Mexican Restaurants, Inc. Form 10-K For the Period Ending 01/01/2006




UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

 
[ X ]
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [FEE REQUIRED]

For the Fiscal Year Ended January 1, 2006

OR

 
[ ]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED]

For the transition period from ___________ to ______________

Commission file number: 0-28234
 
 
 
 

MEXICAN RESTAURANTS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Texas
76-0493269
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(IRS Employer Identification Number)

1135 Edgebrook, Houston, Texas
77034-1899
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 713-943-7574

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $.01 par value
(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes ¨ No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes  ¨ No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X  No ____

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X ]

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Yes   No X

1



The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, based on the sale trade price of the Common Stock as reported by the Nasdaq Small Cap Market on July 3, 2005, the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second quarter, was $14,026,756. For purposes of this computation, all officers, directors and 10% beneficial owners of the registrant are deemed to be affiliates. Such determination should not be deemed an admission that such officers, directors or 10% beneficial owners are, in fact, affiliates of the Registrant.
 
Number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock, as of March 28, 2006: 3,356,977 shares of Common Stock, par value $.01.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Specified portions of the Company’s definitive proxy statement in connection with the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 23, 2006, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.

Table of Contents

Part I
 
Page
 
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
2
Item 1.
Business
4
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
10
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
12
Item 2.
Properties
12
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
13
Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
14
     
Part II
   
Item 5.
Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
14
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
15
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
16
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
22
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
22
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
23
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
23
Item 9B.
Other Information
23
     
Part III
   
Item 10.
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
23
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
23
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters
24
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
24
Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
24
     
Part IV
   
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
24


SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements in this Form 10-K constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Reform Act”). Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other facts which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Mexican Restaurants, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”), its restaurants, area developers and franchisees to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, the following: general economic and business conditions; competition; success of operating initiatives; development and operating costs; advertising and promotional efforts; brand awareness; adverse publicity; acceptance of new product offerings; availability, locations and terms of sites for store development; changes in

2


business strategy or development plans; quality of management; availability, terms and development of capital; business abilities and judgment of personnel; availability of qualified personnel; food, labor and employee benefit costs; area developers’ adherence to development schedules; changes in, or the failure to comply with government regulations; regional weather conditions or weather-related events; construction schedules; and other factors referenced in the Form 10-K. The use in this Form 10-K of such words as “believes”, “anticipates”, “expects”, “intends”, “plans” and similar expressions with respect to future activities or other future events or conditions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. The success of the Company is dependent on the efforts of the Company, its employees, its area developers, and franchisees and the manner in which they operate and develop stores in light of various factors, including those set forth above.

Although the Company believes that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate, and therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-K will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by the Company that its objectives or plans will be achieved.


3



PART I

ITEM 1.  BUSINESS

General

Mexican Restaurants, Inc. (the “Company”) operates and franchises Mexican-theme restaurants featuring various elements associated with the casual dining experience under the names Casa Olé®, Monterey’s Tex-Mex Café®, Monterey’s Little Mexico®, Tortuga Coastal Cantina®, La Señorita® and Crazy Jose’s®. The Casa Olé, Monterey, Tortuga, La Señorita and Crazy Jose’s concepts have been in business for 34, 51, 12, 27 and 19 years, respectively. Today the Company operates 60 restaurants, franchises 18 restaurants and licenses one restaurant in various communities across Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Michigan. The Casa Olé, Monterey, La Señorita and Crazy Jose’s restaurants are designed to appeal to a broad range of customers, and are located primarily in small and in medium-sized communities and middle-income areas of larger markets. The Tortuga Coastal Cantina restaurants also are designed to appeal to a broad range of customers and are located primarily in Houston suburban markets. The restaurants offer fresh, quality food, affordable prices, friendly service and comfortable surroundings. Menus feature a variety of traditional Mexican and Tex-Mex selections, complemented by the Company's own original Mexican-based recipes, designed to have broad appeal. The Company believes that the established success of the Company in existing markets, its focus on middle-income customers, and the skills of its management team provide significant opportunities to realize the value inherent in the Mexican restaurant market and increase revenues in existing markets.

The Company was incorporated under the name “Casa Olé Restaurants, Inc.” under the laws of the State of Texas in February 1996, and had its initial public offering of Common Stock in April 1996. In May 1999, the Company changed its corporate name to Mexican Restaurants, Inc. The Company operates as a holding company and conducts substantially all of its operations through its subsidiaries. All references to the Company include the Company and its subsidiaries, unless otherwise stated.

Since its inception as a public company, the Company has primarily grown through the acquisition of other Mexican food restaurant companies. In July 1997, the Company purchased all of the outstanding stock of Monterey’s Acquisition Corp. (“MAC”). At the time of the acquisition, MAC owned and operated 26 restaurants in Texas and Oklahoma under the names “Monterey’s Tex-Mex Café,” “Monterey’s Little Mexico” and “Tortuga Coastal Cantina.”

In April 1999, the Company purchased 100% of the outstanding stock of La Señorita Restaurants, a Mexican restaurant chain operated in the State of Michigan. The Company purchased the shares of common stock of La Señorita for $4.0 million. The transaction was funded with the Company’s revolving line of credit with Bank of America. At the time of the acquisition, La Señorita operated five company-owned restaurants, and three franchise restaurants.

    On January 7, 2004, the Company completed its purchase of 13 restaurants and related assets from its Beaumont-based franchisee and affiliates for a total consideration of approximately $13.75 million. The financing for the acquisition was provided by Fleet National Bank, CNL and the sellers. The restaurants acquired include eight Casa Olé restaurants located in Southeast Texas, two Casa Olé restaurants located in Southwest Louisiana, and three Crazy Jose’s restaurants located in Southeast Texas.

On October 14, 2004, the Company completed its purchase of one franchise restaurant in Brenham, Texas for approximately $215,000. The restaurant was closed, remodeled and re-opened on November 22, 2004.

 
Strategy and Concept

The Company’s objective is to be perceived as a value leader in the Mexican theme segment of the full-service casual dining marketplace. To accomplish this objective, the Company has developed strategies designed to achieve and maintain high levels of customer loyalty, frequent patronage and profitability. The key strategic elements are:

 
Ÿ
Offering consistent, high-quality, original recipe Mexican menu items that reflect both national and local taste preferences;

4




 
Ÿ
Pricing its menu offerings at levels below many family and casual-dining restaurant concepts;

 
Ÿ
Selecting, training and motivating its employees to enhance customer dining experiences and the friendly casual atmosphere of its restaurants;

 
Ÿ
Providing customers with the friendly, attentive service typically associated with more expensive casual-dining experiences; and

 
Ÿ
Reinforcing the perceived value of the dining experience with a comfortable and inviting Mexican decor.


Menu. The Company’s restaurants offer high-quality products with a distinctive, yet mild taste profile with mainstream appeal. Fresh ingredients are a critical recipe component, and the majority of menu items are prepared daily in the kitchen of each restaurant from original recipes.

The menus feature a wide variety of entrees including enchiladas, combination platters, burritos, fajitas, coastal seafood and other house specialties. The menu also includes soup, salads, appetizers and desserts. From time to time the Company also introduces new dishes designed to keep the menus fresh. Alcoholic beverages are served as a complement to meals and represent a range of less than 5% of sales at its more family-oriented locations, and up to 20% in its more casual-oriented dining locations. At Company-owned restaurants the dinner menu entrees presently range in price from $4.99 to $15.95, with most items priced between $5.95 and $9.95. Lunch prices at most Company-owned restaurants presently range from $4.99 to $8.95.

Atmosphere and Layout. The Company emphasizes an attractive interior and exterior design for each of its restaurants. The typical restaurant has an inviting and interesting Mexican exterior. The interior decor is comfortable Mexican in appearance to reinforce the perceived value of the dining experience. Stucco, tile floors, carpets, plants and a variety of paint colors are integral features of each restaurant's decor. These decor features are incorporated in a floor plan designed to provide a comfortable atmosphere. The Company’s restaurant designs are sufficiently flexible to accommodate a variety of available sites and development opportunities, such as malls, end-caps of strip shopping centers and free standing buildings, including conversions to the Company’s restaurant design. The restaurant facility is also designed to serve a high volume of customers in a relatively limited period of time. The Company's restaurants typically range in size from approximately 4,000 to 5,600 square feet, with an average of approximately 4,500 square feet and a seating capacity of approximately 180.

Growth Strategy

The Company believes that the unit economics of the various restaurant concepts of the Company, as well as their value orientation and focus on middle income customers, provide significant potential opportunities for growth. The Company’s long-standing strategy to capitalize on these growth opportunities has been comprised of two key elements:

Improve Same Restaurant Sales and Profits. The Company’s first growth opportunity is to improve the sales and controllable income of existing restaurants (controllable income consists of restaurant sales less food and beverage expenses, labor and controllable expenses, such as utilities and repair and maintenance expenses, but excludes advertising and occupancy expenses). This is accomplished through an emphasis on restaurant operations, coupled with improving marketing, purchasing and other organizational efficiencies (see “Restaurant Operations” below). During fiscal year 2006, the Company expects to focus on improving sales and profitability so that it can maximize free cash flow, which it will use to pay off debt, remodel existing restaurants, build new restaurants, acquire existing franchise restaurants and to make repurchases of its common stock when it determines such repurchases are a prudent use of its capital.
 
Increased Penetration of Existing Markets. The Company’s second growth opportunity is, when it believes market conditions warrant, to increase the number of restaurants in existing Designated Market Areas (“DMAs”) and to expand into contiguous new markets. The DMA concept is a mapping tool developed by the A.C. Nielsen Co. that measures the size of a particular market by reference to communities included within a common television market. The Company's objective in increasing the density of Company-owned restaurants within existing markets is to improve operating efficiencies in such markets and to realize improved overhead absorption. In addition, the Company believes that increasing the density of restaurants in both Company-owned and franchised markets will assist it in achieving effective media penetration while

5





maintaining or reducing advertising costs as a percentage of revenues in the relevant markets. The Company believes that careful and prudent site selection within existing markets will avoid cannibalization of the sales bases of existing restaurants.
 
In implementing its unit expansion strategy, the Company may use a combination of franchised and Company-owned restaurants. The number of such restaurants developed in any period will vary. The Company believes that a mix of franchised and Company-owned restaurants would enable it to realize accelerated expansion opportunities, while maintaining majority or sole ownership of a significant number of restaurants. Generally the Company does not anticipate opening franchised and Company-owned restaurants within the same market. In seeking franchisees, the Company will continue to primarily target experienced multi-unit restaurant operators with knowledge of a particular geographic market and financial resources sufficient to execute the Company's development strategy.

The restaurant industry is a competitive and fragmented business. Moreover, the restaurant industry is characterized by a high initial capital investment. Our focus is not on new restaurant expansion just to generate additional sales, but a balanced approach that emphasizes same-restaurant sales growth and selective new restaurant development and acquisitions of existing franchise restaurants. During fiscal 2005, the Company opened one new restaurant and closed, remodeled and re-opened an existing restaurant. The Company plans to build two new restaurants in fiscal year 2006, as well as significantly remodel one existing restaurant and moderately remodel eight existing restaurants.

     The Company anticipates it will continue to selectively acquire existing franchised restaurants from time to time when such opportunities arise, as well as actively promote the development of new franchise restaurants (see “Franchising” below). Further, the Company will continue to review potential strategic acquisitions within the Mexican food restaurant industry that would complement our existing corporate culture.

Site Selection

When developing new restaurant sites, senior management of the Company devotes significant time and resources to analyzing prospective sites for the Company’s restaurants. Senior management has also created and utilizes a site selection committee, which reviews and approves each site to be developed. In addition, the Company conducts customer surveys to define precisely the demographic profile of the customer base of each of the Company’s restaurant concepts. The Company’s site selection criteria focus on:
 
1)  
matching the customer profile of the respective restaurant concept to the profile of the population of the target local market;

2)  
easy site accessibility, adequate parking, and prominent visibility of each site under consideration;

3)  
the site’s strategic location within the marketplace;

4)  
the site’s proximity to the major concentration of shopping centers within the market;

5)  
the site’s proximity to a large employment base to support the lunch segment; and

6)  
the impact of competition from other restaurants in the market.

The Company believes that a sufficient number of suitable sites are available for contemplated Company and franchise development in existing markets. Based on its current planning and market information, the Company plans to open two new restaurants in fiscal year 2006. The anticipated total investment for a 4,200 to 5,600 square foot restaurant, including land, building, equipment, signage, site work, furniture, fixtures and decor ranges between $1.4 and $2.1 million (including capitalized lease value). Additionally, training and other pre-opening costs are anticipated to approximate $50,000 to $100,000 per location. The cost of developing and operating a Company restaurant can vary based upon fluctuations in land acquisition and site improvement costs, construction costs in various markets, the size of the particular restaurant and other factors. Although the Company anticipates that development costs associated with near-term restaurants will range between $1.4 and $2.1 million, there can be no assurance of this. Where possible, the Company uses build to suit, lease conversion or sale and leaseback transactions in an effort to limit its cash investment to approximately $550,000 per location.

6




 
Restaurant Operations

Management and Employees. The management staff of each restaurant is responsible for managing the restaurant's operations. Each Company-owned restaurant operates with a general manager, one or more assistant managers and a kitchen manager or a chef. Including managers, restaurants have an average of 50 full-time and part-time employees. The Company historically has spent considerable effort developing its employees, allowing it to promote from within. As an additional incentive to its restaurant management personnel, the Company has a bonus plan in which restaurant managers can receive monthly bonuses based on a percentage of their restaurants’ controllable profits.

The Company’s regional supervisors, who report directly to the Company’s Directors of Operation, offer support to the store managers. Each supervisor is eligible for a monthly bonus based on a percentage of controllable profits of the stores under their control.

As of January 1, 2006, the Company employed approximately 3,171 people, of whom approximately 3,120 were restaurant personnel at the Company-owned restaurants and 51 were corporate personnel. The Company considers its employee relations to be good. Most employees, other than restaurant management and corporate personnel, are paid on an hourly basis. The Company’s employees are not covered by a collective bargaining agreement.

Training and Quality Control. The Company requires its hourly employees to participate in a formal training program carried out at the individual restaurants, with the on-the-job training program varying from three days to two weeks based upon the applicable position. Managers of both Company-owned and franchised restaurants are trained at one of the Company's specified training stores by that store's general manager and are then certified upon completion of a four to six week program that encompasses all aspects of restaurant operations as well as personnel management and policy and procedures, with special emphasis on quality control and customer relations. To evaluate ongoing employee service and provide rewards to employees, the Company employs a "mystery shopper" program that consists of two anonymous visits per month per restaurant. The Company's franchise agreement requires each franchised restaurant to employ a general manager who has completed the Company's training program at one of the Company's specified training stores. Compliance with the Company's operational standards is monitored for both Company-owned and franchised restaurants by random, on-site visits by corporate management, regular inspections by regional supervisors, the ongoing direction of a corporate quality control manager and the mystery shopper program.

Marketing and Advertising. The Company believes that when media penetration is achieved in a particular market, investments in radio and television advertising can generate significant increases in revenues in a cost-effective manner. During fiscal 2005, the Company spent approximately 3.0% of restaurant revenues on various forms of advertising and plans to spend a comparable amount in fiscal 2006. Besides radio and television, the Company makes use of in-store promotions, involvement in community activities, and customer word-of-mouth to maintain their performance.

Purchasing. The Company strives to obtain consistent quality products at competitive prices from reliable sources. The Company works with its distributors and other purveyors to ensure the integrity, quality, price and availability of the various raw ingredients. The Company researches and tests various products in an effort to maintain quality and to be responsive to changing customer tastes. The Company operates a centralized purchasing system that is utilized by all of the Company-owned restaurants and is available to the Company's franchisees. Under the Company's franchise agreement, if a franchisee wishes to purchase from a supplier other than a currently approved supplier, it must first submit the products and supplier to the Company for approval. Regardless of the purchase source, all purchases must comply with the Company's product specifications. The Company’s ability to maintain consistent product quality throughout its operations depends upon acquiring specified food products and supplies from reliable sources. Management believes that all essential food and beverage products are available from other qualified sources at competitive prices.

Franchising

The Company currently has 10 franchisees operating a total of 18 restaurants and one licensee operating one restaurant. Most franchisees operate one or two restaurants. No new franchise restaurants were opened during fiscal 2005. In fiscal year 2004, one new franchise restaurant was opened, one was closed, and 11 franchise restaurants were sold to the Company. The Company’s largest franchisee, based in Beaumont, sold its 10 Casa Olé restaurants, three Crazy Jose’s

7



restaurants, and related assets to the Company on January 7, 2004, and a Casa Olé franchisee sold its Brenham, Texas restaurant to the Company on October 14, 2004.

Franchising allows the Company to expand the number of stores and penetrate markets more quickly and with less capital than developing Company-owned stores. The Company has the first right of refusal when a franchisee decides to sell its restaurant(s). Historically, the Company has selectively acquired franchisee restaurants when reasonably available. At the same time, the Company plans to expand its base of franchise restaurants. Consequently, in 2004 the Company updated its Casa Olé and La Señorita Uniform Franchise Offering Circular (“UFOC”) in order to pursue new franchisees.

Franchisees are selected on the basis of various factors, including business background, experience and financial resources. In seeking new franchisees, the Company targets experienced multi-unit restaurant operators with knowledge of a particular geographic market and financial resources sufficient to execute the Company's development schedule. Under the current franchise agreement, franchisees are required to operate their stores in compliance with the Company's policies, standards and specifications, including matters such as menu items, ingredients, materials, supplies, services, fixtures, furnishings, decor and signs. In addition, franchisees are required to purchase, directly from the Company or its authorized agent, spice packages for use in the preparation of certain menu items, and must purchase certain other items from approved suppliers unless written consent is received from the Company.

Franchise Agreements. The Company enters into a franchise agreement with each franchisee that grants the franchisee the right to develop a single store within a specific territory at a site approved by the Company. The franchisee then has limited exclusive rights within the territory. Under the Company's current standard franchise agreement, the franchisee is required to pay a franchise fee of $25,000 per restaurant. The current standard franchise agreement provides for an initial term of 15 years (with a limited renewal option) and payment of a royalty of 3% to 5% of gross sales. The termination dates of the Company's franchise agreements with its existing franchisees currently range from 2006 to 2015.

Franchise agreements are not assignable without the prior written consent of the Company. Also, the Company retains rights of first refusal with respect to any proposed sales by the franchisee. Franchisees are not permitted to compete with the Company during the term of the franchise agreement and for a limited time, and in a limited area, after the term of the franchise agreement. The enforceability and permitted scope of such noncompetition provisions varies from state to state. The Company has the right to terminate any franchise agreement for certain specific reasons, including a franchisee's failure to make payments when due or failure to adhere to the Company's policies and standards. Many state franchise laws, however, limit the ability of a franchisor to terminate or refuse to renew a franchise. See "Item 1. Business—Government Regulation".

Prior forms of the Company's franchise agreements may contain terms that vary from those described above, including with respect to the payment or nonpayment of advertising fees and royalties, the term of the agreement, and assignability, noncompetition and termination provisions.

Franchisee Training and Support. Under the current franchise agreement, each franchisee (or if the franchisee is a business organization, a manager designated by the franchisee) is required to personally participate in the operation of the franchise. Before opening the franchisee's business to the public, the Company provides training at its approved training facility for each franchisee's general manager, assistant manager and kitchen manager or chef. The Company recommends that the franchisee, if the franchisee is other than the general manager, or if a business organization, its chief operating officer, attend such training. The Company also provides a training team to assist the franchisee in opening its restaurant. The team, supervised by the Director of Training, will assist and advise the franchisee and/or its manager in all phases of the opening operation for a seven to fourteen day period. The formal training program required of hourly employees and management, along with continued oversight by the Company's quality control manager, is designed to promote consistency of operations.

Area Developers. The area development agreement is an extension of the standard franchise agreement. The area development agreement provides area developers with the right to execute more than one franchise agreement in accordance with a fixed development schedule. Restaurants established under these agreements must be located in a specific territory in which the area developer will have limited exclusive rights. Area developers pay an initial development fee generally equal to the total initial franchise fee for the first franchise agreement to be executed pursuant to the development schedule plus 10% of the initial franchise fee for each additional franchise agreement to be executed pursuant to the development schedule. Generally the initial development fee is not refundable, but will be applied in the proportions described above to the initial franchise fee payable for each franchise agreement executed pursuant to the development schedule. New area developers

8




will pay monthly royalties for all restaurants established under such franchise agreements on a declining scale generally ranging from 5% of gross sales for the initial restaurant to 3% of gross sales for the fourth restaurant and thereafter as additional restaurants are developed. Area development agreements are not assignable without the prior written consent of the Company. The Company will retain rights of first refusal with respect to proposed sales of restaurants by the area developers. Area developers are not permitted to compete with the Company. As described above, the enforceability and permitted scope of such noncompetition provisions may vary from state to state. If an area developer fails to meet its development schedule obligations, the Company can, among other things, terminate the area development agreement or modify the territory in the agreement. These termination rights may be limited by applicable state franchise laws. The Company is currently seeking new area developers. One area developer, a Beaumont-based franchisee, sold its 10 Casa Ole franchise restaurants and related assets to the Company on January 7, 2004 (the Company also purchased three Crazy Jose’s restaurants in the same transaction). The Company currently has two area developers operating a total of four and three restaurants, respectively.

Competition

The restaurant industry is intensely competitive. Competition is based upon a number of factors, including concept, price, location, quality and service. The Company competes against a broad range of other family dining concepts, including those focusing on various other types of ethnic food, as well as local restaurants in its various markets. The Company also competes against other quick service and casual dining concepts within the Mexican and Tex-Mex food segment. Many of the Company's competitors are well established and have substantially greater financial and other resources than the Company. Some of the Company's competitors may be better established in markets where the Company’s restaurants are or may be located. Also, the Company competes for qualified franchisees with franchisors of other restaurants and various other concepts.

The success of a particular restaurant concept is also affected by many other factors, including national, regional or local economic and real estate conditions, changes in consumer tastes and eating habits, demographic trends, weather, traffic patterns, and the type, number and location of competing restaurants. In addition, factors such as inflation, increased food, labor and benefit costs, and the availability of experienced management and hourly employees may adversely affect the restaurant industry in general and the Company's restaurants in particular.

Government Regulation

Each restaurant is subject to regulation by federal agencies and to licensing and regulation by state and local health, sanitation, safety, fire and other departments relating to the development and operation of restaurants. These include regulations pertaining to the environmental, building and zoning requirements in the preparation and sale of food. The Company is also subject to laws governing the service of alcohol and its relationship with employees, including minimum wage requirements, overtime, working conditions and immigration requirements. Difficulties or failures in obtaining the required construction and operating licenses, permits or approvals could delay or prevent the opening of a specific new restaurant. The Company believes that it is operating in substantial compliance with applicable laws and regulations that govern its operations.

Alcoholic beverage control regulations require each of the Company’s restaurants to apply to a state authority and, in certain locations, county or municipal authorities, for a license or permit to sell alcoholic beverages on the premises and to provide service for extended hours. Typically, licenses must be renewed annually and may be revoked or suspended for cause at any time. Alcoholic beverage control regulations relate to numerous aspects of the Company's restaurants, including minimum age of patrons drinking alcoholic beverages and of employees serving alcoholic beverages, training, hours of operation, advertising, wholesale purchasing, inventory control and handling, storage and dispensing of alcoholic beverages. The Company is also subject to "dramshop" statutes that generally provide that a person injured by an intoxicated person may seek to recover damages from an establishment determined to have wrongfully served alcoholic beverages to the intoxicated person. The Company carries liquor liability coverage as part of its existing comprehensive general liability insurance. Additionally, within thirty days of employment by the Company, each Texas employee of the Company who serves alcoholic beverages is required to attend an alcoholic seller training program that has been approved by the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission and endorsed by the Texas Restaurant Association and that endeavors to educate the server to detect and prevent overservice, as well as underage service, of the customers at the Company’s restaurants.

9


 
In connection with the sale of franchises, the Company is subject to the United States Federal Trade Commission rules and regulations and state laws that regulate the offer and sale of franchises and business opportunities. The Company is also subject to laws that regulate certain aspects of such relationships. To date, the Company has had no claims with respect
to its programs and, based on the nature of any potential compliance issues identified, does not believe that compliance issues associated with its historic franchising programs will have a material adverse effect on its results of operations or financial condition. The Company believes that it is operating in substantial compliance with applicable laws and regulations that govern franchising programs.

The federal Americans with Disabilities Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in public accommodations and employment. The Company is required to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and regulations relating to accommodating the needs of the disabled in connection with the construction of new facilities and with significant renovations of existing facilities.

The Company is subject to various local, state and federal laws regulating the discharge of pollutants into the environment. The Company believes that it conducts its operations in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations. The Company conducts environmental audits of each proposed restaurant site in order to determine whether there is any evidence of contamination prior to purchasing or entering into a lease with respect to such site. To date, the Company's operations have not been materially adversely affected by the cost of compliance with applicable environmental laws.

Trademarks, Service Marks and Trade Dress

The Company believes its trademarks, service marks and trade dress have significant value and are important to its marketing efforts. It has registered the trademarks for “Casa Olé”, “Casa Olé Mexican Restaurant”, “Monterey’s Tex-Mex Café”, “Monterey’s Little Mexico”, “Tortuga Cantina”, “La Señorita” and “Crazy Jose’s” with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the following risk factors as well as the other information contained or incorporated by reference in this report, as these are important factors, among others, that could cause our actual results to differ from our expected or historical results. It is not possible to predict or identify all such factors. Consequently, you should not consider any such list to be a complete statement of all of our potential risks or uncertainties.

Seasonal Fluctuations in Sales and Earnings Affect Our Quarterly Results. Our sales and earnings fluctuate seasonally. Historically our highest sales and earnings have occurred in the second and third calendar quarters, which we believe is typical of the restaurant industry and consumer spending patterns in general. In addition, quarterly results have been and, in the future are likely to be, substantially affected by the timing of new restaurant openings. Because of the seasonality of our business and the impact of new restaurant openings, results for any calendar quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for a full fiscal year and cannot be used to indicate financial performance for the entire year.

Inflation May Adversely Impact Our Net Income.  We believe that inflation impacted net income during fiscal year 2005. Substantial increases in utility expenses, energy-related materials such as paper supplies, and health insurance costs had a marked impact on our operating results to the extent such increases could not be passed along to customers. There can be no assurance that we will not experience the same inflationary impact in the future. If operating expenses increase, our management intends to attempt to recover increased costs by increasing prices to the extent deemed advisable in light of competitive conditions.

    An Increase In Our Interest Rates May Adversely Impact Net Income. Our exposure to interest rate fluctuations is limited to our outstanding bank debt with Bank of America. The interest rate is either the prime rate or LIBOR plus a stipulated percentage. Accordingly, we are impacted by changes in the prime rate and LIBOR. As of January 1, 2006, we had $2.5 million outstanding on our credit facility with Bank of America. We are presently in full compliance with all debt covenants as amended. We expect to be in compliance with all debt covenants in fiscal year 2006. As of January 1, 2006, we also had $3.0 million in notes which have a fixed interest rate of 7.0% (See Note 3 in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements). We plan to prepay $2.5 million in notes on March 31, 2006 by borrowing from our Bank of America credit facility.

10



Our Financial Covenants Could Adversely Affect Our Ability to Borrow. Under our current credit agreement with Bank of America, we are subject to certain reporting requirements and financial covenants, including requirements that we maintain minimum levels of net worth and various financial ratios. Although we are currently in compliance with such financial covenants, an erosion of our business could place us out of compliance in future periods. Potential remedies for the lender if we are not in compliance include declaring all outstanding amounts immediately payable, terminating commitments and enforcing any liens; however, in the event of any future noncompliance we may seek a waiver from such lender. See Note 3, Long-term Debt, of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Rising Insurance Costs Could Negatively Impact Our Profitability. We are insured against a variety of uncertainties. While the cost of certain insurance coverages increased in 2005, we were able to negotiate lower premium costs for other insurance coverages, and in general, were able to minimize the overall increase and impact of all total insurance costs to us. Each year, we renew our insurance coverages. While we try to be proactive in our efforts to control insurance costs, market forces beyond our control may thwart our ability to manage these costs. For example, we expect insurance premiums for property and casualty insurance to increase in light of the impact of Hurricane Rita on the Texas and Louisiana Gulf Coast. An increase in premiums could have a negative impact on our profitability if we are not able to negate the effect of such increases by continuing to improve our operating efficiencies.

Our Small Restaurant Base and Geographic Concentration Make Our Operations More Susceptible to Local Economic Conditions. The results achieved to date by our relatively small restaurant base may not be indicative of the results of a larger number of restaurants in a more geographically dispersed area. Because of our relatively small restaurant base, an unsuccessful new restaurant could have a more significant effect on our results of operations than would be the case in a company owning more restaurants. Additionally, given our present geographic concentration (all of our company-owned units are currently in Texas, especially along the Gulf Coast region, Oklahoma, Louisiana and Michigan), results of operations may be adversely affected by economic or other conditions in the region, such as hurricanes, and any adverse publicity in the region relating to our restaurants could have a more pronounced adverse effect on our overall sales than might be the case if our restaurants were more broadly dispersed.

Our Management and Directors Hold a Majority of the Common Stock. Approximately 69.3% of our Common Stock and rights to acquire Common Stock are beneficially owned or held by Larry N. Forehand, David Nierenberg, Michael D. Domec and Louis P. Neeb, directors and/or executive officers. As a result, these individuals have substantial control over matters requiring shareholder approval, including the election of directors.

Competition May Adversely Affect Our Operations and Financial Results. The restaurant industry is highly competitive with respect to price, service, restaurant location and food quality, and is often affected by changes in consumer tastes, economic conditions, population and traffic patterns. We compete within each market against other family dining concepts, as well as quick service and casual dining concepts, for customers, employees and franchisees. Several of our competitors operate more restaurants and have significantly greater financial resources and longer operating histories than we do. Our inability to successfully compete with the other restaurants in our markets could prevent us from increasing or sustaining our revenues and profitability and result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Changes in General Economic and Political Conditions Affect Consumer Spending and May Harm Our Revenues and Operating Results. The United States experienced an economic expansion throughout most of 2005, including Texas where the majority of our restaurants operate. Although the forecast for 2006 is generally favorable, there are a few significant economic developments that could weaken economic conditions. Rising fuel and energy costs could reduce consumers’ level of discretionary spending. A decrease in discretionary spending could impact the frequency with which our customers choose to dine out or the amount they spend on meals while dining out, thereby decreasing our revenues. Additionally, the continued responses to the terrorist attacks on the United States, possible future terrorist attacks and the conflict in Iraq and its aftermath may exacerbate current economic conditions and lead to a weakening in the economy. Adverse economic conditions and any related decrease in discretionary spending by our customers could have an adverse effect on our revenues and operating results.

Implementing Our Growth Strategy May Strain its Resources. Our ability to expand by adding Company-owned and franchised restaurants will depend on a number of factors, including the availability of suitable locations, the ability to hire, train and retain an adequate number of experienced management and hourly employees, the availability of acceptable lease terms and adequate financing, timely construction of restaurants, the ability to obtain various government permits and licenses and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. The opening of additional franchised restaurants will

11



depend, in part, upon the ability of existing and future franchisees to obtain financing or investment capital adequate to meet their market development obligations. Based on our experience in attempting to grow outside our existing markets, we have found there can be limited consumer acceptance and that the cost of such efforts can have a material adverse impact on our financial results.

Shares Eligible for Future Sale Could Adversely Impact the Stock Price. Sales of substantial amounts of shares in the public market could adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock. In connection with our 1996 initial public offering, we granted limited registration rights to holders of warrants granted by us and Larry N. Forehand to Louis P. Neeb, Tex-Mex Partners, L.C. and a former officer to register the 757,465 underlying shares of Common Stock subject to such warrants in connection with registrations otherwise undertaken by us. Such warrants have an exercise price of $10.90 per share. If we register these shares and these shareholders are able to sell a large portion of their holdings on the open market at one time, the market price of the Common Stock will likely decline. In any event, the market price of the Common Stock could be subject to significant fluctuations in response to our operating results and other factors. These warrants will expire on April 24, 2006.

Litigation Could Have a Material Adverse Effect on Our Business. From time to time we are subject of complaints or litigation from guests alleging food-borne illness, injury or other food quality, health or operational concerns. We may be adversely affected by publicity resulting from such allegations, regardless of whether such allegations are valid or whether it is liable. We are also subject to complaints or allegations from former or prospective employees from time to time. A lawsuit or claim could result in an adverse decision against us that could have a materially adverse effect on our business.

We are subject to state “dramshop” laws and regulations, which generally provide that a person injured by an intoxicated person may seek to recover damages from an establishment that wrongfully served alcoholic beverages to such person. Although we carry liquor liability coverage as part of our existing comprehensive general liability insurance, we may still be subject to a judgment in excess of our insurance coverage and we may not be able to obtain or continue to maintain such insurance coverage at reasonable costs, or at all.

Compliance with Changing Regulation of Corporate Governance and Public Disclosure May Result in Additional Expenses. Keeping up-to-date and in compliance with changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, new SEC regulations and Nasdaq Stock Market rules, has required an increased amount of management attention and external resources. We remain committed to maintaining high standards of corporate governance and public disclosure. As a result, we intend to invest all reasonably necessary resources to comply with evolving standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None. 

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

In fiscal year 2005, the Company's executive offices were located in approximately 10,015 square feet of office space in Houston, Texas. The offices are currently leased by the Company from Gillett Properties, Ltd., under a gross lease (where the landlord pays utilities and property taxes) expiring in December 2009, with rental payments of $10,500 per month. See "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Related Party Transactions." The Company believes that its properties are generally well maintained, in good condition and adequate for its operations. Further, the Company believes that suitable additional or replacement space under comparable terms will be available if required.

Real estate leased for Company-owned restaurants is typically leased under triple net leases that require the Company to pay real estate taxes and utilities, to maintain insurance with respect to the premises and in certain cases to pay contingent rent based on sales in excess of specified amounts. Generally the non-mall locations for the Company-owned restaurants have initial terms of 10 to 20 years with renewal options.

The Company owns the land and buildings of one restaurant location; all remaining locations are leased. In fiscal year 2005, the Company sold an office building for $360,000, net of closing costs, that was acquired last year with the

12




Beaumont-based franchisee stores and related assets. In fiscal year 2004, the Company sold a previously closed restaurant in Plainview, Texas for $422,000 in cash.

During fiscal year 2005, the Company opened one new restaurant and closed one under-performing restaurant that the Company plans to sublease. During fiscal year 2004, the Company acquired eleven franchise restaurants and closed four under-performing restaurants, for which two of the leases have expired, one in which the property was subleased, and one in which the leasehold interest was sold. During fiscal year 2003, the Company opened one new restaurant and closed one under-performing restaurant (lease expired in June of 2004).

Restaurant Locations

At January 1, 2006, the Company had 60 Company-operated restaurants, 18 franchise restaurants and one licensed restaurant. As of such date, the Company operated and franchised 42 Casa Olé restaurants in the State of Texas and four in the State of Louisiana; operated four Monterey’s Tex-Mex Café restaurants in the State of Oklahoma; operated and licensed 15 Monterey’s Little Mexico restaurants in the State of Texas; operated five Tortuga Coastal Cantina restaurants in the State of Texas; operated three Crazy Jose’s in the State of Texas, and also operated and franchised six La Señorita restaurants in the State of Michigan. The Company’s portfolio of restaurants is summarized below:

Casa Olé
     
 
Company-operated
29
Leased
 
Franchisee-operated
17
 
 
Concept total
46
 
       
Monterey’s Tex-Mex Café
     
 
Company-operated
4
Leased
 
Concept total
4
 
       
Monterey’s Little Mexico
     
 
Company-operated
14
Leased
 
Licensee-operated
1
 
 
Concept total
15
 
       
Tortuga Coastal Cantina
     
 
Company-operated
5
Leased
 
Concept total
5
 
La Señorita
     
 
Company-operated
5
Leased
 
Franchisee-operated
1
 
 
Concept total
6
 
Crazy Jose’s
     
 
Company-operated
3
Leased
 
Concept total
3
 
       
 
System total
79
 
       


ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is involved from time to time in litigation relating to claims arising from its operations in the normal course of business. Management believes that the ultimate disposition of all uninsured matters resulting from existing litigation will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business or financial position.

13




ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

On November 8, 2005, the Company held a Special Meeting of Shareholders, in which the Company’s shareholders approved a proposal to adopt and approve the Mexican Restaurants, Inc. 2005 Long Term Incentive Plan. There were 2,603,209 votes for, 44,027 against and 200 votes withheld. There were no abstentions or broker non-votes on this proposal.


PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information. The Company’s Common Stock trades on the Nasdaq Small Cap Market tier of The Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol “CASA.” The following table sets forth the range of quarterly high and low reported sale prices of the Company’s Common Stock on the Nasdaq Small Cap Market during each of the Company’s fiscal quarters since the end of the Company’s 2003 fiscal year.

   
HIGH
 
LOW
 
Fiscal Year 2004:
             
First Quarter (ended March 28, 2004)
   
4.88
   
3.65
 
Second Quarter (ended June 27, 2004)
   
7.00
   
5.05
 
Third Quarter (ended September 26, 2004)
   
9.25
   
6.49
 
Fourth Quarter (ended January 2, 2005)
   
9.42
   
7.87
 
               
Fiscal Year 2005:
             
First Quarter (ended April 3, 2005)
   
10.50
   
8.50
 
Second Quarter (ended July 3, 2005)
   
10.42
   
7.79
 
Third Quarter (ended October 2, 2005)
   
10.50
   
8.69
 
Fourth Quarter (ended January 1, 2006)
   
12.06
   
9.17
 
               
Fiscal Year 2006:
             
First Quarter (as of March 28, 2006)
   
13.33
   
10.00
 

Holders. As of March 28, 2006, the Company estimates that there were approximately 850 beneficial owners of the Company’s Common Stock, represented by approximately 50 holders of record, and 3,356,977 shares of Common Stock outstanding.

Issuer Purchases. During its fiscal 2005 fourth quarter, the Company purchased 100,000 shares of its Common Stock.

During 2005, the Company purchased 181,300 shares of its common stock at a cost of approximately $1.7 million. The following table contains information for shares repurchased during the fourth quarter of 2005.

 
 
 
 
Period
 
 
 
 
(a) Total Number of
Shares Purchased
 
 
 
 
(b) Average Price
Paid per Share
 
 
(c) Total Number of
Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
 
(d) Maximum Number
Of Shares (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans Or Programs
 
Oct. 3, 2005 -
Oct. 30, 2005
   
0
         
0
 
$
1,249,733
 
Oct. 31, 2005 -
Nov. 27, 2005
   
100,000
   
9.88
   
181,300
 
$
261,733
 
Nov. 28, 2005 -
Jan. 1, 2006
   
0
         
0
 
$
261,733
 


14




Dividends. Since its 1996 initial public offering, the Company has not paid cash dividends on its Common Stock. The Company intends to retain earnings of the Company to support operations, to finance expansion and pay down its debt, and does not intend to pay cash dividends on the Common Stock for the foreseeable future. In addition, the Company’s current credit agreement prohibits the payment of any cash dividends. Any payment of cash dividends in the future will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend upon such factors as earnings levels, capital requirements, the Company’s financial condition, the ability to do so under then-existing credit agreements and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The selected financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with and are qualified by reference to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes thereto included in Item 8. hereof and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included in Item 7. hereof.

Fiscal Years
 
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
 
                       
   
2001
 
2002
 
2003
 
2004
 
2005
 
Income Statement Data:
                               
Revenues:
                               
Restaurant sales
 
$
55,237
 
$
52,927
 
$
52,882
 
$
77,027
 
$
79,975
 
Franchise fees, royalties and other 
   
1,393
   
1,181
   
1,139
   
753
   
694
 
Business interruption
   
--
   
105
   
--
   
--
   
534
 
  
   
56,630
   
54,213
   
54,021
   
77,780
   
81,203
 
Costs and expenses:
                               
Cost of sales 
   
15,204
   
14,306
   
14,591
   
21,384
   
21,849
 
Restaurant operating expenses 
   
31,432
   
29,809
   
30,242
   
42,904
   
44,946
 
General and administrative 
   
5,457
   
5,198
   
5,306
   
6,587
   
6,942
 
Depreciation and amortization 
   
2,086
   
1,882
   
2,030
   
2,237
   
2,778
 
Asset impairments and restaurant closure
Costs
   
972
   
--
   
655
   
701
   
-
 
(Gain) loss on prop.-Hurricane Rita
   
--
   
--
   
--
   
--
   
(471
)
(Gain) loss on sale of assets 
   
--
   
(28
)
 
(292
)
 
182
   
369
 
     
55,151
   
51,167
   
52,532
   
73,995
   
76,412
 
                                 
Operating income
   
1,479
   
3,046
   
1,489
   
3,785
   
4,791
 
Other income (expense), net 
   
(302
)
 
(85
)
 
(97
)
 
(459
)
 
(404
)
                                 
Income before income tax expense 
   
1,177
   
2,961
   
1,392
   
3,326
   
4,387
 
                                 
Income tax expense (benefit)
   
221
   
981
   
490
   
1,070
   
1,433
 
Income from continuing operations
   
956
   
1,980
   
902
   
2,256
   
2,954
 
                                 
Discontinued Operations
                               
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes
   
(107
)
 
(276
)
 
(1,937
)
 
(495
)
 
(637
)
                                 
Net income (loss) 
 
$
849
 
$
1,704
   
($ 1,035
)
$
1,761
 
$
2,317
 

15



                       
Basic income (loss) per share:
                               
Income from continuing operations
 
$
0.27
 
$
0 .57
 
$
0.26
 
$
0.67
 
$
0.87
 
Loss from discontinued operations
   
(0.03
)
 
(0.08
)
 
(0.57
)
 
(0.15
)
 
(0.19
)
Net income (loss)
 
$
0.24
 
$
0.49
 
$
( 0.31
)
$
0.52
 
$
0.68
 
                                 
Diluted income (loss) per share:
                               
Income from continuing operations
 
$
0.27
 
$
0.56
 
$
0.26
 
$
0.62
 
$
0.80
 
Loss from discontinued operations
   
(0.03
)
 
(0.08
)
 
(0.57
)
 
(0.14
)
 
(0.17
)
Net income (loss)
 
$
0.24
 
$
0.48
 
$
(0.31
)
$
0.48
 
$
0.63
 
                                 
Weighted average shares - Basic
   
3,520,687
   
3,447,957
   
3,384,605
   
3,388,489
   
3,415,806
 
                                 
Weighted average shares - Diluted
   
3,527,291
   
3,520,769
   
3,430,380
   
3,634,849
   
3,700,876
 


In fiscal 2001, the Company’s consolidated statements of income and cash flows included goodwill amortization. With the adoption of SFAS No. 142, no goodwill amortization was recorded for fiscal 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005. The following table provides a reconciliation of reported net income to adjusted net income excluding goodwill amortization:


   
2001
 
2002
 
2003
 
2004
 
2005
 
 
 
(In thousands except per share amounts) 
                                 
Reported net income (loss) 
 
$
849
 
$
1,704
 
$
(1,035
)
$
1,761
 
$
2,317
 
Add back:Goodwill amortization, (net of tax)
   
284
   
--
   
--
   
--
   
--
 
Adjusted net income (loss)
 
$
1,133
 
$
1,704
 
$
(1,035
)
$
1,761
 
$
2,317
 
                                 
Basic earnings per share:
                               
Reported net income (loss) 
 
$
0.24
 
$
0.49
 
$
(0.31
)
$
0.52
 
$
0.68
 
Goodwill amortization
   
0.08
   
--
   
--
   
--
   
--
 
Adjusted net income (loss)
 
$
0.32
 
$
0.49
 
$
(0.31
)
$
0.52
 
$
0.68
 
                                 
Diluted earnings per share:
                               
Reported net income (loss) 
 
$
0.24
 
$
0.48
 
$
(0.31
)
$
0.48
 
$
0.63
 
Goodwill amortization
   
0.08
   
--
   
--
   
--
   
--
 
Adjusted net income (loss)
 
$
0.32
 
$
0.48
 
$
(0.31
)
$
0.48
 
$
0.63
 


 
   
As of the End of Fiscal Years
 
   
2001
 
2002
 
2003
 
2004
 
2005
 
 
 
(In thousands) 
Balance Sheet Data:
                               
Working capital (deficit) 
 
$
(3,154
)
$
(2,736
)
$
(2,669
)
$
(1,359
)
$
(1,632
)
Total assets
 
$
30,067
 
$
28,983
 
$
25,861
 
$
32,326
 
$
33,137
 
Long-term debt, less 
current portion 
 
$
5,573
 
$
3,400
 
$
1,775
 
$
6,000
 
$
4,500
 
Total stockholders’ equity 
 
$
15,717
 
$
16,948
 
$
15,954
 
$
17,868
 
$
18,884
 


ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Certain statements set forth below under this caption constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Reform Act. See “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” above for additional factors relating to such

16


statements.  The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Report. Additional information concerning factors that could cause results to differ materially from those in any forward-looking statements is contained under “Item 1A. Risk Factors”.

General Overview

The Company was organized under the laws of the State of Texas in February 1996.  Pursuant to the reorganization of the Company in preparation for its 1996 initial public offering of Common Stock, the shareholders of related prior corporations contributed to the Company all outstanding shares of capital stock of each corporation, and the Company issued to such shareholders in exchange therefore an aggregate of 2,732,705 shares of its Common Stock. The exchange transaction was completed April 1996, and, as a result, the corporations became wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company, and each shareholder of the Company received a number of shares of Common Stock in the Company.

The Company operates and franchises Mexican-theme restaurants featuring various elements associated with the casual dining experience under the names Casa Olé, Monterey’s Tex-Mex Café, Monterey’s Little Mexico, Tortuga Coastal Cantina, Crazy Jose’s and La Señorita. At January 1, 2006 the Company operated 60 restaurants, franchised 18 restaurants and licensed one restaurant in various communities in Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Michigan.

The Company's primary source of revenues is the sale of food and beverages at Company-owned restaurants. The Company also derives revenues from franchise fees, royalties and other franchise-related activities. Franchise fee revenue from an individual franchise sale is recognized when all services relating to the sale have been performed and the restaurant has commenced operation. Initial franchise fees relating to area franchise sales are recognized ratably in proportion to services that are required to be performed pursuant to the area franchise or development agreements and proportionately as the restaurants within the area are opened.

The consolidated statements of income and cash flows for fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003 have been adjusted to remove the operations of closed restaurants, which have been reclassified as discontinued operations. Consequently, the consolidated statements of income and cash flows for fiscal years 2004 and 2003 shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2005 presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on total assets, total liabilities, stockholders’ equity or net income.
 
Fiscal Year

The Company has a 52/53 week fiscal year ending on the Sunday nearest December 31. References in this Report to fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005 relate to the periods ended December 28, 2003, January 2, 2005 and January 1, 2006, respectively. Fiscal years 2003 and 2005 presented herein consisted of 52 weeks. Fiscal year 2004 presented herein consisted of 53 weeks.

Results of Operations

Fiscal Year 2005 Compared to Fiscal Year 2004 as Adjusted for Discontinued Operations

Revenues. The Company’s revenues for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2006 were up $3.4 million or 4.4% to $81.2 million compared with fiscal year 2004. Restaurant sales for fiscal year 2005 increased $2.9 million or 3.8% to $80.0 million compared with fiscal year 2004, despite being closed a total of 309 store-days during the third and fourth quarters due to the impact of Hurricane Rita. Fiscal year 2005 had 52 weeks of revenue compared to 53 weeks of revenue for fiscal year 2004, resulting in $1.6 million in additional revenue for fiscal 2004. The increase in restaurant sales reflects the opening of one new restaurant and positive same-restaurant sales. The Company has had eight consecutive quarters of positive same-restaurant sales. For fiscal 2005, total system same-restaurant sales increased 3.8%, Company-owned same restaurant sales increased 4.6% and franchise-owned same-restaurant sales increased 1.2% from fiscal year 2004.

Franchise fees, royalties and other decreased $58,991 or 7.8% primarily due to lower royalty income resulting from the closure of a Houston-based franchise restaurant. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company recorded $534,163 of business interruption proceeds related to the Hurricane Rita insurance claim.

Costs and Expenses. Costs of sales, consisting of food, beverage, liquor, supplies and paper costs, decreased as a percent of restaurant sales 50 basis points to 27.3% compared with 27.8% in fiscal 2004. The improvement reflects lower dairy, cheese, meat and poultry costs which was partially offset by higher produce, paper and supplies, beverage and liquor

17


costs and fuel surcharges. Beverage costs were higher reflecting the increased sale of bottled products, and liquor costs were higher due to various reduced price promotions.

 Despite positive same-store sales, labor and other related expenses, as a percentage of restaurant sales, remained at 32.8% in fiscal 2005 compared with fiscal 2004, reflecting higher health insurance premiums, training expense and overtime expense associated with post hurricane labor shortages.

Restaurant operating expenses, which primarily includes rent, property taxes, utilities, repair and maintenance, liquor taxes, property insurance, general liability insurance and advertising, increased in fiscal 2005 as a percentage of restaurant sales 40 basis points to 23.3% as compared with 22.9% in fiscal 2004. The increase reflects higher electricity, natural gas, water and sewer cost, coupons and credit collection expenses.
 
General and administrative expenses consist of expenses associated with corporate and administrative functions that support restaurant operations. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total sales remained at 8.5% in fiscal 2005 as compared with fiscal 2004. Actual general and administrative expenses increased $354,876. The increase reflects higher legal, audit, health insurance and SEC reporting expenses. Legal expenses reflect an unusually high level of litigation expense as the Company successfully defended one employee lawsuit and successfully negotiated the settlement of another employee lawsuit. Additional legal expenses included updating the Uniform Franchise Offering Circular for Casa Olé and legal expenses associated with the development and adoption of the Mexican Restaurants, Inc. 2005 Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”). The higher audit cost reflects last year’s KPMG audit and subsequent change to new auditors (UHY MANN FRANKFORT STEIN AND LIPP CPA’S, L.L.P.). The increase in SEC reporting costs was primarily due to the LTIP.

Depreciation and amortization expenses include the depreciation of fixed assets and the amortization of intangible assets. Depreciation and amortization expense increased as a percentage of restaurant sales 50 basis points to 3.4% in fiscal year 2005 as compared with 2.9% in fiscal year 2004. Actual depreciation and amortization expense increased $540,690 in fiscal year 2005 compared with fiscal year 2004. The increase reflects additional depreciation expense for remodeled restaurants, new restaurants, and the replacement of equipment and leasehold improvements in various existing restaurants.

During fiscal year 2005, the Company incurred $77,942 in pre-opening expenses related to the opening of one new restaurant and the re-opening of a remodeled restaurant. In fiscal year 2004, the Company spent $56,478 in pre-opening expenses related to the remodel of one existing restaurant and the remodel of one acquired Casa Olé franchise restaurant.

Hurricane Rita Loss (Gain). On September 24, 2005, Hurricane Rita hit the Gulf Coast area, affecting a number of the Company’s restaurants in that region. The Company subsequently hired an insurance consulting firm to assist management with the filing of its insurance claim. Based on the low range of the consulting firm’s estimate and negotiations with the insurance carrier, the Company recorded an insurance claim of $1.6 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005.

The consolidated statement of operations ended January 1, 2006, includes a separate line item for a gain of $470,702 resulting from assets damaged by Hurricane Rita and other expenses offset by insurance proceeds for the replacement of assets. The Company’s insurers paid $300,000 during the fourth quarter of 2005 and $785,028 in the first quarter of 2006 related to the property damage claim. Additionally, the Company has recognized $534,163 for estimated business interruption proceeds.

(Gain) Loss on Sale of Assets. During fiscal 2005, the Company recorded a loss on the sale of assets of $369,001. The loss was primarily due to the disposition of assets related to the remodel of existing restaurants, the sale of an office building that was acquired in fiscal 2004 in the purchase of the Beaumont-based franchisee stores and related assets and the sale of a joint ventured restaurant. During fiscal 2004, the Company recorded a loss of $182,359 on the disposition of assets, primarily related to the remodel of existing restaurants and sale of a leasehold interest of another existing restaurant.

Other Income (Expense). Net expense decreased $54,915 to $403,864 in fiscal 2005 compared with a net expense of $458,779 in fiscal 2004. Interest expense decreased $32,210 to $521,161 in fiscal 2005 compared with interest expense of $553,371 in fiscal 2004, reflecting a decrease in outstanding debt which was partially offset by higher interest rates.

Income Tax Expense. The Company’s effective tax rate from continuing operations for fiscal 2005 was 32.6% as compared to fiscal year 2004 of 32.2%. In fiscal year 2005, the Company had a higher pretax income from continuing operations compared to fiscal 2004. In both years, the permanent differences were approximately the same, resulting in a slightly higher effective tax rate in fiscal 2005.

18




Restaurant Closure Costs and Discontinued Operations. In fiscal year 2005, the Company recorded asset impairment and restaurant closure costs of $790,708, all of which is included in discontinued operations related to the 2005 closure of one restaurant pursuant to Statement on Financial Accounting Standards No. 146. In fiscal 2004, the Company recorded asset impairment and restaurant closure costs of $868,580, of which $167,898 related to the fiscal 2004 closure of three restaurants. In fiscal 2003, the Company recorded asset impairment and restaurant closure costs of $2,908,406, of which $2,252,998 related to the fiscal 2003 closure of one restaurant and inclusion of discontinued operations related to the fiscal 2004 closure of three restaurants and the fiscal 2005 closure of one restaurant.

In fiscal 2004, the Company incurred $700,682 of impairment expenses in continuing operations related primarily to four Tortuga restaurants that the Company wanted to position for re-concept to one of the Company’s other Mexican food concepts. Because of improved operating performance, the Company did not re-concept the four Tortuga restaurants in fiscal 2005. In addition, two Monterey’s restaurants, which were impaired in 2003, incurred a small impairment in 2004. These two restaurants will be closed at the expiration of their operating leases.

The circumstances and testing leading to an impairment charge were determined in accordance with SFAS No. 144 which requires that property, plant and equipment be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

Fiscal 2004 Compared to Fiscal 2003 as Adjusted for Discontinued Operations

Revenues. The Company’s revenues for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2005 were up $23.7 million or 44.0% to $77.8 million compared with fiscal year 2003. Restaurant sales for fiscal year 2004 increased $24.1 million or 45.7% to $77.0 million compared with fiscal year 2003. The increase reflects the January 2004 acquisition of 13 restaurants and related assets from the Company’s Beaumont-based franchisee. The increase also reflects positive same-restaurant sales. Each quarter in fiscal 2004 had positive same-restaurant sales. For fiscal 2004, total system same-restaurant sales increased 3.1%, Company-owned same restaurant sales increased 3.3% and franchise-owned same-restaurant sales increased 2.6% from fiscal year 2003.

Franchise fees, royalties and other decreased $385,975 or 33.9% to $753,293, reflecting lost royalty income from the acquisition of the Beaumont-based franchise restaurants, the acquisition of the Brenham, Texas franchise restaurant, and the closure of a Houston based franchise restaurant.

Costs and Expenses. Costs of sales, consisting of food, beverage, liquor, supplies and paper costs, increased as a percent of restaurant sales 20 basis points to 27.8% compared with 27.6% in fiscal 2003. The increase reflects higher cheese and protein commodity prices.

 Labor and other related expenses decreased as a percentage of restaurant sales 10 basis points to 32.8% compared with 32.9% in fiscal 2003. The decrease in labor as a percentage of restaurant sales reflects labor efficiencies gained from positive same-restaurant sales.

Restaurant operating expenses, which primarily includes rent, property taxes, utilities, repair and maintenance, liquor taxes, property insurance, general liability insurance and advertising, decreased as a percentage of restaurant sales 120 basis points to 22.9% in fiscal year 2004 as compared with 24.1% in fiscal year 2003. Much of the improvement reflects the advertising efficiency gained with the acquisition of the Beaumont-based restaurants. Further, the Beaumont-based restaurants have lower occupancy costs and liquor taxes relative to their sales volumes, which when consolidated brought the overall percentage of these costs down. And finally, general liability and property insurance premiums decreased as a percentage of restaurant sales in fiscal 2004 compared with fiscal 2003.

General and administrative expenses consist of expenses associated with corporate and administrative functions that support restaurant operations. General and administrative expenses decreased as a percentage of total sales 130 basis points to 8.5% in fiscal year 2004 as compared with 9.8% in fiscal year 2003. The improvement reflects efficiencies gained with the acquisition of the Beaumont-based restaurants, offset in part by executive and non-executive bonus accruals and higher professional and legal expenses.

Depreciation and amortization expenses include the depreciation of fixed assets and the amortization of intangible assets. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased as a percentage of restaurant sales 90 basis points to 2.9% in fiscal

19


year 2004 as compared with 3.8% in fiscal year 2003. Actual depreciation and amortization expense increased $207,011 in fiscal year 2004 compared with fiscal year 2003. The decrease as a percentage of total sales reflects the acquisition of the Beaumont-based restaurants, which had a smaller asset base relative to the restaurant sales added.

During fiscal year 2004, the Company incurred $56,478 in pre-opening expenses related to the remodel of two existing restaurants and the remodel of one acquired Casa Olé franchise restaurant. In fiscal year 2003, the Company spent $95,891 in pre-opening expenses related to the purchase of one franchise restaurant that the Company remodeled for a new grand opening.

(Gain) Loss on Sale of Assets. During fiscal year 2004, the Company recorded a loss of $182,359 on the disposition of assets, primarily related to the remodel of one existing restaurant and the sale of a leasehold interest of another existing restaurant. During fiscal year 2003, the Company recorded a gain of $292,052 for insurance proceeds received from fire damage at the Humble, Texas restaurant location.

Other Income (Expense). Net expense increased $362,148 to $458,779 in fiscal year 2004 compared with a net expense of $96,631 in fiscal year 2003. Interest expense increased $311,082 to $553,371 in fiscal year 2004 compared with interest expense of $242,289 in fiscal year 2003, reflecting the increase in outstanding debt incurred for the acquisition of the Beaumont-based restaurants.

Income Tax Expense. The Company’s effective tax rate from continuing operations for fiscal year 2004 was 32.2% as compared to fiscal year 2003 of 35.2%. In fiscal year 2004, the Company had a significantly higher pretax income compared to fiscal 2003. In both years, the permanent differences were approximately the same, resulting in a lower effective tax rate in fiscal 2004.

Restaurant Closure Costs and Discontinued Operations. In fiscal 2004, the Company recorded asset impairment and restaurant closure costs of $868,580, of which $167,898 related to the fiscal 2004 closure of three restaurants. In fiscal 2003, the Company recorded asset impairment and restaurant closure costs of $2,908,406, of which $2,252,998 related to the fiscal 2003 closure of one restaurant and inclusion of discontinued operations related to the fiscal 2004 closure of three restaurants.

In fiscal 2004, the Company incurred $700,682 of impairment expenses in continuing operations related primarily to four Tortuga restaurants that the Company wanted to position for re-concept to one of the Company’s other Mexican food concepts. Because of improved operating performance, the Company did not re-concept the four Tortuga restaurants in fiscal 2005. In addition, two Monterey’s restaurants, which were impaired in 2003, incurred a small impairment in 2004. These two restaurants will be closed at the expiration of their operating leases.

The circumstances and testing leading to the impairment in fiscal 2004 are determined in accordance with SFAS No. 144 which requires that property, plant and equipment be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company met fiscal 2005 capital requirements with cash generated by operations and with its cash reserves. In fiscal 2005, the Company's operations generated approximately $6.2 million in cash, as compared with $5.7 million in fiscal 2004 and $2.4 million in fiscal 2003. As of January 1, 2006, the Company had a working capital deficit of approximately $1.6 million, compared with a working capital deficit of approximately $1.4 million at January 2, 2005. A working capital deficit is common in the restaurant industry, since restaurant companies do not typically require a significant investment in either accounts receivable or inventory.

The Company's principal capital requirements are the funding of routine capital expenditures, new restaurant development or acquisitions and remodeling of older units. During fiscal 2005, total cash used for capital requirements was approximately $4.6 million ($1.9 million on routine capital expenditures, $600,000 on one new restaurant, $1.4 million on remodels and $680,000 for hurricane expenditures). The Company also received approximately $360,000 from the sale of an office building that was acquired in January 2004 acquisition of the Beaumont-based franchisee stores and related assets. The Company opened one new restaurant in Humble, Texas near the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2005. That restaurant

20


is presently exceeding our sales expectations. During the third quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company closed and later re-opened one restaurant after extensive remodeling. That restaurant is also exceeding our sales expectations. Additionally, six restaurants were moderately remodeled (not requiring closures) and one restaurant parking lot was expanded. The balance of capital expenditures was for necessary replacement of equipment and leasehold improvements in various older restaurants and for hurricane repairs. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company signed a new lease for a restaurant it plans to open in the first quarter of fiscal 2006.

    For fiscal year 2006, the Company plans to develop two new restaurants, extensively remodel one restaurant and moderately remodel eight other restaurants. The estimated capital needed for fiscal year 2006 for general corporate purposes, including remodeling and new restaurant expansion, is approximately $4.2 million.

    Over the last several years, the Company’s debt was incurred to carry out acquisitions, to develop new restaurants, and to remodel existing restaurants, as well as to accommodate other working capital needs. The Company anticipates that it will use excess cash flow during fiscal year 2006 to pay down acquisition debt approximately $2.5 million.

    On January 7, 2004, the Company completed its purchase of 13 restaurants and related assets from its Beaumont-based franchisee for a total consideration of approximately $13.75 million. The financing for the acquisition was provided by Bank of America (formerly Fleet National Bank), CNL Franchise Network, LP (“CNL’) and the sellers of the Beaumont-based franchise restaurants. Bank of America provided $3.1 million of the acquisition price by amending its credit facility with Mexican Restaurants, Inc. Six of the acquired restaurants were concurrently sold to CNL for $8.325 million in a sale-leaseback transaction. The sellers accepted $3.0 million in notes from Mexican Restaurants, Inc. for the balance of the purchase price. The seller notes pay interest only for five years, with $1.5 million in principal due on January 7, 2009 and $1.5 million in principal amortizing over an additional five years. The Company plans to prepay $2.5 million of the seller notes on March 31, 2006 by borrowing on its Bank of America credit facility.

    On October 14, 2004, the Company completed its purchase of one franchise restaurant in Brenham, Texas for approximately $215,000. The restaurant was closed, remodeled and re-opened on November 22, 2004. The Company spent $329,489 remodeling the restaurant.
 
    On January 7, 2004, Bank of America amended its $10.0 million credit facility to accommodate the acquisition of the Beaumont-based franchise restaurants. The amended credit facility consists of a $5.0 million term note that requires quarterly principal payments of $250,000 and matures on June 30, 2008. The credit facility also includes a $5.0 million revolving line of credit that matures on January 7, 2007. The interest rate is either the prime rate or LIBOR plus a stipulated percentage. Accordingly, the Company is impacted by changes in the prime rate and LIBOR. The Company is subject to a non-use fee of 0.75% on the unused portion of the revolver from the date of the credit agreement. During fiscal 2005, the Company paid debt down $1.5 million. As of January 1, 2006, the Company’s outstanding debt to Bank of America was $2.5 million and its outstanding debt on seller notes was $3.0 million, for a total indebtedness of $5.5 million.
 
On April 1, 2005, the Company and Bank of America amended the $10.0 million credit facility to accommodate the Company’s growth plans. The amendment allows for additional capital expenditures, revised certain covenant ratios, increased the amount of allowable stock repurchases, and extended the maturity date of the revolving line of credit to January 7, 2009. Effective June 30, 2005, the Company and Bank of America further amended the $10.0 million credit facility to revise certain ratios affected by Hurricane Rita and the Company’s stock repurchase program, and to lower the applicable interest rate margins. The Company is in full compliance with all debt covenants as amended. The Company expects to be in compliance with all debt covenants throughout fiscal 2006.

On May 9, 2005, the Company announced its plan to implement a limited stock repurchase program in a manner permitted under its bank financing agreement. Under this program, the Company could spend up to $1.0 million over the next 12 months (not to exceed $500,000 in any one quarter) to repurchase outstanding shares of its common stock. On September 7, 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an increase of $1,000,000 to its stock repurchase program announced on May 9, 2005. The Company has entered into a repurchase plan designed to comply with Rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, under which an agent appointed by the Company will determine the time, amount, and price at which purchases of common stock will be made, subject to certain parameters established in advance by the Company. As of January 1, 2006, the Company repurchased 181,300 shares of its common stock for a total price of $1.7 million. During this same period, Company employees exercised 121,472 options and the Company received $430,544 in net proceeds. The shares acquired are being held for general corporate purposes, including the offset of the dilutive effect on shareholders from the exercise of stock options.

21



The Company’s management believes that with its operating cash flow and the Company’s revolving line of credit with Bank of America, funds will be sufficient to meet operating requirements and to finance routine capital expenditures and new restaurant growth through the end of the 2006 fiscal year. Unless the Company violates an important debt covenant, the Company’s credit facility with Bank of America is not subject to triggering events that would cause the credit facility to become due sooner than the maturity dates described in the previous paragraphs.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments.

The following table summarizes the Company’s total contractual cash obligations as of January 1, 2006 (in thousands):
 
 
Contractual Obligation
 
 
Total
 
Less than
1 Year
 
1 to 3
Years
 
3 to 5
Years
 
More Than
5 Years
 
                                 
Long-Term Debt
 
$
5,500,000
 
$
1,000,000
 
$
1,500,000
 
$
2,075,000
 
$
925,000
 
Long-Term Debt Fixed Interest
   
896,875
   
210,000
   
420,000
   
169,750
   
97,125
 
Operating Leases
   
53,762,438
   
5,534,205
   
10,693,148
   
9,719,610
   
27,815,475
 
Total Contractual Cash Obligations
 
$
60,159,313
 
$
6,744,205
 
$
12,613,148
 
$
11,964,360
 
$
28,837,600
 

The contractual obligation table does not include interest payments on our long-term debt with Bank of America (formerly Fleet National Bank) due to the variable interest rates under our credit facility and the varying debt balance during the year. The contractual interest rate for our credit facility is either the prime rate or LIBOR base rate plus a stipulated margin. See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements for balances and terms of our credit facility at January 1, 2006.
 
Related Parties. In May 1998 the Board of Directors of the Company adopted a program to assist executives and five key employees of the Company in their purchasing of shares of the Company. As adopted, the program provided for the Company to assist the executives and key employees in obtaining third party loans to finance such purchases. As of February 1, 2003, the maturity date of the employee third party loans, the Company no longer guarantees employee third party loans.

The Company provides accounting and administrative services for the Casa Olé Media and Production Funds. The Casa Olé Media and Production Funds are not-for-profit, unconsolidated entities used to collect money from company-owned and franchise-owned restaurants to pay for the marketing of Casa Olé restaurants. Each restaurant contributes an agreed upon percentage of its sales to the funds.


ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company does not have or participate in transactions involving derivative, financial and commodity instruments. The Company’s long-term debt bears interest at floating market rates, based upon either the prime rate or LIBOR plus a stipulated percentage. Based on amounts outstanding at year-end, a 1% change in interest rates would change interest expense by approximately $25,000.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 
The Financial Statements and Supplementary Data are set forth herein commencing on page F-1 of this report.

The Company has prepared these financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Company is responsible for the fairness and reliability of the financial statements and other financial data included in this report. In the preparation of the financial statements, it is necessary for the Company to make informed estimates and judgments based on the currently available information on the effects of certain events and transactions.

The audit committee of the Company’s board of directors is composed of three directors who are not our employees. This committee meets periodically with the Company’s independent public accountants and management. Our independent public accountants have full and free access to the audit committee to meet, with and without management being present, to discuss the results of their audits and the quality of the Company’s financial reporting.

22




ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

ITEM 9A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures, which it has designed to ensure that material information related to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to a group comprised of designated members of the Company’s senior management and/or the certifying officer (i.e., Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) on a timely basis. In response to recent legislation and proposed regulations, the Company reviewed its internal control structure and its disclosure controls and procedures. Although the Company believes its pre-existing disclosure controls and procedures were adequate to enable the Company to comply with its disclosure obligations, as a result of such review, the Company implemented minor changes, primarily to formalize and document the procedures already in place. As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, Rule 13a-15 and 15d-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

(b) Changes in internal controls

There were no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses that could significantly affect, or is reasonably likely to affect, these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.

ITEM 9B.  OTHER INFORMATION

None.


PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The information called for by this Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.


ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information called for by this Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.





23



ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

The information called for by this Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The information called for by this Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information called for by this Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.
 

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)  
The following documents are filed as part of this Report:

1.  
Financial Statements:

The Financial Statements are listed in the index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page F-1 of this Report.

 
2.
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report. The exhibits designated with a cross are management contracts and compensatory plans and arrangements required to be filed as exhibits to this report.

3. Exhibits:

3.1
Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (incorporated by reference to the corresponding Exhibit number of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on May 25, 1999 with the Securities and Exchange Commission).
‡3.2
Bylaws of the Company.
‡4.1
Specimen of Certificate of Common Stock of the Company.
4.2
Articles of Incorporation of the Company (see 3.1 above).
‡4.3
Bylaws of the Company (see 3.2 above).
10.1
Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Louis P. Neeb dated February 28, 1996.
10.2
Indemnity Agreement by and between the Company and Louis P. Neeb dated as of April 10, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Form S-1 Registration Statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933, dated April 24, 1996, with the Securities and Exchange Commission (Registration Number 333-1678) (the “1996 Form S-1”)).

24



   
10.3
Indemnity Agreement by and between the Company and Larry N. Forehand dated as of April 10, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the 1996 Form S-1).
10.4
Indemnity Agreement by and between the Company and John C. Textor dated as of April 10, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the 1996 From S-1).
10.5
Indemnity Agreement by and between the Company and Michael D. Domec dated as of April 10, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the 1996 Form S-1).
10.6
Indemnity Agreement by and between the Company and J. J. Fitzsimmons dated as of April 10, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the 1996 Form S-1).
10.7
Indemnity Agreement by and between the Company and Richard E. Rivera dated as of April 10, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of the 1996 Form S-1).
10.8
Corrected Warrant Agreement by and between the Company and Louis P. Neeb dated as of February 26, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of the 1996 Form S-1).
10.9
Corrected Warrant Agreement by and between the Company and Tex-Mex Partners, L.C. dated as of February 26, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of the 1996 Form S-1).
10.10
Form of the Company's Multi-Unit Development Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of the 1996 Form S-1).
10.11
Form of the Company's Franchise Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of the 1996 Form S-1).
10.12
1996 Long Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of the 1996 Form S-1).
10.13
Mexican Restaurants, Inc. 2005 Long Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the 2005 Form S8 filed December 1, 2005).
10.14
Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of the 1996 Form S-1).
10.15
Corrected Warrant Agreement by and between Larry N. Forehand and Louis P. Neeb dated as of February 26, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 of the 1996 Form S-1).
10.16
Corrected Warrant Agreement by and between Larry N. Forehand and Tex-Mex Partners, L.C. dated as of February 26, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 of the 1996 Form S-1).
10.17
Corrected Warrant Agreement by and between Larry N. Forehand and Patrick A. Morris dated as of February 26, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 of the 1996 Form S-1).
10.18
Corrected Warrant Agreement by and between Larry N. Forehand and Stacy M. Riffe dated as of February 26, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 of the 1996 Form S-1).
10.19
Indemnification letter agreement by Larry N. Forehand dated April 10, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 of the 1996 Form S-1).
†10.20
1996 Manager’s Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933, dated February 24, 1997 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission).

25



†10.22
Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Andrew J. Dennard dated May 20, 1997 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.45 of the Company’s Form 10-K Annual Report filed on March 30, 1998 with the Securities and Exchange Commission).
10.23
Fleet Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement between Mexican Restaurants, Inc., as the Borrower, and Fleet National Bank, as the Bank, for $10,000,000 dated June 29, 2001 and as amended on January 7, 2004 and April 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of the Company’s Form 10-K Annual Report filed on April, 2005 with the Securities and Exchange Commission).
*10.24
Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement dated November 15, 2005 (effective June 30, 2005) between Mexican Restaurants, Inc., as the Borrower, and Bank of America, as the Bank, for $10,000,000 dated June 29, 2001 and as amended on January 7, 2004 and April 1, 2005.
*†10.25
Performance Unit Agreement by and between Mexican Restaurants, Inc. and Andrew Dennard dated August 16, 2005.
*†10.26
Performance Unit Agreement by and between Mexican Restaurants, Inc. and Curt Glowacki dated August 16, 2005.
*†10.27
Performance Unit Agreement by and between Mexican Restaurants, Inc. and Louis P. Neeb dated August 16, 2005.
*†10.28
Performance Unit Agreement by and between Mexican Restaurants, Inc. and Dennis Vegas dated August 16, 2005.
21.1
List of subsidiaries of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 22.1 of the Company’s Form S-1 Registration Statement Under the Securities Act of 1933, dated April 24, 1996, filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission).
*23.1
Consent of UHY MANN FRANKFORT STEIN & LIPP CPAs, LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
*23.2
Consent of KPMG, LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
*24.1
Power of Attorney (included on the signature page to this Form 10-K).
*31.1
Certification filed pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
*31.2
Certification filed pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
#32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
#32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
_____
 
*
Filed herewith.
Incorporated by reference to corresponding Exhibit number of the Company’s Form S-1 Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933, dated April 24, 1996, with the Securities and Exchange Commission (Registration number 333-1678) (the “1996 Form S-1”).
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
#
Furnished herewith.
   


26



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on March 30, 2006.

MEXICAN RESTAURANTS, INC.
 
By: /s/ Louis P. Neeb
Louis P. Neeb,
Chairman of the Board of Directors

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN AND WOMEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Louis P. Neeb, Curt Glowacki and Andrew Dennard, and each of them, such individual’s true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for such individual and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Form 10-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signatures
Title
Date
     
/s/ Louis P. Neeb
Chairman of the Board of Directors
March 30, 2006
Louis P. Neeb
   
     
/s/ Larry N. Forehand
Founder and Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors
March 30, 2006
Larry N. Forehand
   
     
/s/ Curt Glowacki
President and Chief Executive Officer and Director
March 30, 2006
Curt Glowacki
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
     
/s/ Andrew J. Dennard
Exec. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
March 30, 2006
Andrew J. Dennard
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 
     
/s/ David Nierenberg
Director
March 30, 2006
David Nierenberg
   
     
/s/ Michael D. Domec
Director
March 30, 2006
Michael D. Domec
   
     
/s/ J. J. Fitzsimmons
Director
March 30, 2006
J. J. Fitzsimmons
   
     
/s/ Thomas E. Martin
Director
March 30, 2006
Thomas E. Martin
   
     
/s/ J. Stuart Sargent
Director
March 30, 2006
J. Stuart Sargent
   


27




Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Curt Glowacki, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Mexican Restaurants, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Registrant and have:

 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

(a)   
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in
the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

March 30, 2006
 
/s/ Curt Glowacki
By: Curt Glowacki,
Chief Executive Officer


28





Exhibit 31.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Andrew J. Dennard, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Mexican Restaurants, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Registrant and have:

 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

(b)   
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in
the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

March 30, 2006
 
/s/ Andrew J. Dennard
By: Andrew J. Dennard,
Chief Financial Officer

29






MEXICAN RESTAURANTS, INC.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 
Page
   
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
F-2
   
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
F-3
   
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 2, 2005 and January 1, 2006
F-4
   
Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the years in the three fiscal-year
period ended January 1, 2006
F-5
   
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for each of the years in
the three fiscal-year period ended January 1, 2006
F-6
   
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the years in the three
fiscal-year period ended January 1, 2006
F-7
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-8





























F-1




Exhibit 23.1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Mexican Restaurants, Inc. and Subsidiaries:


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Mexican Restaurants, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of January 1, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended January 1, 2006. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Mexican Restaurants, Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 1, 2006, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended January 1, 2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 
 

UHY MANN FRANKFORT STEIN & LIPP CPAs, LLP


Houston, Texas
March 27, 2006

















F-2




Exhibit 23.2


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Mexican Restaurants, Inc.:
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Mexican Restaurants, Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 2, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended January 2, 2005. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Mexican Restaurants, Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 2, 2005, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended January 2, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
 

 

 
(signed) KPMG LLP
 



Houston, Texas
March 28, 2005, except for Note 1, as to which the date is March 30, 2006
 




















F-3



MEXICAN RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
January 2, 2005 and January 1, 2006


   
Fiscal Years
 
ASSETS
 
2004
 
2005
 
Current assets:
             
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
1,293,836
 
$
788,109
 
Royalties receivable
   
85,377
   
176,649
 
Other receivables
   
701,413
   
2,088,035
 
Inventory
   
658,687
   
744,397
 
Taxes receivable
   
573,840
   
--
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
   
832,928
   
833,678
 
Total current assets
   
4,146,081
   
4,630,868
 
               
Property, plant and equipment
   
28,929,887
   
31,511,205
 
Less accumulated depreciation
   
(13,464,153
)
 
(15,315,864
)
Net property, plant and equipment
   
15,465,734
   
16,195,341
 
               
Goodwill
   
10,902,664
   
10,902,664
 
Deferred tax assets
   
619,087
   
256,274
 
Property held for sale, net
   
505,118
   
625,318
 
Other assets
   
687,502
   
526,804
 
   
$
32,326,186
 
$
33,137,269
 
               
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
             
Current liabilities:
             
Current installments of long-term debt
 
$
1,000,000
 
$
1,000,000
 
Accounts payable
   
1,623,859
   
1,710,068
 
Income taxes payable
   
--
   
203,116
 
Accrued sales and liquor taxes
   
740,898
   
127,283
 
Accrued payroll and taxes
   
1,043,182
   
1,685,235
 
Accrued expenses
   
1,097,640
   
1,536,895
 
               
Total current liabilities
   
5,505,579
   
6,262,597
 
               
Long-term debt
   
6,000,000
   
4,500,000
 
Other liabilities
   
1,183,426
   
1,930,056
 
Deferred gain
   
1,769,212
   
1,561,070
 
               
Stockholders' equity:
             
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued
   
--
   
--
 
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, 4,732,705 shares
issued
   
47,327
   
47,327
 
Additional paid-in capital
   
20,121,076
   
19,406,139
 
Retained earnings
   
9,303,791
   
11,620,788
 
Deferred Compensation
   
(6,303
)
 
--
 
Treasury stock, cost of 1,308,500 common shares in 2004 and 1,368,328 common
shares in 2005
   
(11,597,922
)
 
(12,190,708
)
Total stockholders' equity
   
17,867,969
   
18,883,546
 
               
   
$
32,326,186
 
$
33,137,269
 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4



MEXICAN RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the fiscal years ended December 28, 2003,
January 2, 2005 and January 1, 2006

 
   
Fiscal Years
 
   
 2003
 
 2004
 
 2005
 
Revenues:
Restaurant sales
 
$
52,882,270
 
$
77,026,420
 
$
79,974,937
 
Franchise fees, royalties and other
   
1,139,268
   
753,293
   
694,302
 
Business interruption
   
--
   
--
   
534,163
 
     
54,021,538
   
77,779,713
   
81,203,402
 
                     
Costs and expenses:
                   
Cost of sales
   
14,591,387
   
21,384,135
   
21,849,096
 
Labor
   
17,420,803
   
25,241,550
   
26,207,831
 
Restaurant operating expenses
   
12,724,407
   
17,605,751
   
18,659,054
 
General and administrative
   
5,306,211
   
6,586,807
   
6,941,683
 
Depreciation and amortization
   
2,030,377
   
2,237,388
   
2,778,078
 
Pre-opening costs
   
95,891
   
56,478
   
77,942
 
Impairments and restaurant closure costs
   
655,408
   
700,682
   
--
 
Gain on disposal of assets - Hurricane Rita
   
--
   
--
   
(470,702
)
(Gain) loss on sale of assets
   
(292,052
)
 
182,359
   
369,001
 
     
52,532,432
   
73,995,150
   
76,411,983
 
                     
Operating income
   
1,489,106
   
3,784,563
   
4,791,419
 
                     
Other income (expense):
                   
Interest income
   
28,736
   
9,711
   
3,451
 
Interest expense
   
(242,289
)
 
(553,371
)
 
(521,161
)
Other, net
   
116,922
   
84,881
   
113,846
 
     
(96,631
)
 
(458,779
)
 
(403,864
)
                     
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
   
1,392,475
   
3,325,784
   
4,387,555
 
Income tax expense
   
490,644
   
1,069,690
   
1,433,191
 
Income from continuing operations 
   
901,831
   
2,256,094
   
2,954,364
 
                     
Discontinued Operations:
                   
Loss from discontinued operations
   
(813,591
)
 
(415,859
)
 
(222,193
)
Impairments and restaurant closure costs
   
(2,252,998
)
 
(167,898
)
 
(790,708
)
Loss on sale of assets
   
(28,156
)
 
(210,150
)
 
(210
)
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes
   
(3,094,745
)
 
(793,907
)
 
(1,013,111
)
Income tax benefit
   
1,158,006
   
298,787
   
375,744
 
Loss from discontinued operations
   
(1,936,739
)
 
(495,120
)
 
(637,367
)
                     
Net Income (loss)
 
$
(1,034,908
)
$
1,760,974
 
$
2,316,997
 
                     
Basic income (loss) per share:
                   
Income from continuing operations
 
$
0.26
 
$
0.67
 
$
0.87
 
Loss from discontinued operations
   
(0.57
)
 
(0.15
)
 
(0.19
)
Net income (loss)
 
$
(0.31
)
$
0.52
 
$
0.68
 
                     
Diluted income (loss) per share:
                   
Income from continuing operations
 
$
0.26
 
$
0.62
 
$
0.80
 
Loss from discontinued operations
   
(0.57
)
 
(0.14
)
 
(0.17
)
Net income (loss)
 
$
(0.31
)
$
0.48
 
$
0.63
 
                     
Weighted average number of shares (basic)
   
3,384,605
   
3,388,489
   
3,415,806
 
                     
Weighted average number of shares (diluted)
   
3,430,380
   
3,634,849
   
3,700,876
 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-5




MEXICAN RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

For the fiscal years ended
December 28, 2003, January 2, 2005
and January, 1 2006

   
 
Common Stock
 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 
 
Retained
Earnings
 
 
Deferred
Compensation
 
 
Treasury
Stock
 
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
 
Balances at December 29, 2002
 
$
47,327
 
$
20,121,076
 
$
8,577,725
 
$
(88,911
)
$
(11,709,513
)
$
16,947,704
 
                                       
Amortization of Deferred Compensation
   
--
   
--
   
--
   
41,304
   
--
   
41,304
 
                                       
Net loss
   
--
   
--
   
(1,034,908
)
 
--
   
--
   
(1,034,908
)
                                       
Balances at December 28, 2003
 
$
47,327
 
$
20,121,076
 
$
7,542,817
 
$
(47,607
)
$
(11,709,513
)
$
15,954,100
 
                                       
Exercise of Stock Options
   
--
   
--
   
--
   
--
   
111,591
   
111,591
 
                                       
Amortization of Deferred Compensation
   
--
   
--
   
--
   
41,304
   
--
   
41,304
 
                                       
Net income
   
--
   
--
   
1,760,974
   
--
   
--
   
1,760,974
 
                                       
Balances at January 2, 2005
 
$
47,327
 
$
20,121,076
 
$
9,303,791
 
$
(6,303
)
$
(11,597,922
)
$
17,867,969
 
                                       
Exercise of Stock Options Through
Issuance of Treasury Shares
   
--
   
(714,937
)
 
--
   
--
   
1,145,481
   
430,544
 
                                       
Repurchase of shares
   
--
   
--
   
--
   
--
   
(1,738,267
)
 
(1,738,267
)
                                       
Amortization of Deferred Compensation
   
--
   
--
   
--
   
6,303
   
--
   
6,303
 
                                       
Net income
   
--
   
--
   
2,316,997
   
--
   
--
   
2,316,997
 
                                       
Balances at January 1, 2006
 
$
47,327
 
$
19,406,139
 
$
11,620,788
 
$
--
 
$
(12,190,708
)
$
18,883,546
 

















See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


F-6



MEXICAN RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the fiscal years ended December 28, 2003, January 2, 2005 and January 1, 2006
   
Fiscal Years
 
   
2003
 
2004
 
2005
 
   
(Revised. See Note 1)
 
(Revised. See
Note 1)
     
Cash flows from operating activities:
                   
Net income (loss)
 
$
(1,034,908
)
$
1,760,974
 
$
2,316,997
 
Adjustment to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating
activities
                   
Depreciation and amortization
   
2,030,377
   
2,237,388
   
2,778,078
 
Deferred gain amortization
   
(208,143
)
 
(208,185
)
 
(208,142
)
Loss from discontinued operations
   
1,936,739
   
495,120
   
637,367
 
Asset impairments and restaurant closure costs
   
655,408
   
700,682
   
--
 
Impairment of Notes Receivable
   
196,109
   
--
   
--
 
(Gain) loss on sale of property, plant and equipment
   
(10,129
)
 
182,359
   
369,001
 
Gain on disposal of assets - Hurricane Rita
   
--
   
--
   
(470,702
)
Deferred compensation expense
   
41,304
   
41,304
   
6,303
 
Gain from insurance proceeds
   
(478,032
)
 
--
   
(534,163
)
Deferred income taxes (benefit)
   
(70,235
)
 
509,739
   
676,841
 
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions
                   
Royalties receivable
   
(37,486
)
 
94,140
   
(91,272
)
Other receivables 
   
220,855
   
(308,281
)
 
(36,751
)
Taxes receivable/payable
   
37,876
   
(228,834
)
 
776,956
 
Inventory
   
(9,385
)
 
9,458
   
(276,026
)
Prepaids and other current assets
   
(118,361
)
 
(147,403
)
 
313
 
Other assets
   
(374,268
)
 
34,548
   
4,074
 
Accounts payable
   
(415,872
)
 
25,576
   
17,353
 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
   
20,914
   
129,741
   
309,249
 
Deferred rent and other long-term liabilities
   
29,760
   
312,609
   
139,988
 
Net cash provided by continuing operations
   
2,412,523
   
5,640,935
   
6,415,464
 
Net cash provided (used) in discontinued operations
   
(7,610
)
 
62,055
   
(173,225
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
   
2,404,913
   
5,702,990
   
6,242,239
 
                     
Cash flows from investing activities:
                   
Insurance proceeds received from fire loss (2003) & Hurricane Rita loss (2005)
   
488,629
   
--
   
300,000
 
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
   
(1,750,402
)
 
(2,886,281
)
 
(4,581,258
)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
   
476,500
   
655,752
   
372,691
 
Business Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
   
--
   
(6,767,916
)
 
--
 
Net cash used in continuing operations
   
(785,273
)
 
( 8,998,445
)
 
( 3,908,567
)
Net cash used in discontinued operations
   
(155,134
)
 
(113,342
)
 
(31,676
)
Net cash used in investing activities
   
(940,407
)
 
(9,111,787
)
 
(3,940,243
)
                     
Cash flows from financing activities:
                   
Net borrowings (payment) under line of credit agreement
   
(1,625,000
)
 
1,225,000
   
(1,500,000
)
Purchase of treasury stock
   
--
   
--
   
(1,738,267
)
Exercise of Stock Options
   
--
   
111,591
   
430,544
 
Additions to Long term Notes Payable
   
--
   
3,000,000
   
--
 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 
   
(1,625,000
)
 
4,336,591
   
(2,807,723
)
                     
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
   
(160,494
)
 
927,794
   
(505,727
)
                     
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
   
526,536
   
366,042
   
1,293,836
 
                     
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
 
$
366,042
 
$
1,293,836
 
$
788,109
 
                     
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
                   
Cash paid during the year:
                   
Interest
 
$
265,262
 
$
494,844
 
$
561,972
 
Income taxes
 
$
304,453
 
$
464,532
 
$
297,693
 
Non-cash financing activities:
                   
CNL real estate transaction
   
--
   
8,325,000
   
--
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7





MEXICAN RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 28, 2003, January 2, 2005 and January 1, 2006

(1) Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(a) Description of Business

On February 16, 1996, Mexican Restaurants, Inc. (formerly Casa Olé Restaurants, Inc.) was incorporated in the State of Texas, and on April 24, 1996, its initial public offering of 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock became effective. Mexican Restaurants, Inc. is the holding company for Casa Olé Franchise Services, Inc. and several subsidiary restaurant operating corporations (collectively the “Company”). Casa Olé Franchise Services, Inc. was incorporated in 1977, and derives its revenues from the collection of franchise fees under a series of protected location franchise agreements and from the sale of restaurant accessories to the franchisees of those protected location franchise agreements. The restaurants feature moderately priced Mexican and Tex-Mex food served in a casual atmosphere. The first Casa Olé restaurant was opened in 1973.

On July 2, 1997, the Company purchased 100% of the outstanding stock of Monterey’s Acquisition Corp. (“MAC”). The Company purchased the shares of common stock for $4.0 million, paid off outstanding debt and accrued interest totaling $7.1 million and funded various other agreed upon items approximating $500,000. At the time of the acquisition, MAC owned and operated 26 restaurants in Texas and Oklahoma under the names “Monterey’s Tex-Mex Café,” “Monterey’s Little Mexico” and “Tortuga Coastal Cantina.”

On April 30, 1999, the Company purchased 100% of the outstanding stock of La Señorita Restaurants, a Mexican restaurant chain operated in the State of Michigan. The Company purchased the shares of common stock of La Señorita for $4.0 million. The transaction was funded with the Company’s revolving line of credit with Bank of America. At the time of the acquisition, La Señorita operated five company-owned restaurants, and three franchise restaurants.

    On January 7, 2004, the Company completed its purchase of 13 restaurants and related assets from its Beaumont-based franchisee, Thomas Harken, and Mr. Harken's operating partner, Victor Gonzalez, for a total consideration of approximately $13.75 million. The financing for the acquisition was provided by Fleet National Bank, CNL and the sellers. The restaurants acquired include 8 Casa Olé restaurants located in Southeast Texas, 2 Casa Olé restaurants located in Southwest Louisiana, and 3 Crazy Jose’s restaurants located in Southeast Texas. In the past year these restaurants had combined sales of over $20 million.

On October 14, 2004, the Company completed its purchase of one franchise restaurant in Brenham, Texas for approximately $215,000. The restaurant was closed, remodeled and re-opened on November 22, 2004. The Company spent $329,489 remodeling the restaurant.

The consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for fiscal years 2005, 2004, and 2003 have been adjusted to remove the operations of closed restaurants, which have been reclassified as discontinued operations. Consequently, the consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the fiscal years 2004 and 2003 shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2005 presentation. These reclassifications have no effect on total assets, total liabilities, stockholders equity or net income.

(b) Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Mexican Restaurants, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, after elimination of all significant inter-company transactions. The Company owns and operates various Mexican restaurant concepts principally in Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana and Michigan. The Company’s three Idaho restaurants were closed on December 30, 2001 and the restaurants are either subleased or leased to third parties. The Company also franchises the Casa Olé concept principally in Texas and Louisiana and the La Señorita concept principally in the State of Michigan.


F-8



MEXICAN RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(c) Fiscal Year

The Company maintains its accounting records on a 52/53 week fiscal year ending on the Sunday nearest December 31. Fiscal years 2003 and 2005 consisted of 52 weeks and fiscal year 2004 consisted of 53 weeks.
 
(d) Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

(e) Inventory

Inventory, which is comprised of food and beverages, is stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method. Miscellaneous restaurant supplies are included in inventory and valued on a specific identification basis.

(f) Pre-opening Costs

Pre-opening costs primarily consists of hiring and training employees associated with the opening of a new restaurant and are expensed upon the opening of the restaurant.

(g) Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation on equipment and on buildings and improvements is calculated on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized straight-line over the shorter of the lease term plus options reasonably assured or estimated useful life of the assets.

Buildings and improvements
20-40 years
Vehicles
5 years
Equipment
3-15 years
Leasehold improvements
2-25 years
 
At the opening of a new restaurant, the initial purchase of smallwares is capitalized as restaurant equipment, but not depreciated. Subsequent purchases of smallwares are expensed as incurred.
 
Significant expenditures that add materially to the utility or useful lives of property, plant and equipment are capitalized. All other maintenance and repair costs are charged to current operations. The cost and related accumulated depreciation of assets replaced, retired or otherwise disposed of are eliminated from the property accounts and any gain or loss is reflected as other income and expense.

Property, plant and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable pursuant to Statement on Financial Accounting Standards No. 144. The various indicators leading to the testing of these long-lived assets include declines in revenues, a current cash flow loss combined with a forecast demonstrating continuing cash flow losses, current market conditions and competitive intrusion. The service potential of the assets includes assessment of future cash-flow-generating capacity, the remaining lives of the assets, the remaining term of the operating lease and evaluation of future cash flows associated with potential capital expenditures. The method for determining the fair value of impaired assets to be sold is based on its appraised fair market value or the value that a third party buyer would be willing to pay.

In fiscal year 2005, the Company recorded asset impairment and restaurant closure costs of $790,708, all of which is included in discontinued operations related to the 2005 closure of one restaurant pursuant to Statement on Financial Accounting Standards No. 146. In fiscal 2004, the Company recorded asset impairment and restaurant closure costs of
F-9



MEXICAN RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

$868,580, of which $167,898 related to the fiscal 2004 closure of three restaurants. In fiscal 2003, the Company recorded asset impairment and restaurant closure costs of $2,908,406, of which $2,252,998 related to the fiscal 2003 closure of one restaurant and inclusion of discontinued operations related to the fiscal 2004 closure of three restaurants and the fiscal 2005 closure of one restaurant.

In fiscal 2004, the Company incurred $700,682 of impairment expenses in continuing operations related primarily to four Tortuga restaurants that the Company wanted to position for re-concept to one of the Company’s other Mexican food concepts. Because of improved operating performance, the Company did not re-concept the four Tortuga restaurants in fiscal 2005. In addition, two Monterey’s restaurants, which were impaired in 2003, incurred a small impairment in 2004. These two restaurants will be closed at the expiration of their operating leases.

Property held for sale is separately aggregated in the consolidated balance sheets and is recorded at the lower of cost or net realizable value.

(h)  
Impairment of Property Held for Sale
 
In fiscal 2005, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $29,800 related to the pending sale of the Pt. Arthur, Texas pad site that was acquired in the 2004 acquisition of 13 restaurants from its Beaumont-based franchisee.


(i)  
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill represents the excess of costs over fair value of assets of businesses acquired. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, as of January 1, 2002. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142. SFAS No. 142 also requires that intangible assets with estimable useful lives be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.

At January 1, 2006 and January 2, 2005, the consolidated balance sheets included $10.9 million of goodwill primarily resulting from the MAC, La Señorita and Beaumont-based franchisee acquisitions. In connection with SFAS No. 142’s transitional goodwill impairment evaluation, the Statement required the Company to perform an assessment of whether there was an indication that goodwill is impaired as of the date of adoption. To accomplish this, the Company was required to identify its reporting units and determine the carrying value of each reporting unit by assigning the assets and liabilities, including the existing goodwill and intangible assets, to those reporting units as of January 1, 2002. The Company was required to determine the fair value of each reporting unit and compare it to the carrying amount of the reporting unit within six months of January 1, 2002. To the extent the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeded the fair value of the reporting unit, the Company would be required to perform the second step of the transitional impairment test, as this is an indication that the reporting unit goodwill may be impaired. For purposes of applying SFAS No. 142 impairment testing, the Company believes it is operating in one segment. Although each restaurant is measured and analyzed by Company management for performance, since the economic characteristics and operations are similar across restaurant concept lines, the reporting unit is considered to be equivalent to the Company’s operating segment. Management evaluated goodwill as required by SFAS 142 upon its adoption and annually as of December 28, 2003, January 2, 2005 and January 1, 2006. Management performed its goodwill impairment testing for each year and determined that the fair value exceeded the carrying amount of the reporting units and that no impairment of goodwill exists.
 
(j) Impairment of Long-Lived Assets  

In accordance with SFAS No. 144, long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment, and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the
F-10



MEXICAN RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated. The assets and liabilities of a disposed group classified as held for sale would be presented separately in the appropriate asset and liability sections of the balance sheet. The revenues and expenses, as well as gains, losses, and impairments, from those assets are reported in the discontinued operations section of the consolidated statement of operations for all periods presented.

Goodwill and intangible assets not subject to amortization are tested annually for impairment, and are tested for impairment more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the asset’s fair value.
 
(k) Deferred Rent Recognition

The Company expenses lease rentals that have escalating rents on a straight line basis over the life of each lease pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13. Incentive allowances provided by landlords under leasing arrangements are deferred as a liability and amortized to income as an adjustment to rent expense over the life of the lease.

(l) Income Taxes

Income taxes are provided based on the asset and liability method of accounting pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. 

(m) Revenue Recognition

The Company records revenue from the sale of food, soft beverages and alcoholic beverages as products are sold. Franchise fee revenue from an individual franchise sale is recognized when all services relating to the sale have been performed and the restaurant has commenced operation. Initial franchise fees relating to area franchise sales are recognized ratably in proportion to services that are required to be performed pursuant to the area franchise or development agreements and proportionately as the restaurants within the area are opened.

(n) Stock Options

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123 (Revised), “Share-Based Payment”, a revision of SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” SFAS 123R required the fair value measurement of all stock-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, and recognition of those expenses in the statement of operations. SFAS 123R is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2005. We will continue to account for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method until adoption of SFAS 123R in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. Historically, the compensation expense recognized related to stock options under this method has been minimal. The Company expects that the adoption of SFAS 123R, using the fair value of the options at the grant date to determine compensation cost, will result in amounts that are similar to the current pro forma disclosures under SFAS 123. The Company anticipates utilizing the modified prospective method upon adoption.

The Company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123, which amends SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and has accounted for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and related interpretations. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for stock options or warrants. Had compensation cost for the Company’s outstanding stock options and warrants been determined based on the fair value at the grant date for awards consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net income and net income per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below for fiscal years 2003, 2004 and 2005:

F-11




MEXICAN RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 
   
2003
 
2004
 
2005
 
Net income (loss) - as reported
 
$
(1,034,908
)
$
1,760,974
 
$
2,316,997
 
Less: Stock based compensation expense, determined under fair value
based method for all awards, net of tax
   
(44,568
)
 
(29,380
)
 
(34,073
)
Proforma net income (loss) - pro forma for SFAS No. 123
   
(1,079,476
)
 
1,731,594
   
2,282,924
 
Net income (loss) per share - as reported
   
(0.31
)
 
0.52
   
0.68
 
Pro forma net income (loss) per share - pro forma for SFAS No. 123
   
(0.32
)
 
0.51
   
0.67
 
 
(o) Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

(p)  
Insurance proceeds

On September 24, 2005, Hurricane Rita hit the Gulf Coast area, affecting a number of the Company’s restaurants in that region. The Company subsequently hired an insurance consulting firm to assist management with the filing of its insurance claim. Based on the low range of the consulting firm’s estimate and negotiations with the insurance carrier, the Company recorded an insurance claim of $1.6 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005.

The consolidated statement of operations for the year ended January 1, 2006, includes a separate line item for a gain of $470,702 resulting from assets damaged by Hurricane Rita and other expenses offset by insurance proceeds for the replacement of assets. The Company’s insurers paid $300,000 during the fourth quarter of 2005 and $785,028 in first quarter of 2006 related to the property damage claim. Additionally, the Company has recognized $534,163 for estimated business interruption proceeds.
 
During fiscal year 2003, the Company recorded a gain of $478,032 for insurance proceeds received from fire damage at the Humble, Texas restaurant location. There were no insurance claims recorded in 2004.
 
(q)  
Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No.123 (Revised), Share-Based Payments, a revision of SFAS No.123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS No.123R requires the fair value measurement of all stock-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, and recognition of those expenses in the statement of operations. SFAS No.123R is effective for the first annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2005. We will continue to account for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method until adoption of SFAS No.123R on January 2, 2006. Historically, the compensation expense recognized related to stock options under the intrinsic value method has been minimal. As a result, adoption of the provisions of SFAS No.123R is expected to have an impact to reported net income and earnings per share. The Company expects that the adoption of SFAS 123R, using the fair value of the options at the grant date to determine compensation cost, will result in amounts that are similar to the current pro forma disclosures under SFAS 123. The Company anticipates utilizing the modified prospective method upon adoption.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets—an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions. This Statement amends APB Opinion No. 29 Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions, based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. Certain of the disclosure modifications are required for fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 153 will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.


F-12





MEXICAN RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections - a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3. This statement replaces APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, and FASB Statement No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements, and changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. This Statement applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle and is required for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005.

On October 6, 2005, the FASB released FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS No. 13-1, Accounting for Rental Costs Incurred during a Construction Period. This FSP affects companies that are engaged in construction activities on buildings or grounds accounted for as operating leases. The FSP requires the Company to expense rental costs associated with these leases, starting on the date that the tenant is given control of the premises. As a result, companies must cease capitalizing rental costs during construction periods. The FSP is effective for the first reporting period beginning after December 15, 2005. Retrospective application is permitted, but not required. The Company has determined that the adoption of FSP FAS No. 13-1 will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

(r) Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made at January 2, 2005 to conform with classifications at January 1, 2006. These reclassifications have no effect on the Company’s net income or financial position as previously reported.

(s) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

We have revised the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for 2003 and 2004 consistent with 2005 to reconcile net cash provided by operating activities from net income (loss) instead of net income (loss) from continuing operations.

(t) Advertising Expense

Each year the Company prepares a budget for advertising expenses to promote each of the Company’s restaurant brands. Prepaid advertising is deferred and amortized to expense based on estimates of usage. For fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003 the Company recorded advertising expense in continuing operations of $2,415,829, $2,248,854 and $1,813,929 which represents 3.0%, 2.9% and 3.4% of restaurant sales from continuing operations, respectively.

(2) Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment at January 2, 2005 and January 1, 2006 are as follows:
 

   
2004
 
2005
 
Land
 
$
360,750
 
$
60,750
 
Buildings and improvements
   
250,000
   
--
 
Vehicles
   
20,874
   
16,874
 
Equipment and Smallwares
   
17,809,973
   
19,415,556
 
Leasehold Improvements
   
10,341,598
   
11,988,063
 
     
28,783,195
   
31,481,243
 
Less: Accumulated Depreciation
   
(13,464,153
)
 
(15,315,864
)
     
15,319,042
   
16,165,379
 
Construction in Progress
   
146,692
   
29,962
 
Net
 
$
15,465,734
 
$
16,195,341
 


F-13





MEXICAN RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)


(3) Long-term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following at January 2, 2005 and January 1, 2006:
 
   
2004
 
2005
 
Term Note
 
$
4,000,000
 
$
2,500,000
 
               
Revolving Line of Credit
   
--
   
--
 
               
Other long-term debt
   
3,000,000
   
3,000,000
 
Total long-term debt
   
7,000,000
   
5,500,000
 
Less current installments
   
(1,000,000
)
 
(1,000,000
)
Long-term debt, excluding current installments
 
$
6,000,000
 
$
4,500,000
 

    On January 7, 2004, Bank of America (formerly Fleet National Bank) amended its $10.0 million credit facility to accommodate the acquisition of the Beaumont-based franchise restaurants. The amended credit facility consists of a $5.0 million term note that requires quarterly principal payments of $250,000 and matures on June 30, 2008. The credit facility also includes a $5.0 million revolving line of credit. The interest rate is either the prime rate or LIBOR plus a stipulated percentage. Accordingly, the Company is impacted by changes in the prime rate and LIBOR. The Company is subject to a non-use fee of 0.75% on the unused portion of the revolver from the date of the credit agreement.

    On April 1, 2005, the Company and Bank of America amended the $10.0 million credit facility to accommodate the Company’s growth plans. The amendment allows for additional capital expenditures, revised certain covenant ratios, increased the amount of allowable stock repurchases, and extended the maturity date of the revolving line of credit to January 7, 2009. Effective June 30, 2005, the Company and Bank of America further amended the $10.0 million credit facility to revise certain ratios affected by Hurricane Rita and the Company’s stock repurchase program, and to lower the applicable interest rate margins. As of January 1, 2006, the Company had $2.5 million outstanding on the credit facility and $3.0 million in notes for a total indebtedness of $5.5 million. The Company acquired 13 restaurants from its Beaumont-based franchisee in January 2004. Part of the financing for the acquisition included $3.0 million in notes issued by Mexican Restaurants to the sellers. The seller notes pay interest for five years, with $1.5 million in principal due on January 7, 2009 and $1.5 million in principal amortizing over an additional five years. The Company is in full compliance with all debt covenants as amended. The Company expects to be in compliance with all debt covenants in fiscal year 2006.

Maturities on long-term debt are as follows:
     
       
Year Ending
     
         
2006
 
$
1,000,000
 
2007
   
1,000,000
 
2008
   
500,000
 
2009
   
1,775,000
 
2010
   
300,000
 
Thereafter
   
925,000
 
   
$
5,500,000
 





F-14




MEXICAN RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)


(4) Income Taxes

The provision for income tax expense from continuing operations is summarized as follows for fiscal years 2003, 2004 and 2005:
   
2003
 
2004
 
2005
 
Current:
                   
Federal
 
$
388,764
 
$
462,609
 
$
625,433
 
  State and local
   
172,115
   
97,342
   
130,917
 
Deferred (benefit)
   
(70,235
)
 
509,739
   
676,841
 
 
 
$
490,644
 
$
1,069,690
 
$
1,433,191
 


The income tax benefit from discontinued operations is summarized as follows for fiscal years 2003, 2004 and 2005:

   
2003
 
2004
 
2005
 
Current:
                   
Federal
 
$
332,174
 
$
361,148
 
$
49,764
 
  State and local
   
78,347
   
80,986
   
11,952,
 
Deferred (provision)
   
747,485
   
(143,347
)
 
314,028
 
 
 
$
1,158,006
 
$
298,787
 
$
375,744
 

The actual income tax expense differs from expected income tax expense calculated by applying the U.S. federal corporate tax rate to income before income tax expense from continuing operations as follows:

   
2003
 
2004
 
2005
 
                     
Expected tax expense Federal
 
$
505,743
 
$
1,130,766
 
$
1,491,769
 
 State tax expense, net  State and local
   
126,622
   
99,518
   
128,176
 
Non-deductible amortization 
   
3,391
   
3,391
   
3,391
 
Tax credits 
   
(123,905
)
 
(169,079
)
 
(162,325
)
Other 
   
(21,207
)
 
5,094
   
(27,820
)
   
$
490,644
 
$
1,069,690
 
$
1,433,191
 

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities at January 2, 2005 and January 1, 2006 are as follows:
   
January 2, 2005
 
January 1, 2006
 
Deferred tax assets:
             
Sale-leaseback
 
$
654,212
 
$
577,128
 
Tax credit carryforwards
   
591,592
   
472,385
 
Asset impairments
   
747,699
   
561,794
 
Accrued expenses
   
40,397
   
110,351
 
   
$
2,033,900
 
$
1,721,658
 
Deferred tax liabilities:
             
Other
   
($ 8,219
)
 
($ 8,160
)
Depreciation differences 
   
( 1,406,594
)
 
( 1,457,224
)
     
($1,414,813
)
 
($1,465,384
)
               
Net deferred taxes
 
$
619,087
 
$
256,274
 
 
 
F-15



MEXICAN RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

At January 1, 2006, the Company determined that it was more likely than not that the deferred tax assets would be realized based on the level of historical taxable income and projections of future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible. At January 1, 2006, the Company has tax credit carryforwards of $472,385 which are available to reduce future Federal regular income taxes, if any, over an indefinite period.

(5) Common Stock, Options and Warrants
 
(a)  
2005 Long Term Incentive Plan

The Board of Directors and shareholders of the Company have approved the Mexican Restaurants, Inc. 2005 Long Term Incentive Plan (the "Incentive Plan"). The Incentive Plan authorizes the granting of up to 350,000 shares of Common Stock in the form of incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options to key executives and other key employees of the Company, including officers of the Company and its subsidiaries. The purpose of the 2005 Plan is to benefit and advance the interests of the Company by attracting and retaining qualified directors and key executive and managerial employees; motivating employees, by making appropriate awards, to achieve long-range goals; providing incentive compensation that is competitive with other corporations; and further aligning the interests of directors, employees and other participants with those of other shareholders. It is anticipated that the 350,000 shares proposed to be authorized under the 2005 Plan, together with the shares remaining under the 1996 Plan, will enable the Company to provide sufficient grants of awards for the foreseeable future. Also, the inclusion of authority to grant various forms of equity compensation in addition to stock options, including restricted stock, will allow the Company to tailor future awards to the Company’s specific needs and circumstances at that time.

(b) 1996 Long Term Incentive Plan
 
The Board of Directors and shareholders of the Company have approved the Mexican Restaurants, Inc. 1996 Long Term Incentive Plan (the "Incentive Plan"). The Incentive Plan, as amended, authorizes the granting of up to 500,000 shares of Common Stock in the form of incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options to key executives and other key employees of the Company, including officers of the Company and its subsidiaries. The purpose of the Incentive Plan is to attract and retain key employees, to motivate key employees to achieve long-range goals and to further align the interests of key employees with those of the other shareholders of the Company. Options granted under the Incentive Plan will generally vest and become exercisable at the rate of 10% on the first anniversary of the date of grant, 15% on the second anniversary of the date of grant, and 25% on each of the third through fifth anniversaries of the date of grant. All stock options granted pursuant to the 1996 Long Term Incentive Plan will be nonqualified stock options and will remain exercisable until the earlier of ten years from the date of grant or no more than 90 days after the optionee ceases to be an employee of the Company.

(c) Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors
 
The Company has adopted the Mexican Restaurants, Inc. Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the “Directors Plan”) for its outside directors and has reserved 200,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance thereunder. The Directors Plan provides that each outside director will automatically be granted an option to purchase 10,000 shares of Common Stock at the time of becoming a director. These options will be exercisable in 20% increments and will vest equally over the five-year period from the date of grant. Such options are priced at the fair market value at the time an individual is elected as a director. Until the third quarter of fiscal year 2002, each outside director received options to purchase 1,500 shares of Common Stock quarterly, plus additional options for attendance at committee meetings, exercisable at the fair market value of the Common Stock at the close of business on the date immediately preceding the date of grant. Such annual options will vest at the conclusion of one year, so long as the individual remains a director of the Company. All stock options granted pursuant to the Directors Plan will be nonqualified stock options and will remain exercisable until the earlier of ten years from the date of grant or six months after the optionee ceases to be a director of the Company.

As of the third quarter of fiscal year 2002, compensation for each outside director was changed from quarterly options to cash payments of $2,000 per quarter and $1,000 per board meeting attended. The chairman of the audit committee receives compensation of $6,250 per quarter.
F-16



MEXICAN RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

During fiscal year 2005, the Company’s employees exercised 121,472 stock options in the open market. The Company received $430,544 in exchange for 121,472 shares of common stock that was previously held as Treasury stock.

On November 15 and 18 of fiscal 2004, one director exercised 30,200 of his options in the open market. The Company received $111,591 in exchange for 30,200 shares of common stock that was previously held as Treasury stock.

(d) 1996 Manager’s Stock Option Plan

    The Company has adopted the 1996 Manager’s Stock Option Plan (the “Manager’s Plan”) specifically for its store-level managers. The Manager’s Plan authorizes the granting of up to 200,000 shares of Common Stock in the form of non-qualified stock options to store-level managers of the Company. The purpose of the Manager’s Plan is to attract, retain and motivate restaurant managers to achieve long-range goals and to further align the interests of those employees with those of the other shareholders of the Company. Options granted under the Manager’s Plan will generally vest and become exercisable at the rate of 10% on the first anniversary of the date of grant, 15% on the second anniversary of the date of grant, and 25% on each of the third through fifth anniversaries of the date of grant. All stock options granted pursuant to the 1996 Manager’s Stock Option Plan will be nonqualified stock options and will remain exercisable until the earlier of ten years from the date of grant or no more than 90 days after the optionee ceases to be an employee of the Company.

(e)  
Warrants

In conjunction with the initial public offering, the Company entered into warrant agreements with Louis P. Neeb and Tex-Mex, a limited liability company in which a member of the Board of Directors prior to February 14, 2000 is a principal, pursuant to which Mr. Neeb and Tex-Mex acquired warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock at the initial public offering ($11.00 per share) price less the amount paid for the warrant ($.10 per share) for an aggregate amount of Common Stock equal to ten percent (10%) of the shares of Common Stock of the Company outstanding upon consummation of the initial public offering, such shares to be allocated 5%, or 179,885 shares, to Mr. Neeb and 5%, or 179,885 shares, to Tex-Mex. The Company's warrants to Mr. Neeb became exercisable on the second anniversary of the initial public offering, and the Company's warrants to Tex-Mex became exercisable on the first anniversary of the initial public offering. The warrants expire on April 24, 2006.

In late fiscal 1998 the Company exchanged a note valued in the amount of $148,534 (principal and accrued interest) for 98,301 warrants to purchase Common Stock previously held by a former officer of the Company. The warrants, which were granted by Larry N. Forehand with an exercise price of $10.90 per share, became exercisable in April 1998. Upon an exercise by Mr. Neeb or Tex-Mex of the warrants granted to them by the Company, the Company plans to exercise these newly acquired warrants simultaneously and use the warrant shares acquired from Mr. Forehand to satisfy a portion of its obligations under its warrant agreements with Mr. Neeb and Tex-Mex.

(f) Stock Transactions

During 1999 and 2000 the Company authorized the granting of 64,000 shares of restricted stock to key executives. The awards were valued at an average of $3.50 per share and will vest in 20% increments over a five year period from the date of the grant. Compensation expense of $41,304, $41,304 and $6,303 was recognized in fiscal years 2003, 2004 and 2005 respectively.

On May 9, 2005, the Company announced its plan to implement a limited stock repurchase program in a manner permitted under its bank financing agreement. Under this program, the Company could spend up to $1.0 million over the next 12 months (not to exceed $500,000 in any one quarter) to repurchase outstanding shares of its common stock. On September 7, 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an increase of $1.0 million to its stock repurchase program announced on May 9, 2005. During fiscal year 2005, the Company repurchased 181,300 shares of common stock for $1,738,267. During fiscal year 2004 and 2003, the Company did not repurchase any of its common shares.


F-17



MEXICAN RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)


(g) Option and Warrant Summary
     
Weighted Average
 
   
Shares
 
Exercise Price
 
Balance at December 28, 2003:
             
Granted
   
24,500
 
$
3.31
 
Exercised
   
--
   
--
 
Canceled
   
(36,000
)
 
4.67
 
     
1,028,970
 
$
6.87
 
               
Balance at January 2, 2005:
             
Granted
   
--
 
$
--
 
Exercised
   
30,200
   
3.70
 
Canceled
   
22,500
   
7.36
 
     
976,270
 
$
6.96
 
               
Balance at January 1, 2006:
             
Granted
   
260,000
 
$
12.00
 
Exercised
   
121,472
   
3.54
 
Canceled
   
10,750
   
5.68
 
     
1,104,048
 
$
8.54
 
               
The options (744,278) and warrants (359,770) outstanding at January 1, 2006 had exercise prices ranging between $2.50 to $12.00, of which 395,000 of the options had exercise prices ranging from $8.63 to $12.00, and 359,770 of the warrants had a exercise price of $10.90. As of January 1, 2006, 1,052,635 options and warrants were exercisable at an average price of $8.78.

The weighted average fair value of the options and warrants granted during 2003, 2004 and 2005 is estimated at $1.40, $0.00 and $0.00 per share (no options or warrants were granted in 2004 and the options granted in 2005 are fully vested), respectively, on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: volatility of 44% for 2003, 35% for 2004 and 28% for 2005, risk-free interest rate of 3.0% for 2003, 3.4% for 2004 and 4.1% for 2005, an expected life of 5 years for options and 4 years for warrants and 0% dividend yield.
 
(h) Income Per Share

Basic income per share is based on the weighted average shares outstanding without any dilutive effects considered. Diluted income per share reflects dilution from all contingently issuable shares, including options and warrants. For fiscal years 2004 and 2005, the effect of dilutive stock options increase the weighted average shares outstanding by approximately 246,360 and 285,070 shares respectively. For fiscal year 2003, the effect of dilutive stock options did not affect the determination of diluted income per share. For fiscal years 2004 and 2005, such stock options and warrants did affect the determination of diluted income approximately $0.04 and $0.05 per share, respectively. Approximately 454,570 and 405,870 options and warrants were considered antidilutive for fiscal years 2004 and 2005 respectively. For fiscal year 2003 all shares were considered antidilutive. The options and warrants that are considered antidilutive have a grant price that exceeds the market price as of the end of each fiscal year.

(6) Leases

The Company leases restaurant operating space and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases which expire at various dates through January 31, 2024.

The restaurant operating space base agreements typically provide for a minimum lease rent plus common area maintenance, insurance, and real estate taxes, plus additional percentage rent based upon revenues of the restaurant (generally 2% to 7%) and may be renewed for periods ranging from five to twenty-five years.
F-18



MEXICAN RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

On June 25, 1998, the Company completed a sale-leaseback transaction involving the sale and leaseback of land, building and improvements of 13 company-owned restaurants. The properties were sold for $11.5 million and resulted in a gain of approximately $3.5 million that was deferred and is amortized over the terms of the leases, which are 15 years each. The deferred gain at January 2, 2005 and January 1, 2006 was $1,769,212 and $1,561,070, respectively. The leases are classified as operating leases in accordance with SFAS No. 13 “Accounting for Leases”. Subsequent to the original transaction one lease was sold. The remaining 12 leases have a total future minimum lease obligation of approximately $9,415,509 and are included in the future minimum lease payment schedule below.

Future minimum lease payments (which includes the three closed restaurants scheduled below) under non-cancelable operating leases with initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year as of January 1, 2006 are approximately:
 
Year Ending
     
       
2006
 
$
5,534,205
 
2007
   
5,454,338
 
2008
   
5,238,810
 
2009
   
5,090,744
 
2010
   
4,628,866
 
Thereafter
   
27,815,475
 
   
$
53,762,438
 

On December 30, 2001 the Company closed three under-performing Idaho restaurants (which are included in the table above) and in fiscal year 2002 the Company subleased those restaurants to other local operators. Two of the subtenants have two five year options to extend their leases, and one of the subtenants has one five year option to extend its lease. Future minimum lease receipts under non-cancelable operating leases with initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year as of January 1, 2006 are approximately:


Year Ending
     
         
2006
 
$
303,500
 
2007
   
233,500
 
2008
   
145,221
 
Thereafter
   
--
 
   
$
682,221
 


Rent expense for restaurant operating space and equipment amounted to approximately $4,478,663, $5,964,086 and $6,103,154 for the fiscal years 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively.

(7)  
Acquisition

On January 7, 2004, the Company completed its purchase of 13 restaurants and related assets from its Beaumont-based franchisee for a total consideration of approximately $13.75 million. The financing for the acquisition was provided by Bank of America (formerly Fleet National Bank), CNL Franchise Network, LP (“CNL”) and the sellers of the Beaumont-based franchise restaurants. Bank of America (formerly Fleet National Bank) provided $3.1 million of the acquisition financing by amending its existing credit facility with Mexican Restaurants, Inc. Six of the acquired restaurants were concurrently sold to CNL for $8.325 million in a sale-leaseback transaction. The sellers accepted $3.0 million in notes from Mexican Restaurants, Inc. for the balance of the purchase price. The seller notes require the payment of interest only for five years, with $1.5 million in principal due on January 7, 2009 and $1.5 million in principal amortizing over an additional five years.
F-19




MEXICAN RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The acquisition was accounted for under SFAS 141 and results of operations are included in the accompanying financial statements from the date of acquisition. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed of the acquisition were recorded at estimated fair values using comparables, appraisals, and records.
 
A summary of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition follow:

Estimated fair value of assets acquired:
     
Current assets
 
$
184,601
 
Property and equipment
   
2,946,365
 
Other assets
   
175,000
 
Goodwill
   
3,283,916
 
Total assets
 
$
6,589,882
 
Less: Cash acquired
   
(35,150
)
Net assets acquired
 
$
6,554,732
 

On October 14, 2004, the Company completed its purchase of one franchise restaurant in Brenham, Texas for approximately $215,000, which included $164,509 classified as goodwill. The restaurant was closed, remodeled and re-opened on November 22, 2004.

(8)  
401(k) Plan

Beginning in fiscal year 1998, the Company established a defined contribution 401(k) plan that covers substantially all full-time employees meeting certain age and service requirements. Participating employees may elect to defer a percentage of their qualifying compensation as voluntary employee contributions. The Company may contribute additional amounts at the discretion of management. The Company did not make any contributions to the plan in fiscal years 2003, 2004 and 2005.

(9)  
Related Party Transactions
    
       The Company leased its executive offices from a company owned by two shareholders of Mexican Restaurants, Inc. Net lease expense related to these facilities in fiscal 2003 and 2004 was $125,188 and $10,416 respectively. The building was sold to a non-related party on February 20, 2004.
 
The Company provides accounting and administrative services for the Casa Olé Media and Production Funds. The Casa Olé Media and Production Funds are not-for-profit, unconsolidated entities used to collect money from company -owned and franchise-owned restaurants to pay for the marketing of Casa Olé restaurants. Each restaurant contributes an agreed upon percentage of its sales to the funds.

(10)  
Contingencies

The Company has litigation, claims and assessments that arise in the normal course of business. Management believes that the Company’s financial position or results of operations will not be materially affected by such matters.

(11)  
Subsequent Events

The Company acquired 13 restaurants from its Beaumont-based franchisee in January 2004. Part of the financing for the acquisition included $3.0 million in notes issued by Mexican Restaurants, Inc. to the sellers. The seller notes pay interest for five years, with $1.5 million in principal due on January 7, 2009 and $1.5 million in principal amortizing over an additional five years. The Company has decided to prepay $2.5 million of the seller notes on March 31, 2006. Although the Company is not obligated to make any principal payments on the seller notes until 2009, a decision was made to prepay a large portion of the 7% seller notes by borrowing on its Bank of America credit facility. The interest rate on the line of credit is either the prime rate or LIBOR plus a stipulated percentage, which is currently lower than 7%.
F-20




MEXICAN RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(12)  
Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

The unaudited quarterly results for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2005 and January 1, 2006 were as follows (in thousands, except per share data):


   
Fiscal Year 2004 Quarter Ended
 
   
January 02
 
September 26
 
June 27
 
March 28
 
           
Revenues
 
$
20,057
 
$
19,600
 
$
19,485
 
$
18,638
 
Income from continuing operations
   
223
   
639
   
701
   
693
 
Loss from discontinued operations
   
(199
)
 
(56
)
 
(78
)
 
(162
)
Net income (loss)
   
24
   
583
   
623
   
531
 
Basic income per share
                         
Income from continuing operations
 
$
0.07
 
$
0.19
 
$
0.20
 
$
0.21
 
Loss from discontinued operations
   
($ 0.06
)
 
($ 0.02
)
 
($ 0.02
)
 
($ 0.05
)
Net income (loss)
 
$
0.01
 
$
0.17
 
$
0.18
 
$
0.16
 
Diluted income per share
                         
Income from continuing operations
 
$
0.06
 
$
0.18
 
$
0.19
 
$
0.20
 
Loss from discontinued operations
   
($ 0.05
)
 
($ 0.02
)
 
($ 0.02
)
 
($ 0.05
)
Net income (loss)
 
$
0.01
 
$
0.16
 
$
0.17
 
$
0.15
 


 
 
Fiscal Year 2005 Quarter Ended
 
   
January 01
 
October 2
 
July 3
 
April 3
 
           
Revenues
 
$
20,887
 
$
19,773
 
$
20,466
 
$
20,078
 
Income from continuing operations
   
1,653
   
68
   
534
   
698
 
Loss from discontinued operations
   
(545
)
 
(37
)
 
(32
)
 
(23
)
Net income (loss)
   
1,108
   
31
   
502
   
675
 
Basic income per share
                         
Income from continuing operations
 
$
0.49
 
$
0.02
 
$
0.16
 
$
0.21
 
Loss from discontinued operations
   
($ 0.16
)
 
($ 0.01
)
 
($ 0.01
)
 
($ 0.01
)
Net income (loss)
 
$
0.33
 
$
0.01
 
$
0.15
 
$
0.20
 
Diluted income per share
                         
Income from continuing operations
 
$
0.45
 
$
0.02
 
$
0.15
 
$
0.19
 
Loss from discontinued operations
   
($ 0.15
)
 
($ 0.01
)
 
($ 0.01
)
 
($ 0.01
)
Net income (loss)
 
$
0.30
 
$
0.01
 
$
0.14
 
$
0.18
 

 
In the 4th quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company recognized asset impairment and restaurant closure costs of $700,682. In the 3rd and 4th quarters of 2005, the Company recognized a loss from Hurricane Rita of $274,328 and a gain of $1,279,193. Excluding these infrequently occurring costs, income from continuing operations would be $764,000 for the 4th quarter of 2004 and $269,000 and $772,000 for the 3rd and 4th quarters of 2005, respectively.






F-21






Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mexican Restaurants, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending January 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Curt Glowacki, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Curt Glowacki

Curt Glowacki
Chief Executive Officer
March 30, 2006

The foregoing certification is being forwarded solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).




Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mexican Restaurants, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending January 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew J. Dennard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(3)  
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(4)  
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Andrew J. Dennard

Andrew J. Dennard
Chief Financial Officer
March 30, 2006

The foregoing certification is being forwarded solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).