Document
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
| |
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2018
or
|
| |
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from _____________ to _____________
Commission file number 1-4174
|
|
THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC. |
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
|
| | |
DELAWARE | | 73-0569878 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | |
ONE WILLIAMS CENTER | | |
TULSA, OKLAHOMA | | 74172-0172 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (918) 573-2000
NO CHANGE
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer þ | | Accelerated filer ¨ | | Non-accelerated filer ¨ | | Smaller reporting company ¨ | | Emerging growth company ¨ |
| | | | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | | | |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) Yes ¨ No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
|
| | |
Class | | Shares Outstanding at July 30, 2018 |
Common Stock, $1 par value | | 827,973,071 |
The Williams Companies, Inc.
Index
The reports, filings, and other public announcements of The Williams Companies, Inc. (Williams) may contain or incorporate by reference statements that do not directly or exclusively relate to historical facts. Such statements are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act). These forward-looking statements relate to anticipated financial performance, management’s plans and objectives for future operations, business prospects, outcome of regulatory proceedings, market conditions, and other matters. We make these forward-looking statements in reliance on the safe harbor protections provided under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this report that address activities, events or developments that we expect, believe or anticipate will exist or may occur in the future, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by various forms of words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “seeks,” “could,” “may,” “should,” “continues,” “estimates,” “expects,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “might,” “goals,” “objectives,” “targets,” “planned,” “potential,” “projects,” “scheduled,” “will,” “assumes,” “guidance,” “outlook,” “in-service date,” or other similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to management and include, among others, statements regarding:
| |
• | The closing and expected timing of, and anticipated financial results following, the WPZ Merger; |
| |
• | Expected levels of cash distributions by Williams Partners L.P. (WPZ) with respect to limited partner interests; |
| |
• | Levels of dividends to Williams stockholders; |
| |
• | Future credit ratings of Williams, WPZ, and their affiliates; |
| |
• | Amounts and nature of future capital expenditures; |
| |
• | Expansion and growth of our business and operations; |
| |
• | Expected in-service dates for capital projects; |
| |
• | Financial condition and liquidity; |
| |
• | Cash flow from operations or results of operations; |
| |
• | Seasonality of certain business components; |
| |
• | Natural gas and natural gas liquids prices, supply, and demand; |
| |
• | Demand for our services. |
Forward-looking statements are based on numerous assumptions, uncertainties and risks that could cause future events or results to be materially different from those stated or implied in this report. Many of the factors that will determine these results are beyond our ability to control or predict. Specific factors that could cause actual results to differ from results contemplated by the forward-looking statements include, among others, the following:
| |
• | Satisfaction of the conditions to the completion of the WPZ Merger including receipt of the Williams stockholder approval, and our ability to close the WPZ Merger; |
| |
• | Whether WPZ will produce sufficient cash flows to provide expected levels of cash distributions; |
| |
• | Whether we are able to pay current and expected levels of dividends; |
| |
• | Whether we will be able to effectively execute our financing plan; |
| |
• | Availability of supplies, market demand, and volatility of prices; |
| |
• | Inflation, interest rates, and general economic conditions (including future disruptions and volatility in the global credit markets and the impact of these events on customers and suppliers); |
| |
• | The strength and financial resources of our competitors and the effects of competition; |
| |
• | Whether we are able to successfully identify, evaluate and timely execute investment opportunities; |
| |
• | Our ability to acquire new businesses and assets and successfully integrate those operations and assets into existing businesses as well as successfully expand our facilities; |
| |
• | Development and rate of adoption of alternative energy sources; |
| |
• | The impact of operational and developmental hazards and unforeseen interruptions; |
| |
• | The impact of existing and future laws (including, but not limited to, the Tax Cuts and Job Acts of 2017), regulations, the regulatory environment, environmental liabilities, and litigation, as well as our ability to obtain necessary permits and approvals, and achieve favorable rate proceeding outcomes; |
| |
• | Our costs and funding obligations for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans; |
| |
• | Changes in maintenance and construction costs; |
| |
• | Changes in the current geopolitical situation; |
| |
• | Our exposure to the credit risk of our customers and counterparties; |
| |
• | Risks related to financing, including restrictions stemming from debt agreements, future changes in credit ratings as determined by nationally recognized credit rating agencies, and the availability and cost of capital; |
| |
• | The amount of cash distributions from and capital requirements of our investments and joint ventures in which we participate; |
| |
• | Risks associated with weather and natural phenomena, including climate conditions and physical damage to our facilities; |
| |
• | Acts of terrorism, including cybersecurity threats, and related disruptions; |
| |
• | Additional risks described in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). |
Given the uncertainties and risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement, we caution investors not to unduly rely on our forward-looking statements. We disclaim any obligations to and do not intend to update the above list or announce publicly the result of any revisions to any of the forward-looking statements to reflect future events or developments.
In addition to causing our actual results to differ, the factors listed above and referred to below may cause our intentions to change from those statements of intention set forth in this report. Such changes in our intentions may also cause our results to differ. We may change our intentions, at any time and without notice, based upon changes in such factors, our assumptions, or otherwise.
Because forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, we caution that there are important factors, in addition to those listed above, that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. For a detailed discussion of those factors, see Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 22, 2018, and in Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.
DEFINITIONS
The following is a listing of certain abbreviations, acronyms, and other industry terminology that may be used throughout this Form 10-Q.
Measurements:
Barrel: One barrel of petroleum products that equals 42 U.S. gallons
Bcf: One billion cubic feet of natural gas
Bcf/d: One billion cubic feet of natural gas per day
British Thermal Unit (Btu): A unit of energy needed to raise the temperature of one pound of water by one degree
Fahrenheit
Dekatherms (Dth): A unit of energy equal to one million British thermal units
Mbbls/d: One thousand barrels per day
Mdth/d: One thousand dekatherms per day
MMcf/d: One million cubic feet per day
MMdth: One million dekatherms or approximately one trillion British thermal units
MMdth/d: One million dekatherms per day
Tbtu: One trillion British thermal units
Consolidated Entities:
Cardinal: Cardinal Gas Services, L.L.C.
Constitution: Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC
Gulfstar One: Gulfstar One LLC
Northwest Pipeline: Northwest Pipeline LLC
Transco: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
WPZ: Williams Partners L.P.
Partially Owned Entities: Entities in which we do not own a 100 percent ownership interest and which, as of June 30, 2018, we account for as an equity-method investment, including principally the following:
Aux Sable: Aux Sable Liquid Products LP
Caiman II: Caiman Energy II, LLC
Discovery: Discovery Producer Services LLC
Gulfstream: Gulfstream Natural Gas System, L.L.C.
Jackalope: Jackalope Gas Gathering Services, L.L.C.
Laurel Mountain: Laurel Mountain Midstream, LLC
OPPL: Overland Pass Pipeline Company LLC
UEOM: Utica East Ohio Midstream LLC
Government and Regulatory:
EPA: Environmental Protection Agency
FERC: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
SEC: Securities and Exchange Commission
Other:
Charter Amendment: An amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of our authorized shares of common stock to 1,500,000,000 shares, consisting of 1,470,000,000 shares of our common stock and 30,000,000 shares of our preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share
Fractionation: The process by which a mixed stream of natural gas liquids is separated into constituent products, such as ethane, propane, and butane
GAAP: U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
IDR: Incentive distribution right
LNG: Liquefied natural gas; natural gas which has been liquefied at cryogenic temperatures
Merger Agreement: Merger Agreement and Plan of Merger of Williams with Energy Transfer Equity, L.P and certain of its affiliates
MVC: Minimum volume commitment
NGLs: Natural gas liquids; natural gas liquids result from natural gas processing and crude oil refining and are
used as petrochemical feedstocks, heating fuels, and gasoline additives, among other applications
NGL margins: NGL revenues less any applicable Btu replacement cost, plant fuel, and third-party transportation and fractionation
RGP Splitter: Refinery grade propylene splitter
Throughput: The volume of product transported or passing through a pipeline, plant, terminal, or other facility
WPZ Merger: The merger of SCMS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Williams, with and into WPZ, with WPZ as the sole surviving entity
WPZ Merger Agreement: Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of May 16, 2018, by and among The Williams Companies, Inc., SCMS LLC, Williams Partners L.P., and WPZ GP LLC
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The Williams Companies, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Income
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| (Millions, except per-share amounts) |
Revenues: | | | | | | | |
Service revenues | $ | 1,340 |
| | $ | 1,282 |
| | $ | 2,691 |
|
| $ | 2,543 |
|
Service revenues – commodity consideration (Note 2) | 94 |
| | — |
| | 195 |
| | — |
|
Product sales | 657 |
| | 642 |
| | 1,293 |
|
| 1,369 |
|
Total revenues | 2,091 |
| | 1,924 |
| | 4,179 |
|
| 3,912 |
|
Costs and expenses: | | |
| |
|
|
|
Product costs | 636 |
| | 537 |
| | 1,249 |
|
| 1,116 |
|
Processing commodity expenses (Note 2) | 26 |
| | — |
| | 61 |
| | — |
|
Operating and maintenance expenses | 388 |
| | 392 |
| | 745 |
|
| 763 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses | 434 |
| | 433 |
| | 865 |
|
| 875 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses | 130 |
| | 153 |
| | 262 |
|
| 314 |
|
Impairment of certain assets (Note 11) | 66 |
| | 25 |
| | 66 |
| | 26 |
|
Other (income) expense – net | 1 |
| | 6 |
| | 30 |
|
| 10 |
|
Total costs and expenses | 1,681 |
| | 1,546 |
| | 3,278 |
|
| 3,104 |
|
Operating income (loss) | 410 |
| | 378 |
| | 901 |
|
| 808 |
|
Equity earnings (losses) | 92 |
| | 125 |
| | 174 |
|
| 232 |
|
Other investing income (loss) – net (Note 4) | 68 |
| | 2 |
| | 72 |
| | 274 |
|
Interest incurred | (288 | ) |
| (280 | ) |
| (570 | ) |
| (567 | ) |
Interest capitalized | 13 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 16 |
|
Other income (expense) – net | 26 |
| | 24 |
| | 47 |
|
| 101 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes | 321 |
| | 258 |
| | 646 |
|
| 864 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | 52 |
| | 65 |
| | 107 |
|
| 102 |
|
Net income (loss) | 269 |
| | 193 |
| | 539 |
|
| 762 |
|
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 134 |
| | 112 |
| | 252 |
|
| 308 |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to The Williams Companies, Inc. | $ | 135 |
| | $ | 81 |
| | $ | 287 |
|
| $ | 454 |
|
Amounts attributable to The Williams Companies, Inc.: | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings (loss) per common share: | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | $ | .16 |
| | $ | .10 |
| | $ | .35 |
| | $ | .55 |
|
Weighted-average shares (thousands) | 827,868 |
| | 826,426 |
| | 827,689 |
| | 825,492 |
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share: | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | $ | .16 |
| | $ | .10 |
| | $ | .35 |
| | $ | .55 |
|
Weighted-average shares (thousands) | 830,107 |
| | 828,575 |
| | 830,151 |
| | 827,531 |
|
Cash dividends declared per common share | $ | .34 |
| | $ | .30 |
| | $ | .68 |
| | $ | .60 |
|
See accompanying notes.
The Williams Companies, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| (Millions) |
Net income (loss) | $ | 269 |
| | $ | 193 |
| | $ | 539 |
| | $ | 762 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | |
Cash flow hedging activities: | | | | | | | |
Net unrealized gain (loss) from derivative instruments, net of taxes of $3 and $3 in 2018, and $0 and ($1) in 2017 | (15 | ) | | 1 |
| | (14 | ) | | 4 |
|
Reclassifications into earnings of net derivative instruments (gain) loss, net of taxes of ($1) and ($1) in 2018 | 3 |
| | (2 | ) | | 3 |
| | (2 | ) |
Pension and other postretirement benefits: | | | | | | | |
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) included in net periodic benefit cost (credit), net of taxes of $1 and $1 in 2017 | — |
| | (1 | ) | | — |
| | (2 | ) |
Net actuarial gain (loss) arising during the year, net of taxes of ($1) and ($1) in 2018 | 4 |
|
| — |
|
| 4 |
|
| — |
|
Amortization of actuarial (gain) loss and net actuarial loss from settlements included in net periodic benefit cost (credit), net of taxes of ($1) and ($2) in 2018, and ($2) and ($5) in 2017 | 5 |
| | 5 |
| | 10 |
| | 9 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) | (3 | ) | | 3 |
| | 3 |
| | 9 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss) | 266 |
| | 196 |
| | 542 |
| | 771 |
|
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 130 |
| | 112 |
| | 249 |
| | 309 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to The Williams Companies, Inc. | $ | 136 |
| | $ | 84 |
| | $ | 293 |
| | $ | 462 |
|
See accompanying notes.
The Williams Companies, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheet
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
| | (Millions, except per-share amounts) |
ASSETS | | |
Current assets: | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 275 |
| | $ | 899 |
|
Trade accounts and other receivables (net of allowance of $10 at June 30, 2018 and $9 at December 31, 2017) | | 844 |
| | 976 |
|
Inventories | | 153 |
| | 113 |
|
Other current assets and deferred charges | | 269 |
| | 191 |
|
Total current assets | | 1,541 |
| | 2,179 |
|
Investments | | 6,810 |
| | 6,552 |
|
Property, plant, and equipment | | 40,863 |
| | 39,513 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization | | (11,910 | ) | | (11,302 | ) |
Property, plant, and equipment – net | | 28,953 |
| | 28,211 |
|
Intangible assets – net of accumulated amortization | | 8,406 |
| | 8,791 |
|
Regulatory assets, deferred charges, and other | | 664 |
| | 619 |
|
Total assets | | $ | 46,374 |
| | $ | 46,352 |
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 893 |
| | $ | 978 |
|
Accrued liabilities | | 1,063 |
| | 1,167 |
|
Long-term debt due within one year | | 2 |
| | 501 |
|
Total current liabilities | | 1,958 |
| | 2,646 |
|
Long-term debt | | 21,313 |
| | 20,434 |
|
Deferred income tax liabilities | | 3,267 |
| | 3,147 |
|
Regulatory liabilities, deferred income, and other | | 4,389 |
| | 3,950 |
|
Contingent liabilities (Note 12) | |
| |
|
Equity: | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity: | | | | |
Common stock (960 million shares authorized at $1 par value; 862 million shares issued at June 30, 2018 and 861 million shares issued at December 31, 2017) | | 862 |
| | 861 |
|
Capital in excess of par value | | 18,552 |
| | 18,508 |
|
Retained deficit | | (8,735 | ) | | (8,434 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | | (293 | ) | | (238 | ) |
Treasury stock, at cost (35 million shares of common stock) | | (1,041 | ) | | (1,041 | ) |
Total stockholders’ equity | | 9,345 |
| | 9,656 |
|
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries | | 6,102 |
| | 6,519 |
|
Total equity | | 15,447 |
| | 16,175 |
|
Total liabilities and equity | | $ | 46,374 |
| | $ | 46,352 |
|
See accompanying notes.
The Williams Companies, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| The Williams Companies, Inc., Stockholders | | | | |
| Common Stock | | Capital in Excess of Par Value | | Retained Deficit | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | | Treasury Stock | | Total Stockholders’ Equity | | Noncontrolling Interests | | Total Equity |
| (Millions) |
Balance – December 31, 2017 | $ | 861 |
| | $ | 18,508 |
| | $ | (8,434 | ) | | $ | (238 | ) | | $ | (1,041 | ) | | $ | 9,656 |
| | $ | 6,519 |
| | $ | 16,175 |
|
Adoption of ASC 606 (Note 1) | — |
| | — |
| | (84 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (84 | ) | | (37 | ) | | (121 | ) |
Adoption of ASU 2018-02 (Note 1) | — |
| | — |
| | 61 |
| | (61 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Net income (loss) | — |
| | — |
| | 287 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 287 |
| | 252 |
| | 539 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6 |
| | — |
| | 6 |
| | (3 | ) | | 3 |
|
Cash dividends – common stock | — |
| | — |
| | (563 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (563 | ) | | — |
| | (563 | ) |
Dividends and distributions to noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (402 | ) | | (402 | ) |
Stock-based compensation and related common stock issuances | 1 |
| | 32 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 33 |
| | — |
| | 33 |
|
Sales of limited partner units of Williams Partners L.P. | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 46 |
| | 46 |
|
Changes in ownership of consolidated subsidiaries, net | — |
| | 13 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 13 |
| | (17 | ) | | (4 | ) |
Contributions from noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11 |
| | 11 |
|
Deconsolidation of subsidiary (Note 3) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (267 | ) | | (267 | ) |
Other | — |
| | (1 | ) | | (2 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (3 | ) | | — |
| | (3 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in equity | 1 |
| | 44 |
| | (301 | ) | | (55 | ) | | — |
| | (311 | ) | | (417 | ) | | (728 | ) |
Balance – June 30, 2018 | $ | 862 |
| | $ | 18,552 |
| | $ | (8,735 | ) | | $ | (293 | ) | | $ | (1,041 | ) | | $ | 9,345 |
| | $ | 6,102 |
| | $ | 15,447 |
|
See accompanying notes.
The Williams Companies, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(Unaudited) |
| | | | | | | |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2018 | | 2017 |
| (Millions) |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | |
Net income (loss) | $ | 539 |
| | $ | 762 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided (used) by operating activities: | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 865 |
| | 875 |
|
Provision (benefit) for deferred income taxes | 142 |
| | 91 |
|
Equity (earnings) losses | (174 | ) | | (232 | ) |
Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates | 316 |
| | 404 |
|
Net (gain) loss on disposition of equity-method investments | — |
| | (269 | ) |
Impairment of and net (gain) loss on sale of assets | 71 |
| | 18 |
|
Amortization of stock-based awards | 30 |
| | 44 |
|
Cash provided (used) by changes in current assets and liabilities: | | | |
Accounts and notes receivable | 121 |
| | 201 |
|
Inventories | (33 | ) | | (30 | ) |
Other current assets and deferred charges | (63 | ) | | (17 | ) |
Accounts payable | (70 | ) | | 29 |
|
Accrued liabilities | (7 | ) | | (177 | ) |
Other, including changes in noncurrent assets and liabilities | (152 | ) | | (173 | ) |
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities | 1,585 |
| | 1,526 |
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | |
Proceeds from (payments of) commercial paper – net | — |
| | (93 | ) |
Proceeds from long-term debt | 2,179 |
| | 2,643 |
|
Payments of long-term debt | (1,761 | ) | | (2,710 | ) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | 11 |
| | 2,125 |
|
Dividends paid | (563 | ) | | (496 | ) |
Dividends and distributions paid to noncontrolling interests | (356 | ) | | (447 | ) |
Contributions from noncontrolling interests | 11 |
| | 10 |
|
Payments for debt issuance costs | (18 | ) | | (13 | ) |
Other – net | (43 | ) | | (29 | ) |
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities | (540 | ) | | 990 |
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | |
Property, plant, and equipment: | | | |
Capital expenditures (1) | (1,890 | ) | | (1,056 | ) |
Dispositions – net | 3 |
| | (14 | ) |
Contributions in aid of construction | 339 |
| | 194 |
|
Proceeds from dispositions of equity-method investments | — |
| | 200 |
|
Purchases of and contributions to equity-method investments | (91 | ) | | (79 | ) |
Other – net | (30 | ) | | (13 | ) |
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities | (1,669 | ) | | (768 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (624 | ) | | 1,748 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 899 |
| | 170 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 275 |
| | $ | 1,918 |
|
_____________ | | | |
(1) Increases to property, plant, and equipment | $ | (1,864 | ) | | $ | (1,160 | ) |
Changes in related accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (26 | ) | | 104 |
|
Capital expenditures | $ | (1,890 | ) | | $ | (1,056 | ) |
See accompanying notes.
The Williams Companies, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 1 – General, Description of Business, and Basis of Presentation
General
Our accompanying interim consolidated financial statements do not include all the notes in our annual financial statements and, therefore, should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2017, in Exhibit 99.1 of our Form 8-K dated May 3, 2018. The accompanying unaudited financial statements include all normal recurring adjustments and others that, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly our interim financial statements.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, references in this report to “Williams,” “we,” “our,” “us,” or like terms refer to The Williams Companies, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, references to “Williams,” “we,” “our,” and “us” include the operations in which we own interests accounted for as equity-method investments that are not consolidated in our financial statements. When we refer to our equity investees by name, we are referring exclusively to their businesses and operations.
Acquisition of WPZ Public Units
On May 16, 2018, we entered into an agreement for a stock-for-unit transaction whereby we will acquire all of the approximately 256 million publicly held outstanding common units of Williams Partners L.P. (WPZ) in exchange for shares of our common stock (WPZ Merger). Each such WPZ common unit will be converted into the right to receive 1.494 shares of our common stock or 1.513 shares if the closing does not occur before the record date of our third-quarter 2018 dividend. In the event this agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, we could be required to pay a $410 million termination fee to WPZ, of which we currently own approximately 74 percent.
Financial Repositioning
In January 2017, we entered into agreements with WPZ, wherein we permanently waived the general partner’s incentive distribution rights and converted our 2 percent general partner interest in WPZ to a noneconomic interest in exchange for 289 million newly issued WPZ common units. Pursuant to this agreement, we also purchased approximately 277 thousand WPZ common units for $10 million. Additionally, we purchased approximately 59 million common units of WPZ at a price of $36.08586 per unit in a private placement transaction, funded with proceeds from our equity offering. According to the terms of this agreement, concurrent with WPZ’s quarterly distributions in February 2017 and May 2017, we paid additional consideration totaling $56 million to WPZ for these units.
Description of Business
We are a Delaware corporation whose common stock is listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange. Our operations are located principally in the United States. We have one reportable segment, Williams Partners. All remaining business activities as well as corporate activities are included in Other.
Williams Partners
Williams Partners consists of our consolidated master limited partnership, WPZ, and primarily includes gas pipeline and midstream businesses.
WPZ’s gas pipeline businesses primarily consist of two interstate natural gas pipelines, which are Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC (Transco) and Northwest Pipeline LLC (Northwest Pipeline), and several joint venture investments in interstate and intrastate natural gas pipeline systems, including a 50 percent equity-method investment in Gulfstream Natural Gas System, L.L.C., and a 41 percent interest in Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC (Constitution) (a consolidated entity), which is developing a pipeline project (see Note 3 – Variable Interest Entities).
WPZ’s midstream businesses primarily consist of (1) natural gas gathering, treating, compression, and processing; (2) natural gas liquid (NGL) fractionation, storage, and transportation; (3) crude oil production handling and transportation; and (4) olefins production. WPZ sold its olefins operations in July 2017. The primary service areas are concentrated in major producing basins in Colorado, Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, New Mexico, Wyoming, the Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, New York, and Ohio, which include the Barnett, Eagle Ford, Haynesville, Marcellus, Niobrara, and Utica shale plays as well as the Mid-Continent region.
The midstream businesses include equity-method investments in natural gas gathering and processing assets and NGL fractionation and transportation assets, including a 62 percent equity-method investment in Utica East Ohio Midstream, LLC, a 69 percent equity-method investment in Laurel Mountain Midstream, LLC, a 58 percent equity-method investment in Caiman Energy II, LLC, a 60 percent equity-method investment in Discovery Producer Services, LLC, a 50 percent equity-method investment in Overland Pass Pipeline, LLC, and Appalachia Midstream Services, LLC, which owns equity-method investments with an approximate average 66 percent interest in multiple gathering systems in the Marcellus Shale (Appalachia Midstream Investments), a 50 percent interest in Jackalope Gas Gathering Services, L.L.C. (Jackalope) (an equity-method investment following deconsolidation as of June 30, 2018), and our previously owned 50 percent equity-method investment in the Delaware basin gas gathering system (DBJV) in the Mid-Continent region (see Note 4 – Investing Activities).
Basis of Presentation
Consolidated master limited partnership
As of June 30, 2018, we own 74 percent of the interests in WPZ, a variable interest entity (VIE) (see Note 3 – Variable Interest Entities). Pursuant to WPZ’s distribution reinvestment program, 1,230,657 common units were issued to the public in 2018 associated with reinvested distributions of $46 million. This common unit issuance and WPZ’s quarterly distribution of additional paid-in-kind Class B units to us had the combined net impact of decreasing Noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries by $17 million, and increasing Capital in excess of par value by $13 million and Deferred income tax liabilities by $4 million in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
WPZ is self-funding and maintains separate lines of bank credit and cash management accounts and also has a commercial paper program. (See Note 9 – Debt and Banking Arrangements.) Cash distributions from WPZ to limited partners, including us, are governed by WPZ’s partnership agreement.
Significant risks and uncertainties
We may monetize assets that are not core to our strategy which could result in impairments of certain equity-method investments, property, plant, and equipment, and intangible assets. Such impairments could potentially be caused by indications of fair value implied through the monetization process or, in the case of asset dispositions that are part of a broader asset group, the impact of the loss of future estimated cash flows.
On March 15, 2018, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued a revised policy statement regarding the recovery of income tax costs in rates of natural gas pipelines. The FERC found that an impermissible double recovery results from granting a Master Limited Partnership (MLP) pipeline both an income tax allowance and a return on equity pursuant to the discounted cash flow methodology. As a result, the FERC will no longer permit an MLP pipeline to recover an income tax allowance in its cost of service. The FERC further stated it will address the application of this policy to non-MLP partnership forms as those issues arise in subsequent proceedings.
On July 18, 2018, the FERC issued an order dismissing the requests for rehearing and clarification of the revised policy statement. In addition, the FERC provided guidance that an MLP pipeline (or other pass-through entity) no
longer recovering an income tax allowance pursuant to the revised policy may eliminate previously accumulated deferred income taxes (ADIT) from its cost of service instead of flowing these previously accumulated ADIT balances to ratepayers. However, the FERC stated that the revised policy statement and such guidance do not establish a binding rule, but are instead expressions of general policy intent designed to provide guidance by notifying entities of the course of action the FERC intends to follow in future adjudications. To the extent the FERC addresses these issues in future proceedings, it will consider any arguments regarding not only the application of the revised policy to the facts of the case, but also any arguments regarding the underlying validity of the policy itself.
On March 15, 2018, the FERC also issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposing a filing process that will allow it to determine which natural gas pipelines may be collecting unjust and unreasonable rates in light of the recent reduction in the corporate income tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Tax Reform) and the revised policy statement. On July 18, 2018, the FERC issued a Final Rule, retaining the filing requirement and reaffirming the options that pipelines have to either reflect the reduced tax rate or explain why no rate change is necessary. The FERC also clarified that a natural gas company organized as a pass-through entity and all of whose income or losses are consolidated on the federal income tax return of its corporate parent is considered to be subject to the federal corporate income tax and is thus eligible for a tax allowance.
On March 15, 2018, the FERC also issued a Notice of Inquiry seeking comments on the additional impacts of Tax Reform on jurisdictional rates, particularly whether, and if so how, the FERC should address changes relating to accumulated deferred income tax amounts after the corporate income tax rate reduction and bonus depreciation rules, as well as whether other features of Tax Reform require FERC action. We are evaluating the impact of these developments on our interstate natural gas pipelines and currently expect any associated impacts would be prospective and determined through subsequent rate proceedings. We also continue to monitor developments that may impact our regulatory liabilities resulting from Tax Reform. It is reasonably possible that future tariff-based rates collected by our interstate natural gas pipelines may be adversely impacted.
Accounting standards issued and adopted
During the first quarter of 2018, we early adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2018-02 “Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income” (ASU 2018-02). As a result of Tax Reform lowering the federal income tax rate, the tax effects of items within accumulated other comprehensive income may not reflect the appropriate tax rate. ASU 2018-02 allows for the reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from Tax Reform. The adoption of ASU 2018-02 resulted in the reclassification of $61 million from Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to Retained deficit on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2017-12 “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities” (ASU 2017-12). ASU 2017-12 applies to entities that elect hedge accounting in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 815. The ASU affects both the designation and measurement guidance for hedging relationships and the presentation of hedging results. ASU 2017-12 was applied using a modified retrospective approach for cash flow and net investment hedges existing at the date of adoption and prospectively for the presentation and disclosure guidance. The adoption of ASU 2017-12 did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2017-07 “Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost” (ASU 2017-07). ASU 2017-07 requires employers to report the service cost component of net benefit cost in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from employee services. The other components of net benefit cost must be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside Operating income (loss). Only the service cost component is now eligible for capitalization when applicable. The presentation aspect of ASU 2017-07 must be applied retrospectively and the capitalization requirement prospectively. In accordance with this adoption, we have conformed the prior year presentation, which resulted in increases of $3 million and $6 million to Operating and maintenance expenses with corresponding decreases to Operating income (loss) and increases of $3 million and $6 million to Other income (expense) – net below Operating income (loss) in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017, respectively.
Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2016-15 “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments” (ASU 2016-15). Among other things, ASU 2016-15 permits an accounting policy election to classify distributions received from equity-method investees using either the cumulative earnings approach or the nature of distribution approach. We have elected to apply the nature of distribution approach and have retrospectively conformed the prior year presentation within the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows in accordance with ASU 2016-15. For the period ended June 30, 2017, amounts previously presented as Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates in excess of cumulative earnings within Investing Activities are now presented as part of Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates within Operating Activities, resulting in an increase to Net cash provided (used) by operating activities of $258 million with a corresponding reduction in Net cash provided (used) by investing activities.
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2014-09 establishing ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (ASC 606). ASC 606 establishes a comprehensive new revenue recognition model designed to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer in an amount that reflects the consideration the entity expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for those goods or services and requires significantly enhanced revenue disclosures. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date” (ASU 2015-14). Per ASU 2015-14, the standard became effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017.
We adopted the provisions of ASC 606 effective January 1, 2018, utilizing the modified retrospective transition method for all contracts with customers, which included applying the provisions of ASC 606 beginning January 1, 2018, to all contracts not completed as of that date with the cumulative effect of applying the standard for periods prior to January 1, 2018, as an adjustment to Total equity, net of tax, upon adoption. As a result of our adoption, the cumulative impact to our Total equity, net of tax, at January 1, 2018, was a decrease of $121 million in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
For each revenue contract type, we conducted a formal contract review process to evaluate the impact of ASC 606. The adjustment to Total equity upon adoption of ASC 606 is primarily comprised of the impact to the timing of recognition of deferred revenue (contract liabilities) associated with certain contracts which underwent modifications in periods prior to January 1, 2018. Under the provisions of ASC 606, when a contract modification does not increase both the scope and price of the contract, and the remaining goods and services are distinct from the goods and services transferred prior to the modification, the modification is treated as a termination of the existing contract and the creation of a new contract. ASC 606 requires that the transaction price, including any remaining contract liabilities from the old contract, be allocated to the performance obligations over the term of the new contract. The contract modification adjustments are partially offset by the impact of changes to the timing of recognizing revenue which is subject to the constraint on estimates of variable consideration of certain contracts. The constraint of variable consideration will result in the acceleration of revenue recognition and corresponding de-recognition of contract liabilities for certain contracts (as compared to the previous revenue recognition model) as a result of our assessment that it is probable such recognition would not result in a significant revenue reversal in the future. Additionally, under ASC 606, our revenues will increase in situations where we receive noncash consideration, which exists primarily in certain of our gas processing contracts where we receive commodities as full or partial consideration for services provided. This increase in revenues will be offset by a similar increase in costs and expenses when the commodities received are subsequently sold. Financial systems and internal controls necessary for adoption were implemented effective January 1, 2018. (See Note 2 – Revenue Recognition.)
Accounting standards issued but not yet adopted
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13 “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (ASU 2016-13). ASU 2016-13 changes the impairment model for most financial assets and certain other instruments. For trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities, loans, and other instruments, entities will be required to use a new forward-looking “expected loss” model that generally will result in the earlier recognition of allowances for losses. The guidance also requires increased disclosures. ASU 2016-13 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The standard requires varying transition methods for the different categories of amendments. Although we do not expect ASU 2016-13
to have a significant impact, it could impact our trade receivables as the related allowance for credit losses will be recognized earlier under the expected loss model.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 “Leases (Topic 842)” (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 establishes a comprehensive new lease accounting model. ASU 2016-02 modifies the definition of a lease, requires a dual approach to lease classification similar to current lease accounting, and causes lessees to recognize operating leases on the balance sheet as a lease liability measured as the present value of the future lease payments with a corresponding right-of-use asset, with an exception for leases with a term of one year or less. Additional disclosures will also be required regarding the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. In January 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-01 “Leases (Topic 842): Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842” (ASU 2018-01). Per ASU 2018-01, land easements and rights-of-way are required to be assessed under ASU 2016-02 to determine whether the arrangements are or contain a lease. ASU 2018-01 permits an entity to elect a transition practical expedient to not apply ASU 2016-02 to land easements that exist or expired before the effective date of ASU 2016-02 and that were not previously assessed under the previous lease guidance in ASC Topic 840 “Leases.”
In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11 “Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements” (ASU 2018-11). Prior to ASU 2018-11, a modified retrospective transition was required for financing or operating leases existing at or entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. ASU 2018-11 allows entities an additional transition method to the existing requirements whereby an entity could adopt the provisions of ASU 2016-02 by recognizing a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption without adjustment to the financial statements for periods prior to adoption. ASU 2018-11 also allows a practical expedient that permits lessors to not separate non-lease components from the associated lease component if certain conditions are present. ASU 2016-02 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. We expect to adopt ASU 2016-02 effective January 1, 2019.
We are in the process of finalizing our review of contracts to identify leases based on the modified definition of a lease, implementing a financial lease accounting system, and identifying changes to our internal controls to support management in the accounting for and disclosure of leasing activities upon adoption of ASU 2016-02. While we are still in the process of completing our implementation evaluation of ASU 2016-02, we currently believe the most significant changes to our financial statements relate to the recognition of a lease liability and offsetting right-of-use asset in our Consolidated Balance Sheet for operating leases. We are also evaluating ASU 2016-02’s available practical expedients on adoption, which we expect to elect.
Note 2 – Revenue Recognition
Customers in our gas pipeline businesses are comprised of public utilities, municipalities, gas marketers and producers, intrastate pipelines, direct industrial users, and electrical generators. Customers in our midstream businesses are comprised of oil and natural gas producer counterparties. Customers for our product sales are comprised of public utilities, gas marketers, and direct industrial users.
A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service (or integrated package of goods or services) to the customer. A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue, when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied. A performance obligation is distinct if the service is separately identifiable from other items in the integrated package of services and if a customer can benefit from it on its own or with other resources that are readily available to the customer. An integrated package of services typically represents a single performance obligation if the services are contained within the same contract or within multiple contracts entered into in contemplation with one another that are highly interdependent or highly interrelated, meaning each of the services is significantly affected by one or more of the other services in the contract. Service revenue contracts from our gas pipeline and midstream businesses contain a series of distinct services, with the majority of our contracts having a single performance obligation that is satisfied over time as the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided by our performance. Most of our product sales contracts have a single performance obligation with revenue recognized at a point in time when the products have been sold and delivered to the customer.
Certain customers reimburse us for costs we incur associated with construction of property, plant, and equipment utilized in our operations. For our rate-regulated gas pipeline businesses that apply ASC 980. "Regulated Operations" (Topic 980), we follow FERC guidelines with respect to reimbursement of construction costs. FERC tariffs only allow for cost reimbursement and are non-negotiable in nature; thus, the construction activities do not represent an ongoing major and central operation of our gas pipeline businesses and are not within the scope of ASC 606. Accordingly, cost reimbursements are treated as a reduction to the cost of the constructed asset. For our midstream businesses, reimbursement and service contracts with customers are viewed together as providing the same commercial objective, as we have the ability to negotiate the mix of consideration between reimbursements and amounts billed over time. Accordingly, we generally recognize reimbursements of construction costs from customers on a gross basis as a contract liability separate from the associated costs included within property, plant, and equipment. The contract liability is recognized into service revenues as the underlying performance obligations are satisfied.
Service Revenues
Gas pipeline businesses
Revenues from our interstate natural gas pipeline businesses, which are included within the caption “Regulated interstate natural gas transportation and storage” in the revenue by category table below and are subject to regulation by certain state and federal authorities, including the FERC, include both firm and interruptible transportation and storage contracts. Firm transportation and storage agreements provide for a reservation charge based on the pipeline or storage capacity reserved, and a commodity charge based on the volume of natural gas delivered/stored, each at rates specified in our FERC tariffs or based on negotiated contractual rates, with contract terms that are generally long-term in nature. Most of our long-term contracts contain an evergreen provision, which allows the contracts to be extended for periods primarily up to one year in length an indefinite number of times following the specified contract term and until terminated generally by either us or the customer. Interruptible transportation and storage agreements provide for a volumetric charge based on actual commodity transportation or storage utilized in the period in which those services are provided, and the contracts are generally limited to one month periods or less. Our performance obligations related to our interstate natural gas pipeline businesses include the following:
| |
• | Guaranteed transportation or storage under firm transportation and storage contracts—an integrated package of services typically constituting a single performance obligation, which includes standing ready to provide such services and receiving, transporting or storing (as applicable), and redelivering commodities; |
| |
• | Interruptible transportation and storage under interruptible transportation and storage contracts—an integrated package of services typically constituting a single performance obligation, which includes receiving, transporting or storing (as applicable), and redelivering commodities upon nomination by the customer. |
In situations where we consider the integrated package of services a single performance obligation, which represents a majority of our interstate natural gas pipeline contracts with customers, we do not consider there to be multiple performance obligations because the nature of the overall promise in the contract is to stand ready (with regard to firm transportation and storage contracts), receive, transport or store, and redeliver natural gas to the customer; therefore, revenue is recognized at the completion of the integrated package of services which represents a single performance obligation.
We recognize revenues for reservation charges over the performance obligation period, which is the contract term, regardless of the volume of natural gas that is transported or stored. Revenues for commodity charges from both firm and interruptible transportation services and storage services are recognized when natural gas is delivered at the agreed upon delivery point or when natural gas is injected or withdrawn from the storage facility because they specifically relate to our efforts to transfer these distinct services. Generally, reservation charges and commodity charges in our interstate natural gas pipeline businesses are recognized as revenue in the same period they are invoiced to our customers. As a result of the ratemaking process, certain amounts collected by us may be subject to refunds upon the issuance of final orders by the FERC in pending rate proceedings. We record estimates of rate refund liabilities considering our and other third-party regulatory proceedings, advice of counsel, and other risks.
Midstream businesses
Revenues from our midstream businesses, which are included in the caption titled “Non-regulated gathering, processing, transportation, and storage” in the revenue by category table below, include contracts for natural gas gathering, processing, treating, compression, transportation, and other related services with contract terms that are generally long-term in nature and may extend up to the production life of the associated reservoir. Additionally, our midstream businesses generate revenues from fees charged for storing customers’ natural gas and NGLs, generally under prepaid contracted storage capacity contracts. In situations where we provide an integrated package of services combined into a single performance obligation, which represents a majority of this class of contracts with customers, we do not consider there to be multiple performance obligations because the nature of the overall promise in the contract is to provide gathering, processing, transportation, storage, and related services resulting in the delivery, or redelivery in the context of storage services, of pipeline-quality natural gas and NGLs to the customer. As such, revenue is recognized at the daily completion of the integrated package of services as the integrated package represents a single performance obligation. Additionally, certain contracts in our midstream businesses contain fixed or upfront payment terms that result in the deferral of revenues until such services have been performed or such capacity has been made available.
We also earn revenues from offshore crude oil and natural gas gathering and transportation and offshore production handling. These services represent an integrated package of services and are considered a single distinct performance obligation for which we recognize revenues as the services are provided to the customer.
We generally earn a contractually stated fee per unit for the volume of product transported, gathered, processed, or stored. The rate is generally fixed; however, certain contracts contain variable rates that are subject to change based on commodity prices, levels of throughput, or an annual adjustment based on a formulaic cost of service calculation. In addition, we have contracts with contractually stated fees that decline over the contract term, such as declines based on the passage of time periods or achievement of cumulative throughput amounts. For all of our contracts, we allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation based on the relative standalone selling price. The excess of consideration received over revenue recognized results in the deferral of those amounts until future periods based on a units of production or straight-line methodology. Certain of our gas gathering and processing agreements have minimum volume commitments (MVC). If a customer under such an agreement fails to meet its MVC for a specified period (thus not exercising all the contractual rights to gathering and processing services within the specified period, herein referred to as “breakage”), it is obligated to pay a contractually determined fee based upon the shortfall between the actual gathered or processed volumes and the MVC for the period contained in the contract. When we conclude it is probable that the customer will not exercise all or a portion of its remaining rights, we recognize revenue associated with such breakage amount in proportion to the pattern of exercised rights within the respective MVC period.
Under keep-whole and percent-of-liquids processing contracts, we receive commodity consideration in the form of NGLs and take title to the NGLs at the tailgate of the plant. We recognize such commodity consideration as service revenue based on the market value of the NGLs retained at the time the processing is provided. The current market value, as opposed to the market value at the contract inception date, is used due to a combination of factors, including the fact that the volume, mix, and market price of NGL consideration to be received is unknown at the time of contract execution and is not specified in our contracts with customers. Additionally, product sales revenue (discussed below) is recognized upon the sale of the NGLs to a third party based on the sales price at the time of sale. As a result, revenue is recognized both at the time the processing service is provided in Service revenues – commodity consideration and at the time the NGLs retained as part of the processing service are sold in Product sales. The recognition of revenue related to commodity consideration has the impact of increasing the book value of NGL inventory, resulting in higher cost of goods sold at the time of sale. Given that most inventory is sold in the same period that it is generated, the impact of these transactions is expected to have little impact to operating income.
Product Sales
In the course of providing transportation services to customers of our gas pipeline businesses and gathering and processing services to customers of our midstream businesses, we may receive different quantities of natural gas from customers than the quantities delivered on behalf of those customers. The resulting imbalances are primarily settled through the purchase or sale of natural gas with each customer under terms provided for in our FERC tariffs or gathering
and processing agreements, respectively. Revenue is recognized from the sale of natural gas upon settlement of imbalances.
In certain instances, we purchase NGLs, crude oil, and natural gas from our oil and natural gas producer customers. In addition, we retain NGLs as consideration in certain processing arrangements, as discussed above in the Service Revenues - Midstream businesses section. We recognize revenue from the sale of these commodities when the products have been sold and delivered. Our product sales contracts are primarily short-term contracts based on prevailing market rates at the time of the transaction.
Revenue by Category
The following table presents our revenue disaggregated by major service line:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Northeast Midstream | | Atlantic- Gulf Midstream | | West Midstream | | Transco | | Northwest Pipeline | | Other | | Intercompany Eliminations | | Total |
| (Millions) |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 | | |
Revenues from contracts with customers: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Service revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-regulated gathering, processing, transportation, and storage: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Monetary consideration | $ | 205 |
| | $ | 128 |
| | $ | 414 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | (18 | ) | | $ | 730 |
|
Commodity consideration | 5 |
| | 11 |
| | 78 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 94 |
|
Regulated interstate natural gas transportation and storage | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 450 |
| | 108 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 558 |
|
Other | 21 |
| | 2 |
| | 13 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (3 | ) | | 34 |
|
Total service revenues | 231 |
| | 141 |
| | 505 |
| | 451 |
| | 108 |
| | 1 |
| | (21 | ) | | 1,416 |
|
Product Sales: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NGL and natural gas | 75 |
| | 76 |
| | 558 |
| | 30 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (83 | ) | | 656 |
|
Other | — |
| | — |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) | | 3 |
|
Total product sales | 75 |
| | 76 |
| | 562 |
| | 30 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (84 | ) | | 659 |
|
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 306 |
| | 217 |
| | 1,067 |
| | 481 |
| | 108 |
| | 1 |
| | (105 | ) | | 2,075 |
|
Other revenues (1) | 5 |
| | 7 |
| | (2 | ) | | 2 |
| | — |
| | 7 |
| | (3 | ) | | 16 |
|
Total revenues | $ | 311 |
| | $ | 224 |
| | $ | 1,065 |
| | $ | 483 |
| | $ | 108 |
| | $ | 8 |
| | $ | (108 | ) | | $ | 2,091 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues from contracts with customers: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Service revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-regulated gathering, processing, transportation, and storage: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Monetary consideration | $ | 407 |
| | $ | 265 |
| | $ | 822 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | (36 | ) | | $ | 1,459 |
|
Commodity consideration | 9 |
| | 26 |
| | 160 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 195 |
|
Regulated interstate natural gas transportation and storage | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 911 |
| | 220 |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) | | 1,130 |
|
Other | 42 |
| | 8 |
| | 24 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (6 | ) | | 69 |
|
Total service revenues | 458 |
| | 299 |
| | 1,006 |
| | 912 |
| | 220 |
| | 1 |
| | (43 | ) | | 2,853 |
|
Product Sales: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NGL and natural gas | 173 |
| | 144 |
| | 1,079 |
| | 55 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (168 | ) | | 1,283 |
|
Other | — |
| | — |
| | 8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) | | 7 |
|
Total product sales | 173 |
| | 144 |
| | 1,087 |
| | 55 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (169 | ) | | 1,290 |
|
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 631 |
| | 443 |
| | 2,093 |
| | 967 |
| | 220 |
| | 1 |
| | (212 | ) | | 4,143 |
|
Other revenues (1) | 10 |
| | 9 |
| | 3 |
| | 5 |
| | — |
| | 15 |
| | (6 | ) | | 36 |
|
Total revenues | $ | 641 |
| | $ | 452 |
| | $ | 2,096 |
| | $ | 972 |
| | $ | 220 |
| | $ | 16 |
| | $ | (218 | ) | | $ | 4,179 |
|
______________________________
| |
(1) | Service revenues in our Consolidated Statement of Income include leasing revenues associated with our headquarters building and management fees that we receive for certain services we provide to operated joint ventures and other investments. The leasing revenues and the management fees do not constitute revenue from contracts with customers. Product sales in our Consolidated Statement of Income include amounts associated with our derivative contracts that are not within the scope of ASC 606. |
Contract Assets
Our contract assets primarily consist of revenue recognized under contracts containing MVC features whereby management has concluded it is probable there will be a short-fall payment at the end of the current MVC period, which typically follows the calendar year, and that a significant reversal of revenue recognized currently for the future MVC payment will not occur. As a result, our contract assets related to our future MVC payments are generally expected to be collected within the next 12 months and are included within Other current assets and deferred charges in our Consolidated Balance Sheet until such time as the MVC short-fall payments are invoiced to the customer.
The following table presents a reconciliation of our contract assets:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Quarter-to-Date June 30, 2018 | | Year-to-Date June 30, 2018 |
| (Millions) |
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 24 |
| | $ | 4 |
|
Revenue recognized in excess of cash received | 16 |
| | 36 |
|
Minimum volume commitments invoiced | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) |
Balance at end of period | $ | 39 |
| | $ | 39 |
|
Contract Liabilities
Our contract liabilities consist of advance payments primarily from midstream business customers which include construction reimbursements, prepayments, and other billings for which future services are to be provided under the contract. These amounts are deferred until recognized in revenue when the associated performance obligation has been satisfied, which is primarily based on a units of production methodology over the remaining contractual service periods, and are classified as current or noncurrent according to when such amounts are expected to be recognized. Current and noncurrent contract liabilities are included within Accrued liabilities and Regulatory liabilities, deferred income, and other, respectively, in our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Contracts requiring advance payments and the recognition of contract liabilities are evaluated to determine whether the advance payments provide us with a significant financing benefit. This determination is based on the combined effect of the expected length of time between when we transfer the promised good or service to the customer, when the customer pays for those goods or services, and the prevailing interest rates. We have assessed our contracts for significant financing components and determined that one group of contracts entered into in contemplation of one another for certain capital reimbursements contains a significant financing component. As a result, we recognize noncash interest expense based on the effective interest method and revenue (noncash) is recognized when the underlying asset is placed into service utilizing a units of production or straight-line methodology over the life of the corresponding customer contract.
The following table presents a reconciliation of our contract liabilities:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Quarter-to-Date June 30, 2018 | | Year-to-Date June 30, 2018 |
| (Millions) |
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 1,574 |
| | $ | 1,596 |
|
Payments received and deferred | 126 |
| | 218 |
|
Deconsolidation of Jackalope interest (Note 3) | (52 | ) | | (52 | ) |
Recognized in revenue | (113 | ) | | (227 | ) |
Balance at end of period | $ | 1,535 |
| | $ | 1,535 |
|
The following table presents the amount of the contract liabilities balance as of June 30, 2018, expected to be recognized as revenue in each of the next five years as performance obligations are expected to be satisfied:
|
| | | |
| (Millions) |
2018 (remainder) | $ | 184 |
|
2019 | 249 |
|
2020 | 128 |
|
2021 | 110 |
|
2022 | 103 |
|
2023 | 99 |
|
Thereafter | 662 |
|
Remaining Performance Obligations
The following table presents the transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations under certain contracts as of June 30, 2018. These primarily include long-term contracts containing MVCs associated with our midstream businesses, fixed payments associated with offshore production handling, and reservation charges on contracted capacity on our gas pipeline firm transportation contracts with customers, as well as storage capacity contracts. Amounts included in the table below for our interstate natural gas pipeline businesses reflect the rates for such services in our current FERC tariffs for the life of the related contracts; however, these rates may change based on future tariffs approved by the FERC and the amount and timing of these changes is not currently known. As a practical expedient permitted by ASC 606, this table excludes variable consideration as well as consideration in contracts that is recognized in revenue as billed. It also excludes consideration received prior to June 30, 2018, that will be recognized in future periods (see above for Contract Liabilities and the expected recognition of those amounts within revenue). As noted above, certain of our contracts contain evergreen and other renewal provisions for periods beyond the initial term of the contract. The remaining performance obligation as of June 30, 2018, does not consider potential future performance obligations for which the renewal has not been exercised. The table below also does not include contracts with customers for which the underlying facilities have not received FERC authorization to be placed into service.
|
| | | |
| (Millions) |
2018 (remainder) | $ | 1,239 |
|
2019 | 2,441 |
|
2020 | 2,270 |
|
2021 | 2,036 |
|
2022 | 1,842 |
|
2023 | 1,661 |
|
Thereafter | 12,591 |
|
Total | $ | 24,080 |
|
Accounts Receivable
We do not offer extended payment terms and typically receive payment within one month. We consider receivables past due if full payment is not received by the contractual due date. Interest income related to past due accounts receivable is generally recognized at the time full payment is received or collectability is assured.
The following is a summary of our Trade accounts and other receivables as it relates to contracts with customers:
|
| | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2018 | | January 1, 2018 |
| (Millions) |
Accounts receivable related to revenues from contracts with customers | $ | 742 |
| | $ | 958 |
|
Other accounts receivable | 102 |
| | 18 |
|
Total reflected in Trade accounts and other receivables | $ | 844 |
| | $ | 976 |
|
Impact of Adoption of ASC 606
The following table depicts the impact of the adoption of ASC 606 on our 2018 financial statements. The adjustment to Intangible assets – net of accumulated amortization in the table below relates to the recognition under ASC 606 of contract assets for MVC-related contracts associated with a 2014 acquisition. The recognition of these contract assets resulted in a lower purchase price allocation to intangible assets. The adoption of ASC 606 did not result in adjustments to total operating, investing, or financing cash flows.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| As Reported | | Adjustments resulting from adoption of ASC 606 | | Balance without adoption of ASC 606 |
| (Millions) |
Consolidated Statement of Income |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Service revenues | $ | 1,340 |
| | $ | 6 |
| | $ | 1,346 |
|
Service revenues – commodity consideration | 94 |
| | (94 | ) | | — |
|
Product sales | 657 |
| | 32 |
| | 689 |
|
Total revenues | 2,091 |
| | (56 | ) | | 2,035 |
|
Product costs | 636 |
| | (40 | ) | | 596 |
|
Processing commodity expenses | 26 |
| | (26 | ) | | — |
|
Operating and maintenance expenses | 388 |
| | 4 |
| | 392 |
|
Total costs and expenses | 1,681 |
| | (62 | ) | | 1,619 |
|
Operating income (loss) | 410 |
| | 6 |
| | 416 |
|
Other investing income (loss) - net | 68 |
| | (9 | ) | | 59 |
|
Interest incurred | (288 | ) | | 4 |
| | (284 | ) |
Interest capitalized | 13 |
| | (1 | ) | | 12 |
|
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 134 |
| | (1 | ) | | 133 |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to The Williams Companies, Inc. | 135 |
| | 1 |
| | 136 |
|
| | | | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 | | | | | |
Service revenues | $ | 2,691 |
| | $ | 11 |
| | $ | 2,702 |
|
Service revenues – commodity consideration | 195 |
| | (195 | ) | | — |
|
Product sales | 1,293 |
| | 42 |
| | 1,335 |
|
Total revenues | 4,179 |
| | (142 | ) | | 4,037 |
|
Product costs | 1,249 |
| | (95 | ) | | 1,154 |
|
Processing commodity expenses | 61 |
| | (61 | ) | | — |
|
Operating and maintenance expenses | 745 |
| | 3 |
| | 748 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses | 865 |
| | 1 |
| | 866 |
|
Total costs and expenses | 3,278 |
| | (152 | ) | | 3,126 |
|
Operating income (loss) | 901 |
| | 10 |
| | 911 |
|
Equity earnings (losses) | 174 |
| | 1 |
| | 175 |
|
Other investing income (loss) - net | 72 |
| | (9 | ) | | 63 |
|
Interest incurred | (570 | ) | | 7 |
| | (563 | ) |
Interest capitalized | 22 |
| | (4 | ) | | 18 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes | 646 |
| | 5 |
| | 651 |
|
Net income (loss) | 539 |
| | 5 |
| | 544 |
|
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 252 |
| | 1 |
| | 253 |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to The Williams Companies, Inc. | 287 |
| | 4 |
| | 291 |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| As Reported | | Adjustments resulting from adoption of ASC 606 | | Balance without adoption of ASC 606 |
| (Millions) |
| | | | | |
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income | | | | | |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 | | | | | |
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | $ | 130 |
| | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | 129 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to The Williams Companies, Inc. | 136 |
| | 1 |
| | 137 |
|
| | | | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | $ | 539 |
| | $ | 5 |
| | $ | 544 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss) | 542 |
| | 5 |
| | 547 |
|
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 249 |
| | 1 |
| | 250 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to The Williams Companies, Inc. | 293 |
| | 4 |
| | 297 |
|
| | | | | |
Consolidated Balance Sheet |
June 30, 2018 |
Inventories | $ | 153 |
| | $ | (7 | ) | | $ | 146 |
|
Other current assets and deferred charges | 269 |
| | (35 | ) | | 234 |
|
Total current assets | 1,541 |
| | (42 | ) | | 1,499 |
|
Investments | 6,810 |
| | (1 | ) | | 6,809 |
|
Property, plant, and equipment | 40,863 |
| | (4 | ) | | 40,859 |
|
Property, plant, and equipment – net | 28,953 |
| | (4 | ) | | 28,949 |
|
Intangible assets – net of accumulated amortization | 8,406 |
| | 62 |
| | 8,468 |
|
Regulatory assets, deferred charges, and other | 664 |
| | (4 | ) | | 660 |
|
Total assets | 46,374 |
| | 11 |
| | 46,385 |
|
Deferred income tax liabilities | 3,267 |
| | 27 |
| | 3,294 |
|
Regulatory liabilities, deferred income, and other | 4,389 |
| | (133 | ) | | 4,256 |
|
Retained deficit | (8,735 | ) | | 89 |
| | (8,646 | ) |
Total stockholders’ equity | 9,345 |
| | 89 |
| | 9,434 |
|
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries | 6,102 |
| | 28 |
| | 6,130 |
|
Total equity | 15,447 |
| | 117 |
| | 15,564 |
|
Total liabilities and equity | 46,374 |
| | 11 |
| | 46,385 |
|
| | | | | |
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity | | | | | |
June 30, 2018 | | | | | |
Adoption of ASC 606 | $ | (121 | ) | | $ | 121 |
| | $ | — |
|
Net income (loss) | 539 |
| | 5 |
| | 544 |
|
Deconsolidation of subsidiary | (267 | ) | | (9 | ) | | (276 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in equity | (728 | ) | | 117 |
| | (611 | ) |
Balance - June 30, 2018 | 15,447 |
| | 117 |
| | 15,564 |
|
Note 3 – Variable Interest Entities
WPZ
We own a 74 percent interest in WPZ, a master limited partnership that is a VIE due to the limited partners’ lack of substantive voting rights, such as either participating rights or kick-out rights that can be exercised with a simple
majority of the vote of the limited partners. We are the primary beneficiary of WPZ because we have the power, through our general partner interest, to direct the activities that most significantly impact WPZ’s economic performance.
The following table presents amounts included in our Consolidated Balance Sheet that are for the use or obligation of WPZ and/or its subsidiaries, and which comprise a significant portion of our consolidated assets and liabilities.
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2018 |
| December 31, 2017 |
| Classification |
| (Millions) |
|
|
Assets (liabilities): |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 255 |
| | $ | 881 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents |
Trade accounts and other receivables – net | 800 |
| | 972 |
| | Trade accounts and other receivables |
Inventories | 153 |
| | 113 |
| | Inventories |
Other current assets | 260 |
| | 176 |
| | Other current assets and deferred charges |
Investments | 6,810 |
| | 6,552 |
| | Investments |
Property, plant, and equipment – net | 28,718 |
| | 27,912 |
|
| Property, plant, and equipment – net |
Intangible assets – net | 8,405 |
| | 8,790 |
| | Intangible assets – net of accumulated amortization |
Regulatory assets, deferred charges, and other noncurrent assets | 537 |
| | 507 |
| | Regulatory assets, deferred charges, and other |
Accounts payable | (841 | ) | | (957 | ) |
| Accounts payable |
Accrued liabilities including current asset retirement obligations | (824 | ) | | (857 | ) | | Accrued liabilities |
Long-term debt due within one year | (2 | ) | | (501 | ) | | Long-term debt due within one year |
Long-term debt | (17,018 | ) | | (15,996 | ) | | Long-term debt |
Deferred income tax liabilities | (15 | ) | | (16 | ) | | Deferred income tax liabilities |
Noncurrent asset retirement obligations | (961 | ) | | (944 | ) | | Regulatory liabilities, deferred income, and other |
Regulatory liabilities, deferred income, and other noncurrent liabilities | (3,269 | ) | | (2,809 | ) |
| Regulatory liabilities, deferred income, and other |
Consolidated VIEs of WPZ
The assets and liabilities presented in the table above also include the consolidated interests of the following individual VIEs within WPZ:
Gulfstar One
WPZ owns a 51 percent interest in Gulfstar One LLC (Gulfstar One), a subsidiary that, due to certain risk-sharing provisions in its customer contracts, is a VIE. Gulfstar One includes a proprietary floating-production system, Gulfstar FPS, and associated pipelines which provide production handling and gathering services in the eastern deepwater Gulf of Mexico. WPZ is the primary beneficiary because it has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact Gulfstar One’s economic performance.
Constitution
WPZ owns a 41 percent interest in Constitution, a subsidiary that, due to shipper fixed-payment commitments under its long-term firm transportation contracts, is a VIE. WPZ is the primary beneficiary because it has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact Constitution’s economic performance. WPZ, as operator of Constitution, is responsible for constructing the proposed pipeline connecting its gathering system in Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania, to the Iroquois Gas Transmission and the Tennessee Gas Pipeline systems. The total remaining
cost of the project is estimated to be approximately $740 million, which would be funded with capital contributions from WPZ and the other equity partners on a proportional basis.
In December 2014, Constitution received approval from the FERC to construct and operate its proposed pipeline. However, in April 2016, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) denied the necessary water quality certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act for the New York portion of the pipeline. In May 2016, Constitution appealed the NYSDEC’s denial of the Section 401 certification to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and in August 2017, the court issued a decision denying in part and dismissing in part Constitution’s appeal. The court expressly declined to rule on Constitution’s argument that the delay in the NYSDEC’s decision on Constitution’s Section 401 application constitutes a waiver of the certification requirement. The court determined that it lacked jurisdiction to address that contention, and found that jurisdiction over the waiver issue lies exclusively with the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit). As to the denial itself, the court determined that NYSDEC’s action was not arbitrary or capricious. Constitution filed a petition for rehearing with the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, but in October 2017 the court denied our petition.
In October 2017, WPZ filed a petition for declaratory order requesting the FERC to find that, by operation of law, the Section 401 certification requirement for the New York State portion of Constitution’s pipeline project was waived due to the failure by the NYSDEC to act on Constitution’s Section 401 application within a reasonable period of time as required by the express terms of such statute. In January 2018, the FERC denied WPZ’s petition, finding that Section 401 provides that a state waives certification only when it does not act on an application within one year from the date of the application. WPZ filed a request for rehearing of the FERC’s decision, but in July 2018 the FERC denied its request.
The project’s sponsors remain committed to the project. Now that the FERC has issued an order on WPZ’s request for rehearing, WPZ is clear to seek review of the matter with the D.C. Circuit. WPZ plans to file a petition for review with the D.C. Circuit. An unfavorable resolution could result in the impairment of a significant portion of the capitalized project costs, which total $377 million on a consolidated basis at June 30, 2018, and are included within Property, plant, and equipment in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Beginning in April 2016, we discontinued capitalization of development costs related to this project. It is also possible that we could incur certain supplier-related costs in the event of a prolonged delay or termination of the project.
Cardinal
WPZ owns a 66 percent interest in Cardinal Gas Services, L.L.C. (Cardinal), a subsidiary that provides gathering services for the Utica Shale region and is a VIE due to certain risks shared with customers. WPZ is the primary beneficiary because it has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact Cardinal’s economic performance. Future expansion activity is expected to be funded with capital contributions from WPZ and the other equity partner on a proportional basis.
Nonconsolidated VIEs of WPZ
Jackalope
WPZ owns a 50 percent interest in Jackalope, which provides gathering and processing services for the Powder River basin and is a VIE due to certain risks shared with customers. Prior to the second quarter of 2018 WPZ was the primary beneficiary of Jackalope. During the second quarter of 2018, the scope of Jackalope’s planned future activities changed, resulting in a VIE reconsideration event. Upon evaluation, WPZ determined that it is no longer the primary beneficiary, most notably due to changes in the activities that most significantly impact Jackalope’s economic performance and WPZ’s determination that it does not control the power to direct such activities. These activities are primarily related to the capital decision making process. As a result, WPZ deconsolidated Jackalope on June 30, 2018 and now accounts for its interest using the equity method of accounting as it exerts significant influence over the financial and operational policies of Jackalope (see Note 4 – Investing Activities). At June 30, 2018, the carrying value of WPZ’s investment in Jackalope was $310 million. WPZ’s maximum exposure to loss is limited to the carrying value of its investment. WPZ expects to fund future capital contributions from it and the other equity partner on a proportional basis.
Note 4 – Investing Activities
Jackalope Deconsolidation
During the second quarter of 2018, WPZ deconsolidated its interest in Jackalope (see Note 3 – Variable Interest Entities). WPZ recorded its interest in Jackalope as an equity-method investment at its estimated fair value, resulting in a deconsolidation gain of $62 million reflected in Other investing income (loss) – net in the Consolidated Statement of Income. WPZ estimated the fair value of its interest to be $310 million using an income approach based on expected future cash flows and an appropriate discount rate (a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy). The determination of expected future cash flows involved significant assumptions regarding gathering and processing volumes and related capital spending. A 10.9 percent discount rate was utilized and reflected our estimate of the cost of capital as impacted by market conditions and risks associated with the underlying business. The deconsolidated carrying value of the net assets of Jackalope included $47 million of goodwill.
Acquisition of Additional Interests in Appalachia Midstream Investments
During the first quarter of 2017, WPZ exchanged all of its 50 percent interest in DBJV for an increased interest in two natural gas gathering systems that are part of the Appalachia Midstream Investments and $155 million in cash. This transaction was recorded based on our estimate of the fair value of the interests received as we have more insight to this value as we operate the underlying assets. Following this exchange, WPZ has an approximate average 66 percent interest in the Appalachia Midstream Investments. We continue to account for this investment under the equity-method due to the significant participatory rights of our partners such that we do not exercise control. WPZ also sold all of its interest in Ranch Westex JV LLC for $45 million. These transactions resulted in a total gain of $269 million reflected in Other investing income (loss) – net in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
The fair value of the increased interests in the Appalachia Midstream Investments received as consideration was estimated to be $1.1 billion using an income approach based on expected cash flows and an appropriate discount rate (a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy). The determination of estimated future cash flows involved significant assumptions regarding gathering volumes, rates, and related capital spending. A 9.5 percent discount rate was utilized and reflected our estimate of the cost of capital as impacted by market conditions and risks associated with the underlying business.
Note 5 – Other Income and Expenses
The following table presents certain gains or losses reflected in Other (income) expense – net within Costs and expenses in our Consolidated Statement of Income:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| (Millions) |
Williams Partners | | | | | | | |
Amortization of regulatory assets associated with asset retirement obligations | $ | 8 |
| | $ | 9 |
| | $ | 16 |
| | $ | 17 |
|
Accrual of regulatory liability related to overcollection of certain employee expenses | 6 |
| | 5 |
| | 11 |
| | 11 |
|
Adjustments to regulatory liabilities related to Tax Reform | (21 | ) | | — |
| | (17 | ) | | — |
|
Regulatory charge per approved rates related to Tax Reform | 6 |
| | — |
| | 12 |
| | — |
|
Gains on contract settlements and terminations | — |
| | (2 | ) | | — |
| | (15 | ) |
Gain on sale of Refinery Grade Propylene Splitter | — |
| | (12 | ) | | — |
| | (12 | ) |
Additional Items
Certain additional items included in the Consolidated Statement of Income are as follows:
| |
• | Other income (expense) – net below Operating income (loss) includes income of $27 million and $47 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, and $19 million and $37 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, for allowance for equity funds used during construction primarily within the Williams Partners segment. Other income (expense) – net below Operating income (loss) also includes income of $5 million and $10 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, and $9 million and $37 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively of income associated with a regulatory asset related to deferred taxes on equity funds used during construction. These items are reported through our Other segment. |
| |
• | Other income (expense) – net below Operating income (loss) for the six months ended June 30, 2018, includes a $7 million net loss associated with the March 28, 2018, early retirement of $750 million of 4.875 percent senior unsecured notes that were due in 2024. The net loss within the Williams Partners segment reflects $34 million in premiums paid, partially offset by $27 million of unamortized premium. (See Note 9 – Debt and Banking Arrangements.) For the six months ended June 30, 2017, Other income (expense) – net below Operating income (loss) includes a net gain of $30 million associated with the February 23, 2017, early retirement of $750 million of 6.125 percent senior unsecured notes that were due in 2022. The net gain within Williams Partners reflects $53 million of unamortized premium, partially offset by $23 million in premiums paid. |
Note 6 – Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
The Provision (benefit) for income taxes includes:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| (Millions) |
Current: | | | | | | | |
Federal | $ | (17 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (36 | ) | | $ | 3 |
|
State | — |
| | 2 |
| | 1 |
| | 8 |
|
| (17 | ) | | 2 |
| | (35 | ) | | 11 |
|
Deferred: | | | | | | | |
Federal | 60 |
| | 59 |
| | 124 |
| | 74 |
|
State | 9 |
| | 4 |
| | 18 |
| | 17 |
|
| 69 |
| | 63 |
| | 142 |
| | 91 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | $ | 52 |
| | $ | 65 |
| | $ | 107 |
| | $ | 102 |
|
The effective income tax rates for the total provision for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, are less than the federal statutory rate primarily due to the impact of the allocation of income to nontaxable noncontrolling interests, partially offset by the effect of state income taxes.
The effective income tax rate for the total provision for the three months ended June 30, 2017, is less than the federal statutory rate primarily due to the impact of the allocation of income to nontaxable noncontrolling interests, partially offset by the effect of state income taxes.
The effective income tax rate for the total provision for the six months ended June 30, 2017, is less than the federal statutory rate primarily due to releasing a $127 million valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset associated with a capital loss carryover and the impact of the allocation of income to nontaxable noncontrolling interests, partially offset by the effect of state income taxes. The sale of the Geismar olefins facility in 2017 generated capital gains sufficient to offset the capital loss carryover, thereby allowing us to reverse the valuation allowance in full.
On December 22, 2017, Tax Reform was enacted. Under the guidance provided by Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, we recorded provisional adjustments related to the impact of Tax Reform in the fourth quarter of 2017. We consider all amounts recorded related to Tax Reform to be reasonable estimates. The amounts recorded continue to be provisional for the reasons disclosed in Exhibit 99.1 of our Form 8-K dated May 3, 2018, as our interpretation, assessment, and presentation of the impact of the tax law change may be further clarified with additional guidance from regulatory, tax, and accounting authorities. We are continuing to gather additional information to determine the final impact and should additional guidance be provided by these authorities or other sources, we will review the provisional amounts and adjust as appropriate.
During the next 12 months, we do not expect ultimate resolution of any unrecognized tax benefit associated with domestic or international matters to have a material impact on our unrecognized tax benefit position.
Note 7 – Earnings Per Common Share |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| (Dollars in millions, except per-share amounts; shares in thousands) |
Net income attributable to The Williams Companies, Inc. available to common stockholders for basic and diluted earnings per common share | $ | 135 |
| | $ | 81 |
| | $ | 287 |
| | $ | 454 |
|
Basic weighted-average shares | 827,868 |
| | 826,426 |
| | 827,689 |
| | 825,492 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | | | |
Nonvested restricted stock units | 1,819 |
| | 1,499 |
| | 1,956 |
| | 1,402 |
|
Stock options | 420 |
| | 650 |
| | 506 |
| | 637 |
|
Diluted weighted-average shares | 830,107 |
| | 828,575 |
| | 830,151 |
| | 827,531 |
|
Earnings per common share: | | | | | | | |
Basic | $ | .16 |
| | $ | .10 |
| | $ | .35 |
| | $ | .55 |
|
Diluted | $ | .16 |
| | $ | .10 |
| | $ | .35 |
| | $ | .55 |
|
Note 8 – Employee Benefit Plans
Net periodic benefit cost (credit) is as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Pension Benefits |
| Three Months Ended June 30, |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| (Millions) |
Components of net periodic benefit cost (credit): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost | $ | 11 |
|
| $ | 12 |
|
| $ | 25 |
|
| $ | 25 |
|
Interest cost | 12 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 29 |
|
Expected return on plan assets | (15 | ) |
| (21 | ) |
| (31 | ) |
| (41 | ) |
Amortization of net actuarial loss | 5 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 14 |
|
Net actuarial loss from settlements | 1 |
|
| — |
|
| 1 |
|
| — |
|
Net periodic benefit cost (credit) | $ | 14 |
|
| $ | 12 |
|
| $ | 29 |
|
| $ | 27 | |