Form 10-Q
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

 

Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2018

 

Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from                  to                                  

Commission File No. 001-31791

 

 

GALECTIN THERAPEUTICS INC.

 

 

 

Nevada   04-3562325

(State or other jurisdiction

of incorporation)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

4960 Peachtree Industrial Blvd.,

Suite 240, Norcross, GA

  30071
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)   (Zip Code)

(678) 620-3186

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    ☒  Yes    ☐  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.05 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    ☒  Yes    ☐  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large Accelerated Filer      Accelerated Filer  
Non-Accelerated Filer   ☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller reporting company  
Emerging growth company       

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ☐  Yes    ☒  No

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of May 8, 2018 was 37,740,647.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

GALECTIN THERAPEUTICS INC.

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2018

 

         PAGE  
    PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION       

ITEM 1.

 

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

  
 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March  31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 (unaudited)

     3  
 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 (unaudited)

     4  
 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 (unaudited)

     5  
 

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

     6  

ITEM 2.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     11  

ITEM 3.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

     18  

ITEM 4.

 

Controls and Procedures

     18  
    PART II — OTHER INFORMATION       

ITEM 1.

 

Legal Proceedings

     19  

ITEM 1A.

 

Risk Factors

     19  

ITEM 2.

 

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

     19  

ITEM 3.

 

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

     19  

ITEM 4.

 

Mine Safety Disclosures

     19  

ITEM 5.

 

Other Information

     19  

ITEM 6.

 

Exhibits

     19  

SIGNATURES

     20  

 

2


Table of Contents

GALECTIN THERAPEUTICS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

 

     March 31,
2018
    December 31,
2017
 
     (in thousands)  

ASSETS

    

Current assets:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 3,988     $ 3,053  

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     685       766  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

     4,673       3,819  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other

     258       342  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 4,931     $ 4,161  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

    

Current liabilities:

    

Accounts payable

   $ 1,151     $ 608  

Accrued expenses

     1,132       2,292  

Accrued dividends payable

     —         68  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     2,283       2,968  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     2,283       2,968  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)

    

Series C super dividend convertible preferred stock; 1,000 shares authorized, 176 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, redemption value: $7,957,000, liquidation value: $1,760,000 at March 31, 2018

     1,723       1,723  

Stockholders’ equity (deficit):

    

Undesignated stock, $0.01 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized, 20,000,000 designated at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively

     —         —    

Series A 12% convertible preferred stock; 1,742,500 shares authorized, 1,377,500 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, liquidation value $1,377,500 at March 31, 2018

     557       557  

Series B-1 12% convertible preferred stock; 900,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, liquidation value $1,800,000 at March 31, 2018

     1,761       1,761  

Series B-2 12% convertible preferred stock; 2,100,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, liquidation value $4,200,000 at March 31, 2018

     3,697       3,697  

Series B-3 8% convertible preferred stock; 2,508,000 shares authorized, 2,508,000 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, liquidation value $2,508,000 at March 31, 2018

     1,224       1,224  

Common stock, $0.001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, 37,645,971 and 35,789,388 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively

     38       36  

Additional paid-in capital

     179,359       173,363  

Retained deficit

     (185,711     (181,168
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity(deficit)

     925       (530
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders’ equity(deficit)

   $ 4,931     $ 4,161  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

GALECTIN THERAPEUTICS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
     2018     2017  
     (in thousands, except per share data)  

Operating expenses:

    

Research and development

   $ 2,298     $ 3,772  

General and administrative

     1,880       1,174  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

     4,178       4,946  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating loss

     (4,178     (4,946
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other income (expense):

    

Interest income

     4       9  

Interest expense

     (84     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other income (expense)

     (80     9  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net loss

   $ (4,258   $ (4,937
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Preferred stock dividends

     (285     (272
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net loss applicable to common stockholders

   $ (4,543   $ (5,209
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net loss per common share — basic and diluted

   $ (0.12   $ (0.15

Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic and diluted

     37,284       33,928  

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

GALECTIN THERAPEUTICS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
     2018     2017  
     (in thousands)  

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

    

Net loss

   $ (4,258   $ (4,937

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

     —         1  

Stock-based compensation expense

     1,187       330  

Issuance of common stock for services

     7       14  

Non-cash interest expense

     84       —    

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

    

Prepaid expenses and other assets

     81       79  

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

     (617     650  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in operating activities

     (3,516     (3,863
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

    

Net proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants

     4,451       2,145  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

     4,451       2,145  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

     935       (1,718

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

     3,053       15,362  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD

   $ 3,988     $ 13,644  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

NONCASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

    

Payment of preferred stock dividends in common stock

   $ 353     $ 339  

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

GALECTIN THERAPEUTICS INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Basis of Presentation

Galectin Therapeutics Inc. (the “Company”) is a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company that is applying its leadership in galectin science and drug development to create new therapies for fibrotic disease, skin diseases and cancer. These candidates are based on the Company’s targeting of galectin proteins which are key mediators of biologic and pathologic function. These compounds also may have application for drugs to treat other diseases and chronic health conditions.

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as reported in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company as of March 31, 2018 and the results of its operations for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 and its cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017. All adjustments made to the interim financial statements include all those of a normal and recurring nature. Amounts presented in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017 are derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements as of that date, but do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. The Company considers events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued to provide additional evidence relative to certain estimates or to identify matters that require additional disclosure. Subsequent events have been evaluated through the date these financial statements are available to be issued. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the full year. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company should be read in conjunction with its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

The Company has operated at a loss since its inception and has had no significant revenues. The Company anticipates that losses will continue for the foreseeable future. At March 31, 2018, the Company had $4.0 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents available to fund future operations. The Company believes there is sufficient cash, including availability of the line of credit (discussed in Note 3 below), to fund currently planned operations at least through March 31, 2019. The Company’s ability to fund operations after its current cash resources are exhausted depends on its ability to obtain additional financing or achieve profitable operations, as to which no assurances can be given. Accordingly, based on the forecasts and estimates underlying the Company’s current operating plan, the financial statements do not currently include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

The Company was founded in July 2000, was incorporated in the State of Nevada in January 2001 under the name “Pro-Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,” and changed its name to “Galectin Therapeutics Inc.” on May 26, 2011.

2. Accrued Expenses

Accrued expenses consist of the following:

 

     March 31,
2018
     December 31,
2017
 
     (in thousands)  

Legal and accounting fees

   $ 51      $ 74  

Accrued compensation

     314        790  

Accrued research and development costs and other

     767        1,428  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 1,132      $ 2,292  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

3. Line of Credit

On December 19, 2017, the Company entered into a $10 million Line of Credit arrangement with Richard E. Uihlein, a director and shareholder who has an approximate 7% ownership interest in the Company on a fully-diluted basis at December 31, 2017. Borrowings may be made by the Company through December 31, 2018. Borrowings bear interest at the Applicable Federal Rate for short term loans published by the Internal Revenue Service (1.51% on December 19, 2017). All borrowings and interest are due on December 31, 2019 but may be prepaid without penalty. In connection with the Line of Credit agreement, the Company issued to Mr. Uihlein warrants to purchase 1 million shares of the Company’s common stock for $5 per share. Half of the warrants vested at closing of the Line of Credit and the other half vest ratably with borrowings under the agreement. There have been no borrowings under the Line of Credit through March 31, 2018.

 

6


Table of Contents

The fair value of the 500,000 warrants vested at closing was $696,000 at the date of issuance based on the following assumptions: an expected life of 7 years, volatility of 98%, risk free interest rate of 2.05% and zero dividends. The fair value of the vested warrants was recorded in other current assets and other assets (non-current) as a deferred financing cost and will be amortized on a straight-line basis from December 19, 2017 through December 31, 2019. Amortization for the three months ended March 31, 2018 of $84,000 was recorded as interest expense. The fair value of warrants that vest in the future based on borrowings will be computed when those borrowings occur and amortized over the remaining period through December 31, 2019.

4. Stock-Based Compensation

Following is the stock-based compensation expense related to common stock options, common stock, restricted common stock and common stock warrants:

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
     2018      2017  

Research and development

   $ 534      $ 166  

General and administrative

     653        164  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total stock-based compensation expense

   $ 1,187      $ 330  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table summarizes the stock option activity in the Company’s equity incentive plans, including non-plan grants to Company executives, from December 31, 2017 through March 31, 2018:

 

     Shares      Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 

Outstanding, December 31, 2017

     5,155,263      $ 4.11  

Granted

     460,000      5.87

Exercised

     —          —    

Options forfeited/cancelled

     —          —    
  

 

 

    

Outstanding, March 31, 2018

     5,615,263      $ 4.26  
  

 

 

    

As of March 31, 2018, there was $1,972,000 of unrecognized compensation related to 951,181 unvested options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted–average period of approximately 0.75 years. The weighted-average grant date fair value for options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2018 was $4.57. The Company granted 460,000 stock options during the three months ended March 31, 2018, of which 115,000 options vested upon grant with the remaining 345,000 options vesting over the remainder of 2018. Approximately $526,000 of non-cash, stock-based compensation expense was recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2018 related to the options granted during the quarter that vested upon the grant date.

The fair value of all other options granted is determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The following weighted average assumptions were used:

 

     Three
Months Ended
March 31,
    Three
Months Ended
March 31,
 
     2018     2017  

Risk-free interest rate

     2.18 %     —    

Expected life of the options

     5 years     —    

Expected volatility of the underlying stock

     103 %     —    

Expected dividend rate

     0 %     —    

 

7


Table of Contents

5. Common Stock Warrants

The following table summarizes the common stock warrant activity from December 31, 2017 through March 31, 2018:

 

     Shares      Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 

Outstanding, December 31, 2017

     13,229,778      $ 3.35  

Granted

     163        5.23  

Exercised

     (1,780,478      2.50

Forfeited/cancelled

     —          —    
  

 

 

    

Outstanding, March 31, 2018

     11,449,463      $ 3.48  
  

 

 

    

6. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company has certain financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value. Fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize observable data such as quoted prices in active markets. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize data points other than quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs utilize unobservable data points in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. The carrying amounts reflected in the consolidated balance sheets for cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their carrying value due to their short-term nature. There were no level 2 or level 3 assets or liabilities at March 31, 2018 or December 31, 2017.

7. Loss Per Share

Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares and other potential common shares then outstanding. Potential common shares consist of common shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of in-the-money stock options and warrants and potential common shares related to the conversion of the preferred stock. The computation of diluted net loss per share does not assume the issuance of common shares that have an anti-dilutive effect on net loss per share.

Dilutive shares which could exist pursuant to the exercise of outstanding stock instruments and which were not included in the calculation because their affect would have been anti-dilutive are as follows:

 

     March 31, 2018
(shares)
     March 31, 2017
(shares)
 

Warrants to purchase shares of common stock

     11,449,463        12,249,016  

Options to purchase shares of common stock

     5,615,263        4,656,888  

Shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of preferred stock

     4,312,282        4,312,282  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
     21,377,008        21,218,186  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

8. Common Stock

2014 At Market Issuance of Common Stock

On March 30, 2014, the Company entered into an At Market Issuance Sales Agreement (the “2014 At Market Agreement”) with a sales agent under which the Company may issue and sell shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $30.0 million from time to time through the sales agent. Sales of the Company’s common stock through the sales agent, if any, will be made by any method that is deemed an “at the market” offering as defined by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company will pay to the sales agent a commission rate equal to 3.0% of the gross proceeds from the sale of any shares of common stock sold through the sales agent under the 2014 At Market Agreement. In three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company issued 1,496,797 shares of common stock for net proceeds of approximately $1,945,000 under the 2014 At Market Agreement. The 2014 At Market Agreement expired in March 2017.

 

8


Table of Contents

2017 At Market Issuance of Common Stock

On May 19, 2017, the Company entered into an At Market Issuance Sales Agreement (the “2017 At Market Agreement”) with a sales agent under which the Company may issue and sell shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $30.0 million from time to time through the sales agent. Sales of the Company’s common stock through the sales agent, if any, will be made by any method that is deemed an “at the market” offering as defined by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company will pay to the sales agent a commission rate equal to 3.0% of the gross proceeds from the sale of any shares of common stock sold through the sales agent under the 2017 At Market Agreement. During the three months ended March 31, 2018, there were no issuances of common stock under the 2017 At Market Agreement.

2017 Private Placement

On February 28, 2017, the Company closed a transaction with five individual investors through a private placement of common stock and warrants. In total, the Company issued 102,368 shares of common stock for proceeds of $200,000. The Company also issued, to the five investors, warrants to purchase 76,776 shares of common stock at $5.00 per share. The warrants have an expiration date of February 28, 2024. The exercise price of each warrant is adjustable in the event of a stock split or stock combination, capital reorganization, merger or similar event. The warrants were valued at approximately $101,000 as of the date of issuance, using the closing price of $1.86, a life of 7 years, a volatility of 97% and a risk free interest rate of 1.92%. Based upon the Company’s analysis of the criteria contained in ASC Topic 815-40, “Derivatives and Hedging — Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity” the Company has determined that warrants issued in connection with this financing transaction were not derivative liabilities and therefore, were recorded as additional paid-in capital.

Other

In 2018, the Company entered an agreement with a vendor whereby the Company will issue common stock to vendor in lieu of paying in cash in amount up to $100,000 for the year. For the three months ended March 31, 2018, the Company has issued 1,629 shares of common stock and 163 warrants to purchase shares of common stock pursuant to this agreement and the value of such shares has been recorded as research and development expense.

For the three months ended March 31, 2018, the Company has issued a total of 74,476 shares of common stock for dividends on Series A, Series B and Series C Preferred Stock.

9. Commitments and Contingencies

Shareholder Class Actions and Derivative Lawsuits

As previously reported, during August 2014, persons claiming to be Galectin shareholders filed putative shareholder derivative complaints seeking recovery on behalf of the Company against certain of the Company’s directors and officers in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada (the “Federal Action”) and in in state court in Las Vegas, Nevada (the “State Action” and, together with the Federal Action, the “Derivative Actions”). The complaints in the Derivative Actions alleged that certain current and former Galectin directors and/or officers breached fiduciary duties to the Company, committed waste of corporate assets, and/or were unjustly enriched. The complaint in the Federal Action also alleged claims under the federal securities laws. The Federal Action was dismissed with prejudice by order and judgment dated December 30, 2015. Although the plaintiffs in the Federal Action filed a notice of appeal, that appeal was subsequently dismissed. The State Action was dismissed with prejudice by order docketed on June 21, 2016. The dismissal of the State Action with prejudice was affirmed on appeal by the Nevada Supreme Court by opinion entered on April 5, 2018.

As also previously reported, in September 2016, the Board received a demand letter from one of the plaintiffs in the Federal Action requesting, among other things, that the Board investigate the conduct alleged in the complaint in the Federal Action and implement certain remedial measures purportedly designed to address the alleged conduct. Now that all of the shareholder litigation to which the subject matter of the demand letter relates has been resolved, the Board expects to complete its evaluation of the demand letter.

 

9


Table of Contents

Other Legal Proceedings

The Company records accruals for such contingencies to the extent that the Company concludes that their occurrence is probable and the related damages are estimable. There are no other significant pending legal proceedings except as noted above.

10. Galectin Sciences LLC

In January 2014, we created Galectin Sciences, LLC (the “LLC” or “Investee”), a collaborative joint venture co-owned by SBH Sciences, Inc. (“SBH”), to research and develop small organic molecule inhibitors of galectin-3 for oral administration. The LLC was initially capitalized with a $400,000 cash investment to fund future research and development activities, which was provided by the Company, and specific in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) contributed by SBH. The estimated fair value of the IPR&D contributed by SBH, on the date of contribution, was $400,000. Initially, the Company and SBH each had a 50% equity ownership interest in the LLC, with neither party having control over the LLC. Accordingly, from inception through the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company accounted for its investment in the LLC using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Company’s investment was initially recorded at cost with subsequent adjustments to the carrying value to recognize additional investments in or distributions from the Investee, as well as the Company’s share of the Investee’s earnings, losses and/or changes in capital. The estimated fair value of the IPR&D contributed to the LLC was immediately expensed upon contribution as there was no alternative future use available at the point of contribution. The operating agreement provides that if either party does not desire to contribute its equal share of funding required after the initial capitalization, then the other party, providing all of the funding, will have its ownership share increased in proportion to the total amount contributed from inception. In the fourth quarter of 2014, after the LLC had expended the $400,000 in cash, SBH decided not to contribute its share of the funding required. Since then, the Company has contributed a total of $1,663,000, including $23,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2018, for expenses of the LLC. Since the end of 2014, SBH has contributed $123,000 for expenses in the LLC. As of March 31, 2018, the Company’s ownership percentage in the LLC was 79.8%. The Company accounts for the interest in the LLC as a consolidated, less than wholly owned subsidiary. Because the LLC’s equity is immaterial, the value of the non-controlling interest is also deemed to be immaterial.

 

10


Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

In addition to historical information, the following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements as defined under Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is subject to the safe harbor created therein for forward-looking statements. Such statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning our anticipated operating results, research and development, clinical trials, regulatory proceedings, and financial resources, and can be identified by use of words such as, for example, “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe” and “would,” “should,” “could” or “may.” All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included herein that address activities, events, or developments that the Company expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future, are forward-looking statements, including statements regarding: plans and expectations regarding clinical trials; plans and expectations regarding regulatory approvals; our strategy and expectations for clinical development and commercialization of our products; potential strategic partnerships; expectations regarding the effectiveness of our products; plans for research and development and related costs; statements about accounting assumptions and estimates; expectations regarding liquidity and the sufficiency of cash to fund currently planned operations through at least March 31, 2019; our commitments and contingencies; and our market risk exposure. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about the industry and markets in which Galectin Therapeutics operates, and management’s beliefs and assumptions. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. Such risks and uncertainties are related to and include, without limitation,

 

    our early stage of development,

 

    we have incurred significant operating losses since our inception and cannot assure you that we will generate revenue or profit,

 

    our dependence on additional outside capital,

 

    we may be unable to enter into strategic partnerships for the development, commercialization, manufacturing and distribution of our proposed product candidates,

 

    uncertainties related to any litigation,

 

    uncertainties related to our technology and clinical trials, including expected dates of availability of clinical data,

 

    we may be unable to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of our developmental product candidates in human trials,

 

    we may be unable to improve upon, protect and/or enforce our intellectual property,

 

    we are subject to extensive and costly regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and by foreign regulatory authorities, which must approve our product candidates in development and could restrict the sales and marketing and pricing of such products,

 

    competition and stock price volatility in the biotechnology industry,

 

    limited trading volume for our stock, concentration of ownership of our stock, and other risks detailed herein and from time to time in our SEC reports, and

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of Galectin Therapeutics appearing elsewhere herein.

Overview

We are a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company engaged in drug research and development to create new therapies for fibrotic disease, severe skin disease, and cancer. Our drug candidates are based on our method of targeting galectin proteins, which are key mediators of biologic and pathologic functions. We use naturally occurring, readily-available plant products as starting material in manufacturing processes to create proprietary complex carbohydrates with specific molecular weights and other pharmaceutical properties. These complex carbohydrate molecules are appropriately formulated into acceptable pharmaceutical formulations. Using these unique carbohydrate-based candidate compounds that largely bind and inhibit galectin proteins, particularly galectin-3, we are undertaking the focused pursuit of therapies for indications where galectins have a demonstrated role in the pathogenesis of a given disease. We focus on diseases with serious, life-threatening consequences to patients and those where current treatment options are limited. Our strategy is to establish and implement clinical development programs that add value to our business in the shortest period of time possible and to seek strategic partners when a program becomes advanced and requires significant additional resources.

Our lead galectin-3 inhibitor is GR-MD-02, which has been demonstrated in preclinical models to reverse liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. GR-MD-02 has the potential to treat many diseases due to galectin-3’s involvement in multiple key biological pathways such as immune cell function and immunity, cell differentiation, cell growth, and apoptosis (cell death). Galectin Therapeutics Inc. is using this inhibitor to treat advanced liver fibrosis and liver cirrhosis in NASH (non-alcoholic steatohepatitis) patients. We have

 

11


Table of Contents

completed two Phase 1 clinical studies, a Phase 2 clinical study in NASH patients with advanced fibrosis (NASH-FX) and a second Phase 2B clinical trial in NASH patients with well compensated cirrhosis. We announced, in December 2017 top line results from our Phase 2b study in NASH patients with cirrhosis (NASH-CX). NASH cirrhosis is a progressive disease, currently not treatable and ultimately may result in liver failure that has poor prognosis and no effective, approved medical therapies other than liver transplant. Galectin-3 expression is highly increased in the liver of patients with liver fibrosis and liver cirrhosis. We believe that our galectin-3 inhibitor, by reducing galectin-3 at the cellular level, ultimately showing a strong anti-fibrotic potential may provide a novel treatment for various forms of liver fibrosis.

We endeavor to leverage our scientific and product development expertise as well as established relationships with outside sources to achieve cost-effective and efficient drug development. These outside sources, amongst others, provide us with expertise in preclinical models, pharmaceutical development, toxicology, clinical trial operations, pharmaceutical manufacturing, sophisticated physical and chemical characterization, and commercial development. We also have established several collaborative scientific discovery programs with leading experts in carbohydrate chemistry and characterization. These discovery programs are generally aimed at the targeted development of new carbohydrate molecules that bind galectin proteins and offer alternative options to larger market segments in our primary disease indications. We also have established through Galectin Sciences LLC, a discovery program aimed at the targeted development of small molecules (generally, non-carbohydrate) that bind galectin proteins and may afford options for alternative means of drug delivery (e.g., oral) and as a result expand the potential uses of our galectin-3 inhibitor compounds. We are also pursuing a development pathway to clinical enhancement and commercialization for our lead compounds in immuno-oncology for cancer therapy and severe skin disease including moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and severe atopic dermatitis. However, our clinical development efforts are focused on both liver fibrosis and fatty liver disease as represented by a Phase 2 clinical trial in NASH-cirrhosis which reported top line data in December 2017. All of our proposed products are presently in development, including pre-clinical and clinical trials.

Our Drug Development Programs

Galectins are a class of proteins that are made by many cells in the body, but predominantly in cells of the immune system. As a group, these proteins are able to bind to sugar molecules that are part of other proteins, glycoproteins, in and on the cells of our body. Galectin proteins act as a kind of molecular glue, bringing together molecules that have sugars on them. Galectin proteins, in particular galectin-3, are known to be markedly increased in a number of important diseases including inflammatory diseases, scarring of organs (e.g. liver, lung, kidney, and heart) and cancers of many kinds. The increase in galectin protein promotes the disease and is detrimental to the patient. Published data substantiating the importance of galectin-3 in the fibrotic process arises from gene knockout experiments in animal studies. Mice genetically altered to eliminate the galectin-3 gene, and thus unable to produce galectin-3, are incapable of developing liver fibrosis in response to toxic insult to the liver and in fatty liver disease as well as development of fibrosis in other tissues.

We have one new proprietary chemical entity (NCE) in development, GR-MD-02, which has shown promise in preclinical and early clinical studies in treatment of fibrosis, severe skin disease, and in cancer therapy. Currently we are focusing on development of GR-MD-02 intended to be used in the treatment of liver fibrosis associated with fatty liver disease (NASH) and more specifically in NASH cirrhosis. We have also leveraged our relationships with well-known investigators to demonstrate clinical effects of GR-MD-02 in treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, severe atopic dermatitis, and in cancer therapy in combination with immune-system modifying agent(s). GR-MD-02 is a proprietary, patented compound derived from natural, readily available, plant-based starting materials, which, following chemical processing, exhibits the properties of binding to and inhibiting galectin-3 proteins. A second NCE, GM-CT-01 is a proprietary, patented compound that is made from a completely different starting source plant material and also binds and inhibits galectin proteins.

Our product pipeline is shown below:

 

Indication    Drug    Status

Fibrosis

     

NASH with Advanced Fibrosis:

NASH-CX trial and

NASH-FX trial

   GR-MD-02   

IND submitted January 2013. Results from the Phase 1 clinical trial were reported in 2014, with final results reported in January 2015. End of Phase 1 meeting held with FDA in 2014. Two Phase 2 clinical trials were designed.

 

The NASH FX trial was designed for patients with advanced fibrosis but not cirrhosis. The NASH FX trial top line data was reported in September 2016

 

The NASH CX trial, was designed for patients with well compensated cirrhosis. The NASH CX trial top line data was reported in December 2017 and additional results derived from the study were presented subsequently.

 

12


Table of Contents
Indication    Drug    Status
Lung Fibrosis    GR-MD-02    In pre-clinical development
Kidney Fibrosis    GR-MD-02    In pre-clinical development
Cardiac and Vascular Fibrosis    GR-MD-02    In pre-clinical development
   GM-CT-01    Not in active development
Cancer Immunotherapy      

Melanoma, Head, Neck Squamous Cell

Carcinoma (HNSCC)

   GR-MD-02    Investigator IND submitted in December 2013. Phase 1B study in process. A second Phase 1B study began in Q-1 2016. Investigator IND for that study submitted in September 2015. Early data was reported in February 2017 and studies with the 3rd cohort are ongoing.
Psoriasis      

Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Severe Atopic Dermatitis

   GR-MD-02    IND submitted March 2015. A phase 2a trial in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis patients began in January 2016. Interim data on the first four patients were positive and were reported in May 2016. Further positive data was reported in September 2016. Investigator initiated IND submitted for treatment of three patients with severe atopic dermatitis, with positive preliminary data presented in February 2017.

Fibrosis. GR-MD-02 is our lead product candidate for treatment of fibrotic disease. Our preclinical data show that GR-MD-02 has a significant therapeutic effect on liver fibrosis as shown in several relevant animal models. In addition, in NASH animal models, GR-MD-02 has been shown to reduce liver fat, inflammation, and ballooning degeneration or death of liver cells. Therefore, we chose GR-MD-02 as the lead candidate in a development program targeted initially at fibrotic liver disease associated with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH, or fatty liver disease). In January 2013, an Investigational New Drug (“IND”) was submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) with the goal of initiating a Phase 1 study in patients with NASH and advanced liver fibrosis to evaluate the human safety of GR-MD-02 and pharmacodynamics biomarkers of disease. On March 1, 2013, the FDA indicated we could proceed with a US Phase 1 clinical trial for GR-MD-02 with a development program aimed at obtaining support for a proposed indication of GR-MD-02 for treatment of NASH with advanced fibrosis. The Phase 1 trial was completed and demonstrated that GR-MD-02 up to 8 mg/kg, i.v. was safe and well tolerated. The human pharmacokinetic data defined a drug dose for use in the planned Phase 2 trials based on extrapolation from efficacy data in NASH animal models of liver fibrosis and/or cirrhosis. Additionally, there was evidence of a pharmacodynamic effect of GR-MD-02 at the 8 mg/kg dose with a decrease in alpha 2 macroglobulin, a serum marker of fibrotic activity, and a reduction in liver stiffness as determined by FibroScan®. An “End of Phase 1 Meeting” was held with FDA which, amongst other items, provided guidance on the primary endpoint for the Phase 2 clinical trial, the NASH-CX trial.

Additionally, an open label drug-drug interaction study was completed in healthy volunteers during the second quarter of 2015 with GR-MD-02, and it showed that with 8 mg/kg dose of GR-MD-02 and 2 mg/kg dose of midazolam there was no drug-drug interaction and no serious adverse events or drug-related adverse events were observed. This study was required by the FDA, and the primary objective was to determine if single or multiple intravenous (IV) doses of GR-MD-02 affect the pharmacokinetics (PK) of midazolam. The secondary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of GR-MD-02 when administered concomitantly with midazolam. The lack of a drug interaction in this study enabled the Company to expand the number of patients eligible for its Phase 2 clinical trial. In addition, should GR-MD-02 be approved for marketing, the success of this study supports a broader patient population for the drug label.

Our Phase 2 program in fibrotic disease consists of two separate human clinical trials. The primary clinical trial is the Phase 2b NASH-CX study for one year for patients with NASH with well compensated cirrhosis, which began enrolling in June, 2015. This study is the primary focus of our program and is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group Phase 2b trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GR-MD-02 for treatment of liver fibrosis and resultant portal hypertension in NASH patients with well compensated cirrhosis. A smaller, exploratory NASH-FX trial was conducted to explore potential use of various non-invasive imaging techniques in NASH patients with advanced fibrosis but not cirrhosis.

NASH-FX Trial: The NASH-FX trial, a Phase 2a pilot trial NASH-FX for patients with NASH advanced fibrosis that explored use of three non-invasive imaging technologies, is now complete. It was a short, single site, four-month trial in 30 NASH patients with advanced fibrosis, but not cirrhosis, randomized 1:1 to either 9 bi-weekly doses of 8 mg/kg of GR-MD-02 or placebo. The trial did not meet its primary biomarker endpoint as measured using multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (LiverMultiScan(R), Perspectum Diagnostics). The trial also did not meet secondary endpoints that measure liver stiffness as a surrogate for fibrosis using, magnetic resonance-elastography and FibroScan® score. We, and many experts in the field, now believe that a four-month treatment period may not be sufficient to show efficacy results in established liver fibrosis. This small study was not powered for the secondary endpoints and thus, not surprisingly did not meet the secondary endpoints. In the trial, GR-MD-02 was found to be safe and well tolerated among the patient population with no serious adverse events. Although there was no apparent improvement in the three non-invasive

 

13


Table of Contents

tests for assessment of liver fibrosis in the four-month NASH-FX trial, the principal investigator of the NASH-FX trial has stated that the inhibition of galectin-3 with GR-MD-02 remains promising for the treatment of NASH fibrosis. Of note is that GR-MD-02 has demonstrated an improved clinical effect in moderate-to-severe psoriasis, suggesting the compound has activity in humans in an immune-mediated inflammatory human disease that can occur in association with NASH. We believe our drug candidate provides a promising new approach for the therapy of fibrotic diseases, and liver fibrosis in particular. Fibrosis is the formation of excess connective tissue (collagen and other proteins plus cellular elements such as myofibroblasts) in response to damage, inflammation or repair. When the fibrotic tissue becomes confluent, it obliterates the cellular architecture, leading to scarring and dysfunction of the underlying organ. Given galectin-3’s broad biological functionality, it has been demonstrated to be involved in cancer, inflammation and fibrosis, heart disease, and renal disease. We have further demonstrated the broad applicability of the actions of our galectin-3 inhibitor’s biological effect in ameliorating fibrosis involving lung, kidney, blood vessels, and cardiac tissues in a wide variety of animal models.

NASH-CX Trial: The NASH-CX trial was a larger well-designed multi-center clinical trial which explored use of GR-MD-02 for the treatment of liver fibrosis and resultant portal hypertension in patients with well-compensated NASH cirrhosis. Enrollment in this trial was completed in September, 2016, and a total of 162 patients at 36 sites in the United States were randomized to receive either 2 mg/kg of GR-MD-02, 8 mg/kg of GR-MD-02 or placebo, with approximately 54 patients in each group. The primary endpoint is a reduction in change in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). Patients received an infusion every other week for one year, total of 26 infusions, and were evaluated to determine the change in HVPG as compared with placebo. HVPG was also correlated with secondary endpoints of fibrosis on liver biopsy as well as with measurement of liver stiffness (FibroScan(R)) and assessment of liver metabolism (13C-methacetin breath test, Exalenz), which are non-invasive measures of the liver that may be used in future studies. Top line data readout was reported in December 2017 demonstrating positive efficacy data and safety and clinically meaningful results in the NASH patients with well compensated cirrhosis without esophageal varices (stage 1 cirrhosis).

In the total patient population, the primary endpoint HVPG showed a trend toward benefit with GR-MD-02 treatment, but the difference from placebo was not statistically significant. The mean change in HVPG of placebo from baseline to week 54 was 0.3 mm Hg. The mean change in HVPG from baseline was -0.37 and -0.42 for the 2 mg/kg dose and 8 mg/kg dose of GR-MD-02, respectively.

Further analysis showed that the drug effect was significantly dependent on dose “varices” in the total group of patients (p<0.02). In those NASH cirrhosis patients without varices at baseline (about 50% of the total population), there was a statistically significant effect of the 2 mg/kg dose of GR-MD-02 on the absolute change in HVPG (-1.08 mm Hg, p<0.01). The effect of the 8 mg/Kg dose of GR-MD-02 on absolute or percent change in HVPG from baseline to week 54 was not significant. The population of patients without varices at baseline were further subdivided into those with mild portal hypertension (HVPG greater or equal to 6 mm Hg and less than 10 mm Hg). In patients with mild portal hypertension (MPH), both doses of GR-MD-02 demonstrated a statistically significant effect on change in HVPG. The mean change in HVPG in the MPH group were +1.8 mm Hg for placebo and -0.3 and -0.4 mm Hg in the 2 mg/kg and 8 mg/kg dose groups, respectively. In patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (HVPG greater than 10 Mm Hg) with no varices at baseline, there was a statistically significant effect of 2 mg/kg of GR-MD-02 on the change in HVPG.

A responder analysis was performed on those patients without varices at baseline. Analysis was performed looking at two groups: those with an equal to or greater than 2 mm Hg decrease in HVPG from baseline or those with an equal to or greater than 2 mm Hg and greater than or equal to 20% decrease in HVPG from baseline. In both cases, the change observed in the GR-MD-02 2 mg/kg group was statistically significant (p<0.01) while that of the 8 mg/kg group was not.

Additional ad hoc analysis examining the pK-PD correlation between human data and the mouse NASH model showed that the apparent lack of a dose response in the 8 mg/Kg dose group (GR8) may be due to fact that a large number of patients in the GR8 group had very high levels of GR-MD-02. When the GR8 group patients were divided into groups with serum drug levels greater than 12,000 ug*hr/mL and those below 12,000 ug*hr/mL, there was a statistically significant difference in the change in HVPG in the GR8 group with lower serum levels of GR-MD-02 of approximately -8%. Thus, the apparent less pronounced effects of GR8 may be explained, at least in part, by the variable pharmacokinetics observed in the patients which received GR8. This mirrors the effects seen in the NASH mouse model experiments in which the anti-inflammatory effects of GR-MD-02 were significantly reduced at doses between 60 mg/Kg and 120 mg/Kg.

In terms of cirrhosis complications over the 54-week treatment period, in patients without varices there were statistically significantly fewer new varices that developed in the treatment groups vs placebo. We believe this may represent a useful measure of clinical outcome.

The major conclusions, to date from the NASH-CX trial results are that: i) GR-MD-02 had a statistically significant and clinically meaningful effect in improving HVPG vs placebo in patients with NASH cirrhosis who did not have esophageal varices at baseline; this effect was seen regardless of the patient’s baseline portal hypertension. Furthermore, we believe that patients with

 

14


Table of Contents

esophageal varices may have masked benefits in the total patient population; ii) there was an important drug effect of GR-MD-02 in the total patient population on liver biopsy with a statistically significant improvement in hepatocyte ballooning (ie cell death); (iii) there was a statistically significant reduction (p=0.02) in the development of new esophageal varices in drug-treated patients compared to placebo; we believe that this is a clinically relevant endpoint related to patient outcomes; (iv) while there was a drug effect in both the 2 mg/kg and 8 mg/kg dosage groups on liver biopsy and in the mild portal hypertension group, there was a consistently greater and statistically significant effect of the 2 mg/kg dose of GR-MD-02; (v) the apparent lack of a dose response in the GR8 group may be explained by variable pharmacokinetics in the high dose group, and this suggests use of an additional and intermediate dose between 2 and 8 mg/Kg in subsequent trials; (vi) GR-MD-02 appears to be safe and well tolerated in this one year clinical trial; and (vii) we believe this is the first large, randomized clinical trial of any drug to demonstrate a clinically meaningful improvement in portal hypertension or liver biopsy in patients with compensated NASH cirrhosis without esophageal varices.

We are planning to meet with the FDA in May of 2018 to discuss the results of the NASH-CX trial and plans for a phase 3 program. Further information and details on the NASH-CX results summarized above is available in public presentations posted to our website and filed with the SEC.

The focus and goal of the therapeutic program is to stop the progression of and reverse the fibrosis in the liver and, thereby improve liver function and prevent the development of complications of fibrosis/cirrhosis and liver-related mortality in patients. The results of the NASH-CX trial substantiate that, subject to confirmation in later stage clinical trials, this goal is achievable in a significant portion of the NASH cirrhosis patient population i.e. those NASH cirrhosis patients without esophageal varices.

Cancer Immunotherapy. We believe there is potential for galectin inhibition to play a key role in the burgeoning area of cancer immunotherapy. For example, there have been several recent approvals of drugs that enhance a patient’s immune system to fight cancer. It is our goal to use a galectin inhibitor to enhance the immune system function to fight cancer in a way that complements other approaches to this type of therapy. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that galectin-3 is expressed at high levels in multiple types of tumors, adds to the malignant nature of the tumors, and protects the tumors from immune system attack. Our drug candidates provide a promising new therapeutic approach to enhance the activity of the immune system against cancer cells. Preclinical studies have indicated that GR-MD-02 enhances the immune response to cancer cells, increased tumor shrinkage and enhanced survival in immune competent mice with prostate, breast, melanoma and sarcoma cancers when combined with one of the immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1, and with the immune cell activator anti-OX40. These preclinical data led to the filing of two Investigator-sponsored INDs and the initiation of studies of GR-MD-02 in combination with Yervoy® (ipilimumab) and KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) in Phase 1B studies of patients with metastatic melanoma. The KEYTRUDA trial has also been expanded to include patients with non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. These studies are being conducted under the sponsorship of Providence Portland Medical Center’s Earle A. Chiles Research Institute (EACRI).

Data on this combination immunotherapy program was presented on February 7, 2017 at the 9th GTCBio Immunotherapeutics & Immunomonitoring Conference in San Diego, CA by Dr. William L. Redmond, Providence Cancer Center. Preclinical results in mouse models of multiple types of cancers showed important anti-tumor and increased survival effects of combining GR-MD-02 with different types of immune modulators, providing a case for progressing studies into human patients with cancer. Seven patients were treated in the GR-MD-02 in combination with Yervoy trial, with no safety concerns in these low dose cohorts. Due to changes in the standard of care for metastatic melanoma (i.e., approval of anti-PD-1), recruitment has been slowed significantly in this trial. Promising results were reported in the Phase 1b trial combining GR-MD-02 with pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA). Cohort 1 was completed (n=6, 5 with melanoma, one head and neck) with one partial response and one mixed response in 5 melanoma patients. There was a rapid and marked tumor response after 3 doses of combined GR-MD-02 and pembrolizumab in the one partial response patient who had failed high-dose IL-2 and oncolytic virus + ipilimumab. The study is ongoing and progression to further development will be based on response rate as compared to historical response rates to pembrolizumab alone. Results from third cohort of patients is expected in Summer, 2018.

Severe skin diseases. During our Phase 1 NASH fibrosis trial with GR-MD-02, a clinical effect on plaque psoriasis was observed in a NASH patient who also had this disease. This patient had marked improvement in her psoriasis, with improvement beginning after the third infusion. She reported that her psoriasis was “completely gone” and her skin was “normal” after the fourth infusion. Her skin remained normal for 17 months after the final infusion of study drug. The patient is convinced that the improvement in her psoriasis is related to the study drug.

This serendipitous finding, combined with galectin-3 protein being markedly upregulated in the capillary epithelia (small blood vessels) of the psoriatic dermis (plaque lesions), led to a phase 2a trial in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. GR-MD-02 inhibition of galectin-3 may attenuate capillary changes in the psoriatic dermis and inflammatory recruitment, perhaps explaining the improvements observed in the NASH fibrosis trial patient. In this open-label, unblinded trial (no placebo, all patients knowingly receive active drug), 5 patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis were administered GR-MD-02 every two weeks for 24 weeks. In May 2016, we reported positive results on the first four patients after 12 weeks of therapy. Based on these results, we modified the trial to include 24 weeks of therapy. In August 2016, we reported on four patients after 24 weeks of therapy and one patient after

 

15


Table of Contents

12 weeks of therapy. The four patients who received 24 weeks of therapy experienced an average of 48% improvement in their plaque psoriasis. At this time, the average response in all five patients remains at 50% with one patient having an 82% improvement. However, there are existing drugs on the market in this disease that produce 75% and higher improvements in 60-90% of patients. While we are encouraged that this study has demonstrated clinically meaningful results in a human disease with GR-MD-02, the next steps would entail a controlled, does-ranging clinical trial which we do not expect to conduct absent a strategic partnership.

We believe the mechanism of action for GR-MD-02 is based upon interaction with, and inhibition of, galectin proteins, particularly galectin-3, which are expressed at high levels in certain pathological states including inflammation, fibrosis and cancer. While GR-MD-02 is capable of binding to multiple galectin proteins, we believe that it has the greatest affinity for galectin-3, the most prominent galectin implicated in pathological processes. Blocking galectin in cancer and liver fibrosis has specific salutary effects on the disease process, as discussed below.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2018 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2017

Research and Development Expense.

 

     Three Months
Ended March 31,
     2018 as Compared to 2017
Three Months
 
     2018      2017      $ Change      % Change  
     (In thousands, except %)  

Research and development

   $ 2,298      $ 3,772      $ (1,474      (39 )% 

We generally categorize research and development expenses as either direct external expenses, comprised of amounts paid to third party vendors for services, or all other research and development expenses, comprised of employee payroll and general overhead allocable to research and development. We consider a clinical program to have begun upon acceptance by the FDA, or similar agency outside of the United States, to commence a clinical trial in humans, at which time we begin tracking expenditures by the product candidate. Clinical program expenses comprise payments to vendors related to preparation for, and conduct of, all phases of the clinical trial, including costs for drug manufacture, patient dosing and monitoring, data collection and management, oversight of the trials and reports of results. Pre-clinical expenses comprise all research and development amounts incurred before human trials begin, including payments to vendors for services related to product experiments and discovery, toxicology, pharmacology, metabolism and efficacy studies, as well as manufacturing process development for a drug candidate.

Our research and development expenses were as follows:

 

     Three Months
Ended
March 31,
 
     2018      2017  
     (in thousands)  

Direct external expenses:

     

Clinical activities

   $ 1,287      $ 3,162  

Pre-clinical activities

     66        32  

All other research and development expenses

     945        578  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 2,298      $ 3,772  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Clinical programs expenses decreased primarily due to costs related to our Phase 2 clinical trials winding down during the three months ended March 31, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017. Other research and development expense increased primarily due to an increase in non-cash stock-based compensation expense of approximately $368,000.

Both the time required and costs we may incur in order to commercialize a drug candidate that would result in material net cash inflow are subject to numerous variables, and therefore we are unable at this stage of our development to forecast useful estimates. Variables that make estimates difficult include the number of clinical trials we may undertake, the number of patients needed to participate in the clinical trial, patient recruitment uncertainties, trial results as to the safety and efficacy of our product, and uncertainties as to the regulatory agency response to our trial data prior to receipt of marketing approval. Moreover, the FDA or other regulatory agencies may suspend clinical trials if we or an agency believes patients in the trial are subject to unacceptable risks or find deficiencies in the conduct of the clinical trial. Delays or rejections may also occur if governmental regulation or policy changes during our clinical trials or in the course of review of our clinical data. Due to these uncertainties, accurate and meaningful estimates of the ultimate cost to bring a product to market, the timing of costs and completion of our program and the period during which material net cash inflows will commence are unavailable at this time.

 

16


Table of Contents

General and Administrative Expense.

 

     Three Months
Ended March 31,
     2018 as Compared to 2017
Three Months
 
     2018      2017      $ Change      % Change  
     (In thousands, except %)  

General and administrative

   $ 1,880      $ 1,174      $ 706        60

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries including stock-based compensation, legal and accounting fees, insurance, investor relations, business development and other office related expenses. The primary reasons for the increase in general and administrative expenses for the three-months ended March 31, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017 is due to an increase non-cash, stock-based compensation expense of $489,000 and as increase in business development/investor relations expenses of approximately $131,000.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since our inception on July 10, 2000, we have financed our operations from proceeds of public and private offerings of debt and equity. As of March 31, 2018, we raised a net total of $136.5 million from these offerings. We have operated at a loss since our inception and have had no significant revenues. We anticipate that losses will continue for the foreseeable future. At March 31, 2018, the Company had $4.0 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents available to fund future operations. The Company believes there is sufficient cash, including availability of the line of credit, to fund currently planned operations at least through March 31, 2019. Our ability to fund operations after our current cash resources are exhausted depends on our ability to obtain additional financing or achieve profitable operations, as to which no assurances can be given. Accordingly, based on the forecasts and estimates underlying our current operating plan, the financial statements do not currently include any adjustments that might be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.

Net cash used in operations decreased by $347,000 to $3,516,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2018, as compared to $3,863,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017. Cash operating expenses decreased principally due to the winding down of Phase 2 research and development activities related to our clinical trial activity with GR-MD-02.

Net cash provided by financing activities the three months ended March 31, 2018, of $4,451,000 represents proceeds from the exercise of common stock warrants. Net cash provided by financing activities the three months ended March 31, 2017, of $2,145,000 represents net proceeds from the sale of common stock and warrants.

Other.

We have engaged outside vendors for certain services associated with our clinical trials. These services are generally available from several providers and, accordingly, our arrangements are typically cancellable on 30 days notice.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not created, and are not a party to, any special-purpose or off-balance sheet entities for the purpose of raising capital, incurring debt or operating parts of our business that are not consolidated into our financial statements. We do not have any arrangements or relationships with entities that are not consolidated into our financial statements that are reasonably likely to materially affect our liquidity or the availability of capital resources.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to intangible assets, accrued expenses, stock-based compensation, contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience, terms of existing contracts, our observance of trends in the industry, information available from other outside sources and on various other factors that we believe to be appropriate under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Critical accounting policies are those policies that affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in preparation of our consolidated financial statements. We believe our critical accounting policies include our policies regarding stock-based compensation, accrued expenses and income taxes. For a more detailed discussion of our critical accounting policies, please refer to our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

17


Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our financial position, operating results or cash flows due to changes in the U.S. interest rates. The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve cash until it is required to fund operations. To minimize risk, we maintain our portfolio of cash and cash equivalents in operating bank accounts and money market funds. Since our investments are short-term in duration, we believe that we are not subject to any material market risk exposure.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) and concluded that, as of March 31, 2018, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level. During the quarter ended March 31, 2018, no change in our internal control over financial reporting has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

18


Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

None except as discussed in Note 9 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The information set forth in this report should be read in conjunction with the risk factors set forth in Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, which could materially impact our business, financial condition or future results.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable

Item 5. Other Information

Not Applicable

Item 6. Exhibits

 

Exhibit

Number

  

Description of Document

  

Note

Reference

 
  31.1*    Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934   
  31.2*    Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934   
  32.1**    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   
  32.2**    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   
101.INS    XBRL Instance Document*   
101.SCH    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document*   
101.CAL    XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document*   
101.DEF    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document*   
101.LAB    XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document*   
101.PRE    XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document*   

 

* Filed herewith.
** Furnished herewith and not “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

19


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on May 11, 2018.

 

GALECTIN THERAPEUTICS INC.

 

By:  

/s/ Peter G. Traber

Name:   Peter G. Traber, M.D.
Title:  

Chief Executive Officer and President (principal executive officer)

 

 

/s/ Jack W. Callicutt

Name:   Jack W. Callicutt
Title:  

Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial and accounting officer)

 

20