UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
WASHINGTON D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) |
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the transition period from _______________________ to_______________
Commission file number 0-538
AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION |
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) |
New York |
13-0435685 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer) |
Incorporation of Organization) | Identification Number |
111 Arlozorov Street, Tel Aviv, Israel |
62098 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip code) |
Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code (866) 447-8636
Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, If Changed Since Last Report. |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) , and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. |
Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). |
Yes o No x
The number of shares outstanding of the issuers Class A Stock, its only authorized common stock, is 19,994,917 (as of November 3, 2005). |
AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Index to Form 10-Q
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AMPAL-AMERICAN
ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, |
2005 |
2004 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) | (Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | ||||||
REVENUES | ||||||||
Equity in earnings of affiliates | $ | 6,011 | $ | 2,928 | ||||
Real estate income | 6,948 | 6,683 | ||||||
Realized and unrealized gains on investments | - | 5,827 | ||||||
Realized and unrealized gains on marketable securities | 2,763 | 1,052 | ||||||
Interest | 981 | 457 | ||||||
Other | 9,138 | 7,615 | ||||||
Total revenues | 25,841 | 24,562 | ||||||
EXPENSES | ||||||||
Interest | 4,580 | 3,450 | ||||||
Real estate expenses | 6,538 | 6,554 | ||||||
Realized and unrealized loss on investments | 2,672 | - | ||||||
Loss from impairment of investments | 13,914 | 6,863 | ||||||
Translation loss | 1,760 | 1,572 | ||||||
Other (mainly general and administrative) | 6,445 | 7,347 | ||||||
Total expenses | 35,909 | 25,786 | ||||||
Loss before income taxes | (10,068 | ) | (1,224 | ) | ||||
Provision for income taxes | 807 | 1,521 | ||||||
Loss after income tax | (10,875 | ) | (2,745 | ) | ||||
Minority interest | (4,462 | ) | 327 | |||||
Net Loss | $ | (6,413 | ) | $ | (3,072 | ) | ||
Basic and diluted EPS: | ||||||||
Loss per Class A share | $ | (0.33 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) | ||
Shares used in calculation (in thousands) | 19,950 | 19,829 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
1
AMPAL-AMERICAN
ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, |
2005 |
2004 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) | (Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | ||||||
REVENUES | ||||||||
Equity in(loss) earnings of affiliates | $ | (168 | ) | $ | 1,529 | |||
Real estate income | 2,299 | 2,250 | ||||||
Realized and unrealized gains on investments | - | 2,465 | ||||||
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities | 1,208 | (328 | ) | |||||
Interest | 286 | 178 | ||||||
Other | 4,282 | 2,818 | ||||||
Total revenues | 7,907 | 8,912 | ||||||
EXPENSES | ||||||||
Interest | 1,429 | 1,220 | ||||||
Real estate expenses | 2,186 | 2,295 | ||||||
Realized and unrealized loss on investments | 6,199 | - | ||||||
Loss from impairment of investments | 13,314 | 5,400 | ||||||
Translation loss | 175 | 13 | ||||||
Other (mainly general and administrative) | 2,083 | 2,276 | ||||||
Total expenses | 25,386 | 11,204 | ||||||
Loss before income taxes | (17,479 | ) | (2,292 | ) | ||||
Benefit for income taxes | 1,710 | 103 | ||||||
Loss after income tax | (15,769 | ) | (2,189 | ) | ||||
Minority interest | (5,139 | ) | 356 | |||||
Net Loss | $ | (10,630 | ) | $ | (2,545 | ) | ||
Basic and diluted EPS: | ||||||||
Loss per Class A share | $ | (0.53 | ) | $ | (0.13 | ) | ||
Shares used in calculation (in thousands) | 19,975 | 19,862 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
2
AMPAL-AMERICAN
ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS AS OF |
September 30, 2005 |
December 31, 2004 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands) | (Unaudited) | (Audited) | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 31,962 | $ | 17,618 | ||||
Deposits, notes and loans receivable | 503 | 3,534 | ||||||
Marketable Securities | 46,128 | 50,433 | ||||||
Other investments | 95,018 | 127,023 | ||||||
Total Investments | 141,146 | 177,456 | ||||||
Real estate property, less accumulated | ||||||||
depreciation of $13,463 and $12,190 | 71,078 | 63,191 | ||||||
Other assets | 52,627 | 43,148 | ||||||
Total Assets | $ | 297,316 | $ | 304,947 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
3
AMPAL-AMERICAN
ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AS OF |
September 30, 2005 |
December 31, 2004 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) | (Unaudited) | (Audited) | ||||||
LIABILITIES | ||||||||
Notes and loans payable | $ | 123,512 | $ | 118,760 | ||||
Debentures | - | 2,036 | ||||||
Deposits from tenants | 51,876 | 52,152 | ||||||
Accounts payable, accrued expense and others | 29,039 | 26,002 | ||||||
Total Liabilities | 204,427 | 198,950 | ||||||
Minority interests | 3,596 | 5,984 | ||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||
4% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, $5 | ||||||||
par value; authorized 189,287 shares; issued | ||||||||
115,852 and 124,024 shares; outstanding | ||||||||
112,502 and 120,674 shares | 579 | 620 | ||||||
6-1/2% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, | ||||||||
$5 par value; authorized 988,055 shares; | ||||||||
issued 641,655 and 662,219 shares; outstanding | ||||||||
519,119 and 539,683 shares | 3,208 | 3,311 | ||||||
Class A Stock; $1 par value; authorized | ||||||||
60,000,000 shares; issued 25,817,855 and | ||||||||
25,715,303 shares; outstanding 19,993,691 | ||||||||
and 19,883,639 shares | 25,818 | 25,715 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 58,238 | 58,211 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 51,111 | 57,524 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (18,603 | ) | (14,272 | ) | ||||
Treasury Stock, at cost | (31,058 | ) | (31,096 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders' equity | 89,293 | 100,013 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | $ | 297,316 | $ | 304,947 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
4
AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, |
2005 |
2004 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands) | (Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | ||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
Net loss | $ | (6,413 | ) | $ | (3,072 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash | ||||||||
provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Equity in earnings of affiliates | (6,011 | ) | (2,928 | ) | ||||
Realized and unrealized gain on investments and marketable securities | (91 | ) | (6,879 | ) | ||||
Depreciation expense | 1,459 | 1,606 | ||||||
Amortization of deposits from tenants | (1,426 | ) | (1,435 | ) | ||||
Impairment of investments and loans | 13,914 | 6,863 | ||||||
Translation loss | 1,760 | 1,572 | ||||||
Minority interests | (4,462 | ) | 327 | |||||
Increase in other assets | (7,938 | ) | (3,302 | ) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued | ||||||||
expenses and others | 8,265 | (3,953 | ) | |||||
Investments made in trading securities | (12,871 | ) | (33,474 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of trading securities | 25,964 | 53,912 | ||||||
Dividends received from affiliates | 2,461 | 317 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 14,611 | 9,554 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
Deposits, notes and loans receivable collected | 2,724 | 13,991 | ||||||
Deposits, notes and loans receivable granted | (735 | ) | (6,696 | ) | ||||
Investments made in affiliates and others | (661 | ) | (6,295 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of investments | 4,444 | 10,968 | ||||||
Return of capital by partnership | 35 | |||||||
Capital improvements | (9,370 | ) | (762 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing | ||||||||
activities | (3,598 | ) | 11,241 | |||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
5
AMPAL-AMERICAN
ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
NINE MONTHS ENDED SPETEMBER 30 |
2005 |
2004 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands) | (Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
Notes and loans payable received | $ | 6,299 | $ | 6,513 | ||||
Notes and loans payable repaid | (2,983 | ) | (13,885 | ) | ||||
Debentures repaid | (2,023 | ) | (1,753 | ) | ||||
Proceed of exercise of option | 23 | |||||||
Contribution to partnership by minority | 2,035 | 40 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in ) financing activities | 3,351 | (9,085 | ) | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and | ||||||||
Cash equivalents | (20 | ) | (129 | ) | ||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 14,344 | 11,581 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 17,618 | 4,572 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 31,962 | $ | 16,153 | ||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow | ||||||||
Information | ||||||||
Cash paid during the period: | ||||||||
Interest paid to others | $ | 2,142 | $ | 3,827 | ||||
Income taxes paid | $ | 9 | $ | 3,551 | ||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-cash Investing Activities: realization of an investment | ||||||||
Proceeds in marketable securities received from realization of an investment |
3,316 | 2,267 | ||||||
Dividend in kind from an affiliate | 7,088 | - | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statement.
6
AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
September 30, 2005 |
December 31, 2004 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts) | (Unaudited) | (Audited) | ||||||
4% PREFERRED STOCK | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of year | $ | 620 | $ | 660 | ||||
Conversion of 8,172 and 7,928 shares into Class A Stock | (41 | ) | (40 | ) | ||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 579 | $ | 620 | ||||
6-1/2% PREFERRED STOCK | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of year | $ | 3,311 | $ | 3,487 | ||||
Conversion of 20,564 and 35,161 shares into | ||||||||
Class A Stock | (103 | ) | (176 | ) | ||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 3,208 | $ | 3,311 | ||||
CLASS A STOCK | ||||||||
Balance beginning of year | $ | 25,715 | $ | 25,567 | ||||
Issuance of shares upon conversion of | ||||||||
Preferred Stock | 103 | 148 | ||||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 25,818 | $ | 25,715 | ||||
ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of year | $ | 58,211 | $ | 58,143 | ||||
Conversion of Preferred Stock | 41 | 68 | ||||||
Issuance of shares upon exercise of stock options | (14 | ) | ||||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 58,238 | $ | 58,211 | ||||
RETAINED EARNINGS | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of year | $ | 57,524 | $ | 76,109 | ||||
Net loss | (6,413 | ) | (18,385 | ) | ||||
Dividends: | ||||||||
4% Preferred Stock - $0.2 per share | - | (24 | ) | |||||
6-1/2% Preferred Stock - $0.325 per share | - | (176 | ) | |||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 51,111 | $ | 57,524 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
7
AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
September 30, 2005 |
December 31, 2004 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts) | (Unaudited) | (Audited) | ||||||
TREASURY STOCK | ||||||||
4% PREFERRED STOCK | ||||||||
Balance, end of period | (84 | ) | (84 | ) | ||||
6-1/2% PREFERRED STOCK | ||||||||
Balance, end of period | (1,853 | ) | (1,853 | ) | ||||
CLASS A STOCK | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of year | (29,159 | ) | (29,159 | ) | ||||
Issuance of shares upon exercise of 7,500 | ||||||||
stock option | 38 | - | ||||||
Balance, end of period | (29,121 | ) | (29,159 | ) | ||||
Balance, end of period | $ | (31,058 | ) | $ | (31,096 | ) | ||
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30 |
2005 |
2004 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS | ||||||||
Cumulative translation adjustments: | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of year | (20,083 | ) | (20,597 | ) | ||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | 408 | (380 | ) | |||||
Balance, end of period | (19,675 | ) | (20,977 | ) | ||||
Unrealized gain on marketable securities: | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of year | 5,811 | 2,750 | ||||||
Unrealized (loss) gain, net | (573 | ) | 2,023 | |||||
Sale of available-for-sale securities | (4,166 | ) | (334 | ) | ||||
Balance, end of period | 1,072 | 4,439 | ||||||
Balance, end of period | $ | (18,603 | ) | $ | (16,538 | ) | ||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
8
AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, |
2005 |
2004 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands) | (Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | ||||||
Net loss | $ | (6,413 | ) | $ | (3,072 | ) | ||
Other comprehensive gain (loss), net of tax: | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments | 408 | (380 | ) | |||||
Unrealized (loss) gain on securities | (573 | ) | 2,023 | |||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income | (165 | ) | 1,643 | |||||
Comprehensive income (loss) | $ | (6,578 | ) | $ | (1,429 | ) | ||
Related tax (expense) on other comprehensive gain: | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments | $ | (754 | ) | $ | (76 | ) | ||
Unrealized gain on securities | $ | (2,552 | ) | $ | (931 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
9
AMPAL-AMERICAN
ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. | As used in these financial statements, the term the Company refers to Ampal-American Israel Corporation (Ampal) and its consolidated subsidiaries. |
2. | The September 30, 2005 consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. |
Reference should be made to the Companys consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004 for a description of the accounting policies, which have been continued without change. Also, reference should be made to the notes to the Companys December 31, 2004 consolidated financial statements for additional details of the Companys consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. The details in those notes have not changed except as a result of normal transactions in the interim. All adjustments (of a normal recurring nature), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair presentation of the results of the interim period have been included. |
3. | Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements |
In December 2004, the FASB revised Statement No. 123 (FAS 123R), Share-Based Payment, which requires companies to expense the estimated fair value of employee stock options and similar awards. On April 14, 2005, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission adopted a new rule amending the compliance dates for FAS 123R. In accordance with the new rule, the accounting provisions of FAS 123R will be effective for the Company in fiscal 2006. The Company expects to adopt the provisions of FAS 123R prospectively. |
Under such transition method, upon the adoption of SFAS 123R, Ampals financial statements for periods prior to the effective date of the statement will not be restated. The impact of this statement on Ampals financial statements or its results of operations in 2006 and beyond will depend upon various factors, among them Ampals future compensation strategy. We expect that the effect of applying this statement on Ampals results of operations in 2006 as it relates to existing option plans would not be materially different from the SFAS 123 pro forma effect previously reported. |
4. | Employee Stock Based Compensation |
The Company accounts for all employee stock options plans under APB Opinion No. 25, under which no compensation costs were incurred. SFAS No. 123 Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS No. 123) established a fair value-based method of accounting for employee stock options of similar equity instruments and encourages adoption of such method for stock compensation plans. However, it also allows companies to continue to account for those plans using the accounting treatment prescribed by APB No. 25 and accordingly discloses pro forma data assuming the Company had accounted for employee stock option grants using the fair value based method as defined in SFAS in No. 123. |
If compensation cost for the options under plans in effect would have been determined in accordance with SFAS No. 123, the Companys net income (loss) and EPS would have been reduced as follows: |
10
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, |
2005 |
2004 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||
Basic and diluted EPS: | ||||||||
Net loss: | ||||||||
As reported(1) (2) | $ | (6,563 | ) | $ | (3,232 | ) | ||
Less-stock based compensation expense | ||||||||
determined under fair value method | (657 | ) | (382 | ) | ||||
Pro forma | $ | (7,220 | ) | $ | (3,614 | ) | ||
As reported | $ | (0.33 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) | ||
Pro forma | $ | (0.36 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | ||
THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30 |
2005 |
2004 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||
Basic and diluted EPS: | ||||||||
Net (loss) gain: | ||||||||
As reported(1) (2) | $ | (10,680 | ) | $ | (2,598 | ) | ||
Less-stock based compensation expense | ||||||||
Determined under fair value method | (219 | ) | (125 | ) | ||||
Pro forma | $ | (10,899 | ) | $ | (2,723 | ) | ||
As reported | $ | (0.53 | ) | $ | (0.13 | ) | ||
Pro forma | $ | (0.55 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) | ||
(1) | After deduction of accrued Preferred Stock Dividend of $150 and $160 (for the three months $50 and $53), respectively. |
(2) | In 2005 and 2004, the effect of the conversion of the 4% and 6½% Preferred Stock was excluded from the basic and diluted EPS calculation due to its antidilutive effect. |
Under SFAS No. 123, the fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: (1) expected life of options of 5 years (2) dividend yield of 0% (3) volatility ranging from 57% to 60% and (4) risk-free interest rate ranging from 3.3% to 3.46%. |
11
5. | Segment information presented below results |
Segment information presented below results primarily from operations in Israel. |
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, |
2005 |
2004 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||
Finance | $ | 11,265 | $ | 13,397 | ||||
Real Estate | 6,948 | 6,683 | ||||||
Leisure-time | 1,667 | 1,610 | ||||||
Intercompany adjustments | (50 | ) | (56 | ) | ||||
19,830 | 21,634 | |||||||
Equity | 6,011 | 2,928 | ||||||
Total | $ | 25,841 | $ | 24,562 | ||||
Pretax Operating Gain (Loss): | ||||||||
Finance | $ | (16,409 | ) | $ | (4,361 | ) | ||
Real Estate | 186 | (24 | ) | |||||
Leisure-time | 144 | 233 | ||||||
(16,079 | ) | (4,152 | ) | |||||
Equity | 6,011 | 2,928 | ||||||
Total | $ | (10,068 | ) | $ | (1,224 | ) | ||
Total Assets: | ||||||||
Finance | $ | 211,968 | $ | 256,518 | ||||
Real Estate | 72,455 | 65,025 | ||||||
Leisure-Time | 17,838 | 17,046 | ||||||
Intercompany adjustments | (4,945 | ) | (2,766 | ) | ||||
Total | $ | 297,316 | $ | 335,823 | ||||
Corporate office expense is principally applicable to the financing operations and has been charged to that segment above.
The real estate rental segment consists of rental property owned in Israel and leased in the United States and leased or subleased to unrelated parties, and of the operations of Am-Hal Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary which owns and operates a chain of senior citizen facilities located in Israel.
The leisure-time segment consists primarily of Coral World International Limited (marine parks located in Israel and around the world) and Country Club Kfar Saba, the Companys 51%-owned subsidiary located in Israel.
6. | The following table summarizes securities that were not included in the calculations of diluted earnings per Class A share for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 because such shares are anti-dilutive. |
(Shares in thousands) |
SEPTEMBER 30, |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2005 |
2004 | |||||||
Options and Rights | 2,057 | 1,333 | ||||||
6-1/2% Preferred Stock | 642 | 663 | ||||||
4% Preferred Stock | 116 | 125 |
12
7. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS: |
Ampal Communications L.P. |
1. | On May 10, 2004, Ampal Communications L.P., a limited partnership controlled by Ampal and in which Ampal holds a 75% equity interest, filed a claim in the Tel-Aviv District Court against Motorola Communications Israel Ltd., MIRS Communications Ltd. (MIRS), Motorola Israel Ltd., Elisha Yanai, Peter Brum, Rami Guzman, Nathan Gidron and Shimon Tal collectively, the Defendants), for injunctive and declaratory relief as described below. The claim is in connection with the exploitation by the defendants of Ampal Communications minority rights by virtue of its 33% holding in MIRS. |
Ampal Communications L.P. requested the Court to issue relief as follows: |
A. | Declaring that the business of MIRS is conducted in such a way as to be prejudicial to the rights of Ampal Communications L.P. as a minority shareholder; |
B. | Appointing an appraiser to conduct a valuation of MIRS and Ampal Communications L.P.s holdings therein, which will encompass a review of the way MIRS conducts its business, including a review of the related party transactions between MIRS and Motorola Israel Ltd. and/or any other of the Defendants; |
C. | Instructing each of the Defendants to acquire and purchase from Ampal Communications L.P. the shares it holds in MIRS at the highest of the following prices: |
(1) | based on a company valuation of MIRS as presented to Ampal Communications L.P. by Motorola prior to the signing of the Share Purchase Agreement for MIRS; or |
(2) | based on the amount paid by Ampal Communications L.P. for its share holding in MIRS plus linkage to the Israeli consumer index and interest; or |
(3) | based on the company valuation that will be determined by the valuation specified in Section B above, excluding any material negative effect brought about by the Defendants omissions and/or negligence in their management of MIRS, all as may be assessed and computed by the appraiser specified in Section B above; |
D. | Determining that each of the individual Defendants, as officers in MIRS, has violated his respective fiduciary obligations towards Ampal Communications L.P. as a minority shareholder in MIRS; and |
E. | Declaring that the Share Purchase Agreement pursuant to which Ampal Communications L.P. acquired its shareholding in MIRS and the Shareholders Agreement in respect thereof, are void. |
13
7. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS: (CONT.) |
Ampal Communications L.P. |
2. | On May 24, 2004 and on May 31, 2004 the Defendants requested the district court to strike out the claim in limine, on the grounds that Ampal had allegedly not paid sufficient fees when filing the claim, and further requested an extension of the time for filing statements of defense until after the district court had reached a decision regarding the request to strike out the claim. Ampal and the Defendants filed various responses and on June 30, 2004, the district court requested the Attorney General to furnish an opinion regarding the Defendants request before issuing its own decision. On October 11, 2004 the Attorney General furnished its opinion that supported the Defendants request that Ampal should pay the fees calculated on the basis of the value of the requested remedies in the claim. On November 10, 2004 Ampal filed its response. The Court also decided that the statements of defense should be filed 10 days after it issues its decision regarding the striking out of the claim. |
3. | On March 1, 2005, Ampal requested the district court to enter judgment against Peter Brum on the grounds that he failed to file a defense to the Companys claim. On March 15, 2005, the district court granted Ampals request and entered judgment against Peter Brum. On March 17, 2005, the district court ordered Mr. Brum to acquire and purchase from Ampal the shares it holds in MIRS for a total company valuation of $ 765,998,000, which is the highest of the prices set forth in the complaint. The litigation with regard to the other defendants is ongoing. Peter Brum, Motorola and MIRS have appealed the district courts judgment on numerous grounds. Ampal has filed responses to the appeal. |
4. | On August 30, 2005, the Company, through Ampal Communications L.P., entered into a Stock Purchase and Indemnification Agreement, dated as of August 30, 2005, by and among Motorola Israel Ltd., Ampal Communications L.P. and MIRS (the Agreement) to sell to Motorola Israel Ltd. all of its holdings of MIRS. In connection with the closing of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, the existing lawsuit among the parties and others relating to MIRS was dismissed. Please see Note 8 below for more information. |
8. | SUBSEQUENT EVENT |
On October 3, 2005 the Company, through Ampal Communications L.P., completed the sale to Motorola Israel Ltd. of all of its holdings of MIRS pursuant to the Agreement. In connection with the sale of its holdings of MIRS, Ampal Communications L.P. received approximately US $89 million of total proceeds, composed of US$67.7 million for the purchase price and an additional US$ 21.3 million related to guaranteed dividend payments. Approximately US$ 74.0 million of the proceeds was used to repay all outstanding debt to banks incurred in connection with making the MIRS investment, and the Company received US$ 15.0 million ($11.0 million after the deduction of minority interest) of net proceeds from the sale. |
14
Item 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of Ampals consolidated financial statements is in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States which requires management to make estimates and assumptions in certain circumstances that affect amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related footnotes. Actual results may differ from these estimates. To facilitate the understanding of Ampals business activities, described below are certain Ampal accounting policies that are relatively more important to the portrayal of its financial condition and results of operations and that require managements subjective judgments. Ampal bases its judgments on its experience and various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Please refer to Note 1 to Ampals consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2004 for a summary of all of Ampals significant accounting policies.
Portfolio Investments
The Company accounts for a number of its investments, including many of its investments in the high technology and communications industries, on the basis of the cost method. Application of this method requires the Company to periodically review these investments in order to determine whether to maintain the current carrying value or to write off some or all of the investment. While the Company uses some objective measurements in its review, such as the portfolio companys liquidity, burn rate, termination of a substantial number of employees, achievement of milestones set forth in its business plan or projections and seeks to obtain relevant information from the company under review, the review process involves a number of judgments on the part of the Companys management. These judgments include assessments of the likelihood of the company under review to obtain additional financing, to achieve future milestones, make sales and to compete effectively in its markets. In making these judgments the Company must also attempt to anticipate trends in the particular companys industry as well as in the general economy. There can be no guarantee that the Company will be accurate in its assessments and judgments. To the extent that the Company is not correct in its conclusion it may decide to write down all or part of the particular investment.
Investment in MIRS
MIRS is the Companys largest investment and is being accounted for at cost (our equity interest is 25%). The cost method is applied due to preference features we have been granted in our investment in preferred shares in MIRS. Revenues from guaranteed payments from Motorola are recognized as income. For information regarding the sale of the Companys holdings of MIRS, please see Part II Other Information Item 1 Legal Proceedings.
Marketable Securities
We determine the appropriate classification of marketable securities at the time of purchase. We hold marketable securities classified as trading securities that are carried at fair value, and marketable securities classified as available-for-sale that are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in the component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in stockholders equity. We classify investment in marketable securities as investment in trading securities, if those securities are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term (held for only a short period of time). All the other securities are classified as available for sale securities.
15
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 59, Accounting for Noncurrent Marketable Equity Securities, provides guidance on determining when an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired. Investments are reviewed quarterly for indicators of other-than-temporary impairment. This determination requires significant judgment. In making this judgment, we evaluate, among other factors, the duration and extent to which the fair value of an investment is less than its cost; the financial health of the investee; and our intent and ability to hold the investment. Investments with an indicator are further evaluated to determine the likelihood of a significant adverse effect on the fair value and amount of the impairment as necessary. If market, industry and/or investee conditions deteriorate, we may incur future impairments.
Long-Lived Assets
On January 1, 2002, Ampal adopted FAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets. FAS 144 requires that long- lived assets, to be held and used by an entity, be reviewed for impairment and, if necessary, written down to the estimated fair values, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable through undiscounted future cash flows.
Accounting for Income Taxes
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves us estimating our current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in our consolidated balance sheet. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income, and, to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or increase this allowance in a period, we must include an expense within the tax provision in the statement of operations. A valuation allowance is currently set against certain tax assets because management believes it is more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will not be realized through the generation of future taxable income. We also do not provide for taxes on undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, as it is our intention to reinvest undistributed earnings indefinitely outside the United States.
Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and our future taxable income for purposes of assessing our ability to realize any future benefit from our deferred tax assets. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates or we adjust these estimates in future periods, our operating results and financial position could be materially affected.
16
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the FASB revised Statement No. 123 (FAS 123R), Share-Based Payment, which requires companies to expense the estimated fair value of employee stock options and similar awards. On April 14, 2005, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission adopted a new rule amending the compliance dates for FAS 123R. In accordance with the new rule, the accounting provisions of FAS 123R will be effective for the Company in fiscal 2006. The Company expects to adopt the provisions of FAS 123R prospectively.
Under such transition method, upon the adoption of SFAS 123R, Ampals financial statements for periods prior to the effective date of the statement will not be restated. The impact of this statement on Ampals financial statements or its results of operations in 2006 and beyond will depend upon various factors, among them Ampals future compensation strategy. We expect that the effect of applying this statement on Ampals results of operations in 2006 as it relates to existing option plans would not be materially different from the SFAS 123 pro forma effect previously reported.
Results of Operations
Nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to nine months ended September 30, 2004
Ampal-American Israel Corporation (Ampal) and its subsidiaries (the Company) recorded a consolidated net loss of $6.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to a net loss of $3.1 million for the same period in 2004. The increase in net loss is primarily attributable to the increase of realized and unrealized loss on investments, the increase in loss from impairment of investments and the increase in interest expenses in the nine months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004. This increase in net loss was partially offset by an increase of equity in earning of affiliates, the increase in realized and unrealized gains on marketable securities, the increase in other income and the decrease in other expense and minority interest for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004.
In the nine month period ended September 30, 2005, the Company recorded $2.7 million of realized and unrealized loss on investments, as compared to $5.8 million of realized and unrealized gains in the same period in 2004. The loss recorded in the nine months ended September 30, 2005, was primarily attributable to the third-party investment in the high-tech portfolio (which is treated as a disposition for accounting purposes) which resulted in a $7.3 million loss ($4.6 net loss after tax), which was partially offset by the gain recorded from the sale of all of its shares of Modem Art Ltd. ($3.3 million gain) the sale of all of its shares in Epsilon investment ($1.4 million gain).
In the nine month period ended September 30, 2005, the Company recorded $13.9 million of losses from the impairment of its investment in MIRS ($13.3 million) and Shiron Ltd. ($0.6 million). In the same period in 2004, the Company recorded a $6.9 million loss from impairment of certain of its investments. Please see Part II Other Information; Item 1 Legal Proceedings for information regarding the Companys sale of its holdings in MIRS.
Equity in earnings of affiliates increased to $6.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, as compared to a gain of $2.9 million for the same period in 2004. The increase is primarily attributable to a $5.3 million gain recorded by Ophir Holding Ltd. as a result of the sale of all its holdings in Industrial Building Corporation Ltd.
Realized and unrealized gains on marketable securities increased to $2.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to a gain of $1.1 million for the same period in 2004. The gain is attributable to the sale of various marketable securities.
17
In the nine month period ended September 30, 2005, the Company recorded $9.1 million in other income, as compared to $7.6 million for the same period in 2004. The increase in other income primarily related to the committed dividend for 2005 which had been fully paid on October 3, 2005 by Motorola Israel Ltd. as part of the sale of the MIRS investment.
In the nine month period ended September 30, 2005, the Company recorded $6.4 million of other expenses, as compared to $7.3 million for the same period in 2004. The decrease in other expenses pertains to the closing of Ampals office in New York and to a decrease in professional fees.
The Company recorded higher interest expense of $4.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2005, as compared to $3.5 million in the same period in 2004, primarily as a result of increases in interest rates.
Three months ended September 30, 2005 compared to three months ended September 30, 2004
The Company recorded a consolidated net loss of $10.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to a net loss of $2.5 million for the same period in 2004. The increase in net loss is primarily attributable to the increase in realized and unrealized loss on investments, the increase in loss from impairment of investment and the decrease in equity in earning of affiliates in the three months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004. This increase in net loss was offset by the increase in realized and unrealized gains on marketable securities and, the increase in other income for the three month ended September 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004.
In the three month period ended September 30, 2005, the Company recorded $6.2 million of realized and unrealized loss on investments, as compared to $2.5 million of realized and unrealized gains in the same period in 2004. The loss recorded in the three months ended September 30, 2005 was primarily attributable to the third-party investment in the high-tech portfolio (which is treated as a disposition for accounting purposes) which resulted in a $7.3 million loss ($4.6 million net loss after tax), offset by the sale of all of its shares in Epsilon Investment House Ltd. (1.4 million gain).
In the three month period ended September 30, 2005, the Company recorded $13.3 million loss from impairment of its investment in MIRS ($13.3 million), as compared to a $5.4 million loss from impairment of its investment in the same period in 2004. Please see Part II Other Information; Item 1 Legal Proceedings for information regarding the Companys sale of its holdings in MIRS.
Realized and unrealized gains on marketable securities increased to $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005 compared to a loss of $0.3 million for the same period in 2004. The gain is attributable to the sale of various marketable securities.
In the three month period ended September 30, 2005, the Company recorded 4.3 million in other income, as compared to $2.8 million in the same period in 2004. The increase in other income primarily related to the committed dividend for 2005 which had been fully paid by Motorola Israel Ltd. as part of the sale of the MIRS investment.
18
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows
The Companys sources of cash include cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities, which amount to $78.1 million as of September 30, 2005 as compared to $68.1 million in December 31, 2004. The Company also has sources of cash from operations, cash from investing activities and amounts available under credit facilities, as described below. The Company believes that these sources are sufficient to fund the current requirements of operations, capital expenditures, investing activities, dividends on preferred stock and other financial commitments of the Company for the next 12 months. However, to the extent that contingencies and payment obligations described below and in other parts of this Report require the Company to make unanticipated payments, the Company would need to further utilize these sources of cash. In the event of a decline in the market price of its marketable securities, the Company may need to draw upon its other sources of cash, which may include additional borrowing, refinancing of its existing indebtedness or liquidating other assets, the value of which may also decline.
In addition, the shares of MIRS owned by the Company, the shares of Ophir Holdings Ltd. and government debenture notes equal to $9 million have already been pledged as security for various loans provided to the Company for the purchase of these shares and would therefore be unavailable if the Company wished to pledge them in order to provide an additional source of cash.
Cash flows from operating activities
Net cash provided by operating activities totaled approximately $14.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, as compared to approximately $9.6 million at the same period in 2004. The increase is primarily attributable to the $13.1 million net proceeds in trading securities ($26.0 million proceeds offset by $12.9 million invested) as compared to $20.4 million net proceeds in 2004, to the $2.5 million dividends received from affiliates as compared to $0.3 million in 2004 and to an increase in accounts payable.
Cash flows from investing activities
Net cash used in investing activities totaled approximately $3.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, as compared to approximately $11.2 million provided by investing activities for the same period in 2004. The cash used in investing activities during 2005 is primarily attributable to a payment of $9.3 million by Am-Hal Ltd. (Am-Hal), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company to acquire real estate for a new project in Tel-Aviv, which was partially offset by proceeds from the sale of investment.
Cash flows from financing activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was approximately $3.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, as compared to approximately $9.1 million of net cash used in financing activities for the nine months period ended September 30 2004.
In the nine months ended September 30, 2005, Am-Hal Ltd. and its minority partner in the new project borrowed $6.3 million and $2.0 million, respectively to finance the new project (see cash flow from investing activities) and Ampal used its own cash to pay down its existing notes payable and debentures in the amount of $5.0 million. In 2004, the Company paid down its notes payable and debentures in the amount of $15.6 million from its own cash and by borrowing funds in the amount of $6.5 million.
19
Investments
On September 30, 2005, the aggregate fair value of trading and available-for-sale securities was approximately $46.1 million, as compared to $50.4 million at December 31, 2004. The decrease in 2005 is mainly attributable to the sale of various marketable securities.
In the nine months ended September 30 2005, the Company made an additional investment of $0.7 million in Fimi Opportunity Fund, L.P. (Fimi).
During the nine months ended September 30, 2005, Ampal made the following dispositions:
| On March 8, 2005, the Company sold its holdings in Modem Art Ltd. for $4.3 million and recorded a gain of $3.3 million. |
| On September 7, 2005 a third-party Israeli based venture fund and certain of its affiliated companies invested $2.65 million in the companys high-tech portfolio. Ampal received $2.5 million in connection with this transaction. The Company treated this investment as a disposition for accounting purposes and recorded a loss of $7.3 million ($4.6 million after taxes). |
| On August 15, 2005 the Company sold its holdings in Epsilon Investment House Ltd and Renaissance Investment Company Ltd for $2.0 million and recorded a $1.4 million gain. |
Debt
In connection with its investment in MIRS, the Company has two loans from Bank Hapoalim Ltd. (Hapoalim) and Bank Leumi le-Israel B.M. (Leumi) in the outstanding amount of $38.2 million and $34.4 million, respectively, as of September 30 2005. Both loans are due on March 31, 2008 and bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 0.8%.The loans are non-recourse to the Company and are secured by the Companys shares in MIRS. In connection with the sale of the Companys holdings in MIRS, both loans were repaid in full on October 3, 2005. Please see Part II Other Information; Item 1 Legal Proceedings for information regarding the Companys sale of its holdings in MIRS.
The Company financed a portion of the development of Am-Hal, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company which develops and operates luxury retirement centers for senior citizens, through bank loans from Hapoalim and others. At September 30, 2005, and December 31, 2004 the amounts outstanding under these loans were $12.5 million and $7.7 million, respectively. The loans mature in up to one year and have interest rates range between 5.3% and 6.5%. The Company generally repays these loans with the proceeds received from deposits and other payments from the apartments in Am-Hal facilities. The loans are secured by a lien on Am-Hals properties. The Company also issued guarantees in the amount of $3.5 million in favor of tenants of Am-Hal in order to secure their deposits.
The Company also finances its general operations and other financial commitments through bank loans from Bank Hapoalim. These loans in the amount of $31.3 million mature through 2006-2011.
The weighted average interest rates and the balances of these short-term borrowings at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 were 5.8% on $17.6 million and 3.5% on $13.0 million, respectively.
20
As of September 30, 2005, the Company had issued guarantees on certain outstanding loans to its investees and subsidiaries in the aggregate principal amount of $12.0 million. This includes:
1. | $0.5 million guarantee to Leumi with respect to the MIRS loan as described above. In connection with the sale of the Companys holdings in MIRS, the guarantee was terminated on October 3, 2005. Please see Part II Other Information; Item 1 Legal Proceedings for information regarding the Company's sale of its holdings in MIRS. |
2. | $5.5 million guarantee on indebtedness incurred by Bay Heart ($3.4 million of which is recorded as a liability in the Companys financial statements as of September 30, 2005) in connection with the development of its property. Bay Heart recorded losses in 2005, in managements belief, primarily as a result of decreased rental revenues. There can be no guarantee that Bay Heart will become profitable or that it will generate sufficient cash to repay its outstanding indebtedness without relying on the Companys guarantee. |
3. | $3.5 million guarantee to Am-Hal tenants as described above. |
4. | $1.6 million guarantee to am-Hal for the new project in Tel-Aviv. |
5. | $0.9 million guarantee to Galha 1960 Ltd. |
FOREIGN CURRENCY CONTRACTS
The Companys derivative financial instruments consist of foreign currency forward exchange contracts. The Company, utilizes these contracts from time to time, to manage risk exposure to movements in foreign exchange rates. None of these contracts have been designated as hedging instruments. These contracts are recognized as assets or liabilities on the balance sheet at their fair value, which is the estimated amount at which they could be settled based on market prices or dealer quotes, where available, or based on pricing models. Changes in fair value are recognized currently in earnings. As of September 30 2005, the Company had a $10.0 million open foreign currency forward exchange contract to purchase U.S. Dollars and a U.S. $0.9 million open foreign currency forward exchange contract to sell U.S. dollars, in payment of N.I.S.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report (including but not limited to factors discussed above, in the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, as well as those discussed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q) includes forward-looking statements (within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1993 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) and information relating to the Company that are based on the beliefs of management of the Company as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to the management of the Company. When used in this Quarterly Report, the words anticipate, believe, estimate, expect, intend, plan, and similar expressions, as they relate to the Company or the management of the Company, identify forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect the current views of the Company with respect to future events or future financial performance of the Company, the outcome of which is subject to certain risks and other factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by the forward-looking statements, including among others, the economic and political conditions in Israel, the Middle East, and the global business and economic conditions in the different sectors and markets where the Companys portfolio companies operate.
21
Should any of those risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results or outcome may vary from those described herein as anticipated, believed, estimated, expected, intended or planned. Subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements in this paragraph and elsewhere described in this quarterly Report and other Reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
MARKET RISKS AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
The Company is exposed to various market risks, including changes in interest rates, foreign currency rates and equity price changes. The following analysis presents the hypothetical loss in earnings, cash flows and fair values of the financial instruments, which were held by the Company at September 30 2005, and are sensitive to the above market risks.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2005, there have been no material changes in the market risk exposures facing the Company as compared to those the Company faced in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
Interest Rate Risks
At September 30, 2005, the Company had financial assets totaling $30.4 million and financial liabilities totaling $123.5 million. For fixed rate financial instruments, interest rate changes affect the fair market value but do not impact earnings or cash flows. Conversely, for variable rate financial instruments, interest rate changes generally do not affect the fair market value but do impact future earnings and cash flows, assuming other factors are held constant.
At September 30, 2005, the Company had fixed rate financial assets of $30.4 million and held no variable rate financial assets. Holding other variables constant, a ten percent increase in interest rates would decrease the unrealized fair value of the fixed financial assets by approximately $0.1 million.
At September 30, 2005, the Company had fixed rate debt of $3.5 million and variable rate debt of $120.0 million. A ten percent decrease in interest rates would increase the unrealized fair value of the fixed rate debt by approximately $0.1 million.
The net decrease in earnings for the next year resulting from a ten percent interest rate increase would be approximately $0.6 million, holding other variables constant.
Exchange Rate Sensitivity Analysis
The Companys exchange rate exposure on its financial instruments results from its investments and ongoing operations in Israel. During 2005, the Company entered into a foreign exchange forward purchase contract to partially hedge this exposure. At September 30, 2005, the Company held a $10.0 million foreign exchange forward purchase contracts to purchase U.S. Dollars and a U.S. $0.9 million open foreign currency forward exchange contract to sell U.S. dollars. Holding other variables constant, if there were a ten percent devaluation of the foreign currency, the Companys cumulative translation (loss) reflected in the Companys accumulated other comprehensive (loss) would increase by $1.3 million, and in the statements of operations, a ten percent devaluation of the foreign currency would decrease net earnings in the amount of approximately $2.6 million.
22
Securities Price Risk
The Companys investments at September 30, 2005, included marketable securities (trading and available-for-sale), which are recorded at fair value of $46.1 million. Those securities have exposure to price risk. The estimated potential loss in fair value resulting from a hypothetical ten percent decrease in prices quoted on stock exchanges is approximately $4.6 million.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Companys management with the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that it will detect or uncover failures within the Company to disclose material information otherwise required to be set forth in the Companys periodic reports.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
23
Part II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings: |
Ampal Communications L.P.
1. | On May 10, 2004, Ampal Communications L.P., a limited partnership controlled by Ampal and in which Ampal holds a 75% equity interest, filed a claim in the Tel-Aviv District Court against Motorola Communications Israel Ltd., MIRS Communications Ltd.(MIRS), Motorola Israel Ltd., Elisha Yanai, Peter Brum, Rami Guzman, Nathan Gidron, and Shimon Tal (collectively, the Defendants), for injunctive and declaratory relief as described below. The claim is in connection with the exploitation by the defendants of Ampal Communications minority rights by virtue of its 33% holding in MIRS. |
Ampal Communications L.P. requested the Court to issue relief as follows: |
A. | Declaring that the business of MIRS is conducted in such a way as to be prejudicial to the rights of Ampal Communications L.P. as a minority shareholder; |
B. | Appointing an appraiser to conduct a valuation of MIRS and Ampal Communications L.P.s holdings therein, which will encompass a review of the way MIRS conducts its business, including a review of the related party transactions between MIRS and Motorola Israel Ltd. and/or any other of the Defendants; |
C. | Instructing each of the Defendants to acquire and purchase from Ampal Communications L.P. the shares it holds in MIRS at the highest of the following prices: |
(1) | based on a company valuation of MIRS as presented to Ampal Communications L.P. by Motorola prior to the signing of the Share Purchase Agreement for MIRS; or |
(2) | based on the amount paid by Ampal Communications L.P. for its share holding in MIRS plus linkage to the Israeli consumer index and interest; or |
(3) | based on the company valuation that will be determined by the valuation specified in Section B above, excluding any material negative effect brought about by the Defendants omissions and/or negligence in their management of MIRS, all as may be assessed and computed by the appraiser specified in Section B above; |
D. | Determining that each of the individual Defendants, as officers in MIRS, has violated his respective fiduciary obligations towards Ampal Communications L.P. as a minority shareholder in MIRS; and |
E. | Declaring that the Share Purchase Agreement pursuant to which Ampal Communications L.P. acquired its shareholding in MIRS and the Shareholders Agreement in respect thereof, are void. |
24
Part II OTHER INFORMATION (CONT.)
2. | On May 24, 2004 and on May 31, 2004 the Defendants requested the district court to strike out the claim in limine, on the grounds that Ampal had allegedly not paid sufficient fees when filing the claim, and further requested an extension of the time for filing statements of defense until after the district court had reached a decision regarding the request to strike out the claim. Ampal and the Defendants filed various responses and on June 30, 2004, the district court requested the Attorney General to furnish an opinion regarding the Defendants request before issuing its own decision. On October 11, 2004 the Attorney General furnished its opinion that supported the Defendants request that Ampal should pay the fees calculated on the basis of the value of the requested remedies in the claim. |
On November 10, 2004 Ampal filed its response. The Court also decided that the statements of defense should be filed 10 days after it issues its decision regarding the striking out of the claim. |
3. | On March 1, 2005, Ampal requested the district court to enter judgment against Peter Brum on the grounds that he failed to file a defense to the Companys claim. On March 15, 2005, the district court granted Ampals request and entered judgment against Peter Brum. On March 17, 2005, the district court ordered Mr. Brum to acquire and purchase from Ampal the shares it holds in MIRS for a total company valuation of $ 765,998,000, which is the highest of the prices set forth in the complaint. The litigation with regard to the other defendants is ongoing. Peter Brum, Motorola and MIRS have appealed the district courts judgment on numerous grounds. Ampal has filed responses to the appeal. |
4. | On August 30, 2005, the Company, through Ampal Communications L.P. entered into a Stock Purchase and Indemnification Agreement, dated as of August 30, 2005, by and among Motorola Israel Ltd., Ampal Communications L.P. and MIRS (the Agreement) to sell Motorola Israel Ltd. all of its holdings of MIRS. In connection with the closing of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement the existing lawsuit among the parties and other relating to MIRS was dismissed. Please see Subsequent Event for information regarding the Companys sale of its holdings in MIRS. |
SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On October 3, 2005 the Company, through Ampal Communications L.P., completed the sale to Motorola Israel Ltd. of all of its holdings of MIRS pursuant to the Agreement. In connection with the sale of its holdings of MIRS, Ampal Communications L.P. received approximately US $89 million of total proceeds, composed of $67.7 million for the purchase price and an additional $ 21.3 million related to guaranteed dividend payments. Approximately $ 74.0 million of the proceeds was used to repay all outstanding debt to banks incurred in connection with making the MIRS investment, and the Company received US$ 15.0 million ($11.0 million after the deduction of minority interest) of net proceeds from the sale. |
Item 2. |
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None. |
Item 3. |
Defaults upon Senior Securities None. |
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. |
25
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on September 28, 2005. The following proposals were approved by the margins indicated below:
To elect seven (7) directors to the Board of Directors of the Company to hold office for one year terms and until their respective successors shall be elected and qualified:
Names |
For |
Withheld Authority | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yosef A. Maiman | 17,562,373 | 537,189 | ||||||
Jack Bigio | 17,562,263 | 537,299 | ||||||
Leo Malamud | 18,048,666 | 50,896 | ||||||
Dr. Joseph Yerushalmi | 18,048,583 | 50,979 | ||||||
Yehuda Karni | 17,853,612 | 245,950 | ||||||
Eitan Haber | 17,853,825 | 245,737 | ||||||
Menahem Morag | 17,854,125 | 245,437 |
To ratify the appointment of Kesselman & Kesselman, a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005:
For |
Against |
Abstain | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18,084,559 | 12,990 | 2,013 |
Item 5. | Other Information. |
None. |
Item 6. | Exhibits. |
(a) | Exhibits: |
11.1 | Schedule Setting Forth Computation of Gain (Loss) per Share of Class A Stock. |
31.1 | Certification of Jack Bigio pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
31.2 | Certification of Irit Eluz pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1 | Certification of Jack Bigio and Irit Eluz pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
26
AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION BY: /S/ Jack Bigio Jack Bigio Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
BY: /S/ Irit Eluz Irit Eluz CFO and Senior Vice President, Finance and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) |
BY: /S/ Giora Bar-Nir Giora Bar-Nir VP Accounting and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) |
Date: November 10, 2005
27
AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Exhibit Index
Exhibit No. | Description |
11.1 | Schedule Setting Forth Computation of Earnings Per Share of Class A Stock |
31.1 | Certification of Jack Bigio pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
31.2 | Certification of Irit Eluz pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1 | Certification of Jack Bigio and Irit Eluz pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
28