FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period from
_____
to
_____
Commission file number 0-21656
UNITED COMMUNITY BANKS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Georgia
|
|
58-1807304 |
|
|
|
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
63 Highway 515 |
|
|
Blairsville, Georgia
|
|
30512 |
|
|
|
Address of Principal
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Executive Offices |
|
|
(706) 781-2265
(Telephone Number)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES o NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act).
YES o NO þ
Common
stock, par value $1 per share: 48,505,082 shares
outstanding as of April 30, 2009
Part I Financial Information
Item 1 Financial Statements
UNITED COMMUNITY BANKS, INC.
Consolidated Statement of Income (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
81,880 |
|
|
$ |
109,266 |
|
Investment securities, including tax exempt of $319 and $394 |
|
|
20,752 |
|
|
|
19,022 |
|
Federal funds sold, commercial paper and deposits in banks |
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest revenue |
|
|
103,074 |
|
|
|
128,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW |
|
|
3,337 |
|
|
|
8,587 |
|
Money market |
|
|
2,237 |
|
|
|
2,913 |
|
Savings |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
Time |
|
|
36,053 |
|
|
|
38,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposit interest expense |
|
|
41,754 |
|
|
|
50,611 |
|
Federal funds purchased, repurchase agreements and other
short-term borrowings |
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
4,318 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
|
5,745 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
2,769 |
|
|
|
2,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
46,150 |
|
|
|
62,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest revenue |
|
|
56,924 |
|
|
|
65,756 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest revenue after provision for loan losses |
|
|
(8,076 |
) |
|
|
58,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges and fees |
|
|
7,034 |
|
|
|
7,813 |
|
Mortgage loan and other related fees |
|
|
2,651 |
|
|
|
1,963 |
|
Consulting fees |
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
1,807 |
|
Brokerage fees |
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
1,093 |
|
Securities gains, net |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
1,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fee revenue |
|
|
12,846 |
|
|
|
14,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
4,770 |
|
|
|
72,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
28,839 |
|
|
|
28,754 |
|
Communications and equipment |
|
|
3,729 |
|
|
|
3,832 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
3,807 |
|
|
|
3,716 |
|
Advertising and public relations |
|
|
1,109 |
|
|
|
1,351 |
|
Postage, printing and supplies |
|
|
1,182 |
|
|
|
1,592 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
2,293 |
|
|
|
1,921 |
|
Foreclosed property |
|
|
4,319 |
|
|
|
911 |
|
FDIC assessments and other regulatory charges |
|
|
2,682 |
|
|
|
1,266 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
767 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,870 |
|
|
|
3,419 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Severance costs |
|
|
2,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
125,467 |
|
|
|
47,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
(120,697 |
) |
|
|
24,924 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(16,924 |
) |
|
|
8,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(103,773 |
) |
|
|
16,078 |
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
2,554 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(106,327 |
) |
|
$ |
16,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per common share |
|
$ |
(2.20 |
) |
|
$ |
.34 |
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share |
|
|
(2.20 |
) |
|
|
.34 |
|
Cash dividends per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.09 |
|
Stock dividends per common share (new shares issued per shares held) |
|
|
1 for 130 |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding Basic |
|
|
48,324 |
|
|
|
47,052 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding Diluted |
|
|
48,324 |
|
|
|
47,272 |
|
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2
UNITED COMMUNITY BANKS, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(in thousands, except share and per share data) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(audited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
103,707 |
|
|
$ |
116,395 |
|
|
$ |
169,538 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits in banks |
|
|
5,792 |
|
|
|
8,417 |
|
|
|
13,417 |
|
Federal funds sold, commercial paper and short-term investments |
|
|
24,983 |
|
|
|
368,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
134,482 |
|
|
|
493,421 |
|
|
|
182,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
1,719,033 |
|
|
|
1,617,187 |
|
|
|
1,508,402 |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
43,161 |
|
|
|
20,334 |
|
|
|
28,451 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
5,632,705 |
|
|
|
5,704,861 |
|
|
|
5,967,839 |
|
Less allowance for loan losses |
|
|
143,990 |
|
|
|
122,271 |
|
|
|
89,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net |
|
|
5,488,715 |
|
|
|
5,582,590 |
|
|
|
5,877,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
178,980 |
|
|
|
179,160 |
|
|
|
180,746 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
45,514 |
|
|
|
46,088 |
|
|
|
59,585 |
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
|
251,060 |
|
|
|
321,798 |
|
|
|
324,041 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
279,964 |
|
|
|
260,187 |
|
|
|
224,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
8,140,909 |
|
|
$ |
8,520,765 |
|
|
$ |
8,386,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand |
|
$ |
665,447 |
|
|
$ |
654,036 |
|
|
$ |
690,028 |
|
NOW |
|
|
1,284,791 |
|
|
|
1,543,385 |
|
|
|
1,523,942 |
|
Money market |
|
|
500,261 |
|
|
|
466,750 |
|
|
|
431,623 |
|
Savings |
|
|
177,001 |
|
|
|
170,275 |
|
|
|
187,911 |
|
Time: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than $100,000 |
|
|
1,911,627 |
|
|
|
1,953,235 |
|
|
|
1,535,742 |
|
Greater than $100,000 |
|
|
1,350,190 |
|
|
|
1,422,974 |
|
|
|
1,375,000 |
|
Brokered |
|
|
727,171 |
|
|
|
792,969 |
|
|
|
431,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
6,616,488 |
|
|
|
7,003,624 |
|
|
|
6,175,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased, repurchase agreements, and other short-term
borrowings |
|
|
158,690 |
|
|
|
108,411 |
|
|
|
532,896 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
260,125 |
|
|
|
235,321 |
|
|
|
615,324 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
151,006 |
|
|
|
150,986 |
|
|
|
107,996 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
65,747 |
|
|
|
33,041 |
|
|
|
82,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
7,252,056 |
|
|
|
7,531,383 |
|
|
|
7,514,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $1 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized;
Series A; $10 stated value; 25,800 shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
Series B; $1,000 stated value; 180,000 shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
173,480 |
|
|
|
173,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized;
48,809,301 shares issued |
|
|
48,809 |
|
|
|
48,809 |
|
|
|
48,809 |
|
Common stock issuable; 161,807, 129,304 and 90,505 shares |
|
|
3,270 |
|
|
|
2,908 |
|
|
|
2,410 |
|
Capital surplus |
|
|
452,277 |
|
|
|
460,708 |
|
|
|
463,095 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
158,201 |
|
|
|
265,405 |
|
|
|
359,248 |
|
Treasury stock; 322,603, 799,892 and 1,805,078 shares, at cost |
|
|
(5,992 |
) |
|
|
(16,465 |
) |
|
|
(41,351 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
58,550 |
|
|
|
54,579 |
|
|
|
38,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
888,853 |
|
|
|
989,382 |
|
|
|
871,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
8,140,909 |
|
|
$ |
8,520,765 |
|
|
$ |
8,386,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
UNITED COMMUNITY BANKS, INC.
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders Equity (Unaudited)
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A |
|
|
Series B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except share and per share data) |
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Issuable |
|
|
Surplus |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
48,809 |
|
|
$ |
2,100 |
|
|
$ |
462,881 |
|
|
$ |
347,391 |
|
|
$ |
(43,798 |
) |
|
$ |
14,261 |
|
|
$ |
831,902 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,078 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains on
available for sale securities,
net of deferred tax expense
and reclassification adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,341 |
|
|
|
12,341 |
|
Unrealized gains on derivative
financial instruments qualifying
as cash flow hedges, net of
deferred tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,381 |
|
|
|
12,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,722 |
|
|
|
40,800 |
|
Cash dividends declared on common
stock ($.09 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,217 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,217 |
) |
Exercise of stock options (60,271 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(691 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
779 |
|
Common stock issued to Dividend
Reinvestment Plan and employee
benefit plans (31,944 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
503 |
|
Amortization of stock option and
restricted stock awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
975 |
|
Vesting of restricted stock (7,912 shares
issued, 3,125 shares deferred) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation plan, net,
including dividend equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238 |
|
Shares issued from deferred compensation
plan (716 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
476 |
|
Dividends on Series A preferred stock
($.15 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
48,809 |
|
|
$ |
2,410 |
|
|
$ |
463,095 |
|
|
$ |
359,248 |
|
|
$ |
(41,351 |
) |
|
$ |
38,983 |
|
|
$ |
871,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
$ |
173,180 |
|
|
$ |
48,809 |
|
|
$ |
2,908 |
|
|
$ |
460,708 |
|
|
$ |
265,405 |
|
|
$ |
(16,465 |
) |
|
$ |
54,579 |
|
|
$ |
989,382 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103,773 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103,773 |
) |
Other comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains on
available for sale securities,
net of deferred tax expense and reclassification adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,231 |
|
|
|
8,231 |
|
Unrealized losses on derivative
financial instruments qualifying
as cash flow hedges, net of
deferred tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,260 |
) |
|
|
(4,260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103,773 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,971 |
|
|
|
(99,802 |
) |
Stock dividends declared on common
stock (367,081 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,932 |
) |
|
|
(877 |
) |
|
|
7,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Common stock issued to Dividend
Reinvestment Plan and employee
benefit plans (99,604 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,895 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
509 |
|
Amortization of stock options and
restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
935 |
|
Vesting of restricted stock (6,268 shares
issued, 11,875 shares deferred) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
(518 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation plan, net,
including dividend equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
Shares issued from deferred compensation
plan (4,336 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax on option exercise and restricted
stock vesting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
Dividends on Series A preferred stock
($.15 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Dividends on Series B preferred stock (5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,550 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
$ |
173,480 |
|
|
$ |
48,809 |
|
|
$ |
3,270 |
|
|
$ |
452,277 |
|
|
$ |
158,201 |
|
|
$ |
(5,992 |
) |
|
$ |
58,550 |
|
|
$ |
888,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
UNITED COMMUNITY BANKS, INC.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(103,773 |
) |
|
$ |
16,078 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and accretion |
|
|
3,553 |
|
|
|
3,568 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
Goodwill impairment charge |
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
975 |
|
Gain on sale of securities available for sale |
|
|
(303 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of other assets |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
(Gain) loss on sale of other real estate owned |
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
336 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets and accrued interest receivable |
|
|
(9,332 |
) |
|
|
7,005 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
49,552 |
|
|
|
(4,783 |
) |
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
(22,827 |
) |
|
|
(447 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
52,565 |
|
|
|
30,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale |
|
|
14,219 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities available for sale |
|
|
174,220 |
|
|
|
174,956 |
|
Purchases of securities available for sale |
|
|
(297,645 |
) |
|
|
(296,228 |
) |
Net increase in loans |
|
|
(9,878 |
) |
|
|
(61,100 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
Purchases of premises and equipment |
|
|
(2,843 |
) |
|
|
(3,773 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of other real estate |
|
|
22,606 |
|
|
|
7,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(99,219 |
) |
|
|
(153,194 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in deposits |
|
|
(386,319 |
) |
|
|
99,818 |
|
Net change in federal funds purchased, repurchase agreements,
and other short-term borrowings |
|
|
50,279 |
|
|
|
(63,566 |
) |
Repayments of other borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,000 |
) |
Proceeds from FHLB advances |
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
Repayments of FHLB advances |
|
|
(55,000 |
) |
|
|
(205,000 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
779 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock for dividend reinvestment
and employee benefit plans |
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
Cash dividends on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,229 |
) |
Cash dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
(1,754 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(312,285 |
) |
|
|
86,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(358,939 |
) |
|
|
(36,668 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
493,421 |
|
|
|
219,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
134,482 |
|
|
$ |
182,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid
(received) during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
51,207 |
|
|
$ |
65,789 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(22,386 |
) |
|
|
152 |
|
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
United Community Banks, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 Accounting Policies
The accounting and financial reporting policies of United Community Banks, Inc. (United) and
its subsidiaries conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAP) and general banking industry practices. The accompanying interim consolidated
financial statements have not been audited. All material intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated. A more detailed description of Uniteds accounting policies is included in
the 2008 annual report filed on Form 10-K.
In managements opinion, all accounting adjustments necessary to accurately reflect the
financial position and results of operations on the accompanying financial statements have been
made. These adjustments are normal and recurring accruals considered necessary for a fair and
accurate presentation. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results
for the full year or any other interim periods.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161), amends and expands the
disclosure requirements of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133) with the intent to
provide users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of: (a) how and why an entity
uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted
for under SFAS 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related
hedged items affect an entitys financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161
requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives,
quantitative disclosures about the fair value of and gains and losses on derivative instruments,
and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative instruments.
As required by SFAS 133, United records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value.
The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the
derivative, whether United has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and
apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to
apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes
in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk,
such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying
as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of
forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Derivatives may also be designated as
hedges of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation. Hedge
accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss recognition on the
hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or
liability that are attributable to the hedged risk in a fair value hedge or the earnings effect of
the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge. United may enter into derivative
contracts that are intended to economically hedge certain of its risks, even though hedge
accounting does not apply or United elects not to apply hedge accounting under SFAS 133.
Note 2 Stock-Based Compensation
United has an equity compensation plan that allows for grants of incentive stock options,
nonqualified stock options, restricted stock awards (also referred to as nonvested stock awards),
stock awards, performance share awards or stock appreciation rights. Options granted under the
plan can have an exercise price no less than the fair market value of the underlying stock at the
date of grant. The general terms of the plan include a vesting period (usually four years) with an
exercisable period not to exceed ten years. Certain option and restricted stock awards provide for
accelerated vesting if there is a change in control (as defined in the plan). As of March 31,
2009, approximately 1,412,000 additional awards could be granted under the plan. Through March 31,
2009, only incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options and restricted stock awards and
units had been granted under the plan.
The following table shows stock option activity for the first three months of 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinisic |
|
Options |
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Term (Years) |
|
|
Value ($000) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31,
2008 |
|
|
3,350,701 |
|
|
$ |
19.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock dividend adjustment |
|
|
25,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
6.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(11,948 |
) |
|
|
17.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(27,049 |
) |
|
|
13.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
3,342,324 |
|
|
|
19.88 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
2,010,960 |
|
|
|
18.68 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
The weighted average fair value of stock options granted in the first three months of 2009 and
2008 was $2.54 and $3.33, respectively. The fair value of each option granted was estimated on the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes model. Because Uniteds option plan has not been in place
long enough to gather sufficient information about exercise patterns to establish an expected life,
United uses the formula provided by the Securities and Exchange Commission in Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 107 to determine the expected life of options. The weighted average assumptions used
to determine the fair value of stock options are presented in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
40.68 |
% |
|
|
23.42 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
2.36 |
% |
Expected life (in years) |
|
|
6.25 |
|
|
|
6.25 |
|
Risk-free rate |
|
|
1.83 |
% |
|
|
3.21 |
% |
Uniteds stock trading history began in March of 2002 when United listed on the Nasdaq
National Market. For 2009, expected volatility was determined using Uniteds historical monthly
volatility for the seventy five months ended December 31, 2008. Seventy five months was chosen to
correspond to the expected life of 6.25 years. For 2008, expected volatility was determined using
Uniteds historical monthly volatility over the period beginning in March of 2002 through the end
of 2007. Compensation expense for stock options was $738,000 and $771,000 for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Deferred tax benefits of $243,000 and $222,000,
respectively, were included in the determination of income tax (benefit) expense for the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. The amount of compensation expense for both
periods was determined based on the fair value of the options at the time of grant, multiplied by
the number of options granted that were expected to vest, which was then amortized over the vesting
period. The forfeiture rate for options is estimated to be approximately 3% per year. The total
intrinsic value of options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $275,000. No
options were exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2009.
The table below presents the activity in restricted stock awards for the first three months of
2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Grant- |
|
Restricted Stock |
|
Shares |
|
|
Date Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
89,498 |
|
|
$ |
24.17 |
|
Stock dividend adjustment |
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
6.04 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(18,143 |
) |
|
|
28.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
76,935 |
|
|
|
21.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense for restricted stock is based on the fair value of restricted stock
awards at the time of grant, which is equal to the value of Uniteds common stock on the date of
grant. The value of restricted stock grants that are expected to vest is amortized into expense
over the vesting period. For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, compensation expense
of $198,000 and $204,000, respectively, was recognized related to restricted stock awards. The
total intrinsic value of the restricted stock was $320,000 at March 31, 2009.
As of March 31, 2009, there was $6.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to
nonvested stock options and restricted stock awards granted under the plan. That cost is expected
to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.2 years. The aggregate grant date fair value
of options and restricted stock awards that vested during the three months ended March 31, 2009,
was $526 million.
Note 3 Common Stock Issued / Common Stock Issuable
United provides a Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan (DRIP) to its shareholders.
Under the DRIP, shareholders of record can voluntarily reinvest all or a portion of their cash
dividends into shares of Uniteds common stock, as well as purchase additional stock through the
plan with cash. Uniteds 401(k) retirement plan regularly purchases shares of Uniteds common
stock directly from United. In addition, United has an Employee Stock Purchase Program (ESPP) that
allows eligible employees to purchase shares of common stock at a 5% discount, with no commission
charges. For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, United issued 99,604 and 31,944
shares, respectively, and increased capital by $509,000 and $503,000, respectively, through these
programs.
7
United offers its common stock as an investment option in its deferred compensation plan. The
common stock component of the deferred compensation plan is accounted for as an equity instrument
and is reflected in the consolidated financial statements as common stock issuable. At March 31,
2009 and 2008, 161,807 and 90,505 shares, respectively, were issuable under the deferred
compensation plan.
Note 4 Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(106,327 |
) |
|
$ |
16,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
48,324 |
|
|
|
47,052 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options and restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
220 |
|
Warrants attached to trust preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant granted with Series B preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
48,324 |
|
|
|
47,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(2.20 |
) |
|
$ |
.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(2.20 |
) |
|
$ |
.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5 Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value
On January 1, 2008, United adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies
to reported balances that are required or permitted to be measured at fair value under existing
accounting pronouncements; accordingly, the standard does not require any new fair value
measurements of reported balances.
SFAS No. 157 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific
measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions
that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering
market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value
hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained
from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within
Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entitys own assumptions about market
participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).
Fair Value Hierarchy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Valuation is based upon quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities that United has the ability to access. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in
active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other
than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves
that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one
significant assumption based on unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which
are typically based on an entitys own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related
market activity. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is
based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair
value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the
lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
Uniteds assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value
measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the
asset or liability. |
8
The following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities
recorded at fair value.
Securities Available for Sale
Investment securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair
value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available,
fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques
such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the securitys credit rating,
prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions. Level 1 securities
include those traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange, U.S. Treasury
securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets and money
market funds. Level 2 securities include mortgage-backed securities issued by government sponsored
entities, municipal bonds and corporate debt securities. Securities classified as Level 3 include
asset-backed securities in less liquid markets.
Deferred Compensation Plan Assets and Liabilities
Included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet are assets related to employee
deferred compensation plans. The assets associated with these plans are invested in mutual funds
and classified as Level 1. Deferred compensation liabilities, also classified as Level 1, are
carried at the fair value of the obligation to the employee, which mirrors the fair value of the
invested assets and is included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.
Loans Held for Sale
Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or market value. The fair value of loans
held for sale is based on what secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios with similar
characteristics. As such, United classifies loans subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments
as Level 2.
Loans
United does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a
loan is considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses is established. Loans for which it is
probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual
terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually
impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with SFAS 114, Accounting by Creditors for
Impairment of a Loan, (SFAS 114). The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of
several methods, including collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise value,
liquidation value and discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance
represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the
recorded investments in such loans. At March 31, 2009, substantially all of the total impaired
loans were evaluated based on the fair value of the collateral. In accordance with SFAS 157,
impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral require
classification in the fair value hierarchy. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an
observable market price or a current appraised value, United records the impaired loan as
nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair
value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable
market price, United records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 3.
Foreclosed Assets
Foreclosed assets are adjusted to fair value upon transfer of the loans to foreclosed assets.
Subsequently, foreclosed assets are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value. Fair
value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral or managements
estimation of the value of the collateral. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an
observable market price or a current appraised value, United records the foreclosed asset as
nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair
value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable
market price, United records the foreclosed asset as nonrecurring Level 3.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and identified intangible assets are subject to impairment testing. Uniteds approach
to testing goodwill for impairment is to compare the business units carrying value to the implied
fair value based on multiples of earnings and tangible book value for recently completed merger
transactions. In the event the fair value is determined to be less than the carrying value, the
asset is recorded at fair value as determined by the valuation model. As such, United classifies
goodwill and other intangible assets subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 3.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Currently, United uses interest rate swaps and interest rate floors to manage its interest
rate risk. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation
techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative.
This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity,
and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities.
The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of
netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts and the discounted expected variable cash
payments. The variable cash payments are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward
curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves.
9
The fair values of interest rate options are determined using the market standard methodology
of discounting the future expected cash receipts that would occur if variable interest rates fell
below the strike rate of the floors. The variable interest rates used in the calculation of
projected receipts on the floor are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from
observable market interest rate curves and volatilities. To comply with the provisions of SFAS No.
157, United incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own
nonperformance risk and the respective counterpartys nonperformance risk in the fair value
measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of
nonperformance risk, United has considered the effect of netting and any applicable credit
enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.
Although United has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives
fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with
its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the
likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as of March 31, 2009, United has
assessed the significance of the effect of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall
valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are
not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, United has determined
that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The table below presents Uniteds assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis as of March 31, 2009, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those
measurements fall.
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,719,033 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,719,033 |
|
Deferred compensation plan assets |
|
|
3,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,467 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,467 |
|
|
$ |
1,791,975 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,795,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation plan liability |
|
$ |
3,467 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
3,467 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
United may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These include assets that are measured at the lower of
cost or market that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period. The table
below presents Uniteds assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of
March 31, 2009, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements
fall.
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
148,786 |
|
|
$ |
148,786 |
|
Foreclosed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,256 |
|
|
|
69,256 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235,590 |
|
|
|
235,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
453,632 |
|
|
$ |
453,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6 Stock Dividend
During the first quarter of 2009, United declared a stock dividend at a rate of 1 new share
for every 130 shares owned. The stock dividend has been reflected in the financial statements as
an issuance of stock with no proceeds rather than a stock split and
therefore prior period numbers of shares outstanding have not been adjusted. The amount of
$8,000 shown in the equity statement as a reduction of capital related to the stock dividend is the
amount of cash paid to shareholders for fractional shares.
10
Note 7 Derivatives and Hedging Activities
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
United is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic
conditions. United principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational
risks through management of its core business activities. United manages interest rate risk
primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its investment securities portfolio and
debt funding and the use of derivative financial instruments. Specifically, United enters into
derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that
result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are
determined by interest rates. Uniteds derivative financial instruments are used to manage
differences in the amount, timing, and duration of Uniteds known or expected cash receipts and its
known or expected cash payments principally related to Uniteds loans and wholesale borrowings.
The table below presents the fair value of Uniteds derivative financial instruments as well
as their classification on the balance sheet as of March 31, 2009, December 31, 2008 and March 31,
2008.
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Interest Rate |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Products |
|
Location |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset derivatives |
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
72,942 |
|
|
$ |
81,612 |
|
|
$ |
48,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no derivatives classified as liabilities in the balance sheet at March 31, 2009,
December 31, 2008 or March 31, 2008.
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
Uniteds objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest
revenue and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, United
primarily uses interest rate swaps and floors as part of its interest rate risk management
strategy. For Uniteds variable-rate loans, interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges
involve the receipt of fixed-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for United making
variable-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional
amount. Interest rate floors designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate
amounts from a counterparty if interest rates fall below the strike rate on the contract in
exchange for an up front premium. As of March 31, 2009, United had 14 interest rate swaps with an
aggregate notional amount of $730 million and 5 interest rate floors with an aggregate notional
amount of $300 million that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify
as cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and is subsequently
reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings.
During the first quarter of 2009, such derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows
associated with existing prime-based, variable-rate loans. The ineffective portion of the change
in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. During the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008 no hedge ineffectiveness was recognized on derivative financial
instruments designated as cash flow hedges.
Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives will be
reclassified to interest revenue as interest payments are received on Uniteds prime-based,
variable-rate loans. During the remaining nine months of 2009, United estimates that an additional
$34.7 million will be reclassified as an increase to interest revenue.
United is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted
transactions over a maximum period of fifty-two months, excluding forecasted transactions related
to the payment of variable interest on existing financial instruments.
Fair Value Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
United is exposed to changes in the fair value of certain of its fixed rate obligations due to
changes in LIBOR, a benchmark interest rate. United uses interest rate swaps to manage its exposure
to changes in fair value on these instruments attributable to changes in the benchmark interest
rate. Interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges involve the receipt of fixed-rate amounts
from a counterparty in exchange for United making variable rate payments over the life of the
agreements without the exchange of the underlying notional amount. As of March 31, 2009, United
had three interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $195 million that were
designated as fair value hedges of interest rate risk.
11
For derivatives designated and that qualify as fair value hedges, the gain or loss on the
derivative as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the hedged
risk are recognized in earnings. United includes the gain or loss on the hedged
items in the same line item as the offsetting loss or gain on the related derivatives. During
the three months ended March 31, 2009, United recognized a loss of $1,013,000 related to changes in
the fair value of the swaps that were offset by a gain of $1,114,000 related to changes in the fair
value of the hedged items. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, United recognized net
gains of $101,000 related to ineffectiveness of the hedging relationships. The table below
presents the earnings impact of the changes in fair value of the swaps and the hedged items for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Statement |
|
Gain (Loss) on |
|
|
Gain (Loss) on |
|
Classification |
|
Derivative |
|
|
Hedged Item |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other fee revenue |
|
$ |
(1,013 |
) |
|
$ |
1,114 |
|
Tabular Disclosure of the Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Income Statement
The tables below present the effect of Uniteds derivative financial instruments on the Income
Statement as of March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008.
Derivatives in SFAS 133 Fair Value Hedging Relationships (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss) |
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in |
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in |
|
Recognized in Income on |
|
Income on Derivative |
|
|
Income on Hedged Item |
|
Derivative |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other fee revenue |
|
$ |
(1,013 |
) |
|
$ |
762 |
|
|
$ |
1,114 |
|
|
$ |
(756 |
) |
Derivatives in SFAS 133 Cash Flow Hedging Relationships (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain |
|
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
Location of Gain |
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
|
in Income on |
|
|
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
(Loss) Reclassified |
|
|
in Income on |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
|
in Other |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
from Accumulated |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Other |
|
|
(Ineffective |
|
|
and Amount |
|
|
|
Income on |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Portion and |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Income into Income |
|
|
Amount Excluded |
|
|
Effectiveness |
|
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
Income into |
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
from |
|
|
Testing) |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Income (Effective |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Effectiveness |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Portion) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Testing) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate products |
|
$ |
3,118 |
|
|
$ |
24,748 |
|
|
Interest revenue |
|
$ |
10,990 |
|
|
$ |
4,483 |
|
|
Other fee revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit-risk-related Contingent Features
United manages its credit exposure on derivatives transactions by entering into a bi-lateral
credit support agreement with each counterparty. The credit support agreements require
collateralization of exposures beyond specified minimum threshold amounts. The details of these
agreements, including the minimum thresholds, vary by counterparty.
Uniteds agreements with each of its derivative counterparties contain a provision where if
either party defaults on any of its indebtedness, then it could also be declared in default on its
derivative obligations. The agreements with derivatives counterparties also include provisions
that if not met, could result in United being declared in default. United has agreements with
certain of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where if the United fails to
maintain its status as a well-capitalized institution, it could be declared in default on its
derivative obligations. United has an agreement with one counterparty that contains a provision
where if United fails to maintain a minimum shareholders equity of $300 million, it could be
declared in default on its derivative
obligations. An agreement with another counterparty contains a provision where if United
fails to maintain a minimum tier 1 leverage ratio of 5.0%, a minimum tier 1 risk-based capital
ratio of 6.0%, and a minimum total risk-based capital ratio of 10%, it could be declared in
default on its derivative obligations.
12
Note 8 Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-4 (FSP FAS 157-4),
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have
Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly. FSP FAS 157-4 provides
additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly
decreased. This FSP also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a
transaction is not orderly. This FSP emphasizes that even if there has been a significant decrease
in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability and regardless of the valuation
technique(s) used, the objective of a fair value measurement remains the same. Fair value is the
price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at
the measurement date under current market conditions. This accounting standard will be effective
for United for the second quarter of 2009. United does not anticipate a significant impact on
results of operations or financial position upon its adoption in the second quarter.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 (FSP FAS 107-1
and APB 28-1), Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. FSP FAS 107-1 and
APB 28-1 amends FASB Statement No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to
require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of
publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. This FSP also amends APB No.
28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require those disclosures in summarized financial information
at interim reporting periods. This accounting standard will be effective for United for the second
quarter of 2009. It will not have any impact on results of operations or financial position since
it is for disclosure purposes only.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 (FSP FAS 115-2
and FAS 124-2), Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary-Impairments. The objective
of an other-than-temporary impairment analysis under existing GAAP is to determine whether the
holder of an investment in a debt or equity security for which changes in fair value are not
regularly recognized in earnings (such as securities classified as held-to-maturity or
available-for-sale) should recognize a loss in earnings when the investment is impaired. An
investment is impaired if the fair value of the investment is less than its amortized cost basis.
This FSP amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance in GAAP for debt securities to make
the guidance more operational and to improve the presentation and disclosure of
other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial statements. This
FSP does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary
impairments of equity securities. This accounting standard will be effective for United for the
second quarter of 2009. United does not anticipate a significant impact on results of operations
or financial position upon its adoption in the second quarter.
Note 9 Reclassifications
Certain 2008 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2009 presentation.
Note 10 Goodwill
A summary of the changes in goodwill for the three-months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 is
presented below, (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
305,590 |
|
|
$ |
306,086 |
|
Purchase adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(496 |
) |
Impairment |
|
|
(70,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
235,590 |
|
|
$ |
305,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the first quarter of 2009, United updated its annual goodwill impairment assessment as
a result of its stock price falling significantly below tangible book value. As a result of the
updated assessment, goodwill was found to be impaired and was written down to its estimated fair
value. The impairment charge of $70 million was recognized as an expense in the first quarter 2009
consolidated statement of income.
13
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements regarding United Community Banks, Inc.
(United), including, without limitation, statements relating to Uniteds expectations with
respect to revenue, credit losses, levels of nonperforming assets, expenses, earnings and other
measures of financial performance. Words such as may, could, would, should, believes,
expects, anticipates, estimates, intends, plans, targets or similar expressions are
intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not
guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties that are subject to
change based on various factors (many of which are beyond Uniteds control). The following
factors, among others, could cause Uniteds financial performance to differ materially from the
expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
the condition of the banking system and financial markets; |
|
|
|
|
our limited ability to raise capital or maintain liquidity; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to pay dividends; |
|
|
|
|
our past operating results may not be indicative of future operating results; |
|
|
|
|
our business is subject to the success of the local economies in which we operate; |
|
|
|
|
our concentration of construction and land development loans is subject to unique risks
that could adversely affect our earnings; |
|
|
|
|
we may face risks with respect to future expansion and acquisitions or mergers; |
|
|
|
|
changes in prevailing interest rates may negatively affect our net income and the value
of our assets; |
|
|
|
|
if our allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, earnings
would decrease; |
|
|
|
|
competition from financial institutions and other financial service providers may
adversely affect our profitability; |
|
|
|
|
we may be subject to losses due to fraudulent and negligent conduct of our loan
customers, third party service providers or employees; |
|
|
|
|
business increases, productivity gains and other investments are lower than expected or
do not occur as quickly as anticipated; |
|
|
|
|
competitive pressures among financial services companies increase significantly; |
|
|
|
|
the success of our business strategy; |
|
|
|
|
the strength of the United States economy in general; |
|
|
|
|
changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate
policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; |
|
|
|
|
inflation or market conditions fluctuate; |
|
|
|
|
conditions in the stock market, the public debt market and other capital markets
deteriorate; |
|
|
|
|
financial services laws and regulations change; |
|
|
|
|
technology changes and United fails to adapt to those changes; |
|
|
|
|
consumer spending and saving habits change; |
|
|
|
|
unanticipated regulatory or judicial proceedings occur; and |
|
|
|
|
United is unsuccessful at managing the risks involved in the foregoing. |
Additional information with respect to factors that may cause actual results to differ
materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements may also be included in other
reports that United files with the Securities and Exchange Commission. United cautions that the
foregoing list of factors is not exclusive and not to place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements. United does not intend to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or
oral, relating to the matters discussed in this Form 10-Q.
14
Overview
The following discussion is intended to provide insight into the results of operations and
financial condition of United and its subsidiaries and should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.
United is a bank holding company registered with the Federal Reserve under the Bank Holding
Company Act of 1956 that was incorporated under the laws of the state of Georgia in 1987 and
commenced operations in 1988. At March 31, 2009, United had total consolidated assets of $8.1
billion, total loans of $5.6 billion, total deposits of $6.6 billion and stockholders equity of
$889 million.
Uniteds activities are primarily conducted by its wholly owned Georgia banking subsidiary
(the Bank) and Brintech, Inc., a consulting firm providing professional services to the financial
services industry. The Bank operations are conducted under a community bank model that operates 27
community banks with local bank presidents and boards in north Georgia, the Atlanta metropolitan
statistical area (MSA), the Gainesville MSA, coastal Georgia, western North Carolina, and east
Tennessee.
United reported a net loss of $103.8 million for the first quarter of 2009, which included a
non-recurring, non-cash charge of $70 million for goodwill impairment and severance costs of $2.9
million for a reduction in workforce. Uniteds net operating loss, which excludes the
non-recurring goodwill impairment and severance charges was $32.0 million for the first quarter of
2009. This compared with net income of $16.1 million for the first quarter of 2008. Diluted
operating loss per common share was $.71 for the first quarter of 2009, compared with diluted
earnings per common share of $.34 for the first quarter of 2008. The goodwill impairment charge
and severance costs in the first quarter of 2009 represented $1.45 and $.04, respectively, of the
per share loss for the quarter of 2009 bringing the net loss per diluted share to $2.20. The first
quarter of 2009 operating loss reflects the current recessionary economic environment and credit
losses primarily resulting from the weak housing market.
Operating loss and operating loss per diluted share are non-GAAP performance measures.
Uniteds management believes that operating performance is useful in analyzing the companys
financial performance trends since it excludes items that are non-recurring in nature. A
reconciliation of these operating performance measures to GAAP performance measures is included in
the financial highlights table on page 16.
Earnings decreased primarily as a result of the goodwill impairment charge, severance costs
and a higher provision for loan losses related to the increase in charge-offs within the loan
portfolio combined with margin compression due to an increase in non-performing assets, competitive
deposit pricing and the ongoing effect of efforts to maintain liquidity. Although the margin was
down from a year ago, it was up 38 basis points from the fourth quarter of 2008, reflecting
improvement in loan and deposit pricing. Housing sales remain at low levels, leaving a surplus of
finished housing and lot inventory in our markets, most notably in the Atlanta MSA. This decline
in housing sales negatively affects both the cash flows of our residential construction and land
development customers, and the demand for new land development loans.
Nonperforming assets, of $334.5 million, increased to 4.11% of total assets as of March 31,
2009, compared to 1.07 % as of March 31, 2008 and 2.94% as of December 31, 2008. This increase is
a reflection of the continuing effects of declining home sales in the Atlanta MSA, which itself is
indicative of the regional economic slowdown that is occurring in much of the Southeast.
Fee revenue decreased $1.4 million, or 10%, from the first quarter of 2008. With the
exception of mortgage fees, all other fee revenue sources decreased from the first quarter of 2008.
Mortgage fees were up $688,000, or 35%, reflecting higher refinancing activity resulting from the
low interest rate environment. In terms of mortgage production, United closed 996 loans totaling
$174 million in the first quarter of 2009 which set a new company record. The decrease in the
other fee revenue categories primarily reflects the weak economy.
Operating expenses, excluding the $70 million goodwill impairment charge and $2.9 million in
severance costs, increased $5.0 million, or 11%, from the first quarter of 2008, primarily due to
higher expenses associated with and writedowns on foreclosed real estate properties and higher FDIC
insurance premiums. Effective January 1, 2009, the FDIC raised deposit insurance rates on all
insured depository institutions by seven basis points on the balance of insured deposits. Uniteds
first quarter expenses do not contain any provision for the one-time special assessment that is
currently proposed by the FDIC.
Critical Accounting Policies
The accounting and reporting policies of United are in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and conform to general practices within
the banking industry. The more critical accounting and reporting policies include Uniteds
accounting for the allowance for loan losses, intangible assets and income taxes. In particular,
Uniteds accounting policies related to allowance for loan losses, intangibles and income taxes
involve the use of estimates and require significant judgment to be made by management. Different
assumptions in the application of these policies could result in material changes in Uniteds
consolidated financial position or consolidated results of operations. See Asset Quality and Risk
Elements herein for additional discussion of Uniteds accounting methodologies related to the
allowance.
15
Table 1 Financial Highlights
Selected Financial Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
|
2009-2008 |
|
(in thousands, except per share data; taxable equivalent) |
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Change |
|
INCOME SUMMARY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest revenue |
|
$ |
103,562 |
|
|
$ |
108,434 |
|
|
$ |
112,510 |
|
|
$ |
116,984 |
|
|
$ |
129,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
46,150 |
|
|
|
56,561 |
|
|
|
53,719 |
|
|
|
55,231 |
|
|
|
62,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest revenue |
|
|
57,412 |
|
|
|
51,873 |
|
|
|
58,791 |
|
|
|
61,753 |
|
|
|
66,287 |
|
|
|
(13 |
)% |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
76,000 |
|
|
|
15,500 |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fee revenue |
|
|
12,846 |
|
|
|
10,718 |
|
|
|
13,121 |
|
|
|
15,105 |
|
|
|
14,197 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
5,258 |
|
|
|
(22,409 |
) |
|
|
(4,088 |
) |
|
|
61,358 |
|
|
|
72,984 |
|
|
NM |
|
Operating expenses (1) |
|
|
52,569 |
|
|
|
52,439 |
|
|
|
56,970 |
|
|
|
49,761 |
|
|
|
47,529 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income before taxes |
|
|
(47,311 |
) |
|
|
(74,848 |
) |
|
|
(61,058 |
) |
|
|
11,597 |
|
|
|
25,455 |
|
|
NM |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(15,335 |
) |
|
|
(28,101 |
) |
|
|
(21,184 |
) |
|
|
4,504 |
|
|
|
9,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating (loss) income (1) |
|
|
(31,976 |
) |
|
|
(46,747 |
) |
|
|
(39,874 |
) |
|
|
7,093 |
|
|
|
16,078 |
|
|
NM |
|
Noncash goodwill impairment charge |
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance costs, net of tax benefit |
|
|
1,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(103,773 |
) |
|
|
(46,747 |
) |
|
|
(39,874 |
) |
|
|
7,093 |
|
|
|
16,078 |
|
|
NM |
|
Preferred dividends |
|
|
2,554 |
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(106,327 |
) |
|
$ |
(47,459 |
) |
|
$ |
(39,878 |
) |
|
$ |
7,089 |
|
|
$ |
16,074 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PERFORMANCE MEASURES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted operating (loss) earnings (1) |
|
$ |
(.71 |
) |
|
$ |
(.99 |
) |
|
$ |
(.84 |
) |
|
$ |
.15 |
|
|
$ |
.34 |
|
|
NM |
|
Per share impact of goodwill impairment charge |
|
|
(1.45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share impact of severance costs |
|
|
(.04 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings |
|
|
(2.20 |
) |
|
|
(.99 |
) |
|
|
(.84 |
) |
|
|
.15 |
|
|
|
.34 |
|
|
NM |
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.09 |
|
|
|
.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock dividends declared (5) |
|
|
1 for 130 |
|
|
|
1 for 130 |
|
|
|
1 for 130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value |
|
|
14.70 |
|
|
|
16.95 |
|
|
|
17.12 |
|
|
|
17.75 |
|
|
|
18.50 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
Tangible book value (3) |
|
|
9.65 |
|
|
|
10.39 |
|
|
|
10.48 |
|
|
|
11.03 |
|
|
|
11.76 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
Key performance ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on tangible equity (2)(3) |
|
|
NM |
% |
|
|
NM |
% |
|
|
NM |
% |
|
|
5.86 |
% |
|
|
13.16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Return on equity (2)(4) |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
3.41 |
|
|
|
7.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
Return on assets (4) |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
.34 |
|
|
|
.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (4) |
|
|
3.08 |
|
|
|
2.70 |
|
|
|
3.17 |
|
|
|
3.32 |
|
|
|
3.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating efficiency ratio (3) |
|
|
79.29 |
|
|
|
81.34 |
|
|
|
79.35 |
|
|
|
65.05 |
|
|
|
59.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity to assets |
|
|
11.64 |
|
|
|
10.08 |
|
|
|
10.28 |
|
|
|
10.33 |
|
|
|
10.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible equity to assets (3) |
|
|
8.30 |
|
|
|
6.59 |
|
|
|
6.65 |
|
|
|
6.77 |
|
|
|
6.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity to assets (3) |
|
|
6.13 |
|
|
|
6.23 |
|
|
|
6.65 |
|
|
|
6.77 |
|
|
|
6.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSET QUALITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
$ |
43,281 |
|
|
$ |
74,028 |
|
|
$ |
55,736 |
|
|
$ |
14,313 |
|
|
$ |
7,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans (NPLs) |
|
|
259,155 |
|
|
|
190,723 |
|
|
|
139,266 |
|
|
|
123,786 |
|
|
|
67,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed properties |
|
|
75,383 |
|
|
|
59,768 |
|
|
|
38,438 |
|
|
|
28,378 |
|
|
|
22,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets (NPAs) |
|
|
334,538 |
|
|
|
250,491 |
|
|
|
177,704 |
|
|
|
152,164 |
|
|
|
89,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
143,990 |
|
|
|
122,271 |
|
|
|
111,299 |
|
|
|
91,035 |
|
|
|
89,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to loans |
|
|
2.56 |
% |
|
|
2.14 |
% |
|
|
1.91 |
% |
|
|
1.53 |
% |
|
|
1.51 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs to average loans (4) |
|
|
3.09 |
|
|
|
5.09 |
|
|
|
3.77 |
|
|
|
.97 |
|
|
|
.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
NPAs to loans and foreclosed properties |
|
|
5.86 |
|
|
|
4.35 |
|
|
|
3.03 |
|
|
|
2.55 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
NPAs to total assets |
|
|
4.11 |
|
|
|
2.94 |
|
|
|
2.20 |
|
|
|
1.84 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
AVERAGE BALANCES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
5,675,054 |
|
|
$ |
5,784,139 |
|
|
$ |
5,889,168 |
|
|
$ |
5,933,143 |
|
|
$ |
5,958,296 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Investment securities |
|
|
1,712,654 |
|
|
|
1,508,808 |
|
|
|
1,454,740 |
|
|
|
1,507,240 |
|
|
|
1,485,515 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Earning assets |
|
|
7,530,230 |
|
|
|
7,662,536 |
|
|
|
7,384,287 |
|
|
|
7,478,018 |
|
|
|
7,491,480 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
8,312,648 |
|
|
|
8,449,097 |
|
|
|
8,146,880 |
|
|
|
8,295,748 |
|
|
|
8,305,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
6,780,531 |
|
|
|
6,982,229 |
|
|
|
6,597,339 |
|
|
|
6,461,361 |
|
|
|
6,051,069 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
967,505 |
|
|
|
851,956 |
|
|
|
837,487 |
|
|
|
856,727 |
|
|
|
855,659 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Common shares basic |
|
|
48,324 |
|
|
|
47,844 |
|
|
|
47,417 |
|
|
|
47,158 |
|
|
|
47,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares diluted |
|
|
48,324 |
|
|
|
47,844 |
|
|
|
47,417 |
|
|
|
47,249 |
|
|
|
47,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
AT PERIOD END |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
5,632,705 |
|
|
$ |
5,704,861 |
|
|
$ |
5,829,937 |
|
|
$ |
5,933,141 |
|
|
$ |
5,967,839 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Investment securities |
|
|
1,719,033 |
|
|
|
1,617,187 |
|
|
|
1,400,827 |
|
|
|
1,430,588 |
|
|
|
1,508,402 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
8,140,909 |
|
|
|
8,520,765 |
|
|
|
8,072,543 |
|
|
|
8,264,051 |
|
|
|
8,386,255 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Deposits |
|
|
6,616,488 |
|
|
|
7,003,624 |
|
|
|
6,689,335 |
|
|
|
6,696,456 |
|
|
|
6,175,769 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
888,853 |
|
|
|
989,382 |
|
|
|
816,880 |
|
|
|
837,890 |
|
|
|
871,452 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Common shares outstanding |
|
|
48,487 |
|
|
|
48,009 |
|
|
|
47,596 |
|
|
|
47,096 |
|
|
|
47,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes the non-recurring goodwill impairment charge of $70 million and severance costs of
$2.9 million, net of income tax benefit of $1.1 million in the first quarter of 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Net income available to common shareholders, which excludes preferred stock dividends, divided by
average realized common equity, which excludes accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). |
|
(3) |
|
Excludes effect of acquisition related intangibles and associated amortization. |
|
(4) |
|
Annualized. |
|
(5) |
|
Number of new shares issued for shares currently held. |
NM |
|
Not meaningful. |
16
Results of Operations
United reported a net loss of $103.8 million for the first quarter of 2009, which included a
non-recurring, non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $70 million and severance costs of $2.9
million. This compared to net income of $16.1 million for the same period in 2008. The first
quarter 2009 diluted loss per share was $2.20, of which $1.45 related to the goodwill impairment
charge. This compared to diluted earnings per share of $.34 for the first quarter of 2008. The
loss in the first quarter of 2009 reflects the continuing effect of the economic recession and the
weak housing market.
Net Interest Revenue (Taxable Equivalent)
Net interest revenue (the difference between the interest earned on assets and the interest
paid on deposits and borrowed funds) is the single largest component of total revenue. United
actively manages this revenue source to provide optimal levels of revenue while balancing interest
rate, credit and liquidity risks. Net interest revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2009
was $57.4 million, down $8.9 million, or 13%, from last year but up $5.5 million from the fourth
quarter of 2008. Average loans decreased $283 million, or 5%, from the first quarter last year.
The decrease in the loan portfolio was a result of the slowdown in the housing market, particularly
in the Atlanta MSA where period-end loans decreased $318 million from March 31, 2008. Much of the
decrease was intentional as management sought to rebalance the loan portfolio by reducing the
concentration of residential construction loans, particularly in the Atlanta MSA where the housing
market has been under considerable stress. Period-end loans in north Georgia and North Carolina
decreased $57 million and $8 million, respectively. In contrast, coastal Georgia increased $21
million, the Gainesville MSA increased $7 million and east Tennessee increased $20 million from the
first quarter of 2008.
Average interest-earning assets for the first quarter 2009 increased $38.8 million, or 1%,
over the same period in 2008. The increase in interest-earning assets, which was primarily in
the investment securities portfolio and other short-term investments, was partially funded by
interest-bearing sources. Average interest-bearing liabilities decreased $63.4 million from the
first quarter of 2008 with the Series B preferred stock of $180 million, issued in the fourth
quarter as part of the U.S. Treasurys Capital Purchase Program funding the balance sheet growth
and replacing a portion of the borrowed funds. Dividends on the Series B preferred shares are not
included in net income (loss) but are subtracted from net income (loss) in the determination of net
income (loss) available to common shareholders.
The banking industry uses two ratios to measure relative profitability of net interest
revenue. The net interest spread measures the difference between the average yield on
interest-earning assets and the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. The interest
rate spread eliminates the effect of non-interest-bearing deposits and gives a direct perspective
on the effect of market interest rate movements. The net interest margin is defined as net
interest revenue as a percent of average total interest-earning assets and takes into account the
positive effect of investing non-interest-bearing deposits and capital.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the net interest spread was 2.74% and
3.15%, respectively, while the net interest margin was 3.08% and 3.55%, respectively. The
compression of the spread and margin was primarily the result of a rise in non-performing assets
and higher than normal deposit pricing resulting from competition for deposits due to liquidity
pressures affecting the banking industry as a whole. The compression of the spread and margin was
also due to the lowering of the prime interest rate initiated by actions of the Federal Reserve
beginning in September 2007 and the resulting decrease in the repricing of our interest earning
assets faster than our interest-bearing liabilities. Also contributing to the lower spread and net
interest margin was a shift in earning-asset mix from loans to investment securities. These
factors continued to compress the net interest margin and the net interest spread through most of
the fourth quarter of 2008 leading to a net interest margin of 2.70% in the fourth quarter.
Deposit
pricing competition began to ease late in the fourth quarter and United intensified its focus on
loan pricing to ensure that it was being adequately compensated for the credit risk it was taking.
The combined effect of the easing of deposit pricing competition and widening credit spreads in
Uniteds loan portfolio led to the 38 basis point increase in the net interest margin from the
fourth quarter of 2008 to the first quarter of 2009.
The average yield on interest-earning assets for the first quarter of 2009 was 5.56%, compared
with 6.92% in the first quarter of 2008. Loan yields were down 153 basis points compared with the
first quarter of 2008, due to the effect of the Federal Reserves policy of lowering interest rates
to stimulate the economy on Uniteds primarily prime-based loan portfolio and the higher level of
non-performing loans.
The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities for the first quarter was 2.82% compared to
3.77% from the same period of 2008. Throughout much of early 2008, United was unable to reduce
deposit rates commensurate with the rate declines in its loan portfolio. This trend became more
visible in the third and fourth quarters of 2008 when industry liquidity pressures led to increased
competition for deposits and did not allow United to reduce deposit rates to correspond with the
Federal Reserves actions to lower interest rates. Late in the fourth quarter of 2008, liquidity
pressures began to ease, allowing United to lower its deposit rates and still maintain its
liquidity position.
17
The following table shows the relationship between interest revenue and expense, and the
average amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
Table 2 Average Consolidated Balance Sheets and Net Interest Analysis
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg. |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg. |
|
(dollars in thousands, taxable equivalent) |
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income (1)(2) |
|
$ |
5,675,054 |
|
|
$ |
81,749 |
|
|
|
5.84 |
% |
|
$ |
5,958,296 |
|
|
$ |
109,252 |
|
|
|
7.37 |
% |
Taxable securities (3) |
|
|
1,682,603 |
|
|
|
20,433 |
|
|
|
4.86 |
|
|
|
1,448,224 |
|
|
|
18,628 |
|
|
|
5.15 |
|
Tax-exempt securities (1)(3) |
|
|
30,051 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
6.95 |
|
|
|
37,291 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
6.95 |
|
Federal funds sold and other interest-earning assets |
|
|
142,522 |
|
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
2.41 |
|
|
|
47,669 |
|
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
4.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
7,530,230 |
|
|
|
103,562 |
|
|
|
5.56 |
|
|
|
7,491,480 |
|
|
|
129,041 |
|
|
|
6.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(128,798 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92,025 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
104,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
179,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets (3) |
|
|
627,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
8,312,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,305,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW |
|
$ |
1,358,149 |
|
|
$ |
3,337 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
1,462,116 |
|
|
$ |
8,587 |
|
|
|
2.36 |
|
Money market |
|
|
477,325 |
|
|
|
2,237 |
|
|
|
1.90 |
|
|
|
439,049 |
|
|
|
2,913 |
|
|
|
2.67 |
|
Savings |
|
|
172,708 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
.30 |
|
|
|
184,812 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
.49 |
|
Time less than $100,000 |
|
|
1,942,897 |
|
|
|
17,217 |
|
|
|
3.59 |
|
|
|
1,553,313 |
|
|
|
18,223 |
|
|
|
4.72 |
|
Time greater than $100,000 |
|
|
1,393,188 |
|
|
|
12,825 |
|
|
|
3.73 |
|
|
|
1,365,307 |
|
|
|
16,370 |
|
|
|
4.82 |
|
Brokered |
|
|
786,171 |
|
|
|
6,011 |
|
|
|
3.10 |
|
|
|
374,402 |
|
|
|
4,291 |
|
|
|
4.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
6,130,438 |
|
|
|
41,754 |
|
|
|
2.76 |
|
|
|
5,378,999 |
|
|
|
50,611 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased and other borrowings |
|
|
150,517 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
1.49 |
|
|
|
551,812 |
|
|
|
4,318 |
|
|
|
3.15 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
204,941 |
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
|
2.13 |
|
|
|
661,498 |
|
|
|
5,745 |
|
|
|
3.49 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
150,997 |
|
|
|
2,769 |
|
|
|
7.44 |
|
|
|
107,996 |
|
|
|
2,080 |
|
|
|
7.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowed funds |
|
|
506,455 |
|
|
|
4,396 |
|
|
|
3.52 |
|
|
|
1,321,306 |
|
|
|
12,143 |
|
|
|
3.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
6,636,893 |
|
|
|
46,150 |
|
|
|
2.82 |
|
|
|
6,700,305 |
|
|
|
62,754 |
|
|
|
3.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
650,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
58,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
7,345,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,449,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
967,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
855,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
8,312,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,305,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
57,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
66,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest-rate spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.08 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest revenue on tax-exempt securities and loans has been increased to reflect
comparable interest on taxable securities and loans. The rate
used was 39%, reflecting the statutory federal income tax rate and the federal tax adjusted
state income tax rate. |
|
(2) |
|
Included in the average balance of loans outstanding are loans where the
accrual of interest has been discontinued. |
|
(3) |
|
Securities available for sale are shown at amortized cost. Pretax unrealized gains
of $10.6 million in 2009 and $15.9 million in 2008 are
included in other assets for purposes of this presentation. |
|
(4) |
|
Net interest margin is taxable equivalent net-interest revenue divided by average
interest-earning assets. |
18
The following table shows the relative effect on net interest revenue for changes in the
average outstanding amounts (volume) of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities
and the rates earned and paid on such assets and liabilities (rate). Variances resulting from a
combination of changes in rate and volume are allocated in proportion to the absolute dollar
amounts of the change in each category.
Table 3 Change in Interest Revenue and Expense on a Taxable Equivalent Basis
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Compared to 2008 |
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) |
|
|
|
Due to Changes in |
|
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Total |
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
(4,991 |
) |
|
$ |
(22,512 |
) |
|
$ |
(27,503 |
) |
Taxable securities |
|
|
2,889 |
|
|
|
(1,084 |
) |
|
|
1,805 |
|
Tax-exempt securities |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
Federal funds sold and other interest-earning assets |
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
(308 |
) |
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
(1,575 |
) |
|
|
(23,904 |
) |
|
|
(25,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW accounts |
|
|
(572 |
) |
|
|
(4,678 |
) |
|
|
(5,250 |
) |
Money market accounts |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
(913 |
) |
|
|
(676 |
) |
Savings deposits |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
Time deposits less than $100,000 |
|
|
4,004 |
|
|
|
(5,010 |
) |
|
|
(1,006 |
) |
Time deposits greater than $100,000 |
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
(3,873 |
) |
|
|
(3,545 |
) |
Brokered deposits |
|
|
3,513 |
|
|
|
(1,793 |
) |
|
|
1,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
7,496 |
|
|
|
(16,353 |
) |
|
|
(8,857 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased & other borrowings |
|
|
(2,177 |
) |
|
|
(1,588 |
) |
|
|
(3,765 |
) |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
(2,967 |
) |
|
|
(1,704 |
) |
|
|
(4,671 |
) |
Long-term debt |
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowed funds |
|
|
(4,351 |
) |
|
|
(3,396 |
) |
|
|
(7,747 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
3,145 |
|
|
|
(19,749 |
) |
|
|
(16,604 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in net interest revenue |
|
$ |
(4,720 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,155 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,875 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses was $65.0 million for the first quarter of 2009, compared with
$7.5 million for the same period in 2008. Net loan charge-offs as an annualized percentage of
average outstanding loans for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were 3.09%, compared to .48%
for the first quarter of 2008. As the housing market in Uniteds markets has struggled, most
notably in the Atlanta MSA, it has been difficult for many builders and developers to obtain cash
flow from selling lots and houses needed to service debt. This deterioration of the residential
construction and housing market has affected the Southeast and resulted in higher credit losses and
an increase in non-performing assets.
The provision for loan losses is based on managements evaluation of losses inherent in the
loan portfolio and corresponding analysis of the allowance for loan losses at quarter-end. The
amount of provision recorded in the first quarter was the amount required such that the total
allowance for loan losses reflects, in the estimation of management, the appropriate balance and is
adequate to cover inherent losses in the loan portfolio. The increase in the allowance was a
result of further credit deterioration within Uniteds loan portfolio. Although a majority of the
losses have been within the residential construction and development portion of the portfolio in
the Atlanta MSA, credit quality deterioration has been observed in other markets and loan
categories. Additional discussion on loan quality and the allowance for loan losses is included in
the Asset Quality section of this report.
19
Fee Revenue
Although United continues to focus on increasing fee revenue through new products and
services, fee revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $12.8 million, a decrease of
$1.4 million, or 10%, from the first quarter of 2008. The following table presents the components
of fee revenue for the first quarters of 2009 and 2008.
Table 4 Fee Revenue
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges and fees |
|
$ |
7,034 |
|
|
$ |
7,813 |
|
|
|
(10 |
)% |
Mortgage loan and related fees |
|
|
2,651 |
|
|
|
1,963 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Consulting fees |
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
1,807 |
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
Brokerage fees |
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
1,093 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
Securities gains, net |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
1,521 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
12,846 |
|
|
$ |
14,197 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges and fees of $7.0 million were down $779,000, or 10%, from the first quarter of
2008, primarily due to lower overdraft fees.
Mortgage loans and related fees for the first quarter were up $688,000, or 35%, from the first
quarter of 2008. The increase is due to a much higher level of refinancing activity as mortgage
rates fell to historical lows. In the first quarter of 2009, United closed 996 loans totaling
$174.3 million compared with 552 loans totaling $96.8 million in the first quarter of 2008. The
first quarter 2009 origination activity was at a record level for United. Substantially all
originated residential mortgages were sold into the secondary market including the right to service
these loans.
Consulting fees decreased $786,000, or 43%, compared to the first three months of 2008. This
decrease is a direct result of the current economic stress affecting the financial services
industry which has limited sales of new consulting projects. During the first quarter, several
consultants were engaged in Uniteds internal project to improve financial performance through
revenue enhancement and cost savings initiatives. This project allowed United to maintain the
consultants productivity while providing a valuable service to United, however, these services do
not result in the recognition of consolidated consulting fee revenue for financial reporting
purposes since the services were performed by a wholly-owned subsidiary.
Brokerage fees of $689,000 were down $404,000, or 37%, from the first quarter of 2008 due to
the continuing weak market conditions.
Other fee revenue of $1.1 million decreased $373,000 or 25%, from the first quarter of 2008.
This decline is due to lower revenue generated by Uniteds bank owned life insurance assets.
20
Operating Expenses
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, total operating expenses were $125.5 million, which
included a $70 million charge for goodwill impairment and $2.9 million in severance costs relating
to a reduction in force. Excluding those non-recurring charges, operating expenses for the first
quarter of 2009 were $52.6 million, an increase of $5.0 million, or 11%, compared with $47.5
million for the same period in 2008. The following table presents the components of operating
expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
Table 5 Operating Expenses
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
$ |
28,839 |
|
|
$ |
28,754 |
|
|
|
|
% |
Communications and equipment |
|
|
3,729 |
|
|
|
3,832 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Occupancy |
|
|
3,807 |
|
|
|
3,716 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Advertising and public relations |
|
|
1,109 |
|
|
|
1,351 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
Postage, printing and supplies |
|
|
1,182 |
|
|
|
1,592 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
Professional fees |
|
|
2,293 |
|
|
|
1,921 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Foreclosed property |
|
|
4,319 |
|
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
FDIC assessments and other regulatory charges |
|
|
2,682 |
|
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance costs |
|
|
2,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
3,870 |
|
|
|
3,419 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
125,467 |
|
|
$ |
47,529 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits for the first quarter 2009 totaled $28.8 million, unchanged
from the same period of 2008. Although United reduced headcount in the first quarter of 2009
through a reduction in force, the positions were eliminated late in the quarter so the reduction in
expense will occur in the second quarter and beyond. Through the reduction in force, United
reduced headcount from 1,994 employees at December 31, 2008 to 1,851 at March 31, 2009.
Professional fees for the first quarter of 2009 of $2.3 million were up $372,000, or 19%, from
the same period in 2008. The increase is primarily related to legal fees incurred in the loan
workout process.
Foreclosed property expense of $4.3 million for the first quarter of 2009 was up $3.4 million
from the first quarter of 2008 reflecting the increase in the number of foreclosed properties.
This expense category includes legal fees, property taxes, marketing costs, utility services,
maintenance and repair charges as well as realized losses and write downs associated with
foreclosed properties.
FDIC assessments and other regulatory charges of $2.7 million for the first quarter of 2009
increased $1.4 million from the first quarter of 2008 reflecting the seven basis point increase in
FDIC insurance premiums charged to all insured depository institutions beginning on January 1,
2009. United did not record any expense associated with the FDICs proposed special assessment
during the first quarter.
Other expense of $3.9 million for the first three months of 2009 increased $451,000 from the
first quarter of 2008. The increase was primarily due to a loss of $405,000 on an equity
investment in a bank that failed during the first quarter.
Income Taxes
Income tax benefit for the first quarter 2009 was $16.9 million as compared with income tax
expense of $8.8 million for the first quarter of 2008, representing an effective tax rate of 14.0%
and 35.5%, respectively. The effective tax rates were lower than the statutory tax rates primarily
due to interest revenue on certain investment securities and loans that are exempt from income
taxes, tax exempt fee revenue, tax credits received on affordable housing investments, the goodwill
impairment charge and the change in valuation allowance on deferred tax assets as discussed below.
Additional information regarding income taxes can be found in Note 14 to the consolidated financial
statements filed with Uniteds 2008 Form 10-K.
The effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2009 reflects the tax treatment of the $70
million goodwill impairment charge. Since the majority of Uniteds goodwill originated from
acquisitions that were treated as tax-free exchanges, no goodwill was
recognized for tax reporting purposes and therefore no tax deduction is allowed for the impairment
charge. Likewise, no tax benefit is recognized in the financial statements relating to the $70
million charge. The first quarter 2009 effective tax rate also reflects a valuation allowance
established for deferred tax assets. Management determined that it is more likely than not that
approximately $2.3 million, net of Federal benefit, in state low income housing tax credits will
expire unused due to their very short three year carry forward period.
21
Balance Sheet Review
Total assets at March 31, 2009 and 2008 were $8.1 billion and $8.4 billion, respectively.
Average total assets for the first quarter of 2009 were $8.3 billion, unchanged from the first
quarter of 2008.
Goodwill
United reviews its goodwill for impairment annually, or more frequently if circumstances
indicate that goodwill has been impaired. United completed its annual goodwill impairment
assessment as of December 31, 2008. In completing the annual assessment, United engaged an
international accounting firm to assist with the valuation. Uniteds year-end goodwill impairment
assessment indicated that there was no goodwill impairment.
Since year-end, Uniteds stock price fell from $13.58 at December 31, 2008 to a low of $2.28
in the first quarter and ended the first quarter of 2009 at $4.16 which management believes
reflects uncertainty about the economic cycle. Additionally, the stock prices of the peer group
used as part of the valuation analysis in the year-end goodwill impairment assessment experienced
similar declines. The current economic environment has resulted in lower earnings with higher
credit costs and those costs have been reflected in the income statement as well as valuation
adjustments to the loan balances through increases to the level of the allowance for loan losses.
With the stock price trading at a significant discount to book value and tangible book value and
these other factors, management believed that goodwill should be re-assessed for impairment.
United engaged the same international accounting firm to update their year-end valuation analysis,
which included several commonly accepted valuation techniques, including a discounted cash flows
analysis and several techniques involving comparisons to peer company valuations. The conclusion
from the updated impairment analysis was that impairment was present and a $70 million charge to
earnings was taken.
Because goodwill is an intangible asset that cannot be sold separately or otherwise disposed
of, it is not recognized in determining capital adequacy for regulatory purposes. Therefore the
goodwill impairment charge had no effect on Uniteds regulatory capital ratios.
Loans
The following table presents a summary of the loan portfolio.
Table 6 Loans Outstanding
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
By Loan Type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial (secured by real estate) |
|
$ |
1,778,691 |
|
|
$ |
1,626,966 |
|
|
$ |
1,526,282 |
|
Commercial construction |
|
|
376,682 |
|
|
|
499,663 |
|
|
|
548,063 |
|
Commercial (commercial and industrial) |
|
|
387,344 |
|
|
|
410,529 |
|
|
|
437,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
2,542,717 |
|
|
|
2,537,158 |
|
|
|
2,511,565 |
|
Residential construction |
|
|
1,430,319 |
|
|
|
1,478,679 |
|
|
|
1,791,338 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
1,503,893 |
|
|
|
1,526,388 |
|
|
|
1,490,951 |
|
Installment |
|
|
155,776 |
|
|
|
162,636 |
|
|
|
173,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
5,632,705 |
|
|
$ |
5,704,861 |
|
|
$ |
5,967,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial (secured by real estate) |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
Commercial construction |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Commercial (commercial and industrial) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Residential construction |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Installment |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By Geographic Location |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta MSA |
|
$ |
1,660,177 |
|
|
$ |
1,705,561 |
|
|
$ |
1,978,047 |
|
Gainesville MSA |
|
|
421,420 |
|
|
|
420,169 |
|
|
|
414,743 |
|
North Georgia |
|
|
2,013,458 |
|
|
|
2,040,082 |
|
|
|
2,070,551 |
|
Western North Carolina |
|
|
808,127 |
|
|
|
809,863 |
|
|
|
816,389 |
|
Coastal Georgia |
|
|
460,122 |
|
|
|
463,642 |
|
|
|
439,116 |
|
East Tennessee |
|
|
269,401 |
|
|
|
265,544 |
|
|
|
248,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
5,632,705 |
|
|
$ |
5,704,861 |
|
|
$ |
5,967,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
Substantially all of Uniteds loans are to customers located in the immediate market areas of
its community banks in Georgia, North Carolina, and Tennessee. At March 31, 2009, total loans were
$5.6 billion, a decrease of $335 million, or 6%, from March 31, 2008. The rate of loan growth
began to decline in the first quarter of 2007 and the balances have continued to decline through
2008 and into 2009. The decline in loan growth was due to deterioration in the residential
construction and housing markets. This deterioration resulted in part in an oversupply of lot
inventory within Uniteds markets, which further slowed construction activities and acquisition and
development projects. To date, the decline in the housing market has been most severe in the
Atlanta MSA although there has been some migration of deterioration into Uniteds other markets.
Asset Quality and Risk Elements
United manages asset quality and controls credit risk through review and oversight of the loan
portfolio as well as adherence to policies designed to promote sound underwriting and loan
monitoring practices. Uniteds credit administration function is responsible for monitoring asset
quality, establishing credit policies and procedures and enforcing the consistent application of
these policies and procedures among all of the Community Banks. Additional information on the
credit administration function is included in Item 1 under the heading Loan Review and
Non-performing Assets in Uniteds Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The provision for loan losses charged to earnings was based upon managements judgment of the
amount necessary to maintain the allowance at a level appropriate to absorb losses inherent in the
loan portfolio at quarter-end. The amount each period is dependent upon many factors, including
growth and changes in the composition of the loan portfolio, net charge-offs, delinquencies,
managements assessment of loan portfolio quality, the value of collateral, and other
macro-economic factors and trends. The evaluation of these factors is performed quarterly by
management through an analysis of the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses. The
increase in the allowance for loan losses during the first quarter of 2009 was due to an increase
in classified assets, deterioration in the collateral values leading to an expectation of higher
charge-offs upon default, further weakening of the housing market, and the recessionary economic
environment.
Reviews of non-performing loans, past due loans and larger credits, designed to identify
potential charges to the allowance for loan losses, as well as determine the adequacy of the
allowance, are conducted on a regular basis during the quarter. These reviews are performed by the
responsible lending officers, as well as by a separate loan review department, and consider such
factors as the financial strength of borrowers, the value of the applicable collateral, past loan
loss experience, anticipated loan losses, growth in the loan portfolio, prevailing economic
conditions and other factors. United also uses external loan review to supplement the activities
of Uniteds internal loan review and to ensure the independence of the loan review process.
23
The following table presents a summary of the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
Table 7 Allowance for Loan Losses
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Balance beginning of period |
|
$ |
122,271 |
|
|
$ |
89,423 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
Charge-offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial (commercial and industrial) |
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
Commercial (secured by real estate) |
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
Commercial construction |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential construction |
|
|
37,967 |
|
|
|
4,808 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
3,111 |
|
|
|
1,073 |
|
Installment |
|
|
926 |
|
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans charged-off |
|
|
44,131 |
|
|
|
7,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial (commercial and industrial) |
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Commercial (secured by real estate) |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential construction |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Installment |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries |
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
43,281 |
|
|
|
7,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance end of period |
|
$ |
143,990 |
|
|
$ |
89,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At period-end |
|
$ |
5,632,705 |
|
|
$ |
5,967,839 |
|
Average |
|
|
5,675,054 |
|
|
|
5,958,296 |
|
Allowance as a percentage of period-end loans |
|
|
2.56 |
% |
|
|
1.51 |
% |
As a percentage of average loans (annualized): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
3.09 |
|
|
|
.48 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
4.65 |
|
|
|
.51 |
|
Allowance as a percentage of non-performing loans |
|
|
56 |
* |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
- Excluding impaired loans with no allocated reserve, the coverage ratio was
117% at March 31, 2009. |
Management believes that the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2009 reflects the losses
inherent in the loan portfolio. This assessment involves uncertainty and judgment; therefore, the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses cannot be determined with precision and may be subject to
change in future periods. In addition, bank regulatory authorities, as part of their periodic
examination of the Bank, may require adjustments to the provision for loan losses in future periods
if, in their opinion, the results of their review warrant such additions.
24
Non-performing Assets
The table below summarizes non-performing assets.
Table 8 Non-Performing Assets
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Non-accrual loans |
|
$ |
259,155 |
|
|
$ |
190,723 |
|
|
$ |
67,728 |
|
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
|
259,155 |
|
|
|
190,723 |
|
|
|
67,728 |
|
Other real estate owned (OREO) |
|
|
75,383 |
|
|
|
59,768 |
|
|
|
22,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
334,538 |
|
|
$ |
250,491 |
|
|
$ |
89,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans as a percentage of total loans |
|
|
4.60 |
% |
|
|
3.34 |
% |
|
|
1.13 |
% |
Non-performing assets as a percentage of total loans and OREO |
|
|
5.86 |
|
|
|
4.35 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
|
Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets |
|
|
4.11 |
|
|
|
2.94 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
Non-performing loans totaled $259.2 million, compared with $190.7 million at December 31, 2008
and $67.7 million at March 31, 2008. The ratio of non-performing loans to total loans increased
substantially from March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2008 reflecting continued deterioration in
Uniteds residential construction and development portfolio primarily in the Atlanta MSA.
Non-performing assets, which include non-performing loans and foreclosed real estate, totaled
$334.5 million at March 31, 2009, compared with $250.5 million at December 31, 2008 and $89.9
million at March 31, 2008. Uniteds position throughout the recession has been to actively and
aggressively work to dispose of problem assets quickly. In the latter half of 2008, with the
rising number of foreclosed properties saturating the market and driving prices down, United made a
strategic decision to hold certain foreclosed properties that have strong prospects for a recovery
in value upon market stabilization. By holding those properties, United expects to realize more
value upon disposition, thereby maximizing returns to shareholders. The strategy to hold selected
properties will result in elevated levels of nonperforming assets over the next few quarters.
Uniteds policy is to classify loans as non-accrual when, in the opinion of management, the
principal and interest on a loan is not likely to be repaid in accordance with the loan terms or
when the loan becomes 90 days past due and is not well secured and in the process of collection.
When a loan is classified on non-accrual status, interest previously accrued but not collected is
reversed against current interest revenue. Payments received on a non-accrual loan are applied to
reduce outstanding principal.
At March 31, 2009 and 2008 there were $200.9 million and $64.5 million, respectively, of loans
classified as impaired under the definition outlined in SFAS No. 114 Accounting By Creditors For
Impairment of a Loan. Of these, $136.2 million and $8.0 million, respectively, did not have a
specific reserve allocated. At March 31, 2009, $64.7 million had specific reserves allocated
totaling $22.6 million. At March 31, 2008, $56.4 million had specific reserves allocated totaling
$12.0 million. The average recorded investment in impaired loans for the quarters ended March 31,
2009 and 2008 was $206.0 million and $38.8 million, respectively. There was no interest revenue
recognized on loans while they were impaired for the first three months of 2009.
Investment Securities
The composition of the investment securities portfolio reflects Uniteds investment strategy
of maintaining an appropriate level of liquidity while providing a relatively stable source of
revenue. The investment securities portfolio also provides a balance to interest rate risk and
credit risk in other categories of the balance sheet while providing a vehicle for the investment
of available funds, furnishing liquidity, and supplying securities to pledge as required collateral
for certain deposits.
Total investment securities available for sale at quarter-end increased $210.6 million from a
year ago. The investment portfolio is used as a supplemental tool to stabilize interest rate
sensitivity and increase net interest revenue. At March 31, 2009 and 2008, the securities
portfolio represented approximately 21% and 18% of total assets, respectively.
The investment securities portfolio primarily consists of U.S. Government sponsored agency
mortgage-backed securities, non-agency mortgage-backed securities, U.S. Government agency
securities, and municipal securities. Mortgage-backed securities rely on the underlying pools of
mortgage loans to provide a cash flow of principal and interest. The actual maturities of these
securities will differ from contractual maturities because loans underlying the securities can
prepay. Decreases in interest rates will generally cause an acceleration of prepayment levels. In
a declining interest rate environment, United may not be able to reinvest the proceeds from these
prepayments in assets that have comparable yields. In a rising rate environment, the opposite
occurs. Prepayments tend to slow and the weighted average life extends. This is referred to as
extension risk which can lead to lower levels of liquidity due to the delay of cash receipts and
can result in the holding of a below market yielding asset for a longer time period.
25
Deposits
Total deposits as of March 31, 2009 were $6.6 billion, an increase of $441 million, or 7%,
from March 31, 2008. Total non-interest-bearing demand deposit accounts of $665 million decreased
$25 million, or 4%, and NOW, money market and savings accounts of $2.0 billion decreased $181
million, or 8%. Management believes the decreases were primarily caused by seasonal timing, the
slowdown in the local economy and the resultant increase in the use of funds by Uniteds customers
because average balances per account have declined over the past year. Since December 31, 2008,
United has seen increases in balances of non-interest bearing-demand, NOW (excluding public funds),
money market and savings balances as a result of internal efforts to raise core deposits.
Total time deposits, excluding brokered deposits, as of March 31, 2009 were $3.3 billion, an
increase of $351 million, or 12%, from March 31, 2008. Time deposits less than $100,000 totaled
$1.9 billion, an increase of $376 million, or 24%, from a year ago. Time deposits of $100,000 and
greater totaled $1.4 billion as of March 31, 2009, a decrease of $25 million, or 2%, from March 31,
2008. During the second quarter of 2008, United made a decision to actively pursue time deposits
by offering a 15 month certificate of deposit at an attractive rate, in order to increase
liquidity. The program was successful in adding over $400 million of customer deposits. United
also takes advantage of brokered time deposits, issued in certificates of less than $100,000, as
an alternate source of cost-effective funding. Brokered time deposits as of March 31, 2009 were
$727 million, compared with $432 million at March 31, 2008.
Wholesale Funding
The Bank is a shareholder in a Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of Atlanta. Through this
affiliation, FHLB secured advances totaled $260 million and $615 million as of March 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively. This decline was the result of a successful CD program during the second
quarter of 2008 and use of brokered deposits in order to keep collateral available for liquidity
purposes. United anticipates continued use of this short- and long-term source of funds. FHLB
advances outstanding at March 31, 2009 had both fixed and floating interest rates from 0% to 4.49%.
Additional information regarding FHLB advances, is provided in Note 10 to the consolidated
financial statements included in Uniteds 2008 Form 10-K.
At March 31, 2009, United had $159 million in Federal funds purchased, repurchase agreements,
and other short-term borrowings outstanding, compared to $533 million outstanding at March 31,
2008. United takes advantage of these additional sources of liquidity when rates are favorable
compared to other forms of short-term borrowings, such as FHLB advances and brokered deposits.
Interest Rate Sensitivity Management
The absolute level and volatility of interest rates can have a significant effect on Uniteds
profitability. The objective of interest rate risk management is to identify and manage the
sensitivity of net interest revenue to changing interest rates, in order to achieve Uniteds
overall financial goals. Based on economic conditions, asset quality and various other
considerations, management establishes tolerance ranges for interest rate sensitivity and manages
within these ranges.
Net interest revenue is influenced by changes in the level of interest rates. United manages
its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates through policies established by the Asset/Liability
Management Committee (ALCO). ALCO meets regularly and has responsibility for approving
asset/liability management policies, formulating and implementing strategies to improve balance
sheet positioning and/or earnings, and reviewing Uniteds interest rate sensitivity.
One of the tools management uses to estimate the sensitivity of net interest revenue to
changes in interest rates is an interest rate simulation model. Such estimates are based upon a
number of assumptions for each scenario, including maintaining current balance sheet levels,
deposit repricing characteristics and the rate of prepayments. The simulation model measures the
potential change in net interest revenue over a twelve-month period under multiple interest rate
scenarios. The base scenario assumes rates remain flat over the next twelve months and is the
scenario to which all others are compared to in order to measure the change in net interest
revenue. A second commonly analyzed scenario is a most likely scenario that projects the most
likely change in rates over the next twelve months based on the slope of the yield curve. Other
scenarios analyzed may include rate shocks, narrowing or widening spreads, and yield curve
steepening or flattening.
Uniteds policy is based on the 12-month impact on net interest revenue of interest rate ramps
that increase 200 basis points and decrease 200 basis points from the flat-rate scenario. In the
ramp scenarios, rates change 25 basis points per month over the initial eight months. The policy
limits the change in net interest revenue over the next 12 months to a 10% decrease in either
scenario. Historically low rates on March 31, 2009 made use of the down 200 basis point scenario
problematic. At March 31, 2009 Uniteds simulation model indicated that a 200 basis point increase
in rates over the next twelve months would cause an approximate 3.2% decrease in net interest
revenue and a 25 basis point decrease in rates over the next twelve months would cause an
approximate .8% increase in net interest revenue. The shift to a liability sensitive position is
primarily due to the inclusion of floors in most new floating rate loans which causes the balance
sheet to be liability sensitive for the first 200 basis point increase in rates.
In order to manage its interest rate sensitivity, United uses off-balance sheet contracts that
are considered derivative financial instruments. Derivative financial instruments can be a cost and
capital effective means of modifying the repricing characteristics of on-balance sheet assets and
liabilities. At March 31, 2009, United was a party to interest rate swap contracts under which it
pays a
variable rate and receives a fixed rate, and interest rate floor contracts in which United pays a
premium to a counterparty who agrees to pay United the difference between a variable rate and a
strike rate if the variable rate falls below the strike rate.
26
The following table presents the interest rate derivative contracts outstanding.
Table 9 Derivative Financial Instruments
As of March 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Fair |
|
Type/Maturity |
|
Amount |
|
|
Received |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Value (5) |
|
Fair Value Hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIBOR Swaps (Brokered CDs) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 27, 2010 (1) |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
|
4.30 |
% |
|
|
1.60 |
% |
|
$ |
1,596 |
|
September 22, 2010 (2) |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
4.25 |
|
|
|
1.77 |
|
|
|
1,492 |
|
September 30, 2010 (1) |
|
|
95,000 |
|
|
|
4.25 |
|
|
|
1.60 |
|
|
|
3,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Value Hedges: |
|
|
195,000 |
|
|
|
4.26 |
|
|
|
1.64 |
|
|
|
6,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime Swaps (Prime Loans) (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 4, 2009 |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
8.29 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
June 9, 2010 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
5.82 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
2,894 |
|
June 11, 2010 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
8.26 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
1,456 |
|
June 13, 2011 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
6.72 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
1,605 |
|
December 12, 2011 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
6.86 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
1,913 |
|
January 2, 2012 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
6.71 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
7,277 |
|
March 12, 2012 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
6.87 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
4,028 |
|
March 27, 2012 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
6.76 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
3,896 |
|
March 27, 2012 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
6.72 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
3,705 |
|
January 31, 2013 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
6.26 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
3,355 |
|
May 6, 2013 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
7.21 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
5,324 |
|
July 22, 2013 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
6.88 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
9,295 |
|
July 25, 2013 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
6.92 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
4,880 |
|
July 25, 2013 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
6.91 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
2,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: |
|
|
730,000 |
|
|
|
6.77 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
52,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime Floors (Prime Loans) (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2009 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
8.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148 |
|
November 1, 2009 |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
8.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,483 |
|
February 4, 2010 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
8.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,702 |
|
August 1, 2010 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
8.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,579 |
|
August 4, 2010 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
8.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash Flow Hedges: |
|
|
1,030,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Derivative Contracts |
|
$ |
1,225,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
72,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Rate Paid equals 1-Month LIBOR plus 1.075 |
|
(2) |
|
Rate Paid equals 1-Month LIBOR plus 1.2435 |
|
(3) |
|
Rate Paid equals Prime rate as of March 31, 2009 |
|
(4) |
|
Floor contracts receive cash payments equal to the floor rate less the prime rate |
|
(5) |
|
Excludes accrued interest |
Uniteds derivative financial instruments are classified as either cash flow or fair value
hedges. The change in fair value of cash flow hedges is recognized in other comprehensive income.
Fair value hedges recognize currently in earnings both the effect of
the change in the fair value of the derivative financial instrument and the offsetting effect of
the change in fair value of the hedged asset or liability associated with the particular risk of
that asset or liability being hedged. At March 31, 2009, United had interest rate swap contracts
with a total notional amount of $730 million that were designated as cash flow hedges of
prime-based loans. United had interest rate floor contracts with a total notional of $300 million
and a remaining unamortized premium balance of $2.4 million that were also designated as cash flow
hedges of prime-based loans. United also had receive fixed, pay LIBOR swap contracts with a total
notional of $195 million that were accounted for as fair value hedges of brokered deposits.
27
Uniteds policy requires all derivative financial instruments be used only for asset/liability
management through the hedging of specific transactions or positions, and not for trading or
speculative purposes. Management believes that the risk associated with using derivative financial
instruments to mitigate interest rate risk sensitivity is minimal and should not have any material
unintended effect on the financial condition or results of operations. In order to mitigate
potential credit risk, from time to time United may require the counterparties to derivative
contracts to pledge securities as collateral to cover the net exposure.
Liquidity Management
The objective of liquidity management is to ensure that sufficient funding is available, at
reasonable cost, to meet the ongoing operational cash needs and to take advantage of revenue
producing opportunities as they arise. While the desired level of liquidity will vary depending
upon a variety of factors, it is the primary goal of United to maintain a sufficient level of
liquidity in all expected economic environments. Liquidity is defined as the ability to convert
assets into cash or cash equivalents without significant loss and to raise additional funds by
increasing liabilities. Liquidity management involves maintaining Uniteds ability to meet the
daily cash flow requirements of the Banks customers, both depositors and borrowers.
Two key objectives of asset/liability management are to provide for adequate liquidity in
order to meet the needs of customers and to maintain an optimal balance between interest-sensitive
assets and interest-sensitive liabilities to optimize net interest revenue. Daily monitoring of
the sources and uses of funds is necessary to maintain a position that meets both requirements.
The asset portion of the balance sheet provides liquidity primarily through loan principal
repayments and the maturities and sales of securities. Mortgage loans held for sale totaled $43
million at March 31, 2009, and typically turn over every 45 days as the closed loans are sold to
investors in the secondary market.
The liability section of the balance sheet provides liquidity through interest-bearing and
noninterest-bearing deposit accounts. Federal funds purchased, Federal Reserve short-term
borrowings, FHLB advances and securities sold under agreements to repurchase are additional sources
of liquidity and represent Uniteds incremental borrowing capacity. These sources of liquidity are
generally short-term in nature and are used as necessary to fund asset growth and meet other
short-term liquidity needs.
United had sufficient qualifying collateral to increase FHLB advances by $1.0 billion at March
31, 2009. Uniteds internal policy limits brokered deposits to 25% of total assets. At March 31,
2009, United had the capacity to increase brokered deposits by $1.3 billion and still remain within
this limit. Also, United had sufficient qualifying assets pledged to the Federal Reserve under the
Term Auction Facility, Term Investment Option and Discount Window to increase short-term borrowings
by $471 million.
As disclosed in Uniteds consolidated statement of cash flows, net cash provided by operating
activities was $52.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The net loss of $103.8
million for the quarter included non-cash expenses for provision for loan losses of $65 million and
goodwill impairment of $70 million. Also included in cash provided from operating activities was a
$49.6 million net increase in accrued expenses other liabilities that primarily related to a
federal tax refund received in the first quarter and cash collateral received from counterparties
to derivatives contracts. This was offset by a net increase in mortgage loans held for sale of
$22.8 million and a net increase in other assets of $9.3 million. Net cash used by investing
activities of $99.2 million consisted primarily of purchases of securities of $297.6 million, a net
increase in loans of $9.9 million and purchases of premises and equipment of $2.8 million, which
were partially offset by proceeds from sales of securities of $14.2 million, maturities and calls
of investment securities of $174.2 million, and proceeds from sales of other real estate of $22.6
million. Net cash used by financing activities of $312.3 million consisted primarily of a net
decrease of $386.3 million in deposits. This was offset by a $50.3 million increase in federal
funds and other short-term borrowings and a net increase of $25 million in Federal Home Loan Bank
advances.
Capital Resources and Dividends
Shareholders equity at March 31, 2009 was $888.9 million, a decrease of $100.5 million from
December 31, 2008. The non-cash goodwill impairment charge accounted for $70 million of the
decrease. Accumulated other comprehensive income is not included in the calculation of regulatory
capital adequacy ratios. Excluding the change in the accumulated other comprehensive income,
shareholders equity decreased $104.5 million from December 31, 2008. The decrease in equity is
primarily due to the $103.8 million net loss for the first quarter which included the $70 million
goodwill impairment charge. In order to preserve capital, Uniteds board of directors declared a 1
for 130 stock dividend during the first quarter of 2009 in lieu of a cash dividend on the
outstanding common shares. United reported $2.6 million in dividends on Series A and Series B
preferred stock. United recognizes that cash dividends are an important component of shareholder
value, and therefore, intends to provide for cash dividends when earnings, capital levels and other
factors permit.
28
Uniteds common stock trades on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol UCBI.
Below is a quarterly schedule of high, low and closing stock prices and average daily volume for
2009 and 2008.
Table 10 Stock Price Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg Daily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg Daily |
|
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
Close |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
Close |
|
|
Volume |
|
First quarter |
|
$ |
13.87 |
|
|
$ |
2.28 |
|
|
$ |
4.16 |
|
|
|
524,492 |
|
|
$ |
20.80 |
|
|
$ |
13.38 |
|
|
$ |
16.98 |
|
|
|
441,659 |
|
Second quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.51 |
|
|
|
8.51 |
|
|
|
8.53 |
|
|
|
464,566 |
|
Third quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.05 |
|
|
|
7.58 |
|
|
|
13.26 |
|
|
|
359,971 |
|
Fourth quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.82 |
|
|
|
9.25 |
|
|
|
13.58 |
|
|
|
319,534 |
|
The following table presents the quarterly cash and stock dividends declared in 2009 and 2008
and the respective cash dividend payout ratios as a percentage of basic operating earnings per
share.
Table 11 Dividend Payout Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Payout |
|
|
Cash |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Payout |
|
|
|
Dividend |
|
|
Dividend |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Dividend |
|
|
Dividend |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter |
|
$ |
|
|
|
1 for 130 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
$ |
.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
% |
Second quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
Third quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 for 130 |
|
|
NA |
|
Fourth quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 for 130 |
|
|
NA |
|
Cash dividends are presented as the dollar amount declared per share.
Stock dividends are presented as the number of new shares issued for shares already owned.
The payout ratio is presented for cash dividends only.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System has issued guidelines for the
implementation of risk-based capital requirements by U.S. banks and bank holding companies. These
risk-based capital guidelines take into consideration risk factors, as defined by regulators,
associated with various categories of assets, both on and off-balance sheet. Under the guidelines,
capital strength is measured in two tiers that are used in conjunction with risk-adjusted assets to
determine the risk based capital ratios. The guidelines require an 8% total risk-based capital
ratio, of which 4% must be Tier I capital. To be considered well-capitalized under the guidelines,
a 10% total risk-based capital ratio is required, of which 6% must be Tier I capital.
A minimum leverage ratio is required in addition to the risk-based capital standards and is
defined as Tier I capital divided by average assets adjusted for goodwill and deposit-based
intangibles. Although a minimum leverage ratio of 3% is required for the highest-rated bank
holding companies which are not undertaking significant expansion programs, the Federal Reserve
Board requires a bank holding company to maintain a leverage ratio greater than 3% if it is
experiencing or anticipating significant growth or is operating with less than well-diversified
risks in the opinion of the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board uses the leverage and
risk-based capital ratios to assess capital adequacy of banks and bank holding companies.
29
The following table shows Uniteds capital ratios, as calculated under regulatory guidelines,
at March 31, 2009 and 2008.
Table 12 Capital Ratios
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
Regulatory |
|
|
Actual |
|
|
Regulatory |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Minimum |
|
Tier I Leverage: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
$ |
637,727 |
|
|
$ |
242,040 |
|
|
$ |
555,126 |
|
|
$ |
239,641 |
|
Ratio |
|
|
7.90 |
% |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
6.95 |
% |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I Risk-Based: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
$ |
637,727 |
|
|
$ |
234,473 |
|
|
$ |
555,126 |
|
|
$ |
252,806 |
|
Ratio |
|
|
10.88 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
8.78 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Risk-Based: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
$ |
795,772 |
|
|
$ |
468,946 |
|
|
$ |
694,462 |
|
|
$ |
505,613 |
|
Ratio |
|
|
13.58 |
% |
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
10.99 |
% |
|
|
8.00 |
% |
Uniteds Tier I capital excludes other comprehensive income, and consists of stockholders
equity and qualifying capital securities, less goodwill and deposit-based intangibles. Tier II
capital components include supplemental capital items such as a qualifying allowance for loan
losses and qualifying subordinated debt. Tier I capital plus Tier II capital components is
referred to as Total Risk-Based capital.
The capital ratios of United and the Banks currently exceed the minimum ratios as defined by
federal regulators. United monitors these ratios to ensure that United and the Banks remain above
regulatory minimum guidelines.
Effect of Inflation and Changing Prices
A banks asset and liability structure is substantially different from that of an industrial
firm in that primarily all assets and liabilities of a bank are monetary in nature with relatively
little investment in fixed assets or inventories. Inflation has an important effect on the growth
of total assets and the resulting need to increase equity capital at higher than normal rates in
order to maintain an appropriate equity to assets ratio.
Uniteds management believes the effect of inflation on financial results depends on Uniteds
ability to react to changes in interest rates, and by such reaction, reduce the inflationary effect
on performance. United has an asset/liability management program to manage interest rate
sensitivity. In addition, periodic reviews of banking services and products are conducted to
adjust pricing in view of current and expected costs.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
There have been no material changes in Uniteds quantitative and qualitative disclosures about
market risk as of March 31, 2009 from that presented in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008. The interest rate sensitivity position at March 31, 2009 is included in
managements discussion and analysis on page 26 of this report.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Uniteds management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
supervised and participated in an evaluation of the companys disclosure controls and procedures as
of March 31, 2009. Based on, and as of the date of that evaluation, Uniteds Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were
effective in accumulating and communicating information to management, including the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosures of that information under the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and
forms and that the disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that the information
required to be disclosed in reports that are filed or submitted by United under the Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities
and Exchange Commissions rules and forms.
There were no significant changes in the internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.
30
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In the ordinary course of operations, United and the Bank are defendants in various legal
proceedings. In the opinion of management, there is no pending or threatened proceeding in which
an adverse decision could result in a material adverse change in the consolidated financial
condition or results of operations of United.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in Uniteds
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds None
Item 3.
Defaults upon Senior Securities None
Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders None
Item 5.
Other Information None
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation of United Community Banks, Inc.,
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to United Community
Banks, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2001, File No. 0-21656, filed with the Commission on August
14, 2001). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Amendment to the Restated Articles of Incorporation of United
Community Banks, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 3.3 to United Community Banks, Inc.s Registration Statement
on Form S-4, File No. 333-118893, filed with the Commission on
September 9, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of United Community Banks, Inc., dated
September 12, 1997 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1
to United Community Banks, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the
year ended December 31, 1997, File No. 0-21656, filed with the
Commission on March 27, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
See Exhibits 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 for provisions of the Restated Articles
of Incorporation, as amended, and Amended and Restated Bylaws, which
define the rights of the Shareholders. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification by Jimmy C. Tallent, President and Chief Executive
Officer of United Community Banks, Inc., as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification by Rex S. Schuette, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of United Community Banks, Inc., as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED COMMUNITY BANKS, INC.
|
|
|
/s/ Jimmy C. Tallent
|
|
|
Jimmy C. Tallent |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Rex S. Schuette
|
|
|
Rex S. Schuette |
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Alan H. Kumler
|
|
|
Alan H. Kumler |
|
|
Senior Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: May 7, 2009 |
|
32
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
See Exhibits 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 for provisions of the Restated Articles
of Incorporation, as amended, and Amended and Restated Bylaws, which
define the rights of the Shareholders. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification by Jimmy C. Tallent, President and Chief Executive
Officer of United Community Banks, Inc., as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification by Rex S. Schuette, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of United Community Banks, Inc., as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
33