OMB
APPROVAL
|
OMB
Number: 3235-0065
|
Expires:
January
31, 2008
|
Estimated
average burden
|
hours
per response 425.00
|
Delaware
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
6719
(Primary
Standard Industrial
Classification
Code Number)
|
95-4302784
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
Number)
|
Arotech
Corporation
1229
Oak Valley Drive
Ann
Arbor, Michigan 48108
Tel:
(800) 281-0356 Fax: (734) 761-5368
|
Thomas
J. Paup
1229
Oak Valley Drive
Ann
Arbor, Michigan 48108
Tel:
(734) 761-5836 Fax: (734) 761-5368
|
||
(Address,
including ZIP code, and telephone number, including
area
code, of Registrant’s principal executive offices)
|
(Name,
address, including ZIP code, and telephone number,
including
area code, of agent for service)
|
Steven
M. Skolnick, Esq.
Lowenstein
Sandler PC
65
Livingston Avenue
Roseland,
New Jersey 07068
Tel:
(973) 597-2500 Fax: (973) 597-2400
|
AND
|
Yaakov
Har-Oz, Adv.
Arotech
Corporation
Western
Industrial Zone
Beit
Shemesh 99000, Israel
Tel:
+(972-2) 990-6623 Fax: +(972-2)
990-6688
|
Title
of each class of securities to be registered
|
Amount
to be
registered(1)(5)
|
Proposed
maximum offering price
per
unit(2)(5)
|
Proposed
maximum
aggregate
offering
price(2)
|
Amount
of
registration
fee(2)(6)
|
||||||||||||
Common
stock, par value $0.01 per share (3)
|
4,062,500
|
$
|
14.000
|
$
|
56,875,000
|
$6,085.63
|
||||||||||
Common
stock, par value $0.01 per share (4)
|
298,221
|
$
|
8.316
|
2,480,006
|
265.37
|
|||||||||||
4,360,721
|
$
|
59,283,006
|
$6,351.00
|
(1) Pursuant
to Rule 416 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the number
of
shares of common stock registered hereby shall include an indeterminate
number of shares of common stock that may be issued in connection
with a
stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization or similar
event.
(2) In
accordance with Rule 457(c), the aggregate offering price of shares
of our
common stock is estimated solely for purposes of calculating the
registration fee payable pursuant hereto, using the higher of (i)
the
average of the high and low sales price reported by The Nasdaq Global
Market System for our common stock during the five business days
prior to
the date of this filing, and (ii) the conversion or exercise price
of such
notes and warrants, respectively.
(3) Represents
an additional 325% of the number of shares of our common stock originally
issuable upon conversion of $17.5 million in notes that may be converted
at a conversion price of $14.00 per share.
(4) Represents
the number of shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of
currently outstanding warrants that may be exercised at any time
until
March 31, 2008.
(5) After
giving effect to a one-for-fourteen reverse stock split effected
on June
21, 2006.
|
Table
of Contents
|
||
Page
|
||
Summary
|
3
|
|
Risk
Factors
|
10
|
|
Information
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
|
23
|
|
About
the Offering
|
23
|
|
Use
of Proceeds
|
25
|
|
Selling
Stockholders
|
25
|
|
Plan
of Distribution
|
28
|
|
Description
of Capital Stock
|
30
|
|
Description
of Common Stock Warrants
|
31
|
|
Legal
Matters
|
32
|
|
Experts
|
32
|
|
Business
|
32
|
|
Properties
|
59
|
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
59
|
|
Market
Price of and Dividends on the Company’s Common Equity
and Related Stockholder Matters
|
60
|
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
60
|
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
62
|
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
87
|
|
Directors
and Executive Officers
|
88
|
|
Executive
Compensation
|
91
|
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
and Related Stockholder Matters
|
97
|
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
|
98
|
|
Where
You Can Find Additional Information
|
99
|
|
Incorporation
by Reference
|
99
|
Ø |
We
develop, manufacture and market advanced high-tech multimedia and
interactive digital solutions for use-of-force training and driving
training of military, law enforcement, security and other personnel
through our Simulation
and Training Division:
|
· |
We
provide simulators, systems engineering and software products to
the
United States military, government and private industry through our
subsidiary FAAC Incorporated, located in Ann Arbor, Michigan (“FAAC”);
and
|
· |
We
provide specialized “use of force” training for police, security personnel
and the military through our subsidiary IES Interactive Training,
Inc.,
located in Ann Arbor, Michigan
(“IES”).
|
Ø |
We
utilize sophisticated lightweight materials and advanced engineering
processes to manufacture aviation armor and to armor vehicles through
our
Armor
Division:
|
· |
We
manufacturer ballistic and fragmentation armor kits for rotary and fixed
wing aircraft and marine armor through our subsidiary Armour of
America,
located in Auburn, Alabama (“AoA”);
and
|
· |
We
use state-of-the-art lightweight armoring materials, special ballistic
glass and advanced engineering processes to fully armor military
and
civilian SUV’s, buses and vans, through
our subsidiaries MDT Protective Industries, Ltd., located in Lod,
Israel
(“MDT”), of which we own 75.5%, and MDT
Armor Corporation, located in Auburn, Alabama (“MDT Armor”),
of which we own 88%.
|
Ø |
We
manufacture and sell lithium and Zinc-Air batteries for defense and
security products and other military applications and we pioneer
advancements in Zinc-Air technology for electric vehicles through
our
Battery
and Power Systems Division:
|
· |
We
develop and sell rechargeable and primary lithium batteries and smart
chargers to the military and to private defense industry in the Middle
East, Europe and Asia through our subsidiary Epsilor Electronic
Industries, Ltd., located in Dimona, Israel (in Israel’s Negev desert
area) (“Epsilor”);
|
· |
We
manufacture and sell Zinc-Air batteries and battery electronics for
the
military, focusing on applications that demand high energy and light
weight, through our subsidiary Electric Fuel Battery Corporation,
located
in Auburn, Alabama (“EFB”); and
|
· |
We
produce water-activated lifejacket lights for commercial aviation
and
marine applications, and we conduct our Electric Vehicle effort,
through
our subsidiary Electric Fuel (E.F.L.) Ltd., located in Beit Shemesh,
Israel (“EFL”).
|
Ø |
Range
3000
-
providing use-of-force simulation for military and law enforcement.
We
believe that the Range 3000 is the most technologically advanced
judgment
training simulator in the world.
|
Ø |
A2Z
Classroom Trainer
-
a state-of-the-art computer based training (CBT) system that allows
students to interact with realistic interactive scenarios projected
life-size in the classroom.
|
Ø |
Range
FDU (Firearms Diagnostic Unit)
-
a unique combination of training and interactive technologies that
give
instructors a first-person perspective of what trainees are seeing
and
doing when firing a weapon.
|
Ø |
Milo
(Multiple Interactive Learning/training Objectives)
-
a simulator designed with “plug in” modules to customize the training
system to meet end user needs.
|
Ø |
Summit
Training International
-
providing relevant, cost-effective professional training services
and
interactive courseware for law enforcement, corrections and corporate
clients.
|
Ø |
IES
Studio Productions
-
providing cutting edge multimedia video services for law enforcement,
military and security agencies, utilizing the newest equipment to
create
the training services required by the most demanding
authorities.
|
This
Offering
|
Shares
offered
by the selling stockholders
|
4,360,721,
including 4,062,500 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion
of the
Company’s Senior Secured Convertible Notes and 298,221 shares of common
stock issuable upon exercise of warrants.
|
|
Use
of proceeds
|
All
net proceeds from the sale of the shares of common stock will go
to the
stockholder who offers and sells them. We will not receive any
proceeds
from this offering. However, we would receive proceeds of $2,480,006
if
all of the warrants issued to the selling stockholders and outstanding
as
of the date of this prospectus are exercised for cash. Any such
funds
would be used for general corporate purposes.
|
|
Risk
factors
|
The
purchase of our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You
should
carefully review and consider “Risk Factors” beginning on page
10.
|
|
Nasdaq
trading symbol
|
ARTX
|
·
|
we
must dedicate a portion of our cash flows from operations to pay
principal
and interest and, as a result, we may have less funds available for
operations and other purposes;
|
·
|
it
may be more difficult and expensive to obtain additional funds through
financings, if available at all;
|
·
|
we
are more vulnerable to economic downturns and fluctuations in interest
rates, less able to withstand competitive pressures and less flexible
in
reacting to changes in our industry and general economic conditions;
and
|
·
|
if
we default under any of our existing debt instruments, including
paying
the outstanding principal when due, and if our creditors demand payment
of
a portion or all of our indebtedness, we may not have sufficient
funds to
make such payments.
|
·
|
our
financial condition at the time;
|
·
|
restrictions
in the agreements governing our other indebtedness;
and
|
·
|
other
factors, including the condition of the financial markets and our
industry.
|
·
|
the
U.S. Federal Acquisition Regulations, which regulate the formation,
administration and performance of government contracts;
|
·
|
the
U.S. Truth in Negotiations Act, which requires certification and
disclosure of all cost and pricing data in connection with contract
negotiations; and
|
·
|
the
U.S. Cost Accounting Standards, which impose accounting requirements
that
govern our right to reimbursement under certain cost-based government
contracts.
|
·
|
announcements
by us, our competitors or our
customers;
|
·
|
the
introduction of new or enhanced products and services by us or our
competitors;
|
·
|
changes
in the perceived ability to commercialize our technology compared
to that
of our competitors;
|
·
|
rumors
relating to our competitors or us;
|
·
|
actual
or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results;
|
·
|
the
issuance of our securities, including warrants, in connection with
financings and acquisitions; and
|
·
|
general
market or economic conditions.
|
·
|
divide
our board of directors into three classes serving staggered three-year
terms;
|
·
|
only
permit removal of directors by stockholders “for cause,” and require the
affirmative vote of at least 85% of the outstanding common stock
to so
remove; and
|
·
|
allow
us to issue preferred stock without any vote or further action by
the
stockholders.
|
Ø
|
4,062,500
shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the conversion of
currently outstanding convertible notes;
and
|
Ø
|
298,221
shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of
currently
outstanding warrants.
|
Number
of Outstanding Shares Beneficially Owned Prior to
|
Number
of Shares
Beneficially
Owned
Prior
to
Offering,
Including
Shares
Potentially
Issuable on
Exercise
of Warrants
and
Conversion
of
Convertible
|
Maximum
Number
of
Shares
to be Sold
Pursuant
to this
|
Shares
Beneficially Owned
After
Offering,
Including
Shares
Potentially
Issuable on
Exercise
of Warrants
and
Conversion
of
Convertible Debt
(2)
|
|||||||||||||
Name of Selling Stockholder |
Offering
|
Debt(1)
|
Prospectus
|
Number
|
Percent
|
|||||||||||
Smithfield
Fiduciary LLC(3)
|
207,504
|
2,478,887
|
(4)
|
1,996,505
|
482,382
|
5.5
|
%
|
|||||||||
Omicron
Master Trust(3)
|
152,900
|
245,360
|
(5)
|
41,218
|
204,142
|
2.4
|
%
|
|||||||||
Portside
Growth and Opportunity Fund(3)
|
0
|
1,282,659
|
(6)
|
1,176,758
|
105,901
|
1.2
|
%
|
|||||||||
Iroquois
Master Fund Ltd.(3)
|
41,185
|
548,328
|
(7)
|
464,285
|
84,043
|
*
|
||||||||||
Cranshire
Capital L.P.(3)
|
127,970
|
550,812
|
(8)
|
383,309
|
167,503
|
2.0
|
%
|
|||||||||
Mainfield
Enterprises Inc.(3)
|
0
|
94,925
|
(9)
|
41,273
|
53,652
|
*
|
||||||||||
Rockmore
Investment Master Fund Ltd.(3)
|
65,361
|
350,198
|
(10)
|
257,373
|
92,825
|
1.1
|
%
|
*
|
Less
than 1%.
|
|
(1)
|
Includes
all shares being registered hereby, and assumes (i) conversion
of all
convertible notes at an assumed rate of conversion based solely
on the
number of conversion shares being registered hereby, and (ii) exercise
of
all warrants held by the selling stockholders, without regard to
any
limitations on conversions or exercise. Also assumes that the selling
stockholders acquire no additional shares of common stock before
completion of this offering. For purposes of determining beneficial
ownership of our common stock, owners of options, warrants and
other
convertible securities exercisable or convertible within sixty
days are
considered to be the beneficial owners of the shares of common
stock for
which such securities are exercisable or
convertible.
|
(2)
|
Assumes
that all of the shares offered by the selling stockholders under
this
prospectus are sold. Percentage ownership is computed in accordance
with
Rule 13d-3 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission,
based on
the assumption (expressly required by the applicable rules of
the
Securities and Exchange Commission) that only the person whose
ownership
is being reported has exercised such derivative securities for
shares of
common stock, and is based on 8,468,957 shares issued and outstanding
as
of August 18, 2006.
|
(3)
|
The
terms of the notes and warrants whose underlying shares of common
stock
are included for resale under this prospectus prohibit conversion
of the
convertible notes and exercise of the warrants to the extent that
conversion of the convertible notes and exercise of the warrants
would
result in the holder, together with its affiliates, beneficially
owning in
excess of 4.999% of our outstanding shares of common stock.
|
(4)
|
Consists
of (i) 1,857,143 shares of common stock, which is approximately
325% of
the 571,429 shares originally issuable upon conversion of convertible
notes issued in September 2005 (based on the original principal
amount
outstanding), being registered hereby, of which 275,410 shares
are
issuable based on the $14.00 conversion price of the remaining
convertible
notes, (ii) 139,362 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise
of the
warrants being registered hereby, (iii) 171,429 shares of common
stock
issuable upon exercise of the warrants issued in connection with
the
convertible notes, (iv) 103,449 shares of common stock issuable
upon
conversion of certain convertible debentures, and (v) 207,504
shares of
common stock. Highbridge Capital Management, LLC (“Highbridge”) is the
trading manager of Smithfield Fiduciary LLC (“Smithfield”) and
consequently has voting control and investment discretion over
the
securities held by Smithfield. Messrs. Glenn Dubin and Henry
Swieca
control Highbridge. Each of Highbridge and Messrs. Dubin and
Swieca
disclaims beneficial ownership of the securities held by
Smithfield.
|
(5)
|
Consists
of (i) 41,218 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
the
warrants being registered hereby, (ii) 51,242 shares of common
stock
issuable upon exercise of the warrants issued in connection with
the
convertible notes, and (iii) 152,900 shares of common stock.
Omicron
Capital, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Omicron Capital”), serves
as investment manager to Omicron Master Trust, a trust formed
under the
laws of Bermuda (“Omicron”), Omicron Capital, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(“OCI”), serves as general partner of Omicron Capital, and Winchester
Global Trust Company Limited (“Winchester”) serves as the trustee of
Omicron. By reason of such relationships, Omicron Capital and
OCI may be
deemed to share dispositive power over the securities
owned by Omicron, and Winchester may be deemed to share voting
and
dispositive power over the securities
owned by Omicron. Omicron Capital, OCI and Winchester disclaim
beneficial
ownership of such securities.
Omicron Capital has delegated authority from the board of directors
of
Winchester regarding the portfolio management decisions with
respect to
the securities
owned by Omicron and, as of April
21, 2003, Mr. Olivier H. Morali and Mr. Bruce T. Bernstein, officers
of
OCI, have delegated authority from the board of directors of
OCI regarding
the portfolio management decisions of Omicron Capital with respect
to the
securities
owned by Omicron. By reason of such delegated authority, Messrs.
Morali
and Bernstein may be deemed to share dispositive power over the
securities
owned by Omicron. Messrs. Morali and Bernstein disclaim beneficial
ownership of such securities
and neither of such persons has any legal right to maintain such
delegated
authority. No other person has sole or shared voting or dispositive
power
with respect to the securities
being offered by Omicron, as those terms are used for purposes
under
Regulation 13D-G of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Omicron and Winchester are not “affiliates” of one another, as that term
is used for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended,
or of any other person named in this prospectus as a selling
stockholder.
No person or “group” (as that term is used in Section 13(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the SEC’s Regulation
13D-G) controls Omicron and Winchester.
|
|
(6)
|
Consists
of (i) 1,135,485 shares of common stock, which is 325% of the
349,380
shares originally issuable upon conversion of convertible notes
issued in
September 2005 based on the original principal amount outstanding,
being
registered hereby, of which 168,390 shares are issuable based
on the
$14.00 conversion price of the remaining convertible notes, (ii)
41,273
shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants
being
registered hereby, (iii) 53,572 shares of common stock issuable
upon
exercise of the warrants issued in connection with the convertible
notes,
(iv) 52,329 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of
certain
convertible debentures. Ramius Capital Group, LLC is the investment
adviser of Portside Growth and Opportunity Fund and consequently
has
voting control and investment discretion over securities held
by Portside.
Ramius Capital disclaims beneficial ownership of the securities
held by
Portside. Peter A. Cohen, Morgan B. Stark, Thomas W. Strauss
and Jeffrey
M. Solomon are the sole managing members of C4S & Co., LLC, the sole
managing member of Ramius Capital. As a result, Messrs. Cohen,
Stark,
Strauss and Solomon may be considered beneficial owners of any
securities
deemed to be beneficially owned by Ramius Capital. Each of Messrs.
Cohen,
Stark, Strauss and Solomon disclaims beneficial ownership of
the
securities held by Portside.
|
|
(7)
|
Consists
of (i) 464,285 shares of common stock, which is approximately
325% of the
142,857 shares originally issuable upon conversion of convertible
notes
issued in September 2005 based on the original principal amount
outstanding, being registered hereby, of which 68,853 shares
are issuable
based on the $14.00 conversion price of the remaining convertible
notes,
(ii) 42,858 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
the warrants
issued in connection with the convertible notes, and (iii) 41,185
shares
of common stock. Joshua Silverman has voting control and investment
discretion over the securities held by this selling stockholder.
Mr.
Silverman disclaims beneficial ownership of the securities held
by
Iroquois Master Fund Ltd.
|
|
(8)
|
Consists
of (i) 348,214 shares of common stock, which is approximately
325% of the
107,143 shares originally issuable upon conversion of convertible
notes
issued in September 2005 based on the original principal amount
outstanding, being registered hereby, of which 51,640 shares
are issuable
based on the $14.00 conversion price of the remaining convertible
notes,
(ii) 35,095 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
the warrants
being registered hereby, (iii) 32,143 shares of common stock
issuable upon
exercise of the warrants issued in connection with the convertible
notes,
(iv) 7,390 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of
certain
convertible debentures, and (v) 127,970 shares of common stock.
Mitchell
P. Kopin, President of Downsview Capital Inc., the General Partner
of
Cranshire Capital L.P., has the right to vote and/or dispose
of the shares
held by this selling stockholder. Mr.
Kopin and Downsview Capital, Inc. both disclaim beneficial ownership
of
these securities.
|
(9)
|
Consists
of (i) 41,273 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
the
warrants being registered hereby, and (ii) 53,652 shares of common
stock
issuable upon conversion of certain convertible debentures. Pursuant
to an investment management agreement, Avi Vigder has voting and
dispositive control over the Shares held by Mainfield Enterprises,
Inc.
Avi Vigder disclaims beneficial ownership of said
shares.
|
|
(10)
|
Consists
of (i) 257,373 shares of common stock, which is approximately
325% of the
79,192 shares originally issuable upon conversion of convertible
notes
issued in September 2005 based on the original principal amount
outstanding, being registered hereby, of which 38,168 shares
are issuable
based on the $14.00 conversion price of the remaining convertible
notes,
(ii) 23,758 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
the warrants
issued in connection with the convertible notes, (iii) 3,706
shares of
common stock issuable upon conversion of certain convertible
debentures,
all
of which securities it acquired in transfers from Omicron Master
Trust in
July 2006, and (iv) 65,361 shares of common stock. Rockmore
Capital, LLC (“Rockmore Capital”) and Rockmore Partners, LLC (“Rockmore
Partners”), each a limited liability company formed under the laws of
the
State of Delaware, serve as the investment manager and general
partner,
respectively, to Rockmore Investments (US) LP, a Delaware limited
partnership, which invests all of its assets through Rockmore
Investment
Master Fund Ltd., an exempted company formed under the laws of
Bermuda
(“Rockmore Master Fund”). By reason of such relationships, Rockmore
Capital and Rockmore Partners may be deemed to share dispositive
power
over the shares of our common stock owned by Rockmore Master
Fund.
Rockmore Capital and Rockmore Partners disclaim beneficial ownership
of
such shares of our common stock. Rockmore Partners has delegated
authority
to Rockmore Capital regarding the portfolio management decisions
with
respect to the shares of common stock owned by Rockmore Master
Fund and,
as of August 18, 2006, Mr. Bruce T. Bernstein and Mr. Brian Daly,
as
officers of Rockmore Capital, are responsible for the portfolio
management
decisions of the shares of common stock owned by Rockmore Master
Fund. By
reason of such authority, Messrs. Bernstein and Daly may be deemed
to
share dispositive power over the shares of our common stock owned
by
Rockmore Master Fund. Messrs. Bernstein and Daly disclaim beneficial
ownership of such shares of our common stock and neither of such
persons
has any legal right to maintain such authority. No other person
has sole
or shared voting or dispositive power with respect to the shares
of our
common stock as those terms are used for purposes under Regulation
13D-G
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. No person
or “group”
(as that term is used in Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of
1934, as amended, or the SEC’s Regulation 13D-G) controls Rockmore Master
Fund.
|
Ø |
on
any national securities exchange or quotation service on which the
securities may be listed or quoted at the time of sale;
|
Ø |
in
the over-the-counter market;
|
Ø |
in
transactions otherwise than on these exchanges or systems or in the
over-the-counter market;
|
Ø |
through
the writing of options, whether such options are listed on an options
exchange or otherwise;
|
Ø |
ordinary
brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer
solicits purchasers;
|
Ø |
block
trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the shares
as agent
but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to
facilitate the transaction;
|
Ø |
purchases
by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for
its
account;
|
Ø |
an
exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable
exchange;
|
Ø |
privately
negotiated transactions;
|
Ø |
short
sales;
|
Ø |
sales
pursuant to Rule 144;
|
Ø |
broker-dealers
may agree with the selling securityholders to sell a specified number
of
such shares at a stipulated price per share;
|
Ø |
a
combination of any such methods of sale;
and
|
Ø |
any
other method permitted pursuant to applicable law.
|
· |
divide
our board of directors into three classes serving staggered three-year
terms;
|
· |
only
permit removal of directors by stockholders “for cause,” and require the
affirmative vote of at least 85% of the outstanding common stock
to so
remove; and
|
· |
allow
us to issue preferred stock without any vote or further action by
the
stockholders.
|
Ø |
declare
or pay a dividend in shares of common stock or make a distribution
of
shares of common stock to holders of our outstanding common
stock;
|
Ø |
subdivide
or combine our common stock; or
|
Ø |
issue
shares of our capital stock in any reclassification of our common
stock.
|
Ø |
We
develop, manufacture and market advanced high-tech multimedia and
interactive digital solutions for use-of-force training and driving
training of military, law enforcement, security and other personnel
through our Simulation
and Training Division:
|
· |
We
provide simulators, systems engineering and software products to
the
United States military, government and private industry through our
subsidiary FAAC Incorporated, located in Ann Arbor, Michigan (“FAAC”);
and
|
· |
We
provide specialized “use of force” training for police, security personnel
and the military through our subsidiary IES Interactive Training,
Inc.,
located in Ann Arbor, Michigan
(“IES”).
|
Ø |
We
utilize sophisticated lightweight materials and advanced engineering
processes to manufacture aviation armor and to armor vehicles through
our
Armor
Division:
|
· |
We
manufacturer ballistic and fragmentation armor kits for rotary
and fixed
wing aircraft and marine armor through our subsidiary Armour
of America,
located in Auburn, Alabama (“AoA”);
and
|
· |
We
use state-of-the-art lightweight armoring materials, special ballistic
glass and advanced engineering processes to fully armor military
and
civilian SUV’s, buses and vans, through
our subsidiaries MDT Protective Industries, Ltd., located in Lod,
Israel
(“MDT”), of which we own 75.5%, and MDT
Armor Corporation, located in Auburn, Alabama (“MDT Armor”),
of which we own 88%.
|
Ø |
We
manufacture and sell lithium and Zinc-Air batteries for defense and
security products and other military applications and we pioneer
advancements in Zinc-Air technology for electric vehicles through
our
Battery
and Power Systems Division:
|
· |
We
develop and sell rechargeable and primary lithium batteries and smart
chargers to the military and to private defense industry in the Middle
East, Europe and Asia through our subsidiary Epsilor Electronic
Industries, Ltd., located in Dimona, Israel (in Israel’s Negev desert
area) (“Epsilor”);
|
· |
We
manufacture and sell Zinc-Air batteries and battery electronics for
the
military, focusing on applications that demand high energy and light
weight, through our subsidiary Electric Fuel Battery Corporation,
located
in Auburn, Alabama (“EFB”); and
|
· |
We
produce water-activated lifejacket lights for commercial aviation
and
marine applications, and we conduct our Electric Vehicle effort,
through
our subsidiary Electric Fuel (E.F.L.) Ltd., located in Beit Shemesh,
Israel (“EFL”).
|
Ø |
Off-road
driving on severe slopes, including muddy or swampy terrain;
|
Ø |
Driving
in night vision goggle and blackout conditions;
|
Ø |
Convoy
training; and
|
Ø |
The
use of the Central Tire Inflation System in response to changing
terrain.
|
Ø |
Leading
Technology−
We believe that we offer better-developed, more dynamic software
than our
competitors. Additionally, we incorporate leading graphics and
motion-cueing technologies in our systems to provide customers with
the
most realistic simulation experience on the market.
|
Ø |
Long
History in the Simulation Software Business−
As a market leader in the simulation software business for more than
thirty years, FAAC’s professionals understand customer requirements and
operating environments. Thus, we build our software to meet and exceed
demanding customers’ expectations.
|
Ø |
Low-Cost
Research and Development Capabilities for New Products−
Our customers benefit from government and commercial funding of research
and development and the low cost of subsequent adaptation. As such,
internally funded new product development costs have been less than
$100,000 per year since 1999.
|
Ø |
Service
Reputation−
We are known for providing strong customer service, a characteristic
that
drives new business within our chosen markets.
|
Ø |
Standardized
Development Processes−
We generally deliver our pro-ducts to market quickly and at high
quality
due to our standardized development processes.
|
Ø |
Range
3000
-
providing use-of-force simulation for military and law enforcement.
We
believe that the Range 3000 is the most technologically advanced
judgment
training simulator in the world.
|
Ø |
A2Z
Classroom Trainer
-
a state-of-the-art computer based training (CBT) system that allows
students to interact with realistic interactive scenarios projected
life-size in the classroom.
|
Ø |
Range
FDU (Firearms Diagnostic Unit)
-
a unique combination of training and interactive technologies that
give
instructors a first-person perspective of what trainees are seeing
and
doing when firing a weapon.
|
Ø |
Milo
(Multiple Interactive Learning/training Objectives)
-
a simulator designed with “plug in” modules to customize the training
system to meet end user needs.
|
Ø |
Summit
Training International
-
providing relevant, cost-effective professional training services
and
interactive courseware for law enforcement, corrections and corporate
clients.
|
Ø |
IES
Studio Productions
-
providing cutting edge multimedia video services for law enforcement,
military and security agencies, utilizing the newest equipment to
create
the training services required by the most demanding authorities.
|
Ø |
Officer’s
Presence and Demeanor
-
Picture-on-picture digital recordings of the trainee’s actions allows
visual review of the trainee’s reaction, body language and weapons
handling during the course of the scenario, which then can be played
back
for debriefing of the trainee’s actions.
|
Ø |
Verbalization
-
Correct phrases, timing, manner and sequence of an officer’s dialogue is
integrated within the platform of the system, allowing the situation
to
escalate or de-escalate through the officer’s own words in the context of
the scenario and in conjunction with the trainer.
|
Ø |
Less-Than-Lethal
Training
-
Training in the use of non-lethal devices such as TASER,
OC (pepper spray), batons and other devices can be used with the
video
training scenarios with appropriate reactions of each. We produce
an
interactive system especially for TASER
products called the TASER™ Judgmental Trainer, which delivers advance
simulated training for law enforcement and government agencies deploying
TASER non-lethal devices.
|
Ø |
Soft
Hand Tactics
-
Low level physical control tactics with the use of additional equipment
such as take-down dummies can be used.
|
Ø |
Firearms
Training and Basic Marksmanship
-
Either utilizing laser based training weapons or in conjunction with
a
live-fire screen, the use of “Live Ammunition” training can be employed on
the system.
|
Ø |
Provides
repeatable training to a standard based on established
policy
|
Ø |
Quick
dissemination and reinforcement of correct behavior and
policies
|
Ø |
Helps
reduce liability
|
Ø |
More
efficient than “traditional and redundant” role-playing
methods
|
Ø |
Realistic
scenarios instead of outdated “play-acting”
|
Ø |
Interactive
training of up to 250 students simultaneously with wireless
keypads
|
Ø |
Easy
Self-Authoring of interactive training
content
|
Ø |
PC-Pentium
platform facilitates low cost of
ownership
|
Ø |
Easy
to use Windows XP-based software
|
Ø |
Easy
to deploy in any classroom
|
Ø |
Fall
of shot feedback
|
Ø |
Trigger
pressure analysis
|
Ø |
Recoil
control, grip and stance assessment
|
Ø |
Sight
alignment
|
Ø |
Sight
picture analysis and target reacquisition
|
Ø |
Recruiting
and Retention of Law Enforcement and Corrections
Personnel
|
Ø |
Ethics
and Integrity
|
Ø |
Issues
of Hate Crimes
|
Ø |
Traffic
Stops and Use of Force
|
Ø |
Community
and Corporate Partnerships for Public
Safety
|
Ø |
Creating
a Safe School Environment
|
Ø |
Bristlecone
Products
|
Ø |
Fox
Valley Technical College
|
Ø |
TASER
International, Inc.
|
Ø |
Force
Science Research Center
|
Ø |
H&K
Training Centers
|
Ø |
The
David, an Ultra Light Armored Vehicle based on a Land Rover or Mercedes
platform;
|
Ø |
Command
vehicles (such as the Land Rover Defender 110);
and
|
Ø |
Pickup
trucks such as the Defender 130.
|
Ø |
Sports
utility vehicles (such as the GM Suburban, the Toyota Land Cruiser
and the
Land Rover Defender);
|
Ø |
Trucks,
such as the Ford F550;
|
Ø |
Passenger
vans (such as the Chevrolet Express, the General Motors Savana and
the
Ford Econoline); and
|
Ø |
Small
buses (based on vehicles in the Mercedes-Benz Vario and Sprinter
lines).
|
Ø |
Primary
batteries;
|
Ø |
Rechargeable
batteries;
|
Ø |
Smart
chargers;
|
Ø |
State
of charge indicators; and
|
Ø |
Control
and monitoring battery circuits
|
Ø |
Armed
forces in the Middle East and Asia;
|
Ø |
Military
original equipment manufacturers (OEMs);
and
|
Ø |
Various
battery manufacturers.
|
Ø |
Tactical
radios
|
Ø |
SIGINT
systems
|
Ø |
Training
systems
|
Ø |
SATCOM
radios
|
Ø |
Nightscope
power
|
Ø |
Guidance
systems
|
Ø |
Surveillance
systems
|
Ø |
Sensors
|
Ø |
an
in-vehicle, Zinc-Air fuel cell unit consisting of a series of Zinc-Air
cells and refuelable zinc-fuel anode cassettes using
commercially-available zinc;
|
Ø |
a
battery exchange unit for fast vehicle turn-around that is equivalent
to
the time needed to refuel a diesel bus;
|
Ø |
an
automated battery refueling system for mechanically replacing depleted
zinc-fuel cassettes with charged cassettes;
and
|
Ø |
a
regeneration system for electrochemical recycling and mechanical
repacking
of the discharged fuel cassettes.
|
Division
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||
Simulation
and Training Division
|
$
|
9,379,000
|
$
|
12,691,000
|
|||
Battery
and Power Systems Division
|
4,523,000
|
8,325,000
|
|||||
Armor
Division
|
4,440,000
|
4,002,000
|
|||||
TOTAL:
|
$
|
18,342,000
|
$
|
25,018,000
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2006
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|||
Third
Quarter (through August 23, 2006)
|
$
|
3.92
|
$
|
2.31
|
|||
Second
Quarter
|
$
|
8.12
|
$
|
2.30
|
|||
First
Quarter
|
$
|
8.96
|
$
|
5.18
|
|||
Year
Ended December 31, 2005
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|||
Fourth
Quarter
|
$
|
10.64
|
$
|
5.04
|
|||
Third
Quarter
|
$
|
16.66
|
$
|
9.80
|
|||
Second
Quarter
|
$
|
20.44
|
$
|
14.00
|
|||
First
Quarter
|
$
|
24.92
|
$
|
17.64
|
|||
Year
Ended December 31, 2004
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|||
Fourth
Quarter
|
$
|
30.24
|
$
|
21.00
|
|||
Third
Quarter
|
$
|
29.96
|
$
|
16.52
|
|||
Second
Quarter
|
$
|
60.76
|
$
|
26.60
|
|||
First
Quarter
|
$
|
35.42
|
$
|
23.10
|
Year
Ended
December 31, |
Six
Months Ended
June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||
2001
|
2002
|
2003**
|
2004
|
2005
|
2005
|
2006
|
||||||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
Statement of Operations Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
2,094
|
$
|
6,407
|
$
|
17,326
|
$
|
49,954
|
$
|
49,045
|
$
|
22,624
|
$
|
16,311
|
||||||||
Cost
of revenues
|
1,992
|
4,422
|
11,088
|
34,011
|
34,384
|
14,981
|
12,742
|
|||||||||||||||
Research
and development expenses
|
456
|
686
|
1,053
|
1,731
|
1,300
|
899
|
521
|
|||||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses and their impairment and amortization
of intangible assets
|
3,934
|
5,982
|
10,255
|
18,394
|
34,662
|
11,497
|
9,164
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating
loss
|
(4,288
|
)
|
(4,683
|
)
|
(5,070
|
)
|
(4,182
|
)
|
(21,301
|
)
|
(6,234
|
)
|
(6,116
|
)
|
||||||||
Other
income
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
339
|
—
|
36
|
|||||||||||||||
Financial
income (expenses), net
|
263
|
100
|
4,039
|
4,229
|
(2,706
|
)
|
(1,306
|
)
|
(6,459
|
)
|
||||||||||||
Loss
before minority interest in (loss) earnings of subsidiary and tax
expenses
|
(4,026
|
)
|
(4,583
|
)
|
(9,109
|
)
|
(8,411
|
)
|
(23,668
|
)
|
(7,541
|
)
|
(12,539
|
)
|
||||||||
Taxes
on income
|
—
|
—
|
(396
|
)
|
(586
|
)
|
(237
|
)
|
(267
|
)
|
(55
|
)
|
||||||||||
Earnings
(loss) from affiliated company
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(75
|
)
|
—
|
138
|
||||||||||||||
Minority
interest in (loss) earnings of subsidiary
|
—
|
(355
|
)
|
157
|
(45
|
)
|
57
|
(71
|
)
|
26
|
||||||||||||
Loss
from continuing operations
|
(4,026
|
)
|
(4,938
|
)
|
(9,348
|
)
|
(9,042
|
)
|
(23,923
|
)
|
(7,879
|
)
|
(12,429
|
)
|
||||||||
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations
|
(13,261
|
)
|
(13,566
|
)
|
110
|
—
|
(120
|
)
|
(200
|
)
|
—
|
|||||||||||
Net
loss for the period
|
(17,287
|
)
|
(18,504
|
)
|
(9,238
|
)
|
(9,042
|
)
|
(24,043
|
)
|
(8,079
|
)
|
(12,429
|
)
|
||||||||
Deemed
dividend to certain stockholders of common stock
|
(1,197
|
)
|
—
|
(350
|
)
|
(3,329
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
(434
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Net
loss attributable to stockholders of common stock
|
$
|
(18,483
|
)
|
$
|
(18,504
|
)
|
$
|
(9,588
|
)
|
$
|
(12,371
|
)
|
$
|
(24,043
|
)
|
$
|
(8,079
|
)
|
$
|
(12,863
|
)
|
|
Basic
and diluted net loss per share from continuing operations
|
$
|
(3.02
|
)
|
$
|
(2.13
|
)
|
$
|
(3.33
|
)
|
$
|
(1.81
|
)
|
$
|
(4.09
|
)
|
$
|
(1.37
|
)
|
$
|
(1.67
|
)
|
|
Loss
per share for combined operations
|
$
|
(10.69
|
)
|
$
|
(8.00
|
)
|
$
|
(3.45
|
)
|
$
|
(2.48
|
)
|
$
|
(4.09
|
)
|
$
|
(1.41
|
)
|
$
|
(1.73
|
)
|
|
Weighted
average number of common shares used in computing basic and diluted
net
loss per share (in thousands)
|
1,729
|
2,313
|
2,778
|
4,995
|
5,872
|
5,746
|
7,438
|
As
at December 31,
|
As
at June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
2001
|
2002
|
2003**
|
2004
|
2005
|
2005
|
2006
|
||||||||||||||||
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
Balance Sheet Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash,
cash equivalents, investments in marketable debt securities and restricted
collateral deposits
|
$
|
12,672
|
$
|
2,091
|
$
|
14,391
|
$
|
13,832
|
$
|
10,084
|
$
|
5,192
|
$
|
12,888
|
||||||||
Receivables
and other assets*
|
11,515
|
7,895
|
8,898
|
25,746
|
29,758
|
25,182
|
25,214
|
|||||||||||||||
Property
and equipment, net of depreciation
|
2,221
|
2,555
|
2,293
|
4,601
|
4,290
|
4,328
|
4,026
|
|||||||||||||||
Goodwill
and other intangible assets, net
|
—
|
7,522
|
7,440
|
54,113
|
40,587
|
49,592
|
40,243
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
26,408
|
$
|
20,063
|
$
|
33,022
|
$
|
98,292
|
$
|
84,719
|
$
|
84,294
|
$
|
82,371
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities*
|
$
|
3,874
|
$
|
7,272
|
$
|
6,710
|
$
|
26,381
|
$
|
26,167
|
$
|
19,396
|
$
|
25,098
|
||||||||
Long-term
liabilities***
|
3,126
|
3,753
|
4,686
|
6,438
|
12,287
|
6,384
|
5,043
|
|||||||||||||||
Stockholders’
equity
|
19,408
|
9,038
|
21,626
|
65,473
|
46,265
|
58,514
|
52,231
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders equity*
|
$
|
26,408
|
$
|
20,063
|
$
|
33,022
|
$
|
98,292
|
$
|
84,719
|
$
|
84,294
|
$
|
82,371
|
*
|
Includes
long-term restricted deposits and assets and liabilities, as applicable,
from discontinued operations.
|
|
**
|
Restated.
|
|
***
|
Includes
minority interest.
|
Ø |
we
develop, manufacture and market advanced high-tech multimedia and
interactive digital solutions for use-of-force and driving training
of
military, law enforcement, security and other personnel (our Simulation
and Training Division);
|
Ø |
we
manufacture aviation armor and we utilize sophisticated lightweight
materials and advanced engineering processes to armor vehicles (our
Armoring
Division);
and
|
Ø |
we
manufacture and sell Zinc-Air and lithium batteries for defense and
security products and other military applications and we pioneer
advancements in Zinc-Air battery technology for electric vehicles
(our
Battery
and Power Systems Division).
|
Ø |
Our
Simulation
and Training Division,
consisting of:
|
· |
FAAC
Incorporated, located in Ann Arbor, Michigan, which provides simulators,
systems engineering and software products to the United States military,
government and private industry (“FAAC”);
and
|
· |
IES
Interactive Training, Inc., located in Ann Arbor, Michigan, which
provides
specialized “use of force” training for police, security personnel and the
military (“IES”).
|
Ø |
Our
Armor
Division,
consisting of:
|
· |
Armour
of America, located in Auburn, Alabama, which manufacturers ballistic
and
fragmentation armor kits for rotary and fixed wing aircraft,
marine armor,
personnel armor, military vehicles and architectural applications,
including both the LEGUARD Tactical Leg Armor and the Armourfloat
Ballistic Floatation Device, which is a unique vest that is certified
by
the U.S. Coast Guard (“AoA”);
|
· |
MDT
Protective Industries, Ltd., located in Lod, Israel, which specializes
in using state-of-the-art lightweight ceramic materials, special
ballistic
glass and advanced engineering processes to fully armor vans and
SUVs, and
is a leading supplier to the Israeli military, Israeli special forces
and
special services (“MDT”) (75.5% owned);
and
|
· |
MDT
Armor Corporation, located in Auburn, Alabama, which conducts MDT’s United
States activities (“MDT Armor”)
(88% owned).
|
Ø |
Our
Battery
and Power Systems Division,
consisting of:
|
· |
Epsilor
Electronic Industries, Ltd., located in Dimona, Israel (in Israel’s Negev
desert area), which develops and sells rechargeable and primary lithium
batteries and smart chargers to the military and to private industry
in
the Middle East, Europe and Asia (“Epsilor”);
|
· |
Electric
Fuel Battery Corporation, located in Auburn, Alabama, which manufactures
and sells Zinc-Air fuel sells, batteries and chargers for the military,
focusing on applications that demand high energy and light weight
(“EFB”);
and
|
· |
Electric
Fuel (E.F.L.) Ltd., located in Beit Shemesh, Israel, which produces
water-activated lifejacket lights for commercial aviation and marine
applications, and which conducts our Electric Vehicle effort, focusing
on
obtaining and implementing demonstration projects in the U.S. and
Europe,
and on building broad industry partnerships that can lead to eventual
commercialization of our Zinc-Air energy system for electric vehicles
(“EFL”).
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
2005
|
2004
|
2003*
|
||||||||
Revenues:
|
||||||||||
Simulation
and Training Division
|
$
|
26,805,772
|
$
|
21,464,406
|
$
|
8,022,026
|
||||
Armor
Division
|
12,322,678
|
17,988,687
|
3,435,716
|
|||||||
Battery
and Power Systems Division
|
9,916,145
|
10,500,753
|
5,868,899
|
|||||||
$
|
49,044,595
|
$
|
49,953,846
|
$
|
17,326,641
|
|||||
Cost
of revenues:
|
||||||||||
Simulation
and Training Division
|
$
|
15,835,735
|
$
|
11,739,690
|
$
|
3,944,701
|
||||
Armor
Division
|
11,206,442
|
15,449,084
|
2,621,550
|
|||||||
Battery
and Power Systems Division
|
7,341,559
|
6,822,320
|
4,521,589
|
|||||||
$
|
34,383,736
|
$
|
34,011,094
|
$
|
11,087,840
|
|||||
Research
and development expenses:
|
||||||||||
Simulation
and Training Division
|
$
|
209,554
|
$
|
395,636
|
$
|
132,615
|
||||
Armor
Division
|
139,514
|
17,065
|
84,186
|
|||||||
Battery
and Power Systems Division
|
951,361
|
1,318,678
|
836,607
|
|||||||
$
|
1,300,429
|
$
|
1,731,379
|
$
|
1,053,408
|
|||||
Sales
and marketing expenses:
|
||||||||||
Simulation
and Training Division
|
$
|
2,704,880
|
$
|
3,185,001
|
$
|
2,237,386
|
||||
Armor
Division
|
834,090
|
565,981
|
180,631
|
|||||||
Battery
and Power Systems Division
|
853,378
|
1,171,235
|
926,872
|
|||||||
All
Other
|
79,242
|
—
|
187,747
|
|||||||
$
|
4,471,590
|
$
|
4,922,217
|
$
|
3,532,636
|
|||||
General
and administrative expenses:
|
||||||||||
Simulation
and Training Division
|
$
|
3,849,881
|
$
|
2,852,969
|
$
|
1,001,404
|
||||
Armor
Division
|
2,181,355
|
1,323,982
|
518,053
|
|||||||
Battery
and Power Systems Division
|
974,704
|
965,058
|
188,655
|
|||||||
All
Other
|
7,856,495
|
5,514,857
|
4,149,764
|
|||||||
$
|
14,862,435
|
$
|
10,656,866
|
$
|
5,857,876
|
|||||
Other
income:
|
||||||||||
Simulation
and Training Division
|
$
|
338,900
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||
Armor
Division
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||
Battery
and Power Systems Division
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||
All
Other
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||
$
|
338,900
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
|||||
Financial
expense (income):
|
||||||||||
Simulation
and Training Division
|
$
|
22,294
|
$
|
27,842
|
$
|
(119,750
|
)
|
|||
Armor
Division
|
(2,463
|
)
|
13,503
|
(19,918
|
)
|
|||||
Battery
and Power Systems Division
|
122,236
|
54,511
|
7,936
|
|||||||
All
Other
|
2,563,622
|
4,133,109
|
4,170,441
|
|||||||
$
|
2,705,689
|
$
|
4,228,965
|
$
|
4,038,709
|
|||||
Tax
expenses:
|
||||||||||
Simulation
and Training Division
|
$
|
63,976
|
$
|
77,811
|
$
|
30,130
|
||||
Armor
Division
|
94,671
|
134,949
|
363,173
|
|||||||
Battery
and Power Systems Division
|
32,846
|
320,878
|
—
|
|||||||
All
Other
|
46,179
|
52,471
|
2,890
|
|||||||
$
|
237,672
|
$
|
586,109
|
$
|
396,193
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
2005
|
2004
|
2003*
|
Amortization
of intangible assets:
|
||||||||||
Simulation
and Training Division
|
$
|
1,213,261
|
$
|
1,323,403
|
$
|
720,410
|
||||
Armor
Division
|
1,348,248
|
661,914
|
144,500
|
|||||||
Battery
and Power Systems Division
|
509,239
|
509,239
|
—
|
|||||||
$
|
3,070,748
|
$
|
2,494,556
|
$
|
864,910
|
|||||
Impairment
of goodwill and other intangible assets:
|
||||||||||
Simulation
and Training Division
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
320,279
|
$
|
—
|
||||
Armor
Division
|
12,256,756
|
—
|
156,900
|
|||||||
Battery
and Power Systems Division
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||
$
|
12,256,756
|
$
|
320,279
|
$
|
156,900
|
|||||
Loss
from affiliated company:
|
||||||||||
Simulation
and Training Division
|
$
|
(75,000
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
|||
Armor
Division
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||
Battery
and Power Systems Division
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||
$
|
(75,000
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||
Minority
interest in loss (profit) of subsidiaries:
|
||||||||||
Simulation
and Training Division
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||
Armor
Division
|
57,149
|
(44,694
|
)
|
—
|
||||||
Battery
and Power Systems Division
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||
$
|
57,149
|
$
|
(44,694
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
||||
Income
(loss) from continuing operations:
|
||||||||||
Simulation
and Training Division
|
$
|
3,170,091
|
$
|
1,541,775
|
$
|
75,130
|
||||
Armor
Division
|
(15,678,786
|
)
|
(222,485
|
)
|
(299,559
|
)
|
||||
Battery
and Power Systems Division
|
(869,178
|
)
|
(661,166
|
)
|
(612,760
|
)
|
||||
All
Other
|
(10,545,538
|
)
|
(9,700,437
|
)
|
(8,510,842
|
)
|
||||
$
|
(23,923,411
|
)
|
$
|
(9,042,313
|
)
|
$
|
(9,348,031
|
)
|
||
Loss
from discontinued operations:
|
||||||||||
Simulation
and Training Division
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||
Armor
Division
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||
Battery
and Power Systems Division
|
(120,000
|
)
|
—
|
110,410
|
||||||
$
|
(120,000
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
110,410
|
||||
Net
income (loss):
|
||||||||||
Simulation
and Training Division
|
$
|
3,170,091
|
$
|
1,541,775
|
$
|
75,130
|
||||
Armor
Division
|
(15,678,786
|
)
|
(222,485
|
)
|
(299,559
|
)
|
||||
Battery
and Power Systems Division
|
(989,178
|
)
|
(661,166
|
)
|
(502,350
|
)
|
||||
All
Other
|
(10,545,538
|
)
|
(9,700,437
|
)
|
(8,510,842
|
)
|
||||
$
|
(24,043,411
|
)
|
$
|
(9,042,313
|
)
|
$
|
(9,237,621
|
)
|
Ø |
IES
and FAAC recognized revenues from the sale of interactive use-of-force
training systems and from the provision of maintenance services in
connection with such systems.
|
Ø |
MDT,
MDT Armor and AoA recognized revenues from payments under vehicle
armoring
contracts, for service and repair of armored vehicles, and on sale
of
armoring products.
|
Ø |
EFB
and Epsilor recognized revenues from the sale of batteries, chargers
and
adapters to the military, and under certain development contracts
with the
U.S. Army.
|
Ø |
EFL
recognized revenues from the sale of water-activated battery (WAB)
lifejacket lights.
|
Ø |
Decreased
revenues from our Armor Division ($3.9 million less in the three
months
ended June 30, 2006 versus the three months ended June 30,
2005).
|
Ø |
Decreased
revenues from our Simulation and Training Division, particularly
FAAC
($1.0 million less in the three months ended June 30, 2006 versus
the
three months ended June 30,
2005).
|
Ø |
Decreases
in certain general and administrative expenses in comparison
to 2005, such
as auditing, legal expenses and travel expenses, as a result
of
cost-cutting programs implemented by
management.
|
Ø |
Decrease
in general and administrative expenses related to our Simulation
and
Training Division (payroll, legal and other
expenses).
|
Ø |
IES
and FAAC recognized revenues from the sale of interactive use-of-force
training systems and from the provision of maintenance services
in
connection with such systems.
|
Ø |
MDT,
MDT Armor and AoA recognized revenues from payments under vehicle
armoring
contracts, for service and repair of armored vehicles, and on sale
of
armoring products.
|
Ø |
EFB
and Epsilor recognized revenues from the sale of batteries, chargers
and
adapters to the military, and under certain development contracts
with the
U.S. Army.
|
Ø |
EFL
recognized revenues from the sale of water-activated battery (WAB)
lifejacket lights.
|
Ø |
Decreased
revenues from our Armor Division ($5.2 million less in the first
six
months of 2006 versus the first six months of
2005).
|
Ø |
Decreased
revenues from our Battery and Power Systems Division, particularly
Epsilor
($920,000 less in the first six months of 2006 versus the first
six months
of 2005).
|
Ø |
Decreases
in certain general and administrative expenses in comparison to
2005, such
as auditing, legal expenses and travel expenses, as a result of
cost-cutting programs implemented by management
($366,000).
|
Ø |
Decrease
in general and administrative expenses related to FAAC, primarily
payroll,
legal and other expenses
($350,000).
|
Ø |
Decrease
in general and administrative expenses related to IES as a result
of the
consolidation of IES and FAAC operations
($106,000).
|
Ø |
Decrease
in general and administrative expenses related to AoA due to decrease
in
operations, employees and the relocation of AoA to Alabama
($248,000).
|
Ø
|
IES
and FAAC recognized revenues from the sale of interactive use-of-force
and
driver operator training systems and from the provision of maintenance
services in connection with such systems;
|
Ø
|
MDT,
MDT Armor and AoA recognized revenues from payments under vehicle
armoring
contracts, for service and repair of armored vehicles, and on sale
of
armoring products;
|
Ø
|
EFB
and Epsilor recognized revenues from the sale of batteries, chargers
and
adapters to the military, and under certain development contracts
with the
U.S. Army; and
|
Ø
|
EFL
recognized revenues from the sale of lifejacket lights and from
subcontracting fees received in connection with Phase IV of the United
States Department of Transportation (DOT) electric bus
program.
|
Ø
|
$26.8
million for the Simulation and Training Division, compared to $21.5
million in 2004, an
increase of $5.3 million, or 25%, due
primarily to the increased revenues of FAAC (approximately $4.5 million).
|
Ø
|
$12.3
million for the Armor Division, compared to $18.0 million in
2004, a
decrease of $5.7 million, or 32%, due
primarily to the decreased revenues from MDT Armor (approximately
$8.3
million) as a result of a slowdown in armoring orders related to
the Iraq
War. This decrease was partially offset by higher revenues recorded
by us
in 2005 from AoA in comparison to 2004, due to the fact that AoA’s
revenues were included for all of 2005 but only for the last five
months
of 2004. On a pro forma basis, AoA’s revenues decreased in 2005 versus
2004, due to decisions by customers to utilize methods of armor not
produced by AoA (hard armor instead of soft armor), the change in
U.S.
military priorities from acquiring new armor to funding the ground
forces
in Iraq and Afghanistan, and, following Hurricane Katrina, the fact
that
substantial funds earmarked for defense were delayed to provide funds
for
hurricane relief.
|
Ø
|
$9.9
million for the Battery and Power Systems Division, compared to $10.5
million in 2004, a
decrease of $585,000, or 6%, due primarily to decreased sales of
lithium
batteries and chargers by our Epsilor subsidiary as a result of reduced
equipment purchases by one of its customers, offset to some extent
by
increased revenues from our Zinc-Air military batteries.
|
Ø
|
The
inclusion of the general and administrative expenses of AoA in our
results
for all of 2005 but only five months of 2004 ($836,000);
|
Ø
|
Increases
in general and administrative expenses in our FAAC subsidiary due
to legal
expenses, employee relocation, accounting, incentive pay accruals,
and
similar expenses ($809,000);
|
Ø
|
Increase
in other corporate general and administrative expenses such as auditing,
legal and travel expenses ($800,000);
and
|
Ø
|
Increase
in costs related to abandoned acquisition activities ($1.1
million).
|
Ø
|
From
the sale of interactive training systems and from the provision of
warranty services in connection with such systems (FAAC and
IES);
|
Ø
|
From
payments under armor contracts and for service and repair of armored
vehicles (AoA and MDT);
|
Ø
|
From
the sale of batteries, chargers and adapters to the military, and
under
certain development contracts with the U.S. Army (EFB and Epsilor);
|
Ø
|
From
the sale of lifejacket lights (EFL);
and
|
Ø
|
From
subcontracting fees received in connection with Phase III of the
United
States Department of Transportation (DOT) electric bus program, which
began in October 2003 and was completed in March 2004. Phase IV of
the DOT
program, which began in October 2004, did not result in any revenues
during 2004 (EFL).
|
Ø
|
Increased
revenues from vehicle armoring; and
|
Ø
|
Revenues
generated by FAAC, Epsilor and AoA in 2004 that were not present
in
2003.
|
Ø
|
The
inclusion of the general and administrative expenses of FAAC, Epsilor
and
AoA in our results for 2004 ($2.4
million);
|
Ø
|
Expenses
in 2004 in connection with grant of options and shares to employees
that
were not present in 2003 ($830,000);
|
Ø
|
Costs
associated with our compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act
of 2002 that were not present in 2003 ($150,000);
and
|
Ø
|
Increases
in other general and administrative expenses, such as employee salaries
and bonuses, travel expenses, audit fees, director fees, legal fees,
and
expenses related to due diligence performed in connection with certain
potential acquisitions, which were not present in
2003.
|
Ø
|
Expenses
in 2003 in connection with a litigation settlement agreement that
were not
present in 2004 ($700,000); and
|
Ø
|
Amortization
of legal and consulting expenses in 2003 in connection with our
convertible debentures that were lower (by $260,000) than in
2004.
|
Ø
|
IES
recognized revenues from the sale of interactive use-of-force training
systems and from the provision of warranty services in connection
with
such systems;
|
Ø
|
MDT
recognized revenues from payments under vehicle armoring contracts
and for
service and repair of armored
vehicles;
|
Ø
|
EFB
recognized revenues from the sale of batteries and adapters to the
military, and under certain development contracts with the U.S.
Army;
|
Ø
|
Arocon
recognized revenues under consulting agreements;
and
|
Ø
|
EFL
recognized revenues from the sale of lifejacket lights and from
subcontracting fees received in connection with Phase III of the
United
States Department of Transportation (DOT) electric bus program, which
began in October 2002 and was completed in March 2004. Phase IV of
the DOT
program, which began in October 2003, did not result in any revenues
during 2003.
|
Ø
|
The
inclusion of the sales and marketing expenses of IES and MDT in our
results for the full year of 2003 but only part of
2002;
|
Ø
|
An
increase in IES’s sales activity during 2003, which resulted in both
increased sales and increased sales and marketing expenses during
2003;
and
|
Ø
|
We
incurred expenses for consultants in the amount of $810,000 in connection
with our CECOM battery program with the U.S. Army and $345,000 in
connection with our security consulting
business.
|
Ø
|
The
inclusion of the general and administrative expenses of IES and MDT
in our
results for the full year of 2003 but only part of
2002;
|
Ø
|
Expenses
in 2003 in connection with a litigation settlement agreement, in
the
amount of $714,000, that were not present in
2002;
|
Ø
|
Expenses
in 2003 in connection with warrant grants, in the amount of $199,500,
that
were not present in 2002;
|
Ø
|
Legal
and consulting expenses in 2003 in connection with our convertible
debentures, in the amount of $484,000, that were not present in 2002;
and
|
Ø
|
Expenses
in 2003 in connection with the start-up of our security consulting
business in the United States and with the beginning of operations
of MDT
Armor, in the amount of $250,000, that were not present in
2002.
|
Payment
Due by Period
|
||||||||||||||||
Contractual
Obligations
|
Total
|
Less
Than 1 Year
|
1-3
Years
|
3-5
Years
|
More
than 5 Years
|
|||||||||||
Long-term
debt*
|
$
|
8,750,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
8,750,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||||
Short-term
debt**
|
$
|
15,474,448
|
$
|
15,474,448
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||||
Operating
lease obligations***
|
$
|
1,926,383
|
$
|
826,367
|
$
|
1,003,176
|
$
|
96,840
|
$
|
—
|
||||||
Severance
obligations***
|
$
|
1,732,955
|
$
|
137,685
|
$
|
1,595,269
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
*
|
Includes convertible debentures in the gross amount of $8,750,000. Unamortized financial expenses related to the beneficial conversion feature of these convertible debentures amounted to $160,000 at year end. |
**
|
Includes sums owed in respect of an earn-out provision related to our acquisition of FAAC, in the amount of $604,000. Also includes $12.8 million short-term convertible note and $2.0 million in short-term bank debt |
***
|
Includes operating lease obligations related to rent. |
****
|
Includes obligations related to special severance pay arrangements in addition to the severance amounts due to certain employees pursuant to Israeli severance pay law (the amount shown in the table above with payment due during the next 1-3 years might not be paid in the period stated in the event the employment agreements to which such severance obligations relate are extended). |
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
||
Robert
S. Ehrlich
|
67
|
Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|
||
Steven
Esses
|
42
|
President,
Chief Operating Officer and Director
|
||
Thomas
J. Paup
|
57
|
Vice
President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|
||
Dr.
Jay M. Eastman
|
57
|
Director
|
||
Jack
E. Rosenfeld
|
67
|
Director
|
||
Lawrence
M. Miller
|
59
|
Director
|
||
Edward
J. Borey
|
55
|
Director
|
||
Seymour
Jones
|
74
|
Director
|
Ø |
cash
salary;
|
Ø |
bonus,
some of which was paid in cash in the year in which it was earned
and some
of which was accrued in the year in which it was earned but paid
in cash
in a subsequent year;
|
Ø |
cash
reimbursement for taxes paid by the Named Executive Officer and reimbursed
by us in accordance with Israeli tax
regulations;
|
Ø |
accruals
(but not cash payments) in respect of contractual termination compensation
in excess of the Israeli statutory
minimum;
|
Ø |
accruals
(but not cash payments) in respect of pension plans, which consist
of a
savings plan, life insurance and statutory severance pay benefits,
and a
continuing education fund (as is customary in
Israel);
|
Ø |
stock
options;
|
Ø |
grants
of restricted stock, where the sale of such stock is prohibited for
a
period of two years and such stock is forfeit to us should the Named
Executive Officer’s employment be terminated for cause, as defined in such
Executive’s employment agreement (e.g.,
fraud, reckless or willful misconduct, etc.);
and
|
Ø |
other
benefits, primarily consisting of annual statutory holiday pay and
redemption of unused vacation days and sick
days.
|
Annual
Compensation
|
Long
Term Compensation
|
All
Other Compensation
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Awards
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name
and Principal Position
|
Year
|
Salary
|
Bonus
|
Tax
Reimbursement
|
Restricted
Stock
Awards(2)
|
Securities
Underlying
Options
|
Changes
in
Accruals
for
Sick
Days,
Vacation
Days,
and
Termination
Compensation
|
Payment
to
Pension
and
Education
Funds
|
Others
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Robert
S. Ehrlich
|
2005
|
$
|
275,362
|
$
|
49,875
|
$
|
26,340
|
$
|
0
|
0
|
(3)
|
$
|
(51,363
|
)(4)
|
$
|
45,362
|
$
|
112,413
|
(5)
|
|||||||||
Chairman
of the Board, Chief
|
2004
|
$
|
275,907
|
$
|
175,000
|
$
|
29,103
|
$
|
626,350
|
3,571
|
$
|
133,898
|
(6)
|
$
|
548,477
|
(7)
|
$
|
19,893
|
||||||||||
Executive
Officer and director*
|
2003
|
$
|
259,989
|
$
|
180,000
|
(8)
|
$
|
27,211
|
$
|
0
|
145,357
|
$
|
80,713
|
(9)
|
$
|
48,228
|
$
|
678
|
||||||||||
Steven
Esses
|
2005
|
$
|
56,722
|
(10)
|
$
|
112,000
|
(11)
|
$
|
22,666
|
$
|
0
|
8,204
|
(12)
|
$
|
228,403
|
(13)
|
$
|
12,446
|
$
|
13,607
|
||||||||
President,
Chief Operating
|
2004
|
$
|
65,506
|
(14)
|
$
|
106,000
|
(15)
|
$
|
25,273
|
$
|
221,100
|
0
|
$
|
3,759
|
(16)
|
$
|
12,116
|
$
|
12,940
|
|||||||||
Officer
and director**
|
2003
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
73,929
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
||||||||||||
Avihai
Shen
|
2005
|
$
|
157,013
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
7,889
|
$
|
0
|
0
|
$
|
70,479
|
(17)
|
$
|
23,121
|
$
|
39,476
|
(18)
|
||||||||||
Vice
President - Finance and
|
2004
|
$
|
155,845
|
$
|
97,000
|
$
|
6,407
|
$
|
54,900
|
1,339
|
$
|
34,972
|
(19)
|
$
|
26,889
|
$
|
476
|
|||||||||||
Chief
Financial Officer***
|
2003
|
$
|
123,988
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
8,653
|
$
|
0
|
43,482
|
$
|
6,471
|
(20)
|
$
|
23,133
|
$
|
463
|
*
|
Mr.
Ehrlich ceased to hold the title of President in December
2005.
|
|
**
|
Mr.
Esses became an executive officer in January 2003. His compensation
as an
officer during 2003 consisted solely of stock options. In December
2005,
Mr. Esses became our President; prior thereto, he held the title
of
Executive Vice President.
|
|
***
|
Mr.
Shen ceased to act as our Chief Financial Officer in February 2006,
and
his employment with us terminated on March 31, 2006.
|
|
(1)
|
We
paid the amounts reported for each named executive officer in U.S.
dollars
and/or New Israeli Shekels (NIS). We have translated amounts paid
in NIS
into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate of NIS into U.S. dollars at
the
time of payment or accrual.
|
(2)
|
Based
on the closing market price of our stock on the Nasdaq Stock Exchange
on
the date of grant multiplied by the number of shares awarded. As
of
December 31, 2004, our Named Executive Officers held 45,357 restricted
shares. Of these shares, the restrictions on 37,857 shares are
scheduled
to expire on August 4, 2006, and the restrictions on 7,500 are
scheduled
to expire on December 8, 2006. The value of the restricted shares
held by
our Named Executive Officers on December 31, 2004, based on the
closing
price of our stock on the Nasdaq Stock Exchange on that date, was
$902,350.
|
(3)
|
During
2005, no new options were granted to Mr. Ehrlich; however, 42,857
of Mr.
Ehrlich’s options were repriced in 2005 from an average exercise price of
$16.66 to a new exercise price of $5.46. Additionally, 56,012 of
Mr.
Ehrlich’s options expired or were cancelled during
2005.
|
|
(4)
|
Of
this amount, $67,024 represents our accrual for severance pay that
will be
payable to Mr. Ehrlich upon his leaving our employ other than if
he is
terminated for cause, such as a breach of trust; $(51,928) represents
the
decrease of the accrual for vacation days redeemable by Mr. Ehrlich;
$(40,483) represents the decrease of the accrual for sick days redeemable
by Mr. Ehrlich; and $(25,976) represents the decrease of our accrual
for
severance pay that would be payable to Mr. Ehrlich under the laws
of the
State of Israel if we were to terminate his employment.
|
|
(5)
|
Of
this amount, $61,195 represents payment for redemption of accrued
but
unused vacation days, and $33,394 represents payment for redemption
of
accrued but unused sick days.
|
|
(6)
|
Of
this amount, $76,766 represents our accrual for severance pay that
would
be payable to Mr. Ehrlich upon a “change of control” or upon the
occurrence of certain other events; $28,603 represents the increase
of the
accrual for vacation days redeemable by Mr. Ehrlich; and $28,529
represents the increase of our accrual for severance pay that would
be
payable to Mr. Ehrlich under the laws of the State of Israel if we
were to
terminate his employment.
|
|
(7)
|
Of
this amount, $500,000 was deposited
by us in a Rabbi Trust for Mr. Ehrlich’s benefit. Pursuant to the terms of
the Rabbi Trust, funds in the Rabbi Trust continue to be owned by
us, and
benefit from all gains and bear the risk of all losses resulting
from
investments of Rabbi Trust funds. See “Employment Contracts - Robert S.
Ehrlich,” below.
|
|
(8)
|
We
paid Mr. Ehrlich $180,000 during 2004 in satisfaction of his bonus
from
2003 to which he was entitled according to his contract. Of this
amount,
we accrued $99,750 for Mr. Ehrlich in satisfaction of the 2003 bonus
to
which he was entitled according to his contract; the remainder was
the
result of the approval in 2004 by the Compensation Committee of a
higher
bonus for 2003 than Mr. Ehrlich’s contractual minimum.
|
(9)
|
Of
this amount, $92,075 represents our accrual for severance pay that
would
be payable to Mr. Ehrlich upon a “change of control” or upon the
occurrence of certain other events; $3,451 represents the increase
of the
accrual for sick leave and vacation days redeemable by Mr. Ehrlich;
and
$(14,813) represents the decrease of our accrual for severance pay
that
would be payable to Mr. Ehrlich under the laws of the State of Israel
if
we were to terminate his
employment.
|
(10)
|
Does
not include $178,176 that we paid in consulting fees to Sampen
Corporation, a
New York corporation owned by members of Steven Esses’s immediate family,
from which Mr. Esses receives a salary. See “Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions - Consulting Agreement with Sampen Corporation,”
below.
|
|
(11)
|
Includes
a $100,000 signing bonus that was paid to Mr. Esses in 2005 and the
$12,000 minimum bonus to which Mr. Esses is entitled pursuant to
the terms
of his employment contract. Does not include
$30,720 that we paid as a bonus to Sampen Corporation, a
New York corporation owned by members of Steven Esses’s immediate family,
from which Mr. Esses receives a salary. See “Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions - Consulting Agreement with Sampen Corporation,”
below..
|
|
(12)
|
In
addition to the grant of 8,204 new options during 2005, 63,224 of
Mr.
Esses’s options were repriced in 2005 from an average exercise price of
$11.20 to a new exercise price of $5.46.
|
|
(13)
|
Of
this amount, $186,707 represents the increase of our accrual for
severance
pay that would be payable to Mr. Esses if we were to terminate his
employment; and $41,369 represents the increase of the accrual for
sick
leave and vacation days redeemable by Mr. Esses.
|
|
(14)
|
Does
not include $208,100 that we paid in consulting fees to Sampen
Corporation, a
New York corporation owned by members of Steven Esses’s immediate family,
from which Mr. Esses receives a salary. See “Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions - Consulting Agreement with Sampen Corporation,”
below.
|
|
(15)
|
Does
not include $110,000 that we paid as a bonus to Sampen Corporation,
a
New York corporation owned by members of Steven Esses’s immediate family,
from which Mr. Esses receives a salary. See “Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions - Consulting Agreement with Sampen Corporation,”
below.
|
|
(16)
|
Represents
the increase of the accrual for vacation days redeemable by Mr.
Esses.
|
|
(17)
|
Of
this amount, $104,602 represents the increase of our accrual for
severance
pay that would be payable to Mr. Shen if we were to terminate his
employment; $(28,597) represents the decrease of the accrual for
sick
leave and vacation days redeemable by Mr. Shen; and $(5,526) represents
the decrease in our accrual for severance pay that would be payable
to Mr.
Shen under the laws of the State of Israel if we were to terminate
his
employment.
Mr. Shen left our employ effective March 31, 2006, and these amounts
were
accordingly paid to him.
|
|
(18)
|
Of
this amount, $35,131 represents payment to Mr. Shen for redemption
of
accrued but unused vacation days.
|
|
(19)
|
Of
this amount, $21,568 represents the increase in our accrual for vacation
days redeemable by Mr. Shen; and $13,404 represents the increase
of our
accrual for severance pay that would be payable to Mr. Shen under
the laws
of the State of Israel if we were to terminate his
employment.
|
|
(20)
|
Of
this amount, $8,369 represents the increase of the accrual for vacation
days redeemable by Mr. Shen; and $(1,628) represents the decrease
of our
accrual for severance pay that would be payable to Mr. Shen under
the laws
of the State of Israel if we were to terminate his
employment.
|
Name
of Borrower
|
Date
of Loan
|
Original
Principal
Amount
of Loan
|
Amount
Outstanding
as
of 12/31/05
|
Terms
of Loan
|
|||||||||
Robert
S. Ehrlich
|
12/28/99
|
$
|
167,975
|
$
|
201,570
|
Ten-year
non-recourse loan to purchase our stock, secured by the shares of
stock
purchased.
|
|||||||
Robert
S. Ehrlich
|
02/09/00
|
$
|
789,991
|
$
|
692,102
|
Twenty-five-year
non-recourse loan to purchase our stock, secured by the shares of
stock
purchased.
|
|||||||
Robert
S. Ehrlich
|
06/10/02
|
$
|
36,500
|
$
|
40,343
|
Twenty-five-year
non-recourse loan to purchase our stock, secured by the shares of
stock
purchased.
|
|
|
Individual
Grants
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Number
of Securities
Underlying
Options
|
%
of Total Options granted to Employees
in
Fiscal
|
Exercise
or Base
Price
|
Expiration
|
Potential
Realizable Value
at
Assumed Annual Rates
of
Stock Price Appreciation
for
Option Term(1)
|
|||||||||||||||
Name
|
Granted
|
Year
|
($/Sh)
|
Date
|
5%
($)
|
10%
($)
|
|||||||||||||
Steven
Esses
|
8,204
|
6.8
|
%
|
$
|
5.46
|
12/29/10
|
$
|
12,376
|
$
|
27,348
|
(1)
|
The
potential realizable value illustrates the value that might be realized
upon exercise of the options immediately prior to the expiration
of their
terms, assuming the specified compounded rates of appreciation of
the
market price per share from the date of grant to the end of the option
term. Actual gains, if any, on stock option exercise are dependent
upon a
number of factors, including the future performance of the common
stock
and the timing of option exercises, as well as the executive officer’s
continued employment through the vesting period. The gains shown
are net
of the option exercise price, but do not include deductions for taxes
and
other expenses payable upon the exercise of the option or for sale
of the
underlying shares of common stock. The 5% and 10% rates of appreciation
are mandated by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission
and do
not represent our estimate or projection of future increases in the
price
of our stock. There can be no assurance that the amounts reflected
in this
table will be achieved, and unless the market price of our common
stock
appreciates over the option term, no value will be realized from
the
option grants made to the executive
officers.
|
Shares
Acquired
on
|
Value
|
Number
of Securities
Underlying
Un-exercised
Options
at Fiscal Year End
|
Value
of Unexercised
In-the-Money
Options
at
Fiscal Year-End(1)
|
||||||||||||||||
Name
|
Exercise
|
Realized
|
Exercisable
|
Unexercisable
|
Exercisable
|
Unexercisable
|
|||||||||||||
Robert
S. Ehrlich
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
150,000
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
||||||||||
Steven
Esses
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
73,929
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
||||||||||
Avihai
Shen
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
44,261
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
(1)
|
Options
that are “in-the-money” are options for which the fair market value of the
underlying securities on December 31, 2005 ($5.18) exceeds the exercise
or
base price of the option.
|
Name
and Address of Beneficial Owner(1)
|
Shares
Beneficially Owned(2)(3)
|
Percentage
of Total Shares
Outstanding(3)
|
|||||
Robert
S. Ehrlich
|
209,466
|
(4)
|
3.0
|
%
|
|||
Steven
Esses
|
85,714
|
(5)
|
1.2
|
%
|
|||
Avihai
Shen**
|
47,153
|
(6)
|
*
|
||||
Thomas
J. Paup
|
3,571
|
(7)
|
*
|
||||
Dr.
Jay M. Eastman
|
7,024
|
(8)
|
*
|
||||
Jack
E. Rosenfeld
|
7,166
|
(9)
|
*
|
||||
Lawrence
M. Miller
|
35,486
|
(10)
|
*
|
||||
Edward
J. Borey
|
4,237
|
(11)
|
*
|
||||
Prof.
Seymour Jones
|
0
|
*
|
|||||
All
of our directors and executive officers as a group (9
persons)
|
399,817
|
(12)
|
5.6
|
%
|
*
|
Less
than one percent.
|
|
**
|
Mr.
Shen ceased to act as our Chief Financial Officer in February 2006,
and
his employment with us terminated on March 31, 2006.
|
|
(1)
|
The
address of each named beneficial owner is in care of Arotech Corporation,
1229 Oak Valley Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108.
|
|
(2)
|
Unless
otherwise indicated in these footnotes, each of the persons or entities
named in the table has sole voting and sole investment power with
respect
to all shares shown as beneficially owned by that person, subject
to
applicable community property laws.
|
(3)
|
Based
on 8,468,957 shares of common stock outstanding as of June 30,
2006. For
purposes of determining beneficial ownership of our common stock,
owners
of options exercisable within sixty days are considered to be the
beneficial owners of the shares of common stock for which such
securities
are exercisable. The percentage ownership of the outstanding common
stock
reported herein is based on the assumption (expressly required
by the
applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission) that
only the
person whose ownership is being reported has exercised his options for
shares of common stock.
|
|
(4)
|
Consists
of 44,154 shares held directly by Mr. Ehrlich, 3,571 shares held
by Mr.
Ehrlich’s wife (in which shares Mr. Ehrlich disclaims beneficial
ownership), 11,527 shares held in Mr. Ehrlich’s pension plan, 214 shares
held by children sharing the same household (in which shares Mr.
Ehrlich
disclaims beneficial ownership), and 150,000 shares issuable upon
exercise
of options exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2006.
|
|
(5)
|
Consists
of 11,785 shares held directly by Mr. Esses and 73,929 shares issuable
upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of June 30,
2006.
|
|
(6)
|
Consists
of 2,892 shares owned directly by Mr. Shen and 44,261 shares issuable
upon
exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of June 30,
2006.
|
|
(7)
|
Consists
of 3,571 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within
60
days of June 30, 2006.
|
|
(8)
|
Consists
of 7,024 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within
60
days of June 30, 2006.
|
|
(9)
|
Consists
of 142 shares owned directly by Mr. Rosenfeld and 7,024 shares
issuable
upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of June 30,
2006.
|
|
(10)
|
Consists
of 851 shares held directly by Mr. Miller, 26,897 shares held by
Leon S.
Gross and Lawrence M. Miller as co-trustees of the Rose Gross Charitable
Foundation, and 7,738 shares issuable upon exercise of options
exercisable
within 60 days of June 30, 2006.
|
|
(11)
|
Consists
of 1,142 shares owned directly by Mr. Borey and 3,095 shares issuable
upon
exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of June 30,
2006.
|
|
(12)
|
Includes
296,642 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within
60
days of June 30, 2006.
|
● |
incorporated
documents are considered part of this prospectus;
and
|
● |
we
can disclose important information to you by referring you to those
documents.
|
● |
the
description of our common stock contained in the Registration Statement
on
Form 8-A, Commission
File No. 0-23336, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on
February 2, 1994;
|
● |
our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2005
filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
on
March 31, 2006, as amended by our Form 10-K/A filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
on
June 16, 2006 and our Form 10-K/A filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
on
July 24, 2006;
|
● |
our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March
31, 2006,
filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
on
May 15, 2006, as amended by our Form 10-Q/A filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
on
July 24, 2006;
|
● |
our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June
30, 2006,
filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
on
August 14, 2006;
|
● |
our
Current Reports on Form 8-K filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
on
April 7, 2006, April 12, 2006, May 18, 2006, June 19, 2006, June
26, 2006
and July 10, 2006; and
|
● |
our
definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities
and
Exchange Commission on May 10, 2006.
|
SEC
Registration Fee.
|
$
|
6,085.63
|
||
Legal
Fees and Expenses
|
5,000.00
|
|||
Accounting
Fees and Expenses
|
5,000.00
|
|||
Printing
and Engraving
|
1,000.00
|
|||
Miscellaneous
|
2,914.37
|
|||
Total:
|
$
|
20,000.00
|
Ø |
Pursuant
to the terms of a Securities Purchase Agreement dated September 30,
2003
(the “Purchase Agreement”) by and between Arotech Corporation and six
institutional investors (the “Debenture Holders”), we issued and sold to
the Debenture Holders (i) an aggregate principal amount of $5,000,000
in
8% secured convertible debentures due September 30, 2006, convertible
into
shares of our common stock at any time after January 1, 2004 at a
conversion price of $1.15 per share, and (ii) three-year warrants
to
purchase up to an aggregate of 1,250,000 shares of our common stock
at any
time after January 1, 2004 at an exercise price of $1.4375 per share.
|
Ø |
In
September 2003, we increased our holdings in both of our vehicle
armoring
subsidiaries to 88% of MDT Armor Corporation and 75.5% in MDT Protective
Industries Ltd. We acquired the additional stake from AGA Means of
Protection and Commerce Ltd. in exchange for the issuance to AGA
of
126,000 shares of our common stock.
|
Ø |
Under
the terms of an independent contractor agreement between us and InteSec
Group LLC, we pay InteSec a commission in stock of 5% of the military
battery sales that InteSec brings to us from U.S. and NATO defense,
security and military entities and U.S. defense contractors. Pursuant
to
the terms of this agreement, in July 2003, we issued 215,294 shares
to
InteSec.
|
Ø |
Pursuant
to the terms of a Securities Purchase Agreement dated January 7,
2004 (the
“SPA”) by and between us and several institutional investors (the
“Investors”), we issued and sold to the Investors registered stock off of
our effective shelf registration statement at a price of $1.88 per
share,
and three-year warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 9,840,426
shares
of our common stock at any time beginning six months after closing
(the
“Warrants”) at an exercise price per share equal to $1.88. The common
stock underlying the Warrants was not registered.
|
Ø |
Under
the terms of an independent contractor agreement between us and InteSec
Group LLC, we pay InteSec a commission in stock of 5% of the military
battery sales that InteSec brings to us from U.S. and NATO defense,
security and military entities and U.S. defense contractors. Pursuant
to
the terms of this agreement, in February 2004, we issued 74,215 shares
to
InteSec.
|
Ø |
In
November 2000 and May 2001, we issued a total of 916,667 warrants
to an
investor, which warrants contained certain antidilution provisions:
a
Series A warrant to purchase 666,667 shares of our common stock at
a price
of $3.22 per share, and a Series C warrant to purchase 250,000 shares
at a
price of $3.08 per share. Operation of the antidilution provisions
provided that the Series A warrant should be adjusted to be a warrant
to
purchase 888,764 shares at a price of $2.48 per share, and the Series
C
warrant should be adjusted to be a warrant to purchase 333,286 shares
at a
price of $2.31 per share. After negotiations, the investor agreed
to
exercise its warrants immediately, in exchange for a lowering of
the
exercise price to $1.45 per share (which was paid in cash), and the
issuance of a new six-month Series D warrant to purchase 1,222,050
shares
at an exercise price of $2.10 per share. The new Series D warrant
does not
have similar antidilution provisions.
|
Ø |
In
June 2004, we issued at par value a total of 40,000 shares of our
stock to
the general manager of one of our subsidiaries, as a special stock
bonus.
|
Ø |
In
July 2004, warrants to purchase 8,814,235 shares of common stock,
having
an aggregate exercise price of $16,494,194, were exercised. In connection
with this exercise, we issued to those exercising warrants an aggregate
of
8,717,265 new five-year warrants to purchase shares of common stock
at an
exercise price of $1.38 per share.
|
Ø |
In
October 2004, we granted a total of 430,000 shares of our common
stock as
stock bonuses to two employees. Under the terms of this grant, the
sale or
other transfer of these shares is restricted for a period of two
years
from the date of grant, and such shares automatically return to us
if the
employee leaves our employ during such two-year period under circumstances
that would not entitle the employee to statutory severance under
Israeli
law (generally, resignation without good cause or dismissal with
good
cause).
|
Ø |
In
December 2004, we granted a total of 310,000 shares of our common
stock as
stock bonuses to five employees. Under the terms of this grant, the
sale
or other transfer of these shares is restricted for a period of two
years
from the date of grant, and such shares automatically return to us
if the
employee leaves our employ during such two-year period under circumstances
that would not entitle the employee to statutory severance under
Israeli
law (generally, resignation without good cause or dismissal with
good
cause).
|
Ø |
In
December 2004, we donated 40,000 shares of our common stock to a
charitable organization recognized by the Internal Revenue Service
as
tax-exempt under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986,
as amended.
|
Ø |
In
January 2005, we granted 10,000 shares of our common stock as a stock
bonus to an employee. Under the terms of this grant, the sale or
other
transfer of these shares is restricted for a period of two years
from the
date of grant, and such shares automatically return to us if the
employee
leaves our employ during such two-year period under circumstances
that
would not entitle the employee to statutory severance under Israeli
law
(generally, resignation without good cause or dismissal with good
cause).
|
Ø |
On
May 17, 2005, we issued an aggregate of 8,264,463 shares of our common
stock to the two former shareholders (the “Former Shareholders”) of FAAC
Incorporated (“FAAC”) as part of the earnout consideration for our
purchase of FAAC. Of these shares, 3,479,464 shares were sold by
the
Former Shareholders. The remaining 4,784,999 shares were returned
to us
for cancellation in 2005.
|
Ø |
In
June 2005, we granted a total of 50,000 shares of our common stock
as
stock bonuses to two employees of FAAC. Under the terms of this grant,
the
sale or other transfer of these shares is restricted, 50% for a period
of
one year from the date of grant and 50% for a period of two years
from the
date of grant, and such shares automatically return to us if the
employees
leave our employ during such restricted periods under certain
circumstances (generally, resignation without good cause or dismissal
with
good cause).
|
Ø |
In
August 2005, pursuant to the terms of agreements between us and Artemis
Equity LLC, we issued an aggregate of 425,000 shares of our common
stock
as part of the fee arrangements in connection with investment banking
and
financial consulting services that Artemis rendered to us.
|
Ø |
In
August 2005, pursuant to the terms of an agreement between us and
RK
Equity Advisors, LLC, we issued 9,600 shares of our common stock
as part
of the fee arrangements in connection with investor relations services
that RK Equity rendered to us.
|
Ø |
Pursuant
to the terms of a Securities Purchase Agreement dated September 29,
2005
(the “Purchase Agreement”) by and between Arotech Corporation and five
institutional investors (the “Investors”), we issued and sold to the
Investors (i) an aggregate of $17.5 million principal amount of senior
secured notes (the “Notes”), and (ii) one year warrants (“Warrants”),
which are not exercisable for the six month period following closing,
to
purchase up to 5,250,000 shares of common stock (30% warrant coverage)
at
an exercise price of $1.10 per share.
|
Ø |
Pursuant
to the terms of our senior secured notes due March 31, 2008 (the
“Notes”),
we are obligated to repay the principal amount of the Notes over
the term
of the Notes, with the principal amount being amortized in twelve
payments
payable at our option in cash and/or by requiring the conversion
of a
portion of the Notes into shares of our common stock, provided certain
conditions are met. In this connection, we elected on December 23,
2005 to
make the first payment of $1,458,333.34, which was due on January
31,
2006, by requiring the conversion of a portion of the Notes into
shares of
our common stock. Pursuant to the terms of the Notes, the price used
to
determine the number of shares to be issued upon such conversion
was
calculated using an 8% discount to the average trading price of our
common
stock during 17 of the 20 consecutive trading days ending two days
before
the installment payment date. This calculation resulted in a volume
weighted average price of $0.4199, which after application of the
8%
discount resulted in a discounted price of $0.3863 per share (a total
of
3,775,134 shares of our common stock after rounding). The Notes further
provide that within two trading days after we send notice of an election
to convert a portion of the Notes into shares of our common stock,
we must
issue to the holders of our Notes a number of shares of our common
stock
equal to the quotient of (x) the amount of the Note being paid in
stock,
divided by (y) the conversion price of $1.00 per share, rounded up
to the
nearest whole share of common stock. Accordingly, on December 29,
2005, we
issued an aggregate of 1,458,335 shares of our common stock to the
holders
of the Notes. The remaining shares issuable upon such conversion
were
required to be issued by the installment payment date of January
31, 2006.
Accordingly, on January 31, 2006, we issued an aggregate of 2,316,799
additional shares of our common stock to the holders of the Notes.
|
Ø |
Pursuant
to the terms of our senior secured notes due March 31, 2008 (the
“Notes”),
we are obligated to repay the principal amount of the Notes over
the term
of the Notes, with the principal amount being amortized in twelve
payments
payable at our option in cash and/or by requiring the conversion
of a
portion of the Notes into shares of our common stock, provided certain
conditions are met. In this connection, we elected on March 1, 2006
to
make the second payment of $1,458,333.34, which is due on March 31,
2006,
by requiring the conversion of a portion of the Notes into shares
of our
common stock. Pursuant to the terms of the Notes, the price used
to
determine the number of shares to be issued upon such conversion
will be
calculated using an 8% discount to the average trading price of our
common
stock during 17 of the 20 consecutive trading days ending two days
before
the installment payment date. This calculation resulted in a volume
weighted average price of $0.44, which after application of the 8%
discount resulted in a discounted price of $0.4048 per share (a total
of
3,602,604 shares of our common stock after rounding). The Notes further
provide that within two trading days after we send notice of an election
to convert a portion of the Notes into shares of our common stock,
we must
issue to the holders of our Notes a number of shares of our common
stock
equal to the quotient of (x) the amount of the Note being paid in
stock,
divided by (y) the conversion price of $1.00 per share, rounded up
to the
nearest whole share of common stock. Accordingly, on March 1, 2005,
we
issued an aggregate of 1,458,335 shares of our common stock to the
holders
of the Notes. The remaining shares issuable upon such conversion
were
required to be issued by the installment payment date of March 31,
2006.
Accordingly, on March 31, 2006, we issued an aggregate of 2,144,269
additional shares of our common stock to the holders of the Notes.
|
Ø |
Pursuant
to the terms of Amendment Agreements dated March 27, 2006 and March
28,
2006, we and certain of our existing warrant holders (“Investors”) agreed
to amend certain of the Investors’ existing warrants (consisting of
415,200 warrants to purchase common stock at a price of $2.20 per
share,
797,872 warrants to purchase common stock at a price of $1.88 per
share,
274,748 warrants to purchase common stock at a price of $1.45 per
share,
125,000 warrants to purchase common stock at a price of $1.4375 per
share,
and 2,502,658 warrants to purchase common stock at a price of $1.38
per
share - a total of 4,115,478 warrants) to provide for an exercise
price
equal to $0.40, in exchange for (i) immediate exercise by the Investors
of
all such warrants, with the exercise price being deposited in a collateral
account to secure our obligation to repay its 8% secured convertible
debentures due in September 2006, and (ii) the issuance to the Investors
of a total of 1,646,192 warrants, expiring on March 31, 2008, with
an
exercise price equal to $0.594 per share.
|
Ø |
On
April 7,
2006, we and each holder (each, an “Investor” and
collectively, the
“Investors”) of our Senior Secured Convertible Notes due 2008 (the
“Notes”) entered into a Conversion Agreement dated April
7, 2006 (collectively, the “Conversion Agreements”) pursuant to which an
aggregate of $6,148,903.60 principal amount of the Notes was
converted into 15,372,259 shares of our common stock. The amount
converted
will eliminate our obligation to make the installment payments under
the
Notes on each of March 31, 2008, January 31, 2008, November 30, 2007
and
September 30, 2007 (aggregating a total of $5,833,333.33). In addition,
an
additional $315,570.27 as a result of the conversion was applied
against
part of the installment payment due July 31, 2007. As a result of
the
conversion, $8,434,429.73 of principal remains outstanding under
the
Notes. Each Investor also agreed, among other things, to defer the
installment payment due on May 31, 2006 to July 31, 2006.
|
Ø |
Pursuant
to the terms of an Amendment Agreement dated April 11, 2006, we
and
Mainfield Enterprises Inc. (“Mainfield”) agreed to amend certain of
Mainfield’s existing warrants (consisting of 155,700 warrants to purchase
common stock at a price of $2.20 per share, 1,063,829 warrants
to purchase
common stock at a price of $1.88 per share, and 225,000 warrants
to
purchase common stock at a price of $1.38 per share - a total of
1,444,529
warrants) to provide for an exercise price equal to $0.40, in exchange
for
(i) immediate exercise by Mainfield of all such warrants, with
the
exercise price being deposited in a collateral account to secure
our
obligation to repay its 8% secured convertible debentures due in
September
2006, and (ii) the issuance to Mainfield of 577,812 warrants, expiring
on
March 31, 2008, with an exercise price equal to $0.594 per
share.
|
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
||
(1)
|
3.1
|
Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
|
|
(4)
|
3.1.1
|
Amendment
to our Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation
|
|
(13)
|
3.1.2
|
Amendment
to our Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation
|
|
(14)
|
3.1.3
|
Amendment
to our Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation
|
|
(24)
|
3.1.4
|
Amendment
to our Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation
|
|
(2)
|
3.2
|
Amended
and Restated By-Laws
|
|
(14)
|
4.1
|
Specimen
Certificate for shares of common stock, $.01 par value
|
|
***
|
5.1
|
Legal
Opinion of Lowenstein Sandler PC
|
|
†(1)
|
10.1.1
|
Form
of Management Employment Agreements
|
|
†**(1)
|
10.1.2
|
General
Employee Agreements
|
|
**(1)
|
10.2
|
Office
of Chief Scientist documents
|
|
(2)
|
10.2.1
|
Letter
from the Office of Chief Scientist to us dated January 4,
1995
|
|
(20)
|
10.3
|
Promissory
Note dated December 3, 1999, from Robert S. Ehrlich to
us
|
Exhibit No. |
Description
|
||
(20)
|
10.4
|
Promissory
Note dated February 9, 2000, from Robert S. Ehrlich to
us
|
|
(20)
|
10.5
|
Promissory
Note dated January 12, 2001, from Robert S. Ehrlich to
us
|
|
(3)
|
10.6
|
Form
of Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated May 8, 2001
|
|
(4)
|
10.7
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement dated December 31, 2002 between us and the
Investors
|
|
(4)
|
10.8
|
Form
of 9% Secured Convertible Debenture due June 30, 2005
|
|
(4)
|
10.9
|
Form
of Warrant dated December 31, 2002
|
|
(4)
|
10.10
|
Form
of Security Agreement dated December 31, 2002
|
|
(4)
|
10.11
|
Form
of Intellectual Property Security Agreement dated December 31,
2002
|
|
†(5)
|
10.12
|
Settlement
Agreement and Release between us and Yehuda Harats dated December
31,
2002
|
|
(5)
|
10.13
|
Commercial
lease agreement between Commerce Square Associates L.L.C. and I.E.S.
Electronics Industries U.S.A., Inc. dated September 24,
1997
|
|
(5)
|
10.14
|
Amendment
to Commercial lease agreement between Commerce Square Associates
L.L.C.
and I.E.S. Electronics Industries U.S.A., Inc. dated as of May 1,
2000
|
|
(5)
|
10.15
|
Agreement
of Lease dated December 6, 2000 between Janet Nissim et
al.
and M.D.T. Protection (2000) Ltd. [English summary of Hebrew
original]
|
|
(5)
|
10.16
|
Agreement
of Lease dated August 22, 2001 between Aviod Building and Earthworks
Company Ltd. et
al.
and M.D.T. Protective Industries Ltd. [English summary of Hebrew
original]
|
|
(6)
|
10.17
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement dated September 30, 2003 between us and the Investors
named therein
|
|
(19)
|
10.17.1
|
Amendment
Agreement dated February 15, 2006 between us and Smithfield Fiduciary
LLC
|
|
(21)
|
10.17.2
|
Amendment
Agreement dated March 27/28, 2006 between us and the Investors named
therein
|
|
(6)
|
10.18
|
Form
of 8% Secured Convertible Debenture due September 30,
2006
|
|
(6)
|
10.19
|
Form
of Warrant dated September 30, 2003
|
|
(6)
|
10.20
|
Form
of Security Agreement dated September 30, 2003
|
|
(6)
|
10.21
|
Form
of Intellectual Property Security Agreement dated September 30,
2003
|
|
(7)
|
10.22
|
Form
of Amendment and Exercise Agreement dated December 10,
2003
|
|
(7)
|
10.23
|
Form
of Supplemental Warrant dated December 18, 2003
|
|
(8)
|
10.24
|
Stock
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated January 7, 2004 between us and
the
shareholders of FAAC Incorporated
|
|
(8)
|
10.25
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement dated January 7, 2004 between us and the Investors
named therein
|
|
(8)
|
10.26
|
Registration
Rights Agreement dated January 7, 2004 between us and the Investors
named
therein
|
|
(8)
|
10.27
|
Form
of Warrant dated January __, 2004
|
|
(9)
|
10.28
|
Share
Purchase Agreement dated January __, 2004 between us and the shareholders
of Epsilor Electronics Industries, Ltd.
|
|
(9)
|
10.29
|
Management
Agreement dated January __, 2004 among us, Office Line Ltd. and Hezy
Aspis
|
|
**(10)
|
10.30
|
Settlement
Agreement between us and I.E.S. Electronics Industries, Ltd. dated
February 4, 2004
|
|
†(11)
|
10.31
|
Consulting
agreement dated January 1, 2004 between us and Edward J.
Borey
|
|
(11)
|
10.32
|
Promissory
Note dated July 1, 2002 from Robert S. Ehrlich to us
|
|
(11)
|
10.33
|
Lease
dated April 8, 1997, between AMR Holdings, L.L.C. and FAAC
Incorporated
|
|
(11)
|
10.34
|
Lease
dated as of March 22, 2004 between us and Fisk Building Associates
L.L.C.
|
|
(12)
|
10.35
|
Stock
Purchase Agreement dated as of July 15, 2004 between us and Armour
of
America, Incorporated and its sole shareholder
|
|
(13)
|
10.36
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement dated as of July 15, 2004, by and among us and
various
investors
|
|
†(14)
|
10.37
|
Consulting
Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2005, between us and Sampen
Corporation
|
|
†(15)
|
10.38
|
Third
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective as of January
1, 2005
between us, EFL and Robert S. Ehrlich
|
|
†(15)
|
10.39
|
Employment
Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2005 between EFL and Steven
Esses
|
Exhibit No. | Description | ||
(16)
|
10.40
|
Stock
Purchase Agreement dated as of May 17, 2005, by and among us and
various
purchasers
|
|
(17)
|
10.41
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement dated September 29, 2005 between us and the
Investors
named therein
|
|
(17)
|
10.42
|
Form
of Senior Secured Convertible Note due March 31, 2008
|
|
(17)
|
10.43
|
Form
of Warrant dated September 29, 2005
|
|
(17)
|
10.44
|
Form
of Security Agreement dated September 29, 2005
|
|
(17)
|
10.45
|
Form
of Intellectual Property Security Agreement dated September 29,
2005
|
|
†(18)
|
10.46
|
Employment
Agreement between the Company and Thomas J. Paup dated December
30,
2005
|
|
†(18)
|
10.47
|
Separation
Agreement and Release of Claims among the Company, EFL and Avihai
Shen
dated January 5, 2006
|
|
(19)
|
10.48
|
Form
of Warrant dated February 15, 2006
|
|
(20)
|
10.49
|
Lease
dated February 10, 2006 between Arbor Development Company LLC and
FAAC
Incorporated
|
|
(21)
|
10.50
|
Form
of Warrant dated March 28/29, 2006
|
|
(22)
|
10.51
|
Conversion
Agreement dated April 7, 2006 between us and the Investors named
therein
|
|
(23)
|
10.52
|
Form
of Warrant dated April 11, 2006
|
|
(14)
|
21.1
|
List
of Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
|
*
|
23.1
|
Consent
of Kost, Forer, Gabbay & Kasierer, a member of Ernst & Young
Global
|
|
*
|
23.2
|
Consent
of Stark Winter Schenkein & Co., LLP
|
|
***
|
23.3
|
Consent
of Lowenstein Sandler PC (contained in the opinion filed as Exhibit
5.1)
|
|
***
|
24.1
|
Power
of Attorney (included as part of the signature page filed
herewith)
|
*
|
Filed
herewith
|
|
**
|
English
translation or summary from original
Hebrew
|
***
|
Previously
filed
|
†
|
Includes
management contracts and compensation plans and
arrangements
|
|
(1)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No.
33-73256), which became effective on February 23, 1994
|
|
(2)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No.
33-97944), which became effective on February 5, 1996
|
|
(3)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 7, 2001
(EDGAR
Film No. 1623989)
|
|
(4)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 6,
2003
|
|
(5)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December
31, 2002
|
|
(6)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 3,
2003
|
|
(7)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 23,
2003
|
|
(8)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 9,
2004
|
|
(9)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 4,
2004
|
|
(10)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 5,
2004
|
|
(11)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December
31, 2003
|
|
(12)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended
June 30, 2004
|
|
(13)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 15,
2004
|
|
(15)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended
June 30, 2004
|
|
(16)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 17,
2005
|
|
(17)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 30,
2005
|
|
(18)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 5,
2006
|
|
(19)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 16,
2006
|
|
(20)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December
31, 2005
|
|
(21)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 30,
2006
|
|
(22)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 7,
2006
|
(23)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 12,
2006
|
|
(24)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended
June 30, 2006
|
AROTECH CORPORATION | ||
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Robert S. Ehrlich |
Name: Robert S. Ehrlich |
||
Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
||
/s/
Robert S. Ehrlich
Robert S. Ehrlich |
Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer and
Director
(Principal Executive Officer) |
August
24, 2006
|
||
|
|
|||
*
Thomas J. Paup |
Vice
President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
August
24, 2006
|
||
*
Danny Waldner |
Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
August
24, 2006
|
||
*
Steven Esses |
President,
Chief Operating Officer and Director |
August
24, 2006 |
||
Dr. Jay M. Eastman |
Director
|
August
__, 2006
|
||
*
Lawrence M. Miller |
Director |
August
24, 2006
|
||
|
|
|
||
*
Jack E. Rosenfeld |
Director
|
August
24, 2006
|
||
Edward J. Borey |
Director |
August
__, 2006 |
||
*
Seymour Jones |
Director
|
August
24, 2006
|
||
* | |||||
By:
|
/s/
Robert S. Ehrlich
Robert
S. Ehrlich, Attorney-In-Fact
|
August
24, 2006 |