SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-KSB
ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001
Commission File No. 1-11182
BIO-IMAGING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware | 11-2872047 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
826 Newtown-Yardley Road, Newtown, Pennsylvania |
18940-1721 |
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
(267) 757-1360
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class |
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
---|---|---|
Common Stock, $.00025 par value per share |
Boston Stock Exchange |
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
None
Check whether the Registrant: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes /x/ No / /
Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. / /
State Registrant's revenues for fiscal year ended September 30, 2001: $8,754,817
State
the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant:
$4,813,902 at November 30, 2001 based on the average bid and asked prices on that date.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant's classes of common stock, as of November 30, 2001:
Class |
Number of Shares |
|
---|---|---|
Common Stock, $.00025 par value | 8,259,212 |
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format Yes / / No /x/
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB: Portions of the Registrant's definitive Proxy Statement for its 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report.
|
Item |
Page |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PART I | 1. | Business | 1 | |||
2. |
Properties |
8 |
||||
3. |
Legal Proceedings |
8 |
||||
4. |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
8 |
||||
PART II |
5. |
Market for the Company's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters |
9 |
|||
6. |
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
10 |
||||
7. |
Financial Statements |
15 |
||||
8. |
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
15 |
||||
PART III |
9. |
Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons; Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act |
16 |
|||
10. |
Executive Compensation |
16 |
||||
11. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management |
16 |
||||
12. |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions |
16 |
||||
13. |
Exhibits, List and Reports on Form 8-K |
16 |
||||
SIGNATURES |
17 |
|||||
EXHIBIT INDEX |
18 |
|||||
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
F-1 |
i
General
Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. ("Bio-Imaging" or the "Company") is a pharmaceutical contract service organization, providing services that support the product development process of the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device industries. The Company specializes in assisting its clients in the design and management of the medical-imaging component of clinical trials for all modalities, which consist of computerized tomography ("CT"), magnetic resonance imaging ("MRI"), x-rays, dual energy x-ray absorptiometry ("DEXA"), position emission tomography single photon emission computerized tomography ("PET SPECT") and ultrasound.
The Company utilizes proprietary processes and software applications in providing its services to pharmaceutical companies conducting clinical studies in which medical imaging modalities are used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmaceuticals, biologics or medical devices. The Company's digital image processing and computer analysis techniques enable it to make highly precise measurements and biostatistical inferences about drug or device effects. The resulting data enable the Company's clients, and their regulatory reviewers (primarily the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, (the "FDA") and European agencies) to evaluate product efficacy and safety. In addition, the Company has developed specialized computer services and software applications that enable independent radiologists and other medical specialists involved in clinical trials to review medical image data in an entirely digital format. The Company's services also include the regulatory submission of medical images, quantitative data and text.
The Company continues to believe that it is at an early stage of market penetration and is directing its marketing and sales efforts towards those clinical development areas that heavily depend upon medical imaging. These areas include therapeutic and diagnostic anti-inflammatory, oncology, central nervous system, osteoporosis and cardiovascular.
In February 1997, the Company opened a European facility in Leiden, the Netherlands to provide centralized image processing services for European clients. The Company manages its services for European based clinical trials from this facility. The Company's European facility has the same capabilities as the Company's U.S. headquarters.
In May 1999, the Company acquired the operations of Bona Fide, Ltd. ("Bona Fide"). Bona Fide provides DEXA quality assurance and quality control ("QA/QC") to the pharmaceutical and medical device industry for studies requiring bone densitometry and body composition measurements.
In September 2000, the Company offered a new service called, Bio-Imaging ETCSM. Bio-Imaging ETCSM focuses on Education, Training and Certification for medical imaging equipment, facilities and staff.
On October 25, 2001 (the "Closing Date"), the Company acquired the Intelligent ImagingTM business unit ("Intelligent Imaging") of Quintiles, Inc., a North Carolina corporation ("Quintiles"), and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Quintiles Transnational Corporation (the "Intelligent Imaging Acquisition"). All Intelligent Imaging personnel (approximately 47) have become employed by the Company and all of the clinical projects, which were handled by Intelligent Imaging, are now being managed by the combined Company.
Intelligent Imaging specializes in providing digital medical imaging services for clinical trials and the health care industry, a line of business the Company intends to continue. In the Intelligent Imaging Acquisition, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Intelligent Imaging and assumed certain liabilities of Intelligent Imaging.
1
The assets acquired included Intelligent Imaging's customer contracts, equipment, permits, leases and proprietary rights. In consideration for the assets purchased, the Company issued an unsecured, subordinated convertible promissory note, dated as of October 25, 2001, in the principal amount of $1,000,000 (the "Note"). The Note bears interest at the rate in effect on the business day immediately prior to the date on which payments are due under the Note equal to the Three-Month London Interbank Offering Rate as published from time to time in the Wall Street Journal plus 3%, compounded annually based on a 365-day year. The Note, which is payable in quarterly installments with respect to fifty percent (50%) of the aggregate principal amount together with all outstanding interest, matures thirty-six (36) months from the Closing Date and is convertible, in whole or in part, by Quintiles any time prior to maturity into shares of the Company's common stock, $0.00025 par value (the "Common Stock"). The number of shares of Common Stock into which the Note may be converted is calculated by dividing the outstanding principal balance of the Note ($1,000,000 as of October 25, 2001), plus all accrued and unpaid interest thereon, by the greater of: (i) 75% of the average closing price of the Company's Common Stock over the ten consecutive trading days ending prior to the date of conversion, or (ii) $0.906 per share. Accordingly, the Note is convertible into a maximum of 1,103,753 shares of Common Stock. As of October 25, 2001, the Note was convertible into 1,103,753 shares of Common Stock (assuming a conversion price of $0.906 per share as of October 25, 2001). The Company may pay additional consideration if certain financial results are achieved (the maximum number of shares that may be issued to Quintiles pursuant to such provision is 646,247 shares of Common Stock which is to be paid out no later than February 15, 2003). The Company also assumed certain liabilities of Intelligent Imaging, including all obligations of Intelligent Imaging arising after the closing under certain contracts and unearned income reflected on the closing balance sheet.
The Company was incorporated in Delaware in 1987 under the name Wise Ventures, Inc. The Company's name was changed to Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. in 1991. The address of the Company's principal executive offices is 826 Newtown-Yardley Road, Newtown, Pennsylvania, 18940, and its telephone number is 267-757-1360.
Business Services
Core Laboratory Services
Bio-Imaging is a leading provider of medical imaging management services for clinical development purposes. The Company's imaging core laboratory facilities in the U.S.A. and Europe provide centralized image data collection, processing, analysis and archival services for clinical trials conducted worldwide. The facilities are designed for high-volume efficient processing of analog (film) and digital image data in a secure environment that complies with regulatory guidelines for clinical data management.
Medical image data are received by Bio-Imaging facilities from clinical trial sites, typically academic or community hospitals. The Company has developed procedures for data tracking and quality control that it believes to be of significant value to its clients. The Company's facilities contain specialized hardware and software for the digitization of films and translation of digital data, enabling data to be standardized, regardless of its source. The Company believes its ability to handle most commercially available image file formats is a valuable technical asset and an important competitive advantage in gaining new business for large global multi-center clinical trials.
The Company performs image analyses on client data using internally developed or specially configured software. The Company measures key indicators of drug efficacy in different organs and disease states. The results from image analysis derived in Bio-Imaging facilities are transferred to databases that can be transmitted electronically to the Company's clients, or integrated directly into the Company's Bio/ImageBase® package for regulatory submission on the client's behalf.
2
Information Management Services
Bio-Imaging's information management services focus on providing specialized solutions for improving the quality, speed and flexibility of image data management for clinical trials. The Company's Computer Assisted Masked Reading ("CAMRTM") systems offer numerous advantages over conventional film-based medical image reading scenarios, including increased reading speed, greater standardization of image reading, and reduced error in the capture of reader interpretations.
Using the Company's CAMRTM systems, independent medical specialists can review medical image data from clinical trials in a digital format. The CAMRTM systems can display all modalities of medical image data, regardless of source equipment. In addition, the systems can display either translated digital data or digitized films. Such image reviews are often required during clinical trials to evaluate patients' responses to therapy or to determine if patients qualify for studies. By using the CAMRTM systems to read and evaluate image data, medical specialists can achieve greater reading speed than is possible with film, and can perform evaluations in a more objective, reproducible manner.
The Company has also developed remote CAMRTM ("rCAMRTM") systems which are located on the premises, either home or office, of the individual medical specialists who are engaged by the sponsor to perform the analysis of the medical image data. Historically, the CAMRTM systems have been utilized to determine efficacy of the compounds being studied. More recently, clients are requesting Bio-Imaging to provide "real-time" reads for inclusion/exclusion criteria, or safety reads. The Company believes that the rCAMRTM system is the optimal tool for this type of work because it allows Bio-Imaging, at the client's discretion, to provide the images to an expert in the field to facilitate the review of the images from the expert's office or home.
The Company has developed a proprietary image database software application, Bio/ImageBase®, that enables the Company's clients to submit their medical images and related clinical data to the FDA in a digital format. Using data stored on CD-ROM disks, Bio/ImageBase® allows clients and their FDA medical reviewers to review medical images and related clinical data. The Company believes that Bio/ImageBase® offers the potential to decrease review time, resulting in faster regulatory approvals and reduced time-to-market for new drugs, biologics and medical devices.
The Company's Bio/ImageBase® software has been installed at client sites and on certain computer systems at the FDA. The Company has been using its Bio/ImageBase® software to submit medical images and related data to the FDA since mid-1993. In March 1996, Bio/ImageBase® was cited in the FDA's 1996 Computer-Assisted Product License Application Guidance Manual as an acceptable database for submission of imaging data.
Education, Training and Certification
Bio-Imaging ETCSM focuses on Education, Training and Certification for medical imaging equipment, facilities and staff. A program of Instrument Quality Control ("IQC") will provide physicians with a method of ensuring that systems operate to specifications on a continual basis. This program is designed to protect the accuracy of diagnostic interpretation of bone density data and give the physicians current and in-depth feedback on the status of their instruments. In addition, Bio-Imaging ETCSM will train entry-level physicians and allied health professionals in routine clinical practice.
Other Services
The Company provides technical consulting in the evaluation of the sites that may participate in clinical trials. The Company also consults with clients regarding regulatory issues involved in the design, execution, analysis and submission of medical image data in clinical trials.
3
Target Markets
The Company's primary target market is comprised of pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device companies whose clinical development pipelines include drugs, biologics or devices that are typically evaluated by medical imaging methods. This target market includes leading international pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies with products currently in the clinical development pipeline.
Bio-Imaging focuses its marketing on the following stages of clinical development:
Phase II Clinical Trials
Phase II clinical trials are generally conducted over six months to two years and involve basic efficacy (effectiveness), safety and dose-range testing in approximately 50 to 400 patients suffering from the disease or condition under study. Such trials help determine the best effective dose, confirm that the drug works as expected and provide initial safety data.
Phase III Clinical Trials
Phase III clinical trials are generally conducted over one to four years and involve efficacy and safety studies in broader populations of hundreds or thousands of patients and many investigational sites (hospitals and clinics). These trials are sometimes referred to as pivotal studies for submission to the regulatory agencies. Generally, Phase III studies are intended to provide additional information on drug safety and efficacy, an evaluation of the risk-benefit of the drug and information for the adequate labeling of the product.
Bio-Imaging focuses its marketing efforts further on clinical trials for the following classes of drugs:
Anti-Inflammatory Therapeutics
Anti-inflammatory clinical trials, such as those focused on arthritis, include radiologic evaluation of the bones and joints to determine drug efficacy. The Company believes that demand among drug developers for its services will increase as new classes of biotechnology-derived drugs enter and progress through the clinical development pipeline.
Cancer Therapeutics
Many pharmaceutical companies are currently developing new therapies for the treatment of cancer. For solid tumor studies, medical imaging modalities are used to determine the response of treated and untreated tumors. These medical images are evaluated by medical specialists during the course of oncology clinical trials to determine the extent of disease and changes in tumor size over time.
The FDA's guidelines aimed at accelerating access to new drugs for the review and approval of new cancer therapies place greater emphasis on shrinkage of tumors as an early indicator of anti-tumor efficacy. Bio-Imaging believes that these FDA guidelines may have a favorable impact on its business as pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies may have an increased need for regulatory compliant medical imaging services to conduct their oncology clinical trials.
Central Nervous System Therapeutics
Various pharmaceutical companies are currently developing drugs for treatment of diseases and conditions of the central nervous system, most of which are evaluated with the aid of medical imaging. Most later-stage clinical trials for these serious and costly conditions involve the evaluation of medical
4
image data. The Company believes that its central nervous system clinical trials business may increase as more therapies progress through the research pipeline.
Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis is the disease of "thinning bones" which leads to fractures in the elderly. The FDA guidance document for developing treatments for this disease recognized DEXA as one of the primary efficacy and safety measurement tools available. Furthermore, all data needs to go through a quality assurance laboratory. This is now standard practice in all studies using DEXA instruments whether for osteoporosis oncology or antiobesity or muscle wasting assessment.
Diagnostic Imaging Agents
Bio-Imaging provides its services to clients developing diagnostic imaging agents which are designed to diagnose disease conditions more quickly and accurately in their development in order to facilitate earlier and more accurate treatment.
Cardiovascular Therapeutics
Various pharmaceutical companies are currently developing drugs for the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular diseases and conditions which are evaluated with the aid of medical imaging. The Company provides its services to clients developing diagnostic agents for the detection and treatment of these conditions.
Market Trends
The Company believes that demand for its services should grow because of a variety of favorable regulatory, technological and market trends:
5
continue to benefit. The Company believes it is well-positioned to take advantage of these trends due to its U.S. and European operations.
Intellectual Property
Proprietary protection for the Company's computer-imaging programs, processes and know-how is important to its business. Bio-Imaging has developed certain technically derived procedures and computer software applications that are intended to increase the effectiveness and quality of its services. The Company relies upon trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, know-how and continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain its competitive position. The Company has obtained registered trademark protection for the Bio/ImageBase® and has claimed trademark protection for CAMRTM, rCAMRTM and Intelligent ImagingTM. The Company holds patents for the two DEXA phantoms, titled Spine and Variable Composition Phantoms, which it sells to trial sites. The Company has registered its Stylized Man Design with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Furthermore, Bio-Imaging requires all employees, consultants and contractors to execute confidential disclosure agreements as a condition of employment or engagement by the Company. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company can limit unauthorized or wrongful disclosures of trade secrets or other confidential information. In addition, to the extent the Company relies on trade secrets and know-how to maintain its competitive technological position, there can be no assurance that others may not develop independently the same, similar or superior techniques. Although the Company's intellectual property rights are important to the results of its operations, the Company believes that other factors such as independence, process knowledge, technical expertise and experience are more important, and that, overall, these technological capabilities offer significant benefits to its clients.
Government Regulation
The research and development, manufacture and marketing of drugs and medical devices are subject to stringent regulation by the FDA in the United States and by comparable authorities in other countries. In addition, regulations imposed by other federal agencies, as well as state and local authorities, may impact such research and development, manufacturing and marketing.
The FDA has established mandatory procedures and safety standards which apply to the clinical testing, manufacturing and marketing of drugs and medical devices. These procedures and safety standards include, among other things, the completion of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials to establish the safety and efficacy of the drug or device for its recommended conditions or use. The Company advises its clients in the execution of clinical trials and other drug and device developmental tasks. The Company does not administer drugs to or utilize medical devices on patients.
The success of the Company's business is dependent upon continued acceptance by the FDA and other regulatory authorities of the data and analyses generated by the Company's services in connection with the evaluation of the safety and efficacy of new drugs and devices. The FDA has formal guidelines which encourage the use of "surrogate measures," through submission of digital image data, for evaluation of drugs to treat life-threatening or debilitating conditions. There can be no assurance, however, that the FDA or other regulatory authorities will accept the data or analyses generated by the Company in the future and, even assuming acceptance, there can be no assurance that the FDA or other regulatory authorities will require the application of imaging techniques to numbers of patients and over time periods substantially similar to those required of traditional safety and efficacy techniques.
6
Changes in the FDA's policy for the evaluation of therapeutic oncology agents may have a positive impact on the time to market of such therapeutics. According to the guidelines announced in March 1996, approval times for new cancer therapies can be shortened if evidence of tumor shrinkage is verifiable and demonstrable through the use of objective measurement techniques. These guidelines place much greater reliance on the use of medical image data to demonstrate objective tumor shrinkage. In addition, in March 1997, the FDA announced new guidelines aimed at accelerating all therapeutic categories through the use of surrogate markers such as imaging endpoints. The Company believes the FDA's initiatives to streamline and accelerate the submission and review process of therapeutic agents may have a favorable impact on the Company's business.
In October 1998, the FDA released a draft guidance for the industry relating to how medical imaging should be defined, handled and evaluated in clinical trials. In June 2000, the FDA released another draft guidance which provided more details on the October 1998 draft guidance. The Company believes that the guidance documents comports with the methodologies and processes utilized by the Company in providing medical information management services for its clients.
The Company believes that its ability to achieve continued and sustainable growth will be materially dependent upon, among other factors, the continued stringent enforcement of the comprehensive regulatory framework by various government agencies. Any significant change in these regulatory requirements or the enforcement thereof, especially relaxation of standards, could adversely affect the Company's prospects.
The current European market regulation is more fragmented than in the U.S.A., therefore, such European agencies have a tendency to follow FDA guidelines.
Competition
As a sign of growth in the clinical trials-related medical imaging services business, the Company continues to experience competition from commercial competitors and academic research centers. As competition increases, Bio-Imaging will look to provide value-added services and undertake marketing and sales programs to differentiate its services based on its expertise and experience in specific therapeutic and diagnostic areas, its technological expertise and regulatory and clinical development experience, its quality performance and its international capabilities. Competition in the Company's industry has resulted in additional pressure being placed on price, service and quality. Although the Company believes that it is well positioned against its competitors due to its experience in clinical trials and regulatory compliance along with its international presence, there can be no assurance that the Company's competitors or clients will not provide or develop services similar or superior to those provided by the Company. Any such competition could have a material adverse impact on the Company. The Company's competitive position also depends upon its ability to attract and retain qualified personnel and develop and preserve proprietary technology, processes and know-how.
Marketing and Sales
Bio-Imaging provides and markets its services on an international basis primarily to pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. The Company's sales and marketing activities are directed by a Vice President of Business Development, and supported by in-house staff and field business development personnel.
The Company's selling efforts are focused on North America and Western Europe. Sales efforts are directed from both of the Company's headquarters in Pennsylvania and Leiden, the Netherlands. The Company's marketing activities include exhibiting at major trade shows, advertising in trade journals and the sponsoring of industry associations. The Company continues to evaluate appropriate co-marketing activities and strategic alliances, in particular with contract research organizations, to augment its own business development efforts.
7
Significant Clients
During fiscal 2001, two clients accounted for approximately 34% of the Company's project revenues encompassing nine projects. No other customers accounted for more than 10% of project revenues. These contracts are terminable by the Company's clients at any time and for any reason. The loss of such clients, or a reduction in services provided to such clients, would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.
Employees
As of September 30, 2001, the Company had 90 employees, five of whom are officers of the Company. As a result of the Acquisition, the Company had 137 employees as of October 25, 2001.
Of the Company's employees, as of September 30, 2001, nine were engaged in sales and marketing, 75 were engaged in client related projects and six were engaged in administration and management. A significant number of the Company's management and professional employees have prior industry experience. Bio-Imaging believes that it has been successful in attracting skilled and experienced personnel, however, competition for such personnel is intensifying. Although all of the Company's employees are covered by confidentiality and non-competition agreements, there can be no assurance that such agreements will be enforceable. Bio-Imaging has entered into an employment contract with one of its executive officers. See "Item 10. Executive Compensation." Bio-Imaging considers relations with its employees to be good.
The Company leases approximately 17,000 square feet of office space located in Newtown, Pennsylvania. This lease expires January 2005 and provides for a fixed base rent of approximately $26,000 per month with an annual inflation increase. The Company also leases approximately 5,000 square feet of additional office space located in Newtown, Pennsylvania for approximately $3,000 per month in base rent expiring November 2002. In addition, the Company leases approximately 4,000 square feet of office space in Leiden, the Netherlands. This lease, denominated in Netherland guilders, expires February 14, 2003 and provides for a base rent of approximately $4,700, based upon the conversion rate as of November 30, 2001, per month with an annual inflation increase. In connection with the Intelligent Imaging Acquisition in October 2001, the Company assumed a lease for approximately 12,000 square feet in Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, with a base rent of approximately $17,000 per month through December 2002. The Company is currently negotiating rates for additional space in Newtown, Pennsylvania for approximately 11,000 square feet. The Company believes that these facilities will be adequate for its needs for the foreseeable future.
In the normal course of business, the Company may be a party to legal proceedings. The Company is not currently a party to any material legal proceedings.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.
8
Item 5. Market for the Company's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.
The Company's Common Stock is listed on the NASD OTC Bulletin Board under the Symbol BITI.
The following table sets forth the high and low bid quotations for the Common Stock as reported on the NASD OTC Bulletin Board (the "OTCBB") for each of the quarters ended December 31, 1999 through September 30, 2001. Such quotations reflect interdealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions.
|
Common Stock |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quarter Ended |
||||
High |
Low |
|||
December 31, 1999 | 0.3438 | 0.2813 | ||
March 31, 2000 | 1.7813 | 0.2813 | ||
June 30, 2000 | 1.0625 | 0.5313 | ||
September 30, 2000 | 1.0000 | 0.5000 | ||
December 31, 2000 | 0.9375 | 0.5000 | ||
March 31, 2001 | 0.9375 | 0.5625 | ||
June 30, 2001 | 1.1563 | 0.6563 | ||
September 30, 2001 | 1.2188 | 0.7969 |
The Company's Common Stock also has been listed on the Boston Stock Exchange ("BSE") under the symbol BIT.
The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices for the Common Stock as reported on the BSE for each of the quarters from the quarter ended December 31, 1999 through September 30, 2001.(1)
|
Common Stock |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quarter Ended |
||||
High |
Low |
|||
December 31, 1999(2) | | | ||
March 31, 2000(2) | | | ||
June 30, 2000 | .72 | .72 | ||
September 30, 2000(2) | | | ||
December 31, 2000 | .75 | .63 | ||
March 31, 2001 | .75 | .75 | ||
June 30, 2001(2) | | | ||
September 30, 2001(2) | | |
As of November 30, 2001, the approximate number of holders of record of the Common Stock was 123 and the approximate number of beneficial holders of the Common Stock was 1459.
On January 2, 2001, the Company elected to convert the 416,667 shares of its Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, $.00025 par value per share (the "Series A Stock"), held of record by Investment Partners of America, L.P. ("IPA") into 416,667 shares of its restricted Common Stock. The shares of Common Stock issued upon conversion of the Series A Stock were issued to the designees of IPA and have certain piggy-back registration rights. The Company has satisfied any and all obligations with
9
respect to cumulative dividends on the Series A Stock. The Company did not receive any consideration for the conversion of the Series A Stock. Subsequent to the conversion, the Company has no issued and outstanding shares of Series A Stock.
During May and June of 2001, the Company issued an aggregate of 66,667 shares of its restricted Common Stock to IPA and its affiliate in connection with the exercise of 66,667 Class C Warrants (the "Class C Warrants") to purchase shares of Common Stock of the Company previously issued to IPA on June 26, 1996. The Class C Warrants had an exercise price equal to $.63 per share at the time of exercise, and the Company received $42,000 as proceeds for the exercise of such warrants by IPA and its affiliate.
On October 25, 2001, in connection with the Intelligent Imaging Acquisition, the Company issued the Note in the principal amount equal to $1,000,000. The Note is convertible into a maximum of 1,103,753 shares of Common Stock.
The Company believes that the issuance of the forgoing securities was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"). Each purchaser was an accredited investor (as defined in Rule 501 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act), had adequate access to information about the Company and each purchaser acquired the securities for investment only and not with a view to distribution.
The Company has neither paid nor declared dividends on its Common Stock since its inception and does not plan to pay dividends on its Common Stock in the foreseeable future. The Company expects that any earnings which the Company may realize will be retained to finance the growth of the Company.
Item 6. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Overview
Bio-Imaging is a pharmaceutical contract service organization, providing services that support the product development process of the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device industries. The Company specializes in assisting its clients in the design and management of the medical-imaging component of clinical trials for all modalities which consist of CT, MRI, x-rays, DEXA, PET SPECT and ultrasound. The Company provides services which include the processing and analysis of medical images and the data-basing and regulatory submission of medical images, quantitative data and text. Bio-Imaging ETC focuses on Education, Training and Certification for medical imaging equipment, facilities and staff.
The Company's sales cycle (the period from the presentation by the Company to a potential client to the engagement of the Company by such client) is generally twelve months. In addition, the contracts under which the Company performs services typically cover a period of 12 to 36 months and the volume and type of services performed by the Company generally vary during the course of a project. No assurance can be made that the Company's project revenues will remain at levels sufficient to maintain profitability. Project revenues were generated from 53 clients encompassing 111 distinct projects for fiscal 2001 as compared to 42 clients encompassing 91 distinct projects for fiscal 2000. This represents an increase of 26.2% in clients and 22.0% in projects for fiscal 2001 as compared to fiscal 2000. The Company's contracted/committed backlog was approximately $20,972,000 as of September 30, 2001 as compared to approximately $17,518,000 as of September 30, 2000, an increase of 19.9%. The Company had contracted/committed backlog of approximately $26,896,000 as of November 30, 2001. Contracted/committed backlog is the amount of revenue that remains to be earned and recognized on signed and agreed to contracts. Such contracts are subject to termination by the Company's clients at any time or for any reason. There can be no assurance that the Company can attain such revenue levels from these contracts or that such revenue may be recognized within the next fiscal year, if at all.
10
The Company believes that demand for its services and technologies will grow during the long-term as the use of digital technologies for data acquisition and management increases in the radiology and drug development communities. The Company also believes that there is a growing recognition within the bio-pharmaceutical industry regarding the use of an independent centralized core laboratory for analysis of medical-imaging data that is derived from clinical trials and the rigorous regulatory requirements relating to the submission of this data. In addition, the FDA is gaining experience with electronic submissions and is continuing to develop guidelines for computerized submission of data, including medical images. Furthermore, the increased use of digital medical images in clinical trials, especially for important drug classes, such as anti-inflammatory, neurologic and oncologic therapeutics and diagnostic image agents, generate large amounts of image data that will require processing, analysis, data management and submission services. Due to several factors, including, without limitation, an increase in competition from commercial competitors and academic research centers, there can be no assurance that demand for the Company's services and technologies will grow, sustain growth, or that additional revenue generating opportunities will be realized by the Company.
Certain matters discussed in this Form 10-KSB are "forward-looking statements" intended to qualify for the safe harbors from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In particular, the Company's statements regarding the demand for the Company's services and technologies, integration of the Intelligent Imaging business into the Company, growing recognition for the use of independent centralized core laboratories, trends toward the outsourcing of imaging services in clinical trials, realized return from the Company's marketing efforts, the favorable impact of the FDA's initiatives to streamline and accelerate its review process and increased use of digital medical images in clinical trials are examples of such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements include risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the timing of revenues due to the variability in size, scope and duration of projects, regulatory delays, clinical study results which lead to reductions or cancellations of projects, and other factors, including general economic conditions and regulatory developments, not within the Company's control. The factors discussed herein and expressed from time to time in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission could cause actual results and developments to be materially different from those expressed in or implied by such statements. The forward-looking statements are made only as of the date of this filing and the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
Results of Operations
Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2001 and 2000
Project revenues for fiscal 2001 and fiscal 2000 were approximately $8,755,000 and $5,772,000, respectively, an increase of approximately $2,983,000, or 51.7%. The increase in project revenues is primarily a result of the increase in the number of clients and projects for which the Company was engaged to perform services. This increase resulted primarily from the increase in the Company's sales and marketing efforts over the past year. The Company's scope of work in both periods included medical imaging core laboratory services and image-based information management services.
Cost of revenues for fiscal 2001 and fiscal 2000 were comprised of professional salaries and benefits and allocated overhead. Cost of revenues were approximately $4,807,000 for fiscal 2001 and approximately $3,619,000 for fiscal 2000, an increase of approximately $1,188,000, or 32.8%. This increase is attributable to an increase in staffing levels required for project related tasks for fiscal 2001 and in anticipation of work to be performed on new contracts as compared to fiscal 2000.
The difference between project revenues and cost of revenues may fluctuate as a percentage of project revenues based on the utilization of staff and the mix of services provided by the Company to
11
its clients during the comparable periods. The increase in this percentage difference for fiscal 2001 from fiscal 2000 resulted from a higher increase in project revenues as compared to a lower increase in project related costs due to better utilization by the Company.
General and administrative expenses for fiscal 2001 and fiscal 2000 consisted primarily of salaries and benefits, depreciation and amortization, professional and consulting services, office rent and corporate insurance. General and administrative expenses were approximately $1,597,000 for fiscal 2001 and approximately $1,276,000 for fiscal 2000. The increase for fiscal 2001, of approximately $321,000, or 25.2%, from fiscal 2000, is primarily attributable to the increase in infrastructure to support the business growth and professional services associated with general corporate matters.
Sales and marketing expenses for fiscal 2001 and fiscal 2000 were comprised of direct sales and marketing costs, professional salaries and benefits and allocated overhead. Sales and marketing expenses were approximately $1,741,000 for fiscal 2001 and approximately $1,478,000 for fiscal 2000. The increase for fiscal 2001, of approximately $263,000, or 17.8%, from fiscal 2000, resulted primarily from additional expenses associated with increased marketing efforts and increased attendance at additional conferences.
Total costs and expenses during fiscal 2001 and fiscal 2000 consisted primarily of cost of revenues, general and administrative expenses and sales and marketing. The Company's cost and expenses were approximately $8,145,000 in fiscal 2001 and $6,373,000 in fiscal 2000. Such increase of approximately $1,772,000, or 27.8%, is due primarily to an increase in staffing levels required to support an increase in revenues, an increase in the Company's sales and marketing efforts, an increase in infrastructure to support the business growth and professional services associated with general corporate matters.
Net interest expense of approximately $33,000 during fiscal 2001, resulted from interest expense incurred in connection with equipment lease obligations offset in part by interest earned on cash balances. Net interest expense of approximately $92,000 for fiscal 2000 resulted from interest expense incurred in the assignment of accounts receivable and interest expense incurred in connection with equipment lease obligations.
The income tax benefit represents a reduction in the Company's valuation allowance of $442,000 offset by a state income tax provision of approximately $100,000. Management has determined that it is more likely than not that a portion of the Company's federal net operating loss carryforwards will be realized in the future. The determination took into account that the Company has been profitable for the last five quarters and the Company's 2002 budget. If the Company's profitability continues and subsequent years budgets project income, management will further reduce the existing valuation allowance that relates to the federal net operating loss carryforward. The state income tax provision relates to the state of Pennsylvania where the Company has no net operating loss carryforwards.
The Company's net income for fiscal 2001 was approximately $919,000, while the Company had a net loss of approximately $692,000 for fiscal 2000. The Company's net income for fiscal 2001 was attributable primarily to increased revenues associated with an increase in the number of clients and projects for which the Company was engaged to perform services and the income tax benefit of $342,000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At September 30, 2001, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $545,000. Working capital at September 30, 2001 was approximately $982,000.
Net cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2001 was approximately $473,000. This primarily consists of net income in fiscal 2001 of approximately $919,000, depreciation and amortization of approximately $567,000, an increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities of approximately $236,000 and an increase in deferred revenue of approximately $112,000 offset by an increase in accounts
12
receivable of approximately $992,000 and the deferred income taxes of $417,000. The growth in receivables is attributed to the growth in revenues in fiscal 2001.
For fiscal 2001, the Company invested approximately $267,000 in capital and leasehold improvements. The Company currently anticipates that capital expenditures for the next fiscal year will approximate $400,000. These expenditures represent additional upgrades in the Company's networking, data storage and core laboratory capabilities along with similar capital requirements for its European operations.
In December 2000, the Company paid to the holders of its Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, $.00025 par value per share (the "Series A Stock"), an aggregate amount of $20,000, which amount represented accrued cumulative dividends for the period from July 1, 2000 through and including December 31, 2000. On January 2, 2001, all outstanding shares of Series A Stock were converted into Common Stock, and, therefore, the Company is not obligated to make any future dividend payments on the Series A Stock.
In December 1999, the Company entered into an accounts receivable financing agreement with Silicon Valley Bank ("Silicon Valley Bank" or the "Bank"), whereby, the Company may assign up to $500,000 of eligible accounts receivable to the Bank. In March 2000, the Bank increased the eligible accounts receivable to $1,000,000. The Bank, in turn, would advance the Company up to 80% of the assigned accounts receivable amount. Upon collection by the Bank, the balance of the assigned accounts receivable would be remitted to the Company net of the Bank's finance charges and administration fees. Although the agreement is contractually renewable each year, it is cancelable by the Bank at any time. In fiscal 2001, the Company assigned accounts receivable of approximately $212,000 to the Bank. At September 30, 2001, the Company had repaid its borrowings and had a $0 balance with the Bank. A 1.00% administrative fee of the face amount of the assigned receivable was charged by the Bank along with a 1.75% finance charge per month of the average daily account balance outstanding.
Also, in April 2001 and July 2001, the Company entered into equipment lease obligations consisting of monthly installments of $4,424 and $1,640, respectively, including interest at 10.61% for both leases through March 2004 and June 2004. The debt is collateralized by the related equipment.
In October 2001, in connection with the Intelligent Imaging Acquisition, the Company is obligated to pay quarterly payments of principal of $41,667 under the Note, plus accrued interest thereon, and one payment of $500,000 on November 1, 2004, unless the Note is previously converted.
The Company anticipates that its cash and cash equivalents, together with anticipated cash from operations, will be sufficient to fund current working capital needs and capital requirements for at least the next twelve months. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company's operating results will continue to maintain profitability on an annual basis. Operating losses together with the risks associated with the Company's ability to gain new client contracts, the variability of the timing of milestone payments on existing client contracts and other changes in the Company's operating assets and liabilities, may have a material adverse affect on the Company's future liquidity. In connection therewith, the Company may need to raise additional capital in the foreseeable future from equity or debt sources in order to implement its business, sales or marketing plans, take advantage of unanticipated opportunities (such as more rapid expansion, acquisitions of complementary businesses or the development of new services), to react to unforeseen difficulties (such as the decrease in the demand for the Company's services or the timing of revenues) or to otherwise respond to unanticipated competitive pressures. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available, if at all, on terms acceptable to the Company.
The Company's 2002 operating plan contains assumptions regarding revenue and expenses. The achievement of the operating plan depends heavily on the timing of work performed by the Company
13
on existing projects and the ability of the Company to gain and perform work on new projects. Project cancellations, delays in the timing of work performed by the Company on existing projects or the inability of the Company to gain and perform work on new projects could have an adverse impact on the Company's ability to execute its operating plan and maintain adequate cash flow. In the event actual results do not meet the operating plan, management believes it could execute contingency plans to mitigate such effects. Such plans include additional financing, to the extent available, through the accounts receivable financing agreement. Considering the cash on hand and based on the achievement of the operating plan and management's actions taken to date, management believes it has the ability to continue to generate sufficient cash to satisfy its operating requirements in the normal course of business. However, no assurance can be given that sufficient cash will be generated from operations. The Company's cash balance was approximately $545,000 and $1,181,000 as of September 30, 2001 and November 30, 2001, respectively.
New Accounting Requirements
In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 ("SAB 101"), Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements. SAB 101 provides guidance for revenue recognition under certain circumstances. The accounting and disclosures prescribed by SAB 101 became effective for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2001. The Company's adoption of SAB 101 did not have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial position.
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statements of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 141, "Business Combinations," and No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," which establishes accounting and reporting standards governing business combinations, goodwill and intangible assets. SFAS No. 141 requires all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001, to be accounted for using the purchase method. SFAS No. 142 states that goodwill is no longer subject to amortization over its estimated useful life. Rather, goodwill will be subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment by applying a fair-value based test. Under the new rules, an acquired intangible asset should be separately recognized and amortized over its useful life (unless an indefinite life) if the benefit of the intangible asset is obtained through contractual or other legal rights, or if the intangible asset can be sold, transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged regardless of the acquirer's intent to do so. The Company is not required to adopt these standards until January 1, 2002, until which time the Company will continue to amortize its existing goodwill and intangible assets. The Company does not expect that the adoption of these standards will have a material effect on its consolidated results of operations or financial position.
In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations". SFAS No. 143 addresses financial accounting and reporting obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. SFAS No. 143 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 14, 2002. The Company does not expect that the adoption of SFAS No. 143, which is effective for the Company as of January 1, 2003, will have a material effect on its consolidated results of operations or financial position.
In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets", which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001, and addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. This statement supersedes SFAS No. 121 "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of," and the accounting and reporting provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30, "Reporting the Results of OperationsReporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions," for the disposal of a segment of a business. The Company plans to adopt the standard on January 1, 2002, and does not expect that the adoption of SFAS No. 144 will have a material effect on its consolidated results of operations or financial position.
14
Existing Contracts
During fiscal 2001, the Company signed approximately $15,375,000 in new project contracts as compared to approximately $12,819,000 in fiscal 2000. As of September 30, 2001, the Company had entered into agreements with 42 companies, encompassing 83 projects, to provide services in the aggregate amount of approximately $33,669,000 through December 2008, of which services valued at approximately $20,972,000 remain to be completed. Such contracts are subject to termination by the Company or its clients at any time or for any reason. In addition, client's clinical trials or other projects are subject to timing and scope changes. Therefore, future revenue generated by the Company may not equal initial contract values.
European Monetary Union
Currently, twelve (12) of the fifteen (15) member countries of the European Union set fixed conversion rates between their existing legacy currencies and the euro. As such, these participating countries have agreed to adopt the euro as their common legal currency. The twelve (12) participating countries will issue sovereign debt exclusively in euro and will redenominate outstanding sovereign debt. Euro coins are currently in circulation and euro notes will be issued on January 1, 2002. Both euro and existing legacy currencies may be used for all transactions until December 31, 2001. Thereafter, all non-cash transactions must be in euro. Existing legacy currencies may be used for cash transactions until approximately January or February 2002 depending on the particular country. There can be no assurance, however, that such euro conversion will not adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Change in Fiscal Year
On November 6, 2001, the Company's Board of Directors approved a change in the Company's fiscal year-end from September 30 to December 31.
The financial statements required to be filed pursuant to this Item 7 are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB. A list of the financial statements filed herewith is found at "Item 13. Exhibits, List, and Reports on Form 8-K."
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
15
Item 9. Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons; Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.
The information relating to the Company's directors, nominees for election as directors and executive officers under the headings "Election of Directors" and "Executive Officers" in the Company's definitive proxy statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference to such proxy statement.
Item 10. Executive Compensation.
The discussion under the heading "Executive Compensation" in the Company's definitive proxy statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference to such proxy statement.
Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
The discussion under the heading "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" in the Company's definitive proxy statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference to such proxy statement.
Item 12. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
The discussion under the heading "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" in the Company's definitive proxy statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference to such proxy statement.
Item 13. Exhibits, List, and Reports on Form 8-K.
Reference is made to the Index to Financial Statements on Page F-1.
None.
Reference is made to the Index to Exhibits on Page 24.
Report on Form 8-K filed on November 9, 2001 (reporting Intelligent Imaging Acquisition on October 25, 2001).
16
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized this 21st day of December, 2001.
BIO-IMAGING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | |||
BY: |
/S/ MARK L. WEINSTEIN Mark L. Weinstein, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature |
Title |
Date |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
/s/ MARK L. WEINSTEIN Mark L. Weinstein |
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director (principal executive and financial officer) | December 21, 2001 | ||
/s/ MARIA T. KRAUS Maria T. Kraus |
Controller (principal accounting officer) |
December 21, 2001 |
||
/s/ JEFFREY H. BERG, PH.D. Jeffrey H. Berg, Ph.D. |
Director |
December 21, 2001 |
||
/s/ MARC BERGER, CHFC Marc Berger, ChFC |
Director |
December 21, 2001 |
||
/s/ DAVID E. NOWICKI, D.M.D. David E. Nowicki, D.M.D. |
Chairman of the Board and Director |
December 21, 2001 |
||
/s/ ALLEN RUBENSTEIN, M.D. Allen Rubenstein, M.D. |
Director |
December 21, 2001 |
||
/s/ DAVID STACK David Stack |
Director |
December 21, 2001 |
||
/s/ PAULA B. STAFFORD Paula B. Stafford |
Director |
December 21, 2001 |
||
/s/ JAMES A. TAYLOR, PH.D. James A. Taylor, Ph.D. |
Director |
December 21, 2001 |
17
Exhibit No. |
Description of Exhibit |
|
---|---|---|
2.1 | Asset Purchase Agreement dated October 25, 2001, by and between the Company and Quintiles. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 25, 2001.) | |
3.1 |
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File Number 33-47471) which became effective on June 18, 1992.) (Amendments incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1993 and to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 1995.) |
|
3.2 |
Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2001.) |
|
4.1 |
Specimen Common Stock Certificate. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File Number 33-47471) which became effective on June 18, 1992.) |
|
4.2 |
Registration Agreement dated October 13, 1994 between the Company and Corning Pharmaceuticals Services Inc., now Covance, Inc. ("Covance"). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 13, 1994.) |
|
4.3 |
Convertible Promissory Note, dated October 25, 2001, made by the Company payable to Quintiles. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 25, 2001.) |
|
10.1 |
Lease between the Plymouth Woods and the Company dated December 8, 1997, as amended on February 25, 1999. |
|
10.2* |
1991 Stock Option Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File Number 33-47471) which became effective on June 18, 1992.) |
|
10.3* |
401(k) Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File Number 33-47471) which became effective on June 18, 1992.) |
|
10.4 |
Form of Employee's Invention Assignment, Confidential Information and Non-Competition Agreement. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1992.) |
|
10.5 |
Stock Purchase Agreement dated October 13, 1994 between the Company and Covance. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 13, 1994.) |
|
10.6* |
Employment Agreement including Invention Assignment and Confidential Information Agreement dated January 20, 2000, by and between the Company and Mark L. Weinstein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 1999.) |
|
10.7 |
Office Space Lease dated September 22, 1999 between Yardley Road Associates, L.P. and the Company. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999). |
18
10.8 |
Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement dated December 23, 1999 between Silicon Valley Bank and the Company. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999). |
|
10.9 |
Office Space Lease dated September 11, 2000 between Angelo Investment Company and the Company. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company's Annual Report on 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2000.) |
|
21 |
List of Subsidiaries of Registrant. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997.) |
|
23.1 |
Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP. |
None.
19
Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONTENTS
Report of Independent Public Accountants | F-2 | |
Consolidated Financial Statements: |
||
Balance Sheets |
F-3 |
|
Statements of Operations | F-4 | |
Statements of Stockholders' Equity | F-5 | |
Statements of Cash Flows | F-6 | |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | F-7 |
F1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To
the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2001 and 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Princeton,
New Jersey
October 31, 2001
F2
Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
September 30, |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2001 |
2000 |
|||||
ASSETS | |||||||
Current Assets: | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 545,345 | $ | 491,048 | |||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $65,000 in 2001 and 2000 | 2,318,316 | 1,326,193 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 209,438 | 234,201 | |||||
Deferred income taxes | 417,000 | | |||||
Total current assets | 3,490,099 | 2,051,442 | |||||
Property and equipment, net | 1,206,957 | 1,292,344 | |||||
Other assets | 224,219 | 261,762 | |||||
Total Assets | $ | 4,921,275 | $ | 3,605,548 | |||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|||||||
Current Liabilities: | |||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 326,577 | $ | 321,113 | |||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | 465,557 | 229,354 | |||||
Deferred revenue | 1,518,288 | 1,406,417 | |||||
Current maturities of long-term debt | 197,357 | 150,796 | |||||
Total current liabilities | 2,507,779 | 2,107,680 | |||||
Long-term debt | 127,307 | 164,139 | |||||
Total liabilities | 2,635,086 | 2,271,819 | |||||
Stockholders' Equity: | |||||||
Convertible cumulative preferred stock$.00025 par value; authorized 3,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding 0 shares at September 30, 2001 and 416,667 shares ($500,000 liquidation preference) at September 30, 2000 | | 104 | |||||
Common stock$.00025 par value; authorized 18,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding 8,259,212 shares at September 30, 2001 and 7,773,878 shares at September 30, 2000 | 2,065 | 1,944 | |||||
Additional paid-in capital | 9,274,740 | 9,231,497 | |||||
Accumulated deficit | (6,990,616 | ) | (7,899,816 | ) | |||
Stockholders' equity | 2,286,189 | 1,333,729 | |||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | $ | 4,921,275 | $ | 3,605,548 | |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these balance sheets.
F3
Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
Year ended September 30, |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||
Project revenues | $ | 8,754,817 | $ | 5,772,443 | |||||
Cost and expenses: | |||||||||
Cost of revenues | 4,806,978 | 3,619,343 | |||||||
General and administrative expenses | 1,596,918 | 1,275,669 | |||||||
Sales and marketing expenses | 1,740,956 | 1,477,841 | |||||||
Total cost and expenses | 8,144,852 | 6,372,853 | |||||||
Income (loss) from operations | 609,965 | (600,410 | ) | ||||||
Interest expense, net | (32,765 | ) | (92,021 | ) | |||||
Income (loss) before income tax benefit | 577,200 | (692,431 | ) | ||||||
Income tax benefit | 342,000 | | |||||||
Net income (loss) | 919,200 | (692,431 | ) | ||||||
Dividends on preferred stock | 10,000 | 40,000 | |||||||
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock | $ | 909,200 | $ | (732,431 | ) | ||||
Basic earnings (loss) per common share | $ | 0.11 | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||||
Weighted average number of common shares | 8,108,043 | 7,773,878 | |||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share | $ | 0.11 | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||||
Weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common equivalent shares | 8,309,000 | 7,773,878 | |||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F4
Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
|
Preferred Stock |
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital |
Accumulated Deficit |
Stockholders' Equity |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Shares |
Amount |
Shares |
Amount |
||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 1999 | 416,667 | $ | 104 | 7,773,878 | $ | 1,944 | $ | 9,231,497 | $ | (7,167,385 | ) | $ | 2,066,160 | |||||||
Dividends on preferred stock | | | | | | (40,000 | ) | (40,000 | ) | |||||||||||
Net loss | | | | | | (692,431 | ) | (692,431 | ) | |||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2000 | 416,667 | 104 | 7,773,878 | 1,944 | 9,231,497 | (7,899,816 | ) | 1,333,729 | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock conversion | (416,667 | ) | (104 | ) | 416,667 | 104 | | |||||||||||||
Stock options exercised | 2,000 | 1 | 1,260 | 1,261 | ||||||||||||||||
Warrants exercised | 66,667 | 16 | 41,983 | 41,999 | ||||||||||||||||
Dividends on preferred stock | | | | | | (10,000 | ) | (10,000 | ) | |||||||||||
Net income | | | | | | 919,200 | 919,200 | |||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2001 | | $ | | 8,259,212 | $ | 2,065 | $ | 9,274,740 | $ | (6,990,616 | ) | $ | 2,286,189 | |||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F5
Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
Year ended September 30, |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 919,200 | $ | (692,431 | ) | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 566,693 | 565,249 | |||||||
Deferred income taxes | (417,000 | ) | | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |||||||||
Increase in accounts receivable | (992,123 | ) | (88,447 | ) | |||||
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other current assets | 24,763 | (96,074 | ) | ||||||
Decrease (increase) in other assets | 7,647 | (112,034 | ) | ||||||
Increase in accounts payable | 15,464 | 186,428 | |||||||
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other current liabilities | 236,203 | (25,211 | ) | ||||||
Increase in deferred revenue | 111,871 | 864,484 | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 472,718 | 601,964 | |||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment | (267,413 | ) | (340,579 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (267,413 | ) | (340,579 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||||
Payments under equipment lease obligations and notes payable | (343,810 | ) | (1,501,971 | ) | |||||
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders | (20,000 | ) | (40,000 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from notes payable | 169,542 | 1,358,731 | |||||||
Proceeds from exercise of warrants and stock options | 43,260 | | |||||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (151,008 | ) | (183,240 | ) | |||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 54,297 | 78,145 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 491,048 | 412,903 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 545,345 | $ | 491,048 | |||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | |||||||||
Cash paid during the year for interest | $ | 40,417 | $ | 93,721 | |||||
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: | |||||||||
Equipment purchased under capital lease obligations | $ | 183,997 | $ | 306,864 | |||||
Preferred stock conversion | $ | 104 | | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F6
Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Principal Business Activity and Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Business and Future Operations
Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries ("Bio-Imaging" or the "Company") is a pharmaceutical contract service organization, operating in one business segment, providing services that support the product development process of the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device industries. The Company specializes in assisting its clients in the design and management of the medical-imaging component of clinical trials for all modalities which consist of computerized tomography ("CT"), magnetic resonance imaging ("MRI"), x-rays, dual energy x-ray absorptiometry ("DEXA"), position emission tomography single photon emission computerized tomography ("PET SPECT") and ultrasound. The Company provides services which include the processing and analysis of medical images and the data-basing and regulatory submission of medical images, quantitative data and text.
The Company's fiscal 2002 operating plan contains assumptions regarding revenues, expenses and cash flows. The achievement of the operating plan depends heavily on the timing of work performed by the Company on existing projects and the ability of the Company to obtain and perform work on new projects. Project cancellations, delays in the timing of work performed by the Company on existing projects or the inability of the Company to obtain and perform work on new projects could have an adverse impact on the Company's ability to execute its operating plan and maintain adequate cash flow. In the event actual results do not meet the operating plan, management believes it could execute contingency plans to mitigate such effects. Such plans include additional financing, to the extent available, through the accounts receivable financing agreement. Considering the cash on hand and based on the achievement of the operating plan and management's actions taken to date, management believes it has the ability to continue to generate sufficient cash to satisfy its operating requirements in the normal course of business. However, no assurance can be given that sufficient cash will be generated from operations.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Oxford Bio-Imaging Research, Inc. and Bio-Imaging Technologies Holding B.V. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and capital lease obligations approximate fair value due to their short-term nature.
F7
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company maintains cash in excess of FDIC insurance limits in certain financial institutions. The Company considers cash equivalents to be highly liquid investments with a maturity at the time of purchase of three months or less.
Revenue Recognition
Project revenues are recognized primarily using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting for services rendered in connection with contractual arrangements, which generally range from a few months to two years. Provisions for losses expected to be incurred on contracts are recognized in full in the period in which it is determined that a loss will result from performance of the contractual arrangement. Unbilled services are recorded for revenue recognized to date that is currently unbilled to the client pursuant to contractual terms. In general, amounts become billable pursuant to contractual milestones or in accordance with predetermined payment schedules. Unbilled services are generally billable within one year from the respective balance sheet date. Accounts receivable include approximately $449,000 and $469,000 of unbilled receivables at September 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Deferred revenue is recorded for cash received from clients for services which have not yet been provided at the respective balance sheet date. Revenue from other activities is recognized as services are performed.
In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 ("SAB 101"), Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements. SAB 101 provides guidance for revenue recognition under certain circumstances. The accounting and disclosures prescribed by SAB 101 became effective for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2001. The Company's adoption of SAB 101 did not have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial position.
Property and Equipment
Depreciation of property and equipment is provided for using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Amortization of leasehold improvements is provided for over the related lease term.
Capitalized Software Development
The Company capitalizes software development costs after technological feasibility has been determined and ceases capitalization at such time as the end product is available for general release to the public. The establishment of technological feasibility and the ongoing assessment of recoverability of capitalized software development costs require considerable judgment by management with respect to certain external factors including, but not limited to, anticipated future revenue, estimated economic life and changes in software and hardware technologies. The Company capitalized approximately $123,000 and $47,000 of software development costs during 2001 and 2000, respectively. At September 30, 2001, management has estimated an economic useful life of 60 months and is amortizing these costs on a straight-line basis over this period. The amortization period is reviewed annually by management. Capitalized software development costs, net of accumulated depreciation, approximated $145,000 and $44,000 as of September 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively, and are included in property and equipment in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
F8
Long Lived Assets
The provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121 "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets" requires, among other things, that an entity review its long-lived assets and certain related intangibles for impairment whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. Impairment of long-lived assets exist if, at a minimum, the future expected cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) from an entity's operations are less than the carrying value of these assets. The Company does not believe that any such changes in circumstances have occurred.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." SFAS No. 109 requires the use of the liability method where deferred taxes are determined based on the estimated future tax effects of differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities at currently enacted tax laws and rates.
Foreign Currency Translation
The U.S. Dollar is the functional currency for the Company's foreign subsidiaries.
Earnings Per Share
SFAS No. 128 "Earnings per Share" requires the presentation of basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings (loss) per common share was calculated by dividing the net income (loss) available to common stockholders divided by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share was calculated by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding, adjusted for the effect of options and warrants using the treasury method, if dilutive. Diluted loss per common share for the years ended September 30, 2001 and 2000 excludes 1,539,253 and 1,479,627 of options and warrants, respectively, as their inclusion would be antidilutive.
F9
The computation of basic earnings (loss) per common share and diluted earnings (loss) per common share is as follows:
|
Year Ended September 30, 2001 |
Year Ended September 30, 2000 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net income (loss) | $ | 919,200 | $ | (692,431 | ) | ||
Dividends on preferred stock | (10,000 | ) | (40,000 | ) | |||
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockbasic | $ | 909,200 | $ | (732,431 | ) | ||
Dilutive dividends on preferred stock | 10,000 | | |||||
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockdiluted | $ | 919,200 | $ | (732,431 | ) | ||
Denominator: | |||||||
Weighted average number of common shares | 8,108,043 | 7,773,878 | |||||
Basic earnings (loss) per common share | $ | 0.11 | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||
Denominator: | |||||||
Weighted average number of common shares | 8,108,043 | 7,773,878 | |||||
Common share equivalents of outstanding stock options and warrants | 200,957 | | |||||
Total | 8,309,000 | 7,773,878 | |||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share | $ | 0.11 | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statements of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 141, "Business Combinations," and No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," which establishes accounting and reporting standards governing business combinations, goodwill and intangible assets. SFAS No. 141 requires all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001, to be accounted for using the purchase method. SFAS No. 142 states that goodwill is no longer subject to amortization over its estimated useful life. Rather, goodwill will be subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment by applying a fair-value based test. Under the new rules, an acquired intangible asset should be separately recognized and amortized over its useful life (unless an indefinite life) if the benefit of the intangible asset is obtained through contractual or other legal rights, or if the intangible asset can be sold, transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged regardless of the acquirer's intent to do so. The Company is not required to adopt these standards until January 1, 2002, until which time the Company will continue to amortize its existing goodwill and intangible assets. The Company does not expect that the adoption of these standards will have a material effect on its consolidated results of operations or financial position.
In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations". SFAS No. 143 addresses financial accounting and reporting obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. SFAS No. 143 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 14, 2002. The Company does not expect that the adoption of SFAS No. 143, which is effective for the Company as of January 1, 2003, will have a material effect on its consolidated results of operations or financial position.
In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets", which is effective for fiscal years beginning after
F10
December 15, 2001, and addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. This statement supersedes SFAS No. 121 "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of," and the accounting and reporting provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30, "Reporting the Results of OperationsReporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions," for the disposal of a segment of a business. The Company plans to adopt the standard January 1, 2002, and does not expect that the adoption of SFAS No. 144 will have a material effect on its consolidated results of operations or financial position.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2000 financial statements to conform with the 2001 presentation.
2. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment, at cost, consists of the following:
|
September 30, |
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Estimated Useful Life |
|||||||
|
2001 |
2000 |
||||||
Equipment | $ | 2,350,533 | $ | 2,253,935 | 5 years | |||
Equipment under capital leases | 857,057 | 673,060 | 5 years | |||||
Furniture and fixtures | 223,834 | 187,853 | 7 years | |||||
Leasehold improvements | 55,811 | 48,391 | Term of lease | |||||
Computer software costs | 170,142 | 46,667 | 5 years | |||||
3,657,377 | 3,209,906 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | (2,450,420 | ) | (1,917,562 | ) | ||||
$ | 1,206,957 | $ | 1,292,344 | |||||
During 2000, the Company retired property and equipment of approximately $2,049,000 that was fully depreciated. Accumulated depreciation related to equipment acquired under capital leases amounted to approximately $462,000 and $363,000 at September 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Accumulated amortization related to computer software costs amounted to approximately $26,000 and $3,000 at September 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
3. Long-term Debt
Long-term debt consists of equipment lease obligations. The equipment lease obligations are payable in monthly installments ranging from $1,170 to $4,961, including interest at rates ranging from 10.24% to 13.75%, through June 2004. The debt is collateralized by the related equipment.
Aggregate maturities of long-term debt at September 30, 2001 are as follows:
2002 | $ | 197,357 | |
2003 | 90,351 | ||
2004 | 36,956 | ||
$ | 324,664 | ||
F11
In December 1999, the Company entered into an accounts receivable purchase agreement with a bank, whereby, the Company may assign up to $500,000 of eligible accounts receivable to the bank. The bank, in turn, would advance the Company up to 80% of the assigned accounts receivable amount. In March 2000, the bank increased the eligible accounts receivable to $1,000,000. Although the agreement is contractually renewable each year, it is cancelable by the bank at any time. During 2001 and 2000, the Company assigned accounts receivable of approximately $212,000 and $1,698,000 to the bank of which all has been repaid to the bank. At September 30, 2001 and 2000, the Company had no borrowings under the accounts receivable purchase agreement.
4. Stockholders' Equity
In December 1991 and June 1992, the Company's Board of Directors and stockholders, respectively, approved the adoption of the Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. Stock Option Plan. In January 1995 and 1997, the Company amended this plan to provide for the granting of options to key employees, directors and consultants to purchase an aggregate of not more than 1,800,000 and 2,400,000 shares, respectively, of the Company's common stock. Each option is exercisable into one share of common stock. Options granted pursuant to the plan may be qualified incentive stock options, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code, or nonqualified options. The exercise price of qualified incentive stock options may not be less than the fair market value of the Company's common stock at the date of grant. The term of such stock options granted under the plan shall not exceed ten years and the vesting schedule of such stock option grants varies from immediate vesting on date of grant to vesting over a period of up to five years.
The following table summarizes the transactions pursuant to the Company's stock option plan for the two-year period ended September 30, 2001:
|
Number of Options |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Options outstanding at September 30, 1999 | 1,192,370 | $ | 1.44 | ||
Options granted | 329,340 | 0.89 | |||
Options canceled | (108,750 | ) | 0.93 | ||
Options outstanding at September 30, 2000 | 1,412,960 | 1.49 | |||
Options granted | 355,500 | 0.78 | |||
Options exercised | (2,000 | ) | 0.63 | ||
Options canceled | (26,250 | ) | 0.84 | ||
Options outstanding at September 30, 2001 | 1,740,210 | $ | 1.18 | ||
Approximately 1,276,000 and 932,000 options are exercisable at September 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively, at a weighted average exercise price of $1.30 and $1.49, respectively.
The Company has elected, in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation ("SFAS 123"), to apply the accounting rules under APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations in accounting for its stock options and, accordingly, has presented the disclosure-only information as required by SFAS 123. If the Company had elected to recognize compensation cost based on the fair value method of SFAS 123, the
F12
Company's net loss applicable to common stock and net loss per common share for the years ended September 30, 2001 and 2000 would have been the pro forma amounts indicated in the following table:
|
Year ended September 30, |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2001 |
2000 |
|||||
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockas reported | $ | 909,200 | $ | (732,431 | ) | ||
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockpro forma | $ | 657,926 | $ | (789,881 | ) | ||
Net income (loss) per common sharebasic and dilutedas reported | $ | 0.11 | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||
Net income (loss) per common sharebasic and dilutedpro forma | $ | 0.08 | $ | (0.10 | ) |
The weighted average fair value of options granted in 2001 and 2000 was $0.68 and $0.77, respectively. The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
|
Grants for the year ended September 30, |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2001 |
2000 |
|||
Risk-free interest rate | 6.0 | % | 5.9 | % | |
Expected dividend yield | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | |
Expected volatility | 114 | % | 118 | % | |
Expected life in years | 6.00 | 6.00 |
At September 30, 2001, by range of exercise prices, the number of shares represented by outstanding options with their weighted average exercise price and weighted average remaining contractual life, in years, and the number of shares represented by exercisable options with their weighted average exercise price are as follows:
Options Outstanding |
Options Exercisable |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Range of Exercise Prices |
Number Outstanding |
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Number Exercisable |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|||||||
$0.63 - $1.31 | 1,588,210 | 7.12 years | $ | 0.85 | 1,124,385 | $ | 0.85 | |||||
$4.13 - $4.69 | 152,000 | 0.67 years | $ | 4.60 | 152,000 | $ | 4.60 | |||||
$0.63 - $4.69 | 1,740,210 | 6.56 years | $ | 1.18 | 1,276,385 | $ | 1.30 | |||||
On January 2, 2001, the Company elected to convert 416,667 shares of its Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, $.00025 par value per share (the "Series A Stock"), held of record by Investment Partners of America, L.P. ("IPA") into 416,667 shares of its restricted common stock. The shares of common stock issued upon conversion of the Series A Stock were issued to the designees of IPA and have certain piggy-back registration rights. The Company has satisfied any and all obligations with respect to cumulative dividends on the Series A Stock.
The Company did not receive any consideration for the conversion of the Series A Stock. Subsequent to the conversion, the Company has no issued and outstanding shares of Series A Stock.
During May and June of 2001, the Company issued an aggregate of 66,667 shares of its restricted common stock to IPA and its affiliate in connection with the exercise of 66,667 Class C Warrants (the "Class C Warrants") to purchase shares of common stock of the Company previously issued to IPA on
F13
June 26, 1996. The Class C Warrants had an exercise price equal to $.63 per share at the time of exercise, and the Company received approximately $43,000 as proceeds for the exercise of such warrants.
Subsequent to September 30, 2001, the Company granted 264,750 options to employees. The exercise price of the options granted ($1.10) was equal to the fair value of the Company's common stock at the date of grant.
5. Commitments
The Company has entered into noncancelable operating leases for office facilities which expire through January 2005.
Future minimum aggregate rental payments on the noncancelable portion of the lease are as follows:
Year ending September 30, |
|
||
---|---|---|---|
2002 | 403,000 | ||
2003 | 372,000 | ||
2004 | 343,000 | ||
2005 | 115,000 | ||
$ | 1,233,000 | ||
Rent expense charged to operations for the years ended September 30, 2001 and 2000 approximated $429,000 and $306,000, respectively.
The Company has an employment contract with an officer which expires February 1, 2002. The amount due from October 1, 2001 through contract expiration under this contract is approximately $63,000. The contract provided for the granting of options in February 2000 to purchase 150,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $0.63 which was greater than the fair market value of the Company's common stock at the date of grant. Options to purchase 37,500 shares of the Company's common stock vested immediately, and 37,500 on each of the first, second and third of the anniversary date of grant. In February 2001, the employment contract was amended whereby the officer would receive additional stock options if the Company achieved certain quarterly earnings. During fiscal year 2001, the officer was granted 50,000 options at exercise prices ranging from $0.66 to $1.00 (the fair value of the Company's common stock at the dates of grant) as the Company achieved the quarterly earnings targets.
6. Employee Benefit Plan
On December 17, 1991, the Company adopted the Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. Employees' Savings Plan (the "401(k) Plan"), a defined contribution plan with a cash or deferred arrangement. Under the terms of the 401(k) Plan, eligible employees may elect to reduce their annual compensation up to 15%, subject to an annual limit prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company may make discretionary matching contributions in cash, subject to plan limits. The Company accrued $50,000 in matching contributions for the year ended September 30, 2001. The Company did not make a matching contribution to this account for the year ended September 30, 2000.
F14
7. Major Customers
Revenue from two major customers, encompassing nine projects, accounted for approximately 22% and 12% of project revenues for the year ended September 30, 2001 and revenue from two major customers, encompassing seven projects, accounted for approximately 20% and 13% of project revenues for the year ended September 30, 2000. No other customers accounted for more than 10% of project revenues.
One customer accounted for approximately 17% of accounts receivable at September 30, 2001 and two customers accounted for approximately 25% and 20% of accounts receivable at September 30, 2000. No other customers accounted for more than 10% of accounts receivable.
8. Income Taxes
The income tax benefit consists of the following:
|
September 30, 2001 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current: | |||||
State and local | $ | 75,000 | |||
Deferred: | |||||
State and local | 25,000 | ||||
Federal | (442,000 | ) | |||
(417,000 | ) | ||||
Income tax benefit | $ | (342,000 | ) | ||
The Company's reconciliation of the expected Federal provision (benefit) rate to the effective income tax rate is as follows:
|
September 30, 2001 |
September 30, 2000 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tax provision (benefit) at statutory rate | 34 | % | (34 | )% | |
State and local income taxes, net of federal benefit | 11 | % | 0 | % | |
Foreign losses for which no benefit is available | 28 | % | 0 | % | |
Change in the valuation allowance | (132 | )% | 34 | % | |
Effective income tax rate | (59 | )% | 0 | % | |
F15
The components of net deferred tax assets (liabilities) consist of the following:
|
September 30, 2001 |
September 30, 2000 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deferred tax assets: | |||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 26,000 | $ | 26,000 | |||||
Amortization of goodwill | 22,000 | 14,000 | |||||||
Federal net operating loss carryforwards | 1,978,000 | 2,248,000 | |||||||
New Jersey net operating loss carryforwards | 539,000 | 539,000 | |||||||
Total deferred tax assets | 2,565,000 | 2,827,000 | |||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: | |||||||||
Excess of tax over book depreciation | (53,000 | ) | (50,000 | ) | |||||
Prepayments | (86,000 | ) | | ||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities | (139,000 | ) | (50,000 | ) | |||||
Valuation allowance | (2,009,000 | ) | (2,777,000 | ) | |||||
Net deferred tax assets | $ | 417,000 | $ | | |||||
Management has determined that it is more likely than not that a portion of the Company's Federal net operating loss carryforwards will be realized in the future. The determination took into account that the Company has been profitable for the last five quarters and the Company's 2002 budget. As a result of moving the corporate headquarters to Pennsylvania in fiscal 2000, the Company may not be able to utilize their New Jersey net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $5,993,000. A full valuation allowance has been provided for these New Jersey net operating loss carryforwards.
9. Foreign Operations
Foreign customers accounted for approximately 4% and 11% of project revenues for the years ended September 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
10. Subsequent Events
On October 25, 2001 (the "Closing Date"), the Company acquired the Intelligent ImagingTM business unit ("Intelligent Imaging") of Quintiles, Inc., a North Carolina corporation ("Quintiles"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Quintiles Transnational Corporation, (the "Intelligent Imaging Acquisition"). Intelligent Imaging specializes in providing digital medical imaging services for clinical trials and the health care industry, a line of business the Company intends to continue. In the Intelligent Imaging Acquisition, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Intelligent Imaging and assumed certain liabilities of Intelligent Imaging pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2001, by and between the Company and Quintiles.
The assets acquired included Intelligent Imaging's customer contracts, equipment, permits, leases and proprietary rights. In consideration for the assets purchased, the Company issued an unsecured, subordinated convertible promissory note, dated as of October 25, 2001, in the principal amount of $1,000,000 (the "Note"). The Note bears interest at the rate in effect on the business day immediately prior to the date on which payments are due under the Note equal to the Three-Month London Interbank Offering Rate as published from time to time in the Wall Street Journal plus 3%,
F16
compounded annually based on a 365-day year. The Note, which is payable in quarterly installments with respect to fifty percent (50%) of the aggregate principal amount together with all outstanding interest, matures thirty-six (36) months from the Closing Date and is convertible, in whole or in part, by Quintiles any time prior to maturity into shares of the Company's common stock. The number of shares of common stock into which the Note may be converted is calculated by dividing the outstanding principal balance of the Note ($1,000,000 as of October 25, 2001), plus all accrued and unpaid interest thereon, by the greater of: (i) 75% of the average closing price of the Company's common stock over the ten consecutive trading days ending prior to the date of conversion, or (ii) $0.906 per share. Accordingly, the Note is convertible into a maximum of 1,103,753 shares of common stock. As of October 25, 2001, the Note was convertible into 1,103,753 shares of common stock (assuming a conversion price of $0.906 per share as of October 25, 2001). The Company may pay additional consideration if certain financial results are achieved (the maximum number of shares that may be issued to Quintiles pursuant to such provision is 646,247 shares of common stock which is to be paid out no later than February 15, 2003). The Company also assumed certain liabilities of Intelligent Imaging, including all obligations of Intelligent Imaging arising after the closing under certain contracts and unearned income reflected on the closing balance sheet.
F17