publicly available? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. The charters of each of the Audit, Compensation,
Corporate Issues, Science and Technology and Nominating and
Governance Committee are available on the Corporate Governance
section of our Internet Web site at www.wyeth.com. As
required by the charters, we evaluate each of these charters on
an annual basis. |
|
Q: |
|
Does Wyeth have an Ethics Code? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. The Wyeth Code of Conduct, which has been in
existence for many years, was revised in 2007 in accordance with
SEC regulations and the NYSE Corporate Governance Rules, in
addition to other considerations, and is available on the Wyeth
Internet Web site at www.wyeth.com. Worldwide training on
the Wyeth Code of Conduct, and its application to the
business lives of all employees, is on-going using custom
designed educational tools. The Wyeth Code of Conduct
applies to all of our directors and executive officers, as
well as all of our employees. The Wyeth Code of Conduct
includes a code of ethics that applies to our senior
financial officers and our Chief Executive Officer. It is
designed to assure honest and ethical conduct, avoidance of
conflicts of interest, good public disclosure and full
compliance with applicable laws and regulations. |
|
Q: |
|
Does Wyeth have a way for stockholders to report concerns
they may have regarding accounting matters directly to the Audit
Committee? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. If any party has concerns about accounting, internal
accounting controls or audit matters, he or she can write
directly to the Audit Committee of the Wyeth board of directors
at a P.O. Box of the Audit Committee located in New
York City. The address is available in the Corporate Governance
section of our Internet Web site at www.wyeth.com. The
Audit Committee Chairman receives all such communication,
unopened, and responds or directs the response as he deems
appropriate. The full Audit Committee reviews the treatment and
status of all such communications at each Audit Committee
meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
Does Wyeth have a way for parties to directly contact the
Wyeth board of directors or our non-employee directors? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. If any party wishes to directly contact the Wyeth
board of directors or the non-employee members of the Wyeth
board of directors, he or she can write directly to the Wyeth
board of directors at a P.O. Box of the Wyeth board of
directors located in New York City. The address is available in
the Corporate Governance section of our Internet Web site at
www.wyeth.com. All such communication, other than
advertising circulars, solicitations and advertisements, is
forwarded to the party to whom it is addressed. |
|
Q: |
|
Does Wyeth have stock ownership guidelines for its executive
officers? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. Wyeth has stock ownership guidelines for executive
officers and other key U.S. employees in order to promote equity
ownership and further align the interests of management with
Wyeths stockholders. The Chief Executive Officer has a
share ownership guideline with a value of at least eight times
his base salary, officers who report directly to the Chief
Executive Officer have a share ownership guideline with a value
of at least six times base salary and other employees who are
members of the Management, Law/Regulatory Review, Human
Resources, Benefits and Compensation, and Operations Committees
have a share ownership guideline with a value of at least four
times base salary. Additional information regarding these stock
ownership guidelines is included in the section entitled
Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion
and Analysis in this proxy statement/prospectus. |
237
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Does Wyeth have stock ownership guidelines for its
non-employee directors? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. Each non-employee director is required to hold at
least five times the value of the annual cash board service
retainer in Wyeth stock and/or equivalent units. Directors are
given five years to attain this ownership threshold. |
NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
Frances D. Fergusson, Ph.D., Chairman
Robert Langer, Sc.D.
John P. Mascotte
Raymond J. McGuire
Mary Lake Polan, M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H.
238
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS FEE SUMMARY
On February 28, 2008, the Audit Committee of the Wyeth
board of directors appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our
independent registered public accounting firm for 2008, as
ratified by stockholders at the 2008 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP also has acted in this
capacity since 2001. The information below includes amounts
billed or expected to be billed for these services.
Audit
Fees
The aggregate fees billed or expected to be billed by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for professional services rendered
for the audit of our annual financial statements for the fiscal
years ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007
were $12.5 million and $11.1 million, respectively.
Audit-Related
Fees
The aggregate fees billed or expected to be billed by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for audit-related services to Wyeth,
for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, were $1.9 million and
$2.1 million, respectively. These services consist
primarily of employee benefit plan audits, assistance with
registration statements, consents and comfort letters related to
debt issuances, assistance with divestitures and other services
approved by the Audit Committee.
Tax
Fees
The aggregate fees billed or expected to be billed by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for tax services to Wyeth for the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007 were $2.1 million and $1.5 million, respectively.
These services primarily relate to the analysis and review of
consolidated and local foreign tax provisions, preparation of
local foreign tax returns, assistance on foreign tax audits, as
well as foreign transfer pricing documentation.
All Other
Fees
There were no fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP relating
to any other services for the years ended December 31, 2008
and December 31, 2007.
It is the Audit Committees policy to approve in advance
the types of audit, audit-related, tax and any other services to
be provided by Wyeths independent registered public
accounting firm. In situations when it is not possible to obtain
full Audit Committee approval, the Audit Committee has delegated
to the Chairman of the Audit Committee authority to grant
pre-approvals of audit, audit-related, tax and all other
services. All such pre-approved decisions are required to be
reviewed with the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled
meeting.
The Audit Committee has approved all of the aforementioned
independent registered public accounting firms services
and fees for 2008 and 2007 and, in doing so, has considered
whether the provision of such services is compatible with
maintaining independence.
PROPOSAL 4:
APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM
The Audit Committee of the Wyeth board of directors, subject to
ratification by the stockholders, has appointed
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Wyeths independent
registered public accounting firm for the year 2009. This firm
served in such capacity in 2008 and previously. A representative
from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP will be present at the meeting,
will have the opportunity to make comments if he or she desires
to do so and will be available to answer questions.
THE WYETH BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE
FOR RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS WYETHS INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2009.
239
2009
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
Our stockholders have informed management of their intention to
present the following resolutions for consideration at the
meeting. The name, address and number of shares held by these
stockholders will be promptly furnished orally or in writing by
us upon request. These requests may be directed to Eileen M.
Lach, our Corporate Secretary, who may be contacted at Five
Giralda Farms, Madison, NJ 07940 by mail or by calling
(973) 660-6073.
PROPOSAL 5:
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING REPORTING ON WYETHS
POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRADE ASSOCIATION PAYMENTS
Resolved, that the shareholders of Wyeth (the
Company) hereby request that the company provide a
report, updated semi-annually, disclosing the Companys:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Policies and procedures for political contributions and
expenditures (both direct and indirect) made with corporate
funds.
|
|
|
2.
|
Monetary and non-monetary political contributions and
expenditures not deductible under section 162 (e)(1)(B) of
the Internal Revenue Code, including but not limited to
contributions to or expenditures on behalf of political
candidates, political parties, political committees and other
political entities organized and operating under 26 USC
Sec. 527 of the Internal Revenue Code and any portion of any
dues or similar payments made to any tax exempt organization
that is used for an expenditure or contribution if made directly
by the corporation would not be deductible under
section 162 (e)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code. The
report shall include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
a.
|
An accounting of the Companys funds that are used for
political contributions or expenditures as described above;
|
|
|
b.
|
Identification of the person or persons in the Company who
participated in making the decisions to make the political
contribution or expenditure; and
|
|
|
c.
|
The internal guidelines or policies, if any, governing the
Companys political contributions and expenditures.
|
The report shall be presented to the board of directors
audit committee or other relevant oversight committee and posted
on the companys website to reduce costs to shareholders.
Stockholder
Supporting Statement
As long-term shareholders of Wyeth, we support transparency and
accountability in corporate spending on political activities.
These activities include direct and indirect political
contributions to candidates, political parties or political
organizations; independent expenditures; or electioneering
communications on behalf of a federal, state or local candidate.
Disclosure is consistent with public policy, in the best
interest of the company and its shareholders, and critical for
compliance with recent federal ethics legislation. Absent a
system of accountability, company assets can be used for policy
objectives that may be inimical to the long-term interests of
and may pose risks to the company and its shareholders.
Wyeth contributed at least $6.7 million in corporate funds
since the 2002 election cycle. (CQs PoliticalMoneyLine:
http://moneyline.cq.com/pml/home.do
and National Institute on Money in State Politics:
http://www.followthemoney.org/index.phtml.)
However, relying on publicly available data does not provide a
complete picture of the Companys political expenditures.
For example, the Companys payments to trade associations
used for political activities are undisclosed and unknown. In
many cases, even management does not know how trade associations
use their companys money politically. The proposal asks
the Company to disclose all of its political contributions,
including payments to trade associations and other tax exempt
organizations. This would bring our Company
240
in line with a growing number of leading companies, including
Pfizer, Aetna and American Electric Power that support political
disclosure and accountability and present this information on
their websites.
The Companys Board and its shareholders need complete
disclosure to be able to fully evaluate the political use of
corporate assets. Thus, we urge your support for this critical
governance reform.
Wyeths
Response
OUR BOARD AND MANAGEMENT OPPOSE THIS PROPOSAL AND
RECOMMEND A VOTE AGAINST IT FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
Many different laws affect our business. We believe that it is
in the best interests of our stockholders for Wyeth to be
actively engaged in the political and lawmaking process to
ensure that our interests are known and understood by law and
policymakers. However, we believe that producing the information
requested by this proposal would not be an effective use of
Wyeths resources and would not lead to a commensurate
benefit. In addition, the publication of this information by
Wyeth is unnecessary, because Wyeths political
contributions and expenditures already are well documented by
existing disclosure requirements and our internal policies, as
described below.
Numerous federal, state and local laws regulate Wyeths
political contributions and expenditures at all levels, and
these laws and regulations include extensive disclosure
requirements. Information about all of Wyeths political
contributions is also available to the public in easily
accessible online databases.
In addition to these laws and regulations, the Wyeth Code of
Conduct sets forth our policy on corporate political
activity and political contributions by our employees worldwide.
The report entitled Wyeth Corporate Citizenship Report 2008:
Connecting Our Work With The World provides further
information on our policy regarding political contributions. In
addition, in 2007, we began publishing a report regarding our
policy on political contributions and our activities in this
area entitled Wyeth Report on Political Contributions and
Policies. All of these documents can be found on our
Internet Web site at www.wyeth.com.
As permitted by state and federal laws in the United States,
some Wyeth employees voluntarily pool their personal resources
to fund a nonpartisan political action committee (PAC) used to
support federal and state candidates who understand and
appreciate the value of innovation and its importance to
improving health care. All political contributions made by the
PAC at the federal level are required to be publicly disclosed
and are available through the Federal Election Commission at
www.fec.gov, and all contributions to state candidates
are disclosed to the appropriate state authorities. We also
provide information about federal and state political
contributions made by the PAC on our Internet Web site as part
of the Wyeth Report on Political Contributions and
Policies. We are required by law to disclose our federal
lobbying expenses to the Clerk of the U.S. House of
Representatives and the Secretary of the U.S. Senate, where
these disclosures are then available for public review. In
addition, we support our employees involvement in the
political process. We are committed to complying with campaign
finance and lobbying laws and to any changes to them that may be
made in the future, including laws requiring public disclosure
of political contributions and lobbying expenses.
Wyeth is an active participant in lobbying initiatives that
impact our business. Our contributions to trade associations
help advance many of our business objectives and are part of
Wyeths larger goal of shaping legislation and public
policy to improve the environment for pharmaceutical and
biopharmaceutical research and development. Wyeths various
trade association memberships also provide significant benefits
to the Company and our stockholders by giving Wyeth access to
their business, technical and industry expertise.
We believe that the trade association disclosures requested by
the proposal could place us at a competitive disadvantage by
highlighting Wyeths strategies and priorities to our
competitors and other parties whose interests are adverse to
ours, potentially to our detriment. Providing the amounts Wyeth
pays for membership could also increase competition among the
trade associations for funding. The disclosure requested by this
proposal would not provide our stockholders with a greater
understanding of our business objectives or insight on the
reasons for our trade association contributions and expenditures
and could instead risk misrepresenting our political activities
and legislative objectives. For example, these associations may
take positions on certain
241
matters that Wyeth does not support. In addition, under the
Internal Revenue Code, the extent to which these associations
engage in political activities is already disclosed to the IRS
by the associations. Furthermore, because these contributions
may be made to organizations dispersed throughout the United
States, the costs of gathering and maintaining the requested
information on these contributions could be prohibitive.
We believe that the disclosure already available to the public
and Wyeths current internal policies and other information
disclosed on our Web site are sufficient to provide information
to our stockholders. Accordingly, we believe that the spirit of
this proposal has been substantially implemented, and we do not
believe that any further disclosure or reports are warranted at
this time or are in the best interests of the Company and our
stockholders.
OUR BOARD AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMEND A VOTE AGAINST THIS
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL.
PROPOSAL 6:
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING SPECIAL STOCKHOLDER
MEETINGS
6
Special Shareowner Meetings
RESOLVED, Shareowners ask our board to take the steps necessary
to amend our bylaws and each appropriate governing document to
give holders of 10% of our outstanding common stock (or the
lowest percentage allowed by law above 10%) the power to call
special shareowner meetings. This includes that such bylaw
and/or
charter text will not have any exception or exclusion conditions
(to the fullest extent permitted by state law) that apply only
to shareowners but not to management
and/or the
board.
Statement
of Kenneth Steiner
Special meetings allow shareowners to vote on important matters,
such as electing new directors, that can arise between annual
meetings. If shareowners cannot call special meetings,
management may become insulated and investor returns may suffer.
Shareowners should have the ability to call a special meeting
when a matter is sufficiently important to merit prompt
consideration.
This proposal topic also won from 55% to 69%
support at the following companies based on 2008 yes and no
votes:
|
|
|
|
|
Entergy (ETR)
|
|
55%
|
|
Emil Rossi (Sponsor)
|
International Business Machines (IBM)
|
|
56%
|
|
Emil Rossi
|
Merck (MRK)
|
|
57%
|
|
William Steiner
|
Kimberly-Clark (KMB)
|
|
61%
|
|
Chris Rossi
|
Occidental Petroleum (OXY)
|
|
66%
|
|
Emil Rossi
|
FirstEnergy Corp. (FE)
|
|
67%
|
|
Chris Rossi
|
Marathon Oil (MRO)
|
|
69%
|
|
Nick Rossi
|
The merits of this Special Shareowner Meetings proposal should
also be considered in the context of the need for improvements
in our companys corporate governance and in individual
director performance. In 2008 the following governance and
performance issues were identified:
The Corporate Library www.thecorporatelibrary.com, an
independent investment research firm, rated our board High
Concern in executive pay $24 million.
Nell Minow said, If the board cant get executive
compensation right, its been shown it wont get
anything else right either.
The following was the background on 75% of our executive pay
committee:
|
|
|
|
|
Gary Rogers was on the W.W. Grainger executive pay committee.
Grainger was rated D in governance and High
Concern in executive pay by The Corporate Library.
|
|
|
|
Robert Amen was the CEO of a creator and manufacturer of flavors
and fragrances.
|
242
|
|
|
|
|
Victor Ganzi was designated as an Accelerated
Vesting director by The Corporate Library due to his
involvement with accelerating stock option vesting to avoid
recognizing the corresponding expense.
|
Our directors held 4 board seats on boards rated D
by The Corporate Library:
|
|
|
Frances
Daly Fergusson
|
|
Mattel, Inc. (MAT)
|
Robert Langer
|
|
Momenta Pharmaceuticals (MNTA)
|
Gary Rogers
|
|
W. W. Grainger (GWW)
|
Michael Critelli
|
|
Eaton (ETN)
|
Two directors had 21 to 26 years tenure
Independence concern:
John Feerick
John Torell
Additionally:
|
|
|
|
|
We did not have an Independent Chairman or Lead
Director Independence concern.
|
|
|
|
No shareholder right to cumulative voting.
|
|
|
|
No shareholder right to act by written consent.
|
The above concerns shows there is need for improvement. Please
encourage our board to respond positively to this proposal:
Special
Shareowner Meetings
Yes on 6
Wyeths
Response
OUR BOARD AND MANAGEMENT OPPOSE THIS PROPOSAL AND
RECOMMEND A VOTE AGAINST IT FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
Wyeth is committed to observing principles of good corporate
governance and remaining responsive and accountable to our
stockholders. We believe that our current corporate governance
structure and policies adequately fulfill our commitment to
these goals while protecting the Company from the expense and
distraction of special stockholder meetings that are unnecessary
or that serve only the narrow purposes of a single or small
group of stockholders.
The Board believes that this proposal should be evaluated in the
context of the Companys corporate governance practices and
policies, which strongly demonstrate its commitment to being
accountable to our stockholders. Indeed, the Board has
repeatedly demonstrated its responsiveness to issues of
importance to our stockholders without the need for more drastic
intervention. Most recently, at the 2007 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, the Board submitted for stockholder approval a
series of amendments to our restated certificate of
incorporation to eliminate supermajority voting requirements in
response to the approval of a stockholder proposal requesting
these changes at the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Also
in 2006, in response to a stockholder vote, the Board approved
amendments to our bylaws to provide for the election of
directors by a majority of votes cast rather than by the
Companys previous plurality standard. In addition, all of
the Companys directors are elected annually we
do not have a staggered Board, where only a single class of
directors is up for election in any given year. Rather, Wyeth
has regular annual meetings of stockholders with majority voting
in the election of directors, which gives stockholders the
opportunity to make changes in leadership every year.
Moreover, the contention that stockholders need the right to
call special meetings to protect their interests is not credible
in light of the Companys governance structure. The Company
is incorporated in Delaware and our shares are listed on the New
York Stock Exchange. Under our bylaws, which are consistent with
the Delaware
243
General Corporation Law, a majority of the Board or any of our
Chairman, Vice Chairman, President or Secretary may call a
special stockholders meeting. Additionally, Delaware law
requires stockholder approval of specific items such as mergers,
the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, and
amendments to the Companys certificate of incorporation,
including amendments to increase the Companys authorized
shares. Furthermore, New York Stock Exchange rules require
shareholder approval of various significant matters, including
the issuance of more than 20% of the Companys
then-outstanding equity securities and the adoption or material
amendment of equity compensation plans. We do not believe,
therefore, that adoption of this proposal would give our
stockholders greater rights over these matters than those rights
that they already enjoy.
The Board believes, however, that giving a single stockholder or
group of stockholders with as little as 10 percent of our
outstanding stock the unrestricted right to call an unlimited
number of special meetings in order to advance their own
interests as envisioned by the proposal would be disruptive to
our Companys operations and not in the best interests of
all of our stockholders. Such meetings would require significant
attention from our Board and management, and impose substantial
administrative and financial burdens on the Company. If the
proposal were implemented, an interested party that is not a
long-term holder of our stock could acquire or borrow shares (in
some cases without bearing the same market risk borne by other
stockholders) solely in order to meet the required threshold
needed to trigger a special meeting that serves its narrow
purposes, rather than those of the Company and all of its
stockholders as a whole. In addition, the Board believes that
special stockholder meetings should be reserved for
extraordinary purposes. However, the proposal does not include
any requirement that the meeting be called for an extraordinary,
or even a proper, purpose, nor does it limit the number of times
within any
12-month
period that any such special meetings must be held, further
lending itself to the potential for misuse.
We also note that the proposal includes statements that are
outdated, inaccurate or irrelevant. The proponent states that
the Company does not have a lead director. However, in November
2008, our Board of Directors amended the Wyeth Corporate
Governance Guidelines to establish the role of a lead
director, who will serve in this capacity when our Chairman is
not an independent director. Our first lead director will be
appointed at the meeting of the Board of Directors immediately
following the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The proponent
also comments on the tenure of John D. Feerick. Professor
Feerick, who served as a valuable member of our Board of
Directors for many years, retired from the Board in July 2008,
in accordance with the mandatory retirement provisions in the
Wyeth Corporate Governance Guidelines. Finally, the
statement includes opinions regarding the corporate governance
and activities of other companies on whose boards some of our
directors serve. Such information is irrelevant to the vigilance
maintained by our Company regarding corporate governance and the
demonstrated responsiveness of the Company to its stockholders.
As the above practices and actions demonstrate, the Board is
strongly committed to ensuring effective corporate governance
and remaining responsive to the concerns of our stockholders. We
believe our existing governance structure strikes the
appropriate balance between ensuring accountability to our
stockholders and enabling the Board and management to run the
Company in an effective manner. For these reasons, the Board
believes that adoption of the proposal is neither necessary nor
in the best interests of the Company or our stockholders.
OUR BOARD AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMEND A VOTE AGAINST THIS
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL.
OTHER
MATTERS
What
happens if you receive multiple copies of the annual financial
report and proxy statement/prospectus?
Applicable rules permit brokerage firms and our Company to send
one annual financial report and proxy statement to multiple
stockholders who share the same address under certain
circumstances. This practice is known as
householding. Householding saves printing and
postage costs by reducing duplicate mailings. If you hold your
shares through a broker, you may have consented to reducing the
number of copies of materials delivered to your address. In the
event that you wish to revoke a householding consent
you previously
244
provided to a broker, you must contact that broker to revoke
your consent. However, if you wish to receive a separate proxy
statement/prospectus for the meeting or Wyeths 2008
Financial Report, you may find these materials on the Web at
www.wyeth.com/2009proxymaterials or you may receive
printed copies by contacting Wyeth Investor Relations, Five
Giralda Farms, Madison, NJ 07940 by mail or by calling
1-877-552-4744.
If your household is receiving multiple copies of our annual
financial report or proxy statement/prospectus and you wish to
request delivery of a single copy, you may send a written
request to Wyeth Investor Relations, Five Giralda Farms,
Madison, NJ 07940.
When can
you expect to receive a 2008 Financial Report?
Our 2008 Financial Report for the year ended December 31,
2008 is being mailed or made available electronically to
stockholders together with these proxy materials. Each of the
2008 Financial Report and this proxy statement/prospectus are
also posted on the Web at
www.wyeth.com/2009proxymaterials.
How can I
obtain copies of Wyeths corporate governance
documents?
The charters of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee,
Nominating and Governance Committee, Corporate Issues Committee,
and Science and Technology Committee, the Wyeth Charter of
the Lead Director of the Board of Directors, our Criteria
and Procedures for Board Candidate Selection for the Board of
Directors and the Wyeth Corporate Governance
Guidelines, as well as other documents related to corporate
governance, are available on our Internet Web site
(www.wyeth.com) and also may be obtained, without charge,
by contacting Wyeth Investor Relations at
1-877-552-4744.
The Criteria and Procedures for Board Candidate Selection for
the Board of Directors also is included in this proxy
statement/prospectus as Annex E. In addition, our code of
ethics, which is included in the Wyeth Code of Conduct,
is available on our Internet Web site (www.wyeth.com) and
also may be obtained, without charge, by contacting Wyeth
Investor Relations.
Regardless of the number of shares you hold, it is important
that your shares be represented at the meeting in order that a
quorum will be present at the meeting. If you are unable to
attend the meeting, you are urged to submit your proxy as
promptly as possible by telephone or through the Internet Web
site if permitted on your proxy card or by marking, signing and
dating your proxy card and returning it without delay in the
postage-paid envelope provided. The shares represented by each
proxy that is signed and returned or submitted by telephone or
via the Internet Web site will be voted in accordance with your
directions.
245
CHAPTER THREE
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the Pfizer common stock and, if any, Pfizer $2
Convertible Preferred Stock to be issued in connection with the
merger will be passed upon for Pfizer by Amy Schulman, Senior
Vice President and General Counsel of Pfizer.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Pfizer as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and for each of the years in
the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008,
have been incorporated by reference herein and in the
registration statement in reliance upon the reports of KPMG LLP,
independent registered public accounting firm, incorporated by
reference herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts
in accounting and auditing.
The financial statements of Wyeth and Wyeth managements
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting (which is included in Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting)
incorporated in this proxy statement/prospectus by reference to
Wyeths Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the audited
historical financial statements included in Exhibit 99.1 of
Pfizers Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on March 13, 2009 have been so
incorporated in reliance on the reports of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts
in auditing and accounting.
FUTURE
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
If the merger is consummated, there will be no annual meeting of
Wyeth stockholders in 2010. If the merger is not consummated,
Wyeth will hold a 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Stockholder proposals for Wyeths 2010 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders must be received by Wyeth at its principal
executive offices located at Five Giralda Farms, Madison, New
Jersey 07940 on or before February 17, 2010 in order to be
included in Wyeths proxy materials for the meeting. Also,
in accordance with the notice requirements in Wyeths
bylaws, if a stockholder notifies Wyeth of his or her intent to
present a proposal for consideration at Wyeths 2010 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders after April 21, 2010, Wyeth
(through the persons named as proxies in the proxy materials)
may exercise discretionary voting authority (as it chooses) at
the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof with
respect to that late proposal without including information
regarding it in Wyeths proxy materials. The above
deadlines may change in the event that the 2010 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders is held on a date that differs substantially
from the date of the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
STOCKHOLDERS
SHARING AN ADDRESS
Only one copy of this proxy statement/prospectus is being
delivered to multiple stockholders of Wyeth sharing an address
unless Wyeth has previously received contrary instructions from
one or more of such stockholders. On written or oral request to
Wyeth Investor Relations at Five Giralda Farms, Madison, New
Jersey 07940, or by calling 1-877-552-4744, Wyeth will deliver
promptly a separate copy of this proxy statement/prospectus to a
stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the
proxy statement/prospectus was delivered. The proxy
statement/prospectus can also be found at
www.wyeth.com/2009proxy materials. Stockholders sharing
an address who wish, in the future, to receive separate copies
or a single copy of Wyeths proxy statements and annual
reports should provide written or oral notice to the Corporate
Secretary of Wyeth at the address and telephone number set forth
above.
246
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
Pfizer has filed with the SEC a registration statement under the
Securities Act of which this proxy statement/prospectus forms a
part, which registers the shares of Pfizer common stock and
Pfizer $2 Convertible Preferred Stock, if any, to be issued to
Wyeth stockholders in connection with the merger. The
registration statement, including the attached exhibits and
schedules, contains additional relevant information about Pfizer
and its common stock and preferred stock. The rules and
regulations of the SEC allow Pfizer and Wyeth to omit certain
information included in the registration statement from this
document.
Wyeth and Pfizer file annual, quarterly and current reports,
proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may
read and copy this information at the Public Reference Room of
the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580,
Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the
operation of the SECs Public Reference Room by calling the
SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
You can also inspect reports, proxy statements and other
information about Pfizer and Wyeth at the offices of the NYSE,
20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005. You may also
obtain copies of this information by mail from the Public
Reference Section of the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E.,
Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed
rates, or from commercial document retrieval services. The SEC
also maintains an internet website that contains reports, proxy
statements and other information about issuers, like Pfizer and
Wyeth, who file electronically with the SEC. The address of the
site is www.sec.gov. The reports and other information
filed by Pfizer with the SEC are also available at Pfizers
website at www.pfizer.com. The reports and other
information filed by Wyeth with the SEC are also available at
Wyeths website at www.wyeth.com. The web addresses
of the SEC, Pfizer, and Wyeth have been included as inactive
textual references only. Except as specifically incorporated by
reference into this proxy statement/prospectus, information on
those web sites is not part of this proxy statement/prospectus.
The SEC allows Pfizer and Wyeth to incorporate by reference
information into this proxy statement/prospectus. This means
that Pfizer and Wyeth can disclose important information to you
by referring you to another document filed separately with the
SEC. The information incorporated by reference is considered to
be a part of this proxy statement/prospectus, except for any
information that is superseded by information that is included
directly in this proxy statement/prospectus.
This proxy statement/prospectus incorporates by reference the
documents listed below that Pfizer and Wyeth previously filed
with the SEC. They contain important information about the
companies and their financial condition.
|
|
|
Pfizer SEC Filings
|
|
|
(SEC File No. 001-3619; CIK No. 0000078003)
|
|
Period or Date Filed
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008
|
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q
|
|
Quarter ended March 29, 2009
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
|
|
Filed January 14, 2009, January 26, 2009,
January 29, 2009, February 20, 2009, March 12,
2009, March 13, 2009, April 7, 2009, April 27,
2009, April 28, 2009 and June 3, 2009
|
|
|
|
The description of Pfizer common stock set forth in a
registration statement filed pursuant to Section 12 of the
Exchange Act and any amendment or report filed for the purpose
of updating those descriptions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wyeth SEC Filings
|
|
|
(SEC File No. 001-1225; CIK No. 0000005187)
|
|
Period or Date Filed
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and Form 10-K/A
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008
|
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2009
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
|
|
Filed January 26, 2009, January 29, 2009 and April 23,
2009
|
247
In addition, Pfizer and Wyeth also incorporate by reference
additional documents that either company files with the SEC
under Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 and 15(d) of the Exchange
Act, between the date of this proxy statement/prospectus and the
date of Wyeths annual meeting. These documents include
periodic reports, such as Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
and Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
and any amendments to those reports, as well as proxy
statements. To the extent that any information contained in any
such Current Report on
Form 8-K,
or any exhibit thereto, was furnished, rather than filed, with
the SEC, such information or exhibit is specifically not
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.
Pfizer has supplied all information contained or incorporated by
reference into this proxy statement/prospectus relating to
Pfizer, as well as all pro forma financial information, and
Wyeth has supplied all information relating to Wyeth.
Documents incorporated by reference are available from Pfizer
and Wyeth without charge, excluding any exhibits to those
documents unless the exhibit is specifically incorporated by
reference as an exhibit in this proxy statement/prospectus. You
can obtain documents incorporated by reference into this
document by requesting them in writing or by telephone from the
appropriate company at the following addresses:
|
|
|
Pfizer Inc.
|
|
Wyeth
|
|
Pfizer Inc.
235 East 42nd Street
New York, New York 10017
Attention: Investor Relations
Telephone: 1-212-573-2323
|
|
Wyeth
Five Giralda Farms
Madison, New Jersey 07940
Attention: Investor Relations
Telephone: 1-877-552-4744
|
Wyeth stockholders requesting documents should do so by
July 13, 2009 to receive them before the Wyeth annual
meeting. You will not be charged for any of
these documents that you request. If you request any document
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus
from Pfizer, Pfizer will mail them to you by first class mail,
or another equally prompt means, within one business day after
it receives your request.
Neither Pfizer nor Wyeth has authorized anyone to give any
information or make any representation about the merger or the
respective companies that is different from, or in addition to,
that contained in this proxy statement/prospectus or in any of
the materials that have been incorporated by reference into this
proxy statement/prospectus. Therefore, if anyone does give you
information of this sort, you should not rely on it. If you are
in a jurisdiction where offers to exchange or sell, or
solicitations of offers to exchange or purchase, the securities
offered by this proxy statement/prospectus or the solicitation
of proxies is unlawful, or if you are a person to whom it is
unlawful to direct these types of activities, then the offer
presented in this proxy statement/prospectus does not extend to
you. The information contained in this proxy
statement/prospectus speaks only as of the date of this proxy
statement/prospectus unless the information specifically
indicates that another date applies.
248
Annex
A
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER
among
PFIZER INC.,
WAGNER ACQUISITION CORP.
and
WYETH
Dated as of January 25, 2009
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
ARTICLE I
THE MERGER
|
Section 1.1
|
|
The Merger
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Section 1.2
|
|
Closing
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Section 1.3
|
|
Effective Time
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Section 1.4
|
|
Effects of the Merger
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Section 1.5
|
|
Bylaws
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
Section 1.6
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
Section 1.7
|
|
Officers and Directors
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
Section 1.8
|
|
Effect on Capital Stock
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
Section 1.9
|
|
Company Stock Options and Other Equity-Based Awards
|
|
|
A-3
|
|
Section 1.10
|
|
Certain Adjustments
|
|
|
A-6
|
|
Section 1.11
|
|
Appraisal Rights
|
|
|
A-6
|
|
|
ARTICLE II
EXCHANGE OF SHARES
|
Section 2.1
|
|
Exchange Agent
|
|
|
A-6
|
|
Section 2.2
|
|
Exchange Procedures
|
|
|
A-6
|
|
Section 2.3
|
|
Distributions with Respect to Unexchanged Shares
|
|
|
A-7
|
|
Section 2.4
|
|
No Further Ownership Rights
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
Section 2.5
|
|
No Fractional Shares of Parent Common Stock
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
Section 2.6
|
|
Termination of Exchange Fund
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
Section 2.7
|
|
No Liability
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
Section 2.8
|
|
Investment of the Exchange Fund
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
Section 2.9
|
|
Lost Certificates
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Section 2.10
|
|
Withholding Rights
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Section 2.11
|
|
Further Assurances
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Section 2.12
|
|
Stock Transfer Books
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
|
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY
|
Section 3.1
|
|
Organization, Good Standing and Qualification
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
Section 3.2
|
|
Capital Structure
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
Section 3.3
|
|
Corporate Authority
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
Section 3.4
|
|
Governmental Filings; No Violations, Etc.
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
Section 3.5
|
|
Company Reports; Financial Statements
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
Section 3.6
|
|
Absence of Certain Changes
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
Section 3.7
|
|
Litigation
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
Section 3.8
|
|
Compliance with Laws
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
Section 3.9
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
Section 3.10
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
Section 3.11
|
|
Employee Benefit Plans
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
Section 3.12
|
|
Labor Matters
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
Section 3.13
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
Section 3.14
|
|
Intellectual Property
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
A-i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Section 3.15
|
|
Environmental Matters
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
Section 3.16
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
Section 3.17
|
|
Regulatory Compliance
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
Section 3.18
|
|
Interested Party Transactions
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
Section 3.19
|
|
Brokers and Finders
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
Section 3.20
|
|
No Additional Representations
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
|
ARTICLE IV
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT AND MERGER SUB
|
Section 4.1
|
|
Organization, Good Standing and Qualification
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
Section 4.2
|
|
Capital Structure
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
Section 4.3
|
|
Corporate Authority
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
Section 4.4
|
|
Governmental Filings; No Violations; Etc.
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
Section 4.5
|
|
Parent Reports; Financial Statements
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
Section 4.6
|
|
Litigation
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
Section 4.7
|
|
Brokers and Finders
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
Section 4.8
|
|
No Business Activities
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
Section 4.9
|
|
Board Approval
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
Section 4.10
|
|
Vote Required
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
Section 4.11
|
|
Financing
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
Section 4.12
|
|
Absence of Certain Changes
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
Section 4.13
|
|
Compliance with Laws
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
Section 4.14
|
|
Certain Agreements
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
Section 4.15
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
Section 4.16
|
|
Intellectual Property
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
Section 4.17
|
|
Regulatory Compliance
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
Section 4.18
|
|
No Additional Representations
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
|
ARTICLE V
COVENANTS RELATING TO CONDUCT OF BUSINESS
|
Section 5.1
|
|
Ordinary Course
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
Section 5.2
|
|
Governmental Filings
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
Section 5.3
|
|
Restrictions on Parent
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
|
ARTICLE VI
ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS
|
Section 6.1
|
|
Preparation of Proxy Statement; Stockholders Meeting
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
Section 6.2
|
|
Access to Information/Employees
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
Section 6.3
|
|
Reasonable Best Efforts
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
Section 6.4
|
|
Acquisition Proposals
|
|
|
A-39
|
|
Section 6.5
|
|
Employee Benefits Matters
|
|
|
A-41
|
|
Section 6.6
|
|
Fees and Expenses
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
Section 6.7
|
|
Directors and Officers Indemnification and Insurance
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
Section 6.8
|
|
Public Announcements
|
|
|
A-45
|
|
Section 6.9
|
|
Listing of Shares of Parent Common Stock and Parent Convertible
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
A-45
|
|
Section 6.10
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
A-45
|
|
A-ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Section 6.11
|
|
Section 16 Matters
|
|
|
A-45
|
|
Section 6.12
|
|
Company Cooperation on Certain Matters
|
|
|
A-45
|
|
Section 6.13
|
|
Financing Cooperation
|
|
|
A-46
|
|
Section 6.14
|
|
Convertible Debentures and Company Convertible Preferred Stock
|
|
|
A-48
|
|
Section 6.15
|
|
Board Representation
|
|
|
A-48
|
|
|
ARTICLE VII
CONDITIONS PRECEDENT
|
Section 7.1
|
|
Conditions to Each Partys Obligation to Effect the Merger
|
|
|
A-48
|
|
Section 7.2
|
|
Additional Conditions to Obligations of Parent and Merger Sub
|
|
|
A-49
|
|
Section 7.3
|
|
Additional Conditions to Obligations of the Company
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
|
ARTICLE VIII
TERMINATION AND AMENDMENT
|
Section 8.1
|
|
General
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
Section 8.2
|
|
Obligations in Event of Termination
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
Section 8.3
|
|
Amendment
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
Section 8.4
|
|
Extension; Waiver
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
|
ARTICLE IX
GENERAL PROVISIONS
|
Section 9.1
|
|
Non-Survival of Representations, Warranties and Agreements
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
Section 9.2
|
|
Notices
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
Section 9.3
|
|
Headings
|
|
|
A-55
|
|
Section 9.4
|
|
Counterparts
|
|
|
A-55
|
|
Section 9.5
|
|
Entire Agreement; No Third-Party Beneficiaries
|
|
|
A-56
|
|
Section 9.6
|
|
Governing Law
|
|
|
A-56
|
|
Section 9.7
|
|
Severability
|
|
|
A-56
|
|
Section 9.8
|
|
Assignment
|
|
|
A-56
|
|
Section 9.9
|
|
Submission to Jurisdiction; Waivers
|
|
|
A-56
|
|
Section 9.10
|
|
Specific Performance
|
|
|
A-57
|
|
Section 9.11
|
|
Waiver of Jury Trial
|
|
|
A-57
|
|
Section 9.12
|
|
Interpretation
|
|
|
A-57
|
|
Section 9.13
|
|
Definitions
|
|
|
A-57
|
|
|
LIST OF EXHIBITS
|
Exhibit
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
Bylaws of the Surviving Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
B
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of the Surviving Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
A-iii
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 25, 2009
(this Agreement), among PFIZER INC., a Delaware
corporation (Parent), WAGNER ACQUISITION CORP., a
Delaware corporation and a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of
Parent (Merger Sub), and WYETH, a Delaware
corporation (the Company and collectively with
Parent and Merger Sub, the parties).
W I T N E S
S E T H:
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of each of the Company and
Parent deem it advisable and in the best interests of their
respective corporation and stockholders that the Company and
Parent engage in a business combination; and
WHEREAS, the combination of the Company and Parent shall be
effected by, and subject to, the terms of this Agreement through
a merger as set forth below;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the
respective representations, warranties, covenants and agreements
set forth in this Agreement, and intending to be legally bound
hereby, the parties agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
THE MERGER
Section 1.1 The
Merger. Upon the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth in this Agreement, and in accordance with
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
DGCL), Merger Sub shall be merged with and into the
Company at the Effective Time (the Merger).
Following the Merger, the separate corporate existence of Merger
Sub shall cease and the Company shall continue as the surviving
corporation (the Surviving Corporation).
Section 1.2 Closing. Upon
the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this
Agreement, the closing of the Merger (the Closing)
will take place at 10:00 a.m. New York City time on
the date that is the fifth (5th) Business Day following the
satisfaction or (subject to applicable Law) waiver of the
conditions set forth in Article VII (excluding conditions
that, by their nature, cannot be satisfied until the Closing
Date, but subject to the fulfillment or waiver of those
conditions); provided, however, that (i) in the event that
the proceeds from the Financing (or any alternative financing)
are unavailable on such fifth (5th) Business Day, the Closing
will take place on the earlier of (A) the date that is the
tenth (10th) Business Day following the date on which Parent
receives the Election Notice from the Company and
(B) December 31, 2009, and (ii) in no event shall
Parent be obligated to consummate the Closing prior to
July 31, 2009, unless this Agreement has been previously
terminated pursuant to its terms or unless another time or date
is agreed to in writing by the parties (the actual time and date
of the Closing being referred to herein as the Closing
Date). The Closing shall be held at the offices of
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, One World Financial
Center, New York, New York, 10281, or at such other place as the
parties may agree.
Section 1.3 Effective
Time. At the Closing, the Company shall
(i) file a certificate of merger (the Certificate of
Merger) in such form as is required by, and executed and
acknowledged in accordance with, the relevant provisions of the
DGCL and (ii) make all other filings or recordings required
under the DGCL in connection with the Merger. The Merger shall
become effective at such time as the Certificate of Merger is
duly filed with the Delaware Secretary of State or at such
subsequent time as Parent and the Company shall agree and as
shall be specified in the Certificate of Merger (the date and
time the Merger becomes effective being the Effective
Time).
Section 1.4 Effects
of the Merger. At and after the Effective Time,
the Merger will have the effects set forth herein and in the
DGCL. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, and
subject thereto, at the Effective Time all the property, rights,
privileges, immunities, powers and franchises of the Company and
A-1
Merger Sub shall be vested in the Surviving Corporation, and all
debts, liabilities and duties of the Company and Merger Sub
shall become the debts, liabilities and duties of the Surviving
Corporation.
Section 1.5 Bylaws. The
bylaws of Merger Sub, as in effect immediately prior to the
Effective Time, shall be the bylaws of the Surviving Corporation
and shall read in their entirety as set forth in Exhibit A
hereto until thereafter changed or amended as provided therein
or by applicable Law (subject to Section 6.7).
Section 1.6 Certificate
of Incorporation. At the Effective Time, the
certificate of incorporation of the Company shall be amended so
as to read in its entirety as set forth in Exhibit B hereto
and, as so amended, shall be the certificate of incorporation of
the Surviving Corporation until thereafter amended in accordance
with its terms and as provided by applicable Law (subject to
Section 6.7).
Section 1.7 Officers
and Directors. From and after the Effective Time,
until their successors are duly elected or appointed and
qualified in accordance with applicable Law, (i) the
directors of Merger Sub immediately prior to the Effective Time
shall be the directors of the Surviving Corporation and
(ii) the officers of the Company immediately prior to the
Effective Time shall be the officers of the Surviving
Corporation.
Section 1.8 Effect
on Capital Stock.
(a) At the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and
without any action on the part of the holder thereof, each share
of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Merger Sub issued
and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time, shall
be converted into one validly issued, fully paid and
non-assessable share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share,
of the Surviving Corporation.
(b) At the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and
without any action on the part of the holder thereof, each share
of common stock, par value
$0.331/3
per share, of the Company (Company Common Stock)
issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time
(other than Restricted Stock, which shall be treated in
accordance with Section 1.9(d), and shares of Company
Common Stock and Company Convertible Preferred Stock owned
directly or indirectly by Parent or held directly or indirectly
by the Company, all of which shall be canceled as provided in
Section 1.8(e)), shall, except as provided in
Section 1.11 with respect to the shares of Company Common
Stock as to which appraisal rights have been exercised, be
converted into the right to receive (i) 0.985 (as may be
adjusted pursuant to this Section 1.8, the Exchange
Ratio) validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable
shares of common stock (Parent Common Stock), par
value $0.05 per share, of Parent (unless the aggregate number of
shares of Parent Common Stock to be issued in the Merger
pursuant to this Section 1.8 and Section 1.9, together
with the shares, if any, of Parent Common Stock issuable upon
conversion of the Parent Convertible Preferred Stock and the
Floating Rate Convertible Senior Debentures Due 2024 (the
Convertible Debentures), in each case to the extent
shares of Parent Convertible Preferred Stock
and/or the
Convertible Debentures are issued and outstanding as of the
Effective Time, would exceed 19.9% of Parents issued and
outstanding shares of Parent Common Stock immediately prior to
the Effective Time (19.9% of such issued and outstanding shares
rounded down to the nearest whole share, the Maximum Share
Number) in which case the Exchange Ratio shall be reduced
(the amount of such reduction, the Exchange Ratio
Reduction Number) to the minimum extent necessary such
that the number of shares of Parent Common Stock issuable in the
Merger pursuant to this Section 1.8 and Section 1.9,
together with the shares, if any, of Parent Common Stock
issuable upon conversion of the Parent Convertible Preferred
Stock and the Convertible Debentures, equals the Maximum Share
Number) (the Stock Consideration) and
(ii) $33.00 in cash without interest plus, if the Exchange
Ratio is adjusted pursuant to the preceding clause (i), the
amount in cash equal to the Exchange Ratio Reduction Number
multiplied by the Parent Share Cash Value (the Cash
Consideration). Together with any cash in lieu of
fractional shares of Parent Common Stock to be paid pursuant to
Section 2.5, the Stock Consideration and Cash Consideration
are collectively referred to herein as the Common Stock
Merger Consideration.
(c) At the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and
without any action on the part of the holder thereof, each share
of the $2 Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $2.50 per
share, of the Company (Company Convertible Preferred
Stock), issued and outstanding immediately prior to the
Effective Time, if any, shall be converted into the right to
receive one share of a new series of convertible preferred stock
(Parent Convertible Preferred Stock) to be issued by
Parent at the Effective Time and to be designated as
A-2
Parent Convertible Preferred Stock (the Preferred Stock
Merger Consideration, and collectively with the Common
Stock Merger Consideration, the Merger
Consideration) having the same powers, designations,
preferences and rights (to the fullest extent practicable) as
the shares of Company Convertible Preferred Stock (it being
understood that the number of shares of Parent Common Stock into
which each share of Parent Convertible Preferred Stock shall be
convertible will equal the product of (i) the number of
shares of Common Stock into which a share of Company Convertible
Preferred Stock is convertible immediately prior to the
Effective Time and (ii) the sum of the (A) the
Exchange Ratio and (B) the quotient of the Cash
Consideration and the Parent Share Cash Value). Prior to the
Closing, Parent shall take all corporate action necessary to
reserve for issuance a sufficient number of shares of Parent
Common Stock for delivery upon conversion of the Parent
Convertible Preferred Stock.
(d) Except as set forth in Section 1.8(e),
Section 1.9(d) and Section 1.11, as a result of the
Merger and without any action on the part of the holders
thereof, at the Effective Time, all shares of outstanding
Company Common Stock and Company Convertible Preferred Stock, if
any, shall cease to be outstanding and shall be canceled and
retired and shall cease to exist, and each holder of a
certificate or certificates which immediately prior to the
Effective Time represented any such shares of Company Common
Stock (Common Certificates) or of Company
Convertible Preferred Stock (Preferred Certificates
and together with the Common Certificates, the
Certificates) or book-entry shares which immediately
prior to the Effective Time represented shares of Company Common
Stock (Common Book-Entry Shares) or shares of
Company Convertible Preferred Stock (Preferred Book-Entry
Shares and together with the Common Book-Entry Shares, the
Book-Entry Shares) shall thereafter cease to have
any rights with respect to such shares of Company Common Stock
or Company Convertible Preferred Stock, respectively, except as
provided herein or by Law.
(e) Each share of Company Common Stock and Company
Convertible Preferred Stock owned by Parent or held by the
Company at the Effective Time including any Reacquired Shares
shall, by virtue of the Merger, cease to be outstanding and
shall be canceled and retired and no stock of Parent or other
consideration shall be delivered in exchange therefor.
Section 1.9 Company
Stock Options and Other Equity-Based Awards.
(a) By virtue of the Merger, each option to purchase shares
of Company Common Stock under the applicable Company Stock Plans
that is outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time,
whether or not then vested and exercisable (collectively, the
Options or Company Stock Options) shall
become fully vested and exercisable immediately prior to, and
then shall be canceled at, the Effective Time, and the holder
thereof shall, subject to Section 1.9(f), be entitled to
receive an amount in cash equal to the product of (i) the
excess, if any, of (1) the Per Share Amount over
(2) the exercise price per share of Company Common Stock
subject to such Option, with the aggregate amount of such
payment rounded up to the nearest cent, and (ii) the total
number of shares of Company Common Stock subject to such fully
vested and exercisable Option as in effect immediately prior to
the Effective Time (the Option Consideration). The
Option Consideration shall be paid in a lump sum as soon as
practicable after the Effective Time but in no event later than
ten (10) Business Days following the Effective Time.
(b) By virtue of the Merger, each restricted stock unit,
representing a right to receive one share of Company Common
Stock (an RSU) granted by the Company under any
Company Stock Plan, including each performance share
award denominated in RSUs (but excluding any DSU (as
defined in Section 1.9(c)), which is outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time shall become fully
vested (except that with respect to any RSU, which by the terms
of the award agreement pursuant to which it was granted provides
for a lesser percentage of such RSUs to become vested upon the
consummation of the Merger, shall only become vested as to such
lesser percentage), and then shall be canceled at the Effective
Time, and the holder of such vested RSU shall, subject to
Section 1.9(f), be entitled to receive an amount in cash
equal to the Per Share Amount in respect of each share of
Company Common Stock into which the vested portion of the RSU
would otherwise be convertible (the RSU
Consideration), which shall be paid in a lump sum as soon
as practicable after the Effective Time but in no event later
than ten (10) Business Days following the Effective Time.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any RSU that constitutes, either
in whole or in part, a deferral of compensation
A-3
subject to Section 409A of the Code (the 409A
Deferred RSUs), shall be treated in the appropriate manner
provided in (i) or (ii) below, as applicable:
(i) Each 409A Deferred RSU that first becomes vested as a
result of the transactions contemplated under this Agreement
(the 409A RSUs) shall, as of the Effective Time,
become a vested right to receive, in respect of each share of
Company Common Stock into which the 409A RSUs would otherwise be
convertible, the Common Stock Merger Consideration (the
409A RSU Consideration); provided, however, that all
such 409A RSU Consideration shall be deposited in a grantor
trust that satisfies the requirements of Revenue Procedure
92-64 (the
Grantor Trust) and that will serve as the funding
source for the Surviving Corporation to satisfy its obligations
to pay each former holder of a 409A Deferred RSU the amount of
409A RSU Consideration due to such holder at such time(s) and in
such manner as may be provided under the terms of the applicable
Company Stock Plan, award agreement, deferral election form
and/or any
other payment election form, applicable to such holders
respective 409A RSU (collectively, the Deferred Payment
Terms). Additionally, during the period that any such 409A
RSU Consideration remains in such Grantor Trust, (x) the
portion of the 409A RSU Consideration that is comprised of the
Cash Consideration shall accrue interest at the Market
Rate (as such term is defined under the Wyeth 2005 (409A)
Deferred Compensation Plan (effective January 1, 2005) (the
Wyeth 2005 (409A) DCP) and (y) the portion of
the 409A RSU Consideration that is comprised of the Stock
Consideration shall accrue, in additional shares of Parent
Common Stock (with any cash dividends being reinvested into
shares of Parent Common Stock).
(ii) In respect of (x) each 409A Deferred RSU that has
first become vested in accordance with its terms, other than as
a result of the transactions contemplated under this Agreement
and (y) any RSU that would have constituted, either in
whole or in part, a deferral of compensation subject to
Section 409A of the Code, but for such RSU having been
earned and vested prior to December 31, 2004 (and any
dividend equivalents that have been credited with respect to
such RSU) (any of the foregoing, a Vested Deferred
RSU) for which there is outstanding a corresponding share
of Company Common Stock held in the Wyeth Restricted Stock Trust
(the Stock Trust) for the purpose of satisfying the
Companys obligations to deliver shares of Company Common
Stock in respect of such Vested Deferred RSU (the Deferred
RSU Shares) in accordance with the applicable Deferred
Payment Terms, immediately upon the Effective Time, each such
Deferred RSU Share shall be converted into Common Stock Merger
Consideration pursuant to Section 1.8(b) above (the
Vested Deferred RSU Consideration); provided,
however, that all such Vested Deferred RSU Consideration shall
be held in the Stock Trust and any payments due in respect of
such Deferred RSU Shares shall be as set forth under the
applicable Deferred Payment Terms; and provided, further, that,
during the period that any such Vested Deferred RSU
Consideration is held in the Stock Trust (x) the portion of
the Vested Deferred RSU Consideration representing the Cash
Consideration shall accrue interest at the Market Rate and
(y) the portion of the Vested Deferred RSU Consideration
representing the Stock Consideration shall accrue, in additional
shares of Parent Common Stock, dividends in the same amount(s)
and at the same time(s) as dividends are paid on Parent Common
Stock.
(c) By virtue of the Merger and pursuant to the terms of
the Companys 2008 Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive
Plan or 2006 Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan
(together, the Director DSU Plans), each deferred
stock unit, representing a right to receive one share of Company
Common Stock granted by the Company under the Director DSU Plans
(a DSU) which is outstanding immediately prior to
the Effective Time shall become vested and then canceled at the
Effective Time, and the holder thereof shall, subject to
Section 1.9(f), be entitled to receive (i) an amount
in cash equal to the Per Share Amount in respect of each share
of Company Common Stock subject to the DSU (including shares
attributable to dividend equivalents accrued on such DSU and
converted into additional shares of Company Common Stock subject
to such DSU), and (ii) the amount in cash equal to any
dividend equivalents then credited to the holders DSU
account which have not yet been converted into shares of Company
Common Stock, all in accordance with the Director DSU Plans (the
DSU Consideration), which shall be paid in a lump
sum as soon as practicable after the Effective Time but in no
event later than ten (10) Business Days following the
Effective Time. In addition, and pursuant to the terms of the
Companys Directors Deferral Plan (the Director
Deferral Plan),
A-4
effective as of the Effective Time, each phantom share of Common
Stock credited to a participants account thereunder
(including phantom shares attributable to dividend equivalents)
shall be converted into the right to receive an amount in cash
equal to the Per Share Amount (such amount, the Director
Deferral Amount). Such Director Deferral Amounts shall, to
the extent provided under the Director Deferral Plan, be paid
out in a lump sum immediately following the Effective Time (but
in no event later than ten (10) Business Days following the
Effective Time); provided, however, that any such other Director
Deferral Amounts (the Grandfathered Amounts) that do
not, under the terms of the Director Deferral Plan, become
payable immediately upon the Effective Time shall instead be
paid out in accordance with the applicable payment schedules
provided under the Director Deferral Plan; provided, further,
that for so long as any Grandfathered Amounts remain in the
accounts maintained under the Director Deferral Plan, such
amounts shall accrue an amount of deemed interest at the
Company Credit rate (as such term is defined in such
plan).
(d) By virtue of the Merger and pursuant to the terms of
the 1994 Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the
1994 Plan), each restricted share of Company Common
Stock granted by the Company under the 1994 Plan that is either
unvested, or vested but held in the Stock Trust (collectively,
the Restricted Stock) that is outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time shall, to the extent not
vested, vest as of the Effective Time, and at the Effective
Time, the holder of all of the foregoing Restricted Stock shall,
subject to Section 1.9(f), be entitled to receive an amount
in cash equal to the Per Share Amount in cancellation of each
share of Restricted Stock previously held under such Company
Stock Plan (the Restricted Stock Consideration). The
Restricted Stock Consideration shall be paid to such holders as
soon as practicable after the Effective Time but in no event
later than ten (10) Business Days following the Effective
Time.
(e) As of the Effective Time, each phantom share of Company
Common Stock credited to a participant account under any of the
Wyeth Supplemental Employee Savings Plan (amended and restated
effective as of January 1, 2005), the Wyeth 2005 (409A) DCP
and the Wyeth Deferred Compensation Plan, amended and restated
as of November 20, 2003 (and further amended
January 1, 2005) (collectively, the Company Deferred
Equity Unit Plans) shall be converted into the right to
receive an amount equal to the Common Stock Merger Consideration
(the Deferred Equity Unit Amount ); provided,
further, however, that the Cash Consideration component of such
Deferred Equity Unit Amount shall accrue interest at the Market
Rate, unless and until all or any portion of such notional Cash
Consideration component of the Deferred Equity Unit Amount is
notionally invested in another investment option, to the extent
provided for under any Deferred Equity Unit Plan, and the Stock
Consideration component of such Deferred Equity Unit Amount
shall earn dividend equivalents in the same manner as would
otherwise be earned under the applicable Company Deferred Equity
Unit Plan. All amounts payable under the Deferred Equity Unit
Plans (including the Deferred Equity Unit Amount) shall be paid
to participants in accordance with the terms of the applicable
Deferred Payment Terms. Solely with respect to the Wyeth
Management Incentive Plan, as amended through December 5,
2007 (the MIP), each right to receive a share of
Company Common Stock outstanding thereunder as of the Effective
Time shall be converted into the right to receive the Common
Stock Merger Consideration, to be paid to participants therein
in accordance with and subject to the terms of the MIP.
(f) All amounts payable pursuant to this Section 1.9
shall be reduced by any required withholding of taxes in
accordance with Section 2.10 and shall, except as otherwise
provided in this Section 1.9, be paid without interest.
(g) Any such amounts representing Option Consideration, RSU
Consideration, 409A RSU Consideration, Vested Deferred RSU
Consideration, DSU Consideration, Restricted Stock Consideration
or the Director Deferred Amounts (and amounts due under the MIP)
shall be paid by Parent or the Surviving Corporation, and any
such amounts paid by the Surviving Corporation shall be
reimbursed promptly by Parent to the Surviving Corporation
following the Effective Time.
(h) Prior to the Effective Time, the Board of Directors of
the Company (or the appropriate committee thereof) shall, and
such Board of Directors (or the appropriate committee thereof)
shall cause the Company to, use its commercially reasonable
efforts to take all actions reasonably required to effectuate
the provisions of this Section 1.9.
A-5
Section 1.10 Certain
Adjustments. If, between the date of this
Agreement and the Effective Time, the outstanding Parent Common
Stock or Company Common Stock shall have been changed into a
different number of shares or different class by reason of any
reclassification, recapitalization, stock split,
split-up,
combination or exchange of shares or a stock dividend or
dividend payable in any other securities shall be declared with
a record date within such period, or any similar event shall
have occurred, the Common Stock Merger Consideration shall be
appropriately adjusted to provide to the holders of Company
Common Stock the same economic effect as contemplated by this
Agreement prior to such event.
Section 1.11 Appraisal
Rights.
(a) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the
contrary, shares of Company Common Stock outstanding immediately
prior to the Effective Time and held by a holder who has not
voted in favor of the adoption of this Agreement and who has
demanded appraisal for such shares of Company Common Stock in
accordance with the DGCL shall not be converted into the right
to receive the Common Stock Merger Consideration unless such
holder fails to perfect or withdraws or otherwise loses such
holders right to appraisal in accordance with the DGCL.
If, after the Effective Time, such holder fails to perfect or
withdraws or loses such holders right to appraisal, such
shares of Company Common Stock shall be treated as if they had
been converted into, and exchanged for, as of the Effective
Time, the right to receive the Common Stock Merger Consideration.
(b) The Company shall give Parent (i) prompt notice of
any demands for appraisal received by the Company, withdrawals
of such demands, and any other instruments served pursuant to
Section 262 of the DGCL and received by the Company and
(ii) the opportunity to direct all negotiations and
proceedings with respect to demands for appraisal under the
DGCL. The Company shall not, except with the prior written
consent of Parent, make any payment with respect to any demands
for appraisal or offer to settle or settle any such demands.
ARTICLE II
EXCHANGE OF
SHARES
Section 2.1 Exchange
Agent. Prior to the Effective Time, Parent shall
appoint a commercial bank or trust company to act as exchange
agent hereunder (which entity shall be reasonably acceptable to
the Company) for the purpose of exchanging Certificates and
Book-Entry Shares for the Merger Consideration (the
Exchange Agent). At or prior to the Effective Time,
Parent shall deposit with the Exchange Agent, (a) in trust
for the benefit of holders of shares of Company Common Stock,
Common Book-Entry Shares (or certificates if requested)
representing the Parent Common Stock issuable, and cash in
U.S. dollars in an amount sufficient to pay the Cash
Consideration payable, pursuant to Section 1.8 in exchange
for outstanding shares of Company Common Stock, and (b) in
trust for the benefit of holders of shares of Company
Convertible Preferred Stock, Preferred Book-Entry Shares (or
certificates if requested) representing the Parent Convertible
Preferred Stock issuable pursuant to Section 1.8 in
exchange for outstanding shares of Company Convertible Preferred
Stock. Parent agrees to make available directly or indirectly to
the Exchange Agent from time to time as needed, any cash in lieu
of fractional shares of Parent Common Stock to be issued or paid
in consideration therefor pursuant to Section 2.5 of this
Agreement and any dividends or distributions to which such
holder is entitled pursuant to Section 2.3 of this
Agreement. Any cash, shares of Parent Common Stock and Parent
Convertible Preferred Stock deposited with the Exchange Agent
shall hereinafter be referred to as the Exchange
Fund. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the
exchange procedures described in this Article II shall not
apply to Restricted Stock and the Restricted Stock Consideration
and the Exchange Agent shall not act as exchange agent for the
Restricted Stock.
Section 2.2 Exchange
Procedures.
(a) Promptly after the Effective Time, and in any event not
later than the fifth (5th) Business Day following the Effective
Time, the Surviving Corporation shall cause the Exchange Agent
to mail to each holder of record of a Certificate (i) a
letter of transmittal which shall specify that delivery shall be
effected, and risk of loss and title to the Certificates shall
pass, only upon proper delivery of the Certificates to the
A-6
Exchange Agent, and which letter shall be in customary form and
have such other provisions as Parent may reasonably specify
(such letter to be reasonably acceptable to the Company prior to
the Effective Time) and (ii) instructions for effecting the
surrender of such Certificates (or effective affidavits of loss
in lieu thereof) in exchange for the applicable Merger
Consideration, any cash in lieu of fractional shares of Parent
Common Stock to be issued or paid in consideration therefor
pursuant to Section 2.5 of this Agreement and any dividends
or distributions to which such holder is entitled pursuant to
Section 2.3 of this Agreement. Upon surrender of a
Certificate to the Exchange Agent together with such letter of
transmittal, duly executed and completed in accordance with the
instructions thereto, and such other documents as may reasonably
be required by the Exchange Agent, the holder of such
Certificate shall be entitled to receive in exchange therefor:
(i) in the case of holders of Common Certificates
(A) one or more shares of Parent Common Stock (which shall
be in uncertificated book-entry form unless a physical
certificate is requested) representing, in the aggregate, the
whole number of shares that such holder has the right to receive
pursuant to Section 1.8 (after taking into account all
shares of Company Common Stock then held by such holder) and
(B) cash in the amount equal to the Cash Consideration that
such holder has the right to receive pursuant to
Section 1.8, plus cash that such holder has the right to
receive in lieu of any fractional shares of Parent Common Stock
pursuant to Section 2.5 and dividends and other
distributions pursuant to Section 2.3 (in each case, after
taking into account all shares of Company Common Stock then held
by such holder); and
(ii) in the case of holders of Preferred Certificates
(A) one or more shares of Parent Convertible Preferred
Stock (which shall be in uncertificated book-entry form unless a
physical certificate is requested) representing, in the
aggregate, the number of shares that such holder has the right
to receive pursuant to Section 1.8 and (B) cash that
such holder has the right to receive in lieu of any dividends
and other distributions pursuant to Section 2.3 (in each
case, after taking into account all shares of Company
Convertible Preferred Stock then held by such holder).
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this
Agreement, any holder of Book-Entry Shares shall not be required
to deliver a Certificate or an executed letter of transmittal to
the Exchange Agent to receive the Merger Consideration that such
holder is entitled to receive pursuant to this Agreement.
(b) No interest will be paid or will accrue on any cash
payable pursuant to Section 2.3 or Section 2.5.
(c) In the event of a transfer of ownership of a
Certificate representing Company Common Stock or Company
Convertible Preferred Stock that is not registered in the stock
transfer records of the Company, the Common Stock Merger
Consideration or the Preferred Stock Merger Consideration, as
applicable, shall be issued or paid in exchange therefor to a
person other than the person in whose name the Certificate so
surrendered is registered if the Certificate formerly
representing such Company Common Stock or Company Convertible
Preferred Stock shall be properly endorsed or otherwise be in
proper form for transfer and the person requesting such payment
or issuance shall pay any transfer or other similar Taxes
required by reason of the payment or issuance to a person other
than the registered holder of the Certificate or establish to
the satisfaction of Parent that the Tax has been paid or is not
applicable.
Section 2.3 Distributions
with Respect to Unexchanged Shares. All shares of
Parent Common Stock and Parent Convertible Preferred Stock to be
issued pursuant to this Agreement shall be deemed issued and
outstanding as of the Effective Time and whenever a dividend or
other distribution is declared by Parent in respect of the
Parent Common Stock or Parent Convertible Preferred Stock, as
the case may be, the record date for which is at or after the
Effective Time, that declaration shall include dividends or
other distributions in respect of all shares issuable pursuant
to this Agreement; provided that no dividends or other
distributions declared or made in respect of the Parent Common
Stock or Parent Convertible Preferred Stock, as the case may be,
shall be paid to the holder of any unsurrendered Certificate
until the holder of such Certificate shall surrender such
Certificate in accordance with this Article II. Subject to
the effect of applicable Laws, following surrender of any such
Certificate, there shall be paid to such holder of shares of
Parent Common Stock or Parent Convertible Preferred Stock
issuable in exchange therefor, without interest,
(a) promptly after the time of such surrender, the amount
of any cash payable in lieu of fractional shares of Parent
Common
A-7
Stock to which such holder is entitled pursuant to
Section 2.5 and the amount of dividends or other
distributions with a record date after the Effective Time
theretofore paid with respect to such whole shares of Parent
Common Stock or shares of Parent Convertible Preferred Stock,
and (b) at the appropriate payment date, the amount of
dividends or other distributions with a record date at or after
the Effective Time but prior to such surrender and a payment
date subsequent to such surrender payable with respect to such
shares of Parent Common Stock or Parent Convertible Preferred
Stock.
Section 2.4 No
Further Ownership Rights. All shares of Parent
Common Stock and Parent Convertible Preferred Stock issued and
cash paid upon conversion of shares of Company Common Stock or
Company Convertible Preferred Stock in accordance with the terms
of Article I and this Article II (including any cash
paid pursuant to Section 1.8, Section 2.3 or
Section 2.5) shall be deemed to have been issued or paid in
full satisfaction of all rights pertaining to the shares of
Company Common Stock and Company Convertible Preferred Stock, as
the case may be (other than any rights with respect to any
unpaid dividends with respect to Company Common Stock or Company
Convertible Preferred Stock that were declared prior to the
Effective Time with a record date prior to the Effective Time
and a payment date after the Effective Time).
Section 2.5 No
Fractional Shares of Parent Common Stock.
(a) No certificates or scrip or shares of Parent Common
Stock representing fractional shares of Parent Common Stock or
book-entry credit of the same shall be issued upon the surrender
for exchange of Certificates and such fractional share interests
will not entitle the owner thereof to vote or to have any rights
of a stockholder of Parent or a holder of shares of Parent
Common Stock.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement,
each holder of shares of Company Common Stock exchanged pursuant
to the Merger who would otherwise have been entitled to receive
a fraction of a share of Parent Common Stock (after taking into
account all Certificates delivered by such holder) shall
receive, in lieu thereof, cash (without interest) in an amount
equal to the product of (i) such fractional part of a share
of Parent Common Stock multiplied by (ii) the Parent Share
Cash Value.
(c) As promptly as practicable after the determination of
the amount of cash, if any, to be paid to holders of fractional
interests, the Exchange Agent shall so notify Parent, and Parent
shall promptly deposit or cause the Surviving Corporation to
deposit such amount with the Exchange Agent and shall cause the
Exchange Agent to forward payments to such holders of fractional
interests subject to and in accordance with the terms hereof.
Section 2.6 Termination
of Exchange Fund. Any portion of the Exchange
Fund which remains undistributed to the holders of shares of
Company Common Stock or Company Convertible Preferred Stock for
twelve (12) months after the Effective Time shall be
delivered to Parent or otherwise on the instruction of Parent,
and any holders of shares of Company Common Stock or Company
Convertible Preferred Stock who have not theretofore complied
with this Article II shall thereafter look only to Parent
for, and Parent shall remain liable for, the Common Stock Merger
Consideration or Preferred Stock Merger Consideration, as the
case may be, to which such holders are entitled pursuant to
Section 1.8 and Section 2.2, and any cash in lieu of
fractional shares of Parent Common Stock to which such holders
are entitled pursuant to Section 2.5 and any dividends or
distributions with respect to shares of Parent Common Stock or
Parent Convertible Preferred Stock to which such holders are
entitled pursuant to Section 2.3. Any such portion of the
Exchange Fund remaining unclaimed by holders of shares of
Company Common Stock or Company Convertible Preferred Stock five
(5) years after the Effective Time (or such earlier date
immediately prior to such time as such amounts would otherwise
escheat to or become property of any Governmental Entity shall,
to the extent permitted by Law, become the property of the
Surviving Corporation free and clear of any claims or interest
of any Person previously entitled thereto.
Section 2.7 No
Liability. None of Parent, Merger Sub, the
Company, the Surviving Corporation or the Exchange Agent shall
be liable to any Person in respect of any Merger Consideration
from the Exchange Fund delivered to a public official pursuant
to any applicable abandoned property, escheat or similar Law.
Section 2.8 Investment
of the Exchange Fund. The Exchange Agent shall
invest any cash included in the Exchange Fund as directed by
Parent on a daily basis in (i) short term direct
obligations of the United
A-8
States of America with maturities of no more than 30 days,
(ii) short term obligations for which the full faith and
credit of the United States of America is pledged to provide for
payment of all principal and interest or (iii) commercial
paper obligations receiving the highest rating from either
Moodys Investor Services, Inc. or Standard &
Poors; provided, that no gain or loss thereon shall affect
the amounts payable to the Company stockholders pursuant to
Article I and the other provisions of this Article II.
If for any reason (including losses) the cash in the Exchange
Fund shall be insufficient to fully satisfy all of the payment
obligations to be made in cash by the Exchange Agent hereunder,
Parent shall promptly deposit cash into the Exchange Fund in an
amount which is equal to the deficiency in the amount of cash
required to fully satisfy such cash payment obligations. Any
interest and other income resulting from such investments shall
promptly be paid to Parent.
Section 2.9 Lost
Certificates. If any Certificate shall have been
lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit of
that fact by the Person claiming such Certificate to be lost,
stolen or destroyed and, if required by the Surviving
Corporation, the posting by such Person of a bond in such
reasonable amount as the Surviving Corporation may direct as
indemnity against any claim that may be made against it with
respect to such Certificate, the Exchange Agent will deliver in
exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed Certificate the
applicable Merger Consideration with respect to the shares of
Company Common Stock or Company Convertible Preferred Stock, as
the case may be, formerly represented thereby, any cash in lieu
of fractional shares of Parent Common Stock to which such
holders are entitled pursuant to Section 2.5, and unpaid
dividends and distributions on shares of Parent Common Stock or
Parent Convertible Preferred Stock to which such holders are
entitled pursuant to Section 2.3, as the case may be,
deliverable in respect thereof, pursuant to this Agreement.
Section 2.10 Withholding
Rights. Each of the Surviving Corporation, Parent
and the Exchange Agent shall be entitled to deduct and withhold
from the consideration otherwise payable pursuant to this
Agreement to any holder of shares of Company Common Stock,
Company Convertible Preferred Stock, Company Stock Options,
RSUs, DSUs, Restricted Stock or any other Equity Interests in
the Company such amounts as it is required to deduct and
withhold with respect to the making of such payment under the
Code and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, or
any provision of state, local or foreign Tax Law. To the extent
that amounts are so withheld by the Surviving Corporation,
Parent or the Exchange Agent, as the case may be, such withheld
amounts shall be treated for all purposes of this Agreement as
having been paid to the holder of shares of Company Common
Stock, Company Convertible Preferred Stock, Company Stock
Options, RSUs, DSUs, Restricted Stock or other Equity Interests
in the Company, as the case may be, in respect of which such
deduction and withholding was made by the Surviving Corporation
or Parent.
Section 2.11 Further
Assurances. After the Effective Time, the
officers and directors of the Surviving Corporation will be
authorized to execute and deliver, in the name and on behalf of
the Company or Merger Sub, any deeds, bills of sale, assignments
or assurances and to take and do, in the name and on behalf of
the Company or Merger Sub, any other actions and things to vest,
perfect or confirm of record or otherwise in the Surviving
Corporation any and all right, title and interest in, to and
under any of the rights, properties or assets acquired or to be
acquired by the Surviving Corporation as a result of, or in
connection with, the Merger.
Section 2.12 Stock
Transfer Books. The stock transfer books of the
Company shall be closed at the close of business on the day on
which the Effective Time occurs and there shall be no further
registration of transfers of shares of Company Common Stock or
Company Convertible Preferred Stock thereafter on the records of
the Company. On or after the Effective Time, any Certificates
presented to the Exchange Agent or Parent for any reason shall
be converted into the Merger Consideration with respect to the
shares of Company Common Stock or Company Convertible Preferred
Stock, as the case may be, formerly represented thereby
(including any cash in lieu of fractional shares of Parent
Common Stock to which the holders thereof are entitled pursuant
to Section 2.5) and any dividends or other distributions to
which the holders thereof are entitled pursuant to
Section 2.3.
A-9
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY
Except (i) as disclosed in the Company SEC Documents filed
since January 1, 2008 but prior to the date hereof (but
excluding any risk factor disclosures contained under the
heading Risk Factors, any disclosure of risks
included in any forward-looking statements
disclaimer or any other statements that are similarly
non-specific or predictive or forward-looking in nature, in each
case, other than any specific factual information contained
therein) or (ii) as set forth in the Company Disclosure
Letter delivered by the Company to Parent prior to the execution
of this Agreement (the Company Disclosure Letter),
which identifies items of disclosure by reference to a
particular section or subsection of this Agreement (provided,
however, that any information set forth in one section of such
Company Disclosure Letter also shall be deemed to apply to each
other section and subsection of this Agreement to which its
relevance is reasonably apparent), the Company hereby represents
and warrants to Parent and Merger Sub as follows:
Section 3.1 Organization,
Good Standing and Qualification.
(a) Each of the Company and its Significant Subsidiaries is
a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good
standing (with respect to jurisdictions that recognize the
concept of good standing) under the Laws of its respective
jurisdiction of organization and has all requisite corporate or
similar power and authority to own, lease and operate its
properties and assets and to carry on its business as presently
conducted, except with respect to Significant Subsidiaries,
where the failure to be so organized, qualified or in good
standing, or to have such power or authority when taken together
with all other such failures, has not, and would not reasonably
be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company
Material Adverse Effect. Each of the Company and its Significant
Subsidiaries is duly qualified or licensed to do business and is
in good standing (with respect to jurisdictions that recognize
the concept of good standing) as a foreign corporation in each
jurisdiction where the ownership, leasing or operation of its
assets or properties or conduct of its business requires such
qualification, except where the failure to be so organized,
qualified or in good standing, or to have such power or
authority when taken together with all other such failures, has
not, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually
or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect.
(b) The Company has delivered or made available to Parent
and Merger Sub a true and complete copy of the Companys
currently effective certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as
amended and restated to the date hereof. The Companys
certificate of incorporation and bylaws so delivered are in full
force and effect and the Company is not in violation of its
certificate of incorporation or bylaws.
(c) Section 3.1(c) of the Company Disclosure Letter
lists, as of the date of this Agreement, each Significant
Subsidiary of the Company.
Section 3.2 Capital
Structure.
(a) As of the close of business on January 23, 2009
(the Capitalization Date), the authorized capital
stock of the Company consists of
(i) 2,400,000,000 shares of Company Common Stock, of
which 1,331,176,822 shares were outstanding (inclusive of
37,823.2483 shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to
the Company Stock Plans) and 91,492,222 shares were held in
the treasury of the Company and (ii) 5,000,000 shares
of Preferred Stock, par value $2.50 per share, of which
2,830,000 have been designated as $2 Convertible Preferred
Stock, of which 8,959 shares were outstanding. There are no
other classes of capital stock of the Company authorized or
outstanding. All issued and outstanding shares of the capital
stock of the Company are duly authorized, validly issued, fully
paid and non-assessable, and no class of capital stock is
entitled to preemptive rights.
(b) From the close of business on the Capitalization Date
through the date of this Agreement, there have been no issuances
of shares of the capital stock or equity securities of the
Company or any other securities of the Company other than
issuances of shares of Company Common Stock pursuant to the
exercise of Company Stock Options or the settlement of RSU or
DSU rights outstanding as of the Capitalization Date under the
Company Stock Plans. There were outstanding as of the
Capitalization Date, no options, warrants, calls, commitments,
agreements, arrangements, undertakings or any other rights to
acquire capital stock from the
A-10
Company other than Company Stock Options, RSUs and DSUs as set
forth in Section 3.2(b) of the Company Disclosure Letter
and other than the Company Convertible Preferred Stock.
Section 3.2(b) of the Company Disclosure Letter sets forth
a complete and correct list, as of the Capitalization Date, of
the number of shares of Company Common Stock subject to Company
Stock Options, RSUs, DSUs, Restricted Stock or any other rights
to purchase or receive Company Common Stock granted under the
Company Stock Plans or otherwise. Immediately prior to the
Closing, the Company will provide to Parent a complete and
correct list, as of the Closing, of the number of shares of
Company Common Stock subject to Company Stock Options, RSUs,
DSUs, Restricted Stock or any other rights to purchase or
receive Company Common Stock granted under the Company Stock
Plans or otherwise, the dates of grant, the extent to which such
options are vested and, where applicable, the exercise prices
thereof. No options, warrants, RSUs, DSUs, calls, commitments,
agreements, arrangements, undertakings or other rights to
acquire capital stock from the Company, or other equity-based
awards, have been issued or granted on or after the
Capitalization Date through the date of this Agreement.
(c) Other than Convertible Debentures, no bonds,
debentures, notes or other indebtedness of the Company having
the right to vote (or convertible into or exercisable for
securities having the right to vote) on any matters on which
holders of capital stock of the Company may vote (Company
Voting Debt) are issued or outstanding.
(d) Except as otherwise set forth in this Section 3.2,
Section 6.5(j) or contained in Section 3.2(b) of the
Company Disclosure Letter, as of the date of this Agreement,
(i) there are no outstanding obligations of the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries to repurchase, redeem or otherwise
acquire any shares of capital stock of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries except for purchases, redemptions or other
acquisitions of capital stock or other securities
(1) required by the terms of the Company Benefit Plans,
(2) in order to pay Taxes or satisfy withholding
obligations in respect of such Taxes in connection with the
exercise of Company Stock Options, or (3) as required by
the terms of, or necessary for the administration of, any plans,
arrangements or agreements existing on the date hereof between
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries and any director or
employee of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries and
(ii) there are no outstanding stock-appreciation rights,
security-based performance units, phantom stock or
other security rights or other agreements, arrangements or
commitments of any character (contingent or otherwise) pursuant
to which any Person is or may be entitled to receive any payment
or other value based on the stock price performance of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries (other than under the Company
Stock Plans) or to cause the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
to file a registration statement under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the Securities Act).
(e) Except as set forth in this Section 3.2, as of the
date of this Agreement, there are no outstanding obligations of
the Company or any of its Significant Subsidiaries
(i) restricting the transfer of, (ii) affecting the
voting rights of, (iii) requiring the sales, issuance,
repurchase, redemption or disposition of, or containing any
right of first refusal with respect to, (iv) requiring the
registration for sale of or (v) granting any preemptive or
antidilutive rights with respect to any shares of Company Common
Stock, Company Convertible Preferred Stock or other Equity
Interests in the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.
(f) Section 3.2(f) of the Company Disclosure Letter
sets forth, as of the date hereof, for each of the
Companys Significant Subsidiaries: (i) its authorized
capital stock or other Equity Interests, (ii) the number of
its outstanding shares of capital stock or other Equity
Interests and type(s) of such outstanding shares of capital
stock or other Equity Interests and (iii) the record
owner(s) thereof. The Company owns directly or indirectly,
beneficially and of record, all of the issued and outstanding
shares of capital stock or other Equity Interests of each of the
Companys Significant Subsidiaries, free and clear of any
Liens other than Permitted Liens, and all of such shares of
capital stock or other Equity Interests have been duly
authorized and validly issued and are fully paid, nonassessable
and free of preemptive rights. Except for the ownership of
Equity Interests in the Companys Subsidiaries and
investments in marketable securities and cash equivalents, none
of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries owns directly or
indirectly any Equity Interest in any Person, or has any
obligation or has made any commitment to acquire any such Equity
Interest, to provide funds to, or to make any investment (in the
form of a loan, capital contribution or otherwise) in, any of
its Subsidiaries or any other Person that is or would reasonably
be expected to be material to the Company and its Subsidiaries,
taken as a whole.
A-11
Section 3.3 Corporate
Authority.
(a) The Company has all requisite corporate power and
authority and has taken all corporate action necessary in order
to execute, deliver and perform its obligations under this
Agreement and to consummate the transactions contemplated
hereby, subject, assuming the accuracy of the representations
and warranties of Parent and Merger Sub set forth in
Section 4.14, only to the adoption of this Agreement by the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority in voting power of
the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock and Company
Convertible Preferred Stock, voting together as a single class
(the Company Requisite Vote), and to the filing and
recording of the Certificate of Merger under the provisions of
the DGCL. The Company Requisite Vote is the only vote of the
holders of any class or series of capital stock of the Company
necessary to adopt, approve or authorize this Agreement, the
Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement. This Agreement has been duly authorized and validly
executed and delivered by the Company and, assuming due
authorization, execution and delivery by Parent and Merger Sub,
constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Company
enforceable against the Company in accordance with its terms,
subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent transfer,
reorganization, moratorium and similar Laws of general
applicability relating to or affecting creditors rights
and to general equity principles (the Bankruptcy and
Equity Exception).
(b) As of the date of this Agreement, the Board of
Directors of the Company (i) has, by resolution duly
adopted at a meeting duly called and held, approved and declared
advisable this Agreement and the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement; (ii) has
received the separate opinions of each of the Company Financial
Advisors (as defined in Section 3.19 below), dated the date
of this Agreement, to the effect that, as of such date and
subject to assumptions, qualifications and limitations set forth
therein, the Common Stock Merger Consideration to be received by
the holders of the Company Common Stock pursuant to the Merger
is fair from a financial point of view to such holders;
(iii) has resolved to recommend adoption of this Agreement
to the stockholders of the Company; and (iv) has directed
that this Agreement be submitted to the holders of Company
Common Stock and Company Convertible Preferred Stock for
adoption.
(c) Assuming the accuracy of the representations and
warranties of Parent and Merger Sub set forth in
Section 4.14, no fair price,
moratorium, control share acquisition or
other similar anti-takeover statute or regulation (each, a
Takeover Statute) or any anti-takeover provision in
the Companys certificate of incorporation and bylaws is,
or at the Effective Time will be, applicable to the Company
Common Stock, the Merger or the other transactions contemplated
by this Agreement. Assuming the accuracy of the representations
and warranties of Parent and Merger Sub set forth in
Section 4.14, the Board of Directors of the Company has
taken all action so that Parent will not be prohibited from
entering into a business combination with the
Company (as such term is used in Section 203 of the DGCL)
as a result of the execution of this Agreement, or the
consummation of the Merger or the other transactions
contemplated hereby, without any further action on the part of
the Company stockholders or the Board of Directors of the
Company.
Section 3.4 Governmental
Filings; No Violations, Etc.
(a) Except for the reports, registrations, consents,
approvals, permits, authorizations, notices
and/or
filings (i) pursuant to Section 1.3 of this Agreement,
(ii) under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvement Act of 1976 (the HSR Act), the
Securities Act, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act), the EC Merger Regulation and the
China Anti-Monopoly Law, (iii) required to be made with the
New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE), (iv) for or
pursuant to other applicable foreign securities Law approvals,
state securities, takeover and blue sky laws,
(v) required to be made with or to those foreign
Governmental Entities (as defined below) regulating competition
and antitrust Laws, (vi) required to be made under any
Environmental Law and (vii) pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the FDA and similar foreign Governmental
Entities, no notices, reports or other filings are required to
be made by the Company with, nor are any registrations,
consents, approvals, permits or authorizations required to be
obtained by the Company from, any governmental or regulatory
authority, agency, commission, body or other governmental entity
(Governmental Entity), in connection with the
execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Company and the
consummation by the Company of the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement,
A-12
except those that the failure to make or obtain would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect.
(b) None of the execution, delivery or performance of this
Agreement by the Company, the consummation by the Company of the
Merger or any other transaction contemplated by this Agreement,
or the Companys compliance with any of the provisions of
this Agreement will (with or without notice or lapse of time, or
both): (i) subject to obtaining the Company Requisite Vote,
conflict with or violate any provision of the Companys
certificate of incorporation or bylaws or any equivalent
organizational or governing documents of any of the
Companys Significant Subsidiaries; (ii) assuming that
all consents, approvals, authorizations and permits described in
this Section 3.4 have been obtained and all filings and
notifications described in this Section 3.4 have been made
and any waiting periods thereunder have terminated or expired,
conflict with or violate any Law or Order applicable to the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective
properties or assets; or (iii) require any consent or
approval under, violate, conflict with, result in any breach of
or any loss of any benefit under, or constitute a default under,
or result in termination or give to others any right of
termination, vesting, amendment, acceleration or cancellation
of, or result in the creation of a Lien, other than Permitted
Liens, upon any of the respective properties or assets of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries pursuant to, any Contract,
permit or other instrument or obligation to which the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries is a party or by which they or any of
their respective properties or assets may be bound or affected,
except, with respect to clauses (ii) and (iii), for any
such conflicts, violations, consents, approvals, authorizations,
permits, breaches, losses, defaults, other occurrences or Liens
which would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or
in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.5 Company
Reports; Financial Statements.
(a) Since January 1, 2006, the Company has timely
filed or otherwise furnished (as applicable) all registration
statements, prospectuses, forms, reports, definitive proxy
statements, schedules, statements and documents required to be
filed by it under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, as the
case may be, together with all certifications required pursuant
to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act) (such documents and any other documents filed by the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries with the SEC, including
exhibits and other information incorporated therein as they have
been supplemented, modified or amended since the time of filing,
collectively, the Company SEC Documents). As of
their respective filing dates (or, if amended or superseded by a
filing prior to the date of this Agreement, then on the date of
such filing), the Company SEC Documents (i) did not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements made therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading and
(ii) complied in all material respects with the applicable
requirements of the Exchange Act or the Securities Act, as the
case may be, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the applicable rules and
regulations of the SEC thereunder. None of the Companys
Subsidiaries is required to make any filings with the SEC. All
of the audited consolidated financial statements and unaudited
consolidated interim financial statements of the Company
included in the Company SEC Documents (together with the related
notes and schedules thereto, collectively, the Company
Financial Statements) (A) have been prepared from,
and are in accordance with, the books and records of the Company
and the Companys Subsidiaries in all material respects,
(B) have been prepared in accordance with GAAP applied on a
consistent basis during the periods involved (except as may be
indicated in the notes thereto or, in the case of interim
financial statements, for normal and recurring year-end
adjustments) and (C) fairly present in all material
respects the consolidated financial position and the
consolidated results of operations, cash flows and changes in
stockholders equity of the Company and its Subsidiaries as
of the dates and for the periods referred to therein.
(b) The Company is in compliance in all material respects
with (i) the applicable provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act and (ii) the applicable listing and corporate
governance rules and regulations of the NYSE. Except as
permitted by the Exchange Act, including Sections 13(k)(2)
and (3), since the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, neither
the Company nor any of its Affiliates has made, arranged,
modified (in any material way), or forgiven personal loans to
any executive officer or director of the Company.
A-13
(c) The Companys disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e) of
the Exchange Act), as required by
Rules 13a-15(a)
and
15d-15(a) of
the Exchange Act, are designed to ensure that all information
required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files
or submits under the Exchange Act is made known to the chief
executive officer and the chief financial officer of the Company
by others within the Company to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure as required under the Exchange Act and is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified by the SECs rules and forms. The Company
has evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures and, to the extent required by
applicable Law, presented in any applicable Company SEC Document
that is a report on
Form 10-K
or
Form 10-Q,
or any amendment thereto, its conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of
the end of the period covered by such report or amendment based
on such evaluation. Based on its most recently completed
evaluation of its system of internal control over financial
reporting prior to the date of this Agreement, (i) to the
Knowledge of the Company, the Company had no significant
deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or operation
of its internal control over financial reporting that would
reasonably be expected to adversely affect the Companys
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information and (ii) the Company does not have Knowledge of
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.
(d) No attorney representing the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, whether or not employed by the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company, has reported to the Companys
chief legal counsel or chief executive officer evidence of a
material violation of securities Laws, breach of fiduciary duty
or similar violation by the Company or any of its officers,
directors, employees or agents pursuant to Section 307 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
(e) Since January 1, 2006, to the Knowledge of the
Company, no employee of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
has provided or is providing information to any law enforcement
agency or Governmental Entity regarding the commission or
possible commission of any crime or the violation or possible
violation of any applicable legal requirements of the type
described in Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act by the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries.
(f) To the Knowledge of the Company, none of the Company
SEC Documents (other than confidential treatment requests) is
the subject of ongoing SEC review. The Company has made
available to Parent true and complete copies of all written
comment letters from the staff of the SEC received since
January 1, 2006 through the date of this Agreement relating
to the Company SEC Documents and all written responses of the
Company thereto through the date of this Agreement other than
with respect to requests for confidential treatment. As of the
date of this Agreement, there are no outstanding or unresolved
comments in comment letters received from the SEC staff with
respect to any Company SEC Documents other than confidential
treatment requests. To the Knowledge of the Company, as of the
date of this Agreement, there are no SEC inquiries or
investigations, other governmental inquiries or investigations
or internal investigations pending or threatened, in each case
regarding any accounting practices of the Company.
Section 3.6 Absence
of Certain Changes. (a) Since
September 30, 2008, the business of the Company and its
Subsidiaries has been conducted in the ordinary course in all
material respects and (b) since December 31, 2007,
there has not been any event, occurrence, development or state
of circumstances or facts or condition that has had or would
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.7 Litigation.
(a) There are no civil, criminal or administrative actions,
suits, claims, hearings, investigations or proceedings
(collectively, Actions) pending or, to the Knowledge
of the Company, threatened against the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries or any of their respective assets or properties
that if determined adversely to the Company would reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company
Material Adverse Effect.
A-14
(b) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries or, to
the Knowledge of the Company, any of their respective assets or
properties, is subject to any outstanding Order, writ,
injunction, decree or arbitration ruling, award or other finding
that would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in
the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.8 Compliance
with Laws. The Company and each of its
Subsidiaries are in compliance with all Laws or Orders, except
where any such failure to be in compliance has not had, or would
not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect. No investigation
or review by any Governmental Entity with respect to the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries is pending or, to the Knowledge of
the Company, threatened, nor has any Governmental Entity
indicated an intention to conduct the same which, in each case,
would reasonably be expected to have a material and adverse
impact on the Company. To the Knowledge of the Company, the
Company is in material compliance with the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act of 1977, as amended, and any rules and regulations
thereunder.
Section 3.9 Properties. Except
as would not have, or would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse
Effect, the Company or one of its Subsidiaries, as the case may
be, (i) holds good, marketable and valid fee simple title
to all of the properties and assets reflected in the
September 30, 2008 balance sheet included in the Company
SEC Documents as being owned by the Company or one of its
Subsidiaries (collectively, with respect to real property, the
Owned Real Property) or acquired after the date
thereof that are material to the Companys business on a
consolidated basis (except for properties and assets sold or
otherwise disposed of since the date thereof in the ordinary
course of business), free and clear of all Liens, except for
Permitted Liens and other matters described in Section 3.9
of the Company Disclosure Letter, (ii) holds the Owned Real
Property, or any portion thereof or interest therein, free of
any outstanding options or rights of first refusal or offer to
purchase or lease, (iii) is the lessee of all leasehold
estates reflected in the September 30, 2008 financial
statements included in the Company SEC Documents or acquired
after the date thereof that are material to the Companys
business on a consolidated basis (except for leases that have
expired by their terms since the date thereof or been assigned,
terminated or otherwise disposed of in the ordinary course of
business) (collectively, with respect to real property, the
Leased Real Property) and (x) is in possession
of the properties purported to be leased thereunder, and each
such lease is valid and in full force and effect, constitutes a
valid and binding obligation of the Company or the applicable
Subsidiary of the Company, subject to the Bankruptcy and Equity
Exception and (y) the Company has not received any written
notice of termination or cancellation of or of a breach or
default under any such lease.
Section 3.10 Contracts.
(a) As of the date hereof, except as set forth as an
exhibit to the Company SEC Documents and on Section 3.10(a)
of the Company Disclosure Letter, neither the Company nor any of
its Subsidiaries is a party to or bound by any:
(i) Contract relating to third-party indebtedness for
borrowed money or any third-party financial guaranty in excess
of $500,000,000;
(ii) non-competition agreements or any other agreements or
arrangements that materially limit or otherwise materially
restrict the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their
respective Affiliates or any successor thereto or that, to the
Knowledge of the Company, would, after the Effective Time, limit
or restrict Parent or any of its Subsidiaries (including the
Surviving Corporation) or any successor thereto, in each case
from engaging or competing in any line of business or in any
geographic area or, in the case of the pharmaceutical business,
any therapeutic area, class of drugs or mechanism of action,
which agreement or arrangements would reasonably be expected to
materially limit, materially restrict or materially conflict
with the business of Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a
whole (including for purposes of such determination, the
Surviving Corporation and its Subsidiaries), after giving effect
to the Merger; or
(iii) Contract required to be filed as an exhibit to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
pursuant to Item 601(b)(10) of
Regulation S-K
under the Securities Act.
A-15
(b) All Contracts of the type described in clauses (a)(i),
(ii) and (iii) above to which the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries is a party to or bound by as of the date of
this Agreement, together with the Contracts set forth on
Section 3.10(b) of the Company Disclosure Letter, are
referred to herein as the Company Material Contracts
(provided that for purposes of Section 5.1, Contracts of
the type referred to in clause (i) above shall not be
deemed to be Company Material Contracts). Except, in each case,
as has not, and would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse
Effect: (i) all Company Material Contracts are valid and
binding on the Company
and/or the
relevant Subsidiary of the Company that is a party thereto and,
to the Knowledge of the Company, each other party thereto,
subject to the Bankruptcy and Equity Exception, (ii) all
Company Material Contracts are in full force and effect,
(iii) the Company and each of its Subsidiaries has
performed all material obligations required to be performed by
them under the Company Material Contracts to which they are
parties, (iv) to the Knowledge of the Company, each other
party to a Company Material Contract has performed all material
obligations required to be performed by it under such Company
Material Contract and (v) no party to any Company Material
Contract has given the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
written notice of its intention to cancel, terminate, change the
scope of rights under or fail to renew any Company Material
Contract and neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries,
nor, to the Knowledge of the Company, any other party to any
Company Material Contract, has repudiated in writing any
material provision thereof. Neither the Company nor any of its
Subsidiaries has Knowledge of, or has received written notice
of, any violation or default under (or any condition which with
the passage of time or the giving of notice would cause such a
violation of or default under or permit termination,
modification or acceleration under) any Company Material
Contract or any other Contract to which it is a party or by
which it or any of its material properties or assets is bound,
except for violations or defaults that are not, individually or
in the aggregate, reasonably likely to result in a Company
Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.11 Employee
Benefit Plans.
(a) Section 3.11(a) of the Company Disclosure Letter,
sets forth a true, complete and correct list of each material
employee benefit plan as defined in
Section 3(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974, as amended (ERISA) (whether or not subject
to ERISA), and any other material plan, policy, program
practice, agreement, understanding or arrangement (whether
written or oral) providing compensation or other benefits to any
current or former director, officer, employee or consultant (or
to any dependent or beneficiary thereof) of the Company or any
ERISA Affiliate, which are now maintained, sponsored or
contributed to by the Company or any ERISA Affiliate, or under
which the Company or any ERISA Affiliate has any material
obligation or liability, whether actual or contingent, including
all incentive, bonus, deferred compensation, vacation, holiday,
cafeteria, medical, disability, stock purchase, stock option,
stock appreciation, phantom stock, restricted stock, restricted
stock unit, stock-based compensation,
change-in-control,
retention, employment, consulting, personnel or severance
policies, programs, practices, Contracts or arrangements (each,
a Company Benefit Plan), excluding Foreign Benefit
Plans. For purposes of this Agreement, the term Foreign
Benefit Plans shall mean those Company Benefit Plans
maintained, sponsored or contributed to primarily for the
benefit of current or former employees of the Company or any
ERISA Affiliate who are or were regularly employed outside the
United States (but which shall exclude any such Company Benefit
Plans to the extent required by applicable foreign law to be so
maintained, sponsored or contributed to). Not more than twenty
(20) Business Days after the date hereof, the Company shall
deliver a true, complete and correct list of each material
Foreign Benefit Plan to Parent. For purposes of this
Section 3.11, ERISA Affiliate shall mean any
entity (whether or not incorporated) that, together with any
other entity, is considered under common control and treated as
one employer under Sections 414(b) or (c) of the Code.
The Company has no express or implied commitment to terminate or
modify or change any Company Benefit Plan in the United States,
other than with respect to a termination, modification or change
required by ERISA or the Code or which would not, individually
or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Company
Material Adverse Effect.
(b) With respect to each Company Benefit Plan (other than
any Foreign Benefit Plan), the Company has made available to
Parent (or, with respect to items (iv), (v), (vi) and
(vii), will provide to Parent not more than twenty
(20) Business Days after the date hereof) true, complete
and correct copies of the following (as
A-16
applicable): (i) the written document evidencing such
Company Benefit Plan or, with respect to any such plan that is
not in writing, a written description of the material terms
thereof; (ii) the summary plan description; (iii) the
most recent annual report, financial statement
and/or
actuarial report; (iv) the most recent determination letter
from the Internal Revenue Service (the IRS );
(v) the most recent Form 5500 required to have been
filed with the IRS, including all schedules thereto;
(vi) any related trust agreements, insurance contracts or
other funding arrangements; (vii) any notices to or from
the IRS or any office or representative of the Department of
Labor or Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC)
relating to any unresolved compliance issues in respect of any
such Company Benefit Plan; and (viii) all material
amendments, modifications or supplements to any Company Benefit
Plan. With respect to each Foreign Benefit Plan, the Company
will provide to Parent not more than twenty (20) Business
Days after the date hereof the items identified in each of
clauses (i), (vi) and (viii) above.
(c) Except as would not, individually or in the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse
Effect, each Company Benefit Plan has been administered in
accordance with its terms, applicable Law (including
Section 409A of the Code) and any applicable collective
bargaining agreement including timely filing of all Tax, annual
reporting and other governmental filings required by ERISA and
the Code and timely contribution (or, if not yet due, proper
financial reporting) of any amounts required to be made under
the terms of any of the Company Benefit Plans as of the date of
this Agreement. With respect to each of the Company Benefit
Plans, no event has occurred and there exists no condition or
set of circumstances in connection with which the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries would be subject to any liability that,
individually or in the aggregate, would reasonably be expected
to have a Company Material Adverse Effect. Each Company Benefit
Plan that is intended to be qualified under
Section 401 of the Code has received a favorable
determination letter from the IRS to such effect and, to the
Knowledge of the Company, no fact, circumstance or event has
occurred or exists since the date of such determination letter
that would reasonably be expected to adversely affect the
qualified status of any such Company Benefit Plan. Except as
would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be
expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect, none of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries has received notice of and,
to the Knowledge of the Company, there are no audits or
investigations by any Governmental Entity with respect to, or
other actions, claims, suits or other proceedings against or
involving any Company Benefit Plan or asserting rights or claims
to benefits under any Company Benefit Plan (other than routine
claims for benefits payable in the normal course). Other than as
set forth on Section 3.11(c) of the Company Disclosure
Letter, each Company Benefit Plan subject to ERISA that provides
retiree healthcare or life insurance benefits in the United
States provides by its terms that it may be amended or
terminated without material liability to the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries at any time after the Effective Time (other
than as required by applicable Law).
(d) No Company Benefit Plan is a multiemployer
plan (as defined in Sections 3(37) and 4001(a)(3) of
ERISA) or a multiple employer plan within the
meaning of Sections 4063/4064 of ERISA or
Section 413(c) of the Code and neither the Company nor any
ERISA Affiliate has sponsored or contributed to or been required
to contribute to a multiemployer plan or
multiple employer plan.
(e) Except as set forth on Section 3.11(e) of the
Company Disclosure Letter, neither the Company nor any ERISA
Affiliate maintains or contributes to, or during the six-year
period prior to the date hereof has maintained or contributed
to, any employee benefit plan within the meaning of
Section 3(3) of ERISA that is subject to Section 412
of the Code or Section 302 or Title IV of ERISA.
Except as would not have, individually or in the aggregate, a
Company Material Adverse Effect, with respect to each plan set
forth on Schedule 3.11(e) of the Company Disclosure Letter
that is subject to Section 412 of the Code or
Section 302 of Title IV of ERISA: (i) there does
not exist any accumulated funding deficiency within the meaning
of Section 412 of the Code or Section 302 of ERISA,
whether or not waived; (ii) there has been no
reportable event within the meaning of
Section 4043 of ERISA and the regulations thereunder which
required a notice to the PBGC which has not been fully and
accurately reported in a timely fashion, as required, or which,
whether or not reported, would constitute grounds for the PBGC
to institute involuntary termination proceedings with respect to
any Company Benefit Plan that is subject to Title IV of
ERISA; (iii) all premiums to the PBGC have been timely paid
in full; (iv) there has not been a partial termination; and
(v) none of the following events has occurred: (A) the
filing of a notice of intent to terminate, (B) the
treatment of an
A-17
amendment to such a Company Benefit Plan as a termination under
Section 4041 of ERISA or (C) the commencement of
proceedings by the PBGC to terminate such a Company Benefit Plan
and, to the Knowledge of the Company, no condition exists that
presents a substantial risk that such proceedings will be
instituted or which would constitute grounds under
Section 4042 of ERISA for the termination of, or the
appointment of a trustee to administer, any such plan.
(f) Except as set forth on Section 3.11(f) of the
Company Disclosure Letter, the execution of this Agreement or
the consummation of the Merger will not constitute an event
that, either alone or in conjunction with any other event, will
or may result in (i) any payment, acceleration,
termination, forgiveness of indebtedness, vesting, distribution,
increase in compensation or benefits or obligation to fund
benefits with respect to any current or former employee or other
personnel of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries,
(ii) any amount failing to be deductible by reason of
Section 280G of the Code or (iii) the provision of any
reimbursement of excise Taxes under Section 4999 of the
Code or any income Taxes under the Code.
(g) Except as would not have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect, (i) each
Foreign Benefit Plan has been established, maintained and
administered in compliance with its terms and all applicable
Laws and Orders of any controlling Governmental Entity;
(ii) each Foreign Benefit Plan required to be registered
has been registered and has been maintained in good standing
with applicable regulatory authorities; and (iii) each
Foreign Benefit Plan required to be funded
and/or book
reserved is funded
and/or book
reserved, as appropriate, in accordance with applicable Law.
Section 3.12 Labor
Matters. Each of the Company and its Subsidiaries
is in compliance with all applicable Laws of the United States,
or of any state or local government or any subdivision thereof
or of any foreign government respecting employment and
employment practices, terms and conditions of employment, wages
and hours and occupational safety and health, including the
Immigration Reform and Control Act, the Worker Adjustment
Retraining and Notification Act, any Laws respecting employment
discrimination, sexual harassment, disability rights or
benefits, equal opportunity, plant closure issues, affirmative
action, workers compensation, employee benefits, severance
payments, COBRA, labor relations, employee leave issues, wage
and hour standards, occupational safety and health requirements
and unemployment insurance and related matters, except where any
such failure to be in compliance has not had, or would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect. Except as
specifically identified on Section 3.12 of the Company
Disclosure Letter, neither the Company nor any of its
Subsidiaries is a party to or bound by any labor or collective
bargaining agreement (other than any industry-wide or
statutorily mandated agreement or non-material agreement in a
non-U.S. jurisdiction).
There is no unfair labor practice charge pending or, to the
Knowledge of the Company, threatened which if determined
adversely to the Company or its Subsidiaries would reasonably be
expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect. Except as
would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be
expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect, (i) to
the Knowledge of the Company, there are no organizational
campaigns, petitions or other activities or proceedings of any
labor union, workers council or labor organization seeking
recognition of a collective bargaining unit with respect to, or
otherwise attempting to represent, any of the employees of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries or compel the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries to bargain with any such labor union, works
council or labor organization, (ii) there are no strikes,
slowdowns, walkouts, work stoppages or other labor-related
controversies pending or, to the Knowledge of the Company,
threatened and (iii) neither the Company nor any of its
Subsidiaries has experienced any such strike, slowdown, walkout,
work stoppage or other labor-related controversy within the past
three (3) years.
Section 3.13 Tax.
(a) Except to the extent reserved for in the most recent
Company Financial Statements, the Company and each of its
Subsidiaries have timely filed, or have caused to be timely
filed, all material Tax Returns required to be filed, all such
Tax Returns are true, complete and accurate in all material
respects, and all material amounts of Taxes shown to be due on
such Tax Returns, or otherwise owed, have been or will be timely
paid.
(b) Except as would not have and would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company
Material Adverse Effect, (i) no Tax authority has asserted,
or threatened in writing to assert, a Tax liability (exclusive
of interest) in excess of $25 million in connection with an
audit or other
A-18
administrative or court proceeding involving Taxes of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries, (ii) neither the
Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has distributed stock of
another corporation or has had its stock distributed in a
transaction that was purported or intended to be governed, in
whole or in part, by Section 355 or Section 361 of the
Code within the preceding five (5) years,
(iii) neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has
participated, or is currently participating, in a listed
transaction as defined in Treasury Regulations
Section 1.6011-4(b),
and (iv) neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is
a party to any agreement or arrangement relating to the
apportionment, sharing, assignment or allocation of Taxes (other
than an agreement or arrangement solely among the members of a
group the common parent of which is the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries), or has any liability for Taxes of any Person
(other than the Company or any of its Subsidiaries) under
Treasury Regulations
Section 1.1502-6
or any similar provision of state, local or foreign Law, as a
transferee or successor, by contract or otherwise.
Section 3.14 Intellectual
Property.
(a) Except as, in the aggregate, would not reasonably be
expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect, (i) to
the Companys Knowledge, the Company and each of its
Subsidiaries owns, or is licensed to use (in each case, free and
clear of any Liens), all Intellectual Property used in or
necessary for the conduct of its business as currently
conducted; (ii) to the Companys Knowledge, the use of
any Intellectual Property by the Company and its Subsidiaries
does not infringe on or otherwise violate the rights of any
Person and is in accordance with any applicable license pursuant
to which the Company or any Subsidiary acquired the right to use
any Intellectual Property; (iii) to the Companys
Knowledge, no Person is challenging, infringing on or otherwise
violating any right of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
with respect to any Intellectual Property owned by
and/or
licensed to the Company or its Subsidiaries; and (iv) to
the Companys Knowledge, neither the Company nor any of its
Subsidiaries has received any written notice or otherwise has
Knowledge of any pending claim, order or proceeding with respect
to any Intellectual Property used by the Company and its
Subsidiaries and to its Knowledge no Intellectual Property owned
and/or
licensed by the Company or its Subsidiaries is being used or
enforced in a manner that would reasonably be expected to result
in the abandonment, cancellation or unenforceability of such
Intellectual Property. For purposes of this Agreement,
Intellectual Property shall mean trademarks, service
marks, brand names, certification marks, trade dress and other
indications of origin, the goodwill associated with the
foregoing and registrations in any domestic or foreign
jurisdiction of, and applications in any such jurisdiction to
register, the foregoing, including any extension, modification
or renewal of any such registration or application; inventions,
discoveries and ideas, whether patentable or not, in any
domestic or foreign jurisdiction; patents, applications for
patents (including, without limitation, divisions,
continuations, continuations in part and renewal applications),
and any renewals, extensions or reissues thereof, in any such
jurisdiction; nonpublic information, trade secrets and
confidential information and rights in any domestic or foreign
jurisdiction to limit the use or disclosure thereof by any
person; writings and other works, whether copyrightable or not,
in any such jurisdiction; and registrations or applications for
registration of copyrights in any domestic or foreign
jurisdiction, and any renewals or extensions thereof; and any
similar intellectual property or proprietary rights.
(b) The Company and its Subsidiaries have taken reasonable
steps to protect the confidentiality and value of all trade
secrets and any other confidential information that are owned,
used or held by the Company and its Subsidiaries in confidence,
including entering into licenses and Contracts that require
employees, licensees, contractors, and other Persons with access
to trade secrets or other confidential information to safeguard
and maintain the secrecy and confidentiality of such trade
secrets. To the Companys Knowledge, such trade secrets
have not been used, disclosed to or discovered by any Person
except pursuant to valid and appropriate non-disclosure, license
or any other appropriate Contract which has not been breached.
Section 3.15 Environmental
Matters.
(a) The Company and its Subsidiaries are in compliance with
all applicable Environmental Laws, and to the Companys
Knowledge any past non-compliance by the Company and its
Subsidiaries with applicable Environmental Laws has been
resolved, except for any failure to comply or to resolve past
non-compliance that would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse
Effect.
A-19
(b) Except as would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse
Effect: (i) each of the Company and its Subsidiaries has
obtained, maintained and complied with all Environmental Permits
necessary for the conduct and operation of its business as
currently operated, and the Company or any applicable Subsidiary
of the Company has not received any notice that any such
Environmental Permit is not in full force and effect; and
(ii) no such Environmental Permit is or will be subject to
review, revision, major modification or prior consent by any
Governmental Authority as a result of the consummation of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(c) None of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has
received any notice of any violation of or liability under
Environmental Laws, which would reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse
Effect.
(d) There are no pending or, to the Companys
Knowledge, threatened civil, criminal or administrative claims,
actions, proceedings, hearings, notices of violation,
investigations, arbitrations or demand letters pursuant to
Environmental Laws or with respect to Hazardous Materials
against the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or, to the
Companys Knowledge, related to the Owned Real Property,
the Leased Real Property or any other facility previously owned
or operated by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries which
would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect.
(e) To the Companys Knowledge, there has been no
presence of storage tanks at or presence or release of any
Hazardous Materials on, at, or from the Owned Real Property or
the Leased Real Property or any other facility operated by the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries, except (i) in
compliance with applicable Environmental Laws and (ii) in a
manner or in quantities or locations that would not require any
investigation, cleanup or remediation of soil or groundwater
under applicable Environmental Laws, other than any presence or
release which would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse
Effect; and neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has
received notice with respect to such presence or release.
(f) Neither (i) the Company nor any Subsidiary,
(ii) any predecessors of the Company or any Subsidiary nor
(iii) any entity previously owned by the Company or any
Subsidiary, has transported or arranged for the treatment,
storage, handling, disposal or transportation of any Hazardous
Material at or to any off-site location which, to the
Companys Knowledge, has resulted in, or would be
reasonably expected to result in, a liability to the Company
that has had, or would reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse
Effect.
(g) There are no Liens or institutional or engineering
controls applicable to any Owned Real Property or, to the
Companys Knowledge, Leased Real Property arising out of or
pursuant to Environmental Laws that have had, or would
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect.
(h) To the Companys Knowledge, there are no other
facts, activities, circumstances or conditions that have
resulted in or would be reasonably expected to result in, the
Company incurring a liability or obligation, pursuant to any
applicable Environmental Laws that has had, or would reasonably
be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company
Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.16 Insurance. Except
as has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse
Effect, (i) each insurance policy under which the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries is an insured or otherwise the
principal beneficiary of coverage (collectively, the
Insurance Policies) is in full force and effect, all
premiums due thereon have been paid in full and the Company and
its Subsidiaries are in compliance with the terms and conditions
of such Insurance Policy, except as has not had, and would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect, (ii) neither
the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is in breach or default
under any Insurance Policy, and (iii) no event has occurred
which, with notice or lapse of time, would constitute such
breach or default, or permit termination or modification, under
the policy.
A-20
Section 3.17 Regulatory
Compliance.
(a) Except as has not had, and would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company
Material Adverse Effect, each of the Company and its Significant
Subsidiaries holds all licenses, permits, franchises, variances,
registrations, exemptions, Orders and other governmental
authorizations, consents, approvals and clearances, and has
submitted notices to, all Governmental Entities, including all
authorizations under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of
1938, as amended (the FDCA), the Public Health
Service Act of 1944, as amended (the PHSA), and the
regulations of the United States Food and Drug Administration
(the FDA) promulgated thereunder, and any other
Governmental Entity that is concerned with the quality,
identity, strength, purity, safety, efficacy or manufacturing of
the Company Products (any such Governmental Entity, a
Company Regulatory Agency) necessary for the lawful
operating of the businesses of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries (the Company Permits), and all such
Company Permits are valid, and in full force and effect. Since
January 1, 2006, there has not occurred any violation of,
default (with or without notice or lapse of time or both) under,
or event giving to others any right of termination, amendment or
cancellation of, with or without notice or lapse of time or
both, any Company Permit except as has not had, and would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect. The Company and
each of its Subsidiaries are in compliance in all material
respects with the terms of all Company Permits, and no event has
occurred that, to the Knowledge of the Company, would reasonably
be expected to result in the revocation, cancellation,
non-renewal or adverse modification of any Company Permit,
except as has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to
have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material
Adverse Effect.
(b) Except as would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse
Effect, since January 1, 2006, all applications,
submissions, information and data utilized by the Company or the
Companys Subsidiaries as the basis for, or submitted by
or, to the Knowledge of the Company, on behalf of the Company or
the Companys Subsidiaries in connection with, any and all
requests for a Company Permit relating to the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries, and its respective business and Company
Products, when submitted to the FDA or other Company Regulatory
Agency, were true and correct in all material respects as of the
date of submission, and any updates, changes, corrections or
modification to such applications, submissions, information and
data required under applicable Laws have been submitted to the
FDA or other Company Regulatory Agency.
(c) Since January 1, 2006, neither the Company, nor
any of its Subsidiaries, has committed any act, made any
statement or failed to make any statement that would reasonably
be expected to provide a basis for the FDA or any other Company
Regulatory Agency to invoke its policy with respect to
Fraud, Untrue Statements of Material Facts, Bribery, and
Illegal Gratuities, or similar policies, set forth in any
applicable Laws, except as has not had, and would not reasonably
be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company
Material Adverse Effect.
(d) For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of this
Section 3.17 do not apply to Environmental Laws or
Environmental Permits.
Section 3.18 Interested
Party Transactions. Since January 1, 2006,
there have been no transactions, agreements, arrangements or
understandings between the Company or any of its Subsidiaries on
the one hand, and the Affiliates of the Company on the other
hand (other than the Companys Subsidiaries), that would be
required to be disclosed under Item 404 under
Regulation S-K
under the Exchange Act and that has not been so disclosed.
Section 3.19 Brokers
and Finders. Neither the Company nor any of its
Subsidiaries has employed any broker or finder or incurred any
liability for any brokerage fees, commissions or finders fees in
connection with the Merger or the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, except that the Company has
employed Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and
Evercore Group L.L.C. as its financial advisors (the
Company Financial Advisors), and the Company has
heretofore made available to Parent a true and complete copy of
all agreements between the Company and the Company Financial
Advisors pursuant to which such firm would be entitled to any
payment relating to the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement.
A-21
Section 3.20 No
Additional Representations.
(a) Except for the representations and warranties made by
the Company in this Article III, neither the Company nor
any other Person makes any express or implied representation or
warranty with respect to the Company or its Subsidiaries or
their respective businesses, operations, assets, liabilities,
conditions (financial or otherwise) or prospects, and the
Company hereby disclaims any such other representations or
warranties. In particular, without limiting the foregoing
disclaimer, neither the Company nor any other Person makes or
has made any representation or warranty to Parent, Merger Sub,
or any of their Affiliates or Representatives with respect to
(i) any financial projection, forecast, estimate, budget or
prospect information relating to the Company, any of its
Subsidiaries or their respective businesses, or (ii) except
for the representations and warranties made by the Company in
this Article III, any oral or written information presented
to Parent, Merger Sub or any of their Affiliates or
Representatives in the course of their due diligence
investigation of the Company, the negotiation of this Agreement
or in the course of the transactions contemplated hereby.
(b) The Company acknowledges and agrees that it
(i) has had the opportunity to meet with the management of
Parent and to discuss the business, assets and liabilities of
Parent and its Subsidiaries, (ii) has been afforded the
opportunity to ask questions of and receive answers from
officers of Parent and (iii) has conducted its own
independent investigation of Parent and its Subsidiaries, their
respective businesses, assets, liabilities and the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement.
(c) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement to
the contrary, the Company acknowledges and agrees that none of
Parent, Merger Sub or any other Person has made or is making any
representations or warranties relating to Parent or Merger Sub
whatsoever, express or implied, beyond those expressly given by
Parent and Merger Sub in Article IV hereof, including any
implied representation or warranty as to the accuracy or
completeness of any information regarding Parent furnished or
made available the Company, or any of its Representatives.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Company
acknowledges that no representations or warranties are made with
respect to any projections, forecasts, estimates, budgets or
prospect information that may have been made available to the
Company or any of its Representatives.
ARTICLE IV
REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT AND MERGER SUB
Except (i) as disclosed in the Parent SEC Documents filed
since January 1, 2008 but prior to the date hereof (but
excluding any risk factor disclosures contained under the
heading Risk Factors, any disclosure of risks
included in any forward-looking statements
disclaimer or any other statements that are similarly
non-specific or predictive or forward-looking in nature, in each
case, other than any specific factual information contained
therein) or (ii) as set forth in the Parent Disclosure
Letter delivered by Parent to the Company prior to the execution
of this Agreement (the Parent Disclosure Letter),
which identifies items of disclosure by reference to a
particular section or subsection of this Agreement (provided,
however, that any information set forth in one section of such
Parent Disclosure Letter also shall be deemed to apply to each
other section and subsection of this Agreement to which its
relevance is reasonably apparent), each of Parent and Merger Sub
hereby represents and warrants to the Company as follows:
Section 4.1 Organization,
Good Standing and Qualification. Each of Parent
and Merger Sub and Parents Significant Subsidiaries is a
corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good
standing (with respect to jurisdictions that recognize the
concept of good standing) under the Laws of its respective
jurisdiction of organization and has all requisite corporate or
similar power and authority to own, lease and operate its
properties and assets and to carry on its business as presently
conducted, except with respect to Parents Subsidiaries,
where the failure to be so organized, qualified or in good
standing or to have such power or authority when taken together
with all other such failures, has not, and would not reasonably
be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent
Material Adverse Effect. Each of Parent and its Significant
Subsidiaries is duly qualified or licensed to do business and is
in good standing (with respect to jurisdictions that recognize
the concept of good standing) as a foreign corporation in each
jurisdiction where the ownership, leasing or operation of its
assets or properties or conduct of its business requires such
qualification, except
A-22
where the failure to be so organized, qualified or in good
standing or to have such power or authority when taken together
with all other such failures, has not, and would not reasonably
be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent
Material Adverse Effect.
Section 4.2 Capital
Structure.
(a) As of January 23, 2009, the authorized capital
stock of Parent consisted of (i) 12,000,000,000 shares
of Parent Common Stock of which 7,357,577,519 shares were
outstanding and 1,504,695,838 shares were held in the
treasury of Parent and (ii) 27,000,000 shares of
Preferred Stock, no par value, of which 1,805 shares were
outstanding and no shares were held in the treasury of Parent.
There are no other classes of capital stock of Parent authorized
or outstanding. All issued and outstanding shares of the capital
stock of Parent are, and when shares of Parent Common Stock and
Parent Convertible Preferred Stock are issued in connection with
the Merger or pursuant to Section 1.8 and Section 1.9,
such shares will be, duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid
and non-assessable and free of any preemptive rights.
(b) Since January 23, 2009 to the date of this
Agreement, there have been no issuances of shares of the capital
stock or equity securities of Parent or any other securities of
Parent other than issuances of shares of Parent Common Stock
pursuant to employee benefit, director or equity compensation
plans, programs or arrangements sponsored or maintained by
Parent or any of its Subsidiaries (the Parent Benefit
Plans). There were outstanding as of December 31,
2008 no options, warrants, calls, commitments, agreements,
arrangements, undertakings or any other rights to acquire
capital stock from Parent other than options, restricted stock
and other rights to acquire capital stock from Parent
representing in the aggregate the right to purchase
approximately 476,000,000 shares of Parent Common Stock
under the Parent Benefit Plans. No options, warrants, calls,
commitments, agreements, arrangements, undertakings or other
rights to acquire capital stock from Parent have been issued or
granted since December 31, 2008 to the date of this
Agreement other than pursuant to the Parent Benefit Plans or the
ordinary course of business in connection with employment offer
letters.
(c) No bonds, debentures, notes or other indebtedness of
Parent having the right to vote (or convertible into or
exercisable for securities having the right to vote) on any
matters on which holders of capital stock of Parent may vote are
issued or outstanding.
(d) Except as otherwise set forth in this Section 4.2,
as of the date of this Agreement, (i) there are no
outstanding obligations of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries to
repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of capital
stock of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries except for purchases,
redemptions or other acquisitions of capital stock or other
securities (1) required by the terms of the Parent Benefit
Plans, (2) in order to pay Taxes or satisfy withholding
obligations in respect of such Taxes in connection with the
exercise of Parent stock options, the lapse of restrictions or
settlement of awards granted pursuant to the Parent Benefit
Plans, or (3) required by the terms of any plans,
arrangements or agreements existing on the date hereof between
the Parent or any of its Subsidiaries and any director or
employee of the Parent or any of its Subsidiaries and
(ii) there are no outstanding stock-appreciation rights,
security-based performance units, phantom stock or
other security rights or other agreements, arrangements or
commitments of any character (contingent or otherwise) pursuant
to which any Person is or may be entitled to receive any payment
or other value based on the stock price performance of Parent or
any of its Subsidiaries (other than ordinary course payments or
commissions to sales representatives of Parent based upon
revenues generated by them without augmentation as a result of
the transactions contemplated hereby and with respect to awards
granted under the Parent Benefit Plans).
(e) Except as set forth in Section 4.2(e) of the
Parent Disclosure Letter and with respect to awards granted
under the Parent Benefit Plans, as of the date of this
Agreement, there are no outstanding obligations of Parent or any
of its Subsidiaries (i) restricting the transfer of,
(ii) affecting the voting rights of, (iii) requiring
the sales, issuance, repurchase, redemption or disposition of,
or containing any right of first refusal with respect to,
(iv) requiring the registration for sale of or
(v) granting any preemptive or antidilutive rights with
respect to, any shares of Parent Common Stock or other Equity
Interests in Parent or any of its Subsidiaries.
A-23
(f) The authorized capital stock of Merger Sub consists of
1,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share,
all of which are validly issued and outstanding. All of the
issued and outstanding capital stock of Merger Sub is, and at
the Effective Time will be, owned by Parent, and there are
(i) no other shares of capital stock or voting securities
of Merger Sub, (ii) no securities of Merger Sub convertible
into or exchangeable for shares of capital stock or voting
securities of Merger Sub and (iii) no options or other
rights to acquire from Merger Sub, and no obligations of Merger
Sub to issue, any capital stock, voting securities or securities
convertible into or exchangeable for capital stock or voting
securities of Merger Sub.
Section 4.3 Corporate
Authority. Each of Parent and Merger Sub has all
requisite corporate power and authority and, except for the
adoption of this Agreement by Parent as the sole stockholder of
Merger Sub (which adoption Parent shall effect on the date
hereof immediately following the execution hereof), has taken
all corporate action necessary in order to execute, deliver and
perform its obligations under this Agreement and to consummate
the transactions contemplated hereby. This Agreement has been
duly authorized and validly executed and delivered by Parent and
Merger Sub, except for the adoption of this Agreement by Parent
as the sole stockholder of Merger Sub, and, assuming due
authorization, execution and delivery by the Company,
constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of Parent
enforceable against the Company in accordance with its terms,
subject to the Bankruptcy and Equity Exception.
Section 4.4 Governmental
Filings; No Violations; Etc.
(a) Except for the reports, registrations, consents,
approvals, permits, authorizations, notices
and/or
filings (i) pursuant to Section 1.3 of this Agreement,
(ii) under the HSR Act, the Securities Act, the Exchange
Act, the EC Merger Regulation and the China Anti-Monopoly Law,
(iii) required to be made with the NYSE, (iv) for or
pursuant to other applicable foreign securities Law approvals,
state securities, takeover and blue sky laws,
(v) required to be made with or to those foreign
Governmental Entities regulating competition and antitrust Laws,
(vi) required to be made under any Environmental Law and
(vii) pursuant to the rules and regulations of the FDA and
similar foreign Governmental Entities, no notices, reports or
other filings are required to be made by Parent or Merger Sub
with, nor are any registrations, consents, approvals, permits or
authorizations required to be obtained by Parent or Merger Sub
from, any Governmental Entity, in connection with the execution
and delivery of this Agreement by Parent or Merger Sub and the
consummation by Parent and Merger Sub of the Merger and the
other transactions contemplated by this Agreement, except those
that the failure to make or obtain would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent
Material Adverse Effect.
(b) None of the execution, delivery or performance of this
Agreement by Parent or Merger Sub, the consummation by the
Company and Merger Sub of the Merger or any other transaction
contemplated by this Agreement, or Parents or Merger
Subs compliance with any of the provisions of this
Agreement will (with or without notice or lapse of time, or
both): (i) conflict with or violate any provision of
Parents or Merger Subs certificate of incorporation
or bylaws or any equivalent organizational or governing
documents of any of Parents or Merger Subs
Subsidiaries; (ii) assuming that all consents, approvals,
authorizations and permits described in this Section 4.4
have been obtained and all filings and notifications described
in this Section 4.4 have been made and any waiting periods
thereunder have terminated or expired, conflict with or violate
any Law or Order applicable to Parent, Merger Sub, or their
Subsidiaries, or any of their respective properties or assets;
or (iii) require any consent or approval under, violate,
conflict with, result in any breach of or any loss of benefit
under, or constitute a default under, or result in termination
or give to others any right of termination, vesting, amendment,
acceleration or cancellation of, or result in the creation of a
Lien, other than Permitted Liens, upon any of the respective
properties or assets of Parent or any of its Significant
Subsidiaries pursuant to, any Contract, permit or other
instrument or obligation to which Parent, Merger Sub or any of
their Subsidiaries is a party or by which they or any of their
respective properties or assets may be bound or affected,
except, with respect to clauses (ii) and (iii), for any
such conflicts, violations, consents, approvals, authorizations,
permits, breaches, defaults, losses, other occurrences or Liens
which would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or
in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
A-24
Section 4.5 Parent
Reports; Financial Statements.
(a) Since January 1, 2006, each of Parent and Merger
Sub has timely filed or otherwise furnished (as applicable) all
registration statements, prospectuses, forms, reports,
definitive proxy statements, schedules, statements and documents
required to be filed by it under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, as the case may be, together with all
certifications required pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (such
documents and any other documents filed by Parent or any of its
Subsidiaries with the SEC, including exhibits and other
information incorporated therein, as they have been
supplemented, modified or amended since the time of filing,
collectively, the Parent SEC Documents). As of their
respective filing dates (or, if amended or superseded by a
filing prior to the date of this Agreement, then on the date of
such filing), the Parent SEC Documents (i) did not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements made therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading and
(ii) complied in all material respects with the applicable
requirements of the Exchange Act or the Securities Act, as the
case may be, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the applicable rules and
regulations of the SEC thereunder. None of Parents
Subsidiaries are required to make any filings with the SEC. All
of the audited consolidated financial statements and unaudited
consolidated interim financial statements of Parent and
Parents Subsidiaries included in the Parent SEC Documents
(together with the related notes and schedules thereto,
collectively, the Parent Financial Statements)
(A) have been prepared from, and are in accordance with,
the books and records of Parent and Parents Subsidiaries
in all material respects, (B) have been prepared in
accordance with GAAP applied on a consistent basis during the
periods involved (except as may be indicated in the notes
thereto or, in the case of interim financial statements, for
normal and recurring year-end adjustments) and (C) fairly
present in all material respects the consolidated financial
position and the consolidated results of operations, cash flows
and changes in stockholders equity of Parent and its
Subsidiaries as of the dates and for the periods referred to
therein.
(b) Parent is in compliance in all material respects with
(i) the applicable provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and
(ii) the applicable listing and corporate governance rules
and regulations of the NYSE. Except as permitted by the Exchange
Act, including Sections 13(k)(2) and (3), since the
enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, neither Parent nor any of
its Affiliates has made, arranged, modified (in any material
way), or forgiven personal loans to any executive officer or
director of Parent.
(c) Parents disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e) of
the Exchange Act), as required by
Rules 13a-15(a)
and
15d-15(a) of
the Exchange Act, are designed to ensure that all information
required to be disclosed by Parent in the reports it files or
submits under the Exchange Act is made Known to the chief
executive officer and the chief financial officer of Parent by
others within Parent to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure as required under the Exchange Act and is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified by the SECs rules and forms. Parent has
evaluated the effectiveness of Parents disclosure controls
and procedures and, to the extent required by applicable Law,
presented in any applicable Parent SEC Document that is a report
on
Form 10-K
or
Form 10-Q,
or any amendment thereto, its conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of
the end of the period covered by such report or amendment based
on such evaluation. Based on its most recently completed
evaluation of its system of internal control over financial
reporting prior to the date of this Agreement, (i) to the
Knowledge of Parent, Parent had no significant deficiencies or
material weaknesses in the design or operation of its internal
control over financial reporting that would reasonably be
expected to adversely affect Parents ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information and
(ii) Parent does not have Knowledge of any fraud, whether
or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in Parents internal control over
financial reporting.
(d) No attorney representing Parent or any of its
Subsidiaries, whether or not employed by Parent or any
Subsidiary of Parent, has reported to Parents chief legal
counsel or chief executive officer evidence of a material
violation of securities Laws, breach of fiduciary duty or
similar violation by Parent or any of its officers, directors,
employees or agents pursuant to Section 307 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
(e) Since January 1, 2006, to the Knowledge of the
Parent, no employee of the Parent or any of its Subsidiaries has
provided or is providing information to any law enforcement
agency or Governmental Entity
A-25
regarding the commission or possible commission of any crime or
the violation or possible violation of any applicable legal
requirements of the type described in Section 806 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act by the Parent or any of its Subsidiaries.
(f) To the Knowledge of the Parent, none of the Parent SEC
Documents is the subject of ongoing SEC review (other than
confidential treatment requests). Parent has made available to
the Company true and complete copies of all written comment
letters from the staff of the SEC received since January 1,
2006 through the date of this Agreement relating to the Parent
SEC Documents and all written responses of Parent thereto
through the date of this Agreement other than with respect to
requests for confidential treatment. As of the date of this
Agreement, there are no outstanding or unresolved comments in
comment letters received from the SEC staff with respect to any
Parent SEC Documents other than confidential treatment requests.
To the Knowledge of Parent, as of the date of this Agreement,
there are no SEC inquiries or investigations, other governmental
inquiries or investigations or internal investigations pending
or threatened, in each case regarding any accounting practices
of Parent.
Section 4.6 Litigation.
(a) There are no Actions pending or, to the Knowledge of
Parent or Merger Sub, threatened against Parent or Merger Sub or
any of their respective Subsidiaries or any of their respective
assets or properties that if determined adversely to Parent
would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
(b) Neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries or, to the
Knowledge of Parent, any of their respective assets or
properties, is subject to any outstanding Order, writ,
injunction, decree or arbitration ruling, award or other finding
that would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in
the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
Section 4.7 Brokers
and Finders. Neither Parent nor any of its
Subsidiaries has employed any broker or finder or incurred any
liability for any brokerage fees, commissions or finders fees in
connection with the Merger or the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, except that Parent has employed
Banc of America Securities LLC and Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Goldman,
Sachs & Co., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.,
Barclays Capital Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. as
its financial advisors (the Parent Financial
Advisors), and Parent and Merger Sub have heretofore made
available to the Company a true and complete copy of all
agreements between Parent, Merger Sub and the Parent Financial
Advisors pursuant to which such firms would be entitled to any
payment relating to the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement.
Section 4.8 No
Business Activities. Merger Sub has not conducted
any activities other than in connection with the organization of
Merger Sub, the negotiation and execution of this Agreement and
the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby. Merger
Sub has no Subsidiaries.
Section 4.9 Board
Approval. The Board of Directors of Parent, by
resolutions duly adopted by unanimous vote, at a meeting duly
called and held and not subsequently rescinded or modified, has
duly (i) determined that this Agreement and the Merger are
advisable and are fair to and in the best interests of Parent
and its stockholders, (ii) approved this Agreement and the
Merger and (iii) resolved that until the earlier of the
Effective Time and the termination of this Agreement in
accordance with its terms, it is advisable and in the best
interests of Parent to reduce its quarterly cash dividend to an
amount not to exceed $0.16 per share of Parent Common Stock and
that Parent shall not declare, set aside, make or pay any
quarterly cash dividend or distribution in excess of such amount
or rescind, modify or amend such resolution.
Section 4.10 Vote
Required. There are no votes of the holders of
any class or series of Parent capital stock necessary to
consummate any of the transactions contemplated hereby.
Section 4.11 Financing. Parent
has delivered to the Company true and complete fully executed
copies of the commitment letter, dated as of January 25,
2009 between Parent and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.,
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Banc of America Securities LLC, Bank
of America, N.A., Barclays Bank PLC, Citigroup Global Markets
Inc. and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., including all
exhibits, schedules,
A-26
annexes and amendments to such letter in effect as of the date
of this Agreement (the Commitment Letter), pursuant
to which and subject to the terms and conditions thereof each of
the parties thereto (other than Parent) have severally agreed to
lend the amounts set forth therein (the provision of such funds
as set forth therein, the Financing) for the
purposes set forth in such Commitment Letter. The Commitment
Letter has not been amended, restated or otherwise modified or
waived prior to the date of this Agreement, and the respective
commitments contained in the Commitment Letter have not been
withdrawn, modified or rescinded in any respect prior to the
date of this Agreement. As of the date of this Agreement, the
Commitment Letter is in full force and effect and constitutes
the legal, valid and binding obligation of each of Parent and,
to the Knowledge of Parent, the other parties thereto. There are
no conditions precedent or contingencies (including pursuant to
any flex provisions) related to the funding of the
full amount of the Financing, other than as expressly set forth
in the Commitment Letter. Subject to the terms and conditions of
the Commitment Letter, assuming the accuracy of the
Companys representations and warranties contained in
Section 3.2(a) and (b) and assuming compliance by the
Company in all material respects with its covenants contained in
Section 5.1, the net proceeds contemplated from the
Financing, together with other financial resources of Parent and
Merger Sub including cash on hand and marketable securities of
Parent, Merger Sub, the Company and the Companys
Subsidiaries on the Closing Date, will, in the aggregate, be
sufficient for the satisfaction of all of Parents and
Merger Subs obligations under this Agreement, including
the payment of any amounts required to be paid pursuant to
Article I or Article II, and the payment of any debt
required to be repaid in connection with the Merger and of all
fees and expenses reasonably expected to be incurred in
connection herewith. As of the date of this Agreement, (i)
(assuming the accuracy of the Companys representations and
warranties contained in Section 3.6 hereof) no event has
occurred which would constitute a breach or default (or an event
which with notice or lapse of time or both would constitute a
default), in each case, on the part of Parent or Merger Sub
under the Commitment Letter or, to the Knowledge of Parent and
Merger Sub, any other party to the Commitment Letter, and
(ii) subject to the satisfaction of the conditions
contained in Sections 7.1 and 7.2 hereof, Parent does not
have any reason to believe that any of the conditions to the
Financing will not be satisfied or that the Financing or any
other funds necessary for the satisfaction of all of
Parents and Merger Subs obligations under this
Agreement and the payment of any debt required to be repaid in
connection with the Merger and of all fees and expenses
reasonably expected to be incurred in connection herewith will
not be available to Parent on the Closing Date. Parent has fully
paid all commitment fees or other fees required to be paid prior
to the date of this Agreement pursuant to the Commitment Letter.
Section 4.12 Absence
of Certain Changes. (a) Since
September 30, 2008, the business of Parent and its
Subsidiaries has been conducted in the ordinary course in all
material respects and (b) since December 31, 2007,
there has not been any event, occurrence, development or state
of circumstances or facts or condition that has had or would
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
Section 4.13 Compliance
with Laws. Parent and each of its Subsidiaries
are in compliance with all Laws or Orders, except where any such
failure to be in compliance has not had, or would not reasonably
be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent
Material Adverse Effect. No investigation or review by any
Governmental Entity with respect to Parent or any of its
Subsidiaries is pending or, to the Knowledge of Parent,
threatened, nor has any Governmental Entity indicated an
intention to conduct the same which, in each case, would
reasonably be expected to have a material and adverse impact on
Parent. To the Knowledge of Parent, Parent is in material
compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as
amended, and any rules and regulations thereunder.
Section 4.14 Certain
Agreements. Prior to the Board of Directors of
the Company approving this Agreement, the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated hereby for purposes of the applicable
provisions of the DGCL, neither Parent nor Merger Sub, alone or
together with any other person, was at any time, or became, an
interested stockholder (as such term is defined in
Section 203 of the DGCL) thereunder or has taken any action
that would cause any anti-takeover statute under the DGCL or
other applicable state Law to be applicable to this Agreement,
the Merger, or any of the transactions contemplated hereby.
Except as set forth in Section 4.14 of the Parent
Disclosure Letter, none of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries has
any
A-27
direct or indirect beneficial ownership, or sole or shared
voting power, with respect to any shares of Company Common Stock
or Company Convertible Preferred Stock.
Section 4.15 Tax.
(a) Except to the extent reserved for in the most recent
Parent Financial Statements, Parent and each of its Subsidiaries
have timely filed, or have caused to be timely filed, all
material Tax Returns required to be filed, all such Tax Returns
are true, complete and accurate in all material respects, and
all material amounts of Taxes shown to be due on such Tax
Returns, or otherwise owed, have been or will be timely paid.
(b) Except as would not have and would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent
Material Adverse Effect, (i) no Tax authority has asserted,
or threatened in writing to assert, a Tax liability (exclusive
of interest) in excess of $25 million in connection with an
audit or other administrative or court proceeding involving
Taxes of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, (ii) neither
Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries has distributed stock of
another corporation or has had its stock distributed in a
transaction that was purported or intended to be governed, in
whole or in part, by Section 355 or Section 361 of the Code
within the preceding five (5) years, (iii) neither
Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries has participated, or is
currently participating, in a listed transaction as
defined in Treasury Regulations
Section 1.6011-4(b),
and (iv) neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries is a
party to any agreement or arrangement relating to the
apportionment, sharing, assignment or allocation of Taxes (other
than an agreement or arrangement solely among the members of a
group the common parent of which is Parent or any of its
Subsidiaries), or has any liability for Taxes of any Person
(other than Parent or any of its Subsidiaries) under Treasury
Regulations
Section 1.1502-6
or any similar provision of state, local or foreign Law, as a
transferee or successor, by contract or otherwise.
Section 4.16 Intellectual
Property.
(a) Except as, in the aggregate, would not reasonably be
expected to have a Parent Material Adverse Effect, (i) to
Parents Knowledge, Parent and each of its Subsidiaries
owns, or is licensed to use (in each case, free and clear of any
Liens), all Intellectual Property used in or necessary for the
conduct of its business as currently conducted; (ii) to
Parents Knowledge, the use of any Intellectual Property by
Parent and its Subsidiaries does not infringe on or otherwise
violate the rights of any Person and is in accordance with any
applicable license pursuant to which Parent or any Subsidiary
acquired the right to use any Intellectual Property;
(iii) to Parents Knowledge, no Person is challenging,
infringing on or otherwise violating any right of Parent or any
of its Subsidiaries with respect to any Intellectual Property
owned by
and/or
licensed to Parent or its Subsidiaries; and (iv) to
Parents Knowledge, neither Parent nor any of its
Subsidiaries has received any written notice or otherwise has
Knowledge of any pending claim, order or proceeding with respect
to any Intellectual Property used by Parent and its Subsidiaries
and to its Knowledge no Intellectual Property owned
and/or
licensed by Parent or its Subsidiaries is being used or enforced
in a manner that would reasonably be expected to result in the
abandonment, cancellation or unenforceability of such
Intellectual Property. Parent and its Subsidiaries have taken
reasonable steps to protect the confidentiality and value of all
trade secrets and any other confidential information that are
owned, used or held by Parent and its Subsidiaries in
confidence, including entering into licenses and Contracts that
require employees, licensees, contractors, and other Persons
with access to trade secrets or other confidential information
to safeguard and maintain the secrecy and confidentiality of
such trade secrets. To Parents Knowledge, such trade
secrets have not been used, disclosed to or discovered by any
Person except pursuant to valid and appropriate non-disclosure,
license or any other appropriate Contract which has not been
breached.
Section 4.17 Regulatory
Compliance.
(a) Except as has not had, and would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent
Material Adverse Effect, each of Parent and its Significant
Subsidiaries holds all licenses, permits, franchises, variances,
registrations, exemptions, Orders and other governmental
authorizations, consents, approvals and clearances, and has
submitted notices to, all Governmental Entities, including all
authorizations under the FDCA, the PHSA, and the regulations of
the FDA promulgated thereunder, and any other Governmental
Entity that is concerned with the quality, identity, strength,
purity, safety, efficacy or
A-28
manufacturing of Parents products (any such Governmental
Entity, a Parent Regulatory Agency) necessary for
the lawful operating of the businesses of Parent or any of its
Subsidiaries (the Parent Permits), and all such
Parent Permits are valid, and in full force and effect. Since
January 1, 2006, there has not occurred any violation of,
default (with or without notice or lapse of time or both) under,
or event giving to others any right of termination, amendment or
cancellation of, with or without notice or lapse of time or
both, any Parent Permit except as has not had, and would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect. Parent and each of
its Subsidiaries are in compliance in all material respects with
the terms of all Parent Permits, and no event has occurred that,
to the Knowledge of Parent, would reasonably be expected to
result in the revocation, cancellation, non-renewal or adverse
modification of any Parent Permit, except as has not had, and
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
(b) Except as would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse
Effect, since January 1, 2006, all applications,
submissions, information and data utilized by Parent or
Parents Subsidiaries as the basis for, or submitted by or,
to the Knowledge of Parent, on behalf of Parent or Parents
Subsidiaries in connection with, any and all requests for a
Parent Permit relating to Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, and
its respective business and Parent Products, when submitted to
the FDA or other Parent Regulatory Agency, were true and correct
in all material respects as of the date of submission, and any
updates, changes, corrections or modification to such
applications, submissions, information and data required under
applicable Laws have been submitted to the FDA or other Parent
Regulatory Agency.
(c) Since January 1, 2006, neither Parent, nor any of
its Subsidiaries, has committed any act, made any statement or
failed to make any statement that would reasonably be expected
to provide a basis for the FDA or any other Parent Regulatory
Agency to invoke its policy with respect to Fraud, Untrue
Statements of Material Facts, Bribery, and Illegal
Gratuities, or similar policies, set forth in any
applicable Laws, except as has not had, and would not reasonably
be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent
Material Adverse Effect.
(d) For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of this
Section 4.17 do not apply to Environmental Laws or
Environmental Permits.
Section 4.18 No
Additional Representations.
(a) Except for the representations and warranties made by
Parent and Merger Sub in this Article IV, none of Parent,
Merger Sub or any other Person makes any express or implied
representation or warranty with respect to Parent, Merger Sub or
their respective Subsidiaries or their respective businesses,
operations, assets, liabilities, conditions (financial or
otherwise) or prospects, and Parent hereby disclaims any such
other representations or warranties. In particular, without
limiting the foregoing disclaimer, none of Parent, Merger Sub or
any other Person makes or has made any representation or
warranty to the Company or any of its Affiliates or
Representatives with respect to (i) any financial
projection, forecast, estimate, budget or prospect information
relating to Parent, Merger Sub any of their respective
Subsidiaries or their respective businesses, or (ii) except
for the representations and warranties made by Parent and Merger
Sub in this Article IV, any oral or written information
presented to the Company or any of its Affiliates or
Representatives in the course of their due diligence
investigation of Parent and Merger Sub, the negotiation of this
Agreement or in the course of the transactions contemplated
hereby.
(b) Parent and Merger Sub each acknowledge and agree that
it (i) has had the opportunity to meet with the management
of the Company and to discuss the business, assets and
liabilities of the Company and its Subsidiaries, (ii) has
been afforded the opportunity to ask questions of and receive
answers from officers of the Company, and (iii) has
conducted its own independent investigation of the Company and
its Subsidiaries, their respective businesses, assets,
liabilities and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(c) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement to
the contrary, each of Parent and Merger Sub acknowledges and
agrees that neither the Company nor any Person has made or is
making any representations or warranties relating to the Company
or its Subsidiaries whatsoever, express or implied, beyond those
expressly given by the Company in Article III hereof,
including any implied representation or warranty as to
A-29
the accuracy or completeness of any information regarding the
Company furnished or made available to Parent, Merger Sub or any
of their respective Representatives. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, each of Parent and Merger Sub
acknowledges that no representations or warranties are made with
respect to any projections, forecasts, estimates, budgets or
prospect information that may have been made available to
Parent, Merger Sub or any of their respective Representatives.
ARTICLE V
COVENANTS
RELATING TO CONDUCT OF BUSINESS
Section 5.1 Ordinary
Course. The Company covenants and agrees as to
itself and its Subsidiaries that, from the date of this
Agreement until the earlier of the Effective Time and
termination of this Agreement, except as specifically permitted
by any other provision of this Agreement (or as set forth in
Section 5.1 of the Company Disclosure Letter) or required
by applicable Law or the regulations or requirements of any
stock exchange or regulatory organization applicable to the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries or except with Parents
prior written approval (not to be unreasonably withheld,
conditioned or delayed), the business of it and its Subsidiaries
shall be conducted in the ordinary and usual course consistent
with the Companys past practice and, to the extent
consistent therewith, the Company and its Subsidiaries shall use
their reasonable best efforts to (i) preserve their assets,
(ii) keep available the services of current officers, key
employees and consultants of the Company and each of its
Subsidiaries, (iii) preserve the Companys business
organization intact and maintain its existing relations and
goodwill with customers, suppliers, distributors, creditors,
lessors, clinical trial investigators or managers of its
clinical trials and (iv) comply in all material respects
with all applicable Laws. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, and as an extension thereof, except as specifically
permitted by any other provision of this Agreement (or as set
forth in Section 5.1 of the Company Disclosure Letter) or
required by applicable Law or the regulations or requirements of
any stock exchange or regulatory organization applicable to the
Company, or the terms of any Contract binding upon the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries, the compliance with which shall not
cause the Company to be in material non-compliance with this
Section 5.1, the Company shall not, and shall not permit
any of its Subsidiaries to, from the date of this Agreement
until the Effective Time, directly or indirectly, do, or agree
to do, any of the following without the prior written consent of
Parent (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed):
(a) amend or propose to amend the certificate of
incorporation or bylaws or other comparable governing
instruments of the Company or any of its Significant
Subsidiaries;
(b) issue, sell, pledge, dispose of, grant, transfer or
encumber or authorize the issuance, sale, pledge, disposition,
grant, transfer or encumbrance of any shares of, or securities
convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for, or options,
warrants, calls, commitments or rights of any kind to acquire,
or based on the value of, any shares of its capital stock of any
class or any Equity Interest, voting debt of the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries, other than the issuance of shares upon the
exercise of Company Convertible Preferred Stock, outstanding as
of the date hereof, in accordance with its terms, or the
exercise of Options or the settlement of DSUs or RSUs or MIP,
outstanding as of the date hereof, in each case in accordance
with the terms of the applicable Company Stock Plan and related
award agreements;
(c) other than pursuant to cash management or investment
portfolio activities in the ordinary course of business, acquire
(including by merger, consolidation, or acquisition of stock or
assets or Intellectual Property or any other business
combination) any ownership interest in any corporation,
partnership, other business organization or any division thereof
or any assets or interest in any assets from any other Person
for consideration valued in excess of $50 million
individually or $200 million in the aggregate (with the
valuation of any contingent consideration being determined in
accordance with the valuation methodology used by the Company in
connection with determining the need to make a notification
under the HSR Act (without regard to whether payments are being
made with respect to assets within or outside the United
States));
A-30
(d) enter into any strategic licensing, joint venture,
collaboration, alliance, co-promotion or similar agreement for
consideration valued in excess of $50 million individually
or $200 million in the aggregate for all such contracts
(with the valuation of any contingent consideration being
determined in accordance with the valuation methodology used by
the Company in connection with determining the need to make a
notification under the HSR Act (without regard to whether
payments are being made with respect to assets within or outside
the United States)), provided, that no such agreement would
(i) constitute a Company Material Contract, (ii) limit
or restrict the Company or its Subsidiaries or the Parent or any
of its Affiliates (including the Surviving Corporation) or any
successor thereto, in each case, after the Effective Time, from
engaging or competing in, or require any of them to work
exclusively with the party to such agreement in, any material
line of business or in any material geographic area or, in the
case of the pharmaceutical or animal health business, in the
research, development, manufacture and commercialization of any
antibody or therapeutic agent directed at a specific antigen or
other target or product or in any therapeutic area, class of
drugs or mechanism of action or modality, other than any
limitation or restriction which the Company shall have the right
to terminate upon a change of control at no cost and with no
such continuing material restrictions or obligations to the
Company or Parent or any of their respective Subsidiaries; or
(iii) be reasonably expected to interfere with the
parties ability to consummate the Merger;
(e) (i) purchase financial instruments that at the
time of purchase qualify as Level III assets (as defined in
FASB 157); (ii) change in a material manner the average
duration of the Companys investment portfolio or the
average credit quality of such portfolio, except for changes
that would reduce investment risk in such portfolio;
(iii) materially change investment guidelines with respect
to the Companys investment portfolio except for changes
that would reduce investment risk of the Companys
investment portfolio; (iv) hypothecate, repo, encumber or
otherwise pledge assets in the Companys investment
portfolio; or (v) invest new surplus cash from operations
in securities other than short-term liquid securities permitted
by Parents investment guidelines (which shall be
implemented by the Company with respect to such new surplus cash
as soon as practicable after the date hereof);
(f) enter into interest rate swaps, foreign exchange or
commodity agreements and other similar hedging arrangements
other than for purposes of offsetting a bona fide exposure
(including counterparty risk);
(g) merge or consolidate the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries with any Person or adopt a plan of complete or
partial liquidation or resolutions providing for a complete or
partial liquidation, dissolution, restructuring,
recapitalization or other reorganization of the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries, other than any such transaction between or
among direct or indirect wholly-owned Subsidiaries of the
Company that would not result in material adverse tax
consequences or material loss of tax benefits or loss of any
material asset (including Intellectual Property);
(h) sell, pledge, dispose of, transfer, lease, license,
guarantee or encumber, or authorize the sale, pledge,
disposition, transfer, lease, license, guarantee or encumbrance
of, any material property or assets (including Intellectual
Property) of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, except
(i) pursuant to existing Contracts or commitments,
(ii) for the sale of goods and services in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice,
(iii) transactions involving property or assets of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries having a value no greater
than $120 million in the aggregate for all such transfers
(with the valuation of any contingent consideration being
determined in accordance with the valuation methodology used by
the Company in connection with determining the need to make a
notification under the HSR Act (without regard to whether
payments are being made with respect to assets within or outside
the United States)), (iv) in connection with any waiver,
release, assignment, settlement, compromise of litigation
otherwise permitted under this Section 5.1, or (v) in
connection with cash management or investment portfolio
activities in the ordinary course of business;
(i) split, combine, reclassify, subdivide or amend the
terms of its outstanding shares of capital stock or any other
securities of the Company or enter into any agreement with
respect to voting of any of its capital stock or any securities
convertible into or exchangeable for such shares;
A-31
(j) declare, set aside, make or pay any dividend or other
distribution, whether payable in cash, stock, property or
otherwise, in respect of the capital stock of the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries, except (i) the declaration and payment
of regular quarterly cash dividends not in excess of $0.30 per
share of Company Common Stock, (ii) the declaration and
payment of regular quarterly cash dividends not in excess of
$0.50 per share of Company Convertible Preferred Stock, in each
case, with usual record and payment dates for such dividends in
accordance with past dividend practice and (iii) between or
among direct or indirect wholly-owned Subsidiaries of the
Company;
(k) purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire, or permit any of
its Subsidiaries to purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any
shares of its capital stock, any securities convertible or
exchangeable or exercisable for any shares of capital stock or
any other securities, including the Convertible Debentures and
Company Convertible Preferred Stock, except for purchases,
redemptions or other acquisitions of capital stock or other
securities (i) required by the terms of the Company Stock
Plans or the Convertible Debenture Indenture, (ii) in order
to pay Taxes or satisfy withholding obligations in respect of
such taxes in connection with the exercise of Company Stock
Options or vesting of RSUs or DSUs or the lapse of restrictions
in respect of any other Equity Interests in the Company, in each
case pursuant to the terms of the Company Stock Plans,
(iii) required by the terms of any plans, arrangements or
agreements existing on the date hereof and disclosed in
Section 3.11(a) of the Company Disclosure Letter between
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries and any director or
employee of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or
(iv) prepayment, repurchase or redemption of all or any
portion of the Convertible Debentures for an amount less than or
equal to par, plus any accrued and unpaid interest incurred up
to the date on which such Convertible Debentures are prepaid,
repurchased or redeemed;
(l) incur any indebtedness for borrowed money or issue any
debt securities or warrants or other rights to acquire debt
securities of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or assume,
guarantee or endorse, as an accommodation or otherwise, the
obligations of any other Person for borrowed money, in each case
other than for borrowing under the Companys existing
working capital facilities and existing letter of credit
facilities in the ordinary course;
(m) make any loans, capital contributions to, or
investments in, any Person in amounts in excess of
$50 million in the aggregate, other than (i) cash
management or investment portfolio activities in the ordinary
course of business and consistently with the Companys
obligations under Section 5.1(e) or (ii) in connection
with a transaction permitted under Section 5.1(c) or (d);
(n) make or agree to make any capital expenditures in
excess of $1.2 billion in the aggregate for all such
capital expenditures (it being understood that any excess over
such amount attributable solely to foreign exchange fluctuation
shall not be deemed to violate this clause), or commit to any
new capital projects in excess of $50 million individually
and $100 million in the aggregate for all such capital
expenditures that are not contemplated by the Companys
2009 operating plan;
(o) terminate, cancel, renew, or request or agree to any
material amendment or material modification to, material change
in, or material waiver under, any Company Material Contract, or
enter into or materially amend any Contract that, if existing on
the date hereof, would be a Company Material Contract (in each
case, excluding the Company Material Contracts identified in
Section 3.10(a)(ii) (except for any amendment that would
expand the limitations or restrictions referenced therein));
(p) (i) increase the number of employees of the
Company and its Subsidiaries (Company Employees),
based on the number of Company Employees employed as of the date
hereof, other than with respect to (A) employees hired
pursuant to offers of employment outstanding on the date hereof
or to replace currently authorized key positions that are or may
become vacant or (B) as reasonably determined by the
Company in good faith, employees (up to a maximum of
500 people) based on essential business need, or
(ii) enter into an employment agreement or relationship
with any Person who earns an annual rate of base salary of more
than or equal to $215,000 (other than with respect to employees
hired pursuant to offers of employment outstanding on the date
hereof or with respect to newly hired employees filling
positions that are reasonably and in good faith deemed by the
Company to be essential, but in no event, in the aggregate, to
exceed 50 people);
A-32
(q) enter into, modify, amend or terminate any Contract or
waive, release or assign any rights or claims thereunder, which
if so entered into, modified, amended, terminated, waived,
released or assigned would be reasonably likely to
(i) impair the ability of the Company to perform its
obligations under this Agreement in any material respect or
(ii) prevent or materially delay or impair the consummation
of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement;
(r) except as required pursuant to any Company Benefit
Plans, Foreign Benefit Plans, Collective Bargaining Agreements,
the terms of this Agreement or any applicable Law:
(i) grant or provide, or adopt a plan or enter into any
agreement or agreements intended to grant or provide, any
retention, change in control, severance or termination payments
or benefits to any current or former director, officer, employee
or consultant of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries,
(ii) increase the compensation, bonus or pension, welfare,
severance or other benefits of, pay any bonus to, or make any
new equity awards to any current or former director, officer,
employee or consultant of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, except for increases in base salary, in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice for
promoted employees who are not officers and whose new position
fills a vacancy (other than a vacancy created as a result of
Project Impact), that do not exceed six percent (6%), on
average, of the base salary increases of all those receiving
such salary increases in the United States and Puerto Rico (and
consistent with local promotional practices and applicable Law
in jurisdictions outside the United States or Puerto Rico),
(iii) establish, adopt, amend or terminate any Company
Benefit Plan or amend the terms of any outstanding equity-based
awards, (iv) take any action to accelerate the vesting or
payment, or fund or in any other way secure the payment, of
compensation or benefits under any Company Benefit Plan,
(v) change any actuarial or other assumptions used to
calculate funding obligations with respect to any Company
Benefit Plan or to change the manner in which contributions to
such plans are made or the basis on which such contributions are
determined, or (vi) issue or forgive any loans to
directors, officers, employees, contractors or any of their
respective Affiliates except for any such issuance that would
not violate the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is consistent with past
practice and policy;
(s) pre-pay any long-term indebtedness for borrowed money
or change the terms or extend the maturity thereof (including
providing cash cover under any letter of credit otherwise than
as required to do so under such facility), other than
(i) borrowings under its existing working capital
facilities and (ii) prepayment, repurchase or redemption of
all or any portion of the Convertible Debentures for an amount
less than or equal to par, plus any accrued and unpaid interest
incurred up to the date on which such Convertible Debentures are
prepaid, repurchased or redeemed;
(t) make any material change in its method of accounting or
its accounting practices, policies or principles, unless
required by Law, a Governmental Entity or GAAP, and neither the
Company nor any of its Subsidiaries shall (i) change its
fiscal year, (ii) make, change or revoke any material
United States Tax election, (iii) settle or compromise the
United States federal income Tax examination for the 2002
through 2005 tax years, or (iv) settle or compromise any
other Tax claim where the amount of cash to be paid to the
relevant taxing authority upon such settlement or compromise of
such claim exceeds $25 million;
(u) waive, release, assign, settle or compromise
(i) any product liability claim asserted against the
Company or its Subsidiaries with respect to hormone therapy
products; (ii) any other product liability claims asserted
against the Company or its Subsidiaries, other than any
compromises or settlements involving the payment by the Company
or its Subsidiaries of monetary damages not to exceed
$5 million individually or $50 million in the
aggregate; or (iii) any claim (other than a product
liability claim or a Tax claim covered by Section 5.1(t)),
the resolution of which (x) would be material to the
Company and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole, (y) would
involve the payment by the Company of an amount in excess of
$25 million individually and $100 million in the
aggregate (but excluding from such aggregate total any
individual claim involving the payment by the Company of an
amount less than $1 million) or (z) would involve the
imposition of injunctive relief against the Company that would
materially limit or restrict the business of Parent and its
Subsidiaries (including the Surviving Corporation) following the
Effective Time; or
(v) authorize or enter into an agreement to do any of the
foregoing.
A-33
Section 5.2 Governmental
Filings.
(a) The Company agrees that, between the date of this
Agreement and the Effective Time, the information supplied by
the Company in writing expressly for inclusion or incorporation
by reference in the
Form S-4
(as defined in Section 6.1(a)) (and any amendment thereof
or supplement thereto) will not, at the date filed with the SEC,
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements made therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they are made, not misleading, except
that no representation or warranty is made by the Company with
respect to statements made in the Proxy Statement based on
information supplied by Parent or Merger Sub in writing
expressly for inclusion therein.
(b) Parent and Merger Sub agree that, between the date of
this Agreement and the Effective Time:
(i) the information supplied by Parent or Merger Sub in
writing expressly for inclusion or incorporation by reference in
the Proxy Statement (as defined in Section 6.1(a)) (and any
amendment thereof or supplement thereto) will not, at the date
mailed to the Companys stockholders and at the time of the
meeting of the Companys stockholders to be held in
connection with the Merger, contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements made
therein, in light of the circumstances under which they are
made, not misleading;
(ii) the
Form S-4
(and any amendment thereof or supplement thereto) will not, when
filed with the SEC, at the time of distribution or dissemination
thereof to the stockholders of the Company, contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact
required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the
statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which
they are made, not misleading, except that no representation or
warranty is made by Parent or Merger Sub with respect to
statements made in the
Form S-4
based on information supplied by the Company in writing
expressly for inclusion therein. The
Form S-4
will comply as to form in all material respects with the
provisions of the Exchange Act, the rules and regulations
thereunder and any other applicable federal securities Laws.
Section 5.3 Restrictions
on Parent. Parent covenants and agrees as to
itself and its Subsidiaries that, from the date of this
Agreement until the earlier of the Effective Time and
termination of this Agreement, except as specifically permitted
by any other provision of this Agreement (or as set forth in
Section 5.3 of the Parent Disclosure Letter) or required by
applicable Law or the regulations or requirements of any stock
exchange or regulatory organization applicable to Parent or
except with the Companys prior written approval (not to be
unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), the business of
it and its Subsidiaries shall be conducted in the ordinary and
usual course consistent with Parents past practice and, to
the extent consistent therewith, Parent and its Subsidiaries
shall use their reasonable best efforts to (i) preserve
their assets, (ii) preserve Parents business
organization intact and maintain its existing relations and
goodwill with customers, suppliers, distributors, creditors,
lessors, clinical trial investigators or managers of its
clinical trials and (iii) comply in all material respects
with all applicable Laws. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, and as an extension thereof, except as specifically
permitted by any other provision of this Agreement (or as set
forth in Section 5.3 of the Parent Disclosure Letter) or
required by applicable Law or the regulations or requirements of
any stock exchange or regulatory organization applicable to
Parent or the terms of any Contract binding upon Parent or any
of its Subsidiaries, Parent shall not, and shall not permit any
of its Subsidiaries to, from the date of this Agreement until
the Effective Time, directly or indirectly, do, or agree to do,
any of the following without the prior written consent of the
Company, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld,
conditioned or delayed:
(a) acquire (including, by merger, consolidation, or
acquisition of stock, assets or any acquisition or license of
Intellectual Property or any other business combination or
collaboration) any interest in any corporation, partnership,
other business organization or any division thereof or any
assets or interest in any assets from any other Person, except
for acquisitions and licenses for which the cash consideration
paid prior to the Effective Time, together with the cash
consideration paid prior to the Effective Time for any other
such acquisitions or licenses, does not exceed $750 million
in the aggregate;
A-34
(b) merge or consolidate Parent with any Person or adopt a
plan of complete or partial liquidation or resolutions providing
for a complete or partial liquidation, dissolution,
restructuring, recapitalization or other reorganization of
Parent;
(c) purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire, or permit any of
its Subsidiaries to purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any
shares of its capital stock, any securities convertible or
exchangeable or exercisable for any shares of capital stock or
any other securities, for consideration in excess of
$500 million in the aggregate, other than any purchase,
redemption or other acquisition (i) of such securities made
in connection with the Financing subject to the Companys
prior written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably
withheld, conditioned or delayed, (ii) required by the
terms of the Parent Benefit Plans or the Parent Series A
Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock, (iii) in order to
pay Taxes or satisfy withholding obligations in respect of such
Taxes in connection with the exercise of Parent stock options,
the lapse of restrictions or settlement of awards granted
pursuant to the Parent Benefit Plans or (iv) required by
the terms of any plans, arrangements or agreements existing on
the date hereof between the Parent or any of its Subsidiaries
and any director or employee of the Parent or any of its
Subsidiaries;
(d) declare, set aside, make or pay any dividend or other
distribution, whether payable in cash, stock, property or
otherwise, in respect of the capital stock of Parent or any of
its Subsidiaries, except the declaration and payment of regular
quarterly cash dividends not in excess of the amount
contemplated in Section 4.9, with usual record and payment
dates for such dividends in accordance with past dividend
practice;
(e) enter into, modify, amend or terminate any Contract or
waive, release or assign any rights or claims thereunder, which
if so entered into, modified, amended, terminated, waived,
released or assigned would be reasonably likely to
(i) impair the ability of Parent to perform its obligations
under this Agreement in any material respect or
(ii) prevent or materially delay or impair the consummation
of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement; or
(f) authorize or enter into an agreement to do any of the
foregoing.
ARTICLE VI
ADDITIONAL
AGREEMENTS
Section 6.1 Preparation
of Proxy Statement; Stockholders Meeting.
(a) As promptly as reasonably practicable following the
date hereof, the Company shall prepare (with Parents
reasonable cooperation) and file with the SEC a proxy statement
to be sent to the stockholders of the Company in connection with
the Company Stockholder Meeting (such proxy statement, and any
amendments or supplements thereto, the Proxy
Statement) and Parent shall prepare (with the
Companys reasonable cooperation) and file a registration
statement on
Form S-4
with respect to the issuance of Parent Common Stock and the
Parent Convertible Preferred Stock, if any, in the Merger (such
registration statement, and any amendments or supplements
thereto, the
Form S-4).
The
Form S-4
and the Proxy Statement shall comply as to form in all material
respects with the applicable provisions of the Securities Act
and the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder
and other applicable Law. Each of Parent and the Company shall
use reasonable best efforts to have the
Form S-4
declared effective by the SEC as promptly as practicable after
the filing thereof and to keep the
Form S-4
effective as long as is necessary to consummate the Merger and
the transactions contemplated thereby. Parent and the Company
shall, as promptly as practicable after receipt thereof, provide
the other party copies of any written comments and advise the
other party of any oral comments, with respect to the
Form S-4
and Proxy Statement received from the SEC. Parent shall provide
the Company with a reasonable opportunity to review and comment
on the
Form S-4,
and any amendment or supplement thereto, prior to filing such
with the SEC, and will promptly provide the Company with a copy
of all such filings made with the SEC. The Company shall provide
Parent with a reasonable opportunity to review and comment on
the Proxy Statement, and any amendment or supplement thereto,
prior to filing such with the SEC, and will promptly provide
Parent with a copy of all such filings made with the SEC.
Notwithstanding any other provision herein to the contrary, no
amendment or supplement (including by
A-35
incorporation by reference) to the
Form S-4
or the Proxy Statement shall be made without the approval of
Parent and the Company, which approval shall not be unreasonably
withheld, conditioned or delayed; provided, that with respect to
documents filed by a party which are incorporated by reference
in the
Form S-4
or Proxy Statement, this right of approval shall apply only with
respect to information relating to the other party or its
business, financial condition or results of operations; and
provided, further, that the Company, in connection with a Change
in the Company Recommendation (as defined in
Section 6.1(b)), may amend or supplement the Proxy
Statement (including by incorporation by reference) pursuant to
a Qualifying Amendment to effect such a Change. The Company will
use reasonable best efforts to cause the Proxy Statement to be
mailed to the Companys stockholders as soon as reasonably
practicable after the
Form S-4
is declared effective under the Securities Act. Parent shall
also take any action (other than qualifying to do business in
any jurisdiction in which it is not now so qualified or to file
a general consent to service of process) required to be taken
under any applicable state securities Laws in connection with
the issuance of Parent Common Stock and Parent Convertible
Preferred Stock and the Company shall furnish all information
concerning the Company and the holders of Company Common Stock
and Company Convertible Preferred Stock as may be reasonably
requested in connection with any such action. Parent will advise
the Company, promptly after it receives notice thereof, of the
time when the
Form S-4
has become effective, the issuance of any stop order, the
suspension of the qualification of the Parent Common Stock or
Parent Convertible Preferred Stock issuable in connection with
the Merger for offering or sale in any jurisdiction, or any
request by the SEC for amendment of the
Form S-4,
and the Company will advise Parent, promptly after it receives
notice thereof, of any request by the SEC for amendment of the
Proxy Statement. If at any time prior to the Effective Time any
information relating to Parent or the Company, or any of their
respective Affiliates, officers or directors, should be
discovered by Parent or the Company which should be set forth in
an amendment or supplement to any of the
Form S-4
or the Proxy Statement so that any of such documents would not
include any misstatement of a material fact or omit to state any
material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in light
of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading,
the party which discovers such information shall promptly notify
the other party hereto and, to the extent required by Law, rules
or regulations, an appropriate amendment or supplement
describing such information shall be promptly filed with the SEC
and disseminated to the stockholders of the Company.
(b) The Company shall duly take all lawful action to call,
give notice of, convene and hold a meeting of stockholders of
the Company on a date as soon as reasonably practicable
following the effectiveness of the
Form S-4
(Company Stockholder Meeting) for the purpose of
obtaining the Company Requisite Vote; provided, however, that
the Company shall be permitted to delay or postpone convening
the Company Stockholder Meeting to the extent the Board of
Directors of the Company or any committee thereof, after
consultation with outside legal counsel, reasonably believes
that such delay or postponement is consistent with its fiduciary
duties under applicable Law. The Board of Directors of the
Company shall recommend adoption of this Agreement by the
stockholders of the Company to the effect as set forth in
Section 3.3(b) (the Company Recommendation),
and shall not (x) withdraw, modify or qualify (or publicly
propose to withdraw, modify or qualify) (a Change)
in any manner adverse to Parent such recommendation or
(y) approve, adopt or recommend any Acquisition Proposal
(any action described in clauses (x) or (y) being
referred to herein as a Change in the Company
Recommendation); provided the foregoing shall not prohibit
accurate disclosure (and such disclosure shall not be deemed to
be a Change in the Company Recommendation) of factual
information regarding the business, financial condition or
results of operations of Parent or the Company or the fact that
an Acquisition Proposal has been made, the identity of the party
making such proposal or the material terms of such proposal in
the Proxy Statement or otherwise, to the extent the Company in
good faith determines that such information, facts, identity or
terms is required to be disclosed under applicable Law; provided
further, that the Board of Directors of the Company may make a
Change in the Company Recommendation pursuant to
Section 6.4(d).
(c) The Company and Parent shall coordinate and cooperate
in connection with (i) the preparation of the
Form S-4,
the Proxy Statement and any other filings that are required to
consummate the Merger and any related transactions contemplated
hereby, (ii) determining whether any action by or in
respect of, or filing with, any Governmental Entity is required
(or any actions are required to be taken under, or consents,
approvals or waivers are required to be obtained from parties
to, any Company Material Contracts and
A-36
Company Benefit Plans) in connection with the Merger or the
other transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and
(iii) using reasonable best efforts to timely take any such
actions (including seeking any such consents, approvals or
waivers) or making any such filings or furnishing information
required in connection therewith or with the
Form S-4,
the Proxy Statement or any other filings.
Section 6.2 Access
to Information/Employees.
(a) Upon reasonable notice, and subject to applicable Law,
the Company shall (and shall cause its Subsidiaries to) afford
to the officers, employees, accountants, counsel, financial
advisors, financing sources and other authorized Representatives
of the Parent reasonable access during normal business hours and
upon reasonable prior notice to the Company during the period
prior to the Effective Time, to all its and its
Subsidiaries properties, books, Contracts, commitments,
records, officers and employees and, during such period as
Parent may from time to time reasonably request, and during such
period the Company shall (and shall cause its Subsidiaries to)
furnish promptly to Parent all other information concerning it,
its Subsidiaries and each of their respective businesses,
properties and personnel as Parent may reasonably request
(including consultation with respect to litigation matters and
material inquiries from the FDA); provided, however, that the
Company may restrict the foregoing access and the disclosure of
information pursuant to Section 6.12 to the extent that
(i) in the reasonable judgment of the Company, any Law
applicable to the Company requires the Company or its
Subsidiaries to restrict or prohibit access to any such
properties or information, (ii) in the reasonable judgment
of the Company, the information is subject to confidentiality
obligations to a Third Party, (iii) such disclosure would
result in disclosure of any trade secrets of Third Parties or
(iv) disclosure of any such information or document could
result in the loss of attorney-client privilege (provided that
the Company
and/or its
counsel shall use their reasonable best efforts to enter into
such joint defense agreements or other arrangements, as
appropriate, so as to allow for such disclosure in a manner that
does not result in the loss of attorney client privilege);
provided, however, that with respect to clauses (i) through
(iv) of this Section 6.2(a), the Company shall use its
commercially reasonable best efforts to (A) obtain the
required consent of such third party to provide such access or
disclosure or (B) develop an alternative to providing such
information so as to address such matters that is reasonably
acceptable to Parent and the Company.
(b) With respect to the information disclosed pursuant to
Section 6.2(a) or Section 6.12, each of Parent and the
Company shall comply with, and shall cause such partys
Representatives to comply with, all of its obligations under the
Confidentiality Agreement, which agreement shall remain in full
force and effect in accordance with its terms.
Section 6.3 Reasonable
Best Efforts.
(a) Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement,
each party will use its reasonable best efforts to take, or
cause to be taken, all actions and to do, or cause to be done,
all things necessary, proper or advisable under this Agreement
and applicable Laws and regulations to consummate the Merger and
the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement as soon as
practicable after the date hereof, including (i) preparing
and filing, in consultation with the other party and as promptly
as practicable and advisable after the date hereof, all
documentation to effect all necessary applications, notices,
petitions, filings, Tax ruling requests and other documents and
to obtain as promptly as practicable all consents, clearances,
waivers, licenses, orders, registrations, approvals, permits,
Tax rulings and authorizations necessary or advisable to be
obtained from any Third Party
and/or any
Governmental Entity in order to consummate the Merger or any of
the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement and
(ii) taking all reasonable steps as may be necessary to
obtain all such material consents, clearances, waivers,
licenses, registrations, permits, authorizations, Tax rulings,
orders and approvals. In furtherance and not in limitation of
the foregoing, each party hereto agrees to make or cause to be
made, in consultation and cooperation with the other and as
promptly as practicable and advisable after the date hereof,
(i) an appropriate filing of a Notification and Report Form
pursuant to the HSR Act, (ii) all appropriate filings
required pursuant to the EC Merger Regulation, (iii) all
appropriate filings required pursuant to the China Anti-Monopoly
Law and (iv) all other necessary registrations,
declarations, notices and filings relating to the Merger with
other Governmental Entities under any other antitrust,
competition, trade regulation or other Regulatory Law (including
under applicable Regulatory Law in Australia and Canada) with
respect to the transactions contemplated hereby and to respond
to any inquiries received and
A-37
supply as promptly as practicable any additional information and
documentary material that may be requested pursuant to the HSR
Act and any other Regulatory Law and to take all other actions
reasonably necessary to cause the expiration or termination of
the applicable waiting periods under the HSR Act and any other
Regulatory Law as soon as practicable and not extend any waiting
period under the HSR Act or any other Regulatory Law or enter
into any agreement with a Governmental Entity not to consummate
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, except with the
prior written consent of the other party, which consent shall
not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. If necessary to obtain
any regulatory approval pursuant to any Regulatory Law, or if
any administrative or judicial Action, including any Action by a
private party, is instituted (or threatened to be instituted by
a Governmental Entity), challenging the Merger or any other
transaction contemplated by this Agreement as violative of any
Regulatory Law, each of Parent and the Company shall cooperate
with each other to (x) obtain any regulatory approval,
(y) contest and resist any such Action, or (z) avoid
the entry of or have vacated or terminated, lifted, reversed or
overturned any decree, judgment, injunction, or other order
(whether temporary, preliminary or permanent) that would
restrain, prevent or delay the Closing or the other transactions
contemplated herein.
(b) To the extent permissible under applicable Law, each of
Parent and the Company shall, in connection with the efforts
referenced in Section 6.3(a) to obtain all requisite
approvals, clearances and authorizations for the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement under the HSR Act or any other
Regulatory Law, use its reasonable best efforts to
(i) cooperate in all respects with each other in connection
with any filing or submission and in connection with any
investigation or other inquiry, including any proceeding
initiated by a private party, (ii) promptly inform the
other party of any communication received by such party from, or
given by such party to, the Antitrust Division of the Department
of Justice (the DOJ), the Federal Trade Commission
(the FTC) or any other Governmental Entity and of
any material communication received or given in connection with
any proceeding by a private party, in each case regarding any of
the transactions contemplated hereby, (iii) permit the
other party, or the other partys legal counsel, to review
any communication given by it to, and consult with each other in
advance of any meeting or conference with, the DOJ, the FTC or
any such other Governmental Entity or, in connection with any
proceeding by a private party, with any other Person,
(iv) give the other party the opportunity to attend and
participate in such meetings and conferences to the extent
allowed by applicable Law or by the applicable Governmental
Entity, (v) in the event one party is prohibited by
applicable Law or by the applicable Governmental Entity from
participating in or attending any meetings or conferences, keep
the other promptly and reasonably apprised with respect thereto
and (vi) cooperate in the filing of any memoranda, white
papers, filings, correspondence, or other written communications
explaining or defending the transactions contemplated hereby,
articulating any regulatory or competitive argument,
and/or
responding to requests or objections made by any Governmental
Entity.
(c) If any objections are asserted with respect to the
transactions contemplated hereby under any Regulatory Law or if
any suit or proceeding, whether judicial or administrative, is
instituted by any Governmental Entity or any private party
challenging any of the transactions contemplated hereby as
violative of any Regulatory Law, each of Parent and the Company
shall use its reasonable best efforts to: (i) oppose or
defend against any action to prevent or enjoin consummation of
this Agreement (and the transactions contemplated herein),
and/or
(ii) take such action as reasonably necessary to overturn
any regulatory action by any Government Entity to block
consummation of this Agreement (and the transactions
contemplated herein), including by defending any suit, action,
or other legal proceeding brought by any Governmental Entity in
order to avoid entry of, or to have vacated, overturned or
terminated, including by appeal if necessary, in order to
resolve any such objections or challenge as such Governmental
Entity or private party may have to such transactions under such
Regulatory Law so as to permit consummation of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, provided that Parent and Company
shall cooperate with one another in connection with all
proceedings related to the foregoing and Parent shall have final
decision-making authority on any action or decision required to
insure that Parent can meet its obligations in this
Section 6.3 and its ability to consummate the transaction.
(d) Notwithstanding the foregoing, and subject to the
remainder of this Section 6.3(d) and Section 6.3(e),
Parent shall and, shall cause its Subsidiaries to, propose,
negotiate, offer to commit and effect (and if such offer is
accepted, commit to and effect), by consent decree, hold
separate order, or otherwise, the sale,
A-38
divestiture or disposition of such assets or businesses of
Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, or effective as of the
Effective Time, the Company or its Subsidiaries, or otherwise
offer to take or offer to commit to take any action (including
any action that limits its freedom of action, ownership or
control with respect to, or its ability to retain or hold, any
of the businesses, assets, product lines, properties or services
of Parent, any of its Subsidiaries, the Surviving Corporation or
its Subsidiaries) which it is lawfully capable of taking and if
the offer is accepted, take or commit to take such action, in
each case, as may be required in order to avoid the commencement
of any Action to prohibit the Merger or any other transaction
contemplated by this Agreement, or if already commenced, to
avoid the entry of, or to effect the dissolution of, any
injunction, temporary restraining order or other order in any
Action so as to enable the Closing to occur as soon as
reasonably possible (and in any event, not later than the
Initial Termination Date, or if such date is extended pursuant
to the terms of Section 8.1(b), the Termination Date).
Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither Parent nor any of its
Subsidiaries shall be required to propose, negotiate, commit to
or effect any such sale, divestiture or disposition of assets or
business of Parent or the Company, or any of their respective
Subsidiaries, or offer to take or offer to commit to take any
such action where such action, sale, divestiture or disposition,
individually or in the aggregate, would be of assets or a
business of the Company or its Subsidiaries or Parent or any of
its Subsidiaries, and such action, sale, divestiture or
disposition would result in the one year loss of net sales
revenues (as measured by net 2008 sales revenue) in excess
of $3,000,000,000. For purposes of calculating the loss of net
sales revenue in the preceding sentence, the least amount of
lost revenues (as measured by net 2008 sales revenue) as
may be required to avoid the commencement of any Action to
prohibit the Merger or any other transaction contemplated by
this Agreement, or if already commenced, to avoid the entry of,
or to effect the dissolution of, any injunction, temporary
restraining order or other order in any Action, shall be used in
the event that Parent elects to offer any action, sale,
divestiture or disposition that would result in a higher loss of
net sales revenue (as measured by net 2008 sales revenue)
than reasonably required to achieve such result.
(e) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the
contrary, the Company shall not, without the consent of Parent,
publicly or before any Governmental Entity or other third party,
offer, suggest, propose or negotiate, and shall not commit to or
effect, by consent decree, hold separate order or otherwise, any
sale, divestiture, disposition, prohibition or limitation or
other action of a type described in Section 6.3(d).
Section 6.4 Acquisition
Proposals.
(a) The Company agrees that it shall not and shall cause
its Subsidiaries not to, and shall use its reasonable best
efforts to cause its and its Subsidiaries Representatives
not to, directly or indirectly, (i) initiate, solicit or
knowingly encourage any inquiries or the making of any proposal
or offer from a Third Party relating to any Acquisition
Proposal, (ii) enter into or participate in any substantive
discussion or negotiation with respect to, or provide any
confidential information or data to any Person relating to, an
Acquisition Proposal, (iii) enter into any merger
agreement, letter of intent, agreement in principle, share
purchase agreement, asset purchase agreement, share exchange
agreement, option agreement or other similar Contract relating
to an Acquisition Proposal or enter into any Contract or
agreement in principle requiring the Company to abandon,
terminate or breach its obligations hereunder or fail to
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby, (iv) take
any action to make the provisions of any fair price,
moratorium, control share acquisition,
business combination or other similar anti-takeover
statute or regulation (including any transaction under, or a
Third Party becoming an interested shareholder
under, Section 203 of the DGCL), or any restrictive
provision of any applicable anti-takeover provision in the
Companys certificate of incorporation or bylaws,
inapplicable to any transactions contemplated by an Acquisition
Proposal (and, to the extent permitted thereunder, the Company
shall promptly take all steps necessary to terminate any waiver
that may have been heretofore granted, to any Person other than
Parent or any of Parents Affiliates, under any such
provisions) or (v) resolve, propose or agree to do any of
the foregoing. The Company shall immediately cease and cause to
be terminated any solicitation, discussion or negotiation with
any Persons conducted prior to the execution of this Agreement
by the Company, its Subsidiaries or any of the Companys
Representatives with respect to any Acquisition Proposal and
shall promptly request the return or destruction of all
confidential information provided by or on behalf of the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries to such Person in connection with the
consideration of any Acquisition Proposal to the extent that the
Company is entitled to have such documents returned or destroyed.
A-39
(b) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in
Section 6.4(a), if at any time following the date hereof
and prior to the time on which the Company has received the
Company Requisite Vote, (i) in response to an unsolicited
Acquisition Proposal or any inquiry relating to a potential
Acquisition Proposal made or received after the date of this
Agreement from a Third Party whom the Companys Board of
Directors (or the Executive Committee thereof) determines, in
good faith, is credible and is reasonably capable of making a
Superior Proposal (an Inquiry), in each case, under
circumstances not involving a breach of Section 6.4(a) in
any material respect, the Company may furnish information with
respect to the Company and its Subsidiaries to the Person making
such Acquisition Proposal or Inquiry and (ii) participate
in discussions or negotiations with the Person making such
Acquisition Proposal or Inquiry; provided that the Company
(A) will not, and will not allow the Companys
Subsidiaries and the Companys Representatives to, disclose
any information to such Person without first entering into a
confidentiality agreement with terms overall no less favorable
to the Company than those contained in the Confidentiality
Agreement and (B) will, subject to applicable Law, promptly
provide to Parent any information concerning the Company or its
Subsidiaries provided to such other Person which was not
previously provided to Parent.
(c) The Company shall promptly notify Parent in writing of
any Acquisition Proposal or Inquiry (and in no event later than
24 hours following the Companys, any of its
Subsidiaries or any Representatives receipt of the
Acquisition Proposal or Inquiry), such notice to include the
identity of the Person making such Acquisition Proposal or
Inquiry and a copy of such Acquisition Proposal or Inquiry,
including draft agreements or term sheets submitted in
connection therewith (or, where no such copy is available, a
reasonably detailed description of such Acquisition Proposal or
Inquiry), including any modifications thereto. The Company shall
keep Parent reasonably informed on a reasonably current basis of
the status of any material developments with respect to an
Acquisition Proposal or Inquiry and shall provide Parent with
copies of all written inquiries and correspondence with respect
to such Acquisition Proposal or Inquiry no later than
24 hours following the receipt thereof. The Company shall
not, and shall cause the Companys Subsidiaries not to,
enter into any Contract with any Person subsequent to the date
of this Agreement, and neither the Company nor any of its
Subsidiaries is party to any Contract, in each case, that
prohibits the Company from providing such information to Parent.
The Company shall not, and shall cause the Companys
Subsidiaries not to, terminate, waive, amend or modify, or grant
permission under, the standstill provisions of any agreement to
which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a party which
prohibits the counterparty from making, effecting, entering
into, making or participating in any solicitation of proxies in
respect of, seeking, proposing or otherwise acting alone or in
concert with others, to influence the management or Board of the
Directors of the Company with respect to, or advising,
assisting, knowingly encouraging or acting as a financing source
for, an Acquisition Proposal. The Company shall, and shall cause
its Subsidiaries to, enforce the standstill provisions of any
such agreement, and the Company shall, and shall cause its
Subsidiaries to, immediately take all steps necessary to
terminate any waiver that may have been heretofore granted, to
any Person other than Parent or any of Parents Affiliates,
under any such provisions except, in each case, if the Board of
Directors concludes in good faith, after consultation with
outside counsel, that the failure to take such action could
reasonably be determined to be inconsistent with its fiduciary
duties under applicable Law.
(d) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the
contrary, the Companys Board of Directors may at any time
prior to the time that the Company receives the Company
Requisite Vote (i) effect a Change in the Company
Recommendation in response to an Intervening Event if the
Companys Board of Directors concludes in good faith, after
consultation with outside counsel, that the failure to take such
action could reasonably be determined to be inconsistent with
its fiduciary duties under applicable Law, (ii) effect a
Change in the Company Recommendation in response to an
Acquisition Proposal if the Companys Board of Directors
concludes in good faith, after consultation with outside
counsel, that the failure to take such action could reasonably
be determined to be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under
applicable Law,
and/or
(iii) if the Company receives an Acquisition Proposal which
the Companys Board of Directors concludes in good faith,
after consultation with outside counsel and the Companys
financial advisors, constitutes a Superior Proposal, terminate
this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(h) to enter into a
definitive agreement with respect to such Superior Proposal (the
Alternative Acquisition Agreement); provided,
however, that the Company shall have provided prior written
notice to Parent, at least three (3) Business Days in
advance, of its intention to take any such action referred to in
clause (i), (ii) and (iii).
A-40
(e) Nothing contained in this Section 6.4 shall
prohibit the Companys Board of Directors from
(i) taking and disclosing to the stockholders of the
Company a position contemplated by
Rule 14e-2(a)
promulgated under the Exchange Act or making a statement
contemplated by Item 1012(a) of
Regulation M-A
or
Rule 14d-9
promulgated under the Exchange Act or (ii) making any
disclosure to the Companys stockholders if the Board of
Directors of the Company determined in good faith, after
consultation with its outside counsel, that the failure to make
such disclosure could reasonably be determined to be
inconsistent with applicable Law; provided, however, that any
disclosure of a position contemplated by
Rule 14e-2(a)
or
Rule 14d-9
promulgated under the Exchange Act other than a stop, look
and listen or similar communication of the type
contemplated by
Rule 14d-9(f)
under the Exchange Act, an express rejection of any applicable
Acquisition Proposal or an express reaffirmation of its
recommendation to its stockholders in favor of the Merger shall
be deemed to be a Change of Board Recommendation.
For purposes of this Agreement, Acquisition Proposal
means any offer or proposal by any Third Party concerning any
(i) merger, consolidation, other business combination or
similar transaction involving the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, pursuant to which such Person would own 15% or
more of the consolidated assets, revenues or net income of the
Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, (ii) sale,
lease, license or other disposition directly or indirectly by
merger, consolidation, business combination, share exchange,
joint venture or otherwise, of assets of the Company (including
Equity Interests of any of its Subsidiaries) or any Subsidiary
of the Company representing 15% or more of the consolidated
assets, revenues or net income of the Company and its
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, (iii) issuance or sale or
other disposition (including by way of merger, consolidation,
business combination, share exchange, joint venture or similar
transaction) of Equity Interests representing 15% or more of the
voting power of the Company, (iv) transaction or series of
transactions in which any Person will acquire beneficial
ownership or the right to acquire beneficial ownership of Equity
Interests representing 15% or more of the voting power of the
Company or (v) any combination of the foregoing.
For purposes of this Agreement, Superior Proposal
shall mean a bona fide written Acquisition Proposal (except the
references therein to 15% shall be replaced by
50%), which, in the good faith judgment of the
Companys Board of Directors (after consultation with the
Companys financial advisors and outside counsel), taking
into account the various legal, financial and regulatory aspects
of the proposal, including the financing terms thereof (it being
understood that the inclusion of any seller
financing in such Acquisition Proposal, pursuant to which
the Companys stockholders may be issued debt instruments
as part of the consideration payable in connection with the
transactions contemplated by such Acquisition Proposal, shall
not create any inference that, nor be used by Parent to assert
or otherwise claim that, an Acquisition Proposal is not a
Superior Proposal), and the Person making such proposal
(i) if accepted, is reasonably likely to be consummated,
and (ii) if consummated would result in a transaction that
is more favorable to the Companys stockholders, from a
financial point of view, than the Merger.
Section 6.5 Employee
Benefits Matters.
(a) At the Effective Time, Parent shall provide employment
to, or shall cause the Surviving Corporation to provide
employment to, employees who were employed by the Company or its
Subsidiaries as of the Effective Time (Covered
Employees).
(b) From and after the Effective Time until the second
anniversary of the Effective Time (the Benefits
Continuation Period), Parent shall provide, or shall cause
the Surviving Corporation to provide, to each Covered Employee:
(i) the same annual base salary or wage rates in effect as
of the date of this Agreement and the same annual incentive and
bonus opportunities provided by the Company in respect of 2008
as set forth under the applicable Company Benefit Plan (and, for
the avoidance of doubt, for purposes of annual cash bonus
opportunities to be provided to Covered Employees whose annual
cash bonuses in respect of 2008 were discretionary, the amount
of such bonuses actually paid to such employees shall be deemed
the amount of their opportunity for purposes of this
provision), and (ii) employee benefits which are
substantially comparable, in the aggregate, to those provided to
similarly situated Covered Employees (as a group), in each case
by the Company and its Subsidiaries immediately prior to the
Effective Time; provided, however, that (A) the foregoing
covenants shall not take into account any change in control- or
transaction-based retention,
A-41
transition, stay or similar bonus arrangements for purposes of
defining either annual incentive and bonus opportunities or
employee benefits as used in this Section 6.5(b));
(B) with respect to Covered Employees who are subject to
collective bargaining agreements, compensation and benefits
shall be provided in accordance with the applicable collective
bargaining agreements; (C) so long as Parent shall, or
shall cause the Surviving Corporation to, honor the provisions
of Section 6.5(c) below with respect to a particular
Covered Employee (other than any Covered Employee who
participates in a Company Benefit Plan that is a Sales Force
incentive or Integrated Metrics Reports Bonus Program), Parent
shall be deemed to have satisfied the portion of the covenant
contained in this Section 6.5(b) with respect to annual
cash incentive or bonus opportunities to be provided to such
Covered Employee in respect of 2009; (D) so long as Parent
shall, or shall cause the Surviving Corporation to, honor the
provisions of Section 6.5(d) or Section 6.5(g) (as it
relates to the CIC Severance Agreements), as applicable to a
given Covered Employee, Parent shall be deemed to have satisfied
the portion of the covenant contained in this
Section 6.5(b) with respect to any obligation to provide
severance payments
and/or
benefits to any such Covered Employee as may otherwise be
required to be provided hereunder; and (E) with respect to
any Covered Employees based outside the United States,
Parents obligations under this Section 6.5(b) shall
be modified to the extent necessary to comply with applicable
Laws of the foreign countries and political subdivisions thereof
in which such employees are based.
(c) Parent shall, or shall cause the Surviving Corporation
to, and the Company shall, in each case honor all of the
obligations and covenants relating to 2009 Bonuses (as defined
on Section 5.1(r) of the Company Disclosure Letter) as are,
and to the fullest extent, set forth in Section 6.5(c) of
the Company Disclosure Letter.
(d) At all times during the Benefits Continuation Period,
Parent shall, or shall cause the Surviving Corporation to,
maintain the Company Special Transaction Severance Plan in
accordance with its terms as in effect on the date hereof (as
such plan is identified on Section 3.11(a) of the Company
Disclosure Letter).
(e) At all times following the Effective Time, Parent
shall, or shall cause the Surviving Corporation to, treat former
employees of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries who, as of
the Effective Time, are eligible to receive post-retirement
health benefits under the applicable Company Benefit Plans, no
less favorably than similarly situated former employees of the
Parent with respect to post-retirement health benefits.
(f) With respect to any Parent Benefit Plans in which
Covered Employees first become eligible to participate on or
after the Effective Time (collectively, New Benefit
Plans), Parent shall, or shall cause the Surviving
Corporation to: (i) waive any pre-existing condition
exclusions and waiting periods with respect to participation and
coverage requirements applicable to Covered Employees under any
such New Benefit Plans providing medical, dental or vision
benefits to the same extent such limitation would have been
waived or satisfied under the analogous Company Benefit Plan in
which such Covered Employee participated immediately prior to
the Effective Time, (ii) provide each Covered Employee with
credit for any co-payments and deductibles paid prior to the
Effective Time during the calendar year in which such Effective
Time occurs (or if later, paid in the year in which such Covered
Employee is first eligible to participate), to the same extent
such credit was given under the analogous Company Benefit Plan
prior to the Effective Time, in satisfying any applicable
deductible or out-of-pocket requirements under any such New
Benefit Plan in which the Covered Employee participates during
the calendar year in which such Effective Time occurs (or if
later, the year in which such Covered Employee is first eligible
to participate) and (iii) recognize all service of each
Covered Employee prior to the Effective Time to the Company, its
Subsidiaries and any predecessor entities of the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries (as well as service to Parent and its
Affiliates (including the Surviving Corporation) after the
Effective Time), for all purposes (including, but not limited
to, eligibility to participate, vesting credit, entitlement to
benefits and benefit accrual) of any New Benefit Plans
(including those providing for vacation and paid time-off) in
which any Covered Employee participates after the Effective
Time; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not apply to
the extent it would result in any duplication of benefits for
the same period of service.
(g) From and after the Effective Time, Parent shall honor,
fulfill and discharge, or shall cause the Surviving Corporation
to honor, fulfill and discharge, in accordance with its
respective terms as in effect as of the date hereof or as may be
amended or terminated after the date hereof with the prior
written consent of
A-42
Parent, each employment, change in control, severance and
termination agreement between the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries and any director, officer or employee of such
company listed on Section 3.11(a) of the Company Disclosure
Letter (the CIC Severance Agreements) and the
obligations of Company and its Subsidiaries as of the Effective
Time under each deferred compensation plan or agreement listed
on Section 3.11(a) of the Company Disclosure Letter.
(h) Nothing in this Section 6.5 shall be construed to
(i) limit the right of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries
(including, following the Closing Date, the Surviving
Corporation and its Subsidiaries) to amend or terminate any
Company Benefit Plan or other employee benefit plan, to the
extent such amendment or termination is permitted by the terms
of the applicable plan, or (ii) require Parent or any of
its Subsidiaries (including, following the Closing Date, the
Surviving Corporation and its Subsidiaries) to retain the
employment of any particular Covered Employee for any fixed
period of time following the Closing Date.
(i) Without limiting the generality of Section 9.5,
the provisions of this Section 6.5 are solely for the
benefit of the parties to this Agreement, and no current or
former employee, director or independent contractor or any other
individual associated therewith shall be regarded for any
purpose as a third-party beneficiary of the Agreement, and
nothing herein shall be construed as an amendment to any Company
Benefit Plan or other employee benefit plan for any purpose.
(j) Prior to the Effective Time, the Company shall
reacquire from the Stock Trust any shares of Restricted Stock
held by the Stock Trust (the Excess Shares and, upon
their acquisition by the Company, the Reacquired
Shares); provided, however, that the Company shall not
reacquire such Excess Shares in exchange for payment of any
consideration to the Stock Trust, unless such consideration
shall be paid to such Stock Trust with express instructions to
the trustee thereof to pay such consideration to the applicable
beneficiaries of the consideration in respect of such Reacquired
Shares in full satisfaction of the obligations of the Company
under applicable Company Stock Plans in respect of such
Reacquired Shares. From and after the date hereof until the
Effective Time, the Company shall not cause the Stock Trust to
sell or otherwise dispose of any Excess Shares except as
permitted under this Section 6.5(j).
Section 6.6 Fees
and Expenses. Subject to Section 6.13 and
Section 8.2, whether or not the Merger is consummated, all
Expenses incurred in connection with this Agreement and the
transactions contemplated hereby shall be paid by the party
incurring such Expenses, except if the Merger is consummated,
the Surviving Corporation or its relevant Subsidiary shall pay,
or cause to be paid, any and all property or transfer taxes
imposed on the Company or its Subsidiaries.
Section 6.7 Directors
and Officers Indemnification and Insurance.
(a) From and after the Effective Time, Parent shall, and
shall cause the Surviving Corporation to, (i) indemnify,
defend and hold harmless, all past and present directors,
officers and employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries (in
all of their capacities) and all fiduciaries under any Company
Benefit Plans (collectively, the Indemnified
Parties) against any costs, expenses (including
attorneys fees and expenses and disbursements), judgments,
fines, losses, claims damages or liabilities incurred in
connection with any claim, action, suit, proceeding or
investigation, whether civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative, arising out of or pertaining to the fact that the
Indemnified Party is or was a director, officer, employee or
fiduciary of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or a
fiduciary under any Company Benefit Plan or is or was serving at
the request of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries as a
director, officer or employee of any other corporation, limited
liability company, partnership, joint venture, trust or other
business or non-profit enterprise (including an employee benefit
plan) whether asserted or claimed prior to, at or after the
Effective Time (including with respect to acts or omissions
occurring in connection with this Agreement and the consummation
of the transactions contemplated hereby), and provide
advancement of expenses to the Indemnified Parties (within ten
(10) days of receipt by Parent or the Surviving Corporation
from an Indemnified Party of a request therefor), in all such
cases to the same extent that such persons are indemnified or
have the right to advancement of expenses as of the date of this
Agreement by the Company pursuant to the Companys
certificate of incorporation, bylaws and indemnification
agreements, if any, or by any one of the Companys
Subsidiaries pursuant to such Subsidiarys certificate of
incorporation, bylaws and indemnification agreements of any
Subsidiary of the Company, if any, in existence on the date
hereof, (ii) without limitation to clause (i),
A-43
to the fullest extent permitted by applicable Law, include and
cause to be maintained in effect in the Surviving
Corporations (or any successors) certificate of
incorporation and bylaws for a period of six (6) years
after the Effective Time, the current provisions regarding
elimination of liability of directors, and indemnification of
and advancement of expenses to directors, officers and employees
of the Company, contained in the certificate of incorporation
and bylaws of the Company and (iii) not settle, compromise
or consent to the entry of any judgment in any proceeding or
threatened Action (and in which indemnification could be sought
by an Indemnified Party hereunder), unless such settlement,
compromise or consent includes an unconditional release of such
Indemnified Party from all liability arising out of such Action
or such Indemnified Party otherwise consents in writing, and
cooperates in the defense of such proceeding or threatened
Action. Prior to the Effective Time, the Company shall and, if
the Company is unable to, Parent shall cause the Surviving
Corporation to, obtain and fully pay for tail
prepaid insurance policies with a claims period of at least six
(6) years from and after the Effective Time from an
insurance carrier with the same or better rating as the
Companys current insurance carrier with respect to
directors and officers liability insurance and
fiduciary insurance (collectively, D&O
Insurance), for the Indemnified Parties, with terms,
conditions, retentions and levels of coverage at least as
favorable as the Companys existing D&O Insurance with
respect to matters existing or occurring prior to the Effective
Time (including with respect to acts or omissions occurring in
connection with this Agreement and the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby). If such tail
prepaid insurance policies have been obtained, Parent shall, and
shall cause the Surviving Corporation after the Effective Time,
to maintain such policies in full force and effect, for its full
term, and to continue to honor its respective obligations
thereunder. If the Company and the Surviving Corporation for any
reason fail to obtain such tail prepaid insurance
policies as of the Effective Time, the Surviving Corporation
shall, and Parent shall cause the Surviving Corporation to,
continue to maintain in effect, at no expense to the
beneficiaries, for a period of at least six (6) years from
and after the Effective Time for the Indemnified Parties, the
D&O Insurance (provided that Parent (or any successor) may
substitute therefor policies of at least the same terms,
conditions, retentions and levels of coverage and amounts which
are, in the aggregate, as favorable to the Indemnified Parties
as provided in the existing policies as of the date of this
Agreement) or, if such insurance is unavailable, the Surviving
Corporation shall, and Parent shall cause the Surviving
Corporation to, purchase the best available D&O Insurance
for such six-year period from an insurance carrier with the same
or better credit rating as the Companys current insurance
carrier with respect to the Companys existing D&O
Insurance with terms, conditions, retentions and with levels of
coverage at least as favorable as provided in the Companys
existing policies as of the date of this Agreement with respect
to claims, actions, suits, proceedings or investigations,
whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative,
arising out of or pertaining to facts or events that occurred
prior to, at or after the Effective Time (including with respect
to acts or omissions occurring in connection with this Agreement
and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby),
provided, however, that in no event will Parent or the Surviving
Corporation be required to expend annually in excess of 300% of
the annual premium currently paid by the Company for such
coverage (and to the extent the annual premium would exceed 300%
of the annual premium currently paid by the Company for such
coverage, the Surviving Corporation shall use all reasonable
efforts to cause to be maintained the maximum amount of coverage
as is available for such 300% of such annual premium). The
obligations of Parent and the Surviving Corporation under this
Section 6.7 shall not be terminated, amended or modified in
any manner so as to adversely affect any Indemnified Party
(including their successors, heirs and legal representatives) to
whom this Section 6.7 applies without the consent of such
affected Indemnified Party (it being expressly agreed that the
Indemnified Parties to whom this Section 6.7 applies shall
be third party beneficiaries of this Section 6.7, and this
Section 6.7 shall be enforceable by such Indemnified
Parties and their respective successors, heirs and legal
representatives and shall be binding on all successors and
assigns of Parent and the Surviving Corporation).
(b) If Parent or any of its successors or assigns
(i) shall consolidate with or merge into any other
corporation or entity and shall not be the continuing or
surviving corporation or entity of such consolidation or merger
or (ii) shall transfer all or substantially all of its
properties and assets to any Person, then, and in each such
case, proper provisions shall be made so that the successors and
assigns of Parent shall assume all of the obligations set forth
in this Section 6.7.
A-44
(c) The rights of the Indemnified Parties under this
Section 6.7 shall be in addition to any rights such
Indemnified Parties may have under the certificate of
incorporation or bylaws of the Surviving Corporation or any of
its Subsidiaries, or under any applicable Contracts or Laws, and
Parent shall, and shall cause the Surviving Corporation to,
honor and perform under all indemnification agreements entered
into by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.
Section 6.8 Public
Announcements. Parent and the Company have agreed
upon the form and substance of the press release to be issued by
Parent, on the one hand, and the Company, on the other hand,
announcing the execution of this Agreement and the Merger, which
shall be issued promptly following the execution and delivery
hereof. Subject to Section 6.1, each of Parent and the
Company agrees that no public release, announcement,
and/or other
public statement with respect to the transactions contemplated
hereby shall be issued prior to consulting with and considering
in good faith the views of the other party, and except as such
public release, announcement,
and/or other
public statement may be required by applicable Law or the rules
or regulations of any applicable United States securities
exchange or regulatory body or Governmental Entity to which the
relevant party is subject, in which case the party required to
make the public release, announcement,
and/or other
public statement shall use its commercially reasonable efforts
to allow each other party reasonable time to comment on such
public release, announcement,
and/or other
public statement in advance of such issuance.
Section 6.9 Listing
of Shares of Parent Common Stock and Parent Convertible
Preferred Stock. Parent shall use its reasonable
best efforts to cause the shares of Parent Common Stock and
Parent Convertible Preferred Stock, if any, to be issued in the
Merger and such other shares to be reserved for issuance in
connection with the Merger to be approved for listing on the
NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance, prior to the
Effective Time.
Section 6.10 Dividends. After
the date of this Agreement, each of Parent and the Company shall
coordinate with the other the payment of dividends with respect
to the Parent Common Stock and Company Common Stock and the
record dates and payment dates relating thereto, it being the
intention of the parties that holders of Parent Common Stock and
Company Common Stock shall not receive two dividends, or fail to
receive one dividend, for any single calendar quarter with
respect to their shares of Parent Common Stock
and/or
Company Common Stock or any shares of Parent Common Stock that
any such holder receives in exchange for such shares of Company
Common Stock in the Merger. Notwithstanding anything herein to
the contrary, until the earlier of the Effective Time and the
termination of this Agreement in accordance with its terms,
Parent agrees that it shall not declare, set aside, make or pay
any quarterly cash dividend or distribution in excess of the
amount contemplated in clause (iii) of Section 4.9 and
the Company agrees that it shall not declare, set aside, make or
pay any quarterly cash dividend or distribution in excess of the
amount contemplated in clause (j) of Section 5.1.
Section 6.11 Section 16
Matters. Prior to the Effective Time, each of
Parent and the Company shall take all such steps as may be
required to cause any dispositions of Company Common Stock
(including derivative securities with respect to Company Common
Stock) or acquisitions of Parent Common Stock resulting from the
transactions contemplated hereby by each individual who is
subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of
the Exchange Act with respect to the Company, to be exempt under
Rule 16b-3
promulgated under the Exchange Act, such steps to be taken in
accordance with the interpretive guidance set forth by the SEC.
Section 6.12 Company
Cooperation on Certain Matters. After the date
hereof and prior to the Effective Time, Parent and the Company
shall establish a mechanism, subject to applicable Law,
reasonably acceptable to both parties by which the parties will
confer on a regular and continued basis regarding the general
status of the ongoing operations of the Company and its
Subsidiaries and integration planning matters and communicate
and consult with specific persons to be identified by each party
to the other with respect to the foregoing.
A-45
Section 6.13 Financing
Cooperation.
(a) Parent shall use its reasonable best efforts to take,
or cause to be taken, all actions and to do, or cause to be
done, all things necessary, proper or advisable to consummate
and obtain the Financing on the terms and conditions described
in the Commitment Letter, including using reasonable best
efforts to (i) maintain in effect the Commitment Letter,
(ii) negotiate definitive agreements with respect thereto
on terms and conditions (including the flex
provisions) contemplated by the Commitment Letter and execute
and deliver to the Company a copy thereof concurrently with such
execution, (iii) satisfy on a timely basis all conditions
applicable to Parent in the Commitment Letter that are within
its control and comply with its obligations thereunder,
(iv) provide prior to the Effective Time the lenders under
the Commitment Letter with such evidence as may be requested by
such lenders to demonstrate the satisfaction of the condition
set forth in Paragraph 2 of Annex D to the Commitment
Letter, including if necessary by requesting that Moodys
Investors Services, Inc. and Standard & Poors
provide written evidence thereof at the Closing and
(v) enforce its rights under the Commitment Letter in the
event of a breach by the financing sources that impedes or
delays Closing, including seeking specific performance of the
parties thereunder. In the event that all conditions to the
Commitment Letter have been satisfied or, upon funding will be
satisfied, Parent and Merger Sub shall use their reasonable best
efforts to cause the lenders and the other Persons providing
such Financing to fund on the Closing Date the Financing
required to consummate the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement (including by taking enforcement
action, including seeking specific performance, to cause such
lenders and the other Persons providing such Financing to fund
such Financing). Parent shall have the right from time to time
to amend, replace, supplement or otherwise modify, or waive any
of its rights under, the Commitment Letter
and/or
substitute other debt or equity financing for all or any portion
of the Financing from the same
and/or
alternative financing sources, provided that any such amendment,
replacement, supplement or other modification to or waiver of
any provision of the Commitment Letter that amends the Financing
and/or
substitution of all or any portion of the Financing shall not
(A) expand upon the conditions precedent or contingencies
to the Financing as set forth in the Commitment Letter or
(B) prevent or impede or delay the consummation of the
Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement. Parent shall be permitted to reduce the amount of
Financing under the Commitment Letter in its reasonable
discretion, provided, that Parent shall not reduce the Financing
to an amount committed below the amount that is required,
together with the financial resources of Parent and Merger Sub,
including cash on hand and marketable securities, to consummate
the Merger, and provided further that such reduction shall not
(A) expand upon the conditions precedent or contingencies
to the Financing as set forth in the Commitment Letter or
(B) prevent or impede or delay the consummation of the
Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement. If any portion of the Financing becomes unavailable
or Parent becomes aware of any event or circumstance that makes
any portion of the Financing unavailable, in each case, on the
terms and conditions (including the flex provisions)
contemplated in the Commitment Letter and such portion is
reasonably required to fund the Merger Consideration, Parent
shall use its reasonable best efforts to arrange and obtain
alternative financing from alternative financial institutions in
an amount sufficient to consummate the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement upon conditions no less favorable to Parent
and the Company than those in the Commitment Letter as promptly
as practicable following the occurrence of such event. Parent
shall give the Company prompt oral and written notice (but in
any event not later than 48 hours after the occurrence) of
any material breach by any party to the Commitment Letter or of
any condition not likely to be satisfied, in each case, of which
Parent becomes aware or any termination of the Commitment
Letter. Parent shall keep the Company informed on a reasonably
current basis of the status of its efforts to arrange the
Financing.
(b) The Company shall provide, and shall cause its
Subsidiaries, and shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause
each of its and their respective Representatives, including
legal, tax, regulatory and accounting, to provide all
cooperation reasonably requested by Parent in connection with
the Financing (provided that such requested cooperation does not
unreasonably interfere with the ongoing operations of the
Company and its Subsidiaries), including (i) providing
information relating to the Company and its Subsidiaries to the
Financing Parties (including information to be used in the
preparation of an information package regarding the business,
operations, financial projections and prospects of Parent and
the Company customary for such financing or reasonably necessary
for the completion of the Financing by the Financing Parties) to
the extent reasonably
A-46
requested by Parent to assist in preparation of customary
offering or information documents to be used for the completion
of the Financing as contemplated by the Commitment Letter,
(ii) participating in a reasonable number of meetings
(including customary
one-on-one
meetings with the parties acting as lead arrangers for the
Financing and senior management and Representatives, with
appropriate seniority and expertise, of the Company),
presentations, road shows, drafting sessions, due diligence
sessions (including accounting due diligence sessions) and
sessions with the rating agencies, (iii) assisting in the
preparation of (A) any customary offering documents, bank
information memoranda, prospectuses and similar documents
(including historical and pro forma financial statements and
information) for any of the Financing, and (B) materials
for rating agency presentations, (iv) cooperating with the
marketing efforts for any of the Financing (including consenting
to the use of the Companys and its Subsidiaries
logos; provided that such logos are used solely in a manner that
is not intended to or reasonably likely to harm or disparage the
Company or its Subsidiaries or the reputation or goodwill of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries), (v) executing and
delivering (or using reasonable best efforts to obtain from its
advisors), and causing its Subsidiaries to execute and deliver
(or use reasonable best efforts to obtain from its advisors),
customary certificates (including a certificate of the principal
financial officer of the Company or any Subsidiary with respect
to solvency matters), accounting comfort letters (including
consents of accountants for use of their reports in any
materials relating to the Financing), legal opinions or other
documents and instruments relating to guarantees and other
matters ancillary to the Financing as may be reasonably
requested by Parent as necessary and customary in connection
with the Financing, (vi) assisting in (A) the
preparation of and entering into one or more credit agreements,
currency or interest hedging agreements, or other agreements or
(B) the amendment of any of the Companys or its
Subsidiaries existing credit agreements, currency or
interest hedging agreements, or other agreements, in each case,
on terms satisfactory to Parent and that are reasonably
requested by Parent in connection with the Financing provided
that no obligation of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
under any such agreements or amendments shall be effective until
the Effective Time, (vii) as promptly as practicable,
furnishing Parent and the Financing Parties with all financial
and other information regarding the Company and its Subsidiaries
as may be reasonably requested by Parent to assist in
preparation of customary offering or information documents to be
used for the completion of the Financing as contemplated by the
Commitment Letter, (viii) using its reasonable best
efforts, as appropriate, to have its independent accountants
provide their reasonable cooperation and assistance,
(ix) using its reasonable best efforts to permit any cash
and marketable securities of the Company and its Subsidiaries to
be made available to the Parent
and/or
Merger Sub at the Closing, (x) providing authorization
letters to the Financing Parties authorizing the distribution of
information to prospective lenders and containing a
representation to the Financing Parties that the public side
versions of such documents, if any, do not include material
non-public information about the Company or its Affiliates or
securities, (xi) using its reasonable best efforts to
ensure that the Financing Parties benefit from the existing
lending relationships of the Company and its Subsidiaries,
(xii) providing audited consolidated financial statements
of the Company covering the three (3) fiscal years
immediately preceding the Closing for which audited consolidated
financial statements are currently available, unaudited
financial statements (excluding footnotes) for any interim
period or periods of the Company ended after the date of the
most recent audited financial statements and at least
45 days prior to the Closing Date, (xiii) cooperating
reasonably with Parents financing sources due
diligence, to the extent customary and reasonable and to the
extent not unreasonably interfering with the business of the
Company and (xiv) terminating and repaying in full the
commitments under the Credit Agreement, dated as of
August 2, 2007, among the Company, the lenders party
thereto, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent,
on or prior to the Closing Date; provided that, until the
Effective Time occurs, neither the Company nor any of its
Subsidiaries shall (i) be required to pay any commitment or
other similar fee, (ii) have any liability or any
obligation under any credit agreement or any related document or
any other agreement or document related to the Financing (or
alternative financing that Parent may raise in connection with
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement) or
(iii) be required to incur any other liability in
connection with the Financing (or any alternative financing that
Parent may raise in connection with the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement) unless reimbursed or reasonably
satisfactorily indemnified by Parent. Parent (i) shall
promptly, upon request by the Company, reimburse the Company for
all reasonable out-of-pocket costs (including reasonable
attorneys fees) incurred by the Company, any of its
Subsidiaries or their respective Representatives in connection
with the cooperation of the Company and its Subsidiaries
contemplated by this Section 6.13, (ii) acknowledges
and agrees that the Company, its
A-47
Subsidiaries and their respective Representatives shall not have
any responsibility for, or incur any liability to any Person
under, the Financing or any alternative financing that Parent
may raise in connection with the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement and (iii) shall indemnify and hold harmless
the Company, its Subsidiaries and their respective
Representatives from and against any and all losses, damages,
claims, costs or expenses suffered or incurred by any of them in
connection with the arrangement of the Financing and any
information used in connection therewith, except with respect to
any information provided by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries.
(c) In the event that the Commitment Letter is amended,
replaced, supplemented or otherwise modified, including as a
result of obtaining alternative financing in accordance with
Section 6.13(a), or if Parent substitutes other debt or
equity financing for all or a portion of the Financing, each of
Parent and the Company shall comply with its covenants in
Section 6.13(a) and (b) with respect to the Commitment
Letter as so amended, replaced, supplemented or otherwise
modified and with respect to such other debt or equity financing
to the same extent that Parent and the Company would have been
obligated to comply with respect to the Financing.
Section 6.14 Convertible
Debentures and Company Convertible Preferred Stock.
(a) If any of the holders of the Convertible Debentures
elect to convert the Convertible Debentures in accordance with
the terms of the Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
December 16, 2003, between the Company and The Bank of New
York (as successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.) (the
Convertible Debenture Indenture), then the Company
shall settle any such conversion in cash pursuant to its right
to elect the form of settlement set forth in Section 5.03
of the Convertible Debenture Indenture to the extent permitted
by the terms thereof.
(b) Subject to applicable Law, to the extent requested by
Parent and to the extent redeemable under the Indenture and the
Convertible Debenture Indenture, prior to the Effective Time,
the Company shall, as promptly as practicable following such
request, use its reasonable best efforts to effect, prior to the
Effective Time, the redemption of any or all of the outstanding
aggregate principal amount of the indebtedness issued under the
Convertible Debenture Indenture in accordance with the terms of
the Convertible Debenture Indenture.
(c) To the extent requested by Parent, as promptly as
practicable following such request, the Company shall use its
reasonable best efforts to effect, prior to the Effective Time,
the redemption of all outstanding shares of Company Convertible
Preferred Stock in accordance with the terms of the Company
Convertible Preferred Stock Certificate of Designation and the
applicable provisions of the DGCL.
Section 6.15 Board
Representation. Parent shall cause to be
appointed to the Board of Directors of Parent, effective as of
the Effective Time, two (2) of the individuals who serve on
the Board of Directors of the Company as of the date of this
Agreement.
ARTICLE VII
CONDITIONS
PRECEDENT
Section 7.1 Conditions
to Each Partys Obligation to Effect the
Merger. The respective obligations of the
Company, Parent and Merger Sub to effect the Merger are subject
to the satisfaction or waiver (to the extent permitted by Law)
on or prior to the Closing Date of the following conditions:
(a) Stockholder Approval. The Company
shall have obtained the Company Requisite Vote.
(b) No Injunctions or Restraints;
Illegality. No Laws shall have been adopted or
promulgated, and no temporary restraining order, preliminary or
permanent injunction or other order, judgment, decision, opinion
or decree issued by a court or other Governmental Entity of
competent jurisdiction in the United States or the European
Union shall be in effect, having the effect of making the Merger
illegal or otherwise prohibiting consummation of the Merger.
A-48
(c) Regulatory Matters. Each of
(i) the waiting period (and any extension thereof)
applicable to the Merger under the HSR Act shall have been
terminated or shall have expired; (ii) the approval of the
Merger by the European Commission shall have been granted
pursuant to the EC Merger Regulation; (iii) the approval of
the Merger by Chinas Ministry of Commerce shall have been
granted
and/or
deemed to have been granted by expiration of the applicable
waiting period pursuant to the China Anti-Monopoly Law; and
(iv) the approval of the Merger by the antitrust regulators
in Canada and Australia shall have been granted (if such
approval is required).
(d) NYSE Listing. The shares of Parent
Common Stock and Parent Convertible Preferred Stock, if any, to
be issued in the Merger and such other shares to be reserved for
issuance in connection with the Merger shall have been approved
for listing on the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance.
(e) Effectiveness of the
Form S-4. The
Form S-4
shall have been declared effective by the SEC under the
Securities Act. No stop order suspending the effectiveness of
the
Form S-4
shall be in effect and no proceedings for that purpose shall be
pending before the SEC.
Section 7.2 Additional
Conditions to Obligations of Parent and Merger
Sub. The obligations of Parent and Merger Sub to
effect the Merger are subject to the satisfaction of, or waiver
by Parent, on or prior to the Closing Date of the following
conditions:
(a) Representations and
Warranties. (i) Each of the representations
and warranties of the Company contained in Section 3.1
(Organization, Good Standing and Qualification),
Sections 3.2(a) and (b) (Capital Structure) and
Section 3.3 (Corporate Authority) shall be true and correct
other than in de minimis respects as of the date of this
Agreement and as of the Closing Date, as if made as of such date
(except for those representations and warranties which address
matters only as of an earlier date which shall have been true
and correct as of such earlier date), (ii) the
representation and warranty of the Company contained in
Section 3.6(b) (Absence of Certain Changes) shall be true
and correct in all respects as of the date of this Agreement and
as of the Closing Date, as if made as of such date and
(iii) each of the other representations and warranties of
the Company contained in this Agreement shall be true and
correct (without giving effect to any exception or qualification
contained therein relating to materiality or a Company Material
Adverse Effect) as of the date of this Agreement and as of the
Closing Date, as if made as of such date (except for those
representations and warranties which address matters only as of
an earlier date which shall have been true and correct as of
such earlier date), except in the case of this clause (iii),
where the failure of such other representations and warranties
to be true and correct, individually or in the aggregate, has
not had, or would not be reasonably expected to have, a Company
Material Adverse Effect. Parent shall have received a
certificate of the chief executive officer or the chief
financial officer of the Company to such effect.
(b) Performance of Obligations of the
Company. The Company shall have performed or
complied in all material respects with all material agreements
and covenants required to be performed or complied with by it
under this Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date and Parent
shall have received a certificate of the chief executive officer
or the chief financial officer of the Company to such effect.
(c) Financing. The lenders who are
parties to the Commitment Letter (or, in the event that
alternative financing has been arranged, the lenders or other
financing sources who have committed to such alternative
financing) shall not have declined on the date that would
otherwise have been the Closing Date to make the Financing (or
such alternative financing) available to Parent primarily by
reason of the failure of either or both of the following
conditions: (i) Parent shall on the Closing Date, and
taking into account the Merger, have (i) an unsecured
long-term obligations rating of at least A2 (with
stable (or better) outlook) and a commercial paper credit rating
of at least
P-1
(which rating shall be affirmed) from Moodys Investors
Services, Inc. and (ii) a long-term issuer credit rating of
at least A (with stable (or better) outlook) and a
short-term issuer credit rating of at least
A-1
(which rating shall be affirmed) from Standard &
Poors Ratings Group (for the avoidance of doubt, it being
understood, that an unsecured long-term obligations rating of
higher than A2 and a long-term issuer credit rating
of higher than A shall satisfy the foregoing
condition, as applicable, irrespective of whether or not such
rating(s) are subject to negative watch or
negative outlook); or (ii) since
December 31, 2007, there shall not have
A-49
been any event, occurrence, development or state of
circumstances or facts or condition that has had or would
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect, except (A) as
disclosed in the Parent SEC Documents filed since
January 1, 2008 but prior to the date hereof (but excluding
any risk factor disclosures contained under the heading
Risk Factors, any disclosure of risks included in
any forward-looking statements disclaimer or any
other statements that are similarly non-specific or predictive
or forward-looking in nature, in each case, other than any
specific factual information contained therein) or (B) as
set forth in the Parent Disclosure Letter.
Section 7.3 Additional
Conditions to Obligations of the Company. The
obligations of the Company to effect the Merger are subject to
the satisfaction of, or waiver by the Company, on or prior to
the Closing Date of the following additional conditions:
(a) Representations and
Warranties. (i) Each of the representations
and warranties of Parent and Merger Sub contained in
Section 4.1(Organization, Good Standing and Qualification),
Section 4.2(a) and (b) (Capital Structure) and
Section 4.3 (Corporate Authority) shall be true and correct
other than in de minimis respects as of the date of this
Agreement and as of the Closing Date, as if made as of such date
(except for those representations and warranties which address
matters only as of an earlier date which shall have been true
and correct in all material respects as of such earlier date),
(ii) each of the representations and warranties of Parent
and Merger Sub contained in Section 4.12(b) (Absence of
Changes) shall be true and correct in all respects as of the
date of this Agreement and as of the Closing Date, as if made as
of such date, and (iii) each of the other representations
and warranties of Parent and Merger Sub contained in this
Agreement shall be true and correct (without giving effect to
any exception or qualification contained therein relating to
materiality or a Parent Material Adverse Effect) as of the date
of this Agreement and as of the Closing Date, as if made as of
such date (except for those representations and warranties which
address matters only as of an earlier date which shall have been
true and correct as of such earlier date), except in the case of
this clause (iii), where the failure of such other
representations and warranties to be true and correct,
individually or in the aggregate, has not had, or would not be
reasonably expected to have, a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
The Company shall have received a certificate of the chief
executive officer or the chief financial officer of Parent and
Merger Sub to such effect.
(b) Performance of Obligations of Parent and Merger
Sub. Each of Parent and Merger Sub shall have
performed or complied with in all material respects all material
agreements and covenants required to be performed or complied
with by it under this Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date,
and the Company shall have received a certificate of the chief
executive officer or the chief financial officer of Parent and
Merger Sub to such effect.
ARTICLE VIII
TERMINATION
AND AMENDMENT
Section 8.1 General. This
Agreement may be terminated and the transactions contemplated
hereby may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time
notwithstanding approval thereof by the stockholders of the
Company:
(a) by mutual written consent of Parent and the Company, by
action of each of their respective Board of Directors;
(b) by either Parent or the Company, upon written notice to
the other party, if the Merger shall not have been consummated
on or prior to the close of banking business New York City time
on October 31, 2009 (the Initial Termination
Date); provided, however, that the right to terminate this
Agreement under this Section 8.1(b) shall not be available
to any party whose breach of any provision of this Agreement has
been the cause of, or resulted in, the failure of the Merger to
occur on or before the Termination Date; provided, further, that
(i) if on the Initial Termination Date the condition to
Closing set forth in Section 7.1(c) shall not have been
fulfilled but all other conditions to Closing shall or shall be
capable of being fulfilled then the Initial Termination Date
shall be automatically extended to the close of banking
A-50
business New York City time on December 31, 2009 and
(ii) if the Company has delivered an Election Notice on or
prior to, or could be capable of delivering an Election Notice
within five (5) Business Days of, the Initial Termination
Date, then the Initial Termination Date shall be automatically
extended by twenty (20) Business Days provided that in no
event shall the Initial Termination Date be extended beyond
December 31, 2009. As used in this Agreement, the term
Termination Date shall mean the Initial Termination
Date, unless the Initial Termination Date has been extended
pursuant to the foregoing proviso, in which case, the term
Termination Date shall mean the last date to which
the Initial Termination Date has been so extended;
(c) by the Company, upon written notice to Parent, if
Parent or Merger Sub (i) shall have breached any of the
covenants or agreements contained in this Agreement to be
complied with by Parent or Merger Sub such that the closing
condition set forth in Section 7.3(b) would not be
satisfied or (ii) there exists a breach of any
representation or warranty of Parent or Merger Sub contained in
this Agreement such that the closing condition set forth in
Section 7.3(a) would not be satisfied, and, in the case of
both (i) and (ii), such breach is incapable of being cured
by the Termination Date;
(d) by Parent, upon written notice to the Company, if the
Company (i) shall have breached any of the covenants or
agreements contained in this Agreement to be complied with by
the Company such that the closing condition set forth in
Section 7.2(b) would not be satisfied or (ii) there
exists a breach of any representation or warranty of the Company
contained in this Agreement such that the closing condition set
forth in Section 7.2(a) would not be satisfied, and, in the
case of both (i) and (ii), such breach is incapable of
being cured by the Termination Date;
(e) by the Company or Parent, upon written notice to the
other party, if a Governmental Entity of competent jurisdiction
in the United States or the European Union shall have issued an
order, judgment, decision, opinion, decree or ruling or taken
any other action (which the party seeking to terminate shall
have used its reasonable best efforts to resist, resolve, annul,
quash, or lift, as applicable, subject to the provisions of
Section 6.3) permanently enjoining or otherwise prohibiting
the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, and such order, decree, ruling or action shall have
become final and non-appealable; provided, however, that the
party seeking to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this
clause (e) has fulfilled its obligations under
Section 6.3;
(f) by Parent, upon written notice to the Company, if
(i) a Change in the Company Recommendation pursuant to
Section 6.4(d)(ii) (or any action by any committee of the
Companys Board of Directors which, if taken by the
Companys full Board of Directors, would be a Change in the
Company Recommendation pursuant to Section 6.4(d)(ii))
shall have occurred, (ii) the Company or its Board of
Directors (or any committee thereof) shall approve or recommend,
or enter into or allow the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to
enter into, a merger agreement, letter of intent, agreement in
principle, share purchase agreement, asset purchase agreement,
share exchange agreement, option agreement or other similar
Contract relating to an Acquisition Proposal,
(iii) following the date any bona fide Acquisition Proposal
or any material modification thereto is first published, sent or
given to the stockholders of the Company, the Company fails to
issue a press release that expressly reaffirms the Company
Recommendation within ten (10) Business Days following
Parents written request to do so (which request may be
made by Parent one time following any such Acquisition Proposal
or any material modifications thereto), (iv) if any tender
offer or exchange offer is commenced by any Third Party with
respect to the outstanding Company Common Stock prior to the
time at which the Company receives the Company Requisite Vote,
and the Companys Board of Directors shall not have
recommended that the Companys stockholders reject such
tender offer or exchange offer and not tender their Company
Common Stock into such tender offer or exchange offer within ten
(10) Business Days after commencement of such tender offer
or exchange offer, unless the Company has issued a press release
that expressly reaffirms the Company Recommendation within such
ten (10) Business Day period, (v) the Company shall
have failed to include the Company Recommendation in the Proxy
Statement or (vi) the Company or its Board of Directors (or
any committee thereof) shall publicly announce its intentions to
do any of actions specified in this Section 8.1(f);
A-51
(g) by the Company or Parent, upon written notice to the
other party, if the Company Stockholder Meeting has concluded
(including any adjournment or postponement thereof) and the
Company Requisite Vote shall not have been obtained;
(h) by the Company, upon written notice to Parent, at any
time prior to the time at which the Company receives the Company
Requisite Vote, if the Board of Directors of the Company
determines to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement
with respect to a Superior Proposal, but only if the Company
(i) is not in material breach of Section 6.4, and
(ii) shall concurrently with such termination enter into
the Alternative Acquisition Agreement and the Company shall pay
the Tier I Termination Fee or Tier II Termination Fee,
as applicable, substantially concurrently with such termination;
(i) by the Company, upon written notice to Parent, if the
Closing has not occurred within five (5) Business Days
following the satisfaction or waiver of all of the conditions
set forth in Sections 7.1 and 7.2 (other than (i) the
condition set forth in Section 7.2(c) and (ii) those
other conditions that, by their nature, cannot be satisfied
until the Closing Date, but, in the case of clause (ii), which
conditions would be satisfied if the Closing Date were the date
of such termination) due to the failure of the condition set
forth in Section 7.2(c) to be satisfied or waived;
provided, however, that the Company may not exercise such right
of termination until the date that is the earlier of
(A) the date that is the tenth (10) Business Day
following the date on which Parent receives the Election Notice
from the Company and (B) December 31, 2009; and
(j) by Parent, upon written notice to the Company, if a
Change in the Company Recommendation pursuant to
Section 6.4(d)(i) (or any action by any committee of the
Companys Board of Directors which, if taken by the
Companys full Board of Directors, would be a Change in the
Company Recommendation pursuant to Section 6.4(d)(i)) shall
have occurred.
Section 8.2 Obligations
in Event of Termination.
(a) In the event of any termination of this Agreement as
provided in Section 8.1, this Agreement shall forthwith
become wholly void and of no further force and effect and there
shall be no liability or obligation on the part of Parent,
Merger Sub or the Company or their respective Subsidiaries,
officers or directors, except (i) with respect to
Section 6.2(b), Section 6.6, the last sentence of
Section 6.13(b), this Section 8.2 and Article IX,
which shall remain in full force and effect and (ii) with
respect to any liabilities or damages incurred or suffered by a
party, to the extent such liabilities or damages were the result
of fraud or the willful and material breach by another party of
any of its representations, warranties, covenants or other
agreements set forth in this Agreement. For purposes of this
Agreement, willful and material breach shall mean a
material breach that is a consequence of an act undertaken by
the breaching party with the knowledge (actual or constructive)
that the taking of such act would, or would be reasonably
expected to, cause a breach of this Agreement.
(b) In the event that this Agreement is terminated
(i) by Parent pursuant to Section 8.1(f) or
(ii) by the Company pursuant to Section 8.1(h), and:
(A) during the thirty (30) day period following the
date of this Agreement the Company received a bona fide written
Acquisition Proposal from a Third Party and during such period
the Board of Directors of the Company determined in good faith,
after consultation with the Companys financial advisors
and outside legal counsel, that such Acquisition Proposal
constituted or was reasonably likely to lead to a Superior
Proposal, and
(B) (i) in the case of termination pursuant to
Section 8.1(f) the Acquisition Proposal referred to in
(A) above resulted in the Company taking or failing to take
the action giving rise to Parents right to terminate this
Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(f) or (ii) in the
case of termination pursuant to Section 8.1(h), the
Alternative Acquisition Proposal entered into by the Company in
connection with such termination is with such Third Party,
then, the Company shall pay to Parent a termination fee of
$1,500,000,000 (the Tier I Termination Fee)
(x) promptly (and in any event within two (2) Business
Days) following such termination, in the case of
A-52
termination pursuant to Section 8.1(f) and (y) prior
to or concurrently with such termination, in the case of
termination pursuant to Section 8.1(h).
(c) In the event that this Agreement is terminated by
Parent pursuant to Section 8.1(f) or Section 8.1(j) or
by the Company pursuant to Section 8.1(h) and the
Tier I Termination Fee is not payable pursuant to
Section 8.2(b), then the Company shall pay to Parent a
termination fee of $2,000,000,000 (the Tier II
Termination Fee) plus, in the case of a termination
pursuant to Section 8.1(j), Parents Expenses actually
incurred by Parent on or prior to the termination of this
Agreement; provided that in no event shall the Company be
required to reimburse Parents Expenses in excess of
$700,000,000. The Tier II Termination Fee payable pursuant
to this Section 8.2(c) shall be paid (x) promptly (and
in any event within two (2) Business Days) following
termination of this Agreement, in the case of termination
pursuant to Section 8.1(f) or Section 8.1(j) and
(y) prior to or concurrently with such termination, in the
case of termination pursuant to Section 8.1(h). Any
Expenses required to be reimbursed pursuant to this
Section 8.2(c) shall be paid promptly (and in any event
with two (2) Business Days) following the Companys
receipt of an invoice therefor.
(d) In the event that this Agreement is terminated pursuant
to Section 8.1(d) or Section 8.1(g) and (i) at
any time after the date of this Agreement and prior to the
breach giving rise to Parents right to terminate (in the
case of a termination pursuant to Section 8.1(d)) or prior
to the taking of the vote to adopt this Agreement at the Company
Stockholder Meeting (in the case of a termination pursuant to
Section 8.1(g)) an Acquisition Proposal shall have been
made known to the senior management or the Board of Directors of
the Company (in the case of a termination pursuant to
Section 8.1(d)) or shall have been publicly announced or
publicly made known to the stockholders of the Company (in the
case of a termination pursuant to Section 8.1(g)) and shall
not have been withdrawn prior to the breach giving rise to
Parents right to terminate (in the case of a termination
pursuant to Section 8.1(d)) or prior to the taking of the
vote to adopt this Agreement at the Company Stockholder Meeting
(in the case of a termination pursuant to Section 8.1(g))
and (ii) within twelve (12) months of such
termination, the Company enters into a definitive agreement with
any Third Party with respect to any Acquisition Proposal or any
Acquisition Proposal with respect to the Company is consummated,
then the Company shall pay to Parent, not later than two
(2) Business Days after the earlier of the date any such
agreement is entered into or any such Acquisition Proposal is
consummated, the Tier II Termination Fee; provided,
however, that for purposes of the definition of Acquisition
Proposal in this Section 8.2(d), references to
15% shall be replaced by 50%.
(e) In the event that this Agreement is terminated by
(i) the Company or Parent pursuant to Section 8.1(b)
and all of the conditions to Closing set forth in
Article VII (other than (A) the condition set forth in
Section 7.2(c) and (B) those other conditions that, by
their nature, cannot be satisfied until the Closing Date, but,
in the case of clause (B), which conditions would be satisfied
if the Closing Date were the date of such termination) have been
satisfied or waived on or prior to the date of such termination
or (ii) the Company pursuant to Section 8.1(i) (either
of the terminations described in (clauses (i) and
(ii) above, a Specified Financing Condition
Termination), then Parent shall pay to the Company a
termination fee equal to $4,500,000,000 (the Reverse
Termination Fee) (which fee shall be payable within two
(2) Business Days after written notice of such
termination). The Company agrees that in the event that the
Reverse Termination Fee is paid to the Company pursuant to this
Section 8.2(e), the payment of such Reverse Termination Fee
shall be the sole and exclusive remedy of the Company, its
Subsidiaries, stockholders, affiliates, officers, directors,
employees or Representatives against Parent, Merger Sub or any
of their Related Persons, Representatives or Affiliates for, and
in no event will the Company seek to recover any other money
damages or seek any other remedy based on a claim in law or
equity with respect to, (1) any loss suffered as a result
of the failure of the Merger to be consummated, (2) the
termination of this Agreement, (3) any liabilities or
obligations arising under this Agreement, or (4) any claims
or actions arising out of or relating to any breach, termination
or failure of or under this Agreement, in each case, with
respect to a Specified Financing Condition Termination and any
event related thereto, and upon payment to the Company of the
Reverse Termination Fee, neither Parent, Merger Sub nor any
Related Person, Representative or Affiliate of Parent shall have
any further liability or obligation to the Company relating to
or arising out of this Agreement or the transactions
contemplated hereby (except that Parent shall also be obligated
with respect to the provisions of Section 6.2(b) and
Section 8.2(g)).
A-53
(f) All payments under this Section 8.2 shall be made
by wire transfer of immediately available funds to an account
designated in writing by Parent or Company, as applicable. In no
event shall (i) the Company be required to pay both the
Tier I Termination Fee and the Tier II Termination Fee
or to pay either the Tier I Termination Fee or the
Tier II Termination Fee on more than one occasion or
(ii) Parent be required to pay the Reverse Termination Fee
on more than one occasion.
(g) If Parent or the Company shall fail to pay the Reverse
Termination Fee, the Tier I Termination Fee or the
Tier II Termination Fee, as applicable, the Company shall
reimburse Parent, or Parent shall reimburse the Company, as
applicable, for all reasonable costs and expenses actually
incurred or accrued by such other party (including reasonable
Expenses of counsel) in connection with the collection under and
enforcement of this Section 8.2 from the date such payment
was required to be made until the date of payment at the prime
lending rate prevailing during such period as published in The
Wall Street Journal.
Section 8.3 Amendment. This
Agreement may be amended by the parties, by action taken or
authorized by their respective Boards of Directors, at any time
before or after approval of the matters presented in connection
with the Merger by the stockholders of the Company, but, after
any such approval by the stockholders of the Company, no
amendment shall be made which, by Law or in accordance with the
rules of any relevant stock exchange, requires further approval
by such stockholders without obtaining such further approval.
This Agreement may not be amended except by an instrument in
writing signed on behalf of each of the parties.
Section 8.4 Extension;
Waiver. At any time prior to the Effective Time,
the parties, by action taken or authorized by their respective
Boards of Directors, may, to the extent legally allowed,
(i) extend the time for the performance of any of the
obligations or other acts of the other parties, (ii) waive
any breach of or inaccuracy in the representations and
warranties of the other contained herein or in any document
delivered pursuant hereto and (iii) waive compliance by the
other of any of the agreements or conditions contained herein.
Any agreement on the part of a party hereto to any such
extension or waiver pursuant to the foregoing sentence shall be
valid only if set forth in a written instrument signed on behalf
of such party. In addition and notwithstanding the foregoing, if
the Closing cannot occur as scheduled pursuant to Article I
due to an act of God, war, terrorism, flood, banking moratorium
or suspension of payments in respect of federal or state banks
in the United States (whether or not mandatory), the Closing
will automatically be postponed until the earliest date that is
reasonably practicable following the conclusion of such event,
and if such date is after the Termination Date, then the
Termination Date shall automatically be extended to such date,
and in such case, all references to the term Termination
Date in this Agreement shall mean such extended date. The
failure of any party to this Agreement to assert any of its
rights under this Agreement or otherwise shall not constitute a
waiver of those rights.
ARTICLE IX
GENERAL
PROVISIONS
Section 9.1 Non-Survival
of Representations, Warranties and
Agreements. None of the representations,
warranties, covenants and other agreements in this Agreement or
in any instrument delivered pursuant to this Agreement,
including any rights arising out of any breach of such
representations, warranties, covenants and other agreements,
shall survive the Effective Time, except for those covenants and
agreements contained herein and therein (including
Section 6.7) that by their terms are to be performed in
whole or in part after the Effective Time and this
Article IX.
Section 9.2 Notices. Any
notices or other communications required or permitted under, or
otherwise given in connection with, this Agreement shall be in
writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given
(i) when delivered or sent if delivered in person or sent
by facsimile transmission (provided confirmation of facsimile
transmission is obtained), (ii) on the fifth (5th) Business
Day after dispatch by registered or certified
A-54
mail, (iii) on the next Business Day if transmitted by
national overnight courier or (iv) on the date delivered if
sent by email (provided confirmation of email receipt is
obtained), in each case as follows:
(a) if to Parent or Merger Sub, to:
Pfizer Inc.
235 East 42nd Street
New York, New York 10017
Attention: Amy Schulman, Senior Vice President and General
Counsel
Facsimile:
(212) 573-0768
with a copy to:
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
One World Financial Center
New York, New York 10281
|
|
|
|
Attention:
|
Dennis J. Block, Esq.
|
William P. Mills, Esq.
Facsimile:
(212) 504-6666
(b) if to Merger Sub, to:
Wagner Acquisition Corp.
235 East 42nd Street
New York, New York 10017
Attention: David Reid, Senior Vice President and Managing
Director
Facsimile:
(212) 573-0768
(c) if to the Company, to:
Wyeth
Five Giralda Farms
Madison, New Jersey 07940
Attention: General Counsel
Facsimile:
(973) 660-7155
with a copy to counsel to the Company:
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
425 Lexington Ave.
New York, New York 10017
Eric Swedenburg
Facsimile:
(212) 455-2502;
and
with a copy to counsel to the independent directors of the
Company:
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
51 West 52nd Street
New York, New York 10019
|
|
|
|
Attention:
|
Adam O. Emmerich
|
David K. Lam
Facsimile:
(212) 403-2000
Section 9.3 Headings. The
table of contents and headings contained in this Agreement are
for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the
meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.
Section 9.4 Counterparts. This
Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, all of
which shall be considered one and the same agreement and shall
become effective when one or more counterparts
A-55
have been signed by each of the parties and delivered to the
other party, it being understood that each party need not sign
the same counterpart.
Section 9.5 Entire
Agreement; No Third-Party Beneficiaries.
(a) This Agreement (including the Exhibits and Schedules
hereto) and the Confidentiality Agreement constitute the entire
agreement, and supersede all prior agreements and
understandings, both written and oral, among the parties with
respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof.
(b) This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure solely
to the benefit of each party hereto, and nothing in this
Agreement, express or implied, is intended to or shall confer
upon any other Person any right, benefit or remedy of any nature
whatsoever under or by reason of this Agreement, other than
Section 6.7 (which is intended to be for the benefit of the
Persons covered thereby and may be enforced by such Persons).
Section 9.6 Governing
Law. This Agreement shall be governed and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware
(without giving effect to choice of law principles thereof).
Section 9.7 Severability. If
any term or other provision of this Agreement is invalid,
illegal or incapable of being enforced by any Law or public
policy, all other terms and provisions of this Agreement shall
nevertheless remain in full force and effect so long as the
economic or legal substance of the transactions contemplated
hereby is not affected in any manner materially adverse to any
party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon such determination
that any term or other provision is invalid, illegal or
incapable of being enforced, the parties shall negotiate in good
faith to modify this Agreement so as to effect the original
intent of the parties as closely as possible in an acceptable
manner in order that the transactions contemplated hereby are
consummated as originally contemplated to the greatest extent
possible.
Section 9.8 Assignment. Neither
this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or obligations
hereunder shall be assigned by any of the parties, in whole or
in part (whether by operation of Law or otherwise), without the
prior written consent of the other party, and any attempt to
make any such assignment without such consent shall be null and
void, except that Merger Sub may assign, in its sole discretion,
any or all of its rights, interests and obligations under this
Agreement to any direct wholly-owned Subsidiary of Parent
without the consent of the Company, but no such assignment shall
relieve Merger Sub of any of its obligations under this
Agreement. Subject to the preceding sentence, this Agreement
will be binding upon, inure to the benefit of and be enforceable
by the parties and their respective successors and assigns.
Section 9.9 Submission
to Jurisdiction; Waivers. Each of the parties
irrevocably agrees that any legal action or proceeding with
respect to this Agreement or for recognition and enforcement of
any judgment in respect hereof brought by any other party hereto
or its successors or assigns may be brought and determined
exclusively in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware
or, if under applicable Law exclusive jurisdiction over such
matter is vested in the federal courts, any court of the United
States located in the State of Delaware, and each of the parties
to this Agreement hereby irrevocably submits with regard to any
such action or proceeding for itself and in respect to its
property, generally and unconditionally, to the exclusive
jurisdiction of the aforesaid courts and agrees that it will not
bring any legal action or proceeding with respect to this
Agreement or for recognition and enforcement of any judgment in
respect hereof in any court other than the aforesaid courts.
Each of the parties to this Agreement hereby irrevocably waives,
and agrees not to assert, by way of motion, as a defense,
counterclaim or otherwise, in any action or proceeding with
respect to this Agreement or for recognition and enforcement of
any judgment in respect hereof, (i) any claim that it is
not personally subject to the jurisdiction of the above-named
courts for any reason other than the failure to lawfully serve
process, (ii) that it or its property is exempt or immune
from jurisdiction of any such court or from any legal process
commenced in such courts (whether through service of notice,
attachment prior to judgment, attachment in aid of execution of
judgment, execution of judgment or otherwise), and (iii) to
the fullest extent permitted by applicable Law, that
(A) the suit, action or proceeding in any such court is
brought in an inconvenient forum, (B) the venue of such
suit, action or proceeding is improper and (C) this
Agreement, or the subject matter hereof, may not be enforced in
or by such courts. Each party to this Agreement irrevocably
consents to service of process in the manner provided for
notices in Section 9.2; provided that
A-56
nothing in this Agreement shall affect the right of any party to
this Agreement to serve process in any other manner permitted by
law.
Section 9.10 Specific
Performance. The parties hereto agree that
irreparable damage would occur if any provision of this
Agreement were not performed in accordance with the terms hereof
and that the parties shall be entitled to seek an injunction or
injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement or to enforce
specifically the performance of the terms and provisions hereof.
Section 9.11 Waiver
of Jury Trial. EACH PARTY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES
THAT ANY CONTROVERSY WHICH MAY ARISE UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS
LIKELY TO INVOLVE COMPLICATED AND DIFFICULT ISSUES, AND
THEREFORE EACH SUCH PARTY HEREBY IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY
WAIVES ANY RIGHT SUCH PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN
RESPECT OF ANY LITIGATION DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ARISING OUT OF
OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED
BY THIS AGREEMENT. EACH PARTY CERTIFIES AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT
(I) NO REPRESENTATIVE, AGENT OR ATTORNEY OF ANY OTHER PARTY
HAS REPRESENTED, EXPRESSLY OR OTHERWISE, THAT SUCH OTHER PARTY
WOULD NOT, IN THE EVENT OF LITIGATION, SEEK TO ENFORCE THE
FOREGOING WAIVER, (II) EACH PARTY UNDERSTANDS AND HAS
CONSIDERED THE IMPLICATIONS OF THIS WAIVER, (III) EACH
PARTY MAKES THIS WAIVER VOLUNTARILY AND (IV) EACH PARTY HAS
BEEN INDUCED TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT BY, AMONG OTHER
THINGS, THE MUTUAL WAIVERS AND CERTIFICATIONS IN THIS
SECTION 9.11.
Section 9.12 Interpretation. When
a reference is made in this Agreement to an Article, a Section,
Exhibit or Schedule, such reference shall be to an Article of, a
Section of, or an Exhibit or Schedule to, this Agreement unless
otherwise indicated. Whenever the words include,
includes or including are used in this
Agreement, they shall be deemed to be followed by the words
without limitation. All references to
dollars or $ are to United States
dollars. The words hereof, herein and
hereunder and words of similar import when used in
this Agreement shall refer to this Agreement as a whole and not
to any particular provision of this Agreement. References to
this Agreement shall include the Company Disclosure
Letter and the Parent Disclosure Letter. The definitions
contained in this Agreement are applicable to the singular as
well as the plural forms of such terms and to the masculine as
well as to the feminine and neuter genders of such term. This
Agreement is the product of negotiation by the parties having
the assistance of counsel and other advisors. It is the
intention of the parties that this Agreement not be construed
more strictly with regard to one party than with regard to the
others.
Section 9.13 Definitions. As
used in this Agreement:
(a) Affiliate means, with respect to any
Person, another Person that, directly or indirectly, through one
or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under
common control with such Person.
(b) Board of Directors means the Board
of Directors of any specified Person and any committees thereof.
(c) Business Day means any day other
than a Saturday or Sunday or any day on which the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York is closed or any day on which banks in
the city of New York are required to close.
(d) Cash Value of the Stock
Consideration means the product of (x) the
Exchange Ratio, and (y) the Parent Share Cash Value.
(e) Code means the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended.
(f) Company Material Adverse Effect
means an effect, event, development, change, state of facts,
condition, circumstance or occurrence that is or would be
reasonably expected to be materially adverse to the financial
condition, assets, liabilities, business or results of
operations of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a
whole; provided, however, that a Company Material Adverse Effect
shall not be deemed to include effects, events, developments,
changes, states of facts, conditions, circumstances or
occurrences arising out of, relating to or resulting from:
(A) changes generally affecting the economy,
A-57
financial or securities markets or political or regulatory
conditions, to the extent such changes do not adversely affect
the Company and its Subsidiaries in a disproportionate manner
relative to other participants in the pharmaceutical or
biotechnology industry; (B) changes in the pharmaceutical
or biotechnology industry, to the extent such changes do not
adversely affect the Company and its Subsidiaries in a
disproportionate manner relative to other participants in such
industry; (C) any change in Law or the interpretation
thereof or GAAP or the interpretation thereof, to the extent
such changes do not adversely affect the Company and its
Subsidiaries in a disproportionate manner relative to other
participants in such industry; (D) acts of war, armed
hostility or terrorism to the extent such changes do not
adversely affect the Company and its Subsidiaries in a
disproportionate manner relative to other participants in the
pharmaceuticals or biotechnology industry; (E) any change
attributable to the negotiation, execution or announcement of
the Merger, including any litigation resulting therefrom, and
any adverse change in customer, distributor, employee, supplier,
financing source, licensor, licensee, sub-licensee, stockholder,
co-promotion or joint venture partner or similar relationships,
including as a result of the identity of Parent; (F) any
failure by the Company to meet any internal or published
industry analyst projections or forecasts or estimates of
revenues or earnings for any period (it being understood and
agreed that the facts and circumstances giving rise to such
failure that are not otherwise excluded from the definition of a
Company Material Adverse Effect may be taken into account in
determining whether there has been a Company Material Adverse
Effect); (G) any change in the price or trading volume of
the Company Common Stock on the NYSE (it being understood and
agreed that the facts and circumstances giving rise to such
change that are not otherwise excluded from the definition of a
Company Material Adverse Effect may be taken into account in
determining whether there has been a Company Material Adverse
Effect); and (H) compliance with the terms of, or the
taking of any action required by, this Agreement.
(g) Company Product means all biological
and drug products, all animal health products and all consumer
products being tested in clinical trials, manufactured, sold or
distributed by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.
(h) Company Stock Plans means,
collectively, the Companys 2005 Amended and Restated Stock
Incentive Plan, 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, 1999 Stock Incentive
Plan, 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, 2008 Non-Employee Director
Stock Incentive Plan, 2006 Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive
Plan, Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, 1994
Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors, Wyeth Ireland
Share Participation Scheme and the MIP.
(i) Confidentiality Agreement means the
letter agreement, dated January 16, 2009 between Parent and
the Company.
(j) Contracts means, with respect to any
Person, any of the agreements, contracts, leases (whether for
real or personal property), notes, bonds, mortgages, indentures,
deeds of trust, loans, evidences of indebtedness, letters of
credit, settlement agreements, franchise agreements,
undertakings, employment agreements, license agreements,
instruments to which such Person or its Subsidiaries is a party,
whether oral or written.
(k) Election Notice means a notice from
the Company to Parent notifying Parent of the Companys
intention to exercise its right to terminate the Merger
Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(i) or its rights under
Section 9.10; provided that an Election Notice may not be
delivered by the Company until the earlier of (A) (i) in
the case of a notice of intention with respect to
Section 9.10, the tenth (10th) Business Day following the
satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth in
Article VII (excluding conditions that, by their nature,
cannot be satisfied until the Closing Date) or (ii) in the
case of a notice of intention with respect to
Section 8.1(i), the tenth (10th) Business Day following the
satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth in
Sections 7.1 and 7.2 (other than (x) the condition set
forth in Section 7.2(c) and (y) those other conditions
that, but their nature, cannot be satisfied until the Closing
Date) and (B) December 31, 2009.
(l) Environmental Laws means any and all
Laws which (i) regulate or relate to: the protection or
clean up of the environment; the treatment, storage,
transportation, handling, packaging, labeling, disposal
A-58
or release of, or exposure to, any pollutant, contaminant or
hazardous substances, wastes or similar materials; the
protection of human health and safety to the extent affected by
harmful or deleterious substances in the workplace or the
environment; or the preservation or protection of waterways,
groundwater, drinking water, air, wildlife, plants or other
natural resources; or (ii) impose liability or
responsibility with respect to any of the foregoing, including
property and business transfer laws such as the New Jersey
Industrial Site Recovery Act, N.J.S.A. 13:1K-6 et seq.
(m) Environmental Permit means any
permit, approval, identification number, license and other
authorization required under any applicable Environmental Law.
(n) Equity Interest means any share,
capital stock, partnership, limited liability company,
membership, member or similar interest in any Person, and any
option, warrant, right or security (including debt securities)
convertible, exchangeable or exercisable thereto or therefor.
(o) Expenses includes all documented
out-of-pocket expenses (including all commitment fees, ticking
fees, extension fees, underwriting fees, structuring fees,
interest, expenses and other costs or fees incurred in relation
to the financing of the transactions contemplated hereby, and
fees, expenses and disbursements of counsel, accountants,
investment bankers, financing sources, experts and consultants
to a party hereto and its affiliates and Representatives)
incurred in connection with or related to due diligence, the
authorization, preparation, negotiation, execution and
performance of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated
hereby, including obtaining the financing for the Merger, and
all other matters related thereto.
(p) GAAP means United States generally
accepted accounting principles.
(q) Hazardous Material means petroleum
and its products and derivatives including gasoline and diesel
fuel, radioactive materials, asbestos and asbestos-containing
materials, pesticides, radon, urea formaldehyde, lead and
lead-containing materials, polychlorinated biphenyls and any
other chemicals, materials, substances or wastes in any amount
or concentration which are regulated pursuant to or the basis
for liability pursuant to any Environmental Law or defined as or
included in the definition of hazardous substance,
hazardous material, hazardous waste,
toxic substance, pollutant,
regulated substance, solid waste,
contaminant or words of similar import under any
applicable Environmental Law.
(r) Intervening Event means, with
respect to the Company, a material event or circumstance that
was not known to the Board of Directors of the Company on the
date of this Agreement (or if known, the consequences of which
are not known to or reasonably foreseeable by such Board of
Directors as of the date hereof), which event or circumstance,
or any material consequences thereof, becomes known to the Board
of Directors of the Company prior to the time at which the
Company receives the Company Requisite Vote; provided, however,
that in no event shall the receipt, existence or terms of an
Acquisition Proposal or Inquiry or any matter relating thereto
or consequence thereof constitute an Intervening Event.
(s) Known or Knowledge means
(i) with respect to the Company, the actual knowledge of
any of the persons listed in Section 9.13(s) of the Company
Disclosure Letter and (ii) with respect to Parent or Merger
Sub, the actual knowledge of any of the persons listed in
Section 9.13(s) of the Parent Disclosure Letter.
(t) Law means any federal, state, local,
national or supranational or foreign law (including common law),
statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, Order, code ruling,
decree, arbitration award, agency requirement, license or permit
of any Governmental Entity.
(u) Lien means any lien, mortgage,
pledge, encumbrance, condition, restriction, lease, license,
security interest or deed of trust.
(v) Order means any order, judgment or
injunction.
(w) other party means, with respect to
the Company, Parent or Merger Sub and means, with respect to
Parent or Merger Sub, the Company, unless the context otherwise
requires.
A-59
(x) Parent Material Adverse Effect means
an effect, event, development, change, state of facts,
condition, circumstance or occurrence that is or would be
reasonably expected to be materially adverse to the financial
condition, assets, liabilities, business or results of
operations of Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole;
provided, however, that a Parent Material Adverse Effect shall
not be deemed to include effects, events, developments, changes,
states of facts, conditions, circumstances or occurrences
arising out of, relating to or resulting from: (A) changes
generally affecting the economy, financial or securities markets
or political or regulatory conditions, to the extent such
changes do not adversely affect Parent and its Subsidiaries in a
disproportionate manner relative to other participants in the
pharmaceutical or biotechnology industry; (B) changes in
the pharmaceutical or biotechnology industry, to the extent such
changes do not adversely affect Parent and its Subsidiaries in a
disproportionate manner relative to other participants in such
industry; (C) any change in Law or the interpretation
thereof or GAAP or the interpretation thereof, to the extent
such changes do not adversely affect Parent and its Subsidiaries
in a disproportionate manner relative to other participants in
such industry; (D) acts of war, armed hostility or
terrorism to the extent such changes do not adversely affect
Parent and its Subsidiaries in a disproportionate manner
relative to other participants in the pharmaceutical or
biotechnology industry; (E) any change attributable to the
negotiation, execution or announcement of the Merger, including
any litigation resulting therefrom, and any adverse change in
customer, distributor, employee, supplier, financing source,
licensor, licensee, sub-licensee, stockholder, co-promotion or
joint venture partner or similar relationships; (F) any
failure by Parent to meet any internal or published industry
analyst projections or forecasts or estimates of revenues or
earnings for any period (it being understood and agreed that the
facts and circumstances giving rise to such failure that are not
otherwise excluded from the definition of Parent Material
Adverse Effect may be taken into account in determining whether
there has been a Parent Material Adverse Effect); (G) any
change in the price or trading volume of the Parent Common Stock
on the NYSE (it being understood and agreed that the facts and
circumstances giving rise to such change that are not otherwise
excluded from the definition of Parent Material Adverse Effect
may be taken into account in determining whether there has been
a Parent Material Adverse Effect); and (H) compliance with
the terms of, or the taking of any action required by, this
Agreement.
(y) Parent Product means all biological
and drug products, all animal health products and all consumer
products being tested in clinical trials, manufactured, sold or
distributed by Parent or any of its Subsidiaries.
(z) Parent Share Cash Value means the
volume weighted average of the per share prices of Parent Common
Stock on the NYSE Transaction Reporting System for the five
(5) consecutive trading days ending two (2) days prior
to the Effective Time.
(aa) Per Share Amount means the sum of
(i) the Cash Value of the Stock Consideration and
(ii) the Cash Consideration.
(bb) Permitted Liens means
(i) Liens for Taxes not yet due and payable or that are
being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings and for
which adequate reserves in accordance with GAAP have been
established in the latest Company Financial Statements,
(ii) Liens in favor of vendors, carriers, warehousemen,
repairmen, mechanics, workmen, materialmen, construction or
similar Liens or other encumbrances arising by operation of Law,
(iii) Liens affecting the interest of the grantor of any
easements benefiting owned real property and Liens of record
attaching to real property, fixtures or leasehold improvements,
which would not materially impair the use of the real property
in the operation of the business thereon and (iv) Liens,
exceptions, defects or irregularities in title, easements,
imperfections of title, claims, charges, security interests,
rights-of-way, covenants, restrictions, and other similar
matters that would not, individually or in the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to materially impair the continued use
and operation of the assets to which they relate in the business
of such entity and its Subsidiaries as presently conducted.
(cc) Person means an individual,
corporation, limited liability company, partnership,
association, trust, unincorporated organization, other entity or
group (as defined in the Exchange Act).
A-60
(dd) Qualifying Amendment means an
amendment or supplement to the Proxy Statement (including by
incorporation by reference) to the extent it contains (i) a
Change in the Company Recommendation, (ii) a statement of
the reasons of the Board of Directors of the Company for making
such Change in the Company Recommendation and
(iii) additional information reasonably related to the
foregoing.
(ee) Regulatory Law means the Sherman
Act, as amended, Council Regulation No. 4064/89 of the
European Community, as amended (the EC Merger
Regulation), the Clayton Act, as amended, the HSR Act, the
Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, the China
Anti-Monopoly Law and all other Federal, state and foreign, if
any, statutes, rules, regulations, orders, decrees,
administrative and judicial doctrines and other Laws that are
designed or intended to prohibit, restrict or regulate
(i) foreign investment or (ii) actions having the
purpose or effect of monopolization or restraint of trade or
lessening of competition.
(ff) Related Person means any former,
current or future, direct or indirect, manager, director,
officer, employee, agent or Representative of Parent or Merger
Sub, any former, current or future, direct or indirect, holder
of any equity interests or securities of Parent or Merger Sub,
any former, current or future affiliate or assignee of Parent or
Merger Sub or any former, current or future manager, director,
officer, employee, agent, representative, affiliate or assignee
of any of the foregoing.
(gg) Representative means, with respect
to any party hereto, such party or any of its Subsidiaries
respective directors, officers, employees, investment bankers,
financing sources, financial advisors, attorneys, accountants or
other advisors, agents
and/or
representatives.
(hh) Significant Subsidiary when used
with respect to any party, means such partys significant
subsidiaries as defined under
Rule 1-02(w)
of
Regulation S-X
promulgated pursuant to the Exchange Act.
(ii) Subsidiary means any corporation,
partnership, joint venture or other legal entity of which
Parent, the Company or such other Person, as the case may be
(either alone or through or together with any other Subsidiary),
owns, directly or indirectly, a majority of the stock or other
Equity Interests the holders of which are generally entitled to
vote for the election of the board of directors or other
governing body of such corporation, partnership, joint venture
or other legal entity, or any Person that would otherwise be
deemed a subsidiary under
Rule 12b-2
promulgated under the Exchange Act.
(jj) Taxes includes all forms of
taxation, whenever created or imposed, and whether of the United
States or elsewhere, and whether imposed by a local, municipal,
governmental, state, foreign, Federal or other Governmental
Entity, or in connection with any agreement with respect to
Taxes, including all interest, penalties and additions imposed
with respect to such amounts.
(kk) Tax Return means all Federal,
state, local, provincial and foreign Tax returns, declarations,
statements, reports, schedules, forms and information returns
and, in each case, any amendments thereto.
(ll) Third Party shall mean any Person,
including as defined in Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act,
other than Parent or any of its Affiliates, and the
Representatives of such Person, in each case, acting in such
capacity.
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]
A-61
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Parent, Merger Sub and the Company have
caused this Agreement to be signed by their respective officers
thereunto duly authorized, all as of the date first written
above.
PFIZER INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Jeffrey
B. Kindler
|
Name: Jeffrey B. Kindler
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
WAGNER ACQUISITION CORP.
Name: David R. Reid
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Senior Vice President and Managing Director
|
WYETH
Name: Bernard Poussot
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
A-62
Index of
Definitions
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
1994 Plan
|
|
A-5
|
409A Deferred RSUs
|
|
A-4
|
409A RSU Consideration
|
|
A-4
|
409A RSUs
|
|
A-4
|
Acquisition Proposal
|
|
A-41
|
Actions
|
|
A-4
|
Affiliate
|
|
A-57
|
Agreement
|
|
A-1
|
Alternative Acquisition Agreement
|
|
A-40
|
Bankruptcy and Equity Exception
|
|
A-12
|
Benefits Continuation Period
|
|
A-41
|
Board of Directors
|
|
A-57
|
Book-Entry Shares
|
|
A-3
|
Business Day
|
|
A-57
|
Capitalization Date
|
|
A-10
|
Cash Consideration
|
|
A-2
|
Cash Value of the Stock Consideration
|
|
A-57
|
Certificate of Merger
|
|
A-1
|
Certificates
|
|
A-3
|
Change
|
|
A-36
|
Change in the Company Recommendation
|
|
A-36
|
CIC Severance Agreements
|
|
A-43
|
Closing
|
|
A-1
|
Closing Date
|
|
A-1
|
Code
|
|
A-57
|
Commitment Letter
|
|
A-27
|
Common Book-Entry Shares
|
|
A-3
|
Common Certificates
|
|
A-3
|
Common Stock Merger Consideration
|
|
A-2
|
Company
|
|
A-1
|
Company Benefit Plan
|
|
A-16
|
Company Common Stock
|
|
A-2
|
Company Convertible Preferred Stock
|
|
A-2
|
Company Deferred Equity Unit Plans
|
|
A-5
|
Company Disclosure Letter
|
|
A-10
|
Company Employees
|
|
A-32
|
Company Financial Advisors
|
|
A-21
|
Company Financial Statements
|
|
A-13
|
Company Material Adverse Effect
|
|
A-57
|
Company Material Contracts
|
|
A-16
|
Company Permits
|
|
A-21
|
Company Product
|
|
A-58
|
Company Recommendation
|
|
A-36
|
A-63
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Company Regulatory Agency
|
|
A-21
|
Company Requisite Vote
|
|
A-12
|
Company SEC Documents
|
|
A-13
|
Company Stock Options
|
|
A-3
|
Company Stock Plan
|
|
A-58
|
Company Stockholder Meeting
|
|
A-36
|
Company Voting Debt
|
|
A-11
|
Confidentiality Agreement
|
|
A-58
|
Contracts
|
|
A-58
|
Convertible Debenture Indenture
|
|
A-48
|
Convertible Debentures
|
|
A-2
|
Covered Employees
|
|
A-41
|
D&O Insurance
|
|
A-44
|
Deferred Equity Unit Amount
|
|
A-5
|
Deferred Payment Terms
|
|
A-4
|
Deferred RSU Shares
|
|
A-4
|
DGCL
|
|
A-1
|
Director Deferral Amount
|
|
A-5
|
Director Deferral Plan
|
|
A-4
|
Director DSU Plans
|
|
A-4
|
DOJ
|
|
A-38
|
DSU
|
|
A-4
|
DSU Consideration
|
|
A-4
|
EC Merger Regulation
|
|
A-61
|
Effective Time
|
|
A-1
|
Election Notice
|
|
A-58
|
Environmental Laws
|
|
A-58
|
Environmental Permit
|
|
A-59
|
Equity Interest
|
|
A-59
|
ERISA
|
|
A-16
|
ERISA Affiliate
|
|
A-16
|
Excess Shares
|
|
A-43
|
Exchange Act
|
|
A-12
|
Exchange Agent
|
|
A-6
|
Exchange Fund
|
|
A-6
|
Exchange Ratio
|
|
A-2
|
Exchange Ratio Reduction Number
|
|
A-2
|
Expenses
|
|
A-59
|
FDA
|
|
A-21
|
FDCA
|
|
A-21
|
Financing
|
|
A-27
|
Foreign Benefit Plans
|
|
A-16
|
Form S-4
|
|
A-35
|
FTC
|
|
A-38
|
A-64
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
GAAP
|
|
A-59
|
Governmental Entity
|
|
A-12
|
Grandfathered Amounts
|
|
A-5
|
Grantor Trust
|
|
A-4
|
Hazardous Material
|
|
A-59
|
HSR Act
|
|
A-12
|
Indemnified Parties
|
|
A-43
|
Initial Termination Date
|
|
A-50
|
Inquiry
|
|
A-40
|
Insurance Policies
|
|
A-20
|
Intellectual Property
|
|
A-19
|
Intervening Event
|
|
A-59
|
IRS
|
|
A-17
|
Knowledge
|
|
A-59
|
Known
|
|
A-59
|
Law
|
|
A-59
|
Leased Real Property
|
|
A-15
|
Lien
|
|
A-59
|
Market Rate
|
|
A-4
|
Maximum Share Number
|
|
A-2
|
Merger
|
|
A-1
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
A-3
|
Merger Sub
|
|
A-1
|
MIP
|
|
A-5
|
New Benefit Plans
|
|
A-42
|
NYSE
|
|
A-12
|
Option Consideration
|
|
A-3
|
Options
|
|
A-3
|
Order
|
|
A-59
|
other party
|
|
A-59
|
Owned Real Property
|
|
A-15
|
Parent
|
|
A-1
|
Parent Benefit Plans
|
|
A-23
|
Parent Common Stock
|
|
A-2
|
Parent Convertible Preferred Stock
|
|
A-2
|
Parent Disclosure Letter
|
|
A-22
|
Parent Financial Advisors
|
|
A-26
|
Parent Financial Statements
|
|
A-25
|
Parent Material Adverse Effect
|
|
A-60
|
Parent Permits
|
|
A-29
|
Parent Product
|
|
A-60
|
Parent Regulatory Agency
|
|
A-29
|
Parent SEC Documents
|
|
A-25
|
Parent Share Cash Value
|
|
A-60
|
A-65
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
parties
|
|
A-1
|
PBGC
|
|
A-17
|
Per Share Amount
|
|
A-60
|
Permitted Liens
|
|
A-60
|
Person
|
|
A-60
|
PHSA
|
|
A-21
|
Preferred Book-Entry Shares
|
|
A-3
|
Preferred Certificates
|
|
A-3
|
Preferred Stock Merger Consideration
|
|
A-3
|
Proxy Statement
|
|
A-35
|
Qualifying Amendment
|
|
A-61
|
Reacquired Shares
|
|
A-43
|
Regulatory Law
|
|
A-61
|
Related Person
|
|
A-61
|
Representative
|
|
A-61
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
A-5
|
Restricted Stock Consideration
|
|
A-5
|
Reverse Termination Fee
|
|
A-53
|
RSU
|
|
A-3
|
RSU Consideration
|
|
A-3
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
|
A-13
|
Securities Act
|
|
A-11
|
Significant Subsidiary
|
|
A-61
|
Specified Financing Condition Termination
|
|
A-53
|
Stock Consideration
|
|
A-2
|
Stock Trust
|
|
A-4
|
Subsidiary
|
|
A-61
|
Superior Proposal
|
|
A-41
|
Surviving Corporation
|
|
A-1
|
Takeover Statute
|
|
A-12
|
Tax Return
|
|
A-61
|
Taxes
|
|
A-61
|
Termination Date
|
|
A-51
|
Third Party
|
|
A-61
|
Tier I Termination Fee
|
|
A-52
|
Tier II Termination Fee
|
|
A-53
|
Vested Deferred RSU
|
|
A-4
|
Vested Deferred RSU Consideration
|
|
A-4
|
willful and material breach
|
|
A-52
|
Wyeth 2005 (409A) DCP
|
|
A-4
|
A-66
Exhibit A
FORM OF
AMENDED AND RESTATED BY-LAWS OF WYETH
ARTICLE I
OFFICES
Section 1.1. Registered
Office. The registered office of the
Corporation in the State of Delaware shall be located at the
principal place of business in such state of the corporation or
individual acting as the Corporations registered agent in
Delaware.
Section 1.2. Other
Offices. In addition to its registered office
in the State of Delaware, the Corporation may have an office or
offices in such other places as the Board of Directors may from
time to time designate or the business of the Corporation may
require.
ARTICLE II
MEETING
OF STOCKHOLDERS
Section 2.1. Time
and Place. All meetings of the stockholders
of the Corporation shall be held at such time and place, either
within or without the State of Delaware, as shall be stated in
the notice of the meeting or in a duly executed waiver of notice
thereof.
Section 2.2. Annual
Meeting. The annual meeting of stockholders
of the Corporation shall be held at such date, time and place,
either within or without the State of Delaware, as shall be
determined by the Board of Directors and stated in the notice of
meeting.
Section 2.3. Special
Meetings of Stockholders. Special meetings of
stockholders for any purpose or purposes if not otherwise
prescribed by statute or by the Certificate of Incorporation,
may be called by the Board of Directors, the President, or the
Secretary and shall be called by the President or Secretary at
the request of stockholders owning a majority of the shares of
capital stock of the Corporation issued and outstanding and
entitled to vote at a meeting of stockholders. Such request
shall state the purpose or purposes of the proposed meeting. The
time of any such special meeting shall be fixed by the officer
calling the meeting and shall be stated in the notice of such
meeting, which notice shall specify the purpose or purposes
thereof. Business transacted at any special meeting shall be
confined to the purposes stated in the notice of meeting and
matters germane thereto.
Section 2.4. Notice
of Meetings. Notice of the time and place of
every annual or special meeting of the stockholders shall be
given not less than ten nor more than sixty days before the date
of the meeting to each stockholder entitled to vote at such
meeting, in the manner prescribed by Section 6.1 of these
By-Laws, except that where the matter to be acted upon is a
merger or consolidation of the Corporation, or a sale, lease or
exchange of all or substantially all of its assets, such notice
shall be given not less than twenty nor more than sixty days
prior to such meeting.
Section 2.5. Quorum
and Adjournment of Meetings. The holders of a
majority of the shares of capital stock issued and outstanding
and entitled to vote thereat, present in person, or represented
by proxy, shall be requisite and shall constitute a quorum at
all meetings of the stockholders for the transaction of
business, except as otherwise provided by the Certificate of
Incorporation. If a majority shall not be present in person or
represented by proxy at any meeting of the stockholders at which
action is to be taken by the stockholders, the stockholders
entitled to vote thereat, present in person or represented by
proxy, shall have power to adjourn the meeting from time to time
without notice other than announcement at the meeting, until
holders of the requisite number of shares of stock entitled to
vote shall be present or represented by proxy. At such adjourned
meeting at which such holders of the requisite number of shares
of capital stock shall be present or represented by proxy, any
business may be transacted which might have been transacted at
the meeting as originally called. If the adjournment is for more
than thirty days, or if after the adjournment a new record date
is fixed
A-67
for the adjourned meeting, a notice of adjourned meeting shall
be given to each stockholder of record entitled to vote thereat.
Section 2.6. Vote
Required. At any meeting of stockholders,
directors shall be elected by a plurality of votes, and all
other matters shall be decided by a majority of votes, cast by
the stockholders present in person or represented by proxy and
entitled to vote, unless the matter is one for which, by express
provisions of statute, of the Certificate of Incorporation or of
these By-Laws, a different vote is required, in which case such
express provision shall govern and control the determination of
such matter.
Section 2.7. Voting. At
any meeting of the stockholders, each stockholder having the
right to vote shall be entitled to vote in person or by proxy.
To determine the stockholders entitled to notice of or to vote
at any meeting of the stockholders or any adjournment thereof,
the Board of Directors may fix, in advance, a record date which
shall be not more than sixty days nor less than ten days before
the date of such meeting. Except as otherwise provided by the
Certificate of Incorporation or by statute, each stockholder of
record shall be entitled to one vote for each outstanding share
of capital stock standing in his or her name on the books of the
Corporation as of the record date. A complete list of the
stockholders entitled to vote at any meeting of stockholders
arranged in alphabetical order with the address of each and the
number of shares held by each, shall be prepared by the
Secretary. Such list shall be open to the examination of any
stockholder for any purpose germane to the meeting during
ordinary business hours for a period of at least ten days prior
to the meeting, at the locations specified by the Delaware
General Corporation Law. The list shall also be produced and
kept at the time and place of the meeting during the whole time
thereof, and may be inspected by any stockholder who is present.
Section 2.8. Proxies. Each
proxy shall be in writing executed by the stockholder giving the
proxy or his or her duly authorized attorney. No proxy shall be
valid after the expiration of three years from its date, unless
a longer period is provided for in the proxy. Unless and until
voted, every proxy shall be revocable at the pleasure of the
person who executed it or his or her legal representatives or
assigns, except in those cases where an irrevocable proxy
permitted by statute has been given.
Section 2.9. Consents. The
provision of these By-Laws covering notices and meetings to the
contrary notwithstanding, any action required or permitted to be
taken at any meeting of stockholders may be taken without a
meeting, without prior notice and without a vote, if a consent
in writing setting forth the action so taken shall be signed by
the holders of outstanding stock having not less than the
minimum number of votes that would have been necessary to
authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares
of stock entitled to vote thereon were present and voted. Where
corporate action is taken in such manner by less than unanimous
written consent, prompt written notice of the taking of such
action shall be given to all stockholders who have not consented
in writing thereto and who, if the action had been taken at a
meeting, would have been entitled to notice of the meeting.
ARTICLE III
DIRECTORS
Section 3.1. Board
of Directors. The business and affairs of the
Corporation shall be managed by a Board of Directors. The Board
of Directors may exercise all such powers of the Corporation and
do all such lawful acts and things on its behalf as are not by
statute or by the Certificate of Incorporation or by these
By-Laws directed or required to be exercised or done by the
stockholders.
Section 3.2. Number;
Election and Tenure. The number of directors
shall be fixed initially by the incorporator of the Corporation
and thereafter such number may be increased from time to time by
the stockholders or by the Board of Directors or may be
decreased by the stockholders; provided that no decrease
in the number of directors shall shorten the term of any
incumbent director. Except as provided by law or these By-Laws,
directors shall be elected each year at the annual meeting of
stockholders. Each director shall hold office until the annual
meeting of stockholders next succeeding his or her election
until his or her successor is elected and has qualified or until
his or her earlier resignation or removal.
A-68
Section 3.3. Resignation
and Removal. A director may resign at any
time by giving written notice to the Board of Directors or to
the President of the Corporation. Such resignation shall take
effect upon receipt thereof by the Board of Directors or by the
President, unless otherwise specified therein. Any one or more
of the directors may be removed, either with or without cause,
at any time by the affirmative vote of a majority of the then
existing shares outstanding at any special meeting of the
stockholders called for such purpose.
Section 3.4. Vacancies. A
vacancy occurring for any reason and newly created directorships
resulting from an increase in the authorized number of directors
may be filled by the vote of a majority of the directors then in
office, although less than a quorum, or by the sole remaining
director, or by the stockholders.
Section 3.5. Compensation. Each
director shall receive for services rendered as a director of
the Corporation such compensation as may be fixed by the Board
of Directors. Nothing herein contained shall be construed to
preclude any director from serving the Corporation in any other
capacity and receiving compensation therefor.
ARTICLE IV
MEETINGS
OF THE BOARD
Section 4.1. Time
and Place. Meetings of the Board of Directors
shall be held at such places, within or without the State of
Delaware, and within or without the United States of America, as
shall be determined in accordance with these By-Laws.
Section 4.2. Annual
Meeting. Immediately after and at the place
of the annual meeting of the stockholders, or at such other
place as the Board of Directors may designate, a meeting of the
newly elected Board of Directors for the purpose of organization
and the election of officers and otherwise may be held. Such
meeting may be held without notice.
Section 4.3. Regular
Meetings. Regular meetings of the Board of
Directors may be held without notice, at such time and place as
shall, from time to time, be determined by the Board of
Directors.
Section 4.4. Special
Meetings. Special meetings of the Board of
Directors may be held at any time and place as shall be
determined by resolution of the Board of Directors or upon the
call of the President, the Secretary, or any member of the Board
of Directors on two days notice to each director by mail or on
one days notice personally or by telecopy, telephone or
telegraph. Meetings of the Board of Directors may be held at any
time without notice if all the directors are present, or if
those not present waive notice of the meeting in writing, either
before or after the meeting.
Section 4.5. Quorum
and Voting. A majority of the entire Board of
Directors shall constitute a quorum at any meeting of the Board
of Directors and the act of a majority of the directors shall be
the act of the Board of Directors, except as may otherwise be
specifically provided by law, the Certificate of Incorporation
or by these By-Laws. If at any meeting of the Board of Directors
there shall be less than a quorum present, the director or
directors present thereat may adjourn the meeting from time to
time, without notice other than announcement at the meeting,
until a quorum shall have been obtained.
Section 4.6. Consents. Any
action required or permitted to be taken at any meeting of the
Board of Directors may be taken without a meeting if all members
of the Board of Directors consent to such action in writing, and
such writing or writings are filed with the minutes of the
proceedings of the Board of Directors.
Section 4.7. Telephonic
Meetings of Directors. The Board of Directors
may participate in a meeting by means of conference telephone or
similar communications equipment by means of which all persons
participating in the meeting can hear each other. Participation
by such means shall constitute presence in person at such
meeting.
A-69
ARTICLE V
COMMITTEES
OF THE BOARD
Section 5.1. Designation
and Powers. The Board of Directors may in its
discretion designate one or more committees. Each committee
shall consist of one or more of the directors of the
Corporation. Such committee or committees shall have duties and
powers not inconsistent with the laws of the State of Delaware,
the Certificate of Incorporation, these By-Laws, and the
respective resolution or resolutions of the Board of Directors.
ARTICLE VI
NOTICES
Section 6.1. Delivery
of Notices. Notices to directors and
stockholders shall be in writing and may be delivered personally
or by mail. Notice by mail shall be deemed to be given at the
time when deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid,
and addressed to directors or stockholders at their respective
addresses appearing on the books of the Corporation, unless any
such director or stockholder shall have filed with the Secretary
of the Corporation a written request that notices intended for
him or her be mailed or delivered to some other address, in
which case the notice shall be mailed to or delivered at the
address designated in such request. Notice to directors may also
be given by telegram or by telecopy.
Section 6.2. Waiver
of Notice. Whenever notice is required to be
given by statute, the Certificate of Incorporation or these
By-Laws, a waiver thereof in writing, signed by the person or
persons entitled to such notice whether before or after the time
stated therein, shall be deemed equivalent to the giving of such
notice. Attendance of a person at a meeting of stockholders,
directors or any committee of directors, as the case may be,
shall constitute a waiver of notice of such meeting, except
where the person is attending for the express purpose of
objecting, at the beginning of the meeting, to the transaction
of any business because the meeting is not lawfully called or
convened. Neither the business to be transacted at, nor the
purpose of, any regular or special meeting of stockholders,
directors or committee of directors need be specified in any
written waiver of notice.
ARTICLE VII
OFFICERS
Section 7.1. Executive
Officers. At the annual meeting of directors
the Board of Directors shall elect a Chairman of the Board,
President, Secretary and Treasurer and may elect one or more
Vice Presidents, Assistant Secretaries or Assistant Treasurers
and such other officers as the Board of Directors may from time
to time designate or the business of the Corporation may
require. Except for the Chairman of the Board, no executive
officer need be a member of the Board. Any number of offices may
be held by the same person, except that the office of
Secretary may not be held by the Chairman of the Board or the
President.
Section 7.2. Other
Officers and Agents. The Board of Directors
may also elect such other officers and agents as the Board of
Directors may at any time or from time to time determine to be
advisable, such officers and such agents to serve for such terms
and to exercise such powers and perform such duties as shall be
specified at any time or from time to time by the Board of
Directors.
Section 7.3. Tenure;
Resignation; Removal; Vacancies. Each officer
of the Corporation shall hold office until his or her successor
is elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier
resignation or removal; provided, that if the term of
office of any officer elected or appointed pursuant to
Section 7.2 of these By-Laws shall have been fixed by the
Board of Directors, he or she shall cease to hold such office no
later than the date of expiration of such term regardless of
whether any other person shall have been elected or appointed to
succeed him or her. Any officer elected by the Board of
Directors may be removed at any time, with or without cause, by
the Board of Directors; provided, that any such removal
shall be without prejudice to the rights, if any, of the officer
so employed under any employment contract or other agreement
with the
A-70
Corporation. An officer may resign at any time upon written
notice to the Board of Directors. If the office of any officer
becomes vacant by reason of death, resignation, retirement,
disqualification, removal from office or otherwise, the Board of
Directors may choose a successor or successors to hold office
for such term as may be specified by the Board of Directors.
Section 7.4. Compensation. Except
as otherwise provided by these By-Laws, the salaries of all
officers and agents of the Corporation appointed by the Board of
Directors shall be fixed by the Board of Directors.
Section 7.5. Authority
and Duties. All officers as between
themselves and the Corporation, shall have such authority and
perform such duties in the management of the Corporation as may
be provided in these By-Laws. In addition to the powers and
duties hereinafter specifically prescribed for the respective
officers, the Board of Directors may from time to time impose or
confer upon any of the officers such additional duties and
powers as the Board of Directors may see fit, and the Board of
Directors may from time to time impose or confer any or all of
the duties and powers hereinafter specifically prescribed for
any officer upon any other officer or officers.
Section 7.6. Chairman
of the Board. The Chairman of the Board of
Directors, who shall be a director, shall preside at all
meetings of the stockholders and at all meetings of the Board of
Directors. As director, he or she shall perform such other
duties as may be assigned from time to time by the Board of
Directors.
Section 7.7. President. The
President shall be the chief executive officer of the
Corporation. He or she shall perform such duties as may be
assigned to him or her by the Board of Directors, and in the
event of disability or absence of the Chairman of the Board,
perform the duties of the Chairman of the Board, including
presiding at meetings of stockholders and directors. He or she
shall from time to time report to the Board of Directors all
matters within his or her knowledge which the interest of the
Corporation may require to be brought to their notice, and shall
also have such other powers and perform such other duties as may
be specifically assigned to him or her from time to time by the
Board of Directors. The President shall see that all resolutions
and orders of the Board of Directors are carried into effect,
and in connection with the foregoing, shall be authorized to
delegate to the Vice President and the other officers such of
his or her powers and such of his or her duties as he or she may
deem to be advisable.
Section 7.8. The
Vice President(s). The Vice President, or if
there be more than one, the Vice Presidents, shall perform such
duties as may be assigned to them from time to time by the Board
of Directors or as may be designated by the President. In case
of the absence or disability of the President the duties of the
office shall, if the Board of Directors or the President has so
authorized, be performed by the Vice President, or if there be
more than one Vice President, by such Vice President as the
Board of Directors or President shall designate.
Section 7.9. The
Treasurer. The Treasurer shall have the
custody of the corporate funds and securities and shall keep
full and accurate accounts of receipts and disbursements in
books belonging to the Corporation and shall deposit all monies
and other valuable effects in the name and to the credit of the
Corporation, in such depositories as may be designated by the
Board of Directors or by any officer of the Corporation
authorized by the Board of Directors to make such designation.
The Treasurer shall exercise such powers and perform such duties
as generally pertain or are necessarily incident to his or her
office and shall perform such other duties as may be
specifically assigned to him or her from time to time by the
Board of Directors or by the President or any Vice President.
Section 7.10. The
Secretary. The Secretary shall attend all
meetings of the Board of Directors and all meetings of the
stockholders and record all votes and the minutes of all
proceedings in a book to be kept for that purpose; and shall
perform like duties for any committee when required. He or she
shall give, or cause to be given, notice of all meetings of the
stockholders and, when necessary, of the Board of Directors. The
Secretary shall exercise such powers and perform such duties as
generally pertain or are necessarily incident to his or her
office and he or she shall perform such other duties as may be
assigned to him or her from time to time by the Board of
Directors, the President or by any Vice President.
A-71
ARTICLE VIII
CERTIFICATES
OF STOCK
Section 8.1. Form
and Signature. The certificates of stock of
the Corporation shall be in such form or forms not inconsistent
with the Certificate of Incorporation as the Board of Directors
shall approve. They shall be numbered, the certificates for the
shares of stock of each class to be numbered consecutively, and
shall be entered in the books of the Corporation as they are
issued. They shall exhibit the holders name and number of
shares and shall be signed by the Chairman of the Board, the
President or a Vice President and the Treasurer (or any
Assistant Treasurer) or the Secretary (or any Assistant
Secretary); provided, however, that where any such
certificate is signed by a transfer agent or an assistant
transfer agent, or by a transfer clerk acting on behalf of the
Corporation, and registered by a registrar, the signature of any
such President, Vice President, Treasurer, Assistant Treasurer,
Secretary or Assistant Secretary, may be a facsimile. In case
any officer or officers who shall have signed, or whose
facsimile signature or signatures shall have been used on any
such certificate or certificates, shall cease to be such officer
or officers of the Corporation, whether because of death,
resignation, removal or otherwise, before such certificate or
certificates shall have been delivered by the Corporation, such
certificate or certificates may nevertheless be issued and
delivered as though the person or persons who signed such
certificate or certificates, or whose facsimile signature or
signatures shall have been used thereon, had not ceased to be
such officer or officers of the Corporation.
Section 8.2. Lost
or Destroyed Certificates. The Board of
Directors may direct a new certificate or certificates to be
issued in place of any certificate or certificates theretofore
issued by the Corporation alleged to have been lost or
destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit of that fact by the
person claiming the certificate or stock to be lost or
destroyed. When authorizing such issue of a new certificate or
certificates, the Board of Directors may in its discretion and
as a condition precedent to the issuance thereof, require the
owner of such lost or destroyed certificate or certificates, or
his or her legal representatives, to advertise the same in such
manner as it shall require, and to give a bond in such sum as
the Board of Directors may direct, indemnifying the Corporation,
any transfer agent and any registrar against any claim that may
be made against them or any of them with respect to the
certificate alleged to have been lost or destroyed.
Section 8.3. Registration
of Transfer. Upon surrender to the
Corporation of a certificate for shares, duly endorsed or
accompanied by proper evidence of succession, assignment or
authority to transfer, the Corporation shall issue a new
certificate to the person entitled thereto, cancel the old
certificate, and record the transaction on its books.
ARTICLE IX
GENERAL
PROVISIONS
Section 9.1. Record
Date. In order that the Corporation may
determine the stockholders entitled to notice of or to vote at
any meeting of stockholders or any adjournment thereof, or
entitled to express consent to corporate action in writing
without a meeting, or entitled to receive payment of any
dividend or other distribution or allotment of any rights, or
entitled to exercise any rights in respect of any change,
conversion or exchange of stock, or for the purpose of any other
lawful action, the Board of Directors may fix, in advance, a
record date, which shall not be more than sixty nor less than
ten days before the date of such meeting, nor more than sixty
days prior to any other action.
Section 9.2. Registered
Stockholders. The Corporation shall be
entitled to treat the holder of record of any share or shares of
stock as the holder in fact thereof and accordingly shall not be
bound to recognize any equitable or other claim to or interest
in such share on the part of any other person, whether or not it
shall have express or other notice thereof, save as expressly
provided by the laws of the State of Delaware.
Section 9.3. Dividends. Dividends
upon the capital stock of the Corporation shall in the
discretion of the Board of Directors from time to time be
declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally
available therefor after setting aside of proper reserves.
A-72
Section 9.4. Checks
and Notes. All checks and drafts on the bank
accounts of the Corporation, all bills of exchange and
promissory notes of the Corporation, and all acceptances,
obligations and other instruments for the payment of money
drawn, signed or accepted by the Corporation, shall be signed or
accepted, as the case may be, by such officer or officers, agent
or agents as shall be thereunto authorized from time to time by
the Board of Directors or by officers of the Corporation
designated by the Board of Directors to make such authorization.
Section 9.5. Fiscal
Year. The fiscal year of the Corporation
shall be fixed by the Board of Directors.
Section 9.6. Voting
of Securities of Other Corporations. In the
event that the Corporation shall at any time own and have power
to vote any securities (including but not limited to shares of
stock) of any other issuer, such securities shall be voted by
such person or persons, to such extent and in such manner, as
may be determined by the Board of Directors.
Section 9.7. Transfer
Agent. The Board of Directors may make such
rules and regulations as it may deem expedient concerning the
issue, transfer and registration of stock. It may appoint one or
more transfer agents and one or more registrars and may require
all stock certificates to bear the signature of either or both.
Section 9.8. Corporate
Seal. The corporate seal shall have inscribed
thereon the name of the Corporation and the words
Corporate Seal, Delaware.
ARTICLE X
INDEMNIFICATION
Section 10.1. Indemnification.
As used in this Section 10.1, (i) the term
officer shall include each person appointed an
officer of the Corporation pursuant to Section 7.1 and 7.2
of the By-Laws and each person who is or was serving as a
president, executive vice president or senior vice president of
a division of the Corporation, and (ii) the term
related entity shall mean any corporation (other
than the Corporation), limited liability company, partnership,
joint venture, trust, or other business or non-profit enterprise
(including an employee benefit plan).
The Corporation shall indemnify and hold harmless, to the
fullest extent permitted by applicable law as it presently
exists or may hereafter be amended (but, in the case of any such
amendment, only to the extent such amendment permits the
Corporation to provide broader indemnification rights than such
law permitted the Corporation to provide prior to such
amendment), any person who was or is made or threatened to be
made a party, or is otherwise involved in, any threatened,
pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil,
criminal, administrative or investigative (a
proceeding), by reason of the fact that such person
is or was a director, officer or employee of the Corporation or
is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as a
director, officer or employee of a related entity, against all
expense, liability and loss (including attorneys fees,
judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement) actually and
reasonably incurred by such person in connection therewith;
provided, however, that, except as otherwise expressly provided
in this Section 10.1, the Corporation shall be required to
indemnify such person in connection with a proceeding (or part
thereof) commenced by such person only if the commencement of
such proceeding (or part thereof) by such person was authorized
in the specific case by the Board.
The Corporation shall, to the fullest extent not prohibited by
applicable law, pay the expenses (including attorneys
fees) reasonably incurred by any person who is or was a director
or officer of the Corporation or is or was serving at the
request of the Corporation as a director or officer of a related
entity, in defending any proceeding referred to in the preceding
paragraph in advance of its final disposition upon receipt of an
undertaking acceptable to the Corporation by or on behalf of
such person to repay all such amounts if it shall ultimately be
determined that such person is not entitled to be indemnified
under this Section 10.1, such undertaking to include a
certification by such person that he or she acted in good faith
and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in the best
interests of the Corporation and, in the case of a criminal
proceeding, had no reason to believe his or her conduct was
unlawful. Such expenses reasonably incurred by other persons
A-73
may be so paid by the Corporation upon such terms and
conditions, if any, as the Corporation deems appropriate.
If a claim for indemnification (following the final disposition
of the applicable proceeding) or advancement of expenses under
this Section 10.1 is not paid in full by the Corporation
within sixty (60) days after a written claim therefor by
the person being indemnified hereunder has been received by the
Corporation, such person may file suit to recover the unpaid
amount of such claim, and if successful in whole or in part,
shall be entitled to be paid the expense of prosecuting such
claim.
The rights of indemnification and advancement of expenses
provided in this Section 10.1 shall be in addition to, and
not exclusive of, any other right which any person may have or
hereafter acquire by statute, certificate of incorporation,
by-laws, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested
directors or otherwise. The Corporation shall have the
authority, to the extent and in the manner permitted by law, to
indemnify and to advance expenses to any person, whether or not
such person has any rights to indemnification or advancement of
expenses under this Section 10.1, when and as authorized by
appropriate corporate action.
Indemnification under this Section 10.1 shall not include
any amount payable on account of profits realized by such person
in the purchase or sale of securities of the Corporation or a
related entity. The Corporations obligation, if any, to
indemnify or to advance expenses to any person who was or is
serving at the request of the Corporation as a director or
officer of a related entity shall be reduced by any amount such
person may collect as indemnification or advancement of expenses
from such related entity.
The Corporation may maintain insurance, at its expense, to
protect itself and any person who is or was serving as a
director, officer, employee or agent of the Corporation or, at
the request of the Corporation, any related entity, against any
expense, liability or loss, whether or not the Corporation would
have the power to indemnify such person against such expense,
liability or loss under the Delaware General Corporation Law.
Any repeal or modification of the foregoing provisions of this
Section 10.1 shall not adversely affect any right or
protection hereunder of any person in respect of any act or
omission occurring prior to the time of such repeal or
modification.
ARTICLE XI
AMENDMENTS
Section 11.1. By
the Stockholders. These By-Laws may be
altered, amended or repealed in whole or in part, and new
By-Laws may be adopted, by the affirmative vote of the holders
of a majority of the shares of capital stock issued and
outstanding and entitled to vote at any annual or special
meeting of the stockholders, if notice thereof shall be
contained in the notice of the meeting.
Section 11.2. By
the Board of Directors. These By-Laws may be
altered, amended or repealed by the Board of Directors at any
regular or special meeting of the Board of Directors if notice
thereof shall be contained in the notice of the meeting.
A-74
Exhibit B
FORM OF
RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF WYETH
First. The name of the corporation is Wyeth.
Second. The address of the Companys
registered office in the State of Delaware is 1209 Orange
Street, Wilmington, DE 19805, in the County of New Castle. The
name of its registered agent at such address is The Corporation
Trust Company.
Third. The purpose of the Company is to engage
in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be
organized under the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.
Fourth. The total number of shares of stock
which the Company is authorized to issue is one thousand (1,000)
shares of Common Stock, par value 0.01 dollars ($0.01) per share.
Fifth. Unless and to the extent that the
By-Laws of the Company shall so require, the election of
directors of the Company need not be by written ballot.
Sixth. In furtherance and not in limitation of
the powers conferred by the General Corporation Law of the State
of Delaware, the Board of Directors of the Company shall be
authorized to make, alter, or repeal the By-Laws of the Company
as and to the extent permitted therein.
Seventh. No director shall be personally
liable to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary
damages for any breach of fiduciary duty by such director as a
director, except (i) for breach of the directors duty
of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for
acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) pursuant to
section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or
(iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an
improper personal benefit.
A-75
Annex B
1585
Broadway
New York, New York 10036
Morgan
Stanley
January 25,
2009
Board of Directors
Wyeth
Five Giralda Farms
Madison, NJ 07940
Members of the Board:
We understand that Wyeth (the Company), Pfizer
Corporation (Pfizer) and Wagner Acquisition Corp., a
wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer (Merger Sub),
propose to enter into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated
January 25, 2009 (the Merger Agreement), which
provides, among other things, for the merger (the
Merger) of Merger Sub with and into the Company.
Pursuant to the Merger, the Company will become a wholly owned
subsidiary of Pfizer and, among other things, each outstanding
share of common stock, par value
$0.331/3
per share, of the Company (the Company Common
Stock), other than Restricted Stock (as defined in the
Merger Agreement) or shares owned directly or indirectly by
Pfizer or held directly or indirectly by the Company and shares
of Company Common Stock as to which appraisal rights have been
exercised, will be converted into the right to receive
(i) 0.985 shares (the Exchange Ratio) of
common stock, par value $0.05 per share, of Pfizer (the
Pfizer Common Stock), subject to adjustment in
certain circumstances (the Stock Consideration), and
(ii) $33.00 in cash, subject to adjustment in certain
circumstances (such cash, together with the Stock Consideration,
as each may be adjusted, the Common Stock Merger
Consideration). The terms and conditions of the Merger are
more fully set forth in the Merger Agreement.
You have asked for our opinion as to whether the Common Stock
Merger Consideration to be received by the holders of shares of
the Company Common Stock entitled to receipt thereof pursuant to
the Merger Agreement is fair from a financial point of view to
such holders.
For purposes of the opinion set forth herein, we have:
i) reviewed certain publicly available financial statements
and other business and financial information of the Company and
Pfizer, respectively;
ii) reviewed certain internal financial statements and
other financial and operating data concerning the Company
prepared by the management of the Company;
iii) reviewed certain financial projections concerning the
Company prepared by the management of the Company;
iv) discussed the past and current operations and financial
condition and the prospects of the Company with senior
executives of the Company;
v) reviewed certain internal financial statements and other
financial and operating data concerning Pfizer prepared by the
management of Pfizer;
vi) reviewed certain financial projections concerning
Pfizer prepared by the management of Pfizer;
vii) discussed the past and current operations and
financial condition and the prospects of Pfizer with senior
executives of Pfizer;
viii) discussed certain information relating to certain
strategic, financial and operational benefits and costs
anticipated from the Merger with senior executives of the
Company and Pfizer;
B-1
ix) reviewed the pro forma impact of the Merger on certain
financial ratios of the combined company;
x) reviewed certain historical reported prices and trading
activity for the Company Common Stock and the Pfizer Common
Stock;
xi) compared the financial performance of the Company and
Pfizer and certain historical prices and trading activity of the
Company Common Stock and the Pfizer Common Stock with those of
certain other publicly-traded companies comparable with the
Company and Pfizer, respectively, and their securities;
xii) reviewed the financial terms, to the extent publicly
available, of certain comparable acquisition transactions;
xiii) participated in discussions and negotiations among
representatives of the Company, Pfizer and their financial and
legal advisors;
xiv) reviewed the final Merger Agreement, the executed
commitment letter from certain lenders dated January 25,
2009 (the Debt Financing Commitment Letter) and
certain related documents; and
xv) considered such other factors and performed such other
analyses as we have deemed appropriate.
For purposes of our opinion, we have assumed and relied upon
without independent verification the accuracy and completeness
of the information that was publicly available or supplied or
otherwise made available to us by the Company and Pfizer, and
that formed a substantial basis for this opinion. With respect
to the financial projections, including information relating to
certain strategic, financial and operational benefits and costs
anticipated from the Merger, we have assumed that they have been
reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently
available estimates and judgments of the respective managements
of the Company and Pfizer of the future financial performance of
the Company and Pfizer. We have also assumed that the terms of
the Merger Agreement will not result in an adjustment to the
Exchange Ratio (other than an adjustment as provided in the
Merger Agreement so as not to issue shares of Company Common
Stock in excess of the Maximum Share Number (as defined in the
Merger Agreement)). In addition, we have assumed that the Merger
will be consummated in accordance with the terms set forth in
the Merger Agreement with no waiver, delay or amendment of any
material terms or conditions, including, among other things,
that the financing of the Merger will be consummated in
accordance with the terms described in the Debt Financing
Commitment Letter. We have assumed that in connection with the
receipt of all the necessary governmental, regulatory or other
approvals and consents required for the proposed Merger, no
delays, limitations, conditions or restrictions will be imposed
that would adversely affect in any material respect the
contemplated benefits expected to be derived in the proposed
Merger. We are not legal, regulatory, accounting or tax
advisors. We are financial advisors only and have relied upon,
without independent verification, the assessment of the Company
and Pfizer and their legal, regulatory or tax advisors with
respect to such matters. We express no opinion with respect to
the fairness of the amount or nature of the compensation to any
of the Companys officers, directors or employees, or any
class of such persons, relative to the consideration to be
received by the holders of shares of Company Common Stock. We
have relied upon, without independent verification, the
assessment by the managements of the Company and Pfizer of:
(i) the strategic, financial and other benefits expected to
result from the Merger; (ii) the timing and risks
associated with the integration of the Company and Pfizer; and
(iii) the validity of, and risks associated with, the
Company and Pfizers existing and future technologies,
intellectual property, products, services and business models.
Morgan Stanley also expresses no opinion as to the Preferred
Stock Merger Consideration (as defined in the Merger Agreement)
or as to the relative fairness of any portion of the
consideration to holders of shares of the Company Common Stock,
on the one hand, and holders of shares of any series of Company
preferred stock, on the other hand. We have not made any
independent valuation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities
of the Company or Pfizer, nor have we been furnished with any
such appraisals. Our opinion is necessarily based on financial,
economic, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the
information made available to us as of, the date hereof. Events
occurring after the date hereof may affect this opinion and the
assumptions used in preparing it, and we do not assume any
obligation to update, revise or reaffirm this opinion.
B-2
Other than Pfizer and one other party, which each expressed
interest to Morgan Stanley in the possible acquisition of the
Company or certain of its constituent businesses, in arriving at
our opinion, we were not authorized to solicit, and did not
solicit, interest from any party with respect to an acquisition,
business combination or other extraordinary transaction
involving the Company or any of its assets.
We have acted as financial advisor to the Board of Directors of
the Company in connection with the Merger and will receive a fee
for our services, a substantial portion of which is contingent
upon the closing of the Merger. In the two years prior to the
date hereof, we have provided financial advisory and financing
services for Pfizer and the Company and have received fees in
connection with such services.
Please note that Morgan Stanley is a global financial services
firm engaged in the securities, investment management and
individual wealth management businesses. Our securities business
is engaged in securities underwriting, trading and brokerage
activities, foreign exchange, commodities and derivatives
trading, prime brokerage, as well as providing investment
banking, financing and financial advisory services. Morgan
Stanley, its affiliates, directors and officers may at any time
invest on a principal basis or manage funds that invest, hold
long or short positions, finance positions, and may trade or
otherwise structure and effect transactions, for their own
account or the accounts of its customers, in debt or equity
securities or loans of Pfizer, the Company, or any other
company, or any currency or commodity, that may be involved in
this transaction, or any related derivative instrument. This
opinion has been approved by a committee of Morgan Stanley
investment banking and other professionals in accordance with
our customary practice. This opinion is for the information of
the Board of Directors of the Company and may not be used for
any other purpose without our prior written consent, except that
a copy of this opinion may be included in its entirety in any
filing the Company, and any related registration statement that
Pfizer, is required to make with the Securities and Exchange
Commission in connection with this transaction if such inclusion
is required by applicable law. In addition, this opinion does
not in any manner address the prices at which the Company Common
Stock or the Pfizer Common Stock will trade following the
announcement of the Merger, or at any other time. Morgan Stanley
expresses no opinion or recommendation as to how any
shareholders of the Company should vote or act in respect of the
Merger.
Based on and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion on
the date hereof that the Common Stock Merger Consideration to be
received by the holders of shares of the Company Common Stock
entitled to receipt thereof pursuant to the Merger Agreement is
fair from a financial point of view to such holders.
Very truly yours,
MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED
Susan S. Huang
Managing Director
B-3
Annex C
[LETTERHEAD
OF EVERCORE GROUP L.L.C.]
January 25,
2009
The Board of Directors
Wyeth
Five Giralda Farms
Madison, New Jersey 07940
Members of the Board of Directors:
We understand that Wyeth, a Delaware corporation
(Wyeth), proposes to enter into an Agreement and
Plan of Merger, dated as of January 25, 2009 (the
Merger Agreement), with Pfizer Inc., a Delaware
corporation (Pfizer), and Wagner Acquisition Corp.,
a Delaware corporation and a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of
Pfizer (Merger Sub), pursuant to which Merger Sub
will be merged with and into Wyeth (the Merger). As
a result of the Merger, Wyeth will become a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Pfizer and each outstanding share of the common
stock, par value
$0.331/3
per share, of Wyeth (Wyeth Common Stock), other than
restricted shares, shares owned directly or indirectly by Pfizer
or held directly or indirectly by Wyeth and shares as to which
appraisal rights have been exercised, will be converted into the
right to receive (a) $33.00 in cash (the Cash
Consideration) and (b) 0.985 of a share of the common
stock, par value $0.05 per share, of Pfizer (Pfizer Common
Stock and, such fraction of a share of Pfizer common
stock, together with the Cash Consideration, the Merger
Consideration), subject to adjustment under certain
circumstances (as to which we express no opinion). The terms and
conditions of the Merger are more fully set forth in the Merger
Agreement.
The Board of Directors of Wyeth (the Board of
Directors) has asked us whether, in our opinion, the
Merger Consideration is fair, from a financial point of view, to
the holders of shares of Wyeth Common Stock entitled to receive
such Merger Consideration.
In connection with rendering our opinion, we have, among other
things:
(i) reviewed certain publicly available business and
financial information relating to Wyeth and Pfizer that we
deemed to be relevant, including publicly available research
analysts estimates;
(ii) reviewed certain non-public historical financial
statements and other non-public historical financial and
operating data relating to Wyeth and Pfizer prepared and
furnished to us by the respective managements of Wyeth and
Pfizer;
(iii) reviewed certain non-public projected financial data
relating to Wyeth under alternative business assumptions
prepared and furnished to us by the management of Wyeth;
(iv) reviewed certain non-public projected financial data
relating to Pfizer prepared and furnished to us by the
management of Pfizer;
(v) discussed the past and current operations, financial
projections and current financial condition of Wyeth and Pfizer
with the managements of Wyeth and Pfizer;
(vi) reviewed the reported prices and the historical
trading activity of Wyeth Common Stock and Pfizer Common Stock;
(vii) compared the financial performance of Wyeth and
Pfizer and their respective stock market trading multiples with
those of certain other publicly traded companies that we deemed
relevant;
(viii) reviewed the financial performance of Wyeth and
compared the valuation multiples for Wyeth implied in the Merger
with those of certain other transactions that we deemed relevant;
C-1
(ix) reviewed the amount and timing of the integration
costs and cost savings estimated by the managements of Wyeth and
Pfizer to result from the Merger (collectively, the
Synergies);
(x) considered the potential pro forma financial impact of
the Merger on Pfizer based on projected financial data relating
to Wyeth and Pfizer prepared and furnished to us by the
respective managements of Wyeth and Pfizer and other assumptions
provided by the management of Wyeth;
(xi) reviewed the Merger Agreement; and
(xii) performed such other analyses and examinations and
considered such other factors that we deemed appropriate.
For purposes of our analysis and opinion, we have assumed and
relied upon, without undertaking any independent verification
of, the accuracy and completeness of all of the information
publicly available, and all of the information supplied or
otherwise made available to, discussed with, or reviewed by us,
and we assume no liability therefor. With respect to the
projected financial data relating to Wyeth and Pfizer referred
to above and the Synergies, we have assumed that they have been
reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently
available estimates and good faith judgments of managements of
Wyeth and Pfizer as to the future financial performance of Wyeth
under the alternative business assumptions reflected therein,
the future financial performance of Pfizer and such Synergies.
We express no view as to any projected financial data relating
to Wyeth or Pfizer, the Synergies or the assumptions on which
they are based. We have relied, at your direction, without
independent verification, upon the assessments of the
managements of Wyeth and Pfizer as to (i) the products and
product candidates of Wyeth and Pfizer and the risks associated
with such products and product candidates (including, without
limitation, the potential impact of drug competition and the
probability of successful testing, development and marketing,
and approval by appropriate governmental authorities, of such
products and product candidates) and (ii) the ability of
Pfizer to integrate the businesses of Wyeth and Pfizer.
For purposes of rendering our opinion, we have assumed, in all
respects material to our analysis, that the representations and
warranties of each party contained in the Merger Agreement are
true and correct, that each party will perform all of the
covenants and agreements required to be performed by it under
the Merger Agreement and that the Merger will be consummated in
accordance with the terms set forth in the Merger Agreement
without material modification, waiver or delay. We also have
assumed that all governmental, regulatory or other consents,
approvals or releases necessary for the consummation of the
Merger will be obtained without any material delay, limitation,
restriction or condition that would have an adverse effect on
Wyeth or the consummation of the Merger or materially reduce the
benefits of the Merger to the holders of Wyeth Common Stock.
We have not made or assumed any responsibility for making any
independent valuation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities
(contingent or otherwise) of Wyeth or Pfizer and we have not
been furnished with any such valuations or appraisals, nor have
we evaluated the solvency or fair value of Wyeth or Pfizer under
any state or federal laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or
similar matters. Our opinion is necessarily based upon
information made available to us as of the date hereof and
financial, economic, market and other conditions as they exist
and as can be evaluated on the date hereof. It is understood
that subsequent developments may affect this opinion and that we
do not have any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm this
opinion.
We have not been asked to pass upon, and express no opinion with
respect to, any matter other than the fairness to the holders of
Wyeth Common Stock, from a financial point of view, of the
Merger Consideration. We do not express any view on, and our
opinion does not address, the fairness of the proposed Merger
to, or any consideration received in connection therewith by,
the holders of any other securities, creditors or other
constituencies of Wyeth or Pfizer, nor as to the fairness of the
amount or nature of any compensation to be paid or payable to
any of the officers, directors or employees of Wyeth or Pfizer,
or any class of such persons, whether relative to the Merger
Consideration or otherwise. Our opinion does not address the
relative merits of the Merger as compared to other business or
financial strategies that might be available to Wyeth, nor does
it address the underlying business decision of Wyeth to engage
in the Merger. In connection with our
C-2
engagement, we were not authorized to, and we did not, solicit
third party indications of interest with respect to the
acquisition of any or all shares of Wyeth Common Stock or any
business combination or other extraordinary corporate
transaction involving Wyeth. This letter, and our opinion, does
not constitute a recommendation to any holder of shares of Wyeth
Common Stock as to how such holder should vote or act in respect
of the Merger. We express no opinion herein as to the price at
which shares of Wyeth Common Stock or shares of Pfizer Common
Stock will trade at any time. We are not legal, regulatory,
accounting or tax experts and have assumed the accuracy and
completeness of assessments by Wyeth and its advisors with
respect to legal, regulatory, accounting and tax matters.
We have acted as financial advisor to Wyeth in connection with
the Merger and will receive a fee for our services upon the
rendering of this opinion. We also will be entitled to receive a
success fee if the Merger is consummated. Wyeth also has agreed
to reimburse our expenses and to indemnify us against certain
liabilities arising out of our engagement. We may provide
financial or other services to Wyeth or Pfizer in the future and
in connection with any such services we may receive compensation.
In the ordinary course of business, Evercore Group L.L.C. or its
affiliates may actively trade the securities, or related
derivative securities, or financial instruments of Wyeth, Pfizer
and their respective affiliates, for its own account and for the
accounts of its customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold
a long or short position in such securities or instruments.
This letter, and the opinion expressed herein is addressed to,
and for the information and benefit of, the Board of Directors
in connection with its evaluation of the proposed Merger. The
issuance of this opinion has been approved by an opinion
committee of Evercore Group L.L.C.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that,
as of the date hereof, the Merger Consideration to be received
by holders of shares of Wyeth Common Stock pursuant to the
Merger Agreement is fair, from a financial point of view, to
such holders.
Very truly yours,
EVERCORE GROUP L.L.C.
C-3
Annex D
SECTION 262
OF THE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW OF THE STATE OF
DELAWARE
(a) Any stockholder of a corporation of this State who
holds shares of stock on the date of the making of a demand
pursuant to subsection (d) of this section with respect to
such shares, who continuously holds such shares through the
effective date of the merger or consolidation, who has otherwise
complied with subsection (d) of this section and who has
neither voted in favor of the merger or consolidation nor
consented thereto in writing pursuant to § 228 of this
title shall be entitled to an appraisal by the Court of Chancery
of the fair value of the stockholders shares of stock
under the circumstances described in subsections (b) and
(c) of this section. As used in this section, the word
stockholder means a holder of record of stock in a
stock corporation and also a member of record of a nonstock
corporation; the words stock and share
mean and include what is ordinarily meant by those words and
also membership or membership interest of a member of a nonstock
corporation; and the words depository receipt mean a
receipt or other instrument issued by a depository representing
an interest in one or more shares, or fractions thereof, solely
of stock of a corporation, which stock is deposited with the
depository.
(b) Appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of
any class or series of stock of a constituent corporation in a
merger or consolidation to be effected pursuant to
§ 251 (other than a merger effected pursuant to
§ 251(g) of this title), § 252,
§ 254, § 257, § 258,
§ 263 or § 264 of this title:
(1) Provided, however, that no appraisal rights under this
section shall be available for the shares of any class or series
of stock, which stock, or depository receipts in respect
thereof, at the record date fixed to determine the stockholders
entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the meeting of
stockholders to act upon the agreement of merger or
consolidation, were either (i) listed on a national
securities exchange or (ii) held of record by more than
2,000 holders; and further provided that no appraisal rights
shall be available for any shares of stock of the constituent
corporation surviving a merger if the merger did not require for
its approval the vote of the stockholders of the surviving
corporation as provided in subsection (f) of
§ 251 of this title.
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1) of this subsection,
appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the
shares of any class or series of stock of a constituent
corporation if the holders thereof are required by the terms of
an agreement of merger or consolidation pursuant to
§§ 251, 252, 254, 257, 258, 263 and 264 of this
title to accept for such stock anything except:
a. Shares of stock of the corporation surviving or
resulting from such merger or consolidation, or depository
receipts in respect thereof;
b. Shares of stock of any other corporation, or depository
receipts in respect thereof, which shares of stock (or
depository receipts in respect thereof) or depository receipts
at the effective date of the merger or consolidation will be
either listed on a national securities exchange or held of
record by more than 2,000 holders;
c. Cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional
depository receipts described in the foregoing subparagraphs a.
and b. of this paragraph; or
d. Any combination of the shares of stock, depository
receipts and cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional
depository receipts described in the foregoing subparagraphs a.,
b. and c. of this paragraph.
(3) In the event all of the stock of a subsidiary Delaware
corporation party to a merger effected under § 253 of
this title is not owned by the parent corporation immediately
prior to the merger, appraisal rights shall be available for the
shares of the subsidiary Delaware corporation.
(c) Any corporation may provide in its certificate of
incorporation that appraisal rights under this section shall be
available for the shares of any class or series of its stock as
a result of an amendment to its certificate of incorporation,
any merger or consolidation in which the corporation is a
constituent corporation or the sale
D-1
of all or substantially all of the assets of the corporation. If
the certificate of incorporation contains such a provision, the
procedures of this section, including those set forth in
subsections (d) and (e) of this section, shall apply
as nearly as is practicable.
(d) Appraisal rights shall be perfected as follows:
(1) If a proposed merger or consolidation for which
appraisal rights are provided under this section is to be
submitted for approval at a meeting of stockholders, the
corporation, not less than 20 days prior to the meeting,
shall notify each of its stockholders who was such on the record
date for such meeting with respect to shares for which appraisal
rights are available pursuant to subsection (b) or
(c) hereof that appraisal rights are available for any or
all of the shares of the constituent corporations, and shall
include in such notice a copy of this section. Each stockholder
electing to demand the appraisal of such stockholders
shares shall deliver to the corporation, before the taking of
the vote on the merger or consolidation, a written demand for
appraisal of such stockholders shares. Such demand will be
sufficient if it reasonably informs the corporation of the
identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends
thereby to demand the appraisal of such stockholders
shares. A proxy or vote against the merger or consolidation
shall not constitute such a demand. A stockholder electing to
take such action must do so by a separate written demand as
herein provided. Within 10 days after the effective date of
such merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting
corporation shall notify each stockholder of each constituent
corporation who has complied with this subsection and has not
voted in favor of or consented to the merger or consolidation of
the date that the merger or consolidation has become
effective; or
(2) If the merger or consolidation was approved pursuant to
§ 228 or § 253 of this title, then either a
constituent corporation before the effective date of the merger
or consolidation or the surviving or resulting corporation
within 10 days thereafter shall notify each of the holders
of any class or series of stock of such constituent corporation
who are entitled to appraisal rights of the approval of the
merger or consolidation and that appraisal rights are available
for any or all shares of such class or series of stock of such
constituent corporation, and shall include in such notice a copy
of this section. Such notice may, and, if given on or after the
effective date of the merger or consolidation, shall, also
notify such stockholders of the effective date of the merger or
consolidation. Any stockholder entitled to appraisal rights may,
within 20 days after the date of mailing of such notice,
demand in writing from the surviving or resulting corporation
the appraisal of such holders shares. Such demand will be
sufficient if it reasonably informs the corporation of the
identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends
thereby to demand the appraisal of such holders shares. If
such notice did not notify stockholders of the effective date of
the merger or consolidation, either (i) each such
constituent corporation shall send a second notice before the
effective date of the merger or consolidation notifying each of
the holders of any class or series of stock of such constituent
corporation that are entitled to appraisal rights of the
effective date of the merger or consolidation or (ii) the
surviving or resulting corporation shall send such a second
notice to all such holders on or within 10 days after such
effective date; provided, however, that if such second notice is
sent more than 20 days following the sending of the first
notice, such second notice need only be sent to each stockholder
who is entitled to appraisal rights and who has demanded
appraisal of such holders shares in accordance with this
subsection. An affidavit of the secretary or assistant secretary
or of the transfer agent of the corporation that is required to
give either notice that such notice has been given shall, in the
absence of fraud, be prima facie evidence of the facts stated
therein. For purposes of determining the stockholders entitled
to receive either notice, each constituent corporation may fix,
in advance, a record date that shall be not more than
10 days prior to the date the notice is given, provided,
that if the notice is given on or after the effective date of
the merger or consolidation, the record date shall be such
effective date. If no record date is fixed and the notice is
given prior to the effective date, the record date shall be the
close of business on the day next preceding the day on which the
notice is given.
(e) Within 120 days after the effective date of the
merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation
or any stockholder who has complied with subsections (a)
and (d) of this section hereof and who is otherwise
entitled to appraisal rights, may commence an appraisal
proceeding by filing a petition in the Court of Chancery
demanding a determination of the value of the stock of all such
stockholders.
D-2
Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time within 60 days
after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, any
stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or
joined that proceeding as a named party shall have the right to
withdraw such stockholders demand for appraisal and to
accept the terms offered upon the merger or consolidation.
Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger or
consolidation, any stockholder who has complied with the
requirements of subsections (a) and (d) of this
section hereof, upon written request, shall be entitled to
receive from the corporation surviving the merger or resulting
from the consolidation a statement setting forth the aggregate
number of shares not voted in favor of the merger or
consolidation and with respect to which demands for appraisal
have been received and the aggregate number of holders of such
shares. Such written statement shall be mailed to the
stockholder within 10 days after such stockholders
written request for such a statement is received by the
surviving or resulting corporation or within 10 days after
expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisal
under subsection (d) of this section hereof, whichever is
later. Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, a
person who is the beneficial owner of shares of such stock held
either in a voting trust or by a nominee on behalf of such
person may, in such persons own name, file a petition or
request from the corporation the statement described in this
subsection.
(f) Upon the filing of any such petition by a stockholder,
service of a copy thereof shall be made upon the surviving or
resulting corporation, which shall within 20 days after
such service file in the office of the Register in Chancery in
which the petition was filed a duly verified list containing the
names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded
payment for their shares and with whom agreements as to the
value of their shares have not been reached by the surviving or
resulting corporation. If the petition shall be filed by the
surviving or resulting corporation, the petition shall be
accompanied by such a duly verified list. The Register in
Chancery, if so ordered by the Court, shall give notice of the
time and place fixed for the hearing of such petition by
registered or certified mail to the surviving or resulting
corporation and to the stockholders shown on the list at the
addresses therein stated. Such notice shall also be given by 1
or more publications at least 1 week before the day of the
hearing, in a newspaper of general circulation published in the
City of Wilmington, Delaware or such publication as the Court
deems advisable. The forms of the notices by mail and by
publication shall be approved by the Court, and the costs
thereof shall be borne by the surviving or resulting corporation.
(g) At the hearing on such petition, the Court shall
determine the stockholders who have complied with this section
and who have become entitled to appraisal rights. The Court may
require the stockholders who have demanded an appraisal for
their shares and who hold stock represented by certificates to
submit their certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery
for notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal
proceedings; and if any stockholder fails to comply with such
direction, the Court may dismiss the proceedings as to such
stockholder.
(h) After the Court determines the stockholders entitled to
an appraisal, the appraisal proceeding shall be conducted in
accordance with the rules of the Court of Chancery, including
any rules specifically governing appraisal proceedings. Through
such proceeding the Court shall determine the fair value of the
shares exclusive of any element of value arising from the
accomplishment or expectation of the merger or consolidation,
together with interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount
determined to be the fair value. In determining such fair value,
the Court shall take into account all relevant factors. Unless
the Court in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause
shown, interest from the effective date of the merger through
the date of payment of the judgment shall be compounded
quarterly and shall accrue at 5% over the Federal Reserve
discount rate (including any surcharge) as established from time
to time during the period between the effective date of the
merger and the date of payment of the judgment. Upon application
by the surviving or resulting corporation or by any stockholder
entitled to participate in the appraisal proceeding, the Court
may, in its discretion, proceed to trial upon the appraisal
prior to the final determination of the stockholders entitled to
an appraisal. Any stockholder whose name appears on the list
filed by the surviving or resulting corporation pursuant to
subsection (f) of this section and who has submitted such
stockholders certificates of
D-3
stock to the Register in Chancery, if such is required, may
participate fully in all proceedings until it is finally
determined that such stockholder is not entitled to appraisal
rights under this section.
(i) The Court shall direct the payment of the fair value of
the shares, together with interest, if any, by the surviving or
resulting corporation to the stockholders entitled thereto.
Payment shall be so made to each such stockholder, in the case
of holders of uncertificated stock forthwith, and the case of
holders of shares represented by certificates upon the surrender
to the corporation of the certificates representing such stock.
The Courts decree may be enforced as other decrees in the
Court of Chancery may be enforced, whether such surviving or
resulting corporation be a corporation of this State or of any
state.
(j) The costs of the proceeding may be determined by the
Court and taxed upon the parties as the Court deems equitable in
the circumstances. Upon application of a stockholder, the Court
may order all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any
stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding,
including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys fees
and the fees and expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata
against the value of all the shares entitled to an appraisal.
(k) From and after the effective date of the merger or
consolidation, no stockholder who has demanded appraisal rights
as provided in subsection (d) of this section shall be
entitled to vote such stock for any purpose or to receive
payment of dividends or other distributions on the stock (except
dividends or other distributions payable to stockholders of
record at a date which is prior to the effective date of the
merger or consolidation); provided, however, that if no petition
for an appraisal shall be filed within the time provided in
subsection (e) of this section, or if such stockholder
shall deliver to the surviving or resulting corporation a
written withdrawal of such stockholders demand for an
appraisal and an acceptance of the merger or consolidation,
either within 60 days after the effective date of the
merger or consolidation as provided in subsection (e) of
this section or thereafter with the written approval of the
corporation, then the right of such stockholder to an appraisal
shall cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no appraisal
proceeding in the Court of Chancery shall be dismissed as to any
stockholder without the approval of the Court, and such approval
may be conditioned upon such terms as the Court deems just;
provided, however that this provision shall not affect the right
of any stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding
or joined that proceeding as a named party to withdraw such
stockholders demand for appraisal and to accept the terms
offered upon the merger or consolidation within 60 days
after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, as set
forth in subsection (e) of this section.
(l) The shares of the surviving or resulting corporation to
which the shares of such objecting stockholders would have been
converted had they assented to the merger or consolidation shall
have the status of authorized and unissued shares of the
surviving or resulting corporation.
D-4
Annex
E
CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES
FOR
BOARD CANDIDATE SELECTION
FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
It is the desire of Wyeth to select individuals for nomination
to the Board of Directors who, if elected, will best serve the
interests of the Corporation and its stockholders. The following
Criteria and Procedures for Board Candidate Selection are not
intended to be exclusive or exhaustive, but rather
representative of the scope of delegation by the Board of
Directors of Wyeth, to its Nominating and Governance Committee
in the fulfillment of the duties and responsibilities in
accordance with Section V(1) of its Charter. Certain
criteria should be met by all candidates for Board selection,
while only a portion of the Board need meet other criteria.
|
|
I.
|
Criteria
for All Candidates
|
Among those characteristics to be sought in each candidate,
being mindful of the overall Board composition, are the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Integrity and a commitment to ethical behavior.
|
|
|
|
Personal maturity and leadership skills in industry, education,
the professions, or government.
|
|
|
|
Independence of thought and willingness to deal directly with
difficult issues.
|
|
|
|
Fulfillment of the broadest definition of diversity, seeking
diversity of thought.
|
|
|
|
Broad business
and/or
professional experience, with an understanding of business and
financial affairs, and the complexities of business
organizations.
|
|
|
II.
|
Criteria
for a Portion of Candidates
|
Among those characteristics that may be sought in individual
board candidates, as needed to fulfill certain functions on the
Board from time to time, are the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Scientific accomplishment in medicine or pharmaceuticals.
|
|
|
|
Management experience and expertise.
|
|
|
|
Financial
and/or
accounting expertise, generally, and as necessary to fulfill the
financial requirements of the New York Stock Exchange and the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
|
|
|
Experience in other regulated industries.
|
|
|
|
Business and other experience relevant to large public companies.
|
III.
Procedures to Be Used in Board Candidate Selection
The Nominating and Governance Committee will include the
following among its procedures to be used in the selection of
candidates for the Board:
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluate qualifications under Section I, and any specific
needs under Section II, prior to commencement of the
recruitment process.
|
|
|
|
Develop a selection process specific to a candidate search to be
led by the Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee
with the assistance of a search firm, if deemed appropriate by
the Committee, to be identified and retained within the sole
discretion of the Committee.
|
E-1
|
|
|
|
|
Receive recommendations from other existing members of the Board
of Directors and other sources, including self-nominated
candidates, and submit such potential candidates for review
under the foregoing specific selection process.
|
|
|
|
Determine that a prospective candidate fulfills the independence
requirements of the New York Stock Exchange, the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the Internal Revenue Code, as applicable.
|
|
|
|
Review the education of the prospective candidate.
|
|
|
|
Evaluate the quality of experience and achievement of the
prospective candidate.
|
|
|
|
Review the prospective candidates current or past
membership on other boards.
|
|
|
|
Determine that the candidate has the ability, and the
willingness, to spend the necessary time required to function
effectively as a Director.
|
|
|
|
Determine that the candidate has a genuine interest in
representing the stockholders and the interests of the
Corporation overall.
|
E-2